# First Bancorp: Form 10-K for the period ended Dec 31, 2022 - Company: [First Bancorp](/companies/fbp.md) (CIK 1057706) - Form: 10-K - Filed: 2023-02-28 - Accepted by EDGAR: Feb 28, 2023, 13:35 ET - Period: 2022-12-31 - Accession: 0001057706-23-000002 - Inline XBRL: yes - Main document: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1057706/000105770623000002/fbp1231202210k.htm - All documents and exhibits: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1057706/000105770623000002/ ## Figures reported in this filing Standardized XBRL line items for the period ended 2022-12-31. | Line item | Period | Value | XBRL concept | | --- | --- | ---: | --- | | Revenue | 12 months, 2022-01-01 to 2022-12-31 | $918.4m | us-gaap:RevenueFromContractWithCustomerExcludingAssessedTax | | Interest expense | 12 months, 2022-01-01 to 2022-12-31 | $67.3m | us-gaap:InterestExpense | | Income tax | 12 months, 2022-01-01 to 2022-12-31 | $142.5m | us-gaap:IncomeTaxExpenseBenefit | | Net income | 12 months, 2022-01-01 to 2022-12-31 | $305.1m | us-gaap:NetIncomeLoss | | Diluted EPS | 12 months, 2022-01-01 to 2022-12-31 | $1.59 | us-gaap:EarningsPerShareDiluted | | Basic EPS | 12 months, 2022-01-01 to 2022-12-31 | $1.60 | us-gaap:EarningsPerShareBasic | | Diluted shares (weighted) | 12 months, 2022-01-01 to 2022-12-31 | 191,968,000 shares | us-gaap:WeightedAverageNumberOfDilutedSharesOutstanding | | Operating cash flow | 12 months, 2022-01-01 to 2022-12-31 | $440.5m | us-gaap:NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities | | Capital expenditure | 12 months, 2022-01-01 to 2022-12-31 | $20.5m | us-gaap:PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment | | Dividends paid | 12 months, 2022-01-01 to 2022-12-31 | $87.8m | us-gaap:PaymentsOfDividendsCommonStock | | Share repurchases | 12 months, 2022-01-01 to 2022-12-31 | $277.8m | us-gaap:PaymentsForRepurchaseOfCommonStock | | Total assets | at 2022-12-31 | $18.63bn | us-gaap:Assets | | Total liabilities | at 2022-12-31 | $17.31bn | us-gaap:Liabilities | | Shareholders' equity | at 2022-12-31 | $1.33bn | us-gaap:StockholdersEquity | ## Business As filed, 83,618 characters. ### Business ### GENERAL First BanCorp. is a publicly owned financial holding company that is subject to regulation, supervision and examination by the Federal Reserve Board. The Corporation was incorporated under the laws of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico in 1948 to serve as the bank holding company for FirstBank. Through its subsidiaries, including FirstBank, the Corporation provides full-service commercial and consumer banking services, mortgage banking services, automobile financing, trust services, insurance agency services, and other financial products and services in Puerto Rico, the U.S., the USVI and the BVI. As of December 31, 2022, the Corporation had total assets of $18.6 billion, including loans of $11.6 billion, total deposits of $16.1 billion, and total stockholders’ equity of $1.3 billion. The Corporation provides a wide range of financial services for retail, commercial and institutional clients. The Corporation has two wholly-owned subsidiaries: FirstBank and FirstBank Insurance Agency, Inc. (“FirstBank Insurance Agency”). FirstBank is a Puerto Rico-chartered commercial bank, and FirstBank Insurance Agency is a Puerto Rico-chartered insurance agency. FirstBank is subject to the supervision, examination and regulation of both the Office of the Commissioner of Financial Institutions of Puerto Rico (“OCIF”) and the FDIC. Deposits are insured through the FDIC Deposit Insurance Fund (the “DIF”). In addition, within FirstBank, the Bank’s USVI operations are subject to regulation and examination by the USVI Division of Banking Insurance, and Financial Regulation; its BVI operations are subject to regulation by the BVI Financial Services Commission; and its operations in the state of Florida are subject to regulation and examination by the Florida Office of Financial Regulation. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) regulates FirstBank’s consumer financial products and services. FirstBank Insurance Agency is subject to the supervision, examination and regulation of the Office of the Insurance Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the Division of Banking and Insurance Financial Regulation in the USVI. FirstBank conducts its business through its main office located in San Juan, Puerto Rico, 59 banking branches in Puerto Rico, eight banking branches in the USVI and the BVI, and nine banking branches in the state of Florida. FirstBank has six wholly-owned subsidiaries with operations in Puerto Rico: First Federal Finance Corp. (d/b/a Money Express La Financiera), a finance company specializing in the origination of small loans with 27 offices in Puerto Rico; First Management of Puerto Rico, a Puerto Rico corporation, which holds tax-exempt assets; FirstBank Overseas Corporation, an international banking entity (an “IBE”) organized under the International Banking Entity Act of Puerto Rico; two companies engaged in the operation of certain real estate owned (“OREO”) property and one private equity fund. For a discussion of certain significant events that have occurred in the year ended December 31, 2022, please refer to “Significant Events” included in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of this Form 10- K. ### BUSINESS SEGMENTS The Corporation has six reportable segments: Commercial and Corporate Banking; Mortgage Banking; Consumer (Retail) Banking; Treasury and Investments; United States Operations; and Virgin Islands Operations. These segments are described below, as well as in Note 27 - “Segment Information,” to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2022 included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K. ### Commercial and Corporate Banking The Commercial and Corporate Banking segment consists of the Corporation’s lending and other services for large customers represented by specialized and middle-market clients and the government sector in the Puerto Rico region. The Commercial and Corporate Banking segment offers commercial loans, including commercial real estate and construction loans, as well as other products, such as cash management and business management services. A substantial portion of the commercial and corporate banking portfolio is secured by the underlying real estate collateral and the personal guarantees of the borrowers. ### Mortgage Banking The Mortgage Banking segment consists of the origination, sale and servicing of a variety of residential mortgage loan products and related hedging activities in the Puerto Rico region. Originations are sourced through different channels, such as FirstBank branches and purchases from mortgage bankers, and in association with new project developers. The Mortgage Banking segment focuses on originating residential real estate loans, some of which conform to the U.S. Federal Housing Administration (the “FHA”), U.S. Veterans Administration (the “VA”) and the U.S. Department of Agriculture Rural Development (the “RD”) standards. Originated loans that meet the FHA’s standards qualify for the FHA’s insurance program whereas loans that meet the standards of the VA or RD are guaranteed by those respective federal agencies. Mortgage loans that do not qualify under the FHA, VA or RD programs are referred to as conventional loans. Conventional real estate loans can be conforming or non-conforming. Conforming loans are residential real estate loans that meet the standards for sale under the U.S. Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”) and the U.S. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“FHLMC”) programs. Loans that do not meet FNMA or FHLMC standards are referred to as non-conforming residential real estate loans. The Mortgage Banking segment also acquires and sells mortgages in the secondary markets. Residential real estate conforming loans are sold to investors like FNMA and FHLMC. Most of the Corporation’s residential mortgage loan portfolio consists of fixed- rate, fully amortizing, full documentation loans. The Corporation has commitment authority to issue Government National Mortgage Association (“GNMA”) mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”). Under this program, the Corporation has been selling FHA/VA mortgage loans into the secondary market since 2009. ### Consumer (Retail) Banking The Consumer (Retail) Banking segment consists of the Corporation’s consumer lending and deposit-taking activities conducted mainly through FirstBank’s branch network in the Puerto Rico region. Loans to consumers include auto loans, finance leases, boat and personal loans, credit card loans, and lines of credit. Deposit products include interest-bearing and non-interest-bearing checking and savings accounts, Individual Retirement Accounts (“IRAs”) and retail certificates of deposit (“retail CDs”). Retail deposits gathered through each branch of FirstBank’s retail network serve as one of the funding sources for the lending and investment activities. This segment also includes the Corporation’s insurance agency activities in the Puerto Rico region. ### Treasury and Investments The Treasury and Investments segment is responsible for the Corporation’s treasury and investment management functions. The treasury function, which includes funding and liquidity management, lends funds to the Commercial and Corporate Banking, the Mortgage Banking, the Consumer (Retail) Banking and the United States Operations segments to finance their respective lending activities and borrows from those segments. The Treasury and Investments segment also obtains funding through brokered deposits, advances from the FHLB, and repurchase agreements involving investment securities, among other possible funding sources. ### United States Operations The United States Operations segment consists of all banking activities conducted by FirstBank on the U.S. mainland. FirstBank provides a wide range of banking services to individual and corporate customers, primarily in southern Florida through nine banking branches. The United States Operations segment offers an array of both consumer and commercial banking products and services. Consumer banking products include checking, savings and money market accounts, retail CDs, internet banking services, residential mortgages, home equity loans, and lines of credit. Retail deposits, as well as FHLB advances and brokered CDs assigned to this segment, serve as funding sources for its lending activities. Commercial banking services include checking, savings and money market accounts, retail CDs, internet banking services, cash management services, remote deposit capture, and automated clearing house (“ACH”) transactions. Loan products include the traditional commercial and industrial and commercial real estate products, such as lines of credit, term loans and construction loans. ### Virgin Islands Operations The Virgin Islands Operations segment consists of all banking activities conducted by FirstBank in the USVI and BVI regions, including consumer and commercial banking services, with a total of eight banking branches serving the islands in the USVI of St. Thomas, St. Croix, and St. John, and the island of Tortola in the BVI. The Virgin Islands Operations segment is driven by its consumer, commercial lending and deposit -taking activities. Loans to consumers include auto and boat loans, lines of credit, and personal and residential mortgage loans. Deposit products include interest-bearing and non-interest-bearing checking and savings accounts, IRAs, and retail CDs. Retail deposits gathered through each branch serve as the funding sources for its own lending activities. ### ENVIRONMENTAL , SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE (“ESG”) PROGRAM OVERVIEW The Corporation is committed to supporting our clients, employees, shareholders and communities in which we serve. Our ESG program builds on the Corporation’s core values, including being a socially responsible company. The Corporation sees effective ESG management as a critical step towards a sustainable, inclusive and successful future. During 2021, the Corporation adopted an ESG framework through which it establishes and communicates its ESG strategy and overarching governance policy. In 2022, the Corporation continued evolving its ESG program, including the publication of its initial First BanCorp. Environmental, Social and Governance Report for 2021 (the “2021 ESG Report”). The 2021 ESG Report discloses information on a wide range of ESG topics, including governance and leadership; responsible business practices; employees and culture; diversity, equity and inclusion; community engagement; and environmental stewardship. The ESG Report for 2022 is expected to be published during the second quarter of 2023. Also in 2022, the Corporation’s Board of Directors (the “Board of Directors” or the “Board”) approved First BanCorp.’s Sustainability Policy (the “Sustainability Policy”), which establishes the Corporation’s framework to address ESG matters. ### ESG Governance The Corporation’s Board of Directors and executive leadership team share responsibilities relating to oversight of our ESG policies and practices. In February 2022, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee of the Board of Directors amended its charter to include oversight responsibility of ESG matters, and it has primary oversight of ESG policies, practices and disclosures. Nonetheless, other committees of the Corporation’s Board of Directors also play a role in ESG oversight in matters related to risk and cybersecurity management, human capital management, investment management and credit risk management. As part of the ESG governance structure set forth in the Sustainability Policy, the responsibility of day-to-day management of our ESG framework and strategy has been delegated to a management-level ESG Committee, comprised of leaders from different areas, such as Human Resources, Enterprise Risk Management, Strategic Planning and Investor Relations, Legal and Corporate Affairs, Marketing, Compliance, Finance, and Corporate Internal Audit. The ESG Committee is tasked with aligning priorities and initiatives for the year, setting and monitoring long-term objectives and goals, and leading the annual reporting process on ESG related topics. The ESG Committee reports to the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee of the Board of Directors. ### HUMAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT First BanCorp. strives to be recognized as a leading and diversified financial institution, offering a superior experience to our clients and employees. We believe that the key to our success is caring about our team as much as we care about our customers. Our goal is to be an employer of choice within our primary operating regions, which we believe is achieved and sustained by adding value to our employees’ lives and providing satisfying and evolving work experience. The core of our employer value proposition, “The Experience of Being 1,” is our commitment to our employees’ wellbeing, success, professional development, and work environment. ### Employees As of December 31, 2022, the Corporation and its subsidiaries had 3,133 regular employees, nearly all of whom are full-time, representing a 2% increase in overall headcount from December 31, 2021. The Corporation had 2,773 employees in the Puerto Rico region, 200 employees in the Florida region, and 160 employees in the Virgin Islands region. As of December 31, 2022, approximately 67% of the total employee population and 57% of top and middle management, were women. ### Oversight The Human Resources Division manages all elements of the Corporation’s human capital programs and strategies, including talent recruiting and engagement, training and development, and compensation and benefits, and directly reports to the Corporation’s Chief Risk Officer. The Human Resources Division efforts are also overseen by the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and the executive management team through regular work-related interactions. Our leaders focus on strengthening employee management and engagement and maximizing collaboration between departments and talents by promoting an open-door culture that stimulates frequent communication between employees and management. This provides more opportunities to identify employees' needs, obtain feedback about work experience, and adapt our employee engagement as we believe is appropriate. In addition, the Corporation’s Board of Directors and its Compensation and Benefits Committee monitor and are regularly updated on the Corporation’s human capital management strategies. ### Talent Acquisition and Retention First BanCorp. is an equal opportunity employer, which considers qualified candidates for employment to fill its available positions. Our efforts are focused on attracting and retaining the best talent for the Corporation, including college graduates, and promoting internal mobility. The attraction and selection process includes: Promoting and posting our vacant positions internally and externally. Building our employer brand by participating in professional events and job fairs and maintaining a relationship with universities through internship programs and career forums. A collaboration with hiring managers to ensure an accurate match between role and candidate and reasonably speed up the recruitment process to secure top candidates. A robust management information system to enhance the effectiveness of the recruitment process and provide candidates with a unique experience. A robust on-boarding process to engage and support the new employee’s induction process, including assignment of a “FirstPal” from day one to help with the organizational culture transition and learning process. We believe that financial security is critical for our employees. Our goal is to maintain compensation levels that are competitive with comparable job categories in similar organizations. Our salary administration program is designed to provide compensation that is consistent with our employees’ assigned duties and responsibilities in order to recognize differences in individual performance levels and to attract the right and best talent for each job. In addition to salary, some job positions are eligible to participate in variable pay programs. The Corporation has different incentive programs for most of its business units. These incentive programs are periodically reviewed to align them to business strategies and ensure sound risk management. Further, the Corporation’s Management Award Program is used to recognize and reward outstanding performance for exempt employees who do not participate in other variable pay programs. The Corporation also has a long-term incentive plan for top-performing leaders and employees with high potential. These programs provide awards based upon the Corporation’s and individual’s performance and are key for the attraction and engagement of the best talent The Corporation’s investment in its employees has resulted in a stable-tenured workforce, with an average tenure of 10 years of service as of December 31, 2022. In 2022, employee voluntary turnover rates remained significantly higher than pre-pandemic levels, reflecting workforce challenges affecting most industries. Our employee voluntary turnover rate for 2022 was 13.3%, mostly related to hourly employees in call centers and branches. For high performers , employees’ turnover was relatively low at 5.5%. ### Talent Development and Engagement We believe that a culture of learning and development maximizes the talent of human capital and is the foundation for sustained business success and our commitment to employee engagement continues throughout employees’ time with the Corporation. Our training program strives to reflect both employees’ and the organization’s needs. The Corporation offers more than 8,000 training opportunities through online courses and in-person or virtual classes, as well as development activities, special projects, and partial tuition reimbursement to complete a bachelor’s or master's degree to eligible employees. Training is offered on various subjects within five main areas: fundamentals, compliance and corporate governance, specialized technical subjects, professional development, and leadership development. In 2022 we provided over 80 training topics through virtual and in-person modalities allowing our employees to continue learning and complete development plans. In 2022, we delivered more than 108,000 hours of training and each employee completed an average of 30.6 training hours. Every year around 100 new and existing supervisors and managers receive training. In 2022, we delivered more than 6,200 hours of supervision and management-related training. For new supervisors, we offer a program intended to train in basic supervision, leadership and communication skills, and our human resources policies and practices. In addition, our program for active supervisors and managers encourages leaders to review their leadership skills with feedback received from instructors and coworkers. The program has been delivered to 63% of our current leaders since launched, accounting for over 21,000 training hours. In addition to these training opportunities, we have processes to promote professional development and career growth, including the promotion of internal career opportunities, performance management processes, annual talent review, and robust succession planning. We also encourage employees to participate in our commitment to our communities through our volunteer and community reinvestment programs. In 2022, our employees supported 36 organizations with more than 1,800 hours of volunteer work. The Bank also encourages its employees to serve on non-profit organizations’ boards of directors. In 2022, First BanCorp employees were members of the board of directors for 24 non-profit organizations across the Puerto Rico, Florida, and Virgin Islands regions and offered approximately 1,500 hours of service. ### Health & Wellness Health and well-being programs are a strong component of the benefits we provide to our employees. First BanCorp. provides competitive benefits programs that are intended to address even the most pressing needs of our employees and their families to promote occupational, physical, emotional, and financial health. Our comprehensive wellness package includes health, dental and vision insurance offered through different insurance company options that enable employees to choose those that best accommodate their and their families’ needs. We also offer life insurance and disability plans, as well as a defined contribution retirement plan option where both employee and employer contribute. To promote work-life balance, we grant a variety of paid time off for vacation, sick, maternity and paternity leave, bereavement leave, marriage and personal days, in-house health services, and a complete wellness program, including nutrition, fitness, health fairs, personal finance education, and preventive healthcare activities, nursing services, among others. The Corporation subsidizes a substantial portion of the cost of these benefits. Initiatives for the safety and security of employees have always been an important priority. In 2022, in response to the ongoing impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, certain business units in the Florida and Puerto Rico regions incorporated hybrid work schedules. Additional activities implemented by the Corporation to support employees included: COVID-19 monitoring and contact tracing processes. Free laboratory testing for all employees. Paid leave for employees affected by the virus and special leave of absence without pay for unique needs. Training activities related to COVID-19, safety measures, stress management, and remote work. Reinforce COVID-19 vaccination to protect our workforce. Offered multiple onsite vaccination clinics, including updated bivalent COVID-19 vaccine clinics. ### MARKET AREA AND COMPETITION Puerto Rico, where the banking market is highly competitive, is the main geographic service area of the Corporation. As of December 31, 2022, the Corporation also had a presence in the state of Florida and in the USVI and BVI. Puerto Rico banks are subject to the same federal laws, regulations and supervision that apply to similar institutions on the United States mainland. Competitors include other banks, insurance companies, mortgage banking companies, small loan companies, automobile financing companies, leasing companies, brokerage firms with retail operations, credit unions and certain retailers that operate in Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands and the state of Florida, as well as fintech companies and emerging competition from digital platforms. The Corporation’s businesses compete with these other firms with respect to the range of products and services offered and the types of clients, customers and industries served. ### SUPERVISION AND REGULATION The Corporation and FirstBank, its bank subsidiary, are subject to comprehensive federal and Puerto Rican supervision and regulation. These supervisory and regulatory requirements apply to all aspects of the Corporation’s and the Bank’s activities, including commercial and consumer lending, deposit taking, management, governance and other activities. As part of this regulatory framework, the Corporation and the Bank are subject to extensive consumer financial regulatory legal and supervisory requirements. Further, U.S. financial supervision and regulation is dynamic in nature, and supervisory and regulatory requirements are subject to change as new legislative and regulatory actions are taken. Future legislation may increase the regulation and oversight of the Corporation and the Bank. Any change in applicable laws or regulations, however, may have a material adverse effect on the business of commercial banks and bank holding companies, including the Bank and the Corporation. ### Bank Holding Company Activities and Other Limitations The Corporation is registered under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the “Bank Holding Company Act”), and is subject to ongoing supervision, regulation and examination by the Federal Reserve Board. The Corporation is required to file with the Federal Reserve Board periodic and annual reports and other information concerning its own business operations and those of its subsidiaries. The Bank Holding Company Act also permits a bank holding company to elect to become a financial holding company and engage in a broader range of financial activities. The Corporation has elected to be a financial holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act. Financial holding companies may engage, directly or indirectly, in any activity that is determined to be (i) financial in nature, (ii) incidental to such financial activity, or (iii) complementary to a financial activity and does not pose a substantial risk to the safety and soundness of depository institutions or the financial system generally. The Bank Holding Company Act specifically provides that the following activities have been determined to be “financial in nature”: (i) lending, trust and other banking activities; (ii) insurance activities; (iii) financial or economic advice or services; (iv) pooled investments; (v) securities underwriti ng and dealing; (vi) domestic activities permitted for an existing bank holding company; (vii) foreign activities permitted for an existing bank holding company; and (viii) merchant banking activities. A financial holding company that ceases to meet certain standards is subject to a variety of restrictions, depending on the circumstances, including precluding the undertaking of new financial activities or the acquisition of shares or control of other companies. Until compliance is restored, the Federal Reserve Board has broad discretion to impose appropriate limitations on the financial holding company’s activities. The Corporation and FirstBank must be “well-capitalized” and “well-managed” for regulatory purposes, and FirstBank must earn “satisfactory” or better ratings on its periodic Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”) examinations for the Corporation to preserve its financial holding company status. Under federal law and Federal Reserve Board policy, a bank holding company such as the Corporation is expected to act as a source of strength to its banking subsidiaries and to commit required levels of support to them. This support may be required at times when, absent such policy, the bank holding company might not otherwise provide such support. In the event of a bank holding company’s bankruptcy, any commitment by the bank holding company to a federal bank regulatory agency to maintain capital of a subsidiary bank will be assumed by the bankruptcy trustee and be entitled to a priority of payment. In addition, any capital loans by a bank holding company to any of its subsidiary banks must be subordinated in right of payment to deposits and to certain other indebtedness of such subsidiary bank. As of December 31, 2022, and the date hereof, FirstBank was and is the only banking subsidiary of the Corporation. ### State Chartered Non-Member Bank and Banking Laws and Regulations ### in General FirstBank is subject to regulation and examination by the OCIF, the CFPB and the FDIC, and is subject to comprehensive federal and state (Commonwealth of Puerto Rico) regulations that regulate, among other things, the scope of their businesses, their investments, their reserves against deposits, the timing and availability of deposited funds, and the nature and amount of collateral for certain loans. The OCIF, the CFPB and the FDIC periodically examine FirstBank to test the Bank’s conformance to safe and sound banking practices and compliance with various statutory and regulatory requirements. This oversight establishes a comprehensive framework of permissible activities, and the supervision by the FDIC is also intended for the protection of the FDIC’s insurance fund and depositors. These regulatory authorities have discretion in connection with their supervisory and enforcement activities and examination policies, including policies with respect to the classification of assets and the establishment of adequate loan loss reserves for regulatory purposes. Their enforcement authority includes, among other things, the ability to assess civil monetary penalties, issue cease-and-desist or removal orders, and initiate injunctive actions against banking organizations and institution-affiliated parties. In general, these enforcement actions may be initiated for violations of laws and regulations and for engaging in unsafe or unsound practices. In addition, certain bank actions are required by statute and implementing regulations. Other actions or failure to act may provide the basis for enforcement action, including the filing of misleading or untimely reports with regulatory authorities. ### Regulatory Capital Requirements The federal banking agencies have implemented rules for U.S. banks that establish minimum regulatory capital requirements, the components of regulatory capital, and the risk-based capital treatment of bank assets and off-balance sheet exposures. These rules currently apply to the Corporation and FirstBank, and generally are intended to align U.S. regulatory capital requirements with international regulatory capital standards adopted by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (“Basel Committee”), in particular, the international capital accord known as “Basel III.” The current rules increase the quantity and quality of capital required by, among other things, establishing a minimum common equity capital requirement and an additional common equity Tier 1 capital conservation buffer. In addition, the current rules revise and harmonize the bank regulators’ rules for calculating risk-weighted assets, by applying a variation of the Basel III “Standardized Approach” for the risk-weighting of bank assets and off-balance sheet exposures to all U.S. banking organizations other than large internationally active banks. International regulatory developments also affect the regulation and supervision of U.S. banking organizations, including the Corporation and FirstBank. Both the Basel Committee and the Financial Stability Board have agreed to take action to strengthen regulation and supervision of the financial system with greater international consistency, cooperation, and transparency, including the adoption of Basel III and a commitment to raise capital standards and liquidity buffers within the banking system under Basel III. In addition, 12 U.S.C. 5371 (the “Collins Amendment”), among other things, eliminates certain trust-preferred securities (“TRuPs”) from Tier 1 capital. Preferred securities issued under the U.S. Treasury’s Troubled Asset Relief Program (“TARP”) are exempt from this change. Bank holding companies, such as the Corporation, were required to fully phase out these instruments from Tier 1 capital by January 1, 2016; however, these instruments may remain in Tier 2 capital until the instruments are redeemed or mature. As of December 31, 2022, the Corporation had $178.3 million in TRuPs that were subject to a full phase-out from Tier 1 capital under the final regulatory capital rules discussed above. Consistent with Basel Committee actions noted above, the Federal Reserve Board has adopted risk-based and leverage capital adequacy guidelines pursuant to which it assesses the adequacy of capital in examining and supervising a bank holding company and in analyzing applications to it under the Bank Holding Company Act. The Corporation and FirstBank became subject to the U.S. Basel III capital rules beginning on January 1, 2015. The Basel III rules require the Corporation to maintain an additional capital conservation buffer of 2.5% to avoid limitations on both (i) capital distributions ( #### e.g. , repurchases of capital instruments, dividends and interest payments on capital instruments) and (ii) discretionary bonus payments to executive officers and heads of major business lines. Under the fully phased-in Basel III rules, in order to be considered adequately capitalized and not subject to the above-described limitations, the Corporation is required to maintain: (i) a minimum common equity Tier 1 Capital (“CET1”) to risk-weighted assets ratio of at least 4.5%, plus the 2.5% “capital conservation buffer,” resulting in a required minimum CET1 ratio of at least 7%; (ii) a minimum ratio of total Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 6.0%, plus the 2.5% capital conservation buffer, resulting in a required minimum Tier 1 capital ratio of 8.5%; (iii) a minimum ratio of total Tier 1 plus Tier 2 capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 8.0%, plus the 2.5% capital conservation buffer, resulting in a required minimum total capital ratio of 10.5%; and (iv) a required minimum leverage ratio of 4%, calculated as the ratio of Tier 1 capital to average on-balance sheet (non-risk adjusted) assets. The Basel III rules have increased our regulatory capital requirements and require us to hold more capital against certain of our assets and off-balance sheet exposures. Further, as part of its response to the impact of COVID-19, on March 31, 2020, federal banking agencies issued an interim final rule that provided the option to temporarily delay the effects of CECL on regulatory capital for two years, followed by a three -year transition period. The interim final rule provides that, at the election of a qualified banking organization, the initial impact of the adoption of CECL on retained earnings plus 25% of the change in the ACL (excluding PCD loans) from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2021 will be delayed for two years and phased-in at 25% per year beginning on January 1, 2022 over a three -year period, resulting in a total transition period of five years. The Corporation and the Bank elected to phase in the full effect of CECL on regulatory capital over the five-year transition period. The Corporation and the Bank compute risk-weighted assets using the Standardized Approach required by the Basel III rules. The Standardized Approach expands the risk-weighting categories from the four major categories under the previous regulatory capital rules (0%, 20%, 50%, and 100%) to a much larger and more risk-sensitive number of categories, depending on the nature of the assets. In a number of cases, the Standardized Approach resulted in higher risk weights for a variety of asset categories. Specific changes to the risk-weightings of assets included, among other things: (i) applying a 150% risk weight instead of a 100% risk weight for high volatility commercial real estate acquisition, development and construction loans, (ii) assigning a 150% risk weight to exposures that are 90 days past due (other than qualifying residential mortgage exposures, which remain at an assigned risk-weighting of 100%), (iii) establishing a 20% credit conversion factor for the unused portion of a commitment with an original maturity of one year or less that is not unconditionally cancellable, in contrast to the 0% risk-weighting under the prior rules and (iv) requiring capital to be maintained against on-balance-sheet and off-balance-sheet exposures that result from certain cleared transactions, guarantees and credit derivatives, and collateralized transactions (such as repurchase agreement transactions). Set forth below are the Corporation's and FirstBank's capital ratios as of December 31, 2022 based on Federal Reserve and FDIC guidelines: ### Banking Subsidiary ### First BanCorp. ### FirstBank ### Well-Capitalized ### Minimum ### As of December 31, 2022 Total capital (Total capital to risk-weighted assets) 19.21% 18.90% 10.00% CET1 Capital (CET1 capital to risk-weighted assets) 16.53% 16.84% 6.50% Tier 1 capital ratio (Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets) 16.53% 17.65% 8.00% Leverage ratio (1) 10.70% 11.43% 5.00% (1) Tier 1 capital to average assets. ### Stress-Testing and Capital Planning Requirements Federal regulations currently do not impose formal stress-testing requirements on banking organizations with total assets of less than $100 billion, such as the Corporation and FirstBank. The federal banking agencies have indicated through interagency guidance that the capital planning and risk management practices of institutions with total assets of less than $100 billion will continue to be reviewed through the regular supervisory process. Notwithstanding, the Corporation monitors its capital consistent with the safety and soundness expectations of the federal regulators and continues to perform internal stress testing as part of its annual capital planning process. ### Dividend Restrictions The Federal Reserve Board has a policy that, as a matter of prudent banking, a bank holding company should generally not pay cash dividends unless its net income available to common shareholders for the past four quarters, net of dividends previously paid during that period, has been sufficient to fully fund the dividends and the prospective rate of earnings retention appears to be consistent with the organization’s capital needs, asset quality, and overall current and prospective financial condition. Furthermore, the Federal Reserve Board’s regulatory capital rule (Regulation Q) limits the amount of capital a bank holding company may distribute under certain circumstances. A banking organization must maintain a capital conservation buffer of CET1 capital in an amount greater than 2.5% of total risk weighted assets to avoid being subject to limitations on capital distributions. The Corporation is also subject to certain restrictions generally imposed on Puerto Rico corporations with respect to the declaration and payment of dividends (i.e., that dividends may be paid out only from the Corporation’s capital surplus or, in the absence of such excess, from the Corporation’s net earnings for such fiscal year and/or the preceding fiscal year). The principal source of funds for the Corporation, as a parent holding company, is dividends declared and paid by its subsidiary, FirstBank. The ability of FirstBank to declare and pay dividends on its capital stock is regulated by the Puerto Rico Banking Law of 1933, as amended (the “Puerto Rico Banking Law”), the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (the “FDIA”), and FDIC regulations. In general terms, the Puerto Rico Banking Law provides that when the expenditures of a bank are greater than receipts, the excess of expenditures over receipts shall be charged against undistributed profits of the bank and the balance, if any, shall be charged against the required reserve fund of the bank. If the reserve fund is not sufficient to cover such balance in whole or in part, the outstanding amount must be charged against the bank’s capital account. The Puerto Rico Banking Law provides that, until said capital has been restored to its original amount and the reserve fund to 20% of the original capital, the bank may not declare any dividends. In general, regulations of the FDIA and the FDIC restrict the payment of dividends when a bank is undercapitalized (as discussed in Prompt Corrective Action below), when a bank has failed to pay insurance assessments, or when there are safety and soundness concerns regarding such bank. The principal source of funds for the Corporation’s parent holding company is dividends declared and paid by its subsidiary, FirstBank. The ability of FirstBank to declare and pay dividends on its capital stock is regulated by the Puerto Rico Banking Law, the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (the “FDIA”), and FDIC regulations. In general terms, the Puerto Rico Banking Law provides that when the expenditures of a bank are greater than receipts, the excess of expenditures over receipts shall be charged against undistributed profits of the bank and the balance, if any, shall be charged against the required reserve fund of the bank. If the reserve fund is not sufficient to cover such balance in whole or in part, the outstanding amount must be charged against the bank’s capital account. The Puerto Rico Banking Law provides that, until said capital has been restored to its original amount and the reserve fund to 20% of the original capital, the bank may not declare any dividends. In general, the FDIA and the FDIC regulations restrict the payment of dividends when a bank is undercapitalized (as discussed in #### Prompt Corrective Action below), when a bank has failed to pay insurance assessments, or when there are safety and soundness concerns regarding such bank. Refer to Part II, Item 5, “Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information on the Corporation’s distribution of dividends and repurchases of common stock. ### Consumer Financial Protection Bureau The CFPB has primary examination and enforcement authority over FirstBank and other banks with over $10 billion in assets with respect to consumer financial products and services. The CFPB’s primary functions include the supervision of “covered persons” (broadly defined to include any person offering or providing a consumer financial product or service and any affiliated service provider) for compliance with federal consumer financial laws. It implements amendments to and has primary authority to enforce the federal consumer financial laws, including the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”) and the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (“RESPA”), among others. The CFPB also has broad powers to prescribe rules applicable to a covered person or service provider in connection with any transaction with a consumer for a consumer financial product or service, or the offering of a consumer financial product or service. Among other actions, the CFPB has issued regulations setting forth mortgage servicing rules that apply to the Bank, which affect consumer notices regarding delinquency, foreclosure alternatives, modification applications, interest rate adjustments and options for avoiding “force-placed” insurance. Further, the CFPB has adopted rules and forms that combine certain disclosures that consumers receive in connection with applying for and closing on a mortgage loan under the TILA and the RESPA. ### The Volcker Rule Section 13 of the Bank Holding Company Act (commonly known as the Volcker Rule), generally prohibits a banking entity such as the Corporation or the Bank from acquiring or retaining any ownership in, or acting as sponsor to, a hedge fund or private equity fund (“covered fund”). The Volcker Rule also prohibits these entities from engaging, for their own account, in short-term proprietary trading of certain securities, derivatives, commodity futures and options on these instruments. The Corporation and the Bank are not engaged in “proprietary trading” as defined in the Volcker Rule. In addition, the Corporation has reviewed its investments and concluded that they are not considered covered funds under the Volcker Rule. ### Community Reinvestment Act and Home Mortgage Disclosure Act Regulations The CRA encourages banks to help meet the credit needs of the local communities in which they offer services, including low- and moderate-income individuals, consistent with the safe and sound operation of the bank. The CRA requires the federal supervisory agencies, as part of the general examination of supervised banks, to assess a bank’s record of meeting the credit needs of its community, assign a performance rating, and take such record and rating into account in their evaluation of certain applications by such bank, such as an application for approval of a merger or the establishment of a branch. A rating of less than “satisfactory” could result in the denial of such applications. The CRA also requires all institutions to make public disclosure of their CRA ratings. FirstBank received a “satisfactory” CRA rating in its most recent examination by the FDIC. In June 2022, the U.S. federal banking regulatory agencies issued a joint proposal to amend their regulations implementing the CRA. The proposed rules would materially revise the current CRA framework, including new assessment area requirements, new methods of calculating credit for lending, investment, and service activities, and additional data collection and reporting requirements. The proposed rule included analysis indicating a significant increase in the thresholds for large banks to receive “Outstanding” ratings in the future. ### USA PATRIOT Act and Other Anti-Money Laundering Requirements As a regulated depository institution, FirstBank is subject to the Bank Secrecy Act, which imposes a variety of reporting and other requirements, including the requirement to file suspicious activity and currency transaction reports that are designed to assist in the detection and prevention of money laundering, terrorist financing and other criminal activities. In addition, under Title III of the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001, all financial institutions are required to identify their customers, adopt formal and comprehensive anti-money laundering programs, scrutinize or prohibit certain transactions of special concern, and be prepared to respond to inquiries from U.S. law enforcement agencies concerning their customers and their transactions. On January 1, 2021, major legislative amendments to U.S. anti-money laundering requirements became effective through the enactment of Division F of the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2021, otherwise known as the Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020 (“AML Act”). The AML Act includes a variety of provisions designed to modernize the anti-money laundering regulatory regime and remediate gaps in the U.S.’s approach to anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism, including the creation of a national database of absence corporate beneficial ownership along with significantly enhanced reporting requirements, increased penalties for Bank Secrecy Act violations, clarification of Suspicious Activity Report filing and sharing requirements, and provisions addressing the adverse consequences of “de-risking,” namely, the practice of financial institutions’ termination or limitation of business relationships with clients or classes of clients in order to manage the risks associated with such clients. Regulations implementing the Bank Secrecy Act and the USA PATRIOT Act are published and primarily enforced by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”), a bureau of the U.S. Treasury. Failure of a financial institution, such as the Corporation or the Bank, to comply with the requirements of the Bank Secrecy Act or the USA PATRIOT Act could have serious legal and reputational consequences for the institution, including the possibility of regulatory enforcement or other legal actions, such as significant civil monetary penalties. The Corporation is also required to comply with federal economic and trade sanctions requirements enforced by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”), a bureau of the U.S. Treasury. The Corporation believes it has adopted appropriate policies, procedures and controls to address compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act, USA PATRIOT Act and economic/trade sanctions requirements, and to implement banking agency, FinCEN, OFAC and other U.S. Treasury regulations. ### Financial Privacy and Cybersecurity The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act limits the ability of financial institutions to disclose non-public information about consumers to non- affiliated third parties. These limitations require disclosure of privacy policies to consumers and, in some circumstances, allow consumers to prevent disclosure of certain personal information to a non-affiliated third party. The federal banking regulators regularly issue guidance regarding cybersecurity intended to enhance cyber risk management standards among financial institutions. A financial institution is expected to establish multiple lines of defense and to ensure their risk management processes address the risk posed by potential threats to the institution. A financial institution’s management is expected to maintain sufficient processes to effectively respond and recover the institution’s operations after a cyber-attack. A financial institution is also expected to develop appropriate processes to enable recovery of data and business operations if a critical service provider of the institution falls victim to this type of a cyber-attack. The Corporation’s Information Security Program reflects these requirements. ### Limitations on Transactions with Affiliates and Insiders Certain transactions between FDIC-insured banks financial institutions such as FirstBank and its affiliates are governed by Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act and by Federal Reserve Regulation W. An affiliate of a bank is, in general, any corporation or entity that controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with the bank, including the bank’s parent holding company and any companies that are controlled by such holding company. Generally, Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act (i) limit the extent to which the bank or its subsidiaries may engage in “covered transactions” with any one affiliate to an amount equal to 10% of such bank’s capital stock and surplus, and contain an aggregate limit on all such transactions with all affiliates to an amount equal to 20% of such bank’s capital stock and surplus and (ii) require that all “covered transactions” be on terms that are substantially the same, or at least as favorable to the bank or affiliate, as those provided to a non-affiliate. The term “covered transaction” includes the making of loans, purchase of assets, issuance of a guarantee, credit derivatives, securities lending and other similar transactions entailing the provision of financial support by the bank to an affiliate. In addition, loans or other extensions of credit by the bank to the affiliate are required to be collateralized in accordance with the requirements set forth in Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act. In addition, Sections 22(h) and (g) of the Federal Reserve Act, implemented through Regulation O, place restrictions on commercial bank loans to executive officers, directors, and principal stockholders of the bank and its affiliates. Under Section 22(h) of the Federal Reserve Act, bank loans to a director, an executive officer, a greater than 10% stockholder of the bank, and certain related interests of these persons, may not exceed, together with all other outstanding loans to such persons and affiliated interests, the bank’s limit on loans to one borrower, which is generally equal to 15% of the bank’s unimpaired capital and surplus in the case of loans that are not fully secured, and an additional 10% of the bank's unimpaired capital and unimpaired surplus in the case of loans that are fully secured by readily marketable collateral having a market value at least equal to the amount of the loan. Section 22(h) of the Federal Reserve Act also requires that loans to directors, executive officers, and principal stockholders be made on terms that are substantially the same as offered in comparable transactions to other persons and also requires prior board approval for certain loans. In addition, the aggregate amount of extensions of credit by a bank to insiders cannot exceed the bank’s unimpaired capital and surplus. Furthermore, Section 22(g) of the Federal Reserve Act places additional restrictions on loans to executive officers. ### Executive Compensation The federal banking agencies have adopted interagency guidance governing incentive-based compensation programs, which applies to all banking organizations regardless of asset size. This guidance uses a principles-based approach to ensure that incentive-based compensation arrangements appropriately tie rewards to longer-term performance and do not undermine the safety and soundness of banking organizations or create undue risks to the financial system. The interagency guidance is based on three major principles: (i) balanced risk-taking incentives; (ii) compatibility with effective controls and risk management; and (iii) strong corporate governance. The guidance further provides that, where appropriate, the banking agencies will take supervisory or enforcement action to ensure that material deficiencies that pose a threat to the safety and soundness of the organization are promptly addressed. In May 2016, the federal financial regulators proposed regulations (first proposed in 2011) governing incentive-based compensation practices at covered banking institutions, which would include, among others, all banking organizations with assets of $1 billion or greater. Portions of these proposed rules would apply to the Corporation and FirstBank. Those applicable provisions would generally (i) prohibit types and features of incentive-based compensation arrangements that encourage inappropriate risk because they are “excessive” or “could lead to material financial loss” at the banking institution; (ii) require incentive-based compensation arrangements to adhere to three basic principles: (1) a balance between risk and reward; (2) effective risk management and controls; and (3) effective governance; and (iii) require appropriate board of directors (or committee) oversight and recordkeeping and disclosures to the banking institution’s primary regulatory agency. The nature and substance of any final action