# Fidelity D & D Bancorp Inc: Form 10-K for the period ended Dec 31, 2008

- Company: [Fidelity D & D Bancorp Inc](/companies/fdbc.md) (CIK 1098151)
- Form: 10-K
- Filed: 2009-03-12
- Accepted by EDGAR: Mar 12, 2009, 15:50 ET
- Period: 2008-12-31
- Accession: 0001104659-09-017064
- Inline XBRL: no
- Main document: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1098151/000110465909017064/a09-1404_110k.htm
- All documents and exhibits: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1098151/000110465909017064/

## Business

As filed, 5,604 characters.

Fidelity D & D Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) was incorporated in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, on August 10, 1999, and is a bank holding company, whose wholly-owned state chartered commercial bank is The Fidelity Deposit and Discount Bank (the Bank) (collectively, the Company). The Company is headquartered at Blakely and Drinker Streets in Dunmore, Pennsylvania.

The Bank has offered a full range of traditional banking services since it commenced operations in 1903. The Bank has a personal and corporate trust department and also provides alternative financial and insurance products with asset management services. A full list of services provided by the Bank is detailed in the section entitled “Products and Services” contained within the 2008 Annual Report to Shareholders, incorporated by reference. The service area is comprised of the Borough of Dunmore and the surrounding communities within Lackawanna and Luzerne counties in Northeastern Pennsylvania.

The banking business is highly competitive, and the profitability of the Company depends principally upon the Company’s ability to compete in its market area. Competition includes, among other sources, the following:

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| · | local community banks | · | insurance companies |
| · | savings banks | · | money market funds |
| · | regional banks | · | mutual funds |
| · | credit unions | · | small loan companies |
| · | savings & loans | · | other financial service companies |

The Company has been able to compete effectively with other financial institutions by emphasizing technology and customer service, including local decision making on loans. These efforts enabled the Company to establish long-term customer relationships and build customer loyalty by providing products and services designed to address their specific needs.

There are no concentrations of loans that, if lost, would have a materially adverse effect on the continued business of the Company. The Company’s loan portfolio does not have a material concentration within a single industry or group of related industries that are vulnerable to the risk of a near-term severe impact. However, the Company’s success is dependent, to a significant degree, on economic conditions in Northeastern Pennsylvania, especially Lackawanna and Luzerne counties which the Company defines as its primary market area. The banking industry is affected by general economic conditions including the effects of inflation, recession, unemployment, real estate values, trends in national and global economies and other factors beyond the Company’s control. An economic recession or a delayed economic recovery over a prolonged period of time in the Company’s primary market area could cause an increase in the level of the Company’s non-performing assets and loan losses, and thereby cause operating losses, impairment of liquidity and erosion of capital. We cannot assure you that adverse changes in the local economy would not have a material effect on the Company’s future consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Refer to Item 1A, “Risk Factors” for material risks and uncertainties that management believes affect the Company.

The Company had 196 full-time equivalent employees on December 31, 2008, which includes exempt officers and part-time employees.

Federal and state banking laws contain numerous provisions that affect various aspects of the business and operations of the Company and the Bank. The Company is subject to, among others, the regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) and the Federal Reserve Board (the FRB) and the Bank is subject to, among others, the regulations of the Pennsylvania Department of Banking and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the FDIC). Refer to Part II, Item 7 “Supervision and Regulation” for descriptions of and references to applicable statutes and regulations which are not intended to be complete descriptions of these provisions or their effects on the Company or the Bank. They are summaries only and are qualified in their entirety by reference to such statutes and regulations. Applicable regulations relate to, among other things:

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| · | operations | · | consolidation |
| · | securities | · | reserves |
| · | risk management | · | dividends |
| · | consumer compliance | · | branches |
| · | mergers | · | capital adequacy |

4

Annually, the Bank is examined by the Pennsylvania Department of Banking and/or the FDIC. The last examination was conducted by the Pennsylvania Department of Banking as of December 31, 2007.

