# First Citizens Bancshares Inc: Form 10-K for the period ended Dec 31, 2021

- Company: [First Citizens Bancshares Inc](/companies/fcnca.md) (CIK 798941)
- Form: 10-K
- Filed: 2022-02-25
- Accepted by EDGAR: Feb 25, 2022, 16:02 ET
- Period: 2021-12-31
- Accession: 0000798941-22-000014
- Inline XBRL: yes
- Main document: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/798941/000079894122000014/fcnca-20211231.htm
- All documents and exhibits: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/798941/000079894122000014/

## Figures reported in this filing

Standardized XBRL line items for the period ended 2021-12-31.

| Line item | Period | Value | XBRL concept |
| --- | --- | ---: | --- |
| Interest expense | 12 months, 2021-01-01 to 2021-12-31 | $60.7m | us-gaap:InterestExpense |
| Income tax | 12 months, 2021-01-01 to 2021-12-31 | $154.2m | us-gaap:IncomeTaxExpenseBenefit |
| Net income | 12 months, 2021-01-01 to 2021-12-31 | $547.5m | us-gaap:NetIncomeLoss |
| Basic EPS | 12 months, 2021-01-01 to 2021-12-31 | $53.88 | us-gaap:EarningsPerShareBasic |
| Operating cash flow | 12 months, 2021-01-01 to 2021-12-31 | −$283.8m | us-gaap:NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities |
| Capital expenditure | 12 months, 2021-01-01 to 2021-12-31 | $107.4m | us-gaap:PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment |
| Dividends paid | 12 months, 2021-01-01 to 2021-12-31 | $41.6m | us-gaap:PaymentsOfDividendsCommonStock |
| Share repurchases | 12 months, 2021-01-01 to 2021-12-31 | $0 | us-gaap:PaymentsForRepurchaseOfCommonStock |
| Cash and equivalents | at 2021-12-31 | $9.03bn | us-gaap:CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue |
| Total assets | at 2021-12-31 | $58.31bn | us-gaap:Assets |
| Total liabilities | at 2021-12-31 | $53.57bn | us-gaap:Liabilities |
| Long-term debt | at 2021-12-31 | $1.19bn | us-gaap:LongTermDebt |
| Shareholders' equity | at 2021-12-31 | $4.74bn | us-gaap:StockholdersEquity |

## Business

As filed, 64,791 characters.

### General

First Citizens BancShares, Inc. (the “Parent Company” and when including all of its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis, “BancShares,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) was incorporated under the laws of Delaware on August 7, 1986, to become the holding company of First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company (“FCB,” or the “Bank”), its banking subsidiary. FCB opened in 1898 as the Bank of Smithfield in Smithfield, North Carolina, and later changed its name to First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company. As of December 31, 2021, BancShares has expanded through de novo branching and acquisitions and operates in 19 states, providing a broad range of financial services to individuals, businesses and professionals. At December 31, 2021, BancShares had total consolidated assets of $58.31 billion. On January 3, 2022, BancShares completed its largest acquisition to date with the merger with CIT Group Inc. (“CIT”) and its subsidiary CIT Bank, N.A., a national banking association (“CIT Bank”). CIT had consolidated total assets of approximately $53.2 billion at December 31, 2021. The merger with CIT (the “CIT Merger”) is described further in the “Business Combinations” discussion below and the “Business Combinations” section of Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Throughout its history, the operations of BancShares have been significantly influenced by descendants of Robert P. Holding, who came to control FCB during the 1920s. Robert P. Holding’s children and grandchildren have served as members of the Board of Directors (the “Board”), as chief executive officers and in other executive management positions and, since BancShares’ formation in 1986, have remained shareholders owning a large percentage of its common stock.

The Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Frank B. Holding, Jr., is the grandson of Robert P. Holding. Hope Holding Bryant, Vice Chairman of BancShares, is Robert P. Holding’s granddaughter. Peter M. Bristow, President of BancShares, is the brother-in-law of Frank B. Holding, Jr. and Hope Holding Bryant.

BancShares seeks to meet the financial needs of both individuals and commercial entities in its market areas through a wide range of retail and commercial banking services. Loan services include various types of commercial, business and consumer lending. Deposit services include checking, savings, money market and time deposit accounts. Our subsidiaries also provide mortgage lending, a full-service trust department, wealth management services for businesses and individuals, and other activities incidental to commercial banking. FCB’s wholly owned subsidiaries, First Citizens Investor Services, Inc. (“FCIS”) and First Citizens Asset Management, Inc. (“FCAM”), provide various investment products and services. As a registered broker-dealer, FCIS provides a full range of investment products, including annuities, discount brokerage services and third-party mutual funds. As registered investment advisors, FCIS and FCAM provide investment management services and advice. As a result of BancShares’ merger with CIT and CIT Bank (the “CIT Merger”), BancShares acquired a registered broker-dealer, registered investment adviser, a wide range of commercial lending, leasing, and deposit products, as well as ancillary services and products, that spans several industries, including aerospace and defense, communication, power and energy, entertainment, gaming, healthcare, industrials, maritime, rail, real estate, restaurants, retail, services and technology. In addition, BancShares now provides commercial factoring, receivables management and secured financing services to businesses (generally manufacturers or importers of goods) that operate in several industries, including apparel, textile, furniture, home furnishings and consumer electronics.

BancShares delivers products and services to its customers through an extensive branch network as well as digital banking, telephone banking and various ATM networks. Services offered at most offices include the taking of deposits, the cashing of checks and providing for individual and commercial cash needs. Business customers may conduct banking transactions through the use of remote image technology.

Statistical information regarding our business activities is found in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

### Business Combinations

BancShares pursues growth through strategic mergers and acquisitions to enhance organizational value, strengthen its presence in existing markets, as well as expand its footprint in new markets. In 2020, BancShares completed the acquisition of Community Financial Holding Company, Inc. for total cash consideration of $2.3 million.

On January 3, 2022, BancShares closed the CIT Merger. Pursuant to the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Agreement and Plan of Merger (as amended, the “Merger Agreement”) by and among the Parent Company, FCB, FC Merger Subsidiary IX, Inc., a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of FCB (“Merger Sub”), and CIT, CIT and CIT Bank have merged into FCB. Immediately prior to and in connection with the effectiveness of such mergers, BancShares acquired from CIT its registered broker-dealer, CIT Capital Securities, LLC, and certain other nonbank subsidiaries of CIT that hold noncontrolling equity investments. These entities are nonbank subsidiaries of the Parent Company.

As a result of the consummation of the CIT Merger, FCB is now a top 20 U.S. bank based on asset size with more than $100 billion in total assets. BancShares believes that the CIT Merger allowed for the combination of organizations with complementary strengths, with FCB’s robust retail franchise and full suite of banking products with CIT’s strong market position in nationwide commercial lending and direct digital banking. The combined banking organization intends to leverage the capabilities of both legacy banks to serve a broader spectrum of businesses and individuals, while offering convenience, scale and value.

Additional information relating to business combinations is set forth in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, under the caption “Business Combinations,” and Item 8. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note B, Business Combinations and Note W, Subsequent Events, in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

As of December 31, 2021, we managed our business and reported our financial results as a single segment. Due to the CIT Merger, we intend to begin reporting multiple segments in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2022. As summarized below, BancShares plans to report financial results in three operating segments: General Banking, Commercial Banking, and Rail, and a non-operating segment, Corporate. We also intend to conform prior period comparisons to any new segment presentation. Based on the planned approach for segment disclosures to be implemented during the first quarter of 2022, the substantial majority of BancShares’ operations for historical periods prior to the CIT Merger will be reflected in the General Banking segment.

| SEGMENT | MARKETS AND SERVICES |
| --- | --- |
| **General Banking** | •Delivers services to individuals and businesses through an extensive branch network, digital banking, telephone banking and various ATM networks, including a full suite of deposit products, loans (primarily residential mortgages and commercial loans), and various fee-based services. •Provides a variety of wealth management products and services to individuals and institutional clients, including brokerage, investment advisory, and trust services. •Also provides deposit, cash management and lending to homeowner associations and property management companies. |
| **Commercial Banking** | •Provides lending, leasing and other financial and advisory services, primarily to small and middle-market companies across select industries. •Provides asset-based lending, factoring, receivables management products and supply chain financing. |
| **Rail** | •Rail provides equipment leasing and secured financing to railroads and shippers. |
| **Corporate** | •Earning assets primarily include investment securities and interest-bearing cash. •Certain items are not allocated to operating segments and are included in Corporate. Some of the more significant and recurring items that are not allocated to operating segments include interest income on investment securities, income on bank owned life insurance (“BOLI”), a portion of interest expense primarily related to corporate funding costs, mark-to-market adjustments on equity securities and foreign currency hedges, restructuring charges, intangible assets amortization expenses, as well as certain unallocated interest income and other costs. |

### Competition

The financial services industry is highly competitive. BancShares competes with national, regional and local financial services providers. In recent years, the ability of non-bank financial entities to provide services has intensified competition. Non-bank financial service providers are not subject to the same significant regulatory restrictions as traditional commercial banks. More than ever, customers have the ability to select from a variety of traditional and nontraditional alternatives. Competition is based on a number of factors including, among others, customer service, quality and range of products and services offered, price, reputation, interest rates on loans and deposits and customer convenience.

As of December 31, 2021, FCB’s primary deposit markets are North Carolina and South Carolina, which represent approximately 50.8% and 22.7%, respectively, of total FCB deposits. FCB’s deposit market share in North Carolina and South Carolina was 4.9% and 9.3%, respectively, as of June 30, 2021, which makes FCB the fourth largest bank in both North Carolina and South Carolina based on the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) Deposit Market Share Report. The three banks larger than FCB based on deposits in North Carolina and South Carolina as of June 30, 2021 include Bank of America, Truist Bank and Wells Fargo. These banks collectively controlled 74.2% and 45.4% of North Carolina and South Carolina deposits, respectively as of June 30, 2021.

Subsequent to the CIT Merger, the branches that were previously owned and controlled by CIT Bank are now owned and controlled by FCB. As of January 3, 2022, FCB had 609 total domestic offices, which included 227 in North Carolina, 126 in South Carolina and 86 in California.

On July 9, 2021, President Biden issued an Executive Order on Promoting Competition in the American Economy, encouraging the U.S. Attorney General along with the federal banking agencies, to review the current framework for merger oversight practices under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (“BHCA”) and the Bank Merger Act. The review is ongoing by the agencies, and no formal changes have been announced. The adoption of more expansive or prescriptive standards could impact our future potential acquisitions. Refer to Item 1A. Risk Factors below for additional information.

### Geographic Locations

As of December 31, 2021, BancShares operated a total of 529 branches which includes branches in Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Maryland, Missouri, North Carolina, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin and West Virginia. The CIT Merger added approximately 80 branches, which are primarily located in Southern California, to our branch network.

### Human Capital

As of December 31, 2021, BancShares employed approximately 6,578 full-time staff and approximately 268 part-time staff for a total of 6,846 employees. Women and ethnically diverse associates make up approximately 67% and 28% of total employees, respectively, and our Executive Leadership Team includes two women. After the CIT Merger, BancShares’ has approximately 10,300 total employees and our Executive Leadership Team expanded to three women.

Our ability to attract, retain and develop associates who align with our purpose is key to our success. BancShares’ human capital strategy is predicated on ensuring the organization has the right people with the right skills in the right places at the right time for the right cost to fulfill its mandate and strategic objectives. Our human resources team works to formalize the process of defining and deploying the mission-critical talent needed to align BancShares with the financial and strategic goals and objectives. Key human capital initiatives include scaling and developing talent, enhancing performance management and coaching, and accelerating inclusion, equity and diversity initiatives. The retention and integration of key CIT employees will be a significant initiative. The Board monitors these initiatives and associated risks primarily through its Risk Committee.

To assist with these goals, we monitor and evaluate various metrics, specifically around attraction, retention and development of talent. Our annual voluntary turnover is relatively low compared to the industry. We believe this reflects our strong corporate culture, competitive compensation and benefit structures and commitment to career development.

### Compensation and Benefits

We strive to provide robust compensation and benefits to our employees. In addition to salaries, compensation and benefit programs include a 401(k) plan with employer matching opportunities, healthcare and insurance benefits, health savings and flexible spending accounts, paid time off and other employee assistance programs.

### COVID-19 Pandemic

The health and wellness of our employees is also critical to our success. In an effort to keep our employees safe during the COVID-19 pandemic, we implemented a number of health-related measures, including protocols governing the use of face masks and hand sanitizer, a flexible work-from-home policy, enhanced cleaning procedures at our corporate and branch offices, social-distancing protocols and limitations on in-person meeting and other gatherings.

### Regulatory Considerations

Various laws and regulations administered by regulatory agencies affect BancShares’ corporate practices, including the payment of dividends, the incurrence of debt, and the acquisition of financial institutions and other companies. Laws and regulations also affect business practices, such as the payment of interest on deposits, the charging of interest on loans, the types of business conducted and the location of offices. Certain subsidiaries of the Parent Company and FCB are subject to regulation, supervision, and examination by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”), state regulatory agencies, and other regulatory authorities as “regulated entities.” FCB’s insurance activities are subject to licensing and regulation by state insurance regulatory agencies.

In general, numerous statutes and regulations also apply to and restrict the activities of BancShares, including limitations on the ability to pay dividends, capital requirements, reserve requirements, deposit insurance requirements and restrictions on transactions with related persons and entities controlled by related persons. The impact of these statutes and regulations is discussed below and in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

As a result of the consummation of the CIT Merger, BancShares has over $100 billion in total consolidated assets, and is expected to be subject to certain enhanced prudential standards and enhanced oversight under the applicable transition provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) by the Federal Reserve Board (“Federal Reserve” or “FRB”), and the FDIC with respect to FCB. As BancShares continues to grow, BancShares and FCB could become subject to additional regulatory requirements, based on the tailored regulatory framework applicable to banking organizations with $100 billion or more in total assets, and adopted by the federal banking agencies pursuant to the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act (the “EGRRCPA”).

In connection with the CIT Merger, FCB established as a wholly-owned subsidiary, FC International, Inc. (“FC International”), which is a corporation chartered by the Federal Reserve pursuant to Section 25A of the Federal Reserve Act (“Edge Act”) and the Federal Reserve’s Regulation K. Edge Act corporations are international banking organizations that are authorized to engage in international banking and foreign financial transactions. FCB established FC International for the purpose of holding the equity interests in the foreign nonbank subsidiaries (“foreign companies”) that FCB acquired in the CIT Merger. Certain of the foreign companies are in the process of being wound-down or dissolved. The other foreign companies acquired by FCB support the railcar leasing business acquired from CIT in Canada and Mexico. FC International is subject to supervision and regulation by the Federal Reserve, including examination, reporting, capital, and Bank Secrecy Act of 1970 (“BSA”) and anti-money laundering (“AML”) requirements, pursuant to the Edge Act and the Federal Reserve’s Regulation K. FC International’s home office is the same as the home office the Parent Company and FCB. FC International will not have a physical presence outside of the United States and therefore BancShares is evaluating whether FC International will be subject to any regulatory requirements with respect to its direct ownership of the equity interests of the foreign companies.

*Dodd-Frank Act*. The Dodd-Frank Act, enacted in 2010, significantly restructured the financial services regulatory environment; imposed significant regulatory and compliance changes; increased capital, leverage and liquidity requirements; and expanded the scope of oversight responsibility of certain federal agencies through the creation of new oversight bodies. For example, the Dodd-Frank Act established the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) with broad powers to supervise and enforce consumer financial protection laws.

*EGRRCPA.* Enacted in 2018, the EGRRCPA, while largely preserving the fundamental elements of the post-Dodd-Frank Act regulatory framework, modified certain requirements of the Dodd-Frank Act as they applied to regional and community banking organizations. Certain of the significant requirements of the Dodd-Frank Act are listed below with information regarding how they apply to BancShares following the enactment of the EGRRCPA.

- *Asset Threshold for Applicability of Dodd-Frank Act Enhanced Prudential Standards and Enhanced Supervision.* The Dodd-Frank Act mandated the applicability of enhanced prudential standards (including enhanced liquidity and capital requirements, enterprise-wide risk management requirements, concentration limits, resolution plans and credit exposure report requirements, etc.) and enhanced supervision of bank holding companies with $50 billion or more in assets. The EGRRCPA raised the asset threshold for mandatory applicability of enhanced prudential standards to $250 billion or more in total consolidated assets, and gives the Federal Reserve Board the discretion to apply any enhanced prudential standards to banking organizations with $100 billion or more in total assets on a tailored basis based on asset size and other risk-related factors to prevent or mitigate risks to the financial stability of the United States or to promote the safety and soundness of a bank holding company. In November 2019, the Federal Reserve Board, along with the FDIC and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the “OCC”), adopted a framework for tailoring the applicability of enhanced prudential standards for banking organizations with $100 billion or more in assets (the “Tailoring Rules”). The Tailoring Rules are further discussed below.
- *Capital Planning and Stress Testing.* The Dodd-Frank Act mandated stress tests be developed and performed by banking organizations with $10 billion or more in total assets to ensure financial institutions have sufficient capital to absorb losses and support operations during multiple economic and bank scenarios. The EGRRCPA gave immediate relief from Dodd-Frank Act and company-run stress testing for banking organizations with less than $250 billion in total consolidated assets. Therefore, BancShares is not subject to Dodd-Frank Act company-run stress testing until such time that it has $250 billion or more in total assets. Notwithstanding these amendments to the stress testing requirements, the federal banking agencies indicated, through inter-agency guidance, the capital planning and risk management practices of institutions with total assets less than $250 billion would continue to be reviewed through the regular supervisory process, including through the Federal Reserve’s Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (“CCAR”) for banking organizations with $100 billion or more in total assets. As a result of the consummation of the CIT Merger, BancShares has over $100 billion in total consolidated assets, and we expect to be subject to supervisory stress testing by the Federal Reserve under the CCAR process as a Category IV banking organization in accordance with the applicable transition provisions. BancShares has made substantial progress in developing policies, programs, and systems designed to comply with capital planning and stress testing requirements.
- *The Volcker Rule*. The Volcker Rule was promulgated to implement provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act. It prohibits banks and their affiliates from engaging in proprietary trading and investing in and sponsoring hedge funds and private equity funds. The EGRRCPA exempted many financial institutions with total consolidated assets of less than $10 billion from the Volcker Rule, but it continues to apply to BancShares. However, the Volcker Rule does not significantly impact our operations as we do not have any significant engagement in the businesses it prohibits.
- *Ability-to-Repay and Qualified Mortgage Rule*. Creditors are required to comply with mortgage reform provisions prohibiting the origination of any residential mortgages that do not meet rigorous Qualified Mortgage standards or Ability-to-Repay standards. All mortgage loans originated by FCB meet Ability-to-Repay standards and a substantial majority also meet Qualified Mortgage standards. The EGRRCPA impact on the original Ability-to-Repay and Qualified Mortgage standards is only applicable to banks with less than $10 billion in total consolidated assets.
- *Reciprocal Deposits are not treated as Brokered Deposits.* Section 29 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (the “FDI Act”) and the FDIC’s implementing regulations limit the ability of an insured depository institution to accept brokered deposits unless the institution is well-capitalized under the prompt corrective action under the FDI Act, or the insured depository institution is adequately capitalized and obtains a waiver from the FDIC. Insured depository institutions that are less than well-capitalized are not able to accept brokered deposits, and are subject to restrictions on the interest rates paid on deposits. In addition, deposits that are considered “brokered” are subject to higher deposit assessments. EGRRCPA amended the FDI Act to add a limited exception under which insured depository institutions that are well-capitalized or adequately capitalized and meet certain other criteria are able to exempt from treatment as “brokered” deposits up to $5 billion or 20 percent of the institution’s total liabilities in reciprocal deposits (defined generally as deposits received by a depository institution through a deposit placement network with the same maturity and in the same aggregate amount as deposits placed by the depository institution in other network institutions). In addition, in December 2020, the FDIC amended its regulations governing “brokered deposits” to clarify and modernize this regulatory framework. Notable aspects of the final rule include (1) the establishment of bright-line standards for determining whether an entity meets the statutory definition of “deposit broker”; (2) the identification of a number of business relationships that qualify for the “primary purpose” exception for agents to avoid being deemed a “deposit broker” for the placement of funds with depository institutions; (3) the establishment of a more transparent application process for entities that seek to rely upon the “primary purpose” exception but do not qualify for one of the identified exceptions for business relationships deemed to satisfy the “primary purpose” exception; and (4) the clarification that third parties that have an exclusive deposit-placement arrangement with one insured depository institution are not considered a “deposit broker.” The final rule became effective April 1, 2021, with full compliance required by January 1, 2022.

### First Citizens BancShares, Inc.

*General.* As a bank holding company registered under the BHCA, the Parent Company is subject to supervision, regulation and examination by the Federal Reserve. As a “financial holding company” (“FHC”), the Parent Company may engage in or acquire and retain the shares of a company engaged in activities that are “financial in nature” as long as the Parent Company continues to meet the eligible requirements for FHC status, including that the Parent Company and FCB each remain “well-capitalized” and “well-managed.” Activities that are “financial in nature” include securities underwriting, dealing and market making, advising mutual funds and investment companies, insurance underwriting and agency, merchant banking, and any activities that the Federal Reserve in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury determines to be in “financial in nature,” “complementary” or “incidental” to such financial activity. The Parent Company is also registered under the bank holding company laws of North Carolina and is subject to supervision, regulation and examination by the North Carolina Commissioner of Banks (“NCCOB”).

*Enhanced Prudential Standards and Enhanced Supervision.* A bank holding company with total consolidated assets of $250 billion or more is subject to enhanced prudential standards under the Dodd-Frank Act, as amended by EGRRCPA. A bank holding company with $100 billion or more in assets, but less than $250 billion in assets is subject to certain enhanced prudential standards based on the Tailoring Rules. Under the Tailoring Rules, banking organizations are grouped into four categories, based on asset size, off-balance sheet exposure, nonbank assets, weighted short-term wholesale funding, and cross-jurisdictional activities. Category I banking organizations (i.e., large banks that have been designated as global systemically important banks) are subject to the most stringent enhanced prudential requirements, and Category IV banking organizations (i.e., between $100 billion and $250 billion in total consolidated assets, and less than $75 billion in nonbank assets, off-balance sheet exposure, cross-jurisdictional activities, and weighted short-term wholesale funding) are subject to the least stringent requirements.

As a result of the CIT Merger, BancShares has total consolidated assets in excess of $100 billion and therefore, expects to be required to comply with certain enhanced prudential standards applicable to Category IV banking organizations, subject to the applicable transition periods. In planning for the CIT Merger, BancShares developed policies, programs, and systems designed to meet such enhanced prudential standards, including annual capital plan submissions and supervisory stress testing by the Federal Reserve under CCAR, enhanced enterprise-wide risk management requirements, and enhanced liquidity management requirements, including liquidity stress tests and liquidity buffer requirements. In the event BancShares’ assets grow to meet or exceed the thresholds for the asset size or other risk-based factors, BancShares will be subject to other enhanced prudential standards on a tailored basis. For example, if BancShares has $50 billion or more in weighted short-term wholesale funding, it will be subject to modified liquidity coverage ratio (“LCR”) and net stable funding ratio (“NSFR”) requirements. In the event BancShares becomes a Category III banking organization, BancShares will be subject to full or reduced LCR and NSFR requirements, annual company-run capital stress testing, resolution planning requirements, annual supervisory capital stress testing under CCAR, additional risk-based capital requirements (countercyclical buffer), the supplementary leverage ratio, and additional liquidity reporting requirements.

*Permitted Activities*. A bank holding company is limited to managing or controlling banks, furnishing services to or performing services for its subsidiaries, and engaging in other activities the Federal Reserve determines by regulation or order to be so closely related to banking or managing or controlling banks as to be a proper incident thereto. In addition, bank holding companies that qualify and elect to be financial holding companies, such as the Parent Company, may engage in any activity, or acquire and retain the shares of a company engaged in any activity, that is either (i) financial in nature or incidental to such financial activity (as determined by the Federal Reserve in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury) or (ii) complementary to a financial activity and does not pose a substantial risk to the safety and soundness of depository institutions or the financial system generally (as solely determined by the Federal Reserve), without prior approval of the Federal Reserve. Activities financial in nature include securities underwriting and dealing, serving as an insurance agent and underwriter and engaging in merchant banking.

*Acquisitions.* A bank holding company must obtain approval from the Federal Reserve prior to directly or indirectly acquiring ownership or control of 5% of the voting shares or substantially all of the assets of another bank holding company or bank or prior to merging or consolidating with another bank holding company.

*Status Requirements.* To maintain financial holding company status, a financial holding company and all of its depository institution subsidiaries must be well-capitalized and well-managed. A depository institution subsidiary is considered to be well-capitalized if it satisfies the requirements for this status under applicable Federal Reserve capital requirements. A depository institution subsidiary is considered well managed if it received a composite rating and management rating of at least “satisfactory” in its most recent examination. If a financial holding company ceases to meet these capital and management requirements, the Federal Reserve may impose limitations or conditions on the conduct of its activities.

*Capital Requirements*. The Federal Reserve imposes certain capital requirements on bank holding companies under the BHCA, including a minimum leverage ratio and a minimum ratio of “qualifying” capital to risk-weighted assets. These requirements are described below under “Subsidiary Bank - FCB.” As of December 31, 2021, the total risk-based capital, Tier 1 risk-based capital, common equity Tier 1 risk based capital, and Tier 1 leverage ratios (collectively “Regulatory Capital Ratios”) of BancShares were 14.35%, 12.47% 11.50%, and 7.59%, respectively, and each capital ratio listed above exceeded the applicable Basel III (as defined below) minimums and the well-capitalized thresholds as further addressed under “Shareholders’ Equity and Capital Adequacy” in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. Subject to its capital requirements and certain other restrictions, the Parent Company is able to borrow money to make capital contributions to FCB and such loans may be repaid from dividends paid by FCB to the Parent Company. As a result of the CIT Merger, BancShares expects to be a Category IV banking organization and expects to be required to submit an annual capital plan to the Federal Reserve in accordance with the applicable transition provisions. BancShares will also be subject to biennial supervisory stress testing under the Federal Reserve’s CCAR process, and the stress capital buffer calculated by the Federal Reserve under CCAR will replace the static 2.5% percent component of our capital conservation buffer.

The CCAR supervisory stress tests are distinct from Dodd-Frank Act company-run stress testing (“DFAST”), and BancShares will not be subject to DFAST requirements until it has $250 billion or more in total consolidated assets, pursuant to the EGRRCPA.

*Source of Strength*. Under the Dodd-Frank Act, bank holding companies are required to act as a source of financial and managerial strength to their subsidiary banks. Under this requirement, the Parent Company is expected to commit resources to support FCB, including times when the Parent Company may not be in a financial position to provide such resources. Any capital loans made by a bank holding company to any of its subsidiary banks are subordinate in right of payment to depositors and to certain other indebtedness of such subsidiary banks. In the event of a bank holding company’s bankruptcy, any commitment by the bank holding company to a federal bank regulatory agency to maintain the capital of a subsidiary bank will be assumed by the bankruptcy trustee and entitled to priority of payment.