to adopt these proposed rules, and the timing of any such action, are not known at this time. On October 26, 2022, the SEC also finalized a rule that directs stock exchanges to require listed companies to implement clawback policies to recover incentive-based compensation from current or former executive officers in the event of certain financial restatements, and requires companies to disclose their clawback policies and their actions under those policies. The stock exchanges will be required to file their proposed listing standards with the SEC for approval no later than 90 days following the publication of the final rules in the Federal Register, which must be effective no later than one year following such publication. The rules are therefore not expected to take effect until mid-2023 at the earliest. ### Prompt Corrective Action The “prompt corrective action” provisions of the FDIA require the federal bank regulatory agencies to take prompt corrective action against any insured depository institution (“institutions”) that are undercapitalized. The FDIA establishes five capital categories: well-capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized, and critically undercapitalized. Well-capitalized institutions significantly exceed the required minimum level for each relevant capital measure. A bank’s capital category may not constitute an accurate representation of the overall financial condition or prospects of a bank, such as the Bank, and should be considered in conjunction with other available information regarding the financial condition and results of operations of such bank. ### Deposit Insurance FirstBank is subject to FDIC deposit insurance assessments, which increased for all banks, including FirstBank, following the increase in deposit insurance coverage to up to $250,000 per customer and the FDIC’s expanded authority to increase insurance premiums implemented by the Dodd-Frank Act. The FDIA further requires that the designated reserve ratio for the DIF for any year not be less than 1.35% of estimated insured deposits or the comparable percentage of the new deposit assessment base. In addition, the FDIC was required to take the necessary actions for the reserve ratio to reach 1.35% of estimated insured deposits by September 30, 2020. The FDIC managed to reach the goal early, achieving a reserve ratio of 1.36% in September 2018. However, in the third quarter of 2020, the FDIC announced that the reserve ratio of the DIF fell nine basis points between the first and second quarters of 2020, from 1.39% to 1.30%. The decline was attributed to an unprecedented surge in deposits. The FDIC approved a plan that is expected to restore the DIF to at least 1.35% within eight years, as required by the FDIA. Under the plan, the FDIC will maintain the current schedules of assessment rates for all banks; monitor deposit balance trends, potential losses and other factors that affect the reserve ratio; and provide updates to its loss and income projections at least twice a year. The FDIC has also adopted a final rule raising its industry target ratio of reserves to insured deposits to 2%, 65 basis points above the statutory minimum, but the FDIC has indicated that it does not project that goal to be met for several years. On October 18, 2022, the FDIC adopted a final rule, applicable to all insured depository institutions, to increase initial base deposit insurance assessment rate schedules uniformly by 2 basis points, beginning in the first quarterly assessment period of 2023. The FDIC also concurrently maintained the designated reserve ratio for the DIF at 2% for 2023. The increase in assessment rate schedules is intended to increase the likelihood that the reserve ratio of the DIF reaches the statutory minimum of 1.35% by the statutory deadline of September 30, 2028. The new assessment rate schedules will remain in effect unless and until the reserve ratio meets or exceeds 2% in order to support growth in the DIF and progress toward the FDIC’s long-term goal of a 2% designated reserve ratio. Progressively lower assessment rate schedules will take effect when the reserve ratio reaches 2% and again when it reaches 2.5%. The Corporation estimates an increase of approximately 56% in deposit insurance expense for 2023 compared to the FDIC insurance expense levels in 2022. ### FDIC Insolvency Authority Under Puerto Rico banking laws, the OCIF may appoint the FDIC as conservator or receiver of a failed or failing FDIC-insured Puerto Rican bank, and the FDIA authorizes the FDIC to accept such an appointment. In addition, the FDIC has broad authority under the FDIA to appoint itself as conservator or receiver of a failed or failing state bank, including a Puerto Rican bank. If the FDIC is appointed conservator or receiver of a bank upon the bank’s insolvency or the occurrence of other events, the FDIC may sell or transfer some, part or all of a bank’s assets and liabilities to another bank, or liquidate the bank and pay out insured depositors, as well as uninsured depositors and other creditors to the extent of the closed bank’s available assets. As part of its insolvency authority, the FDIC has the authority, among other things, to take possession of and administer the receivership estate, pay out estate claims, and repudiate or disaffirm certain types of contracts to which the bank was a party if the FDIC believes such contract is burdensome and its disaffirmance will aid in the administration of the receivership. The FDIA provides that, in the event of the liquidation or other resolution of an insured depository institution, including the Bank, the claims of depositors of the institution (including the claims of the FDIC as subrogee of insured depositors) and certain claims for administrative expenses of the FDIC as a receiver would have priority over other general unsecured claims against the institution. If the Bank were to fail, insured and uninsured depositors, along with the FDIC, would have priority in payment ahead of unsecured, non-deposit creditors, including the Corporation, with respect to any extensions of credit they have made to such insured depository institution. ### Activities and Investments The principal activities of FDIC-insured, state-chartered banks, such as FirstBank, are generally limited to those that are permissible for national banks. Similarly, under regulations dealing with equity investments, an insured state-chartered bank generally may not directly or indirectly acquire or retain any equity investments of a type, or in an amount, that is not permissible for a national bank. ### Federal Home Loan Bank System FirstBank is a member of the FHLB system. The FHLB system consists of eleven regional FHLBs governed and regulated by the Federal Housing Finance Agency. The FHLBs serve as reserve or credit facilities for member institutions within their assigned regions. FirstBank is a member of the FHLB of New York and, as such, is required to acquire and hold shares of capital stock in the FHLB of New York in an amount calculated in accordance with the requirements set forth in applicable laws and regulations. FirstBank is in compliance with the stock ownership requirements of the FHLB of New York. All loans, advances and other extensions of credit made by the FHLB to FirstBank are secured by a portion of FirstBank’s mortgage loan or securities portfolios, certain other investments and the capital stock of the FHLB held by FirstBank. The board of directors of each FHLB can increase the minimum investment requirements if it has concluded that additional capital is required to meet its own regulatory capital requirements. Any increase in the minimum investment requirements outside of specified ranges requires the approval of the Federal Housing Finance Agency. Because the extent of any obligation to increase our investment in any of the FHLBs depends entirely upon the occurrence of a future event, the amount of any future investment in the capital stock of the FHLBs is not determinable. ### Ownership and Control Because of FirstBank’s status as an FDIC-insured bank, as defined in the Bank Holding Company Act, the Corporation, as the owner of FirstBank’s common stock, is subject to certain restrictions and disclosure obligations under various federal laws, including the Bank Holding Company Act and the Change in Bank Control Act (the “CBCA”). Regulations adopted pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act and the CBCA generally require prior Federal Reserve Board or other federal banking agency approval or non- objection for an acquisition of control of an “insured institution” (as defined in the Act) or holding company thereof by any person (or persons acting in concert). Control is deemed to exist if, among other things, a person (or group of persons acting in concert) acquires 25% or more of any class of voting stock of an insured institution or holding company thereof. Under the CBCA, control is presumed to exist subject to rebuttal if a person (or group of persons acting in concert) acquires 10% or more of any class of voting stock and either (i) the corporation has registered securities under Section 12 of the Exchange Act, or (ii) no person (or group of persons acting in concert) will own, control or hold the power to vote a greater percentage of that class of voting securities immediately after the transaction. The concept of acting in concert is broad and subject to certain rebuttable presumptions, including, among others, that relatives, business partners, management officials, affiliates and others are presumed to be acting in concert with each other and their businesses. The regulations of the FDIC implementing the CBCA are generally similar to those described above. The Puerto Rico Banking Law requires the approval of the OCIF for changes in control of a Puerto Rico bank. See “Puerto Rico Banking Law” below for further detail. ### Standards for Safety and Soundness The FDIA requires the FDIC and other federal bank regulatory agencies to prescribe standards of safety and soundness. Bank regulators have various remedies available if they determine that the financial condition, capital resources, asset quality, earnings prospects, management, liquidity, or other aspects of a banking organization’s operations are unsatisfactory. The regulators may also take action if they determine that the banking organization or its management is violating or has violated any law or regulation. The regulators have the power to, among other things, prohibit unsafe or unsound practices, require affirmative actions to correct any violation or practice, issue administrative orders that can be judicially enforced, direct increases in capital, direct the sale of subsidiaries or other assets, limit dividends and distributions, restrict growth, assess civil monetary penalties, remove officers and directors, and terminate deposit insurance. Engaging in unsafe or unsound practices or failing to comply with applicable laws, regulations, and supervisory agreements could subject the Corporation, its subsidiaries, and their respective officers, directors, and institution-affiliated parties to the remedies described above, and other sanctions. In addition, the FDIC may terminate a bank’s deposit insurance upon a finding that the bank’s financial condition is unsafe or unsound or that the bank has engaged in unsafe or unsound practices or has violated an applicable rule, regulation, order, or condition enacted or imposed by the bank’s regulatory agency. ### Brokered Deposits FDIC regulations adopted under the FDIA govern the receipt of brokered deposits by banks. Well -capitalized institutions are not subject to limitations on brokered deposits, while adequately-capitalized institutions are able to accept, renew or rollover brokered deposits only with a waiver from the FDIC and subject to certain restrictions on the interest paid on such deposits. Undercapitalized institutions are not permitted to accept brokered deposits. In October 2020, the FDIC adopted revisions to its brokered deposit regulations that became effective on April 1, 2021, with full compliance extended to January 1, 2022. For brokered deposits, the final rule established a new framework for analyzing certain parts of the “deposit broker” definition, including a new interpretation for the “primary purpose” exception and the business relationships that meet the exception. Pursuant to this revision, during the fourth quarter of 2021, certain non-maturity deposits previously reported as brokered deposits were recharacterized as non-brokered deposits. ### COVID-Related Regulatory Activities During 2020, the federal banking agencies took several actions to mitigate the stress on regulated banks resulting from the COVID- 19 pandemic. These actions were generally designed to facilitate the ability of banks to provide responsible credit and liquidity to businesses and individuals affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, and mitigate the distorting effects under regulatory capital and other requirements resulting from the pandemic. In addition to the CECL regulatory capital relief discussed above, the banking agencies adopted regulations that, among other things: neutralized the regulatory capital and liquidity effects of banks participating in certain COVID-related Federal Reserve liquidity facilities; deferred appraisal and valuation requirements after the closing of certain residential and commercial real estate transactions; provided temporary relief for banks from the FDIC’s audit and reporting requirements for banks that experienced large cash inflows resulting from participation in the SBA’s PPP and other COVID-related facilities, or otherwise resulting from the effects of government stimulus efforts. These regulatory actions were taken in conjunction with federal financial regulatory efforts to encourage banks and other depositories to provide responsible credit and other financial assistance to consumers and small businesses in response to the pandemic. ### Puerto Rico Banking Law As a commercial bank organized under the laws of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, FirstBank is subject to supervision, examination and regulation by the commissioner of OCIF (the “Commissioner”) pursuant to the Puerto Rico Banking Law of 1933, as amended (the “Banking Law”). The Banking Law contains various provisions relating to FirstBank and its affairs, including its incorporation and organization, the rights and responsibilities of its directors, officers and stockholders and its corporate powers, lending limitations, capital requirements, and investment requirements. In addition, the Commissioner is given extensive rule-making power and administrative discretion under the Banking Law. The Banking Law requires every bank to maintain a legal reserve, which shall not be less than 20% of its demand liabilities, except government deposits (federal, state and municipal) that are secured by actual collateral. The reserve is required to be composed of any of the following securities or a combination thereof: (i) legal tender of the United States; (ii) checks on banks or trust companies located in any part of Puerto Rico that are to be presented for collection during the day following the day on which they are received; (iii) money deposited in other banks provided said deposits are authorized by the Commissioner and subject to immediate collection; (iv) federal funds sold to any Federal Reserve Bank and securities purchased under agreements to resell executed by the bank with such funds that are subject to be repaid to the bank on or before the close of the next business day; and (v) any other asset that the Commissioner identifies from time to time. Section 17 of the Banking Law permits Puerto Rico commercial banks to make loans to any one person, firm, partnership or corporation in an aggr egate amount of up to 15% of the sum of: (i) the bank’s paid-in capital; (ii) the bank’s reserve fund; (iii) 50% of the bank’s retained earnings, subject to certain limitations; and (iv) any other components that the Commissioner may determine from time to time. If such loans are secured by collateral worth at least 25% of the amount of the loan, the aggregate maximum amount may reach 33.33% of the sum of the bank’s paid-in capital, reserve fund, 50% of retained earnings, subject to certain limitations, and such other components that the Commissioner may determine from time to time. There are no restrictions under the Banking Law on the amount of loans that may be wholly secured by bonds, securities and other evidences of indebtedness of the government of the United States, or of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or by bonds, not in default, of municipalities or instrumentalities of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. The Banking Law requires that Puerto Rico commercial banks prepare each year a balance summary of their operations and submit such balance summary for approval at a regular meeting of stockholders, together with an explanatory report thereon. The Banking Law also requires that at least 10% of the yearly net income of a Puerto Rico commercial bank be credited annually to a reserve fund until such reserve fund is in amount equal to the total paid-in-capital of the bank. The Banking Law also provides that when the expenditures of a Puerto Rico commercial bank are greater than its receipts, the excess of the expenditures over receipts must be charged against the undistributed profits of the bank, and the balance, if any, charged against the reserve fund, as a reduction thereof. If there is no reserve fund sufficient to cover such balance in whole or in part, the outstanding amount must be charged against the capital account and no dividend may be declared until said capital has been restored to its original amount and the amount in the reserve fund equals 20% of the original capital. The Finance Board, which is composed of nine members from enumerated Puerto Rico Government agencies, instrumentalities and public corporations, including the Commissioner, has the authority to regulate the maximum interest rates and finance charges that may be charged on loans to individuals and unincorporated businesses in Puerto Rico. The current regulations of the Finance Board provide that the applicable interest rate on loans to individuals and unincorporated businesses, including real estate development loans but excluding certain other personal and commercial loans secured by mortgages on real estate properties, is to be determined by free competition. Accordingly, the regulations do not set a maximum rate for charges on retail installment sales contracts, small loans, and credit card purchases. Furthermore, there is no maximum rate set for installment sales contracts involving motor vehicles, commercial, agricultural and industrial equipment, commercial electric appliances and insurance premiums. ### International Banking Center Regulatory Act of Puerto Rico (“IBE Act 52”) The business and operations of FirstBank International Branch (“FirstBank IBE” or the “IBE division of FirstBank”) and FirstBank Overseas Corporation (the IBE subsidiary of FirstBank) are subject to supervision and regulation by the Commissioner. FirstBank and FirstBank Overseas Corporation were created under Puerto Rico Act 52-1989, as amended, known as the “International Banking Center Regulatory Act” (the IBE Act 52), which provides for total Puerto Rico tax exemption on net income derived by an IBE operating in Puerto Rico on the specific activities identified in the IBE Act 52. An IBE that operates as a unit of a bank pays income taxes at the corporate standard rates to the extent that the IBE’s net income exceeds 20% of the bank’s total net taxable income. Under the IBE Act 52, certain sales, encumbrances, assignments, mergers, exchanges or transfers of shares, interests or participation(s) in the capital of an IBE may not be initiated without the prior approval of the Commissioner. The IBE Act 52 and the regulations issued thereunder by the Commissioner (the “IBE Regulations”) limit the business activities that may be carried out by an IBE. Such activities are limited in part to persons and assets located outside of Puerto Rico. Pursuant to the IBE Act 52 and the IBE Regulations, each of FirstBank IBE and FirstBank Overseas Corporation must maintain in Puerto Rico books and records of its transactions in the ordinary course of business. FirstBank IBE and FirstBank Overseas Corporation are also required to submit to the Commissioner quarterly and annual reports of their financial condition and results of operations, including annual audited financial statements. The IBE Act 52 empowers the Commissioner to revoke or suspend, after notice and hearing, a license issued thereunder if, among other things, the IBE fails to comply with the IBE Act 52, the IBE Regulations or the terms of its license, or if the Commissioner finds that the business or affairs of the IBE are conducted in a manner that is not consistent with the public interest. In 2012, the Puerto Rico government approved Act Number 273 (“Act 273”). Act 273 replaces, prospectively, IBE Act 52 with the objective of improving the conditions for conducting international financial transactions in Puerto Rico. An IBE existing on the date of approval of Act 273, such as FirstBank IBE and FirstBank Overseas Corporation, can continue operating under IBE Act 52, or it can voluntarily convert to an International Financial Entity (“IFE”) under Act 273 so it may broaden its scope of Eligible IFE Activities, as defined below, and obtain a grant of tax exemption under Act 273. As of the date of the issuance of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, FirstBank IBE and FirstBank Overseas Corporation are operating under IBE Act 52. IFEs are licensed by the Commissioner and authorized to conduct certain Act 273 specified financial transactions (“Eligible IFE Activities”). Once licensed, an IFE can request a grant of tax exemption (“Tax Grant”) from the Puerto Rico Department of Economic Development and Commerce, which will enumerate and secure the following tax benefits provided by Act 273 as contractual rights #### i.e. , regardless of future changes in Puerto Rico law) for a 15-year period: (i) to the IFE: a fixed 4% Puerto Rico income tax rate on the net income derived by the IFE from its Eligible IFE Activities; and full property and municipal license tax exemptions on such activities. (ii) to its shareholders: 6% income tax rate on distributions to Puerto Rico resident shareholders of earnings and profits derived from the Eligible IFE Activities; and full Puerto Rico income tax exemption on such distributions to non-Puerto Rico resident shareholders. The primary purpose of IFEs is to attract Unites States and foreign investors to Puerto Rico. Consequently, Act 273 authorizes IFEs to engage in traditional banking and financial transactions, principally with non-residents of Puerto Rico. Furthermore, the scope of Eligible IFE Activities encompasses a wider variety of transactions than those previously authorized to IBEs. Act 187, as amended, enacted on November 17, 2015, requires an IBE to obtain from the Commissioner a Certificate of Compliance every two years that certifies its compliance with the provisions of IBE Act 52. ### Puerto Rico Income Taxes Under the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code of 2011, as amended (the “2011 PR Code”), the Corporation and its subsidiaries are treated as separate taxable entities and are not entitled to file consolidated tax returns and, thus, the Corporation is generally not entitled to utilize losses from one subsidiary to offset gains in another subsidiary. Accordingly, to obtain a tax benefit from a net operating loss (“NOL”), a particular subsidiary must be able to demonstrate sufficient taxable income within the applicable NOL carry-forward period. The 2011 PR Code provides a dividend received deduction of 100% on dividends received from “controlled” subsidiaries subject to taxation in Puerto Rico and 85% on dividends received from other taxable domestic corporations. The Corporation has maintained an effective tax rate lower than the maximum statutory rate in Puerto Rico, which has resulted mainly from investments in government obligations and MBS generally exempt from U.S. and Puerto Rico income taxes and from doing business through an IBE unit of the Bank, and through the Bank’s subsidiary, FirstBank Overseas Corporation, whose interest income and gain on sales is exempt from Puerto Rico income taxation. ### United States Income Taxes As a Puerto Rico corporation, First BanCorp. is treated as a foreign corporation for U.S. and USVI income tax purposes and, accordingly, is generally subject to U.S. and USVI income tax only on its income from sources within the U.S. and USVI or income effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in those jurisdictions. Any such tax paid in the U.S. and USVI is also creditable against the Corporation’s Puerto Rico tax liability, subject to certain conditions and limitations. ### Insurance Operations Regulation FirstBank Insurance Agency is registered as an insurance agency with the Insurance Commissioner of Puerto Rico and is subject to regulations issued by the Insurance Commissioner and the Division of Banking and Insurance Financial Regulation in the USVI relating to, among other things, the licensing of employees and sales and solicitation and advertising practices, and by the Federal Reserve as to certain consumer protection provisions mandated by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and its implementing regulations. ### Mortgage Banking Operations In addition to FDIC and CFPB regulations, FirstBank is subject to the rules and regulations of the FHA, VA, FNMA, FHLMC, GNMA, and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) with respect to originating, processing, selling and servicing mortgage loans and the issuance and sale of MBS. Those rules and regulations, among other things, prohibit discrimination and establish underwriting guidelines that include provisions for inspections and appraisals, require credit reports on prospective borrowers and fix maximum loan amounts, and, with respect to VA loans, fix maximum interest rates. Moreover, lenders such as FirstBank are required annually to submit audited financial statements to the FHA, VA, FNMA, FHLMC, GNMA and HUD and each regulatory entity has its own financial requirements. FirstBank’s affairs are also subject to supervision and examination by the FHA, VA, FNMA, FHLMC, GNMA and HUD at all times to assure compliance with applicable regulations, policies and procedures. Mortgage origination activities are subject to, among other requirements, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, TILA and the RESPA and the regulations promulgated thereunder that, among other things, prohibit discrimination and require the disclosure of certain basic information to mortgagors concerning credit terms and settlement costs. FirstBank is licensed by the Commissioner under the Puerto Rico Mortgage Banking Law, and, as such, is subject to regulation by the Commissioner, with respect to, among other things, licensing requirements and the establishment of maximum origination fees on certain types of mortgage loan products. ### WEBSITE ACCESS TO REPORT The Corporation makes available annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports, and proxy statements on Schedule 14A, filed or furnished pursuant to Sections 13(a), 14(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, free of charge on or through its internet website at www.1firstbank.com (under “Investor Relations”), as soon as reasonably practicable after the Corporation electronically files such material with, or furnishes it to, the SEC. The SEC maintains a website that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at www.sec.gov. The Corporation also makes available its Corporate Governance Guidelines and Principles, the charters of the Audit, Asset/Liability, Compensation and Benefits, Credit, Risk, Trust, and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committees and the documents listed below, free of charge on or through its internet website at www.fbpinvestor.com (under Corporate Governance): - Code of Ethics for CEO and Senior Financial Officers - Code of Ethical Conduct applicable to all employees - Independence Principles for Directors - 2021 ESG Report - Sustainability Policy The Corporate Governance Guidelines and Principles and the aforementioned charters and documents may also be obtained free of charge by sending a written request to Mrs. Sara Alvarez Cabrero , Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of the Board, PO Box 9146, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00908. Website addresses referenced in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are provided as textual references and for convenience only, and the content on the referenced websites does not constitute a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K or any other report or document that the Corporation files with or furnishes to the SEC. ## Risk factors As filed, 83,342 characters. ### Risk Factors Below is a discussion about material risks and uncertainties that could impact the Corporation’s businesses, results of operations and financial condition, including by causing the Corporation’s actual results to differ materially from those projected in any forward- looking statements. Other risks and uncertainties, including those not currently known to the Corporation or its management and those that the Corporation or its management currently deems to be immaterial, could also materially adversely affect the Corporation in future periods. Thus, the following should not be considered a complete discussion of all of the risks and uncertainties the Corporation may face. See the discussion under “Forward-Looking Statements,” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. ### RISKS RELATING TO THE BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT AND OUR INDUSTRY ### The impacts of rising interest rates and inflation may reduce demand for new loan originations and refinancings and increase ### competition for borrowers, thus reducing net interest income. Shifts in short-term interest rates have reduced net interest income in the past and, in the future, may reduce net interest income, which is the principal component of our earnings. Net interest income is the difference between the amounts received by us on our interest-earning assets and the interest paid by us on our interest-bearing liabilities. Differences in the re-pricing structure of our assets and liabilities may result in changes in our profits when interest rates change. For instance, higher interest rates increase the cost of mortgage and other loans to consumers and businesses and may reduce future demand for such loans, which may negatively impact our profits by reducing the amount of loan interest income due to declines in volume. Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors that are beyond our control, including general economic conditions, inflationary trends, changes in government spending and debt issuances and policies of various governmental and regulatory agencies, in particular, the Federal Reserve. Throughout 2022 the Federal Reserve raised the target range for the federal funds rate on seven separate occasions and has indicated that ongoing increases may be appropriate. Additionally, basis risk is the risk of adverse consequences resulting from unequal changes in the difference, also referred to as the “spread” or basis, between the rates for two or more different instruments with the same maturity and occurs when market rates for different financial instruments or the indices used to price assets and liabilities change at different times or by different amounts. For example, the interest expense for liability instruments might not change by the same amount as interest income received from loans or investments. To the extent that the interest rates on loans and borrowings change at different rates and by different amounts, the margin between our variable rate-based assets and the cost of the interest-bearing liabilities might be compressed and adversely affect net interest income. Further, rising interest rates reduce the value of our fixed-rate securities. Any unrealized loss from these portfolios impacts other comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and the tangible common equity ratio. Any realized loss from these portfolios impacts regulatory capital ratios. ### Changes in prepayments may adversely affect net interest income. Net interest income could also be affected by prepayments of MBS. Generally, when rates rise, prepayments of principal and interest will decrease, and the duration of MBS securities will increase. Conversely, when rates fall, prepayments of principal and interest will increase, and the duration of mortgage-backed securities will decrease. Such acceleration in the prepayments of MBS would lower yields on these securities, as the amortization of premiums paid upon the acquisition of these securities would accelerate. Conversely, acceleration in the prepayments of MBS would increase yields on securities purchased at a discount, as the accretion of the discount would accelerate. Also, net interest income in future periods might be affected by our investment in callable securities because decreases in interest rates might prompt the early redemption of such securities. ### The transition from LIBOR to alternative rates and other potential interest rate reforms may affect the interest rates we pay or ### receive. A transition away from the widespread use of LIBOR to alternative rates is underway and will continue until full cessation of this reference rate. These changes may cause such rates to perform differently than in the past, or to disappear entirely, or have other consequences which cannot be predicted. A group of market participants convened by the Federal Reserve, the Alternative Reference Rate Committee (the “ARRC”), has selected the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) as its recommended alternative to LIBOR. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York started to publish SOFR in April 2018. SOFR is a broad measure of the cost of overnight borrowings collateralized by Treasury securities that was selected by the ARRC due to the depth and robustness of the U.S. Treasury repurchase market. The passage of the Adjustable Interest Rate Act (the “LIBOR Act”) by U.S. Congress, and the Federal Reserve’s implementing rule, should decrease the risk of contracts that are not remediated prior to the cessation deadline by providing the terms for a transition to SOFR. The market transition away from LIBOR to an alternative reference rate, such as SOFR, is complex and could have a range of adverse effects on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. In particular, any such transition could: Adversely affect the interest rates received or paid on, the revenue and expenses associated with or the value of the Corporation’s LIBOR-based assets and liabilities, which include certain variable rate loans, primarily commercial and construction loans, private label MBSs, the Corporation’s junior subordinated debentures, and certain other financial arrangements such as derivatives. As of December 31, 2022, the most significant of the Corporation’s LIBOR-based assets and liabilities consisted of $1.4 billion of variable-rate commercial and construction loans (including unused commitments), $124.4 million of Puerto Rico municipalities bonds held as part of the Corporation’s held-to-maturity debt securities portfolio, $44.6 million of U.S. agencies debt securities and private label MBS held as part of the Corporation’s available- for-sale debt securities portfolio, and $183.8 million of junior subordinated debentures; Prompt inquiries or other actions from regulators in respect of the Corporation’s preparation and readiness for the replacement of LIBOR with an alternative reference rate; and Result in disputes, litigation or other actions with counterparties regarding the interpretation and enforceability of certain fallback language in LIBOR-based contracts. The transition away from LIBOR to an alternative reference rate has required the transition to, or development of, appropriate systems and analytics to effectively transition the Corporation’s risk management and other processes from LIBOR-based products to those based on the applicable alternative reference rate, such as SOFR. The LIBOR Transition Working Group (“LTWG”), which is composed by officers of the major areas affected such as Treasury, Legal, Corporate Loans, Credit, Operations, Systems, Asset- Liability Management, Risk, Accounting, Financial Reporting, Public Relations, and Strategic Planning, are in charge of executing the LIBOR transition workplan. The LTWG is overseen by the Corporation’s Management Investments & Asset-Liability Committee and the Board of Directors Asset-Liability Committee. Effective December 31, 2021, the Corporation discontinued originations that use U.S. Dollar LIBOR as a reference rate. In addition, the Corporation continues working with the update of systems, processes, documentation and models, with additional updates expected through 2023. There can be no guarantee that these efforts will successfully mitigate the operational risks associated with the transition away from LIBOR to an alternative reference rate. The manner and impact of the transition from LIBOR to an alternative reference rate, as well as the effect of these developments on our funding costs, loan and investment securities portfolios, asset-liability management, and business, is uncertain. ### Difficult market and general economic conditions have affected the financial industry and may continue to adversely affect us ### in the future. Given that most of our business is in Puerto Rico and the U.S. and given the degree of interrelation between Puerto Rico’s economy and that of the U.S., we are exposed to downturns in the U.S. economy, including factors such as employment levels in the U.S. and real estate valuations. The deterioration of these conditions adversely affected us in the past and in the future could adversely affect the credit performance of mortgage loans, and result in significant write-downs of asset values by financial institutions, including government-sponsored entities as well as major commercial banks and investment banks. In particular, we may face the following risks: Our ability to assess the creditworthiness of our customers may be impaired if the models and approaches we use to select, manage, and underwrite the loans become less predictive of future behaviors. The models used to estimate losses inherent in the credit exposure, particularly those under CECL, require difficult, subjective, and complex judgments, including forecasts of economic conditions and how these economic predictions might impair the ability of the borrowers to repay their loans, which may no longer be accurately estimated and which may, in turn, impact the reliability of the models. Our ability to borrow from other financial institutions or to engage in sales of mortgage loans to third parties (including mortgage loan securitization transactions with government-sponsored entities and repurchase agreements) on favorable terms, or at all, could be adversely affected by further disruptions in the capital or credit markets or other events, including deteriorating investor expectations. Competitive dynamics in the industry could change as a result of strategic growth opportunities in connection with current market conditions. Expected future regulation of our industry may increase our compliance costs and limit our ability to pursue business opportunities. There may be downward pressure on our stock price. Any deterioration of economic conditions in the U.S. and disruptions in the financial markets could adversely affect our ability to access capital, our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Unfavorable or uncertain economic and market conditions have been and could cause declines in economic growth, business activity or investor or business confidence; limitations on the availability or increases in the cost of credit and capital; increases in inflation or interest rates; high unemployment; natural disasters; epidemics and pandemics (such as the COVID-19 pandemic); or a combination of these or other factors. Additionally, the residential mortgage loan origination business is impacted by home values and has historically been cyclical, enjoying periods of strong growth and profitability followed by periods of shrinking volumes and industry-wide losses. During periods of rising interest rates, including the series of interest rate increases that occurred in 2022, the refinancing of many mortgage products tends to decrease as the economic incentives for borrowers to refinance their existing mortgage loans are reduced. Any sustained period of increased delinquencies, foreclosures, or losses could adversely affect our ability to sell loans, the prices we receive for loans, the values of mortgage loans held for sale, or residual interests in securitizations, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, any additional material decline in real estate values would further weaken the loan-to-value ratios and increase the possibility of loss if a borrower defaults. In such event, we will be subject to the risk of loss on such real estate arising from borrower defaults to the extent not covered by third-party credit enhancement. ### The currently evolving situation related to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic may impact the Corporation’s business, financial ### condition and results of operations. The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic created a global public health crisis that has resulted in challenging economic conditions for our business and is likely to continue to do so. The economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant volatility and disruption in the financial markets of Puerto Rico and the other markets in which the Corporation operates. Further, the uncertainty surrounding future economic conditions has challenged management's ability to estimate the pandemic's impact on credit quality, revenues, and assets values. The Corporation may also face residual risk related to its participation in the SBA PPP program established by the CARES Act of 2020\. The Corporation’s participation in the SBA PPP and any other such programs or stimulus packages may give rise to claims, including by governments, regulators, or customers or through class action lawsuits, or judgments against the Corporation that may result in the payment of damages or the imposition of fines, penalties or restrictions by regulatory authorities, or result in reputational harm. The occurrence of any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on the Corporation’s results of operations or financial condition. The full extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic further impacts our business, results of operations, and financial condition, as well as our regulatory capital and liquidity ratios, will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on the global economy, as well as any future resumption of responsive actions taken by governmental authorities and other third parties. Even after the COVID-19 pandemic has subsided, we may continue to experience materially adverse impacts to our business and our results of operations as a result of its global economic impact. ### We operate in a highly competitive industry and market area. We face substantial competition in all areas of our operations from a variety of different competitors, including other banks, insurance companies, mortgage banking companies, small loan companies, automobile financing companies, leasing companies, brokerage firms with retail operations, credit unions, certain retailers, fintech companies and digital platforms. The Corporation’s ability to compete effectively depends on the relative performance of its products, the degree to which the features of its products appeal to customers, and the extent to which the Corporation meets clients’ needs and expectations. The Corporation’s ability to compete also depends on its ability to attract and retain professional and other personnel, and on its reputation. The Corporation encounters intense competition in attracting and retaining deposits and in its consumer and commercial lending activities. The Corporation competes for loans with other financial institutions. The Corporation’s ability to originate loans depends primarily on the rates and fees charged and the service it provides to its borrowers in making prompt credit decisions. There can be no assurance that in the future the Corporation will be able to increase its deposit base, originate loans in the manner or on the terms on which it has done so in the past, or otherwise compete effectively. ### The Corporation’s credit quality and the value of the portfolio of Puerto Rico government securities has been, and in the future ### may be, adversely affected by Puerto Rico’s economic condition, and may be affected by actions taken by the Puerto Rico ***government or the PROMESA oversight board to address the ongoing fiscal and economic challenges in Puerto Rico.*** A significant portion of the Corporation’s business activities and credit exposure is concentrated in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, which has experienced an economic and fiscal crisis for more than a decade. On November 10, 2022, the Puerto Rico Planning Board (“PRPB”) presented the Economic Report to the Governor, which provides an analysis of Puerto Rico’s economy during fiscal year 2021 and a short-term forecast for fiscal years 2022 and 2023. According to the PRPB, Puerto Rico’s real gross national product (“GNP”) expanded by 1.0% in fiscal year 2021, significantly above the PRPB’s original baseline projection of a 2.0% contraction. According to the report, real GNP growth was primarily driven by a sharp increase in personal consumption expenditures reflecting the relaxation of COVID-related restrictions, as well as the impact of the substantial disaster relief funding deployed over the period. To a lesser extent, growth in fiscal year 2021 was also driven by a higher level of investments in machinery, equipment, and construction. These favorable variances were partially offset by an increase in imports, a reduction in exports, and a negative change in the level of inventories. For fiscal years 2022 and 2023, the Puerto Rico economy is forecasted to grow 4.0% and 0.7% in real terms, according to the PRPB’s baseline projection. Among the key assumptions included in this forecast is the positive impact expected from the ongoing disbursements of disaster recovery funds ($2.8 billion and $4.0 billion in fiscal years 2022 and 2023, respectively), as well as the stimulus from remaining pandemic relief funds ($1.1 billion and $632 million in fiscal years 2022 and 2023, respectively), and the inclusion of Puerto Rico in the Earned Income Tax Credit and the Child Tax Credit since 2021. The 2022 Fiscal Plan contains an updated macroeconomic forecast that reflects the adverse impact of the pandemic-induced recession at the end of fiscal year 2020, followed by a forecasted rebound and recovery in fiscal years 2021 through 2023. Similar to the previous fiscal plan, the 2022 Fiscal Plan incorporates a real growth series that was adjusted for the short-term income effects resulting from the extraordinary unemployment insurance and other pandemic -related direct transfer programs. Specifically, the 2022 Fiscal Plan estimates that Puerto Rico’s GNP will grow by 5.2% in fiscal year 2022, followed by a 0.6% growth in fiscal year 2023. Excluding the effect on household income from the unprecedented pandemic-related federal government stimulus, the 2022 Fiscal Plan estimates that real GNP growth would be 2.6% and 0.9% in fiscal years 2022 and 2023, respectively. Over the past few years, Puerto Rico has benefited from historical levels of federal support, creating new opportunities to address high-priority needs. The 2022 Fiscal Plan projects that approximately $84 billion of disaster relief funding in total, from federal and private sources, will be disbursed in the reconstruction process over a period of 18 years (2018 to 2035). As of December 31, 2022, the Corporation had $338.9 million of direct exposure to the Puerto Rico government, its municipalities and public corporations. As of December 31, 2022, approximately $183.4 million of the exposure consisted of loans and obligations of municipalities in Puerto Rico that are supported by assigned property tax revenues and for which, in most cases, the good faith, credit, and unlimited taxing power of the applicable municipality have been pledged to their repayment, and $114.0 million of loans and obligations which are supported by one or more specific sources of municipal revenues. The municipalities are required by law to levy special property taxes in such amounts as are required for the payment of all of their respective general obligation bonds and notes. In addition to municipalities, the total direct exposure also included $10.8 million in loans to an affiliate of PREPA, $27.4 million in loans to an agency of the Puerto Rico central government, and obligations of the Puerto Rico government, specifically a residential pass-through MBS issued by the PR Housing Finance Authority (“PRHFA”), at an amortized cost of $3.3 million as part of its available-for-sale debt securities portfolio (fair value of $2.2 million as of December 31, 2022). In addition, as of December 31, 2022, the Corporation had $84.7 million in exposure to residential mortgage loans that are guaranteed by the PRHFA. Residential mortgage loans guaranteed by the PRHFA are secured by the underlying properties and the guarantees serve to cover shortfalls in collateral in the event of a borrower default. The regulations adopted by the PRHFA require the establishment of adequate reserves to guarantee the solvency of its mortgage loans insurance program As of June 30, 2021, the most recent date as of which information is available, the PRHFA had a liability of approximately $5 million as an estimate of the losses inherent in the portfolio. As of December 31, 2022, the Corporation had $2.3 billion of public sector deposits in Puerto Rico. Approximately 24% of the public sector deposits as of December 31, 2022 was from municipalities and municipal agencies in Puerto Rico and 76% was from the public corporation, the Puerto Rico central government and agencies, and U.S. federal government agencies in Puerto Rico. Instability in economic conditions, delays in the receipt of disaster relief funds allocated to Puerto Rico, and the potential impact on asset values resulting from past or future natural disaster events, when added to Puerto Rico’s ongoing fiscal challenges, could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations and capital position. ### A deterioration in economic conditions in the U.S. Virgin Islands and British Virgin Islands could harm our results of ### operations. For many years, the USVI has been experiencing a number of fiscal and economic challenges that have deteriorated the overall financial and economic conditions in the area. On March 4, 2022, the United States Bureau of Economic Analysis (the “BEA”) released its estimates of gross domestic product (“GDP”) for 2020. According to the BEA, the USVI’s real GDP decreased 2.2%. Also, the BEA revised its previously published real GDP growth estimate for 2019 from 2.2% to 2.8%. According to the BEA, the decline in real GDP for 2020 reflected decreases in exports of services, private fixed investment, personal consumption expenditures, and government spending primarily as a result of the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. These decreases were partly offset by an increase in private inventory investment, reflecting an increase in crude oil and other petroleum products imported and stored in the islands. In addition, there were reductions in imports of goods including consumer goods and equipment, and in imports of services. According to the BEA, expenditures funded by the various federal grants and transfer payments are reflected in the GDP estimates; however, the full effects of the pandemic cannot be quantified in the GDP statistics for the USVI because the impacts are generally embedded in source data and cannot be separately identified. Nonetheless, over the past two years, the USVI has been recovering from the adverse impact caused by COVID-19 and has continued to make progress on its rebuilding efforts related to Hurricanes Irma and Maria in 2017. According to data published by the government, over $1.4 billion in disaster recovery funds were disbursed during 2021 and 2022, up 22% from the preceding 2-year period. On the fiscal front, revenues have trended positively and the USVI Government successfully completed the restructuring of the government employee retirement system. Although no official GDP data has been released for 2021 and/or 2022, the aforementioned developments, as well as the positive trend reflected by key economic indicators such as visitor arrivals, non-farm payrolls and unemployment rate potentially indicate that the territory has experienced an overall economic recovery since 2020. PROMESA does not apply to the USVI and, as such, there is currently no federal legislation permitting the restructuring of the debts of the USVI and its public corporations and instrumentalities. To the extent that the fiscal condition of the USVI government continues to deteriorate, the U.S. Congress or the government of the USVI may enact legislation allowing for the restructuring of the financial obligations of the USVI government entities or imposing a stay on creditor remedies, including by making PROMESA applicable to the USVI. As of December 31, 2022, the Corporation had $38.0 million in loans to USVI government and public corporations, compared to $39.2 million as of December 31, 2021. As of December 31, 2022, all loans were currently performing and up to date on principal and interest payments. A deterioration in economic conditions in USVI and the BVI region could adversely affect our business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations and capital position. ***We are subject to ESG risks that could adversely affect our reputation and the market price of our securities.