The Company’s website address is http://www.bankatfidelity.com. The Company makes available through this website the annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practical after filing with the SEC. You may read and copy any materials filed with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at (202) 551-8090. The SEC also maintains an internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information about the Company at http://www.sec.gov.

The Company’s accounting policies and procedures are designed to comply with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). Refer to “Critical Accounting Policies,” which are incorporated by reference in Part II, Item 7.

## Risk factors

As filed, 30,440 characters.

An investment in the Company’s common stock is subject to risks inherent to the Company’s business. The material risks and uncertainties that management believes affect the Company are described below. Before making an investment decision, you should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below together with all of the other information included or incorporated by reference in this report. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones facing the Company. Additional risks and uncertainties that management is not aware of or focused on or that management currently deems immaterial may also impair the Company’s business operations. This report is qualified in its entirety by these risk factors.

If any of the following risks actually occur, the Company’s financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. If this were to happen, the value of the Company’s common stock could decline significantly, and you could lose all or part of your investment.

### Risks Related to the Company’s Business

*The Company’s business is subject to interest rate risk and variations in interest rates may negatively affect its financial performance.*

Changes in the interest rate environment may reduce profits. The Company’s earnings and cash flows are largely dependent upon its net interest income. Net interest income is the difference between the interest earned on loans, securities and other interest-earning assets, and interest paid on deposits, borrowings and other interest-bearing liabilities. As prevailing interest rates change, net interest spreads are affected by the difference between the maturities and re-pricing characteristics of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. In addition, loan volume and yields are affected by market interest rates on loans, and rising interest rates generally are associated with a lower volume of loan originations. An increase in the general level of interest rates may also adversely affect the ability of certain borrowers to pay the interest on and principal of their obligations. Accordingly, changes in levels of market interest rates could materially adversely affect the Company’s net interest spread, asset quality, loan origination volume and overall profitability.

#### The Company is subject to lending risk.

There are inherent risks associated with the Company’s lending activities. These risks include, among other things, the impact of changes in interest rates and changes in the economic conditions in the markets where the Company operates as well as those across the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the United States. Increases in interest rates and/or weakening economic conditions could adversely impact the ability of borrowers to repay outstanding loans or the value of the collateral securing these loans. The Company is also subject to various laws and regulations that affect its lending activities. Failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations could subject the Company to regulatory enforcement action that could result in the assessment of significant civil money penalties against the Company.

As of December 31, 2008, approximately 56% of the Company’s loan portfolio consisted of commercial, commercial real estate and real estate construction loans. These types of loans are generally viewed as having more risk of default than residential real estate loans or consumer loans. These types of loans are also typically larger than residential real estate loans and consumer loans. Because the Company’s loan portfolio contains a significant number of commercial, commercial real estate and construction loans with relatively large balances, the deterioration of one or a few of these loans could cause a significant increase in non-performing loans. An increase in non-performing loans could result in a net loss of earnings from these loans, an increase in the provision for possible loan losses and an increase in loan charge-offs, all of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

#### The Company’s allowance for possible loan losses may be insufficient.

The Company maintains an allowance for possible loan losses, which is a reserve established through a provision for possible loan losses charged to expense, that represents management’s best estimate of probable losses that have been incurred within the existing portfolio of loans. The allowance, in the judgment of management, is necessary to reserve for estimated loan losses and risks inherent in the loan portfolio. The level of the allowance reflects management’s continuing evaluation of industry concentrations; specific credit risks; loan loss experience; current loan portfolio quality; present economic, political and regulatory conditions and unidentified losses inherent in the current loan portfolio. The determination of the appropriate level of the allowance for possible loan losses inherently involves a high degree of subjectivity and requires the Company to make significant estimates of current credit risks and future trends, all of which may undergo material changes. Changes in economic conditions affecting borrowers, new information regarding existing loans, identification of additional problem loans and other factors, both within and outside of the Company’s control, may require an increase in the allowance for possible loan losses. In addition, bank regulatory agencies periodically review the Company’s allowance for loan losses and may require an increase in the provision for possible loan losses or the recognition of further loan charge-offs, based on judgments different than those of management. In addition, if charge-offs in future periods exceed the allowance for possible loan losses, the Company will need additional provisions to increase the allowance for possible loan losses. Any increases in the allowance for loan losses will result in a decrease in net income and capital and may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