*Safety and Soundness*. The federal bank regulatory agencies have adopted guidelines prescribing safety and soundness standards. These guidelines establish general standards relating to internal controls and information systems, internal audit systems, loan documentation, credit underwriting, interest rate exposure, asset growth and compensation, fees and benefits. In general, the guidelines require, among other things, appropriate systems and practices to identify and manage the risk and exposures specified in the guidelines. There are a number of obligations and restrictions imposed on bank holding companies and their subsidiary banks by law and regulatory policy that are designed to minimize potential loss to the depositors of such depository institutions and to the FDIC insurance fund in the event of a depository institution default. As noted above, BancShares expects to be a Category IV banking organization and expects to be subject to enhanced prudential standards and enhanced supervision under the Tailoring Rules subject to the applicable transition periods.

*Limits on Dividends and Other Payments*. The Parent Company is a legal entity, separate and distinct from its subsidiaries. Revenues of the Parent Company primarily result from dividends received from FCB. There are various legal limitations applicable to the payment of dividends by FCB to the Parent Company and to the payment of dividends by the Parent Company to its shareholders. The payment of dividends by FCB or the Parent Company may be limited by certain factors, such as requirements to maintain capital above regulatory guidelines. Bank regulatory agencies have the authority to prohibit FCB or the Parent Company from engaging in an unsafe or unsound practice in conducting their business. The payment of dividends, depending on the financial condition of FCB or the Parent Company, could be deemed to constitute such an unsafe or unsound practice. BancShares expects to be a Category IV banking organization and expects to be required to submit a capital plan annually to the Federal Reserve in accordance with the applicable transition provisions. The annual capital plan will include planned capital distributions over a specified forecasting horizon. BancShares expects to be subject to biennial supervisory capital stress testing under the Federal Reserve’s CCAR process. The stress capital buffer would replace the static 2.5% component of the capital conservation buffer with a capital buffer that is based on supervisory stress test results and the Parent Company’s planned capital distributions. BancShares’ supervisory stress testing results under CCAR could impact the ability of the Parent Company to declare dividends or make other capital distributions, including common share repurchases.

Additionally, under the FDI Act, insured depository institutions, such as FCB, are prohibited from making capital distributions, including the payment of dividends, if, after making such distributions, the institution would become “undercapitalized” as such term is used in the statute. Additionally, under Basel III capital guidelines, banking institutions with a Regulatory Capital Ratio above the Basel III minimum, but below the Basel III requirement will face constraints on dividends, equity repurchases and compensation based on the amount of the shortfall. Based on FCB’s current financial condition, the Parent Company currently does not expect these provisions to have any material impact on its ability to receive dividends from FCB. The Parent Company’s non-bank subsidiaries pay dividends to the Parent Company periodically on a non-regulated basis.

### Subsidiary Bank - FCB

*General.* FCB is a state-chartered bank, subject to supervision and examination by, and the regulations and reporting requirements of, the FDIC and the NCCOB. Deposit obligations are insured by the FDIC to the maximum legal limits. As a subsidiary of a Category IV banking organization, we expect FCB will be subject to enhanced prudential standards for insured depository subsidiaries under the FDIC’s regulations in accordance with the applicable transition provisions.

*Capital Requirements.* Federal banking agencies approved regulatory capital guidelines (“Basel III”) aimed at strengthening previous capital requirements for banking organizations. Basel III became effective for BancShares on January 1, 2015 and the associated capital conservation buffers of 2.5% were fully phased in by January 1, 2019. The capital conservation buffer is designed to absorb losses during periods of economic stress. Additionally, federal banking agencies have developed Prompt Corrective Action (“PCA”) thresholds for regulatory capital ratios. The following table includes the Basel III requirements and PCA well-capitalized thresholds for the Regulatory Capital Ratios.

| Regulatory Capital Ratios | Basel III Minimums | Basel III Conservation Buffers | Basel III Requirements | PCA Well-Capitalized Thresholds |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Total risk-based capital | 8.00% | 2.50% | 10.50% | 10.00% |
| Tier 1 risk-based capital | 6.00 | 2.50 | 8.50 | 8.00 |
| Common equity Tier 1 | 4.50 | 2.50 | 7.00 | 6.50 |
| Tier 1 leverage | 4.00 | — | 4.00 | 5.00 |

Failure to meet regulatory capital requirements may result in certain actions by regulators that could have a direct material effect on FCB’s consolidated financial statements. As of December 31, 2021, FCB exceeded the applicable Basel III requirements and the well-capitalized thresholds as further addressed under “Shareholders’ Equity and Capital Adequacy” in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Although FCB is unable to control the external factors influencing its business, by maintaining high levels of balance sheet liquidity, prudently managing interest rate exposures, ensuring capital positions remain strong and actively monitoring asset quality, FCB seeks to minimize the potentially adverse risks of unforeseen and unfavorable economic trends and to take advantage of favorable economic conditions and opportunities when appropriate.

*Covered Insured Depository Institution Contingency Planning Requirements.* Under the FDIC’s “covered insured depository institution” rule (the “CIDI Rule”), an insured depository institution with $50 billion or more in total assets is required to submit periodically to the FDIC a contingency plan for the resolution of the institution in the event of its failure (“Resolution Plan”). The FDIC requires the Resolution Plan to ensure that the FDIC, as receiver, would be able to resolve the institution pursuant to the receivership provisions of the FDI Act. In April 2019, the FDIC issued an advance notice of proposed rule making to amend the CIDI Rule, and suspended the requirement to submit Resolution Plans until further notice. In January 2021, the FDIC announced that it would resume Resolution Plan requirements for insured depository institutions with $100 billion in assets. On June 25, 2021, the FDIC issued a policy statement, describing a new framework for the implementation of the CIDI Rule. The FDIC has stated that it will provide covered insured depository institutions with 12 months advance notice prior to the submission deadline of its Resolution Plan.

FCB has not previously submitted a Resolution Plan under the CIDI Rule. As an insured depository institution with more than $100 billion in total assets, FCB will be expected to submit its first Resolution Plan under the CIDI Rule once notified by the FDIC.

*Transactions with Affiliates*. Pursuant to Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act, Regulation W and Regulation O, the authority of FCB to engage in transactions with related parties or “affiliates” or to make loans to insiders is limited. Loan transactions with an affiliate generally must be collateralized and certain transactions between FCB and its affiliates, including the sale of assets, the payment of money or the provision of services, must be on terms and conditions that are substantially the same, or at least as favorable to FCB, as those prevailing for comparable nonaffiliated transactions. In addition, FCB generally may not purchase securities issued or underwritten by affiliates.

FCB receives management fees from its subsidiaries and the Parent Company for expenses incurred for performing various functions on their behalf. These fees are charged to each company based upon the estimated cost for usage of services by that company. The fees are eliminated from the consolidated financial statements.

*Community Reinvestment Act*. FCB is subject to the requirements of the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 (“CRA”). The CRA imposes on financial institutions an affirmative and ongoing obligation to meet the credit needs of the local communities, including low-and-moderate-income neighborhoods. If FCB receives a rating from the Federal Reserve of less than “satisfactory” under the CRA, restrictions would be imposed on our operating activities. In addition, in order for a financial holding company, like the Parent Company, to commence any new activity permitted by the BHCA or to acquire any company engaged in any new activity permitted by the BHCA, each insured depository institution subsidiary of the financial holding company must have received a rating of at least “satisfactory” in its most recent examination under the CRA. FCB currently has a “satisfactory” CRA rating.

As part of the CIT Merger, BancShares adopted a community benefit plan, developed in collaboration with representatives of community reinvestment organizations, for the combined bank. Under the Community Benefit Plan, FCB will invest $16 billion in the communities served by FCB, including $2.5 billion in home purchase mortgage loans focusing on low- and moderate-income and minority borrowers in majority-minority (“MM”) geographies and $5 million in discounts or subsidies on home purchase and home improvement loans to borrowers in MM census tracts in the combined bank’s footprint in California.

*Anti-Money Laundering and the United States Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Asset Control (“OFAC”) Regulation*. Governmental policy in recent years has been aimed at combating money laundering and terrorist financing. The BSA and subsequent laws and regulations require financial institutions to take steps to prevent the use of their systems to facilitate the flow of illegal or illicit money or terrorist funds. The USA Patriot Act of 2001 (“Patriot Act”) significantly expanded AML and financial transparency laws and regulations by imposing new compliance and due diligence obligations, including standards for verifying customer identification at account opening and maintaining expanded records, as well as rules promoting cooperation among financial institutions, regulators and law enforcement entities in identifying persons who may be involved in terrorism or money laundering. These rules were expanded to require new customer due diligence and beneficial ownership requirements in 2018.

An institution subject to the BSA, such as FCB, must additionally provide AML training to employees, designate an AML compliance officer and annually audit the AML program to assess its effectiveness. The United States has imposed economic sanctions on transactions with certain designated foreign countries, nationals and others. As these rules are administrated by OFAC, these are generally known as the OFAC rules. Failure of a financial institution to maintain and implement adequate BSA, AML and OFAC programs, or to comply with all the relevant laws and regulations, could have serious legal and reputational consequences, including material fines and sanctions. FCB has implemented a program designed to facilitate compliance with the full extent of the applicable BSA and OFAC related laws, regulations and related sanctions.

On January 1, 2021, Congress passed the National Defense Authorization Act, which enacted the most significant overhaul of the BSA and related anti-money laundering laws since the Patriot Act. Notable amendments include (1) significant changes to the collection of beneficial ownership information and the establishment of a beneficial ownership registry, which requires corporate entities (generally, any corporation, LLC, or other similar entity with 20 or fewer employees and annual gross income of $5 million or less) to report beneficial ownership information to FinCEN (which will be maintained by FinCEN and made available upon request to financial institutions); (2) enhanced whistleblower provisions, which provide that one or more whistleblowers who voluntarily provide original information leading to the successful enforcement of violations of the AML laws in any judicial or administrative action brought by the Secretary of the Treasury or the Attorney General resulting in monetary sanctions exceeding $1 million (including disgorgement and interest but excluding forfeiture, restitution, or compensation to victims) will receive not more than 30% of the monetary sanctions collected and will receive increased protections; (3) increased penalties for violations of the BSA; (4) improvements to existing information sharing provisions that permit financial institutions to share information relating to Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) with foreign branches, subsidiaries, and affiliates (except those located in China, Russia, or certain other jurisdictions) for the purpose of combating illicit finance risks; and (5) expanded duties and powers of FinCEN. Many of the amendments require the Treasury Department and FinCEN to promulgate rules. On December 8, 2021, FinCEN issued proposed regulations that would implement the amendments with respect to beneficial ownership.

*Consumer Laws and Regulations*. FCB is also subject to certain laws and regulations designed to protect consumers in transactions with banks. These laws include the Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”), the Truth in Savings Act, the Electronic Funds Transfer Act, the Expedited Funds Availability Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, the Fair Housing Act and the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act. The laws and related regulations mandate certain disclosures and regulate the manner in which financial institutions transact business with certain customers. FCB must comply with these consumer protection laws and regulations in its relevant lines of business.

To promote fairness and transparency for mortgages, credit cards, and other consumer financial products and services, the CFPB is responsible for interpreting and enforcing federal consumer financial laws, as defined by the Dodd-Frank Act, that, among other things, govern the provision of deposit accounts along with mortgage origination and servicing. Some federal consumer financial laws enforced by the CFPB include the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, TILA, the Truth in Savings Act, the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA), the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, and the Fair Credit Reporting Act. The CFPB is also authorized to prevent any institution under its authority from engaging in an unfair, deceptive, or abusive act or practice in connection with consumer financial products and services.

Under TILA, as implemented by Regulation Z, mortgage lenders are required to make a reasonable and good faith determination based on verified and documented information that a consumer applying for a mortgage loan has a reasonable ability to repay the loan according to its terms. Mortgage lenders are required to determine consumers’ ability to repay in one of two ways. The first alternative requires the mortgage lender to consider the following eight underwriting factors when making the credit decision: (1) current or reasonably expected income or assets; (2) current employment status; (3) the monthly payment on the covered transaction; (4) the monthly payment on any simultaneous loan; (5) the monthly payment for mortgage-related obligations; (6) current debt obligations, alimony, and child support; (7) the monthly DTI ratio or residual income; and (8) credit history. Alternatively, the mortgage lender can originate Qualified Mortgages (“QMs”), which are entitled to a presumption that the creditor making the loan satisfied the ability-to-repay (“ATR”) requirements. In general, a QM is a mortgage loan without negative amortization, interest-only payments, balloon payments, or terms exceeding 30 years. In addition, to be a QM the points and fees paid by a consumer cannot exceed 3% of the total loan amount.

On December 10, 2020, the CFPB issued two final rules related to QM loans. The first rule replaces the strict 43% DTI threshold for QM loans and provides that, in addition to existing requirements, a loan receives a conclusive presumption that the consumer had the ability to repay if the APR does not exceed the average prime offer rate for a comparable transaction by 1.5 percentage points or more as of the date the interest rate is set. Further, a loan receives a rebuttable presumption that the consumer had the ability to repay if the APR exceeds the average prime offer rate for a comparable transaction by 1.5 percentage points or more but by less than 2.25 percentage points. The second rule creates a new category of “seasoned” QMs for loans that meet certain performance requirements. That rule allows a non-QM loan or a “rebuttable presumption” QM loan to receive a safe harbor from ATR liability at the end of a “seasoning” period of at least 36 months as a “seasoned QM” if it satisfies certain product restrictions, points-and-fees limits, and underwriting requirements, and the loan meets the designated performance and portfolio requirements during the “seasoning period.” The mandatory compliance date under the first final rule was July 1, 2021, but subsequently was delayed by the CFPB to October 1, 2022. The second final rule will apply to covered transactions for which institutions receive an application after the compliance date for the first final rule.

Additionally, the CFPB has the authority to take supervisory and enforcement action against banks and other financial services companies under the agency’s jurisdiction that fail to comply with federal consumer financial laws. As an insured depository institution with total assets of more than $10 billion, FCB is subject to the CFPB’s supervisory and enforcement authorities. The Dodd-Frank Act also permits states to adopt stricter consumer protection laws and state attorneys general to enforce consumer protection rules issued by the CFPB. As a result of these aspects of the Dodd-Frank Act, FCB operates in a stringent consumer compliance environment. The CFPB has been active in bringing enforcement actions against banks and other financial institutions to enforce consumer financial laws. The federal financial regulatory agencies, including the FDIC and states attorneys general, also have become increasingly active in this area with respect to institutions over which they have jurisdiction.

Pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act, the FDIC has backup enforcement authority over a depository institution holding company, such as the Parent Company, if the conduct or threatened conduct of such holding company poses a risk to the Depositors Insurance Fund (“DIF”), although such authority may not be used if the holding company is generally in sound condition and does not pose a foreseeable and material risk to the DIF. The Dodd-Frank Act may have a material impact on BancShares’ operations, particularly through increased compliance costs resulting from possible future consumer and fair lending regulations. Refer to Item 1A. Risk Factors below for a more extensive discussion of this topic.

### Other Regulations applicable to the Parent Company and FCB

*Privacy, Data Protection, and Cybersecurity.* We are subject to a number of U.S. federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations relating to consumer privacy and data protection. Under privacy protection provisions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 (“GLBA”) and its implementing regulations and guidance, we are limited in our ability to disclose certain non-public information about consumers to nonaffiliated third parties. Financial institutions, such as us, are required by statute and regulation to notify consumers of their privacy policies and practices and, in some circumstances, allow consumers to prevent disclosure of certain personal information to a nonaffiliated third party. In addition, such financial institutions must appropriately safeguard their customers’ nonpublic, personal information.

Consumers must be notified in the event of a data breach under applicable state laws. The changing privacy laws in the United States, Europe and elsewhere, including the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018, (the “CCPA”), which became effective on January 1, 2020, applies to for-profit businesses that conduct business in California and meet certain revenue or data collection thresholds. The CCPA gives consumers the right to request disclosure of information collected about them, and whether that information has been sold or shared with others, the right to request deletion of personal information (subject to certain exceptions), the right to opt out of the sale of the consumer’s personal information, and the right not to be discriminated against for exercising these rights. The CCPA contains several exemptions, including for information that is collected, processed, sold or disclosed pursuant to the GLBA. In November 2020, voters in the State of California approved the California Privacy Rights Act (“CPRA”), a ballot measure that amends and supplements the CCPA by creating the California Privacy Protection Agency, a watchdog privacy agency to be appointed shortly after the CPRA’s enactment. The CPRA also modifies the CCPA by expanding both the scope of businesses covered by the law and certain rights relating to personal information and its use, collection, and disclosure by covered businesses. Similar laws have and may be adopted by other states where BancShares does business.

In addition, multiple other states, Congress and regulators outside the United States are considering similar laws or regulations which could create new individual privacy rights and impose increased obligations on companies handling personal data. For example, on November 23, 2021, the federal financial regulatory agencies published a final rule that will impose upon banking organizations and their service providers new notification requirements for significant cybersecurity incidents (the “Cybersecurity Rule”). Specifically, the Cybersecurity Rule requires banking organizations to notify their primary federal regulator as soon as possible and no later than 36 hours after the discovery of a “computer-security incident” that rises to the level of a “notification incident” within the meaning attributed to those terms by the Cybersecurity Rule. Banks’ service providers are required under the Cybersecurity Rule to notify any affected bank to or on behalf of which the service provider provides services “as soon as possible” after determining that it has experienced an incident that materially disrupts or degrades, or is reasonably likely to materially disrupt or degrade, covered services provided to such bank for as much as four hours. The Cybersecurity Rule will take effect on April 1, 2022 and banks and their service providers must be in compliance with the requirements by May 1, 2022. We are actively working on updating processes to ensure compliance.

Federal banking agencies, including the FDIC, have adopted guidelines for establishing information security standards and cybersecurity programs for implementing safeguards under the supervision of the board of directors. These guidelines, along with related regulatory materials, increasingly focus on risk management and processes related to information technology and the use of third parties in the provision of financial services. In October 2016, the federal banking agencies issued an advance notice of proposed rulemaking on enhanced cybersecurity risk-management and resilience standards that would apply to large and interconnected banking organizations and to services provided by third parties to these firms. If adopted, these enhanced standards will apply to depository institutions and depository institution holding companies with total consolidated assets of $50 billion or more, which includes the Parent Company and FCB.

*Climate-Related Regulation and Risk Management.* In recent years the federal banking agencies have increased their focus on climate-related risks impacting the operations of banks, the communities they serve and the broader financial system. Accordingly, the agencies have begun to enhance their supervisory expectations regarding the climate risk management practices of larger banking organizations, such as BancShares, including by encouraging such banks to: ensure that management of climate-related risk exposures has been incorporated into existing governance structures; evaluate the potential impact of climate-related risks on the bank’s financial condition, operations and business objectives as part of its strategic planning process; account for the effects of climate change in stress testing scenarios and systemic risk assessments; revise expectations for credit portfolio concentrations based on climate-related factors; consider investments in climate-related initiatives and lending to communities disproportionately impacted by the effects of climate change; evaluate the impact of climate change on the bank’s borrowers and consider possible changes to underwriting criteria to account for climate-related risks to mortgaged properties; incorporate climate-related financial risk into the bank’s internal reporting, monitoring and escalation processes; and prepare for the transition risks to the bank associated with the adjustment to a low-carbon economy and related changes in laws, regulations, governmental policies, technology, and consumer behavior and expectations.

On October 21, 2021, the Financial Stability Oversight Council published a report identifying climate-related financial risk as an “emerging threat” to financial stability. On December 16, 2021, the OCC issued proposed principles for climate-related financial risk management for national banks with more than $100 billion in total assets. The OCC has also indicated that all banks, regardless of their size, may have material exposures to climate-related financial and other risks that require prudent management. The federal banking agencies, either independently or on an interagency basis, are expected to adopt a more formal climate risk management framework for larger banking organizations in the coming months. In addition, states in which we conduct business have taken, or are considering taking, similar actions on climate-related financial risks.

### Other Regulated Subsidiaries

As noted above, certain subsidiaries of the Parent Company and FCB are subject to regulation, supervision, and examination by the SEC, FINRA, state regulatory agencies, and other regulatory authorities as “regulated entities.”

FCB’s insurance activities are subject to licensing and regulation by state insurance regulatory agencies. Each of CIT's insurance subsidiaries acquired by FCB in the CIT Merger is also licensed and regulated in the states in which the subsidiaries conduct insurance business. The extent of such regulation varies, but most jurisdictions have laws and regulations governing the financial aspects and business conduct of insurers. State laws in the U.S. grant insurance regulatory authorities broad administrative powers with respect to, among other things: licensing companies and agents to transact business; establishing statutory capital and reserve requirements and the solvency standards that must be met and maintained; regulating certain premium rates; reviewing and approving policy forms; regulating unfair trade and claims practices, including through the imposition of restrictions on marketing and sales practices, distribution arrangements and payment of inducements; approving changes in control of insurance companies; restricting the payment of dividends and other transactions between affiliates; and regulating the types, amounts and valuation of investments. CIT’s Vermont insurance captive subsidiary (acquired in the CIT Merger) is required to file reports, generally including detailed annual financial statements, with the insurance regulatory authority, and its operations and accounts are subject to periodic examination by such authorities.

Specialty business operations that were under CIT’s Commercial Finance Division prior to the CIT Merger, and specifically the Rail, Maritime, and other equipment financing operations, are subject to various laws, rules, and regulations administered by authorities in jurisdictions where business is conducted. In the United States, equipment financing and leasing operations, including for railcars, ships, and other equipment, are subject to rules and regulations relating to safety, operations, maintenance, and mechanical standards promulgated by various federal and state agencies and industry organizations, including the U.S. Department of Transportation, the Federal Railroad Administration, the Association of American Railroads, the Maritime Administration, the U.S. Coast Guard, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. In addition, state agencies regulate some aspects of rail and maritime operations with respect to health and safety matters.

### Available Information

The Parent Company does not have its own separate Internet website. However, FCB’s website (www.firstcitizens.com) includes a hyperlink to the SEC website where the public may obtain copies of BancShares’ Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports, free of charge, as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. Interested parties may also directly access the SEC’s website (www.sec.gov), which contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information electronically filed by BancShares. Except as specifically incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K, information on those websites is not part of this report.

## Risk factors

As filed, 96,954 characters.

### Risk Factor Summary

We are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could have a material impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations and cash flows. As a financial services organization, certain elements of risk are inherent in our transactions and operations and are present in the business decisions we make. We encounter risks as part of the normal course of our business, and our success is dependent on our ability to identify, understand and manage the risks presented by our business activities. We categorize risks into the following areas, and the principal risks and uncertainties that management believes make an investment in us speculative or risky are summarized within their respective areas:

- **Strategic Risks:** The risks to our earnings or capital arising from our business decisions or improper implementation of those decisions.
- *We may be adversely affected by risks associated with completed, pending or any potential future acquisitions.*
- *We may fail to realize all of the anticipated benefits of the CIT Merger, or those benefits may take longer to realize than expected. We may also encounter significant difficulties in integrating with the acquired operations.*
- **Operational Risks:** The risks of loss resulting from inadequate or failed processes, people and systems or from external events, including, but not limited to, the COVID-19 pandemic.
- *We face significant operational risks in our businesses and may fail to maintain appropriate operational infrastructure and oversight.*
- *A cyber attack, information or security breach, or a technology failure of ours or of a third party could adversely affect our ability to conduct our business, manage our exposure to risk, result in the disclosure or misuse of confidential customer or employee data or proprietary information, increase our costs to maintain and update our operational and security systems and infrastructure. This could adversely impact our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition, as well as cause us legal or reputational harm.*
- *The continued economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic are expected to continue to affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.*
- **Credit Risks:** The risks that a borrower will fail to perform on an obligation or that our risk management processes will fail or be insufficient.
- *If we fail to effectively manage credit risk, our business and financial condition will suffer.*
- *Our allowance for credit losses may prove to be insufficient to absorb losses in our loan portfolio.*
- **Market Risks:** The risks to our financial condition resulting from adverse movements in market rates or prices, including, but not limited to, interest rates, foreign exchange rates or equity prices.
- *Unfavorable economic or political conditions, as considered through a range of metrics, have and could continue to adversely affect our business.*
- *Failure to effectively manage our interest rate risk could adversely affect us.*
- **Liquidity Risks:** The risks that we will be unable to meet our obligations as they come due because of an inability to (i) liquidate assets or obtain adequate funding, or (ii) unwind or offset specific exposures without significantly lowering market prices because of inadequate market depth or market disruptions, or that we will not meet the liquidity management requirements we expect to be applicable to us as a Category IV banking organization, subject to the applicable transition periods.
- *If our current level of balance sheet liquidity were to experience pressure, it could affect our ability to pay deposits and fund our operations.*
- *We expect to be subject to enhanced liquidity risk management requirements as a Category IV banking organization, subject to the applicable transition periods, including reporting, liquidity stress testing, and a liquidity buffer, and failure to meet these requirements could result in regulatory and compliance risks, and possible restrictions on our activities.*
- **Capital Adequacy Risks:** The risks that our capital levels are inadequate to preserve our safety and soundness, support our ongoing business operations and strategies and provide us with support against unexpected or sudden changes in the business/economic environment.
- *Our ability to grow is contingent upon access to capital, which may not be readily available to us.*
- *We are subject to capital adequacy and liquidity guidelines and, if we fail to meet these guidelines, our financial condition would be adversely affected.*
- **Compliance Risks:** The risks of loss or reputational harm to us resulting from regulatory sanctions, fines, penalties or losses due to our failure to comply with laws, rules, regulations or other supervisory requirements applicable to us.
- *We operate in a highly regulated industry, and the laws and regulations that govern our operations, taxes, corporate governance, executive compensation and financial accounting and reporting, including changes in them or our failure to comply with them, may adversely affect us.*
- *We face compliance risks related to the specialty commercial business lines acquired from CIT.*
- **Asset Risks:** The risks that the value of our long-lived assets will be lower than expected, resulting in reduced income or depreciation over the remaining life of the asset or a lower sale value.
- *We may not be able to realize our entire investment in the equipment that we lease to our customers.*
- **Financial Reporting Risks:** The risks that our financial information is reported incorrectly or incompletely, including through the improper application of accounting standards or other errors or omissions.
- *Accounting standards may change and increase our operating costs or otherwise adversely affect our results.*
- *Our accounting policies and processes are critical to the reporting of our financial condition and results of operations. They require management to make estimates about matters that are uncertain, and such estimates may be incorrect.*

The risks and uncertainties that management believes are material to an investment in us are described below. Additional risks and uncertainties that are not currently known to management or that management does not currently deem material could also have a material adverse impact on our financial condition, the results of our operations or our business. If such risks and uncertainties were to materialize or the likelihoods of the risks were to increase, we could be adversely affected, and the market price of our securities could significantly decline.