*** The Corporation is subject to a variety of risks arising from ESG matters. ESG matters include climate risk, hiring practices, the diversity of our work force, and racial and social justice issues involving our personnel, customers and third parties with whom we otherwise do business. Risks arising from ESG matters may adversely affect, among other things, our reputation and the market price of our securities. For example, we may be exposed to negative publicity based on the identity and activities of those to whom we lend and with which we otherwise do business and the public’s view of the approach and performance of our customers and business partners with respect to ESG matters. Any such negative publicity could arise from adverse news coverage in traditional media and could also spread through the use of social media platforms. The Corporation’s relationships and reputation with its existing and prospective customers and third parties with which we do business could be damaged if we were to become the subject of any such negative publicity. This, in turn, could have an adverse effect on our ability to attract and retain customers and employees and could have a negative impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, concerns over the long-term impacts of climate change have led and will continue to lead to governmental efforts to mitigate those impacts. Consumers and businesses also may change their behavior on their own as a result of these concerns. The Corporation and its customers will need to respond to new laws and regulations as well as consumer and business preferences resulting from climate change concerns. Finally, regulatory authorities, shareholders, customers and other stakeholders are considering how corporations are addressing ESG issues. Regulations already adopted or being considered may expand mandatory and voluntary reporting, diligence and disclosure on specific ESG topics, such as greenhouse gas emissions and other climate matters. These requirements would likely result in increased ESG related compliance costs, which could result in increases to our overall operational costs. Failure to adapt to or comply with regulatory requirements or investor or stakeholder expectations and standards could negatively impact our reputation, ability to do business with certain partners, and our stock price. ### Our results of operations could be adversely affected by natural disasters, political crises, negative global climate patterns or ### other catastrophic events. Natural disasters, which nature and severity may be impacted by climate change, such as hurricanes, floods, extreme cold events and other adverse weather conditions; political crises, such as terrorist attacks, war, labor unrest, other political instability, trade policies and sanctions, including the repercussions of the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine; negative global climate patterns, especially in water stressed regions; or other catastrophic events, such as fires or other disasters occurring at our locations, whether occurring in Puerto Rico, the U.S., or internationally, could cause a significant adverse effect on the economy and disrupt our operations. Certain areas in which our business is concentrated, including Puerto Rico and the USVI, are particularly susceptible to earthquakes, hurricanes, and major storms. Further, climate change may increase both the frequency and severity of extreme weather conditions and natural disasters, which may affect our business operations, either in a particular region or globally, as well as the activities of our customers. The Corporation is also not able to predict the positive or negative effects that future events or changes to the U.S. or global economy, financial markets, or regulatory and business environment could have on our operations. ***Climate change may materially adversely affect the Corporation's business and results of operations.*** Concerns over the long-term effects of climate change have led and will continue to lead to governmental efforts around the world to mitigate those impacts. Consumers and businesses also may voluntarily change their behavior as a result of these concerns. The Corporation and its customers will need to respond to new laws and regulations as well as consumer and business preferences resulting from climate change concerns. The Corporation and its customers may face cost increases, asset value reductions and operating process changes. The impact on our customers will likely vary depending on their specific attributes, including reliance on or role in fossil fuel activities. Among the impacts to the Corporation, we could face reductions in creditworthiness on the part of some customers or in the value of assets securing loans. The Corporation’s efforts to take these risks into account in making lending and other decisions, including increasing our business with climate-responsible companies, may not be effective in protecting the Corporation from the negative impact of new laws and regulations or changes in consumer or business behavior. ### Deterioration in collateral values may result in additional losses. Our business is affected by the value of the assets securing our loans or underlying our investments. We had a commercial and construction loan portfolio held for investment in the amount of $5.4 billion as of December 31, 2022. Due to their nature, these loans entail a higher credit risk than consumer and residential mortgage loans, since they are larger in size, concentrate more risk in a single borrower and are generally more sensitive to economic downturns. Furthermore, in the case of a slowdown in the real estate market, it may be difficult to dispose of the properties securing these loans upon any foreclosure of the properties. We may incur losses over the near term, either because of continued deterioration in the quality of loans or because of sales of problem loans, which would likely accelerate the recognition of losses. Any such losses could adversely impact our overall financial performance and results of operations. Deterioration of the value of real estate collateral securing our construction, commercial and residential mortgage loan portfolios, whether located in Puerto Rico or elsewhere, would result in increased credit losses. As of December 31, 2022, approximately 20% and 25% of our loan portfolio held for investment consisted of commercial mortgage and residential real estate loans, respectively. Whether the collateral that underlies our loans is located in Puerto Rico, the USVI, the BVI, or the U.S. mainland, the performance of our loan portfolio and the collateral value backing the transactions are dependent upon the performance of, and conditions within, each specific real estate market. As of December 31, 2022, our commercial mortgage and construction real estate loans held for investment in the Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands regions and Florida region amounted to $1.9 billion and $0.6 billion, respectively, which constituted 22% of the total loan portfolio held for investment. We measure credit losses for collateral dependent loans based on the fair value of the collateral, which is generally obtained from appraisals, adjusted for undiscounted selling costs as appropriate. Updated appraisals are obtained when we determine that loans are collateral dependent and are updated annually thereafter. In addition, appraisals are also obtained for certain residential mortgage loans on a spot basis based on specific characteristics, such as delinquency levels, and age of the appraisal. The appraised value of the collateral may decrease, or we may not be able to recover collateral at its appraised value. A significant decline in collateral valuations for collateral dependent loans has required and, in the future, may require, increases in our credit loss expense on loans. Any such increase would have an adverse effect on our future financial condition and results of operations. ***Labor shortages and constraints in the supply chain could adversely affect our clients’ operations as well as our operations.*** Many sectors in Puerto Rico, the United States, the Virgin Islands and around the world are experiencing a shortage of workers. Many of our commercial clients have been impacted by this shortage along with disruptions and constraints in the supply chain, which could adversely impact their operations and could lead to reduced cash flow and difficulty in making loan repayments. The Corporation’s industry has also been affected by the shortage of workers, as well as increasing wages for entry level and certain professional roles. This may lead to open positions remaining unfilled for longer periods of time, which may affect the level of service provided by the Corporation, or a need to increase wages to attract workers. ### The failure of other financial institutions could adversely affect us. Our ability to engage in routine financing transactions could be adversely affected by future failures of financial institutions and the actions and commercial soundness of other financial institutions. Financial institutions are interrelated as a result of trading, clearing, counterparty and other relationships. We have exposure to different industries and counterparties and routinely execute transactions with counterparties in the financial services industry, including brokers and dealers, commercial banks, investment banks, investment companies and other institutional clients. In certain of these transactions, we are required to post collateral to secure the obligations to the counterparties. In the event of a bankruptcy or insolvency proceeding involving one of such counterparties, we may experience delays in recovering the assets posted as collateral, or we may incur a loss to the extent that the counterparty was holding collateral in excess of the obligation to such counterparty or under other circumstances. In addition, many of these transactions expose us to credit risk in the event of a default by our counterparty or client. The credit risk may be exacerbated when the collateral held by us cannot be realized or is liquidated at prices not sufficient to recover the full amount of the loan or derivative exposure due to us. Any losses resulting from our routine funding transactions may materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. ### RISKS RELATING TO THE CORPORATION’S BUSINESS ***Certain funding sources may not be available to us and our funding sources may prove insufficient and/or costly to replace.*** FirstBank relies primarily on customer deposits, the issuance of brokered CDs, and advances from the FHLB of New York to maintain its lending activities and to replace certain maturing liabilities. As of December 31, 2022, we had $105.8 million in brokered CDs outstanding, representing approximately 1% of our total deposits. Approximately $55.7 million, or 53% in brokered CDs mature over the twelve months ending December 31, 2023, and the average remaining term to maturity of the brokered CDs outstanding as of December 31, 2022 was approximately 1.6 years. None of these brokered CDs are callable at the Corporation’s option. In addition, the Corporation had $675 million of FHLB advances outstanding as of December 31, 2022, of which $475.0 million are short-term and are scheduled to mature within the next three months and $200 million are long-term and are scheduled to mature over three to five years. Although FirstBank has historically been able to replace maturing deposits and advances, we may not be able to replace these funds in the future if our financial condition or general market conditions change. If we are unable to maintain access to funding sources, our results of operations and liquidity would be adversely affected. Alternate sources of funding may carry higher costs than sources currently utilized. If we are required to rely heavily on more expensive funding sources, profitability would be adversely affected. We may determine to seek debt financing in the future to achieve our long-term business objectives. Additional borrowings, if sought, may not be available to us, or if available, may not be on acceptable terms. The availability of additional financing will depend on a variety of factors, such as market conditions, the general availability of credit, our credit ratings and our credit capacity. The recent rising interest rate environment has and may continue to increase the borrowing costs associated with any additional financing. In addition, FirstBank may seek to sell loans as an additional source of liquidity. If additional financing sources are unavailable or are not available on acceptable terms, our profitability and future prospects could be adversely affected. ***Downgrades in our credit ratings could further increase the cost of borrowing funds.*** The Corporation’s ability to access new non-deposit sources of funding could be adversely affected by downgrades in our credit ratings. The Corporation’s liquidity is to a certain extent contingent upon its ability to obtain external sources of funding to finance its operations. The Corporation’s current credit ratings and any downgrades in such credit ratings can hinder the Corporation’s access to new forms of external funding and/or cause external funding to be more expensive, which could in turn adversely affect results of operations. ### We depend on cash dividends from FirstBank to meet our cash obligations. As a holding company, dividends from FirstBank, our banking subsidiary, have provided a substantial portion of our cash flow used to service the interest payments on our TRuPs and other obligations. FirstBank is limited by law in its ability to make dividend payments and other distributions to us based on its earnings and capital position. A failure by FirstBank to generate sufficient cash flow to make dividend payments to us may have a negative impact on our results of operations and financial condition. ***Our level of non-performing assets may adversely affect our future results of operations.*** Non-performing assets decreased by $28.9 million to $129.2 million as of December 31, 2022, or 18%, from $158.1 million as of December 31, 2021. As of December 31, 2022, we continued to have a relevant amount of nonaccrual loans, even though nonaccrual loans decreased by $20.8 million to $89.9 million as of December 31, 2022, or 19%, from $110.7 million as of December 31, 2021. Our nonaccrual loans represent approximately 1% of our $11.6 billion loan portfolio as of December 31, 2022. If we are unable to effectively maintain the quality of our loan portfolio, our financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected. ### Our allowance for credit losses (“ACL”) may not be adequate to cover actual losses, and we may be required to materially ***increase our ACL, which may adversely affect our capital ratios, financial condition and results of operations.*** We are subject, among other things, to the risk of loss from loan defaults and foreclosures with respect to the loans we originate and purchase. We recognize periodic credit loss expenses on loans, which leads to reductions in our income from operations, in order to maintain our ACL on loans at a level that our management deems to be appropriate based upon an assessment of the quality of the loan and lease portfolios. Management may fail to accurately estimate the level of credit losses or may have to increase our credit loss expense on loans in the future as a result of new information regarding existing loans, future increases in nonaccrual loans beyond what was forecasted, foreclosure actions and loan modifications, changes in current and expected economic and other conditions affecting borrowers or for other reasons beyond our control. In addition, the bank regulatory agencies periodically review the adequacy of our ACL on loans and may require an increase in the credit loss expense on loans or the recognition of additional classified loans and loan charge-offs, based on judgments that differ from those of management. The level of the ACL reflects management’s estimates based upon various assumptions and judgments as to specific credit risks; evaluation of industry concentrations; loan loss experience; current loan portfolio quality; present economic, political and regulatory conditions; unidentified losses inherent in the current loan portfolio and reasonable and supportable forecasts. The determination of the appropriate level of the ACL on loans inherently involves a high degree of subjectivity and requires management to make significant estimates and judgments regarding current credit risks and future trends, all of which may undergo material changes. If our estimates prove to be incorrect, our ACL on loans may not be sufficient to cover losses in our loan portfolio and our credit loss expense on loans could increase substantially. In addition, any increases in our credit loss expense on loans or any loan losses in excess of our ACL on loans could have a material adverse effect on our future capital ratios, financial condition and results of operations. ***The Corporation’s force-placed insurance policies could be disputed by the customer.*** The Corporation maintains force-placed insurance policies that have been put into place when a borrower’s insurance policy on a property has been canceled, lapsed or was deemed insufficient and the borrower did not secure a replacement policy. A borrower may make a claim against the Corporation under such force -placed insurance policy and the failure of the Corporation to resolve such a claim to the borrower’s satisfaction may result in a dispute between the borrower and the Corporation, which if not adequately resolved, could have an adverse effect on the Corporation. ### Defective and repurchased loans may harm our business and financial condition. In connection with the sale and securitization of loans, we are required to make a variety of customary representations and warranties relating to the loans sold or securitized. Our obligations with respect to these representations and warranties are generally outstanding for the life of the loan, and relate to, among other things, the following: (i) compliance with laws and regulations; (ii) underwriting standards; (iii) the accuracy of information in the loan documents and loan files; and (iv) the characteristics and enforceability of the loan. A loan that does not comply with the representations and warranties made may take longer to sell, may impact our ability to obtain third-party financing for the loan, and may not be saleable or may be saleable only at a significant discount. If such a loan is sold before we detect non-compliance, we may be obligated to repurchase the loan and bear any associated loss directly, or we may be obligated to indemnify the purchaser against any loss, either of which could reduce our cash available for operations and liquidity. Management believes that it has established controls to ensure that loans are originated in accordance with the secondary market’s requirements, but certain employees may make mistakes or may deliberately violate our lending policies. ### Our controls and procedures may fail or be circumvented, our risk management policies and procedures may be inadequate and ### operational risks could adversely affect our consolidated results of operations. We may fail to identify and manage risks related to a variety of aspects of our business, including, but not limited to, operational risk, interest rate risk, trading risk, fiduciary risk, legal and compliance risk, liquidity risk and credit risk. We have adopted and periodically improve various controls, procedures, policies and systems to monitor and manage risk. Any improvements to our controls, procedures, policies and systems, however, may not be adequate to identify and manage the risks in our various businesses. If our risk framework is ineffective, either because it fails to keep pace with changes in the financial markets or our businesses or for other reasons, we could incur losses, suffer reputational damage, or find ourselves out of compliance with applicable regulatory mandates or expectations. We may also be subject to disruptions from external events, such as natural disasters and cyber-attacks, which could cause delays or disruptions to operational functions, including information processing and financial market settlement functions. In addition, our customers, vendors and counterparties could suffer from such events. Should these events affect us, or the customers, vendors or counterparties with which we conduct business, our consolidated results of operations could be negatively affected. When we record balance sheet reserves for probable loss contingencies related to operational losses, we may be unable to accurately estimate our potential exposure, and any reserves we establish to cover operational losses may not be sufficient to cover our actual financial exposure, which may have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations or financial condition for the periods in which we recognize the losses. ***Our failure to attract and retain a qualified workforce could harm our overall business and results of operations.*** The Corporation’s success depends, in large part, on its ability to attract and retain skilled, experienced personnel. Competition for qualified candidates in the activities and markets that the Corporation and FirstBank serves is intense, and while the Corporation invests significantly in the training and development of its employees, it may not be able to hire people or to retain them. In addition, high inflation has impacted both cost structure and employee demand for wage growth, which may lead to sustained higher turnover rates. If the Corporation is unable to retain its most qualified employees, its performance and competitive positioning could be materially adversely affected. ### Our businesses may be adversely affected by litigation. We have, in the past, been party to claims and legal actions by our customers, or subject to regulatory supervisory actions by the government on behalf of customers, relating to our performance of fiduciary or contractual responsibilities. In the past, we have also been subject to securities class action litigation by our shareholders and we have also faced employment lawsuits and other legal claims. In any future claims or actions, demands for substantial monetary damages may be asserted against us, resulting in financial liability or an adverse effect on our reputation among investors or on customer demand for our products and services. A securities class action suit against us in the future could result in substantial costs, potential liabilities and the diversion of management’s attention and resources. We may be unable to accurately estimate our exposure to litigation risk when we record balance sheet reserves for probable loss contingencies. As a result, reserves we establish to cover any settlements or judgments may not be sufficient to cover our actual financial exposure, which has occurred in the past and may occur in the future, resulting in a material adverse impact on our consolidated results of operations or financial condition. In the ordinary course of our business, we are also subject to various regulatory, governmental and law enforcement inquiries, investigations and subpoenas. These may be directed generally to participants in the businesses in which we are involved or may be specifically directed at us. In regulatory enforcement matters, claims for disgorgement, the imposition of penalties and the imposition of other remedial sanctions are possible. The resolution of legal actions or regulatory matters, when unfavorable, has had, and could in the future have, a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations for the quarter in which such actions or matters are resolved or a reserve is established. ***Our businesses may be negatively affected by adverse publicity or other reputational harm.*** Our relationships with many of our customers are predicated upon our reputation as a fiduciary and a service provider that adheres to the highest standards of ethics, service quality and regulatory compliance. Adverse publicity, regulatory actions, litigation, operational failures, the failure to meet customer expectations and other issues with respect to one or more of our businesses, including FirstBank as our banking subsidiary, could materially and adversely affect our reputation, or our ability to attract and retain customers or obtain sources of funding for the same or other businesses. Preserving and enhancing our reputation also depends on maintaining systems and procedures that address known risks and regulatory requirements, as well as our ability to identify and mitigate additional risks that arise due to changes in our businesses, the market places in which we operate, the regulatory environment and customer expectations. If we fail to promptly address matters that bear on our reputation, our reputation may be materially adversely affected and our business may suffer. ***Any impairment of our goodwill or other intangible assets may adversely affect our operating results.*** If our goodwill or other intangible assets become impaired, we may be required to record a significant charge to earnings. Goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis, and more frequently if events or circumstances lead management to believe the values of goodwill may be impaired. Other intangible assets are amortized over the projected useful lives of the related intangible asset, generally on a straight-line basis, and these assets are reviewed periodically for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the fair value may not exceed their carrying amount. Factors that may be considered a change in circumstances indicating that the carrying value of the goodwill or amortizable intangible assets may not be recoverable includes reduced future cash flow estimates, decreases in the current market price of our common shares, negative information concerning the terminal value of similarly situated insured depository institutions, and slower growth rates in the industry. The goodwill annual impairment evaluation process includes a qualitative assessment of events and circumstances that may affect the reporting unit's fair value to determine whether it was more likely than not that the fair value of any reporting unit was less than its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the result of the qualitative assessment indicates that it is more likely than not that the carrying value of goodwill exceeds its fair value, a quantitative analysis is made to determine the amount of goodwill impairment. Analyzing goodwill includes consideration of various factors that continue to rapidly evolve and for which significant uncertainty remains, including the pace of economic recovery from the ongoing impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. Further weakening in the economic environment, such as decline in the performance of the reporting units or other factors, could cause the fair value of one or more of the reporting units to fall below their carrying value, resulting in a goodwill impairment charge. Actual values may differ significantly from this assessment. Such differences could result in future impairment of goodwill that would, in turn, negatively impact our results of operations and the reporting unit to which the goodwill relates. During the fourth quarter of 2022, management performed a qualitative analysis of the carrying amount of goodwill, and concluded that it is more-likely-than-not that the fair value of the reporting units exceeded their carrying value. Therefore, no quantitative analysis was required. As of December 31, 2022, the book value of our goodwill was $38.6 million, which was recorded at FirstBank. If an impairment determination is made in a future reporting period, our earnings and book value of goodwill will be reduced by the amount of the impairment. If an impairment loss is recorded, it will have little or no impact on the tangible book value of our common stock, or our regulatory capital levels, but such an impairment loss could significantly reduce FirstBank’s earnings and thereby restrict FirstBank’s ability to make dividend payments to us without prior regulatory approval, because Federal Reserve policy states that the bank holding company dividends should be paid from current earnings. ***Recognition of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income by the Bank.*** As of December 31, 2022, the Corporation had a deferred tax asset of $155.6 million (net of a valuation allowance of $185.5 million, including a valuation allowance of $149.5 million against the deferred tax assets of FirstBank). Under the 2011 PR Code, as amended, the Corporation and its subsidiaries, including FirstBank, are treated as separate taxable entities and are not entitled to file consolidated tax returns. Accordingly, in order to obtain a tax benefit from a net operating loss (“NOL”), a particular subsidiary must be able to demonstrate sufficient taxable income within the applicable NOL carry-forward period. Pursuant to the 2011 PR Code, the carry-forward period for NOLs incurred during taxable years that commenced after December 31, 2004 and ended before January 1, 2013 is 12 years; for NOLs incurred during taxable years commencing after December 31, 2012, the carryover period is 10 years. Accounting for income taxes requires that companies assess whether a valuation allowance should be recorded against their deferred tax asset based on an assessment of the amount of the deferred tax asset that is more likely than not to be realized. Due to significant estimates utilized in determining the valuation allowance and the potential for changes in facts and circumstances in the future, the Corporation may not be able to reverse the remaining valuation allowance or may need to increase its current deferred tax asset valuation allowance. ### The Corporation’s judgments regarding tax accounting policies and the resolution of tax disputes may impact the Corporation’s ### earnings and cash flow, and changes in the tax laws of multiple jurisdictions can materially affect our operations, tax obligations, ### and effective tax rate. Significant judgment is required in determining the Corporation’s effective tax rate and in evaluating its tax positions. The Corporation provides for uncertain tax positions when such tax positions do not meet the recognition thresholds or measurement criteria prescribed by applicable GAAP. Fluctuations in federal, state, local, and foreign taxes or a change to uncertain tax positions, including related interest and penalties, may impact the Corporation’s effective tax rate. When particular tax matters arise, a number of years may elapse before such matters are audited and finally resolved. In addition, the Puerto Rico Department of Treasury (“PRTD”), the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), and the tax authorities in the jurisdictions in which we operate may challenge our tax positions and we may estimate and provide for potential liabilities that may arise out of tax audits to the extent that uncertain tax positions fail to meet the recognition standard under applicable GAAP. Unfavorable resolution of any tax matter could increase the effective tax rate and could result in a material increase in our tax expense. Resolution of a tax issue may require the use of cash in the year of resolution. First BanCorp. is subject to Puerto Rico income tax on its income from all sources. FirstBank is treated as a foreign corporation for U.S. and USVI income tax purposes and is generally subject to U.S. and USVI income tax only on its income from sources within the U.S. and USVI or income effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in those regions. The USVI jurisdiction imposes income taxes based on the U.S. Internal Revenue Code under the “mirror system” established by the Naval Service Appropriations Act of 1922. However, the USVI jurisdiction also imposes an additional 10% surtax on the USVI tax liability, if any. These tax laws are complex and subject to different interpretations. We must make judgments and interpretations about the application of these inherently complex tax laws when determining our provision for income taxes, our deferred tax assets and liabilities, and our valuation allowance. In addition, legislative changes, particularly changes in tax laws, could adversely impact our results of operations. Changes in applicable tax laws in Puerto Rico, the U.S., or other jurisdictions or tax authorities’ new interpretations could result in increases in our overall taxes and the Corporation’s financial condition or results of operations may be adversely impacted. ### Our ability to use our NOL carryforwards may be limited. The Corporation has U.S. and USVI sourced NOL carryforwards. Section 382 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code (“Section 382”) limits the ability to utilize U.S. and USVI NOLs for income tax purposes, respectively, at such jurisdictions following an event of an ownership change. Generally, an “ownership change” occurs when certain shareholders increase their aggregate ownership by more than 50 percentage points over their lowest ownership percentage over a three-year testing period. Section 1034.04(u) of the 2011 PR Code is significantly similar to Section 382. However, Act 60-2019 amended the PR Code to repeal the corporate NOL carryover limitations upon change in control for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2018. Upon the occurrence of a Section 382 ownership change, the use of NOLs attributable to the period prior to the ownership change is subject to limitations and only a portion of the U.S. and USVI NOLs, as applicable, may be used by the Corporation to offset the annual U.S. and USVI taxable income, if any. In 2017, the Corporation completed a formal ownership change analysis within the meaning of Section 382 covering a comprehensive period, and concluded that an ownership change, for U.S. and USVI purposes only, had occurred during such period. The Section 382 limitation has resulted in higher U.S. and USVI income tax liabilities than we would have incurred in the absence of such limitation. It is possible that the utilization of our U.S. and USVI NOLs could be further limited due to future changes in our stock ownership, as a result of either sales of our outstanding shares or issuances of new shares that could separately or cumulatively trigger an ownership change and, consequently, a Section 382 limitation. Any further Section 382 limitations may result in greater U.S. and USVI tax liabilities than we would incur in the absence of such a limitation and any increased liabilities could adversely affect our earnings and cash flow. We may be able to mitigate the adverse effects associated with a Section 382 limitation in the U.S. and USVI to the extent that we could credit any resulting additional U.S. and USVI tax liability against our tax liability in Puerto Rico. However, our ability to reduce our Puerto Rico tax liability through such a credit or deduction will depend on our tax profile at each annual taxable period, which is dependent on various factors. ### RISKS RELATING TO TECHNOLOGY AND CYBERSECURITY ### We must respond to rapid technological changes, and these changes may be more difficult or expensive than anticipated. We ### may also be negatively affected if we fail to identify and address operational risks associated with the introduction of or changes to ### products and services. Like most financial institutions, FirstBank significantly depends on technology to deliver its products and other services and to otherwise conduct business. To remain technologically competitive and operationally efficient, FirstBank invests in system upgrades, new technological solutions, and other technology initiatives. If competitors introduce new products and services embodying new technologies, or if new industry standards and practices emerge, our existing product and service offerings, technology and systems may become obsolete. Furthermore, if we fail to adopt or develop new technologies or to adapt our products and services to emerging industry standards, we may lose current and future customers, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. The financial services industry is changing rapidly and, in order to remain competitive, we must continue to enhance and improve the functionality and features of our products, services and technologies. These changes may be more difficult or expensive to implement than we anticipate. When we launch a new product or service, introduce a new platform for the delivery or distribution of products or services (including mobile connectivity and cloud computing), or make changes to an existing product or service, we may not fully appreciate or identify new operational risks that may arise from those changes, or we may fail to implement adequate controls to mitigate the risks associated with those changes. Significant failure in this regard could diminish our ability to operate our business or result in potential liability to our customers and third parties, increased operating expenses, weaker competitive standing, and significant reputational, legal and regulatory costs. Any of the foregoing consequences could materially and adversely affect our businesses and results of operations. ### Our operational or security systems or infrastructure, or those of third parties, could fail or be breached. Any such future ### incidents could potentially disrupt our business and adversely impact our results of operations, liquidity, and financial condition, ### as well as cause legal or reputational harm. The potential for operational risk exposure exists throughout our business and, as a result of our interactions with, and reliance on, third parties, is not limited to our own internal operational functions. Our operational and security systems and infrastructure, including our computer systems, data management, and internal processes, as well as those of third parties that perform key aspects of our business operations, such as data processing, information security, recording and monitoring transactions, online banking interfaces and services, internet connections, and network access are integral to our performance. We rely on our employees and third parties in our day-to-day and ongoing operations, who may, because of human error, misconduct, malfeasance, failure, or breach of our or of third-party systems or infrastructure, expose us to risk. Our ability to implement backup systems and other safeguards with respect to third-party systems is more limited than with respect to our own systems. In addition, our financial, accounting, data processing, backup, or other operating or security systems and infrastructure may fail to operate properly or become disabled, damaged, or otherwise compromised as a result of a number of factors, including events that are wholly or partially beyond our control. We may need to take our systems offline if they become infected with malware or a computer virus or because of another form of cyberattack. If backup systems are utilized, they may not process data as quickly as our primary systems and some data might not have been saved to backup systems, potentially resulting in a temporary or permanent loss of such data. We frequently update our systems to support our operations and growth and to remain compliant with applicable laws, rules, and regulations. In addition, we review and strengthen our security systems in response to any cyber incident. Such strengthening entails significant costs and risks associated with implementing new systems and integrating them with existing ones, including potential business interruptions and the risk that this strengthening may not be entirely effective. Implementation and testing of controls related to our computer systems, security monitoring, and retaining and training personnel required to operate our systems also entail significant costs. Such operational risk exposures could adversely impact our operations, liquidity, and financial condition, as well as cause reputational harm. In addition, we may not have adequate insurance coverage to compensate for losses from a major interruption. ### Cyber-attacks, system risks and data protection breaches could adversely affect our ability to conduct business, manage our ### exposure to risk or expand our business, result in the disclosure or misuse of confidential or proprietary information, increase our ### costs to maintain and update our operational and security systems and infrastructure, and present significant reputational, legal ### and regulatory costs Our business is highly dependent on the security, controls and efficacy of our infrastructure, computer and data management systems, as well as those of our customers, suppliers, and other third parties. To access our network, products and services, our employees, customers, suppliers, and other third parties, including downstream service providers, the financial services industry and financial data aggregators, with whom we interact, on whom we rely or who have access to our customers' personal or account information, increasingly use personal mobile devices or computing devices that are outside of our network and control environments and are subject to their own cybersecurity risks. Our business relies on effective access management and the secure collection, processing, transmission, storage and retrieval of confidential, proprietary, personal and other information in our computer and data management systems and networks, and in the computer and data management systems and networks of third parties. Information security risks for financial institutions have significantly increased in recent years, especially given the increasing sophistication and activities of organized computer criminals, hackers, and terrorists and our expansion of online and digital customer services to better meet our customer’s needs. These threats may derive from fraud or malice on the part of our employees or third- party providers or may result from human error or accidental technological failure. These threats include cyber-attacks, such as computer viruses, malicious or destructive code, phishing attacks, denial of service attacks, or other security breach tactics that could result in the unauthorized release, gathering, monitoring, misuse, loss, destruction, or theft of confidential, proprietary, and other information, including intellectual property, of ours, our employees, our customers, or third parties, damages to systems, or otherwise material disruption to our or our customers’ or other third parties’ network access or business operations, both domestically and internationally. While we maintain an Information Security Program that continuously monitors cyber-related risks and ultimately ensures protection for the processing, transmission and storage of confidential, proprietary, and other information in our computer systems, and networks as well as vendor management program to oversee third party and vendor risks, there is no guarantee that we will not be exposed to or be affected by a cybersecurity incident. Cyber threats are rapidly changing and future attacks or breaches could lead to other security breaches of the networks, systems, or devices that our customers use to access our integrated products and services, which, in turn, could result in unauthorized disclosure, release, gathering, monitoring, misuse, loss or destruction of confidential, proprietary, and other information (including account data information) or data security compromises. As cyber threats continue to evolve, we may be required to expend significant additional resources to modify or enhance our protective measures, investigate, and remediate any information security vulnerabilities or incidents and develop our capabilities to respond and recover. The full extent of a particular cyberattack, and the steps that the Corporation may need to take to investigate such attack, may not be immediately clear, and it could take considerable additional time for us to determine the complete scope of information compromised, at which time the impact on the Corporation and measures to recover and restore to a business-as-usual state may be difficult to assess. These factors may also inhibit our ability to provide full and reliable information about the cyberattack to our customers, third-party vendors, regulators, and the public. A successful penetration or circumvention of our system security, or the systems of our customers, suppliers, and other third parties, could cause us serious negative consequences, including significant operational, reputational, legal, and regulatory costs and concerns. Any of these adverse consequences could adversely impact our results of operations, liquidity, and financial condition. In addition, our insurance policies may not be adequate to compensate us for the potential costs and other losses arising from cyber-attacks, failures of information technology systems, or security breaches, and such insurance policies may not be available to us in the future on economically reasonable terms, or at all. Insurers may also deny us coverage as to any future claim. Any of these results could harm our growth prospects, financial condition, business, and reputation. ### The Corporation is subject to stringent and changing privacy laws, regulations, and standards as well as policies, contracts, and ### other obligations related to data privacy and security. Our failure to comply with privacy laws and regulations, as well as other ### legal obligations, could have a material adverse effect on our business. State, federal, and foreign governments are increasingly enacting laws and regulations governing the collection, use, retention, sharing, transfer, and security of personally identifiable information and data. A variety of federal, state, local, and foreign laws and regulations, orders, rules, codes, regulatory guidance, and certain industry standards regarding privacy, data protection, consumer protection, information security, and the processing of personal information and other data apply to our business. State laws are changing rapidly, and new legislation proposed or enacted in a number of other states imposes, or has the potential to impose, additional obligations on companies that process confidential, sensitive and personal information, and will continue to shape the data privacy environment nationally. The U.S. federal government is also focused on privacy matters. Any failure by us or any of our business partners to comply with applicable laws, rules, and regulations may result in investigations or actions against us by governmental entities, private claims and litigation, fines, penalties or other liabilities. Such events may increase our expenses, expose us to liabilities, and impair our reputation, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. While we aim to comply with applicable data protection laws and obligations in all material respects, there is no assurance that we will not be subject to claims that we have violated such laws and obligations, will be able to successfully defend against such claims, or will not be subject to significant fines and penalties in the event of non-compliance. Additionally, to the extent multiple state-level laws are introduced in the U.S. with inconsistent or conflicting standards and there is no federal law to preempt such laws, compliance with such laws could be difficult and costly, or impossible, to achieve, and we could be subject to fines and penalties in the event of non-compliance. ### RISK RELATING TO THE REGULATION OF OUR INDUSTRY ***We are subject to certain regulatory restrictions that may adversely affect our operations.*** We are subject to supervision and regulation by the Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC. We are a bank holding company and a financial holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended. The Bank is also subject to supervision and regulation by OCIF. Under federal law, financial holding companies are permitted to engage in a broader range of “financial” activities than those permitted to bank holding companies that are not financial holding companies. A financial holding company that ceases to meet certain standards is subject to a variety of restrictions, depending on the circumstances, including the prohibition from undertaking new activities or acquiring shares or control of other companies. If we fail to comply with the requirements from our regulators, we may become subject to regulatory enforcement action and other adverse regulatory actions that might have a material and adverse effect on our operations. The FDIC insures deposits at FDIC-insured depository institutions up to certain limits (currently, $250,000 per depositor account). The FDIC charges insured depository institutions premiums to maintain the DIF. In the event of a bank failure, the FDIC takes control of a failed bank and, if necessary, pays all insured deposits up to the statutory deposit insurance limits using the resources of the DIF. The FDIC is required by law to maintain adequate funding of the DIF, and the FDIC may increase premium assessments to maintain such funding. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) requires the FDIC to increase the DIF’s reserves against future losses, which will require institutions with assets greater than $10 billion, such as FirstBank, to bear an increased responsibility for funding the prescribed reserve to support the DIF. The FDIC may further increase FirstBank’s premiums or impose additional assessments or prepayment requirements in the future. The Dodd-Frank Act removed the statutory cap for the reserve ratio, leaving the FDIC free to set this cap going forward. ### Our compensation practices are subject to oversight by the Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC. Any deficiencies in our ### compensation practices may be incorporated into our supervisory ratings, which can affect our ability to make acquisitions or ***perform other actions. In addition, the regulation of our compensation practices has and may continue to change in the future.*** Our compensation practices are subject to oversight by the Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC. As discussed in Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Corporation currently is subject to the interagency guidance governing the incentive compensation activities of regulated banks and bank holding companies, and other financial regulators have also implemented regulations regarding compensation practices. Our failure to satisfy these restrictions and guidelines could expose us to adverse regulatory criticism, lowered supervisory ratings, and restrictions on our operations and acquisition activities. The scope and content of the U.S. financial regulators’ policies on executive compensation are continuing to develop and are likely to continue evolving in the future. It cannot be determined at this time whether compliance with such policies will adversely affect the ability of the Corporation and its subsidiaries to hire, retain and motivate their key employees. ### We are subject to regulatory capital adequacy guidelines, and, if we fail to meet these guidelines, our business and financial ### condition will be adversely affected. We are subject to stringent regulatory capital requirements. Although the Corporation and FirstBank met general well-capitalized capital ratios as of December 31, 2022, and we expect both companies will continue to exceed the minimum risk-based and leverage capital ratio requirements for well-capitalized status under the current capital rules, we cannot assure that we will remain at such levels. If we fail to meet these minimum capital guidelines and other regulatory requirements, our business and financial condition will be materially and adversely affected. If we fail to maintain certain capital levels or are deemed not well managed under regulatory exam procedures, or if we experience certain regulatory violations, our status as a financial holding company, and our ability to offer certain financial products will be compromised and our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected. ### Monetary policies and regulations of the Federal Reserve Board could adversely affect our business, financial condition and ### results of operations. In addition to being affected by general economic conditions, our earnings and growth are affected by the policies of the Federal Reserve Board. An important function of the Federal Reserve Board is to regulate the money supply and credit conditions. Among the instruments used by the Federal Reserve Board to implement these objectives are open market operations in U.S. government securities, adjustments of the discount rate and changes in reserve requirements for bank deposits. These instruments are used in varying combinations to influence overall economic growth and the distribution of credit, bank loans, investments and deposits. Their use also affects interest rates charged on loans or paid on deposits. The monetary policies and regulations of the Federal Reserve Board, which during 2022 included, but were not limited to, multiple increases in the federal funds rate to reduce inflation, have had a significant effect on the operating results of commercial banks and are expected to continue to do so in the future. The effects of such policies upon our business, financial condition and results of operations have been and may continue to be adverse. ### We are subject to numerous laws designed to protect consumers, including the Community Reinvestment Act and fair lending ***laws, and failure to comply with these laws could lead to a wide variety of sanctions.