*The Company is subject to environmental liability risk associated with lending activities.*

A significant portion of the Company’s loan portfolio is secured by real property. During the ordinary course of business, the Company may foreclose on and take title to properties securing certain loans. In doing so, there is a risk that hazardous or toxic substances could be found on these properties. If hazardous or toxic substances are found, the Company may be liable for remediation costs, as well as for personal injury and property damage. Environmental laws may require the Company to incur substantial expenses and may materially reduce the affected property’s value or limit the Company’s ability to use or sell the affected property. In addition, future laws or more stringent interpretations or enforcement policies with respect to existing laws may increase the Company’s exposure to environmental liability. Although the Company has policies and procedures to perform an environmental review before initiating any foreclosure action on real property, these reviews may not be sufficient to detect all potential environmental hazards. The remediation costs and any other financial liabilities associated with an environmental hazard could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

*The Company’s profitability depends significantly on economic conditions in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the local region in which it conducts business.*

The Company’s success depends primarily on the general economic conditions of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the specific local markets in which the Company operates. Unlike larger national or other regional banks that are more geographically diversified, the Company provides banking and financial services to customers primarily in Lackawanna and Luzerne Counties. The local economic conditions in these areas have a significant impact on the demand for the Company’s products and services as well as the ability of the Company’s customers to repay loans, the value of the collateral securing loans and the stability of the Company’s deposit funding sources. A significant decline in general economic conditions, caused by inflation, recession, acts of terrorism, an outbreak of hostilities or other international or domestic occurrences, unemployment, changes in securities markets or other factors could impact these local economic conditions and, in turn, have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. Currently, our Country is in a recession. The severity, depth and length of this recession is indeterminable. Job layoffs and eliminations continue to be announced throughout the United States, as well as locally. Reductions in the levels of income of both businesses and individual consumers could have a material impact on their ability to meet their loan payment obligations. This in turn could have a material adverse impact on the companies overall financial condition and earnings.

*There is no assurance that the Company will be able to successfully compete with others for business.*

The Company competes for loans, deposits and investment dollars with numerous regional and national banks and other community banking institutions, as well as other kinds of financial institutions and enterprises, such as securities firms, insurance companies, savings associations, credit unions, mortgage brokers and private lenders. Many competitors have substantially greater resources than the Company does, and operate under less stringent regulatory environments. The differences in resources and regulations may make it more difficult for the Company to compete profitably, reduce the rates that it can earn on loans and investments, increase the rates it must offer on deposits and other funds, and adversely affect its overall financial condition and earnings.

#### The Company is subject to extensive government regulation and supervision.

The Company, primarily through the Bank, is subject to extensive federal and state regulation and supervision. Banking regulations are primarily intended to protect depositors’ funds, federal deposit insurance funds and the banking system as a whole, not shareholders. These regulations affect the Company’s lending practices, capital structure, investment practices, dividend policy and growth, among other things. Federal or commonwealth regulatory agencies continually review banking laws, regulations and policies for possible changes. Changes to statutes, regulations or regulatory policies, including changes in interpretation or implementation of statutes, regulations or policies, could affect the Company in substantial and unpredictable ways. Such changes could subject the Company to additional costs, limit the types of financial services and products the Company may offer and/or increase the ability of non-banks to offer competing financial services and products, among other things. Failure to comply with laws, regulations or policies could result in sanctions by regulatory agencies, civil money penalties and/or reputation damage, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations. While the Company has policies and procedures designed to prevent any such violations, there can be no assurance that such violations will not occur.

#### The Company’s controls and procedures may fail or be circumvented.

Management regularly reviews and updates the Company’s internal controls, disclosure controls and procedures, and corporate governance policies and procedures. Any system of controls, however well designed and operated, is based in part on certain assumptions and can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurances that the objectives of the system are met. Any failure or circumvention of the Company’s controls and procedures or failure to comply with regulations related to controls and procedures could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition.

