# Consolidated Edison Inc: Form 10-K for the period ended Dec 31, 2025 - Company: [Consolidated Edison Inc](/companies/ed.md) (CIK 1047862) - Form: 10-K - Filed: 2026-02-19 - Accepted by EDGAR: Feb 19, 2026, 22:24 ET - Period: 2025-12-31 - Accession: 0001047862-26-000031 - Inline XBRL: yes - Main document: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1047862/000104786226000031/ed-20251231.htm - All documents and exhibits: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1047862/000104786226000031/ ## Figures reported in this filing Standardized XBRL line items for the period ended 2025-12-31. | Line item | Period | Value | XBRL concept | | --- | --- | ---: | --- | | Revenue | 12 months, 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 | $17.05bn | us-gaap:RevenueFromContractWithCustomerExcludingAssessedTax | | Operating income | 12 months, 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 | $2.94bn | us-gaap:OperatingIncomeLoss | | Interest expense | 12 months, 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 | $1.23bn | us-gaap:InterestExpense | | Income tax | 12 months, 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 | $574.0m | us-gaap:IncomeTaxExpenseBenefit | | Net income | 12 months, 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 | $2.02bn | us-gaap:NetIncomeLoss | | Diluted EPS | 12 months, 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 | $5.64 | us-gaap:EarningsPerShareDiluted | | Basic EPS | 12 months, 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 | $5.66 | us-gaap:EarningsPerShareBasic | | Diluted shares (weighted) | 12 months, 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 | 358,700,000 shares | us-gaap:WeightedAverageNumberOfDilutedSharesOutstanding | | Operating cash flow | 12 months, 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 | $4.80bn | us-gaap:NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities | | Dividends paid | 12 months, 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 | $1.17bn | us-gaap:PaymentsOfDividendsCommonStock | | Share repurchases | 12 months, 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 | $0 | us-gaap:PaymentsForRepurchaseOfCommonStock | | Cash and equivalents | at 2025-12-31 | $1.63bn | us-gaap:CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue | | Current assets | at 2025-12-31 | $6.75bn | us-gaap:AssetsCurrent | | Total assets | at 2025-12-31 | $74.60bn | us-gaap:Assets | | Current liabilities | at 2025-12-31 | $6.61bn | us-gaap:LiabilitiesCurrent | | Long-term debt | at 2025-12-31 | $25.55bn | us-gaap:LongTermDebtNoncurrent | | Current portion of debt | at 2025-12-31 | $250.0m | us-gaap:LongTermDebtCurrent | | Shareholders' equity | at 2025-12-31 | $24.19bn | us-gaap:StockholdersEquity | ## Business As filed, 122,156 characters. ### Overview Consolidated Edison, Inc. (Con Edison), incorporated in New York State in 1997, is a holding company that owns all of the outstanding common stock of Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (CECONY), Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc. (O&R) and Con Edison Transmission, Inc. As used in this report, the term the “Companies” refers to Con Edison and CECONY, and the term the “Utilities” refers to CECONY and O&R. | | Con Edison | | | --- | --- | --- | | **CECONY** | **O&R** | **Con Edison Transmission** | | | •RECO | | Con Edison’s principal business operations are those of CECONY, O&R and Con Edison Transmission. CECONY’s principal business operations are its regulated electric, gas and steam delivery businesses. O&R’s principal business operations are its regulated electric and gas delivery businesses. Con Edison Transmission, through its subsidiaries, develops and invests in electric transmission projects and owns, through joint ventures, both electric and gas assets. See “Con Edison Transmission” in Item 1. Con Edison seeks to provide shareholder value through continued dividend growth, supported by earnings growth in regulated utilities and electric transmission projects. The company invests to provide reliable, resilient, safe and clean energy critical for its New York and New Jersey customers. Con Edison is a responsible neighbor, helping the communities it serves become more sustainable. ### CECONY ### Electric CECONY provides electric service to approximately 3.7 million customers in all of New York City (except a part of Queens) and most of Westchester County, an approximately 660 square mile service area with a population of more than nine million. ### Gas CECONY delivers gas to approximately 1.1 million customers in Manhattan, the Bronx, parts of Queens and most of Westchester County. ### Steam CECONY operates the largest steam distribution system in the United States by producing and delivering approximately 16,975 MMlb of steam annually to approximately 1,490 customers in parts of Manhattan. ### O&R ### Electric O&R and its utility subsidiary, Rockland Electric Company (RECO) (together referred to herein as O&R) provide electric service to approximately 0.3 million customers in southeastern New York and northern New Jersey, an approximately 1,300 square mile service area. ### Gas O&R delivers gas to over 0.1 million customers in southeastern New York. ### Con Edison Transmission Con Edison Transmission, through its subsidiaries, develops and invests in electric transmission projects and owns, through joint ventures, both electric and gas assets. See “Con Edison Transmission,” below. ### Utility Regulation ### State Utility Regulation ### Regulators The Utilities are subject to regulation by the NYSPSC, that under the New York Public Service Law, is authorized to set the terms of service and the rates the Utilities charge for providing service in New York. See “Rate Plans,” below and in Note B to the financial statements in Item 8. The NYSPSC also approves the issuance of the Utilities’ securities and transactions between the Utilities and Con Edison and its other subsidiaries. See “Capital Resources,” below and Note U to the financial statements in Item 8. The NYSPSC exercises jurisdiction over the siting of electric transmission lines in New York State (see “Con Edison Transmission,” below) and approves mergers or other business combinations involving New York utilities. In addition, under the New York Public Service Law, the NYSPSC has the authority to (i) impose penalties on New York utilities, which could be material, for violating state utility laws and regulations and its orders; (ii) review, at least every five years, an electric and gas utility’s capability to provide safe, adequate and reliable service, order the utility to comply with additional and more stringent terms of service than existed prior to the review, assess the continued operation of the utility as the provider of electric service in its service territory and propose, and act upon, such measures as are necessary to ensure safe and adequate service; and (iii) based on findings of repeated violations of the New York Public Service Law or rules or regulations adopted thereto that demonstrate a failure of a combination gas and electric utility to continue to provide safe and adequate service, revoke or modify an operating certificate issued to the utility by the NYSPSC (following consideration of certain factors, including public interest and standards deemed necessary by the NYSPSC to ensure continuity of service, and due process). See "Risk Factors" in Item 1A and “Other Regulatory Matters” in Note B to the financial statements in Item 8. O&R’s New Jersey subsidiary, RECO, is subject to regulation by the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities (NJBPU). The NYSPSC, together with the NJBPU, are referred to herein as state utility regulators. ### New York Utility Industry ### Restructuring in the 1990s In the 1990s, the NYSPSC restructured the electric utility industry in the state. In accordance with NYSPSC orders, the Utilities sold all of their electric generating facilities other than those that also produce steam for CECONY’s steam business (see "Electric Operations – Electric Facilities," below) and provided all of their customers the choice to buy electricity or gas from the Utilities or other suppliers (see "Electric Operations – Electric Sales and Deliveries" and "Gas Operations – Gas Sales and Deliveries," below). In 2025, 56 percent of the electricity and 33 percent of the gas CECONY delivered to its customers, and 39 percent of the electricity and 20 percent of the gas O&R delivered to its customers, was purchased by the customers from other suppliers. In addition, the Utilities no longer control or operate their bulk power electric transmission facilities. See “New York Independent System Operator (NYISO),” below. Following industry restructuring, there were several utility mergers as a result of which substantially all of the electric and gas delivery service in New York State is now provided by one of five investor-owned utility companies – Con Edison, National Grid plc, Avangrid, Inc. (an affiliate of Iberdrola, S.A.), National Fuel Gas Company or CH Energy Group, Inc. (a subsidiary of Fortis Inc.) – or one of two state authorities – New York Power Authority (NYPA) or Long Island Power Authority. ### Rate Plans Investor-owned utilities in the United States provide delivery service to customers according to the terms of tariffs approved by the appropriate state utility regulator. The tariffs include schedules of rates for service that limit the rates charged by the utilities to amounts that the utilities recover from their customers for costs approved by the regulator, including capital costs, of providing service to customers as defined by the tariff. The tariffs implement rate plans adopted by state utility regulators in rate orders issued at the conclusion of rate proceedings. The utilities’ earnings depend on the limits on rates authorized in, and the other provisions of, their rate plans and their ability to operate their businesses in a manner consistent with such rate plans. The utilities’ rate plans cover specified periods, but rates determined pursuant to a plan generally continue in effect until a new rate plan is approved by the state utility regulator. In New York, either the utility or the NYSPSC can commence a proceeding for a new rate plan, and a new rate plan filed by the utility will generally take effect automatically in approximately 11 months unless prior to such time the NYSPSC approves a rate plan. The NYSPSC may request that the utility agree to suspend its request for new rates beyond the 11-month period, but if the utility agrees then the NYSPSC typically allows the utility to recover its new rates as if they went into effect at the 11-month date. In each rate proceeding, rates are determined by the state utility regulator following the submission by the utility of testimony and supporting information, which are subject to review by the staff of the regulator. Other parties with an interest in the proceeding can also review the utility’s proposal and become involved in the rate proceeding. In New York State, the review process is overseen by an administrative law judge who is employed by the NYSPSC. After an administrative law judge issues a recommended decision that generally considers the interests of the utility, the regulatory staff, other parties and legal requisites, the regulator will issue a rate order. The utility and the regulator’s staff and interested parties may enter jointly into a proposed settlement agreement prior to the completion of this administrative process, in which case the agreement could be approved by the regulator with or without modification. For each rate plan, the revenues needed to provide the utility a return on invested capital is determined by multiplying the utilities’ rate base by the pre-tax weighted average cost of capital determined in the rate plan. In general, rate base, as reflected in a utility's rate plans, is the sum of the utility’s net plant, working capital and certain regulatory assets less deferred taxes and certain regulatory liabilities. The NYSPSC uses a forecast of the average rate base for the year that new rates would be in effect (rate year). The NJBPU uses the rate base balances that exist at the end of the historical 12-month period on which base rates are set. The capital structure used in the weighted average cost of capital is determined using actual and forecast data for the same time periods as rate base. The costs of long-term debt, customer deposits and the allowed return on common equity represent a combination of actual and forecast financing information. The allowed return on common equity is determined by each state’s respective utility regulator. The NYSPSC’s current methodology for determining the allowed return on common equity assigns a one-third weight to an estimate determined from a capital asset pricing model applied to a peer group of utility companies and a two-thirds weight to an estimate determined from a dividend discount model using stock prices and dividend forecasts for a peer group of utility companies. Both methodologies employ market measurements of equity capital to estimate returns rather than the accounting measurements to which such estimates are applied in setting rates. Pursuant to the Utilities’ rate plans, there generally can be no change to the rates charged to customers during the respective terms of the rate plans other than specified adjustments provided for in the rate plans. For information about the Utilities’ rate plans, see Note B to the financial statements in Item 8. ### Liability for Service Interruptions The tariff provisions under which CECONY provides electric, gas and steam service, and O&R provides electric and gas service, limit each company’s liability to pay for damages resulting from service interruptions due to circumstances resulting from its gross negligence or willful misconduct. Under RECO's tariff provisions for electric service, the company is not liable for interruptions that are due to causes beyond its control. CECONY’s and O&R’s tariffs for electric and gas service also provide for compensation to residential and small business customers that experience widespread prolonged outages lasting more than seventy-two consecutive hours, subject to certain exceptions, including: for residential customers, a bill credit of $25 for each twenty-four hour period of service outage beyond the first seventy-two consecutive hour outage; for residential and small business customers, reimbursement for food spoilage of up to $540; and reimbursement of affected residential customers for prescription medicine spoilage losses without limitation. Any such costs incurred by utilities are not recoverable from customers. Utilities may petition the NYSPSC to request a waiver of the requirement that it compensate customers after widespread prolonged outages. CECONY’s electric tariff requires it to also compensate customers for certain other service outages resulting from malfunctions in the company’s lines and cable of 33 Kilovolt (kV) or less or associated equipment, including, for residential customers, up to $655 for food spoilage and actual losses for prescription medicine losses, and for all other customers, up to $12,900 for losses of perishable merchandise. Each New York electric utility is required to submit to the NYSPSC annually an emergency response plan for the reasonably prompt restoration of service in the case of widespread outages in the utility’s service territory due to storms or other events beyond the control of the utility. If, after evidentiary hearings or other investigatory proceedings, the NYSPSC finds that the utility failed to reasonably implement its plan during an event, the NYSPSC may impose penalties or deny recovery of any part of the service restoration costs caused by such failure. In March 2025, the NYSPSC approved CECONY’s and O&R's emergency response plans. In December 2025, CECONY and O&R each submitted updated emergency response plans for 2026. ### Generic Proceedings The NYSPSC from time to time conducts “generic” proceedings to consider issues relating to all electric and gas utilities operating in New York State. Proceedings include clean energy and related implementation proceedings, such as the Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act proceeding, and proceedings relating to energy affordability, data access, retail access, gas planning, energy efficiency and renewable energy programs, and negative revenue adjustments for billing delays related to community solar generation projects. The Utilities typically are active participants in such proceedings. ### Federal Regulation During 2025, a series of executive orders, memoranda and proclamations were issued (collectively, Federal Actions) designed to address areas such as tariffs on imports, environmental and energy regulations, domestic energy production, and retention of domestic generation resources, among other things. Many of the executive orders imposing tariffs on imports have been modified, stayed, or are the subject of litigation. Although these tariffs have not had a significant impact on the Companies' operations or financial condition to date, the cost of materials have increased during 2025 across various supply chain contract portfolios. If the tariffs remain in place, the cost of materials is anticipated to continue to increase and also may lead to supply chain disruptions. The Companies continue to monitor these developments closely to assess any potential additional impact on the Companies. The situation remains fluid and is subject to rapid change. The Companies are unable to predict changes in regulations, regulatory guidance, legal interpretations, policy positions and implementation actions that may result from the Federal Actions. ### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), among other things, regulates the transmission and wholesale sales of electricity in interstate commerce and the transmission and sale of natural gas for resale in interstate commerce. In addition, the FERC can impose substantial penalties, including penalties for violations of reliability and cybersecurity rules. Certain activities of the Utilities and Con Edison Transmission are subject to the jurisdiction of the FERC. The Utilities are subject to regulation by the FERC with respect to electric transmission rates and to regulation by the NYSPSC with respect to electric and gas retail commodity sales and local delivery service. As a matter of practice, the NYSPSC has approved delivery service rates for the Utilities that include both transmission and distribution costs. The FERC also authorizes the Utilities' short-term borrowings. The electric and gas transmission projects in which Con Edison Transmission invests are also subject to regulation by the FERC. See “Con Edison Transmission,” below. ### New York Independent System Operator (NYISO) The NYISO is a not-for-profit organization that controls and directs the operation of most of the electric transmission facilities in New York State, including those of the Utilities, as an integrated system. It also administers wholesale markets for electricity in New York State and facilitates the construction of new transmission it considers necessary to meet identified reliability, economic or public policy needs. The New York State Reliability Council (NYSRC) promulgates reliability standards subject to FERC oversight, and the NYISO has agreed to comply with those standards. Pursuant to a requirement that is set annually by the NYSRC, the NYISO requires that entities supplying electricity to customers in New York State have generating capacity (owned, procured through the NYISO capacity markets or contracted for) in an amount equal to the peak demand of their customers plus the applicable reserve margin. In addition, the NYISO has determined that entities that serve customers in New York City must procure sufficient capacity from resources that are electrically located in New York City to cover a substantial percentage of the peak demands of their New York City customers. The NYISO also requires entities that serve customers in the Lower Hudson Valley and New York City customers that are served through the Lower Hudson Valley to procure sufficient capacity from resources electrically located in the Lower Hudson Valley. These requirements apply both to regulated utilities such as CECONY and O&R for the customers they supply under regulated tariffs and to other load serving entities that supply customers on market terms. See “CECONY – Electric Operations – Electric Supply,” "CECONY – Electric Operations – Electric Reliability Needs" and “O&R – Electric Operations – Electric Supply,” below. ### Cyber Regulation The Companies are subject to cyber regulation by federal agencies, including FERC, the Transportation Security Agency and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency. The Utilities are subject to cyber regulation by the NYSPSC, that under the New York Public Service Law, is authorized to evaluate annually the utility’s customer privacy protections, including, but not limited to, customer electric and gas consumption data, and protection of critical energy infrastructure. In March 2023, the New York State legislature amended the New York State Public Service Law, directing the NYSPSC to develop rules to direct electric and gas utilities to, among other things, (i) protect customer privacy, including customer consumption data, from unauthorized disclosure; (ii) develop and implement tools to monitor operational control networks to detect unauthorized network behavior; and (iii) mandate that utilities’ emergency response plans include cyberattack response plans. In December 2024, the NYSPSC and the NYSDPS prepared a report on their review of New York gas and electric utilities’ compliance with the New York Public Service Law referenced above and their cybersecurity posture for operational and informational technology systems that manage operations and hold private customer data. The NYSPSC recommended adoption of specific cybersecurity regulations to enhance and codify standards and practices in these areas, which will be developed and implemented pursuant to a separate proceeding. O&R’s subsidiary, RECO, is subject to cyber regulation by the NJBPU. See “The Companies Are Extensively Regulated And May Be Subject To Penalties” and "A Cyber Attack Could Adversely Affect the Companies" in Item 1A and Item 1C: Cybersecurity. ### Competition The subset of distributed energy resources (DER) that produce electricity is collectively called distributed generation (DG). DG includes solar energy production facilities, fuel cells, and micro-turbines, and provides an alternative source of electricity for the Utilities’ electric delivery customers. Energy storage, though not a form of DG, is also a source of electricity for the Utilities’ electric delivery customers. Typically, customers with DG remain connected to the utility’s delivery system and do not pay a different rate. Gas delivery customers have electricity, oil and propane as alternatives, and steam customers have electricity, oil and natural gas as alternative sources for heating and cooling their buildings. Micro-grids and community-based micro-grids enable DG to serve multiple locations and multiple customers. The Companies expect DERs and electric alternatives to gas and steam, to increase, and for gas and steam usage to decrease, as the Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act (CLCPA) enacted by New York State and the Climate Mobilization Act enacted by New York City continue to be implemented. See “Environmental Matters – Clean Energy Future,” below. See “CECONY- Gas Operations - Gas Peak Demand,” below. The following table shows the aggregate capacities of the DG projects connected to the Utilities’ distribution systems at the end of the last five years: | Technology Total MW, except project number | CECONY 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | O&R 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Internal-combustion engines | 184 | 175 | 160 | 157 | 155 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | | Photovoltaic solar | 785 | 680 | 579 | 487 | 398 | 323 | 283 | 243 | 213 | 183 | | Battery energy storage | 116 | 90 | 47 | 25 | 18 | 51 | 49 | 36 | 25 | 11 | | Gas turbines | 61 | 61 | 61 | 61 | 61 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | | Micro turbines | 26 | 25 | 24 | 24 | 23 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | Fuel cells | 49 | 47 | 46 | 45 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | | Steam turbines | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | | Landfill | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | | **Total distribution-level DG** | 1,227 | 1,085 | 924 | 805 | 692 | 400 | 358 | 305 | 264 | 220 | | **Number of DG projects** | 87,032 | 75,868 | 65,311 | 53,147 | 43,512 | 17,248 | 15,848 | 14,200 | 12,447 | 10,911 | The Utilities do not consider it reasonably likely that another company would be authorized to provide utility delivery service of electricity, gas or steam where the Utilities already provide service. Any such other company would need to obtain NYSPSC consent, satisfy applicable local requirements, install facilities to provide the service, meet applicable services standards and charge customers comparable taxes and other fees and costs imposed on the service. A new delivery company would also be subject to extensive ongoing regulation by the NYSPSC. See “Utility Regulation – State Utility Regulation – Regulators,” above, "The Companies Are Extensively Regulated And May Be Subject To Substantial Penalties" in Item 1A and “Other Regulatory Matters” in Note B to the financial statements in Item 8. Con Edison Transmission develops and invests in electric transmission projects, the current and prospective customers of which may have competitive alternatives, and owns, through joint ventures, both electric and gas assets. See "Con Edison Transmission," below. ### The Utilities ### CECONY CECONY, incorporated in New York State in 1884, is a subsidiary of Con Edison and has no significant subsidiaries of its own. Its principal business segments are its regulated electric, gas and steam businesses. For a discussion of the company’s operating revenues and operating income for each segment, see “Results of Operations” in Item 7. For additional information about the segments, see Note P to the financial statements in Item 8. ### Electric Operations ### Electric Facilities CECONY’s capitalized costs for utility plant, net of accumulated depreciation, for distribution facilities were $25,214 million and $23,770 million at December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. For its transmission facilities, the costs for utility plant, net of accumulated depreciation, were $5,223 million and $4,703 million at December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, and for its portion of the steam-electric generation facilities, the costs for utility plant, net of accumulated depreciation, were $597 million and $577 million, at December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. See "CECONY – Steam Operations – Steam Facilities," below. ### Distribution Facilities CECONY owns 63 area distribution substations and various distribution facilities located throughout New York City and Westchester County. At December 31, 2025, the company’s distribution system had a transformer capacity of 33,020 MVA, with 38,219 miles of overhead distribution lines and 100,371 miles of underground distribution lines. The underground distribution lines represent the single longest underground electric delivery system in the United States. ### Transmission Facilities CECONY’s transmission facilities are located in New York City and Westchester, Orange, Rockland, Putnam and Dutchess counties in New York State. At December 31, 2025, the company owned or jointly owned 490 miles of overhead circuits operating at 138, 230, 345 and 500 kV and 770 miles of underground circuits operating at 69, 138 and 345 kV. The company’s 40 transmission substations and 63 area stations are supplied by circuits operated at 69 kV and above. CECONY’s transmission facilities interconnect with those of National Grid, Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation, O&R, New York State Electric & Gas, Eversource Energy, Long Island Power Authority, NYPA, New York Transco and Public Service Electric and Gas Company. ### Generating Facilities CECONY’s electric generating facilities consist of plants located in Manhattan whose primary purpose is to produce steam for the company's steam business and also co-produce electricity. The facilities have a combined electric nameplate capacity of approximately 726 MW. The company expects to have sufficient amounts of gas and fuel oil available in 2026 for use in these facilities. ### Electric Sales and Deliveries CECONY delivers electricity to its full-service customers who purchase electricity from the company. Under the company's retail choice program, CECONY also delivers electricity to its customers who choose to purchase electricity from other load serving entities. In addition, the company delivers electricity to state and municipal customers of the NYPA. The company charges all customers in its service area for the delivery of electricity. The company generally recovers, on a current basis, the cost of the electricity that it buys and then sells to its full-service customers. It does not make any margin or profit on the electricity it sells. CECONY’s electric delivery revenues are subject to a revenue decoupling mechanism. As a result, its electric delivery revenues are generally not affected by changes in delivery volumes from levels assumed when rates were approved. CECONY’s electric sales and deliveries for the last five years were: | Electric Energy Delivered (millions of kWh) | Year Ended December 31, 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | | CECONY full service customers | 23,457 | 22,272 | 22,657 | 22,547 | 20,710 | | Delivery service for retail choice customers | 20,785 | 20,715 | 20,315 | 21,116 | 21,549 | | Delivery service to NYPA customers and others | 9,556 | 9,440 | 9,284 | 9,357 | 9,069 | | **Total Deliveries in Franchise Area** | 53,798 | 52,427 | 52,256 | 53,020 | 51,328 | | **Electric Energy Delivered ($ in millions)** | | | | | | | CECONY full service customers | $7,908 | $7,178 | $6,305 | $6,192 | $5,299 | | Delivery service for retail choice customers | 2,777 | 2,697 | 2,394 | 2,526 | 2,613 | | Delivery service to NYPA customers and others | 889 | 849 | 758 | 715 | 683 | | Other operating revenues | 96 | (7) | 621 | 318 | 211 | | **Total Deliveries in Franchise Area** | $11,670 | $10,717 | $10,078 | $9,751 | $8,806 | | **Average Revenue per kWh Sold (Cents)** | | | | | | | Residential | ¢36.70 | ¢35.70 | ¢30.10 | ¢28.80 | ¢27.30 | | Commercial and industrial | ¢30.30 | ¢28.30 | ¢25.40 | ¢26.00 | ¢23.50 | For further discussion of the company’s electric operating revenues and its electric results, see “Results of Operations” in Item 7. For additional segment information, see Note P to the financial statements in Item 8. ### Electric Peak Demand The electric peak demand in CECONY’s service area typically occurs during the summer air conditioning season. CECONY’s 2025 service area actual hourly peak demand was 12,530 MW, which occurred on June 25, 2025. At “design weather conditions,” electric peak demand in CECONY’s service area would have been approximately 12,600 MW. Design weather conditions for the electric system is a standard to which the actual hourly peak demand is adjusted for evaluation and planning purposes. Since NYISO-invoked demand reduction programs can only be called upon under specific circumstances, design weather conditions do not include these programs' potential impact. However, the CECONY forecasted hourly peak demand at design weather conditions does include the impact of certain demand reduction programs. The company estimates that, under design weather conditions, the 2026 service area hourly peak demand will be 12,690 MW. As of January 2026, the company forecasts an average annual increase in hourly electric peak demand in its service area at design weather conditions over the next five years to be approximately 0.7 percent per year. The five-year forecast in peak demand is used by the company for electric supply and