# Tompkins Financial Corp: Form 10-K for the period ended Dec 31, 2017 - Company: [Tompkins Financial Corp](/companies/tmp.md) (CIK 1005817) - Form: 10-K - Filed: 2018-03-01 - Accepted by EDGAR: Mar 1, 2018, 14:51 ET - Period: 2017-12-31 - Accession: 0001005817-18-000002 - Inline XBRL: yes - Main document: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1005817/000100581718000002/tmp-20171231x10k.htm - All documents and exhibits: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1005817/000100581718000002/ ## Figures reported in this filing Standardized XBRL line items for the period ended 2017-12-31. | Line item | Period | Value | XBRL concept | | --- | --- | ---: | --- | | Interest expense | 3 months, 2017-10-01 to 2017-12-31 | $7.1m | us-gaap:InterestExpense | | Interest expense | 12 months, 2017-01-01 to 2017-12-31 | $25.5m | us-gaap:InterestExpense | | Income tax | 12 months, 2017-01-01 to 2017-12-31 | $42.6m | us-gaap:IncomeTaxExpenseBenefit | | Net income | 3 months, 2017-10-01 to 2017-12-31 | $2.5m | us-gaap:NetIncomeLoss | | Net income | 12 months, 2017-01-01 to 2017-12-31 | $52.5m | us-gaap:NetIncomeLoss | | Diluted EPS | 3 months, 2017-10-01 to 2017-12-31 | $0.16 | us-gaap:EarningsPerShareDiluted | | Diluted EPS | 12 months, 2017-01-01 to 2017-12-31 | $3.43 | us-gaap:EarningsPerShareDiluted | | Basic EPS | 3 months, 2017-10-01 to 2017-12-31 | $0.16 | us-gaap:EarningsPerShareBasic | | Basic EPS | 12 months, 2017-01-01 to 2017-12-31 | $3.46 | us-gaap:EarningsPerShareBasic | | Diluted shares (weighted) | 12 months, 2017-01-01 to 2017-12-31 | 15,073,255 shares | us-gaap:WeightedAverageNumberOfDilutedSharesOutstanding | | Capital expenditure | 12 months, 2017-01-01 to 2017-12-31 | $35.3m | us-gaap:PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment | | Dividends paid | 12 months, 2017-01-01 to 2017-12-31 | $27.6m | us-gaap:PaymentsOfDividendsCommonStock | | Share repurchases | 12 months, 2017-01-01 to 2017-12-31 | $0 | us-gaap:PaymentsForRepurchaseOfCommonStock | | Cash and equivalents | at 2017-12-31 | $84.3m | us-gaap:CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue | | Total assets | at 2017-12-31 | $6.65bn | us-gaap:Assets | | Total liabilities | at 2017-12-31 | $6.07bn | us-gaap:Liabilities | | Shareholders' equity | at 2017-12-31 | $574.8m | us-gaap:StockholdersEquity | ## Business As filed, 64,444 characters. *The disclosures set forth in this Item 1. Business are qualified by the section captioned “Forward-Looking Statements” in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of this Report and other cautionary statements set forth elsewhere in this Report.* ### General Tompkins Financial Corporation (“Tompkins” or the “Company”) is headquartered in Ithaca, New York and is registered as a Financial Holding Company with the Federal Reserve Board under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended. The Company is a locally oriented, community-based financial services organization that offers a full array of products and services, including commercial and consumer banking, leasing, trust and investment management, financial planning and wealth management, and insurance. At December 31, 2017, the Company’s subsidiaries included: four wholly-owned banking subsidiaries, Tompkins Trust Company (the “Trust Company”), The Bank of Castile (DBA Tompkins Bank of Castile), Mahopac Bank (DBA Tompkins Mahopac Bank), VIST Bank (DBA Tompkins VIST Bank); and a wholly-owned insurance agency subsidiary, Tompkins Insurance Agencies, Inc. (“Tompkins Insurance”). The Trust Company provides a full array of trust and investment services under the Tompkins Financial Advisors brand, including investment management, trust and estate, financial and tax planning as well as life, disability and long-term care insurance services. The Company’s principal offices are located at The Commons, Ithaca, New York, 14851, and its telephone number is (888) 503-5753. The Company’s common stock is traded on the NYSE American under the symbol “TMP.” Tompkins was organized in 1995, under the laws of the State of New York, as a bank holding company for the Trust Company, a commercial bank that has operated in Ithaca, New York and surrounding communities since 1836. Information relating to revenues, profit and loss, and total assets for the Company’s three business segments - banking, insurance, and wealth management - is incorporated herein by reference to “Note 21 - Segment and Related Information” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. of this Report. The Tompkins strategy centers around its core values and a commitment to delivering long-term value to our clients, communities, and shareholders. To achieve this the Company has a variety of strategic initiatives focused on delivering high quality products and services; a continual focus on improving operational effectiveness, investing in our people through talent management and development, maintaining appropriate risk management programs, and delivering profitable growth across all of our business lines. The Company's growth strategy includes initiatives to grow organically through our current businesses, as well as through possible acquisitions of financial institutions, branches, and financial services businesses. As such, the Company has acquired, and from time to time considers acquiring, banks, thrift institutions, branch offices of banks or thrift institutions, or other businesses that would complement the Company’s business or its geographic reach. The Company generally targets merger or acquisition partners that are culturally similar and have experienced management and possess either significant market presence or have potential for improved profitability through financial management, economies of scale and expanded services. The Company has pursued acquisition opportunities in the past, and continues to review new opportunities. The Company's most recent sizable acquisition was its 2012 acquisition of VIST Financial, a financial holding company headquartered in Wyomissing, Pennsylvania. Although Tompkins is a corporate entity, legally separate and distinct from its affiliates, bank holding companies such as Tompkins are generally required to act as a source of financial strength for their banking subsidiaries. Tompkins’ principal source of income is dividends from its subsidiaries. There are certain regulatory restrictions on the extent to which these subsidiaries can pay dividends or otherwise supply funds to Tompkins. See the section “Supervision and Regulation” for further details. ### Narrative Description of Business Information about the Company’s business segments is included in “Note 21 Segment and Related Information” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. of this Report. The Company has identified three business segments, consisting of banking, insurance and wealth management. Banking services consist primarily of attracting deposits from the areas served by the Company’s four banking subsidiaries’ 65 banking offices (45 offices in New York and 20 offices in Pennsylvania), and using those deposits to originate a variety of commercial loans, agricultural loans, consumer loans, real estate loans, and leases in those same areas. The Company’s lending function is managed within the guidelines of a comprehensive Board-approved lending policy. Policies and procedures are reviewed on a regular basis. Reporting systems are in place to provide management with ongoing information related to loan production, loan quality, concentrations of credit, loan delinquencies and nonperforming and potential problem loans. The Company has an independent third party loan review process that reviews and validates the risk identification and assessment made by the lenders and credit personnel. The results of these reviews are presented to the Board of Directors of each of the Company’s banking subsidiaries, and the Company’s Audit Committee. The Company’s principal expenses are interest on deposits, interest on borrowings, and operating and general administrative expenses, as well as provisions for loan and lease losses. Funding sources, other than deposits, include borrowings, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, and cash flow from lending and investing activities. The Company’s principal source of income is interest income on loans and securities. The Company maintains a portfolio of securities such as obligations of U.S. government agencies and U.S. government sponsored entities, obligations of states and political subdivisions thereof, and equity securities. Management typically invests in securities with short to intermediate average lives in order to better match the interest rate sensitivities of its assets and liabilities. Investment decisions are made within policy guidelines established by the Company’s Board of Directors. The investment policy is based on the asset/liability management goals of the Company, and is monitored by the Company’s Asset/Liability Management Committee. The intent of the policy is to establish a portfolio of high quality diversified securities, which optimizes net interest income within safety and liquidity limits deemed acceptable by the Asset/Liability Management Committee. The Company has operated its insurance agency subsidiary, Tompkins Insurance Agencies Inc., since 2001. Insurance services include property and casualty insurance, employee benefit consulting, life, long-term care and disability insurance. Tompkins Insurance is headquartered in Batavia, New York. Over the years, Tompkins Insurance has acquired smaller insurance agencies in the market areas served by the Company’s banking subsidiaries and successfully consolidated them into Tompkins Insurance. Tompkins Insurance offers services to customers of the Company’s banking subsidiaries by sharing offices with Tompkins Bank of Castile, the Trust Company, and Tompkins VIST Bank. In addition to these shared offices, Tompkins Insurance has five stand-alone offices in Western New York, and one stand-alone office in Tompkins County, New York. Wealth management services consist of investment management, trust and estate, financial and tax planning as well as life, disability and long-term care insurance services. Wealth management services are provided under the trade name Tompkins Financial Advisors. Tompkins Financial Advisors has office locations, and services are available, within all four of the Company’s subsidiary banks. ### Subsidiaries The Company operates four banking subsidiaries, and an insurance agency subsidiary. In addition, the Company also owns 100% of the common stock of Sleepy Hollow Capital Trust I, Leesport Capital Trust II, and Madison Statutory Trust I. The Company’s banking subsidiaries operate 65 offices, including 2 limited-service offices, with 45 banking offices located in New York and 20 banking offices located in southeastern Pennsylvania. The decision to operate as four locally managed community banks reflects management’s commitment to community banking as a business strategy. For Tompkins, personal delivery of high quality services, a commitment to the communities in which we operate, and the convergence of a single-source financial service provider characterize management’s community banking approach. The combined resources of the Tompkins organization provide increased capacity for growth and the greater capital resources necessary to make investments in technology and services. Tompkins has a comprehensive suite of products and services in the markets served by all four banking subsidiaries. These services include trust and investment services, insurance, leasing, card services, Internet banking, and remote deposit services. ### Tompkins Trust Company (the “Trust Company”) The Trust Company is a New York State-chartered commercial bank that has operated in Ithaca, New York and surrounding communities since 1836. The Trust Company provides wealth management services through Tompkins Financial Advisors (“TFA”), a division of Tompkins Trust Company. The Trust Company operates 14 banking offices, including one limited-service banking office in each of the counties of Tompkins, Cayuga, Cortland, Onondaga and Schuyler, New York. The Trust Company’s largest market area is Tompkins County, which has a population of approximately 105,000. Education plays a significant role in the Tompkins County economy with Cornell University and Ithaca College being two of the county’s major employers. The Trust Company has a full-service office in Cortland, New York and a full-service office in Auburn, New York. Both of these offices are located in counties contiguous to Tompkins County. The Trust Company also has a full service branch in Fayetteville, New York which is located in Onondaga County. As of December 31, 2017, the Trust Company had total assets of $2.1 billion, total loans of $1.3 billion and total deposits of $1.5 billion. ### Tompkins Bank of Castile Tompkins Bank of Castile is a New York State-chartered commercial bank and conducts its operations through its 17 banking offices, in towns situated in and around the areas commonly known as the Genesee Valley region of New York State. The main business office for Tompkins Bank of Castile is located in Batavia, New York and is shared with Tompkins Insurance. Tompkins Bank of Castile serves a five-county market, much of which is rural in nature, but also includes Monroe County (population approximately 748,000), where the city of Rochester is located. The population of the counties served by Tompkins Bank of Castile, other than Monroe, is approximately 205,000. In 2017, Tompkins Bank of Castile opened a loan production office in Amherst, New York, which is located near Buffalo, New York. As of December 31, 2017, Tompkins Bank of Castile had total assets of $1.5 billion, total loans of $1.1 billion and total deposits of $1.3 billion. ### Tompkins Mahopac Bank Tompkins Mahopac Bank is a New York State-chartered commercial bank that operates 14 banking offices. The 14 banking offices include 5 full-service offices in Putnam County, New York, 3 full-service offices in Dutchess County, New York, and 6 full-service offices in Westchester County, New York. Putnam County has a population of approximately 99,000 and is about 60 miles north of Manhattan. Dutchess County has a population of approximately 294,000, and Westchester County has a population of approximately 975,000. As of December 31, 2017, Tompkins Mahopac Bank had total assets of $1.4 billion, total loans of $947.4 million and total deposits of $972.4 million. ### Tompkins VIST Bank Tompkins VIST Bank is a full service Pennsylvania State-charted commercial bank that operates 20 banking offices in Pennsylvania, including one limited-service office. The 20 banking offices include 12 offices in Berks County, 5 offices in Montgomery County, 1 office in Philadelphia County, 1 office in Delaware County and 1 office in Schuylkill County. The population of the counties served by Tompkins VIST Bank is Philadelphia 1.6 million, Montgomery 823,000, Delaware 563,000, Berks 415,000 and Schuylkill 144,000. The main office is located in Wyomissing, Pennsylvania. As of December 31, 2017, Tompkins VIST Bank had total assets of $1.7 billion, total loans of $1.3 billion and total deposits of $1.1 billion. ### Tompkins Insurance Agencies, Inc. ("Tompkins Insurance") Tompkins Insurance is headquartered in Batavia, New York. Insurance services include property and casualty insurance, employee benefit consulting, and life, long-term care and disability insurance. Over the past 16 years, Tompkins Insurance has acquired smaller insurance agencies in the market areas serviced by the Company's banking subsidiaries and successfully consolidated them into Tompkins Insurance. Tompkins Insurance offers services to customers of the Company's banking subsidiaries by sharing offices with Tompkins Bank of Castile, Trust Company, and Tompkins VIST Bank. In addition to these shared offices, Tompkins Insurance has five stand-alone offices in Western New York, and one stand-alone office in Tompkins County. ### Sleepy Hollow Capital Trust I Sleepy Hollow Capital Trust I, a Delaware statutory business trust, was formed in 2003 and issued $4.0 million of floating rate (three-month LIBOR plus 305 basis points) trust preferred securities. The Company acquired Sleepy Hollow Capital Trust I through the acquisition of Sleepy Hollow Bancorp, Inc. in 2008. ### Leesport Capital Trust II Leesport Capital Trust II, a Delaware statutory business trust, was formed in 2002 and issued $10.0 million of mandatory redeemable capital securities carrying a floating interest rate of three month LIBOR plus 3.45%. The Company assumed the rights and obligations of VIST Financial pertaining to the Leesport Capital Trust II through the Company’s acquisition of VIST Financial in 2012. ### Madison Statutory Trust I Madison Statutory Trust I, a Connecticut statutory business trust formed in 2003, issued $5.0 million of mandatory redeemable capital securities carrying a floating interest rate of three month LIBOR plus 3.10%. VIST Financial assumed Madison Statutory Trust I pursuant to the purchase of Madison Bancshares Group, Ltd in 2004. The Company assumed the rights and obligations of VIST Financial pertaining to the Madison Statutory Trust I through the Company’s acquisition of VIST Financial in 2012. For additional details on the above capital trusts refer to “Note 10 - Trust Preferred Debentures” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. of this Report. ### Competition Competition for commercial banking and other financial services is strong in the Company’s market areas. In one or more aspects of its business, the Company’s subsidiaries compete with other commercial banks, savings and loan associations, credit unions, finance companies, Internet-based financial services companies, mutual funds, insurance companies, brokerage and investment banking companies, and other financial intermediaries. Some of these competitors have substantially greater resources and lending capabilities and may offer services that the Company does not currently provide. In addition, many of the Company’s non-bank competitors are not subject to the same extensive Federal regulations that govern financial holding companies and Federally-insured banks. Competition among financial institutions is based upon interest rates offered on deposit accounts, interest rates charged on loans and other credit and service charges, the quality and scope of the services rendered, the convenience of facilities and services, and, in the case of loans to commercial borrowers, relative lending limits. Management believes that a community-based financial organization is better positioned to establish personalized financial relationships with both commercial customers and individual households. The Company’s community commitment and involvement in its primary market areas, as well as its commitment to quality and personalized financial services, are factors that contribute to the Company’s competitiveness. Management believes that each of the Company’s subsidiary banks can compete successfully in its primary market areas by making prudent lending decisions quickly and more efficiently than its competitors, without compromising asset quality or profitability. In addition, the Company focuses on providing unparalleled customer service, which includes offering a strong suite of products and services. Although management feels that this business model has caused the Company to grow its customer base in recent years and allows it to compete effectively in the markets it serves, we cannot assure you that such factors will result in future success. ### Supervision and Regulation ### Regulatory Agencies As a registered financial holding company, the Company is regulated under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 as amended (“BHC Act”), and is subject to examination and comprehensive regulation by the Federal Reserve Board (“FRB”). The Company is also subject to the jurisdiction of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and is subject to disclosure and regulatory requirements under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). The Company's activities are also subject to regulation under the Federal Reserve Act, the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, the Dodd-Frank Act, the Truth-in-Lending Act (which governs disclosures of credit terms to consumer borrowers), the Truth-in-Savings Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act (which governs the manner in which consumer debts may be collected by collection agencies), the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (which requires financial institutions to provide certain information about home mortgage and refinanced loans), the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (which prohibits unfair or deceptive acts and practices in or affecting commerce), the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, and the Electronic Funds Transfer Act, as well as other federal, state and local laws. The Company’s common stock is traded on the NYSE American under the Symbol “TMP” and as a result the Company is subject to the rules of the NYSE American for listed companies. The Company’s banking subsidiaries are subject to examination and comprehensive regulation by various regulatory authorities, including the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), the New York State Department of Financial Services (“NYSDFS”), and the Pennsylvania Department of Banking and Securities (“PDBS”). Each of these agencies issues regulations and requires the filing of reports describing the activities and financial condition of the entities under its jurisdiction. Likewise, such agencies conduct examinations on a recurring basis to evaluate the safety and soundness of the institutions, and to test compliance with various regulatory requirements, including: consumer protection, privacy, fair lending, the Community Reinvestment Act, the Bank Secrecy Act, sales of non-deposit investments, electronic data processing, and trust department activities. The Company’s insurance subsidiary is subject to examination and regulation by the NYSDFS and the Pennsylvania Insurance Department. The Company’s wealth management subsidiary is subject to examination and regulation by various regulatory agencies, including the SEC and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”). The trust division of Tompkins Trust Company is subject to examination and comprehensive regulation by the FDIC and NYSDFS. ### Federal Home Loan Bank System The Company’s banking subsidiaries are also members of the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”), which provides a central credit facility primarily for member institutions for home mortgage and neighborhood lending. The Company’s banking subsidiaries are subject to the rules and requirements of the FHLB, including the requirement to acquire and hold shares of capital stock in the FHLB in an amount at least equal to the sum of 0.35% of the aggregate principal amount of its unpaid residential mortgage loans and similar obligations at the beginning of each year, up to a maximum of $25.0 million. The Company’s banking subsidiaries were in compliance with FHLB rules and requirements as of December 31, 2017. ### Regulatory Reform The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), which was enacted in July 2010, significantly changed the financial regulatory landscape in the United States. The Dodd-Frank Act was designed to enhance supervisory oversight and strengthen the regulation of the financial services industry. These regulations have increased, and will continue to increase, the Company's compliance costs, and they have negatively impacted the Company's revenues; however, because the Company has total consolidated assets of less than $10 billion, it is exempt from certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act which pertain only to larger institutions. The Dodd-Frank Act broadened the base for FDIC insurance assessment, as discussed in greater detail below. The legislation also contained provisions impacting publicly-traded companies generally, such as requirements that companies give shareholders a non-binding vote on executive compensation and “golden parachute” payments, and include numerous additional compensation-related disclosures in their proxy materials. As required by the Dodd-Frank Act, the FRB and other federal banking regulators promulgated rules prohibiting excessive compensation paid to bank holding company executives, regardless of whether the company is publicly traded. The Dodd-Frank Act established a new Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (“CFPB”) with broad powers to supervise and enforce consumer protection laws. The CFPB has broad rule-making authority for a wide range of consumer protection laws that apply to all banks and savings institutions, including the authority to prohibit “unfair, deceptive or abusive” acts and practices. The CFPB has examination and enforcement authority over all banks and savings institutions with more than $10 billion in assets. The Company and its subsidiaries are required to comply with the rules of the CFPB; however, these rules are generally enforced by our primary regulators, the FRB and the FDIC. The Dodd-Frank Act requires that any interchange transaction fee charged for a debit transaction be reasonable and proportional to the cost incurred by the issuer for the transaction. FRB regulations mandated by the Dodd-Frank Act limit interchange fees on debit cards to a maximum of 21 cents per transaction plus 5 basis points of the transaction amount. Issuers that, together with their affiliates, have less than $10 billion in assets, such as the Company, are exempt from the debit card interchange fee standards. However, FRB regulations prohibit all card issuers, including the Company and its banking subsidiaries, from restricting the number of networks over which electronic debit transactions may be processed to fewer than two unaffiliated networks, or inhibiting a merchant's ability to direct the routing of the electronic debit transaction over any network that the card issuer has enabled to process them. The Dodd-Frank Act also required the federal financial regulatory agencies to adopt rules that prohibit banks and their affiliates from engaging in proprietary trading and investing in and sponsoring certain unregistered investment companies (defined as hedge funds and private equity funds). The statutory provision is commonly called the “Volcker Rule.” During 2017, to comply with the Volcker Rule, the Company completed a divestiture of its interest in approximately $500,000 in covered funds. At December 31, 2017, the Company had outstanding investments of approximately $600,000 in covered funds (the "Legacy Investments"). The FRB has granted our request for an extended compliance period for our Legacy Investments, for which we must complete our divestiture process no later than July 2022. The Volcker Rule has not had, and is not expected to have, a material effect on the Company. ### Bank Holding Company Regulation In general, the BHC Act limits the business of bank holding companies to banking, managing or controlling banks and other activities that the FRB has determined to be so closely related to banking as to be a proper incident thereto. In addition, bank holding companies that qualify and elect to be financial holding companies may engage in any activity, or acquire and retain the shares of a company engaged in any activity, that is either (i) financial in nature or incidental to such financial activity (as determined by the FRB in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury) or (ii) complementary to a financial activity and does not pose a substantial risk to the safety and soundness of depository institutions or the financial system generally (as solely determined by the Federal Reserve Board), without prior approval of the FRB. Activities that are financial in nature include securities underwriting and dealing, insurance underwriting and making merchant banking investments. The Company is registered as a financial holding company. To maintain financial holding company status, a financial holding company and all of its depository institution subsidiaries must be “well capitalized” and “well managed.” A depository institution subsidiary is considered to be “well capitalized” if it satisfies the requirements for this status discussed in the section captioned “Capital Adequacy and Prompt Corrective Action,” below. A depository institution subsidiary is considered “well managed” if it received a composite rating and management rating of at least “satisfactory” in its most recent examination. A financial holding company’s status will also depend upon it maintaining its status as “well capitalized” and “well managed” under applicable FRB regulations. If a financial holding company ceases to meet these capital and management requirements, the FRB’s regulations provide that the financial holding company must enter into an agreement with the FRB to comply with all applicable capital and management requirements. Until the financial holding company returns to compliance, the FRB may impose limitations or conditions on the conduct of its activities, and the company may not commence any of the broader financial activities permissible for financial holding companies or acquire a company engaged in such financial activities without prior approval of the FRB. If the company does not return to compliance within 180 days, the FRB may require divestiture of the holding company’s depository institutions. Bank holding companies and banks must also be both well capitalized and well managed in order to acquire banks located outside their home state. In order for a financial holding company to commence any new activity permitted by the BHC Act or to acquire a company engaged in any new activity permitted by the BHC Act, each insured depository institution subsidiary of the financial holding company must have received a rating of at least “satisfactory” in its most recent examination under the Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”). See the section captioned “Community Reinvestment Act”, below. The FRB has the power to order any bank holding company or its subsidiaries to terminate any activity or to terminate its ownership or control of any subsidiary when the FRB has reasonable grounds to believe that continuation of such activity or such ownership or control constitutes a serious risk to the financial soundness, safety or stability of any bank subsidiary of the bank holding company. ### Share Repurchases and Dividends Under FRB regulations, the Company may not, without providing prior notice to the FRB, purchase or redeem its own common stock if the gross consideration for the purchase or redemption, combined with the net consideration