*New lines of business or new products and services may subject the Company to additional risks.*

From time-to-time, the Company may implement new lines of business or offer new products and services within existing lines of business. There are substantial risks and uncertainties associated with these efforts, particularly in instances where the markets are not fully developed. In developing and marketing new lines of business and/or new products and services the Company may invest significant time and resources. Initial timetables for the introduction and development of new lines of business and/or new products or services may not be achieved and price and profitability targets may not prove feasible. External factors, such as compliance with regulations, competitive alternatives, and shifting market preferences, may also impact the successful implementation of a new line of business or a new product or service. Furthermore, any new line of business and/or new product or service could have a significant impact on the effectiveness of the Company’s system of internal controls. Failure to successfully manage these risks in the development and implementation of new lines of business or new products or services could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition.

*The Company’s ability to pay dividends depends primarily on dividends from its banking subsidiary, which is subject to regulatory limits.*

The Company is a bank holding company and its operations are conducted by its subsidiary. Its ability to pay dividends depends on its receipt of dividends from its subsidiary. Dividend payments from its banking subsidiary are subject to legal and regulatory limitations, generally based on net profits and retained earnings, imposed by the various banking regulatory agencies. The ability of its subsidiary to pay dividends is also subject to its profitability, financial condition, capital expenditures and other cash flow requirements. There is no assurance that its subsidiary will be able to pay dividends in the future or that the Company will generate adequate cash flow to pay dividends in the future. The Company’s failure to pay dividends on its common stock could have a material adverse effect on the market price of its common stock.

*The Company’s future acquisitions could dilute your ownership and may cause it to become more susceptible to adverse economic events.*

The Company may use its common stock to acquire other companies or make investments in banks and other complementary businesses in the future. The Company may issue additional shares of common stock to pay for future acquisitions, which would dilute your ownership interest in the Company. Future business acquisitions could be material to the Company, and the degree of success achieved in acquiring and integrating these businesses into the Company could have a material effect on the value of the Company’s common stock. In addition, any acquisition could require it to use substantial cash or other liquid assets or to incur debt. In those events, it could become more susceptible to economic downturns and competitive pressures.

#### The Company may not be able to attract and retain skilled people.

The Company’s success depends, in large part, on its ability to attract and retain key people. Competition for the best people in most activities engaged in by the Company can be intense and the Company may not be able to hire people or to retain them. The unexpected loss of services of one or more of the Company’s key personnel could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s business because of their skills, knowledge of the Company’s market, years of industry experience and the difficulty of promptly finding qualified replacement personnel. The Company has an employment agreement with its President and Chief Executive Officer.

*The Company’s information systems may experience an interruption or breach in security.*

The Company relies heavily on communications and information systems to conduct its business. Any failure, interruption or breach in security of these systems could result in failures or disruptions in the Company’s customer relationship management, general ledger, deposit, loan and other systems. While the Company has policies and procedures designed to prevent or limit the effect of the failure, interruption or security breach of its information systems, there can be no assurance that any such failures, interruptions or security breaches will not occur or, if they do occur, that they will be adequately addressed. The occurrence of any failures, interruptions or security breaches of the Company’s information systems could damage the Company’s reputation, result in a loss of customer business, subject the Company to additional regulatory scrutiny, or expose the Company to civil litigation and possible financial liability, any of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

#### The Company continually encounters technological change.

The financial services industry is continually undergoing rapid technological change with frequent introductions of new technology-driven products and services. The effective use of technology increases efficiency and enables financial institutions to better serve customers and to reduce costs. The Company’s future success depends, in part, upon its ability to address the needs of its customers by using technology to provide products and services that will satisfy customer demands, as well as to create additional efficiencies in the Company’s operations. Many of the Company’s competitors have substantially greater resources to invest in technological improvements. The Company may not be able to effectively implement new technology-driven products and services or be successful in marketing these products and services to its customers. Failure to successfully keep pace with technological change affecting the financial services industry could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s business and, in turn, the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