capital expenditures planning purposes. ### Electric Supply Most of the electricity sold by CECONY to its full-service customers in 2025 was purchased through the wholesale electricity market administered by the NYISO. The company expects that resources will again be adequate to meet the requirements of its customers in 2026. See "Electric Reliability Needs," below. The company plans to meet its continuing obligation to supply electricity to its full-service customers through a combination of electricity purchased under contract, purchased through the NYISO’s wholesale electricity market, or generated from its electricity generating facilities. For information about the company’s contracts for electric generating capacity, see Notes I and Q to the financial statements in Item 8. To reduce the volatility of its full-service customers’ electric energy costs, the company enters into derivative transactions to hedge the costs of a portion of its expected purchases through the NYISO’s wholesale electricity market. CECONY owns generating stations in New York City associated primarily with its steam system and local reliability support. The generating stations have a combined electric nameplate capacity of approximately 780 MW. For information about electric generating capacity owned by the company, see “Electric Operations – Electric Facilities – Generating Facilities,” above. In general, the Utilities recover their costs of purchasing power for full-service customers, including the cost of hedging purchase prices, pursuant to rate provisions approved by the state public utility regulatory authority having jurisdiction. See “Financial and Commodity Market Risks – Commodity Price Risk” in Item 7 and “Recoverable Energy Costs” in Note A to the financial statements in Item 8. ### Electric Reliability Needs CECONY monitors the adequacy of the electric capacity resources and related developments in its service area, and works with other parties on long-term resource adequacy within the framework of the NYISO reliability planning process. In October 2025, the NYISO issued its 2025 Q3 Short-Term Assessment of Reliability (STAR) that identifies a bulk power system electric reliability need in New York City beginning in the summer of 2026 and continuing through 2030. See "Electric Supply" above. The need is primarily driven by forecasted increases in peak demand, deactivation notices of existing generation on the Gowanus and Narrows barges and the uncertainty as to whether certain planned projects will be completed and energized within the forecasted time period (the Gowanus-Greenwood 345-138 kV feeder and the Champlain Hudson Power Express transmission line in May 2026, Empire Wind 1 in July 2027 and Propel NY in May 2030). In its 2025 Q4 STAR report issued in January 2026, the NYISO observed that the scope, scale, and nature of the forecasted reliability need remains unchanged. NYISO previously solicited both market-based and regulated solutions which remain under evaluation by the NYISO. In December 2025, CECONY issued its preliminary 2025 Local Transmission Plan (LTP), which projected reliability needs in New York driven by increasing load demand, cumulative generator retirements without incremental new generation resources, and reliability design criteria updates. Following CECONY’s preliminary 2025 LTP, the NYSPSC issued an order directing CECONY to develop a reliability contingency plan by June 2026 to address projected reliability needs in New York City. In January 2026, pursuant to the NYSPSC order, CECONY filed its updated projection of reliability needs in New York City of 125 MW beginning in 2032 and increasing to 750 MW by 2036. Additionally, CECONY issued a Request for Information (RFI) to engage with stakeholders for the submission of feasible, effective, timely and cost-effective options to meet these needs. The RFI will be used to inform CECONY's New York City reliability contingency plan. ### Gas Operations ### Gas Facilities CECONY’s capitalized costs for utility plant, net of accumulated depreciation, for gas facilities, which are primarily distribution facilities, were $12,629 million and $11,830 million at December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. Natural gas is delivered by interstate pipelines to CECONY at various points in or near its service territory and is distributed to customers by the company through an estimated 4,374 miles of mains and 379,939 service lines. The company owns a natural gas liquefaction facility and storage tank at its Astoria property in Queens, New York with a capacity of approximately 1 Bcf. The company has a contract for approximately 1.2 Bcf of additional natural gas storage capacity at a field in upstate New York, owned and operated by Honeoye, a corporation 71.2 percent owned by Con Edison Transmission and 28.8 percent owned by CECONY. Con Edison Transmission and CECONY are considering strategic alternatives with respect to their investments in Honeoye. ### Gas Sales and Deliveries CECONY delivers gas to its full-service customers who purchase gas from the company. The company generally recovers the cost of the gas that it buys and then sells to its full-service customers. It does not make any margin or profit on the gas it sells. Under the company's retail choice program, CECONY also delivers gas to its customers who choose to purchase gas from other suppliers. CECONY’s gas delivery revenues are subject to a weather normalization clause and a revenue decoupling mechanism. As a result, its gas delivery revenues are generally not affected by changes in delivery volumes from levels assumed when rates were approved. CECONY’s gas sales and deliveries for the last five years were: | Gas Delivered (MDt) Firm sales | Year Ended December 31, 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Full service | 89,529 | 74,503 | 77,525 | 85,246 | 81,637 | | Firm transportation | 79,874 | 71,521 | 72,740 | 75,172 | 76,765 | | **Total Firm Sales** | 169,403 | 146,024 | 150,265 | 160,418 | 158,402 | | Interruptible sales (a) | 3,574 | 2,959 | 7,892 | 6,098 | 5,927 | | **Total Gas Delivered to CECONY Customers** | 172,977 | 148,983 | 158,157 | 166,516 | 164,329 | | Transportation of customer-owned gas | | | | | | | NYPA | 40,877 | 56,291 | 53,541 | 45,085 | 43,094 | | Other (mainly generating plants and interruptible transportation) | 85,138 | 79,930 | 80,378 | 72,448 | 67,871 | | Off-system sales | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | | **Total Sales** | 299,004 | 285,216 | 292,088 | 284,061 | 275,306 | | **Gas Delivered ($ in millions)** | | | | | | | Firm sales | | | | | | | Full service | $2,171 | $1,788 | $1,791 | $1,850 | $1,473 | | Firm transportation | 965 | 914 | 853 | 798 | 704 | | **Total Firm Sales** | 3,136 | 2,702 | 2,644 | 2,648 | 2,177 | | Interruptible sales | 28 | 28 | 49 | 51 | 29 | | **Total Gas Delivered to CECONY Customers** | 3,164 | 2,730 | 2,693 | 2,699 | 2,206 | | Transportation of customer-owned gas | | | | | | | NYPA | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | | Other (mainly generating plants and interruptible transportation) | 62 | 60 | 58 | 64 | 59 | | Other operating revenues (mainly regulatory amortizations) | 50 | 42 | 76 | 159 | 111 | | **Total Sales** | $3,278 | $2,834 | $2,829 | $2,924 | $2,378 | | **Average Revenue per Dt Sold** | | | | | | | Residential | $25.99 | $25.93 | $26.63 | $24.67 | $20.71 | | General | $21.83 | $21.18 | $18.03 | $17.17 | $13.67 | (a) Includes 2,574, 2,015 and 1,920 MDt for 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively, which are also reflected in delivery service for firm retail choice customers and other. For further discussion of the company’s gas operating revenues and its gas results, see “Results of Operations” in Item 7. For additional segment information, see Note P to the financial statements in Item 8. ### Gas Peak Demand The gas actual peak day demand for firm gas customers in CECONY’s service area occurs during the winter heating season and during the winter of 2025/2026 (through January 31, 2026) occurred on January 30, 2026 when the firm gas customers' demand reached approximately 1,310 MDt. “Design weather conditions” for the gas system is a standard to which the actual peak demand is adjusted for evaluation and planning purposes. The company estimates that, under design weather conditions, the 2026/2027 service area peak day demand for firm gas customers will be 1,648 MDt. The forecasted peak day demand for firm gas customers at design conditions does not include gas used by interruptible gas customers including electric and steam generating stations. As of January 2026, the company forecasts an average annual increase of the gas peak day demand for firm gas customers over the next five years at design conditions of approximately 0.2 percent in its service area. The five-year forecast in peak demand is used by the company for gas supply and capital expenditures planning purposes. ### Gas Supply CECONY and O&R have combined their gas requirements, and contracts to meet those requirements, into a single portfolio. The combined portfolio is administered by, and related management services are provided by, CECONY (for itself and as an agent for O&R) and costs are allocated between the Utilities in accordance with provisions approved by the NYSPSC. See Note U to the financial statements in Item 8. Charges from suppliers for the firm purchase of gas, which are based on formulas or indexes or are subject to negotiation, are generally designed to approximate market prices. The Utilities have contracts with interstate pipeline companies for the purchase of firm transportation from upstream points where gas has been purchased to the Utilities’ distribution systems, and for upstream storage services. Charges under these transportation and storage contracts are approved by the FERC. The Utilities are required to pay certain fixed charges under the supply, transportation and storage contracts whether or not the contracted capacity is actually used. These fixed charges amounted to approximately $580.3 million in 2025, including $509.4 million for CECONY. At December 31, 2025, the contracts were for various terms extending to 2027 for supply and 2047 for transportation and storage. During 2025, no new transportation contracts were entered into by CECONY or O&R. In addition, the Utilities purchase gas on the spot market and contract for interruptible gas transportation. See “Contractual Obligations,” below and “Recoverable Energy Costs” in Note A, Note Q and Note U to the financial statements in Item 8. ### Steam Operations ### Steam Facilities CECONY’s capitalized costs for utility plant, net of accumulated depreciation, for steam facilities, including steam's portion of the steam-electric generation facilities, were $2,009 million and $2,006 million at December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. See "CECONY – Electric Operations – Electric Facilities," above. CECONY generates steam at one steam-electric generating station and four steam-only generating stations and distributes steam to its customers through approximately 106 miles of transmission, distribution and service piping. ### Steam Sales and Deliveries CECONY’s steam sales and deliveries for the last five years were: | Steam Sold (MMlb) | Year Ended December 31, 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | | General | 502 | 428 | 428 | 513 | 504 | | Apartment house | 5,303 | 4,880 | 4,657 | 5,122 | 5,013 | | Annual power | 11,170 | 10,186 | 10,359 | 11,792 | 11,367 | | **Total Steam Delivered to CECONY Customers** | 16,975 | 15,494 | 15,444 | 17,427 | 16,884 | | **Steam Sold ($ in millions)** | | | | | | | General | $36 | $31 | $25 | $27 | $25 | | Apartment house | 199 | 162 | 150 | 155 | 137 | | Annual power | 470 | 395 | 363 | 391 | 340 | | Other operating revenues | (2) | (10) | 31 | 20 | 30 | | **Total Steam Delivered to CECONY Customers** | $703 | $578 | $569 | $593 | $532 | | **Average Revenue per Mlb Sold** | $41.53 | $37.95 | $34.84 | $32.88 | $29.73 | For further discussion of the company’s steam operating revenues and its steam results, see “Results of Operations” in Item 7. For additional segment information, see Note P to the financial statements in Item 8. ### Steam Peak Demand and Capacity The steam actual hourly peak demand in CECONY’s service area occurs during the winter heating season and during the winter of 2025/2026 (through January 31, 2026) occurred on January 30, 2026 when the actual hourly demand reached approximately 7.01 MMlb per hour. “Design weather conditions” for the steam system is a standard to which the actual hourly peak demand is adjusted for evaluation and planning purposes. The company’s estimate for the winter of 2026/2027 hourly peak demand of its steam customers is about 7.3 MMlb per hour under design weather conditions. As of January 2026, the company forecasts an average annual decrease in steam hourly peak demand in its service area at design weather conditions over the next five years to be approximately 0.9 percent. The five-year forecast in peak demand is used by the company for steam supply and capital expenditures planning purposes. On December 31, 2025, the steam system was capable of delivering approximately 11.2 MMlb of steam per hour, and CECONY estimates that the system will maintain the same capability throughout the 2026/2027 winter. ### Steam Supply 40 percent of the steam produced by CECONY in 2025 was supplied by the company’s steam-only generating assets; 42 percent was produced by the company’s steam-electric generating assets, where steam and electricity are primarily cogenerated; and 18 percent was purchased under an agreement with Brooklyn Navy Yard Cogeneration Partners L.P. ### O&R ### Electric Operations ### Electric Facilities O&R’s capitalized costs for utility plant, net of accumulated depreciation, for distribution facilities were $1,482 million and $1,359 million at December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. For its transmission facilities, the costs for utility plant, net of accumulated depreciation, were $377 million and $369 million at December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. O&R and RECO own, in whole or in part, transmission and distribution facilities which include 552 circuit miles of transmission lines, 16 transmission substations, 63 distribution substations, 89,675 in-service line transformers, 3,764 pole miles of overhead distribution lines and 2,417 miles of underground distribution lines. O&R’s transmission system is part of the NYISO system except that portions of RECO’s system are located within the transmission area controlled by PJM. ### Electric Sales and Deliveries O&R delivers electricity to its full-service customers who purchase electricity from the company. Under the company's retail choice program, O&R also delivers electricity to its customers who purchase electricity from load serving entities. The company charges all customers in its service area for the delivery of electricity. O&R generally recovers, on a current basis, the cost of the electricity that it buys and then sells to its full-service customers. It does not make any margin or profit on the electricity it sells. O&R’s New York electric revenues (which accounted for 76.66 percent of O&R’s electric revenues in 2025) are subject to a revenue decoupling mechanism. As a result, O&R’s New York electric delivery revenues are generally not affected by changes in delivery volumes from levels assumed when rates were approved. Effective July 2021, the majority of O&R’s electric distribution revenues in New Jersey are subject to a conservation incentive program, as a result of which distribution revenues are generally not affected by changes in delivery volumes from levels assumed when rates were approved. O&R’s electric transmission revenues in New Jersey are not subject to a conservation incentive program, and as a result, changes in such volumes do impact revenues. O&R’s electric sales and deliveries for the last five years were: | Electric Energy Delivered (millions of kWh) | Year Ended December 31, 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Total deliveries to O&R full service customers | 3,541 | 3,212 | 2,988 | 2,973 | 2,702 | | Delivery service for retail choice customers | 2,234 | 2,522 | 2,397 | 2,580 | 2,839 | | **Total Deliveries in Franchise Area** | 5,775 | 5,734 | 5,385 | 5,553 | 5,541 | | **Electric Energy Delivered ($ in millions)** | | | | | | | Total deliveries to O&R full service customers | $809 | $653 | $578 | $576 | $453 | | Delivery service for retail choice customers | 159 | 198 | 172 | 198 | 223 | | Other operating revenues | (34) | 1 | 9 | (1) | 5 | | **Total Deliveries in Franchise Area** | $934 | $852 | $759 | $773 | $681 | | **Average Revenue Per kWh Sold (Cents)** | | | | | | | Residential | ¢25.30 | ¢22.20 | ¢21.90 | ¢21.50 | ¢19.00 | | Commercial and Industrial | ¢18.80 | ¢17.30 | ¢15.30 | ¢15.60 | ¢13.00 | For further discussion of the company’s electric operating revenues and its electric results, see “Results of Operations” in Item 7. For additional segment information, see Note P to the financial statements in Item 8. ### Electric Peak Demand The electric peak demand in O&R’s service area typically occurs during the summer air conditioning season. O&R’s 2025 service area actual hourly peak demand was 1,553 MW, which occurred on June 23, 2025. At “design weather conditions,” electric peak demand in O&R’s service area would have been approximately 1,526 MW. Design weather conditions for the electric system is a standard to which the actual hourly peak demand is adjusted for evaluation and planning purposes. Since NYISO-invoked demand reduction programs can only be called upon under specific circumstances, design weather conditions do not include these programs' potential impact. However, the O&R forecasted hourly peak demand at design conditions does include the impact of certain demand reduction programs. The company estimates that, under design weather conditions, the 2026 service area peak demand will be 1,600 MW. As of January 2026, the company forecasts an average annual increase in hourly electric peak demand in its service area at design conditions over the next five years to be approximately 4.1 percent primarily due to anticipated load growth from commercial customers, including data centers, and electric vehicles, offset in part by energy efficiency programs. The five-year forecast in peak demand is used by the company for electric supply and capital expenditures planning purposes. ### Electric Supply The electricity O&R sold to its full-service customers in 2025 was purchased under firm power contracts or through the wholesale electricity market. The company expects that these resources will again be adequate to meet the requirements of its customers in 2026. O&R does not own any electric generating capacity. The company plans to meet its continuing obligation to supply electricity to its customers through a combination of electricity purchased under contracts or purchased through the wholesale electricity market. To reduce the volatility of its customers’ electric energy costs, the company has contracts to purchase electric energy and enters into derivative transactions to hedge the costs of a portion of its expected purchases. For information about the company’s contracts, see Note Q to the financial statements in Item 8. In general, the Utilities recover their costs of purchasing power for full service customers, including the cost of hedging purchase prices, pursuant to rate provisions approved by the state public utility regulatory authority having jurisdiction. See “Financial and Commodity Market Risks – Commodity Price Risk,” in Item 7 and “Recoverable Energy Costs” in Note A to the financial statements in Item 8. From time to time, certain parties have petitioned the NYSPSC to review these provisions, the elimination of which could have a material adverse effect on the Companies’ financial position, results of operations or liquidity. ### Gas Operations ### Gas Facilities O&R’s capitalized costs for utility plant, net of accumulated depreciation for gas facilities, which are primarily distribution facilities, were $927 million and $873 million at December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. Natural gas is delivered by pipeline to O&R at various points in or near its service territory and is distributed to customers by the company through an estimated 1,902 miles of mains and 107,866 service lines. ### Gas Sales and Deliveries O&R delivers gas to its full-service customers who purchase gas from the company. O&R generally recovers the cost of the gas that it buys and then sells to its full-service customers. It does not make any margin or profit on the gas it sells. Under the company's retail choice program, O&R also delivers gas to its customers who choose to purchase gas from other suppliers. O&R’s gas delivery revenues are subject to a weather normalization clause and to a revenue decoupling mechanism. As a result, its gas delivery revenues are generally not affected by changes in delivery volumes from levels assumed when rates were approved. O&R’s gas sales and deliveries for the last five years were: | Gas Delivered (MDt) Firm sales | Year Ended December 31, 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Full service | 16,558 | 12,516 | 14,357 | 15,353 | 13,998 | | Firm transportation | 5,300 | 4,623 | 5,055 | 6,396 | 7,584 | | **Total Firm Sales** | 21,858 | 17,139 | 19,412 | 21,749 | 21,582 | | Interruptible sales | 3,630 | 3,712 | 3,301 | 3,911 | 3,821 | | **Total Gas Delivered to O&R Customers** | 25,488 | 20,851 | 22,713 | 25,660 | 25,403 | | Transportation of customer-owned gas | | | | | | | Sales for resale | 790 | 710 | 672 | 673 | 468 | | Sales to electric generating stations | 2 | 10 | 4 | 10 | 26 | | Off-system sales | 164 | 109 | 20 | 73 | 81 | | **Total Sales** | 26,444 | 21,680 | 23,409 | 26,416 | 25,978 | | Gas Delivered ($ in millions) Firm sales | Year Ended December 31, 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Full service | $277 | $187 | $230 | $245 | $190 | | Firm transportation | 41 | 34 | 38 | 45 | 55 | | **Total Firm Sales** | 318 | 221 | 268 | 290 | 245 | | Interruptible Sales | 7 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 6 | | **Total Gas Delivered to O&R Customers** | 325 | 228 | 274 | 296 | 251 | | Transportation of customer-owned gas | | | | | | | Other operating revenues | 6 | 45 | 23 | 16 | 9 | | **Total Sales** | $331 | $273 | $297 | $312 | $260 | | **Average Revenue Per Dt Sold** | | | | | | | Residential | $17.43 | $15.44 | $16.90 | $16.49 | $14.09 | | General | $13.43 | $11.73 | $12.64 | $13.62 | $11.24 | For further discussion of the company’s gas operating revenues and its gas results, see “Results of Operations” in Item 7. For additional segment information, see Note P to the financial statements in Item 8. ### Gas Peak Demand The gas actual peak day demand for firm sales customers in O&R’s service area occurs during the winter heating season and during the winter of 2025/2026 (through January 31, 2026) occurred on January 24, 2026 when the firm sales customers' demand reached approximately 188 MDt. “Design weather conditions” for the gas system is a standard to which the actual peak demand is adjusted for evaluation and planning purposes. The company estimates that, under design weather conditions, the 2026/2027 service area peak day demand for firm sales customers will be 247 MDt. The forecasted peak day demand at design conditions does not include gas used by interruptible gas customers including electric generating stations. As of January 2026, the company forecasts an average annual increase of the gas peak day demand for firm gas customers over the next five years at design conditions of approximately 1.2 percent primarily due to an anticipated increase in the number of firm gas customers within the next five years. The five-year forecast in peak demand is used by the company for gas supply and capital expenditures planning purposes. ### Gas Supply O&R and CECONY have combined their gas requirements and purchase contracts to meet those requirements into a single portfolio. See “CECONY – Gas Operations – Gas Supply” above. ### Con Edison Transmission Con Edison Transmission, through its subsidiaries, develops and invests in electric transmission projects and owns, through joint ventures, both electric and gas assets. ### Electric The following table presents Con Edison Transmission’s ownership interests in New York Transco’s electric transmission projects. | | Ownership Interest | In-Service Date/Anticipated | Base Return on Common Equity plus incentive Return on Equity (ROE) | Common Equity Ratio | | --- | ---: | --- | --- | ---: | | Transmission Owner Transmission Solutions (TOTS) (a) | 45.7% | 2016 | 9.99% plus 0.50% = 10.49% | 53% | | New York Energy Solution (NYES) (b) | 45.7% | 2023/2025 | 9.99% plus 0.50% to 1.00% = 10.49% to 10.89% (c) | 53% | | Propel NY Energy (d) | 41.7% of New York Transco's share | 2030 | 10.3% plus 1% = 11.3% | 53% | (a) TOTS is a group of three electric power bulk transmission projects ($217 million total cost) constructed on the New York bulk transmission system to increase transfer capability between upstate and downstate New York. In December 2025, the FERC approved a settlement agreement that provides a base ROE of 9.99 percent and allows the use of a 54% common equity ratio to calculate the revenue requirement. (b) The NYES project was constructed to relieve transmission congestion between upstate and downstate (estimated cost of approximately $800 million). Construction of the Dover Station, an additional network upgrade to support the NYES project, was completed during the fourth quarter of 2025. In December 2025, the FERC approved a settlement agreement that provides a base ROE of 9.99 percent and allows the use of a 54% common equity ratio to calculate the revenue requirement. (c) Includes a cost containment reduction. (d) Propel NY Energy, a project that is under development jointly with the NYPA, is a 90-mile electric transmission project that is expected to increase high voltage transmission connections between Long Island and the rest of New York State. New York Transco’s share of the estimated cost of the Propel NY Energy project is $2,200 million, excluding interconnection costs and the cost of projects expected to be built by local transmission owners, including CECONY. The siting, construction and operation of the project will require approvals and permits from the appropriate governmental agencies and authorities, including the NYSPSC. ### Gas Con Edison Transmission owns a 71.2 percent interest in Honeoye, a company that operates a gas storage facility in upstate New York and in which CECONY owns the remaining interest. Con Edison Transmission and CECONY are considering strategic alternatives with respect to their investments in Honeoye. In January 2026, Con Edison Transmission completed the sale of approximately 40 percent of its approximately 6.6 percent interest in Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC (MVP) to one of the founding members of MVP and expects to complete the sale of its remaining interest in MVP to another founding member during the first half of 2026 for total aggregate consideration of $357.5 million, subject to certain closing adjustments. See "Investment in Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC (MVP)" in Note A to the financial statements in Item 8. For information about Con Edison Transmission's results, see "Results of Operations" in Item 7 and Note P to the financial statements in Item 8. ### Capital Requirements and Resources ### Capital Requirements The following table contains the Companies’ capital requirements for the years 2023 through 2025: | (Millions of Dollars) CECONY (a)(b) | Actual 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Electric | $3,201 | $3,088 | $2,909 | | Gas | 1,151 | 1,154 | 1,046 | | Steam | 113 | 132 | 128 | | Sub-total | 4,465 | 4,374 | 4,083 | | O&R (b) | | | | | Electric | 337 | 214 | 211 | | Gas | 144 | 111 | 85 | | Sub-total | 481 | 325 | 296 | | Con Edison Transmission | 50 | 29 | 49 | | Clean Energy Businesses (c) | — | — | 81 | | Total capital expenditures | 4,996 | 4,728 | 4,509 | | Retirement of long-term securities | | | | | Con Edison – parent company | — | — | 650 | | CECONY | — | 475 | — | | Clean Energy Businesses (c) | — | — | 60 | | Total retirement of long-term securities (d) | — | 475 | 710 | | Total capital requirements | $4,996 | $5,203 | $5,219 | (a) CECONY’s capital expenditures for environmental protection facilities and related studies were $656 million, $672 million and $589 million in 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively. (b) Amounts and estimates shown do not include regulatory asset expenditure amounts for energy efficiency and other clean energy programs. See "Regulatory Assets and Liabilities" in Note B to the financial statements in Item 8. (c) On March 1, 2023, Con Edison completed the sale of all of the stock of the Clean Energy Businesses. See Note W and Note X to the financial statements in Item 8. (d) Amounts exclude $2 million of retired debt for Broken Bow II, a deferred project, which was classified as Held for Sale as of December 31, 2024 and is shown under “Project Debt Held for Sale" on Con Edison's Consolidated Statement of Capitalization. See "Assets Held for Sale" in Note A and Note X to the financial statements in Item 8. The sale and transfer of Broken Bow II, including the related debt, was completed in January 2025. The following table contains the Companies’ capital requirements current estimate of amounts for 2026 through 2030: | (Millions of Dollars) CECONY (a)(b) | Estimate 2030 | 2029 | 2028 | 2027 | 2026 | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Electric | $6,293 | $6,228 | $5,019 | $4,852 | $4,766 | | Gas | 1,451 | 1,436 | 1,066 | 1,057 | 1,093 | | Steam | 209 | 223 | 201 | 193 | 127 | | Sub-total | 7,953 | 7,887 | 6,286 | 6,102 | 5,986 | | O&R (b) | | | | | | | Electric | 479 | 494 | 502 | 380 | 415 | | Gas | 139 | 143 | 151 | 110 | 132 | | Sub-total | 618 | 637 | 653 | 490 | 547 | | Con Edison Transmission | 17 | 75 | 213 | 167 | 62 | | Total capital expenditures | 8,588 | 8,599 | 7,152 | 6,759 | 6,595 | | Retirement of long-term securities | | | | | | | CECONY | 600 | — | 800 | 700 | 250 | | O&R | 35 | 44 | — | 80 | — | | Total retirement of long-term securities | 635 | 44 | 800 | 780 | 250 | | Total capital requirements | $9,223 | $8,643 | $7,952 | $7,539 | $6,845 | (a) CECONY’s capital expenditures for environmental protection facilities and related studies are estimated to be $637 million in 2026. Amounts include surcharge recovery programs that are not in base rates for CECONY of $1,885 million, $1,893 million, $1,766 million, $1,391 million and $603 million for 2030, 2029, 2028, 2027 and 2026, respectively. See Note B to the financial statements in Item 8. (b) Amounts and estimates shown do not include regulatory asset expenditure amounts for energy efficiency and other clean energy programs. See "Regulatory Assets and Liabilities" in Note B to the financial statements in Item 8. ### Contractual Obligations The following table summarizes the Companies’ material obligations at December 31, 2025 to make payments pursuant to contracts. Long-term debt, operating and capital lease obligations and other noncurrent liabilities are included on their balance sheets. Electricity and gas purchase agreements (for which undiscounted future annual payments are shown) are described in the notes to the financial statements. | (Millions of Dollars) Long-term debt (Statement of Capitalization) | Payments Due by Period Total | After 5 years | Years 4 & 5 | Years 2 & 3 | 1 year or less | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | | CECONY | $24,550 | 22,200 | $600 | $1,500 | $250 | | O&R | 1,500 | 1,341 | 79 | 80 | — | | Interest on long-term debt (a) | 23,647 | 17,786 | 2,273 | 2,374 | 1,214 | | Total long-term debt, including interest | 49,697 | 41,327 | 2,952 | 3,954 | 1,464 | | Finance lease obligations (Note J) | | | | | | | CECONY | 2 | — | — | 1 | 1 | | O&R | 1 | — | — | 1 | — | | Total finance lease obligations (b) | 3 | — | — | 2 | 1 | | Operating leases (Note J) | | | | | | | CECONY | 631 | 291 | 131 | 137 | 72 | | O&R | 1 | — | — | — | 1 | | Total operating