### Strategic Risks

*We may be adversely affected by risks associated with completed, pending or any potential future acquisitions.*

We plan to continue to grow our business organically. However, we have pursued and expect to continue to pursue acquisition opportunities that we believe support our business strategies and may enhance our profitability. We must generally satisfy a number of material conditions prior to consummating any acquisition including, in many cases, federal and state regulatory approval. We may fail to complete strategic and competitively significant business opportunities as a result of our inability to obtain required regulatory approvals in a timely manner or at all, or the approval for such opportunity could include conditions imposing additional costs or limitations that reduce the anticipated related benefits. On July 9, 2021, President Biden issued an Executive Order on Promoting Competition in the American Economy encouraging the United States Attorney General along with the federal banking agencies to review the framework for evaluating bank mergers and acquisitions under the BHC Act and the Bank Merger Act. Additionally, the Director of the CFPB has publicly sought a greater role for the CFPB in the evaluation of bank merger proposals. Any enhanced regulatory scrutiny of bank mergers and acquisitions and revision of the regulatory framework for approval of bank mergers could adversely affect the marketplace for bank merger transactions and could result in potential future acquisitions by us being delayed, impeded or restricted in certain respects and result in new rules that possibly limit the size of financial institutions that we may be able to acquire in the future or alter the terms for such transactions.

We may be unsuccessful in identifying, consummating or integrating any potential acquisitions. Acquisitions of financial institutions, assets of financial institutions or other operating entities involve operational risks and uncertainties, and acquired companies or assets may have unknown or contingent liabilities, exposure to unexpected asset quality problems that require write downs or write-offs, additional regulatory requirements or difficulty retaining key employees and customers.

Due to these and other issues relating to acquisitions, we may not be able to realize projected cost savings, synergies or other benefits associated with any such acquisition. Failure to efficiently integrate any acquired entities or assets into our existing operations could significantly increase our operating costs and consequently have material adverse effects on our financial condition and results of operations.

*We may fail to realize all of the anticipated benefits of the CIT Merger, or those benefits may take longer to realize than expected. We may also encounter significant difficulties in integrating with the acquired operations.*

The success of the CIT Merger, including anticipated benefits and cost savings, will depend, in substantial part, on our ability to successfully integrate the acquired operations in a manner that results in various benefits, such as anticipated synergies or cost savings, and that does not materially disrupt existing customer relationships or result in decreased revenues due to loss of customers. The process of integrating operations has resulted in a loss of key personnel and could cause an interruption of, or loss of momentum in, the activities of our business. Inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures and policies could adversely affect us. The diversion of management’s attention and any delays or difficulties encountered in connection with the integration of the acquired operations could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, operating results and prospects.

If we experience difficulties in the integration process, including those listed above, we may fail to realize the anticipated benefits of the CIT Merger in a timely manner or at all. In particular, the impacts of the pandemic caused by COVID-19 and its variants may make the integration more costly or more difficult to effect, which, in turn, may make it more difficult for us to realize anticipated synergies or cost savings in the amounts estimated or in the time frame contemplated or at all.

*We have incurred and expect to continue to incur substantial expenses related to the integration of the operations acquired in connection with the CIT Merger.*

There are a large number of processes, policies, procedures, operations, technologies and systems that must be integrated in connection with the consummation of the CIT Merger, and integration remains in process and is expected to continue for some time. While we have attempted to accurately forecast a certain level of expenses that will be incurred in connection with such integration, there are many factors beyond our control that have affected and could continue to affect the total amount and the timing of the integration expenses. Moreover, many of the integration expenses that will be incurred are, by their nature, difficult to estimate accurately. These expenses could materially exceed our current estimates and, consequently, could materially adversely affect our future earnings.

*Our future results will suffer if we do not effectively manage our expanded operations following the CIT Merger.*

Following the consummation of the CIT Merger, the size and geographic and operational scope of our business has increased significantly. The CIT Merger more than doubled our asset size, increased the breadth and complexity of our business with the addition of new business lines in which we have not previously engaged and expanded our geographic scope to new geographic areas. Our future success depends, in part, upon the ability to manage this expanded business, which will pose substantial challenges for management, including challenges related to the management and monitoring of new and expanded operations and associated increased costs and complexity. We may be unsuccessful in this regard or fail to realize the expected operating efficiencies, cost savings and other benefits currently anticipated from the CIT Merger.

*We encounter significant competition that may reduce our market share and profitability.*

We compete with other banks and specialized financial services providers in our market areas. Our primary competitors include local, regional and national banks; credit unions; commercial finance companies; leasing companies; various wealth management providers; independent and captive insurance agencies; mortgage companies; and other non-bank providers of financial services. Some of our larger competitors, including certain banks with a significant presence in our market areas, have the capacity to offer products and services we do not offer. Some of our non-bank competitors operate in less stringent regulatory environments, and certain competitors are not subject to federal or state income taxes. The fierce competitive pressures that we face adversely affect pricing for many of our products and services.

Additionally, technology and other changes are allowing parties to complete financial transactions that historically have involved banks through alternative methods without involving banks. For example, consumers can now maintain funds that would have historically been held as bank deposits in brokerage accounts, mutual funds or virtual accounts. Consumers can also complete transactions, such as paying bills or transferring funds directly without the assistance of banks. Transactions utilizing digital assets, including cryptocurrencies, stablecoins and other similar assets, have increased substantially. Certain characteristics of digital asset transactions, such as the speed with which such transactions can be conducted, the ability to transact without the involvement of regulated intermediaries, the ability to engage in transactions across multiple jurisdictions, and the anonymous nature of the transactions, are appealing to certain consumers. Accordingly, digital asset service providers—which, at present, are not subject to as extensive regulation as banking organizations and other financial institutions—have become active competitors for our customers’ banking business. The process of eliminating banks as intermediaries, known as “disintermediation,” could result in the loss of fee income, as well as the loss of customer deposits and the related income generated from those deposits. The loss of these revenue streams and the lower cost of deposits as a source of funds could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

*Certain provisions in our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws may prevent a change in management or a takeover attempt a shareholder might consider to be in their best interests.*

Certain provisions contained in our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (our “Certificate of Incorporation) and Amended and Restated Bylaws (our “Bylaws”) could delay or prevent the removal of our directors and other management. The provisions could also delay or make more difficult a tender offer, merger or proxy contest a shareholder might consider to be in their best interests. For example, our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws:

- allow the Board to issue and set the terms of preferred shares without further shareholder approval;
- limit who can call a special meeting of shareholders; and
- establish advance notice requirements for nominations for election to the Board and proposals of other business to be considered at annual meetings of shareholders.

These provisions, as well as provisions of the BHCA and other relevant statutes and regulations that require advance notice and applications for regulatory approval of changes in control of banks and bank holding companies, may discourage bids for our common stock at a premium over market price, adversely affecting the price that could be received by our shareholders for our common stock. Additionally, the fact that the Holding family holds or controls shares representing approximately 50%, and in the past have held or controlled shares representing more than 50%, of the voting power of our common stock may discourage potential takeover attempts and bids for our common stock at a premium over market price.

*Our Bylaws provide that, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware will be the sole and exclusive forum for substantially all disputes between us and our shareholders. This could limit our shareholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers, or employees or agents.*

Our Bylaws provide that, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware will be the sole and exclusive forum for (i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on behalf of us; (ii) any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any of our directors, officers, other employees or shareholder to us or our shareholders; (iii) any action asserting a claim against us arising pursuant to any provision of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware or as to which the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware confers jurisdiction on the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware; or (iv) any action asserting a claim against us governed by the internal affairs doctrine. These choice of forum provisions do not preclude or contract the scope of exclusive federal or concurrent jurisdiction for any actions brought under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Accordingly, our choice of forum provisions will not relieve us of our duties to comply with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder, and our shareholders will not be deemed to have waived our compliance with these laws, rules and regulations.

These choice of forum provisions may limit a shareholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum of its choosing for disputes with us or our directors, officers or other employees or agents, which may discourage lawsuits against us and our directors, officers and other employees or agents.

If a court were to find the choice of forum provision contained in our Bylaws to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions, which could harm our business, results of operations, and financial condition. Even if we are successful in defending against these claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and be a distraction to management and other employees.

*We rely on dividends from FCB for paying dividends on our common and preferred stock and servicing our debt obligations, and FCB’s ability to pay us dividends is restricted.*

As a financial holding company, we are a separate legal entity from FCB. We derive most of our revenue and cash flow from dividends paid by FCB. These dividends are the primary source from which we pay dividends on our common and preferred stock and interest and principal on our debt obligations. State and federal laws impose restrictions on the dividends that FCB may pay to us. In the event FCB is unable to pay dividends to us for an extended period of time, we may not be able to service our debt obligations or pay dividends on our common or preferred stock, and the inability to receive dividends from FCB could consequently have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

*Our financial performance depends upon our ability to attract and retain customers for our products and services, which may be adversely impacted by weakened consumer or business confidence and by any inability on our part to predict and satisfy customers’ needs and demands.*

Our financial performance is subject to risks associated with the loss of customer confidence and demand. A fragile, weakening or changing economy, or ambiguity surrounding the economic future, may lessen the demand for our products and services. Our performance may also be negatively impacted if we fail to attract and retain customers because we are not able to successfully anticipate, develop and market products and services that satisfy market demands. Such events could impact our performance through fewer loans, reduced fee income and fewer deposits, each of which could result in reduced net income. The COVID-19 pandemic, while disruptive to our customers and the economy, has not led to a significant decline in our products and services to date, but it could if its impact on us and our customers continues or increases in the future.

*New technologies, and our ability to efficiently and effectively implement, market and deliver new products and services to our customers present competitive risks.*

The financial services industry is continually undergoing rapid technological change with frequent introduction of new technology-driven products and services. The effective use of technology increases efficiency and enables financial institutions to better serve customers and to reduce costs. The rapid growth of new digital technologies related to the digitization of banking services and capabilities, including through internet services, smart phones and other mobile devices, requires us to continuously evaluate our product and service offerings to ensure they remain competitive. These trends were accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic increasing demand for mobile banking solutions. Our success depends in part on our ability to adapt and deliver our products and services in a manner responsive to evolving industry standards and consumer preferences. New technologies by banks and non-bank service providers may create risks if our products and services are no longer competitive with then-current standards, and could negatively affect our ability to attract or maintain a loyal customer base. We may not be able to effectively implement new technology-driven products and services that allow us to remain competitive or be successful in marketing these products and services to our customers. These risks may affect our ability to grow and could reduce our revenue streams from certain products and services, while increasing expenses associated with developing more competitive solutions, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

### Operational Risks

*We face significant operational risks in our businesses and may fail to maintain appropriate operational infrastructure and oversight.*

Safely conducting and growing our business requires that we create and maintain an appropriate operational and organizational control infrastructure. Operational risk can arise in numerous ways, including employee fraud, customer fraud and control lapses in bank operations and information technology. Our dependence on our employees and internal and third party automated systems to record and process transactions may further increase the risk that technical failures or system-tampering will result in losses that are difficult to detect. We may be subject to disruptions of our operating systems arising from events that are wholly or partially beyond our control. Failure to maintain appropriate operational infrastructure and oversight can lead to loss of service to customers, legal actions and noncompliance with various laws and regulations, all of which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Our internal controls that are intended to safeguard and maintain our operational and organizational infrastructure and information have inherent limitations and may not be successful.

*A cyber attack, information or security breach, or a technology failure of ours or of a third party could adversely affect our ability to conduct our business, manage our exposure to risk, result in the disclosure or misuse of confidential customer or employee data or proprietary information, increase our costs to maintain and update our operational and security systems and infrastructure. This could adversely impact our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition, as well as cause us legal or reputational harm.*

Our businesses are highly dependent on the security and efficacy of our infrastructure, computer and data management systems, as well as those of third parties with whom we interact or on whom we rely. Our businesses rely on the secure processing, transmission, storage and retrieval of confidential, proprietary and other information in our computer and data management systems and networks, and in the computer and data management systems and networks of third parties. In addition, to access our network, products and services, our customers and other third parties may use personal mobile devices or computing devices that are outside of our network environment and are subject to their own cybersecurity risks, which may provide a point of entry for adverse effects on our own network environment.

We, our customers, regulators and other third parties have been subject to, and are likely to continue to be the target of, cyber attacks. These cyber attacks include computer viruses, malicious or destructive code, ransomware, phishing attacks, denial of service or information or other security breaches that could result in the unauthorized release, gathering, monitoring, misuse, loss or destruction of confidential, proprietary and other information of ours, our employees, our customers or of third parties, damages to systems, or other material disruption to our or our customers’ or other third parties’ network access or business operations. As cyber threats continue to evolve, we have been and will likely continue to be required to expend significant resources to continuously enhance our protective measures and may be required to expend significant resources to investigate and remediate any information security vulnerabilities or incidents. We may not be able to anticipate all security breaches, nor may we be able to implement guaranteed preventive measures against such security breaches. Additionally, a security breach may be difficult to detect, even after it occurs, which may compound the issues related to such breach.

Cybersecurity risks for banking organizations have significantly increased in recent years in part because of the proliferation of new technologies and the use of the internet to conduct financial transactions. These risks are expected to continue in the future as that proliferation intensifies. For example, we will likely see an increase in cybersecurity risks in the future as we continue to augment our mobile-payment and other internet-based product offerings and expand our internal usage of web-based products and applications. In addition, financially motivated attacks remain a challenge from a cybercrime perspective due to the increased sophistication and activities of organized crime groups, hackers, terrorist organizations, hostile foreign governments, disgruntled employees or vendors, activists and other external parties, including those involved in corporate espionage. Even the most advanced internal control environment may be vulnerable to compromise. Additionally, the increase of supply chain attacks including third parties with access to our data or those providing critical services, remain an emerging operational issue which could adversely affect our business, customers, reputation and operations.

Although to date we are not aware of any material losses or other material consequences relating to technology failure, cyber attacks or other information or security breaches, whether directed at us or third parties, we may suffer such losses or other consequences in the future.

We also face indirect technology, cybersecurity and operational risks relating to the customers and other third parties with whom we do business or upon whom we rely to facilitate or enable our business activities, including financial counterparties; financial intermediaries such as clearing agents, exchanges and clearing houses; vendors; regulators; and providers of critical infrastructure such as internet access and electrical power. As a result of increasing consolidation, interdependence and complexity of financial entities and technology systems, a technology failure, cyber attack or other information or security breach that significantly degrades, deletes or compromises the systems or data of one or more financial entities could have a material impact on counterparties or other market participants, including us. This consolidation interconnectivity and complexity increases the risk of operational failure, on both individual and industry-wide bases, as disparate systems need to be integrated, often on an accelerated basis. Any third-party technology failure, cyber attack or other information or security breach, termination or constraint could, among other things, adversely affect our ability to effect transactions, service our customers, manage our exposure to risk or expand our businesses.

Cyber attacks or other information or security breaches, whether directed at us or third parties, may result in a material loss or have material consequences. Furthermore, the public perception that a cyber attack on our systems has been successful, whether or not this perception is correct, may damage our reputation with customers and third parties with whom we do business and may encourage further cyber attacks. A successful penetration or circumvention of system security could cause us negative consequences, including loss of customers and business opportunities, disruption to our operations and business, misappropriation or destruction of our confidential information and that of our customers, or damage to our customers’ and third parties’ computers or systems, and could result in a violation of applicable data privacy and protection laws and other laws, litigation exposure, regulatory fines, penalties or intervention, loss of confidence in our security measures, reputational damage, reimbursement or other compensatory costs, and additional compliance costs, any of which could adversely impact our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition.

*The continued economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic are expected to continue to affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.*

Beginning in early 2020, COVID-19 spread across most of the world, including the United States. The COVID-19 pandemic, sustained by the spread of new, more-transmissible coronavirus variants, has continued to cause severe disruptions to the United States economy, regional quarantines, business and school shutdowns, high unemployment, disruptions to supply chains and overall economic instability, which has adversely impacted the operations, activities and business of our customers. Effects have generally been felt across all industries, including financial services.

In response to the national public health crisis, federal, state and local governments have imposed and continue to impose an array of restrictions on the way we conduct our operations and on our customers, business partners, vendors and employees. These restrictions, along with other economic factors including inflation risks, oil price volatility and changes in interest rates have and may continue to destabilize financial markets and negatively impact our customers’ business activities and operations, making it difficult for them to satisfy existing debt obligations. They also have led to periods of elevated unemployment and slower consumer spending, which, in turn, has previously temporarily increased our collection risk as deteriorating economic conditions correlate with lower credit quality metrics and higher customer defaults on loans. Economic pressures and uncertainty have and may continue to change consumer and business behaviors, which, in the short and long term, could affect borrowers’ creditworthiness and the demand for loans and other products and services we offer. We are actively monitoring the loan portfolio to identify changes in credit risk within a specific geography, loan class, or within a particular industry concentration; provision expense could increase as we incorporate these changes into our estimate on the allowance for credit losses.

Additionally, our operations have experienced modification as we continue to operate in a primarily remote working environment for many corporate employees and as we have adjusted branch operations and corporate processes. With continued uncertainty around outbreak severity and vaccine effectiveness and acceptance, particularly in regards to coronavirus variants, there may be increased absenteeism and lost productivity as a result of the remote workforce. We have seen an increased incidence of cybersecurity threats and fraud as cyber-criminals look to profit from the disruption and potential strain on information technology relating to a regularly remote working environment.

The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly reduced demand for goods and service for many customers and other businesses in sectors that we service. In the retail sector, our exposure is primarily in the factoring business, principally in trade receivables, and to a lesser extent in the commercial real estate business. In the hospitality and transportation sectors, we have loan exposures to the restaurant, lodging, gaming, maritime, aviation and rail industries. The significant declines in the price of, or demand for, oil and gas may have negative effects on not only our loan exposures in the exploration and production sector, but may also lead to a decreased demand for our railcars, and could have a significant adverse effect on the demand for ships that are collateral for our loans. Further, we have exposure to small businesses through both equipment loans and leases and through SBA loans, which could be adversely affected by the extensive closure of businesses in many states during the COVID-19 pandemic. We also have exposure to single family residential mortgages, which could be adversely affected by job losses due to the economic dislocation resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. Further, during the COVID-19 pandemic we implemented several forms of temporary relief to our consumer and commercial customers, including payment deferrals, suspension of foreclosures and evictions, and fee waivers for ATM transactions, overdrafts, and early withdrawal of certificates of deposit, which may adversely affect our revenue and results of operations or result in higher rates of default and increased credit losses in future periods. The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on economic and market conditions have increased demands on credit facilities that we provide to our customers, which could have an adverse impact on our liquidity.

Market volatility and general uncertainty in the capital markets related to the COVID-19 pandemic may also impact our business. Our access to capital and liquidity could be limited by market disruptions, which could be exacerbated by delays in customer payments or significant withdrawals from customer deposit accounts. In addition, the fair value of our assets and liabilities have been and will continue to be impacted by the changing market environment. This could also increase liquidity and capital adequacy risks, as well as long-lived asset impairment risk.

As the government and its regulatory bodies respond to the COVID-19 pandemic, it increases the burden on our associates to quickly process and respond to changing regulatory guidance. This increases the risk of noncompliance, which could expose us to liability or other adverse effects.

The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic will heighten specific risk factors and could impact substantially all risk factors described herein. Those effects will adversely affect our business operations and results at least until the outbreak has subsided to a manageable level, and the negative effects on the economy, our customers and our business and results likely will continue to be felt for some time afterwards. The full extent of the impact will depend on future developments that are highly uncertain including the duration and spread of the outbreak, its severity, vaccine effectiveness and acceptance, governmental actions to contain the virus (including its variants) and the long-term economic impact, both globally, as well as in our banking markets, which includes the potential for further recession.

*We are subject to litigation and other legal liability risks, and our expenses related to such risks may adversely affect our results.*

We are subject to litigation risks in the ordinary course of our business. Claims and legal actions, including supervisory actions by our regulators, that have been or may be initiated against us (including against entities that we acquire) from time to time could involve large monetary sums and significant defense costs. During the last credit crisis, we saw the number of cases and our expenses related to those cases increase and expect to see the same in future credit crises. The outcomes of such cases are always uncertain until finally adjudicated or resolved.

In the course of our business, we may foreclose on and take title to real estate that contains or was used in the manufacture or processing of hazardous materials or that is subject to other environmental risks. In addition, we may lease equipment to our customers that is used to mine, develop, process or transport hazardous materials. As a result, we could be subject to environmental liabilities or claims for negligence, property damage or personal injury with respect to these properties or equipment. We may be held liable to a governmental entity or to third parties for property damage, personal injury, investigation and clean-up costs incurred by these parties in connection with environmental contamination, accidents or other hazardous risks, or may be required to investigate or clean up hazardous or toxic substances or chemical releases at a property. The costs associated with investigation or remediation activities could be substantial. In addition, if we are the owner or former owner of a contaminated site or equipment involved in a hazardous incident, we may be subject to common law claims by third parties based on damages and costs resulting from environmental contamination, property damage, personal injury or other hazardous risks emanating from the property or related to the equipment.

We establish reserves for legal claims when payments associated with the claims become probable and our liability can be reasonably estimated. We may still incur legal costs for a matter even if we have not established a reserve. In addition, the actual amount paid in resolution of a legal claim may be substantially higher than any amounts reserved for the matter. The ultimate resolution of a legal proceeding, depending on the remedy sought and any relief granted, could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Substantial legal claims or significant regulatory action against us could have material adverse financial effects or cause significant reputational harm to us, which in turn could seriously harm our business prospects. We may be exposed to substantial uninsured legal liabilities and regulatory actions which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. For additional information, refer to the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Note T, Commitments and Contingencies, in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

*We depend on qualified personnel for our success and may not be able to retain or attract such personnel.*

Our success depends to a great extent on our ability to attract and retain highly skilled and qualified executive officers and management, financial, compliance, technical, operations, sales, and support employees, which has taken on heightened importance because of the significant expansion of the size and geographic and operational scope of our business that occurred in connection with the CIT Merger. We face significant competition in the recruitment of qualified executive officers and employees. Losses of, or changes in, our current executive officers or other personnel and their expertise and services, or substantial increases in the costs of employee compensation or benefits, may disrupt our business and could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. We have developed an executive officer succession plan, but it may be ineffective, or we may fail in implementing it. We may be unsuccessful in retaining our current executive officers or other key personnel, or hiring additional key personnel to assist in executing our growth, expansion and acquisition strategies, all of which could cause those strategies to fail or be less successful than they would otherwise be.

Our compensation practices are subject to review and oversight by the Federal Reserve, the FDIC and other regulators. The federal banking agencies have issued joint guidance on executive compensation designed to help ensure that a banking organization’s incentive compensation policies do not encourage imprudent risk taking and are consistent with the safety and soundness of the organization. In addition, the Dodd-Frank Act required those agencies, along with the SEC, to adopt rules to require reporting of incentive compensation and to prohibit certain compensation arrangements. In October 2021, the SEC signaled a renewed interest in its incentive compensation rulemaking initiative by re-opening the comment period on a proposed rule regarding “clawbacks” of incentive-based executive compensation. If as a result of complying with such rules we are unable to attract and retain qualified employees, or do so at rates necessary to maintain our competitive position, or if the compensation costs required to attract and retain employees become more significant, our performance, including our competitive position, could be materially adversely affected.

#### We are exposed to losses related to fraud.

As technology continues to evolve, criminals are using increasingly more sophisticated techniques to commit and hide fraudulent activity. Fraudulent activity that we are exposed to can come in many forms, including debit card/credit card fraud, check fraud, wire fraud, electronic scanning devices attached to ATM machines, social engineering, digital fraud and phishing attacks to obtain personal information and fraudulent impersonation of our customers through the use of falsified or stolen credentials. We expect that combating fraudulent activities as they evolve will require continued ongoing investments and attention in the future as significant fraud could cause us direct losses or impair our customer relationships, among other potential consequences, adversely impacting our reputation or results of operation.

*Our business and financial performance could be impacted by natural or man-made disasters, global pandemics, acts of war or terrorist activities, climate change or other adverse external events.*

Natural or man-made disasters (including, but not limited to, earthquakes, hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, fires, pollution, and explosions), global pandemics, acts of war, terrorist activities, climate change or other adverse external events could hurt our financial performance (i) directly through damage to our facilities or other impacts to our ability to conduct business in the ordinary course, and (ii) indirectly through such damage or impacts to our customers, suppliers or other counterparties. In particular, a significant amount of our business is concentrated in North Carolina, South Carolina, California, Texas, New York and Florida, including areas where our facilities and retail and commercial customers have been and in the future could be impacted by hurricanes and flooding, earthquakes or wildfires. We also do business in Georgia, Virginia, Nebraska, Arizona, New Jersey, Hawaii, Nevada, as well as in Canada, all of which also include areas significantly exposed to the foregoing risks. We could also suffer adverse results to the extent that disasters, wars, terrorist activities, riots or civil unrest affect the broader markets or economy or our operations specifically. Our ability to minimize the consequences of such events is in significant measure reliant on the quality of our disaster recovery planning and our ability, if any, to forecast the events, and such quality and ability may be inadequate.

There has been increasing political and social attention to the issue of climate change. Federal and state legislators and regulatory agencies have proposed and continue to advance numerous legislative and regulatory initiatives seeking to mitigate the negative effects of climate change. To the extent that these initiatives lead to the promulgation of new regulations or supervisory guidance applicable to us, we would expect to experience increased compliance costs and other compliance-related risks. Such climate change-related measures may also result in the imposition of taxes and fees, the required purchase of emission credits or the implementation of significant operational changes, each of which may require us to expend significant capital and incur compliance, operating, maintenance and remediation costs.

We are unable to predict how climate change may impact our financial condition and operations; however, as a banking organization, the physical effects of climate change may present certain unique risks to us. For example, an increase in the frequency or magnitude of natural disasters, shifts in local climates and other disruptions related to climate change may adversely affect the value of real properties securing our loans, which could diminish the value of our loan portfolio. Such events may also cause reductions in regional and local economic activity that may have an adverse effect on our customers. Consumers and businesses in communities that we serve may change their behavior and preferences as a result of these issues and new climate change laws and regulations aimed at mitigating climate change. The impact on our customers will likely vary depending on their specific attributes, including their reliance on or role in carbon intensive activities; however, we could experience a drop in demand for our products and services, particularly in certain sectors. We may also be subject to adverse action from our regulators or other third parties, such as environmental advocacy organizations, in relation to how our business relates to or has addressed or failed to address climate change-related risks. Each of these outcomes could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

*We rely on third party vendors to provide key components of our business infrastructure, and our vendors may be responsible for or contribute to failures that adversely affect our operations.*

Third party vendors provide key components of our business infrastructure, including certain data processing and information services. Their services could be difficult to quickly replace in the event of failure or other interruption in service. Failures of certain vendors to provide services could adversely affect our ability to deliver products and services to our customers. Third party vendors also present information security risks to us, both directly and indirectly through our customers. Our monitoring of significant vendor risks, including the financial stability of critical vendors, may be inadequate and incomplete. Vendor risks in particular are compounded by the COVID-19 pandemic, as unexpected disruptions can impact a third party vendor’s operations with little warning. The failure of a critical third party vendor to provide key components of our business infrastructure could substantially disrupt our business and cause us to incur significant expense while harming our relationships with our customers.