*The Company is subject to claims and litigation pertaining to fiduciary responsibility.*

From time-to-time, customers make claims and take legal action pertaining to the Company’s performance of its fiduciary responsibilities. Whether customer claims and legal action related to the Company’s performance of its fiduciary responsibilities are founded or unfounded, if such claims and legal actions are not resolved in a manner favorable to the Company they may result in significant financial liability and/or adversely affect the market perception of the Company and its products and services as well as impact customer demand for those products and services. Any financial liability or reputation damage could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

*Severe weather, natural disasters, acts of war or terrorism and other external events could significantly impact the Company’s business.*

Severe weather, natural disasters, acts of war or terrorism and other adverse external events could have a significant impact on the Company’s ability to conduct business. Such events could affect the stability of the Company’s deposit base, impair the ability of borrowers to repay outstanding loans, impair the value of collateral securing loans, cause significant property damage, result in loss of revenue and/or cause the Company to incur additional expenses. Severe weather or natural disasters, acts of war or terrorism or other adverse external events may occur in the future. Although management has established disaster recovery policies and procedures, the occurrence of any such event could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

### Risks Associated with the Company’s Common Stock

#### The Company’s stock price can be volatile.

Stock price volatility may make it more difficult for you to resell your common stock when you want and at prices you find attractive. The Company’s stock price can fluctuate significantly in response to a variety of factors including, among other things:

- Actual or anticipated variations in quarterly results of operations.
- Recommendations by securities analysts.
- Operating and stock price performance of other companies that investors deem comparable to the Company.
- News reports relating to trends, concerns and other issues in the financial services industry.
- Perceptions in the marketplace regarding the Company and/or its competitors.
- New technology used, or services offered, by competitors.
- Significant acquisitions or business combinations, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments by or involving the Company or its competitors.
- Failure to integrate acquisitions or realize anticipated benefits from acquisitions.
- Changes in government regulations.
- Geopolitical conditions such as acts or threats of terrorism or military conflicts.

General market fluctuations, industry factors and general economic and political conditions and events, such as economic slowdowns or recessions, interest rate changes or credit loss trends, could also cause the Company’s stock price to decrease regardless of operating results.

*The trading volume in the Company’s common stock is less than that of other larger financial services companies.*

The Company’s common stock is listed for trading on the over-the-counter bulletin board; the trading volume in its common stock is less than that of other larger financial services companies. A public trading market having the desired characteristics of depth, liquidity and orderliness depends on the presence in the marketplace of willing buyers and sellers of the Company’s common stock at any given time. This presence depends on the individual decisions of investors and general economic and market conditions over which the Company has no control. Given the lower trading volume of the Company’s common stock, significant sales of the Company’s common stock, or the expectation of these sales, could cause the Company’s stock price to fall.

#### An investment in the Company’s common stock is not an insured deposit.

The Company’s common stock is not a bank deposit and, therefore, is not insured against loss by the FDIC, any other deposit insurance fund or by any other public or private entity. Investment in the Company’s common stock is inherently risky for the reasons described in this “Risk Factors” section and elsewhere in this report and is subject to the same market forces that affect the price of common stock in any company. As a result, if you acquire the Company’s common stock, you may lose some or all of your investment.

*The Company’s articles of incorporation and by-laws, as well as certain banking laws, may have an anti-takeover effect.*

Provisions of the Company’s articles of incorporation and by-laws, federal banking laws, including regulatory approval requirements, could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire the Company, even if doing so would be perceived to be beneficial to the Company’s shareholders. The combination of these provisions effectively inhibits a non-negotiated merger or other business combination, which, in turn, could adversely affect the market price of the Company’s common stock.