leases | 632 | 291 | 131 | 137 | 73 | | Purchase obligations | | | | | | | Electricity power purchase agreements – Utilities (Note I) | | | | | | | CECONY | | | | | | | Energy | 1,505 | 817 | 275 | 277 | 136 | | Capacity (c) | 931 | 259 | 116 | 334 | 222 | | Total CECONY | 2,436 | 1,076 | 391 | 611 | 358 | | O&R | | | | | | | Energy and Capacity (c) | 118 | — | — | 47 | 71 | | Total electricity and power purchase agreements – Utilities | 2,554 | 1,076 | 391 | 658 | 429 | | Natural gas supply, transportation, and storage contracts – Utilities (Note I) (d) | | | | | | | CECONY | | | | | | | Natural gas supply | 473 | — | — | 7 | 466 | | Transportation and storage | 3,818 | 1,975 | 465 | 885 | 493 | | Total CECONY | 4,291 | 1,975 | 465 | 892 | 959 | | O&R | | | | | | | Natural gas supply | 57 | — | — | 1 | 56 | | Transportation and storage | 557 | 291 | 68 | 127 | 71 | | Total O&R | 614 | 291 | 68 | 128 | 127 | | Total natural gas supply, transportation and storage contracts | 4,905 | 2,266 | 533 | 1,020 | 1,086 | | Other purchase obligations (e) | | | | | | | CECONY | 4,702 | 392 | 556 | 1,062 | 2,692 | | O&R | 333 | 49 | 35 | 51 | 198 | | Total other purchase obligations | 5,035 | 441 | 591 | 1,113 | 2,890 | | Total | $62,826 | $45,401 | $4,598 | $6,884 | $5,943 | (a) Amounts include interest on variable-rate debt. (b) Amounts exclude four lease agreements for clean energy facilities that had not yet commenced operation. See Note J to the financial statements in Item 8. (c) Included in these amounts is the cost of minimum quantities of energy that the Utilities are obligated to purchase at both fixed and variable prices. (d) Included in these amounts is the cost of minimum quantities of natural gas supply, transportation and storage that the Utilities are obligated to purchase at both fixed and variable prices. (e) Amounts shown for other purchase obligations, which reflect capital and operations and maintenance costs incurred by the Utilities in running their day-to-day operations, were derived from the Utilities’ purchasing system as the difference between the amounts authorized and the amounts paid (or vouchered to be paid) for each obligation. For many of these obligations, the Utilities are committed to purchase less than the amount authorized. Payments for the “Other Purchase Obligations” are generally assumed to be made ratably over the term of the obligations. Long-term Purchase Obligations, which comprises $3,116 million of "Other Purchase Obligations," were derived from the Utilities' purchasing system by using a method that identifies the remaining purchase obligations. The Utilities believe that unreasonable effort and expense would be involved to enable them to report their “Other Purchase Obligations” in a different manner. The Companies’ commitments to make payments in addition to these contractual commitments include their other liabilities reflected on their balance sheets, any funding obligations for their pension and other postretirement benefit plans, financial hedging activities, their collective bargaining agreements and Con Edison’s guarantee of certain obligations. See Notes E, F, Q and “Guarantees” in Note H to the financial statements in Item 8. ### Capital Resources Con Edison is a holding company that operates only through its subsidiaries and has no material assets other than its interests in its subsidiaries. Con Edison finances its capital requirements primarily through internally-generated funds, the sale of its common shares or external borrowings. Con Edison’s ability to make payments on external borrowings and dividends on its common shares depends on receipt of dividends from its subsidiaries, proceeds from the sale of additional common shares or its interests in its subsidiaries or additional external borrowings. See "Con Edison's Ability To Pay Dividends Or Interest Depends On Dividends From Its Subsidiaries" in Item 1A and Note U to the financial statements in Item 8. For information about restrictions on the payment of dividends by the Utilities and significant debt covenants, see Note C to the financial statements in Item 8. For information on the Companies’ commercial paper program and revolving credit agreements with banks, see Note D to the financial statements in Item 8. The Companies require access to the capital markets to fund capital requirements that are substantially in excess of available internally-generated funds. See “Capital Requirements,” above and "The Companies Require Access To Capital Markets to Satisfy Funding Requirements” in Item 1A and each of the Companies believes that it will continue to be able to access capital, although financial market conditions or changes in the Companies' credit ratings may affect the timing and cost of the Companies’ financing activities. The Companies monitor the availability and costs of various forms of capital, and will seek to issue Con Edison common shares and other securities when it is necessary or advantageous to do so. For information about the Companies’ long-term debt and short-term borrowing, see Notes C and D to the financial statements in Item 8. The Utilities finance their operations, capital requirements and payment of dividends to Con Edison from internally-generated funds, contributions of equity capital from Con Edison, if any, and external borrowings. See "Liquidity and Capital Resources" in Item 7. Con Edison plans to meet its capital requirements for 2026 through 2030 through internally-generated funds, the issuance of long-term debt through public and private offerings and the issuance of common equity through public offerings, including pursuant to an at-the-market equity program. See “Capital Requirements and Resources - Capital Requirements" in Item 1. Con Edison's plans include the issuance of up to $3,200 million of long-term debt in 2026 and up to $3,000 million of long-term debt in 2027, including for maturing securities, at the Utilities and approximately $9,900 million in aggregate of long-term debt, including for maturing securities, at the Utilities during 2028 through 2030. Con Edison plans to issue up to $1,100 million of common equity in 2026, in addition to equity issued under its dividend reinvestment, employee stock purchase and long-term incentive plans. Con Edison also plans to issue common equity of approximately $1,200 million in 2027 and up to $3,300 million in aggregate during 2028 through 2030, in addition to equity issued under its dividend reinvestment, employee stock purchase and long-term incentive plans. Con Edison’s estimates of its capital requirements and related financing plans reflect information available and assumptions at the time the statements are made and include, among other things, the assumptions that the Utilities’ forecasted capital investments and financing plans through 2030 are approved by the NYSPSC. Actual developments and the timing and amount of funding may differ materially. In 2024, the NYSPSC authorized CECONY, through 2027, to issue up to $6,050 million of debt securities ($3,525 million of which the company had issued as of December 31, 2025). In 2025, the NYSPSC authorized O&R, through 2028, to issue up to $700 million of debt securities ($250 million of which the company had issued as of December 31, 2025). The NYSPSC also authorized CECONY and O&R for such periods to issue debt securities to refund existing debt securities of up to $2,500 million and $125 million, respectively, pursuant to which CECONY redeemed $225 million of its Series 2010A tax-exempt bonds and O&R had not refunded any securities pursuant to these authorizations. FERC has authorized CECONY through April 30, 2026 and O&R through July 31, 2026 to issue short-term borrowings for a period of not more than 12 months, in an amount not to exceed $4,000 million and $250 million, respectively, at prevailing market rates. Con Edison Transmission has financed its operations and capital requirements primarily with capital contributions and borrowings from Con Edison and internally-generated funds. See "Liquidity and Capital Resources" in Item 7. For each of the Companies, the common equity ratio for the last five years was: | | Common Equity Ratio (Percent of total capitalization) 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Con Edison | 48.6 | 47.1 | 49.1 | 50.9 | 47.4 | | CECONY | 47.8 | 46.0 | 47.9 | 46.9 | 47.0 | The credit ratings assigned by Moody’s, S&P and Fitch to the issuer rating and commercial paper rating of Con Edison, and the senior unsecured debt and commercial paper ratings of CECONY and O&R are as follows: | | Moody's | S&P | Fitch | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | **Con Edison** | | | | | Issuer Rating | Baa1 | A- | BBB+ | | Commercial Paper | P-2 | A-2 | F2 | | **CECONY** | | | | | Senior Unsecured Debt | A3 | A- | A- | | Commercial Paper | P-2 | A-2 | F2 | | **O&R** | | | | | Senior Unsecured Debt | Baa1 | A- | A- | | Commercial Paper | P-2 | A-2 | F2 | Credit ratings assigned by rating organizations are expressions of opinion and are not recommendations to buy, sell or hold securities. A credit rating is subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the assigning rating organization. Each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating. See “The Companies Require Access To Capital Markets To Satisfy Funding Requirements” and “Changes To Tax Laws Could Adversely Affect the Companies” in Item 1A. ### Energy Affordability Programs In July 2025, the NYSPSC issued an order adopting an enhanced energy affordability policy, which will expand eligibility for New York utilities' Energy Affordability Programs (EAP). These changes are expected to take effect in 2026. In an effort to address growing affordability concerns, the 2023-24 New York State budget tasked the NYSPSC with developing a discount program for residential electric and gas customers who do not qualify for the existing EAP but whose income is below the state or area median income to help additional households with energy bills. The order establishes three additional benefit tiers in a new Enhanced EAP (EEAP) alongside the current EAP and increases the total budget for these programs from 2 percent to 3 percent of each New York utility's total annual revenue, with 0.5 percent set aside for the three new EEAP. The Utilities are required, among other things, to file cost recovery plans detailing the cost to implement the program, update EAP budgets accordingly, and track enrollment and participation in the EEAP over an initial two-year pilot period. See "Energy Affordability" in Item 7. ### Environmental Matters ### Clean Energy Future ### New York State’s Clean Energy Goals In 2019, New York State enacted the Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act (CLCPA) that established a goal of 70 percent of the electricity procured by load serving entities regulated by the NYSPSC to be produced by renewable energy systems by 2030 and requires the statewide electrical demand system to have zero emissions by 2040. The law also codified state targets for energy efficiency (end-use energy savings of 185 trillion British thermal units below 2025 energy-use forecast), offshore wind (9,000 MW by 2035), solar (6,000 MW by 2025) and energy storage (3,000 MW by 2030, that was subsequently increased by the NYSPSC to 6,000 MW by 2030). See “Energy Storage,” below. The CLCPA established a climate action council that made recommendations for meeting the statewide greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction requirements through displacing fossil-fuel fired electricity with renewable electricity, transitioning heating and transportation to lower GHG impact fuels (including substantial electrification), implementing energy efficiency measures and providing 35 percent to 40 percent of the benefits of CLCPA-related investments to disadvantaged communities. As required by the law, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) adopted regulations establishing statewide GHG emissions limits that are 60 percent of 1990 emissions levels by 2030 and 15 percent of 1990 emissions by 2050. The Utilities are unable to predict the impact that the implementation of this law will have on them. In January 2025, CECONY published its integrated long-range plan, which sets forth CECONY’s planning and investment strategy to provide safe, reliable and resilient service to customers and to support the decarbonization of energy use for electric, gas and steam customers, aligning with the greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets mandated by the CLCPA. Implementing this strategy will require capital expenditures above historic norms. While the details of CECONY’s investments will continue to be addressed in its rate cases or other filings, subject to the approval of the NYSPSC, CECONY projects that $72 billion of capital expenditures will be needed between 2025 and 2034 to implement its strategy. ### Offshore Wind In an effort to meet the CLCPA’s offshore wind goals, load serving entities, such as CECONY and O&R, will be required to purchase offshore wind renewable energy credits when NYSERDA's offshore wind projects begin operation. NYSERDA issued competitive solicitations for offshore wind energy resulting in two projects that are in development, Sunrise Wind (924 MW), a project that began construction in June 2024 and that is expected to enter commercial operation in 2026 and Empire Wind 1 (810 MW), a project that is expected to enter commercial operation in 2027 and connect to the New York City electrical grid at CECONY’s Gowanus substation. In December 2025, the United States Department of the Interior issued stop work orders to a number of awarded offshore wind projects, including Sunrise Wind and Empire Wind 1, citing national security risks. In January and February 2026, a federal district judge granted Empire Wind 1 and Sunrise Wind a preliminary injunction that allowed construction activities to resume. ### Building Electrification and Energy Efficiency In January 2020, and updated in August 2022, the NYSPSC issued an order directing energy efficiency targets and budgets for New York utilities. The order approved electric and gas energy efficiency programs and heat pump budgets for building electrification, and associated targets, for the years 2020 through 2025 to meet the NYSPSC’s goal of reducing electric use by 3 percent annually and gas use by 1.3 percent annually by 2025. The order and subsequent update authorized budgets for the years 2020 through 2025 for: electric energy efficiency programs of $688 million and $71 million for CECONY and O&R, respectively; gas energy efficiency programs of $338 million and $17 million for CECONY and O&R, respectively; and heat pump programs of $1,106 million and $15 million for CECONY and O&R, respectively. CECONY’s 2023-2025 electric and gas rate plans allowed it to recover the costs of heat pumps for building electrification and energy efficiency expenditures, including a full rate of return, in rates from customers. See Note B to the financial statements in Item 8. In May 2025, the NYSPSC issued two orders that established budgets for CECONY’s and O&R’s energy efficiency and building electrification programs (formerly known as New Efficiency New York) for 2026-2030 with aggregate budgets of $2,138 million and $110 million, respectively. The aggregate amounts are comprised of average annual budgets of: $300 million and $19 million for electric energy efficiency and heat pump programs for CECONY and O&R, respectively, and $128 million and $3 million for gas energy efficiency programs for CECONY and O&R, respectively. Building electrification and energy efficiency expenditures are treated as regulatory assets with recovery including the weighted average cost of capital and beginning on March 1, 2026 collected via a surcharge rather than included in base rates. ### Electric Vehicles In July 2020, the NYSPSC established light-duty electric vehicle make-ready and other infrastructure programs that included budgets of $290 million and $24 million for CECONY and O&R, respectively, through 2025. In November 2023, the light-duty infrastructure and other programs, including medium and heavy-duty make-ready pilot projects and a new micromobility infrastructure incentive program, were expanded to approximately $823 million for CECONY and $56 million for O&R. The November 2023 order also permitted the make-ready programs to extend beyond 2025 until targets are met or authorized budgets depleted. The NYSPSC authorized CECONY and O&R to recover these costs, including a full rate of return, through surcharge mechanisms and subsequently in rates from customers. In July 2022, the NYSPSC issued an order that provided CECONY and O&R with up to a total of $31 million and $5.8 million, respectively, through 2025, for implementation of residential vehicle managed charging programs and administration costs. The order also provided CECONY and O&R with authorization to offer incentives to encourage electric vehicle charging to occur overnight and during off-peak times totaling approximately $71.8 million and $8.2 million, respectively, through 2025, that would be recovered through the respective company’s revenue reconciliation mechanisms. In August 2025, the NYSPSC authorized the continuance of the residential vehicle managed charging programs beyond the original end date of December 31, 2025 as it conducts a program review. In October 2022, the NJBPU approved RECO’s electric vehicle make-ready program that includes a budget of $7.6 million through 2026 for electric vehicle infrastructure and related program costs. The NJBPU authorized RECO to recover these costs, including a full rate of return, in rates from customers. In November 2023, the NYSPSC issued an order that provides CECONY and O&R with up to $432 million and $18 million through 2026, respectively, for the implementation of commercial managed charging programs and demand charge rebates, participant incentives and administration costs. The NYSPSC authorized CECONY and O&R to recover these costs, including a full rate of return, through surcharge mechanisms and subsequently in rates from customers. ### Energy Storage In June 2024, the NYSPSC issued an order adopting an updated roadmap for achieving 6,000 MW of statewide energy storage resource deployment by 2030 and recognized the need for additional statewide energy storage of 12,000 MW by 2040 and 17,000 MW by 2050. In October 2024, New York utilities, including CECONY and O&R, completed a study of the potential of energy storage to provide non-market transmission and distribution services and identified services for which energy storage is suitable. CECONY owns and operates three energy storage projects located in Ozone Park, Queens, Fox Hills, Staten Island, and Brownsville, Brooklyn that are designed to store 1.5 MW/12 MWh, 7.5 MW/30 MWh, and 5.8MW/23.2MWh of energy, respectively. CECONY has procured 185 MW of energy storage projects under its Utility Dispatch Rights program and is evaluating proposals for additional projects. These long-term contracts provide CECONY with the right to dispatch energy from the storage projects for both wholesale market and grid purposes. O&R owns and operates one energy storage project located in Pomona, New York that is designed to store 3MW / 12MWh of energy and is engaged in procuring for Utility Dispatch Rights in its service territory. The Utilities expect to recover the cost of energy storage services procured under their Utility Dispatch Rights programs, including a full rate of return, in rates and surcharges from customers. ### Thermal Energy Networks In April 2024, the NYSDPS approved CECONY’s and O&R’s December 2023 Stage 1 filings (Project Scope, Feasibility, and Stakeholder Engagement) for utility-scale thermal energy network pilot projects. The NYSDPS also confirmed CECONY and O&R are authorized to incur costs of $17.1 million and $4.6 million, respectively, through the completion of Stage 2 (Pilot Project Engineering Design and Customer Protection Plan). These projected costs are within the budgets previously proposed by CECONY and O&R in December 2023 of $255 million and $46 million, respectively. In December 2024, the NYSPSC issued an order approving CECONY’s May 2024 petition seeking $6 million for certain unaddressed costs that are necessary to complete Stage 2 of its utility thermal energy network pilot projects, in addition to the $17.1 million described above. The remaining proposed budget amounts are subject to approval by the NYSPSC. In July 2025, CECONY and O&R filed with the NYSPSC their final Pilot Engineering Design and Customer Protection Plans (Stage 2 Filings) for the utility-scale thermal energy network (UTEN) pilot projects. CECONY and O&R requested authorization to proceed to Stage 3 (Customer Enrollment and Construction). The total estimated costs for the UTEN projects have increased to $415 million (from $255 million) and $112 million (from $46 million) for CECONY and O&R, respectively. CECONY and O&R were previously authorized to incur costs of $23.1 million and $4.6 million, respectively. The remaining proposed budget amounts in excess of the previously authorized amounts are subject to approval by the NYSPSC. ### Distribution System and Distributed Energy Resources The NYSPSC is directing development by New York electric utilities of a distributed system platform to manage and coordinate distributed energy resources (DER) in their service areas under NYSPSC regulation and to provide customers, together with third parties, with data and tools to better manage their energy use. Although DER has the ability to reduce load on the system, increased deployment of bidirectional DER may lead to DER hotspots that trigger system upgrades. The NYSPSC has required the Utilities to file distributed system implementation plans and ordered the Utilities to develop demonstration projects to inform distributed system platform business models. As of December 31, 2025, CECONY and O&R had three and one active demonstration projects, respectively. In New York, net energy metering (NEM) compensates kilowatt-hours exported to the electric distribution system at the full-service rate for production, delivery, taxes and fees. NYSPSC’s policy is to phase in changes to limit annual bill increases on non-participating customers to two percent. In addition, NEM projects interconnected on or after January 1, 2022 are charged for their share of energy efficiency and other public policy benefit programs. ### New York City’s Clean Energy Goals In 2014, New York City announced a goal to reduce GHG emissions 80 percent below 2005 levels by 2050. In May 2019, New York City enacted a package of legislation known as the Climate Mobilization Act, that includes provisions intended to reduce GHG emissions from large buildings by 40 percent from 2005 levels by 2030. Building owners may achieve compliance through operational changes, building retrofits, the purchase of GHG offsets, the purchase of renewable energy credits and the use of clean distributed energy resources. ### Federal Regulation of GHG Emissions Section 111 of the Clean Air Act authorizes the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to set standards of performance (emissions limits) for new sources of air pollution, including GHG emissions, and establish guidelines for states to issue standards of performance for existing sources. These standards of performance are based on technology that the EPA determines to be the best system of emission reduction (BSER). In April 2024, the EPA issued a final Section 111 rule (Section 111 Rule) regulating GHG emissions from new electric-generating gas-fired combustion turbines and existing coal, oil, and gas-fired boilers used to generate electricity. The Section 111 Rule included carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) at a 90% capture rate as the BSER for certain new gas-fired combustion turbines and certain existing coal-fired boilers. The Section 111 Rule did not cover existing electric-generating, gas-fired combustion turbines. After the EPA issued the Section 111 Rule, petitioners challenged it in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (D.C. Circuit). Con Edison, as part of a coalition of public and private utilities, intervened in this litigation, arguing that the EPA had the authority to set the BSER, but the coalition took no position as to whether CCS was achievable in the timeframe set forth in the Section 111 Rule. In February 2025, the D.C. Circuit held the case in abeyance at the EPA's request. In June 2025, the EPA proposed a rule (Section 111 Repeal Rule) which would repeal all Section 111 GHG emissions standards from fossil fuel-fired power plants, including those found in the Section 111 Rule. The Section 111 Repeal Rule also contained a narrower, alternative proposal that would repeal the CCS-based and certain other GHG emissions standards found in the Section 111 Rule. In February 2026, the EPA issued a final rule which rescinded its 2009 Greenhouse Gas Endangerment Finding under Section 202(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act and eliminated all existing GHG emissions standards for motor vehicles. While the 2009 endangerment finding did not directly regulate the utility industry, the EPA could apply the same legal theories in this final rule to other federal regulations on GHG emissions, including those under Section 111. After the EPA issued the final rule, certain entities filed litigation in the D.C. Circuit challenging the rescission. Additional litigation is expected to be filed. The Companies are unable to predict the impact that the above matters will have on them. See "Federal Regulation," above. ### Climate Change As indicated by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, GHG emissions from manmade sources are changing the world’s climate. Climate change could affect customer demand for the Companies’ energy services. It might also cause physical damage to the Companies’ facilities and disruption of their operations due to more frequent and more extreme weather. See “The Failure of, or Damage to, the Companies’ Facilities Could Adversely Affect the Companies” in Item 1A. Past major weather events such as Superstorm Sandy in 2012 and Tropical Storm Isaias in 2020 caused large power outages in the Utilities’ territories and resulted in the Utilities incurring substantial response and restoration costs. In September 2023, CECONY updated the climate change vulnerability study it issued in 2019 and O&R published its first climate change vulnerability study. The studies were developed pursuant to a New York State Public Service Law that requires all New York electric utilities to release a climate change vulnerability study and file with the NYSPSC a subsequent climate change resilience plan at least every five years. The law authorizes utilities to recover costs incurred outside of the rate plans through a surcharge and to subsequently include approved costs into base rates during the next rate case proceeding. The Utilities’ studies identified rising temperatures, inland flooding, sea level rise, storm surge, high winds, ice accumulation and extreme and compound weather events to be the biggest risks to their systems. The resulting extreme weather events brought about by climate change are manifested in increased system load, asset degradation, equipment damage and worker safety and accessibility concerns. In February 2025, CECONY and O&R filed updated climate change resilience plans with the NYSPSC in compliance with an order that directed CECONY and O&R to re-submit their November 2023 plans to exclude proposed projects that the NYSPSC determined are not climate resilience investments. CECONY’s and O&R’s updated climate change resilience plans propose investments of $645.4 million and $184.1 million, respectively, between 2025 and 2029 to enhance the resilience of their electric systems against extreme weather events brought about by climate change. The total cost of CECONY’s and O&R’s climate resilience investments from 2025 through 2044 are currently projected to be $5,294 million and $900.4 million, respectively. These investments are subject to approval by the NYSPSC through the base rate case process. CECONY’s rate plan included $146 million for climate resilience investments from 2026 through 2028 and O&R’s rate plan included climate resilience investments of $110.4 million from 2025 through 2027. See “Rate Plans” in Note B to the financial statements in Item 8. ### GHG Emissions Reporting Based on the most recent data (2022) published by the EPA, Con Edison estimates that its direct GHG emissions constitute less than 0.1 percent of the nation’s GHG emissions. Con Edison’s estimated Scope 1 emissions of GHG during the past five years were: | (Metric tons, in millions (a), (b)) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | | CO2 equivalent emissions | 2.7 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 2.9 | 2.8 | (a) Estimated emissions for 2025 are based on preliminary data and are subject to third-party verification. Scope 1 emissions are GHG emitted into the atmosphere by assets owned by Con Edison. Con Edison’s Scope 1 emissions primarily include emissions from CECONY’s operation of steam, electric, and co-generation plants. Con Edison’s Scope 1 emissions also include fugitive emissions that occur when pressurized equipment and infrastructure containing a GHG has a controlled or uncontrolled emission and emissions from Con Edison’s vehicle fleet. (b) The GHG emissions information includes those of CECONY and O&R. Con Edison is evaluating opportunities to enhance and update its emissions inventory. Con Edison’s more than 55 percent decrease in direct GHG emissions (carbon dioxide, methane and sulfur hexafluoride) from the 2005 baseline (6.0 million metric tons) reflects emission reductions resulting from equipment and repair projects, reduced steam demand, the increased use of natural gas in lieu of fuel oil at CECONY’s steam production facilities and projects to reduce sulfur hexafluoride emissions and to replace leak-prone gas distribution pipes. As a result of the Utilities’ participation in the NYISO wholesale markets, a portion of the Utilities’ NYISO energy purchases are sourced from renewable electric production facilities. The electricity produced by renewable generation offsets the energy that the Utilities would otherwise have procured, thereby reducing the amount of electricity produced by non-renewable production facilities. The Utilities also actively promote energy efficiency and the use of renewable generation to help their customers reduce their GHG emissions. CECONY has participated for several years in voluntary initiatives with the EPA to reduce its methane and sulfur hexafluoride emissions. The Utilities reduce methane emissions from the operation of their gas distribution systems through pipe maintenance and replacement programs and by utilizing technologies to reduce fugitive emissions from leaks or when work is performed on operating assets. The Utilities reduce emissions of sulfur hexafluoride by using improved technologies to locate and repair leaks and by replacing older equipment. In December 2024, NYSDEC adopted a regulation that will impose an emissions limit on owners of gas insulated equipment containing sulfur hexafluoride starting in 2030, including equipment used in electric power transmission and distribution. In January 2016, the NYSPSC approved a 10-year clean energy fund to be managed by NYSERDA under the NYSPSC's supervision. Subsequent NYSPSC orders modified program targets and extended clean energy fund-related initiatives through 2030. The Utilities collect clean energy fund surcharges from their customers through the system benefit charge. The Utilities billed customers clean energy fund surcharges of $248 million, $277 million and $224 million in 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively. CECONY is subject to carbon dioxide emissions regulations established by New York State under the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) due to its ownership of electric generation assets. The initiative established a decreasing cap on carbon dioxide emissions resulting from the generation of electricity. Under RGGI, affected electric generators are required to obtain emission allowances to cover their carbon dioxide emissions. CECONY will purchase RGGI allowances