*The quality of our data could deteriorate and cause financial or reputational harm to the Bank.*

Our Data Governance program is reliant on the execution of procedures, process controls and system functionality, and errors may occur. Incomplete, inconsistent, or inaccurate data could lead to non-compliance with regulatory requirements and result in fines. Additionally, adverse impacts on customers could result in reputational harm and customer attrition. Inaccurate or incomplete data presents the risk that business decisions relying on such data will prove inefficient, ineffective or harmful to us. Additionally, information we provide to our investors and regulators may be negatively impacted by inaccurate or incomplete data, which could have a wide range of adverse consequences such as legal liability and reputational harm.

*Malicious action by an employee could result in harm to our customers or the Bank.*

Several high-profile cases of employee misconduct have occurred at other financial institutions. Such an event may lead to large regulatory fines, as well as an erosion in customer confidence, which could impact our financial and competitive position. Our employee code of ethics and policies governing our compensation, conduct and sales practices may be inadequate to deter and respond to potential employee misconduct.

### Credit Risks

*If we fail to effectively manage credit risk, our business and financial condition will suffer.*

Effectively managing credit risks is essential for the operation of our business. There are credit risks inherent in making any loan, including risks of repayment, risks with respect to the period of time over which the loan may be repaid, risks relating to proper loan underwriting and guidelines, risks resulting from changes in economic and industry conditions, risks in dealing with individual borrowers and risks resulting from uncertainties as to the future value of collateral. Our loan approval procedures and our credit risk monitoring may be or become inadequate to appropriately manage the inherent credit risks associated with lending. Our credit administration personnel, policies and procedures may not adequately adapt to changes in economic or other conditions affecting customers and the quality of our loan portfolio. Any failure to manage such credit risks may materially adversely affect our business, consolidated results of operations and financial condition because it may lead to loans that we make not being paid back in part or in full on a timely basis or at all.

*Our allowance for credit losses may prove to be insufficient to absorb losses in our credit portfolios.*

We maintain an allowance for credit losses (“ACL”) that is designed to cover expected credit losses on loans that borrowers may not repay in their entirety. A reserve is also maintained in other liabilities to cover expected losses for unfunded commitments. The ACL may not be sufficient to cover actual credit losses, and future provisions for credit losses could materially and adversely affect our operating results. Accounting measurements related to asset impairment and the ACL require significant estimates that are subject to uncertainty and revisions driven by new information and changing circumstances. The significant uncertainties surrounding our borrowers’ abilities to conduct their businesses successfully through changing economic environments, competitive challenges and other factors complicate our estimates of the risk and amount of loss on any loan. Due to the degree of uncertainty and the susceptibility to change, the actual losses may vary substantially from current estimates. We also expect fluctuations in the ACL due to economic changes nationally as well as locally within the states in which we conduct business. This is especially true as the economy reacts to the continuation of and potential recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic. The reserve related to unfunded commitments may not be sufficient to cover actual losses, and future provisions for such losses could also materially and adversely affect our operating results and are also subject to significant uncertainties and fluctuations, particularly in light of the COVID-19 pandemic.

As an integral part of their examination process, our banking regulators periodically review the ACL and may require us to increase it by recognizing additional provisions for credit losses charged to expense or to decrease the allowance by recognizing loan charge-offs, net of recoveries. Any such required additional credit loss provisions or loan charge-offs could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

*Our concentration of loans to borrowers within the medical and dental industries, as well as the rail business, could impair our earnings if those industries experience economic difficulties.*

Statutory or regulatory changes relevant to the medical and dental industries, or economic conditions in the market generally, could negatively impact these borrowers’ businesses and their ability to repay their loans with us, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, smaller practices such as those in the dental industry generally have fewer financial resources in terms of capital or borrowing capacity than larger entities, and generally have a heightened vulnerability to negative economic conditions. Consequently, we could be required to increase our ACL through additional provisions on our income statement, which would reduce reported net income.

Due to our substantial concentration in our rail business, if there is a significant downturn in shipping by railcar, it could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. The COVID-19 pandemic has created volatility and uncertainty in the economy, which has and is expected to continue to adversely impact our rail business. As described above, the significant declines in the price of, and demand for, oil and gas may lead to a decreased demand for our railcars.

*Economic conditions in real estate markets impacting collateral values and our reliance on junior liens may adversely impact our business and our results of operations.*

Real property collateral values may be impacted by economic conditions in the real estate market and may result in losses on loans that, while adequately collateralized at the time of origination, become inadequately collateralized over time. Our reliance on junior liens is concentrated in our consumer revolving mortgage loan portfolio. Approximately two-thirds of the consumer revolving mortgage portfolio is secured by junior lien positions, and lower real estate values for collateral underlying these loans may cause the outstanding balance of the senior lien to exceed the value of the collateral, resulting in a junior lien loan becoming effectively unsecured. Inadequate collateral values, rising interest rates and unfavorable economic conditions could result in greater delinquencies, write-downs or charge-offs in future periods, which could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and capital adequacy.

*Our financial condition could be adversely affected by the soundness of other financial institutions.*

Financial services institutions are interrelated as a result of trading, clearing, counterparty and other relationships. We have exposure to numerous financial services providers, including banks, securities brokers and dealers and other financial services providers. Our monitoring of the financial conditions of financial institutions with which we have credit exposure is inherently limited and may be inadequate, and transactions with those institutions expose us to credit risk through the possibility of counterparty default.

### Market Risks

*Unfavorable economic or political conditions, as considered through a range of metrics, have and could continue to adversely affect our business.*

Our business is subject to periodic fluctuations based on international, national, regional and local economic conditions. These fluctuations are not predictable, cannot be controlled and have had and may continue to have or further have a material adverse impact on our operations and financial condition. Our banking operations are primarily located within several states but are locally oriented and community-based. Our retail and commercial banking activities are primarily concentrated within the same geographic footprint. The markets in which we have the greatest presence are North Carolina, South Carolina, California, Texas, New York, Florida and Canada. Worsening economic conditions within our markets, particularly within those with our greatest presence, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Accordingly, we expect to continue to be dependent upon local business conditions, rail industry conditions and conditions in the local residential and commercial real estate markets we serve. Unfavorable changes in unemployment, real estate values, interest rates, foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations and other factors could weaken the economies of the communities we serve and otherwise adversely affect our business. Thus far, this includes declines in fee income and impacts on the fair value of our equity securities, but could create additional adverse impacts to provision for credit losses and declines in demand for our products and services.

We conduct limited business operations in certain foreign jurisdictions, and we engage in certain cross border lending and leasing transactions. An economic recession or downturn or business disruption associated with the political environments in the international markets in which we operate could similarly adversely affect us.

In addition, the political environment, the level of United States debt and global economic conditions can have a destabilizing effect on financial markets. Weakness in any of our market areas could have an adverse impact on our earnings, and consequently, our financial condition and capital adequacy.

#### Failure to effectively manage our interest rate risk could adversely affect us.

Our results of operations and cash flows are highly dependent upon net interest income. Interest rates are sensitive to economic and market conditions that are beyond our control, including the actions of the Federal Reserve’s Federal Open Market Committee (“FOMC”). Changes in monetary policy could influence interest income, interest expense, and the fair value of our financial assets and liabilities. If changes in interest rates on our interest-earning assets are not equal to the changes in interest rates on our interest-bearing liabilities, our net interest income and, therefore, our net income, could be adversely impacted.

As interest rates rise, our interest expense will increase and our net interest margins may decrease, negatively impacting our performance and our financial condition. To the extent banks and other financial services providers compete for interest-bearing deposit accounts through higher interest rates, our deposit base could be reduced if we are unwilling to pay those higher rates. If we decide to compete with those higher interest rates, our cost of funds could increase and our net interest margins could be reduced. Additionally, higher interest rates may impact our ability to originate new loans. Increases in interest rates could adversely affect the ability of our borrowers to meet higher payment obligations. If this occurred, it could cause an increase in nonperforming assets and net charge-offs.

The forecasts of future net interest income by our interest rate risk monitoring system are estimates and may be inaccurate. Actual interest rate movements may differ from our forecasts, and unexpected actions by the FOMC may have a direct impact on market interest rates. In response to the economic conditions resulting from the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Federal Reserve’s target federal funds rate has been reduced nearly to 0%. Stimulus payments related to the COVID-19 pandemic made by the federal government to businesses, non-profit organizations, taxpayers and others have had the incidental effect of adding to inflationary pressures. In an effort to counteract such pressures, the Federal Reserve has signaled its intent to raise interest rates in 2022. Increased interest rates may increase the cost of deposits and our other funding sources.

#### Accounting for acquired assets may result in earnings volatility.

Fair value discounts that are recorded at the time an asset is acquired are accreted into interest income based on accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). The rate at which those discounts are accreted is unpredictable and the result of various factors including prepayments and estimated credit losses. Post-acquisition credit deterioration results in the recognition of provision expense. Additionally, the income statement impact of adjustments to the indemnification asset recorded in certain FDIC-assisted transactions may occur over a shorter period of time than the adjustments to the covered assets.

Fair value discount accretion, post-acquisition impairment and adjustments to the indemnification asset may result in significant volatility in our earnings. Volatility in earnings could unfavorably influence investor interest in our common stock, thereby depressing the market value of our stock and the market capitalization of our company.

*The performance of equity securities and corporate bonds in our investment securities portfolio could be adversely impacted by the soundness and fluctuations in the market values of other financial institutions.*

Our investment securities portfolio contains certain equity securities and corporate bonds of other financial institutions. As a result, a portion of our investment securities portfolio is subject to fluctuation due to changes in the financial stability and market value of other financial institutions, as well as interest rate sensitivity to economic and market conditions. Such fluctuations could reduce the value of our investment securities portfolio and consequently have an adverse effect on our results of operations. We have seen volatile earnings impacts related to the fair value of equity securities in recent periods.

#### We may be adversely impacted by the transition from LIBOR as a reference rate.

We have loans, borrowings and other financial instruments with attributes that are either directly or indirectly dependent on the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”). In 2017, the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority (the “FCA”) announced that after 2021 it would no longer compel banks to submit the rates required to calculate LIBOR. In November 2020, to facilitate an orderly LIBOR transition, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the FDIC and the Federal Reserve jointly announced that entering into new contracts using LIBOR as a reference rate after December 31, 2021, would create a safety and soundness risk. On March 5, 2021, the FCA announced that all LIBOR settings will either cease to be provided by any administrator or no longer be representative immediately after December 31, 2021, in the case of 1-week and 2-month United States dollar LIBOR, and immediately after June 30, 2023, in the case of the remaining United States dollar LIBOR settings. In the United States, efforts to identify a set of alternative United States dollar reference interest rates are ongoing, and the Alternative Reference Rate Committee (the “ARRC”) has recommended the use of a Secured Overnight Funding Rate (“SOFR”). SOFR is different from LIBOR in that it is a backward-looking secured rate rather than a forward-looking unsecured rate. These differences could lead to a greater disconnect between the Bank’s costs to raise funds for SOFR as compared to LIBOR. For cash products and loans, the ARRC has also recommended Term SOFR, which is a forward-looking SOFR based on SOFR futures and may in part reduce differences between SOFR and LIBOR. To further reduce differences between replacement indices and substitute indices, some market practitioners have also gravitated towards credit sensitive alternative reference rates besides SOFR. At this time, it is not possible to predict whether and to what extent banks will continue to provide submissions for the calculation of LIBOR. Similarly, there is still uncertainty around how quickly replacement reference rates will develop sufficient liquidity and industry-wide usage, or what the effect of any such changes in views or alternatives may be on the markets for LIBOR-indexed financial instruments.

The transition from LIBOR is complex and is expected to create additional costs and risks. Since proposed replacement reference rates, such as SOFR, are calculated differently, payments under contracts referencing such rates will differ from those referencing LIBOR. If LIBOR rates are no longer available, and we are required to implement replacement reference rates for the calculation of interest rates under our loan agreements with borrowers, we may incur significant expense in effecting the transition and may be subject to disputes or litigation with our borrowers over the appropriateness or comparability to LIBOR of the replacement reference rates. Consequently, failure to adequately manage this transition process with our customers could adversely impact our reputation and potentially introduce additional legal risks. The replacement reference rates could also result in a reduction in our interest income. We may also receive inquiries and other actions from regulators with respect to our preparation and readiness for the replacement of LIBOR with replacement reference rates. The transition will change our market risk profiles, requiring changes to risk and pricing models, systems, contracts, valuation tools and product design, and failure to adequately manage this transition process could consequently have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

#### The value of our goodwill may decline in the future.

At December 31, 2021, we had $346.1 million of goodwill recorded as an asset on our balance sheet. We test goodwill for impairment at least annually, comparing the estimated fair value of a reporting unit with its net book value. We also test goodwill for impairment when certain events occur, such as a significant decline in our expected future cash flows, a significant adverse change in the business climate or a sustained decline in the price of our common stock. These tests may result in a write-off of goodwill deemed to be impaired, which could have a significant impact on our financial results.

*The market price of our common stock may be volatile due to its relative illiquidity and other factors.*

Although publicly traded, our common stock, particularly our Class B common stock, has less liquidity and public float than many other large, publicly traded financial services companies. Lower liquidity increases the price volatility of our common stock and could make it difficult for our shareholders to sell or buy our common stock at specific prices.

Excluding the impact of liquidity, the market price of our common stock can fluctuate widely in response to other factors, including expectations of financial and operating results, actual operating results, actions of institutional shareholders, speculation in the press or the investment community, market perception of acquisitions, including the CIT Merger, rating agency upgrades or downgrades, stock prices of other companies that are similar to us, general market expectations related to the financial services industry and the potential impact of government actions affecting the financial services industry. For example, the closing price per share of our Class A common stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market ranged from a low of $568.46 to a high of $907.04 during the year ended December 31, 2021.

### Liquidity Risks

*If our current level of balance sheet liquidity were to experience pressure, it could affect our ability to pay deposits and fund our operations.*

Our deposit base represents our primary source of core funding and balance sheet liquidity. We typically have the ability to stimulate core deposit growth through reasonable and effective pricing strategies. However, in circumstances where our ability to generate needed liquidity is impaired, we need access to non-core funding such as borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank and the Federal Reserve, Federal Funds purchased lines and brokered deposits. While we maintain access to these non-core funding sources, some sources are dependent on the availability of collateral as well as the counterparty’s willingness and ability to lend. Failure to access sources of liquidity may affect our ability to pay deposits and fund our operations.

*We expect to be subject to enhanced liquidity risk management requirements as a Category IV banking organization, subject to the applicable transition periods, including reporting, liquidity stress testing, and a liquidity buffer, and failure to meet these requirements could result in regulatory and compliance risks, and possible restrictions on our activities.*

As a result of the consummation of the CIT Merger, our total consolidated assets exceed $100 billion, and therefore we expect to be subject to enhanced liquidity risk management requirements as a Category IV banking organization, including reporting, liquidity stress testing and a liquidity buffer, subject to the applicable transition periods. Were we to meet or exceed certain thresholds for asset size and other risk-based factors, we would become subject to additional requirements under the Tailoring Rules. We expect to incur significant expense in continuing to develop policies, programs and systems designed to comply with all such requirements applicable to us. Failure to develop and maintain an adequate liquidity risk management and monitoring process may lead to adverse regulatory action (including possible restrictions on our activities).

*Fee revenues from overdraft and nonsufficient funds programs constitute a significant portion of our non-interest income and may be subject to increased supervisory scrutiny.*

Revenues derived from transaction fees associated with overdraft and nonsufficient funds (“NSF”) programs represent a significant portion of our non-interest income. In 2021, we collected approximately $54.9 million in overdraft and NSF fees, although we expect this amount to be reduced significantly in 2022 due to the reduction in our fees for overdrafts and elimination of NSF fees announced in January 2022. In 2021, certain members of Congress and the leadership of the CFPB expressed a heightened interest in bank overdraft and NSF programs. In December 2021, the CFPB published a report providing data on banks’ overdraft and NSF fee revenues as well as observations regarding consumer protection issues relating to such programs and in January 2022, the CFPB published an initiative seeking public input on experiences with respect to such fees, among others. The CFPB has indicated that it intends to pursue enforcement actions against banking organizations, and their executives, that oversee overdraft practices that are deemed to be unlawful.

In response to this increased congressional and regulatory scrutiny, and in anticipation of enhanced supervision and enforcement of overdraft practices in the future, certain banking organizations have begun to modify their overdraft programs. In January 2022, we announced an elimination of NSF fees and a decrease in overdraft fees. Continued competitive pressures from our peers, as well as any adoption by our regulators of new rules or supervisory guidance or more aggressive examination and enforcement policies in respect of banks’ overdraft fee practices, could cause us to further modify our program and practices in ways that may have a negative impact on our revenue and earnings, which, in turn, could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, as supervisory expectations and industry practices regarding overdraft fee programs change, our continued charging of overdraft fees may result in negative public opinion and increased reputation risk.

### Capital Adequacy Risks

*Our ability to grow is contingent upon access to capital, which may not be readily available to us.*

Our primary capital sources have been retained earnings and debt issued through both private and public markets. Rating agencies regularly evaluate our creditworthiness and assign credit ratings to us and FCB. The ratings of the agencies are based on a number of factors, some of which are outside our control. In addition to factors specific to our financial strength and performance, the rating agencies also consider conditions generally affecting the financial services industry. We may not be able to maintain our current credit ratings. Rating reductions could adversely affect our access to funding sources and the cost of obtaining funding.

Based on existing capital levels, we and FCB are well-capitalized under current leverage and risk-based capital standards. Our ability to grow is contingent on our ability to generate or otherwise access sufficient capital to remain well-capitalized under current and future capital adequacy guidelines.

*We are subject to capital adequacy and liquidity guidelines and, if we fail to meet these guidelines, our financial condition would be adversely affected.*

Under regulatory capital adequacy guidelines and other regulatory requirements, we, together with FCB, must meet certain capital and liquidity guidelines, subject to qualitative judgments by regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.

We are subject to capital rules issued by the Federal Reserve including required minimum capital and leverage ratios. These requirements could adversely affect our ability to pay dividends, restrict certain business activities or compel us to raise capital, each of which may adversely affect our results of operations or financial condition. Refer to the “Regulatory Considerations” section in Item 1. Business of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information regarding the capital requirements under the Dodd-Frank Act and Basel III.

We expect to be required to submit an annual capital plan to the Federal Reserve and to be subject to supervisory stress testing under the Federal Reserve’s CCAR process on a biennial basis as a Category IV banking organization, subject to the applicable transition periods. Under the CCAR process, the Federal Reserve will evaluate our planned capital distributions (e.g., dividends) included in our capital plan over the planning horizon (i.e., nine consecutive quarters, beginning with the quarter preceding the quarter in which the capital plan is submitted over which the relevant projections extend) to determine whether we will be able to meet our ongoing capital needs under a range of different economic scenarios. Failure to obtain a non-objection on our capital plan submitted to the Federal Reserve, or to demonstrate capital adequacy under the CCAR process, could result in restrictions in our ability to make dividends or other capital distributions. Refer to the “Regulatory Considerations” section of Item 1. Business of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information regarding the annual capital plan submission to the Federal Reserve and supervisory stress testing under the CCAR process.

*In connection with the CIT Merger, we assumed CIT’s outstanding debt obligations and preferred stock, and our resulting level of indebtedness could adversely affect our ability to raise additional capital and to meet our obligations under our existing indebtedness.*

In connection with the CIT Merger, we assumed certain of CIT’s outstanding indebtedness and CIT’s obligations related to its outstanding preferred stock. In February 2022, we redeemed approximately $2.9 billion of outstanding senior unsecured notes that we assumed in the CIT Merger. Our existing debt, together with any future incurrence of additional indebtedness, and the assumption of CIT’s outstanding notes and preferred stock, could have consequences that are materially adverse to our business, financial condition or results of operations. For example, it could: (i) limit our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, debt service requirements, acquisitions and general corporate or other purposes; (ii) restrict us from making strategic acquisitions or cause us to make non-strategic divestitures; (iii) restrict us from paying dividends to our shareholders; (iv) increase our vulnerability to general economic and industry conditions; or (v) require a substantial portion of cash flow from operations to be dedicated to the payment of principal and interest on our indebtedness and dividends on the preferred stock, thereby reducing our ability to use cash flows to fund our operations, capital expenditures and future business opportunities. Refer to the “Business Combinations” and “Borrowings” sections of Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further discussion of the debt we assumed in the CIT Merger, conversion of CIT Preferred Stock into BancShares Preferred Stock, and the redemption of approximately $2.9 billion of debt that we assumed in the CIT Merger.

### Compliance Risks

*We operate in a highly regulated industry, and the laws and regulations that govern our operations, taxes, corporate governance, executive compensation and financial accounting and reporting, including changes in them or our failure to comply with them, may adversely affect us.*

We operate in a highly regulated industry and are subject to many laws, rules, and regulations at both the federal and state levels. These broad-based laws, rules, and regulations include, but are not limited to, expectations relating to anti-money laundering, lending limits, client privacy, fair lending, prohibitions against unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices, regulatory reporting, and community reinvestment,

In addition, we must comply with other regulations that protect the deposit insurance fund and the stability of the United States financial system, including laws and regulations that, among other matters, prescribe minimum capital requirements, impose limitations on our business activities and investments, limit the dividends or distributions that we can pay, restrict the ability of our bank subsidiaries to guarantee our debt and impose certain specific accounting requirements that may be more restrictive and may result in greater or earlier charges to earnings or reductions in our capital than GAAP. Compliance with laws and regulations can be difficult and costly, and changes in laws and regulations often result in additional compliance costs.

We are subject to extensive federal and applicable state regulation and supervision, primarily through FCB and certain nonbank subsidiaries. Banking regulations are primarily intended to protect depositors’ funds, federal deposit insurance funds, and the banking system as a whole, not shareholders. These regulations affect our lending practices, capital structure, investment practices, dividend policy, and growth, among other things. Congress and federal regulatory agencies continually review banking laws, regulations, and policies for possible changes.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the related rules and regulations issued by the SEC and The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (“Nasdaq”), as well as numerous other more recently enacted statutes and regulations, including the Dodd-Frank Act, EGRRCPA, and regulations promulgated thereunder, have increased the scope, complexity and cost of corporate governance and reporting and disclosure practices, including the costs of completing our external audit and maintaining our internal controls. Such additional regulation and supervision may limit our ability to pursue business opportunities and result in a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

Changes to statutes, regulations, or regulatory policies, including changes in interpretation or implementation of statutes, regulations, or policies, could affect us in substantial and unpredictable ways. Such changes could subject us to additional costs, limit the types of financial services and products we may offer, or increase the ability of nonbanks to offer competing financial services and products, among other things. Failure to comply with laws, regulations, or policies could result in sanctions by regulatory agencies (including potential limitations on our future acquisitions or operations, or requirements to forfeit assets), civil money penalties, or reputation damage.

*We face compliance risks related to the specialty commercial business lines acquired from CIT.*

In connection with the CIT Merger, we acquired new business lines that are subject to new compliance risks. Our new rail business line is subject to various laws, rules and regulations administered by authorities in jurisdictions that were not applicable to us prior to the CIT Merger. In the United States, our equipment leasing operations, including for railcars, ships, and other equipment, are subject to rules and regulations relating to safety, operations, maintenance and mechanical standards promulgated by various federal and state agencies and industry organizations, including the United States Department of Transportation, the Federal Railroad Administration, the Association of American Railroads, the Maritime Administration, the United States Coast Guard, and the United States Environmental Protection Agency. We are also subject to regulation by governmental agencies in foreign countries in which we do business as a result of the CIT Merger. Our business operations and our equipment financing and leasing portfolios may be adversely impacted by rules and regulations promulgated by governmental and industry agencies, which could require substantial modification, maintenance, or refurbishment of our railcars, ships or other equipment, or could potentially make such equipment inoperable or obsolete. Failure to comply with these laws, rule and regulations could result in sanctions by regulatory agencies (including potential limitations on our future acquisitions or operations, or requirements to forfeit assets), civil money penalties, or reputation damage. Additionally, we may incur significant expenses in our efforts to comply with these laws, rules and regulations, and these laws, rules and regulations.

*We expect to be a Category IV banking organization and therefore we expect to be subject to enhanced prudential standards and enhanced supervision under the Dodd-Frank Act, as amended by the EGRRCPA, and implemented by the Tailoring Rules, subject to the applicable transition periods.*

As a result of consummation of the CIT Merger, our total consolidated assets exceed $100 billion, and therefore we expect to be subject to enhanced prudential standards under Section 165 of the Dodd-Frank Act, as amended by the EGRRCPA, and implemented by the Tailoring Rules, subject to the applicable transition periods. If we fail to develop and maintain at a reasonable cost the systems and processes necessary to comply with the standards and requirements imposed by these rules, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. Additionally, as we grow, and our assets exceed certain thresholds, regulatory requirements that we are subject to, as well as our compliance expenses, will increase. Refer to the “Regulatory Considerations” section of Item 1. Business of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information regarding the Tailoring Rules.

*The CFPB has reshaped the consumer financial laws through rulemaking and enforcement of the prohibitions against unfair, deceptive and abusive business practices. Compliance with any such change may impact the business operations of depository institutions offering consumer financial products or services, including FCB.*

The CFPB has broad rulemaking authority to administer and carry out the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act with respect to financial institutions that offer covered financial products and services to consumers. The CFPB is responsible for adopting rules identifying practices or acts that are unfair, deceptive or abusive in connection with any transaction with a consumer for a consumer financial product or service, or the offering of a consumer financial product or service. The CFPB has initiated enforcement actions against a variety of bank and non-bank market participants with respect to a number of consumer financial products and services that has resulted in those participants expending significant time, money and resources to adjust to the initiatives being pursued by the CFPB. The CFPB has pursued a more aggressive enforcement policy in respect of a range of regulatory compliance matters under the Biden Administration. CFPB enforcement actions may serve as precedent for how the CFPB interprets and enforces consumer protection laws, including practices or acts that are deemed to be unfair, deceptive or abusive, with respect to all supervised institutions, which may result in the imposition of higher standards of compliance with such laws. Moreover, we are subject to supervision and examination by the CFPB for compliance with the CFPB’s regulations and policies. The limitations and restrictions that may be placed upon us by the CFPB with respect to our consumer product offerings and services may produce significant, material effects on our profitability.