*** The Community Reinvestment Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Housing Act and other fair lending laws and regulations impose nondiscriminatory lending requirements on financial institutions. The U.S. Department of Justice and other federal agencies are responsible for enforcing these laws and regulations. A successful regulatory challenge to an institution's performance under the Community Reinvestment Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Housing Act or any of the other fair lending laws and regulations could result in a wide variety of sanctions, including damages and civil money penalties, injunctive relief, restrictions on mergers and acquisitions activity, restrictions on expansion and restrictions on entering new business lines. Private parties may also have the ability to challenge an institution's performance under fair lending laws in private class action litigation. Such actions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. ### We face a risk of noncompliance and enforcement action related to the Bank Secrecy Act and other anti-money laundering ### statutes and regulations. The Bank Secrecy Act, the USA PATRIOT Act, and other laws and regulations require financial institutions to institute and maintain an effective anti-money laundering program and file suspicious activity and currency transaction reports as appropriate, among other duties. The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network is authorized to impose significant civil money penalties for violations of those requirements and has recently engaged in coordinated enforcement efforts with the individual federal banking regulators, as well as the U.S. Department of Justice’s Drug Enforcement Administration. We are also subject to increased scrutiny of our compliance with trade and economic sanctions requirements and rules enforced by OFAC. If our policies, procedures and systems are deemed deficient, we would be subject to liability, including fines and regulatory actions, which may include restrictions on our ability to pay dividends and the necessity to obtain regulatory approvals to proceed with certain aspects of our business plan, including our acquisition plans. Failure to maintain and implement adequate programs to combat money laundering and terrorist financing could also have serious reputational consequences for us. Any of these results could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. ## Properties As filed, 1,467 characters. As of December 31, 2022, First BanCorp. has ownership in the following three main buildings located in Puerto Rico: Headquarters – Located at First Federal Building, 1519 Ponce de León Avenue, San Juan, Puerto Rico. Approximately 51% of this 16-story office building is owned by the Corporation. Service Center – Located at 1130 Muñoz Rivera Avenue, Hato Rey, Puerto Rico. This facility, which is fully occupied by the Corporation, houses over 1,000 employees from operations and accommodates branch operations, mortgage operations, Collections and Loss Mitigation, data processing and administrative and certain other offices. Consumer Lending Center – Located at 876 Muñoz Rivera Avenue, Hato Rey, Puerto Rico. This three-story facility is fully occupied by the Corporation and accommodates a retail branch, Money Express, Auto Financing and Leasing and a FirstBank Insurance Agency office, among others. The Corporation owns 16 retail branches and 6 office centers, other facilities, and/or parking lots. It leases 89 branch premises, loan and office centers and other facilities. In certain situations, financial services such as mortgage and insurance businesses and commercial banking services are in the same building or branch. All of these premises are in Puerto Rico, Florida, the USVI and the BVI. Management believes that the Corporation’s properties are well maintained and are suitable for the Corporation’s business as presently conducted. ## Legal proceedings As filed, 230 characters. Reference is made to Note 29, “Regulatory Matters, Commitments and Contingencies,” to the audited consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which is incorporated herein by reference. ## Management's discussion and analysis As filed, 281,603 characters. The following MD&A relates to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements of First BanCorp. (the “Corporation,” “we,” “us,” “our,” or “First BanCorp.”) and should be read in conjunction with such financial statements and the notes thereto. This section also presents certain financial measures that are not based on generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”). See “Special Items” and “Basis of Presentation” below for information about why non-GAAP financial measures are presented and the reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to the most comparable GAAP financial measures for which the reconciliation is not presented earlier. The detailed financial discussion that follows focuses on 2022 results compared to 2021. For a discussion of 2021 results compared to 2020, see Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on March 1, 2022. In this discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations, we have included information that may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the safe harbor provisions of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Forward-looking statements are not historical facts or statements of current conditions, but instead represent only our beliefs regar ding future events, many of which, by their nature, are inherently uncertain and outside our control. By identifying these statements for you in this manner, we are alerting you to the possibility that our actual results, financial condition, liquidity and capital actions may differ materially from the anticipated results, financial condition, liquidity and capital actions in these forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause our results, financial condition, liquidity and capital actions to differ from those in these statements include, among others, those described in “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of this Form 10-K. ### DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS First BanCorp. is a diversified financial holding company headquartered in San Juan, Puerto Rico offering a full range of financial products to consumers and commercial customers through various subsidiaries. First BanCorp. is the holding company of FirstBank Puerto Rico (“FirstBank” or the “Bank”) and FirstBank Insurance Agency. Through its wholly -owned subsidiaries, the Corporation operates in Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands (“USVI”), the British Virgin Islands (“BVI”), and the state of Florida, concentrating on commercial banking, residential mortgage loans, credit cards, personal loans, small loans, auto loans and leases, and insurance agency activities. ### SIGNIFICANT EVENTS #### Economy The Corporation remains cautiously optimistic on economic conditions in Puerto Rico, its principal market. Total non-farm payroll employment rose to a decade high of 927,100 in December 2022, or a 4% year-over-year increase. Moreover, the most recent Economic Development Bank for Puerto Rico’s Economic Activity Index (“EDB-EAI”), which is highly correlated to Puerto Rico’s real gross national product (“GNP”) in both level and annual growth rates, showed a 2.6% growth for the first nine months of 2022. Although global expectations point to an economic slowdown in the United States, the Corporation expects growth in the local economy to be sustained by the large amount of federal disaster relief funds that are pending to be disbursed. Over $45 billion remaining obligated disaster recovery funding has been earmarked to support broad based economic development and rebuilding initiatives. Growth in economic activity, the robustness of the labor market, supply chain complications and geopolitical matters, have contributed to rising inflation. In response, the Federal Reserve (the “FED”) has raised interest rates and has been reducing the size of its balance sheet. Furthermore, the FED signaled that it would continue to implement these policy actions in order to bring inflation down. The timing and impact of inflation and rising interest rates on our business and related financial results will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and difficult to predict. We delivered positive results in 2022, driven by continued execution of strategic initiatives including loan and lease growth, and expanded fee income while maintaining disciplined expense management. Credit continues to perform well, reflecting lower nonaccrual and adversely classified loan balances, as well as charge -off rates that are still lower than pre-pandemic levels. We remain vigilant to changing global economic conditions and the effect that restrictive monetary policies may continue to have on the overall inflationary environment. We believe that the Corporation is well equipped to manage rising market challenges going into the next cycle. We are highly encouraged by the growth prospects in our main market, which should continue to benefit from rebuilding activity over the next few years. See “Update on the Puerto Rico Fiscal Situation” below for additional information on the economic and fiscal crisis that Puerto Rico has experienced for more than a decade. #### Return of Capital to Shareholders In 2022, the Corporation returned approximately $363 million, or 119% of 2022 earnings, to its shareholders through $275 million in repurchases of common stock and the payment of $88 million in common stock dividends. For the year ended December 31, 2022, the Corporation repurchased approximately 19.4 million shares of common stock for a total purchase price of $275.0 million under previously publicly-announced stock repurchase programs. Of this total, $225.0 million of common stock, representing 16.0 million common shares at a weighted-average price of $14.06, were repurchased under the $350 million stock repurchase program announced on April 27, 2022 (the “2022 Repurchase Plan”). As of February 21, 2023, the Corporation has repurchased approximately 18.1 million shares of common stock totaling $254.9 million through open market purchases under the 2022 Repurchase Plan. With the additional purchases, the Corporation has $95.1 million remaining for share repurchases under the 2022 Repurchase Plan. On February 9, 2023, the Corporation’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.14 per common share, which represents an increase of $0.02 per common share, or a 17% increase, compared to its most recent dividend paid in December 2022. The dividend is payable on March 10, 2023 to shareholders of record at the close of business on February 24, 2023. The increased quarterly dividend level equates to an annualized dividend of $0.56 per common share. #### LIBOR Transition On January 1, 2022, the publication of certain U.S. Dollar (“USD”) LIBOR settings ceased. The publication of the most commonly used overnight, one-month, three-month, six-month and twelve-month USD LIBOR will cease immediately after June 30, 2023, except that per the UK Financial Conduct Authority (the “FCA”) proposal, the one-, three-, and six-month tenors will continue to be published on a “non-representative,” synthetic basis until September 30, 2024. The Adjustable Interest Rate Act (the “LIBOR Act”), that was enacted in March 2022, provides a statutory framework to replace USD LIBOR for contracts governed by U.S. law that do not have clear and practicable provisions for replacing USD LIBOR after June 30, 2023 (“tough legacy contracts”). On December 16, 2022, the FED adopted final rule 12 C.F.R. Part 253, “Regulation Implementing the LIBOR Act (Regulation ZZ)” (the “Final Rule”). The Final Rule identifies replacement benchmark rates based on the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) to replace the aforementioned USD LIBOR settings that will cease after June 30, 2023 in contracts subject to the LIBOR Act. Under the final rule, tough legacy contracts will be converted by operation of law to various forms of SOFR, along with a spread adjustment, upon a LIBOR replacement date (i.e., the first London banking day after June 30, 2023). The spread adjustment was designed to compensate for USD LIBOR being higher than SOFR in two regards. First, USD LIBOR is an unsecured rate while SOFR is a secured rate. Second, USD LIBOR includes term premia. In addition, the final rule codifies safe harbor protections for selection or use of SOFR as a replacement benchmark and clarifies who would be considered a “determining person” able to elect a replacement benchmark when USD LIBOR ceases to be published as representative on June 30, 2023. As of December 31, 2022, the Corporation’s risk exposure to USD LIBOR consisted of the following: (i) $1.4 billion of variable- rate commercial and construction loans (including unused commitments), (ii) $44.6 million of U.S. agencies debt securities and private label mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) held as part of the available-for-sale debt securities portfolio, (iii) $124.4 million of Puerto Rico municipalities bonds held as part of the held-to-maturity debt securities portfolio, and (iv) $183.8 million of junior subordinated debentures reported as other borrowings in the accompanying audited consolidated statements of financial condition included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K. Most of these contracts contain adequate features to convert to an alternative interest rate; however, as of December 31, 2022, contracts totaling approximately $338.6 million do not contain fallback language mainly consisting of the aforementioned Puerto Rico municipalities bonds held as part of the held-to-maturity debt securities portfolio and the junior subordinated debentures. The Corporation expects to follow the provisions of the LIBOR Act and Regulation ZZ for the transition of any residual exposure after June 30, 2023. The Corporation continues to execute its LIBOR transition workplan. Effective December 31, 2021, the Corporation discontinued originations that use USD LIBOR as a reference rate. In addition, the Corporation continues working with the update of systems, processes, documentation, and models, with additional updates expected through 2023. #### Legislative and Regulatory A comprehensive discussion of legislative and regulatory matters affecting us can be found in Item 1: Business – “Supervision and Regulation” section of this Form 10-K. ### OVERVIEW OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS First BanCorp.'s results of operations depend primarily on its net interest income, which is the difference between the interest income earned on its interest-earning assets, including investment securities and loans, and the interest expense incurred on its interest-bearing liabilities, including deposits and borrowings. Net interest income is affected by various factors, including the following: (i) the interest rate environment; (ii) the volumes, mix, and composition of interest-earning assets, and interest-bearing liabilities; and (iii) the repricing characteristics of these assets and liabilities. The Corporation's results of operations also depend on the provision for credit losses, non-interest expenses (such as personnel, occupancy, the deposit insurance premium and other costs), non-interest income (mainly service charges and fees on deposits, cards and processing income, and insurance income), gains (losses) on sales of investments, gains (losses) on mortgage banking activities, and income taxes. The Corporation had net income of $305.1 million, or $1.59 per diluted common share, for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to $281.0 million, or $1.31 per diluted common share, for the year ended December 31, 2021. Other relevant selected financial indicators for the periods presented is included below: ### Year Ended December 31, ### 2022 ### 2021 ### 2020 ### Key Performance Indicator: (1) Return on Average Assets (2) 1.57 1.38 0.67 Return on Average Total Equity (3) 18.66 12.56 4.59 Efficiency Ratio (4) 48.25 57.45 59.62 (1) These financial ratios are used by Management to monitor the Corporation’s financial performance and whether it is using its assets efficiently. (2) Indicates how profitable the Corporation is in relation to its total assets and is calculated by dividing net income by its average total assets. (3) Measures the Corporation’s performance based on its average stockholders’ equity and is calculated by dividing net income by its average total stockholders’ equity. (4) Measures how much the Corporation incurred to generate a dollar of revenue and is calculated by dividing non-interest expenses by total revenue. The key drivers of the Corporation’s GAAP financial results for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to the year ended December 31, 2021, include the following: Net interest income for the year ended December 31, 2022 was $795.3 million, compared to $729.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. The increase in interest income primarily reflects a 39 basis points increase in the net interest margin to 4.12%. The increase in the net interest margin was mainly driven by a higher interest rate environment driving an increase in yields on variable-rate commercial loans, interest-bearing cash balances maintained at the FED, and MBS, partially offset by higher cost of funds. See “Net Interest Income” below for additional information. The provision for credit losses on loans, finance leases, unfunded loan commitments and debt securities for the year ended December 31, 2022 was an expense of $27.7 million, compared to a net benefit of $65.7 million for 2021. The increase in the overall provision reflects the growth in the loan portfolio, primarily consumer loans, and the uncertainty in the near-term macroeconomic outlook. The benefit reported in 2021 reflected improvement related to reduced uncertainties relating to the economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, primarily reflected in the commercial and residential mortgage loan portfolios. Net charge-offs totaled $34.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, or 0.31% of average loans, compared to net charge-offs of $55.1 million, or 0.48% of average loans, for the year ended December 31, 2021. Total net charge-offs for the year ended December 31, 2021 included $23.1 million in net charge-offs related to a bulk sale of $52.5 million of residential mortgage nonaccrual loans and related servicing advance receivables. Adjusted for those net charge-offs, total net charge -offs in 2021 on a non-GAAP basis were $32.0 million, or 0.28% of average loans. The increase in adjusted net charge -offs was primarily reflected in consumer loans, as well as lower commercial loans loss recoveries. See “Provision for Credit Losses” and “Risk Management” below for analyses of the ACL and non-performing assets and related ratios. The Corporation recorded non-interest income of $123.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to $121.2 million for 2021. The $1.9 million increase was primarily driven by higher transactional fee income from card and merchant transactions, a higher realization of purchased income tax credits, and an increase in service charges and fees on deposit accounts, partially offset by a decrease in revenues from mortgage banking activities, primarily related to a lower volume of sales. See “Non-Interest Income” below for additional information. Non-interest expenses for the year ended December 31, 2022 were $443.1 million, compared to $489.0 million in 2021. Non- interest expenses for 2021 included $26.4 million of merger and restructuring costs associated with the acquisition and integration of Banco Santander Puerto Rico (“BSPR”) and $3.0 million of COVID-19 pandemic -related expenses, primarily related to additional cleaning, safety materials, and security measures. Adjusted for the above-mentioned merger and restructuring costs and COVID-19 expenses, on a non-GAAP basis, total non-interest expenses in 2022 decreased by $16.5 million, when compared to adjusted total non-interest expenses in 2021, mainly driven by a decrease in outsourcing technology service fees, higher gains on other real estate owned (“OREO”) activities, as well as reductions in the amortization of intangible assets and charges to legal and operational reserves. The efficiency ratio for the year ended December 31, 2022 was 48.25%, as compared to 57.45% for 2021. See “Non-Interest Expenses” and “Special Items” below for additional information. For the year ended December 31, 2022, the Corporation recorded an income tax expense of $142.5 million, compared to $146.8 million for 2021. The variance was primarily related to a lower effective tax rate as a result of a higher proportion of exempt to taxable income when compared to 2021, partially offset by higher pre-tax income. As of December 31, 2022, the Corporation’s net deferred tax asset amounted to $155.6 million (net of a valuation allowance of $185.5 million, including a valuation allowance of $149.5 million of the Corporation’s banking subsidiary, FirstBank), compared to a net deferred tax asset of $208.4 million as of December 31, 2021. See “Income Taxes” below and Note 22 – Income Taxes, to the audited consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information. As of December 31, 2022, total assets were approximately $18.6 billion, down $2.2 billion from December 31, 2021. The decrease includes a $2.1 billion decline in cash and cash equivalents mainly in connection with customer deposit withdrawals and maturities, as well as capital return to stockholders. In addition, there was a $571.4 million decrease in total investments, driven by net unrealized losses of available-for-sale debt securities of $718.6 million recorded during the year attributed to changes in market interest rates. These variances were partially offset by growth of $469.3 million in total loans. See “Financial Condition and Operating Data Analysis” below for additional information. As of December 31, 2022, total liabilities were $17.3 billion, down $1.4 billion from December 31, 2021. The decline was mainly driven by a $1.6 billion decrease in total deposits, partially offset by a $250.1 million net increase in borrowings, primarily short-term advances from the FHLB and repurchase agreements. The decline in total deposits reflected the effect of customers’ allocation of cash into higher yielding alternatives and elevated customer spending, as well as the reduction in transactional account balances of government deposits. See “Risk Management – Liquidity Risk and Capital Adequacy” below for additional information about the Corporation’s funding sources and strategy. The Bank’s primary sources of funding are consumer and commercial core deposits. As of December 31, 2022, these core deposits funded 71% of total assets. Other sources of liquidity include non-core deposits, such as brokered CDs and government deposits as well as repurchase agreements and FHLB advances. The Bank maintains borrowing capacity at the FHLB and the FED Discount Window. Although currently not in use, as of December 31, 2022, the Corporation had approximately $1.3 billion available for funding under the FED’s Discount Window and $644.2 million available for additional borrowing capacity on FHLB lines of credit based on collateral pledged at these entities. As of December 31, 2022, the Corporation’s stockholders’ equity was $1.3 billion, a decrease of $776.2 million from December 31, 2021. The decline was driven by a $718.6 million decrease in the fair value of available-for-sale debt securities recorded as part of accumulated other comprehensive loss in the consolidated statements of financial condition, as a result of changes in market interest rates. The decrease in total stockholders’ equity also reflects the purchase of approximately 19.4 million shares of common stock for a total purchase price of approximately $275.0 million and $88.2 million in dividends declared to common stock shareholders during 2022. These variances were partially offset by earnings generated during 2022. The Corporation’s common equity tier 1 (“CET1”) capital, tier 1 capital, total capital, and leverage ratios were 16.53%, 16.53%, 19.21%, and 10.70%, respectively, as of December 31, 2022, compared to CET1 capital, tier 1 capital, total capital, and leverage ratios of 17.80%, 17.80%, 20.50%, and 10.14%, respectively, as of December 31, 2021. See “Risk Management - Capital” below for additional information. Total loan production, including purchases, refinancings, renewals, and draws from existing revolving and non-revolving commitments, but excluding the utilization activity on outstanding credit cards, increased by $42.9 million to $4.9 billion for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to $4.8 billion for 2021. The Corporation originated $283.6 million of Small Business Administration Paycheck Protection Program (“SBA PPP”) loans during the year ended December 31, 2021. Excluding SBA PPP loan originations, total loan originations increased by $326.5 million consisting of a $231.5 million increase in consumer loan originations and a $249.7 million increase in commercial and construction loan originations, partially offset by a $154.7 million decrease in residential mortgage loan originations. Total non-performing assets were $129.2 million as of December 31, 2022, a decrease of $28.9 million, from December 31, 2021\. The decrease was driven by: (i) a $12.8 million decrease in nonaccrual commercial and construction loans, mainly related to $8.5 million in loans restored to accrual status and collections; (ii) a $12.3 million reduction in nonaccrual residential mortgage loans, mostly driven by collections and foreclosures; and (iii) a $8.1 million decrease in OREO and other assets, mainly associated with sales of OREO residential properties in the Puerto Rico region. These variances were partially offset by an increase of $4.3 million in nonaccrual consumer loans. See “Risk Management – Nonaccrual Loans and Non- Performing Assets” below for additional information. Adversely classified commercial and construction loans decreased by $83.7 million to $93.6 million as of December 31, 2022, compared to December 31, 2021. The decrease was mostly driven by $31.8 million in payoffs and paydowns associated with six commercial and construction loans, each in excess of $1 million, the sale of a $23.9 million commercial and industrial loan participation in the Florida region, and the upgrades in the credit risk classification of three commercial and industrial loans totaling $12.3 million. The Corporation monitors its loan portfolio to identify potential at-risk segments, payment performance, the need for permanent modifications, and the performance of different sectors of the economy in all of the markets where the Corporation operates. ### SPECIAL ITEMS The financial results for the year ended December 31, 2022 did not include any significant special item that management believes is not reflective of core operating performance, is not expected to reoccur with any regularity or may reoccur at uncertain times and in uncertain amounts (the “Special Items”). The Corporation’s financial results for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 included the following Special Items: Year ended December 31, 2021 Merger and restructuring costs of $26.4 million ($16.5 million after-tax) in connection with the BSPR acquisition integration process and related restructuring initiatives. Merger and restructuring costs included approximately $6.5 million related to a Voluntary Employee Separation Program (the “VSP”) as well as involuntary separation actions implemented in the Puerto Rico region. In addition, merger and restructuring costs included costs related to system conversions, accelerated depreciation charges related to planned closures and consolidation of branches in accordance with the Corporation’s integration and restructuring plan, and other integration related efforts. Costs of $3.0 million ($1.9 million after-tax) related to the COVID-19 pandemic response efforts, primarily costs related to additional cleaning, safety materials, and security measures. Year ended December 31, 2020 Merger and restructuring costs of $26.5 million ($16.6 million after-tax) in connection with the acquisition of BSPR and related restructuring initiatives. Merger and restructuring costs primarily included consulting, legal, valuation, and other professional service fees associated with the acquisition, a VSP offered to eligible employees, retention and other compensation bonuses, and expenses related to system conversions and other integration-related efforts. Gain on sales of U.S. agencies MBS and U.S Treasury notes of $13.2 million. The gain on tax-exempt securities or realized at the tax-exempt international banking entity subsidiary level had no effect on the income tax expense recorded in 2020. Tax benefit of $8.0 million related to the partial reversal of the deferred tax asset valuation allowance. Costs of $5.4 million ($3.4 million after-tax) related to the COVID-19 pandemic response efforts, primarily costs related to additional cleaning, safety materials, and security measures. Gain of $0.1 million realized on the repurchase of $0.4 million of TRuPs. The gain, realized at the holding company level, had no effect on the income tax expense in 2020. Benefit of $6.2 million ($3.8 million after-tax) from insurance recoveries. Insurance recoveries included a $5.0 million benefit related to the final settlement of the Corporation’s business interruption insurance claim related to lost profits caused by Hurricanes Irma and Maria in 2017. The following table shows the net income reported for the year ended December 31, 2022 and reconciles for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, the reported net income to adjusted net income, a non-GAAP financial measure that excludes the Special Items identified above: ### Year Ended December 31, ### 2022 ### 2021 ### 2020 (In thousands) Net income, as reported (GAAP) 305,072 281,025 102,273 Adjustments: Merger and restructuring costs 26,435 26,509 COVID-19 pandemic-related expenses 2,958 5,411 Gain on sales of investment securities (13,198) Partial reversal of deferred tax asset valuation allowance (8,000) Gain on early extinguishment of debt (94) Benefit from hurricane-related insurance recoveries (6,153) Income tax impact of adjustments (1) (11,023) (9,663) Adjusted net income (Non-GAAP) 305,072 299,395 97,085 (1) See "Special Items" above for the individual tax impact related to the above adjustments, which were based on the Puerto Rico statutory tax rate of 37.5%, as applicable. Adjusted non-interest expenses – The following tables reconcile for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 the non-interest expenses to adjusted non-interest expenses, which is a non-GAAP financial measure that excludes the relevant Special Items identified above: ### 2021 ### Non-Interest Expenses ### (GAAP) ### Merger and ### Restructuring Costs ### COVID 19 Pandemic- ### Related Expenses ### Adjusted (Non-GAAP) (In thousands) ### Non-interest expenses ### 488,974 ### 26,435 ### 2,958 ### 459,581 Employees' compensation and benefits 200,457 67 200,390 Occupancy and equipment 93,253 2,601 90,652 Business promotion 15,359 22 15,337 Professional service fees 59,956 59,956 Taxes, other than income taxes 22,151 261 21,890 FDIC deposit insurance 6,544 6,544 Net gain on OREO operations (2,160) (2,160) Credit and debit card processing expenses 22,169 22,169 Communications 9,387 9,387 Merger and restructuring costs 26,435 26,435 Other non-interest expenses 35,423 7 35,416 ### 2020 ### Non-Interest ### Expenses (GAAP) ### Merger and ### Restructuring Costs ### COVID 19 Pandemic- ### Related Expenses ### Hurricane-Related ### Insurance Recoveries ### Adjusted (Non- ### GAAP) (In thousands) ### Non-interest expenses ### 424,240 ### 26,509 ### 5,411 ### (1,153) ### 393,473 Employees' compensation and benefits 177,073 1,772 175,301 Occupancy and equipment 74,633 2,713 (789) 72,709 Business promotion 12,145 581 (184) 11,748 Professional service fees 52,633 8 (180) 52,805 Taxes, other than income taxes 17,762 274 17,488 FDIC deposit insurance 6,488 6,488 Net loss on OREO operations 3,598 3,598 Credit and debit card processing expenses 19,144 19,144 Communications 8,437 16 8,421 Merger and restructuring costs 26,509 26,509 Other non-interest expenses 25,818 47 25,771 ### CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES The accounting principles of the Corporation and the methods of applying these principles conform to GAAP. In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management is required to make estimates, assumptions, and judgments that affect the amounts recorded for assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Accounting estimates require assumptions and judgments about uncertain matters that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements. The Corporation’s critical accounting estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant changes include the following: (i) the ACL; (ii) valuation of financial instruments; and (iii) income taxes. Actual results could differ from estimates and assumptions if different outcomes or conditions prevail. ### Allowance for Credit Losses The Corporation maintains an ACL for loans and finance leases based upon management’s estimate of the lifetime expected credit losses in the loan portfolio, as of the balance sheet date, excluding loans held for sale. Additionally, the Corporation maintains an ACL for held-to-maturity or available-for-sale debt securities, and other off-balance sheet credit exposures ( #### e.g. , unfunded loan commitments). For loans and finance leases, unfunded loan commitments, and held-to-maturity debt securities, the estimate of lifetime credit losses includes the use of quantitative models that incorporate forward-looking macroeconomic scenarios that are applied over the contractual lives of the portfolios, adjusted, as appropriate, for prepayments and permitted extension options using historical experience. For purposes of the ACL for lending commitments, such allowance is determined using the same methodology as the ACL for loans, while also taking into consideration the probability of drawdowns or funding, and whether such commitments are cancellable by us. The ACL for available-for-sale debt securities is measured using a risk-adjusted discounted cash flow approach that also considers relevant current and forward-looking economic variables and the ACL is limited to the difference between the fair value of the security and its amortized cost. Judgment is specifically applied in the determination of economic assumptions, the length of the initial loss forecast period, the reversion of losses beyond the initial forecast period, historical loss expectations, usage of macroeconomic scenarios, and qualitative factors, which may not be adequately captured in the loss model, as further discussed below. The macroeconomic scenarios utilized by the Corporation include variables that have historically been key drivers of increases and decreases in credit losses. These variables include, but are not limited to, unemployment rates, housing and commercial real estate prices, gross domestic product levels, retail sales, interest rate forecasts, corporate bond spreads, and changes in equity market prices. The Corporation derives the economic forecasts it uses in its ACL model from Moody's Analytics. The latter has a large team of economists, database managers and operational engineers with a history of producing monthly economic forecasts for over 25 years. The Corporation has currently set an initial forecast period (“reasonable and supportable period”) of two years and a reversion period of up to three years, utilizing a straight-line approach and reverting back to the historical macroeconomic mean for Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands regions. For the Florida region, the methodology considers a reasonable and supportable forecast period and an implicit reversion towards the historical trend that varies for each macroeconomic variable. After the reversion period, a historical loss forecast period covering the remaining contractual life, adjusted for prepayments, is used based on the change in key historical economic variables during representative historical expansionary and recessionary periods. Changes in economic forecasts impact the probability of default (“PD”), loss-given default (“LGD”), and exposure at default (“EAD”) for each instrument, and therefore influence the amount of future cash flows for each instrument that the Corporation does not expect to collect. Further, the Corporation periodically considers the need for qualitative adjustments to the ACL. Qualitative adjustments may be related to and include, but not be limited to, factors such as the following: (i) management’s assessment of economic forecasts used in the model and how those forecasts align with management’s overall evaluation of current and expected economic conditions; (ii) organization specific risks such as credit concentrations, collateral specific risks, nature, and size of the portfolio and external factors that may ultimately impact credit quality, and (iii) other limitations associated with factors such as changes in underwriting and loan resolution strategies, among others. The qualitative factors applied at December 31, 2022, and the importance and levels of the qualitative factors applied, may change in future periods depending on the level of changes to items such as the uncertainty of economic conditions and management's assessment of the level of credit risk within the loan portfolio as a result of such changes, compared to the amount of ACL calculated by the model. The evaluation of qualitative factors is inherently imprecise and requires significant management judgment. The ACL can also be impacted by factors outside the Corporation’s control, which include unanticipated changes in asset quality of the portfolio, such as deterioration in borrower delinquencies, or credit scores in our residential real estate and consumer portfolio. Further, the current fair value of collateral is utilized to assess the expected credit losses when a financial asset is considered to be collateral dependent. Our process for determining the ACL is further discussed in Note 1 – Nature of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K. Also, see “Allowance for Credit Losses for Loans and Finance Leases” below for additional information on the weighting of economic scenarios to estimate the ACL, changes in key economic variables, and the ACL sensitivity analysis performed as of December 31, 2022. ### Valuation of financial instruments The measurement of fair value is fundamental to the Corporation’s presentation of its financial condition and results of operations. The Corporation holds debt and equity securities, derivatives, and other financial instruments at fair value. The Corporation’s significant assets reflected at fair value on a recurring basis on the Corporation’s financial statements consisted of available-for-sale debt securities amounting to $5.6 billion as of December 31, 2022. In addition, fair value is also used for measuring other non- recurring fair value assets such as collateral dependent loans, OREO, and loans held for sale. Assets and liabilities carried at fair value inherently include subjectivity and may require the use of significant assumptions, adjustments and judgment including, among others, discount rates, cash flows, default rates, and loss rates. A significant change in assumptions may result in a significant change in fair value, which in turn, may result in a higher degree of financial statement volatility and could result in significant impact on our results of operations, financial condition or disclosures of fair value information. The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The Corporation categorizes the fair value of its available- for-sale debt securities using a three-level hierarchy for fair value measurements that distinguishes between market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of the Corporation (observable inputs) and the Corporation’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs). The hierarchy of inputs used in determining the fair value maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that observable inputs be used when available. The hierarchy level assigned to each security in the Corporation’s investment portfolio was based on management’s assessment of the transparency and reliability of the inputs used to estimate the fair values at the measurement date. The fair value of available-for-sale debt securities was based on unadjusted quoted market prices (as is the case with U.S. Treasury securities and equity securities with readily determinable fair values), when available (Level 1). If quoted market prices are unavailable, the fair value is based on market prices for comparable assets (as is the case with MBS and U.S. agency debt securities) that are based on observable market parameters, including benchmark yields, reported trades, quotes from brokers or dealers, issuer spreads, bids, offers, and reference data, including market research operations, when available (Level 2). Observable prices in the market already consider the risk of nonperformance. If listed prices or quotes are not available, fair value is based upon discounted cash flow models that use unobservable inputs due to the limited market activity of the instrument, as is the case with private label MBS held by the Corporation (Level 3). Assets are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to their fair value measurement. Private label MBS are collateralized by fixed-rate mortgages on single-family residential properties in the U.S. with original FICO scores over 700 and moderate loan-to-value ratios (under 80%), as well as moderate delinquency levels. The interest rate on the securities is variable, tied to 3-month LIBOR, and limited to the weighted -average coupon of the underlying collateral. The market valuation represents the estimated net cash flows over the projected life of the pool of underlying assets applying a discount rate that reflects market observed floating spreads over LIBOR, with a widening spread based on a nonrated security. The market valuation is derived from a model that utilizes relevant assumptions such as the prepayment rate, default rate, and loss severity on a loan level basis. The Corporation modeled the cash flow from the fixed-rate mortgage collateral using a static cash flow analysis according to collateral attributes of the underlying mortgage pool ( #### i.e. , loan term, current balance, note rate, rate adjustment type, rate adjustment frequency, rate caps, and others) in combination with prepayment forecasts based on historical portfolio performance. The Corporation models the variable cash flow of the security using the 3-month LIBOR forward curve. Declines in fair value that are credit-related are recorded on the balance sheet through an ACL with a corresponding adjustment to provision for credit losses and declines that are non-credit-related are recognized through other comprehensive income (loss). If the Corporation intends to sell a debt security in an unrealized loss position or determines that it is more likely than not that the Corporation will be required to sell a debt security before it recovers its amortized cost basis, the debt security is written down to fair value through earnings. As of December 31, 2022, the Corporation did not intend to sell any debt securities in an unrealized loss position and it is not more likely than not that the Corporation will be required to sell any debt securities before recovery of their amortized cost basis. For debt securities in an unrealized loss position for which the Corporation does not intend to sell the debt security and it is not more likely than not that the Corporation will be required to sell the debt security, the Corporation determines whether the loss is due to credit-related factors or non-credit-related factors. For debt securities in an unrealized loss position for which the losses are determined to be the result of both credit-related and non-credit-related factors, the credit loss is determined as the difference between the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected, and the amortized cost basis of the debt security. Available-for-sale debt securities held by the Corporation at year-end primarily consisted of securities issued by U.S. government- sponsored entities (“GSEs”), and the aforementioned private label MBS. Given the explicit and implicit guarantees provided by the U.S. federal government, the Corporation believes the credit risk in securities issued by the GSEs is low. For the year ended December 31, 2022, the Corporation determined the credit losses for private label MBS based on a risk-adjusted discounted cash flow methodology that considers qualitative and quantitative factors specific to the instruments, including PDs and LGDs that considered, among other things, historical payment performance, loan-to-value attributes, and relevant current and forward-looking macroeconomic variables, such as regional unemployment rates and the housing price index. Under this approach, expected cash flows (interest and principal) were discounted at the Treasury yield curve as of the reporting date. See Note 25 – Fair Value, to the audited consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K, for additional information. ### Income Taxes The Corporation is required to estimate income taxes in preparing its consolidated financial statements. This involves the estimation of current income tax expense together with an assessment of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. The determination of current income tax expense involves estimates and assumptions that require the Corporation to assume certain positions based on its interpretation of current tax regulations. Management assesses the relative benefits and risks of the appropriate tax treatment of transactions, taking into account statutory, judicial and regulatory guidance, and recognizes tax benefits only when deemed probable. Changes in assumptions affecting estimates may be required in the future and estimated tax liabilities may need to be increased or decreased accordingly. The Corporation adjusts the accrual of tax contingencies in light of changing facts and circumstances, such as the progress of tax audits, case law and emerging legislation. The Corporation’s effective tax rate includes the impact of tax contingencies and changes to such accruals, as considered appropriate by management. When particular tax matters arise, a number of years may elapse before such matters are audited by the taxing authorities and finally resolved. Favorable resolution of such matters or the expiration of the statute of limitations may result in the release of tax contingencies that the Corporation recognizes as a reduction to its effective tax rate in the year of resolution. Unfavorable settlement of any particular issue could increase the effective tax rate and may require the use of cash in the year of resolution. As of December 31, 2022, we had $155.6 million of deferred tax assets, net of a related valuation allowance of $185.5 million. The determination of deferred tax expense or benefit is based on changes in the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities that generate temporary differences and recognizes enacted changes in tax rates and laws in the period in which they occur. The carrying value of the Corporation’s net deferred tax asset assumes that the Corporation will be able to generate sufficient future taxable income based on estimates and assumptions. Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. The determination of whether a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets is appropriate is subject to considerable judgment and requires the evaluation of positive and negative evidence that can be objectively verified. Positive evidence necessary to overcome the negative evidence includes whether future taxable income in sufficient amounts and character within the carryforward periods is available under the tax law. Consideration must be given to all sources of taxable income including, as applicable, the future reversal of existing temporary differences, future taxable income forecasts exclusive of the reversal of temporary differences and carryforwards, and tax planning strategies. When negative evidence (e.g., cumulative losses in recent years, history of operating loss or tax credit carryforwards expiring unused) exists, more positive evidence than negative evidence will be necessary. The Corporation has concluded that based on the level of positive evidence, it is more likely than not that the deferred tax asset will be realized, net of the existing valuation allowances at December 31, 2022 and 2021. However, there is no guarantee that the tax benefits associated with the deferred tax assets will be fully realized. The positive evidence considered by management in arriving at its conclusion included factors such as the following: FirstBank’s three-year cumulative income position; sustained periods of profitability; management’s proven ability to forecast future income accurately and execute tax strategies; and the utilization of NOLs over the past three years. The negative evidence considered by management included the following: uncertainties about the state of the Puerto Rico economy, including considerations relating to the effect of hurricane and pandemic recovery funds together with Puerto Rico government debt restructuring and the ultimate sustainability of the latest fiscal plan certified by the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act (“PROMESA”) oversight board. See Note 22 - Income Taxes, to the audited consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 on Form 10-K, for further information related to income taxes. ### OTHER ESTIMATES In addition to the critical accounting estimates we make in connection with the ACL, fair value measurements, and the accounting for income taxes, the use of estimates and assumptions is also important in determining the accounting for goodwill and identifiable intangible assets, pension and postretirement benefit obligations, and provisions for losses that may arise from litigation and regulatory proceedings (including governmental investigations). Goodwill is assessed for impairment at least annually and more frequently if circumstances exist that indicate a possible reduction in the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value. When assessing goodwill for impairment, first, a qualitative assessment can be made to determine whether it is more likely than not that the estimated fair value of a reporting unit is less than its estimated carrying value. If the results of the qualitative assessment are not conclusive, a quantitative goodwill test is performed. Estimating the fair value of our reporting units requires judgment. Critical inputs to the fair value estimates may include projected earnings, macroeconomic conditions, interest rate levels, and peers performance. See Note 1 – Nature of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Note 9 – Goodwill and Other Intangibles, to the audited consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K, for further information about goodwill and identifiable intangible assets, including intangible assets recorded in connection with the acquisition of BSPR. Identifiable intangible assets are tested for impairment when events or changes in circumstances suggest that an asset’s or asset group’s carrying value may not be fully recoverable. Judgment is required to evaluate whether indications of potential impairment have occurred, and to test intangible assets for impairment, if required. An impairment is recognized if the estimated undiscounted cash flows relating to the asset or asset group is less than the corresponding carrying value. The amortization of identified intangible assets is based upon the estimated economic benefits to be received over their economic life, which is also subjective. Customer attrition rates that are based on historical experience are used to determine the estimated economic life of intangibles assets. As part of the BSPR acquisition, the Corporation maintains two frozen qualified noncontributory defined benefit pension plans, and a related complementary postretirement benefits plan covering medical benefits and life insurance after retirement. Calculation of the obligations and related expenses under these plans requires the use of actuarial valuation methods and assumptions, which are subject to management judgment and may differ if different assumptions are used. The discount rate assumption used to measure the postretirement benefit obligation is estimated as the single equivalent rate such that the present value of the plan’s projected benefit obligation cash flows using the single rate equals the present value of those cash flows using the above mean actuarial yield curves. See Note 19 – Employee Benefit Plans, to the audited consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K, for disclosures related to the benefit plans. As necessary, we also estimate and provide for potential losses that may arise out of litigation and regulatory proceedings to the extent that such losses are probable and can be reasonably estimated. Judgment is required in making these estimates and our final liabilities may ultimately be materially different. Our total estimated liability with respect to litigation and regulatory proceedings is determined on a case-by-case basis and represents an estimate of probable losses after considering, among other factors, the progress of each case, our experience and the experience of others in similar cases, proceedings or investigations, and the opinions and views of legal counsel. The outcomes of legal actions are unpredictable and subject to significant uncertainties, and it is inherently difficult to determine whether any loss is probable or even possible. It is also inherently difficult to estimate the amount of any loss and there may be matters for which a loss is probable or reasonably possible but not currently estimable. Accordingly, actual losses may be in excess of the established accrual or the range of reasonably possible loss. See Note 29 – Regulatory Matters, Commitments, and Contingencies to the audited consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K. ### RESULTS OF OPERATIONS ### Net Interest Income Net interest income is the excess of interest earned by First BanCorp. on its interest-earning assets over the interest incurred on its interest-bearing liabilities. First BanCorp.’s net interest income is subject to interest rate risk due to the repricing and maturity mismatch of the Corporation’s assets and liabilities. In addition, variable sources of interest income, such as loan fees, periodic dividends, and collection of interest on nonaccrual loans, can fluctuate from period to period. Net interest income for the year ended December 31, 2022 was $795.3 million, compared to $729.9 million for 2021. On a tax-equivalent basis and excluding the changes in the fair value of derivative instruments, net interest income for the year ended December 31, 2022 was $828.4 million compared to $753.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. Net interest income on an adjusted tax-equivalent basis and excluding the change in the fair value of derivative instruments is a non-GAAP financial measure. For the definition of this non-GAAP financial measure, refer to the discussion in “Basis of Presentation” below. The following tables include a detailed analysis of net interest income for the indicated periods. Part I presents average volumes (based on the average daily balance) and rates on an adjusted tax-equivalent basis and Part II presents, also on an adjusted tax- equivalent basis, the extent to which changes in interest rates and changes in the volume of interest-related assets and liabilities have affected the Corporation’s net interest income. For each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, the tables provide information on changes in (i) volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior period rates), and (ii) rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior period volumes). The Corporation has allocated rate-volume variances (changes in rate multiplied by changes in volume) to either the changes in volume or the changes in rate based upon the effect of each factor on the combined totals. ### Part I ### Average volume ### Interest income (1) ### / expense ### Average rate (1) ### Year Ended December 31, ### 2022 ### 2021 ### 2020 ### 2022 ### 2021 ### 2020 ### 2022 ### 2021 ### 2020 (Dollars in thousands) Interest-earning assets: Money market and other short-term investments 1,156,127 2,012,617 1,258,683 11,791 2,662 3,388 1.02 0.13 0.27 Government obligations (2) 2,870,889 2,065,522 878,537 39,033 27,058 21,222 1.36 1.31 2.42 MBS 4,052,660 4,064,343 2,236,262 85,090 57,159 48,683 2.10 1.41 2.18 FHLB stock 20,419 28,208 32,160 1,114 1,394 1,959 5.46 4.94 6.09 Other investments 12,747 10,254 6,238 126 61 41 0.99 0.59 0.66 Total investments (3) 8,112,842 8,180,944 4,411,880 137,154 88,334 75,293 1.69 1.08 1.71 Residential mortgage loans 2,886,594 3,277,087 3,119,400 160,359 177,747 166,019 5.56 5.42 5.32 Construction loans 121,642 181,470 168,967 7,350 12,766 9,094 6.04 7.03 5.38 Commercial and Industrial ("C&I") and Commercial Mortgage loans 5,092,638 5,228,150 4,387,419 281,486 261,333 214,830 5.53 5.00 4.90 Finance leases 636,507 518,757 440,796 46,842 38,532 32,515 7.36 7.43 7.38 Consumer loans 2,461,632 2,207,685 1,952,120 262,542 239,725 216,263 10.67 10.86 11.08 Total loans (4)(5) 11,199,013 11,413,149 10,068,702 758,579 730,103 638,721 6.77 6.40 6.34 Total interest-earning assets 19,311,855 19,594,093 14,480,582 895,733 818,437 714,014 4.64 4.18 4.93 Interest-bearing liabilities: Interest-bearing checking accounts 3,942,419 3,667,523 2,197,980 15,568 5,776 5,933 0.39 0.16 0.27 Savings accounts 4,336,901 4,494,757 3,190,743 11,191 6,586 11,116 0.26 0.15 0.35 Retail certificates of deposit ("CDs") 2,213,145 2,636,303 2,741,388 18,102 26,138 43,350 0.82 0.99 1.58 Brokered CDs 69,694 141,959 357,965 1,500 2,982 7,989 2.15 2.10 2.23 Interest-bearing deposits 10,562,159 10,940,542 8,488,076 46,361 41,482 68,388 0.44 0.38 0.81 FHLB advances 179,452 354,055 505,478 5,136 8,199 11,251 2.86 2.32 2.23 Other borrowed funds 379,121 484,244 483,907 15,824 15,098 13,021 4.17 3.12 2.69 Total interest-bearing liabilities 11,120,732 11,778,841 9,477,461 67,321 64,779 92,660 0.61 0.55 0.98 Net interest income on a tax-equivalent basis and excluding valuations 828,412 753,658 621,354 Interest rate spread 4.03 3.63 3.95 Net interest margin 4.29 3.85 4.29 (1) On an adjusted tax-equivalent basis. The Corporation estimated the adjusted tax-equivalent yield by dividing the interest rate spread on exempt assets by 1 less the Puerto Rico statutory tax rate of 37.5% and adding to it the cost of interest-bearing liabilities. The tax-equivalent adjustment recognizes the income tax savings when comparing taxable and tax-exempt assets. Management believes that it is a standard practice in the banking industry to present net interest income, interest rate spread and net interest margin on a fully tax-equivalent basis. Therefore, management believes these measures provide useful information to investors by allowing them to make peer comparisons. The Corporation excludes changes in the fair value of derivatives from interest income and interest expense because the changes in valuation do not affect interest received or paid. See "Basis of Presentation" below. (2) Government obligations include debt issued by government-sponsored agencies. (3) Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale debt securities are excluded from the average volumes. (4) Average loan balances include the average of nonaccrual loans. (5) Interest income on loans includes $11.2 million, $10.5 million, and $7.