for the sixth control period (2024 – 2026) based on anticipated emissions, which are expected to be similar to past compliance periods. The cost to the Companies to comply with legislation, regulations or initiatives limiting GHG emissions could be substantial. ### Environmental Sustainability Con Edison’s sustainability strategy, as it relates to the environment, provides that the company seeks, among other things, to reduce direct and indirect GHG emissions; enhance the efficiency of its water use; reduce its impact to natural ecosystems; focus on reducing, reusing and recycling to lower materials consumption and disposal; and design its work in consideration of climate projections. In support of New York State's and New York City's climate goals, Con Edison has adopted a Clean Energy Commitment whereby it commits to the transition to the clean energy future. Con Edison's Clean Energy Commitment is supported by five pillars: - Build the grid of the future - Empower Con Edison's customers to meet their climate goals - Reimagine the gas system - Lead by reducing Con Edison's carbon footprint - Partner with stakeholders ### CECONY ### Superfund The Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 and similar state statutes (Superfund) impose joint and several liability, regardless of fault, upon generators of hazardous substances for investigation costs, remediation costs (which include costs of demolition, removal, disposal, storage, replacement, containment and monitoring) and natural resource damages. Liability under these laws can be material and may be imposed for contamination from past acts, even though such past acts may have been lawful at the time they occurred. The sites as to which CECONY has been asserted to have liability under Superfund include its and its predecessor companies’ former manufactured gas sites, its multi-purpose Astoria site, the Gowanus Canal site, the Newtown Creek site and other Superfund sites discussed below. There may be additional sites as to which assertions will be made that the company has liability. For a further discussion of claims and possible claims against the company under Superfund, estimated liability accrued for Superfund claims and recovery from customers of site investigation and remediation costs, see Note G to the financial statements in Item 8. ### Manufactured Gas Sites CECONY and its predecessors formerly owned and operated manufactured gas plants at 51 sites (MGP Sites) in New York City and Westchester County. Many of these sites have been subdivided and are now owned by parties other than CECONY and have been redeveloped for other uses, including schools, residential and commercial developments and hospitals. The NYSDEC is requiring CECONY to investigate, and if necessary, develop and implement remediation programs for the sites, including any neighboring areas to which contamination may have migrated. CECONY has started remedial investigations at all 51 MGP Sites. After investigations, no MGP impacts have been detected at all or portions of 15 sites, and the NYSDEC has issued No Further Action (NFA) letters for these sites. Coal tar or other MGP-related contaminants have been detected at the remaining 36 sites. Remedial actions have been completed at all or portions of 14 sites and the NYSDEC has issued NFA letters for these sites. In addition, remedial actions have been completed by property owners at all or portions of four sites under the New York State Brownfield Cleanup Program and Certificates of Completion have been issued by the NYSDEC for these sites. Remedial design, planning or action is ongoing for the remaining sites or portions of sites; however, the information as to the extent of contamination and scope of the remediation likely to be required for many of these sites is incomplete. The company estimates that its undiscounted potential liability for the completion of the site investigation and cleanup of the known contamination on MGP sites (other than the Astoria site, which is discussed below) could range from $645 million to $2,550 million. ### Astoria Site CECONY is permitted by the NYSDEC to operate a hazardous waste storage facility on property owned by it in the Astoria section of Queens, New York. Portions of the property were formerly the location of a manufactured gas plant and also have been used or are being used for, among other things, electric generation operations, electric substation operations, the storage of fuel oil, the manufacture and storage of liquefied natural gas and the maintenance and storage of electric equipment. As a condition of its NYSDEC permit, the company is required to investigate the property and, where environmental contamination is found and action is necessary, to remediate the contamination. The company’s investigations are ongoing. The company has submitted reports to the NYSDEC and the New York State Department of Health and in the future will be submitting additional reports identifying the known areas of contamination. The company estimates that its undiscounted potential liability for the completion of the site investigation and cleanup of the known contamination on the property could range from $291 million to $962 million. ### Gowanus Canal In August 2009, CECONY received a notice of potential liability and request for information from the EPA about the operations of the company and its predecessors at sites adjacent to or near the 1.8 mile Gowanus Canal in Brooklyn, New York. In March 2010, the EPA added the Gowanus Canal to its National Priorities List of Superfund sites. The canal’s adjacent waterfront is primarily commercial and industrial, currently consisting of concrete plants, warehouses and parking lots. The canal is near several residential neighborhoods. In September 2013, the EPA issued its record of decision for the site. The EPA concluded that there was significant contamination at the site, including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), pesticides, metals and volatile organic compounds. The EPA selected a remedy for the site that includes dredging and disposal of some contaminated sediments and stabilization and capping of contamination that will not be removed. The EPA has identified 39 potentially responsible parties (PRPs) with respect to the site, including CECONY (which the EPA indicated has facilities that may be a source of PCBs at the site). The EPA ordered the PRPs, including CECONY, to coordinate and cooperate with each other to perform and/or fund the remedial design for the selected remedy, which current estimates indicate could cost approximately $115 million. CECONY is funding its allocated share of the remedial design costs along with the other PRPs. In April 2019, the EPA issued an order that requires the PRPs, including CECONY, to: (1) design and perform bulkhead structural support work, including associated access dredging, along certain portions of the upper reaches of the canal, and (2) complete the design work for bulkhead structural support along certain portions of the middle part of the canal. The PRPs and CECONY are coordinating the implementation of this order. In January 2020, the EPA issued an order that requires six PRPs, including CECONY, to initiate the remedial action work in the upper reaches of the canal following the completion of the bulkhead upgrades. Cleanup in other areas of the canal is not addressed by this order. In November 2020, the PRPs began implementation of the work required under this order. In August 2024, dredging and stabilization was completed in the upper segment of the Gowanus Canal Superfund Site at a cost of approximately $260 million. In March 2024, CECONY received a notice that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the NYSDEC, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (collectively, the Trustees) published a Draft Natural Resource Assessment Plan, indicating that the Trustees are conducting a natural resource damage assessment to determine, among other things, the appropriate amount and type of projects needed to restore, replace, or acquire the equivalent of injured natural resources at the Gowanus Canal Superfund Site. In June 2024, the EPA issued an order amending its January 2020 order and that requires six PRPs, including CECONY, to initiate remedial action work in the middle segment of the Gowanus Canal Superfund Site. The EPA estimated the cost of this work would be $369 million (although actual costs may be significantly higher) and has indicated the work would take several years to complete. In October 2024, a PRP filed a lawsuit against the other PRPs, including CECONY, with respect to the Gowanus Canal Superfund Site. The plaintiff asserts claims pursuant to the federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 and the New York Navigation Law for cleanup costs incurred, and to be incurred, by the plaintiff at the site. The plaintiff estimated the total cleanup costs at the site to be over $1,000 million. In 2024, the EPA also estimated total cleanup costs at the site to be over $1,000 million. CECONY is unable to estimate its total exposure to liability for the Gowanus Canal Superfund Site. ### Newtown Creek In June 2017, CECONY received a notice of potential liability from the EPA with respect to the Newtown Creek site that was listed in 2010 on the EPA’s National Priorities List of Superfund sites. The EPA has identified at least 30 PRPs with respect to the site, including CECONY. Newtown Creek and its tributaries (collectively, Newtown Creek) form a 3.8 mile border between Brooklyn and Queens, New York. Currently, the predominant land use around Newtown Creek includes industrial, petroleum, recycling, manufacturing and distribution facilities and warehouses. Other uses include trucking, concrete manufacture, transportation infrastructure and a wastewater treatment plant. Newtown Creek is near several residential neighborhoods. Six PRPs, not including CECONY, pursuant to an administrative settlement agreement and order on consent the EPA issued to them in 2011, submitted a final remedial investigation report for the site to the EPA in 2023. The EPA indicated that sampling events have shown the sediments in Newtown Creek to be contaminated with a wide variety of hazardous substances including PCBs, metals, pesticides, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and volatile organic compounds. The EPA also indicated that it has reason to believe that hazardous substances have come to be released from CECONY facilities into Newtown Creek. The current schedule anticipates completion of a feasibility study for the site during 2028 and issuance of the EPA's record of decision selecting a remedy for the site within several years thereafter. In January 2025, the EPA approved a potential early action remedy for the East Branch tributary of Newtown Creek, which the EPA estimates could cost approximately $250 million to implement. CECONY is unable to estimate its exposure to liability for the Newtown Creek site. ### Other Superfund Sites CECONY is a PRP at additional Superfund sites involving other PRPs and participates in PRP groups at those sites. The company generally is not managing the site investigation and remediation at these multiparty sites. Work at these sites is in various stages, and investigation, remediation and monitoring activities at some of these sites can be expected to continue over extended periods of time. The company believes that it is unlikely that monetary sanctions, such as penalties, will be imposed by any governmental authority with respect to these sites. The following table lists each of the additional Superfund sites for which the company anticipates it may have liability. The table also shows for each such site its location, the year in which the company was designated or alleged to be a PRP or to otherwise have responsibilities for the site (shown in the table under “Start”), the name of the court or agency in which proceedings for the site are pending and CECONY’s estimated percentage of the total liability for each site. The company currently estimates that its potential liability for investigation, remediation, monitoring and environmental damages in aggregate for the sites below, other than the sites where the percentage of total liability has not been determined, is less than $2 million. Superfund liability is joint and several. The company’s estimate of its liability for each site was determined pursuant to consent decrees, settlement agreements or otherwise and in light of the financial condition of other PRPs. The company’s actual liability could differ substantially from amounts estimated. | Site | Location | Start | Court or Agency | % of Total Liability | | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---: | | Cortese Landfill | Narrowsburg, NY | 1987 | EPA | 6.0% | | Curcio Scrap Metal | Saddle Brook, NJ | 1987 | EPA | 100.0% | | Metal Bank of America | Philadelphia, PA | 1987 | EPA | 1.0% | | Global Landfill | Old Bridge, NJ | 1988 | EPA | 0.4% | | Borne Chemical | Elizabeth, NJ | 1997 | NJDEP | 0.7% | | Pure Earth | Vineland, NJ | 2018 | EPA | to be determined | | Berry's Creek Site (formerly referred to as Scientific Chemical Processing) | Carlstadt, NJ | 2023 | EPA | to be determined | ### Other Environmental Matters In December 2024, New York State enacted the Climate Change Superfund Act (Act), which requires, among other things, "responsible parties" to pay $75 billion over twenty-five years into a fund based on GHG emissions to finance infrastructure projects needed to address the impacts from climate change. Responsible parties are defined as entities engaged in the trade or business of extracting fossil fuel or refining crude oil and were responsible for more than one billion metric tons of GHG emissions from 2000 to 2018. Although the Utilities are not a responsible party under this definition, they may be subject to other requirements under the Act. Under the Act, as amended in 2025, the NYSDEC is required to promulgate regulations implementing the Act by June 2027. In February 2025, a group of states brought a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York, Albany Division, challenging the Act as unconstitutional. As a result, the Companies are unable to predict the potential impact, if any, that the Act may have on them. In July 2021, a CECONY feeder failure led to the discharge of thousands of gallons of dielectric fluid from a street manhole in New Rochelle, New York. Dielectric fluid reached nearby streets, properties and the New Rochelle Harbor. CECONY, the U.S. Coast Guard, the NYSDEC and other agencies responded to the incident. CECONY stopped the feeder leak on the same day the discharge occurred and has completed the spill recovery and associated cleanup operations. As a result of the discharge, CECONY received third-party damage claims. The costs associated with this matter are not expected to have a material adverse effect on CECONY’s financial condition, results of operations and liquidity. In connection with the incident, CECONY may incur monetary sanctions of more than $0.3 million for violations of certain provisions regulating the discharge of materials into, and for the protection of, the environment. ### O&R ### Superfund The sites at which O&R has been asserted to have liability under Superfund include its manufactured gas sites and the Superfund sites discussed below. There may be additional sites as to which assertions will be made that O&R has liability. For a further discussion of claims and possible claims against O&R under Superfund, see Note G to the financial statements in Item 8. ### Manufactured Gas Sites O&R and its predecessors formerly owned and operated manufactured gas plants at seven sites (O&R MGP Sites) in Orange County and Rockland County, New York. Three of these sites are now owned by parties other than O&R, and have been redeveloped by them for residential, commercial or industrial uses. The NYSDEC is requiring O&R to develop and implement remediation programs for the O&R MGP Sites including any neighboring areas to which contamination may have migrated. O&R has completed remedial investigations and has received the NYSDEC’s decision regarding the remedial work to be performed at all seven of its MGP sites. Of the seven sites, O&R has completed remediation at four sites. Remedial construction was conducted on a portion of one of the remaining sites in 2019 and remedial design is ongoing for the other remaining sites. The company estimates that its undiscounted potential liability for the completion of the site investigation and cleanup of the known contamination on MGP sites could range from $98 million to $160 million. ### Superfund Sites O&R is a PRP at Superfund sites involving other PRPs and participates in PRP groups at those sites. The company is not managing the site investigation and remediation at these multiparty Superfund sites. Work at these sites is in various stages, and investigation, remediation and monitoring activities at some of these sites is expected to continue over extended periods of time. The company believes that it is unlikely that monetary sanctions, such as penalties, will be imposed by any governmental authority with respect to these sites. The following table lists each of the Superfund sites for which the company anticipates it may have liability. The table also shows for each such site its location, the year in which the company was designated or alleged to be a PRP or to otherwise have responsibilities for the site (shown in the table under “Start”), the name of the court or agency in which proceedings for the site are pending and O&R’s estimated percentage of the total liability for each site. The company currently estimates that its potential liability for investigation, remediation, monitoring and environmental damages in aggregate for the sites below is less than $1 million. Superfund liability is joint and several. The company’s estimate of its liability for each site was determined pursuant to consent decrees, settlement agreements or otherwise and in light of the financial condition of other PRPs. The company’s actual liability could differ substantially from amounts estimated. | Site | Location | Start | Court or Agency | % of Total Liability | | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---: | | Metal Bank of America | Philadelphia, PA | 1993 | EPA | 4.6% | | Borne Chemical | Elizabeth, NJ | 1997 | NJDEP | 2.3% | | Ellis Road | Jacksonville, FL | 2011 | EPA | 0.2% | ### Other Federal, State and Local Environmental Provisions ### Toxic Substances Control Act Virtually all electric utilities, including CECONY and O&R, own equipment that may contain PCBs. PCBs are regulated under the Federal Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976. The Utilities have procedures in place to manage and dispose of oil and equipment containing PCBs properly when they are removed from service. ### Water Quality Under NYSDEC regulations, the operation of CECONY’s generating facilities requires permits for water discharges and water withdrawals. Conditions to the renewal of such permits may include limitations on the operations of the permitted facility or requirements to install certain equipment, the cost of which could be substantial. For information about the company’s generating facilities, see “CECONY – Electric Operations – Electric Facilities” and “Steam Operations – Steam Facilities” above in this Item 1. Certain governmental authorities are investigating contamination in the Hudson River and the New York Harbor. These waters run through portions of CECONY’s service area. Governmental authorities could require entities that released hazardous substances that contaminated these waters to bear the cost of investigation and remediation, which could be substantial. ### Air Quality Under the Clean Air Act and New York State law, certain of CECONY’s facilities qualify as major facilities that are required to obtain Clean Air Act Title V operating permits. Consistent with the governing regulations, CECONY applies to renew these permits prior to their expiration and seeks to modify them when needed. Under Clean Air Act New Source Review (NSR) regulations, an owner of a major facility, including CECONY’s steam and steam-electric generating facilities and certain other CECONY facilities, is required to obtain a permit before making certain modifications to the facility, other than routine maintenance, repair, or replacement, that cause the increase of emissions of pollutants from the facility above specified thresholds. To obtain a permit, the facility owner could be required to install additional pollution controls or otherwise limit emissions from the facility. The company reviews on an on-going basis its planned modifications to its facilities to determine the potential applicability of NSR and similar regulations. The EPA's Transport Rule (also referred to as the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule), which was first implemented in January 2015, established a new cap-and-trade program requiring further reductions in air emissions than the Clean Air Intrastate Rule (CAIR) that it replaced. Under the Transport Rule, utilities are to be allocated emissions allowances and may sell the allowances or buy additional allowances. CECONY requested and received NYSPSC approval to change the provisions under which the company recovers its purchased power costs to provide for costs incurred to purchase emissions allowances and revenues received from the sale of allowances. In 2021, the EPA finalized changes to the Transport Rule in response to a court decision. In 2023, the EPA finalized an updated version of the Transport Rule (known as the Good Neighbor Rule) that includes a more recent federal ozone standard than the Transport Rule initially implemented. The Good Neighbor Rule was the subject of litigation in multiple courts and, in June 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court granted a request to stay the Good Neighbor Rule while judicial review over its merits was ongoing in the D.C. Circuit. While the Good Neighbor Rule is stayed, the EPA is allocating allowances based on the 2021 Transport Rule, with certain modifications. The revised Transport Rule reduced the number of allowances allocated to CECONY and required the company to purchase allowances to offset the decreased allocation. CECONY expects to comply with the Transport Rule in 2025 and 2026. The EPA has announced its intention to reconsider the Good Neighbor Rule, but has not yet indicated which requirements may be revised. The NYSDEC issued regulations in 2019 that limit emissions of nitrous oxides (NOx) during the ozone season from May through September and affect older peaking units that are generally located downstate and needed during periods of high electric demand or for local reliability purposes. See “CECONY – Electric Operations – Electric Supply,” above. ### Environmental Matters For information concerning climate change, environmental sustainability, potential liabilities arising from laws and regulations protecting the environment and other environmental matters, see “Environmental Matters” in Item 1, "Air Quality," above and Note G to the financial statements in Item 8. ### State Anti-Takeover Law New York State law provides that a “domestic corporation,” such as Con Edison, may not consummate a merger, consolidation or similar transaction with the beneficial owner of a 20 percent or greater voting stock interest in the corporation, or with an affiliate of the owner, for five years after the acquisition of the voting stock interest, unless the transaction or the acquisition of the voting stock interest was approved by the corporation’s board of directors prior to the acquisition of the voting stock interest. After the expiration of the five-year period, the transaction may be consummated only pursuant to a stringent “fair price” formula or with the approval of a majority of the disinterested stockholders. ### Human Capital Con Edison is committed to attracting, developing and retaining a talented and highly skilled workforce, recognizing that different backgrounds, experiences and leadership styles offer many advantages to the business. The company values and supports a wide range of employee needs and interests, and its skilled and experienced workforce enables the company to maintain best-in-class reliability and progress towards achieving a clean energy future. Human capital measures focus on employee safety, as well as inclusive practices that provide equal employment opportunity in hiring, development, promotion and retention. On December 31, 2025, Con Edison and its subsidiaries had 15,407 employees, based entirely in the United States including 14,166 at CECONY; 1,232 at O&R and 9 at Con Edison Transmission. Of the total CECONY and O&R employees, 7,942 and 599 employees, respectively, were covered by a collective bargaining agreement. The collective bargaining agreement covering most of the CECONY employees expires in June 2028. Agreements covering other CECONY employees and O&R employees expire in June 2029 and May 2026, respectively. Con Edison measures the voluntary attrition rate of its employees in assessing the company’s overall human capital. The company's turnover rate in 2025 was approximately 5.4 percent, 36 percent of which is attributed to retirements. The average length of service of our active employees is 13.0 years. In managing the business, the company emphasizes a strong safety culture. Continuous focus on safety while performing work is paramount, and leaders and managers are committed to implementing programs and practices that promote the right knowledge, skills, and attitudes to undertake the responsibilities of safety, including required training for both field and office employees. To that end, the company has a dedicated facility, the Learning Center, that offers classes to employees covering technical courses, skills enhancement, safety and leadership development. During 2025, employees spent over 670,000 hours in instructor-led, leadership and skill-based training. Further, the company maintains a career development and succession planning program that is committed to helping employees grow their careers, talents, skills and abilities. In addition to their daily job functions, employees of the Utilities are assigned to and trained for a position for emergency response that can be mobilized to support a weather event or emergency. Although working remotely for certain positions has been made possible by digital software and smart device capabilities that enable employees to collaborate with each other and remain productive, the entire CECONY and O&R workforce is available in the event of an emergency that requires on-site presence. ### Available Information For the sources of information about the Companies, see “Available Information” in the “Introduction” appearing before this Item 1. ## Risk factors As filed, 24,474 characters. Information in any item of this report as to which reference is made in this Item 1A is incorporated by reference herein. The use of such terms as “see” or “refer to” shall be deemed to incorporate at the place such term is used the information to which such reference is made. The Companies’ businesses are influenced by many factors that are difficult to predict, that may be beyond their control and that involve uncertainties that may materially affect actual operating results, cash flows and financial condition. The Companies have established an enterprise risk management program to identify, assess, manage and monitor its major business risks based on established criteria for the severity of an event, the likelihood of its occurrence, and the programs in place to control the event or reduce its impact. The Companies’ major risks include: ### Regulatory/Compliance Risks: **The Companies Are Extensively Regulated And May Be Subject To Substantial Penalties.** The Companies’ operations require numerous permits, approvals and certificates from various federal, state and local governmental agencies. State utility regulators may seek to impose substantial penalties on the Utilities for violations of state utility laws, regulations or orders or limit the Utilities from recovering costs incurred above amounts set forth in their rate plans. See “Other Regulatory Matters” in Note B to the financial statements in Item 8. The Utilities are also subject to recurring, independent, third-party audits with respect to these regulations and standards. In February 2025, the NYSPSC issued an order directing the NYSDPS to conduct a state-wide audit on the design of utilities' non-executive incentive compensation programs. In addition, the Utilities' rate plans usually include negative revenue adjustments for failing to meet certain operating and customer satisfaction standards. The FERC has the authority to impose penalties on the Utilities and the projects that Con Edison Transmission invests in, which could be substantial, for violations of the Federal Power Act, the Natural Gas Act or related rules, including reliability and cybersecurity rules. Environmental agencies may seek penalties for failure to comply with laws, regulations or permits. The Companies may also be subject to penalties from other regulatory agencies. The Companies may be subject to new laws, regulations or other requirements or the revision or reinterpretation of such laws, regulations or requirements, which could adversely affect them. See “Utility Regulation," "Competition" and “Environmental Matters – Climate Change" and "Environmental Matters - Other Federal, State and Local Environmental Provisions” in Item 1, “Critical Accounting Estimates” in Item 7 and “Other Regulatory Matters” in Note B to the financial statements in Item 8. **The Utilities’ Rate Plans May Not Provide A Reasonable Return.** The Utilities have rate plans approved by state utility regulators that limit the rates they can charge their customers. The rates are generally designed for, but do not guarantee, the recovery of the Utilities’ cost of providing service (including a return on equity). See “Utility Regulation – State Utility Regulation – Rate Plans” in Item 1 and “Rate Plans” in Note B to the financial statements in Item 8. Rates usually may not be changed during the specified terms of the rate plans other than to recover energy costs and limited other exceptions. The Utilities’ actual costs may exceed levels provided for such costs in the rate plans. State utility regulators can initiate proceedings to prohibit the Utilities from recovering from their customers the cost of service (including energy costs and storm restoration costs) that the regulators determine to have been imprudently incurred. The Utilities have from time to time entered into settlement agreements to resolve various prudence proceedings. **The Companies May Be Adversely Affected By Changes To The Utilities’ Rate Plans.** The Utilities’ rate plans typically require action by regulators at their expiration dates, which may include approval of new plans with different provisions. The need to recover from customers increasing commodity or other costs, taxes or state-mandated assessments or surcharges could adversely affect the Utilities’ opportunity to obtain new rate plans that provide a reasonable rate of return and continue important provisions of current rate plans, while maintaining affordability of services for the Utilities' customers. The Utilities’ current rate plans generally include reconciliation of write-offs of customer accounts receivable balances for specified periods to amounts reflected in rates, with recovery/refund from or to customers via surcharge/sur-credit. Although these regulatory mechanisms are currently in place, the Utilities’ ability to effectively manage their customer accounts receivable balances, and obtain recovery in rates for their respective carrying costs and any related write-offs could have a material impact on the Companies’ businesses. In addition, a continued slow recovery of accounts receivable balances has impacted and is expected to continue to impact the Companies’ liquidity. See “Aged Accounts Receivable Balances” in Item 7. The Utilities’ New York electric and gas rate plans also include revenue decoupling mechanisms, CECONY’s steam rate plan includes a weather normalization adjustment and the Utilities' New York electric, gas and steam rate plans include provisions for the recovery of energy costs and reconciliation of the actual amount of pension and other postretirement, environmental and certain other costs to amounts reflected in rates. Also, accounting credits for pension and other postretirement benefit plans could lead to a reduction in cash received from the Utilities’ revenue requirement. See “Rate Plans” in Note B to the financial statements in Item 8. ### Operations Risks: **The Failure Of, Or Damage To, The Companies’ Facilities Could Adversely Affect The Companies.