*We may be adversely affected by changes in United States and foreign tax laws and other tax laws and regulations.*

Corporate tax rates affect our profitability and capital levels. We are subject to the income tax laws of the United States, its states and their municipalities and to those of the foreign jurisdictions in which we do business. These tax laws are complex and may be subject to different interpretations. We must make judgments and interpretations about the application of these tax laws when determining our provision for income taxes, our deferred tax assets and liabilities and our valuation allowance. Changes to the tax laws, administrative rulings or court decisions could increase our provision for income taxes and reduce our net income. The United States corporate tax code may be reformed by the United States Congress and additional guidance may be issued by the United States Department of the Treasury. Changes in tax laws and regulations, and income tax rates in particular, could have an adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations. These changes could also affect our regulatory capital ratios as calculated in accordance with the Basel III Rules.

*We are subject to ESG risks such as climate risk, hiring practices, diversity, racial and social justice issues, including in relation to our counterparties, which may adversely affect our reputation and ability to retain employees and customers.*

We are subject to a variety of risks arising from environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) matters. ESG matters include, but are not limited to, climate risk, hiring practices, the diversity of our work force, and racial and social justice issues involving our personnel, customers and third parties with whom we otherwise do business. Investors have begun to consider the steps taken and resources allocated by financial institutions and other commercial organizations to address ESG matters when making investment and operational decisions. If our ESG practices do not meet (or are viewed as not meeting) investor or other industry stakeholder expectations and standards, which continue to evolve, our reputation and employee and customer retention may be negatively impacted. The Biden Administration, through Executive Orders and leadership appointments at the federal agencies, has communicated and sought to implement an agenda focused on oversight and legislative initiatives in a variety of areas material to our business, including addressing climate-related risks, promoting diversity and equality within the banking industry and addressing other ESG matters relevant to us. We could also incur additional costs and require additional resources to monitor, report and comply with various ESG practices. Further, we may be exposed to negative publicity based on the identity and activities of those to whom we lend and with which we otherwise do business and the public’s view of the approach and performance of our customers and business partners with respect to ESG matters.

### Asset Risks

*We may not be able to realize our entire investment in the equipment that we lease to our customers.*

Our loans and leases include a significant portion of leased equipment, including, but not limited to, railcars and locomotives, technology and office equipment and medical equipment. The realization of equipment values (residual values) during the life and at the end of the term of a lease is an important element in the profitability of our leasing business. At the inception of each lease, we record a residual value for the leased equipment based on our estimate of the future value of the equipment at the end of the lease term or end of the equipment’s estimated useful life. If the market value of leased equipment decreases at a rate greater than we projected, whether due to rapid technological or economic obsolescence, unusual wear and tear on the equipment, excessive use of the equipment, recession or other adverse economic conditions impacting supply and demand, it could adversely affect the current values or the residual values of such equipment.

### Financial Reporting Risks

*Accounting standards may change and increase our operating costs or otherwise adversely affect our results.*

FASB and the SEC periodically modify the standards governing the preparation of our financial statements. The nature of these changes is not predictable and has impacted and could further impact how we record transactions in our financial statements, which had led to and could lead to material changes in assets, liabilities, shareholders’ equity, revenues, expenses and net income. For example, ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, became effective January 1, 2020, and substantially changed the accounting for credit losses on loans and other financial assets. In some cases, we could be required to apply new or revised standards retroactively, resulting in changes to previously reported financial results or a cumulative adjustment to retained earnings. Implementation of new accounting rules or standards could additionally require us to implement technology changes which could impact ongoing earnings.

*Our accounting policies and processes are critical to the reporting of our financial condition and results of operations. They require management to make estimates about matters that are uncertain, and such estimates may be incorrect.*

Accounting policies and processes are fundamental to how we record and report our financial condition and results of operations. Management must exercise judgment in selecting and applying many of these accounting policies and processes so they comply with GAAP. In some cases, management must select the accounting policy or method to apply from two or more alternatives, any of which may be reasonable under the circumstances, yet may result in us reporting materially different results than would have been reported under a different alternative.

Management has identified certain accounting policies as being critical because they require management to make difficult, subjective or complex conclusions about matters that are uncertain. Materially different amounts could be reported under different conditions or using different assumptions or estimates. Because of the uncertainty surrounding management’s judgments and the estimates pertaining to these matters, we may be required to adjust accounting policies or restate prior period financial statements. Refer to “Critical Accounting Estimates” included in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

*Our business is highly quantitative and requires widespread use of financial models for day-to-day operations; these models may produce inaccurate predictions that significantly vary from actual results, and we may rely on these inaccurate predictions in making decisions that ultimately adversely affect our business.*

We rely on quantitative models to measure risks and to estimate certain financial values. Such models may be used in many processes including, but not limited to, the pricing of various products and services, classifications of loans, setting interest rates on loans and deposits, quantifying interest rate and other market risks, forecasting losses, measuring capital adequacy and calculating economic and regulatory capital levels. Models may also be used to estimate the value of financial instruments and balance sheet items. Inaccurate or erroneous models present the risk that business decisions relying on the models will prove inefficient, ineffective or harmful to us. Additionally, information we provide to our investors and regulators may be negatively impacted by inaccurately designed or implemented models. For further information on risk monitoring, refer to the “Risk Management” section included in Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

*We may fail to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting, which could hinder our ability to prevent fraud and provide reliable financial reports to key stakeholders.*

We must have effective internal controls over financial reporting in order to provide reliable financial reports, to effectively prevent fraud and to operate successfully as a public company. If we are unable to provide reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, our reputation and operating results will be harmed and we may violate regulatory requirements or otherwise become subject to legal liability. We may discover material weaknesses or significant deficiencies requiring remediation, which would require additional expense and diversion of management attention, among other consequences. A “material weakness” is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal controls over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of a company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

Any failure to maintain effective internal controls or to implement any necessary improvement of our internal controls in a timely manner could, among other things, result in losses from fraud or error, harm our reputation or cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, each of which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition and the market value of our common stock.

## Properties

As filed, 719 characters.

We are headquartered in a nine-story building with approximately 163,000 square feet that is located in Raleigh, North Carolina, which is owned by FCB. In addition, FCB owns and occupies two separate facilities in Raleigh as well as a facility in Columbia, South Carolina, which serve as data and operations centers. As of December 31, 2021, FCB operated 529 branch offices throughout the Southeast, Mid-Atlantic, Midwest and Western United States. FCB owns many of our branch buildings and leases other facilities from third parties.

Additional information relating to premises, equipment and lease commitments is set forth in Note F, Premises and Equipment, of BancShares’ Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

## Legal proceedings

As filed, 577 characters.

The Parent Company’s and various subsidiaries are named as defendants in various legal actions arising from our normal business activities in which damages in various amounts are claimed. Although the amount of any ultimate liability with respect to those matters cannot be determined, in the opinion of management, no legal actions exist that would be material to BancShares’ consolidated financial statements. Additional information related to legal proceedings is set forth in Note T, Commitments and Contingencies, of BancShares’ Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

## Management's discussion and analysis

As filed, 93,578 characters.

Management’s discussion and analysis (“MD&A”) of earnings and related financial data is presented to assist in understanding the financial condition and results of operations of First Citizens BancShares, Inc. (the “Parent Company” and when including all of its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis, “BancShares”, “we,” “us,” or “our”) and its banking subsidiary, First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company (“FCB”). Unless otherwise noted, the terms “we,” “us,” “our,” and “BancShares” in this section refer to the consolidated financial position and consolidated results of operations for BancShares.

This MD&A is expected to provide our investors with a view of BancShares’ financial condition and results of operations from our management’s perspective. This MD&A should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes presented in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Refer to further detail in Note A, Accounting Policies and Basis of Presentation, of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Although certain amounts for prior years have been reclassified to conform to statement presentations for 2021, the reclassifications had no effect on shareholders’ equity or net income as previously reported.

On January 3, 2022, BancShares completed its largest acquisition to date with the merger with CIT Group Inc. (“CIT”) and its subsidiary CIT Bank, N.A., a national banking association (“CIT Bank”) pursuant to the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Agreement and Plan of Merger (as amended, the “Merger Agreement”). CIT had consolidated total assets of approximately $53.2 billion at December 31, 2021. We expect substantive changes to our future results due to the merger with CIT (the “CIT Merger”). Some key anticipated reporting impacts related to the CIT Merger include, but are not limited to: (i) increases in our interest income from the loans acquired in the CIT Merger and expected originations and funding of similar types of loans, (ii) increases in interest expense from deposits and debt assumed from CIT, (iii) higher non-interest income generated from the legacy CIT activity, plus an added revenue stream from the operating lease equipment, (iv) higher non-interest expenses related to the added employees as well as the depreciation and maintenance costs on the operating lease portfolio, and (v) higher net charge-offs due to the loans acquired in the CIT Merger and expected originations and funding of similar types of loans. We also expect changes in our regulatory capital ratios due to (i) increases in risk weighted assets from the assets acquired in the CIT Merger and (ii) increases in regulatory capital, primarily related the conversion of common and preferred stock and the assumption of subordinated debt in connection with the CIT Merger. The CIT Merger is described further in the “Business Combinations” section of this MD&A and in Item 1. Business included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Year-over-year comparisons of the financial results for 2020 and 2019 are contained in Item 7. of BancShares’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2020 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on February 24, 2021 and available through FCB’s website www.firstcitizens.com or the SEC’s EDGAR database.

### FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K may contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 regarding the financial condition, results of operations, business plans and future performance of BancShares. Words such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “forecasts,” “intends,” “plans,” “projects,” “targets,” “designed,” “could,” “may,” “should,” “will” or other similar words and expressions are intended to identify these forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on BancShares’ current expectations and assumptions regarding BancShares’ business, the economy, and other future conditions.

Because forward-looking statements relate to future results and occurrences, they are subject to inherent risks, uncertainties, changes in circumstances and other factors that are difficult to predict. Many possible events or factors could affect BancShares’ future financial results and performance and could cause the actual results, performance or achievements of BancShares to differ materially from any anticipated results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, among others, general competitive, economic, political, and market conditions, the impacts of the global COVID-19 pandemic on BancShares’ business, and customers, the financial success or changing conditions or strategies of BancShares’ customers or vendors, fluctuations in interest rates, actions of government regulators, the availability of capital and personnel, the failure to realize the anticipated benefits of BancShares’ previously announced acquisition transaction(s), including the recently-completed CIT Merger discussed further in the “Business Combinations” section of this MD&A, and the risks discussed in Item 1A. Risk Factors of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and other developments or changes in our business that we do not expect.

Except to the extent required by applicable law or regulation, BancShares disclaims any obligation to update such factors or to publicly announce the results of any revisions to any of the forward-looking statements included herein to reflect future events or developments.

### CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

The accounting and reporting policies of BancShares are in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and are described in Note A, Accounting Policies and Basis of Presentation, of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to exercise judgment in determining many of the estimates and assumptions utilized to arrive at the carrying value of assets and liabilities and amounts reported for revenues and expenses. Our financial position and results of operations could be materially affected by changes to these estimates and assumptions.

We consider accounting estimates to be critical to reported financial results if (i) the accounting estimate requires management to make assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain and (ii) different estimates that management reasonably could have used for the accounting estimate in the current period, or changes in the accounting estimate that are reasonably likely to occur from period to period, could have a material impact on our financial statements. Accounting policies related to the allowance for credit losses (“ACL”) are considered to be critical accounting estimates as these policies involve considerable judgment and estimation by management.

The ACL represents management’s best estimate of credit losses expected over the life of the loan, adjusted for expected contractual payments and the impact of prepayment expectations. Prepayment assumptions were developed through a review of BancShares’ historical prepayment activity and considered forecasts of relevant economic conditions, as well as prepayment assumptions utilized in other modeling activities. Estimates for loan losses are determined by analyzing quantitative and qualitative components present as of the evaluation date. Adjustments to the ACL are recorded with a corresponding entry to provision for credit losses. Loan balances considered uncollectible are charged-off against the ACL. Forecasted loss given defaults (LGDs) are adjusted for expected recoveries and realized recoveries of amounts previously charged-off are credited to the ACL.

While management utilizes its best judgment and information available, the ultimate adequacy of our ACL is dependent upon a variety of factors beyond our control which are inherently difficult to predict, the most significant being the economic scenario forecast used in the models. Our ACL forecast considers a range of economic scenarios from an upside scenario to a severely adverse scenario and the December 31, 2021 ACL forecast was calculated using the consensus baseline scenario. Results ranged from approximately $170 million in the upside scenario to approximately $260 million in the severely adverse scenario. Our recorded ACL at December 31, 2021 totaled $178.5 million.

Significant macroeconomic factors used in estimating the expected losses include unemployment, gross domestic product, home price index and commercial real estate index. Current economic conditions and forecasts can change which could affect the anticipated amount of estimated credit losses and therefore the appropriateness of the ACL. It is difficult to estimate how potential changes in any one economic factor or input might affect the overall ACL because a wide variety of factors and inputs are considered in estimating the ACL and changes in those factors and inputs considered may not occur at the same rate and may not be consistent across all product types. Additionally, changes in factors and inputs may be directionally inconsistent, such that improvement in one factor may offset deterioration in others.

Refer to Note A, Accounting Policies and Basis of Presentation, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for discussion of our accounting policies for the ACL and the implementation impact of ASC 326. Refer to Note E, Allowance for Credit Losses, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional disclosures.

### CURRENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

Table 1 below lists the Accounting Standard Updates (“ASUs”) issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) that were recently adopted by BancShares. Refer to Note A, Accounting Policies and Basis of Presentation, in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.

### RECENTLY ADOPTED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

| Standard | Date of Adoption |
| --- | --- |
| FASB ASU 2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes. | January 1, 2021 |
| ASU 2020-01 - Clarifying the Interactions between Investments-Equity Securities (Topic 321), Investments-Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323), and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) | January 1, 2021 |
| FASB ASU 2020-08, Codification Improvements to Subtopic 310-20, Receivables - Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs | January 1, 2021 |
| ASU 2020-10, Codification Improvements | January 1, 2021 |

### EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

The Parent Company conducts its banking operations through FCB, a state-chartered bank organized under the laws of the state of North Carolina.

Our earnings and cash flows are primarily derived from our commercial and retail banking activities. We gather deposits from retail and commercial customers and we secure funding through various non-deposit sources. We invest the liquidity generated from these funding sources in interest-earning assets, including loans, investment securities and overnight investments. We also invest in bank premises, computer hardware and software and furniture and equipment used to conduct our commercial and retail banking business. We provide treasury management services, cardholder and merchant services, wealth management services and other products and services typically offered by commercial banks. The fees generated from these products and services are a primary source of noninterest income and an essential component of our total revenue.

Our strong financial position enables us to pursue growth through strategic acquisitions to enhance organizational value by providing opportunities to grow capital and increase earnings. These transactions allow us to strengthen our presence in existing markets as well as expand our footprint into new markets.

With interest rates near historical lows, our ability to generate earnings and shareholder value has been challenging. While our balance sheet is asset sensitive overall, we seek to reduce volatility and minimize the risk to earnings from interest rate movements in either direction. Additionally, our initiatives focus on growth of noninterest income sources, management of noninterest expenses, optimization of our branch network and further enhancements to our technology and delivery channels.

In lending, we continue to focus our activities within our core competencies of retail, small business, medical, commercial and commercial real estate lending to build a diversified portfolio. Our low to moderate risk appetite continues to govern all lending activities.

We also pursue noninterest income through enhanced credit card offerings and wealth management and merchant services. We have recently redesigned our credit card programs to offer more competitive products, intended to both increase the number of accounts and frequency of card usage. Enhancements include more comprehensive reward programs and improved card benefits. In wealth management, we have broadened our products and services to better align with the specialized needs and desires of those customers. Services include holistic financial planning, business owner advisory services and enhanced private banking offerings.

Our goals are to increase efficiencies and control costs while effectively executing an operating model that best serves our customers’ needs. We seek the appropriate footprint and staffing levels to take advantage of the revenue opportunities in each of our markets. Management is pursuing opportunities to improve operational efficiency and increase profitability through expense control, while continuing enterprise sustainability projects to improve the operating environment. Such initiatives include the automation of certain manual processes, elimination of duplicated and outdated systems, enhancements to existing technology, implementation of new digital technologies, outsourcing to third party service providers and actively managing personnel expenses and discretionary spending. We routinely review vendor agreements and third party contracts for cost savings.

The CIT Merger is addressed in the “Business Combinations” section of this MD&A.

### Economic and Industry Updates

The COVID-19 pandemic that began in 2020 has caused significant disruptions to the domestic and global economies which continue to date. In response to the outbreak, governments imposed restrictions resulting in business shutdowns, regional quarantines, disruptions of supply chains, changes in consumer behavior and overall economic instability.

Indicators of economic activity have begun to return to pre-pandemic levels, but as 2021 progressed variants to COVID-19 led to a significant rise in cases. This uncertainty contributed to continued volatility in the financial markets, and supply and demand imbalances related to the pandemic and the reopening of the economy have continued to contribute to elevated levels of inflation. For a discussion of the risks we face with respect to the COVID-19 pandemic, the associated economic uncertainty, the steps taken to mitigate the pandemic and the resulting economic contraction, refer to Item 1A. Risk Factors included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Various external factors influence the focus of our business efforts and the results of our operations can change significantly based on those external factors. Based on the real gross domestic product (“GDP”) information available (Bureau of Economic Analysis (“BEA”) release, January 2022), the BEA’s revised estimate for GDP showed an annual rate increase of 6.9% percent in the fourth quarter of 2021, in contrast to a decrease of 4.0% percent in 2020. In accordance with this BEA release, the increase in real GDP primarily reflected increases in private inventory investment, exports, personal consumption expenditures, and nonresidential fixed investment. Imports, which are a subtraction in the calculation of GDP, increased. The fourth quarter GDP continued to reflect the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, including continued restrictions and disruptions in operations of businesses in certain areas of the United States. In the fourth quarter of 2021, government assistance payments in the form of forgivable loans to businesses, grants to state and local governments, and social benefits to households all decreased as provisions of several federal programs expired or tapered off. The full economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic were not quantified in the GDP estimate for the fourth quarter because the impacts are generally embedded in source data and cannot be separately identified.

The U.S. unemployment rate decreased from 6.7% in December 2020 to 3.9% in December 2021. According to the U.S. Department of Labor, nonfarm payroll employment increased 6.5 million in 2021, compared to decline of 9.2 million in 2020.

During the first quarter of 2020, the FOMC lowered the federal funds rate to a target range of 0.00% to 0.25%. The FOMC cited the effects of COVID-19 on economic activity and the risks posed to the economic outlook. In its release in January 2022, the FOMC said it seeks to achieve maximum employment and inflation at the rate of 2 percent over the longer run. In support of these goals, the FOMC kept the target range for the federal funds rate at 0.00% to 0.25%. The release stated that, with inflation well above 2 percent and a strong labor market, the FOMC expects it will soon be appropriate to raise the target range for the federal funds rate.

The U.S. Census Bureau and the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s latest estimate for sales of new single-family homes in December 2021 was at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 811,000, down 14% from the December 2020 estimate of 943,000. Purchases of existing homes in 2021 are up 8.5% from a year ago.

### COVID-19 Monitoring and Response

Throughout the outbreak of the “COVID-19” pandemic, we remained in a strong capital and liquidity position providing stability to our employees, customers and shareholders. Our leadership team worked quickly to identify and enact appropriate measures in an effort to protect the welfare of our employees and soundness of the organization, while continuing to support our customers.

The Small Business Administration Paycheck Protection Program (“SBA-PPP”) is one of the centerpieces of the Coronavirus Aid Relief and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”), which was passed on March 27, 2020 in response to COVID-19 and was supplemented with subsequent legislation. Overseen by the U.S. Treasury Department, the SBA-PPP offered cash-flow assistance to nonprofit and small business employers through guaranteed loans for expenses incurred between February 15, 2020, and August 8, 2020 (“Round 1”). Borrowers are eligible for forgiveness of principal and accrued interest on SBA-PPP loans to the extent that the proceeds were used to cover eligible payroll costs, interest costs, rent, and utility costs over a period of between eight and 24-weeks after the loan was made as long as the borrower retains its employees and their compensation levels. The CARES Act authorized the SBA to temporarily guarantee these loans. The SBA began processing forgiveness payments during the fourth quarter of 2020. The Consolidated Appropriations Act 2021 was signed into law during the fourth quarter of 2020 and contained provisions for a second round of funding of SBA-PPP loans (“Round 2”). BancShares originated a total of $3.2 billion of Round 1 loans and $1.2 billion of Round 2 loans. As of December 31, 2021, the total remaining balance of SBA-PPP loans was $493.8 million, net of deferred fees, primarily due to $3.9 billion of forgiveness. To date, we have not seen declines in overall credit quality, though the impacts of these actions and other government stimulus could be delaying signs of credit deterioration

#### Strong Liquidity and Capital Position

We maintain a strong level of liquidity. As of December 31, 2021, liquid assets (available cash and unencumbered high quality liquid assets at market value) totaled approximately $16.41 billion, representing 28.1% of consolidated assets as of December 31, 2021. In addition to liquid assets, we had contingent sources of liquidity totaling approximately $13.43 billion in the form of Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) borrowing capacity, Federal Reserve Discount Window availability, federal funds lines and a committed line of credit. At December 31, 2021, our regulatory capital ratios were well in excess of Basel III requirements as further addressed in the Shareholders’ Equity and Capital Adequacy discussion in this MD&A.

### Changes to Approach for Nonsufficient Funds and Overdraft Fees

As previously announced, we plan to change our approach for nonsufficient fund (“NSF”) and overdraft fees. Beginning mid-year 2022, we plan to eliminate our NSF fees and significantly lower our overdraft fees from $36 to $10 on consumer accounts. We believe these changes are necessary to remain competitive in the current marketplace.

### FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE SUMMARY

#### Income Statement Highlights

For the year ended December 31, 2021, net income available to common shareholders was $528.9 million, or $53.88 per share, compared to $477.7 million, or $47.50 per share, during 2021. The return on average assets was 1.00% during 2021, compared to 1.07% during 2020. The return on average common shareholders’ equity was 12.84% and 12.96% for 2021 and 2020, respectively. The $51.2 million, or 10.7% increase in net income available to common shareholders was primarily the result of the net effect of the following:

- Net interest income for the year ended December 31, 2021 increased $2.2 million, or by 0.2%, compared to the year ended December 31, 2020. While total net interest income did not fluctuate significantly year over year, there were individual components that did fluctuate. The items positively impacting net interest income included increased loan, investment and overnight balances, as well as lower deposit rates and an increase in SBA-PPP income. These increases were largely offset by a decline in the yield on interest-earning assets.
- The taxable-equivalent net interest margin was 2.66% for the year ended December 31, 2021, a decrease of 51 basis points from the year ended December 31, 2020. The margin decline was primarily due to changes in earning asset mix and a decline in the yield on interest-earning assets, partially offset by lower rates paid on interest-bearing deposits and increased fee income from SBA-PPP loans.
- The benefit for credit losses was $36.8 million for the year ending December 31, 2021, compared to a provision for credit losses of $58.4 million for 2020. Credit losses in 2021 were favorably impacted by a $45.8 million reserve release, primarily driven by improvement in macroeconomic factors, continued strong credit performance, and low net charge-offs, while 2020 included a $35.9 million reserve build, primarily related to uncertainties surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic. The net charge-off to average loans ratio was 0.03% for 2021, down 4 basis points from 0.07% in 2020.
- Noninterest income for the year ended December 31, 2021 was $508.0 million, an increase of $31.3 million, or 6.6%, from 2020. The favorable changes from the prior year were primarily driven by improvements in revenue related to

wealth, card, and merchant, partially offset by lower realized gains on sales of available for sale securities and a decline in mortgage income.

- Noninterest expense was $1.23 billion for the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to $1.19 billion for 2020. This increase was primarily attributable to higher personnel expenses and other operating expenses such as processing fees to third parties, and merger-related expenses. These increases were partially offset by declines in other expense categories, such as collection and foreclosure-related expenses.
- Income tax expense was $154.2 million and $126.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively, representing effective tax rates of 22.0% and 20.4%, respectively.

#### Balance Sheet Highlights

- Total loans were $32.37 billion as of December 31, 2021, a decrease of $420.5 million or 1.3% compared to $32.79 billion as of December 31, 2020. The decrease was primarily due to declines of $1.91 billion or 79.5% in SBA-PPP loans, which were primarily due to forgiveness of approximately $3.9 billion, partially offset by originations and recognition of deferred fees. The decrease in SBA-PPP loans was largely offset by increases of $827.6 million in owner occupied commercial mortgages and $697.0 million in commercial and industrial. These increases are primarily due to growth in commercial lines, equipment leasing, and our government lending portfolios.
- The allowance for credit losses as a percentage of total loans was 0.55% as of December 31, 2021, compared to 0.68% as of December 31, 2020. Nonperforming assets include nonaccrual loans and other real estate owned (“OREO”). Nonperforming assets decreased $82.7 million to $159.6 million, or 0.49% of total loans, as of December 31, 2021 from $242.4 million, or 0.74% of total loans, as of December 31, 2020.
- Total deposits increased by $7.97 billion, or 18.4%, to $51.41 billion as of December 31, 2021 from $43.43 billion as of December 31, 2020. The increases were primarily composed of $3.39 billion in demand deposits, $2.10 billion in checking with interest, and $1.96 billion in money market. The growth in deposits is composed of a mix of new clients and existing clients and is generally from our commercial customers.

#### Capital Highlights

- For the year ended December 31, 2021, we returned $37.0 million of capital to shareholders through the distribution of cash dividends to common and preferred shareholders.
- Total shareholders’ equity increased $508.0 million or 12.0% to $4.74 billion as of December 31, 2021 from $4.23 billion as of December 31, 2020. The increase was primarily due to net income, partially offset by common and preferred dividends during the year.
- Under Basel III capital requirements, BancShares remained well-capitalized at December 31, 2021, with a total risk-based capital ratio of 14.35%, Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 12.47%, common equity Tier 1 risk-based ratio of 11.50%, and Tier 1 leverage ratio of 7.59%.

### BUSINESS COMBINATIONS

### CIT Group Inc.

On January 3, 2022, BancShares completed the CIT Merger pursuant to the Merger Agreement. The CIT Merger brings together FCB’s retail franchise and full suite of banking products with CIT’s nationwide commercial lending and direct digital banking. Due to the timing of the CIT Merger, the balances and results of operations of CIT are not included in BancShares’ reported financial results in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Refer to further discussion in Note W, Subsequent Events, in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements and Item 1. Business included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The CIT Merger will be accounted for as a business combination. The assets and liabilities of CIT will be recorded at fair value. Due to the timing of the CIT Merger, the fair value estimates of CIT’s assets and liabilities are not available to disclose in this Annual Report on Form 10-K as of and for the year ended December 31, 2021. At December 31, 2021, the book value of CIT’s total assets was approximately $53.2 billion, which primarily consisted of approximately $32.8 billion of loans, $8.0 billion of operating lease assets, $6.8 billion of investment securities and $3.0 billion of cash. At December 31, 2021, the book value of CIT’s total liabilities was approximately $46.9 billion, which primarily consisted of approximately $39.4 billion of deposits, $3.7 billion senior unsecured notes and $495 million subordinated unsecured notes.

Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the Boards of Directors of the Parent Company and FCB now consist of 14 directors, (i) 11 of whom were members of the legacy Board of Directors of the Parent Company, and (ii) three of whom were selected from among the former Board of Directors of CIT, including Ellen R. Alemany, former Chairwoman and Chief Executive Officer of CIT, Michael A. Carpenter, and Vice Admiral John R. Ryan, USN (Ret.).

#### Common Stock Conversion

Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, each share of CIT common stock, par value $0.01 per share (“CIT Common Stock”), issued and outstanding, except for certain shares of CIT Common Stock owned by CIT or BancShares, was converted into the right to receive 0.062 shares (the “Exchange Ratio” and such shares, the “Merger Consideration”) of the Parent Company’s Class A Common Stock, par value $1.00 per share (“Class A Common Stock”), plus, cash in lieu of fractional shares of Class A Common Stock. The Parent Company issued approximately 6.1 million shares of its Class A Common Stock in connection with the consummation of the CIT Merger. The closing share price of the Class A Common Stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market was $859.76 on January 3, 2022. There were approximately 8,800 fractional shares for which the Parent Company paid cash of approximately $7.2 million.

#### Preferred Stock Conversion

Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, each issued and outstanding share of fixed-to-floating rate non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock, series A, par value $0.01 per share, of CIT (“CIT Series A Preferred Stock”) and each issued and outstanding share of 5.625% non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock, series B, par value $0.01 per share, of CIT (“CIT Series B Preferred Stock”), converted into the right to receive one share of a newly created series of preferred stock, series B, of the Parent Company (“BancShares Series B Preferred Stock”) and one share of a newly created series of preferred stock, series C, of the Parent Company (“BancShares Series C Preferred Stock” and together with the BancShares Series B Preferred Stock, the “New BancShares Preferred Stock”), respectively, having such rights, preferences, privileges and voting powers, and limitations and restrictions, taken as a whole, that are not materially less favorable to the holders thereof than the rights, preferences, privileges and voting powers, and limitations and restrictions, taken as a whole, of the CIT Series A Preferred Stock and the CIT Series B Preferred Stock, respectively. The non-callable period for the New BancShares Preferred Stock was extended for five years to January 4, 2027. There are 325,000 shares of BancShares Series B Preferred Stock with a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share, resulting in a total liquidation preference of $325 million. There are 8 million shares of BancShares Series C Preferred Stock with a liquidation preference of $25 per share, resulting in a total liquidation preference of $200 million. The New BancShares Preferred Stock qualifies as Tier 1 capital.

#### Restricted Stock Conversion

Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, (i) each restricted stock unit (“RSU”) award or performance stock unit (“PSU”) award in respect of shares of CIT Common Stock, including any deferred RSU award (each, a “CIT Award”) outstanding, other than a CIT Director RSU Award (defined below), automatically converted into a RSU in respect of a number of shares of Class A Common Stock (a “BancShares Award”) equal to (a) the number of shares of CIT Common Stock subject to such CIT Award based on target level performance multiplied by (b) the Exchange Ratio, subject to the same terms and conditions applicable to the existing CIT Award (except, in the case of PSU awards, for any performance goals or metrics), and (ii) each RSU award in respect of shares of CIT Common Stock that (a) was outstanding and unvested, (b) was held by a member of the Board of

Directors of CIT, (c) automatically vested upon close of the CIT Merger in accordance with its terms, and (d) was not subject to a deferral election (each, a “CIT Director RSU Award”) automatically converted into the right to receive the applicable Merger Consideration.

#### Assumption of Debt Securities

In connection with the CIT Merger, FCB assumed the following issued and outstanding series of CIT debt securities: (i) $1.25 billion 5.00% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2022 (the “2022 Notes”), (ii) $750 million 5.00% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2023 (the “2023 Notes”); (iii) $500 million 4.750% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2024 (the “2024 Notes”); (iv) $500 million 3.929% Senior Unsecured Fixed-to-Floating Rate Notes due 2024; (v) $500 million 5.250% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2025 (the “2025 Notes”); (vi) $550 million 2.969% Senior Unsecured Fixed-to-Floating Rate Notes due 2025; (vii) $500 million 6.00% Senior Notes due 2036; (viii) $400 million 6.125% Subordinated Notes due 2028; and (ix) $100 million 4.125% Fixed-to-Floating Rate Subordinated Notes due 2029.

#### Redemption of Assumed Senior Unsecured Notes

As part of its liability management to reduce higher debt costs, on January 24, 2022 BancShares announced FCB’s intention, and on February 24, 2022, completed, a redemption of approximately $2.9 billion of senior unsecured notes that were assumed in the CIT Merger. Using excess liquidity, FCB redeemed all of the outstanding $1.1 billion aggregate principal amount of the 2022 Notes, $750 million aggregate principal amount of the 2023 Notes, $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of the 2024 Notes, and $500 million aggregate principal amount of the 2025 Notes.

#### Expected Impact to Segment Reporting

As of December 31, 2021, we manage our business and report our financial results as a single segment. Due to the CIT Merger, we intend to begin reporting multiple segments in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2022. We plan to report financial results in three operating segments: General Banking, Commercial Banking, and Rail, and a non-operating segment, Corporate. We will also conform prior period comparisons to the new segment presentation. Based on the planned approach for segment disclosures to be implemented during the first quarter of 2022, the substantial majority of BancShares’ operations for historical periods prior to the CIT Merger will be reflected in the General Banking segment. This is further addressed in the “Business Combinations” section of Item 1. Business in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

### Community Financial Holding Co. Inc.

On February 1, 2020, we completed the merger of Duluth, Georgia-based Community Financial Holding Company, Inc. (“Community Financial”) and its bank subsidiary, Gwinnett Community Bank, into FCB. Under the terms of the agreement, total cash consideration of $2.3 million was paid to the shareholders of Community Financial. The merger allowed us to expand our presence and enhance banking efforts in Georgia. The merger contributed $221.4 million in consolidated assets (when including purchase accounting adjustments), which included $686 thousand of goodwill, $134.0 million in loans, and $209.3 million in deposits.

Refer to Note B, Business Combinations, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional disclosures.

### FDIC-ASSISTED TRANSACTIONS

BancShares completed fourteen FDIC-assisted transactions between 2009 and 2017. Nine of the fourteen FDIC-assisted transactions included shared-loss agreements which, for their terms, protected us from a substantial portion of the credit and asset quality risk we would otherwise have incurred.

FDIC-assisted transactions may include provisions related to payments owed to the FDIC at the termination of the agreements if actual cumulative losses on covered assets are lower than originally estimated by the FDIC at the time of acquisition (“Clawback Liability”). There was no Clawback Liability remaining at December 31, 2021 as FCB remitted the final payment of $16.1 million to the FDIC during the first quarter of 2021.

Table 2 provides changes in the FDIC Clawback Liability for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.

### FDIC CLAWBACK LIABILITY

*(Dollars in thousands)*

|  | 2021 | 2020 |
| --- | ---: | ---: |
| Beginning balance | $15,601 | $112,395 |
| Accretion | 502 | 2,674 |
| Payments to FDIC for settlement of shared-loss agreements | (16,103) | (99,468) |
| Ending balance | $— | $15,601 |

### Table 3

### AVERAGE BALANCE SHEETS

*(Dollars in thousands, taxable equivalent)*

| Assets | 2021 Average Balance | Interest Income/ Expense | Yield/ Rate | 2020 Average Balance | Interest Income/ Expense | Yield/ Rate |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Loans and leases(1)(2) | $32,860,019 | $1,297,012 | 3.91% | $31,605,090 | $1,335,008 | 4.18% |
| Investment securities(2): |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| U.S. Treasury | 235,849 | 1,573 | 0.67 | 432,938 | 3,103 | 0.72 |
| Government agency | 822,177 | 7,323 | 0.89 | 665,318 | 8,457 | 1.27 |
| Mortgage-backed securities | 8,833,957 | 103,534 | 1.17 | 7,414,661 | 108,604 | 1.46 |
| Corporate bonds | 608,299 | 30,940 | 5.09 | 397,322 | 20,349 | 5.12 |
| Other investments | 110,468 | 2,005 | 1.82 | 144,694 | 4,254 | 2.94 |
| Total investment securities | 10,610,750 | 145,375 | 1.37 | 9,054,933 | 144,767 | 1.60 |
| Overnight investments | 8,348,903 | 10,997 | 0.13 | 2,691,096 | 6,847 | 0.25 |
| Total interest-earning assets | 51,819,672 | $1,453,384 | 2.78% | 43,351,119 | $1,486,622 | 3.40% |
| Cash and due from banks | 349,721 |  |  | 344,938 |  |  |
| Premises and equipment | 1,243,052 |  |  | 1,259,325 |  |  |
| Allowance for credit losses | (202,260) |  |  | (211,413) |  |  |
| Other real estate owned | 44,252 |  |  | 53,137 |  |  |
| Other assets | 1,728,384 |  |  | 1,224,332 |  |  |
| Total assets | $54,982,821 |  |  | $46,021,438 |  |  |
| **Liabilities** |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Interest-bearing deposits: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Checking with interest | $11,257,713 | $5,645 | 0.05% | $8,922,902 | $5,913 | 0.07% |
| Savings | 3,846,732 | 1,291 | 0.03 | 2,936,593 | 1,217 | 0.04 |
| Money market accounts | 9,707,747 | 9,722 | 0.10 | 7,821,266 | 22,504 | 0.29 |
| Time deposits | 2,647,697 | 16,582 | 0.63 | 3,344,492 | 37,001 | 1.11 |
| Total interest-bearing deposits | 27,459,889 | 33,240 | 0.12 | 23,025,253 | 66,635 | 0.29 |
| Securities sold under customer repurchase agreements | 660,288 | 1,312 | 0.20 | 632,362 | 1,610 | 0.25 |
| Other short-term borrowings | — | — | — | 50,549 | 1,054 | 2.05 |
| Long-term obligations | 1,225,661 | 26,124 | 2.12 | 1,186,145 | 26,558 | 2.20 |
| Total interest-bearing liabilities | 29,345,838 | 60,676 | 0.21 | 24,894,309 | 95,857 | 0.38 |
| Demand deposits | 20,798,697 |  |  | 16,721,363 |  |  |
| Other liabilities | 377,564 |  |  | 451,759 |  |  |
| Shareholders’ equity | 4,460,722 |  |  | 3,954,007 |  |  |
| Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | $54,982,821 |  |  | $46,021,438 |  |  |
| Interest rate spread |  |  | 2.57% |  |  | 3.02% |
| Net interest income and net yield on interest-earning assets |  | $1,392,708 | 2.66% |  | $1,390,765 | 3.17% |

(1) Loans and leases include non-PCD and PCD loans, nonaccrual loans and loans held for sale. Interest income on loans and leases includes accretion income and loan fees. Loan fees were $110.1 million, $85.7 million, and $9.7 million for the years ended 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively.

(2) Yields related to loans, leases and securities exempt from both federal and state income taxes, federal income taxes only, or state income taxes only are stated on a taxable-equivalent basis assuming statutory federal income tax rates of 21.0% for 2021, 2020, and 2019, as well as state income tax rates of 3.3%, 3.5%, and 3.9% for the years ended 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively. The taxable-equivalent adjustment was $2.4 million, $2.6 million, and $3.6 million, for the years ended 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively.

(3) The rate/volume variance is allocated proportionally between the changes in volume and rate.

### AVERAGE BALANCE SHEETS (continued)

| 2019 Average Balance | Interest Income/ Expense | Yield/ Rate | 2021 Change from previous year due to: Volume | Yield/Rate | Total Change(3) | 2020 Change from previous year due to: Volume | Yield/Rate | Total Change(3) |
| ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| $26,656,048 | $1,219,825 | 4.54% | $44,393 | $(82,389) | $(37,996) | $232,399 | $(117,216) | $115,183 |
| 945,094 | 22,235 | 2.35 | (1,408) | (122) | (1,530) | (12,058) | (7,074) | (19,132) |
| 491,001 | 14,308 | 2.91 | 1,994 | (3,128) | (1,134) | 5,080 | (10,931) | (5,851) |
| 5,198,884 | 114,819 | 2.21 | 20,629 | (25,699) | (5,070) | 51,357 | (57,572) | (6,215) |
| 153,841 | 7,945 | 5.16 | 10,805 | (214) | 10,591 | 12,575 | (171) | 12,404 |
| 130,249 | 2,205 | 1.69 | (1,039) | (1,210) | (2,249) | 209 | 1,840 | 2,049 |
| 6,919,069 | 161,512 | 2.33 | 30,981 | (30,373) | 608 | 57,163 | (73,908) | (16,745) |
| 1,291,617 | 26,245 | 2.03 | 14,425 | (10,275) | 4,150 | 28,418 | (47,816) | (19,398) |
| 34,866,734 | $1,407,582 | 4.01% | $89,799 | $(123,037) | $(33,238) | $317,980 | $(238,940) | $79,040 |
| 271,466 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| 1,218,611 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| (226,600) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| 45,895 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| 985,613 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| $37,161,719 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| $7,503,325 | $6,018 | 0.08% | $1,816 | $(2,084) | $(268) | $1,122 | $(1,227) | $(105) |
| 2,604,217 | 1,700 | 0.07 | 381 | (307) | 74 | 214 | (697) | (483) |
| 6,025,740 | 23,315 | 0.39 | 5,455 | (18,237) | (12,782) | 6,886 | (7,697) | (811) |
| 3,315,478 | 45,221 | 1.36 | (7,663) | (12,756) | (20,419) | 295 | (8,515) | (8,220) |
| 19,448,760 | 76,254 | 0.39 | (11) | (33,384) | (33,395) | 8,517 | (18,136) | (9,619) |
| 530,818 | 1,995 | 0.38 | 75 | (373) | (298) | 377 | (762) | (385) |
| 23,087 | 671 | 2.87 | (1,054) | — | (1,054) | 788 | (405) | 383 |
| 392,150 | 13,722 | 3.45 | (1,297) | 863 | (434) | 27,393 | (14,557) | 12,836 |
| 20,394,815 | 92,642 | 0.45 | (2,287) | (32,894) | (35,181) | 37,075 | (33,860) | 3,215 |
| 12,769,776 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| 445,347 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| 3,551,781 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| $37,161,719 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  |  | 3.56% |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | $1,314,940 | 3.74% | $92,086 | $(90,143) | $1,943 | $280,905 | $(205,080) | $75,825 |

43

### RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

### Net Interest Margin and Income (Taxable Equivalent Basis)

Taxable-equivalent net interest income was $1.39 billion for the year ended December 31, 2021, an increase of $1.9 million compared to 2020. Interest income decreased by $33.2 million and interest expense decreased by $35.2 million.

Interest income earned on loans and leases was $1.30 billion for the year ended December 31, 2021, a decrease of $38.0 million compared to 2020. The decrease was primarily due to lower loan yields driven by a full year of a lower rate environment, partially offset by growth in loans, excluding SBA-PPP loans, and an increase in SBA-PPP interest and fee income.

Interest income earned on investment securities was $145.4 million and $144.8 million for the year ending December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The increase was primarily due to the higher average investment balances, partially offset by a decline in the overall portfolio yield. During 2021, excess liquidity was used to invest in $2.0 billion of US Treasury securities.

Interest expense on interest-bearing deposits was $33.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, a decrease of $33.4 million compared to 2020, primarily due to lower rates paid on money market and time deposits. We were able to maintain competitive rates, while also growing our money market deposits. Interest expense on borrowings was $27.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, a decrease of $1.8 million compared to 2020, primarily due to a decrease in the rate paid.

The taxable equivalent net interest margin for the year ended December 31, 2021 was 2.66%, compared to 3.17% for the year ending December 31, 2020. The margin decline of 51 basis points was primarily due to changes in the earning asset mix as a result of excess liquidity, (primarily resulting from deposit inflows) being maintained in overnight investments which decreased the margin by 37 basis points, a decline in the yield on loans which decreased the margin by 23 basis points, and a decline in the yield on investment securities and overnight investments which decreased the margin by 6 basis points. These declines in margin were partially offset by lower rates paid on interest-bearing deposits which increased the margin by 9 basis points and increased fee recognition from SBA-PPP loans which increased the margin by 5 basis points. During the year ended December 31, 2021, yields on loans, investment securities and overnight investments decreased 27 basis points to 3.91%, 23 basis points to 1.37% and 12 basis points to 0.13%, respectively, compared to 2020.

Average interest-earning assets increased $8.47 billion or 19.5% for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to 2020. Growth in average interest-earning assets during 2021 was primarily due to increases in average balances of overnight investments, investment securities, and loans. The taxable-equivalent yield on interest-earning assets was 2.78% for the year ended December 31, 2021, a decline of 62 basis points compared to 3.40% for 2020.

Average interest-bearing liabilities for the year ended December 31, 2021 were $29.35 billion, an increase of $4.45 billion compared to $24.89 billion for 2020. The increase is primarily due to growth in interest-bearing deposits. The average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities was 0.21% for the year ended December 31, 2021, a decrease of 17 basis points compared to 0.38% for 2020.

### Credit Losses

The benefit for credit losses was $36.8 million for the year ending December 31, 2021, compared to a provision for credit losses of $58.4 million for 2020. Credit losses in 2021 were favorably impacted by a $45.8 million reserve release, primarily driven by improvement in macroeconomic factors, continued strong credit performance, and low net charge-offs, while 2020 included a $35.9 million reserve build, primarily related to uncertainties surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic. Net charge-offs for the year ending December 31, 2021 were $9.0 million, a decrease of $13.5 million compared to $22.4 million in 2020. The net charge-off to average loans ratio was 0.03% for the year ending December 31, 2021, a decline of 4 basis points from 0.07% for 2020.

### Noninterest Income

### NONINTEREST INCOME

*(Dollars in thousands)*

|  | Year ended December 31 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Wealth management services | $128,788 | $102,776 | $99,241 |
| Service charges on deposit accounts | 94,756 | 87,662 | 105,191 |
| Cardholder services, net | 86,684 | 74,291 | 69,078 |
| Other service charges and fees | 35,923 | 30,911 | 31,644 |
| Merchant services, net | 33,140 | 24,122 | 24,304 |
| Mortgage income | 30,508 | 39,592 | 21,126 |
| Insurance commissions | 15,556 | 14,544 | 12,810 |
| ATM income | 6,002 | 5,758 | 6,296 |
| Marketable equity securities gains, net | 34,081 | 29,395 | 20,625 |
| Realized gains on investment securities available for sale, net | 33,119 | 60,253 | 7,115 |
| Other | 9,445 | 7,446 | 18,431 |
| Total noninterest income | $508,002 | $476,750 | $415,861 |

For the year ended December 31, 2021, total noninterest income was $508.0 million, compared to $476.8 million for 2020, an increase of $31.3 million, or 6.6%. The increases were primarily attributable to the following:

- Wealth management services income increased by $26.0 million, primarily due to growth in assets under management resulting in higher advisory and transaction fees.
- Service charges on deposit accounts increased by $7.1 million and other service charges and fees increased $5.0 million as impacts from the COVID-19 pandemic abated and service charges trended back toward pre-pandemic levels. We recently announced our intent to eliminate our NSF fees and significantly lower our overdraft fees from $36 to $10 on consumer accounts beginning mid-year 2022. This could reduce our income from service charges on deposit accounts.
- Cardholder services income increased $12.4 million, primarily due to an increase in the volume of transactions processed, which reflected improved consumer sentiment in 2021 as the impact of COVID-19 subsided.
- Merchant services increased by $9.0 million, primarily due to an increase in volume, as well as a decrease in processing rates paid as a result of changes in service providers.
- A $4.7 million favorable change related to gains on sales and the fair market value adjustment of marketable equity securities.

The increases in noninterest income were partially offset by a $27.1 million decrease in realized gains on sales of available for sale securities, primarily due to lower sales volume and the interest rate environment, and a $9.1 million decline in mortgage income, primarily due to lower production volume driven by higher mortgage rates and increased competition.

### Noninterest Expense

### NONINTEREST EXPENSE

*(Dollars in thousands)*

|  | Year ended December 31 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Salaries and wages | $623,194 | $590,020 | $551,112 |
| Employee benefits | 135,659 | 132,244 | 120,501 |
| Occupancy expense | 117,180 | 117,169 | 111,179 |
| Equipment expense | 119,171 | 115,535 | 112,290 |
| Processing fees paid to third parties | 59,743 | 44,791 | 29,552 |
| Merger-related expenses | 29,463 | 17,450 | 17,166 |
| Core deposit intangible amortization | 10,948 | 14,255 | 16,346 |
| Collection and foreclosure-related expenses | 5,442 | 13,658 | 11,994 |
| Consultant expense | 12,507 | 12,751 | 12,801 |
| FDIC insurance expense | 14,132 | 12,701 | 10,664 |
| Telecommunications expense | 12,714 | 12,179 | 9,391 |
| Advertising expense | 9,763 | 10,010 | 11,437 |
| Other | 83,594 | 95,922 | 89,308 |
| Total noninterest expense | $1,233,510 | $1,188,685 | $1,103,741 |

For the year ending December 31, 2021, total noninterest expense was $1.23 billion, an increase of $44.8 million or 3.8%, compared to $1.19 billion for 2020. The change was primarily attributable to the following:

- Personnel expense, which includes salaries, wages and employee benefits, increased by $36.6 million, primarily due to an increase in salaries and wages as a result of annual merit increases, increases in revenue-driven incentives, and an increase in temporary personnel costs, largely attributable to transitioning customers to the new business online banking platform.
- Processing fees paid to third parties increased $15.0 million primarily driven by our continued investments in digital and technology to support revenue-generating businesses and improve internal processes.
- Merger-related expenses increased $12.0 million associated with the CIT Merger, primarily due to legal and other professional fees.
- These increases were partially offset by decreases totaling $15.6 million. The decreases were largely attributable to a decline of $14.2 million in net periodic benefit cost related to the defined benefit pension plans.

### Income Taxes

Income tax expense was $154.2 million and $126.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively, representing effective tax rates of 22.0% and 20.4%, respectively.

Income tax expense for 2021 and 2020 was favorably impacted by $2.3 million and $13.9 million, respectively, due to BancShares’ decision in the second quarter of 2020 to utilize an allowable alternative for computing its 2021 and 2020 federal income tax liability. The allowable alternative provides BancShares the ability to use the federal income tax rate for certain current year deductible amounts related to prior year FDIC-assisted acquisitions that was applicable when these amounts were originally subjected to tax.

### INTEREST-EARNING ASSETS

Interest-earning assets include overnight investments, investment securities and loans and leases, all of which reflect varying interest rates based on the risk level and repricing characteristics of the underlying asset. Higher risk investments typically carry a higher interest rate, but expose us to higher levels of market and/or credit risk. We strive to maintain a high level of interest-earning assets relative to total assets, while keeping non-earning assets at a minimum.

Interest-earning assets totaled $54.70 billion and $47.19 billion at December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively. The $7.51 billion increase was primarily composed of a $4.77 billion increase in overnight investments and a $3.19 billion increase in investment securities, partially offset by a $420 million decrease in loans and leases.

### Investment Securities

The primary objective of the investment portfolio is to generate incremental income by deploying excess funds into securities that have minimal liquidity risk and low to moderate interest rate risk and credit risk. Other objectives include acting as a stable source of liquidity, serving as a tool for asset and liability management and maintaining an interest rate risk profile compatible with BancShares’ objectives. Additionally, purchases of equities and corporate bonds in other financial institutions have been made largely under a long-term earnings optimization strategy. Changes in the total balance of our investment securities portfolio result from trends in balance sheet funding and market performance. Generally, when inflows arising from deposit and treasury services products exceed loan and lease demand, we invest excess funds into the securities portfolio or into overnight investments. Conversely, when loan demand exceeds growth in deposits and short-term borrowings, we allow any overnight investments to decline and use proceeds from maturing securities and prepayments to fund loan demand. Refer to Note A, Accounting Policies and Basis of Presentation, and Note C, Investments, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional disclosures regarding investment securities.

The carrying value of total investment securities was $13.11 billion at December 31, 2021, an increase of $3.19 billion compared to $9.92 billion at December 31, 2020. The increase in the portfolio was primarily attributable to purchases totaling $7.78 billion, partially offset by maturities and paydowns of $3.26 billion and sales of $1.40 billion. This increase was due to excess liquidity generated by significant deposit growth during the year.

At December 31, 2021, investment securities available for sale had a net pre-tax unrealized loss of $11.8 million, compared to a net pre-tax unrealized gain of $102.3 million at December 31, 2020. After evaluating the investment securities with unrealized losses, management concluded that no credit-related impairment existed as of December 31, 2021. Investment securities classified as available for sale are reported at fair value and unrealized gains and losses are included as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”), net of deferred taxes.

On October 1, 2021, mortgage-backed securities with an amortized cost of $451.7 million were transferred from investment securities available for sale to the held to maturity portfolio. At the time of transfer, the mortgage-backed securities had a fair value of $439.02 million and a weighted average contractual maturity of approximately 5 years. The unrealized loss on these securities at the date of transfer was $12.7 million, or $9.7 million net of tax, and was reported as a component of AOCI. This unrealized loss is amortized over the remaining expected life of the securities as an adjustment of yield.

On November 1, 2020, mortgage-backed securities with an amortized cost of $1.46 billion were transferred from investment securities available for sale to the held to maturity portfolio. At the time of transfer, the mortgage-backed securities had a fair value of $1.47 billion and a weighted average contractual maturity of 18 years. The unrealized gain on these securities at the date of transfer was $5.9 million, or $4.5 million net of tax, and was reported as a component of AOCI. This unrealized gain is accreted over the remaining expected life of the securities as an adjustment of yield.

Table 6 presents the investment securities portfolio by major category at December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020.