paid for all such purchases or redemptions during the preceding twelve months, is equal to ten percent or more of the Company’s consolidated net worth. FRB regulations provide that dividends shall not be paid except out of current earnings and unless the prospective rate of earnings retention by the Company appears consistent with its capital needs, asset quality, and overall financial condition. Tompkins’ primary source of funds to pay dividends on its common stock is dividends from its subsidiary banks. The subsidiary banks are subject to regulations that limit the dividends that they may pay to Tompkins. Member banks may not declare or pay a dividend during the current calendar year that exceeds the sum of the bank's net income during the current calendar year and the retained net income of the prior two calendar years, unless approved by the pertinent regulatory agencies. ### Transactions with Affiliates and Other Related Parties There are Federal laws and regulations that govern transactions between the Company’s non-bank subsidiaries and its banking subsidiaries, including Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act and related regulations. These laws establish certain quantitative limits and other prudent requirements for loans, purchases of assets, and certain other transactions between a member bank and its affiliates. In general, transactions between the Company’s banking subsidiaries and its non-bank subsidiaries must be on terms and conditions, including credit standards, that are substantially the same or at least as favorable to the banking subsidiaries as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions involving non-affiliated companies. The Dodd-Frank Act significantly expanded the coverage and scope of the limitations on affiliate transactions within a banking organization. The Company’s authority to extend credit to its directors, executive officers and 10% shareholders, as well as to entities controlled by such persons, is governed by the requirements of Sections 22(g) and 22(h) of the Federal Reserve Act and Regulation O as promulgated by the FRB. Among other things, these provisions require that extensions of credit to insiders (i) be made on terms that are substantially the same as, and follow credit underwriting procedures that are not less stringent than, those prevailing for comparable transactions with unaffiliated persons and that do not involve more than the normal risk of repayment or present other unfavorable features; and (ii) not exceed certain limitations on the amount of credit extended to such persons, individually and in the aggregate, which limits are based, in part, on the amount of the Bank’s capital. In addition, extensions of credit in excess of certain limits must be approved by the Bank’s board of directors. ### Mergers and Acquisitions The BHC Act, the Bank Merger Act, the Change in Bank Control Act and other federal and state statutes regulate acquisitions of interests in commercial banks. The BHC Act requires the prior approval of the FRB for the direct or indirect acquisition by a bank holding company of more than 5.0% of the voting shares of a commercial bank or its parent holding company. Under the Bank Merger Act, the prior approval of the FRB or other appropriate bank regulatory authority is required for a member bank to merge with another bank or purchase the assets or assume the deposits of another bank. In reviewing applications seeking approval of merger and acquisition transactions, the bank regulatory authorities will consider, among other things, the competitive effect and public benefits of the transactions, the capital position of the combined organization, the risks to the stability of the U.S. banking or financial system, the applicant’s performance record under the CRA (see the section captioned “Community Reinvestment Act” included elsewhere in this item) and fair housing laws and the effectiveness of the subject organizations in combating money laundering activities. ### Support of Subsidiary Banks The Dodd-Frank Act codified the FRB’s longstanding policy of requiring bank holding companies to act as a source of financial and managerial strength to their subsidiary banks. Under this requirement, Tompkins is expected to commit resources to support its banking subsidiaries, including at times when it may not be advantageous for Tompkins to do so. Any capital loans by a bank holding company to any of its subsidiary banks are subordinated in right of payment to deposits and to certain other indebtedness of such subsidiary banks. In the event of a bank holding company’s bankruptcy, any commitment by the bank holding company to a federal bank regulatory agency to maintain the capital of a subsidiary bank will be assumed by the bankruptcy trustee and entitled to priority of payment. ### Liability of Commonly Controlled Institutions FDIC-insured depository institutions can be held liable for any loss incurred, or reasonably expected to be incurred, by the FDIC due to the default of an FDIC-insured depository institution controlled by the same bank holding company, or for any assistance provided by the FDIC to an FDIC-insured depository institution controlled by the same bank holding company that is in danger of default. “Default” means generally the appointment of a conservator or receiver. “In danger of default” means generally the existence of certain conditions indicating that default is likely to occur in the absence of regulatory assistance. ### Capital Adequacy and Prompt Corrective Action The Basel III Capital Rules were implemented by the FRB in 2013 and established a new comprehensive capital framework for U.S. banking organizations. The rules implemented the Basel Committee’s December 2010 framework known as “Basel III” for strengthening international capital standards as well as certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act. The Basel III Capital Rules substantially revised the risk-based capital requirements applicable to bank holding companies and depository institutions, including Tompkins, compared to the existing U.S. risk-based capital rules. The Basel III Capital Rules defined the components of capital and address other issues affecting the numerator in banking institutions’ regulatory capital ratios. The Basel III Capital Rules also addressed risk weights and other issues affecting the denominator in banking institutions’ regulatory capital ratios and replaced the existing risk-weighting approach, which was derived from the Basel I capital accords of the Basel Committee, with a more risk-sensitive approach based, in part, on the standardized approach in the Basel Committee’s 2004 “Basel II” capital accords. The Basel III Capital Rules also implemented the requirements of Section 939A of the Dodd-Frank Act to remove references to credit ratings from the federal banking agencies’ rules. The Basel III Capital Rules became effective for Tompkins on January 1, 2015 (subject to a phase-in period as described below). The Basel III Capital Rules, among other things, (i) introduced a new capital measure called “Common Equity Tier 1” (“CET1”), (ii) specified that Tier 1 capital consists of CET1 and “Additional Tier 1 capital” instruments meeting specified requirements, (iii) defined CET1 narrowly by requiring that most deductions/adjustments to regulatory capital measures be made to CET1 and not to the other components of capital and (iv) expanded the scope of the deductions/adjustments as compared to existing regulations. Under the Basel III Capital Rules, the minimum capital ratios, capital conservation buffer and other deductions/adjustments are being phased in as follows: *Basel III Capital- Timeline & Transition Period* *Phase-in Schedule* | Ratio | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | Full Phase-in 2019 | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Minimum Tier 1 Leverage Capital Ratio | 4.0% | 4.0% | 4.0% | 4.0% | **4.0%** | | Minimum Common Equity Tier 1 Risk-based Capital Ratio | 4.5% | 4.5% | 4.5% | 4.5% | **4.5%** | | Minimum Tier 1 Risk-based Capital Ratio | 6.0% | 6.0% | 6.0% | 6.0% | **6.0%** | | Minimum Total Risk-based Capital Ratio | 8.0% | 8.0% | 8.0% | 8.0% | **8.0%** | | Buffer | | | | | | | Capital Conservation Buffer | 0.00% | 0.625% | 1.25% | 1.875% | **2.50%** | | Minimum Common Equity Tier 1 Plus Capital Conservation Buffer | 4.5% | 5.125% | 5.75% | 6.375% | **7.00%** | | Minimum Tier 1 Capital Plus Capital Conservation Buffer | 6.0% | 6.625% | 7.25% | 7.875% | **8.50%** | | Minimum Total Capital Plus Capital Conservation Buffer | 8.0% | 8.625% | 9.25% | 9.875% | **10.50%** | | Deductions / Adjustments | | | | | | | Phase-in of certain deductions and adjustments | 40% | 60% | 80% | 100% | | Beginning January 1, 2016, under the Basel III phase-in rules, the Company became required to maintain a “capital conservation buffer” above the minimum risk-based capital requirements. The capital conservation buffer is exclusively composed of CET1 capital, and as described below, it applies to each of the three risk-based capital ratios, but not the leverage ratio. The capital conservation buffer was 1.25% at January 1, 2017 and 1.875% at January 1, 2018, and is scheduled to increase to 2.5% on January 1, 2019. At December 31, 2017, the Company complied with the capital conservation buffer requirement. When fully phased in on January 1, 2019, the Basel III Capital Rules will require Tompkins to maintain (i) a minimum ratio of CET1 to risk-weighted assets of at least 4.5%, plus a 2.5% capital conservation buffer (which when fully phased in, effectively results in a minimum ratio of CET1 to risk-weighted assets of at least 7.0%), (ii) a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 6.0%, plus the capital conservation buffer (which when fully phased in, effectively results in a minimum Tier 1 capital ratio of 8.5%), (iii) a minimum ratio of Total capital (that is, Tier 1 plus Tier 2) to risk-weighted assets of at least 8.0%, plus the capital conservation buffer (which when fully phased in, effectively results in a minimum total capital ratio of 10.5%) and (iv) a minimum leverage ratio of 4.0%, calculated as the ratio of Tier 1 capital to average assets. The aforementioned capital conservation buffer is designed to absorb losses during periods of economic stress. Banking institutions with a ratio of CET1 to risk-weighted assets above the minimum but below the conservation buffer (or below the combined capital conservation buffer and countercyclical capital buffer, when the latter is applied) will face constraints on dividends, equity repurchases and compensation based on the amount of the shortfall. The Basel III Capital Rules also provide for a “countercyclical capital buffer” that is applicable to only certain covered institutions and is not expected to apply to Tompkins for the foreseeable future. The Basel III Capital Rules imposed stricter regulatory capital deductions from and adjustments to capital, with most deductions and adjustments taken against CET1 capital. These include, for example, the requirement that (i) mortgage servicing assets, net of associated deferred tax liabilities; (ii) deferred tax assets, which cannot be realized through net operating loss carrybacks, net of any relative valuation allowances and net of deferred tax liabilities; and (iii) significant investments (i.e. 10% or greater ownership) in unconsolidated financial institutions be deducted from CET1 to the extent that any one such category exceeds 10% of CET1 or all such categories in the aggregate exceed 15% of CET1. Under the Basel III Capital Rules, the effect of certain accumulated other comprehensive items are not excluded, which could result in significant variations in the level of capital depending upon the impact of interest rate fluctuations on the fair value of the Company’s securities portfolio. Contained within the rule was a one-time option to permanently opt-out of the inclusion of accumulated other comprehensive income in the capital calculation based upon asset size. Tompkins decided to opt out of this requirement in January 2015. The Basel III Capital Rules also required the phase-out of certain hybrid securities, such as trust preferred securities, as Tier 1 capital of bank holding companies in equal installments between 2013 and 2016. Trust preferred securities no longer included in Tier 1 capital may nonetheless be included as a component of Tier 2 capital. However, because the trust preferred securities held by Tompkins were issued prior to May 19, 2010, and because Tompkins’ total consolidated assets were less than $15.0 billion as of December 31, 2009, these trust preferred securities are permanently grandfathered under the final rule and may continue to be included as Tier 1 capital. Implementation of the deductions and other adjustments to CET1 began on January 1, 2015. The deductions are being phased-in over a four-year period (beginning at 40% on January 1, 2015 and an additional 20% per year thereafter). In addition, the Basel III Capital Rules provide more advantageous risk weights for derivatives and repurchase-style transactions cleared through a qualifying central counterparty and increase the scope of eligible guarantors and eligible collateral for purposes of credit risk mitigation. The Standardized Approach Proposal expands the risk-weighting categories from the current four Basel I-derived categories (0%, 20%, 50% and 100%) to a much larger and more risk-sensitive number of categories, depending on the nature of the assets, generally ranging from 0% for U.S. government and agency securities, to 600% for certain equity exposures, and resulting in higher risk weights for a variety of asset categories, including many residential mortgages and certain commercial real estate loans. Specifics include, among other things: - Applying a 150% risk weight instead of a 100% risk weight for certain high volatility commercial real estate acquisition, development and construction loans. - For residential mortgage exposures, the current approach of a 50% risk weight for high-quality seasoned mortgages and a 100% risk-weight for all other mortgages is replaced with a risk weight of between 35% and 200% depending upon the mortgage’s loan-to-value ratio and whether the mortgage is a “category 1” or “category 2” residential mortgage exposure (based on eight criteria that include the term, use of negative amortization, balloon payments and certain rate increases). - Assigning a 150% risk weight to exposures (other than residential mortgage exposures) that are 90 days past due. - Providing for a 20% credit conversion factor for the unused portion of a commitment with an original maturity of one year or less that is not unconditionally cancellable (currently set at 0%). - Providing for a risk weight, generally not less than 20% with certain exceptions, for securities lending transactions based on the risk weight category of the underlying collateral securing the transaction. - Providing for a 100% risk weight for claims on securities firms. - Eliminating the current 50% cap on the risk weight for OTC derivatives. With respect to the Company’s banking subsidiaries, the Basel III Capital Rules revised the “prompt corrective action” (“PCA”) regulations adopted pursuant to Section 38 of the FDIA, by: (i) introducing a CET1 ratio requirement at each PCA category (other than critically undercapitalized), with the required CET1 ratio being 6.5% for well-capitalized status; (ii) increasing the minimum Tier 1 capital ratio requirement for each category, with the minimum Tier 1 capital ratio for well-capitalized status being 8% (as compared to 6%); and (iii) eliminating the provision that permitted a bank with a composite supervisory rating of 1 and a 3% leverage ratio to be considered adequately capitalized. The Basel III Capital Rules did not change the total risk-based capital requirement for any PCA category. The Company is in compliance, and management believes that the Company will continue to be in compliance, with the targeted capital ratios as such requirements are phased in. For further information concerning the regulatory capital requirements, actual capital amounts and the ratios of Tompkins and its bank subsidiaries, see the discussion in “Note 19 - Regulations and Supervision” in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. of this Report. ### Deposit Insurance Substantially all of the deposits of the Company’s banking subsidiaries are insured up to applicable limits by the Deposit Insurance Fund (“DIF”) of the FDIC and are subject to deposit insurance assessments to maintain the DIF. The Dodd-Frank Act permanently increased the maximum amount of deposit insurance to $250,000 per deposit category, per depositor, per institution retroactive to January 1, 2008. The Company’s banking subsidiaries pay deposit insurance premiums to the FDIC based on assessment rates established by the FDIC. The assessment rates are based upon asset size and other risks the institution poses to the Deposit Insurance Fund, or DIF. Under this assessment system, risk is defined and measured using an institution’s supervisory ratings with other risk measures, including financial ratios. The current total base assessment rates on an annualized basis range from 1.5 basis points for certain “well-capitalized,” “well-managed” banks, with the highest ratings, to 40 basis points for institutions posing the most risk to the DIF. The FDIC may raise or lower these assessment rates on a quarterly basis based on various factors to achieve a reserve ratio, which the Dodd-Frank Act has mandated to be no less than 1.35 percent of insured deposits. In 2011, the FDIC redefined the deposit insurance assessment base to equal average consolidated total assets minus average tangible equity as required by the Dodd-Frank Act. FDIC insurance expense totaled $2.5 million, $3.0 million and $3.0 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. FDIC insurance expense includes deposit insurance assessments, and Financing Corporation (“FICO”) assessments related to outstanding FICO bonds. FICO is a mixed-ownership government corporation established by the Competitive Equality Banking Act of 1987 whose sole purpose was to function as a financing vehicle for the now defunct Federal Savings & Loan Insurance Corporation. ### Depositor Preference The Federal Deposit Insurance Act provides that, in the event of the “liquidation or other resolution” of an insured depository institution, such as the Company’s subsidiary banks, the claims of depositors of the institution, including the claims of the FDIC, as subrogee of the insured depositors, and certain claims for administrative expenses of the FDIC as receiver, will have priority over other general unsecured claims against the institution. If an insured depository institution fails, insured and uninsured depositors, along with the FDIC, will have priority in payment ahead of unsecured, non-deposit creditors, including the parent bank holding company, with respect to any extensions of credit they have made to such insured depository institutions. ### Community Reinvestment Act The Company’s subsidiary banks are subject to the CRA and to certain fair lending and reporting requirements that relate to home mortgage lending. The CRA requires the federal banking regulators to assess the record of a financial institution in meeting the credit needs of the local communities, including low-and moderate-income neighborhoods, consistent with the safe and sound operation of the bank. The federal agencies consider an institution’s performance under the CRA in evaluating applications for mergers and acquisitions, and new offices. The ratings assigned by the federal agencies are publicly disclosed. As of December 31, 2017, the Company’s subsidiary banks all had ratings of satisfactory or better. ### Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 implemented a broad range of corporate governance, accounting and reporting requirements for companies that have securities registered under the Exchange Act. These requirements include: (1) requirements for audit committees, including independence and financial expertise; (2) certification of financial statements by the chief executive officer and chief financial officer of the reporting company; (3) standards for auditors and regulation of audits; (4) disclosure and reporting requirements for the reporting company and directors and executive officers; and (5) a range of civil and criminal penalties for fraud and other violations of securities laws. ### Anti-Money Laundering and the USA Patriot Act The Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (“USA Patriot Act”), the Bank Secrecy Act, the Money Laundering Control Act, and other federal laws, collectively impose obligations on all financial institutions, including the Company, to implement policies, procedures and controls which are reasonably designed to detect and report instances of money laundering and the financing of terrorism. Failure of a financial institution to maintain and implement adequate programs to combat money laundering and terrorist financing, or to comply with all of the relevant laws or regulations, could have serious legal and reputational consequences for the institution, including causing applicable bank regulatory authorities not to approve merger or acquisition transactions when regulatory approval is required or to prohibit such transactions even if approval is not required. ### Financial Privacy In accordance with the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999, federal banking regulators adopted rules that limit the ability of banks and other financial institutions to disclose non-public information about consumers to non-affiliated third parties. These limitations require disclosure of privacy policies to consumers and, in some circumstances, allow consumers to prevent disclosure of certain personal information to a non-affiliated third party. These provisions affect, among other things, how consumer information is transmitted through diversified financial companies and conveyed to outside vendors. ### Office of Foreign Assets Control Regulation The United States has imposed economic sanctions that affect transactions with designated foreign countries, nationals and others. These are known as the “OFAC” rules based on their administration by the U.S. Treasury Department Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”). The OFAC-administered sanctions take many forms. Generally, however, they include restrictions on trade with or investment in a sanctioned country and a blocking of assets in which the government or specially designated nationals of the sanctioned country have an interest. ### Environmental Regulations Properties owned by the Company's borrowers may contain environmental hazards. The cost of clean-up required by applicable federal and state laws may materially impair the value of these properties, resulting in a corresponding decrease in the value of the borrower's assets. When such properties are taken as collateral for a loan, the Company's collateral position is weakened. Further, if the Company forecloses on contaminated property or is deemed to become involved in the management of the borrower, the Company could become directly liable for clean-up costs. The Company mitigates this risk by requiring environmental examinations and tests on certain properties which are deemed to present a higher risk for potential contamination. The Company is not currently aware of any facts or circumstances relating to contaminated properties which are likely to have a material adverse impact on the Company's financial condition or results of operations. ### Consumer Protection Laws In connection with their lending and leasing activities, the Company’s banking subsidiaries are subject to a number of federal and state laws designed to protect borrowers and promote lending. These laws include the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the Fair and Accurate Credit Transaction Act of 2003, the Truth in Lending Act, the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, and similar laws at the state level. On January 10, 2013, the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau ("CFPB") issued a final rule implementing the ability-to-repay and qualified mortgage provisions of the Truth in Lending Act, as amended by the Dodd-Frank Act (the “QM Rule”). The QM Rule provides that a lender making a special type of loan, known as a “Qualified Mortgage”, is entitled to presume that the loan complies with the “ability to repay” safe harbor requirements. The QM Rule establishes different types of Qualified Mortgages, generally identified as loans with restrictions on loan features, limits or fees being charged and underwriting requirements. ### Cybersecurity Federal banking regulators issued several statements in 2015 advising banking institutions regarding steps they should be taking to prevent and address cybersecurity issues. In March 2015, federal banking regulators issued two related statements regarding cybersecurity. One statement indicated that financial institutions should design multiple layers of security controls to establish several lines of defense and to ensure that their risk management processes also address the risk posed by compromised customer credentials, including security measures to reliably authenticate customers accessing the financial institution’s Internet-based services of the financial institution. The other statement indicated that a financial institution’s management is expected to maintain sufficient business continuity planning processes to ensure the rapid recovery, resumption and maintenance of the institution’s operations after a cyber-attack involving destructive malware. The statement further indicated that financial institutions should develop appropriate processes to enable recovery of data and business operations and address rebuilding network capabilities and restoring data if the institution or its critical service providers fall victim to this type of cyber-attack. If we fail to observe the regulatory guidance, we could be subject to various regulatory sanctions, including financial penalties. Finally, in November 2015, federal banking regulators issued a statement alerting financial institutions to the increasing frequency and severity of cyber attacks involving extortion. The statement indicated that financial institutions should address this threat by developing and implementing effective programs to ensure the institutions are able to identify, protect, detect, respond to, and recover from these types of attacks. In 2016, the NYSDFS adopted a set of rules entitled “Cybersecurity Requirements for Financial Services Companies”, which became effective March 1, 2017, subject to a full phase-in over the following two years. This NYSDFS rule requires financial services companies, including Tompkins, to maintain a maintain a cybersecurity program designed to protect the confidentiality, integrity and availability of the company’s information systems, establish cybersecurity policies and procedures, identify persons responsible for implementing and enforcing the cybersecurity program and cybersecurity policies and procedures, and conduct periodic risk assessments of its information systems. In the ordinary course of business, Tompkins relies on electronic communications and information systems to conduct our operations and to store, process, or transmit sensitive data. Tompkins employs a layered, defensive approach that leverages people, processes and technology to manage and maintain cybersecurity controls. Tompkins employs preventative and detective tools which are designed to monitor and provide alerts regarding suspicious activity. Notwithstanding the strength of our defensive measures, the threat from cyber-attacks is severe, attacks are sophisticated and increasing in volume, and attackers respond rapidly to changes in defensive measures. While to date, Tompkins has not experienced a significant compromise, significant data loss or any material financial losses related to cybersecurity attacks, our systems and those of our customers and third-party service providers are under constant threat and it is possible that we could experience a significant event in the future. Risks and exposures related to cybersecurity attacks are expected to remain high for the foreseeable future due to the rapidly evolving nature and sophistication of these threats, as well as due to the expanding use of Internet banking, mobile banking and other technology-based products and services by us and our customers. See Item 1A. Risk Factors for a further discussion of risks related to cybersecurity. ### Incentive Compensation The Dodd-Frank Act required the federal bank regulatory agencies and the SEC to establish joint regulations or guidelines prohibiting incentive-based payment arrangements at specified regulated entities, such as the Company, having at least $1 billion in total assets that encourage inappropriate risks by providing an executive officer, employee, director or principal shareholder with excessive compensation, fees, or benefits or that could lead to material financial loss to the entity. In addition, these regulators must establish regulations or guidelines requiring enhanced disclosure to regulators of incentive-based compensation arrangements. The agencies proposed such regulations in May 2016. If these or other regulations are adopted in a form similar to that initially proposed, they will impose limitations on the manner in which the Company may structure compensation for its executives. Given the uncertainty at this time whether or when a final rule will be adopted, management cannot determine the potential impact on the Company. Additionally, in 2010, the FRB, OCC and FDIC issued comprehensive final guidance on incentive compensation policies intended to ensure that the incentive compensation policies of banking organizations do not undermine the safety and soundness of such organizations by encouraging excessive risk-taking. The guidance, which covers all employees that have the ability to materially affect the risk profile of an organization, either individually or as part of a group, is based upon the key principles that a banking organization’s incentive compensation arrangements should (i) provide incentives that do not encourage risk-taking beyond the organization’s ability to effectively identify and manage risks, (ii) be compatible with effective internal controls and risk management, and (iii) be supported by strong corporate governance, including active and effective oversight by the organization’s board of directors. Management believes the current and past compensation practices of the Company do not encourage excessive risk taking or undermine the safety and soundness of the organization. The FRB reviews, as part of the regular, risk-focused