** The Utilities provide electricity, gas and steam services using energy facilities, many of which are located either in, or close to, densely populated public places. See the description of the Utilities’ facilities in Item 1. A failure of, or damage to, these facilities, or an error in the operation or maintenance of these facilities, could result in bodily injury or death, property damage, the release of hazardous substances or extended service interruptions. Natural disasters or impacts of climate change, such as sea level rise, coastal storm surge, inland flooding from intense rainfall, hurricane-strength winds and extreme heat or cold could impact or damage facilities or result in large-scale outages and the Utilities may experience more severe consequences by continuing or resuming operations during and after such events. The Utilities’ response to such events may be perceived to be below customer expectations. The Utilities' successful implementation of their maintenance programs reduces, but does not fully protect against, damage to their facilities for which they will be held responsible and which may hinder their restoration efforts. The Utilities could be required to pay substantial amounts that may not be covered by the Utilities’ insurance policies to repair or replace their facilities, compensate others for injury or death or other damage and settle any proceedings initiated by state utility regulators or other regulatory agencies. The occurrence of such events could also adversely affect the cost and availability of insurance. Changes to laws, regulations or judicial doctrines could further expand the Utilities’ liability for service interruptions. See “Utility Regulation – State Utility Regulation” and "Environmental Matters – Climate Change" in Item 1. **A Cyber Attack Could Adversely Affect The Companies.** The Companies and other operators of critical energy infrastructure and energy market participants face a heightened risk of cyber attack and the Companies’ businesses require the continued operation of information systems and network infrastructure. See Item 1 for a description of the businesses of the Utilities and Con Edison Transmission. Cyber attacks may include hacking, viruses, malware, denial of service attacks, ransomware, exploited vulnerabilities or other security incidents, including loss of data and communications and business disruption. Cyber threats in general, and in particular, to critical infrastructure, are increasing in sophistication, magnitude and frequency and the techniques used in cyber attacks change rapidly, including from emerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence (AI), and from nation-state and state-sponsored adversaries as well as criminal actors. Such adversaries have attacked and threatened to attack energy infrastructure and deploy significant resources and employ sophisticated methods to plan and carry out attacks. Risk of these attacks may escalate during periods of heightened geopolitical tensions. Interconnectivity with customers, independent system operators, energy traders and other energy market participants, suppliers, contractors and others also exposes the Companies’ information and operational systems and network infrastructure to an increased risk of cyber incidents, including attacks. Such interconnectivity increases the risk that a cyber incident or attack on the Companies could affect others and that a cyber incident or attack on others could affect the Companies. In the event of a significant cyber incident or attack, the Companies could have their operations and the operations of their customers and others materially disrupted. The Companies could also have their financial and other information systems and network infrastructure impaired or damaged; customer and employee information stolen; experience substantial loss of revenues; incur substantial response costs and other financial losses; be subject to increased regulation, litigation and penalties; and damage to their reputation. The Companies have experienced cyber incidents and attacks in the past (such as threat actors exploiting a vulnerability in the Companies’ information technology system, malicious attempts to disrupt traffic to their websites and attacks against third-party vendors used by the Companies) and expect to experience them in the future. Although none of these incidents has had a material impact on the Companies, the scope and impact of any future incident cannot be predicted. In the event of a significant cybersecurity incident or attack, the Companies’ business strategy, results of operations or financial condition could be materially affected. **AI is an emerging area of technology that has the potential to impact various aspects of the Companies’ business operations and customer interactions.** Generative AI technologies are still in their early stages of development and deployment. Ineffective or inadequate AI development or deployment practices by the Companies or third-party vendors could result in unintended consequences. While the Companies seek contractual protections with third-party vendors regarding the use of AI technology, the Companies may not have full awareness of, or control or visibility over, the quality, performance, security or compliance of the products and services that incorporate AI-related technology used by such vendors. AI algorithms that the Companies or their third-party vendors use may be flawed or may be based on datasets that are biased or insufficient. These limitations or failures, or inaccurate results generated as a result of the Companies’ employees’, contractors’ or vendors’ use or misuse of AI technologies could lead to operational interruptions or otherwise adversely affect the Companies’ businesses, reputation or financial results. Developing, testing, and deploying resource-intensive AI systems may require additional investment and increase the Companies’ costs. In addition, the rapidly evolving nature of AI technologies may cause new laws and regulations to be enacted which could dramatically affect business practices, including the costs to comply with such new laws and regulations. The future development of AI technologies and the nature of any related new laws and regulations, and their costs and consequences, cannot be reasonably predicted at this time. **The Failure of Processes and Systems, the Failure to Retain and Attract Employees and Contractors, and Their Negative Performance Could Adversely Affect The Companies.** The Companies have developed business processes and use information and communication systems and enterprise platforms for operations, customer service, legal compliance, personnel, accounting, planning and other matters. Many services, including certain information technology services and certain work on the Utilities’ electric and gas systems and CECONY’s steam system, are provided to the Companies by third-party contractors. The failure of the Companies’ or its contractors' business processes or information and communication systems or the failure by the Companies’ employees or contractors to follow procedures, their unsafe actions, errors or intentional misconduct, cyber incidents or attacks, or work stoppages could adversely affect the Companies’ operations and liquidity and could result in substantial liability, higher costs, increased regulatory requirements and substantial penalties. The violation of laws or regulations by employees or contractors for personal gain may result from contract and procurement fraud, extortion, bribe acceptance, fraudulent related-party transactions and serious breaches of corporate policy or standards of business conduct. Competition for employee and contractor talent may result in operating challenges and increased costs to attract and retain talent. If the Companies are unable to successfully attract and retain an appropriately qualified workforce, their results of operations, financial position and cash flows could be negatively affected. See “Human Capital” in Item 1. ### Environmental Risks: **The Companies Are Exposed To Risks From The Environmental Consequences Of Their Operations, Including Increased Costs Related To Climate Change.** The Companies are exposed to risks relating to climate change and related matters. In 2023, CECONY and O&R each completed a climate change vulnerability study that evaluated their respective future climate change adaptation strategies and each developed a climate change resilience plan to address projected physical climate risks and outline proposed resilience investments. See “Environmental Matters – Climate Change” in Item 1. CECONY may also be impacted by environmental regulations regarding emissions reductions such as New York’s CLCPA and New York City’s Climate Mobilization Act and compliance with such regulations is expected to require significant capital expenditures. In addition, the Companies are unable to predict changes in regulations, regulatory guidance, legal interpretations, policy positions and implementation actions (including executive orders, memoranda and proclamations from the federal administration) relating to climate change that may result from the change in presidential administrations. The Utilities are also responsible for hazardous substances, such as oil, asbestos, PCBs and coal tar, that have been used or produced in the course of the Utilities’ operations and are present on properties or in facilities and equipment currently or previously owned by them. The Companies could be adversely affected if a causal relationship between electric and magnetic fields and adverse health effects were to be established. The Companies may also be adversely affected by developments to legal or public policy doctrines regarding cable that contains lead. See “Environmental Matters” in Item 1 and Note G to the financial statements in Item 8. ### Financial and Market Risks: **Con Edison’s Ability To Pay Dividends Or Interest Depends On Dividends From Its Subsidiaries.** Con Edison’s ability to pay dividends on its common shares or interest on its external borrowings depends primarily on the dividends and other distributions it receives from its subsidiaries. The dividends that the Utilities may pay to Con Edison are limited by the NYSPSC to not more than 100 percent of their respective income available for dividends calculated on a two-year rolling average basis, with certain exceptions. See “Dividends” in Note C and Note U to the financial statements in Item 8. **Changes To Tax Laws Could Adversely Affect the Companies.** Changes to tax laws, regulations or interpretations thereof could have a material adverse impact on the Companies. Depending on the extent of these changes, the changes could also adversely impact the Companies’ credit ratings and liquidity. See “Capital Requirements and Resources – Capital Resources” in Item 1, “Liquidity and Capital Resources – Cash Flows from Operating Activities” in Item 7, "Rate Plans" and "Other Regulatory Matters" in Note B and Note L to the financial statements in Item 8. **The Companies Require Access To Capital Markets To Satisfy Funding Requirements.** The Utilities estimate that their capital expenditures will exceed $37,100 million over the next five years. The Utilities use internally-generated funds, equity contributions from Con Edison, if any, and external borrowings to fund capital expenditures. Con Edison expects to finance its capital requirements primarily through internally generated funds, the sale of its common shares or external borrowings. Changes in financial market conditions or in the Companies’ credit ratings could adversely affect their ability to raise new capital and the cost thereof. See “Capital Requirements and Resources” in Item 1. **A Disruption In The Wholesale Energy Markets, Increased Commodity Costs Or Failure By An Energy Supplier or Customer Could Adversely Affect The Companies.** Almost all the electricity and gas the Utilities sell to their full-service customers is purchased through the wholesale energy markets or pursuant to contracts with energy suppliers. See the description of the Utilities’ energy supply in Item 1. A disruption in the wholesale energy markets or a failure on the part of the Utilities’ energy suppliers or operators of energy delivery systems that connect to the Utilities’ energy facilities could adversely affect their ability to meet their customers’ energy needs and adversely affect the Companies. The Utilities' ability to gain access to additional energy supplies, if needed, depends on effective markets and siting approvals for developer projects, which the Utilities do not control. Extreme cold weather has negatively impacted, and may in the future negatively impact, energy infrastructure in the northeastern United States, including the interstate natural gas system. During such extreme cold weather, the Utilities could face supply interruptions or operating issues (e.g., compressor failures, low pressures) on the interstate natural gas pipelines that they rely upon to deliver gas to their customers. Such disruptions to the interstate natural gas system could, in turn, result in unprecedented large-scale gas outages within the Utilities’ service territories. In the event of a large-scale outage, the Utilities could be required to pay substantial amounts to restore service, compensate others for injury or death or other damages and settle any proceedings initiated by regulatory agencies. Although the Utilities’ rate plans provide for recovery of purchased power costs, increases in electric and gas commodity prices may contribute to a slower recovery of cash from outstanding customer accounts receivable balances. See "Aged Accounts Receivable Balances" and “Financial and Commodity Market Risks – Commodity Price Risk” in Item 7. ### Other Risks: **The Companies Face Risks Related To Health Epidemics And Other Outbreaks.** Pandemic illness could disrupt the Utilities' employees and contractors from providing essential utility services and adversely impact the Companies' liquidity, financial condition and results of operations. See “Aged Accounts Receivable Balances” in Item 7. **The Companies’ Strategies May Not Be Effective To Address Changes In The External Business Environment.** The failure to identify, plan and execute strategies to address changes in the external business environment could have a material adverse impact on the Companies. Con Edison seeks to provide shareholder value through continued dividend growth, supported by earnings growth in regulated utilities and electric transmission projects. Changes to the competitive landscape, public policy, laws or regulations (or interpretations thereof), customer behavior or technology could significantly impact the value of the Utilities’ energy delivery facilities and Con Edison Transmission's investment in electric transmission projects. Such changes could also affect the Companies’ opportunities to make additional investments in such assets and the potential return on the investments. The Utilities' gas delivery customers and CECONY's steam delivery customers have alternatives, such as electricity and oil. Distributed energy resources, and demand reduction and energy efficiency investments, provide ways for the energy consumers within the Utilities’ service areas to manage their energy usage. The Companies expect distributed energy resources and electric alternatives to gas and steam to increase, and for gas and steam usage to decrease, as the CLCPA and the Climate Mobilization Act continue to be implemented. See "Con Edison Transmission," "Environmental Matters - Clean Energy Future" and "Environmental Matters - Climate Change," “Competition” and "CECONY - Gas Peak Demand" in Item 1. **The Companies Face Risks Related To Supply Chain Disruptions, Inflation and the Imposition of Tariffs (or Subsequent Changes to the Tariffs once Announced or Implemented).** The Companies have been impacted, and expect to continue to be impacted by, global and U.S. supply chain disruptions and shortages of materials, equipment, labor and other resources that are critical to the Companies’ business operations, primarily the Utilities’ electric transmission and distribution operations. Such disruptions and shortages have resulted in increased prices and lead times for critical orders of materials and equipment needed by the Companies in their operations, such as certain raw materials, microprocessors, semiconductors, microchips, vehicles and transformers. Long lead times for replacement parts could restrict the availability and delay the construction, maintenance or repair of items that are needed to support the Utilities' normal operations and may result in prolonged customer outages, which could in turn lead to unrecovered costs for such service interruptions. Demand for electric equipment is increasing due to the anticipated demand growth, in part driven by data centers, efforts to meet clean energy goals and in order to prepare for more frequent extreme weather events at a time when manufacturing capacity and supply are decreasing. Geopolitical conflicts have also caused supply chain disruptions and shortages. Prices of materials, equipment, transportation and other resources have increased as a result of these supply chain disruptions and shortages and may continue to increase as a result of inflation and the imposition of tariffs (or subsequent changes to the tariffs once announced or implemented). Increases in inflation and the imposition of tariffs may raise the Companies’ costs in excess of the costs reflected in the Utilities’ rate plans and could also increase the amount of capital that needs to be raised by the Companies. **The Companies Also Face Other Risks That Are Beyond Their Control.** The Companies’ results of operations can be affected by circumstances or events that are beyond their control. Weather and energy efficiency efforts directly influence the demand for electricity, gas and steam service, and can affect the price of energy commodities. Terrorist or other physical attacks or acts of war could damage the Companies' facilities. Economic conditions can affect customers’ demand and ability to pay for service, which could adversely affect the Companies. See "Energy Affordability" in Item 7. ## Cybersecurity As filed, 10,665 characters. ### Cybersecurity Risk Management The Companies have identified cybersecurity as a key enterprise risk. As operators of critical energy infrastructure, the Companies require the continuous operation and availability of information systems and network infrastructure while protecting confidentiality and integrity of the data. Cybersecurity threats are assessed, identified and managed through the Companies' Cybersecurity Program, which is an integral part of the Companies’ corporate-wide Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) program. The ERM program establishes processes to identify emerging issues; monitor, assess and mitigate known risks; align risk exposure to organizational priorities; and inform business decisions and resource allocation. The Cybersecurity program is aligned with, and audited against, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) and the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 27001/27002. In accordance with the Companies’ ERM program, management has established a multidisciplinary cybersecurity team including personnel from the technology, operations, legal, compliance, and risk management departments that identifies, assesses and remediates cybersecurity risks. The Companies employ several processes to manage their cybersecurity risks, including, but not limited to, the following: - *Incident Detection and Prevention*: The Companies deploy safeguards designed to protect their operational and information systems, the personal information of their customers and employees and other critical information from cybersecurity threats. These safeguards include, among other things, intrusion prevention and detection systems, anti-malware functionality and ongoing vulnerability assessments, and a dedicated 24/7/365 Cybersecurity Operations Center that monitors the Companies’ assets and networks. - *Review and Assessment*: The Companies assess the severity, likelihood and controllability of cybersecurity threats and consider risk outlook, recent external and internal cybersecurity events and audit findings to assess their overall cybersecurity risk management process. The Companies then use the findings from these assessments to inform cybersecurity risk mitigation activities, including long-term strategic and short-term tactical efforts, and capital allocation decisions. - *Independent Advisors; Regulatory Audits*: The Companies engage consultants to assess, identify and manage material risks from cybersecurity threats on a regular basis. The consultants are engaged to, among other things, assess the process by which cybersecurity threats are identified; provide incident response and forensic services; review and analyze cybersecurity controls and infrastructure; provide threat emulation services, perform external penetration testing periodically; and assess the maturity of the Companies’ Cybersecurity Program against the NIST CSF and assess alignment with ISO 27001/27002. Specific portions of the Companies’ cybersecurity policies, processes, and standards are audited by the FERC, North American Electric Reliability Corporation, TSA, Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, NYSPSC, and United States Coast Guard on a regular basis, with at least one regulatory agency conducting an audit periodically. - *Third-Party Risk Assessments*: The Companies’ vendors and suppliers participate in a third-party risk assessment to periodically validate such party’s profile across multiple risk domains. A cybersecurity risk assessment is performed by the Companies’ Information Technology department to assess the controls of high-risk third parties that, among other things, possess the Companies’ sensitive information and the personal information of their customers and employees. In addition, the Companies typically impose contractual obligations on their vendors and suppliers related to privacy, confidentiality, and data security based on their access to the Companies’ data, operational and information technology systems and sensitive information and the personal information of their customers and employees. The Companies also maintain insurance for cybersecurity incidents, with scope and limits evaluated annually. - *Disclosure Controls and Procedures*: Management has developed protocols and procedures to share information regarding cybersecurity incidents with the Chief Information Security Officer, Chief Privacy Officer, the Companies’ Disclosure Committee and the Law Department to enable assessments related to disclosure and reporting obligations in compliance with federal and state cybersecurity and data privacy regulations. - *Incident Response*: The Companies have established and maintain incident response plans aligned with NIST Special Publication 800-61r3 that set forth procedures for their response to cybersecurity incidents and data breaches and test and evaluate such plans on an ongoing basis. - *Training and Compliance*: The Companies train employees regularly on potential cybersecurity threats; monitor network and computing systems; collaborate with government and industry partners on threat mitigation; collaborate with local, state and federal agencies and utility industry colleagues to identify and employ tools that seek to protect the Companies’ operational and information systems and the personal information of their customers and employees from cybersecurity threats; and regularly conduct and participate in exercises to test and further develop prevention and responses to potential cyber and physical threats, both internally and through sector-level and cross-sector exercises led by industry or the U.S. government. The Companies have experienced cybersecurity incidents and attacks in the past and expect to experience them in the future. The Companies have not experienced any cybersecurity incidents in the last three years that have materially affected the business strategy, results of operations, or financial condition of the Companies. Although the Companies have established processes to assess, identify and manage cybersecurity risks, such processes do not provide absolute assurance against a cybersecurity attack that could materially impact the Companies. In the event of a significant cybersecurity incident or attack, the Companies’ business strategy, results of operations or financial condition could be materially affected. Such an incident could materially disrupt the Companies’ or their customers’ operations, cause damage to the Companies’ properties, financial and other information systems and network infrastructure and could result in the theft of the Companies’, their employees’ or customers’ information. See “A Cyber Attack Could Adversely Affect the Companies” in Item 1A. ### Role of Management in Cybersecurity Risk Management The Companies have implemented a “defense-in-depth” approach to governing, preventing, detecting, identifying, mitigating, responding to, and recovering from, cybersecurity threats and incidents, by establishing a cross-functional cybersecurity team that manages the Companies’ cybersecurity risk. The cybersecurity team is led by the Vice President and Chief Information Security Officer, a technology leader with over 15 years of experience in information technology and cybersecurity. The cybersecurity team reports to a multidisciplinary team of executives and senior officers including personnel from the technology and operations departments who are responsible for the review and approval of changes in cybersecurity risk assessment and have oversight of risk mitigation and monitoring strategies. The executive and senior officer team is led by the Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer, a senior global technology and operations leader with over 30 years of experience in the technology field and who is responsible for the Companies’ information technology and corporate security departments. The cybersecurity team’s processes to protect the personal information of the Companies’ customers and employees are supported by a privacy compliance team. The privacy compliance team is led by the Chief Privacy Officer, a professional with over 18 years of experience in data privacy risk and compliance and who is a Certified Information Privacy Professional and a Certified Information Privacy Manager and is designated as a Fellow in Privacy. The Chief Privacy Officer reports to the Vice President and Chief Ethics and Compliance Officer, an attorney and executive who has over 25 years of experience in the legal, ethics, and compliance fields and is responsible for the company’s ethics and compliance program and department, including data privacy compliance. The Chief Ethics and Compliance Officer reports to the Senior Vice President and General Counsel, the Companies’ lead attorney and a senior executive with over 20 years of risk management, corporate governance and team leadership experience. ### Role of Board of Directors and Board of Trustees in Cybersecurity Risk Management Con Edison’s Board of Directors and CECONY’s Board of Trustees (collectively, the Board) and their respective Audit Committees oversee the management of risks from cybersecurity threats, including the policies, processes and practices that management implements to address risks from cybersecurity threats. There is a process in place for the Board and the Audit Committee to receive quarterly updates and information from the Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer and the Vice President and Chief Information Security Officer, regarding significant and potentially significant cybersecurity incidents and a range of cybersecurity metrics. The Board receives an annual presentation and report on cybersecurity risks from the Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer and the Vice President and Chief Information Security Officer that addresses various topics, such as recent developments, vulnerability assessments and third-party and independent reviews. The Audit Committee also meets annually with the Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer in executive session, without management present. At each regular Board meeting, the Board receives a cybersecurity risk update and reviews a cybersecurity dashboard prepared by the Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer that includes updates on a range of cybersecurity metrics and topics and, on a quarterly basis, the Board receives in-depth presentations on cybersecurity topics. The Audit Committee oversees the ERM program and reviews more in-depth cybersecurity matters and risks on a semi-annual basis. ## Properties As filed, 1,155 characters. ### Con Edison Con Edison has no significant properties other than those of the Utilities. For information about the capitalized cost of the Companies’ utility plant, net of accumulated depreciation, see “Plant and Depreciation” in Note A to the financial statements in Item 8 (which information is incorporated herein by reference). ### CECONY For a discussion of CECONY’s electric, gas and steam facilities, see “CECONY – Electric Operations – Electric Facilities,” “CECONY – Gas Operations – Gas Facilities” and “CECONY – Steam Operations – Steam Facilities” in Item 1 (which information is incorporated herein by reference). ### O&R For a discussion of O&R’s electric and gas facilities, see “O&R – Electric Operations – Electric Facilities” and “O&R – Gas Operations – Gas Facilities” in Item 1 (which information is incorporated herein by reference). ### Con Edison Transmission Con Edison Transmission has no properties. Con Edison Transmission has ownership interests in electric and gas transmission companies. For information about these companies, see "Con Edison Transmission" in Item 1 (which information is incorporated herein by reference). ## Legal proceedings As filed, 407 characters. For information about certain legal proceedings affecting the Companies, see “Other Regulatory Matters” in Note B and “Superfund Sites” and “Asbestos Proceedings” in Note G and "Manhattan Explosion and Fire" in Note H to the financial statements in Item 8 and “Environmental Matters – CECONY” and “Environmental Matters – O&R” in Item 1 of this report, which information is incorporated herein by reference. ## Management's discussion and analysis As filed, 96,639 characters. This combined management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations (MD&A) relates to the consolidated financial statements included in this report of two separate registrants: Con Edison and CECONY, and should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes thereto. As used in this report, the term the “Companies” refers to Con Edison and CECONY. CECONY is a subsidiary of Con Edison and, as such, information in this management’s discussion and analysis about CECONY applies to Con Edison. This combined MD&A generally discusses 2025 and 2024 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2025 and 2024. For discussions of 2023 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2024 and 2023, see “Item 7: Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” in Con Edison’s and CECONY’s combined Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, filed with the SEC on February 20, 2025. Information in any item of this report referred to in this discussion and analysis is incorporated by reference herein. The use of terms such as “see” or “refer to” shall be deemed to incorporate by reference into this discussion and analysis the information to which reference is made. ### Corporate Overview Con Edison’s principal business operations are those of the