### INVESTMENT SECURITIES

*(Dollars in thousands)*

| Investment securities available for sale | December 31, 2021 Composition(1) | Cost | Fair Value | December 31, 2020 Composition(1) | Cost | Fair Value |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| U.S. Treasury | 15.4% | $2,006,788 | $2,004,970 | 5.0% | $499,832 | $499,933 |
| Government agency | 6.1 | 797,725 | 798,760 | 7.0 | 706,241 | 701,391 |
| Residential mortgage-backed securities | 36.2 | 4,756,977 | 4,728,413 | 44.5 | 4,369,130 | 4,438,103 |
| Commercial mortgage-backed securities | 8.1 | 1,071,309 | 1,062,749 | 7.9 | 745,892 | 771,537 |
| Corporate bonds | 4.7 | 582,420 | 608,535 | 6.1 | 590,870 | 603,279 |
| State, county and municipal | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total investment securities available for sale | 70.5 | 9,215,219 | 9,203,427 | 70.5 | 6,911,965 | 7,014,243 |
| **Investment in marketable equity securities** | 0.7 | 72,894 | 97,528 | 0.9 | 84,837 | 91,680 |
| **Investment securities held to maturity** |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Residential mortgage-backed securities | 17.6 | 2,322,529 | 2,306,262 | 19.1 | 1,877,692 | 1,895,381 |
| Commercial mortgage-backed securities | 11.1 | 1,484,916 | 1,451,380 | 9.4 | 937,034 | 940,862 |
| Other | 0.1 | 2,008 | 2,008 | 0.1 | 2,256 | 2,256 |
| Total investment securities held to maturity | 28.8 | 3,809,453 | 3,759,650 | 28.6 | 2,816,982 | 2,838,499 |
| Total investment securities | 100.0% | $13,097,566 | $13,060,605 | 100.0% | $9,813,784 | $9,944,422 |
| (1) Calculated as a percent of the total fair value of investment securities. |  |  |  |  |  |  |

47

Table 7 presents the weighted average taxable-equivalent yields for investment securities held to maturity by major category at December 31, 2021 with ranges of contractual maturities. The weighted average yield on the portfolio is calculated using security-level annualized yields.

### WEIGHTED AVERAGE YIELD ON INVESTMENT SECURITIES

| Investment securities held to maturity | December 31, 2021 Within One Year | One to Five Years | Five to 10 Years | After 10 Years | Total |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Residential mortgage-backed securities(1) | —% | —% | —% | 1.23% | 1.23% |
| Commercial mortgage-backed securities(1) | — | — | — | 1.47 | 1.47 |
| Other investments | 0.94 | — | — | — | 0.94 |
| **Total investment securities held to maturity** | 0.94% | —% | —% | 1.33% | 1.33% |

(1) Residential mortgage-backed and commercial mortgage-backed securities, which are not due at a single maturity date, have been included in maturity groupings based on the contractual maturity. The expected life will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers have the right to prepay the underlying loans.

### Loans and Leases

Loans held for sale were $98.7 million as of December 31, 2021, a net decrease of $26.1 million compared to $124.8 million as of December 31, 2020. The decrease is primarily due to sales of $1.00 billion, loans held for sale exchanged for investment securities of $230.5 million, partially offset by originations of $1.12 billion and transfers from loans held for investment to loans held for sale of $87.8 million.

Total loans were $32.37 billion as of December 31, 2021, a decrease of $420.5 million or 1.3% compared to $32.79 billion as of December 31, 2020. The decrease was primarily due to declines of $1.91 billion or 79.5% in SBA-PPP loans, which were primarily due to forgiveness of approximately $3.9 billion, partially offset by originations and recognition of deferred fees. The decrease in SBA-PPP loans was largely offset by increases of $827.6 million in owner occupied commercial mortgages and $697.0 million in commercial and industrial. These increases are primarily due to growth in commercial lines, equipment leasing, and our government lending portfolios.

Loans and leases held for investment are classified differently, dependent on whether they are originated or purchased, and if purchased, whether or not the loans reflect more than insignificant credit deterioration since origination as of the date of acquisition. Non-purchased credit deteriorated (“non-PCD”) loans consist of loans which were originated by us or purchased from other institutions that did not reflect more than insignificant credit deterioration at acquisition. Purchased credit deteriorated (“PCD”) loans are purchased loans which reflect a more than insignificant credit deterioration since origination as of the date of acquisition. The net decrease of $125.3 million in PCD loans as of December 31, 2021 compared to December 31, 2020 was primarily due to pay downs and payoffs.

We report non-PCD and PCD loan portfolios separately, with the non-PCD portfolio further divided into commercial and consumer segments. Non-PCD loans and leases at December 31, 2021 were $32.03 billion compared to $32.33 billion at December 31, 2020, representing 99.0% and 98.6% of total loans, respectively. PCD loans at December 31, 2021 were $337.6 million, compared to $462.9 million at December 31, 2020, representing 1.0% and 1.4% of loans, respectively.

The discount related to acquired non-PCD loans and leases at December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020 was $11.4 million and $19.5 million, respectively. The discount related to PCD loans at December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020 was $29.0 million and $45.3 million, respectively. The primary driver of the decrease in PCD discount was loan payoffs.

During the year ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, accretion income on purchased non-PCD loans and leases was $8.0 million and $11.3 million, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, interest and accretion income on purchased PCD loans and leases was $44.3 million and $59.7 million, respectively.

Table 8 provides the composition of net loans and leases for the past three years.

### LOANS AND LEASES

*(Dollars in thousands)*

| Non-PCD loans and leases: Commercial: | December 31 2021 | 2020 |
| --- | ---: | ---: |
| Construction and land development | $1,111,797 | $985,424 |
| Owner occupied commercial mortgage | 11,992,625 | 11,165,012 |
| Non-owner occupied commercial mortgage | 2,971,393 | 2,987,689 |
| Commercial and industrial and leases | 5,710,652 | 5,013,644 |
| SBA-PPP | 493,821 | 2,406,291 |
| Total commercial loans | 22,280,288 | 22,558,060 |
| Consumer: |  |  |
| Residential mortgage | 5,679,919 | 5,561,686 |
| Revolving mortgage | 1,795,005 | 2,052,854 |
| Construction and land development | 399,570 | 348,123 |
| Consumer auto | 1,331,388 | 1,255,402 |
| Consumer other | 547,728 | 552,968 |
| Total consumer loans | 9,753,610 | 9,771,033 |
| Total non-PCD loans and leases | 32,033,898 | 32,329,093 |
| PCD loans | 337,624 | 462,882 |
| Total loans and leases | 32,371,522 | 32,791,975 |
| Less allowance for credit losses | (178,493) | (224,314) |
| **Net loans and leases** | $32,193,029 | $32,567,661 |

*(Dollars in thousands)*

| Non-PCI loans and leases: Commercial: | December 31 2019 |
| --- | ---: |
| Construction and land development | $1,013,454 |
| Commercial mortgage | 12,282,635 |
| Other commercial real estate | 542,028 |
| Commercial and industrial and leases | 4,403,792 |
| Other | 310,093 |
| Total commercial loans | 18,552,002 |
| Noncommercial: |  |
| Residential mortgage | 5,293,917 |
| Revolving mortgage | 2,339,072 |
| Construction and land development | 357,385 |
| Consumer | 1,780,404 |
| Total noncommercial loans | 9,770,778 |
| Total non-PCI loans and leases | $28,322,780 |
| PCI loans | $558,716 |
| Total loans and leases | 28,881,496 |
| Less allowance for credit losses | (225,141) |
| **Net loans and leases** | $28,656,355 |

49

### Allowance for Credit Losses

During January 2020, we adopted ASU 2016-13 Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): *Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (“*ASC 326”), which changed the methodology, accounting policies, and inputs used in determining the ACL. Refer to Note A, Accounting Policies and Basis of Presentation, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of the methodology used in the determination of the ACL.

The ACL was $178.5 million at December 31, 2021, compared to $224.3 million and $225.1 million at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The ACL as a percentage of total loans and leases was 0.55% at December 31, 2021, compared to 0.68% and 0.78% at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The decrease in the ACL as of December 31, 2021 compared to December 31, 2020 was primarily driven by continued strong credit performance, low net charge-offs, and improvement in macroeconomic factors.

The ACL is calculated using a variety of factors, including, but not limited to, charge-off and recovery activity, loan growth, changes in macroeconomic factors, collateral type, estimated loan life and changes in credit quality. Forecasted economic conditions are developed using third party macroeconomic scenarios adjusted based on management’s expectations over a forecast period of two years. For most pools, BancShares uses a 12-month straight-line reversion period to historical averages for model inputs; however for the consumer other, consumer card and commercial card pools, immediate reversion to historical net loss rates is utilized. Significant macroeconomic factors used in estimating the expected losses include unemployment, gross domestic product, home price index and commercial real estate index. BancShares’ ACL forecasts consider a range of economic scenarios from an upside scenario to a severely adverse scenario, but the December 31, 2021 ACL forecast was calculated using the consensus baseline scenario. This scenario showed improvements in the most significant economic factors compared to what was used to generate the December 31, 2020 ACL. These loss estimates were also influenced by our strong credit quality and low net charge-offs.

As of December 31, 2021, the baseline forecast utilized the following significant inputs over the two-year reasonable and supportable forecast period:

Unemployment - Expected to improve to below 4% by the end of 2022, slightly increasing to just above 4% in the first quarter of 2023, stabilizing below 4% through the remainder of 2023

GDP Growth - Peak quarter over quarter annualized growth of just under 7% in the fourth quarter of 2021, decreasing to below 3% in the second half of 2022 and thereafter

Home Pricing Index - Year over year growth rates of approximately 7% during 2022, declining to below 3% by the second half of 2023

Commercial Real Estate Index - Slight downturn in year over year change in the second quarter of 2022, relatively flat throughout the rest of 2022, followed by continued growth reaching 9% in the second and third quarters of 2023.

At December 31, 2021, the ACL allocated to non-PCD loans and leases was $163.7 million, or 0.51% of non-PCD loans and leases, compared to $200.3 million, or 0.62%, at December 31, 2020, and $217.6 million, or 0.77%, at December 31, 2019. Aside from SBA-PPP loans, which have no allowance, the decrease at December 31, 2021 compared to December 31, 2020 was primarily due to continued strong credit performance, low net charge-offs, and improvement in macroeconomic factors. The ACL as a percentage of non-PCD loans and leases excluding SBA-PPP loans was 0.52% at December 31, 2021 compared to 0.67% at December 31, 2020.

At December 31, 2021, the ACL on PCD loans totaled $14.8 million compared to $24.0 million at December 31, 2020 and $7.5 million, at December 31, 2019. The decrease at December 31, 2021 compared to December 31, 2020 was primarily due to a $9.2 million reserve release for the year ended December 31, 2021, driven primarily by continued strong credit performance, low net charge-offs, improvement in macroeconomic factors, and lower PCD loan balances.

At December 31, 2021, the ACL on unfunded commitments was $11.8 million compared to $12.8 million at December 31, 2020 and $1.1 million, at December 31, 2019.

Table 9 provides details of the ACL, provision components and net charge-off ratio by loan class for the past three years.

### ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES

*(Dollars in thousands)*

| Allowance for credit losses: | Year Ended December 31, 2021 Commercial | Consumer | PCD | Total |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Balance at January 1, 2021 | 80,842 | 119,485 | 23,987 | 224,314 |
| Benefit for credit losses | (1,228) | (21,278) | (14,329) | (36,835) |
| Charge-offs | (15,924) | (17,181) | (2,317) | (35,422) |
| Recoveries | 7,523 | 11,452 | 7,461 | 26,436 |
| Balance at December 31, 2021 | $71,213 | $92,478 | $14,802 | $178,493 |
| Net charge-off (recovery) ratio | 0.04% | 0.06% | (1.28)% | 0.03% |
| Net charge-offs (recoveries) | $8,401 | $7,048 | $(5,144) | $8,986 |
| Average loans | 22,550,607 | 9,797,112 | 402,277 | 32,749,996 |
|  | **Year Ended December 31, 2020** |  |  |  |
|  | **Commercial** | **Consumer** | **PCD** | **Total** |
| Balance at December 31, 2019 | $142,369 | $75,236 | $7,536 | $225,141 |
| Adoption of ASC 326 | (87,554) | 30,629 | 19,001 | (37,924) |
| Balance at January 1, 2020 | 54,815 | 105,865 | 26,537 | 187,217 |
| Provision (benefit) | 37,763 | 27,791 | (7,202) | 58,352 |
| Initial allowance on PCD loans | — | — | 1,193 | 1,193 |
| Charge-offs | (17,586) | (24,219) | (3,300) | (45,105) |
| Recoveries | 5,850 | 10,048 | 6,759 | 22,657 |
| Balance at December 31, 2020 | $80,842 | $119,485 | $23,987 | $224,314 |
| Net charge-off (recovery) ratio | 0.06% | 0.15% | (0.67)% | 0.07% |
| Net charge-offs (recoveries) | $11,736 | $14,171 | $(3,459) | $22,448 |
| Average loans | 21,282,535 | 9,617,600 | 517,121 | 31,417,256 |

*(Dollars in thousands)*

|  | Year Ended December 31, 2019 Commercial | Consumer | PCI | Total |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Balance at January 1, 2019 | $139,043 | $75,525 | 9,144 | 223,712 |
| Provision (benefit) | 13,386 | 19,663 | (1,608) | 31,441 |
| Charge-offs | (14,744) | (28,283) | — | (43,027) |
| Recoveries | 4,684 | 8,331 | — | 13,015 |
| Balance at December 31, 2019 | $142,369 | $75,236 | $7,536 | $225,141 |
| Net charge-off ratio | 0.06% | 0.22% | —% | 0.11% |
| Net charge-offs | $10,060 | $19,952 | $— | $30,012 |
| Average loans | 16,875,800 | 9,182,570 | 537,131 | 26,595,501 |

Table 10 provides trends of the ACL ratios for the past three years.

### ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES RATIOS

*(Dollars in thousands)*

|  | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Allowance for credit losses to total loans and leases: | 0.55% | 0.68% | 0.78% |
| Allowance for credit losses | $178,493 | $224,314 | $225,141 |
| Total loans and leases | 32,371,522 | 32,791,975 | 28,881,496 |
| Allowance for credit losses to non-PCD loans and leases: | 0.51% | 0.62% | 0.77% |
| Allowance for credit losses on non-PCD loans and leases | $163,691 | $200,327 | $217,605 |
| Total non-PCD loans and leases | 32,033,898 | 32,329,093 | 28,322,780 |
| Allowance for credit losses to PCD loans: | 4.38% | 5.18% | 1.35% |
| Allowance for credit losses on PCD loans | $14,802 | $23,987 | $7,536 |
| Total PCD loans | 337,624 | 462,882 | 558,716 |

51

Table 11 details the allocation of the ACL among the various loan types. See Note E, Allowance for Credit Losses, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional disclosures regarding the ACL.

### ALLOCATION OF ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES

*(dollars in thousands)*

| Non-PCD loans and leases Commercial: | December 31 2021 Allowance for credit losses | Percent of loans to total loans | 2020 Allowance for loan and lease losses | Percent of loans to total loans |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Construction and land development | $4,465 | 3.4% | $6,746 | 3.0% |
| Owner occupied commercial mortgage | 21,964 | 37.0 | 23,665 | 34.0 |
| Non-owner occupied commercial mortgage | 14,149 | 9.2 | 22,652 | 9.1 |
| Commercial and industrial and leases | 30,635 | 17.7 | 27,779 | 15.3 |
| SBA-PPP | — | 1.5 | — | 7.3 |
| Total commercial loans and leases | 71,213 | 68.8 | 80,842 | 68.7 |
| Consumer: |  |  |  |  |
| Residential mortgage | 32,865 | 17.5 | 44,098 | 17.0 |
| Revolving mortgage | 16,750 | 5.6 | 24,757 | 6.3 |
| Construction and land development | 976 | 1.2 | 1,731 | 1.1 |
| Consumer auto | 5,762 | 4.1 | 9,460 | 3.8 |
| Consumer other | 36,125 | 1.7 | 39,439 | 1.7 |
| Total consumer loans | 92,478 | 30.1 | 119,485 | 29.9 |
| Total non-PCD loans and leases | 163,691 | 98.9 | 200,327 | 98.6 |
| PCD loans | 14,802 | 1.1 | 23,987 | 1.4 |
| Total loans and leases | $178,493 | 100.0% | $224,314 | 100.0% |

*(dollars in thousands)*

| Non-PCI loans and leases Commercial: | December 31 2019 Allowance for loan and lease losses | Percent of loans to total loans |
| --- | ---: | ---: |
| Construction and land development | $33,213 | 3.5% |
| Commercial mortgage | 45,335 | 42.5 |
| Other commercial real estate | 2,211 | 1.9 |
| Commercial and industrial and leases | 59,374 | 15.3 |
| Other | 2,236 | 1.1 |
| Total commercial loans and leases | 142,369 | 64.3 |
| Noncommercial: |  |  |
| Residential mortgage | 18,232 | 18.3 |
| Revolving mortgage | 19,702 | 8.1 |
| Construction and land development | 2,709 | 1.2 |
| Consumer | 34,593 | 6.2 |
| Total noncommercial loans | 75,236 | 33.8 |
| Total non-PCI loans and leases | 217,605 | 98.1 |
| PCI loans | 7,536 | 1.9 |
| Total loans and leases | $225,141 | 100.0% |

52

### Nonperforming Assets

Nonperforming assets include nonaccrual loans and OREO resulting from both non-PCD and PCD loans. Non-PCD loans are generally placed on nonaccrual when principal or interest becomes 90 days past due or when it is probable that principal or interest is not fully collectable. When non-PCD loans are placed on nonaccrual, all previously uncollected accrued interest is reversed from interest income and the ongoing accrual of interest is discontinued. Non-PCD loans and leases are generally removed from nonaccrual status when they become current for a sustained period of time as to both principal and interest and there is no longer concern as to the collectability of principal and interest. Accretion of income for PCD loans is discontinued when we are unable to estimate the amount or timing of cash flows. PCD loans may begin or resume accretion of income when information becomes available that allows us to estimate the amount and timing of future cash flows.

OREO includes foreclosed property and branch facilities that we have closed but not sold. Net book values of OREO are reviewed at least annually to evaluate if write-downs are required. The level of review is dependent on the value and type of the collateral, with higher value and more complex properties receiving a more detailed review. Changes to the value of the assets between scheduled valuation dates are monitored through communication with brokers and monthly reviews by the asset manager assigned to each asset. The asset manager uses the information gathered from brokers and other market sources to identify any significant changes in the market or the subject property as they occur. Valuations are then adjusted or new appraisals are ordered to ensure the reported values reflect the most current information.

Since OREO is carried at the lower of cost or market value, less estimated selling costs, book value adjustments are only recorded when fair values have declined. Decisions regarding write-downs are based on factors including appraisals, previous offers received on the property, market conditions and the number of days the property has been on the market.

Table 12 provides details on nonperforming assets and other risk elements.

### Table 12

### NONPERFORMING ASSETS

*(Dollars in thousands, except ratios)*

| Nonaccrual loans and leases: | December 31 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Non-PCD | $90,690 | $136,544 | $114,946 |
| PCD | 29,616 | 54,939 | 6,743 |
| Total nonaccrual loans | 120,306 | 191,483 | 121,689 |
| Other real estate owned | 39,328 | 50,890 | 46,591 |
| Total nonperforming assets | $159,634 | $242,373 | $168,280 |
| Accruing loans and leases 90 days or more past due: |  |  |  |
| Non-PCD | $6,382 | $5,507 | $3,291 |
| PCD | 543 | 355 | 24,257 |
| Ratio of total nonperforming assets to total loans, leases and other real estate owned | 0.49 | 0.74 | 0.58 |
| Ratio of nonaccrual loans and leases to total loans and leases | 0.37 | 0.58 | 0.42 |
| Ratio of allowance for credit losses to nonaccrual loans and leases | 148.4 | 117.1 | 185.0 |

### Troubled Debt Restructurings

A loan is considered a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) when both of the following occur: (1) a modification to a borrower’s debt agreement is made and (2) a concession is granted for economic or legal reasons related to a borrower’s financial difficulties that otherwise would not be granted. TDR concessions could include deferrals of interest, modifications of payment terms, or, in certain limited instances, forgiveness of principal or interest. Acquired loans are classified as TDRs if a modification is made subsequent to acquisition. We further classify TDRs as performing and nonperforming. Performing TDRs accrue interest at the time of restructure and continue to perform based on the restructured terms. Nonperforming TDRs do not accrue interest and are included with other nonperforming assets within nonaccrual loans and leases in Table 12 above.

The Interagency Statement on Loan Modifications and Reporting for Financial Institutions Working with Customers Affected by the Coronavirus was published by banking regulators in April 2020 to clarify expectations around loan modifications and the determination of TDRs for borrowers experiencing COVID-19-related financial difficulty. BancShares applied this regulatory guidance during its TDR identification process for short-term loan forbearance agreements as a result of COVID-19 and in most cases is not recording these as TDRs. Refer to Note A, Accounting Policies and Basis of Presentation, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for discussion of our accounting policies for TDRs.

We selectively agree to modify existing loan terms to provide relief to customers who are experiencing financial difficulties or other circumstances that could affect their ability to meet debt obligations. Typical modifications include short-term deferral of interest or modification of payment terms. TDR not accruing interest at the time of restructure are included as nonperforming loans. TDRs accruing at the time of restructure and continuing to perform based on the restructured terms are considered performing loans.

Table 13 provides further details on performing and nonperforming TDRs for the last three years.

### TROUBLED DEBT RESTRUCTURINGS

*(Dollars in thousands)*

| Accruing TDRs: | December 31 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Non-PCD | $117,380 | $139,747 | $111,676 |
| PCD | 29,401 | 17,617 | 17,074 |
| Total accruing TDRs | $146,781 | $157,364 | $128,750 |
| **Nonaccruing TDRs:** |  |  |  |
| Non-PCD | 37,832 | 43,470 | 42,331 |
| PCD | 9,935 | 7,346 | 111 |
| Total nonaccruing TDRs | $47,767 | $50,816 | $42,442 |
| **All TDRs:** |  |  |  |
| Non-PCD | 155,212 | 183,217 | 154,007 |
| PCD | 39,336 | 24,963 | 17,185 |
| Total TDRs | $194,548 | $208,180 | $171,192 |

### INTEREST-BEARING LIABILITIES

Interest-bearing liabilities include interest-bearing deposits, securities sold under customer repurchase agreements, FHLB borrowings, subordinated debt, and other borrowings. Interest-bearing liabilities totaled $31.78 billion at December 31, 2021, compared to $27.31 billion at December 31, 2020. The $4.48 billion increase was primarily due to an increase in interest-bearing deposits of $4.58 billion, partially offset by a decrease in total borrowings of $106.2 million.

### Deposits

We strive to maintain a strong liquidity position, and therefore a focus on core deposit retention remains a key business objective. We believe traditional bank deposit products remain an attractive option for many customers, as evidenced by the significant deposit growth the industry has experienced over the past 18 months. As economic conditions improve, we recognize that our liquidity position could be adversely affected as bank deposits are withdrawn. Our ability to fund future loan growth is significantly dependent on our success at retaining existing deposits and generating new deposits at a reasonable cost.

Total deposits increased by $7.97 billion, or 18.4%, to $51.41 billion as of December 31, 2021 from $43.43 billion as of December 31, 2020. The increases were primarily due to increases of $3.39 billion in demand deposits, $2.10 billion in checking with interest, and $1.96 billion in money market. The growth in deposits is coming from a mix of new clients and existing clients and is generally from our commercial customers.

Table 14 provides deposit balances as of December 31, 2021 and 2020.

### DEPOSITS

*(Dollars in thousands)*

|  | December 31 2021 | 2020 |
| --- | ---: | ---: |
| Demand | $21,404,808 | $18,014,029 |
| Checking with interest | 12,694,389 | 10,591,687 |
| Money market | 10,590,106 | 8,632,713 |
| Savings | 4,235,824 | 3,304,167 |
| Time | 2,480,967 | 2,889,013 |
| Total deposits | $51,406,094 | $43,431,609 |

Table 15 provides the expected maturity of time deposits in excess of $250 thousand, the FDIC insurance limit, as of December 31, 2021.

### Table 15

### MATURITIES OF TIME DEPOSITS IN EXCESS OF $250,000

*(Dollars in thousands)*

| Time deposits maturing in: | December 31 2021 | 2020 |
| --- | ---: | ---: |
| Three months or less | $224,156 | $136,200 |
| Over three months through six months | 115,507 | 118,496 |
| Over six months through 12 months | 84,996 | 86,260 |
| More than 12 months | 154,862 | 311,956 |
| Total | $579,521 | $652,912 |

We estimate total uninsured deposits were $22.95 billion and $18.02 billion at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

### Borrowings

At December 31, 2021, total borrowings were $1.78 billion compared to $1.89 billion at December 31, 2020. The $106.2 million decrease was primarily due to a decrease of $52.4 million in securities sold under customer repurchase agreements and a decrease of $27.0 million in total subordinated debt.

### BORROWINGS

*(Dollars in thousands)*

|  | December 31 2021 | 2020 |
| --- | ---: | ---: |
| Securities sold under customer repurchase agreements | $589,101 | $641,487 |
| Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings | 644,659 | 655,175 |
| Subordinated debt |  |  |
| SCB Capital Trust I | 9,817 | 9,779 |
| FCB/SC Capital Trust II | 17,798 | 17,664 |
| FCB/NC Capital Trust III | 88,145 | 88,145 |
| Macon Capital Trust I | 14,433 | 14,433 |
| 3.375 % Fixed-to-Floating Rate Subordinated Notes due 2030 | 347,371 | 346,541 |
| Other subordinated debt | — | 27,956 |
| Total subordinated debt | 477,564 | 504,518 |
| Other borrowings | 72,155 | 88,470 |
| Total borrowings | $1,783,479 | $1,889,650 |

55

The Parent Company owns four special purpose entities – SCB Capital Trust I, FCB/SC Capital Trust II, FCB/NC Capital Trust III and Macon Capital Trust I (the “Trusts”), which mature in 2034, 2034, 2036, and 2034, respectively. Subordinated debt included junior subordinated debentures representing obligations to the Trusts, which may be redeemed at par in whole or in part at any time. BancShares has guaranteed all obligations of the Trusts.

On March 4, 2020, we completed a public offering of $350 million aggregate principal amount of our 3.375% Fixed-to-Floating Rate Subordinated Notes due 2030, which are redeemable starting with the interest payment due March 15, 2025, subject to obtaining the prior approval of the Federal Reserve to the extent such approval is then required under the rules of the Federal Reserve, or earlier upon the occurrence of certain events.

In conjunction with the CIT Merger, FCB assumed approximately $3.7 billion senior unsecured notes (principal balance) and $500 million subordinated unsecured notes (principal balance). On February 24, 2022, FCB redeemed approximately $2.9 billion of senior unsecured notes, leaving approximately $900 million of senior unsecured debt and $500 million of subordinated unsecured debt outstanding. Refer to Note W, Subsequent Events, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of the redemption of this debt.

### Commitments and Contractual Obligations

Table 17 identifies significant obligations and commitments as of December 31, 2021 representing required and potential cash outflows. See Note T, Commitments and Contingencies, for additional information regarding total commitments. Loan commitments and standby letters of credit are presented at contractual amounts and do not necessarily reflect future cash outflows as many are expected to expire unused or partially used.