examination process, the incentive compensation arrangements of banking organizations, such as the Company, that are not “large, complex banking organizations.” These reviews are tailored to each organization based on the scope and complexity of the organization’s activities and the prevalence of incentive compensation arrangements. The findings of the supervisory initiatives are included in reports of examination. Deficiencies are incorporated into the organization’s supervisory ratings, which can affect the organization’s ability to make acquisitions and take other actions. Enforcement actions may be taken against a banking organization if its incentive compensation arrangements, or related risk-management control or governance processes, pose a risk to the organization’s safety and soundness and the organization is not taking prompt and effective measures to correct the deficiencies. In 2016, the NYSDFS issued “Guidance on Incentive Compensation Arrangements,” directing all New York state regulated banks (including the Trust Company, Tompkins Bank of Castile, and Tompkins Mahopac Bank) to ensure that any employee incentive arrangements do not encourage inappropriate risk-taking or improper sales practices. Under this guidance, incentive compensation based on employee performance indicators may only be paid if the bank has effective risk management, oversight and control systems in place. Incentive compensation plans must also be structured to balance risk and reward in a manner which does not encourage imprudent risk-taking, and must be supported by robust corporate governance (including effective Board oversight) and risk management processes and internal controls. ### Other Legislative Initiatives From time to time, various legislative and regulatory initiatives are introduced in Congress and state legislatures, as well as by regulatory authorities. These initiatives may include proposals to expand or contract the powers of bank holding companies and depository institutions, proposals to change the financial institution regulatory environment, or proposals that affect public companies generally. Such legislation could change banking laws and the operating environment of Tompkins in substantial, but unpredictable ways. We cannot predict whether any such legislation will be enacted, and, if enacted, the effect that it, or any implementing regulations would have on our financial condition or results of operations. ### Employees At December 31, 2017, the Company had 1,041 employees, approximately 116 of whom were part-time. No employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement and the Company believes its employee relations are excellent. ### Available Information The Company maintains a website at www.tompkinsfinancial.com. The Company makes available free of charge through its website its annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, its proxy statements related to its shareholders’ meetings, and amendments to these reports or statements, filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, as soon as reasonably practicable after the Company electronically files such material with, or furnishes such material to, the SEC. Copies of these reports are also available at no charge to any person who requests them, with such requests directed to Tompkins Financial Corporation, Investor Relations Department, The Commons, Ithaca, New York 14851, telephone no. (888) 503-5753. Materials that the Company files with the SEC may be read and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. This information may also be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains an Internet website that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at www.sec.gov. The information contained on the Company's website is provided for the information of the reader and it is not intended to be active links. The Company is not including the information contained on the Company’s website as a part of, or incorporating it by reference into, this Annual Report on Form 10-K, or into any other report filed with or furnished to the SEC by the Company. ## Risk factors As filed, 43,909 characters. Our Company's success is dependent on management's ability to identify and manage the risks inherent in our financial services business. These risks include credit risk, market risk, liquidity risk, operational risk, model risk, compliance and legal risk, and strategic and reputation risk. We list below the material risk factors we face. Any of these risks could result in a material adverse impact on our business, operating results, financial condition, liquidity, and cash flow, or may cause our results to vary materially from recent results, or from the results implied by any forward-looking statements made by us. ### Risks Related to the Company’s Business **The Company is subject to increased business risk because the Company has a significant concentration of commercial real estate and commercial business loans, repayment of which is often dependent on the cash flows of the borrower.** The Company offers different types of commercial loans to a variety of businesses. Real estate lending is generally considered to be collateral based lending with loan amounts based on predetermined loan to collateral values. As such, declines in real estate valuations in the Company’s market area would lower the value of the collateral securing these loans. The Company’s commercial business loans are made based primarily on the cash flow and creditworthiness of the borrower and secondarily on the underlying collateral provided by the borrower, with liquidation of the underlying real estate collateral being viewed as the primary source of repayment in the event of borrower default. The borrowers’ cash flow may be difficult to predict, and collateral securing these loans may fluctuate in value. Although commercial business loans are often collateralized by equipment, inventory, accounts receivable, or other business assets, the liquidation of collateral in the event of default is often an insufficient source of repayment. As of December 31, 2017, commercial and commercial real estate loans totaled $3.3 billion or 70.5% of total loans. **The Company’s agricultural loans are often dependent upon the health of the agricultural industry in the location of the borrower, and the ability of the borrower to repay may be affected by many factors outside of the borrower’s control.** As part of the Company’s commercial business lending activities, the Company originates agricultural loans, consisting of agricultural real estate loans and agricultural operating loans. As of December 31, 2017, $238.6 million or 5.1% of the Company’s total loan portfolio consisted of agriculturally-related loans, including $130.0 million in agricultural real estate loans and $108.6 million in agricultural operating loans. Payments on agricultural loans are dependent on the profitable operation or management of the related farm property. The success of the farm may be affected by many factors outside the control of the borrower, including adverse weather conditions that prevent the planting of a crop or limit crop yields (such as hail, drought and floods), loss of livestock due to disease or other factors, declines in market prices for agricultural products and the impact of governmental regulations and subsidies (including changes in price supports and environmental regulations). Many farms are dependent upon a limited number of key individuals whose injury or death may significantly affect the successful operation of the farm. If the cash flow from a farming operation is diminished, the borrower’s ability to repay the loan may be impaired. While agricultural operating loans are generally secured by a blanket lien on the farm’s operating assets, any repossessed collateral in respect of a defaulted loan may not provide an adequate source of repayment of the outstanding balance. **Declines in asset values may result in impairment charges and may adversely affect the value of the Company’s results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.** A majority of the Company’s investment portfolio is comprised of securities which are collateralized by residential mortgages. These residential mortgage-backed securities include securities of U.S. government agencies, U.S. government-sponsored entities, and private-label collateralized mortgage obligations. The Company’s securities portfolio also includes obligations of U.S. government-sponsored entities, obligations of states and political subdivisions thereof, U.S. corporate debt securities and equity securities. A more detailed discussion of the investment portfolio, including types of securities held, the carrying and fair values, and contractual maturities is provided in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Report. The fair value of investments may be affected by factors other than the underlying performance of the issuer or composition of the obligations themselves, such as rating downgrades, adverse changes in the business climate and a lack of liquidity for resale of certain investment securities. The Company periodically, but not less than quarterly, evaluates investments and other assets for impairment indicators in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. A decline in the fair value of the securities in our investment portfolio could result in an other-than temporary impairment (“OTTI”) write-down that would reduce our earnings. Further, given the significant judgments involved, if we are incorrect in our assessment of OTTI, this error could have a material adverse effect on our results of operation, financial condition, and cash flows. **A decline in the value of our goodwill and other intangible assets could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.** As of December 31, 2017, the Company had $101.6 million of goodwill and other intangible assets. The Company is required to test its goodwill and intangible assets for impairment on a periodic basis. A significant decline in the Company’s expected future cash flows, a significant adverse change in business climate, slower growth rates or a significant and sustained decline in the price of the Company’s common stock, may necessitate our taking charges in the future related to the impairment of the Company’s goodwill and intangible assets. If we make an impairment determination in a future reporting period, the Company’s earnings and the book value of these intangible assets would be reduced by the amount of the impairment. Further, a goodwill impairment charge could significantly restrict the ability of our banking subsidiaries to make dividend payments to us without prior regulatory approval, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. **The Company may be adversely affected by the soundness of other financial institutions.** Financial services institutions are interrelated as a result of counterparty relationships. The Company has exposure to many different industries and counterparties, and routinely executes transactions with counterparties in the financial services industry. The most important counterparty for the Company, in terms of liquidity, is the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York (“FHLBNY”). The Company also has a relationship with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh (“FHLBPITT”). The Company uses FHLBNY as its primary source of overnight funds and also has long-term advances and repurchase agreements with FHLBNY. The Company has placed sufficient collateral in the form of commercial and residential real estate loans at FHLBNY. In addition, the Company is required to hold stock in FHLBNY and FHLBPITT. The amount of borrowed funds and repurchase agreements with the FHLBNY and FHLBPITT, and the amount of FHLBNY and FHLBPITT stock held by the Company, at its most recent fiscal year-end are discussed in Part II, Item 8 of this Report on Form 10-K. There are 11 branches of the FHLB, including New York and Pittsburgh. The FHLBNY and the FHLBPITT are jointly and severally liable along with the other Federal Home Loan Banks for the consolidated obligations issued on behalf of the Federal Home Loan Banks through the Office of Finance. Dividends on, redemption of, or repurchase of shares of the FHLBNY’s or FHLBPITT’s capital stock cannot occur unless the principal and interest due on all consolidated obligations have been paid in full. If another Federal Home Loan Bank were to default on its obligation to pay principal or interest on any consolidated obligations, the Federal Home Loan Finance Agency (the “Finance Agency”) may allocate the outstanding liability among one or more of the remaining Federal Home Loan Banks on a pro rata basis or on any other basis the Finance Agency may determine. As a result, the FHLBNY’s or FHLBPITT’s ability to pay dividends on, to redeem, or to repurchase shares of capital stock could be affected by the financial condition of one or more of the other Federal Home Loan Banks. Any such adverse effects on the FHLBNY or FHLBPITT could adversely affect our liquidity, the value of our investment in FHLBNY or FHLBPITT common stock, and could negatively impact our results of operations. Systemic weakness in the FHLB could result in higher costs of FHLB borrowings, reduced value of FHLB stock, and increased demand for alternative sources of liquidity that are more expensive, such as brokered time deposits, the discount window at the Federal Reserve, or lines of credit with correspondent banks. Any of these scenarios could adversely affect our liquidity, the value of our investment in FHLB common stock and our financial condition. **The Company relies on cash dividends from its subsidiaries to fund its operations, and payment of those dividends could be discontinued at any time.** The Company is a financial holding company whose principal assets and sources of income are its wholly-owned subsidiaries. The Company is a separate and distinct legal entity from its subsidiaries, and therefore the Company relies primarily on dividends from these banking and other subsidiaries to meet its obligations and to provide funds for the payment of dividends to the Company’s shareholders, to the extent declared by the Company’s board of directors. Various federal and state laws and regulations limit the amount of dividends that a bank may pay to its parent company and impose regulatory capital and liquidity requirements on the Company and its banking subsidiaries. Further, as a holding company, the Company’s right to participate in a distribution of assets upon the liquidation or reorganization of a subsidiary is subject to the prior claims of the subsidiary’s creditors (including, in the case of the Company’s banking subsidiaries, the banks’ depositors). If the Company were unable to receive dividends from its subsidiaries it would materially and adversely affects the Company’s liquidity and its ability to service its debt, pay its other obligations, or pay cash dividends on its common stock. **The Company’s business may be adversely affected by conditions in the financial markets and local and national economies.** General economic conditions impact the banking and financial services industry. The Company’s financial performance generally, and in particular, the ability of borrowers to pay interest on and repay the principal of outstanding loans and the value of collateral securing these loans, is highly dependent upon the business environment in the markets where the Company operates. The Company serves numerous market areas within New York State and Pennsylvania, and the Company is dependent on the economic conditions of these two states. Unfavorable or uncertain economic and market conditions could lead to credit quality concerns related to repayment ability and collateral protection as well as reduced demand for the services offered by the Company’s three business segments. In recent years there has been gradual improvement in the U.S. economy as evidenced by a rebound in the housing market, lower unemployment and higher equities markets; however economic growth has been uneven and opinions vary on the strength and direction of the economy. A downturn in the economy or financial markets could adversely affect the credit quality of the Company’s loan portfolio, results of operations and financial condition. Economic downturns could affect the volume of income from and demand for fee-based services, including investment services and insurance commissions and fees. Revenues from the trust and wealth management businesses are dependent on the level of assets under management. Market volatility that leads customers to pull money out of the market or lower equity and bond prices can reduce the Company’s assets under management and thereby decrease revenues. **Our business is concentrated in and largely dependent upon the continued growth and welfare of the general geographical markets in which we operate.** Our operations are heavily concentrated in the New York State and to a lesser extent Pennsylvania and, as a result, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows are significantly impacted by changes in the economic conditions in those areas. Our success depends to a significant extent upon the business activity, population, income levels, deposits and real estate activity in these markets. Although our clients’ business and financial interests may extend well beyond these markets, adverse economic conditions that affect these markets could reduce our growth rate, affect the ability of our clients to repay their loans to us, affect the value of collateral underlying loans and generally affect our financial condition and results of operations. Because of our geographic concentration, we are less able than other regional or national financial institutions to diversify our credit risks across multiple markets. For additional information on our market area, see Part I, Item 1, “Business” of this Report on Form 10-K. **Our insurance agency subsidiary’s commission revenues are based on premiums set by insurers and any decreases in these premium rates could adversely affect our operations and revenues.** Our insurance agency subsidiary, Tompkins Insurance, derives the bulk of its revenue from commissions paid by insurance underwriters on the sale of insurance products to clients. Tompkins Insurance does not determine the insurance premiums on which its commissions are based. Insurance premiums are cyclical in nature and may vary widely based on market conditions. As a result, insurance brokerage revenues and profitability can be volatile. Revenue from insurance commissions and fees could be negatively affected by fluctuations in insurance premiums and other factors beyond the Company’s control, including changes in laws and regulations impacting the healthcare and insurance markets. In addition, there have been and may continue to be various trends in the insurance industry toward alternative insurance markets including, among other things, increased use of self-insurance, captives, and risk retention groups. Even if Tompkins Insurance is able to participate in these activities, it is unlikely to realize revenues and profitability as favorable as those realized from our traditional brokerage activities. We cannot predict the timing or extent of future changes in premiums and thus commissions. As a result, we cannot predict the effect that future premium rates will have on our operations. Decreases in premium rates could adversely affect our operations and revenues. **The Company is subject to fluctuations in interest rates and other market risks, which could materially and adversely affect our earnings, financial condition, and liquidity.** The Company’s earnings, financial condition and liquidity are susceptible to fluctuations in market interest rates. Interest rates are affected by many factors which are outside of our control, including financial regulation, economic/monetary policy, and political conditions, and other factors. Net interest income, which is the difference between interest earned on loans and investments and interest paid on deposits and borrowings, is our primary source of revenue, and could be adversely impacted by fluctuations in interest rates, potentially resulting in losses. Changes in interest rates may have a different effect on the interest earned on our assets than it does on the interest paid on our borrowings or other liabilities. This is because our assets and liabilities reprice at different times and by different amounts as interest rates change. The level of net interest income is dependent upon the volume and mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, the level of nonperforming assets, and the level and trend of interest rates. Changes in market interest rates will also affect the level of prepayments on the Company’s loans and payments on mortgage-backed securities, resulting in the receipt of proceeds that may be reinvested at a lower rate than the loan or mortgage-backed security being prepaid. Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors, including: inflation, economic growth, employment levels, monetary policy and international markets. Significant fluctuations in interest rates could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s earnings, financial condition, and liquidity. The Company’s efforts to manage interest rate risk may not be sufficient to prevent these adverse outcomes. For information about how the Company manages its interest rate risk, refer to Part II, Item 7A, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” of this Report. **Our funding sources may prove insufficient to replace deposits and support our future growth.** We must maintain sufficient cash flow and liquid assets to satisfy current and future financial obligations, including demand for loans and deposit withdrawals, funding operating costs, and for other corporate purposes. As a part of our liquidity management, we use a number of funding sources in addition to core deposit growth and repayments and maturities of loans and investments. As we continue to grow, we are likely to become more dependent on these sources, which may include various short-term and long-term wholesale borrowings, including Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase, brokered certificates of deposit, proceeds from the sale of loans, and borrowings from the FHLBNY and FHLBPITT and others. We also maintain available lines of credit with the FHLBNY and FHLBPITT that are secured by loans. Adverse operating results or changes in industry conditions could make it difficult or impossible for us to access these additional funding sources and could make our existing funds more volatile. Our financial flexibility could be materially constrained if we are unable to maintain access to funding or if adequate financing is not available to accommodate future growth at acceptable interest rates. If we are required to rely more heavily on more expensive funding sources to support future growth, our revenues may not increase proportionately to cover our costs. In that case, our operating margins and profitability would be adversely affected. Further, the volatility inherent in some of these funding sources, particularly including brokered deposits, may increase our exposure to liquidity risk. Any interruption in these sources of liquidity when needed could adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition, cash flow or regulatory capital levels. In addition, reduced liquidity could result from circumstances beyond our control, such as general market disruptions or operational problems that affect us or third parties. Management’s efforts to closely monitor our liquidity position for compliance with internal policies may not be successful or sufficient to deal with dramatic or unanticipated reductions in liquidity. **The Company operates in a highly regulated environment and may be adversely impacted by current or future laws and regulations due to increased compliance costs, potential fines for noncompliance, and restrictions on our ability to offer products or buy or sell businesses.** The Company is subject to extensive state and federal laws and regulations, supervision, and legislation that affect how it conducts its business. The majority of these laws and regulations are for the protection of consumers, depositors and the deposit insurance funds. The regulations influence such things as the Company’s lending practices, capital structure, investment practices, and dividend policy. The Dodd-Frank Act, enacted in July 2010, represented a comprehensive overhaul of the financial services industry in the United States and required federal agencies to implement many new rules. This legislation established the CFPB, which has broad authority to regulate the consumer financial products and services we offer. The Volcker Rule prohibits banking entities from sponsoring or investing in covered funds, and the Company is required to divest itself of $600,000 in covered funds by July 2022. While most of the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act are now in effect, others are still subject to rules that have yet to be adopted or implemented. Reforms, both under the Dodd-Frank Act and otherwise, have had, and will continue to have, a significant effect on the entire financial services industry. Compliance with these regulations and other initiatives negatively impacts revenue and increases the cost of doing business, both in terms of transition expenses and on an ongoing basis. Any new regulatory requirements or changes to existing requirements could require changes to the Company’s businesses, result in increased compliance costs and affect the profitability of such businesses. Refer to “Supervision and Regulation” in Part I, Item 1 - “Business” of this Report on Form 10‑K for additional information on material laws and regulations impacting the Company’s business. As discussed above under the “Supervision and Regulation” section, under Basel III and the Dodd-Frank Act the federal banking agencies established stricter risk-based capital requirements and leverage limits to apply to banks and bank holding companies. These requirements, and any additional requirements adopted in the future, could adversely affect the Company’s ability to pay dividends, or could require it to reduce business levels or to raise capital, including in ways that may adversely affect its results of operations or financial condition. Additionally, banking regulators are authorized to take supervisory actions that may restrict or limit a financial institution's activities. The financial services supervisory environment has become significantly more demanding and restrictive since the financial crisis of 2008. Regulatory restrictions on our activities could adversely affect our costs and revenues, and may impair our ability to execute our strategic plans. In addition, if our regulators identify a compliance failure, we may be assessed a fine, prohibited from completing a strategic acquisition or divestiture, or subject to other actions imposed by the regulatory authorities. The recent regulatory activity and increased scrutiny have resulted, and may continue to result, in increases in our costs of doing business, and could result in decreased revenues and net income, reduce our ability to effectively compete to attract and retain customers, or make it less attractive for us to continue providing certain products and services. Any future changes in federal or state law and regulations, as well as the interpretations and implementations, or modifications or repeals, of such laws and regulations, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. **As an organization focused on building comprehensive relationships with clients, employees and the communities we serve, our reputation is critical to our business, and damage to it could have a material adverse effect on our business and prospects.** Our success as a Company relies on maintaining the value of our brand and our good reputation with our current and potential customers and employees. Through our branding, we communicate to the market about our Company and our product and service offerings. Maintaining a positive reputation is critical to our attracting and retaining clients and employees. Accordingly, reputational damage would likely have a materially adverse impact on our business prospects and our ability to execute on our business strategy. Harm to our reputation can arise from many sources, including regulatory actions or fines, improperly handled conflicts of interest, operating system failures or security breaches, customer complaints, litigation, actual or perceived employee misconduct, misconduct by our outsourced service providers or other counterparties, or other unethical behavior could all cause harm to our reputation, impair our ability to attract and retain customers, and make it more difficult or expensive to obtain external funding. Negative publicity regarding us or any of our subsidiaries, whether or not accurate, may damage our reputation, which could have a material adverse effect on our assets, business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations. **The Company may be exposed to regulatory sanctions or liability if we do not timely detect and report money laundering or other illegal activities.** We are required to comply with anti-money laundering and anti-terrorism laws. These laws and regulations require us, among things, to enact policies and procedures to confirm the identity of our customers, and to report suspicious transactions to regulatory agencies. These laws and regulations are complex and require costly, sophisticated monitoring systems and qualified personnel. The policies and procedures that we have adopted in order to detect and prevent such illegal transactions may not be successful in eliminating all instances of such transactions. To the extent we fail to fully comply with applicable laws and regulations, we face the possibility of fines or other penalties, such as restrictions on our business activities, and we may also suffer reputational harm, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. **Changes in U.S. federal, state and local tax law or interpretations of existing tax law could increase our tax burden or otherwise adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations.** The Company is subject to taxation at the federal, state and local levels in the United States. On December 22, 2017, the U.S. government enacted comprehensive tax legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the "Tax Act"). The changes included in the Tax Act are broad and complex. The final transition impacts of the Tax Act may differ from the estimates provided elsewhere in this report, possibly materially, due to, among other things, changes in interpretations of the Tax Act, any legislative action to address questions that arise because of the Tax Act, any changes in accounting standards for income taxes or related interpretations in response to the Tax Act, or any updates or changes to estimates the Company has utilized to calculate the transition impacts, including impacts from changes to current year earnings estimates. The estimated impact of the new law is based on management’s current knowledge and assumptions and recognized impacts could be materially different from current estimates based on our actual results in fiscal 2018 and our further analysis of the new law. Refer to "Note 14 Income Taxes" in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. of this Report for additional information on the impact of the Tax Act. **Our future success is dependent on our ability to compete effectively in a highly competitive industry and market areas.** Competition for commercial banking and other financial services is strong in the Company’s market areas. In one or more aspects of its business, the Company’s subsidiaries compete with other commercial banks, savings and loan associations, credit unions, finance companies, Internet-based financial services companies, mutual funds, insurance companies, brokerage and investment banking companies, and other financial intermediaries. Some of these competitors have substantially greater resources and lending capabilities and may offer services that the Company does not currently provide. In addition, many of the Company’s non-bank competitors are not subject to the same extensive Federal regulations that govern financial holding companies and Federally insured banks. Failure to compete effectively to attract new and retain current customers could adversely affect our growth and profitability, which could have a materially adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. **Our success depends on our ability to offer our customers an evolving suite of products and services, and we may not be able to effectively manage the risks inherent in the development of financial products and services.** We continually monitor our suite of products and services, and prioritize new offerings based on our determination of customer demand, within regulatory parameters for financial products. We may invest significant time and resources in new products which become obsolete, or do not generate the revenues we had anticipated, or which are ultimately deemed unacceptable by regulatory authorities. As we expand the range and complexity of our products and services, we are exposed to increasingly complex risks, including potential fraud, and our employees and risk management systems may not be adequate to mitigate such risks effectively. Our failure to effectively identify and manage these risks and uncertainties could have a materially adverse effect on our business. **We are dependent on our information technology and telecommunications systems and third-party servicers, and failures, interruptions or breaches of security in these systems could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.** In the ordinary course of business we rely on electronic communications and information systems to conduct our operations and to store, process, and/or transmit sensitive data. Any failure, interruption or breach in security of these systems could result in significant disruption to our operations. Information security breaches and cybersecurity-related incidents may include attempts to access information, including customer and company information, malicious code, computer viruses and denial of service attacks that could result in unauthorized access, misuse, loss or destruction of data (including confidential customer or employee information), account takeovers, unavailability of service or other events. These types of threats may derive from human error, fraud or malice on the part of external or internal parties, or may result from accidental technological failure. Further, to access our products and services our customers may use computers and mobile devices that are beyond our security control systems. Our technologies, systems, networks and software, and those of other financial institutions have been, and are likely to continue to be, the target of cybersecurity threats and attacks, which may range from uncoordinated individual attempts to sophisticated and targeted measures directed at us. The risk of a security breach or disruption, particularly through cyber-attack or cyber intrusion, has significantly increased, in part due to the expansion of new technologies, the increased use of the Internet and mobile services, and the increased intensity and sophistication of attempted attacks and intrusions from around the world. Further, because our information technology and telecommunications systems interface with and depend on third-party systems, we could experience service denials if demand for such services exceeds capacity or such third-party systems fail or experience interruptions. If sustained or repeated, a system failure or service denial could result in a deterioration of our ability to process new and renewal loans, gather deposits and provide customer service, compromise our ability to operate effectively, damage our reputation, result in a loss of customer business and subject us to additional regulatory scrutiny and possible financial liability, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. **Our business requires the collection and retention of large volumes of sensitive data, which is subject to extensive regulation and oversight and exposes our business to additional risks.** In our ordinary course of business, we collect and retain large volumes of customer data, including personally identifiable information in various information systems that we maintain and in those maintained by third parties with whom we contract to provide data services. We also maintain important internal Company data such as personally identifiable information about our employees and information relating to our operations. Our customers and employees have been, and will continue to be, targeted by parties using fraudulent e-mails and other communications in attempts to misappropriate passwords, bank account information or other personal information or to introduce viruses or other malware through "Trojan horse" programs to our information systems and/or our customers' computers. Our attempts to mitigate these threats through product improvements, use of encryption and authentication technology and customer and employee education may not be successful. Cyber crimes are complex and continue to evolve. Publicized information concerning security and cyber-related problems could discourage our customers from using our electronic or web-based applications or solutions, which could harm their utility as a means of conducting commercial transactions. Our security efforts and measures may not be effective in preventing attempted security breaches or disruptions, which could be very damaging to our business. Even the most well protected information, networks, systems and facilities remain potentially vulnerable because attempted security breaches, particularly cyber attacks and intrusions, or disruptions will occur in the future, and because the techniques used in such attempts are constantly evolving and generally are not recognized until launched against a target, and in some cases are designed not to be detected and, in fact, may not be detected. Accordingly, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate security barriers or other preventative measures, and thus it is virtually impossible for us to entirely mitigate this risk. While we maintain specific “cyber” insurance coverage, which would apply in the event of many breach scenarios, the amount of coverage may not be adequate in any particular case. Furthermore, because cyber threat scenarios are inherently difficult to predict and can take many forms, some breaches may not be covered under our cyber insurance coverage. A security breach or other significant disruption of our information systems or those related to our customers, merchants and our third party vendors, including as a result of cyber attacks, could (i) disrupt the proper functioning of our networks and systems and therefore our operations and/or those of certain of our customers; (ii) result in the unauthorized access to, and destruction, loss, theft, misappropriation or release of confidential, sensitive or otherwise valuable information of ours or our customers; (iii) result in a violation of applicable privacy, data breach and other laws, subjecting us to additional regulatory scrutiny and expose the us to civil litigation, governmental fines and possible financial liability; (iv) require significant management attention and resources to remedy the damages that result; or (v) harm our reputation or cause a decrease in the number of customers that choose to do business with us. The occurrence of any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. **The Company is subject to risks presented by acquisitions, which, if realized, could negatively affect our results of operations and financial condition.** The Company’s strategic initiatives include diversification within its markets, growth of its fee-based businesses, and growth internally and through acquisitions of financial institutions, branches, and financial services businesses. As such, the Company has acquired, and from time to time considers acquiring, banks, thrift institutions, branch offices of banks or thrift institutions, or other businesses within markets currently served by the Company or in other locations that would complement the Company’s business or its geographic reach. Future acquisitions will be accompanied by the risks commonly encountered in acquisitions. These risks include: the difficulty of integrating operations and personnel, the potential disruption of our ongoing business, the inability of management to realize or maximize anticipated financial and strategic positions, increased operating costs, the inability to maintain uniform standards, controls, procedures and policies, and the impairment of relationships with employees and customers as a result of changes in ownership and management. Further, the asset quality or other financial characteristics of an acquired company may deteriorate after the acquisition agreement is signed or after the acquisition closes. Any of these risks, if realized, could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. **The Company's operations may be adversely affected if its external vendors do not perform as expected.** The Company relies on certain external vendors to provide products and services necessary to maintain the day-to-day operations of the Company. Accordingly, the Company’s operations are exposed to the risk that these vendors will not perform in accordance with the contracted arrangements under service level agreements. The failure of an external vendor to perform in accordance with the contracted arrangements under service level agreements, because of changes in the vendor’s organizational structure, financial condition, support for existing products and services or strategic focus or for any other reason, could disrupt the Company’s operations. If we are unable to find alternative sources for our vendors’ services and products quickly and cost-effectively, the failures of our vendors could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s business and, in turn, the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. **A failure to effectively utilize, maintain and improve our core information technology infrastructure and information management systems could have a material adverse impact on our business.** Our competitive position relies on our capacity to maintain and upgrade our information technology systems. This requires significant capital expenditure, and we may not always have capital levels which are sufficient to support a robust investment in our technology infrastructure. We recently converted our core operating system in 2017, and we expect to convert additional modules during 2018. There is a risk that this conversion could materially and adversely disrupt our operations. We will be relying on our new vendor, as well as our existing vendor, to help us migrate and integrate these modules into the new core system, and there is a risk that our vendors could fail to perform as we expect, or that the integration and data migration will not be completed in an accurate, timely or efficient manner. Further, our employees could have difficulty performing their job duties on the new platform. The failure to accurately and effectively migrate our data and systems from our legacy core to our new core could adversely affect our customers, who may experience temporary delays or difficulties accessing or utilizing our products and services. The risks associated with core conversion could materially impair our ability to operate effectively following the conversion. ### Risks Associated with the Company’s Common Stock ### The Company’s stock price may be volatile. The Company’s stock price can fluctuate widely in response to a variety of factors, including: actual or anticipated variations in our operating results; recommendations by securities analysts; significant acquisitions or business combinations; operating and stock price performance of other companies that investors deem comparable to Tompkins; new technology used, or services offered by our competitors; news reports relating to trends, concerns and other issues in the financial services industry; and changes in government regulations. Other factors, including general market fluctuations, industry-wide factors and economic and general political conditions and events, including terrorist attacks, economic slowdowns or recessions, interest rate changes, credit loss trends or currency fluctuations, may adversely affect the Company’s stock price even though they do not directly pertain to the Company’s operating results. **The trading volume in our common stock is less than that of larger financial services companies, which may adversely affect the price of our common stock.** The Company’s common stock is traded on the NYSE American. The trading volume in the Company’s common stock is less than that of larger financial services companies. A public trading market having the desired characteristics of depth, liquidity and orderliness depends on the presence in the marketplace of willing buyers and sellers of our common stock at any given time. This presence depends on the individual decisions of investors and general economic and market conditions over which we have no control. Given the lower trading volume of the Company’s common stock, significant sales of our common stock, or the expectation of these sales, could cause our stock price to fall. ### An investment in our common stock is not an insured deposit. The Company’s common stock is not a bank deposit and, therefore, is not insured against loss by the FDIC, any other deposit insurance fund or by any other public or private entity. Investment in the Company’s common stock is inherently risky for the reasons described in this “Risk Factors” section and is subject to the same market forces that affect the price of common stock in any company. As a result, if you acquire the Company’s common stock, you may lose some or all of your investment. ### We may not pay, or may reduce, the dividends paid on our common stock. Holders of Tompkins’ common stock are only entitled to receive such dividends as its board of directors may declare out of funds legally available for such payments. While Tompkins has a long history of paying dividends on its common stock, Tompkins is not required to pay dividends on its common stock and could reduce or eliminate its common stock dividend in the future. This could adversely affect the market price of Tompkins’ common stock. Also, Tompkins is a bank holding company, and its ability to declare and pay dividends is dependent on certain federal regulatory considerations, including the guidelines of the Federal Reserve regarding capital adequacy and dividends. See “Supervision and Regulation” for a description of certain material limitations on the Company’s ability to pay dividends to shareholders. ## Properties As filed, 1,359 characters. The Company’s executive offices are located at 110 North Tioga Street, Ithaca, New York. However, the Company is in the process of building a new headquarters at 118 East Seneca Street in Ithaca, which is expected to be completed in the second quarter of 2018. The new facility will replace leased space at 215 East State Street, Ithaca New York, which currently houses the Company's operations center, and will also consolidate staff from a number of other Ithaca locations into a single facility. In connection with the move to the new building, the Company is planning to sell two buildings currently owned in Ithaca, New York. The Company’s banking subsidiaries have 65 branch offices, of which 33 are owned and 32 are leased at market rents. The Company’s insurance subsidiary has 6 stand-alone offices, of which 3 are owned by the Company and 3 are leased at market rents. The Company’s wealth management and financial planning division has 2 offices which are leased at a market rent, and shares other locations with the Company’s other subsidiaries. Management believes the current facilities are suitable for their present and intended purposes. For additional information about the Company’s facilities, including rental expenses, see “Note 6 Premises and Equipment” in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. of this Report. ## Legal proceedings As filed, 258 characters. The Company is subject to various claims and legal actions that arise in the ordinary course of conducting business. Management does not expect the ultimate disposition of these matters to have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial statements. ## Management's discussion and analysis As filed, 130,944 characters. The following analysis is intended to provide the reader with a further understanding of the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company and its operating subsidiaries for the periods shown. This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with other sections of this Report on Form 10-K, including Part I, “Item 1. Business,” Part II, “Item 6. Selected Financial Data,” and Part II, “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” ### OVERVIEW Tompkins Financial Corporation (“Tompkins” or the “Company”) is headquartered in Ithaca, New York and is registered as a Financial Holding Company with the Federal Reserve Board under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended. The Company is a locally oriented, community-based financial services organization that offers a full array of products and services, including commercial and consumer banking, leasing, trust and investment management, financial planning and wealth management, insurance, and brokerage services. At December 31, 2017, the Company’s subsidiaries included: four wholly-owned banking subsidiaries, Tompkins Trust Company (the “Trust Company”), The Bank of Castile (DBA Tompkins Bank of Castile), Mahopac Bank (DBA Tompkins Mahopac Bank), VIST Bank (DBA Tompkins VIST Bank); and a wholly-owned insurance agency subsidiary, Tompkins Insurance Agencies, Inc. (“Tompkins Insurance”). The Trust Company provides a full array of trust and investment services under the Tompkins Financial Advisors brand, including investment management, trust and estate, financial and tax planning as well as life, disability and long-term care insurance services. The Company’s principal offices are located at The Commons, Ithaca, New York, 14851, and its telephone number is (888) 503-5753. The Company’s common stock is traded on the NYSE American under the Symbol “TMP.” ### Forward-Looking Statements This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The statements contained in this Report that are not statements of historical fact may include forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements may be identified by use of such words as "may", "will", "estimate", "intend", "continue", "believe", "expect", "plan", or "anticipate", and other similar words. Examples of forward-looking statements may include statements regarding; the asset quality of the Company's loan portfolios; the level of the Company's allowance for loan losses; the sufficiency of liquidity sources; the Company's exposure to changes in interest rates; the impact of changes in accounting standards; the likelihood that deferred tax assets will be realized and plans, prospects, growth and strategies. Forward-looking statements are made based on management’s expectations and beliefs concerning future events impacting the Company and are subject to certain uncertainties and factors relating to the Company’s operations and economic environment, all of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond the control of the Company, that could cause actual results of the Company to differ materially from those expressed and/or implied by forward-looking statements. The following factors, in addition to those listed as Risk Factors in Item 1A are among those that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements: changes in general economic, market and regulatory conditions; the development of an interest rate environment that may adversely affect the Company’s interest rate spread, other income or cash flow anticipated from the Company’s operations, investment and/or lending activities; changes in laws and regulations affecting banks, bank holding companies and/or financial holding companies, such as the Dodd-Frank Act and Basel III; technological developments and changes; the ability to continue to introduce competitive new products and services on a timely, cost-effective basis; governmental and public policy changes, including environmental regulation; reliance on large customers; and financial resources in the amounts, at the times and on the terms required to support the Company’s future businesses. ### Critical Accounting Policies In the course of normal business activity, management must select and apply many accounting policies and methodologies and make estimates and assumptions that lead to the financial results presented in the Company’s consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. There are uncertainties inherent in making these estimates and assumptions, which could materially affect our results of operations and financial position. Management considers accounting estimates to be critical to reported financial results if (i) the accounting estimates require management to make assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain, and (ii) different estimates that management reasonably could have used for the accounting estimate in the current period, or changes in the accounting estimate that are reasonably likely to occur from period to period, could have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Management considers the accounting policies relating to the allowance for loan and lease losses (“allowance”), pension and postretirement benefits, and the review of the securities portfolio for other-than-temporary impairment to be critical accounting policies because of the uncertainty and subjectivity involved in these policies and the material effect that estimates related to these areas can have on the Company’s results of operations. ### Allowance for loan and lease losses Management considers the accounting policy relating to the allowance to be a critical accounting policy because of the high degree of judgment involved, the subjectivity of the assumptions used and the potential changes in the economic environment that could result in changes to the amount of the allowance. The Company has developed a methodology to measure the amount of estimated loan loss exposure inherent in the loan portfolio to assure that an appropriate allowance is maintained. The Company’s methodology is based upon guidance provided in SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 102, *Selected Loan Loss Allowance Methodology and Documentation Issues* and includes allowance allocations calculated in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 310, *Receivables*, and allowance allocations calculated in accordance with ASC Topic 450 *Contingencies.* The model is comprised of evaluating impaired loans, criticized and classified loans, historical losses, and qualitative factors. Management has deemed these components appropriate in evaluating the appropriateness of the allowance for loan and lease losses. While none of these components, when used independently, is effective in arriving at an allowance level that appropriately measures the risk inherent in the portfolio, management believes that using them collectively, provides reasonable measurement of the loss exposure in the portfolio. The various factors used in the methodologies are reviewed on a quarterly basis. Although we believe our process for determining the allowance adequately considers all of the factors that would likely result in credit losses, this evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates, including expected default probabilities, the loss emergence periods, the amounts and timing of expected future cash flows on impaired loans, and estimated losses based on historical loss experience and current economic conditions. All of these factors may be susceptible to significant change. To the extent that actual results differ from management estimates, additional loan loss provisions may be required that would adversely impact earnings for future periods. ### Pension and other post retirement benefits The calculation of the expenses and liabilities related to pensions and other post-retirement benefits is a critical accounting policy that requires estimates and assumptions of key factors including, but not limited to, discount rate, return on plan assets, future salary increases, employment levels, employee retention, and life expectancies of plan participants. The Company uses an actuarial firm to assist in making these estimates. Changes in assumptions due to market conditions, governing laws and regulations, or Company specific circumstances may result in material changes to the Company’s pension and other post-retirement expenses and liabilities. ### Investment securities Another critical accounting policy is the policy for reviewing available-for-sale securities and held-to-maturity securities to determine if declines in fair value below amortized cost are other-than-temporary as required by FASB ASC Topic 320, *Investments – Debt and Equity Securities.