Utilities and Con Edison Transmission. CECONY is a regulated utility that provides electric service in New York City and New York's Westchester County, gas service in Manhattan, the Bronx, parts of Queens and parts of Westchester, and steam service in Manhattan. O&R is a regulated utility serving customers in a 1,300-square-mile-area in southeastern New York State and northern New Jersey. Con Edison Transmission, a regulated company primarily under the oversight of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), develops and invests in electric transmission projects and owns, through joint ventures, both electric and gas assets. Con Edison Transmission and CECONY are considering strategic alternatives with respect to their investments in Honeoye. See “Con Edison Transmission” in Item 1. In addition to the risks and uncertainties described in Item 1A and the Companies’ material contingencies described in Notes B, G and H to the financial statements in Item 8, the Companies’ management considers the following events, trends, and uncertainties to be important to understanding the Companies’ current and future financial condition. ### Aged Accounts Receivable Balances At December 31, 2025, CECONY’s and O&R’s customer accounts receivables balances of $2,970 million and $120 million, respectively, included aged accounts receivables (balances outstanding in excess of 60 days) of $1,427 million and $27 million, respectively. At December 31, 2024, CECONY’s and O&R’s customer accounts receivables balances of $2,947 million and $113 million, respectively, included aged accounts receivables (balances outstanding in excess of 60 days) of $1,652 million and $32 million, respectively. In comparison, CECONY’s and O&R’s customer accounts receivable balances at February 28, 2020 were $1,322 million and $89 million, respectively, including aged accounts receivables (balances outstanding in excess of 60 days) of $408 million and $15 million, respectively. Prior to the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Utilities’ practice was to write off customer accounts receivables as uncollectible 90 days after the account is disconnected for non-payment or the account is closed during the collection process. In general, the Utilities suspended collection activities and service disconnections during the COVID-19 pandemic and have since resumed such activities. CECONY’s rate plans for the three-year period January 2023 through December 2025 included reconciliation of late payment charges (from January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2025 for electric and gas and from January 1, 2020 through October 31, 2026 for steam) and write-offs of customer accounts receivable balances (from January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2025 for electric and gas and from January 1, 2020 through October 31, 2026 for steam) to amounts reflected in rates, with recovery/refund from or to customers via surcharge/surcredit. CECONY's surcharge recoveries for late payment charges and write-offs of accounts receivable balances will, collectively, be subject to separate annual caps for electric and gas that produce no more than a half percent (0.5 percent) total customer bill impact per commodity (estimated for electric to be $57.3 million, $60.3 million, $62.6 million for 2023, 2024 and 2025, respectively, and for gas to be $14.8 million, $15.9 million and $16.8 million for 2023, 2024 and 2025, respectively). CECONY's surcharge recoveries for late payment charges and write-offs of accounts receivables for steam will each be subject to an annual cap that produces no more than a half percent (0.5 percent) total customer bill impact (estimated to be $2.5 million, $3.0 million and $3.5 million for 2024, 2025 and 2026, respectively). Amounts in excess of the surcharge caps will be deferred as a regulatory asset for recovery in CECONY’s next base rate cases. CECONY’s electric and gas rate plans for the three-year period January 2026 through December 2028 includes reconciliation of uncollectible expenses and late payment charges during the rate plan pursuant to which CECONY will calculate the annual difference between (i) its actual uncollectible expenses and late payment charges and (ii) the levels of uncollectible expenses and late payment charges provided in rates. In the event the actual net expenses (uncollectible expenses plus late payment charges) are below the amounts in rates, CECONY will defer the full variance as a regulatory liability and refund to customers via surcredit. In the event the actual net expenses are above the amounts in rates, CECONY will defer the full annual variance above $10 million ($8.5 million for electric and $1.5 million for gas) in 2026; above $15 million ($12.75 million for electric and $2.25 million for gas) in 2027, and above $20 million ($17.0 million for electric and $3.0 million for gas) in 2028; as a regulatory asset for recovery via surcharge. Annual surcharge recovery is subject to a cap that produces no more than a 0.5 percent total customer bill impact per commodity. Amounts in excess of the surcharge caps will be deferred for future recovery. O&R’s rate plan for the three-year period January 2025 through December 2027 includes reconciliation of uncollectible expenses and late payment charges that are subject to a combined annual threshold of $0.9 million and $0.5 million for electric and gas, respectively. Once the threshold is met, O&R will defer the variance between actual uncollectible expenses and late payment charges, and the level set forth in rates that is above the threshold. Recovery/refunds will be made via surcharge/surcredit. Surcharge recovery is subject to an annual cap that produces no more than a 0.5 percent total customer bill impact per commodity. Amounts in excess of the surcharge caps will be deferred as a regulatory asset for recovery in O&R’s next base rate cases. Although these regulatory mechanisms are currently in place, the Utilities’ ability to effectively manage their customer accounts receivable balances and obtain recovery in rates for their respective carrying costs and any related write-offs could have a material impact on the Companies’ businesses. In addition, a continued slow recovery of accounts receivable balances has impacted and is expected to continue to impact the Companies’ liquidity. See “Liquidity and Capital Resources,” below, and Note B and Note N to the financial statements in Item 8. The Utilities, in an effort to reduce aged accounts receivables balances, continue to execute on their integrated collections strategy, which includes, among other things, implementation of flexible payment arrangement options, enhanced targeted digital and mail communications to customers regarding collections and an increased presence of field collectors to support in-person account resolution. The Utilities have also strengthened their credit and collection efforts to better manage incoming inquiries and have instituted additional measures to manage outbound collection calls. ### Energy Affordability There has been heightened legislative activity and public policy discussions regarding energy affordability. Substantial investments are needed to support an increasingly decarbonized electric grid that the Utilities, regulators and stakeholders must balance with the need for affordable rates. While the Companies continue to monitor energy affordability concerns, they are unable to predict additional legislative, executive, or regulatory measures that may result from energy affordability concerns. See “Energy Affordability Programs” in Item 1. ### Clean Energy Goals The success of the Companies’ efforts to meet clean energy policy goals and the impact of energy consumers' efforts to meet such goals on CECONY’s electric, gas and steam businesses and O&R’s electric and gas businesses may impact the Companies’ future financial condition. The Utilities expect electric usage to increase and gas and steam usage to decrease in their service territories as laws and policies are enacted and implemented that aim to reduce the carbon intensity of the energy that is consumed in their respective jurisdictions. The Utilities’ and their regulators’ efforts to maintain electric reliability in their service territories as electric usage increases may also impact the Companies’ future financial condition. The long-term future of the Utilities’ gas businesses depends upon the role that natural gas or other gaseous fuels will play in facilitating New York State’s and New York City’s climate goals. In addition, the impact and costs from climate change impacts on the Utilities’ systems and the success of the Utilities’ efforts to maintain system reliability and manage service interruptions resulting from severe weather may impact the Companies’ future financial condition, results of operations and liquidity. See “Federal Regulation,” "Environmental Matters - Clean Energy Future" and "Environmental Matters - Climate Change" in Item 1. ### Con Edison Transmission Con Edison Transmission, through its New York Transco partnership and jointly with the New York Power Authority (NYPA), is developing the Propel NY Energy transmission project, a 90-mile electric transmission project that is expected to increase high voltage transmission connections between Long Island and the rest of New York State. See the table under "Con Edison Transmission," below. Con Edison Transmission also participates in competitive solicitations to develop additional electric projects. The success of Con Edison Transmission’s efforts in these competitive solicitations and to grow its electric transmission portfolio may impact Con Edison’s future capital requirements In January 2026, Con Edison Transmission completed the sale of approximately 40 percent of its approximately 6.6 percent interest in MVP to one of the founding members of MVP and expects to complete the sale of its remaining interest in MVP to another founding member during the first half of 2026 for total aggregate consideration of $357.5 million, subject to certain closing adjustments. Both Con Edison Transmission and CECONY are considering strategic alternatives with respect to their investments in Honeoye. See "Con Edison Transmission" in Item 1. Certain financial data of Con Edison’s businesses are presented below: *(Millions of Dollars, except percentages)* | | For the Year Ended December 31, 2025 Operating Revenues | | Net Income for Common Stock | | At December 31, 2025 Assets | | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | | CECONY | $15,651 | 93% | $1,906 | 94% | $69,316 | 93% | | O&R | 1,265 | 7% | 108 | 5% | 4,420 | 6% | | Total Utilities | 16,916 | 100% | 2,014 | 99% | 73,736 | 99% | | Con Edison Transmission | 4 | —% | 14 | 1% | 488 | 1% | | Other (a) | (2) | —% | (5) | —% | 379 | 1% | | **Total Con Edison** | **$16,918** | **100%** | **$2,023** | **100%** | **$74,603** | **101%** | (a) Other includes the parent company, Con Edison’s tax equity interests, consolidation adjustments and Broken Bow II, the deferred project that was classified as held for sale at December 31, 2024, with the sale and transfer completed in January 2025. See Note W and Note X to the financial statements in Item 8. ### One Big Beautiful Bill Act On July 4, 2025, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) was signed into law, containing a broad range of tax reform provisions, including extending and modifying certain key provisions of the federal Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, as enacted on December 22, 2017 (TCJA) and expanding certain incentives under the federal Inflation Reduction Act, as enacted on August 16, 2022 (IRA) while accelerating the phase-out of solar and wind credits. The Companies have assessed the potential impacts of the OBBBA and any such assessments may be impacted by future guidance to be issued by the Department of Treasury. However, based on management’s assessment, the provisions in the OBBBA are not expected to have a material impact on the Companies’ financial position, results of operations or liquidity. ### Inflation Reduction Act On August 16, 2022, the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) was signed into law and implemented a new corporate alternative minimum tax (CAMT) that imposes a 15 percent tax on modified GAAP net income. Pursuant to the IRA, corporations are entitled to a tax credit (minimum tax credit) to the extent the CAMT liability exceeds the regular tax liability. This amount can be carried forward indefinitely and used in future years when regular tax liability exceeds the CAMT liability. Beginning in 2024, based on the existing statute, the Companies are subject to and report the CAMT in their Consolidated Income Statements, Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and the Consolidated Balance Sheets. At December 31, 2025, Con Edison has a CAMT credit carryforward of $205 million ($213 million of which is for CECONY). For the year ended December 31, 2025, the Companies accrued a CAMT liability of $88 million ($109 million of which is for CECONY) before the application of general business credits, with an offsetting deferred tax asset representing the minimum tax credit carryforward. The deferred tax asset related to the minimum tax credit carryforward will be realized to the extent the Companies’ consolidated deferred tax liabilities exceed the minimum tax credit carryforward. The Companies’ deferred tax liabilities are expected to exceed the minimum tax credit carryforward for the foreseeable future and thus no valuation allowance is required. The Companies are continuing to assess the impacts of the IRA on their financial statements and will update estimates based on future guidance to be issued by the Department of the Treasury. On February 18, 2026, the IRS and the Department of Treasury issued Notice 2026-7, that provides additional interim guidance regarding the application of the CAMT and allows the Companies to deduct certain repair expenditures as a reduction to the Companies’ modified GAAP net income. This interim guidance is retroactive to the beginning of the IRA provisions in calculating the Companies’ CAMT liability. As a result of implementing these new guidelines, the Companies will file a quick refund claim by April 15, 2026 for the 2025 tax year and amend their federal tax return for the 2024 tax year. Con Edison expects to claim tax refunds from the IRS of approximately $45 million ($161 million for CECONY) and would reduce its CAMT credit carryover by approximately $181 million ($161 million for CECONY) and increase Con Edison’s general business credits carryforward by approximately $136 million. This guidance will significantly reduce the Companies’ CAMT liability going forward. ### New York Legislation In May 2025, New York adopted the 2025-2026 budget bill into law that included increases in payroll tax rates from 0.6 percent to 0.895 percent for CECONY and from 0.34 percent to 0.635 percent for O&R, effective July 1, 2025. In April 2021, New York passed a law that increased the corporate franchise tax rate on business income from 6.5 percent to 7.25 percent, retroactive to January 1, 2021, for taxpayers with taxable income greater than $5 million. The law also reinstated the business capital tax at 0.1875 percent, not to exceed a maximum tax liability of $5 million per taxpayer. New York requires a corporate franchise taxpayer to calculate and pay the highest amount of tax under the three alternative methods: a tax on business income; a tax on business capital; or a fixed dollar minimum. The provisions to increase the corporate franchise tax rate and reinstate a capital tax were scheduled to expire after 2023. In May 2023, New York passed a law that extended the increase in the corporate franchise tax rate from 6.5 percent to 7.25 percent for an additional three years, through tax year 2026 and extended the business capital tax through tax year 2026. New York also passed a law establishing a permanent rate of 30 percent for the metropolitan transportation business tax surcharge. Con Edison was not subject to the higher tax rate of 7.25 percent in 2025 and does not expect to be subject to the higher tax rate in 2026. ### Results of Operations Net income for common stock and earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 were as follows: *(Millions of Dollars, except per share amounts)* | | Net Income for Common Stock 2025 | 2024 | Earnings per Share 2025 | 2024 | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | | CECONY | $1,906 | $1,748 | $5.33 | $5.05 | | O&R | 108 | 104 | 0.30 | 0.30 | | Con Edison Transmission (a) | 14 | 45 | 0.04 | 0.13 | | Other (b) | (5) | (77) | (0.01) | (0.22) | | **Con Edison (c)** | **$2,023** | **$1,820** | **$5.66** | **$5.26** | (a) Net income for common stock and earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2025 includes $9 million or $0.03 a share (after-tax) for accretion of the basis difference of Con Edison's equity investment in MVP. Net Income for common stock and earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2025 also include $(10) million or $(0.03) a share (after-tax) for the impairment loss related to Con Edison’s investment in Honeoye. Net Income for common stock and earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2025 also include $(7) million or $(0.02) a share (net of federal income taxes) for the remeasurement of deferred state income taxes related to the previously recorded impairment of MVP. Net Income for common stock and earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2025 also includes $(12) million or $(0.03) a share (after-tax) for transaction costs associated with strategic alternatives review of Con Edison's equity investments in MVP and Honeoye. See “Investment in MVP” in Note A to the financial statements in Item 8. Net income for common stock and earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2024 includes $5 million or $0.01 a share (after-tax) for accretion of the basis difference of Con Edison's equity investment in MVP. See “Investment in MVP” in Note A to the financial statements in Item 8. (b) Other includes the parent company, Con Edison’s tax equity interests, consolidation adjustments and Broken Bow II, the deferred project that was classified as held for sale at December 31, 2024, with the sale and transfer completed in January 2025. Net Income for common stock and earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2025 also includes $3 million or $0.01 a share (after-tax) for the gain on the sale of an interest in a solar electric production project. Net income for common stock for the year ended December 31, 2025 also includes $1 million (after-tax) for an adjustment related to the sale of all of the stock of the Clean Energy Businesses and $1 million (after-tax) on the effects of HLBV accounting for tax equity interests in certain renewable electric projects. See Note X to the financial statements in Item 8. Net income for common stock and earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2024 includes $(46) million (after-tax) or $(0.13) a share (after-tax) for adjustments related to the sale of all of the stock of the Clean Energy Businesses. Net income for common stock and earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2024 also includes $(3) million (after-tax) or $(0.01) a share (after-tax) of income tax impact on the effects of HLBV accounting for tax equity interests in certain renewable electric projects. Impact of the sale of the Clean Energy Businesses on the changes in state unitary tax apportionments (net of federal taxes) for the year ended December 31, 2024 is $(3 million) or $(0.01) per share. See Note X to the financial statements in Item 8. (c) Earnings per share on a diluted basis were $5.64 a share and $5.24 a share in 2025 and 2024, respectively. See "Earnings Per Common Share" in Note A to the financial statements in Item 8. The following table presents the estimated effect of major factors on earnings per share and net income for common stock for the year ended December 31, 2025 as compared with 2024. *Variation for the Year Ended December 31, 2025 vs. 2024* | CECONY (a) | Net Income for Common Stock (Net of Tax) (Millions of Dollars) | Earnings per Share | | --- | ---: | ---: | | Higher electric rate base | $97 | $0.28 | | Higher income from allowance for funds used during construction | 31 | 0.09 | | Higher gas rate base | 20 | 0.06 | | Lower other corporate expenses | 3 | 0.01 | | Dilutive effect of issuance of common shares | — | (0.18) | | Higher interest expense | (38) | (0.11) | | Impact of the May 2024 NYSPSC order denying CECONY's request to capitalize costs to implement its new customer billing and information system | 37 | 0.11 | | Other | 8 | 0.02 | | Total CECONY | 158 | 0.28 | | **O&R (a)** | | | | Gas base rate increase | 10 | 0.03 | | Higher interest expense on long-term debt | (6) | (0.02) | | Other | — | (0.01) | | Total O&R | 4 | — | | **Con Edison Transmission** | | | | Transaction costs associated with the strategic alternatives review of Con Edison's equity investments in MVP and Honeoye | (12) | (0.03) | | Impairment loss related to investment in Honeoye | (10) | (0.03) | | Remeasurement of deferred state income taxes related to the previously recorded impairment of MVP | (7) | (0.02) | | Income tax adjustment in 2024 due to AFUDC from MVP | (5) | (0.02) | | Accretion of the basis difference of Con Edison's equity investment in MVP | 4 | 0.02 | | Other | (1) | (0.01) | | Total Con Edison Transmission | (31) | (0.09) | | **Other, including parent company expenses (b)** | | | | Loss (gain) and other impacts related to the sale of the Clean Energy Businesses | 51 | 0.14 | | Lower accrued commitment to Consolidated Edison Foundation, Inc. | 9 | 0.03 | | Lower taxes other than income taxes | 5 | 0.01 | | HLBV effects | 4 | 0.01 | | Gain on the sale of an interest in a solar electric production project | 3 | 0.01 | | Other | — | 0.01 | | Total Other, including parent company expenses | 72 | 0.21 | | Total Reported (GAAP basis) | $203 | $0.40 | | (a)Under the revenue decoupling mechanisms in the Utilities’ New York electric and gas rate plans revenues are generally not affected by changes in delivery volumes from levels assumed when rates were approved. The Utilities' gas and CECONY’s steam sales are subject to a weather normalization clause, as a result of which, delivery revenues reflect normal weather conditions during the heating season. In general, the Utilities recover on a current basis the fuel, gas purchased for resale and purchased power costs they incur in supplying energy to their full-service customers. Accordingly, such costs do not generally affect Con Edison’s results of operations. (b)Other includes the parent company, Con Edison's tax equity interests, consolidation adjustments and Broken Bow II, the deferred project that was classified as held for sale at December 31, 2024, with the sale and transfer completed in January 2025. See Note W to the financial statements in Item 8. | | | 58 CON EDISON ANNUAL REPORT 2025 The Companies’ other operations and maintenance expenses for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 were as follows: | (Millions of Dollars) CECONY | 2025 | 2024 | | --- | ---: | ---: | | Operations | $2,002 | $1,918 | | Pensions and other postretirement benefits | 28 | 138 | | Health care and other benefits | 212 | 192 | | Regulatory fees and assessments (a) | 467 | 461 | | Other (b) | 685 | 644 | | Total CECONY | 3,394 | 3,353 | | O&R | 380 | 387 | | Con Edison Transmission | 29 | 11 | | Other (c) | 1 | — | | **Total other operations and maintenance expenses** | **$3,804** | **$3,751** | (a) Includes Demand Side Management, System Benefit Charges and Public Service Law 18A assessments that are collected in revenues. (b) Other includes the impact of the May 2024 NYSPSC order denying CECONY's request to capitalize costs to implement its new customer billing and information system in 2024 ($51 million). (c) Other includes the parent company, Con Edison’s tax equity interests, consolidation adjustments and Broken Bow II, the deferred project that was classified as held for sale at December 31, 2024, with the sale and transfer completed in January 2025. See Note X to the financial statements in Item 8. Con Edison’s principal business segments are CECONY’s regulated utility activities, O&R’s regulated utility activities and Con Edison Transmission. CECONY’s principal business segments are its regulated electric, gas and steam utility activities. A discussion of the results of operations by principal business segment for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 follows. For additional business segment financial information, see Note P to the financial statements in Item 8. The Companies’ results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 were: | (Millions of Dollars) | CECONY 2025 | 2024 | O&R 2025 | 2024 | Con Edison Transmission 2025 | 2024 | Other (a) 2025 | 2024 | Con Edison (b) 2025 | 2024 | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Operating revenues | $15,651 | $14,129 | $1,265 | $1,125 | $4 | $4 | $(2) | $(2) | $16,918 | $15,256 | | Purchased power | 2,566 | 2,279 | 379 | 290 | — | — | — | — | 2,945 | 2,569 | | Fuel | 261 | 170 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 261 | 170 | | Gas purchased for resale | 770 | 524 | 129 | 75 | — | — | — | — | 899 | 599 | | Other operations and maintenance | 3,394 | 3,353 | 380 | 387 | 29 | 11 | 1 | — | 3,804 | 3,751 | | Depreciation and amortization | 2,193 | 2,037 | 127 | 117 | 1 | 1 | — | — | 2,321 | 2,155 | | Taxes, other than income taxes | 3,655 | 3,173 | 96 | 95 | — | — | 6 | 12 | 3,757 | 3,280 | | Loss on sale of the Clean Energy Businesses | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | (62) | — | (62) | | Gain on the sale of an interest in a solar electric production project | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 | — | 4 | — | | Operating income (loss) | $2,812 | $2,593 | $154 | $161 | $(26) | $(8) | $(5) | $(76) | $2,935 | $2,670 | | Other income (deductions) | 797 | 578 | 46 | 32 | 46 | 61 | 6 | (16) | 895 | 655 | | Net interest expense | 1,159 | 1,109 | 65 | 60 | — | — | 9 | 18 | 1,233 | 1,187 | | Income before income tax expense (benefit) | 2,450 | 2,062 | 135 | 133 | 20 | 53 | (8) | (110) | 2,597 | 2,138 | | Income tax expense (benefit) | 544 | 314 | 27 | 29 | 9 | 8 | (6) | (33) | 574 | 318 | | Net income (loss) | $1,906 | $1,748 | $108 | $104 | $11 | $45 | $(2) | $(77) | $2,023 | $1,820 | | Income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interest | — | — | — | — | 3 | — | (3) | — | — | — | | **Net income (loss) from common stock** | **$1,906** | **$1,748** | **$108** | **$104** | **$14** | **$45** | **$(5)** | **$(77)** | **$2,023** | **$1,820** | (a) Other includes the parent company, Con Edison’s tax equity interests, consolidation adjustments and Broken Bow II, the deferred project that was classified as held for sale at December 31, 2024, with the sale and transfer completed in January 2025. See Note X to the financial statements in Item 8. (b) Represents the consolidated results of operations of Con Edison and its businesses. ### Year Ended December 31, 2025 Compared with Year Ended December 31, 2024 ### CECONY | (Millions of Dollars) | For the Year Ended December 31, 2025 Electric | Gas | Steam | 2025 Total | For the Year Ended December 31, 2024 Electric | Gas | Steam | 2024 Total | 2025-2024 Variation | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Operating revenues | $11,670 | $3,278 | $703 | $15,651 | $10,717 | $2,834 | $578 | $14,129 | $1,522 | | Purchased power | 2,525 | — | 41 | 2,566 | 2,248 | — | 31 | 2,279 | 287 | | Fuel | 173 | — | 88 | 261 | 126 | — | 44 | 170 | 91 | | Gas purchased for resale | — | 770 | — | 770 | — | 524 | — | 524 | 246 | | Other operations and maintenance | 2,614 | 556 | 224 | 3,394 | 2,622 | 528 | 203 | 3,353 | 41 | | Depreciation and amortization | 1,597 | 482 | 114 | 2,193 | 1,471 | 458 | 108 | 2,037 | 156 | | Taxes, other than income taxes | 2,705 | 719 | 231 | 3,655 | 2,418 | 576 | 179 | 3,173 | 482 | | **Operating income** | **$2,056** | **$751** | **$5** | **$2,812** | **$1,832** | **$748** | **$13** | **$2,593** | **$219** | ### Electric CECONY’s results of electric operations for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared with the year ended December 31, 2024 were as follows: | (Millions of Dollars) | For the Years Ended December 31, 2025 | 2024 | Variation | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Operating revenues | $11,670 | $10,717 | $953 | | Purchased power | 2,525 | 2,248 | 277 | | Fuel | 173 | 126 | 47 | | Other operations and maintenance | 2,614 | 2,622 | (8) | | Depreciation and amortization | 1,597 | 1,471 | 126 | | Taxes, other than income taxes | 2,705 | 2,418 | 287 | | **Electric operating income** | **$2,056** | **$1,832** | **$224** | CECONY’s electric sales and deliveries in 2025 compared with 2024 were: | Description | Millions of kWh Delivered For the Years Ended December 31, 2025 | December 31, 2024 | Variation | Percent Variation | | Revenues in Millions (a) For the Years Ended December 31, 2025 | December 31, 2024 | Variation | Percent Variation | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Residential/Religious (b) | 12,437 | 11,890 | 547 | 4.6% | | $4,569 | $4,240 | $329 | 7.8% | | Commercial/Industrial | 10,940 | 10,267 | 673 | 6.6 | | 3,318 | 2,911 | 407 | 14.0 | | Retail choice customers | 20,785 | 20,715 | 70 | 0.3 | | 2,777 | 2,697 | 80 | 3.0 | | NYPA, Municipal Agency and other sales | 9,636 | 9,555 | 81 | 0.8 | | 910 | 876 | 34 | 3.9 | | Other operating revenues (c) | — | — | — | — | | 96 | (7) | 103 | Large | | **Total** | **53,798** | **52,427** | **1,371** | **2.6%** | **(d)** | **$11,670** | **$10,717** | **$953** | **8.9%** | (a) Revenues from electric sales are subject to a revenue decoupling mechanism, as a result of which, delivery revenues are generally not affected by changes in delivery volumes from levels assumed when rates were approved. (b) “Residential/Religious” generally includes single-family dwellings, individual apartments in multi-family dwellings, religious organizations and certain other not-for-profit organizations. (c) Other electric operating revenues generally reflect changes in the revenue decoupling mechanism current asset or regulatory liability and changes in regulatory assets and liabilities in accordance with other provisions of CECONY’s rate plan. (d) After adjusting for variations, primarily weather and billing days, electric delivery volumes in CECONY’s service area increased 2.5 percent in 2025 compared with 2024. *Operating revenues* increased $953 million in 2025 compared with 2024 primarily due to an increase in revenues from the electric rate plan ($584 million), higher purchased power expenses ($277 million) and higher fuel expenses ($47 million). *Purchased power* expenses increased $277 million in 2025 compared with 2024 due to higher unit costs ($217 million) and higher purchased volume ($60 million). *Fuel* expenses increased $47 million in 2025 compared with 2024 due to higher unit costs ($56 million), offset in part by lower purchased volumes from the company’s electric generating facilities ($9 million). *Other operations and maintenance* expenses decreased $8 million in 2025 compared with 2024 primarily due to the impact of the May 2024 NYSPSC order denying CECONY's request to capitalize costs to implement its new customer billing and information system ($37 million), offset in part by higher costs for injuries and damages ($23 million) and an increase in municipal infrastructure support ($7 million). *Depreciation and amortization expenses* increased $126 million in 2025 compared with 2024 primarily due to higher electric utility plant balances. *Taxes, other than income taxes* increased $287 million in 2025 compared with 2024 primarily due to higher property taxes ($236 million), a lower deferral of under-collected property taxes ($31 million) and higher other taxes ($12 million). ### Gas CECONY’s results of gas operations for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared with the year ended December 31, 2024 were as follows: | (Millions of Dollars) | For the Years Ended December 31, 2025 | 2024 | Variation | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Operating revenues | $3,278 | $2,834 | $444 | | Gas purchased for resale | 