### Table 17

### COMMITMENTS AND CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

*(Dollars in thousands)*

| Type of obligation Contractual obligations: | Payments due by period Less than 1 year | 1-3 years | 3-5 years | Thereafter | Total |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Time deposits | $1,937,216 | $306,928 | $56,970 | $179,853 | $2,480,967 |
| Short-term borrowings | 589,101 | — | — | — | 589,101 |
| Long-term obligations | 82,735 | 131,271 | 2,649 | 977,723 | 1,194,378 |
| Total contractual obligations | $2,609,052 | $438,199 | $59,619 | $1,157,576 | $4,264,446 |
| Commitments: |  |  |  |  |  |
| Loan commitments | $6,391,757 | $2,086,781 | $769,469 | $3,763,147 | $13,011,154 |
| Standby letters of credit | 100,520 | 15,916 | 212 | — | 116,648 |
| Affordable housing partnerships | 28,407 | 13,658 | 556 | 795 | 43,416 |
| Total commitments | $6,520,684 | $2,116,355 | $770,237 | $3,763,942 | $13,171,218 |

### CRA Investment Commitment

Prior to the CIT Merger, CIT announced a Community Benefits Plan developed in collaboration with the California Reinvestment Coalition (“CRC”) and the National Community Reinvestment Coalition (“NCRC”). Through the plan, CIT Bank agreed to fund $7.75 billion in CRA qualified lending and investments over a four-year term, covering the period of January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2023. Of the $7.75 billion commitment, $6.5 billion over the four-year plan period will be within California for statewide CRA lending and investments, with sub-targets for specified multi-family, small business and mortgage lending. Outside of California, CIT Bank had committed $1.25 billion over the four-year term in CRA qualified lending and investments to communities where it will have physical branches. In conjunction with the CIT Merger, BancShares agreed to honor the CRA commitments.

### SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND CAPITAL ADEQUACY

We are committed to effectively managing our capital to protect our depositors, creditors and shareholders. We continually monitor the capital levels and ratios for BancShares and FCB to ensure they exceed the requirements imposed by regulatory authorities and to ensure they are appropriate, given growth projections, risk profile and potential changes in the regulatory environment. Failure to meet certain capital requirements may result in actions by regulatory agencies, which could have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

During 2021, the Parent Company did not repurchase any Class A common stock. During 2020, the Parent Company repurchased a total of 813,090 shares of Class A common stock, or 8.4% of outstanding Class A shares as of December 31, 2019, for $333.8 million at an average cost per share of $410.48. There were no repurchases of Class B common stock or preferred stock during the year ended December 31, 2021 or 2020. All share repurchases were executed under previously approved authorities.

Upon expiration of the most recent share repurchase authorization on July 31, 2020, share repurchase activity ended and will be reevaluated in subsequent periods.

During 2020 and 2019, the share repurchases included 45,000 and 100,000 shares, respectively, of Class A common stock purchased from Ella Anna Holding, as trustee of her revocable trust. Mrs. Holding is the widow of the Parent Company’s former Executive Vice Chairman, Frank B. Holding, and the mother of Frank B. Holding, Jr. and Hope H. Bryant, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Vice Chairman, respectively.

In connection with the consummation of the CIT Merger, the Parent Company issued approximately 6.1 million shares of its Class A Common Stock. The closing share price of the Class A Common Stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market was $859.76 on January 3, 2022. Additionally, CIT Series A and B Preferred Stock was converted into the rights to receive BancShares Series B and C Preferred Stock, respectively. In connection with the consummation of the CIT Merger, the Parent Company issued (a) 325,000 shares of BancShares Series B Preferred Stock with a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share, resulting in a total liquidation preference of $325 million, and (b) 8 million shares of BancShares Series C Preferred Stock with a liquidation preference of $25 per share, resulting in a total liquidation preference of $200 million. The issuance of Class A Common Stock and the conversion of preferred stock is further discussed in the “Business Combinations” section of this MD&A.

Table 18 provides information on capital adequacy for BancShares and FCB as of December 31, 2021 and 2020.

### ANALYSIS OF CAPITAL ADEQUACY

*(Dollars in thousands)*

| BancShares | Basel III Requirements | PCA well-capitalized thresholds | December 31, 2021 Amount | Ratio | December 31, 2020 Amount | Ratio |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Total risk-based capital | 10.50% | 10.00% | $5,041,686 | 14.35% | $4,577,212 | 13.81% |
| Tier 1 risk-based capital | 8.50 | 8.00 | 4,380,452 | 12.47 | 3,856,086 | 11.63 |
| Common equity Tier 1 | 7.00 | 6.50 | 4,040,515 | 11.50 | 3,516,149 | 10.61 |
| Tier 1 leverage | 4.00 | 5.00 | 4,380,452 | 7.59 | 3,856,086 | 7.86 |
| **FCB** |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Total risk-based capital | 10.50% | 10.00 | 4,857,960 | 13.85 | 4,543,496 | 13.72 |
| Tier 1 risk-based capital | 8.50 | 8.00 | 4,651,226 | 13.26 | 4,276,870 | 12.92 |
| Common equity Tier 1 | 7.00 | 6.50 | 4,651,226 | 13.26 | 4,276,870 | 12.92 |
| Tier 1 leverage | 4.00 | 5.00 | 4,651,226 | 8.07 | 4,276,870 | 8.72 |

Federal banking agencies approved regulatory capital guidelines (“Basel III”) aimed at strengthening previous capital requirements for banking organizations. Basel III became effective for BancShares on January 1, 2015 and the associated capital conservation buffers of 2.5% were fully phased in by January 1, 2019. The capital conservation buffer is designed to absorb losses during periods of economic stress. Additionally, federal banking agencies have developed Prompt Corrective Action (“PCA”) thresholds for regulatory capital ratios. Failure to meet regulatory capital requirements may result in certain actions by regulators which could have a direct material effect on our consolidated financial statements. Table 18 demonstrates that the regulatory capital ratios for BancShares and FCB exceed the Basel III requirements and the PCA well-capitalized thresholds as of December 31, 2021 and 2020. At December 31, 2021, BancShares and FCB had total risk-based capital ratio conservation buffers of 6.35% and 5.85%, respectively, which are in excess of the fully phased in Basel III conservation buffer of 2.50%. The capital ratio conservation buffers represent the excess of the regulatory capital ratio as of December 31, 2021 over the Basel III minimum. The Basel III minimums, conservation buffers, and requirements are discussed further in the “Capital Requirements” section in Item 1. Business included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

At December 31, 2021 and 2020, BancShares had additional Tier 1 Capital of $339.9 million, which consists of 5.375% non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock, series A. BancShares had Tier 2 capital totaling $661.2 million and $721.1 million at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. FCB had Tier 2 capital totaling $206.7 million and $266.6 million at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Tier 2 capital consists of the allowance for credit losses (up to 1.25% of risk weighted assets), trust preferred securities, and qualifying subordinated debt. Under Basel III regulations, when subordinated debt is within five years of its scheduled maturity date, issuers must discount the amount included in Tier 2 capital by 20% each year until the debt matures. Once the subordinated debt is within one year of its scheduled maturity date, none of the subordinated debt qualifies as Tier 2 capital.

## Market risk

As filed, 22,519 characters.

### RISK MANAGEMENT

Risk is inherent in any business. BancShares has defined a moderate risk appetite, a balanced approach to risk taking, with a philosophy which does not preclude higher risk business activities balanced with acceptable returns while meeting regulatory objectives. Through the comprehensive Risk Management Framework and Risk Appetite Framework, senior management has primary responsibility for day-to-day management of the risks we face with accountability of and support from all associates. Senior management applies various strategies to reduce the risks to which BancShares may be exposed, with effective challenge and oversight by management committees. In addition, our Board of Directors (the “Board”) strives to ensure the business culture is integrated with the Risk Management program and policies, procedures and metrics for identifying, assessing, monitoring and managing risk are part of the decision-making process. The Board’s role in risk oversight is an integral part of our overall Risk Management Framework and Risk Appetite Framework. The Board administers its risk oversight function primarily through the Board Risk Committee.

The Board Risk Committee structure is designed to allow for information flow, effective challenge and timely escalation of risk-related issues. The Board Risk Committee is directed to monitor and advise the full Board regarding risk exposures, including Credit, Market, Capital, Liquidity, Operational, Compliance, Asset, Strategic and Reputational risks; review, approve, and monitor adherence to the Risk Appetite Statement and supporting risk tolerance levels via a series of established metrics; and evaluate, monitor and oversee the adequacy and effectiveness of the Risk Management Framework and Risk Appetite Framework. The Board Risk Committee also reviews: reports of examination by and communications from regulatory agencies; the results of internal and third party testing and qualitative and quantitative assessments related to risk management; and any other matters within the scope of the Board Risk Committee’s oversight responsibilities. The Board Risk Committee monitors management’s response to certain risk-related regulatory and audit issues. In addition, the Board Risk Committee may coordinate with the Audit Committee and the Compensation, Nominations and Governance Committee for the review of financial statements and related risks, compensation risk management and other areas of joint responsibility.

In combination with other risk management and monitoring practices, enterprise-wide stress testing activities are part of the Risk Management Framework and conducted within a defined framework. Stress tests are performed for various risks to ensure the financial institution can support continued operations during stressed periods.

Enactment of the EGRRCPA significantly altered several provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act, including how stress tests are run. BancShares will continue to monitor and stress test its capital and liquidity consistent with the safety and soundness expectations of the federal regulators. Refer to the “Regulatory Considerations” section of Item 1. Business included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further discussion.

### Credit risk management

Credit risk is the risk of not collecting payments pursuant to the contractual terms of loans, leases and certain investment securities. Loans and leases we originate are underwritten in accordance with our credit policies and procedures and are subject to periodic ongoing reviews. Acquired loans, regardless of whether PCD or non-PCD, are recorded at fair value as of the acquisition date and are subject to periodic reviews to identify any further credit deterioration. Our independent credit review function conducts risk reviews and analyses of both originated and acquired loans to ensure compliance with credit policies and to monitor asset quality trends and borrower financial strength. These reviews include portfolio analysis by geographic location, industry, collateral type and product. We strive to identify potential problem loans as early as possible, to record charge-offs or write-downs as appropriate and to maintain an appropriate ACL that accounts for expected credit losses in the loan and lease portfolio.

Our ACL estimate as of December 31, 2021, included extensive reviews of the changes in credit risk associated with the uncertainties around economic forecasts and the overall economic impact of COVID-19. Expected loss estimates within each portfolio considered the potential impact of economic activity, as well as potential mitigating impact from the government stimulus and loan modification programs. These loss estimates additionally considered BancShares industry risk, historically strong credit quality and actual net losses incurred during prior periods of economic stress, as well as recent credit trends, which have not seen significant deterioration as of December 31, 2021.

We maintain a well-diversified loan and lease portfolio and seek to minimize the risks associated with large concentrations within specific geographic areas, collateral types or industries. Despite our focus on diversification, several characteristics of our loan portfolio subject us to significant risk, such as our concentrations of real estate secured loans, revolving mortgage loans and medical- and dental-related loans.

We have historically carried a significant concentration of real estate secured loans, but actively mitigate exposure through underwriting policies which primarily rely on borrower cash flow rather than underlying collateral values. When we do rely on underlying real property values, we favor financing secured by owner-occupied real property and, as a result, a large percentage of our real estate secured loans are owner occupied. At December 31, 2021, loans secured by real estate were $24.28 billion, or 75.0%, of total loans and leases compared to $23.56 billion, or 71.8% at December 31, 2020, and $22.38 billion, or 77.5%, at December 31, 2019.

Similar to our branch footprint, the collateral of loans secured by real estate is concentrated within North Carolina and South Carolina. At December 31, 2021, real estate located in North Carolina and South Carolina represented 35.9% and 15.6%, respectively, of all real estate used as collateral.

Table 19 provides the geographic distribution of real estate collateral by state.

### GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION OF REAL ESTATE COLLATERAL

| Collateral location | December 31, 2021 Percent of real estate secured loans with collateral located in the state |
| --- | ---: |
| North Carolina | 35.9 |
| South Carolina | 15.6 |
| California | 11.8 |
| Florida | 7.0 |
| Georgia | 6.5 |
| Virginia | 6.3 |
| Washington | 3.7 |
| Texas | 3.1 |
| Tennessee | 1.5 |
| All other locations | 8.6 |

Among real estate secured loans, our revolving mortgage loans (“Home Equity Lines of Credit” or “HELOCs”) present a heightened risk due to long commitment periods during which the financial position of individual borrowers or collateral values may deteriorate significantly. In addition, a large percentage of our HELOCs are secured by junior liens. Substantial declines in collateral values could cause junior lien positions to become effectively unsecured. HELOCs secured by real estate were $1.82 billion, or 5.6%, of total loans at December 31, 2021, compared to $2.09 billion, or 6.4%, at December 31, 2020, and $2.38 billion, or 8.2%, at December 31, 2019.

Except for loans acquired through mergers and acquisitions, we have not purchased HELOCs in the secondary market, nor have we originated these loans to customers outside of our market areas. All originated HELOCs were underwritten by us based on our standard lending criteria. The HELOC portfolio consists of variable rate lines of credit which allow customer draws during a specified period of the line of credit, with a portion switching to an amortizing term following the draw period. Approximately 83.1% of the revolving mortgage portfolio relates to properties in North Carolina and South Carolina. Approximately 36.6% of the loan balances outstanding are secured by senior collateral positions while the remaining 63.4% are secured by junior liens.

We actively monitor the portion of our HELOCs in the interest-only period and when they will mature. Approximately 89.4% of outstanding balances at December 31, 2021, require interest-only payments, while the remaining require monthly payments equal to the greater of 1.5% of the outstanding balance, or $100. When HELOCs switch from interest-only to fully amortizing, including principal and interest, some borrowers may not be able to afford the higher monthly payments. We have not experienced a significant increase in defaults as a result of these increased payments. In the normal course of business, we will work with each borrower as they approach the revolving period maturity date to discuss options for refinance or repayment.

Loans and leases to borrowers in medical, dental or related fields were $7.09 billion as of December 31, 2021, which represents 21.9% of total loans and leases, compared to $5.54 billion or 16.9% of total loans and leases at December 31, 2020, and $5.16 billion or 17.9% of total loans and leases at December 31, 2019. The credit risk of this industry concentration is mitigated through our underwriting policies which emphasize reliance on adequate borrower cash flow rather than underlying collateral value and our preference for financing secured by owner-occupied real property. Except for this single concentration, no other industry represented more than 10% of total loans and leases outstanding at December 31, 2021.

### Interest rate risk management

Interest rate risk (“IRR”) results principally from: assets and liabilities maturing or repricing at different points in time, assets and liabilities repricing at the same point in time but in different amounts, and short-term and long-term interest rates changing in different magnitudes.

We assess our short-term IRR by forecasting net interest income over 24 months under various interest rate scenarios and comparing those results to forecasted net interest income, assuming stable rates. IRR scenarios modeled include, but are not limited to, immediate, parallel rate shocks, interest rate ramps, changes in the shape of the yield curve and changes in the relationships of our rates to market rates.

The composition of our interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities generally results in a net asset-sensitive position, concentrated in the middle of the yield curve, mostly driven by moves in the federal funds rate, whereby our assets will reprice faster than our liabilities. Interest rate sensitive assets generally consist of interest-bearing cash, investment securities, and commercial and consumer loans. Approximately 27% of our commercial and consumer loans have floating contractual reference rates. These floating rate loans are indexed to the following rates (with approximate percentages of each floating rate loan portfolio relative to the total floating rate loan portfolio included in parenthesis), Prime (41%), LIBOR (34%), Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) (12%) and US Treasury (13%).

Table 20 provides the impact on net interest income over 24 months resulting from various instantaneous interest rate shock scenarios as of December 31, 2021 and 2020.

### NET INCOME SENSITIVITY SIMULATION ANALYSIS

| Change in interest rate (basis points) | Estimated (decrease) increase in net interest income December 31, 2021 | December 31, 2020 |
| --- | ---: | ---: |
| -100 | (6.97)% | (6.24)% |
| +100 | 6.68 | 8.09 |
| +200 | 12.87 | 14.57 |

Net interest income sensitivity metrics at December 31, 2021 remain largely unchanged when compared to December 31, 2020.

Long-term interest rate risk exposure is measured using the economic value of equity (“EVE”) sensitivity analysis to study the impact of long-term cash flows on earnings and capital. EVE represents the difference between the sum of the present value of all asset cash flows and the sum of the present value of the liability cash flows. EVE sensitivity analysis involves discounting cash flows under different interest rate scenarios. The base-case measurement and its sensitivity to shifts in the yield curve allow management to measure longer-term repricing and option risk in the balance sheet.

Table 21 presents the EVE profile as of December 31, 2021 and 2020.

### Table 21

### ECONOMIC VALUE OF EQUITY MODELING ANALYSIS

| Change in interest rate (basis points) | Estimated (decrease) increase in EVE December 31, 2021 | December 31, 2020 |
| --- | ---: | ---: |
| -100 | (13.68)% | (21.20)% |
| +100 | 6.10 | 12.18 |
| +200 | 5.93 | 15.71 |

The EVE metrics at December 31, 2021, compared to December 31, 2020, were primarily affected by ongoing growth in non-maturity deposits during 2021, coupled with the interest rate environment.

We do not typically utilize interest rate swaps, floors, collars or other derivative financial instruments to attempt to hedge our overall balance sheet rate sensitivity and interest rate risk. Our simulations do not account for other business developments, including the CIT Merger, that could affect net interest income and EVE, or for management actions that could affect net interest income and EVE or that could be taken to change our risk profile. Accordingly, we can give no assurance that actual results would not differ materially from the estimated outcomes of our simulations.

Table 22 provides loan maturity distribution information.

### LOAN MATURITY DISTRIBUTION

*(Dollars in thousands)*

| Commercial: | At December 31, 2021, maturing Within One Year | One to Five Years | Five to 15 Years | After 15 years | Total |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Construction and land development | $147,315 | $395,055 | $471,156 | $98,271 | $1,111,797 |
| Owner occupied commercial mortgage | 503,491 | 3,194,733 | 7,924,721 | 369,680 | 11,992,625 |
| Non-owner occupied commercial mortgage | 234,654 | 1,343,459 | 1,359,985 | 33,295 | 2,971,393 |
| Commercial and industrial and leases | 1,231,000 | 2,861,414 | 1,563,114 | 55,124 | 5,710,652 |
| SBA-PPP | 43,116 | 450,705 | — | — | 493,821 |
| Total commercial loans and leases | 2,159,576 | 8,245,366 | 11,318,976 | 556,370 | 22,280,288 |
| Consumer: |  |  |  |  |  |
| Residential mortgage | 84,375 | 391,917 | 1,543,399 | 3,660,228 | 5,679,919 |
| Revolving mortgage | 113,575 | 211,084 | 91,455 | 1,378,891 | 1,795,005 |
| Construction and land development | 16,623 | 104,655 | 18,104 | 260,188 | 399,570 |
| Consumer auto | 9,784 | 625,953 | 695,651 | — | 1,331,388 |
| Consumer other | 305,972 | 121,327 | 74,655 | 45,774 | 547,728 |
| Total consumer loans | 530,329 | 1,454,936 | 2,423,264 | 5,345,081 | 9,753,610 |
| PCD loans | 32,719 | 95,715 | 139,102 | 70,088 | 337,624 |
| Total loans and leases | $2,722,624 | $9,796,017 | $13,881,342 | $5,971,539 | $32,371,522 |

Table 23 provides information regarding the sensitivity of loans and leases to changes in interest rates.

### Table 23

### LOAN INTEREST RATE SENSITIVITY

*(Dollars in thousands)*

| Commercial: | Loans maturing after one year with Fixed interest rates | Variable interest rates |
| --- | ---: | ---: |
| Construction and land development | $575,787 | $388,695 |
| Owner occupied commercial mortgage | 10,638,067 | 851,067 |
| Non-owner occupied commercial mortgage | 2,369,125 | 367,614 |
| Commercial and industrial and leases | 3,844,074 | 635,578 |
| SBA-PPP | 450,705 | — |
| Total commercial loans and leases | 17,877,758 | 2,242,954 |
| Consumer: |  |  |
| Residential mortgage | 2,761,276 | 2,834,268 |
| Revolving mortgage | 32,766 | 1,648,664 |
| Construction and land development | 103,947 | 279,000 |
| Consumer auto | 1,321,604 | — |
| Consumer other | 194,726 | 47,030 |
| Total consumer loans | 4,414,319 | 4,808,962 |
| PCD loans | 138,614 | 166,291 |
| Total loans and leases | $22,430,691 | $7,218,207 |

### Liquidity risk management

Liquidity risk is the risk an institution is unable to generate or obtain sufficient cash or its equivalents on a cost-effective basis to meet commitments as they fall due. The most common sources of liquidity risk arise from mismatches in the timing and value of on-balance sheet and off-balance sheet cash inflows and outflows. In general, on-balance sheet mismatches generate liquidity risk when the effective maturity of assets exceeds the effective maturity of liabilities. A commonly cited example of a balance sheet liquidity mismatch is when long-term loans (assets) are funded with short-term borrowings (liabilities). Other forms of liquidity risk include market constraints on the ability to convert assets into cash at expected levels, an inability to access funding sources at sufficient levels at a reasonable cost and changes in economic conditions or exposure to credit, market, operational, legal and reputation risks affecting an institution’s liquidity risk profile.

We utilize various limit-based measures to monitor, measure and control liquidity risk across three different types of liquidity:

- Tactical - Measures the risk of a negative cash flow position whereby cash outflows exceed cash inflows over a short-term horizon out to nine weeks;
- Structural - Measures the amount by which illiquid assets are supported by long-term funding; and
- Contingent - Measures the risk of having insufficient liquidity sources to support cash needs under potential future stressed market conditions or having an inability to access wholesale funding sources in a timely and cost effective manner.

We aim to maintain a diverse mix of liquidity sources to support the liquidity management function, while aiming to avoid funding concentrations by diversifying our external funding with respect to maturities, counterparties and nature. Our primary source of liquidity is our branch-generated deposit portfolio due to the generally stable balances and low cost. Additional sources include cash at the Federal Reserve Bank and various other correspondent bank accounts and unencumbered securities, which totaled $16.41 billion at December 31, 2021, compared to $9.63 billion at December 31, 2020. Another source of available funds is advances from the FHLB of Atlanta. Outstanding FHLB advances were $644.7 million as of December 31, 2021, and we had sufficient collateral pledged to secure $8.92 billion of additional borrowings. Further, in the current year, $4.81 billion in non-PCD loans with a lendable collateral value of $3.95 billion were used to create additional borrowing capacity at the Federal Reserve Bank. We also maintain Federal Funds and other credit lines, which had $556.0 million of available capacity at December 31, 2021.

### FOURTH QUARTER ANALYSIS

For the quarter ended December 31, 2021, net income was $123.3 million compared to $138.1 million for the corresponding quarter of 2020, a decrease of $14.8 million or 10.7%. The decrease was primarily the result of lower net interest income, lower noninterest income and higher noninterest expenses, partially offset by lower provision expense. Earnings per share were $12.09 for the fourth quarter of 2021 compared to $13.59 for the same period a year ago.

Net interest income was $357.4 million, a decrease of $1.3 million, or 0.4%, compared to the fourth quarter of 2020. This was primarily due to a decline in the yield on loans and a decrease in interest and fee income on SBA-PPP loans, largely offset by organic loan growth, higher investment and overnight balances and yields, as well as lower rates on interest-bearing deposits. SBA-PPP loans contributed $26.5 million in interest and fee income for the fourth quarter of 2021 compared to $42.2 million for the same quarter in 2020.

The taxable-equivalent net interest margin for the fourth quarter of 2021 was 2.58%, a decrease of 44 basis points from 3.02% in the same quarter in the prior year. The margin decline was primarily due to changes in earning asset mix driven by excess liquidity and higher balances in overnight investments, a decline in the yield on loans and lower income on SBA-PPP loans. These declines were partially offset by lower rates paid on interest-bearing deposits and higher investment yields.

Income tax expense was $30.3 million in the fourth quarter of 2021, compared to $36.6 million in the fourth quarter of 2020. The effective tax rates were 19.7% and 21.0% during each of these respective periods.

Provision for credit losses was a net benefit of $5.1 million during the fourth quarter of 2021, compared to $5.4 million in expense for the fourth quarter of 2020. The $10.5 million decrease was favorably impacted by a $4.7 million reserve release driven primarily by continued strong credit performance, low net charge-offs and improvement in macroeconomic factors. The net recovery ratio was 0.01% for the fourth quarter of 2021, compared to 0.06% for the fourth quarter of 2020.

Noninterest income was $114.3 million for the fourth quarter of 2021, a decrease of $12.5 million from the same period of 2020. Contributing to the decline was a $15.9 million reduction in fair market value adjustments on marketable equity securities, a $6.0 million decrease in mortgage income due to reductions in gain on sale and production volume driven by higher mortgage rates and increased competition and a $5.3 million decline in realized gains on available for sale securities. These declines were partially offset by a $5.3 million increase in wealth management services due to growth in assets under management resulting in higher advisory and transaction fees, a $3.6 million increase in service charges on deposit accounts, a $2.6 million increase in cardholder services, net, and a $1.2 million increase in both merchant services, net and other service charges and fees.

Noninterest expense was $323.2 million for the fourth quarter of 2021, an increase of $17.8 million from the same quarter last year. This was primarily due to increases of $9.9 million in salaries and wages (resulting from annual merit and higher revenue-based incentives), $4.5 million in CIT merger-related expenses, $3.7 million in processing fees paid to third parties (resulting from our continued investments in digital and technology to support revenue-generating businesses and improve internal processes), and temporary personnel costs.

## Controls and procedures

As filed, 3,414 characters.

BancShares’ management, with the participation of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of BancShares’ disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report, in accordance with Rule 13a-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”). Based upon the evaluation, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded BancShares’ disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance it is able to record, process, summarize and report information required to be disclosed in the reports it files under the Exchange Act in a timely and accurate manner.

There have been no changes in BancShares’ internal control over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of 2021 which have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, BancShares’ internal control over financial reporting.

### MANAGEMENT’S ANNUAL REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

The management of First Citizens BancShares, Inc. (“BancShares”) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. BancShares’ internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to the company’s management and Board of Directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements.

BancShares’ management assessed the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021. In making this assessment, it used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in *Internal Control-Integrated Framework* (2013). Based on that assessment, BancShares’ management believes, as of December 31, 2021, BancShares’ internal control over financial reporting is effective.

All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. A control deficiency exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent or detect misstatements on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those responsible for oversight of the company’s financial reporting. A material weakness in internal control over financial reporting is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of a company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

BancShares’ independent registered public accounting firm has issued an audit report on the company’s internal control over financial reporting. This report appears under “Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control over Financial Reporting” in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Filed Feb 25, 2022.
Source: SEC EDGAR, the filing index for accession 0000798941-22-000014. Last ingested by Listed: Nov 6, 2026, 12:24 ET. No prices; not investment advice.