* When other-than-temporary impairment has occurred, the amount of the other-than-temporary impairment recognized in earnings depends on whether the Company intends to sell the security and whether it is more likely than not will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis less any current-period credit loss. If the Company intends to sell the security or more likely than not will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis less any current-period credit loss, the other-than-temporary impairment is recognized in earnings equal to the entire difference between the investment’s amortized cost basis and its fair value at the balance sheet date. If the Company does not intend to sell the security and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis less any current-period credit loss, the other-than-temporary impairment is separated into the amount representing the credit loss and the amount related to all other factors. The amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to the credit loss is recognized in earnings. In estimating other-than-temporary impairment losses, management considers, among other factors, the length of time and extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, the financial condition and near term prospects of the issuer, underlying collateral of the security, and the structure of the security. All accounting policies are important and the reader of the financial statements should review these policies, described in “Note 1 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. of this Form 10-K, to gain a better understanding of how the Company’s financial performance is reported. ### RESULTS OF OPERATIONS ### (Comparison of December 31, 2017 and 2016 results) ### General Tompkins Financial Corporation’s earnings for the period ended December 31, 2017, were impacted by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, which reduced the Federal statutory tax rate from 35% in 2017, to 21% in 2018 and beyond. The change in the tax law created a one-time, fourth quarter, non-cash write-down of net deferred tax assets in the amount of $14.9 million due to the required remeasurement of net deferred tax assets using the new lower tax rate. A summary of the impact of the tax law changes on 2017 full year earnings per share is as follows: - GAAP diluted earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2017, were $3.43, down 12.3% over 2016 - Adjusted diluted earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2017 (excluding the one-time charge related to tax reform) were $4.42, up 13.0% over 2016 (refer to table of “Non GAAP Disclosures” included below) The Company reported diluted earnings per share of $3.43 in 2017, compared to diluted earnings per share of $3.91 in 2016. Net income for the year ended December 31, 2017, was $52.5 million, a decrease of 11.5% compared to $59.3 million in 2016. The 2017 results were impacted by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, resulting in a one-time, non-cash write-down of net deferred tax assets in the amount of $14.9 million. For additional financial information on the impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, refer to "Note 14 - Income Taxes" in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. of this Report. In addition to earnings per share, key performance measurements for the Company include return on average shareholders’ equity (ROE) and return on average assets (ROA). ROE was 9.09% in 2017, compared to 10.85% in 2016, while ROA was 0.82% in 2017 and 1.01% in 2016. Tompkins’ ROE and ROA at September 30, 2017 (the most recent period for which peer data is publicly available) were in the 79th percentile for ROE and the 54th percentile for ROA of its peer group. The peer group data is derived from the Federal Reserve Board and represents banks and bank holding companies with assets between $3.0 billion and $10.0 billion as of September 30, 2017. ### Non-GAAP Disclosure The following table summarizes the Company’s results of operations on a GAAP basis and on an operating (non-GAAP) basis for the periods indicated. The Company believes the non-GAAP measures provide meaningful comparisons of our underlying operational performance and facilitates management’s and investors’ assessments of business and performance trends in comparison to others in the financial services industry. In addition, the Company believes the exclusion of the nonoperating items from our performance enables management and investors to perform a more effective evaluation and comparison of our results and to assess performance in relation to our ongoing operations. Tangible common equity per share is tangible common equity divided by total shares issued and outstanding. Tangible common equity per share is often regarded as a more meaningful comparative ratio than book value per share as calculated under GAAP, that is, total stockholders' equity including intangible assets divided by total shares issued and outstanding. These non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered in isolation or as a measure of the Company’s profitability or liquidity; they are in addition to, and are not a substitute for, financial measures under GAAP. Net operating income, adjusted diluted earnings per share, operating return on average tangible common equity, and tangible common equity per share as presented herein may be different from non-GAAP financial measures used by other companies, and may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies. Further, the Company may utilize other measures to illustrate performance in the future. Non-GAAP financial measures have limitations since they do not reflect all of the amounts associated with the Company’s results of operations as determined in accordance with GAAP. *Reconciliation of Net Operating Income/Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share (Non-GAAP) to Net Operating Income* *(in thousands, except per share data)* | | For the year ended December 31, 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Net income attributable to Tompkins Financial Corporation | $52,494 | $59,340 | $58,421 | $52,041 | $50,856 | | Less: dividends and undistributed earnings allocated to unvested stock awards | (818) | (912) | (834) | (503) | 0 | | Net income available to common shareholders (GAAP) | 51,676 | 58,428 | 57,587 | 51,538 | 50,856 | | Diluted earnings per share (GAAP) | 3.43 | 3.91 | 3.87 | 3.48 | 3.46 | | Adjustments for non-operating income and expense, net of tax: | | | | | | | Merger related expenses | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 140 | | Gain on redemption of trust preferred securities | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (846) | | Gain on deposit conversion | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (771) | | Gain on pension plan curtailment (net of tax) | 0 | 0 | (3,602) | 0 | 0 | | Remeasurement of net deferred taxes | 14,944 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | Total adjustments | 14,944 | 0 | (3,602) | 0 | (1,477) | | Net operating income available to common shareholders (Non-GAAP) | 66,620 | 58,428 | 53,985 | 51,538 | 49,379 | | Adjusted diluted earnings per share (Non-GAAP) | 4.42 | 3.91 | 3.63 | 3.48 | 3.36 | *(in thousands, except per share data)* | Operating Return on Average Tangible Common Equity (Non-GAAP) | For the year ended December 31, 2017 | 2016 | | --- | ---: | ---: | | Net operating income available to common shareholders (Non-GAAP) | $66,620 | $58,428 | | Amortization of intangibles, net of tax | 1,159 | 1,254 | | Adjusted net operating income available to common shareholders (Non-GAAP) | 67,779 | 59,682 | | Average Tompkins Financial Corporation shareholders’ common equity | 575,958 | 545,545 | | Average goodwill and intangibles 1 | 101,583 | 104,263 | | Average tangible common equity (Non-GAAP) | 474,375 | 441,282 | | Adjusted operating return on average tangible common equity (Non-GAAP) | 14.29% | 13.52% | #### 1 Average goodwill and intangibles excludes mortgage servicing rights. *Reconciliation of Tangible Common Equity Per Share (Non-GAAP) to Shareholders' Common Equity* *(in thousands, except per share data)* | | As of December 31, 2017 | 2016 | | --- | ---: | ---: | | Tompkins Financial Corporations Shareholders' common equity | 574,780 | 547,953 | | Goodwill and intangibles 1 | 100,887 | 103,214 | | Tangible common equity (Non-GAAP) | 473,893 | 444,739 | | Common equity per share | 37.65 | 36.20 | | Tangible common equity per share (Non-GAAP) | 31.04 | 29.38 | #### 1 Goodwill and intangibles excludes mortgage servicing rights. ### Segment Reporting The Company operates in three business segments: banking, insurance and wealth management. Insurance is comprised of property and casualty insurance services and employee benefit consulting operated under the Tompkins Insurance Agencies, Inc. subsidiary. Wealth management activities include the results of the Company’s trust, financial planning, and wealth management services provided by Tompkins Financial Advisors, a division of the Trust Company. All other activities are considered banking. For additional financial information on the Company’s segments, refer to “Note 21 – Segment and Related Information” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. of this Report. ### Banking Segment The banking segment reported net income of $47.0 million for the year ending December 31, 2017, representing a $6.6 million or 12.3% decrease compared to 2016. Banking segment earnings were significantly impacted by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. Due to this legislation, a one-time, $14.9 million write-down was recorded for the remeasurement of net deferred tax assets and is reflected in the banking segment’s results of operations for the fourth quarter of 2017 as an additional charge to income tax expense. Net interest income increased $20.7 million or 11.4% in 2017 compared to 2016, due primarily to loan growth, and a slight increase in average loan yields. Interest income increased $24.0 million or 11.9%, while interest expense increased $3.4 million or 15.2% compared to 2016. The provision for loan and lease losses was $4.2 million in 2017, compared to $4.3 million in the prior year. The loan growth rate for 2017 was 12.8% compared to 16.7% for 2016, contributing to the year-over-year decrease in provision expense. Noninterest income in the banking segment of $25.5 million in 2017 increased by $1.1 million or 4.5% when compared to 2016. The increase in noninterest income was mainly due to card services income (up $1.0 million), gain on sale of other real estate owned (ORE) (up $127,000), other income which included the recognition of income related to previously charged off credits (up $835,000) and other fee income (up $263,000). These were partially offset by decreases in service charges on deposit accounts (down $356,000) and realized gain/loss on available for sale securities (down $1.3 million). Noninterest expenses increased by $12.7 million or 10.4% compared to 2016. The increase was mainly attributed to an increase in salary and wages and employee benefits reflecting normal annual merit and incentive adjustments and higher health insurance costs, respectively, over the prior year. ### Insurance Segment The insurance segment reported net income of $2.9 million, down 11.4% when compared to 2016. The decrease in net income is mainly a result of lower revenue, as total noninterest expenses were in line with 2016. Noninterest income decreased $635,000, or 2.1%, when compared to 2016. The decrease in noninterest income was mainly in life and health insurance commissions and largely reflects impacts of the sale of certain customer relationships in the Pennsylvania market in the second half of 2016 and first quarter of 2017. ### Wealth Management Segment The wealth management segment reported net income of $2.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, an increase of $149,000 or 6.2% compared to 2016. Noninterest income of $16.3 million increased $503,000 or 3.2% compared to 2016. In addition, noninterest expense increased $381,000 or 3.1% compared to 2016, mainly due to increases in salaries and wages, reflecting annual merit increases and higher staffing levels in 2017 compared to 2016. The market value of assets under management or in custody at December 31, 2017 totaled $4.0 billion, an increase of 1.9% compared to year-end 2016. ### Net Interest Income Net interest income is the Company’s largest source of revenue, representing 74.4% of total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2017, and 72.4% of total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2016. Net interest income in 2017 increased 11.4% over 2016. Net interest income is dependent on the volume and composition of interest earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the level of market interest rates. The Company’s net interest income over the past several years benefited from steady growth in average earning assets, which increased 8.7% in 2017 compared to 2016. *Table 1 – Average Statements of Condition and Net Interest Analysis* shows average interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, and the corresponding yield or cost associated with each. Taxable-equivalent net interest income for 2017 increased 11.3% over 2016, benefiting from growth in average earning assets, which increased by 8.7% in 2017, and growth in average noninterest bearing deposits, which increased by 13.2% compared to the prior year. The net interest margin at December 31, 2017 was 3.41% compared to 3.33% reported at December 31, 2016. Improved yields on interest-earning assets contributed to the year-over-year improved margin. Tax-equivalent interest income increased $24.3 million or 11.7% in 2017 over 2016. The increase in taxable-equivalent interest income reflects the $482.0 million or 8.7% increase in average interest-earning assets and an improved net interest margin. The increase in average interest-earning assets was mainly in average loans and leases, which were up $444.0 million or 11.2% in 2017 compared to 2016. The average yield on interest earning assets for 2017 was 3.84%, which increased by 11 basis points from 2016. The average yield on loans was 4.42% in 2017, an increase of 6 basis points compared to 4.36% in 2016. Average loan balances represented 73.1% of average earning assets in 2017 compared to 71.4% in 2016. Average balances on securities increased $25.5 million or 1.6% compared to 2016, while the average yield on the securities portfolio increased 6 basis points or 2.8% compared to 2016. Interest expense for 2017 increased $3.4 million or 15.2% compared to 2016, and average interest bearing liabilities increased $312.5 million or 7.5% over 2016. The increase in interest expense reflects higher average deposits and borrowings during 2017 when compared to 2016, as well as an increase in the average rate paid on deposits and average interest bearing liabilities. The average rate paid on interest bearing deposits was 0.35% in 2017, up 3 basis points from 0.32% in 2016. Average interest bearing deposits in 2017 increased $100.8 million or 3.0% compared to 2016. Average noninterest bearing deposit balances in 2017 increased $148.6 million or 13.2% over 2016 and represented 26.8% of average total deposits compared to 24.9% in 2016. Average other borrowings increased by $265.7 million or 43.1% year over year, mainly due to a higher volume of overnight borrowings with the FHLB in 2017, which were used to support loan growth that exceeded deposit growth in 2017. ### Table 1 - Average Statements of Condition and Net Interest Analysis *(dollar amounts in thousands)* | ASSETS Interest-earning assets | For the year ended December 31, 2017 Average Balance (YTD) | Interest | Average Yield/Rate | 2016 Average Balance (YTD) | Interest | Average Yield/Rate | 2015 Average Balance (YTD) | Interest | Average Yield/Rate | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Interest-bearing balances due from banks | $4,599 | $37 | 0.80% | $2,019 | $6 | 0.30% | $1,812 | $4 | 0.22% | | Securities1 | | | | | | | | | | | U.S. Government securities | 1,471,717 | 31,006 | 2.11% | 1,443,894 | 29,318 | 2.03% | 1,441,420 | 30,500 | 2.12% | | Trading securities | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 4,893 | 220 | 4.50% | 8,231 | 352 | 4.28% | | State and municipal2 | 100,595 | 3,393 | 3.37% | 97,937 | 3,309 | 3.38% | 88,504 | 3,308 | 3.74% | | Other securities2 | 3,597 | 129 | 3.59% | 3,645 | 123 | 3.37% | 3,785 | 121 | 3.20% | | Total securities | 1,575,909 | 34,528 | 2.19% | 1,550,369 | 32,970 | 2.13% | 1,541,940 | 34,281 | 2.22% | | FHLBNY and FRB stock | 42,465 | 2,121 | 4.99% | 32,528 | 1,434 | 4.41% | 24,046 | 1,129 | 4.70% | | Total loans and leases, net of unearned income2,3 | 4,401,205 | 194,433 | 4.42% | 3,957,221 | 172,443 | 4.36% | 3,531,945 | 157,222 | 4.45% | | **Total interest-earning assets** | **6,024,178** | **231,119** | **3.84%** | **5,542,137** | **206,853** | **3.73%** | **5,099,743** | **192,636** | **3.78%** | | Other assets | 365,326 | | | 355,943 | | | 355,471 | | | | **Total assets** | **6,389,504** | | | **5,898,080** | | | **5,455,214** | | | | **LIABILITIES & EQUITY** | | | | | | | | | | | Deposits | | | | | | | | | | | Interest-bearing deposits | | | | | | | | | | | Interest bearing checking, savings, & money market | 2,674,204 | 5,141 | 0.19% | 2,529,009 | 4,008 | 0.16% | 2,363,087 | 3,821 | 0.16% | | Time deposits | 827,181 | 6,992 | 0.85% | 871,595 | 6,705 | 0.77% | 895,391 | 6,630 | 0.74% | | Total interest-bearing deposits | 3,501,385 | 12,133 | 0.35% | 3,400,604 | 10,713 | 0.32% | 3,258,478 | 10,451 | 0.32% | | Federal funds purchased & securities sold under agreements to repurchase | 64,888 | 235 | 0.36% | 99,622 | 2,228 | 2.24% | 137,917 | 2,709 | 1.96% | | Other borrowings | 882,235 | 11,934 | 1.35% | 616,560 | 6,772 | 1.10% | 417,737 | 4,897 | 1.17% | | Trust preferred debentures | 18,338 | 1,158 | 6.31% | 37,588 | 2,390 | 6.36% | 37,417 | 2,308 | 6.17% | | **Total interest-bearing liabilities** | **4,466,846** | **25,460** | **0.57%** | **4,154,374** | **22,103** | **0.53%** | **3,851,549** | **20,365** | **0.53%** | | Noninterest bearing deposits | 1,279,027 | | | 1,130,406 | | | 1,029,545 | | | | Accrued expenses and other liabilities | 66,185 | | | 66,243 | | | 66,366 | | | | **Total liabilities** | 5,812,058 | | | 5,351,023 | | | 4,947,460 | | | | Tompkins Financial Corporation Shareholders’ equity | 575,958 | | | 545,545 | | | 506,243 | | | | Noncontrolling interest | 1,488 | | | 1,512 | | | 1,511 | | | | **Total equity** | **577,446** | | | **547,057** | | | **507,754** | | | | **Total liabilities and equity** | **$6,389,504** | | | **$5,898,080** | | | **$5,455,214** | | | | Interest rate spread | | | **3.27%** | | | **3.20%** | | | **3.25%** | | Net interest income /margin on earning assets | | **205,659** | **3.41%** | | **184,750** | **3.33%** | | **172,271** | **3.38%** | | Tax Equivalent Adjustment | | **(4,355)** | | | **(4,114)** | | | **(3,890)** | | | Net interest income per consolidated financial statements | | **$201,304** | | | **$180,636** | | | **$168,381** | | 1 *Average balances and yields on available-for-sale securities are based on historical amortized cost.* 2 *Interest income includes the tax effects of taxable-equivalent adjustments using a combined New York State and Federal effective income tax rate of 40% to increase tax exempt interest income to taxable-equivalent basis.* 3 *Nonaccrual loans are included in the average asset totals presented above. Payments received on nonaccrual loans have been recognized as disclosed in Note 1 of the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in Part 1 of the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.* ### Table 2 - Analysis of Changes in Net Interest Income | (in thousands)(taxable equivalent) INTEREST INCOME: | 2017 vs. 2016 Increase (Decrease) Due to Change in Average Volume | Yield/Rate | Total | 2016 vs. 2015 Increase (Decrease) Due to Change in Average Volume | Yield/Rate | Total | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Certificates of deposit, other banks | **$14** | **$17** | **$31** | $0 | $2 | $2 | | Investments1 | | | | | | | | Taxable | **354** | **1,120** | **1,474** | (100) | (1,212) | (1,312) | | Tax-exempt | **90** | **(6)** | **84** | 336 | (335) | 1 | | FHLB and FRB stock | **438** | **249** | **687** | 380 | (75) | 305 | | Loans, net1 | **19,414** | **2,576** | **21,990** | 18,610 | (3,389) | 15,221 | | Total interest income | **$20,310** | **$3,956** | **$24,266** | $19,226 | $(5,009) | $14,217 | | **INTEREST EXPENSE:** | | | | | | | | Interest-bearing deposits: | | | | | | | | Interest checking, savings and money market | **259** | **874** | **1,133** | 264 | (77) | 187 | | Time | **(342)** | **629** | **287** | (178) | 253 | 75 | | Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase | **(252)** | **(1,741)** | **(1,993)** | (819) | 338 | (481) | | Other borrowings | **2,078** | **1,852** | **3,930** | 2,224 | (267) | 1,957 | | Total interest expense | **$1,743** | **$1,614** | **$3,357** | $1,491 | $247 | $1,738 | | Net interest income | **$18,567** | **$2,342** | **$20,909** | $17,735 | $(5,256) | $12,479 | *1 Interest income includes the tax effects of taxable-equivalent adjustments using a combined New York State and Federal effective income tax rate of 40% to increase tax exempt interest income to taxable-equivalent basis.* Changes in net interest income occur from a combination of changes in the volume of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, and in the rate of interest earned or paid on them. The above table illustrates changes in interest income and interest expense attributable to changes in volume (change in average balance multiplied by prior year rate), changes in rate (change in rate multiplied by prior year volume), and the net change in net interest income. The net change attributable to the combined impact of volume and rate has been allocated to each in proportion to the absolute dollar amounts of the change. In 2017, net interest income increased by $20.9 million, resulting from a $24.3 million increase in interest income, partially offset by a $3.4 million increase in interest expense. Growth in average balances on interest-earning assets contributed $20.3 million to the increase in interest income, while the higher yields on average earning assets added $4.0 million. The increase in interest expense reflects slightly higher rates paid on interest bearing liabilities and growth in average balances of interest bearing liabilities. ### Provision for Loan and Lease Losses The provision for loan and lease losses represents management’s estimate of the expense necessary to maintain the allowance for loan and lease losses at an appropriate level. The provision for loan and lease losses was $4.2 million in 2017, compared to $4.3 million in 2016. See the section captioned “The Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses” included within “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Financial Condition” of this Report for further analysis of the Company’s allowance for loan and lease losses. ### Noninterest Income *(in thousands)* | | Year ended December 31, 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Insurance commissions and fees | **$28,778** | $29,492 | $29,286 | | Investment services | **15,665** | 15,203 | 15,416 | | Service charges on deposit accounts | **8,437** | 8,793 | 9,325 | | Card services | **9,100** | 8,058 | 7,837 | | Net mark-to-market gains | **0** | 45 | 90 | | Other income | **7,631** | 6,291 | 8,878 | | Net (loss) gain on securities transactions | **(407)** | 926 | 1,108 | | Total | **$69,204** | $68,808 | $71,940 | Noninterest income is a significant source of income for the Company, representing 25.6% of total revenues in 2017, and 27.6% in 2016, and is an important factor in the Company’s results of operations. Insurance commissions and fees decreased 2.4% to $28.8 million in 2017, compared to $29.5 million in 2016. The decrease in insurance commissions and fees was mainly in life and health insurance commissions and largely reflects the impact of the sale of certain customer relationships in the Pennsylvania market in the second half of 2016 and first quarter of 2017. Investment services income of $15.7 million in 2017 increased $462,000 or 3.0% compared to 2016. Investment services income includes trust services, financial planning, and wealth management services. With fees largely based on the market value and the mix of assets managed, the general direction of the stock market can have a considerable impact on fee income. Global equity markets and the broad market index averages finished higher in 2017, when compared to 2016. The market value of assets managed by, or in custody of, the Trust Company was $4.0 billion at December 31, 2017, and $3.9 billion at December 31, 2016. These figures included $1.0 billion in 2017 and $1.2 billion in 2016, of Company-owned securities from which no income was recognized as the Trust Company was serving as custodian. Service charges on deposit accounts in 2017 decreased 4.1% compared to prior year. Service fees on commercial and personal accounts were down $429,000 or 13.8%. The decrease over prior year was mainly due to management's decision to waive certain service fees during the core system conversion completed in 2017. The decrease in service fees was partially offset by an increase in overdraft/insufficient funds charges, the largest component of service charges on deposit accounts, which were up $112,000 or 2.1% in 2017 compared to 2016. Card services income increased $1.0 million or 12.9% over 2016. The primary components of card services income are fees related to interchange income and transactions fees for debit card transactions, credit card transactions and ATM usage. Increased revenue was largely driven by increased transaction volume in both credit and debit cards. 2017 revenues also included approximately $500,000 of volume based incentives related to our branding agreement with MasterCard. There were no net mark-to-market losses on securities and borrowings held at fair value in 2017, compared to $45,000 in 2016. Mark-to-market losses or gains relate to the change in the fair value of securities and borrowings where the Company has elected the fair value option. During 2016, the Company sold its remaining portfolio of trading securities and prepaid its outstanding trading liability. The Company recognized $407,000 of losses on sales/calls of available-for-sale securities in 2017, compared to $926,000 of gains in 2016. Sales of available-for-sale securities are generally the result of general portfolio maintenance and interest rate risk management. Other income of $7.6 million was up $1.3 million or 21.3% compared to 2016. The significant components of other income are other service charges, gains on the sale of other real estate, and loan related income. The increase over prior year included recoveries of nonaccrual interest and prior year legal fees on loans previously charged off. ### Noninterest Expense *(in thousands)* | | Year ended December 31, 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Salaries and wages | **$81,590** | $76,950 | $72,707 | | Pension and other employee benefits | **21,870** | 20,496 | 16,025 | | Net occupancy expense of premises | **13,214** | 12,521 | 12,312 | | Furniture and fixture expense | **7,028** | 6,450 | 6,146 | | FDIC insurance | **2,527** | 3,024 | 2,992 | | Amortization of intangible assets | **1,932** | 2,090 | 2,013 | | Other operating expenses | **42,944** | 37,076 | 37,667 | | Total | **$171,105** | $158,607 | $149,862 | Noninterest expense as a percentage of total revenue was 63.3% in 2017, compared to 63.6% in 2016. Salaries and wages and pension and other employee benefit expenses in 2017 increased $6.0 million or 6.2% compared to 2016. For 2017, salaries and wages increased $4.6 million or 6.0% over the prior year. The increase reflects additional employees, annual merit increases and higher accruals for incentive compensation. Pension and other employee benefits increased $1.4 million or 6.7% over 2016. The increase over prior year in pension and other employee benefit expenses was mainly in health insurance, which was up $900,000 or 13.2% in 2017 over 2016. Other operating expenses of $42.9 million increased by $5.9 million or 15.8% compared to 2016. The primary components of other operating expenses in 2017 were technology expense ($8.3 million), marketing expense ($5.0 million), professional fees ($5.7 million), cardholder expense ($3.4 million) and other miscellaneous expense ($20.5 million). Other operating expenses in 2017 included certain nonrecurring items, including: $2.7 million related to a write off of a historic tax credit investment and $731,000 of deconversion expenses related to a core system conversion in 2017. The historic tax credit project was placed in service in 2017 resulting in the write-off of the $2.7 million and recognition of the $3.3 million of tax credits as a reduction of income tax expense. The 2016 other operating expenses included $546,000 of deconversion expenses related to the core system conversion, and $313,000 of expense related to the early termination of an FDIC loss share agreement. ### Noncontrolling Interests Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests represents the portion of net income in consolidated majority-owned subsidiaries that is attributable to the minority owners of a subsidiary. The Company had net income attributable to noncontrolling interests of $128,000 in 2017 and $131,000 in 2016. The noncontrolling interests relate to three real estate investment trusts, which are substantially owned by the Company’s New York banking subsidiaries. ### Income Tax Expense The provision for income taxes provides for Federal, New York State and Pennsylvania State income taxes. The 2017 provision was $42.6 million, which is up $15.6 million or 57.6% over the 2016 provision. The effective tax rate for the Company was 44.8% in 2017, up from 31.3% in 2016. The effective rates for 2016 and 2017 differed from the U.S. statutory rate of 35.0% during the those periods due to the effect of tax-exempt income from loans, securities, and life insurance assets, investments in tax credits, and excess tax benefits of stock based compensation. The increase in the effective rate in 2017 was mainly due to the $14.9 million one-time write down of net deferred tax assets due to the required remeasurement of the assets that resulted from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. The change in the effective rate in 2017 was partially offset by the recognition of $3.3 million of tax credits related to an investment in a historic tax credit. The changes to the tax laws approved in December 2017, will reduce the federal statutory tax rate from 35% in 2017, to 21% in 2018 and beyond. ### RESULTS OF OPERATIONS ### (Comparison of December 31, 2016 and 2015 results) ### General The Company reported diluted earnings per share of $3.91 in 2016, compared to diluted earnings per share of $3.87 in 2015. Net income for the year ended December 31, 2016, was $59.3 million, an increase of 1.57% compared to $58.4 million in 2015. Results for 2015 had been positively impacted by a one-time curtailment gain of $3.6 million, after-tax, related to changes to the Company’s defined benefit pension plan. Exclusive of this one-time gain, net income and diluted earnings per share for 2015 were $54.8 million and $3.63, respectively. In addition to earnings per share, key performance measurements for the Company include return on average shareholders’ equity (ROE) and return on average assets (ROA). ROE was 10.85% in 2016, compared to 11.51% in 2015, while ROA was 1.01% in 2016 and 1.07% in 2015. The Company’s net operating income available to common shareholders (non-GAAP) in 2016 amounted to $58.4 million or $3.91 per diluted share compared to $54.0 million or $3.63 per diluted share in 2015. Operating (non-GAAP) net income for 2015 excluded a $3.6 million, after-tax, gain on changes to the Company’s pension plan. There were no adjustments to 2016 net operating income. Please see the discussion above under “Results of Operations (Comparison of December 31, 2017 and 2016 results) Non-GAAP Disclosure” for an explanation of why management believes this non-GAAP financial measure is useful, and reconciliation to net income. ### Segment Reporting ### Banking Segment The banking segment reported net income of $53.7 million for the year ending December 31, 2016, representing a $2.0 million or 3.9% increase compared to 2015, driven mainly by growth in interest income. Net interest income increased $12.4 million or 7.4% in 2016 compared to 2015, due primarily to loan growth, which more than offset lower average loan yields. Interest income increased $14.1 million or 7.5%, while interest expense increased $1.7 million or 8.5% compared to 2015. The provision for loan and lease losses was $4.3 million in 2016, compared to $2.9 million in the prior year. The increase reflects the growth in total loans, and is partially offset by the stabilization in credit quality. Noninterest income in the banking segment of $24.4 million in 2016 decreased by $2.7 million or 9.9% when compared to 2015. Declines in noninterest income included: gain on sale of other real-estate owned (“OREO”) (down $860,000), service charges on deposit accounts (down $532,000), gains on available-for-sale (“AFS”) securities (down $182,000), other fee income (down $162,000), mark-to-market gain on liabilities held at fair value (down $159,000), and income on miscellaneous investments (down $85,000). These were partially offset by an increase in card services income (up $221,000), and a decrease in mark-to-market loss on trading securities (down $113,000). Noninterest expenses increased by $7.3 million or 6.3% compared to 2015, reflecting increases in salaries and benefits associated with incentive pay and merit increases. In addition, the increase was related to the impact of the one-time gain related to changes to the Company’s pension plan, which resulted in a $5.4 million pre-tax credit to noninterest expense in the second quarter of 2015. ### Insurance Segment The insurance segment reported net income of $3.3 million, down 9.6% when compared to 2015. The year over year comparison was negatively impacted by non-recurring items in 2015, including the one-time gain of $462,000 related to changes to the Company’s pension plan, and a pre-tax gain of $329,000 related to the sale of certain customer relationships in the fourth quarter of 2015. Insurance commissions and fees increased $206,000 or 0.7% over the prior year. Revenues from commercial and personal insurance, the Company’s primary insurance lines, increased compared to the prior year. Noninterest expense increased $781,000 in 2016 or 3.3% compared to 2015. The increase in noninterest expenses was attributable to the pension plan adjustment in 2015, as well as increases in salaries and benefits costs, including normal merit increases and additional headcount. ### Wealth Management Segment The wealth management segment reported net income of $2.