770 | 524 | 246 | | Other operations and maintenance | 556 | 528 | 28 | | Depreciation and amortization | 482 | 458 | 24 | | Taxes, other than income taxes | 719 | 576 | 143 | | **Gas operating income** | **$751** | **$748** | **$3** | CECONY’s gas sales and deliveries, excluding off-system sales, in 2025 compared with 2024 were: | Description | Thousands of Dt Delivered For the Years Ended December 31, 2025 | December 31, 2024 | Variation | Percent Variation | | Revenues in Millions (a) For the Years Ended December 31, 2025 | December 31, 2024 | Variation | Percent Variation | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Residential | 52,015 | 44,280 | 7,735 | 17.5% | | $1,352 | $1,148 | $204 | 17.8% | | General | 37,514 | 30,223 | 7,291 | 24.1 | | 819 | 640 | 179 | 28.0 | | Firm transportation | 79,874 | 71,521 | 8,353 | 11.7 | | 965 | 914 | 51 | 5.6 | | **Total firm sales and transportation** | **169,403** | **146,024** | **23,379** | **16.0** | **(b)** | **3,136** | **2,702** | **434** | **16.1** | | Interruptible sales | 3,574 | 2,959 | 615 | 20.8% | | 28 | 28 | — | — | | NYPA | 40,877 | 56,291 | (15,414) | (27.4) | | 2 | 2 | — | — | | Generation plants | 66,730 | 61,250 | 5,480 | 8.9 | | 22 | 22 | — | — | | Other | 18,408 | 18,680 | (272) | (1.5) | | 40 | 38 | 2 | 5.3 | | Other operating revenues (c) | — | — | — | — | | 50 | 42 | 8 | 19.0 | | **Total** | **298,992** | **285,204** | **13,788** | **4.8%** | | **$3,278** | **$2,834** | **$444** | **15.7%** | (a) Revenues from gas sales are subject to a weather normalization clause and a revenue decoupling mechanism, as a result of which, delivery revenues are generally not affected by changes in delivery volumes from levels assumed when rates were approved. (b) After adjusting for variations, primarily billing days, firm gas sales and transportation volumes in CECONY’s service area increased 6.5 percent in 2025 compared with 2024. (c) Other gas operating revenues generally reflect changes in the revenue decoupling mechanism and weather normalization clause current asset or regulatory liability and changes in regulatory assets and liabilities in accordance with other provisions of CECONY’s rate plan. *Operating revenues* increased $444 million in 2025 compared with 2024 primarily due to higher gas purchased for resale expense ($246 million) and an increase in gas revenues under the company's gas rate plan ($185 million). *Gas purchased for resale* increased $246 million in 2025 compared with 2024 due to higher unit costs ($236 million) and higher purchased volumes ($10 million). *Other operations and maintenance* expenses increased $28 million in 2025 compared with 2024 primarily due to the higher gas operations maintenance activities ($12 million), total surcharges for assessments and fees that are collected in revenues from customers ($8 million) and higher uncollectible expenses ($6 million). *Depreciation and amortization expenses* increased $24 million in 2025 compared with 2024 primarily due to higher gas utility plant balances. *Taxes, other than income taxes* increased $143 million in 2025 compared with 2024 primarily due to a lower deferral of under-collected property taxes ($90 million), higher property taxes ($31 million) and higher state and local revenue taxes ($11 million). ### Steam CECONY’s results of steam operations for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared with the year ended December 31, 2024 were as follows: | (Millions of Dollars) | For the Years Ended December 31, 2025 | 2024 | Variation | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Operating revenues | $703 | $578 | $125 | | Purchased power | 41 | 31 | 10 | | Fuel | 88 | 44 | 44 | | Other operations and maintenance | 224 | 203 | 21 | | Depreciation and amortization | 114 | 108 | 6 | | Taxes, other than income taxes | 231 | 179 | 52 | | **Steam operating income** | **$5** | **$13** | **$(8)** | CECONY’s steam sales and deliveries in 2025 compared with 2024 were: | Description | Millions of Pounds Delivered For the Years Ended December 31, 2025 | December 31, 2024 | Variation | Percent Variation | | Revenues in Millions (a) For the Years Ended December 31, 2025 | December 31, 2024 | Variation | Percent Variation | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | | General | 502 | 428 | 74 | 17.3% | | $36 | $31 | $5 | 16.1% | | Apartment house | 5,303 | 4,880 | 423 | 8.7 | | 199 | 162 | 37 | 22.8 | | Annual power | 11,170 | 10,186 | 984 | 9.7 | | 470 | 395 | 75 | 19.0 | | Other operating revenues (b) | — | — | — | — | | (2) | (10) | 8 | 80.0 | | **Total** | **16,975** | **15,494** | **1,481** | **9.6%** | **(c)** | **$703** | **$578** | **$125** | **21.6%** | (a) Revenues from steam sales are subject to a weather normalization clause, as a result of which, delivery revenues reflect normal weather conditions during the heating season. (b) Other steam operating revenues generally reflect changes in regulatory assets and liabilities in accordance with CECONY’s rate plan. (c) After adjusting for variations, primarily weather and billing days, steam sales and deliveries in the company’s service area decreased 3.4 percent in 2025 compared with 2024. *Operating revenues* increased $125 million in 2025 compared with 2024 primarily due to the benefit from the steam rate plan ($67 million), higher fuel expenses ($44 million) and higher purchased power expenses ($10 million). *Purchased power* expenses increased $10 million in 2025 compared with 2024 due to higher unit costs ($14 million), offset in part by lower purchased volumes ($4 million). *Fuel* expenses increased $44 million in 2025 compared with 2024 due to higher unit costs ($38 million) and higher purchased volumes used from the company’s steam generating facilities ($6 million). *Other operations and maintenance* expenses increased $21 million in 2025 compared with 2024 primarily due to higher steam operations maintenance activities ($9 million), higher costs for pension and other postretirement benefits, reflecting reconciliation to the rate plan level ($8 million) and higher total surcharges for assessments and fees that are collected in revenues from customers ($3 million). *Depreciation and amortization expenses* increased $6 million in 2025 compared with 2024 primarily due to higher steam utility plant balances. *Taxes, other than income taxes* increased $52 million in 2025 compared with 2024 primarily due to a lower deferral of under-collected property taxes ($50 million) and higher state and local revenue taxes ($2 million). ### Taxes, Other Than Income Taxes At $3,655 million, taxes other than income taxes remain one of CECONY’s largest operating expenses. The principal components of, and variations in, taxes other than income taxes were: | (Millions of Dollars) | For the Years Ended December 31, 2025 | | 2024 | | Variation | | --- | ---: | --- | ---: | --- | ---: | | Property taxes | $3,004 | | $2,738 | | $266 | | State and local taxes related to revenue receipts | 445 | | 429 | | 16 | | Payroll taxes | 91 | | 83 | | 8 | | Other taxes (b) | 115 | | (77) | | 192 | | **Total** | **$3,655** | (a) | **$3,173** | (a) | **$482** | (a) Including sales tax on customers’ bills, total taxes other than income taxes in 2025 and 2024 were $4,488 million and $3,915 million, respectively. (b) Including the deferral of under-collected property taxes in 2025 and 2024 of $88 million and $83 million, respectively. ### Other Income Other income increased $219 million in 2025 compared with 2024 primarily due to higher credits associated with components of pension and other postretirement benefits other than service cost ($204 million) and an increase in AFUDC ($31 million), offset in part by a decrease in the revenue decoupling mechanism interest accrual ($7 million). ### Net Interest Expense Net interest expense increased $50 million in 2025 compared with 2024 primarily due to higher interest expense for long-term debt ($82 million), primarily attributable to timing of long-term debt issuances issued in 2024, offset in part by lower interest on commercial paper ($30 million) and a decrease in the carrying charges and interest on regulatory liability balances ($6 million). ### Income Tax Expense Income taxes increased $230 million in 2025 compared with 2024 primarily due to lower amortization of excess deferred federal income taxes ($153 million) and higher income before income tax expense ($102 million), offset in part by higher write-offs of uncollectible accounts ($19 million). ### O&R | (Millions of Dollars) | For the Year Ended December 31, 2025 Electric | Gas | 2025 Total | For the Year Ended December 31, 2024 Electric | Gas | 2024 Total | 2025-2024 Variation | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Operating revenues | $934 | $331 | $1,265 | $852 | $273 | $1,125 | $140 | | Purchased power | 379 | — | 379 | 290 | — | 290 | 89 | | Gas purchased for resale | — | 129 | 129 | — | 75 | 75 | 54 | | Other operations and maintenance | 297 | 83 | 380 | 306 | 81 | 387 | (7) | | Depreciation and amortization | 87 | 40 | 127 | 82 | 35 | 117 | 10 | | Taxes, other than income taxes | 62 | 34 | 96 | 62 | 33 | 95 | 1 | | **Operating income** | **$109** | **$45** | **$154** | **$112** | **$49** | **$161** | **$(7)** | ### Electric O&R’s results of electric operations for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared with the year ended December 31, 2024 were as follows: | (Millions of Dollars) | For the Years Ended December 31, 2025 | 2024 | Variation | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Operating revenues | $934 | $852 | $82 | | Purchased power | 379 | 290 | 89 | | Other operations and maintenance | 297 | 306 | (9) | | Depreciation and amortization | 87 | 82 | 5 | | Taxes, other than income taxes | 62 | 62 | — | | **Electric operating income** | **$109** | **$112** | **$(3)** | 64 CON EDISON ANNUAL REPORT 2025 O&R’s electric sales and deliveries in 2025 compared with 2024 were: | Description | Millions of kWh Delivered For the Years Ended December 31, 2025 | December 31, 2024 | Variation | Percent Variation | | Revenues in Millions (a) For the Years Ended December 31, 2025 | December 31, 2024 | Variation | Percent Variation | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Residential/Religious (b) | 2,307 | 2,133 | 174 | 8.2% | | $584 | $474 | $110 | 23.2% | | Commercial/Industrial | 1,118 | 965 | 153 | 15.9 | | 210 | 167 | 43 | 25.7 | | Retail choice customers | 2,234 | 2,522 | (288) | (11.4) | | 159 | 198 | (39) | (19.7) | | Public authorities | 116 | 114 | 2 | 1.8 | | 15 | 12 | 3 | 25.0 | | Other operating revenues (c) | — | — | — | — | | (34) | 1 | (35) | Large | | **Total** | **5,775** | **5,734** | **41** | **0.7%** | **(d)** | **$934** | **$852** | **$82** | **9.6%** | (a) O&R’s New York electric delivery revenues are subject to a revenue decoupling mechanism, as a result of which delivery revenues are generally not affected by changes in delivery volumes from levels assumed when rates were approved. The majority of O&R’s electric distribution revenues in New Jersey are subject to a conservation incentive program, as a result of which distribution revenues are generally not affected by changes in delivery volumes from levels assumed when rates were approved. O&R’s electric transmission revenues in New Jersey are not subject to a conservation incentive program, and as a result, changes in such volumes do impact revenues. (b) “Residential/Religious” generally includes single-family dwellings, individual apartments in multi-family dwellings, religious organizations and certain other not-for-profit organizations. (c) Other electric operating revenues generally reflect changes in regulatory assets and liabilities in accordance with O&R’s electric rate plan. (d) After adjusting for weather and other variations, electric delivery volumes in O&R’s service area increased 2.2 percent in 2025 compared with 2024. *Operating revenues* increased $82 million in 2025 compared with 2024 primarily due to higher purchased power expenses ($89 million), offset in part by lower revenues from the New York electric rate plan ($7 million). *Purchased power* expenses increased $89 million in 2025 compared with 2024 due to higher unit costs ($56 million) and higher purchased volumes ($33 million). *Other operations and maintenance* expenses decreased $9 million in 2025 compared with 2024 primarily due to lower non-deferred storm costs. *Depreciation and amortization expenses* increased $5 million in 2025 compared with 2024 primarily due to higher electric utility plant balances. ### Gas O&R’s results of gas operations for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared with the year ended December 31, 2024 were as follows: | (Millions of Dollars) | For the Years Ended December 31, 2025 | 2024 | Variation | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Operating revenues | $331 | $273 | $58 | | Gas purchased for resale | 129 | 75 | 54 | | Other operations and maintenance | 83 | 81 | 2 | | Depreciation and amortization | 40 | 35 | 5 | | Taxes, other than income taxes | 34 | 33 | 1 | | **Gas operating income** | **$45** | **$49** | **$(4)** | O&R’s gas sales and deliveries, excluding off-system sales, in 2025 compared with 2024 were: | Description | Thousands of Dt Delivered For the Years Ended December 31, 2025 | December 31, 2024 | Variation | Percent Variation | | Revenues in Millions (a) For the Years Ended December 31, 2025 | December 31, 2024 | Variation | Percent Variation | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Residential | 13,578 | 10,749 | 2,829 | 26.3% | | $237 | $166 | $71 | 42.8% | | General | 2,980 | 1,767 | 1,213 | 68.6 | | 40 | 21 | 19 | 90.5 | | Firm transportation | 5,300 | 4,623 | 677 | 14.6 | | 41 | 34 | 7 | 20.6 | | **Total firm sales and transportation** | **21,858** | **17,139** | **4,719** | **27.5** | **(b)** | **318** | **221** | **97** | **43.9** | | Interruptible sales | 3,630 | 3,712 | (82) | (2.2) | | 7 | 7 | — | — | | Generation plants | 2 | 10 | (8) | (80.0) | | — | — | — | — | | Other | 744 | 710 | 34 | 4.8 | | 1 | 1 | — | — | | Other gas revenues | — | — | — | — | | 5 | 44 | (39) | (88.6) | | **Total** | **26,234** | **21,571** | **4,663** | **21.6%** | | **$331** | **$273** | **$58** | **21.2%** | (a) Revenues from New York gas sales are subject to a weather normalization clause and a revenue decoupling mechanism, as a result of which, delivery revenues are generally not affected by changes in delivery volumes from levels assumed when rates were approved. (b) After adjusting for weather and other variations, firm sales and transportation volumes in O&R’s service area increased 1.9 percent in 2025 compared with 2024. *Operating revenues* increased $58 million in 2025 compared with 2024 primarily due to higher gas purchased for resale ($54 million) and higher revenues from the New York gas rate plan ($1 million). *Gas purchased for resale* increased $54 million in 2025 compared with 2024 due to higher unit costs ($33 million) and higher purchased volumes ($21 million). *Depreciation and amortization expenses* increased $5 million in 2025 compared with 2024 primarily due to higher gas utility plant balances. ### Taxes, Other Than Income Taxes Taxes, other than income taxes, remained consistent in 2025 compared with 2024. The principal components of taxes, other than income taxes, were: | (Millions of Dollars) | For the Years Ended December 31, 2025 | | 2024 | | Variation | | --- | ---: | --- | ---: | --- | ---: | | Property taxes | $72 | | $73 | | $(1) | | State and local taxes related to revenue receipts | 14 | | 13 | | 1 | | Payroll taxes | 10 | | 9 | | 1 | | **Total** | **$96** | **(a)** | **$95** | **(a)** | **$1** | (a) Including sales tax on customers’ bills, total taxes other than income taxes in 2025 and 2024 were $134 million and $127 million, respectively. ### Other Income Other income increased $14 million in 2025 compared with 2024 primarily due to higher credits associated with components of pension and other postretirement benefits other than service cost ($14 million). ### Net Interest Expense Net interest expense increased $5 million in 2025 compared with 2024 primarily due to higher interest expense for long-term debt due to higher debt balances ($9 million). ### Con Edison Transmission ### Other Income (Deductions) Other deductions decreased $15 million in 2025 compared with 2024 primarily due to transaction costs associated with the strategic alternatives review of Con Edison's equity investments in MVP and Honeoye ($17 million). ### Other ### Taxes, Other Than Income Taxes Taxes, other than income taxes decreased $6 million in 2025 compared with 2024 primarily due to a decrease in the New York State Capital Tax ($7 million). ### Other Income (Deductions) Other income increased $22 million in 2025 compared with 2024 primarily due to the 2024 accrued commitment to the Consolidated Edison Foundation, Inc. ($12 million) and the effects of HLBV accounting for tax equity interests in certain renewable electric projects ($5 million). ### Income Tax Expense Income taxes increased $27 million in 2025 compared with 2024 primarily due to higher income before income tax expense ($21 million) and the absence of production tax credits in 2025 related to the Broken Bow II wind project ($6 million). ### Liquidity and Capital Resources The Companies monitor the financial markets closely, including borrowing rates and daily cash collections. Increases in aged accounts receivable balances, inflationary pressure and higher interest rates have increased the amount of capital needed by the Utilities and the costs of such capital. See "Interest Rate Risk," below, "Aged Accounts Receivable Balances," above and "Capital Resources," below. Con Edison and the Utilities have a $2,500 million revolving credit agreement (the Credit Agreement) in place under which banks are committed to provide loans on a revolving credit basis until March 2029, unless extended for an additional one-year term, subject to certain conditions. CECONY has a $500 million 364-day revolving credit agreement (the CECONY Credit Agreement) in place under which banks are committed to provide loans on a revolving credit basis until March 2026, subject to certain conditions. Con Edison and the Utilities have not entered into any loans under the Credit Agreement and CECONY has not entered into any loans under the CECONY Credit Agreement. In November 2025, CECONY repaid at maturity $700 million pursuant to a 364-Day Senior Unsecured Delayed Draw Term Loan Credit Agreement entered into by the company in November 2024. Also in November 2025, CECONY borrowed $500 million at a variable rate under a 364-Day Senior Unsecured Term Loan Credit Agreement entered into by the company in November 2025 (the CECONY Term Loan Credit Agreement). The term loan matures in November 2026. CECONY has the option to prepay the term loan issued under the CECONY Term Loan Credit Agreement prior to maturity. The FERC has authorized CECONY through April 30, 2026 and O&R through July 31, 2026 to issue short-term borrowings for a period of not more than 12 months, in an amount not to exceed $4,000 million and $250 million, respectively, at prevailing market rates. The Companies’ liquidity reflects cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities, as shown on their respective consolidated statements of cash flows and as discussed below. The principal factors affecting Con Edison’s liquidity are its investments in the Utilities and Con Edison Transmission, the dividends it pays to its shareholders and the dividends it receives from its subsidiaries and cash flows from financing activities discussed below. The principal factors affecting CECONY’s liquidity are its cash flows from operating activities, cash used in investing activities (including capital expenditures), the dividends it pays to Con Edison and cash flows from financing activities discussed below. The Companies generally maintain minimal cash balances and use short-term borrowings to meet their working capital needs and other cash requirements. The Companies repay their short-term borrowings using funds from long-term financings and operating activities. The Utilities’ cost of capital, including working capital, is reflected in the rates they charge to their customers. Each of the Companies believes that it will be able to meet its reasonably likely short-term and long-term cash requirements. See “The Companies Require Access To Capital Markets To Satisfy Funding Requirements,” "Changes To Tax Laws Could Adversely Affect the Companies," “The Companies May be Adversely Affected by Changes to the Utilities’ Rate Plans,” “The Companies Face Risks Related to Health Epidemic And Other Outbreaks,” and “The Companies Also Face Other Risks That Are Beyond Their Control” in Item 1A, and “Capital Requirements and Resources” in Item 1. The Companies’ cash, temporary cash investments and restricted cash resulting from operating, investing and financing activities for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 are summarized as follows: | (Millions of Dollars) | CECONY 2025 | 2024 | O&R 2025 | 2024 | Con Edison Transmission 2025 | 2024 | Other (a)(b) 2025 | 2024 | Con Edison (b) 2025 | 2024 | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Operating activities | $4,529 | $3,358 | $249 | $153 | $53 | $30 | $(31) | $73 | $4,800 | $3,614 | | Investing activities | (4,800) | (4,923) | (445) | (321) | (50) | (29) | 46 | — | (5,249) | (5,273) | | Financing activities | 598 | 1,681 | 182 | 183 | (7) | (3) | (27) | (64) | 746 | 1,797 | | Net change for the period | 327 | 116 | (14) | 15 | (4) | (2) | (12) | 9 | 297 | 138 | | Balance at beginning of period | 1,254 | 1,138 | 38 | 23 | 23 | 25 | 18 | 9 | 1,333 | 1,195 | | Balance at end of period (c) | $1,581 | $1,254 | $24 | $38 | $19 | $23 | $6 | $18 | $1,630 | $1,333 | | Less:Cash balances held for sale (a) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 9 | — | 9 | | Balance at end of period excluding held for sale | $1,581 | $1,254 | $24 | $38 | $19 | $23 | $6 | $9 | $1,630 | $1,324 | (a) Other includes the parent company, Con Edison’s tax equity interests, consolidation adjustments and Broken Bow II, the deferred project held for sale at December 31, 2024, with the sale and transfer completed in January 2025. See Note X to the financial statements in Item 8. (b) Represents the consolidated results of operations of Con Edison and its businesses. (c) See "Reconciliation of Cash, Temporary Cash Investments and Restricted Cash" in Note A to the financial statements in Item 8. ### Cash Flows from Operating Activities The Utilities’ cash flows from operating activities primarily reflect their energy sales and deliveries and cost of operations. The volume of energy sales and deliveries is primarily affected by factors external to the Utilities, such as customer demand, weather, market prices for energy and economic conditions. Measures that promote distributed energy resources, such as distributed generation, demand reduction and energy efficiency, also affect the volume of energy sales and deliveries. See "Competition" and "Environmental Matters – Clean Energy Future" and “Environmental Matters – Climate Change” in Item 1. Pursuant to their rate plans, the Utilities have recovered from customers a portion of the tax liability they will pay in the future as a result of temporary differences between the book and tax basis of assets and liabilities. These temporary differences affect the timing of cash flows, but not net income, as the Companies are required to record deferred tax assets and liabilities at the current corporate tax rate for the temporary differences. For the Utilities, credits to their customers of the net benefits of the TCJA, including the reduction of the corporate tax rate to 21 percent, decrease cash flows from operating activities. Pursuant to their rate plans, the Utilities also recover from customers the amount of property taxes they will pay. The payment of property taxes by the Utilities affects the timing of cash flows and increases the amount of short-term borrowings issued by the Utilities when property taxes are due and as property taxes increase, but generally does not impact net income. See “Changes To Tax Laws Could Adversely Affect the Companies” in Item 1A, “Federal Income Tax” in Note A, “Rate Plans” in Note B, “Other Regulatory Matters” in Note B and Note L to the financial statements in Item 8. In general, the Utilities suspended service disconnections during the COVID-19 pandemic and have since resumed such activities in accordance with applicable law. At December 31, 2025, CECONY’s and O&R’s customer accounts receivables balances of $2,970 million and $120 million, respectively, included aged accounts receivables (balances outstanding in excess of 60 days) of $1,427 million and $27 million, respectively. A continued slow recovery of accounts receivable balances has impacted and is expected to continue to impact the Companies’ liquidity. See “Aged Accounts Receivable Balances,” above. Net income is the result of cash and non-cash (or accrual) transactions. Only cash transactions affect the Companies’ cash flows from operating activities. Principal non-cash charges or credits include depreciation, deferred income tax expense, amortizations of certain regulatory assets and liabilities and accrued unbilled revenue. Non-cash charges or credits may also be accrued under the revenue decoupling and cost reconciliation mechanisms in the Utilities’ New York electric and gas rate plans. See “Rate Plans – CECONY– Electric and Gas" and "Rate Plans – O&R New York – Electric and Gas” in Note B to the financial statements in Item 8. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified within the Companies' cash flows from operating activities to conform with current period presentation. Net cash flows from operating activities in 2025 for Con Edison were $1,186 million higher than in 2024. The changes in net cash flows for Con Edison primarily reflect: - a decrease in taxes receivable of $278 million; - an increase in other current liabilities of $264 million; - lower accounts receivable – customers, net of $233 million; - an increase in accounts payable of $162 million; - lower net deferred charges, noncurrent assets, leases, net and other regulatory assets balances of $49 million; - a decrease in prepayments of $39 million; - an increase in accrued taxes of $38 million; and - a change in distribution from equity investments $35 million. Net cash flows from operating activities in 2025 for CECONY were $1,171 million higher than in 2024. The changes in net cash flows for CECONY primarily reflect: - a decrease in accounts receivable from (to) affiliated companies of $552 million; - an increase in other current liabilities of $275 million; - lower accounts receivable – customers, net of $241 million; and - an increase in accounts payable of $143 million. The change in net cash flows also reflects the timing of payments for and recovery of energy costs. This timing is reflected within changes to accounts receivable – customers, recoverable and refundable energy costs within other regulatory assets and liabilities and accounts payable balances. ### Cash Flows Used in Investing Activities The following table summarizes key components of Con Edison's cash flows used in investing activities for the years ended December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024. | (Millions of Dollars) INVESTING ACTIVITIES | For the Year Ended December 31, 2025 | 2024 | Variance | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Utility capital expenditures | $(4,764) | $(4,770) | $6 | | Cost of removal less salvage | (481) | (474) | (7) | | Non-utility capital expenditures | — | (1) | 1 | | Proceeds from sale of Broken Bow II, net of cash and cash equivalents sold | 45 | — | 45 | | Other investing activities | (49) | (28) | (21) | | NET CASH FLOWS USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES | $(5,249) | $(5,273) | $24 | Net cash flows used in investing activities for Con Edison were $24 million lower in 2025 than in 2024. The change for Con Edison primarily reflects: - the proceeds from the sale of Broken Bow II, net of cash and cash equivalents sold in 2025 of $45 million; Offset in part by - an increase in other investing activities of ($21 million). The following table summarizes key components of CECONY's cash flows used in investing activities for the years ended December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024. | (Millions of Dollars) INVESTING ACTIVITIES | For the Year Ended December 31, 2025 | 2024 | Variance | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Utility capital expenditures | $(4,331) | $(4,456) | $125 | | Cost of removal less salvage | (469) | (467) | (2) | | NET CASH FLOWS USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES | $(4,800) | $(4,923) | $123 | Net cash flows used in investing activities for CECONY were $123 million lower in 2025 than in 2024. The change for CECONY primarily reflects: - a decrease in utility capital expenditures of $125 million; Offset in part by - higher cost of removal less salvage of ($2 million). Pursuant to their rate plans, the Utilities recover the cost of utility capital expenditures from customers, including an approved rate of return (before and after being placed in service and an allowance for funds used during construction (AFUDC) before being placed in service). Increases in the amount of utility capital expenditures may temporarily increase the amount of short-term debt issued by the Utilities prior to the long-term financing of such amounts. ### Cash Flows From Financing Activities The following table summarizes key components of Con Edison's cash flows from financing activities for the years ended December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024. | (Millions of Dollars) FINANCING ACTIVITIES | For the Year Ended December 31, 2025 | 2024 | Variance | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Net payment of short-term debt (Maturities 90 days or less) | $(895) | $(118) | $(777) | | Issuance of short-term debt (Maturities greater than 90 days) | 300 | — | 300 | | Borrowing under term loan | 200 | 500 | (300) | | Repayment of term loan | (200) | — | (200) | | Issuance of long-term debt | 1,150 | 2,975 | (1,825) | | Retirement of long-term debt | — | (477) | 477 | | Debt issuance costs | (15) | (43) | 28 | | Common stock dividends | (1,166) | (1,100) | (66) | | Issuance of common shares - public offering | 1,308 | — | 1,308 | | Issuance of common shares for stock plans | 64 | 60 | 4 | | NET CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES | $746 | $1,797 | $(1,051) | Net cash flows from financing activities for Con Edison were $1,051 million lower for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared with the 2024 period and reflect the following transactions: - a decrease in long-term debt issuances of $1,825 million (reflecting a CECONY issuance of $900 million aggregate principal amount of debentures in November 2025 and an O&R issuance of $250 million aggregate principal amount of debentures in September 2025); - an increase in the net payment of short-term debt (maturities 90 days or less) of $777 million; and - a decrease in term loan borrowings of $300 million, see Note D to the financial statements in Item 8; Offset in part by - an increase in the issuance of common shares of ($1,308 million); and - a decrease in the retirement of long-term debt of ($477 million). Con Edison’s cash flows from financing activities in 2025 and 2024 also reflect the proceeds, and reduction in cash used for reinvested dividends, resulting from the issuance of common shares under the company’s dividend reinvestment, stock purchase and long term incentive plans of $112 million and $109 million, respectively. The following table summarizes key components of CECONY's cash flows from (used in) financing activities for the years ended December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024. | (Millions of Dollars) FINANCING ACTIVITIES | For the Year Ended December 31, 2025 | 2024 | Variance | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Net payment of short-term debt (Maturities 90 days or less) | $(754) | $(209) | $(545) | | Issuance of short-term debt (Maturities greater than 90 days) | 300 | — | 300 | | Borrowing under term loan | 200 | 500 | (300) | | Repayment of term loan | (200) | — | (200) | | Issuance