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020, respectively, of income from prepayment penalties and late fees related to the Corporation’s loan portfolio. ### Part II ### 2022 Compared to 2021 ### 2021 Compared to 2020 ### Increase (decrease) ### Increase (decrease) ### Due to: ### Due to: ### Volume ### Rate ### Total ### Volume ### Rate ### Total (In thousands) Interest income on interest-earning assets: Money market and other short-term investments (4,934) 14,063 9,129 1,513 (2,239) (726) Government obligations 10,914 1,061 11,975 22,111 (16,275) 5,836 MBS (205) 28,136 27,931 32,753 (24,277) 8,476 FHLB stock (405) 125 (280) (223) (342) (565) Other investments 17 48 65 25 (5) 20 Total investments 5,387 43,433 48,820 56,179 (43,138) 13,041 Residential mortgage loans (21,437) 4,049 (17,388) 8,509 3,219 11,728 Construction loans (3,793) (1,623) (5,416) 713 2,959 3,672 C&l and Commercial Mortgage loans (7,132) 27,285 20,153 41,940 4,563 46,503 Finance leases 8,706 (396) 8,310 5,789 228 6,017 Consumer loans 27,330 (4,513) 22,817 28,032 (4,570) 23,462 Total loans 3,674 24,802 28,476 84,983 6,399 91,382 Total interest income 9,061 68,235 77,296 141,162 (36,739) 104,423 Interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities: Brokered CDs (1,537) 55 (1,482) (4,563) (444) (5,007) Non-brokered interest-bearing deposits (1,200) 7,561 6,361 14,669 (36,568) (21,899) FHLB advances (4,520) 1,457 (3,063) (3,438) 386 (3,052) Other borrowed funds (3,833) 4,559 726 222 1,855 2,077 Total interest expense (11,090) 13,632 2,542 6,890 (34,771) (27,881) Change in net interest income 20,151 54,603 74,754 134,272 (1,968) 132,304 Portions of the Corporation’s interest-earning assets, mostly investments in obligations of some U.S. government agencies and U.S. GSEs, generate interest that is exempt from income tax, principally in Puerto Rico. Also, interest and gains on sales of investments held by the Corporation’s international banking entities (“IBEs”) are tax-exempt under Puerto Rico tax law (see Note 22 - Income Taxes to the audited consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K). Management believes that the presentation of interest income on an adjusted tax-equivalent basis facilitates the comparison of all interest data related to these assets. The Corporation estimated the tax equivalent yield by dividing the interest rate spread on exempt assets by 1 less the Puerto Rico statutory tax rate (37.5%) and adding to it the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities. The computation considers the interest expense disallowance required by Puerto Rico tax law. Management believes that the presentation of net interest income excluding the effects of the changes in the fair value of the derivative instruments (“valuations”) provides additional information about the Corporation’s net interest income and facilitates comparability and analysis from period to period. The changes in the fair value of the derivative instruments have no effect on interest due on interest-bearing liabilities or interest earned on interest-earning assets. The following table reconciles net interest income in accordance with GAAP to net interest income, excluding valuations, and net interest income on an adjusted tax-equivalent basis for the indicated periods. The table also reconciles net interest spread and net interest margin on a GAAP basis to these items excluding valuations, and on an adjusted tax-equivalent basis: ### Year Ended December 31, ### 2022 ### 2021 ### 2020 (Dollars in thousands) Interest income - GAAP 862,614 794,708 692,982 Unrealized gain on derivative instruments (30) (24) (27) Interest income excluding valuations 862,584 794,684 692,955 Tax-equivalent adjustment 33,149 23,753 21,059 Interest income on a tax-equivalent basis and excluding valuations 895,733 818,437 714,014 Interest expense - GAAP 67,321 64,779 92,660 Net interest income - GAAP 795,293 729,929 600,322 Net interest income excluding valuations 795,263 729,905 600,295 Net interest income on a tax-equivalent basis and excluding valuations 828,412 753,658 621,354 ### Average Balances Loans and leases 11,199,013 11,413,149 10,068,702 Total securities, other short-term investments and interest-bearing cash balances 8,112,842 8,180,944 4,411,880 Average Interest-Earning Assets 19,311,855 19,594,093 14,480,582 Average Interest-Bearing Liabilities 11,120,732 11,778,841 9,477,461 ### Average Yield/Rate Average yield on interest-earning assets - GAAP 4.47% 4.06% 4.79% Average rate on interest-bearing liabilities - GAAP 0.61% 0.55% 0.98% Net interest spread - GAAP 3.86% 3.51% 3.81% Net interest margin - GAAP 4.12% 3.73% 4.15% Average yield on interest-earning assets excluding valuations 4.47% 4.06% 4.79% Average rate on interest-bearing liabilities 0.61% 0.55% 0.98% Net interest spread excluding valuations 3.86% 3.51% 3.81% Net interest margin excluding valuations 4.12% 3.73% 4.15% Average yield on interest-earning assets on a tax-equivalent basis and excluding valuations 4.64% 4.18% 4.93% Average rate on interest-bearing liabilities 0.61% 0.55% 0.98% Net interest spread on a tax-equivalent basis and excluding valuations 4.03% 3.63% 3.95% Net interest margin on a tax-equivalent basis and excluding valuations 4.29% 3.85% 4.29% Net interest income amounted to $795.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, an increase of $65.4 million, when compared to $729.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. The $65.4 million increase in net interest income was primarily due to: A $31.1 million increase in interest income on consumer loans and finance leases, mainly due to a $371.7 million increase in the average balance of this portfolio, mostly related to growth in the auto loans and finance leases portfolios. A $30.0 million increase in interest income on investment securities, driven by a decrease in the U.S. agencies MBS premium amortization expense associated to lower prepayments as market interest rates increased during 2022. In addition, there was an increase of approximately $8.6 million in interest income attributable to an $805.4 million increase in the average balance of government obligations driven by the redeployment of some cash balances into higher-yielding liquid investment securities. A $15.1 million increase in interest income on commercial and construction loans, primarily reflecting higher interest rates and higher loan balances (excluding SBA PPP loans). The effect associated with higher market interest rates, that included the upward repricing of variable-rate commercial and construction loans and new loans originated at higher interest, resulted in an increase of approximately $34.7 million in interest income. In addition, there was an increase of approximately $57.1 million in the average balance of this portfolio (excluding SBA PPP loans), which resulted in an increase of approximately $2.0 million in interest income. These favorable variances were partially offset by a $12.9 million reduction in interest income from SBA PPP loans, from $20.9 million in 2021 to $8.0 million in 2022, a decrease of $6.7 million in interest income attributed to a lower discount accretion for the acquired BSPR commercial and construction loans, and a reduction of approximately $2.9 million related to the benefit of interest income realized from deferred interest recognized on a construction loan paid off in 2021. The interest rate on approximately 56% of the Corporation’s commercial and construction loans is variable, 42% is based upon LIBOR, SOFR and other indexes and 14% is based upon the Prime rate index. During 2022, the average one-month LIBOR increased 182 basis points, the average three-month LIBOR increased 224 basis points, the average Prime rate increased 161 basis points, and the average three-month SOFR increased 215 basis points, compared to the average rates for such indexes in 2021. A $9.1 million increase in interest income from interest-bearing cash balances, primarily consisting of cash balances held at the FED, mainly due to the effects higher market interest rates, partially offset by the effects associated with an $856.5 million reduction in the average balance. Partially offset by: A $17.5 million decrease in interest income on residential mortgage loans, primarily related to a $390.5 million reduction in the average balance of this portfolio, partially offset by higher yields. A $2.5 million increase in total interest expense, including: o a $4.9 million increase in interest expense on interest-bearing deposits, primarily associated with the effects of higher interest rate environment on average rates paid in 2022, partially offset by the effects of a $378.4 million reduction in the average balance of interest-bearing deposits reflecting the effect of customer allocating more cash into higher yielding liquid alternative, as well as higher consumer spending; o a $0.7 million increase in interest expense on other borrowings, consisting of a $3.1 million increase in interest expense on variable-rate junior subordinated debentures that are tied to LIBOR, partially offset by a $2.4 million decrease in interest expense on repurchase agreements primarily related to a $105.5 million reduction in the average balance; and o a $3.1 million decrease in interest expense on FHLB advances, primarily related to the effects of a $174.6 million decrease in the average balance of FHLB advances, partially offset by the effects of higher market interest rates paid on FHLB advances taken in 2022. The net interest margin increased by 39 basis points to 4.12% for 2022, compared to 3.73% for 2021. The improved margin was primarily attributable to higher market interest rates driving an increase in loans, investment securities, and interest-earning cash balance yields, partially offset by higher cost of funds, the impact of lower accelerated SBA PPP loan fees recognized upon forgiveness payments in 2002, and lower purchase discount accretion as mentioned above. ### Provision for Credit Losses The provision for credit losses consists of provisions for credit losses on loans and finance leases, unfunded loan commitments, as well as the debt securities portfolio. The principal changes in the provision for credit losses by main categories follow: #### Provision for credit losses for loans and finance leases The provision for credit losses for loans and finance leases was an expense of $25.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to a net benefit of $61.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. The variances by major portfolio category were as follows: Provision for credit losses for the commercial and construction loan portfolio was a net benefit of $23.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to a net benefit of $65.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. The net benefit recorded during 2022 mainly reflects reductions in qualitative reserves associated with reduced uncertainty around the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly on loans in the hotel, transportation and entertainment industries, partially offset by loan growth and a less favorable economic outlook in the projection of certain forecasted macroeconomic variables, such as the commercial real estate (“CRE”) index. Meanwhile, the net benefit recorded in 2021 reflects both an improved broad macroeconomic environment following the initial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and an overall decrease in the size of this portfolio in the Puerto Rico region. Provision for credit losses for the consumer loans and finance leases portfolio was an expense of $57.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to $20.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. The increase in charges to the provision during 2022 was driven by the portfolio growth, uncertainties in the macroeconomic outlook reflected in the deterioration in forecasted variables such as the regional unemployment rate, and higher net charge-offs. Provision for credit losses for the residential mortgage loan portfolio was a net benefit of $8.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to $17.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. The net benefit in both periods reflects the effect of a continued decrease in the size of the residential mortgage loan portfolio, as well as releases related to qualitative adjustments associated with reduced uncertainty around the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, while also recognizing the uncertainty in the near-term macroeconomic outlook. During 2022, the Corporation applied probability weights to the baseline and alternative downside economic scenarios to estimate the ACL with the baseline scenario carrying the highest weight. For periods prior to 2022, the Corporation calculated the ACL using the baseline scenario. See Note 1 – Nature of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the audited consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information on the ACL estimation methodology and “Financial Condition and Operating Data Analysis – Loan Portfolio” and “Risk Management – Credit Risk Management” below for additional information concerning the Corporation’s loan portfolio exposure in the geographic areas where the Corporation does business, as well as analyses of the ACL, non-performing assets, and related information. #### Provision for credit losses for unfunded loan commitments The provision for credit losses for unfunded commercial and construction loan commitments and standby letters of credit was an expense of $2.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to a net benefit of $3.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. The expense recorded during 2022 was mainly driven by an increase in balance of unfunded loan commitments principally due to newly originated facilities which remained undrawn as of December 31, 2022. On the other hand, the net benefit recorded in 2021 was mainly related to improvements in forecasted macroeconomic variables following the initial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. #### Provision for credit losses for held-to-maturity and available-for-sale debt securities The provision for credit losses for held-to-maturity securities was a net benefit of $0.3 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021. The net benefit recorded during 2022 was mainly due to the Corporation’s reduction in qualitative reserves driven by improvements in the underlying financial information of certain bond issuers. Meanwhile, the net benefit recorded in 2021 was mainly related to improvements in forecasted macroeconomic variables and the repayment of certain bonds, partially offset by changes in some issuers’ financial metrics based on their most recent financial statements. The provision for credit losses for available-for-sale debt securities was a net benefit of $0.4 million recorded for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. ### Non-Interest Income Non-interest income amounted to $123.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to $121.2 million for the same period in 2021. The $1.9 million increase in non-interest income was primarily due to: A $3.9 million increase in credit and debit cards, point of sale (“POS”) and merchant fee income reflecting increased purchase and transaction volumes. A $3.4 million increase in other sources of non-interest income including: (i) a $2.0 million increase related to higher benefit recognized in relation to purchased income tax credits realized during the year; (ii) a $1.5 million increase in fees and commissions from insurance referrals; and (iii) a $0.9 million increase in gains related to the sale of long-lived assets. These variances were partially offset by a $0.4 million increase in unrealized losses on marketable equity securities and the effect in 2021 of a $0.6 million gain recorded in connection with the settlement and collection of an insurance claim associated with a damaged property. A $2.5 million increase in service charges and fees on deposit accounts, mainly due to an increase in the number of cash management transactions of commercial clients and an increase in the monthly service fee charged on certain checking and savings products which was effective in the third quarter of 2021, partially offset by a $0.7 million adjustment during the fourth quarter of 2022 to reverse previously recognized fees on non-sufficient funds as part of changes in the fees structure. A $1.8 million increase in insurance commission income. Partially offset by: A $9.7 million decrease in revenues from mortgage banking activities, mainly driven by an $11.8 million decrease in net realized gain on sales of residential mortgage loans in the secondary market mainly due to a lower volume of sales and a $1.1 million decrease in servicing fees. These variances were partially offset by a $2.2 million decrease in the mortgage servicing rights amortization expense, net of recoveries, resulting from reduced prepayment rates. During 2022 and 2021, net gains of $8.4 million and $20.2 million, respectively, were recognized as a result of GNMA securitization transactions and whole loan sales to U.S. GSEs amounting to $238.3 million and $518.9 million, respectively. ### Non-Interest Expenses Non-interest expenses for the year ended December 31, 2022 were $443.1 million, compared to $489.0 million for the same period in 2021. On a non-GAAP basis, excluding $26.4 million in merger and restructuring costs associated with the acquisition of BSPR and costs of $3.0 million related to the COVID-19 pandemic response efforts which were recognized during 2021, non-interest expenses decreased by $16.5 million when compared with adjusted non-interest expenses in 2021. See “Special Items” above for additional information. Some of the most significant variances in adjusted non -interest expenses were as follows: A $12.1 million decrease in adjusted professional service fees, driven by an $11.2 million decrease in outsourcing technology service fees, mainly associated with the effect in 2021 of both approximately $7.0 million of temporary processing costs incurred in connection with the acquired BSPR operations prior to system conversions and costs of approximately $1.5 million incurred in connection with the platform used for SBA PPP loan originations and forgiveness funding. A $4.8 million decrease in adjusted other non-interest expenses including: (i) a $2.6 million decrease in amortization of intangible assets mainly associated with the purchased credit card relationship intangible asset recognized in connection with the acquisition of a FirstBank-branded credit card loan portfolio in 2012 which became fully amortized at the end of 2021; and (ii) a $2.6 million decrease in charges for legal and operational reserves, in part due to the reversal of a $1.0 million reserve upon resolution of an operational loss during the second quarter of 2022. A $3.6 million increase in net gains on OREO operation s, primarily reflecting: (i) a $2.3 million increase in net realized gains on sales of OREO properties, primarily residential properties in the Puerto Rico region; (ii) a $1.9 million decrease in OREO-related operating expenses, primarily taxes, repairs and insurance; and (iii) a $1.6 million decrease in write- downs to the value of OREO properties. These variances were partially offset by a $2.2 million decrease in income recognized from rental payments mainly associated to the disposition in 2021 of a large OREO income-producing property. A $2.4 million decrease in adjusted occupancy and equipment expenses, primarily related to a reduction in equipment- related depreciation charges and rental expenses, partially offset by higher energy costs. A $1.6 million decrease in adjusted taxes, other than income taxes, primarily related to lower sales and use taxes, municipal license taxes, and property taxes. Partially offset by: A $5.6 million increase in adjusted employees’ compensation and benefits expenses, primarily reflecting a $3.0 million decrease in deferred loan origination costs mainly driven by the effect of SBA PPP loan originations closed during 2021, as well as the effect of annual salary merit increases and higher medical insurance premium costs. A $2.9 million increase in adjusted business promotion expenses, mainly related to a $0.8 million increase in sponsorship and public relations activities and a $0.6 million increase in donations expense, of which $0.3 million were granted to non- profit organizations in the municipalities most affected by Hurricane Fiona. ### Income Taxes For the year ended December 31, 2022, the Corporation recorded an income tax expense of $142.5 million compared to $146.8 million in 2021. The decrease in income tax expense for 2022, as compared to 2021, was related to a higher proportion of exempt to taxable income resulting in a lower effective tax rate, partially offset by higher pre-tax income. The Corporation’s effective tax rate in the year ended December 31, 2022, excluding entities from which a tax benefit cannot be recognized and discrete items, was 31.2%, compared to 33.9% for 2021. See Note 22 - Income Taxes, to the audited consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K, for additional information. ### OPERATING SEGMENTS Based upon the Corporation’s organizational structure and the information provided to the Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, the operating segments are based primarily on the Corporation’s lines of business for its operations in Puerto Rico, the Corporation’s principal market, and by geographic areas for its operations outside of Puerto Rico. As of December 31, 2022, the Corporation had six reportable segments: Commercial and Corporate Banking; Consumer (Retail) Banking; Mortgage Banking; Treasury and Investments; United States Operations; and Virgin Islands Operations. Management determined the reportable segments based on the internal structure used to evaluate performance and to assess where to allocate resources. Other factors, such as the Corporation’s organizational chart, nature of the products, distribution channels, and the economic characteristics of the products, were also considered in the determination of the reportable segments. For additional information regarding First BanCorp.’s reportable segments, please refer to Note 27 - Segment Information, to the audited consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note 1 - Nature of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, to the audited consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K. The Corporation evaluates the performance of the segments based on net interest income, the provision for credit losses, non-interest income, and direct non- interest expenses. The segments are also evaluated based on the average volume of their interest-earning assets, less the ACL. For the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, other operating expenses not allocated to a particular segment amounted to $155.3 million and $192.2 million, respectively. Expenses pertaining to corporate administrative functions that support the operating segment but are not specifically attributable to or managed by any segment, are not included in the reported financial results of the operating segments. The unallocated corporate expenses include certain general and administrative expenses and related depreciation and amortization expenses. The Treasury and Investments segment lends funds to the Consumer (Retail) Banking, Mortgage Banking, Commercial and Corporate Banking and United States Operations segments to finance their lending activities and borrows from those segments. The Consumer (Retail) Banking segment also lends funds to other segments. The Corporation allocates the interest rates charged or credited by the Treasury and Investment and the Consumer (Retail) Banking segments based on market rates. The difference between the allocated interest income or expense and the Corporation’s actual net interest income from centralized management of funding costs is reported in the Treasury and Investments segment . #### Commercial and Corporate Banking The Commercial and Corporate Banking segment consists of the Corporation’s lending and other services for large customers represented by specialized and middle-market clients and the public sector. The Commercial and Corporate Banking segment offers commercial loans, including commercial real estate and construction loans, as well as other products, such as cash management and business management services. A substantial portion of the commercial and corporate banking portfolio is secured by the underlying real estate collateral and the personal guarantees of the borrowers. Since commercial loans involve greater credit risk than a typical residential mortgage loan because they are larger in size and more risk is concentrated in a single borrower, the Corporation has and maintains a credit risk management infrastructure designed to mitigate potential losses associated with commercial lending, including underwriting and loan review functions, sales of loan participations, and continuous monitoring of concentrations within portfolios. The highlights of the Commercial and Corporate Banking segment’s financial results for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 include the following: Segment income before taxes for the year ended December 31, 2022 decreased to $111.1 million, compared to $239.3 million for 2021, for the reasons discussed below. Net interest income for the year ended December 31, 2022 was $109.8 million, compared to $191.9 million for 2021. The decrease in net interest income was primarily attributable to an increase in the cost of funds borrowed from other segments, resulting from higher market interest rates, partially offset by an increased average balance of commercial and constructions loans and the upward repricing of variable-rate commercial and construction loans during 2022. For 2022, the provision for credit losses was a net benefit of $20.2 million, compared to a net benefit of $67.5 million for 2021\. The net benefit recorded during 2022 mainly reflects reductions in qualitative reserves associated with reduced uncertainty around the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly on loans in the hotel, transportation and entertainment industries, partially offset by loan growth and a less favorable economic outlook in the projection of certain forecasted macroeconomic variables, such as the commercial real estate index. Meanwhile, the net benefit recorded in 2021 reflects both an improved broad macroeconomic environment following the initial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and an overall decrease in the size of this portfolio in the Puerto Rico region. Total non-interest income for the year ended December 31, 2022 amounted to $18.2 million compared to $16.0 million for 2021. The increase in non-interest income was mainly related to a combination of the following; i) a $0.7 million increase in service charges on deposits, primarily related to cash management fee income from corporate customers; ii) a $0.5 million increase in foreign currency exchange commission income; iii) a $0.4 million increase from merchant- related income and iv) a benefit of approximately $0.3 million related income tax credits purchased and realized in 2022. Direct non-interest expenses for the year ended December 31, 2022 were $37.1 million, compared to $36.2 million for 2021\. The increase is mainly driven by an increase of $2.6 million in employees’ compensation and benefits expenses, primarily reflecting the effects of salary annual merit increases and a decrease in deferred loan origination costs mainly driven by the impact of the SBA PPP loans that were originated in 2021. Partially offsetting this increase is a $2.0 million reduction in professional service fees, primarily associated with the effects in 2021 of expenses incurred in connection with the platform used for SBA PPP loan originations and forgiveness funding. #### Consumer (Retail) Banking The Consumer (Retail) Banking segment consists of the Corporation’s consumer lending and deposit-taking activities conducted mainly through FirstBank’s branch network and loan centers in Puerto Rico. Loans to consumers include auto, boat, and personal loans, credit card loans, and lines of credit. Deposit products include interest-bearing and non-interest-bearing checking and savings accounts, individual retirement accounts (“IRAs”), and retail CDs. Retail deposits gathered through each branch of FirstBank’s retail network serve as one of the funding sources for the lending and investment activities. Consumer lending historically has been mainly driven by auto loan and leases originations. The Corporation follows a strategy of seeking to provide outstanding service to selected auto dealers that provide the channel for the bulk of the Corporation’s auto loan originations. Personal loans, credit cards, and, to a lesser extent, boat loans also contribute to interest income generated on consumer lending. Management plans to continue to be active in the consumer loan market, applying the Corporation’s strict underwriting standards. Other activities included in this segment are insurance activities in the Puerto Rico region. The highlights of the Consumer (Retail) Banking segment’s financial results for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 include the following: Segment income before taxes for the year ended December 31, 2022 increased to $301.3 million, compared to $165.8 million for 2021, for the reasons discussed below. Net interest income for the year ended December 31, 2022 was $442.6 million, compared to $281.7 million for 2021. The increase was mainly due to higher income from funds loaned to other business segments resulting from higher market interest rates. In addition, the average volume of consumer loans in the Puerto Rico region increased by $375.8 million, mainly in the auto loans and finance leases portfolios. These variances were partially offset by an increase in average rates paid to consumer customer deposits. The provision for credit losses for the year ended December 31, 2022 increased by $36.8 million to $57.1 million, compared to $20.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. The increase in the provision during 2022 was driven by the portfolio growth, uncertainties in the macroeconomic outlook reflected in the deterioration in forecasted variables such as the regional unemployment rate, and higher net charge-offs. Non-interest income for the year ended December 31, 2022 was $78.5 million, compared to $69.8 million for 2021. The increase was primarily related to a $3.0 million increase in credit and debit cards, POS and merchant fee income reflecting increased purchase and transaction volumes, as well as an increase of $1.8 million in service charges and fees on deposits primarily related to an increase in the monthly service fee charged on certain checking and savings products which was effective in the third quarter of 2021. Also reflected in this variance are a $1.6 million increase on insurance commission income and a benefit of $1.2 million allocated to the Consumer (Retail) Banking segment in relation to income tax credits purchased and realized in 2022. Direct non-interest expenses for the year ended December 31, 2022 were $162.7 million, compared to $165.4 million for 2021\. The decrease was primarily related to a $3.8 million reduction in occupancy and equipment expenses driven by cost savings achieved subsequent to the closure and consolidation of branches in accordance with the BSPR acquisition integration and restructuring plan, in particular rental and depreciation expense. In addition, contributing to the decrease is a $2.0 million reduction in professional service fees, mainly associated with the effects in 2021 of temporary processing costs incurred in connection with the acquired BSPR operations prior to systems conversion, and a $2.5 million reduction in the amortization expense of the purchased credit card relationship intangible recognized in the BSPR acquisition. These variances were partially offset by an increase of $4.5 million in employees’ compensation and benefit expenses, primarily reflecting the effects of salary annual merit increases. #### Mortgage Banking The Mortgage Banking segment conducts its operations mainly through FirstBank. The Mortgage Banking segment consists of the origination, sale, and servicing of a variety of residential mortgage loan products. Originations are sourced through different channels, such as FirstBank branches and purchases from mortgage bankers, and in association with new project developers. The mortgage banking segment focuses on originating residential real estate loans, some of which conform to the Federal Housing Administration (the “FHA”), the Veterans Administration (the “VA”), and U.S. Department of Agriculture Rural Development (“RD”) standards. Loans originated that meet the FHA’s standards qualify for the FHA’s insurance program whereas loans that meet the standards of the VA or the RD are guaranteed by their respective federal agencies. Mortgage loans that do not qualify under the FHA, VA, or RD programs are referred to as conventional loans. Conventional real estate loans can be conforming or non-conforming. Conforming loans are residential real estate loans that meet the standards for sale under the U.S. Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”) and the U.S. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“FHLMC”) programs. Loans that do not meet FNMA or FHLMC standards are referred to as non-conforming residential real estate loans. The Mortgage Banking segment also acquires and sells mortgages in the secondary markets. Residential real estate conforming loans are sold to investors like FNMA and FHLMC. The Corporation has commitment authority to issue GNMA MBS. The highlights of the Mortgage Banking segment’s financial results for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 include the following: Segment income before taxes for the year ended December 31, 2022 decreased to $99.5 million, compared to $115.8 million for 2021, for the reasons discussed below. Net interest income for the year ended December 31, 2022 was $98.9 million, compared to $104.6 million for 2021. The decrease in net interest income was mainly due the decrease in the average balance of residential mortgage loans in the Puerto Rico region. The provision for credit losses for 2022 was a net benefit of $7.6 million, compared to a net benefit of $16.0 million for 2021\. The net benefit in both periods reflects the effect of a continued decrease in the size of the residential mortgage loan portfolio as well as releases related to qualitative adjustments associated with reduced uncertainty around the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Non-interest income for the year ended December 31, 2022 was $16.0 million, compared to $24.3 million for 2021. The decrease was mainly driven by a $10.2 million decrease in net realized gain on sales of residential mortgage loans in the secondary market mainly due to a lower volume of sales, and a $0.6 million decrease in servicing fee income, partially offset by a $2.2 million decrease in mortgage servicing rights amortization expense resulting from reduced prepayments rates. Direct non-interest expenses for the year ended December 31, 2022 were $23.0 million, compared to $29.1 million for 2021\. The decrease was mainly related to a $4.1 million increase in gains on OREO operations, primarily higher gains realized on the sale of residential OREO properties. #### Treasury and Investments The Treasury and Investments segment is responsible for the Corporation’s treasury and investment management functions. The treasury function, which includes funding and liquidity management, lends funds to the Commercial and Corporate Banking segment, the Mortgage Banking segment, the Consumer (Retail) Banking segment, and the United States Operations segment to finance their respective lending activities and borrows from those segments. The Treasury function also obtains funds through brokered deposits, advances from the FHLB, and repurchase agreements involving investment securities, among other possible funding sources. The investment function is intended to implement a leverage strategy for the purposes of liquidity management, interest rate risk management and earnings enhancement. The interest rates charged or credited by Treasury and Investments are based on market rates. The highlights of the Treasury and Investments segment’s financial results for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 include the following: Segment income before taxes for the year ended December 31, 2022 decreased to $36.3 million, compared to $55.6 million for 2021, for the reasons discussed below. Net interest income for the year ended December 31, 2022 was $39.6 million, compared to net interest income of $59.3 million for 2021. The decrease was mainly related to a net transfer pricing charge of $43.8 million recognized in 2022 associated to the cost of funds borrowed from the Consumer (Retail) Banking segment, as compared to a net transfer pricing credit of $14.7 million recognized in 2021 from funds loaned to other business segments. This variance is mainly driven by the effects of a higher volume of investments securities funded by demand deposits gathered by the Consumer (Retail) Banking operating segment as well as higher market interest rates. Non-interest loss for the year ended December 31, 2022 was $0.1 million, compared to non-interest income of $0.2 million for 2021. The variance primarily reflects the effect of a $0.4 million decrease in the fair value of marketable equity securities recorded through earnings. Direct non-interest expenses for 2022 were $3.7 million, compared to $4.1 million for 2021. The decrease was primarily reflected in employees’ compensation expense and professional service fees. #### United States Operations The United States Operations segment consists of all banking activities conducted by FirstBank on the U.S. mainland. FirstBank provides a wide range of banking services to individual and corporate customers primarily in southern Florida through nine banking branches. The United States Operations segment offers an array of both consumer and commercial banking products and services. Consumer banking products include checking, savings and money market accounts, retail CDs, internet banking services, residential mortgages, and home equity loans and lines of credit. Retail deposits, as well as FHLB advances and brokered CDs, allocated to this operation serve as funding sources for its lending activities. Commercial banking services include checking, savings and money market accounts, retail CDs, internet banking services, cash management services, remote data capture, and automated clearing house (“ACH”) transactions. Loan products include the traditional C&I and commercial real estate products, such as lines of credit, term loans, and construction loans. The highlights of the United States operations segment’s financial results for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, include the following: Segment income before taxes for the year ended December 31, 2022 increased to $53.1 million, compared to $37.0 million for 2021, for the reasons discussed below. Net interest income for the year ended December 31, 2022 was $80.5 million, compared to $66.0 million for 2021. The increase was mainly related to higher interest rates, that include the effect of both the upward repricing of variable-rate commercial and construction loans and new loans originated at higher rates, as well as higher average loan balances (excluding SBA PPP loans). For 2022, the provision for credit losses was a net benefit of $3.1 million, compared to a net benefit of $1.0 million for 2021\. The higher benefit recorded in 2022 mainly reflects reductions in qualitative reserves associated with reduced uncertainty around the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, partially offset by loan growth. Total non -interest income for the year ended December 31, 2022 amounted to $2.9 million, compared to $4.0 million for 2021\. The decrease was primarily related to a $1.3 million decline in revenues from mortgage banking activities mainly due to lower volume of sales and lower servicing fee income, partially offset by a $0.3 million increase in other non- deferrable loan fees. Direct non-interest expenses for the year ended December 31, 2022 were $33.4 million, compared to $33.9 million for 2021\. The decrease was mainly due to reductions in professional service fees, employee compensation expenses, and taxes other than income taxes, partially offset by increased business promotion expenses. #### Virgin Islands Operations The Virgin Islands Operations segment consists of all banking activities conducted by FirstBank in the USVI and BVI, including consumer and commercial banking services, with a total of eight banking branches currently serving the islands in the USVI of St. Thomas, St. Croix, and St. John, and the island of Tortola in the BVI. The Virgin Islands Operations segment is driven by its consumer, commercial lending, and deposit -taking activities. Loans to consumers include auto and boat loans, lines of credit, and personal and residential mortgage loans. Deposit products include interest-bearing and non-interest-bearing checking and savings accounts, IRAs, and retail CDs. Retail deposits gathered through each branch serve as the funding sources for its own lending activities. The highlights of the Virgin Islands operations’ financial results for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 include the following: Segment income before taxes for the year ended December 31, 2022 decreased to $1.7 million, compared to $6.5 million for 2021, for the reasons discussed below. Net interest income for the year ended December 31, 2022 was $23.8 million, compared to $26.4 million for 2021. The decrease in net interest income was mainly related to a $44.0 million decrease in the average balance of commercial and construction loans (excluding SBA PPP loans), a $20.0 million decrease in the average balance of residential mortgage loans and a reduction of $1.0 million in interest income from SBA PPP loans. The Corporation recognized a provision for credit losses of $2.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to a net benefit of $1.3 million for 2021. The provision recorded during 2022 was primarily related to consumer loans reflecting the effects of loan growth, higher delinquency and charge-off levels, and a less favorable outlook of certain macroeconomic variables. Non-interest income for the year ended December 31, 2022 was $7.7 million, compared to $6.9 million for 2021. The increase was primarily related to a $0.4 million increase in fee-based income from credit and debit cards, POS and merchant transactions, and a $0.3 million increase in income from insurance commissions. Direct non -interest expens es for the year ended December 31, 2022 were $27.9 million compared to $28.1 million for 2021\. The decrease mainly reflects the effect of accelerated depreciation charges in 2021 related to the closing of certain branches in the Virgin Islands region, partially offset by an increase in employees’ compensation expenses. ### FINANCIAL CONDITION AND OPERATING DATA ANALYSIS ### Financial Condition The following table presents an average balance sheet of the Corporation for the following years: ### December 31, ### 2022 ### 2021 ### 2020 (In thousands) ### ASSETS Interest-earning assets: Money market and other short-term investments 1,156,127 2,012,617 1,258,683 U.S. and Puerto Rico government obligations 2,870,889 2,065,522 878,537 MBS 4,052,660 4,064,343 2,236,262 FHLB stock 20,419 28,208 32,160 Other investments 12,747 10,254 6,238 Total investments 8,112,842 8,180,944 4,411,880 Residential mortgage loans 2,886,594 3,277,087 3,119,400 Construction loans 121,642 181,470 168,967 Commercial loans 5,092,638 5,228,150 4,387,419 Finance leases 636,507 518,757 440,796 Consumer loans 2,461,632 2,207,685 1,952,120 Total loans 11,199,013 11,413,149 10,068,702 Total interest-earning assets 19,311,855 19,594,093 14,480,582 Total non-interest-earning assets (1) 66,794 708,940 752,064 Total assets 19,378,649 20,303,033 15,232,646 ### LIABILITIES Interest-bearing liabilities: Interest-bearing checking accounts 3,942,419 3,667,523 2,197,980 Savings accounts 4,336,901 4,494,757 3,190,743 Retail CDs 2,213,145 2,636,303 2,741,388 Brokered CDs 69,694 141,959 357,965 Interest-bearing deposits 10,562,159 10,940,542 8,488,076 Loans payable 8,415 FHLB advances 179,452 354,055 475,492 Other borrowed funds 379,121 484,244 505,478 Total interest-bearing liabilities 11,120,732 11,778,841 9,477,461 Total non-interest-bearing liabilities (2) 6,622,638 6,285,942 3,525,101 Total liabilities 17,743,370 18,064,783 13,002,562 ### STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY Stockholders' equity: Preferred stock 32,938 36,104 Common stockholders' equity 1,635,279 2,205,312 2,193,980 Stockholders' equity 1,635,279 2,238,250 2,230,084 Total liabilities and stockholders' equity 19,378,649 20,303,033 15,232,646 (1) Includes, among other things, the ACL on loans and finance leases and debt securities, as well as unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale debt securities. (2) Includes, among other things, non-interest-bearing deposits. The Corporation’s total average assets were $19.4 billion for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to $20.3 billion for the year ended December 31, 2021, a net decrease of $924.4 million. The variance primarily reflects the following: (i) a decrease of $856.5 million in the average of interest-bearing cash balances, which consisted primarily of deposits maintained at the Federal Reserve Bank; (ii) a decrease of $642.1 million in non-interest-earning assets mainly related to unrealized losses on available-for-sale debt securities attributable to changes in market interest rates; and (iii) a $214.1 million decrease in the average balance of total loans, primarily reflecting the overall decrease in the residential mortgage loan portfolio as paydowns exceeded originations, and the decrease of the SBA PPP loan portfolio, partially offset by an increase in the average balance of auto loans and finance leases portfolios. These variances were partially offset by an increase of $805.4 million in the average balance of U.S. and Puerto Rico government obligations mainly driven by the deployment of certain cash balances into U.S. agencies debt securities. The Corporation’s total average liabilities were $17.7 billion as of December 31, 2022, a net decrease of $321.4 million compared to December 31, 2021. The net decrease was mainly related to a $378.4 million decrease in the average balance of interest-bearing deposits reflecting the effect of customers allocating more cash into higher yielding liquid alternatives as well as elevated consumer spending, and a $279.7 million decrease in the average balance of borrowings mainly driven by the repayment of long-term debt during 2022. These variances were partially offset by a $336.7 million increase in the average balance of non-interest-bearing liabilities, primarily non-interest-bearing deposits. ### Assets The Corporation’s total assets were $18.6 billion as of December 31, 2022, a decrease of $2.2 billion from December 31, 2021. The decrease was primarily related to a $2.1 billion decrease in cash and cash equivalents mainly attributable to the overall decrease in total deposits, the repurchase of approximately 19.4 million shares of common stock for a total purchase price of $275.0 million, and the funding of new loan originations. This decrease in cash and cash equivalents was partially offset by a $250.1 million net increase in borrowings. In addition, total investment securities decreased by $571.4 million, mainly related to the decrease in the fair value of available-for-sale debt securities and repayments, partially offset by purchases of U.S. agencies and MBS. As further discussed below, these variances were partially offset by a $469.3 million increase in total loans. ### Loans Receivable, including Loans Held for Sale As of December 31, 2022, the Corporation’s total loan portfolio before the ACL amounted to $11.6 billion, an increase of $469.3 million compared to December 31, 2021. The growth reflects increases of $341.6 million in the Puerto Rico region and $139.6 million in the Florida region, partially offset by a decrease of $11.9 million in the Virgin Islands region. On a portfolio basis, the increase consisted of a $439.5 million increase in consumer loans, including a $369.7 million increase in auto loans and leases, and an increase of $184.3 million in commercial and construction loans (net of a $138.2 million decrease in the carrying value of the SBA PPP loan portfolio), partially offset by a reduction of $154.5 million in residential mortgage loans. Excluding the $138.2 million decrease in the carrying value of SBA PPP loans, commercial and construction loans increased by $322.5 million mainly reflecting the origination and purchases of loans related to multiple commercial relationships, each in excess of $10 million, that increased the portfolio amount by $637.1 million, partially offset by payoffs and paydowns of large commercial relationships totaling $219.9 million, the sale of a $35.2 million commercial and industrial loan participation in the Puerto Rico region, and the sale of a $23.9 million adversely classified commercial and industrial loan participation in the Florida region. As of December 31, 2022, the loans held for the Corporation’s investment portfolio was comprised of commercial and construction loans (46%), residential real estate loans (25%), and consumer and finance leases (29%). Of the total gross loan portfolio held for investment of $11.6 billion as of December 31, 2022, the Corporation had credit risk concentration of approximately 79% in the Puerto Rico region, 18% in the United States region (mainly in the state of Florida), and 3% in the Virgin Islands region, as shown in the following table: ### As of December 31, 2022 ### Puerto Rico ### Virgin Islands ### United States ### Total (In thousands) Residential mortgage loans 2,237,983 179,917 429,390 2,847,290 Construction loans 30,529 4,243 98,181 132,953 Commercial mortgage loans 1,768,890 65,314 524,647 2,358,851 Commercial and Industrial loans (1) 1,791,235 68,874 1,026,154 2,886,263 Total commercial loans 3,590,654 138,431 1,648,982 5,378,067 Consumer loans and finance leases 3,256,070 61,419 9,979 3,327,468 Total loans held for investment, gross 9,084,707 379,767 2,088,351 11,552,825 Loans held for sale 12,306 12,306 Total loans, gross 9,097,013 379,767 2,088,351 11,565,131 (1) As of December 31, 2022, includes $6.8 million of SBA PPP loans consisting of $4.8 million in the Puerto Rico region, $0.2 million in the Virgin Islands region, and $1.8 million in the United States region. ### As of December 31, 2021 ### Puerto Rico ### Virgin Islands ### United States ### Total (In thousands) Residential mortgage loans 2,361,322 188,251 429,322 2,978,895 Construction loans 38,789 4,344 95,866 138,999 Commercial mortgage loans 1,635,137 67,094 465,238 2,167,469 Commercial and Industrial loans (1) 1,867,082 79,515 940,654 2,887,251 Total commercial loans 3,541,008 150,953 1,501,758 5,193,719 Consumer loans and finance leases 2,820,102 52,282 15,660 2,888,044 Total loans held for investment, gross 8,722,432 391,486 1,946,740 11,060,658 Loans held for sale 33,002 177 1,976 35,155 Total loans, gross 8,755,434 391,663 1,948,716 11,095,813 (1) As of December 31, 2021, includes $145.0 million of SBA PPP loans consisting of $102.8 million in the Puerto Rico region, $8.2 million in the Virgin Islands region, and $34.0 million in the United States region. First BanCorp. relies primarily on its retail network of branches to originate residential and consumer personal loans. The Corporation manages its construction and commercial loan originations through centralized units and most of its originations come from existing customers, as well as through referrals and direct solicitations. Auto loans and finance leases originations rely primarily on relationships with auto dealers and dedicated sales professionals who serve selected locations in order facilitate originations. The following table sets forth certain additional data (including loan production) related to the Corporation's loan portfolio net of the ACL on loans and finance leases as of and for the indicated dates: ### For the Year Ended December 31, ### 2022 ### 2021 ### 2020 (Dollars in thousands) Beginning balance as of January 1 10,826,783 11,441,691 8,886,543 Residential real estate loans originated and purchased 468,599 623,290 560,012 Construction loans originated 112,640 102,538 126,499 C&I and commercial mortgage loans originated and purchased 2,950,904 2,994,893 2,751,058 Finance leases originated 308,811 240,419 152,254 Consumer loans originated 1,516,316 1,287,487 915,107 Total loans originated and purchased 5,357,270 5,248,627 4,504,930 Loans acquired from BSPR 2,514,700 Sales of loans (293,213) (620,227) (657,498) Repayments and prepayments (4,694,352) (5,495,131) (3,661,289) Other increases (decreases) (1) 108,179 251,823 (145,695) Net increase (decrease) 477,884 (614,908) 2,555,148 Ending balance as of December 31 11,304,667 10,826,783 11,441,691 Percentage increase (decrease) 4.41% (5.37)% 28.75% (1) Includes, among other things, the change in the ACL on loans and finance leases and cancellation of loans due to the repossession of the collateral and loans repurchased. #### Residential Real Estate Loans As of December 31, 2022, the Corporation’s total residential mortgage loan portfolio, including loans held for sale, decreased by $154.5 million, as compared to the balance as of December 31, 2021. The residential mortgage loan portfolio decreased by $144.0 million in the Puerto Rico region, $8.6 million in the Virgin Islands region, and $1.9 million in the Florida region. The decline in all regions was driven by repayments, foreclosures, and charge-offs, which more than offset the volume of new loan originations kept on the balance sheet. The majority of the Corporation’s outstanding balance of residential mortgage loans in the Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands regions consisted of fixed-rate loans that traditionally carry higher yields than residential mortgage loans in the Florida region. In the Florida region, approximately 45% of the residential mortgage loan portfolio consisted of hybrid adjustable-rate mortgages. In accordance with the Corporation’s underwriting guidelines, residential mortgage loans are primarily fully documented loans, and the Corporation does not originate negative amortization loans. Residential mortgage loan originations for the year ended December 31, 2022 amounted to $468.6 million, compared to $623.3 million for 2021. The decrease in residential mortgage loan originations of $154.7 million consisted of declines of $136.8 million and $21.8 million in the Puerto Rico and Florida regions, respectively, partially offset by an increase of $3.9 million in the Virgin Islands region. The decrease in 2022 reflects lower levels of refinancings driven by the effect of higher market interest rates. Approximately 54% of the $363.0 million residential mortgage loan originations in the Puerto Rico region during the year ended December 31, 2022 were of conforming loans, compared to 88% of $499.