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, a decrease of 763,000 or 24.0% compared to 2015. Investment services revenue of $15.8 million decreased $195,000 or 1.2% compared to 2015. In addition, noninterest expenses increased $832,000 or 7.3% compared to 2015, mainly due to increases in employee benefits and a one-time gain related to changes to the Company’s pension plan, which resulted in a $131,000 credit to noninterest expense in the second quarter of 2015. The market value of assets under management or in custody at December 31, 2016 totaled $3.9 billion, an increase of 2.3% compared to year-end 2015. ### Net Interest Income Net interest income is the Company’s largest source of revenue, representing 72.4% of total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2016, and 70.1% of total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2015. Net interest income increased 7.3% in 2016 compared to 2015. Net interest income is dependent on the volume and composition of interest earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the level of market interest rates. The Company’s net interest income over the past several years benefited from steady growth in average earning assets, which increased 8.7% in 2016 compared to 2015, offsetting a modest decline in net interest margin. Tax-equivalent interest income increased $14.2 million or 7.4% in 2016 over 2015. The increase in taxable-equivalent interest income was the result of the $442.4 million or 8.7% increase in average interest-earning assets. The growth in average earning assets and the higher concentration of loans helped to offset lower asset yields. The average yield on interest earning assets for 2016 declined by 5 basis points or 1.3% from the prior year. Average loan balances increased $425.3 million or 12.0% in 2016 compared to 2015, while the average yields on loans declined 9 basis points or 2.0%. Average loan balances represented 71.4% of earning assets in 2016 compared to 69.3% in 2015. Average balances on securities increased $8.4 million or 0.5% compared to 2015, while the average yields on the securities portfolio declined 9 basis points or 4.1% compared to 2015. Interest expense for 2016 increased $1.7 million or 8.5% compared to 2015, and average interest bearing liabilities increased $302.8 million or 7.9%. The increase in interest expense reflects higher average deposits and borrowings during 2016 when compared to 2015. The average rate paid on interest bearing deposits was 0.32% in 2016, which was flat compared to 2015. Average interest bearing deposits in 2016 increased $142.1 million or 4.4% compared to 2015. Average noninterest bearing deposit balances in 2016 increased $100.9 million or 9.8% over 2015 and represented 24.9% of total deposits compared to 24.0% in 2015. Average other borrowings increased by $198.8 million or 47.6% year over year, mainly due to a higher volume of overnight borrowings with the FHLB in 2016 which were used to fund loan growth that exceeded deposit growth in 2016. ### Provision for Loan and Lease Losses The provision for loan and lease losses was $4.3 million in 2016, compared to $2.9 million in 2015. The increase in provision expense was mainly a result of year-over-year loan growth. In addition, asset quality metrics were improved from prior year, with lower levels of nonperforming loans and leases and criticized and classified loans compared to prior year. ### Noninterest Income Noninterest income in 2016 decreased 4.4% from 2015. The decrease in noninterest income from the prior year included a decline in gains on sale of OREO of $860,000, as well as other changes discussed below. Insurance commissions and fees increased 0.7% to $29.5 million in 2016, compared to $29.3 million in 2015. The acquisition of an insurance agency, Shepard, Maxwell & Hale, on January 1, 2016 added $1.3 million to commissions and fees in 2016, while the sale of certain customer relationships in Pennsylvania, in two separate transactions, reduced commissions and fees by $1.2 million. Investment services income of $15.2 million in 2016 decreased $213,000 or 1.4% compared to 2015. Investment services income includes trust services, financial planning, and wealth management services. With fees largely based on the market value and the mix of assets managed, the general direction of the stock market can have a considerable impact on fee income. Although global equity markets finished higher in 2016, the broad market index averages over the course of 2016 were relatively flat when compared to 2015 averages. The market value of assets managed by, or in custody of, the Trust Company was $3.9 billion at December 31, 2016, and December 31, 2015. These figures included $1.2 billion in 2016 and $1.1 billion in 2015, of Company-owned securities from which no income was recognized as the Trust Company was serving as custodian. Service charges on deposit accounts in 2016 increased 5.7% compared to prior year. Overdraft fees, the largest component of service charges on deposit accounts, were down $792,000 or 12.9% in 2016 compared to 2015. The decrease in overdraft fees was partially offset by increases in cycle fees on personal and business accounts, which were up $316,000 or 11.3% in 2016. Card services income increased $221,000 or 2.8% over 2015. The primary components of card services income are fees related to interchange income and transactions fees for debit card transactions, credit card transactions and ATM usage. Increased revenue was largely driven by increased transaction volume in both credit and debit cards. Net mark-to-market gains on securities and borrowings held at fair value were $45,000 in 2016, a decrease of $45,000 compared to 2015. Mark-to-market losses or gains relate to the change in the fair value of securities and borrowings where the Company has elected the fair value option. The year-over-year decrease was mainly attributed to changes in market interest rates. During 2016, the Company sold its remaining portfolio of trading securities and prepaid its outstanding trading liability. The Company recognized $926,000 of gains on sales/calls of available-for-sale securities in 2016, compared to $1.1 million of gains in 2015. Sales of available-for-sale securities are generally the result of general portfolio maintenance and interest rate risk management. Other income of $6.3 million was down $2.6 million or 29.1% compared to 2015. The significant components of other income are other service charges, increases in cash surrender value of corporate owned life insurance (“COLI”), gains on the sales of residential mortgage loans and income from miscellaneous equity investments, including the Company’s investment in a Small Business Investment Company (“SBIC”). As discussed previously, the decrease in 2016 reflected lower gains on sale of OREO (down $860,000) and lower OREO rental income ($150,000) compared to 2015. ### Noninterest Expense Noninterest expense as a percentage of total revenue was 63.45% in 2016, compared to 64.72% in 2015, as revenue growth in 2016 outpaced growth in noninterest expense. Salaries and wages and pension and other employee benefit expenses in 2016 increased $8.7 million or 9.8% compared to 2015. For 2016, salaries and wages increased $4.2 million or 5.8% over the prior year. The increase reflects additional employees, annual merit increases and higher accruals for incentive compensation. Pension and other employee benefits increased $4.5 million or 27.9% over 2015. The increase over prior year in pension and other employee benefit expenses was mainly a result of a one-time curtailment gain of $6.0 million realized in 2015, related to changes to the Company’s defined benefit pension plan. Other operating expenses of $37.1 million decreased by $591,000 or 1.6% compared to 2015. The primary components of other operating expenses in 2016 were technology expense ($7.0 million), marketing expense ($5.1 million), professional fees ($5.4 million), cardholder expense ($2.5 million) and other miscellaneous expense ($17.0 million). Other operating expenses in 2016 included certain nonrecurring items, including: $313,000 related to early termination of an FDIC loss share agreement and $546,000 of deconversion expenses related to a planned core system conversion in 2017. ### Noncontrolling Interests The Company had net income attributable to noncontrolling interests of $131,000 in 2016 and 2015. The noncontrolling interests relate to three real estate investment trusts, which are substantially owned by the Company’s banking subsidiaries. ### Income Tax Expense The provision for income taxes provides for Federal, New York State and Pennsylvania State income taxes. The 2016 provision was $27.0 million. The effective tax rate for the Company was 31.3% in 2016, down from 33.1% in 2015. ### FINANCIAL CONDITION Total assets were $6.6 billion at December 31, 2017, increasing by 6.6% or $411.5 million over the previous year end. The growth was mainly in the loan portfolio which increased $411.1 million or 9.7% over year-end 2016. Loans and leases were 70.2% of total assets at December 31, 2017, compared to 68.3% of total assets at December 31, 2016. A more detailed discussion of the loan portfolio is provided below in this section under the caption “Loans and Leases”. As of December 31, 2017, total securities comprised 23.0% of total assets, compared to 25.2% of total assets at year-end 2016. The securities portfolio primarily contains mortgage-backed securities, obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities, and obligations of states and political subdivisions. A more detailed discussion of the securities portfolio is provided below in this section under the caption “Securities”. Total deposits increased by $212.7 million or 4.6% compared to December 31, 2016. Noninterest bearing deposits increased by $201.9 million or 16.3%, and checking, savings and money market accounts also increased $133.3 million or 5.3% compared to December 31, 2016. Time deposit balances decreased by 14.1% compared to 2016 year-end. Other borrowings, consisting mainly of short term advances with the FHLB, increased $186.9 million from December 31, 2016. A more detailed discussion of deposits and borrowings is provided below in this section under the caption “Deposits and Other Liabilities”. ### Shareholders’ Equity The Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity included in the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company contained in Part II, Item 8. of this Report, detail the changes in equity capital. Total shareholders’ equity was up $26.8 million or 4.9% to $576.2 million at December 31, 2017, from $549.4 million at December 31, 2016. Additional paid-in capital increased by $6.6 million, from $357.4 million at December 31, 2016, to $364.0 million at December 31, 2017. The $6.6 million increase included the following: $3.0 million related to stock-based compensation; $2.9 million in connection with the Company's dividend reinvestment plan; $2.3 million related to shares issued for the employee stock ownership plan; and $441,000 related to shares issued for the Company's director deferred compensation plan. These were partially offset by the net payout of $1.2 million and $643,000 from restricted stock activity and stock option exercises, respectively. Retained earnings increased by $34.7 million, reflecting net income of $52.5 million, less dividends paid of $27.6 million, and a positive, one-time $10.0 million reclassification adjustment of the disproportionate tax effect from accumulated other comprehensive income due to tax law changes associated with the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in December 2017. Accumulated other comprehensive loss increased from $37.1 million at December 31, 2016 to $51.3 million at December 31, 2017; reflecting a $2.4 million increase in unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities due to market interest rates, and a $1.8 million actuarial loss associated with employee benefit plans. The increase also includes the one-time $10.0 million reclassification adjustment mentioned above attributed to the disproportionate tax effect resulting from the recent tax law changes associated with the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in December 2017. Under regulatory requirements, amounts reported as accumulated other comprehensive income/loss related to net unrealized gain or loss on available-for-sale securities and the funded status of the Company’s defined benefit post-retirement benefit plans do not increase or reduce regulatory capital and are not included in the calculation of risk-based capital and leverage capital ratios. Total shareholders’ equity was up $32.9 million or 6.4% to $549.4 million at December 31, 2016, from $516.5 million at December 31, 2015. Additional paid-in capital increased by $6.6 million, from $350.8 million at December 31, 2015, to $357.4 million at December 31, 2016. The $6.6 million increase included the following: $2.3 million related to stock-based compensation; $3.2 million in connection with the Company's dividend reinvestment plan; $1.9 million related to shares issued for the employee stock ownership plan; $1.7 million related to the acquisition of an insurance agency in January 2016; and $296,000 related to shares issued for the Company's director deferred compensation plan. These were partially offset by the net payout of $810,000 from stock option exercises; and the Company’s repurchase of 22,356 shares of its common stock for $1.2 million. Retained earnings increased by $32.7 million, reflecting net income of $59.3 million less dividends of $26.6 million. Accumulated other comprehensive loss increased from $31.0 million at December 31, 2015 to $37.1 million at December 31, 2016; reflecting a $5.2 million increase in unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities due to market interest rates, and an $936,000 actuarial loss associated with post-retirement benefit plans. The Company continued its long history of increasing cash dividends with a per share increase of 2.8% in 2017, which followed an increase of 4.1% in 2016. Dividends per share amounted to $1.82 in 2017, compared to $1.77 in 2016, and $1.70 in 2015. Cash dividends paid represented 52.6%, 44.8%, and 43.5% of after-tax net income in 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. On July 21, 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase plan (the "2016 Repurchase Plan") for the Company to repurchase up to 400,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. Purchases may be made over the 24 months following adoption of the plan. The repurchase program may be suspended, modified or terminated by the Board of Directors at any time for any reason. This plan replaced the Company’s existing 400,000 share repurchase plan announced on July 25, 2014 (the “2014 Repurchase Plan”). No shares have been purchased to date under the 2016 Repurchase Plan. The Company repurchased 22,356 shares under the 2014 Repurchase Plan during 2016, all in the first quarter. The shares were purchased at an average price of $52.18. Over the life of the 2014 Repurchase Plan, the Company repurchased 191,303 shares at an average price of $48.51. The Company and its subsidiary banks are subject to quantitative capital measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy. Consistent with the objective of operating a sound financial organization, the Company and its subsidiary banks maintain capital ratios well above regulatory minimums and meet the requirements to be considered well-capitalized under the regulatory guidelines. As of December 31, 2017, the capital ratios for the Company’s four subsidiary banks exceeded the minimum levels required to be considered well capitalized. Additional information on the Company’s capital ratios and regulatory requirements is provided in “Note 19- Regulations and Supervision” in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. of this Report on Form 10-K. ### Securities The Company maintains a portfolio of securities such as U.S. Treasuries, U.S. government sponsored entities securities, U.S. government agencies, non-U.S. Government agencies or sponsored entities mortgage-backed securities, obligations of states and political subdivisions thereof and equity securities. Management typically invests in securities with short to intermediate average lives in order to better match the interest rate sensitivities of its assets and liabilities. Investment decisions are made within policy guidelines established by the Company’s Board of Directors. The investment policy established by the Company’s Board of Directors is based on the asset/liability management goals of the Company, and is monitored by the Company’s Asset/Liability Management Committee. The intent of the policy is to establish a portfolio of high quality diversified securities, which optimizes net interest income within safety and liquidity limits deemed acceptable by the Asset/Liability Management Committee. The Company classifies its securities at date of purchase as available-for-sale, held-to-maturity or trading. Securities, other than certain obligations of states and political subdivisions thereof, are generally classified as available-for-sale. Securities available-for-sale may be used to enhance total return, provide additional liquidity, or reduce interest rate risk. The held-to-maturity portfolio consists of obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities and obligations of state and political subdivisions. The securities in the trading portfolio reflect those securities that the Company elects to account for at fair value, with the adoption of ASC Topic 825, *Financial Instruments.* The Company’s total securities portfolio at December 31, 2017 totaled $1.53 billion compared to $1.57 billion at December 31, 2016. The table below shows the decrease in fair value in the available-for-sale portfolio during 2017 was mainly due to decreases in mortgage-backed securities issued by U.S. Government agencies and obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities, partially offset by increases in obligations of U.S. state and political subdivisions and U.S. Government sponsored entities mortgage backed securities, during the year. In addition, fair values between year-end 2016 and year-end 2017 were unfavorably impacted by changes in market interest rates. The decrease in fair value in the held-to-maturity portfolio was primarily due to maturities of obligations of U.S. state and political subdivisions. Additional information on the securities portfolio is available in “Note 2 Securities” in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. of this Report, which details the types of securities held, the carrying and fair values, and the contractual maturities as of December 31, 2017 and 2016. *(in thousands)* | Available-for-Sale Securities | 2017 Amortized Cost | Fair Value | 2016 Amortized Cost | Fair Value | 2015 Amortized Cost | Fair Value | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities | **$507,248** | **$504,193** | $527,057 | $527,627 | $551,176 | $552,893 | | Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions | **91,659** | **91,519** | 89,910 | 89,056 | 83,981 | 84,726 | | Mortgage-backed securities-residential, issued by | | | | | | | | U.S. Government agencies | **139,747** | **137,735** | 159,417 | 158,226 | 94,459 | 94,678 | | U.S. Government sponsored entities | **667,767** | **656,178** | 662,724 | 651,430 | 656,947 | 650,097 | | Non-U.S. Government agencies or sponsored entities | **75** | **75** | 116 | 116 | 192 | 194 | | U.S. corporate debt securities | **2,500** | **2,162** | 2,500 | 2,162 | 2,500 | 2,162 | | Total debt securities | **1,408,996** | **1,391,862** | 1,441,724 | 1,428,617 | 1,389,255 | 1,384,750 | | Equity securities | **1,000** | **913** | 1,000 | 921 | 1,000 | 934 | | **Total available-for-sale securities** | **$1,409,996** | **$1,392,775** | $1,442,724 | $1,429,538 | $1,390,255 | $1,385,684 | 42 *(in thousands)* | Held-to-Maturity Securities | 2017 Amortized Cost | Fair Value | 2016 Amortized Cost | Fair Value | 2015 Amortized Cost | Fair Value | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities | **$131,707** | **$132,720** | $132,098 | $132,619 | $132,482 | $132,687 | | Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions | **7,509** | **7,595** | 10,021 | 10,213 | 13,589 | 13,999 | | **Total held-to-maturity securities** | **$139,216** | **$140,315** | $142,119 | $142,832 | $146,071 | $146,686 | *(in thousands)* | Trading Securities | 2017 Fair Value | 2016 Fair Value | 2015 Fair Value | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities | **$0** | $0 | $6,601 | | Mortgage-backed securities-residential issued by U.S. Government sponsored entities | **0** | 0 | 767 | | **Total trading securities** | **$0** | $0 | $7,368 | Quarterly, the Company evaluates all investment securities with a fair value less than amortized cost to identify any other-than-temporary impairment as defined under generally accepted accounting principles. The Company did not recognize any net credit impairment charge to earnings on investment securities in 2017, 2016, and 2015. The Company uses a two step modeling approach to analyze each non-agency CMO issue to determine whether or not the current unrealized losses are due to credit impairment and therefore other-than-temporarily impaired (“OTTI”). Step one in the modeling process applies default and severity credit vectors to each security based on current credit data detailing delinquency, bankruptcy, foreclosure and real estate owned (REO) performance. The results of the credit vector analysis are compared to the security’s current credit support coverage to determine if the security has adequate collateral support. If the security’s current credit support coverage falls below certain predetermined levels, step two is initiated. In step two, the Company uses a third party to assist in calculating the present value of current estimated cash flows to ensure there are no adverse changes in cash flows during the quarter leading to an other-than-temporary-impairment. Management’s assumptions used in step two include default and severity vectors and prepayment assumptions along with various other criteria including: percent decline in fair value; credit rating downgrades; probability of repayment of amounts due, credit support and changes in average life. As a result of the modeling process, the Company does not consider any investment security to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2017. Future changes in interest rates or the credit quality and credit support of the underlying issuers may reduce the market value of these and other securities. If such decline is determined to be other than temporary, the Company will record the necessary charge to earnings and/or accumulated other comprehensive income to reduce the securities to their then current fair value. The Company also holds non-marketable Federal Home Loan Bank New York (“FHLBNY”) stock, non-marketable Federal Home Loan Bank Pittsburgh (“FHLBPITT”) stock and non-marketable Atlantic Community Bankers Bank (“ACBB”) stock, all of which are required to be held for regulatory purposes and for borrowing availability. The required investment in FHLB stock is tied to the Company’s borrowing levels with the FHLB. Holdings of FHLBNY stock, FHLBPITT stock and ACBB stock totaled $34.2 million, $16.2 million and $95,000 at December 31, 2017, respectively. These securities are carried at par, which is also cost. The FHLBNY and FHLBPITT continue to pay dividends and repurchase stock. As such, the Company has not recognized any impairment on its holdings of FHLBNY and FHLBPITT stock. At December 31, 2016, the Company’s holdings of FHLBNY stock, FHLBPITT stock, and ACBB stock totaled $28.1 million, $14.9 million, and $95,000, respectively. Management’s policy is to purchase investment grade securities that, on average, have relatively short expected durations. This policy helps mitigate interest rate risk and provides sources of liquidity without significant risk to capital. The contractual maturity distribution of debt securities and mortgage-backed securities as of December 31, 2017, along with the weighted average yield of each category, is presented in *Table 3-Maturity Distribution* below. Balances are shown at amortized cost and weighted average yields are calculated on a fully taxable-equivalent basis. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities presented in *Table 3-Maturity Distribution* below, because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without penalty and mortgage-backed securities will pay throughout the periods prior to contractual maturity. ### Table 3 - Maturity Distribution *(dollar amounts in thousands)* | Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities | As of December 31, 2017 Securities Available-for-Sale1 Amount | Yield2 | Securities Held-to-Maturity Amount | Yield2 | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Within 1 year | $45,330 | 1.80% | $0 | 0.00% | | Over 1 to 5 years | 336,591 | 1.90% | 50,765 | 2.29% | | Over 5 to 10 years | 125,327 | 2.64% | 80,942 | 2.55% | | | $507,248 | 2.07% | $131,707 | 2.45% | | Obligations of U.S. state and political subdivisions | | | | | | Within 1 year | $6,579 | 3.19% | $5,980 | 3.82% | | Over 1 to 5 years | 32,255 | 3.02% | 1,171 | 6.84% | | Over 5 to 10 years | 36,734 | 3.32% | 358 | 7.97% | | Over 10 years | 16,091 | 4.00% | 0 | 0.00% | | | $91,659 | 3.32% | $7,509 | 4.49% | | Mortgage-backed securities - residential | | | | | | Within 1 year | $62 | 6.16% | $0 | 0.00% | | Over 1 to 5 years | 8,899 | 3.52% | 0 | 0.00% | | Over 5 to 10 years | 126,827 | 2.18% | 0 | 0.00% | | Over 10 years | 671,801 | 2.11% | 0 | 0.00% | | | $807,589 | 2.14% | $0 | 0.00% | | Other securities | | | | | | Over 10 years | $2,500 | 4.06% | $0 | 0.00% | | Equity securities | 1,000 | 2.41% | 0 | 0.00% | | | $3,500 | 3.59% | $0 | 0.00% | | Total securities | | | | | | Within 1 year | $51,970 | 1.98% | $5,980 | 3.82% | | Over 1 to 5 years | 377,745 | 2.03% | 51,936 | 2.39% | | Over 5 to 10 years | 288,889 | 2.52% | 81,300 | 2.57% | | Over 10 years | 690,392 | 2.16% | 0 | 0.00% | | Equity securities | 1,000 | 2.41% | 0 | 0.00% | | | $1,409,996 | 2.19% | $139,216 | 2.56% | #### 1 Balances of available-for-sale securities are shown at amortized cost. *2 Interest income includes the tax effects of taxable-equivalent adjustments using a combined New York State and Federal effective income tax rate of 40% to increase tax exempt interest income to taxable-equivalent basis.