of long-term debt | 900 | 2,850 | (1,950) | | Retirement of long-term debt | — | (475) | 475 | | Debt issuance costs | (14) | (42) | 28 | | Capital contribution by Con Edison | 1,300 | 130 | 1,170 | | Dividend to Con Edison | (1,134) | (1,073) | (61) | | NET CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES | $598 | $1,681 | $(1,083) | Net cash flows from financing activities for CECONY were $1,083 million lower for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared with the 2024 period and reflect the following transactions: - a decrease in long-term debt issuances of $1,950 million (reflecting an issuance of $900 million aggregate principal amount of debentures in November 2025); - an increase in the net payment of short-term debt (maturities 90 days or less) of $545 million; and - a decrease in term loan borrowings of $300 million, see Note D to the financial statements in Item 8; Offset in part by - an increase in contributed equity from Con Edison of ($1,170 million); and - a decrease in the retirement of long-term debt of ($475 million). The following table summarizes key components of O&R's cash flows from financing activities for the years ended December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024. | (Millions of Dollars) FINANCING ACTIVITIES | For the Year Ended December 31, 2025 | 2024 | Variance | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Net issuance (payment) of short-term debt | $(108) | $82 | $(190) | | Issuance of long-term debt | 250 | 125 | 125 | | Debt issuance costs | (2) | (1) | (1) | | Capital contribution by Con Edison | 110 | 45 | 65 | | Dividend to Con Edison | (68) | (68) | — | | NET CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES | $182 | $183 | $(1) | Net cash flows from financing activities for O&R were $1 million lower for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared with the 2024 period and reflect the following transactions: - a decrease in the net issuance (payment) of short-term debt of $190 million; Offset in part by - an increase in long-term debt issuance of ($125 million) (reflecting an issuance of $250 million aggregate principal amount of debentures in September 2025); and - an increase in contributed equity from Con Edison of ($65 million). Cash flows from financing activities of the Companies also reflect commercial paper issuance and repayments. The commercial paper amounts outstanding at December 31, 2025 and 2024 and the average daily balances for 2025 and 2024 for Con Edison and CECONY were as follows: | (Millions of Dollars, except Weighted Average Yield) | 2025 Outstanding at December 31 | Daily average | 2024 Outstanding at December 31 | Daily average | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Con Edison | $1,575 | $804 | $2,170 | $1,842 | | CECONY | $1,240 | $430 | $1,694 | $1,393 | | Weighted average yield | 3.9% | 4.5% | 4.7% | 5.4% | Common stock issuances and external borrowings are sources of liquidity that could be affected by changes in credit ratings, financial performance and capital market conditions. For information about the Companies’ credit ratings and certain financial ratios, see “Capital Requirements and Resources” in Item 1. ### Capital Requirements and Resources For information about capital requirements, contractual obligations and capital resources, see “Capital Requirements and Resources” in Item 1. ### Assets, Liabilities and Equity The Companies’ assets, liabilities and equity at December 31, 2025 and 2024 are summarized as follows: | (Millions of Dollars) ASSETS | CECONY 2025 | 2024 | O&R 2025 | 2024 | Con Edison Transmission 2025 | 2024 | Other (a) 2025 | 2024 | Con Edison (b) 2025 | 2024 | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Current assets | $6,433 | $6,298 | $337 | $385 | $21 | $26 | $(41) | $(45) | $6,750 | $6,664 | | Investments | 725 | 684 | 22 | 23 | 462 | 419 | 4 | — | 1,213 | 1,126 | | Net plant | 51,861 | 48,983 | 3,540 | 3,166 | 3 | 17 | (1) | (1) | 55,403 | 52,165 | | Other noncurrent assets | 10,297 | 9,685 | 521 | 486 | 2 | 7 | 417 | 429 | 11,237 | 10,607 | | Total Assets | $69,316 | $65,650 | $4,420 | $4,060 | $488 | $469 | $379 | $383 | $74,603 | $70,562 | | LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | | | | | | | | | | | | Current liabilities | $5,944 | $5,559 | $396 | $467 | $18 | $7 | $256 | $400 | $6,614 | $6,433 | | Noncurrent liabilities | 17,275 | 16,711 | 1,242 | 1,209 | (61) | (65) | (208) | (339) | 18,248 | 17,516 | | Long-term debt | 24,060 | 23,409 | 1,491 | 1,242 | — | — | — | — | 25,551 | 24,651 | | Equity | 22,037 | 19,971 | 1,291 | 1,142 | 531 | 527 | 331 | 322 | 24,190 | 21,962 | | Total Liabilities and Equity | $69,316 | $65,650 | $4,420 | $4,060 | $488 | $469 | $379 | $383 | $74,603 | $70,562 | (a) Other includes the parent company, Con Edison’s tax equity interests, consolidation adjustments and Broken Bow II, the deferred project that was classified as held for sale at December 31, 2024, with the sale and transfer completed in January 2025. See Note X to the financial statements in Item 8. (b) Represents the consolidated results of operations of Con Edison and its businesses. ### CECONY Current assets at December 31, 2025 were $135 million higher than at December 31, 2024. The change in current assets primarily reflects an increase in cash and temporary cash investments ($327 million), customer accounts receivable, net of allowance for uncollectible accounts ($128 million) (see "Aged Accounts Receivable Balances,” above), offset in part by a decrease in accounts receivable from affiliated companies ($314 million). Net plant at December 31, 2025 was $2,878 million higher than at December 31, 2024. The change in net plant primarily reflects an increase in electric ($3,106 million), gas ($917 million) and steam ($73 million) plant balances and an increase in construction work in progress ($79 million), offset in part by an increase in accumulated depreciation ($1,002 million) and a decrease in general ($294 million) plant balances. Other noncurrent assets at December 31, 2025 were $612 million higher than at December 31, 2024. The change in other noncurrent assets primarily reflects an increase in the pensions and retiree benefits ($414 million), revenue taxes ($94 million) and environmental investigation and remediation costs ($35 million). See Notes B, E, and F to the financial statements in Item 8. Current liabilities at December 31, 2025 were $385 million higher than at December 31, 2024. The change in current liabilities primarily reflects an increase in long-term debt due within a year ($250 million), deferred derivative gains ($130 million) and refundable energy costs ($35 million). See Note B to the financial statements in Item 8. Other noncurrent liabilities at December 31, 2025 were $564 million higher than at December 31, 2024. The change in other noncurrent liabilities primarily reflects an increase in the deferred income taxes and unamortized investment tax credits ($581 million), offset in part by a decrease in net unbilled revenue deferrals ($39 million). See Note B to the financial statements in Item 8. Long-term debt at December 31, 2025 was $651 million higher than at December 31, 2024. The change in long-term debt primarily reflects the 2025 issuances of debentures ($900 million), offset in part by reclassification of long-term debt to long term debt due within a year ($250 million). See "Liquidity and Capital Resources - Cash Flows From Financing Activities" above and Note C to the financial statements in Item 8. Equity at December 31, 2025 was $2,066 million higher than at December 31, 2024. The change in equity primarily reflects net income for the year ended December 31, 2025 ($1,906 million), capital contributions from Con Edison ($1,300 million) in 2025 and a change in stock awards ($7 million), offset in part by common stock dividends to Con Edison ($1,134 million) in 2025 and an other comprehensive loss ($13 million). ### O&R Current assets at December 31, 2025 were $48 million lower than at December 31, 2024. The change in current assets primarily reflects a decrease in regulatory assets ($28 million) and accounts receivable from affiliated companies ($22 million). Net plant at December 31, 2025 was $374 million higher than at December 31, 2024. The change in net plant primarily reflects an increase in electric ($176 million), gas ($86 million) and general ($19 million) plant balances and construction work in progress ($171 million), offset in part by an increase in accumulated depreciation ($78 million). Other noncurrent assets at December 31, 2025 were $35 million higher than at December 31, 2024. The change in other noncurrent assets primarily reflects an increase in pension and retiree benefits ($24 million), fair value of derivative assets ($7 million) and other deferred charges and noncurrent assets ($4 million). Current liabilities at December 31, 2025 were $71 million lower than at December 31, 2024. The change in current liabilities primarily reflects a decrease in notes payable ($108 million) and regulatory liabilities ($18 million), offset in part by an increase in accounts payable ($50 million) and accrued taxes to affiliated companies ($5 million). Noncurrent liabilities at December 31, 2025 were $33 million higher than at December 31, 2024. The change in noncurrent liabilities primarily reflects an increase in deferred income taxes and unamortized investment tax credits ($29 million) and other deferred credits and noncurrent liabilities ($22 million), offset in part by an decrease in regulatory liabilities ($11 million) and fair value of derivative liabilities ($10 million). Long-term debt at December 31, 2025 was $249 million higher than at December 31, 2024. The change in long-term debt primarily reflects the 2025 issuance of debentures ($250 million). See "Liquidity and Capital Resources - Cash Flows From Financing Activities" above and Note C to the financial statements in Item 8. Equity at December 31, 2025 was $149 million higher than at December 31, 2024. The change in equity primarily reflects net income for the year ended December 31, 2025 ($108 million) and capital contributions from Con Edison ($110 million) in 2025, offset in part by common stock dividends to Con Edison ($68 million) in 2025 and an other comprehensive loss ($1 million). ### Con Edison Transmission Investments at December 31, 2025 were $43 million higher than at December 31, 2024. The increase in investments reflects additional investment in New York Transco ($45 million). Net Plant at December 31, 2025 were $14 million lower than at December 31, 2024. The decrease in net plant reflects the impairment loss related to investment in Honeoye ($13 million). Current Liabilities at December 31, 2025 were $11 million higher than at December 31, 2024. The change in current liabilities primarily reflects transaction costs associated with the strategic alternatives review of Con Edison's equity investments in MVP and Honeoye ($17 million). ### Regulatory Matters For information about the Utilities’ rate plans and other regulatory matters affecting the Companies, see “Utility Regulation” in Item 1 and Note B to the financial statements in Item 8. ### Risk Factors The Companies’ businesses are influenced by many factors that are difficult to predict, that may be beyond their control and that involve uncertainties that may materially affect actual operating results, cash flows and financial condition. See “Risk Factors” in Item 1A. ### Critical Accounting Estimates The Companies’ financial statements reflect the application of certain critical accounting estimates, which conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The Companies’ critical accounting estimates include assumptions applied to accounting for: pensions and other postretirement benefits, contingencies, derivative instruments, allowance for uncollectible accounts receivable, asset retirement obligations and income taxes. Also, see “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Other Matters” in Note A to the financial statements in Item 8. ### Accounting for Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits The Utilities provide pensions and other postretirement benefits to substantially all of their employees and retirees. Con Edison Transmission also provides such benefits to transferred employees who previously worked for the Utilities. The Companies account for these benefits in accordance with the accounting rules for retirement benefits. In addition, the Utilities apply the accounting rules for regulated operations to account for the regulatory treatment of these obligations (which, as described in Note B to the financial statements in Item 8, reconciles the amounts reflected in rates for the costs of the benefit to the costs actually incurred). In applying these accounting policies, the Companies have made critical estimates related to actuarial assumptions, including assumptions of expected returns on plan assets, discount rates, health care cost trends and future compensation. See Notes A, E and F to the financial statements in Item 8 for information about the Companies’ pension and other postretirement benefits, the actuarial assumptions, actual performance, amortization of investment and other actuarial gains and losses and calculated plan costs for 2025, 2024 and 2023. The discount rate for determining the present value of future period benefit payments is determined using a model to match the durations of Aa rated (by either Moody’s or S&P) corporate bonds with the projected stream of benefit payments. In determining the health care cost trend rate, the Companies review actual recent cost trends and projected future trends. The cost of pension and other postretirement benefits in future periods will depend on actual returns on plan assets, assumptions for future periods, contributions and benefit experience. Con Edison’s and CECONY’s current estimates for 2026 are decreases, compared with 2025, in their pension and other postretirement benefits credits of $256 million and $243 million, respectively, largely driven by decreases in the discount rates used to determine plan liabilities. See Notes E and F to the financial statements in Item 8. The following table illustrates the effect on 2026 pension and other postretirement costs of changing the critical actuarial assumptions, while holding all other actuarial assumptions constant: | Actuarial Assumption Increase in accounting cost: Discount rate | Change in Assumption | Pension (Millions of Dollars) | Other Postretirement Benefits | Total | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Con Edison | (0.25)% | $35 | $2 | $37 | | CECONY | (0.25)% | $34 | $1 | $35 | | Expected return on plan assets | | | | | | Con Edison | (0.25)% | $41 | $3 | $44 | | CECONY | (0.25)% | $39 | $2 | $41 | | Future compensation increases | | | | | | Con Edison | 0.50% | $28 | $— | $28 | | CECONY | 0.50% | $28 | $— | $28 | | Health care trend rate | | | | | | Con Edison | 1.00% | $— | $12 | $12 | | CECONY | 1.00% | $— | $10 | $10 | | Increase in projected benefit obligation: | | | | | | Discount rate | | | | | | Con Edison | (0.25)% | $373 | $22 | $395 | | CECONY | (0.25)% | $357 | $19 | $376 | | Future compensation increases | | | | | | Con Edison | 0.50% | $136 | $— | $136 | | CECONY | 0.50% | $133 | $— | $133 | | Health care trend rate | | | | | | Con Edison | 1.00% | $— | $68 | $68 | | CECONY | 1.00% | $— | $58 | $58 | A 5 percentage point variation in the actual annual return in 2026, as compared with the expected annual asset return for pension and other postretirement benefits of 6.45 percent and 6.25 percent, respectively, would change pension and other postretirement benefit costs for Con Edison and CECONY by approximately $27 million and $26 million, respectively, in 2027. Pension benefits are provided through a pension plan maintained by Con Edison to which CECONY, O&R and Con Edison Transmission may make contributions for their participating employees. Pension accounting by the Utilities includes an allocation of plan assets. The Companies’ policy is to fund their pension and other postretirement benefit accounting costs to the extent tax deductible, and for the Utilities, to the extent these costs are recovered under their rate plans. The Companies were not required to make cash contributions to the pension plan in 2025 under funding regulations and tax laws. However, CECONY and O&R made discretionary contributions to the pension plan in 2025 of $53 million and $3 million, respectively. In 2026, CECONY and O&R expect to make contributions to the pension plan of $4 million each. See “Expected Contributions” in Notes E and F to the financial statements in Item 8. ### Accounting for Contingencies The accounting rules for contingencies apply to an existing condition, situation or set of circumstances involving uncertainty as to possible loss that will ultimately be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. Known material contingencies, which are described in the notes to the financial statements, include certain regulatory matters (Note B), the Utilities’ responsibility for hazardous substances, such as asbestos, PCBs and coal tar that have been used or generated in the course of operations (Note G) and other contingencies (Note H). Inputs to the estimation of the liability for such environmental remediation include the possible selected remedy for each site where investigation is ongoing, the inflation rate related to the cost of inputs to the remediation process, and for those sites where there are other potentially responsible parties, the allocation of costs to the Companies. Inputs to the estimation of the liability for certain regulatory matters include facts specific to each item and the status and progress of discussions with the applicable state regulator. Inputs to the estimation of the liability for other contingencies may include liabilities incurred for similar circumstances and the outcome of legal proceedings. In accordance with the accounting rules, the Companies have accrued estimates of losses relating to the contingencies as to which loss is probable and can be reasonably estimated, and no liability has been accrued for contingencies as to which loss is not probable or cannot be reasonably estimated. The Utilities recover costs for asbestos lawsuits, workers’ compensation and environmental remediation pursuant to their rate plans. Generally, changes during the terms of the rate plans to the amounts accrued for these contingencies would not impact earnings. ### Accounting for Derivative Instruments The Companies apply the accounting rules for derivatives and hedging to their derivative financial instruments. The Companies use derivative financial instruments to hedge market price fluctuations in related underlying transactions for the physical purchase and sale of electricity and gas. The Utilities are permitted by their respective regulators to reflect in rates all reasonably incurred gains and losses on these instruments. See “Financial and Commodity Market Risks,” below and Note Q to the financial statements in Item 8. Where the Companies are required to make mark-to-market estimates pursuant to the accounting rules, the estimates of gains and losses at a particular period end do not reflect the end results of particular transactions and will most likely not reflect the actual gain or loss at the conclusion of a transaction. Substantially all of the estimated gains or losses are based on prices supplied by external sources such as the fair value of exchange-traded futures and options and the fair value of positions for which price quotations are available through or derived from brokers or other market sources. See Note Q to the financial statements in Item 8. ### Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts The Companies develop expected loss estimates using past events data and consider current conditions and future reasonable and supportable forecasts. For the Utilities’ allowance for uncollectible accounts for customer accounts receivable, which includes accrued unbilled revenue, past events considered include write-offs relative to customer accounts receivable; current conditions include macro-and micro-economic conditions related to trends in the local economy, reconnection rates and current and aged customer accounts receivable balances, including final balances, among other factors; and forecasts about the future include assumptions related to the level of write-offs and recoveries. The historical write-off rate was determined based on post-pandemic collections and write-off experience. From 2020 through 2025, Con Edison's and CECONY's allowances for uncollectible accounts increased from $70 million and $65 million, respectively, to $507 million and $500 million, respectively. See “The Companies May Be Adversely Affected By Changes To The Utilities’ Rate Plans” in Item 1A, “Aged Accounts Receivable Balances” in Item 7 and “Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts" in Note N to the financial statements in Item 8. ### Asset Retirement Obligations (AROs) AROs are computed as the present value of the estimated costs for an asset's future retirement and are recorded in the period in which the liability is incurred. The estimated costs are capitalized as part of the related long-lived asset and depreciated over the asset's useful life. CECONY and O&R, as rate-regulated entities, recognize Regulatory Assets or Liabilities as a result of timing differences between the recording of costs and costs recovered through the ratemaking process. Because quoted market prices are not available for AROs, the Companies estimate the fair value of AROs by calculating discounted cash flows that are dependent upon various assumptions including estimated retirement dates, discount rates, inflation rates, the timing and amount of future cash outlays, and currently available technologies. The Companies recorded asset retirement obligations associated with the removal of asbestos and asbestos-containing material in their buildings (other than the structures enclosing generating stations and substations), electric equipment and steam and gas distribution systems. The Companies also recorded asset retirement obligations relating to gas and oil pipelines abandoned in place and municipal infrastructure support. See Note T to the financial statements in Item 8. A 1 percent increase in the assumed inflation rate used to value the ARO liability as of December 31, 2025 would increase the liability by $29 million for Con Edison and CECONY. ### Accounting for Income Taxes The Companies record provisions for income taxes, deferred tax assets and liabilities, valuation allowances against net deferred tax assets, if any, and reserves for uncertain tax positions. The reporting of tax-related assets and liabilities requires the use of estimates and significant judgments by management. Deferred federal and state tax assets and liabilities are recorded to represent future effects on income taxes for temporary differences between the basis of assets for financial reporting and tax purposes. Although management believes that current estimates for deferred tax assets and liabilities are reasonable, actual results could differ from these estimates for several reasons, including, but not limited to: a change in forecasted financial condition and/or results of operations; changes in income tax laws, enacted tax rates or amounts subject to income tax or state apportionments; the form, structure, and timing of asset or stock sales or dispositions; changes in the regulatory treatment of any tax reform benefits; and changes resulting from audits and examinations by taxing authorities. Valuation allowances against deferred tax assets are recorded when management concludes it is more likely than not such tax benefit will not be realized in future periods. Accounting for income taxes also requires that only tax benefits for positions taken or expected to be taken on tax returns that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold can be recognized or continue to be recognized. Management evaluates each position solely on the technical merits and facts and circumstances of the position, assuming that the position will be examined by a taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information. Significant judgment is required to determine recognition thresholds and the related amount of tax benefits to be recognized. At each period end, and as new developments occur, management reevaluates its tax positions. Additional interpretations, regulations, amendments, or technical corrections related to the federal income tax code as a result of the Inflation Reduction Act, may impact the estimates for income taxes discussed above. See “Changes To Tax Laws Could Adversely Affect the Companies” in Item 1A, “Inflation Reduction Act” above, “Federal Income Tax” and “State Income Tax” in Note A and Note L to the financial statements in Item 8. ### Financial and Commodity Market Risks The Companies are subject to various risks and uncertainties associated with financial and commodity markets. The most significant market risks include interest rate risk, commodity price risk and investment risk. ### Interest Rate Risk The Companies' interest rate risk primarily relates to new debt financing needed to fund capital requirements, including the capital expenditures of the Utilities and maturing debt securities, and variable-rate debt. Con Edison and its subsidiaries manage interest rate risk through the issuance of mostly fixed-rate debt with varying maturities and through opportunistic refinancing of debt. Con Edison and CECONY estimate that at December 31, 2025, a 10 percent increase in interest rates applicable to its variable rate debt would result in an increase in annual interest expense of $10 million and $9 million, respectively. At December 31, 2024, Con Edison and CECONY estimated that a 10 percent increase in interest rates applicable to its variable rate debt would result in an increase in annual interest expense of $15 million and $12 million, respectively. Under CECONY’s electric, gas and steam rate plans, variations in actual variable rate tax-exempt debt interest expense, including costs associated with the refinancing of the variable rate tax-exempt debt, are reconciled to levels reflected in rates. Higher interest rates have resulted in increased interest expense on commercial paper, variable-rate debt and long-term debt issuances. ### Commodity Price Risk Con Edison’s commodity price risk primarily relates to the purchase and sale of electricity, gas and related derivative instruments. The Utilities apply risk management strategies to mitigate their related exposures. See Note Q to the financial statements in Item 8. Con Edison estimates that, as of December 31, 2025, a 10 percent decline in market prices would result in a decline in fair value of $191 million for the derivative instruments used by the Utilities to hedge purchases of electricity and gas, of which $175 million is for CECONY and $16 million is for O&R. As of December 31, 2024, Con Edison estimated that a 10 percent decline in market prices would result in a decline in fair value of $150 million for the derivative instruments used by the Utilities to hedge purchases of electricity and gas, of which $137 million is for CECONY and $13 million is for O&R. Con Edison expects that any such change in fair value would be largely offset by directionally opposite changes in the cost of the electricity and gas purchased. The Utilities do not make any margin or profit on the electricity or gas they sell. In accordance with provisions approved by state regulators, the Utilities generally recover from full-service customers the costs they incur for energy purchased for those customers, including gains and losses on certain derivative instruments used to hedge energy purchased and related costs. See “Recoverable Energy Costs” in Note A to the financial statements in Item 8. However, increases in electric and gas commodity prices may contribute to a slower recovery of cash from outstanding customer accounts receivable balances. ### Investment Risk The Companies’ investment risk relates to the investment of plan assets for their pension and other postretirement benefit plans. Con Edison's investment risk also relates to the investments of Con Edison Transmission that are accounted for under the equity method. See “Critical Accounting Estimates – Accounting for Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits,” above and “Investments” in Note A and Notes E and F to the financial statements in Item 8. The Companies’ current investment policy for pension plan assets includes investment targets of 20 to 34 percent equity securities, 55 to 65 percent debt securities, 14 to 22 percent alternatives. At December 31, 2025, the pension plan investments consisted of 24 percent equity securities, 57 percent debt securities and 19 percent alternatives. For the Utilities’ pension and other postretirement benefit plans, regulatory accounting treatment is generally applied in accordance with the accounting rules for regulated operations. In accordance with the Statement of Policy issued by the NYSPSC and its electric, gas and steam rate plans, CECONY defers for payment to or recovery from customers the difference between the pension and other postretirement benefit expenses and the amounts for such expenses reflected in rates. O&R also defers such difference pursuant to its New York rate plans. ### Environmental Matters For information concerning climate change, environmental sustainability, potential liabilities arising from laws and regulations protecting the environment and other environmental matters, see “Environmental Matters” in Item 1 and Note G to the financial statements in Item 8. ### Material Contingencies For information concerning potential liabilities arising from the Companies’ material contingencies, see “Critical Accounting Estimates – Accounting for Contingencies,” above, and Notes B, G and H to the financial statements in Item 8. ## Market risk As filed, 821 characters. ### Con Edison For information about Con Edison’s primary market risks associated with activities in derivative financial instruments, other financial instruments and derivative commodity instruments, see “Financial and Commodity Market Risks,” in Item 7 (which information is incorporated herein by reference). See also “The Companies Require Access To Capital Markets To Satisfy Funding Requirements,” in Item 1A. ### CECONY For information about CECONY’s primary market risks associated with activities in derivative financial instruments, other financial instruments and derivative commodity instruments, see “Financial and Commodity Market Risks” in Item 7 (which information is incorporated herein by reference). See also “The Companies Require Access To Capital Markets To Satisfy Funding Requirements,” in Item 1A. ## Controls and procedures As filed, 2,000 characters. The Companies maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed in the reports that they submit to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. For each of the Companies, its management, with the participation of its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, has evaluated its disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report and, based on such evaluation, has concluded that the controls and procedures are effective to provide such reasonable assurance. Reasonable assurance is not absolute assurance, however, and there can be no assurance that any design of controls or procedures would be effective under all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote. For the Companies’ Reports of Management On Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and the related opinions of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (presented in the Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm), see Item 8 of this report (which information is incorporated herein by reference). There was no change in the Companies’ internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companies’ most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companies’ internal control over financial reporting. Filed Feb 19, 2026. Source: SEC EDGAR, the filing index for accession 0001047862-26-000031. Last ingested by Listed: Oct 24, 2026, 15:03 ET. No prices; not investment advice.