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. #### Commercial and Construction Loans As of December 31, 2022, the Corporation’s commercial and construction loan portfolio increased by $184.3 million (net of a $138.2 million decrease in the SBA PPP loan portfolio), as compared to the balance as of December 31, 2021. In the Puerto Rico region, commercial and construction loans increased by $49.6 million (net of a $98.0 million decrease in the SBA PPP loan portfolio), as compared to the balance as of December 31, 2021. Excluding the $98.0 million decrease in the SBA PPP loan portfolio, commercial and construction loans in the Puerto Rico region increased by $147.6 million, driven by the origination and purchases of loans related to eleven commercial relationships, each in excess of $10 million, that increased the portfolio amount by $315.3 million, partially offset by payoffs and paydowns, including the payoff of three commercial and construction loans totaling $58.7 million each in excess of $10 million, and the sale of a $35.2 million commercial and industrial loan participation. In the Florida region, commercial and construction loans increased by $147.2 million (net of a $32.2 million decrease in the SBA PPP loan portfolio), as compared to the balance as of December 31, 2021. Excluding the $32.2 million decrease in the SBA PPP loan portfolio, commercial and construction loans in the Florida region increased by $179.4 million, driven by the origination and purchases of loans related to multiple commercial relationships, each in excess of $10 million, that increased the portfolio amount by $321.8 million, partially offset by the payoffs and paydowns of eight commercial relationships totaling $161.2 million, and the sale of a $23.9 million adversely classified commercial and industrial loan participation in the Florida region. In the Virgin Islands region, commercial and construction loans decreased by $12.5 million, driven by an $8.0 million decrease in the SBA PPP loan portfolio, as compared to the balance as of December 31, 2021. As of December 31, 2022, the Corporation had $169.8 million outstanding in loans extended to the Puerto Rico government, its municipalities, and public corporations, compared to $178.4 million as of December 31, 2021. See “Exposure to Puerto Rico Government” below for additional information. The Corporation also has credit exposure to USVI government entities. As of December 31, 2022, the Corporation had $38.0 million in loans to USVI government public corporations, compared to $39.2 million as of December 31, 2021. See “Exposure to USVI Government” below for additional information. As of December 31, 2022, the Corporation’s total exposure to shared national credit (“SNC”) loans (including unused commitments) amounted to $1.1 billion, compared to $918.6 million as of December 31, 2021. As of December 31, 2022, approximately $189.3 million of the SNC exposure is related to the portfolio in Puerto Rico and $872.0 million is related to the portfolio in the Florida region. Commercial and construction loan originations (excluding government loans) decreased by $22.3 million to $3.0 billion for the year ended December 31, 2022, when compared to the same period of 2021. Total commercial and construction loan originations in 2021 includes SBA PPP loan originations of $283.7 million. Excluding SBA PPP loan originations, commercial and construction loan originations increased by $261.4 million in 2022, compared to 2021. The increase consisted of increases of $201.4 million and $93.0 million in the Puerto Rico and Florida regions, respectively, partially offset by a decrease of $33.0 million in the Virgin Islands region. Government loan originations for 2022 amounted to $51.1 million, compared to $62.8 million for 2021. Government loan originations in both years primarily consisted of the renewal of certain facilities in both the Virgin Islands and the Puerto Rico regions, and the utilization of an arranged overdraft line of credit of a government entity in the Virgin Islands region. #### Consumer Loans and Finance Leases As of December 31, 2022, the Corporation’s consumer loan and finance lease portfolio increased by $439.5 million to $3.3 billion, as compared to the portfolio balance of $2.9 billion as of December 31, 2021. The increase was reflected in all classes within the consumer loan portfolio segment, including increases of $226.5 million and $143.2 million in the auto loans and finance leases portfolios, respectively . The growth in consumer loans is mainly reflected in the Puerto Rico region and was driven by an increased level of loan originations during 2022. Originations of auto loans (including finance leases) in 2022 amounted to $1.0 billion, compared to $932.7 million for 2021. The increase consisted of increases of $94.6 million and $5.1 million, respectively, in the Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands regions. Other consumer loan originations, excluding credit cards, for 2022 amounted to $304.5 million, compared to $172.7 million in 2021. Most of the increase in other consumer loan originations in 2022, when compared to 2021, was in the Puerto Rico region. The utilization activity on the outstanding credit card portfolio for 2022 amounted to $488.3 million, compared to $422.5 million for 2021. ### Maturities of Loans Receivable The following tables present the loans held for investment portfolio as of December 31, 2022 by remaining contractual maturities and interest rate type: ### After One Year ### After Five Years ### Total Portfolio ### One Year or Less ### Through Five Years ### Through 15 Years ### After 15 Years (In thousands) Residential mortgage 68,547 434,908 1,252,701 1,091,134 2,847,290 Construction loans 90,824 39,337 1,989 803 132,953 Commercial mortgage loans 962,336 1,191,268 199,833 5,414 2,358,851 C&I loans 1,213,757 1,341,101 326,474 4,931 2,886,263 Consumer loans 997,191 2,064,383 264,594 1,300 3,327,468 Total loans (1) 3,332,655 5,070,997 2,045,591 1,103,582 11,552,825 ### Amount due in one year or less at: ### Amount due after one year: ### Total Portfolio ### Fixed Interest Rates ### Variable Interest ### Rates ### Fixed Interest Rates ### Variable Interest ### Rates Residential mortgage 63,574 4,973 2,577,163 201,580 2,847,290 Construction loans 6,323 84,500 4,227 37,903 132,953 Commercial mortgage loans 725,300 237,036 921,832 474,683 2,358,851 C&I loans 270,125 943,632 422,871 1,249,635 2,886,263 Consumer loans 761,929 235,262 2,321,662 8,615 3,327,468 Total loans (1) 1,827,251 1,505,403 6,247,755 1,972,416 11,552,825 (1) Scheduled repayments are included in the maturity category in which the payment is due. The amounts provided do not reflect prepayment assumptions related to the loan portfolio. ### Investment Activities As part of its liquidity, revenue diversification, and interest rate risk strategies, First BanCorp. maintains a debt securities portfolio classified as available for sale or held to maturity. The Corporation’s total available-for-sale debt securities portfolio as of December 31, 2022 amounted to $5.6 billion, an $854.2 million decrease from December 31, 2021. The decrease was mainly driven by a $718.6 million decrease in fair value attributable to changes in market interest rates and the repayments of approximately $642.9 million of U.S. agencies and MBS, partially offset by purchases of U.S. agencies debentures and MBS totaling $512.3 million during 2022. As of December 31, 2022, substantially all of the Corporation’s available-for-sale debt securities portfolio was invested in U.S. government and agencies debentures and fixed-rate GSEs’ MBS. In addition, as of December 31, 2022, the Corporation held a bond issued by the PRHFA, classified as available for sale, specifically a residential pass-through MBS in the aggregate amount of $3.3 million (fair value - $2.2 million). This residential pass-through MBS issued by the PRHFA is collateralized by certain second mortgages originated under a program launched by the Puerto Rico government in 2010 and had an unrealized loss of $1.1 million as of December 31, 2022, of which $0.4 million is due to credit deterioration. During 2021, the Corporation placed this instrument in nonaccrual status based on the delinquency status of the underlying second mortgage loans collateral. As of December 31, 2022, the Corporation’s held-to-maturity debt securities portfolio, before the ACL, increased to $437.5 million, compared to $178.1 million as of December 31, 2021, mainly driven by purchases of GSEs’ MBS totaling $289.8 million during 2022\. Held-to-maturity debt securities consisted of fixed-rate GSEs’ MBS and financing arrangements with Puerto Rico municipalities issued in bond form, which the Corporation accounts for as securities, but which were underwritten as loans with features that are typically found in commercial loans. Puerto Rico municipal bonds typically are not issued in bearer form, are not registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and are not rated by external credit agencies. These bonds have seniority to the payment of operating costs and expenses of the municipality and, in most cases, are supported by assigned property tax revenues. Approximately 74% of the Corporation’s municipality bonds consisted of obligations issued by four of the largest municipalities in Puerto Rico. The municipalities are required by law to levy special property taxes in such amounts as are required for the payment of all of their respective general obligation bonds and loans. Given the uncertainties as to the effects that the fiscal position of the Puerto Rico central government, and the measures taken, or to be taken, by other government entities may have on municipalities, the Corporation cannot be certain whether future charges to the ACL on these securities will be required. As of December 31, 2022, the ACL for held- to-maturity debt securities was $8.3 million, compared to $8.6 million as of December 31, 2021. See “Risk Management – Exposure to Puerto Rico Government” below for information and details about the Corporation’s total direct exposure to the Puerto Rico government, including municipalities and “Credit Risk Management” below for the ACL of the exposure to Puerto Rico municipal bonds. The following table presents the carrying values of investments as of the indicated dates: ### December 31, 2022 ### December 31, 2021 (In thousands) Money market investments 2,025 2,682 Available-for-sale debt securities, at fair value: U.S. government and agencies obligations 2,492,228 2,405,468 Puerto Rico government obligations 2,201 2,850 MBS: Residential 2,941,458 3,803,933 Commercial 163,133 240,510 Other 500 1,000 Total available-for-sale debt securities, at fair value 5,599,520 6,453,761 Held-to-maturity debt securities, at amortized cost: MBS: Residential 166,739 Commercial 105,088 Puerto Rico municipal bonds 165,710 178,133 ACL for held-to-maturity Puerto Rico municipal bonds (8,286) (8,571) Total held-to-maturity debt securities 429,251 169,562 Equity securities, including $42.9 million and $21.5 million of FHLB stock as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively 55,289 32,169 Total money market investments and investment securities 6,086,085 6,658,174 The carrying values of debt securities as of December 31, 2022 by contractual maturity (excluding MBS), are shown below: ### Carrying Amount ### Weighted-Average Yield % (Dollars in thousands) U.S. government and agencies obligations: Due within one year 132,166 0.32 Due after one year through five years 2,299,262 0.82 Due after five years through ten years 48,594 1.54 Due after ten years 12,206 4.62 2,492,228 0.83 Puerto Rico government and municipalities obligations: Due within one year 1,202 5.20 Due after one year through five years 42,530 6.34 Due after five years through ten years 55,956 6.29 Due after ten years 68,223 6.76 167,911 6.49 Other debt securities Due within one year 500 0.84 Total 2,660,639 1.16 MBS 3,376,418 1.66 ACL on held-to-maturity debt securities (8,286) Total debt securities 6,028,771 1.45 Net interest income in future periods could be affected by prepayments of MBS. Any acceleration in the prepayments of MBS purchased at a premium would lower yields on these securities, since the amortization of premiums paid upon acquisition would accelerate. Conversely, acceleration of the prepayments of MBS would increase yields on securities purchased at a discount, since the amortization of the discount would accelerate. These risks are directly linked to future period market interest rate fluctuations. Also, net interest income in future periods might be affected by the Corporation’s investment in callable securities. As of December 31, 2022, the Corporation had approximately $2.0 billion in callable debt securities (U.S. agencies debt securities) with an average yield of 0.83%, of which approximately 58% were purchased at a discount and 7% at a premium. See “Risk Management” below for further analysis of the effects of changing interest rates on the Corporation’s net interest income and the Corporation’s interest rate risk management strategies. Also, refer to Note 3 – Debt Securities, to the audited financial statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10- K, for additional information regarding the Corporation’s debt securities portfolio. ### RISK MANAGEMENT ### General Risks are inherent in virtually all aspects of the Corporation’s business activities and operations. Consequently, effective risk management is fundamental to the success of the Corporation. The primary goals of risk management are to ensure that the Corporation’s risk-taking activities are consistent with the Corporation’s objectives and risk tolerance, and that there is an appropriate balance between risks and rewards in order to maximize stockholder value. The Corporation has in place a risk management framework to monitor, evaluate and manage the principal risks assumed in conducting its activities. First BanCorp.’s business is subject to eleven broad categories of risks: (i) liquidity risk; (ii) interest rate risk; (iii) market risk; (iv) credit risk; (v) operational risk; (vi) legal and regulatory risk; (vii) reputational risk; (viii) model risk; (ix) capital risk; (x) strategic risk; and (xi) information technology risk. First BanCorp. has adopted policies and procedures designed to identify and manage the risks to which the Corporation is exposed. ### Risk Definition #### Liquidity Risk Liquidity risk is the risk to earnings or capital arising from the possibility that the Corporation will not have sufficient cash to meet its short-term liquidity demands, such as from deposit redemptions or loan commitments. See “Liquidity Risk and Capital Adequacy” below for further details. #### Interest Rate Risk Interest rate risk is the risk arising from adverse movements in interest rates. See “Interest Rate Risk Management” below for further details. #### Market Risk Market risk is the risk of loss in the value of assets or liabilities due to changes in market conditions, including movements in market rates or prices, such as interest rates or equity prices. The Corporation evaluates market risk together with interest rate risk. Both changes in market values and changes in interest rates are evaluated and forecasted. See “Interest Rate Risk Management” below for further details. #### Credit Risk Credit risk is the risk arising from a borrower’s or a counterparty’s failure to meet the terms of a contract with the Corporation or otherwise to perform as agreed. See “Credit Risk Management” below for further details. #### Operational Risk Operational risk is the risk arising from problems with the delivery of services or products. This risk is a function of internal controls, information systems, employees and operating processes. It also includes risks associated with the Corporation’s preparedness for the occurrence of an unforeseen event. This risk is inherent across all functions, products, and services of the Corporation. See “Operational Risk” below for further details. #### Legal and Regulatory Risk Legal and regulatory risk is the risk arising from the Corporation’s failure to comply with laws or regulations that can adversely affect the Corporation’s reputation and/or increase its exposure to litigation or penalties. #### Reputational Risk Reputational risk is the risk arising from any adverse effect on the Corporation’s market value, capital, or earnings arising from negative public opinion, whether true or not. This risk affects the Corporation’s ability to establish new relationships or services, or to continue servicing existing relationships. #### Model Risk Model risk is the potential for adverse consequences from decisions based upon incorrect or misused model outputs and reports or based upon an incomplete or inaccurate model. The use of models exposes the Corporation to some level of model risk. Model errors can contribute to incorrect valuations and lead to operational errors, inappropriate business decisions, or incorrect financial entries. The Corporation seeks to reduce model risk through rigorous model identification and validation. #### Capital Risk Capital risk is the risk that the Corporation may lose value on its capital or have an inadequate capital plan, which would result in insufficient capital resources to meet minimum regulatory requirements (the Corporation’s authority to operate as a bank is dependent upon the maintenance of adequate capital resources), support its credit rating, or support its growth and strategic options. #### Strategic Risk Strategic risk is the risk arising from adverse business decisions, poor implementation of business decisions, or lack of responsiveness to changes in the banking industry, and operating environment. This risk is a function of the compatibility of the Corporation’s strategic goals, the business strategies developed to achieve those goals, the resources deployed against these goals, and the quality of implementation. #### Information Technology Risk Information technology risk is the risk arising from the loss of confidentiality, integrity, or availability of information systems and risk of cyber incidents or data breaches. It includes business risks associated with the use, ownership, operation, involvement, influence, and adoption of information technology within the Corporation. ### Risk Governance The following discussion highlights the roles and responsibilities of the key participants in the Corporation’s risk management framework: ### Board of Directors The Board of Directors oversees the Corporation’s overall risk governance program with the assistance of the Board committees discussed below. #### Risk Committee The Board of Directors has appointed the Risk Committee to assist the Board in fulfilling its responsibility to oversee the Corporation’s management of its company-wide risk management framework. The committee’s role is one of oversight, recognizing that management is responsible for designing, implementing, and maintaining an effective risk management framework. The committee’s primary responsibilities are to: Review and discuss management’s assessment of the Corporation’s aggregate enterprise-wide profile and the alignment of the Corporation’s risk profile with the Corporation’s strategic plan, goals , and objectives; Review and recommend to the Board the parameters and establishment of the Corporation’s risk tolerance and risk appetite; Receive reports from management and, if appropriate, other Board committees, regarding the Corporation’s policies and procedures related to the Corporation’s adherence to risk limits and its established risk tolerance and risk appetite or on selected risk topics; Oversee the strategies, policies, procedures, and systems established by management to identify, assess, measure, and manage the major risks facing the Corporation, which may include an overview of the Corporation’s credit risk, operational risk, information technology risk, compliance risk, interest rate risk, liquidity risk, market risk, and reputational risk, as well as management’s capital management, planning, and process; Oversee management’s activities with respect to capital stress testing and model risk; Review and discuss with management risk assessments for new products and services; and Review periodically the scope and effectiveness of the Corporation’s regulatory compliance policies and programs. #### Asset and Liability Committee The Board of Directors has appoint ed the Asset and Liability Committee to assist the Board in its oversight of the Corporation’s asset and liability management policies related to the management of the Corporation’s funds, investments, liquidity, market and interest rate risk, and the use of derivatives. In doing so, the committee’s primary functions involve: The establishment of a process to enable the identification, assessment, and management of risks that could affect the Corporation’s assets and liabilities management; The identification of the Corporation’s risk tolerance levels for yield maximization relating to its assets and liabilities management; and The evaluation of the adequacy, effectiveness, and compliance with the Corporation’s risk management process relating to the Corporation’s assets and liabilities management, including management’s role in that process. #### Credit Committee The Board of Directors has appointed the Credit Committee to assist the Board in its oversight of the Corporation’s policies related to the Corporation’s lending function, or credit management. The committee’s primary responsibilities are to: Review the quality of the Corporation’s credit portfolio and the trends affecting that portfolio; Oversee the effectiveness and administration of credit-related policies through the review of such processes, reports and other information as it deems appropriate, including the loan-quality grading and examination process, internal and external audits and examinations of the Corporation’s credit processes, the incidence of new problem assets, the frequency and reasons for credit policy exceptions, the loan review functions and the asset classification process; Approve loans as required by the lending authorities approved by the Board; and Report to the Board regarding credit management. #### Audit Committee The Board of Directors has appointed the Audit Committee to assist the Board in fulfilling its responsibility to oversee management regarding: The conduct and integrity of the Corporation’s financial reporting to any governmental or regulatory body, stockholders, other users of the Corporation’s financial reports and the public; The performance of the Corporation’s internal audit function; The Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures; The qualifications, engagement, compensation, independence, and performance of the Corporation’s independent auditors, their conduct of the annual audit of the Corporation’s financial statements, and their engagement to provide any other services; The application of the Corporation’s related parties transaction policy as established by the Board; The application of the Corporation’s code of business conduct and ethics as established by management and the Board; The preparation of the Audit Committee report required to be included in the proxy statement for the Corporation’s annual stockholders’ meeting by the rules of the SEC; and The Corporation’s legal and ethical compliance. #### Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee The Board of Directors has appointed the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee to develop, review, and assess corporate governance principles. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is responsible for director succession, orientation and compensation, identifying and recommending new director candidates, overseeing the evaluation of the Board and management, annually recommending to the Board the designation of a candidate to hold the position of the Chairman of the Board, and directing and overseeing the Corporation’s executive succession plan. In addition, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is responsible for overseeing the Corporation’s sustainability and environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) policies. #### Compensation and Benefits Committee The Board of Directors has appoint ed the Compensation and Benefits Committee to oversee compensation policies and practices including the evaluation and recommendation to the Board of the proper and competitive salaries and incentive compensation programs of the executive officers and key employees of the Corporation. #### Trust Committee The Board of Directors of the Bank has appointed the Trust Committee to assist such Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to the Trust Department and its fiduciary responsibilities. The Trust Committee’s main responsibilities are to ensure proper exercise of the fiduciary powers of the Bank and to review the activities of the Trust Department. The Trust Committee has jurisdiction over all aspects of the Trust Department and may act on behalf of the Board of Directors of the Bank. ### Management Roles and Responsibilities While the Board of Directors has the responsibility to oversee the risk governance program, management is responsible for implementing the necessary policies and procedures, and internal controls. To carry out these responsibilities, the Corporation has a clearly defined risk governance culture. To ensure that risk management is communicated at all levels of the Corporation, and each area understands its specific role, the Corporation has established several management level committees to support risk oversight, as follows: #### Executive Risk Management Committee The Executive Risk Management Committee is responsible for exercising oversight of information regarding First BanCorp.’s enterprise risk management framework, including the significant policies, procedures, and practices employed to manage the identified risk categories (credit risk, operational risk, legal and regulatory risk, reputational risk, model risk, and capital risk). In carrying out its oversight responsibilities, each committee member is entitled to rely on the integrity and expertise of those people providing information to the committee and on the accuracy and completeness of such information, absent actual knowledge of an inaccuracy. The Chief Executive Officer appoints the Executive Risk Management Committee and members of the Corporation’s senior and executive management have the opportunity to share their insights about the types of risks that could impede the Corporation’s ability to achieve its business objectives. The Chief Risk Officer of the Corporation directs the agenda for the meetings and the Enterprise Risk Management (“ERM”) and Operational Risk Director serves as secretary of the committee and maintains the minutes on behalf of the committee. The General Auditor also participates in the committee as an observer. The committee provides assistance and support to the Chief Risk Officer to promote effective risk management throughout the Corporation. The Chief Risk Officer and the ERM and Operational Risk Director report to the Committee matters related to the enterprise risk management framework of the Corporation, including, but not limited to: The risk governance structure; The risk competencies of the Corporation; The Corporation’s risk appetite statement and risk tolerance; and The risk management strategy and associated risk management initiatives and how both support the business strategy and business model of the Corporation. #### Other Management Committees As part of its governance framework, the Corporation has various additional risk management related-committees. These committees are jointly responsible for ensuring adequate risk measurement and management in their respective areas of authority. At the management level, these committees include: Management’s Investment and Asset Liability Committee (the “MIALCO”) – oversees interest rate and market risk, liquidity management and other related matters, including sensitivity of the Corporation’s earnings under various interest rate scenarios. This committee makes recommendations as to any adjustments to asset liability management and financial resource allocation in light of current events, risks, exposures, and regulatory requirements and approves related policies. Refer to “Liquidity Risk and Capital Adequacy” and “Interest Rate Risk Management” below for further details. Information Technology Steering Committee – oversees and counsels on matters related to information technology and cyber security, including the development of information management policies and procedures throughout the Corporation. Bank Secrecy Act Committee – oversees, monitors, and reports on the Corporation’s compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act. Credit Committees (consisting of a Credit Management Committee and a Delinquency Committee) – oversees and establishes standards for credit risk management processes within the Corporation. The Credit Management Committee is responsible for the approval of loans above an established size threshold. The Delinquency Committee is responsible for the periodic review of credit exceptions, past-due loans, portfolio concentrations, foreclosures, collection, loan mitigation programs, risk appetite, leveraged loans, business production and the Bank’s internal credit-risk rating classification; Vendor Management Committee – oversees policies, procedures, and related practices related to the Corporation’s vendor management efforts. The Vendor Management Committee’s primary functions involve the establishment of processes and procedures to enable the recognition, assessment, management, and monitoring of vendor management risks. ESG Committee – primarily responsible for aligning ESG priorities and initiatives for the year, setting and monitoring long- term objectives and goals, and leading the annual reporting process on ESG related topics. The Committee also oversees the sustainability policy and integrates climate change risk factors into the corporate governance, strategy and risk management. The ESG Committee regularly reports to the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee of the Board of Directors. The Community Reinvestment Act Executive Committee – oversees, monitors, and reports on the Corporation’s compliance with Community Reinvestment Act regulatory requirements. Anti-Fraud Committee – oversees the Corporation’s policies, procedures and related practices relating to the Corporation’s anti-fraud measures. Regulatory Compliance Committee – oversees the Corporation’s Regulatory Compliance Management System. The Regulatory Compliance Committee reviews and discusses any regulatory compliance laws and regulations that impact performance of regulatory compliance policies, programs and procedures. The Regulatory Compliance Committee also ensures the coordination of regulatory compliance requirements throughout departments and business units. Regulatory Reporting Committee – oversees and assists the senior officers in fulfilling their responsibility for oversight of the accuracy and timeliness of the required regulatory reports and related policies and procedures, addresses changes and/or concerns communicated by the regulators, and addresses issues identified during the regulatory reporting process. The Regulatory Reporting Committee oversees and updates, as necessary, the established controls and procedures designed to ensure that information in regulatory reports is recorded, processed, and accurately reported and on a timely basis. Complaints Management Committee – assists in overseeing the complaint management process implemented across the Corporation within the Corporation’s three marketplaces: Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, and Florida. The Complaints Management Committee supports the Corporation’s complaints management program relating to resolution of complaints within the lines of business. When appropriate, the Complaints Management Committee evaluates existing corrective actions within the lines of business related to complaints and complaint management practices within those business units. Project Portfolio Management Committee – reviews and oversees the performance of the portfolio and individual technology projects during the Project Management Cycle (Initiation, Planning, Execution, Control & Monitoring, and Closing). The Project Portfolio Management Committee balances conflicting demands between projects, decides on priorities assigned to each project based on organizational priorities and capacity, and oversees project budgets, risks, and actions taken to control and mitigate risks. Current Expected Credit Losses (“CECL”) Committee – oversees the Corporation’s requirements for the calculation of CECL, including the implementation of new models, if necessary, selection of vendors and monitoring of the guidance from different regulatory agencies with regards to CECL requirements. The CECL Committee reviews estimated credit loss inputs, key assumptions, and qualitative overlays. In addition, the Committee approves the determination of reasonable and supportable periods used with respect to macroeconomic forecasts, and the historical loss reversion method and parameters. The CECL Committee reports to the Audit Committee the results of the ACL each reporting period. Capital Planning Committee – oversees the Capital Planning Process and is responsible for operating in accordance with the Capital Policy and ensuring compliance with its guidelines. The Capital Planning Committee develops and proposes to the Board changes to the Capital Policy and the capital plan targets, limits, performance metrics, internal stress testing and guidelines for Capital Management Activities. Business Continuity Committee – responsible to create governance and planning structure that will enable FirstBank to craft an enterprise Business Continuity Management (BCM) program that ensures the Bank is able to continue business operations after a major disruption occurs. Emergency Committee – Responsible to activate an emergency or disaster recovery procedure to ensure the safety of Bank’s personnel and the continuity of critical Bank services. #### Officers As part of its governance framework, the following officers play a key role in the Corporation’s risk management process: The Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) is responsible for the overall risk governance structure of the Corporation. The CEO is ultimately responsible for business strategies, strategic objectives, risk management priorities, and policies. The Chief Operating Officer (“COO”) manages the Corporation’s operational framework, including information technology (“IT”), facilities, banking operations, corporate security, and enterprise architecture. The COO oversees the effective and efficient execution of the various technology initiatives to support the Corporation’s growth and improve overall efficiency. The Chief Risk Officer (“CRO”) is responsible for the oversight of the risk management of the Corporation as well as the risk governance processes. The CRO, together with the ERM and Operational Risk Director, monitor key risks and manage the operational risk program. The CRO provides the leadership and strategy for the Corporation’s risk management and monitoring activities and is responsible for the oversight of regulatory compliance, loan review, model risk, and operational risk management. The CRO supervises talent management efforts, maintains adequate succession planning practices and promotes employee engagement. The Human Resources Director supports the CRO in the human capital and talent management efforts. Chief Credit Officer, Portfolio Risk Manager, Loan Review Manager and other Senior Executives are responsible for managing and executing the Corporation’s credit risk program. The Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), together with the Corporation’s Treasurer and the Asset and Liability Management (“ALM”) Director, manage the Corporation’s interest rate and market and liquidity risk programs and, jointly with the Chief Accounting Officer and the Corporate Controller, are responsible for the implementation of accounting policies and practices in accordance with GAAP and applicable regulatory requirements. The ERM and Operational Risk Director assist the CFO in the review of the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures. The Chief Accounting Officer and the Corporate Controller are responsible for the development and implementation of the Corporation’s accounting policies and practices and the review and monitoring of critical accounts and transactions to ensure that they are reported in accordance with GAAP and applicable regulatory requirements. The Corporate Strategic and Business Development Director is responsible for the development of the Corporation’s strategic and business plan, by coordinating and collaborating with the executive team and all corporate groups involved with the strategic and business planning process. The Corporate Strategy and Investor Relations Officer is responsible for managing communications with the investor community and sell-side research analysts and for coordinating and collaborating with the executive team and all corporate groups involved with the adequate execution of the strategic and business planning process. The ERM and Operational Risk Director is responsible for driving the identification, assessment, measurement, mitigation, and monitoring of key risks throughout the Corporation. The ERM and Operational Risk Director promotes and instills a culture of risk control, identifies and monitors the resolution of major and critical operational risk issues across the Corporation and serves as a key advisor to business executives with regards to risk exposure to the organization, corrective actions and corporate policies and best practices to mitigate risks. The Financi al and Model Risk Manager, IT Risk Manager, Retail Quality Assurance Manager, Regulatory Affairs Manager and Corporate Risk Managers assist the ERM and Operational Risk Director in the monitoring of key risks and oversight of risk management practices. The Compliance Director is responsible for oversight of regulatory compliance. The Compliance Director maintains an inventory of applicable regulations, implements an enterprise-wide compliance risk assessment, and monitors compliance with significant regulations. The Compliance Director is responsible for building awareness of and educating business units and subsidiaries on, regulatory risks. The General Counsel is responsible for the oversight of legal risks, including matters such as contract structuring, litigation risk, and all legal-related aspects of the Corporation’s business. The Corporate Affairs Officer assists the General Counsel with various legal areas, including, but not limited, to SEC reporting matters, insurance coverage and liability, and contract structuring. The Chief Information Officer (“CIO”) is responsible for overseeing technology services provided by IT vendors including the following: (i) the fulfillment of contractual obligations and responsibilities; (ii) the development of policies and standards related to the technology; (iii) services provided; (iv) billing and invoice processing; (v) Service Level Agreement (SLA) metrics and compliance; and vi) the Business Continuity Strategy. The Corporate Security Officer (“CSO”) is responsible for the oversight of information security policies and procedures, and the ongoing monitoring of existing and new vendors’ due diligence for information security. In addition, the CSO identifies risk factors, and determines solutions to security needs. ### Liquidity Risk and Capital Adequacy, Interest Rate Risk Management, Credit Risk Management, Operational Risk, Legal ### and Compliance Risk and Concentration Risk The following discussion highlights First BanCorp.’s adopted policies and procedures for liquidity risk and capital adequacy, interest rate risk, credit risk, operational risk, legal and compliance risk, and concentration risk. ### Liquidity Risk and Capital Adequacy Liquidity risk involves the ongoing ability to accommodate liability maturities and deposit withdrawals, fund asset growth and business operations, and meet contractual obligations through unconstrained access to funding at reasonable market rates. Liquidity management involves forecasting funding requirements and maintaining sufficient capacity to meet liquidity needs and accommodate fluctuations in asset and liability levels due to changes in the Corporation’s business operations or unanticipated events. The Corporation manages liquidity at two levels. The first is the liquidity of the parent company, which is the holding company that owns the banking and non-banking subsidiaries. The second is the liquidity of the banking subsidiary. The Asset and Liability Committee of the Board is responsible for overseeing management’s establishment of the Corporation’s liquidity policy, as well as approving operating and contingency procedures and monitoring liquidity on an ongoing basis. The MIALCO, which reports to the Board of Directors’ Asset and Liability Committee, uses measures of liquidity developed by management that involve the use of several assumptions to review the Corporation’s liquidity position on a monthly basis. The MIALCO oversees liquidity management, interest rate risk, market risk, and other related matters. The MIALCO is composed of senior management officers, including the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, the Chief Risk Officer, the Corporate Strategic and Business Development Director, the Treasury and Investments Risk Manager, the Financial Planning and ALM Director , and the Treasurer. The Treasury and Investments Division is responsible for planning and executing the Corporation’s funding activities and strategy, monitoring liquidity availability on a daily basis, and reviewing liquidity measures on a weekly basis. The Treasury and Investments Accounting and Operations area of the Corporate Controller’s Department is responsible for calculating the liquidity measurements used by the Treasury and Investment Division to review the Corporation’s liquidity position on a monthly basis. The Financial Planning and ALM Division is responsible to estimate the liquidity gap for longer periods. To ensure adequate liquidity through the full range of potential operating environments and market conditions, the Corporation conducts its liquidity management and business activities in a manner that is intended to preserve and enhance funding stability, flexibility, and diversity. Key components of this operating strategy include a strong focus on the continued development of customer-based funding, the maintenance of direct relationships with wholesale market funding providers, and the maintenance of the ability to liquidate certain assets when, and if, requirements warrant. The Corporation develops and maintains contingency funding plans. These plans evaluate the Corporation’s liquidity position under various operating circumstances and are designed to help ensure that the Corporation will be able to operate through periods of stress when access to normal sources of funds is constrained. The plans project funding requirements during a potential period of stress, specify and quantify sources of liquidity, outline actions and procedures for effectively managing liquidity through a period of stress, and define roles and responsibilities for the Corporation’s employees. Under the contingency funding plans, the Corporation stresses the balance sheet and the liquidity position to critical levels that mimic difficulties in generating funds or even maintaining the current funding position of the Corporation and the Bank and are designed to help ensure the ability of the Corporation and the Bank to honor their respective commitments. The Corporation has established liquidity triggers that the MIALCO monitors in order to maintain the ordinary funding of the banking business. The MIALCO developed contingency funding plans for the following three scenarios: a credit rating downgrade, an economic cycle downturn event, and a concentration event. The Board of Directors’ Asset and Liability Committee reviews and approves these plans on an annual basis. The Corporation manages its liquidity in a proactive manner and in an effort to maintain a sound liquidity position. It uses multiple measures to monitor the liquidity position, including core liquidity, basic liquidity, and time-based reserve measures. As of December 31, 2022, the estimated core liquidity reserve (which includes cash and free high quality liquid assets such as U.S. government and GSEs obligations that could be liquidated within one day) was $3.5 billion, or 19.0% of total assets, compared to $5.6 billion, or 27.0% of total assets as of December 31, 2021. The basic liquidity ratio (which adds available secured lines of credit to the core liquidity) was approximately 22.5% of total assets as of December 31, 2022, compared to 32.7% of total assets as of December 31, 2021. The decrease in the core liquidity reserves is in part due to customer deposits withdrawals and maturities, as well as the funding of loan growth. As of December 31, 2022, the Corporation had $644.2 million available for credit from the FHLB. The Corporation also maintains borrowing capacity at the FED Discount Window. The Corporation does not consider borrowing capacity from the FED Discount Window as a primary source of liquidity but had approximately $1.3 billion available for funding under the FED’s BIC Program as of December 31, 2022 as an additional contingent source. Total loans pledged to the FED Discount Window amounted to $2.2 billion as of December 31, 2022. The Corporation also does not rely on uncommitted inter-bank lines of credit (federal funds lines) to fund its operations and does not include them in the basic liquidity measure. As of December 31, 2022, the holding company had $19.3 million of cash and cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents at the Bank level as of December 31, 2022 were approximately $479.8 million, primarily balances deposited at the FED. The Bank had $105.8 million in brokered CDs as of December 31, 2022, of which approximately $55.7 million mature over the next twelve months. Liquidity at the Bank level is highly dependent on bank deposits, which fund 86.9% of the Bank’s assets (or 86.3% excluding brokered CDs). Historically, the use of brokered CDs has been an additional source of funding for the Corporation as it provides an additional efficient channel for funding diversification and can be obtained faster than regular retail deposits. Brokered CDs have been maintained at low levels due to the excess liquidity and availability of core deposits. Over the last twelve months, the FED’s policy to control the inflationary economic environment, including the rising of market interest rates, have resulted in excess liquidity gradually tapering off and impacting the Corporation’s core deposit balances as customers have allocated cash into higher yielding options. During the fourth quarter of 2022, the Corporation increased the use of short-term advances from the FHLB, repurchase agreements, and other sources, such as wholesale funding brokers. The additional use and future levels of these sources of funding are dependent on factors such as the loan portfolio future pipeline, customers continuing to allocate more cash into higher yielding alternatives, among other factors. Funding through these sources could potentially increase the overall cost of funding for the Corporation and impact the net interest margin. Furthermore, as a provider of financial services, the Corporation routinely enters into commitments with off-balance sheet risk to meet the financial needs of its customers. These financial instruments may include loan commitments and standby letters of credit. These commitments are subject to the same credit policies and approval processes used for on-balance sheet instruments. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the statements of financial condition. As of December 31, 2022, the Corporation’s commitments to extend credit amounted to approximately $1.9 billion. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Since certain commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amount does not necessarily represent future cash requirements. For most of the commercial lines of credit, the Corporation has the option to reevaluate the agreement prior to additional disbursements. There have been no significant or unexpected draws on existing commitments. In the case of credit cards and personal lines of credit, the Corporation can cancel the unused credit facility at any time and without cause. The following table summarizes commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit as of the indicated dates: ### December 31, ### 2022 ### 2021 (In thousands) Financial instruments whose contract amounts represent credit risk: Commitments to extend credit: Construction undisbursed funds 170,639 197,917 Unused personal lines of credit 978,219 1,180,824 Commercial lines of credit 761,634 725,259 Letters of credit: Commercial letters of credit 68,647 151,140 Standby letters of credit 9,160 4,342 The Corporation engages in the ordinary course of business in other financial transactions that are not recorded on the balance sheet, or may be recorded on the balance sheet in amounts that are different from the full contract or notional amount of the transaction and, thus, affecting the Corporation’s liquidity position. These transactions are designed to (i) meet the financial needs of customers, (ii) manage the Corporation’s credit, market and liquidity risks, (iii) diversify the Corporation’s funding sources, and (iv) optimize capital. In addition to the aforementioned off-balance sheet debt obligations and unfunded commitments to extend credit, the Corporation has obligations and commitments to make future payments under contracts, amounting to approximately $3.4 billion as of December 31, 2022. Our material cash requirements comprise primarily of contractual obligations to make future payments related to time deposits, short-term borrowings, long-term debt, and operating lease obligations. We also have other contractual cash obligations related to certain binding agreements we have entered into for services including outsourcing of technology services, security, advertising and other services which are not material to our liquidity needs. We currently anticipate that our available funds, credit facilities, and cash flows from operations will be sufficient to meet our operational cash needs for the foreseeable future. Off-balance sheet transactions are continuously monitored to consider their potential impact to our liquidity position and changes are applied to the balance between sources and uses of funds, as deemed appropriate, to maintain a sound liquidity position. #### Sources of Funding The Corporation utilizes different sources of funding to help ensure that adequate levels of liquidity are available when needed. Diversification of funding sources is of great importance to protect the Corporation’s liquidity from market disruptions. The principal sources of short-term funds are deposits, including brokered CDs. Additional funding is provided by short- and long-term securities sold under agreements to repurchase and lines of credit with the FHLB. Consistent with its strategy, the Corporation has been seeking to add core deposits. The Asset and Liability Committee reviews credit availability on a regular basis. The Corporation has also sold mortgage loans as a supplementary source of funding and participates in the BIC Program of the FED. The Corporation has also obtained long-term funding in the past through the issuance of notes and long-term brokered CDs. The Corporation continues to have access to financing through counterparties to repurchase agreements, the FHLB, and other agents, such as wholesale fundi ng brokers. While liquidity is an ongoing challenge for all financial institutions, management believes that the Corporation’s available borrowing capacity and efforts to grow retail deposits will be adequate to provide the necessary funding for the Corporation’s business plans in the foreseeable future. The Corporation’s principal sources of funding are discussed below: ### Deposits The following table presents the composition of total deposits as of the indicated dates: ### As of December 31, ### 2022 ### 2021 (Dollars in thousands) Interest-bearing savings accounts 3,902,888 4,729,387 Interest-bearing checking accounts 3,770,993 3,492,645 CDs 2,356,702 2,535,349 Interest-bearing deposits (1) 10,030,583 10,757,381 Non-interest-bearing deposits 6,112,884 7,027,513 Total 16,143,467 17,784,894 Interest-bearing deposits: Average balance outstanding 10,562,159 10,940,542 Non-interest-bearing deposits: Average balance outstanding 6,391,171 6,063,715 Weighted average rate during the period on interest-bearing deposits 0.44% 0.38% (1) The weighted-average interest rate on total interest-bearing deposits as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 was 1.03% and 0.31%, respectively. #### Retail deposits - The Corporation’s deposit products include regular savings accounts, demand deposit accounts, money market accounts, and retail CDs. As of December 31, 2022, the Corporation’s deposits, excluding government deposits and brokered CDs, decreased by $1.1 billion to $13.3 billion from $14.4 billion as of December 31, 2021. The $1.1 billion decrease was primarily related to lower balances in commercial savings accounts, retail CDs, and retail demand deposits accounts primarily in the Puerto Rico region, reflecting, among other things, the effect of customers’ allocation of cash balances into higher-yielding options and elevated customer spending. #### Government deposits - As of December 31, 2022, the Corporation had $2.3 billion of Puerto Rico public sector deposits ($2.2 billion in transactional accounts and $162.6 million in time deposits), compared to $2.7 billion as of December 31, 2021, which are insured by the FDIC up to the applicable limits and the uninsured portion is fully collateralized. Approximately 24% of the public sector deposits as of December 31, 2022 were from municipalities and municipal agencies in Puerto Rico and 76% were from public corporations, the central government and agencies, and U.S. federal government agencies in Puerto Rico. The decrease was primarily related to decreases in transactional account balances of government public corporations that reflect, among other things, utilization of federal funding allocated to Puerto Rico. In addition, as of December 31, 2022, the Corporation had $442.8 million of government deposits in the Virgin Islands region (December 31, 2021 - $568.4 million) and $11.6 million in the Florida region (December 31, 2021 - $9.6 million). #### Estimate of Uninsured Deposits – As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the estimated amount of uninsured deposits totaled $7.6 billion and $8.9 billion, respectively, generally representing the portion of deposits in domestic offices that exceed the FDIC insurance limit of $250,000 and amounts in any other uninsured deposit account. The balances presented as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 include the uninsured portion of government deposits, which are fully collateralized as previously mentioned. The amount of uninsured deposits is calculated based on the same methodologies and assumptions used for our bank regulatory reporting requirements adjusted for cash held by wholly-owned subsidiaries at the Bank. The following table presents by contractual maturities the amount of U.S. time deposits in excess of FDIC insurance limits (over $250,000) and other time deposits that are otherwise uninsured as of December 31, 2022: (In thousands) ### 3 months or ### less ### 3 months to ### 6 months ### 6 months to ### 1 year ### Over 1 year ### Total U.S. time deposits in excess of FDIC insurance limits 289,172 56,286 148,966 197,107 691,531 Other uninsured time deposits 21,874 7,027 17,281 4,855 51,037 #### Brokered CDs - Total brokered CDs increased during 2022 by $5.4 million to $105.8 million as of December 31, 2022, compared to $100.4 million as of December 31, 2021. The average remaining term to maturity of the brokered CDs outstanding as of December 31, 2022 was approximately 1.6 years. The use of brokered CDs provides an efficient channel for funding diversification and interest rate management. Brokered CDs are insured by the FDIC up to regulatory limits and can be obtained faster than regular retail deposits. Refer to “Net Interest Income” above for information about average balances of interest-bearing deposits and the average interest rate paid on deposits for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020. ### Borrowings As of December 31, 2022, total borrowings amounted to $933.9 million, compared to $683.8 million as of December 31, 2021. The following table presents the composition of total borrowings as of the indicated dates: ### Weighted Average ### Rate as of ### As of December 31, ### December 31, 2022 ### 2022 ### 2021 (Dollars in thousands) Short-term securities sold under agreements to repurchase 4.55% 75,133 Long-term securities sold under agreements to repurchase 300,000 Short-term advances from FHLB 4.56% 475,000 Long-term advances from FHLB 4.25% 200,000 200,000 Other borrowings 7.33% 183,762 183,762 Total 5.04% 933,895 683,762 #### Securities sold under agreements to repurchase - The Corporation’s investment portfolio is funded in part with repurchase agreements. The Corporation’s outstanding short-term securities sold under repurchase agreements amounted to $75.1 million as of December 31, 2022 and are scheduled to mature during the first quarter of 2023. The $300.0 million of long-term repurchase agreements that were outstanding as of December 31, 2021 matured or were called close to its maturity during 2022. In addition to these repurchase agreements, the Corporation has been able to maintain access to credit by using cost-effective sources such as FHLB advances. See Note 12 – Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase, to the audited consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K, for further details about repurchase agreements outstanding by counterparty and maturities. Under the Corporation’s repurchase agreements, as is the case with derivative contracts, the Corporation is required to pledge cash or qualifying securities to meet margin requirements. To the extent that the value of securities previously pledged as collateral declines due to changes in interest rates, a liquidity crisis or any other factor, the Corporation is required to deposit additional cash or securities to meet its margin requirements, thereby adversely affecting its liquidity. Given the quality of the collateral pledged, the Corporation has not experienced margin calls from counterparties arising from credit-quality-related write-downs in valuations. #### Advances from the FHLB – The Bank is a member of the FHLB system and obtains advances to fund its operations under a collateral agreement with the FHLB that requires the Bank to maintain qualifying mortgages and/or investments as collateral for advances taken. As of December 31, 2022, the outstanding balance of fixed-rate FHLB advances was $675.0 million, compared to $200.0 million as of December 31, 2021. The $200.0 million in long-term FHLB advances outstanding as of December 31, 2021 matured and were repaid during the third quarter of 2022. In addition, during the fourth quarter of 2022, the Corporation added $475.0 million of short-term FHLB advances that are scheduled to mature during the first quarter of 2023 and $200.0 million of long-term FHLB advances that are scheduled to mature in November 2027. Of the $675.0 million in FHLB advances, $225.0 million were pledged with investment securities and $450.0 million were pledged with mortgage loans. As of December 31, 2022, the Corporation had $644.2 million available for additional credit on FHLB lines of credit based on collateral pledged at the FHLB of New York . #### Trust Preferred Securities – In 2004, FBP Statutory Trusts I and II, statutory trusts that are wholly-owned by the Corporation and not consolidated in the Corporation’s financial statements, sold to institutional investors variable-rate TRuPs and used the proceeds of these issuances, together with the proceeds of the purchases by the Corporation of variable rate common securities, to purchase junior subordinated deferrable debentures. The subordinated debentures are presented in the Corporation’s consolidated statements of financial condition as other borrowings. As of each of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Corporation had subordinated debentures outstanding in the aggregate amount of $183.8 million with maturity dates from June 17, 2034 through September 20, 2034. Under the indentures, the Corporation has the right, from time to time, and without causing an event of default, to defer payments of interest on the Junior Subordinated Deferrable Debentures by extending the interest payment period at any time and from time to time during the term of the subordinated debentures for up to twenty consecutive quarterly periods. As of December 31, 2022, the Corporation was current on all interest payments due on its subordinated debt. See Note 14 – Other Borrowings and Note 10 – Non-Consolidated Variable Interest Entities (“VIE”) and Servicing Assets, to the audited consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information. #### Other Sources of Funds and Liquidity \- The Corporation’s principal uses of funds are for the origination of loans, the repayment of maturing deposits and borrowings, and deposits withdrawals. In connection with its mortgage banking activities, the Corporation has invested in technology and personnel to enhance the Corporation’s secondary mortgage market capabilities. The enhanced capabilities improve the Corporation’s liquidity profile as they allow the Corporation to derive liquidity, if needed, from the sale of mortgage loans in the secondary market. The U.S. (including Puerto Rico) secondary mortgage market is still highly- liquid, in large part because of the sale of mortgages through guarantee programs of the FHA, VA, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”), FNMA and FHLMC. During 2022, loans pooled into GNMA MBS amounted to approximately $144.5 million. Also, during 2022, the Corporation sold approximately $93.8 million of performing residential mortgage loans to FNMA and FHLMC. The FED Discount Window is a cost-efficient contingent source of funding for the Corporation in highly-volatile market conditions. As previously mentioned, although currently not in use, as of December 31, 2022, the Corporation had approximately $1.3 billion available for funding under the FED’s Discount Window based on collateral pledged at the FED. #### Effect of Credit Ratings on Access to Liquidity The Corporation’s liquidity is contingent upon its ability to obtain external sources of funding to finance its operations. The Corporation’s current credit ratings and any downgrade in credit ratings can hinder the Corporation’s access to new forms of external funding and/or cause external funding to be more expensive, which could, in turn, adversely affect its results of operations. Also, changes in credit ratings may further affect the fair value of unsecured derivatives whose value takes into account the Corporation’s own credit risk. The Corporation does not have any outstanding debt or derivative agreements that would be affected by credit rating downgrades. Furthermore, given the Corporation’s non-reliance on corporate debt or other instruments directly linked in terms of pricing or volume to credit ratings, the liquidity of the Corporation has not been affected in any material way by downgrades. The Corporation’s ability to access new non-deposit sources of funding, however, could be adversely affected by credit downgrades. As of the date hereof, the Corporation’s credit as a long-term issuer is rated BB+ by S&P and BB by Fitch. As of the date hereof, FirstBank’s credit ratings as a long-term issuer are BB+ by S&P, one notch below S&P’s minimum BBB- level required to be considered investment grade; and BB by Fitch, two notches below Fitch’s minimum BBB- level required to be considered investment grade. The Corporation’s credit ratings are dependent on a number of factors, both quantitative and qualitative, and are subject to change at any time. The disclosure of credit ratings is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold the Corporation’s securities. Each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating. #### Cash Flows Cash and cash equivalents were $480.5 million as of December 31, 2022, a decrease of $2.1 billion when compared to December 31, 2021. The following discussion highlights the major activities and transactions that affected the Corporation’s cash flows during 2022 and 2021: #### Cash Flows from Operating Activities First BanCorp.’s operating assets and liabilities vary significantly in the normal course of business due to the amount and timing of cash flows. Management believes that cash flows from operations, available cash balances, and the Corporation’s ability to generate cash through short and long-term borrowings will be sufficient to fund the Corporation’s operating liquidity needs for the foreseeable future. For the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, net cash provided by operating activities was $440.5 million and $399.7 million, respectively. Net cash generated from operating activities was higher than reported net income largely as a result of adjustments for non-cash items such as depreciation and amortization, deferred income tax expense and the provision for credit losses, as well as cash generated from sales of loans held for sale. #### Cash Flows from Investing Activities The Corporation’s investing activities primarily relate to originating loans to be held for investment, as well as purchasing, selling, and repaying available-for-sale and held-to-maturity debt securities. For the year ended December 31, 2022, net cash used in investing activities was $681.5 million, primarily due to purchases of U.S. agencies debentures and MBS and net disbursements on loans held for investment, partially offset by repayments of U.S. agencies MBS and proceeds from sales of commercial loan participations For the year ended December 31, 2021, net cash used in investing activities was $1.3 billion, primarily due to a higher volume of purchases of U.S. agencies investment securities and liquidity used to fund commercial and consumer loan originations, partially offset by principal collected on loans and U.S. agencies MBS repayments, as well as proceeds from U.S. agencies bonds called prior to maturity, the bulk sale of residential mortgage nonaccrual loans, and the sale of criticized commercial and construction loans. #### Cash Flows from Financing Activities The Corporation’s financing activities primarily include the receipt of deposits and the issuance of brokered CDs, the issuance of and payments on long-term debt, the issuance of equity instruments, return of capital, and activities related to its short-term funding. For the year ended December 31, 2022, net cash used by financing activities was $1.8 billion, mainly reflecting a decrease in total deposits, the repayment of long-term debt, and capital returned to stockholders. These variances were partially offset by proceeds from short-term borrowings. For the year ended December 31, 2021, net cash provided by financing activities was $1.9 billion, mainly reflecting an increase in non-brokered deposits, partially offset by capital returned to stockholders, and repayment of matured long-term FHLB advances and brokered CDs. ### Capital As of December 31, 2022, the Corporation’s stockholders’ equity was $1.3 billion, a decrease of $776.2 million from December 31, 2021\. The decrease was driven by a $718.6 million decline in the fair value of available-for -sale debt securities recorded as part of accumulated other comprehensive loss in the consolidated statements of financial condition, as a result of changes in market interest rates. The decrease also reflects the repurchase of 19.4 million shares of common stock for a total purchase price of approximately $275.0 million, and common stock dividends declared in 2022 totaling $88.2 million or $0.46 per common share, partially offset by earnings generated during 2022. On February 9, 2023, the Corporation’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.14 per common share, which represents an increase of $0.02 per common share, or a 17% increase, compared to its most recent dividend paid in December 2022. The dividend is payable on March 10, 2023 to shareholders of record at the close of business on February 24, 2023. The Corporation intends to continue to pay quarterly dividends on common stock. The Corporation’s common stock dividends, including the declaration, timing and amount, remain subject to the consideration and approval by the Corporation’s Board of Directors at the relevant times. During the first quarter of 2022, the Corporation completed its prior $300 million stock repurchase program announced in 2021 by purchasing through open market transactions 3.4 million shares of its common stock for the $50 million remaining in the program. On April 27, 2022, the Corporation announced that its Board of Directors approved a new stock repurchase program, under which the Corporation may repurchase up to $350 million of its outstanding common stock, which commenced in the second quarter of 2022 and at the time was expected to be executed over four quarters. The Corporation’s share repurchase program does not obligate it to acquire any specific number of shares. As of February 21, 2023, the Corporation has repurchased approximately 18.1 million shares of common stock for a total purchase price of $254.9 million under the $350 million stock repurchase program approved in April 2022. The Parent Company has no operations and depends on dividends, distributions and other payments from its subsidiaries to fund dividend payments, stock repurchases, and to fund all payments on its obligations, including debt obligations. The tangible common equity ratio and tangible book value per common share are non-GAAP financial measures generally used by the financial community to evaluate capital adequacy. Tangible common equity is total common equity less goodwill, and other intangible assets. Tangible assets are total assets less the previously mentioned intangible assets. See “Basis of Presentation” below for additional information. The following table is a reconciliation of the Corporation’s tangible common equity and tangible assets, non-GAAP financial measures, to total equity and total assets, respectively, as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively: ### December 31, ### December 31, ### 2022 ### 2021 (In thousands, except ratios and per share information) Total equity - GAAP 1,325,540 2,101,767 Goodwill (38,611) (38,611) Purchased credit card relationship intangible (205) (1,198) Core deposit intangible (20,900) (28,571) Insurance customer relationship intangible (13) (165) ### Tangible common equity ### 1,265,811 ### 2,033,222 Total assets - GAAP 18,634,484 20,785,275 Goodwill (38,611) (38,611) Purchased credit card relationship intangible (205) (1,198) Core deposit intangible (20,900) (28,571) Insurance customer relationship intangible (13) (165) ### Tangible assets ### 18,574,755 ### 20,716,730 ### Common shares outstanding ### 182,709 ### 201,827 ### Tangible common equity ratio ### 6.81% ### 9.81% ### Tangible book value per common share ### 6.93 ### 10.07 The Corporation’s tangible common equity ratio decreased to 6.81% as of December 31, 2022, compared to 9.81% as of December 31, 2021. The decrease in tangible common equity includes the effect of the $718.6 million decrease in the fair value of available-for- sale debt securities due to changes in market interest rates recognized as part of other accumulated other comprehensive loss. See Note 29 - Regulatory Matters, Commitments and Contingencies for the regulatory capital positions of the Corporation and FirstBank as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The Banking Law of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico requires that a minimum of 10% of FirstBank’s net income for the year be transferred to a legal surplus reserve until such surplus equals the total of paid-in-capital on common and preferred stock. Amounts transferred to the legal surplus reserve from retained earnings are not available for distribution to the Corporation without the prior consent of the Puerto Rico Commissioner of Financial Institutions. The Puerto Rico Banking Law provides that, when the expenditures of a Puerto Rico commercial bank are greater than receipts, the excess of the expenditures over receipts must be charged against the undistributed profits of the bank, and the balance, if any, must be charged against the legal surplus reserve, as a reduction thereof. If the legal surplus reserve is not sufficient to cover such balance in whole or in part, the outstanding amount must be charged against the capital account and the Bank cannot pay dividends until it can replenish the legal surplus reserve to an amount of at least 20% of the original capital contributed. During the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Corporation transferred $30.9 million and $28.3 million, respectively, to the legal surplus reserve. FirstBank’s legal surplus reserve, included as part of retained earnings in the Corporation’s consolidated statements of financial condition, amounted to $168.5 and $137.6 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Capital risk is the risk that our capital is insufficient to support our business activities under normal and stressed market conditions or we face capital reductions or risk-weighted assets increases, including from new or revised rules or changes in interpretations of existing rules, and are therefore unable to meet our internal capital targets or external regulatory capital requirements. Capital adequacy is of critical importance to us. Accordingly, we have in place a comprehensive capital management policy that provides a framework, defines objectives and establishes guidelines to maintain an appropriate level and composition of capital in both business- as-usual and stressed conditions. Our capital management framework is designed to provide us with the information needed to comprehensively manage risk and develop and apply projected stress scenarios that capture idiosyncratic vulnerabilities with a goal of holding sufficient capital to remain adequately capitalized even after experiencing a severe stress event. We have established a comprehensive governance structure to manage and oversee our capital management activities and compliance with capital rules and related policies. Capital planning activities are overseen by the Capital Planning Committee which is chaired by the CEO and is comprised of the following members: the CFO, CRO, and the Corporate Strategy and Investor Relations Officer. In addition, committees and members of senior management are responsible for the ongoing monitoring of our capital adequacy and evaluate current and future regulatory capital requirements, review the results of our capital planning and stress tests processes and the results of our capital models, and review our contingency funding and capital plan and key capital adequacy metrics, including regulatory capital ratios. ### Interest Rate Risk Management First BanCorp manages its asset/liability position to limit the effects of changes in interest rates on net interest income and to maintain stability of profitability under varying interest rate scenarios. The MIALCO oversees interest rate risk and monitors, among other things, current and expected conditions in global financial markets, competition and prevailing rates in the local deposit market, liquidity, loan originations pipeline, securities market values, recent or proposed changes to the investment portfolio, alternative funding sources and related costs, hedging and the possible purchase of derivatives such as swaps and caps, and any tax or regulatory issues which may be pertinent to these areas. The MIALCO approves funding decisions in light of the Corporation’s overall strategies and objectives. On a quarterly basis, the Corporation performs a consolidated net interest income simulation analysis to estimate the potential change in future earnings from projected changes in interest rates. These simulations are carried out over a one-to-five-year time horizon, assuming upward and downward yield curve shifts. The rate scenarios considered in these simulations reflect gradual upward and downward interest rate movements of 200 basis points (“bps”) during a twelve-month period. The Corporation carries out the simulations in two ways: (1) Using a static balance sheet, as the Corporation had on the simulation date, and (2) Using a dynamic balance sheet based on recent patterns and current strategies. The balance sheet is divided into groups of assets and liabilities by maturity or re-pricing structure and their corresponding interest yields and costs. As interest rates rise or fall, these simulations incorporate expected future lending rates, current and expected future funding sources and costs, the possible exercise of options, changes in prepayment rates, deposit decay and other factors, which may be important in projecting net interest income. The Corporation uses a simulation model to project future movements in the Corporation’s balance sheet and income statement. The starting point of the projections corresponds to the actual values on the balance sheet on the date of the simulations. These simulations are highly complex and are based on many assumptions that are intended to reflect the general behavior of the balance sheet components over the modeled periods. It is unlikely that actual events will match these assumptions in all cases. For this reason, the results of these forward-looking computations are only approximations of the true sensitivity of net interest income to changes in market interest rates. Several benchmark and market rate curves were used in the modeling process, primarily the LIBOR/SWAP curve, SOFR curve, Prime Rate, U.S. Treasury yield curve, FHLB rates, brokered CDs rates, repurchase agreements rates, and the mortgage commitment rate of 30 years. As of December 31, 2022, the Corporation forecasted the 12-month net interest income assuming December 31, 2022 interest rate curves remain constant. Then, net interest income was estimated under rising and falling rates scenarios. For rising rates scenarios, a gradual (ramp) parallel upward shift of the yield curve is assumed during the first twelve months (the “+200 ramp” scenario). Conversely, for the falling rates scenario, a gradual (ramp) parallel downward shift of the yield curve is assumed during the first twelve months (the “-200 ramp” scenario). The LIBOR/Swap rates for December 31, 2022, as compared to the January 31, 2022 rates used for the December 31, 2021 sensitivity analysis, reflected an increase in the short-term sector of the curve, that is between one to twelve months, of 449 basis points (“bps”) on average; while market rates increased in the medium-term sector of the curve, that is between 2 to 5 years, by 274 bps. In the long-term sector, that is over 5-year maturities, market rates increased 196 bps as compared to January 31, 2022. A similar pattern in market rates changes were observed in the Treasury and the SOFR curve of 416 and 410 bps in the short-term sector, respectively, 282 and 247 in the medium-term sector, respectively, and 200 and 167 bps in the long-term sector, respectively. The following table presents the results of the simulations as of December 31, 2022 and 2021. Consistent with prior years, these exclude non-cash changes in the fair value of derivatives: ### December 31, 2022 ### December 31, 2021 ### Net Interest Income Risk ### Net Interest Income Risk ### (Projected for the next 12 months) ### (Projected for the next 12 months) ### Static Simulation ### Growing Balance Sheet ### Static Simulation ### Growing Balance Sheet (Dollars in millions) ### $ Change ### % Change ### $ Change ### % Change ### $ Change ### % Change ### $ Change ### % Change \+ 200 bps ramp 7.8 0.96 11.5 1.37 34.5 4.81 39.1 5.17 \- 200 bps ramp (13.1) (1.61) (17.0) (2.03) (12.2) (1.70) (13.5) (1.78) The Corporation continues to manage its balance sheet structure to control and limit the overall interest rate risk by managing its asset composition while maintaining a sound liquidity position. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the simulations showed that the Corporation continues to have an asset-sensitive position. As of December 31, 2022, the net interest income for the next twelve months under a non-static balance sheet scenario is estimated to increase by $11.5 million in the rising rate scenario, when compared against the base simulation. The decrease in net interest income sensitivity for the +200 bps ramp scenario, as compared to December 31, 2021, is primarily driven by the size and mix of the balance sheet coupled with changes in market interest rates and its impact on deposit betas. As of December 31, 2022, the starting point of the simulation reflects lower balances in more sensitive assets such as cash and cash equivalents as a result of the overall decline in total deposits. In addition, the repricing of the more sensitive interest-bearing deposits, such as government deposits, have resulted in increases in deposit betas which ultimately impact net interest income. As of December 31, 2022, under a falling rate, non-static balance sheet scenario, the net interest income is estimated to decrease by $17.0 million, when compared against the base simulation. The increase in net interest income sensitivity for the -200 bps ramp scenario, when compared to December 31, 2021, was driven by higher sensitivity in the asset side as a result of rate decompression as market rates move away from historically low interest rate levels, allowing for greater downward interest rate shifts, which more than offset the aforementioned repricing of the more sensitive interest-bearing deposits described above. #### Derivatives First BanCorp. uses derivative instruments and other strategies to manage its exposure to interest rate risk caused by changes in interest rates beyond management’s control. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Corporation considered all of its derivative instruments to be undesignated economic hedges. For detailed information regarding the volume of derivative activities ( #### e.g. , notional amounts), location and fair values of derivative instruments in the consolidated statements of financial condition and the amount of gains and losses reported in the consolidated statements of income, see Note 24 - Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, to the audited consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K. ### Credit Risk Management First BanCorp. is subject to credit risk mainly with respect to its portfolio of loans receivable and off-balance-sheet instruments, principally loan commitments. Loans receivable represents loans that First BanCorp. holds for investment and, therefore, First BanCorp. is at risk for the term of the loan. Loan commitments represent commitments to extend credit, subject to specific conditions, for specific amounts and maturities. These commitments may expose the Corporation to credit risk and are subject to the same review and approval process as for loans made by the Bank. See “Liquidity Risk and Capital Adequacy” above for further details. The Corporation manages its credit risk through its credit policy, underwriting, monitoring of loan concentrations and related credit quality, counterparty credit risk, economic and market conditions, and legislative or regulatory mandates. The Corporation also performs independent loan review and quality control procedures, statistical analysis, comprehensive financial analysis, established management committees, and employs proactive collection and loss mitigation efforts. Furthermore, personnel performing structured loan workout functions are responsible for mitigating defaults and minimizing losses upon default within each region and for each business segment. In the case of the commercial and industrial, commercial mortgage and construction loan portfolios, the Special Asset Group (“SAG”) focuses on strategies for the accelerated reduction of non-performing assets through note sales, short sales, loss mitigation programs, and sales of OREO. In addition to the management of the resolution process for problem loans, the SAG oversees collection efforts for all loans to prevent migration to the nonaccrual and/or adversely classified status. The SAG utilizes relationship officers, collection specialists and attorneys. The Corporation may also have risk of default in the securities portfolio. The securities held by the Corporation are principally fixed-rate U.S. agencies MBS and U.S. Treasury and agencies securities. Thus, a substantial portion of these instruments is backed by mortgages, a guarantee of a U.S. GSE or the full faith and credit of the U.S. government. Management, consisting of the Corporation’s Commercial Credit Risk Officer, Retail Credit Risk Officer, Chief Credit Officer, and other senior executives, has the primary responsibility for setting strategies to achieve the Corporation’s credit risk goals and objectives. Management has documented these goals and objectives in the Corporation’s Credit Policy. ### Allowance for Credit Losses and Non-performing Assets #### Allowance for Credit Losses for Loans and Finance Leases The ACL for loans and finance leases represents the estimate of the level of reserves appropriate to absorb expected credit losses over the estimated life of the loans. The amount of the allowance is determined using relevant available information, from internal and external sources, relating to past events, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Historical credit loss experience is a significant input for the estimation of expected credit losses, as well as adjustments to historical loss information made for differences in current loan-specific risk characteristics, such as differences in underwriting standards, portfolio mix, delinquency level, or term. Additionally, the Corporation’s assessment involves evaluating key factors, which include credit and macroeconomic indicators, such as changes in unemployment rates, property values, and other relevant factors to account for current and forecasted market conditions that are likely to cause estimated credit losses over the life of the loans to differ from historical credit losses. Such factors are subject to regular review and may change to reflect updated performance trends and expectations, particularly in times of severe stress. The process includes judgments and quantitative elements that may be subject to significant change. Further, the Corporation periodically considers the need for qualitative reserves to the ACL. Qualitative adjustments may be related to and include, but are not limited to, factors such as the following: (i) management’s assessment of economic forecasts used in the model and how those forecasts align with management’s overall evaluation of current and expected economic conditions; (ii) organization specific risks such as credit concentrations, collateral specific risks, nature and size of the portfolio and external factors that may ultimately impact credit quality, and (iii) other limitations associated with factors such as changes in underwriting and loan resolution strategies, among others. The ACL for loans and finance leases is reviewed at least on a quarterly basis as part of the Corporation’s continued evaluation of its asset quality. During 2022, the Corporation applied probability weights to the baseline and alternative downside economic scenarios to estimate the ACL with the baseline scenario carrying the highest weight. In weighting these macroeconomic scenarios, the Corporation applied judgment based on a variety of factors such as economic uncertainties including continued conflict in Ukraine, the overall inflationary environment, and a potential slowdown in economic activity as a result of the FED’s policy actions to control inflationary economic conditions. For periods prior to 2022, the Corporation calculated the ACL using the baseline scenario. As of December 31, 2022, the Corporation’s ACL model considered the following assumptions for key economic variables in the probability-weighted economic scenarios: Average Commercial Real Estate Price Index forecast for the year 2023 is expected to contract by 2.96%, compared to an average projected appreciation for 2023 of 8.68% as of December 31, 2021. Average Regional Home Price Index forecast for year 2023 in Puerto Rico (purchase only prices) shows a deterioration of 6.88%, when compared to the forecast for 2023 as of December 31, 2021. An increase in levels of regional unemployment in Puerto Rico to 8.55% for the year 2023, compared to the forecast for 2023 of 7.60% as of December 31, 2021. For the Florida region and the U.S. mainland, an increase in unemployment rate to 4.23% and 4.83%, respectively, for the year 2023, compared to 2.88% and 3.49%, respectively, for 2023 as of December 31, 2021. A decrease in real GDP in the U.S. mainland to 0.26% for the year 2023, compared to the forecast for 2023 of 2.84% as of December 31, 2021. It is difficult to estimate how potential changes in one factor or input might affect the overall ACL because management considers a wide variety of factors and inputs in estimating the ACL. Changes in the factors and inputs considered may not occur at the same rate and may not be consistent across all geographies or product types, and changes in factors and inputs may be directionally inconsistent, such that improvement in one factor or input may offset deterioration in others. However, to demonstrate the sensitivity of credit loss estimates to macroeconomic forecasts as of December 31, 2022, management compared the modeled estimates under the probability- weighted economic scenarios against a more adverse scenario. Under this more adverse scenario, as an example, average unemployment rate for the Puerto Rico region increases to 9.16% for the year 2023, compared to 8.55% for the same period on the probability-weighted economic scenario projections. To demonstrate the sensitivity to key economic parameters used in the calculation of our ACL at December 31, 2022, management calculated the difference between our quantitative ACL and this more adverse scenario. Excluding consideration of qualitative adjustments, this sensitivity analysis would result in a hypothetical increase in our ACL of approximately $41 million at December 31, 2022\. This analysis relates only to the modeled credit loss estimates and is not intended to estimate changes in the overall ACL as it does not reflect any potential changes in other adjustments to the qualitative calculation, which would also be influenced by the judgment management applies to the modeled lifetime loss estimates to reflect the uncertainty and imprecision of these estimates based on current circumstances and conditions. Recognizing that forecasts of macroeconomic conditions are inherently uncertain, particularly in light of the recent economic conditions and challenges, which continue to evolve, management believes that its process to consider the available information and associated risks and uncertainties is appropriately governed and that its estimates of expected credit losses were reasonable and appropriate for the period ended December 31, 2022. As of December 31, 2022, the ACL for loans and finance leases was $260.5 million, down approximately $8.5 million from December 31, 2021. The ACL reduction for commercial and construction loans was $20.8 million during 2022, primarily reflecting reduced uncertainties related to the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly on loans in the hotel, transportation and entertainment industries; and, to a lesser extent, the effect during the second half of 2022 of reserve releases totaling $4.8 million associated with two adversely classified loans that were paid off or sold, partially offset by an increase in the size of the loan portfolio and a less favorable economic outlook in the projection of certain forecasted macroeconomic variables, such as the CRE price index. In addition, there was an ACL reduction of $12.0 million for residential mortgage loans, partially offset by a $24.3 million increase in the ACL for consumer loans. The net reduction in the ACL for residential mortgage loans was primarily driven by the overall decrease in the size of this portfolio and, to a lesser extent, a decrease in qualitative adjustments due to improvements in underlying portfolio metrics. The ACL increase for consumer loans was mainly driven by a less favorable long-term outlook of certain macroeconomic variables, such as the regional unemployment rate, and an increasing trend in delinquency and charge-off levels in the consumer loan portfolios. The ratio of the ACL for loans and finance leases to total loans held for investment decreased to 2.25% as of December 31, 2022, compared to 2.43% as of December 31, 2021. An explanation for the change for each portfolio follows: The ACL to total loans ratio for the residential mortgage portfolio decreased from 2.51% as of December 31, 2021 to 2.20% as of December 31, 2022, primarily due to a decrease in qualitative adjustments due to improvements in underlying portfolio metrics. The ACL to total loans ratio for the commercial mortgage portfolio decreased from 2.43% as of December 31, 2021 to 1.49% as of December 31, 2022, primarily reflecting reduced uncertainties related to the COVID-19 pandemic, as previously discussed. The ACL to total loans ratio for the commercial and industrial portfolio was 1.14% as of December 31, 2022, relatively flat when compared to 1.19% as of December 31, 2021 The ACL to total loans ratio for the construction loan portfolio decreased from 2.91% as of December 31, 2021 to 1.74% as of December 31, 2022, primarily reflecting reductions in qualitative reserves mostly associated to previously-identified specific risks for a construction project in Florida that were resolved during the first quarter of 2022. The ACL to total loans ratio for the consumer loan portfolio increased from 3.57% as of December 31, 2021 to 3.83% as of December 31, 2022, primarily associated to a less favorable long -term outlook of certain macroeconomic variables and an increasing trend in delinquency and charge-off levels in the consumer loan portfolios. The ratio of the total ACL for loans and finance leases to nonaccrual loans held for investment was 289.61% as of December 31, 2022, compared to 242.99% as of December 31, 2021. Substantially all of the Corporation’s loan portfolio is located within the boundaries of the U.S. economy. Whether the collateral is located in Puerto Rico, the U.S. and British Virgin Islands, or the U.S. mainland (mainly in the state of Florida), the performance of the Corporation’s loan portfolio and the value of the collateral supporting the transactions are dependent upon the performance of and conditions within each specific area’s real estate market. The Corporation believes it sets adequate loan-to-value ratios following its regulatory and credit policy standards. As shown in the following tables, the ACL for loans and finance leases amounted to $260.5 million as of December 31, 2022, or 2.25% of total loans, compared with $269.0 million, or 2.43% of total loans, as of December 31, 2021. See “Results of Operations - Provision for Credit Losses” above for additional information. ### Year Ended December 31, ### 2022 ### 2021 ### 2020 (Dollars in thousands) ACL for loans and finance leases, beginning of year 269,030 385,887 155,139 Impact of adopting CECL 81,165 Initial allowance on purchased credit deteriorated ("PCD") loans 28,744 Provision for credit losses - expense (benefit): Residential mortgage (8,734) (16,957) 22,427 (1) Commercial mortgage (18,994) (55,358) 81,125 (1) Commercial and Industrial (1,770) (8,549) 6,627 (1) Construction (2,342) (1,408) 2,105 Consumer and finance leases 57,519 20,552 56,433 (1) Total provision for credit losses - expense (benefit) 25,679 (61,720) 168,717 (1) Charge-offs: Residential mortgage (6,890) (33,294) (2) (11,017) Commercial mortgage (85) (1,494) (3,330) Commercial and Industrial (2,067) (1,887) (3,634) Construction (123) (87) (76) Consumer and finance leases (48,165) (43,948) (46,483) Total charge offs (57,330) (80,710) (64,540) Recoveries: Residential mortgage 3,547 4,777 1,519 Commercial mortgage 1,372 281 1,936 Commercial and Industrial 2,459 6,776 3,192 Construction 725 163 184 Consumer and finance leases 14,982 13,576 9,831 Total recoveries 23,085 25,573 16,662 Net charge-offs (34,245) (55,137) (3) (47,878) ACL for loans and finance leases, end of year 260,464 269,030 385,887 ACL for loans and finance leases to year-end total loans held for investment 2.25% 2.43% 3.28% Net charge-offs to average loans outstanding during the year 0.31% 0.48% 0.48% Provision for credit losses - expense (benefit) for loans and finance leases to net charge-offs during the year 0.75x -1.12x 3.52x (1) Includes a $37.5 million charge related to the establishment of the initial reserves for non-PCD loans acquired in conjunction with the BSPR acquisition consisting of: (i) a $13.6 million charge related to non-PCD residential mortgage loans; (ii) a $9.2 million charge related to non-PCD commercial mortgage loans, (iii) a $4.6 million charge related to non-PCD commercial and industrial loans, and (iv) a $10.1 million charge related to non-PCD consumer loans. (2) Includes net charge-offs totaling $23.1 million associated with a bulk sale of residential nonaccrual loans and related servicing advance receivables. (3) Excluding net charge-offs associated with the bulk sale, total net charge -offs to related average loans for the year ended 2023 was 0.28%. The following table sets forth information concerning the allocation of the Corporation’s ACL for loans and finance leases by loan category and the percentage of loan balances in each category to the total of such loans as of the indicated dates: ### As of December 31, ### 2022 ### 2021 ### Amount ### Percent of loans in ### each category to total ### loans ### Amount ### Percent of loans in ### each category to total ### loans (Dollars in thousands) Residential mortgage loans 62,760 25% 74,837 27% Commercial mortgage loans 35,064 20% 52,771 20% Commercial and industrial loans 32,906 25% 34,284 26% Construction loans 2,308 1% 4,048 1% Consumer loans and finance leases 127,426 29% 103,090 26% 260,464 100% 269,030 100% The following table sets forth information concerning the composition of the Corporation's loan portfolio and related ACL by loan category as of the indicated dates: ### As of December 31, 2022 ### Residential ### Mortgage ### Loans ### Commercial ### Mortgage ### Loans ### C&I Loans ### Consumer and ### Finance Leases ### Construction ### Loans (Dollars in thousands) ### Total Total loans held for investment: Amortized cost of loans 2,847,290 2,358,851 2,886,263 132,953 3,327,468 11,552,825 Allowance for credit losses 62,760 35,064 32,906 2,308 127,426 260,464 Allowance for credit losses to amortized cost 2.20 1.49 1.14 1.74 3.83 2.25 ### As of December 31, 2021 ### Residential ### Mortgage ### Loans ### Commercial ### Mortgage ### Loans ### C&I Loans ### Consumer and ### Finance Leases ### Construction ### Loans (Dollars in thousands) ### Total Total loans held for investment: Amortized cost of loans 2,978,895 2,167,469 2,887,251 138,999 2,888,044 11,060,658 Allowance for credit losses 74,837 52,771 34,284 4,048 103,090 269,030 Allowance for credit losses to amortized cost 2.51 2.43 1.19 2.91 3.57 2.43 #### Allowance for Credit Losses for Unfunded Loan Commitments The Corporation estimates expected credit losses over the contractual period in which the Corporation is exposed to credit risk as a result of a contractual obligation to extend credit, such as pursuant to unfunded loan commitments and standby letters of credit for commercial and construction loans, unless the obligation is unconditionally cancellable by the Corporation. The ACL for off-balance sheet credit exposures is adjusted as a provision for credit loss expense. As of December 31, 2022, the ACL for off-balance sheet credit exposures increased by $2.7 million to $4.3 million, when compared to December 31, 2021, mainly driven by an increase in balance of unfunded loan commitments principally due to newly originated facilities which remained undrawn as of December 31, 2022. #### Allowance for Credit Losses for Held-to-Maturity Debt Securities As of December 31, 2022, the ACL for held-to-maturity securities portfolio was entirely related to financing arrangements with Puerto Rico municipalities issued in bond form, which the Corporation accounts for as securities, but which were underwritten as loans with features that are typically found in commercial loans. As of December 31, 2022, the ACL for held-to-maturity debt securities was $8.3 million, compared to $8.6 million as of December 31, 2021. #### Allowance for Credit Losses for Available -for-Sale Debt Securities The ACL for available-for-sale debt securities, which is associated with private label MBS and a residential pass-through MBS issued by the PRHFA, was $0.5 million as of December 31, 2022, compared to $1.1 million as of December 31, 2021. ### Nonaccrual Loans and Non-performing Assets Total non-performing assets consist of nonaccrual loans (generally loans held for investment or loans held for sale on which the recognition of interest income was discontinued when the loan became 90 days past due or earlier if the full and timely collection of interest or principal is uncertain), foreclosed real estate and other repossessed properties, and non-performing investment securities, if any. When a loan is placed in nonaccrual status, any interest previously recognized and not collected is reversed and charged against interest income. Cash payments received are recognized when collected in accordance with the contractual terms of the loans. The principal portion of the payment is used to reduce the principal balance of the loan, whereas the interest portion is recognized on a cash basis (when collected). However, when management believes that the ultimate collectability of principal is in doubt, the interest portion is applied to the outstanding principal. The risk exposure of this portfolio is diversified as to individual borrowers and industries, among other factors. In addition, a large portion is secured with real estate collateral. See Note 1 – Nature of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, to the audited consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K, for additional information. #### Nonaccrual Loans Policy #### Residential Real Estate Loans - The Corporation generally classifies real estate loans in nonaccrual status when it has not received interest and principal for a period of 90 days or more. #### Commercial and Construction Loans - The Corporation classifies commercial loans (including commercial real estate and construction loans) in nonaccrual status when it has not received interest and principal for a period of 90 days or more or when it does not expect to collect all of the principal or interest due to deterioration in the financial condition of the borrower. #### Finance Leases - The Corporation classifies finance leases in nonaccrual status when it has not received interest and principal for a period of 90 days or more. #### Consumer Loans - The Corporation classifies consumer loans in nonaccrual status when it has not received interest and principal for a period of 90 days or more. Credit card loans continue to accrue finance charges and fees until charged-off at 180 days delinquent. #### Purchased Credit Deteriorated Loans - For PCD loans, the nonaccrual status is determined in the same manner as for other loans, except for PCD loans that prior to the adoption of CECL were classified as purchased credit impaired (“PCI”) loans and accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30, “Receivables – Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality” (ASC Subtopic 310-30). As allowed by CECL, the Corporation elected to maintain pools of loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 as “units of accounts,” conceptually treating each pool as a single asset. Regarding interest income recognition, the prospective transition approach for PCD loans was applied at a pool level, which froze the effective interest rate of the pools as of January 1, 2020. According to regulatory guidance, the determination of nonaccrual or accrual status for PCD loans with respect to which the Corporation has made a policy election to maintain previously existing pools upon adoption of CECL should be made at the pool level, not the individual asset level. In addition, the guidance provides that the Corporation can continue accruing interest and not report the PCD loans as being in nonaccrual status if the following criteria are met: (i) the Corporation can reasonably estimate the timing and amounts of cash flows expected to be collected; and (ii) the Corporation did not acquire the asset primarily for the rewards of ownership of the underlying collateral, such as the use in operations or improving the collateral for resale. Thus, the Corporation continues to exclude these pools of PCD loans from nonaccrual loan statistics. ### Other Real Estate Owned OREO acquired in settlement of loans is carried at fair value less estimated costs to sell the real estate acquired. Appraisals are obtained periodically, generally on an annual basis. ### Other Repossessed Property The other repossessed property category generally included repossessed boats and autos acquired in settlement of loans. Repossessed boats and autos are recorded at the lower of cost or estimated fair value. ### Other Non-Performing Assets This category consisted of a residential pass-through MBS issued by the PRHFA placed in non-performing status in the second quarter of 2021 based on the delinquency status of the underlying second mortgage loans. ### Loans Past-Due 90 Days and Still Accruing These are accruing loans that are contractually delinquent 90 days or more. These past-due loans are either current as to interest but delinquent as to the payment of principal (i.e., well secured and in process of collection) or are insured or guaranteed under applicable FHA, VA, or other government-guaranteed programs for residential mortgage loans. Furthermore, as required by instructions in regulatory reports, loans past due 90 days and still accruing include loans previously pooled into GNMA securities for which the Corporation has the option but not the obligation to repurchase loans that meet GNMA’s specified delinquency criteria (e.g., borrowers fail to make any payment for three consecutive months). For accounting purposes, these GNMA loans subject to the repurchase option are required to be reflected on the financial statements with an offsetting liability. In addition, loans past due 90 days and still accruing include PCD loans, as mentioned above, and credit cards that continue accruing interest until charged-off at 180 days. Troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”) are classified as either accrual or nonaccrual loans. A loan in nonaccrual status and restructured as a TDR will remain in nonaccrual status until the borrower has proven the ability to perform under the modified structure, generally for a minimum of six months, and there is evidence that such payments can and are likely to continue as agreed. The Corporation considers performance prior to the restructuring, or significant events that coincide with the restructuring, in assessing whether the borrower can meet the new terms, which may result in the loan being returned to accrual status at the time of the restructuring or after a shorter performance period. If the borrower’s ability to meet the revised payment schedule is uncertain, the loan remains classified as a nonaccrual loan. The following table presents non-performing assets as of the indicated dates: ### December 31, ### December 31, ### 2022 ### 2021 (Dollars in thousands) Nonaccrual loans held for investment: Residential mortgage 42,772 55,127 Commercial mortgage 22,319 25,337 Commercial and Industrial 7,830 17,135 Construction 2,208 2,664 Consumer and finance leases 