* The average taxable-equivalent yield on the securities portfolio was 2.19 % in 2017, 2.13% in 2016 and 2.22% in 2015. At December 31, 2017, there were no holdings of any one issuer, other than the U.S. Government sponsored entities, in an amount greater than 10% of the Company’s shareholders’ equity. ### Loans and Leases ### Table 4 - Composition of Loan and Lease Portfolio *(in thousands)* | Originated Loans and Leases Commercial and industrial | As of December 31, 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Agriculture | **$108,608** | $118,247 | $88,299 | $78,507 | $74,788 | | Commercial and industrial other | **932,067** | 847,055 | 768,024 | 688,529 | 562,439 | | Subtotal commercial and industrial | **1,040,675** | 965,302 | 856,323 | 767,036 | 637,227 | | Commercial real estate | | | | | | | Construction | **202,486** | 135,834 | 103,037 | 72,427 | 46,441 | | Agriculture | **129,712** | 102,509 | 86,935 | 58,994 | 52,627 | | Commercial real estate other | **1,660,782** | 1,431,690 | 1,167,250 | 979,621 | 903,320 | | Subtotal commercial real estate | **1,992,980** | 1,670,033 | 1,357,222 | 1,111,042 | 1,002,388 | | Residential real estate | | | | | | | Home equity | **212,812** | 209,277 | 202,578 | 186,957 | 171,809 | | Mortgages | **1,039,040** | 947,378 | 823,841 | 710,904 | 658,966 | | Subtotal residential real estate | **1,251,852** | 1,156,655 | 1,026,419 | 897,861 | 830,775 | | Consumer and other | | | | | | | Indirect | **12,144** | 14,835 | 17,829 | 18,298 | 21,202 | | Consumer and other | **50,214** | 44,393 | 40,904 | 35,874 | 32,312 | | Subtotal consumer and other | **62,358** | 59,228 | 58,733 | 54,172 | 53,514 | | Leases | **14,467** | 16,650 | 14,861 | 12,251 | 5,563 | | Total loans and leases | **4,362,332** | 3,867,868 | 3,313,558 | 2,842,362 | 2,529,467 | | Less: unearned income and deferred costs and fees | **(3,789)** | (3,946) | (2,790) | (2,388) | (2,223) | | **Total originated loans and leases, net of unearned income and deferred costs and fees** | **$4,358,543** | $3,863,922 | $3,310,768 | $2,839,974 | $2,527,244 | | **Acquired Loans** | | | | | | | Commercial and industrial | | | | | | | Commercial and industrial other | **$50,976** | $79,317 | $84,810 | $97,034 | $128,503 | | Subtotal commercial and industrial | **50,976** | 79,317 | 84,810 | 97,034 | 128,503 | | Commercial real estate | | | | | | | Construction | **1,480** | 8,936 | 4,892 | 35,906 | 39,353 | | Agriculture | **247** | 267 | 2,095 | 3,182 | 3,135 | | Commercial real estate other | **206,020** | 241,605 | 284,952 | 308,488 | 366,438 | | Subtotal commercial real estate | **207,747** | 250,808 | 291,939 | 347,576 | 408,926 | | Residential real estate | | | | | | | Home equity | **28,444** | 37,737 | 42,092 | 56,008 | 67,183 | | Mortgages | **22,645** | 25,423 | 27,491 | 32,282 | 35,336 | | Subtotal residential real estate | **51,089** | 63,160 | 69,583 | 88,290 | 102,519 | | Consumer and other | | | | | | | Indirect | **0** | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | | Consumer and other | **765** | 826 | 911 | 1,095 | 1,219 | | Subtotal consumer and other | **765** | 826 | 911 | 1,095 | 1,224 | | Covered loans | **0** | 0 | 14,031 | 19,319 | 25,868 | | **Total acquired loans and leases** | **$310,577** | $394,111 | $461,274 | $553,314 | $667,040 | 45 Total loans and leases of $4.7 billion at December 31, 2017 were up $411.1 million or 9.7% from December 31, 2016. The growth was mainly due to organic loan growth. On August 1, 2012, the Company acquired $889.3 million of loans in the VIST Financial acquisition. These loans are shown in the table under the acquired loan heading. All other loans, including loans originated by VIST Bank since the acquisition date of August 1, 2012, are considered originated loans. Originated loan balances at December 31, 2017 were up 12.8% over year-end 2016. The increase in originated loans, over prior year-end, was in all loan categories. As of December 31, 2017, total loans and leases represented 70.2% of total assets compared to 68.3% of total assets at December 31, 2016. Residential real estate loans of $1.3 billion at December 31, 2017, including home equity loans, increased by $83.1 million or 6.8% from $1.2 billion at year-end 2016, and comprised 28.0% of total loans and leases at December 31, 2017. The growth in residential real estate loan balances reflects higher origination volumes due to the low interest rate environment as well as a decision to retain certain residential mortgages in the portfolio rather than sell them in the secondary market due to interest rate considerations. The Company’s Asset/Liability Committee meets regularly and establishes standards for selling and retaining residential real estate mortgage originations. The Company may sell residential real estate loans in the secondary market based on interest rate considerations. These residential real estate loans are generally sold to Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“FHLMC”) or State of New York Mortgage Agency (“SONYMA”) without recourse in accordance with standard secondary market loan sale agreements. These residential real estate loans also are subject to customary representations and warranties made by the Company, including representations and warranties related to gross incompetence and fraud. The Company has not had to repurchase any loans as a result of these representations and warranties. During 2017, 2016, and 2015, the Company sold residential mortgage loans totaling $4.6 million, $3.9 million, and $3.2 million, respectively, and realized net gains on these sales of $50,000, $95,000, and $54,000, respectively. When residential mortgage loans are sold to FHLMC or SONYMA, the Company typically retains all servicing rights, which provides the Company with a source of fee income. In connection with the sales in 2017, 2016, and 2015, the Company recorded mortgage-servicing assets of $38,000, $21,000, and $18,000, respectively. The Company originates fixed rate and adjustable rate residential mortgage loans, including loans that have characteristics of both, such as a 7/1 adjustable rate mortgage, which has a fixed rate for the first seven years and then adjusts annually thereafter. The majority of residential mortgage loans originated over the last several years have been fixed rate given the low interest rate environment. Adjustable rate residential real estate loans may be underwritten based upon an initial rate which is below the fully indexed rate; however, the initial rate is generally less than 100 basis points below the fully indexed rate. As such, the Company does not believe that this practice creates any significant credit risk. Commercial real estate loans totaled $2.2 billion at December 31, 2017; an increase of $279.9 million compared to December 31, 2016, and represented 47.1% of total loans and leases at December 31, 2017, compared to 45.1% at December 31, 2016. Commercial and industrial loans totaled $1.1 billion at December 31, 2017, which is an increase of $47.0 million from $1.0 billion reported as of December 31, 2016. As of December 31, 2017, agriculturally-related loans totaled $238.6 million or 5.1% of total loans and leases compared to $221.1 million or 5.2% of total loans and leases at December 31, 2016. Agriculturally-related loans include loans to dairy farms and cash and vegetable crop farms. Agriculturally related loans are primarily made based on identified cash flows of the borrower with consideration given to underlying collateral, personal guarantees, and government related guarantees. Agriculturally-related loans are generally secured by the assets or property being financed or other business assets such as accounts receivable, livestock, equipment or commodities/crops. The consumer loan portfolio includes personal installment loans, indirect automobile financing, and overdraft lines of credit. Consumer and other loans were $63.1 million at December 31, 2017, compared to $60.1 million at December 31, 2016. The lease portfolio decreased by 13.1% to $14.5 million at December 31, 2017 from $16.7 million at December 31, 2016. As of December 31, 2017, commercial leases and municipal leases represented 100.0% of total leases. Acquired loans were recorded at fair value pursuant to the purchase accounting guidelines in FASB ASC 805 – “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (as determined by the present value of expected future cash flows) with no valuation allowance (i.e., the allowance for loan losses). At acquisition, the Company evaluated whether each acquired loan (regardless of size) was within the scope of ASC 310-30, “Receivables – Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality”. The carrying value of loans acquired from VIST and accounted for in accordance with ASC Subtopic 310-30, “Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality,” was $12.0 million at December 31, 2017, compared to $22.5 million at December 31, 2016 due to normal loan run off. Under ASC Subtopic 310-30, loans may be aggregated and accounted for as pools of loans if the loans being aggregated have common risk characteristics. The Company elected to account for the loans with evidence of credit deterioration individually rather than aggregate them into pools. The difference between the undiscounted cash flows expected at acquisition and the investment in the acquired loans, or the “accretable yield,” is recognized as interest income utilizing the level-yield method over the life of each loan. Contractually required payments for interest and principal that exceed the undiscounted cash flows expected at acquisition, or the “non-accretable difference,” are not recognized as a yield adjustment, as a loss accrual or as a valuation allowance. Increases in expected cash flows subsequent to the acquisition are recognized prospectively through an adjustment of the yield on the loans over the remaining life, while decreases in expected cash flows are recognized as impairment through a loss provision and an increase in the allowance for loan losses. Valuation allowances (recognized in the allowance for loan losses) on these impaired loans reflect only losses incurred after the acquisition (representing all cash flows that were expected at acquisition but currently are not expected to be received). The carrying value of loans not exhibiting evidence of credit impairment at the time of the acquisition (i.e. loans outside of the scope of ASC 310-30) was $298.6 million at December 31, 2017 as compared to $371.6 million at December 31, 2016 due to normal loan run off. The fair value of the acquired loans not exhibiting evidence of credit impairment was determined by projecting contractual cash flows discounted at risk-adjusted interest rates. The carrying value of the acquired loans reflects management’s best estimate of the amount to be realized from the acquired loan and lease portfolios. However, the amounts the Company actually realizes on these loans could differ materially from the carrying value reflected in these financial statements, based upon the timing of collections on the acquired loans in future periods, underlying collateral values and the ability of borrowers to continue to make payments. Purchased performing loans were recorded at fair value, including a credit discount. Credit losses on acquired performing loans are estimated based on analysis of the performing portfolio. Such estimated credit losses are recorded as an accretable discount in a manner similar to purchased impaired loans. The fair value discount other than for credit loss is accreted as an adjustment to yield over the estimated lives of the loans. Interest is accrued daily on the outstanding principal balances of purchased performing loans. Fair value adjustments are also accreted into income over the estimated lives of the loans on a level yield basis. The Company has adopted comprehensive lending policies, underwriting standards and loan review procedures. There were no significant changes to the Company’s existing policies, underwriting standards and loan review during 2017. The Company’s Board of Directors approves the lending policies at least annually. The Company recognizes that exceptions to policy guidelines may occasionally occur and has established procedures for approving exceptions to these policy guidelines. Management has also implemented reporting systems to monitor loan originations, loan quality, concentrations of credit, loan delinquencies and nonperforming loans and potential problem loans. The Company’s loan and lease customers are located primarily in the New York and Pennsylvania communities served by its four subsidiary banks. Although operating in numerous communities in New York State and Pennsylvania, the Company is still dependent on the general economic conditions of these states. Other than geographic and general economic risks, management is not aware of any material concentrations of credit risk to any industry or individual borrower. ### Analysis of Past Due and Nonperforming Loans *(in thousands)* | Loans 90 days past due and accruing\* | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Commercial real estate | **$0** | $0 | $0 | $0 | $161 | | Residential real estate | **0** | 0 | 58 | 106 | 446 | | Consumer and other | **44** | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | Total loans 90 days past due and accruing | **44** | 0 | 58 | 106 | 607 | | Nonaccrual loans | | | | | | | Commercial and industrial | **2,852** | 738 | 1,738 | 2,116 | 1,679 | | Commercial real estate | **5,948** | 9,076 | 6,054 | 7,520 | 23,364 | | Residential real estate | **10,363** | 9,061 | 9,863 | 9,043 | 13,086 | | Consumer and other | **354** | 166 | 182 | 349 | 254 | | Leases | **0** | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | Total nonaccrual loans and leases | **19,517** | 19,041 | 17,837 | 19,028 | 38,383 | | Troubled debt restructurings not included above | **3,449** | 2,631 | 3,915 | 3,444 | 45 | | **Total nonperforming loans and leases** | **23,010** | 21,672 | 21,810 | 22,578 | 39,035 | | Other real estate owned | **2,047** | 908 | 2,692 | 5,683 | 4,253 | | **Total nonperforming assets** | **$25,057** | $22,580 | $24,502 | $28,261 | $43,288 | | **Total nonperforming loans and leases as a percentage of total loans and leases** | **0.49%** | 0.51% | 0.58% | 0.67% | 1.22% | | **Total nonperforming assets as a percentage of total assets** | **0.38%** | 0.36% | 0.43% | 0.54% | 0.87% | | **Allowance as a percentage of nonperforming loans and leases** | **172.84%** | 164.98% | 146.74% | 128.43% | 71.65% | *\* The 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014 and 2013 columns in the above table exclude $1.1 million, $2.6 million, $2.5 million, $3.5 million, and $7.0 million, respectively, of acquired loans that are 90 days past due and accruing interest. These loans were originally recorded at fair value on the acquisition date of August 1, 2012. These loans are considered to be accruing as the Company can reasonably estimate future cash flows on these acquired loans and the Company expects to fully collect the carrying value of these loans. Therefore, the Company is accreting the difference between the carrying value of these loans and their expected cash flows into interest income.* The level of nonperforming assets at the past five year-ends is illustrated in the table above. The tables show that the balances of nonperforming loans and assets were down significantly compared to 2013. The ratio of nonperforming loans to total loans steadily improved between 2013 and 2017. The ratio of nonperforming assets to total assets also steadily improved between 2013 and 2016, but was up slightly at year-end 2017 from year-end 2016. The Company’s total nonperforming assets as a percentage of total assets was 0.38% at December 31, 2017, up from 0.36% at December 31, 2016, but continues to compare favorably to its peer group’s most recent ratio of 0.64% at September 30, 2017. The peer data is from the Federal Reserve Board and represents banks or bank holding companies with assets between $3.0 billion and $10.0 billion. Nonperforming loans at December 31, 2017 were up 6.2% from December 31, 2016. The increase was mainly in commercial and industrial loans and residential real estate loans, partially offset by a decrease in commercial real estate loans. The increase in commercial and industrial nonaccrual loans was mainly due to the addition of four commercial loans totaling about $2.3 million. The decrease in commercial real estate nonaccrual loans reflects paydowns, loans returned to accruing status due to improved performance, and loans taken into other real estate owned. Nonperforming loans represented 0.49% of total loans at December 31, 2017, compared to 0.51% of total loans at December 31, 2016, and 0.58% of total loans at December 31, 2015. A breakdown of nonperforming loans by portfolio segment is shown above. At December 31, 2017, other real estate owned was up $1.1 million from prior year-end and represented 8.2% of total nonperforming assets, up from 4.0% at December 31, 2016. The increase in other real estate owned was mainly due to one commercial real estate loan for $1.3 million that was taken into other real estate owned during 2017. Loans are considered modified in a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) when, due to a borrower’s financial difficulties, the Company makes a concession(s) to the borrower that the Company would not otherwise consider. When modifications are provided for reasons other than as a result of the financial distress of the borrower, these loans are not classified as TDRs or impaired. These modifications may include, among others, an extension of the term of the loan, and granting a period when interest-only payments can be made, with the principal payments made over the remaining term of the loan or at maturity. TDRs are included in the above table within the following categories: “loans 90 days past due and accruing”, “nonaccrual loans”, or “troubled debt restructurings not included above”. Loans in the latter category include loans that meet the definition of a TDR but are performing in accordance with the modified terms and have shown a satisfactory period of repayment (generally six consecutive months) and where full collection of all is reasonably assured. At December 31, 2017, the Company had $7.7 million in TDR balances, which are included in the above table; $3.4 million are included in the line captioned “Troubled debt restructurings not included above” and the remainder within nonaccrual loans. In general, the Company places a loan on nonaccrual status if principal or interest payments become 90 days or more past due and/or management deems the collectability of the principal and/or interest to be in question, as well as when called for by regulatory requirements. Although in nonaccrual status, the Company may continue to receive payments on these loans. These payments are generally recorded as a reduction to principal and interest income is recorded only after principal recovery is reasonably assured. For additional financial information on the difference between the interest income that would have been recorded if these loans and leases had been paid in accordance with their original terms and the interest income that was recorded, refer to “Note 3 – Loans and Leases” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. of this Report. The Company’s recorded investment in originated loans and leases that are considered impaired totaled $12.1 million at December 31, 2017, and $13.0 million at December 31, 2016. A loan is impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans consist of our non-homogenous nonaccrual loans and loans that are 90 days or more past due. Specific reserves on individually identified impaired loans that are not collateral dependent are measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the original effective interest rate of each loan. For loans that are collateral dependent, impairment is measured based on the fair value of the collateral less estimated selling costs, and such impaired amounts are generally charged off. At December 31, 2017, there was a specific reserve of $441,000 on seven commercial loans in the originated loan portfolio, compared to a $417,000 reserve on three commercial real estate loans and three commercial loans in 2016. The majority of impaired loans are collateral dependent impaired loans that have limited exposure or require limited specific reserves because of the amount of collateral support with respect to these loans or the loans have been written down to fair value. Interest payments on impaired loans are typically applied to principal unless collectability of the principal amount is reasonably assured. In these cases, interest is recognized on a cash basis. There was no interest income recognized on impaired loans and leases for 2017, 2016 and 2015. The ratio of the allowance to nonperforming loans (loans past due 90 days and accruing, nonaccrual loans and restructured troubled debt) was 172.84% at December 31, 2017, compared to 164.98% at December 31, 2016. The improvement in the ratio reflects growth in the allowance. The Company’s nonperforming loans are mostly made up of collateral dependent impaired loans requiring little to no specific allowance due to the level of collateral available with respect to these loans and/or previous charge-offs. Management reviews the loan portfolio for evidence of potential problem loans and leases. Potential problem loans and leases are loans and leases that are currently performing in accordance with contractual terms, but where known information about possible credit problems of the related borrowers causes management to have doubt as to the ability of such borrowers to comply with the present loan payment terms and may result in such loans and leases becoming nonperforming at some time in the future. Management considers loans and leases classified as Substandard, which continue to accrue interest, to be potential problem loans and leases. The Company, through its credit administration function, identified 28 commercial relationships from the originated portfolio and 10 commercial relationships from the acquired portfolio totaling $11.2 million and $3.6 million, respectively at December 31, 2017 that were potential problem loans. At December 31, 2016, there were 27 relationships totaling $7.6 million in the originated portfolio and 18 relationships totaling $8.4 million in the acquired portfolio that were considered potential problem loans. Of the 28 commercial relationships from the originated portfolio that were classified as potential problem loans at December 31, 2017, there were 4 relationships that equaled or exceeded $1.0 million, which in aggregate totaled $7.6 million. Of the 10 commercial relationships from the acquired loan portfolio, there was 1 relationship that equaled or exceeded $1.0 million which totaled $1.9 million. The potential problem loans remain in a performing status due to a variety of factors, including payment history, the value of collateral supporting the credits, and personal or government guarantees. These factors, when considered in the aggregate, give management reason to believe that the current risk exposure on these loans does not warrant accounting for these loans as nonperforming. However, these loans do exhibit certain risk factors, which have the potential to cause them to become nonperforming. Accordingly, management’s attention is focused on these credits, which are reviewed on at least a quarterly basis. ### The Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses ### Originated loans and leases The methodology for determining the allowance is considered by management to be a critical accounting policy due to the high degree of judgment involved, the subjectivity of the assumptions utilized and the potential for changes in the economic environment that could result in changes to the amount of the allowance. Management’s determination of the adequacy of the allowance is based on periodic evaluations of the loan portfolio and of current economic conditions. Tompkins' model has been designed with certain key concepts in mind, including: 1\. An acknowledgment that arriving at an appropriate allowance requires a high degree of management judgment. 2\. The allowance should be maintained at a level appropriate to cover estimated losses on loans individually evaluated for impairment, as well as estimated credit losses inherent in the remainder of the portfolio. 3\. Estimates of credit losses should consider all significant factors that affect the collectability of the portfolio as of the evaluation date. 4\. Loss emergence period is a critical assumption in the allowance estimate, which represents the average amount of time between when loss events occur for specific loan types and when such problem loans are identified and the related loss amounts are confirmed through charge-offs. 5\. The allowance should be based on a comprehensive, well-documented, and consistently applied analysis of the loan portfolio. The model is comprised of four major components that management has deemed appropriate in evaluating the appropriateness of the allowance for loan and lease losses. While none of these components, when used independently, is effective in arriving at a reserve level that appropriately measures the risk inherent in the portfolio, management believes that using them collectively, provides reasonable measurement of the loss exposure in the portfolio. The components include: 1\. *Impaired Loans* - Management considers a loan to be impaired if, based on current information, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all scheduled payments of principal or interest when due, according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. When a loan is considered to be impaired, the amount of the impairment is measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the effective interest rate of the loan or, as a practical expedient, at the observable market price or the fair value of collateral (less costs to sell) if the loan is collateral dependent. Management excludes large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans such as residential mortgages, consumer loans, and leases, which are collectively evaluated. 2\. *Criticized and Classified Credits –* For loans that are not impaired, but are rated special mention or worse, management evaluates credits based on elevated risk characteristics and assigns reserves based upon analysis of historical loss experience of loans with similar risk characteristics. 3\. *Historical Loss Experience -* For loans that are not impaired, or reviewed individually, management assigns a reserve based upon historical loss experience over a designated look-back period. Management has evaluated a variety of look-back periods and has determined that an eight year look back period is appropriate to capture a full range of economic cycles. 4\. *Qualitative/Subjective Analysis –* The model also includes an analysis of a variety of subjective factors to support the reserve estimate. These subjective factors may include reserve allocations for risks that may not otherwise be fully recognized in other components of the model. Among the subjective factors that are routinely considered as part of this analysis are: growth trends in the portfolio, changes in management and/or polices related to lending activities, trends in classified or past due/nonaccrual loans, concentrations of credit, local and national economic trends, and industry trends. Periodically, management conducts an analysis to estimate the loss emergence period for various loan categories based on samples of historical charge-offs. Model output by loan category is reviewed to evaluate the reasonableness of the reserve levels in comparison to the estimated loss emergence period applied to historical loss experience. In addition to the components discussed above, management reviews the model output for reasonableness by analyzing the results in comparisons to recent trends in the loan/lease portfolio, through back-testing of results from prior models in comparison to actual loss history, and by comparing our reserves and loss history to industry peer results. The model results are reviewed by management at the Corporate Credit Policy Committee and at the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. Additionally, on an annual basis, management conducts a validation process of the model. This validation includes reviewing the appropriateness of model calculations, back testing of model results and appropriateness of key assumptions used in the model. Although we believe our process for determining the allowance adequately considers all of the factors that would likely result in credit losses, this evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates, including expected default probabilities, loss emergence periods, the amounts and timing of expected future cash flows on impaired loans, and estimated losses based on historical loss experience and current economic conditions. All of these factors may be susceptible to significant change. To the extent that actual results differ from management estimates, additional loan loss provisions may be required that would adversely impact earnings for future periods. Based on its evaluation of the allowance as of December 31, 2017, management considers the allowance to be appropriate. Under adversely or positively different conditions or assumptions, the Company would need to increase or decrease the allowance. ### Acquired Loans and Leases As part of our determination of the fair value of our acquired loans at the time of acquisition, the Company established a credit mark to provide for expected losses in our acquired loan portfolio. There was no allowance for loan losses carried over from the acquired company. To the extent that credit quality deteriorates subsequent to acquisition, such deterioration would result in the establishment of an allowance for the acquired loan portfolio. #### Acquired loans accounted for under ASC 310-30 Acquired loans were accounted for under ASC 310-30, and our allowance for loan losses is estimated based upon our expected cash flows for these loans. To the extent that we experience a deterioration in borrower credit quality resulting in a decrease in our expected cash flows subsequent to the acquisition of the loans, an allowance for loan losses would be established based on our estimate of future credit losses over the remaining life of the loans. #### Acquired loans accounted for under ASC 310-20 We establish our allowance for loan losses through a provision for credit losses based upon an evaluation process that is similar to our evaluation process used for originated loans. This evaluation, which includes a review of loans on which full collectability may not be reasonably assured, considers, among other matters, the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral, economic conditions, historical net loan loss experience, carrying value of the loans, which includes the remaining net purchase discount or premium, and other factors that warrant recognition in determining our allowance for loan losses. The allocation of the Company’s allowance as of December 31, 2017, and each of the previous four years is illustrated in *Table 5- Allocation of the Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses*, below. ### Table 5 - Allocation of the Allowance for Originated and Acquired Loan and Lease Losses *(in thousands)* | | As of December 31, 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | | **Originated loans outstanding at end of year** | **$4,358,543** | $3,863,922 | $3,310,768 | $2,839,974 | $2,527,244 | | **Allocation of the originated allowance by originated loan type:** | | | | | | | Commercial and industrial | **$11,812** | $9,389 | $10,495 | $9,157 | $8,406 | | Commercial real estate | **20,412** | 19,836 | 15,479 | 12,069 | 10,459 | | Residential real estate | **6,161** | 5,149 | 4,070 | 5,030 | 5,771 | | Consumer and other | **1,301** | 1,224 | 1,268 | 1,900 | 2,059 | | Leases | **0** | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | | **Total** | **$39,686** | $35,598 | $31,312 | $28,156 | $26,700 | | **Allocation of the originated allowance as a percentage of total originated allowance:** | | | | | | | Commercial and industrial | **30%** | 27% | 34% | 32% | 31% | | Commercial real estate | **51%** | 56% | 49% | 43% | 39% | | Residential real estate | **16%** | 14% | 13% | 18% | 22% | | Consumer and other | **3%** | 3% | 4% | 7% | 8% | | **Total** | **100%** | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | | **Loan and lease types as a percentage of total originated loans and leases:** | | | | | | | Commercial and industrial | **24%** | 25% | 26% | 27% | 25% | | Commercial real estate | **46%** | 43% | 41% | 39% | 40% | | Residential real estate | **29%** | 30% | 31% | 32% | 33% | | Consumer and other | **1%** | 2% | 2% | 2% | 2% | | Leases | **0%** | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | | **Total** | **100%** | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 52 *(in thousands)* | | As of December 31, 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | | **Acquired loans outstanding at end of year** | **$310,577** | $394,111 | $461,274 | $553,314 | $667,040 | | **Allocation of the acquired allowance by acquired loan type:** | | | | | | | Commercial and industrial | **$25** | $0 | $433 | $431 | $168 | | Commercial real estate | **0** | 97 | 61 | 337 | 770 | | Residential real estate | **54** | 54 | 198 | 51 | 274 | | Consumer and other | **6** | 6 | 0 | 22 | 58 | | **Total** | **$85** | $157 | $692 | $841 | $1,270 | | **Allocation of the acquired allowance as a percentage of total acquired allowance:** | | | | | | | Commercial and industrial | **29%** | 0% | 62% | 51% | 13% | | Commercial real estate | **0%** | 62% | 9% | 40% | 60% | | Residential real estate | **64%** | 34% | 29% | 6% | 22% | | Consumer and other | **7%** | 4% | 0% | 3% | 5% | | **Total** | **100%** | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | | **Loan and lease types as a percentage of total acquired loans and leases:** | | | | | | | Commercial and industrial | **16%** | 20% | 18% | 18% | 19% | | Commercial real estate | **67%** | 64% | 64% | 63% | 61% | | Residential real estate | **17%** | 16% | 15% | 16% | 15% | | Consumer and other | **0%** | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1% | | Covered | **0%** | 0% | 3% | 3% | 4% | | **Total** | **100%** | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | The above tables provide, as of the dates indicated, an allocation of the allowance for probable and inherent loan losses by loan type. The allocation is neither indicative of the specific amounts or the loan categories in which future charge-offs may occur, nor is it an indicator of future loss trends. The allocation of the allowance to each category does not restrict the use of the allowance to absorb losses in any category. The five year trend in the allowance is shown above. Over the five year period, the originated allowance has steadily increased driven in large part by growth in originated loans, while the acquired portfolio has steadily decreased, reflecting run-off of the acquired portfolio, improving asset quality metrics in the acquired portfolio, and net charge-offs. As of December 31, 2017, the total allowance for loan and lease losses was $39.8 million, which was up $4.0 million or 11.2% from year-end 2016. The year-end allowance for originated loans and leases was up $4.1 million compared to prior year end, and the allowance for acquired loans was down $72,000 from year-end 2016. At December 31, 2017, the total allowance was 172.84% of total nonperforming loans compared to 164.98% at December 31, 2016. The Company’s allowance for originated loan and lease losses totaled $39.7 million at December 31, 2017, which represented 0.91% of total originated loans, down from 0.92% at December 31, 2016. The $4.1 million or 11.5% increase in the allowance for originated loans in 2017 over 2016 was mainly due to the 12.8% growth in the originated loan portfolio over the period. In addition, asset quality metrics in the originated portfolio showed some modest deterioration at December 31, 2017. Originated loans internally-classified as Special Mention and Substandard totaled $66.7 million at December 31, 2017, up from $40.8 million at year-end 2016. The increase was mainly in Special Mention loans in the Company's agricultural loan portfolio. Nonaccrual originated loans were $16.3 million as of December 31, 2017, up $2.0 million from year-end 2016. Net charge-offs of originated loans were $140,000 or 0.0% of average originated loans in 2017 compared to net recoveries of $149,000 in 2016. The decrease in the allowance for acquired loans and leases reflects improved asset quality in 2017, as well as the partial charge off of two credits that had specific reserves as of December 31, 2016. The amount of acquired loans internally-classified as Special Mention and Substandard at December 31, 2017 was down $7.8 million or 57.0% compared to December 31, 2016, reflecting successful workouts and related paydowns and charge-offs during 2017. Net charge-offs of acquired loans totaled $5,000 in 2017 compared to net charge-offs of $719,000 in 2016. Acquired nonaccrual loans totaled $3.3 million at December 31, 2017, compared to $4.7 million at December 31, 2016. The level of future charge-offs is dependent upon a variety of factors such as national and local economic conditions, trends in, various industries, underwriting characteristics, and conditions unique to each borrower. Given uncertainties surrounding these factors, it is difficult to estimate future losses. ### Table 6 - Analysis of the Allowance for Originated and Acquired Loan and Lease Losses *(in thousands)* | | December 31, 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Average originated loans outstanding during year | **$4,051,298** | $3,525,649 | $3,023,456 | $2,624,282 | $2,307,493 | | Balance of allowance at beginning of year | **35,598** | 31,312 | 28,156 | 26,700 | 24,643 | | **Originated loans charged-off:** | | | | | | | Commercial and industrial | **291** | 878 | 221 | 470 | 1,605 | | Commercial real estate | **21** | 12 | 363 | 639 | 651 | | Residential real estate | **584** | 263 | 338 | 512 | 752 | | Consumer and other | **960** | 521 | 1,074 | 1,308 | 1,282 | | Leases | **0** | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | **Total loans charged-off** | **$1,856** | $1,674 | $1,996 | $2,929 | $4,290 | | **Recoveries of originated loans previously charged-off:** | | | | | | | Commercial and industrial | **119** | 576 | 809 | 636 | 4,162 | | Commercial real estate | **980** | 859 | 1,277 | 1,832 | 718 | | Residential real estate | **212** | 63 | 112 | 88 | 48 | | Consumer and other | **405** | 325 | 487 | 536 | 419 | | **Total loan recoveries** | **$1,716** | $1,823 | $2,685 | $3,092 | $5,347 | | Net loan (recoveries) and charge-offs | **140** | (149) | (689) | (163) | (1,057) | | Additions to allowance charged to operations | **4,228** | 4,137 | 2,467 | 1,293 | 1,000 | | **Balance of originated allowance at end of year** | **$39,686** | $35,598 | $31,312 | $28,156 | $26,700 | | **Originated allowance as a percentage of originated loans and leases outstanding** | **0.91%** | 0.92% | 0.95% | 0.99% | 1.06% | | **Net (recoveries) charge-offs as a percentage of average originated loans and leases outstanding during the year** | **0.00%** | 0.00% | (0.02)% | (0.01)% | (0.05)% | 54 *(in thousands)* | | December 31, 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Average acquired loans outstanding during year | **$349,915** | $431,572 | $508,490 | $614,740 | $746,045 | | Balance of allowance at beginning of year | **157** | 692 | 841 | 1,270 | 0 | | **Acquired loans charged-off:** | | | | | | | Commercial and industrial | **74** | 698 | 77 | 293 | 2,991 | | Commercial real estate | **159** | 181 | 400 | 631 | 179 | | Residential real estate | **483** | 35 | 302 | 484 | 696 | | Consumer and other | **2** | 121 | 6 | 51 | 25 | | **Total loans charged-off** | **$718** | $1,035 | $785 | $1,459 | $3,891 | | **Recoveries of acquired loans previously charged-off:** | | | | | | | Commercial and industrial | **24** | 20 | 7 | 0 | 0 | | Commercial real estate | **637** | 268 | 142 | 0 | 0 | | Residential real estate | **44** | 0 | 9 | 0 | 0 | | Consumer and other | **8** | 28 | 0 | 17 | 0 | | **Total loan recoveries** | **$713** | $316 | $158 | $17 | $0 | | Net loans charged-off | **5** | 719 | 627 | 1,442 | 3,891 | | (Reductions) additions to allowance charged to operations | **(67)** | 184 | 478 | 1,013 | 5,161 | | **Balance of acquired allowance at end of year** | **$85** | $157 | $692 | $841 | $1,270 | | **Acquired allowance as a percentage of acquired loans outstanding** | **0.02%** | 0.04% | 0.14% | 0.14% | 0.17% | | **Net charge-offs as a percentage of average acquired loans and leases outstanding during the year** | **0.00%** | 0.17% | 0.12% | 0.23% | 0.52% | | **Total net charge-offs as a percentage of average total loans and leases outstanding during the year** | **0.00%** | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 0.09% | The provision for loan and lease losses represents management’s estimate of the expense necessary to maintain the allowance for loan and lease losses at an appropriate level. The above table shows an increase in provision expense for the originated portfolio and a decrease in provision expense for the acquired portfolio over the period from 2013 to 2017. The increase in provision expense for the originated portfolio largely reflects the growth in the originated portfolio over that period. Asset quality has been generally favorable over the period. The provision expense for originated loans over the past five years benefited from significant recoveries on two commercial/commercial real estate relationships that resulted in net loan recoveries on originated loans in 2016, 2015, and 2014 and a small net charge-off in 2017. The decrease in provision expense for the acquired portfolio over the period reflects improving asset quality of the remaining acquired portfolio as evidenced by lower net charge-offs and lower Special Mention and Substandard loans. The ratio of the allowance for originated loan and lease losses as a percentage of total originated loans was 0.91% at year-end 2017 compared to 0.92% at year-end 2016. The allowance coverage to nonperforming loans and leases was 172.84% at December 31, 2017 compared to 164.98% at December 31, 2016. Management believes that, based upon its evaluation as of December 31, 2017, the allowance is appropriate. ### Deposits and Other Liabilities Total deposits were $4.8 billion at December 31, 2017, an increase of $212.7 million or 4.6% compared to year-end 2016. The increase from year-end 2016 consisted of noninterest bearing deposits (up $201.9 million) and savings and money market balances (up $133.3 million), which is partially offset by time deposits (down $122.5 million). The most significant source of funding for the Company is core deposits. The Company defines core deposits as total deposits less time deposits of $250,000 or more, brokered deposits and municipal money market deposits. Core deposits grew by $244.5 million or 6.5% to $4.0 billion at year-end 2017 from $3.7 billion at year-end 2016. Core deposits represented 82.6% of total deposits at December 31, 2017, compared to 81.1% of total deposits at December 31, 2016. Municipal money market accounts totaled $545.8 million at year-end 2017, which was an increase of 7.4% over year-end 2016. In general, there is a seasonal pattern to municipal deposits starting with a low point during July and August. Account balances tend to increase throughout the fall and into the winter months from tax deposits and receive an additional inflow at the end of March from the electronic deposit of state funds. *Table 1-Average Statements of Condition and Net Interest Analysis,* shows the average balance and average rate paid on the Company’s primary deposit categories for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015. Average interest-bearing deposits were flat for 2017 over 2016. The average cost of interest-bearing deposits was 0.35% for 2017 and 0.32% for 2016. Average noninterest bearing deposits at December 31, 2017 were up $148.6 million or 13.1% over year-end 2016. A maturity schedule of time deposits outstanding at December 31, 2017 is included in “Note 7 Deposits” in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. of this Report. The Company uses both retail and wholesale repurchase agreements. Retail repurchase agreements are arrangements with local customers of the Company, in which the Company agrees to sell securities to the customer with an agreement to repurchase those securities at a specified later date. Retail repurchase agreements totaled $75.2 million at December 31, 2017, and $59.1 million at December 31, 2016. Management generally views local repurchase agreements as an alternative to large time deposits. The Company’s wholesale repurchase agreements were $0 at December 31, 2017, and $10.0 million at December 31, 2016. Refer to “Note 8 Federal Funds Purchased and Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase” in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. of this Report for further details on the Company’s repurchase agreements. The Company’s other borrowings totaled $1.1 billion at year-end 2017, up $186.9 million or 21.1% from $884.8 million at year-end 2016. The increase was to support loan growth in excess of deposit growth. The $1.1 billion in borrowings at December 31, 2017, included $587.7 million in overnight advances from the FHLB, $475.0 million in term advances from the FHLB and a $9.0 million advance from a third party bank. Borrowings at year-end 2016 included $503.8 million in overnight advances from the FHLB, $365.0 million of FHLB term advances, and a $16.0 million advance from a bank. Of the $475.0 million of the FHLB term advances at year-end 2017, $275.0 million are due in over one year. Refer to “Note 9 Other Borrowings” in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. of this Report for further details on the Company’s term borrowings with the FHLB. ### LIQUIDITY MANAGEMENT The objective of liquidity management is to ensure the availability of adequate funding sources to satisfy the demand for credit, deposit withdrawals, operating expenses, and business investment opportunities. The Company’s large, stable core deposit base and strong capital position are the foundation for the Company’s liquidity position. The Company uses a variety of resources to meet its liquidity needs, which include deposits, cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, cash flow from lending and investing activities, repurchase agreements, and borrowings. The Company may also use borrowings as part of a growth strategy. Asset and liability positions are monitored primarily through the Asset/Liability Management Committee of the Company’s subsidiary banks. This Committee reviews periodic reports on the liquidity and interest rate sensitivity positions. Comparisons with industry and peer groups are also monitored. The Company’s strong reputation in the communities it serves, along with its strong financial condition, provides access to numerous sources of liquidity as described below. Management believes these diverse liquidity sources provide sufficient means to meet all demands on the Company’s liquidity that are reasonably likely to occur. Core deposits, discussed above under “Deposits and Other Liabilities”, are a primary and low cost funding source obtained primarily through the Company’s branch network. In addition to core deposits, the Company uses non-core funding sources to support asset growth. These non-core funding sources include time deposits of $250,000 or more, brokered time deposits, national deposit listing services, municipal money market deposits, bank borrowings, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, overnight borrowings and term advances from the FHLB and other funding sources. Rates and terms are the primary determinants of the mix of these funding sources. Non-core funding sources totaled $2.0 billion at December 31, 2017, an increase of $161.3 million or 8.8% from $1.8 billion at December 31, 2016. Non-core funding sources increased year-over-year as the Company supplemented growth in core deposits, with growth in overnight and term borrowings with the FHLB, to fund earning asset growth. Non-core funding sources as a percentage of total liabilities increased from 32.2% at year-end 2016 to 32.8% at year-end 2017. Non-core funding sources may require securities to be pledged against the underlying liability. Securities carried at $1.3 billion at December 31, 2017 and $1.2 billion at December 31, 2016, were either pledged or sold under agreements to repurchase. Pledged securities or securities sold under agreements to repurchase represented 84.3% of total securities at December 31, 2017, compared to 75.0% of total securities at December 31, 2016. Cash and cash equivalents totaled $84.3 million as of December 31, 2017, up from $64.0 million at December 31, 2016. Short-term investments, consisting of securities due in one year or less, increased from $25.5 million at December 31, 2016, to $57.9 million at December 31, 2017. Cash flow from the loan and investment portfolios provides a significant source of liquidity. These assets may have stated maturities in excess of one year, but have monthly principal reductions. Total mortgage-backed securities, at fair value, were $794.0 million at December 31, 2017 compared with $810.0 million at December 31, 2016. Outstanding principal balances of residential mortgage loans, consumer loans, and leases totaled approximately $1.4 billion at December 31, 2017 as compared to $1.3 billion at December 31, 2016. Aggregate amortization from monthly payments on these assets provides significant additional cash flow to the Company. Liquidity is enhanced by ready access to national and regional wholesale funding sources including Federal funds purchased, repurchase agreements, brokered certificates of deposit, and FHLB advances. Through its subsidiary banks, the Company has borrowing relationships with the FHLB and correspondent banks, which provide secured and unsecured borrowing capacity. At December 31, 2017, the unused borrowing capacity on established lines with the FHLB was $950.8 million. As members of the FHLB, the Company’s subsidiary banks can use certain unencumbered mortgage-related assets and securities to secure additional borrowings from the FHLB. At December 31, 2017, total unencumbered mortgage loans and securities of the Company were $399.2 million. Additional assets may also qualify as collateral for FHLB advances upon approval of the FHLB. The Company has not identified any trends or circumstances that are reasonably likely to result in material increases or decreases in liquidity in the near term. ### Table 7 - Loan Maturity *(in thousands)* | Remaining maturity of originated loans | At December 31, 2017 Total | Less than 1 year | After 1 year to 5 years | After 5 years | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Commercial and industrial | **$1,040,675** | $287,400 | $276,502 | $476,773 | | Commercial real estate | **1,992,980** | 83,816 | 211,434 | 1,697,730 | | Residential real estate | **1,251,852** | 479 | 9,951 | 1,241,422 | | **Total** | **$4,285,507** | $371,695 | $497,887 | $3,415,925 | *(in thousands)* | Remaining maturity of acquired loans | At December 31, 2017 Total | Less than 1 year | After 1 year to 5 years | After 5 years | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Commercial and industrial | **$50,976** | $10,652 | $17,523 | $22,801 | | Commercial real estate | **207,747** | 26,647 | 86,233 | 94,867 | | Residential real estate | **51,089** | 676 | 2,571 | 47,842 | | **Total** | **$309,812** | $37,975 | $106,327 | $165,510 | Of the loan amounts shown above in Table 7 - Loan Maturity, maturing over 1 year, $1.9 billion have fixed rates and $2.3 billion have adjustable rates. ### OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS In the normal course of business the Company is party to certain financial instruments, which in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, are not included in its Consolidated Statements of Condition. These transactions include commitments under standby letters of credit, unused portions of lines of credit, and commitments to fund new loans and are undertaken to accommodate the financing needs of the Company’s customers. Loan commitments are agreements by the Company to lend monies at a future date. These loan and letter of credit commitments are subject to the same credit policies and reviews as the Company’s loans. Because most of these loan commitments expire within one year from the date of issue, the total amount of these loan commitments as of December 31, 2017, are not necessarily indicative of future cash requirements. Further information on these commitments and contingent liabilities is provided in “Note 16 Commitments and Contingent Liabilities” in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. of this Report. ### CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS The Company leases land, buildings, and equipment under operating lease arrangements extending to the year 2090. Most leases include options to renew for periods ranging from 5 to 20 years. In addition, the Company has a software contract for its core banking application through June 30, 2024 along with contracts for more specialized software programs through 2020. Further information on the Company’s lease arrangements is provided in “Note 6 Premises and Equipment” in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. of this Report. The Company’s contractual obligations as of December 31, 2017, are shown in *Table 8-Contractual Obligations and Commitments* below. ### Table 8 - Contractual Obligations and Commitments *(in thousands)* | Contractual cash obligations | At December 31, 2017 Payments due within Total | 1 year | 1-3 years | 3-5 years | After 5 years | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Long-term debt | $493,579 | $206,407 | $287,172 | $0 | $0 | | Trust Preferred Debentures1 | 33,186 | 919 | 1,838 | 1,838 | 28,591 | | Operating leases | 34,994 | 4,981 | 8,416 | 6,546 | 15,051 | | Software contracts | 9,473 | 1,892 | 2,855 | 2,652 | 2,074 | | **Total contractual cash obligations** | **$571,232** | **$214,199** | **$300,281** | **$11,036** | **$45,716** | *1 Dollar amounts include interest payments and contractual payments due until maturity without conversion to stock or early redemption for the remainder of the Company's Trust Preferred Debentures.* ### RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS Refer to “Note 1 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. of this Form 10-K for details of recently issued accounting pronouncements and their expected impact on the Company’s financial statements. ### Fourth Quarter Summary Net income for the fourth quarter of 2017 was $2.5 million, down from the $15.1 million reported for the same period in 2016. Diluted earnings per share of $0.16 for the fourth quarter of 2017 were down 83.8% from the $0.99 reported in the fourth quarter of 2016. Fourth quarter 2017 net income was adversely impacted by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, which reduced the Federal statutory tax rate from 35% in 2017 to 21% in 2018 and beyond. The change in the tax law created a one-time, fourth quarter, non-cash write-down of net deferred tax assets in the amount of $14.9 million due to the required remeasurement of the net deferred tax assets using the new lower tax rate. Removing the impact of the one-time charge related to tax reform from fourth quarter earnings would have resulted in diluted earnings per share of $1.15 for the fourth quarter of 2017, representing a 16.2% increase over the same period in 2016. Please see the discussion above under “Results of Operations (Comparison of December 31, 2017 and 2016 results) Non-GAAP Disclosure” for an explanation of why management believes this non-GAAP financial measure is useful, and a reconciliation to net income. Net interest income on a taxable-equivalent basis totaled $53.1 million in the fourth quarter of 2017, up 12.0% from $47.4 million in the year-earlier quarter. The increase reflects growth in average earning assets of $452.3 million or 7.9% over the same quarter in 2016 and an improved net interest margin for the fourth quarter of 2017 compared to the fourth quarter of 2016. The rise in average earning assets was attributable to a $411.2 million or 9.9% growth in average loans and leases. The yield on average interest earning assets of 3.87% for the fourth quarter of 2017 was up 19 basis points or 4.9% compared to the fourth quarter of 2016. Average noninterest bearing deposit balances for the fourth quarter of 2017 were up $179.6 million or 14.8% compared to the fourth quarter of 2016. The average cost of interest bearing liabilities in the fourth quarter of 2017 was 0.62% compared to 0.52% in the fourth quarter of 2016. Provision for loan and lease losses was $2.0 million for the fourth quarter of 2017, compared to $1.7 million in the fourth quarter of 2016. Net charge-offs totaled $281,000 in the fourth quarter of 2017, compared to net charge-offs of $63,000 for the fourth quarter of 2016. Noninterest income was $17.3 million for the fourth quarter of 2017, which was up $1.0 million or 6.1% compared to the same period in 2016. Noninterest expense was $46.3 million in the fourth quarter of 2017, which was up $6.9 million or 17.5% compared to the same period in 2016. During 2017, the Company invested $2.7 million in a historic preservation tax credit which yielded Federal and New York State tax credits. The project was placed in service in the fourth quarter, and accordingly, the fourth quarter results include the required write-off of this investment as operating expense and recognition of the related $3.3 million of tax credits generated from the investment as a reduction of income tax expense. Income tax expense for the fourth quarter of 2017 was $18.5 million compared to $6.4 million for the fourth quarter of 2016. The increase in income tax expense is mainly due to the $14.9 million one-time write-down of net deferred tax assets resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. Tax expense for the fourth quarter of 2017 was reduced by the $3.3 million historic tax credit described above, which was recognized in the fourth quarter of 2017. ## Market risk As filed, 5,740 characters. ### MARKET RISK Interest rate risk is the primary market risk category associated with the Company’s operations. Interest rate risk refers to the volatility of earnings caused by changes in interest rates. The Company manages interest rate risk using income simulation to measure interest rate risk inherent in its on-balance sheet and off-balance sheet financial instruments at a given point in time by showing the potential effect of interest rate shifts on net interest income for future periods. Each quarter the Company’s Asset/Liability Management Committee reviews the simulation results to determine whether the exposure of net interest income to changes in interest rates remains within Board-approved levels. The Committee also discusses strategies to manage this exposure and incorporates these strategies into the investment and funding decisions of the Company. The Company does not currently use derivatives, such as interest rate swaps, to manage its interest rate risk exposure, but may consider such instruments in the future. The Company’s Board of Directors has set a policy that interest rate risk exposure will remain within a range whereby net interest income will not decline by more than 10% in one year as a result of a 100 basis point parallel change in rates. Based upon the simulation analysis performed as of November 30, 2017, a 200 basis point parallel upward change in interest rates over a one-year time frame would result in a one-year decrease in net interest income of approximately 1.4% from the base case, while a 100 basis point parallel decline in interest rates over a one-year period would result in a one-year decrease in net interest income of approximately 1.1% from the base case. The simulation assumes no balance sheet growth and no management action to address balance sheet mismatches. The decrease in net interest income in the rising rate scenario is a result of the balance sheet showing a more liability sensitive position over a one year time horizon. As such, in the short-term net interest income is expected to trend slightly below the base assumption, as upward adjustments to rate sensitive deposits and short-term funding outpace increases to asset yields which are concentrated in intermediate to longer-term products. As intermediate and longer-term assets continue to reprice/adjust into higher rate environment and funding costs stabilize, net interest income is expected to trend upwards. The exposure in the 100 basis point decline scenario results from the Company’s assets repricing downward to a greater degree than the rates on the Company’s interest-bearing liabilities, mainly deposits. Rates on savings and money market accounts are at low levels given the historically low interest rate environment experienced in recent years. In addition, the model assumes that prepayments accelerate in the down interest rate environment resulting in additional pressure on asset yields as proceeds are reinvested at lower rates. The most recent simulation of a base case scenario, which assumes interest rates remain unchanged from the date of the simulation, reflects a net interest margin that is stable to higher over the next 12 to 18 months. Although the simulation model is useful in identifying potential exposure to interest rate movements, actual results may differ from those modeled as the repricing, maturity, and prepayment characteristics of financial instruments may change to a different degree than modeled. In addition, the model does not reflect actions that management may employ to manage its interest rate risk exposure. The Company’s current liquidity profile, capital position, and growth prospects, offer a level of flexibility for management to take actions that could offset some of the negative effects of unfavorable movements in interest rates. Management believes the current exposure to changes in interest rates is not significant in relation to the earnings and capital strength of the Company. In addition to the simulation analysis, management uses an interest rate gap measure. *Table 9-Interest Rate Risk Analysis* below is a Condensed Static Gap Report, which illustrates the anticipated repricing intervals of assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2017. The Company’s one-year interest rate gap was a negative $762.6 million or 11.47% of total assets at December 31, 2017, compared with a negative $520.7 million or 8.35% of total assets at December 31, 2016. A negative gap position exists when the amount of interest-bearing liabilities maturing or repricing exceeds the amount of interest-earning assets maturing or repricing within a particular time period. This analysis suggests that the Company’s net interest income is more vulnerable to an increasing rate environment than it is to a prolonged declining interest rate environment. An interest rate gap measure could be significantly affected by external factors such as a rise or decline in interest rates, loan or securities prepayments, and deposit withdrawals. ### Table 9 - Interest Rate Risk Analysis *(in thousands)* | Condensed Static Gap - December 31, 2017 | Repricing Interval Total | 0-3 months | 3-6 months | 6-12 months | 12 months | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Interest-earning assets\* | $6,278,384 | $1,228,819 | $257,097 | $530,634 | $2,016,550 | | Interest-bearing liabilities | 4,563,492 | 2,296,027 | 195,131 | 288,008 | 2,779,166 | | Net gap position | | (1,067,208) | 61,966 | 242,626 | (762,616) | | Net gap position as a percentage of total assets | | **(16.05)%** | **0.93%** | **3.65%** | **(11.47)%** | #### \*Balances of available-for-sale securities are shown at amortized cost. #### \[This Page Intentionally Left Blank\] ## Controls and procedures As filed, 2,025 characters. ### Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures The Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of December 31, 2017. Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-K, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective. ### Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Company. As of December 31, 2017, management evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on the framework for effective internal control over financial reporting established in “Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013),” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO) of the Treadway Commission. Based on its evaluation under the COSO framework, management concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2017. The results of management’s assessment were reviewed with the Company’s Audit Committee of its Board of Directors. The independent registered public accounting firm that audited the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in this report has issued an attestation report on the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting, which is included in Part II, Item 8 of this Report. ### Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2017, that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Filed Mar 1, 2018. Source: SEC EDGAR, the filing index for accession 0001005817-18-000002. Last ingested by Listed: Oct 31, 2026, 15:15 ET. No prices; not investment advice.