14,806 10,454 Total nonaccrual loans held for investment (1) 89,935 110,717 OREO 31,641 40,848 Other repossessed property 5,380 3,687 Other assets (2) 2,202 2,850 Total non-performing assets (1) 129,158 158,102 Past due loans 90 days and still accruing (3) (4) (5) 80,517 115,448 Non-performing assets to total assets 0.69 0.76 Nonaccrual loans held for investment to total loans held for investment 0.78 1.00 ACL for loans and finance leases 260,464 269,030 ACL for loans and finance leases to total nonaccrual loans held for investment 289.61 242.99 ACL for loans and finance leases to total nonaccrual loans held for investment, excluding residential real estate loans 552.26 483.95 (1) Nonaccrual loans exclude $328.1 million and $363.4 million of TDR loans that were in compliance with the modified terms and in accrual status as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. (2) Residential pass-through MBS issued by the PRHFA held as part of the available-for-sale debt securities portfolio. (3) Includes PCD loans previously accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 for which the Corporation made the accounting policy election of maintaining pools of loans as “units of account” both at the time of adoption of CECL on January 1, 2020 and on an ongoing basis for credit loss measurement. These loans will continue to be excluded from nonaccrual loan statistics as long as the Corporation can reasonably estimate the timing and amount of cash flows expected to be collected on the loan pools. The portion of such loans contractually past due 90 days or more amounted to $12.0 million and $20.6 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. (4) Includes FHA/VA government-guaranteed residential mortgage as loans past-due 90 days and still accruing as opposed to nonaccrual loans. The Corporation continues accruing interest on these loans until they have passed the 15 months delinquency mark, taking into consideration the FHA interest curtailment process. These balances include $28.2 million and $46.6 million of FHA government guaranteed residential mortgage loans that were over 15 months delinquent as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. (5) Includes rebooked loans, which were previously pooled into GNMA securities, amounting to $10.3 million and $7.2 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Under the GNMA program, the Corporation has the option but not the obligation to repurchase loans that meet GNMA’s specified delinquency criteria. For accounting purposes, the loans subject to the repurchase option are required to be reflected on the financial statements with an offsetting liability. Total nonaccrual loans were $89.9 million as of December 31, 2022. This represents a net decrease of $20.8 million from $110.7 million as of December 31, 2021. The net decrease was primarily related to a $12.8 million reduction in nonaccrual commercial and construction loans, mostly driven by $8.5 million in loans returned to accrual status and $8.5 million in collections, partially offset by inflows of $5.7 million. In addition, nonaccrual residential mortgage loans decreased by $12.3 million mainly related to $15.4 million of loans restored to accrual status, $11.8 million in collections, and $3.9 million in loans transferred to OREO during 2022, partially offset by inflows of $20.3 million. These variances were partially offset by a $4.3 million increase in nonaccrual consumer loans, mostly related to the continued trend of growth in the auto loan and finance leases portfolios. The following table shows non-performing assets by geographic segment as of the indicated dates: ### December 31, ### December 31, ### 2022 ### 2021 (In thousands) ### Puerto Rico: Nonaccrual loans held for investment: Residential mortgage 28,857 39,256 Commercial mortgage 14,341 15,503 Commercial and Industrial 5,859 14,708 Construction 831 1,198 Consumer and finance leases 14,142 10,177 Total nonaccrual loans held for investment 64,030 80,842 OREO 28,135 36,750 Other repossessed property 5,275 3,456 Other assets 2,202 2,850 Total non-performing assets 99,642 123,898 Past due loans 90 days and still accruing 76,417 114,001 ### Virgin Islands: Nonaccrual loans held for investment: Residential mortgage 6,614 8,719 Commercial mortgage 7,978 9,834 Commercial and Industrial 1,179 1,476 Construction 1,377 1,466 Consumer 469 144 Total nonaccrual loans held for investment 17,617 21,639 OREO 3,475 3,450 Other repossessed property 76 187 Total non-performing assets 21,168 25,276 Past due loans 90 days and still accruing 4,100 1,265 ### United States: Nonaccrual loans held for investment: Residential mortgage 7,301 7,152 Commercial and Industrial 792 951 Consumer 195 133 Total nonaccrual loans held for investment 8,288 8,236 OREO 31 648 Other repossessed property 29 44 Total non-performing assets 8,348 8,928 Past due loans 90 days and still accruing Nonaccrual commercial mortgage loans decreased by $3.0 million to $22.3 million as of December 31, 2022, from $25.3 million as of December 31, 2021. The decrease was primarily associated to collections and loans restored to accrual status during 2022, partially offset by the migration to nonaccrual status of a $2.9 million commercial mortgage loan related to the health care industry in the Puerto Rico region. Nonaccrual commercial and industrial loans decreased by $9.3 million to $7.8 million as of December 31, 2022, from $17.1 million as of December 31, 2021. The decrease was primarily associated with loans restored to accrual status during 2022, including a $5.2 million commercial and industrial loan in the Puerto Rico region, and collections, including the repayment of a $1.2 million commercial and industrial loan in the Puerto Rico region. This variance was partially offset by inflows, including the inflow of a $1.1 million commercial and industrial loan related to the entertainment industry in the Puerto Rico region. Nonaccrual construction loans decreased by $0.5 million to $2.2 million as of December 31, 2022, from $2.7 million as of December 31, 2021. The following tables present the activity of commercial and construction nonaccrual loans held for investment for the indicated periods: ### Commercial ### Mortgage ### Commercial & ### Industrial ### Construction ### Total (In thousands) ### Year ended December 31, 2022 Beginning balance 25,337 17,135 2,664 45,136 Plus: Additions to nonaccrual 2,934 2,749 20 5,703 Less: Loans returned to accrual status (1,585) (6,864) (48) (8,497) Nonaccrual loans transferred to OREO (549) (273) (130) (952) Nonaccrual loans charge-offs (83) (385) (114) (582) Loan collections (3,333) (4,934) (184) (8,451) Reclassification (402) 402 Ending balance 22,319 7,830 2,208 32,357 ### Commercial ### Mortgage ### Commercial & ### Industrial ### Construction ### Total (In thousands) ### Year ended December 31, 2021 Beginning balance 29,611 20,881 12,971 63,463 Plus: Additions to nonaccrual 5,090 4,367 23 9,480 Less: Loans returned to accrual status (2,376) (752) (319) (3,447) Nonaccrual loans transferred to OREO (1,011) (1,441) (252) (2,704) Nonaccrual loans charge-offs (1,433) (629) (86) (2,148) Loan collections (4,326) (6,471) (6,585) (17,382) Reclassification (218) 1,180 962 Nonaccrual loans sold, net of charge-offs (3,088) (3,088) Ending balance 25,337 17,135 2,664 45,136 Nonaccrual residential mortgage loans decreased by $12.3 million to $42.8 million as of December 31, 2022, compared to $55.1 million as of December 31, 2021. The decrease was primarily related to loans restored to accrual status of $15.4 million, $11.8 million in collections, including the payoff of an individual loan of approximately $1.3 million, foreclosures of $3.9 million, and charge-offs of $1.6 million during the year ended in 2022, partially offset by inflows, including the inflow of an individual loan of approximately $1.4 million. The following table presents the activity of residential nonaccrual loans held for investment for the indicated periods: ### Year ended December 31, ### 2022 ### 2021 (In thousands) Beginning balance 55,127 125,367 Plus: Additions to nonaccrual 20,320 33,543 Less: Loans returned to accrual status (15,362) (15,918) Nonaccrual loans transferred to OREO (3,895) (8,058) Nonaccrual loans charge-offs (1) (1,594) (26,735) Loan collections (11,824) (20,595) Reclassification (962) Nonaccrual loans sold (31,515) Ending balance 42,772 55,127 (1) For the year ended December 31, 2021, includes net charge -offs totaling $23.1 million associated with the bulk sale of residential mortgage nonaccrual loans and related servicing advance receivables. The amount of nonaccrual consumer loans, including finance leases, increased by $4.3 million to $14.8 million as of December 31, 2022, compared to $10.5 million as of December 31, 2021. The increase was mainly reflected in the auto loans and finance leases portfolio. As of December 31, 2022, approximately $15.3 million of the loans placed in nonaccrual status, mainly commercial loans, were current, or had delinquencies of less than 90 days in their interest payments, including $7.8 million of TDRs maintained in nonaccrual status until the restructured loans meet the criteria of sustained payment performance under the revised terms for reinstatement to accrual status and there is no doubt about full collectability. Collections on these loans are being recorded on a cash basis through earnings, or on a cost-recovery basis, as conditions warrant. During the year ended December 31, 2022, interest income of approximately $0.9 million related to nonaccrual loans with a carrying value of $24.1 million as of December 31, 2022, mainly nonaccrual commercial and construction loans, was applied against the related principal balances under the cost-recovery method. Total loans in early delinquency ( #### i.e. , 30-89 days past due loans, as defined in regulatory reporting instructions) amounted to $104.9 million as of December 31, 2022, an increase of $14.6 million, compared to $90.3 million as of December 31, 2021. The variances by major portfolio categories were as follows: Consumer loans in early delinquency increased by $21.5 million to $70.9 million as of December 31, 2022, mainly reflected in auto loans. Residential mortgage loans in early delinquency decreased by $6.0 million to $28.2 million as of December 31, 2022. Commercial and construction loans in early delinquency decreased by $0.9 million to $5.8 million as of December 31, 2022. In addition, the Corporation provides homeownership preservation assistance to its customers through a loss mitigation program. Depending upon the nature of borrowers’ financial condition, restructurings or loan modifications through this program, as well as other restructurings of individual commercial, commercial mortgage, construction, and residential mortgage loans, fit the definition of a TDR. A restructuring of a debt constitutes a TDR if the creditor, for economic or legal reasons related to the debtor’s financial difficulties, grants a concession to the debtor that it would not otherwise consider. Modifications involve changes in one or more of the loan terms that bring a defaulted loan current and provide sustainable affordability. Changes may include, among others, the extension of the maturity of the loan and modifications of the loan rate. As of December 31, 2022, the Corporation’s total TDR loans held for investment amounted to $366.7 million, a decrease of $48.0 million from $414.7 million as of December 31, 2021. The decrease was mainly related to payoffs and paydowns of residential mortgage and commercial and industrial loans. See Note 4 - Loans Held for Investment, to the audited consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K, for additional information and statistics about the Corporation’s TDR loans. To assist borrowers affected by the passing of Hurricane Fiona through Puerto Rico on September 17, 2022, the Corporation established a Natural Disaster Deferral or Extension Program, with a term that did not extend beyond December 31, 2022, for residents of Puerto Rico that were directly impacted by the passing of the hurricane. This program provided payment deferral or term extension on a one payment basis, that did not exceed three payments, to retail borrowers ( #### i.e. , borrowers with personal loans, auto loans, finance leases, credit cards and residential mortgage loans) that contacted the Corporation by October 31, 2022, to request the payment extension. Loans continued to accrue interest during the deferral or extension period. For credit cards, borrowers who were 30 days or less past due as of September 16, 2022 were eligible for this program. For residential mortgage loans and consumer loans, borrowers who were 60 days or less past due as of September 16, 2022 were eligible for this program. For both consumer and residential mortgage loans subject to the deferral programs, each borrower was required to opt in on a monthly basis to the program and had to resume making their regularly scheduled loan payments at the end of the deferral period. For consumer loans, deferred amounts extended the maturity date by the number of deferred periods. For residential mortgage loans, deferred amounts were moved to the end of the loan term. Borrowers that made a payment during any given month were not eligible for the program during that month. Furthermore, for customers that opted into the program, the delinquency status of loans subject to the deferral or extension program was frozen to the status that existed in the month prior to the relief granted. Loans subject to the above-described program were not considered TDRs since the deferral or extension was considered insignificant. Borrowers were eligible for payment deferral or extension of three payments only if cumulative payment extensions granted during the last 12 months did not exceed six payments, including the extensions granted through this program. As of December 31, 2022, the Corporation entered into deferral or extension payment agreements on consumer and residential mortgage loans totaling $73.1 million pursuant to this program. Customers who were unable to resume making their contractual loan payments upon exiting from these deferral programs may require further assistance and may receive or be eligible to receive modifications, which could be considered TDRs. The OREO portfolio, which is part of non-performing assets, decreased by $9.2 million to $31.6 million as of December 31, 2022, compared to $40.8 million as of December 31, 2021. The following tables show the composition of the OREO portfolio as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, as well as the activity of the OREO portfolio by geographic area during the year ended December 31, 2022: ### OREO Composition by Region ### As of December 31, 2022 (In thousands) ### Puerto Rico ### Virgin Islands ### Florida ### Consolidated Residential 23,388 606 31 24,025 Commercial 3,042 2,810 5,852 Construction 1,705 59 1,764 28,135 3,475 31 31,641 ### As of December 31, 2021 (In thousands) ### Puerto Rico ### Virgin Islands ### Florida ### Consolidated Residential 28,396 489 648 29,533 Commercial 4,521 2,810 7,331 Construction 3,833 151 3,984 36,750 3,450 648 40,848 ### OREO Activity by Region ### For the year ended December 31, 2022 (In thousands) ### Puerto Rico ### Virgin Islands ### Florida ### Consolidated Beginning Balance 36,750 3,450 648 40,848 Additions 14,719 601 31 15,351 Sales (20,727) (590) (648) (21,965) Write-downs and other adjustments (2,607) 14 (2,593) Ending Balance 28,135 3,475 31 31,641 #### Net Charge-offs and Total Credit Losses Net charge -offs totaled $34.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, or 0.31% of average loans on an annualized basis, compared to $55.1 million, or annualized 0.48% of average loans for the year ended December 31, 2021. The bulk sale of nonaccrual residential mortgage loans added $23.1 million in net charge-off s for the year ended December 31, 2021. Excluding the effect of net charge-offs related to the bulk sale, total net charge-offs in 2021 were $32.0 million, or 0.28% of average loans. Residential mortgage loans net charge-offs for the year ended December 31, 2022 were $3.3 million, or an annualized 0.12% of average residential loans, compared to $28.5 million, or an annualized 0.87% of average residential mortgage loans, for the year ended December 31, 2021. Excluding the effect of net charge -offs related to the bulk sale, residential mortgage loans net charge-offs for the year ended December 31, 2021 were $5.4 million, or 0.17% of average residential mortgage loans. Approximately $1.4 million in charge-offs recorded during 2022 resulted from valuations of collateral dependent residential mortgage loans, compared to $5.7 million in 2021. Net charge-offs on residential mortgage loans also included $2.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2022 related to foreclosures recorded in 2022, compared to $2.8 million recorded for the same period in 2021. Commercial mortgage loans net recoveries for the year ended December 31, 2022 were $1.3 million, or an annualized 0.06% of average commercial mortgage loans, compared to net charge-offs of $1.2 million, or an annualized 0.06% of related average loans for the year ended December 31, 2021. Commercial mortgage loans net recoveries for 2022 included recoveries totaling $1.2 million associated with two commercial mortgage relationships. Commercial and industrial loans net recoveries for the year ended December 31, 2022 were $0.4 million, or an annualized 0.01% of average commercial and industrial loans, compared to $4.9 million, or an annualized 0.16% of related average loans for the year ended December 31, 2021. The lower net recoveries for 2022 reflects both the effect of a $1.7 million charge-off recognized in connection with the sale of an adversely classified commercial and industrial loan participation in the Florida region in 2022 and the effect in 2021 of a $5.2 million loan loss recovery recognized in connection with the paydown of a nonaccrual commercial and industrial loan participation in the Puerto Rico region. Construction loans net recoveries for the year ended December 31, 2022 were $0.6 million, or an annualized 0.49% of average construction loans, compared to $0.1 million, or an annualized 0.04% of related average loans, for the same period in 2021. The net recoveries for 2022 included a $0.5 million loan loss recovery of a construction loan in the Puerto Rico region. Net charge-offs of consumer loans and finance leases for the year ended December 31, 2022 were $33.2 million, or 1.07% of related average loans, compared to $30.4 million, or 1.11% of related average loans, for 2021 . The increase in 2022 was primarily reflected in the personal loan portfolio, when compared to the same period in 2021. Notwithstanding, the net charge-off ratio for 2022 decreased due to a higher average balance of loans held-in-portfolio that more than offset the increase in net charge-offs. The following table presents net charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans held-in-portfolio for the indicated periods: ### Year Ended December 31, ### 2022 ### 2021 ### 2020 Residential mortgage (1) 0.12 0.87 0.30 Commercial mortgage (0.06) 0.06 0.08 Commercial and Industrial (0.01) (0.16) 0.02 Construction (0.49) (0.04) (0.06) Consumer loans and finance leases 1.07 1.11 1.53 Total loans (1) 0.31 0.48 0.48 (1) For the year ended December 31, 2021, includes net charge-offs totaling $23.1 million associated with the bulk sale of residential nonaccrual loans and related servicing advance receivables. Excluding net charge-offs associated with the bulk sale, residential mortgage and total net charge-offs to related average loans for the year ended 2021 was 0.17% and 0.28%, respectively. The following table presents net charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans held in various portfolios by geographic segment for the indicated periods: ### Year Ended December 31, ### 2022 ### 2021 ### 2020 ### PUERTO RICO: Residential mortgage (1) 0.14 1.09 0.39 Commercial mortgage (0.04) 0.08 0.26 Commercial and Industrial (0.11) (0.30) Construction (1.68) (0.05) (0.11) Consumer and finance leases 1.07 1.10 1.51 Total loans (1) 0.37 0.59 0.62 ### VIRGIN ISLANDS: Residential mortgage 0.18 0.06 0.17 Commercial mortgage (0.22) (0.23) (0.18) Construction (0.04) Consumer and finance leases 1.23 1.16 0.65 Total loans 0.23 0.13 0.13 ### FLORIDA: Residential mortgage (0.03) (0.01) Commercial mortgage (0.10) (0.01) (0.48) Commercial and Industrial 0.17 0.10 0.04 Construction (0.06) (0.04) (0.05) Consumer and finance leases 0.30 2.15 4.35 Total loans 0.05 0.07 (1) For the year ended December 31, 2021, includes net charge-offs totaling $23.1 million associated with the bulk sale of residential nonaccrual loans and related servicing advance receivables. Excluding net charge-offs associated with the bulk sale, residential mortgage and total net charge-offs to related average loans in the Puerto Rico region for the year ended 2021 was 0.21% and 0.34%, respectively. The above ratios are not necessarily indicative of the results expected in subsequent periods. Total net charge -offs plus gains on OREO operations for the year ended December 31, 2022 amounted to $28.4 million, or a loss rate of 0.25% of average loans and repossessed assets, compared to losses of $53.0 million, or a loss rate of 0.46% on an annualized basis, for the year ended December 31, 2021. The following table presents information about the OREO inventory and credit losses for the indicated periods: ### Year Ended December 31, ### 2022 ### 2021 ### 2020 (Dollars in thousands) ### OREO OREO balances, carrying value: Residential 24,025 29,533 32,418 Commercial 5,852 7,331 44,356 Construction 1,764 3,984 6,286 Total 31,641 40,848 83,060 OREO activity (number of properties): Beginning property inventory 418 513 697 Properties acquired 156 167 120 Properties disposed (230) (262) (304) Ending property inventory 344 418 513 Average holding period (in days) Residential 606 700 626 Commercial 2,570 2,018 2,170 Construction 2,185 2,115 2,151 Total average holding period (in days) 1,057 1,075 1,566 OREO operations gain (loss): Market adjustments and gains (losses) on sale: Residential 7,742 4,166 (29) Commercial 420 (1,182) (886) Construction (418) 820 (484) Total net gain (loss) 7,744 3,804 (1,399) Other OREO operations expenses (1,918) (1,644) (2,199) ### Net Gain (Loss) on OREO operations 5,826 2,160 (3,598) ### (CHARGE-OFFS) RECOVERIES Residential charge-offs, net (1) (3,343) (28,517) (9,498) Commercial recoveries (charge-offs), net 1,679 3,676 (1,836) Construction recoveries, net 602 76 108 Consumer and finance leases charge-offs, net (33,183) (30,372) (36,652) Total charge-offs, net (34,245) (55,137) (47,878) ### TOTAL CREDIT LOSSES (2) (28,419) (52,977) (51,476) ### LOSS RATIO PER CATEGORY (3) Residential (0.15) 0.74 0.30 Commercial (0.04) (0.05) 0.06 Construction (0.15) (0.48) 0.21 Consumer 1.07 1.11 1.53 ### TOTAL CREDIT LOSS RATIO (4) ### 0.25 ### 0.46 ### 0.51 (1) For the year ended December 31, 2021, includes net charge -offs totaling $23.1 million associated with the bulk sale of residential nonaccrual loans and related servicing advance receivables. (2) Equal to net gain (loss) on OREO operations plus charge -offs, net. (3) Calculated as net charge-offs plus market adjustment and gains (losses) on sale of OREO divided by average loans and repossessed assets. (4) Calculated as net charge-offs plus net gain (loss) on OREO operations divided by average loans and repossessed assets. ### Operational Risk The Corporation faces ongoing and emerging risk and regulatory pressure related to the activities that surround the delivery of banking and financial products. Coupled with external influences, such as market conditions, security risks, and legal risks, the potential for operational and reputational loss has increased. To mitigate and control operational risk, the Corporation has developed, and continues to enhance, specific internal controls, policies and procedures that are designed to identify and manage operational risk at appropriate levels throughout the organization. The purpose of these mechanisms is to provide reasonable assurance that the Corporation’s business operations are functioning within the policies and limits established by management. The Corporation classifies operational risk into two major categories: business-specific and corporate-wide affecting all business lines. For business specific risks, a risk assessment group works with the various business units to ensure consistency in policies, processes and assessments. With respect to corporate-wide risks, such as information security, business recovery, and legal and compliance, the Corporation has specialized groups, such as the Legal Department, Information Security, Corporate Compliance, and Operations. These groups assist the lines of business in the development and implementation of risk management practices specific to the needs of the business groups. ### Legal and Compliance Risk Legal and compliance risk includes the risk of noncompliance with applicable legal and regulatory requirements, the risk of adverse legal judgments against the Corporation, and the risk that a counterparty’s performance obligations will be unenforceable. The Corporation is subject to extensive regulation in the different jurisdictions in which it conducts its business, and this regulatory scrutiny has been significantly increasing over the years. The Corporation has established, and continues to enhance, procedures that are designed to ensure compliance with all applicable statutory, regulatory and any other legal requirements. The Corporation has a Compliance Director who reports to the Chief Risk Officer and is responsible for the oversight of regulatory compliance and implementation of an enterprise-wide compliance risk assessment process. The Compliance division has officer roles in each major business area with direct reporting responsibilities to the Corporate Compliance Group. ### Concentration Risk The Corporation conducts its operations in a geographically concentrated area, as its main market is Puerto Rico. Of the total gross loan portfolio held for investment of $11.6 billion as of December 31, 2022, the Corporation had credit risk of approximately 79% in the Puerto Rico region, 18% in the United States region, and 3% in the Virgin Islands region. ### Update on the Puerto Rico Fiscal and Economic Situation A significant portion of the Corporation’s business activities and credit exposure is concentrated in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, which has experienced economic and fiscal distress over the last decade. Since declaring bankruptcy and benefitting from the enactment of the federal Puerto Rico Oversight, Management and Economic Stability Act (“PROMESA”) in 2016, the Government of Puerto Rico has made progress on fiscal matters primarily by restructuring a large portion of its outstanding public debt and identifying funding sources for its unfunded pension system. #### Economic Indicators On November 10, 2022, the Puerto Rico Planning Board (“PRPB”) presented the Economic Report to the Governor, which provides an analysis of Puerto Rico’s economy during fiscal year 2021 and a short-term forecast for fiscal years 2022 and 2023. According to the PRPB, Puerto Rico’s real gross national product (“GNP”) expanded by 1.0% in fiscal year 2021, significantly above the PRPB’s original baseline projection of a 2.0% contraction. According to the report, real GNP growth was primarily driven by a sharp increase in personal consumption expenditures reflecting the relaxation of COVID-related restrictions, as well as the impact of the substantial disaster relief funding deployed over the period. To a lesser extent, growth in fiscal year 2021 was also driven by a higher level of investments in machinery, equipment, and construction. These favorable variances were partially offset by an increase in imports, a reduction in exports, and a negative change in the level of inventories. According to the PRPB’s baseline projection the Puerto Rico economy is forecasted to continue growing for fiscal years 2022 and 2023. Among the key assumptions included in this forecast is the positive impact expected from the ongoing disbursements of disaster recovery funds ($2.8 billion and $4.0 billion in fiscal years 2022 and 2023, respectively), as well as the stimulus from remaining pandemic relief funds ($1.1 billion and $632 million in fiscal years 2022 and 2023, respectively), and the inclusion of Puerto Rico in the Earned Income Tax Credit and the Child Tax Credit. There are other indicators that gauge economic activity and are published with greater frequency, for example, the Economic Development Bank for Puerto Rico’s Economic Activity Index (“EDB-EAI”). Although not a direct measure of Puerto Rico’s real GNP, the EDB-EAI is correlated to Puerto Rico’s real GNP. For December 2022, preliminary estimates showed that the EDB-EAI increased 1.6% and 0.6% on a month-over-month and year-over-year basis, respectively. Similarly, for calendar year 2022, the preliminary data reflects that the index averaged 124.4 during the year, which would represent a 1.8% increase from the comparable figure in 2021. #### Fiscal Plan On January 27, 2022, the PROMESA oversight board certified the 2022 Fiscal Plan for Puerto Rico. Similar to previous fiscal plans, the 2022 Fiscal Plan incorporates updated information related to the macroeconomic environment, as well as government revenues, expenditures, structural reform efforts, and recent increases in federal funding. More importantly, the 2022 Fiscal Plan reflects the Commonwealth Plan of Adjustment confirmed by the U.S. District Court for the District of Puerto Rico. Relative to the previous fiscal plan, the 2022 Fiscal Plan incorporates a new set of expenditure projections that factor in the now-established debt service requirements pursuant to the Plan of Adjustment, as well as additional investments enabled by the increased resources available to the government. Accordingly, the 2022 Fiscal Plan projects unrestricted surplus after debt service to average $1 billion annually between fiscal years 2022 and 2031. The 2022 Fiscal Plan prioritizes resource allocations across three major themes: (i) investing in the operational capacity of the government to deliver services with Civil Service Reform, (ii) prioritizing obligations to current and future retirees, and (iii) creating a fiscally responsible post-bankruptcy government. The 2022 Fiscal Plan contains an updated macroeconomic forecast that reflects the adverse impact of the pandemic-induced recession at the end of fiscal year 2020, followed by a forecasted rebound and recovery in fiscal years 2021 through 2023. Similar to the previous fiscal plan, the 2022 Fiscal Plan incorporates a real growth series that was adjusted for the short-term income effects resulting from the extraordinary unemployment insurance and other pandemic -related direct transfer programs. Specifically, the 2022 Fiscal Plan estimates that Puerto Rico’s GNP will grow by 5.2% in fiscal year 2022, followed by a 0.6% growth in fiscal year 2023. Excluding the effect on household income from the unprecedented pandemic-related federal government stimulus, the 2022 Fiscal Plan estimates that real GNP growth would be 2.6% and 0.9% in fiscal years 2022 and 2023, respectively. Over the past few years, Puerto Rico has benefited from historical levels of federal support, creating new opportunities to address high-priority needs. The 2022 Fiscal Plan projects that approximately $84 billion of disaster relief funding in total, from federal and private sources, will be disbursed in the reconstruction process over a period of 18 years (2018 to 2035). Moreover, since the previous fiscal plan was certified in 2021, the Commonwealth’s available resources have significantly increased principally as a result of two major developments: (i) incremental federal funding for health care as a result of the recent guidance issued by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, which increases the federal funding cap by over $2 billion per year, and (ii) improved local revenue collections as a result of a better-than-expected recovery, increased local consumption and economic activity enabled by enhanced income support programs (e.g., incremental funding of approximately $460 million for the Nutrition Assistance Program). The 2022 Fiscal Plan provides a roadmap to take advantage of this unique opportunity, create an environment of fiscal stability, and develop the conditions for long-term growth and economic development , while continuing to underline the need to implement structural reforms to maximize the positive impact of federal recovery funds. #### Debt Restructuring After more than four years since the Commonwealth entered Title III, on January 18, 2022, the U.S. District Court for the District of Puerto Rico (the “Court”) issued an order to confirm the Plan of Adjustment to restructure approximately $35 billion of debt and other claims against the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the PBA, and the ERS; and more than $50 billion of pension liabilities. The Plan of Adjustment became effective on March 15, 2022, as the Government of Puerto Rico completed the exchange of more than $33 billion of existing bonds and other claims into approximately $7 billion of new bonds. As a result, annual debt service for the Commonwealth is anticipated to decrease from a maximum of $3.9 billion prior to the restructuring to $1.15 billion each year. In addition, the Commonwealth made more than $10 billion in cash payments to various creditor groups, as well as implemented the Pension Reserve Trust provisions created in the Plan of Adjustment. The Pension Reserve Trust is projected to be funded with more than $10 billion in contributions over the next 10 years, including $1.4 billion that were contributed on September 30, 2022. Confirmation and implementation of the Plan of Adjustment marks a major milestone in the overall debt restructuring process and creates a foundation for Puerto Rico’s recovery and economic growth. On October 12, 2022, the Court issued an order to confirm the Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority’s (“HTA”) Plan of Adjustment to restructure approximately $6.4 billion in claims. On December 6, 2022, the HTA Plan of Adjustment became effective. The transactions therein significantly lessen HTA’s debt burden by reducing HTA’s funded debt by 75%, from $6.4 billion to $1.245 billion senior and $359 million subordinate HTA toll road-supported debt. The substantial consummation of the HTA Plan of Adjustment represents a significant achievement in advancing Puerto Rico’s public policy objective to attain fiscal responsibility and to access the capital markets and is expected to enable HTA to make the necessary investments to improve and maintain Puerto Rico’s roads and other transportation infrastructure. On February 9, 2023, the PROMESA oversight board filed an amended proposed Plan of Adjustment and Disclosure Statement to restructure the debt of the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA-POA”). The PREPA -POA proposes to cut PREPA’s more than $10 billion of debt and other claims by almost half, to approximately $5.68 billion. According to the PROMESA oversight board, the restructured debt would be paid by a hybrid charge (the “Legacy Charge”) consisting of a flat connection fee and a volumetric charge based on the amount of PREPA customers’ electricity usage that would be added to the electricity bills. The proposed Legacy Charge is subject to approval by the Puerto Rico Energy Bureau, the independent energy regulator. The Court will hold a hearing to consider approval of the Disclosure Statement on February 28, 2023. #### Other Developments On September 17, 2022, Hurricane Fiona made landfall on the southwestern part of Puerto Rico with winds exceeding 100 miles per hour in some areas and leaving historic amounts of rain, causing a complete power outage in Puerto Rico, which in turn led to water service interruptions for over 778,000 residents in the Island. Following the passage of the hurricane, President Biden granted the Governor’s request for a declaration of a major disaster for all 78 municipalities in Puerto Rico, and as a result, all municipalities have access to FEMA’s Public Assistance Programs for response and reconstruction projects. In addition, the local government, in collaboration with the PROMESA oversight board, has enacted numerous emergency response measures to provide immediate funding and assistance to municipalities and governmental agencies. As of October 14, 2022, 99% of both Puerto Rico’s water and electric services had been restored. Notable progress continues to be made as part of the ongoing efforts of prioritizing the restoration, improvement, and modernization of Puerto Rico’s infrastructure. According to the Central Office for Recovery, Reconstruction, and Resiliency (“COR3”), progress is evidenced by the significant increase in permanent work projects that have already started executing the reconstruction efforts with FEMA obligated funding. As of September 30, 2022, there were a total of 5,63 7 active permanent work projects reported, more than twice the comparable amount reported as of December 31, 2021, of 2,650 projects. Furthermore, on October 5, 2022, COR3 announced that during the first nine months of 2022, the Government had already reached its goal for the entire year of disbursing approximately $1 billion in advances and reimbursements for projects led by municipalities, government dependencies and non-profit organizations, through FEMA’s Public Assistance program. Such progress has been mainly driven by the implementation of the Working Capital Advance (“WCA”) program during June 2022. The WCA program, which was originally made available to municipalities and more recently extended to PREPA, PRASA and other government agencies, advances 25% of the total cost of obligated projects that have not commenced due to lack of funding. According to COR3, the extension of the WCA program to these additional entities is expected to accelerate the pace of disbursements going forward. On January 25, 2023, the Government of Puerto Rico announced that the Puerto Rico Public-Private Partnerships Authority (“P3A”) selected Genera PR LLC (“Genera”) to operate and maintain PREPA’s legacy power plants pursuant to a 10-year Operation and Maintenance Agreement. Genera was selected by the P3A after a competitive process that began in 2020. Under the agreement, Genera will operate, maintain, decommission, and modernize the PREPA-owned thermal power generation system of approximately 3,600 MW after a mobilization period. In this role, Genera will manage the operating budget, fuel contracts and federal funds for the generation fleet on behalf of PREPA. Key features of Genera’s proposal selected by the P3A include (i) significant cost-savings for the benefit of Puerto Rico’s ratepayers through fuel management and streamlined operations, (ii) improved reliability and efficiency across the generation system with a focus on distributed power and microgrids, (iii) retirement of antiquated power plants while ensuring there is reliable, low-cost and cleaner generation in load centers to support the transition to renewables, and (iv) commitment to local hiring and plans to recruit, train and incentivize employees. Headquartered in San Juan, PR, Genera is a power and energy service provider, and an independently managed subsidiary of New Fortress Energy (NASDAQ: NFE). On January 26, 2023, FEMA announced that it had recently approved approximately $422 million to restore and renovate 37 multi- family residential properties belonging to the Public Housing Administration due to damaged caused by Hurricane María. These works will benefit over 5,400 families throughout the island. According to FEMA, the funds include nearly $165.3 million for measures that seek to strengthen the facilities, thus mitigating future damage from other disasters. The PROMESA oversight board, in collaboration with the Government of Puerto Rico, is currently in the process of developing, submitting, and certifying the 2023 Fiscal Plan for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (the “2023 Fiscal Plan”). On January 25, 2023, the PROMESA oversight board sent a letter to the Governor of Puerto Rico outlining a revised schedule in order to allow additional time for the integration of more recent information regarding Puerto Rico’s macroeconomic environment, federal funding, and Government revenues and expenditures that will underpin the Fiscal Year 2024 development process in the spring of 2023. According to the letter, the PROMESA oversight board expects to certify the 2023 Fiscal Plan on or before March 16, 2023. In a separate letter sent to the Governor on February 16, 2023, the PROMESA oversight board mentioned that the fact that this will be the first fiscal plan to be certified in a fully post-restructuring environment presents a unique opportunity to focus the 2023 Fiscal Plan on three pillars: (i) entrenching a legacy of strong fiscal management to prevent a recurrence of past challenges and secure a stable base for future prosperity, (ii) establishing conditions for economic prosperity to improve the livelihood of Puerto Rico’s citizens and bolster public finances to facilitate key government programs, (ii) instilling a culture of public-sector excellence through targeted actions focused on enhancing the foundation for high performance in the public sector. ### Exposure to Puerto Rico Government As of December 31, 2022, the Corporation had $338.9 million of direct exposure to the Puerto Rico government, its municipalities and public corporations, compared to $360.1 million as of December 31, 2021. As of December 31, 2022, approximately $183.4 million of the exposure consisted of loans and obligations of municipalities in Puerto Rico that are supported by assigned property tax revenues and for which, in most cases, the good faith, credit and unlimited taxing power of the applicable municipality have been pledged to their repayment, and $114.0 million of loans and obligations which are supported by one or more specific sources of municipal revenues. Approximately 72% of the Corporation’s exposure to Puerto Rico municipalities consisted primarily of senior priority loans and obligations concentrated in four of the largest municipalities in Puerto Rico. The municipalities are required by law to levy special property taxes in such amounts as are required for the payment of all of their respective general obligation bonds and notes. Furthermore, municipalities are also likely to be affected by the negative economic and other effects resulting from the COVID- 19 pandemic, as well as expense, revenue, or cash management measures taken to address the Puerto Rico government’s fiscal problems and measures included in fiscal plans of other government entities. In addition to municipalities, the total direct exposure also included $10.8 million in loans to an affiliate of PREPA, $27.4 million in loans to an agency of the Puerto Rico central government, and obligations of the Puerto Rico government, specifically a residential pass-through MBS issued by the PRHFA, at an amortized cost of $3.3 million as part of its available-for-sale debt securities portfolio (fair value of $2.2 million as of December 31, 2022). The following table details the Corporation’s total direct exposure to Puerto Rico government obligations according to their maturities: ### As of December 31, 2022 ### Investment ### Portfolio ### Total ### (Amortized cost) ### Loans ### Exposure (In thousands) Puerto Rico Housing Finance Authority: After 10 years 3,331 3,331 ### Total Puerto Rico Housing Finance Authority 3,331 3,331 Puerto Rico public corporation: After 5 to 10 years 27,354 27,354 Total Puerto Rico public corporation 27,354 27,354 Affiliate of the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority: Due within one year 10,849 10,849 Total Puerto Rico government affiliate 10,849 10,849 ### Total Puerto Rico public corporation and government affiliate 38,203 38,203 Municipalities: Due within one year 1,202 19,093 20,295 After 1 to 5 years 42,530 55,901 98,431 After 5 to 10 years 55,956 56,652 112,608 After 10 years 66,022 66,022 ### Total Municipalities 165,710 131,646 297,356 ### Total Direct Government Exposure ### 169,041 ### 169,849 ### 338,890 In addition, as of December 31, 2022, the Corporation had $84.7 million in exposure to residential mortgage loans that are guaranteed by the PRHFA, a governmental instrumentality that has been designated as a covered entity under PROMESA (December 31, 2021 – $92.8 million). Residential mortgage loans guaranteed by the PRHFA are secured by the underlying properties and the guarantees serve to cover shortfalls in collateral in the event of a borrower default. The Puerto Rico government guarantees up to $75 million of the principal for all loans under the mortgage loan insurance program. According to the most recently released audited financial statements of the PRHFA, as of June 30, 2021, the PRHFA’s mortgage loans insurance program covered loans in an aggregate amount of approximately $473 million. The regulations adopted by the PRHFA require the establishment of adequate reserves to guarantee the solvency of the mortgage loans insurance program. As of June 30, 2021, the most recent date as of which information is available, the PRHFA had a liability of approximately $5 million as an estimate of the losses inherent in the portfolio. As of December 31, 2022, the Corporation had $2.3 billion of public sector deposits in Puerto Rico, compared to $2.7 billion as of December 31, 2021. Approximately 24% of the public sector deposits as of December 31, 2022 was from municipalities and municipal agencies in Puerto Rico and 76% was from the public corporation, the Puerto Rico central government and agencies, and U.S. federal government agencies in Puerto Rico. ### Exposure to USVI Government The Corporation has operations in the USVI and has credit exposure to USVI government entities. For many years, the USVI has been experiencing a number of fiscal and economic challenges that have deteriorated the overall financial and economic conditions in the area. On March 4, 2022, the United States Bureau of Economic Analysis (the “BEA”) released its estimates of gross domestic product (“GDP”) for 2020. According to the BEA, the USVI’s real GDP decreased 2.2%. Also, the BEA revised its previously published real GDP growth estimate for 2019 from 2.2% to 2.8%. According to the BEA, the decline in real GDP for 2020 reflected decreases in exports of services, private fixed investment, personal consumption expenditures, and government spending primarily as a result of the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. These decreases were partly offset by an increase in private inventory investment, reflecting an increase in crude oil and other petroleum products imported and store in the islands. In addition, there were reductions in imports of goods including consumer goods and equipment, and in import of services. According to the BEA, expenditures funded by the various federal grants and transfer payments are reflected in the GDP estimates; however, the full effects of the pandemic cannot be quantified in the GDP statistics for the USVI because the impacts are generally embedded in source data and cannot be separately identified. Nonetheless, over the past two years, the USVI has been recovering from the adverse impact caused by COVID-19 and has continued to make progress on its rebuilding efforts related to Hurricanes Irma and Maria in 2017. According to data published by the government, over $1.4 billion in disaster recovery funds were disbursed during 2021 and 2022, up 22% from the preceding 2-year period. On the fiscal front, revenues have trended positively and the USVI Government successfully completed the restructuring of the government employee retirement system. Although no official GDP data has been released for 2021 and/or 2022, the aforementioned developments, as well as the positive trend reflected by key economic indicators such as visitor arrivals, non-farm payrolls and unemployment rate potentially indicate that the territory has experienced an overall economic recovery since 2020. PROMESA does not apply to the USVI and, as such, there is currently no federal legislation permitting the restructuring of the debts of the USVI and its public corporations and instrumentalities. To the extent that the fiscal condition of the USVI government continues to deteriorate, the U.S. Congress or the government of the USVI may enact legislation allowing for the restructuring of the financial obligations of the USVI government entities or imposing a stay on creditor remedies, including by making PROMESA applicable to the USVI. As of December 31, 2022, the Corporation had $38.0 million in loans to USVI public corporations, compared to $39.2 million as of December 31, 2021. As of December 31, 2022, all loans were currently performing and up to date on principal and interest payments. ### BASIS OF PRESENTATION The Corporation has included in this Form 10-K the following financial measures that are not recognized under GAAP, which are referred to as non-GAAP financial measures: 1. Net interest income, interest rate spread, and net interest margin excluding the changes in the fair value of derivative instruments and on a tax-equivalent basis are reported in order to provide to investors additional information about the Corporation’s net interest income that management uses and believes should facilitate comparability and analysis of the periods presented. The changes in the fair value of derivative instruments have no effect on interest due or interest earned on interest-bearing liabilities or interest-earning assets, respectively. The tax-equivalent adjustment to net interest income recognizes the income tax savings when comparing taxable and tax-exempt assets and assumes a marginal income tax rate. Income from tax-exempt earning assets is increased by an amount equivalent to the taxes that would have been paid if this income had been taxable at statutory rates. Management believes that it is a standard practice in the banking industry to present net interest income, interest rate spread, and net interest margin on a fully tax-equivalent basis. This adjustment puts all earning assets, most notably tax-exempt securities and tax-exempt loans, on a common basis that facilitates comparison of results to the results of peers. See “Results of Operati ons - Net Interest Income” above for the table that reconciles the net interest income calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP with the non-GAAP financial measure “net interest income on a tax-equivalent basis and excluding valuations.” The table also reconciles net interest spread and margin calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP with the non-GAAP financial measures “net interest spread and margin on a tax-equivalent basis and excluding valuations.” 2. The tangible common equity ratio and tangible book value per common share are non-GAAP financial measures that management believes are generally used by the financial community to evaluate capital adequacy. Tangible common equity is total common equity less goodwill and other intangibles. Similarly, tangible assets are total assets less goodwill and other intangibles. Management and many stock analysts use the tangible common equity ratio and tangible book value per common share in conjunction with more traditional bank capital ratios to compare the capital adequacy of banking organizations with significant amounts of goodwill or other intangible assets, typically stemming from the use of the purchase method of accounting for mergers and acquisitions. Accordingly, the Corporation believes that disclosures of these financial measures may be useful to investors. Neither tangible common equity nor tangible assets, or the related measures, should be considered in isolation or as a substitute for stockholders’ equity, total assets, or any other measure calculated in accordance with GAAP. Moreover, the manner in which the Corporation calculates its tangible common equity, tangible assets, and any other related measures may differ from that of other companies reporting measures with similar names. See “Risk Management – Capital” above for a reconciliation of the Corporation’s tangible common equity and tangible assets. 3. To supplement the Corporation’s financial statements presented in accordance with GAAP, the Corporation uses, and believes that investors would benefit from disclosure of, non-GAAP financial measures that reflect adjustments to net income and non -interest expenses to exclude items that management identifies as Special Items because management believes they are not reflective of core operating performance, are not expected to reoccur with any regularity or may reoccur at uncertain times and in uncertain amounts. See “Special Items” above for non-GAAP financial measures for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 that reflect the described items that were excluded for one of those reasons. ### CEO and CFO Certifications First BanCorp.’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have filed with the SEC certifications required by Section 302 and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 as Exhibits 31.1, 31.2, 32.1 and 32.2 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In addition, in 2022, First BanCorp’s Chief Executive Officer provided to the NYSE his annual certification, as required for all NYSE listed companies, that he was not aware of any violation by the Corporation of the NYSE corporate governance listing standards. ## Market risk As filed, 279 characters. The information required herein is incorporated by reference to the information included under the sub-caption “Interest Rate Risk Management” in Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. ## Controls and procedures As filed, 1,867 characters. ### Disclosure Controls and Procedures First BanCorp.’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of First BanCorp.’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Based on this evaluation as of the period covered by this Form 10-K, our CEO and CFO concluded that the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective and provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by the Corporation in reports that the Corporation files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms and is accumulated and reported to the Corporation’s management, including the CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. ### Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting is included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K and incorporated herein by reference. The effectiveness of the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022 has been audited by Crowe LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10- K. ### Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting There have been no changes to the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d- 15(f) under the Exchange Act) during our most recent quarter ended December 31, 2022 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting. Filed Feb 28, 2023. Source: SEC EDGAR, the filing index for accession 0001057706-23-000002. Last ingested by Listed: Nov 3, 2026, 20:14 ET. No prices; not investment advice.