### Risks Associated with the Company’s Industry

*Future governmental regulation and legislation could limit the Company’s future growth.*

The Company is a registered bank holding company, and its subsidiary bank is a depository institution whose deposits are insured by the FDIC. As a result, the Company is subject to various regulations and examinations by various regulatory authorities. In general, statutes establish the corporate governance and eligible business activities for the Company, certain acquisition and merger restrictions, limitations on inter-company transactions such as loans and dividends, capital adequacy requirements, requirements for anti-money laundering programs and other compliance matters, among other regulations. The Company is extensively regulated under federal and state banking laws and regulations that are intended primarily for the protection of depositors, federal deposit insurance funds and the banking system as a whole. Compliance with these statutes and regulations is important to its ability to engage in new activities and to consummate additional acquisitions.

In addition, the Company is subject to changes in federal and state tax laws as well as changes in banking and credit regulations, accounting principles and governmental economic and monetary policies. The Company cannot predict whether any of these changes may adversely and materially affect it. Federal and state banking regulators also possess broad powers to take supervisory actions as they deem appropriate. These supervisory actions may result in higher capital requirements, higher insurance premiums and limitations on the Company’s activities that could have a material adverse effect on its business and profitability. While these statutes are generally designed to minimize potential loss to depositors and the FDIC insurance funds, they do not eliminate risk, and compliance with such statutes increases the Company’s expense, requires management’s attention and can be a disadvantage from a competitive standpoint with respect to non-regulated competitors.

*The earnings of financial services companies are significantly affected by general business and economic conditions.*

The Company’s operations and profitability are impacted by general business and economic conditions in the United States and abroad. These conditions include short-term and long-term interest rates, inflation, money supply, political issues, legislative and regulatory changes, fluctuations in both debt and equity capital markets, broad trends in industry and finance, and the strength of the U.S. economy and the local economies in which the Company operates, all of which are beyond the Company’s control. Deterioration in economic conditions could result in an increase in loan delinquencies and non-performing assets, decreases in loan collateral values and a decrease in demand for the Company’s products and services, among other things, any of which could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

*Financial services companies depend on the accuracy and completeness of information about customers and counterparties.*

In deciding whether to extend credit or enter into other transactions, the Company may rely on information furnished by or on behalf of customers and counterparties, including financial statements, credit reports and other financial information. The Company may also rely on representations of those customers, counterparties or other third parties, such as independent auditors, as to the accuracy and completeness of that information. Reliance on inaccurate or misleading financial statements, credit reports or other financial information could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s business and, in turn, the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

#### Consumers may decide not to use banks to complete their financial transactions.

Technology and other changes are allowing parties to complete financial transactions that historically have involved banks through alternative methods. For example, consumers can now maintain funds that would have historically been held as bank deposits in brokerage accounts or mutual funds. Consumers can also complete transactions such as paying bills and/or transferring funds directly without the assistance of banks. The process of eliminating banks as intermediaries, known as “disintermediation,” could result in the loss of fee income, as well as the loss of customer deposits and the related income generated from those deposits. The loss of these revenue streams and the lower cost deposits as a source of funds could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

*The capital and credit markets have experienced unprecedented levels of volatility.*

During 2008 the capital and credit markets experienced severe volatility and disruption. In the third and fourth quarters of 2008, the volatility and disruption reached unprecedented levels. This has continued into 2009 and the Country is presently in a recession. Reflecting concern about the stability of the financial markets generally and the strength of counterparties, many lenders and institutional investors have reduced, and in some cases ceased to provide, funding to borrowers, including other financial institutions. Although to date we have not suffered liquidity problems, we are part of the financial system and a systemic lack of available credit, a lack of confidence in the financial sector, increased volatility in the financial markets and reduced business activity could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In response to the turmoil in the banking system and financial markets, the U.S. government has taken unprecedented actions, including the U.S. Treasury’s plan to inject capital and to purchase mortgage loans and mortgage-backed and other securities from financial institutions for the purpose of stabilizing the financial markets generally or particular financial institutions. There is no assurance that these government actions will achieve their purpose.

The failure to help stabilize the financial markets and a continuation or worsening of the current financial market conditions could have a material adverse affect on our business, our financial condition, the financial condition of our customers, our common stock trading price, as well as our ability to access credit.

## Properties

As filed, 2,925 characters.

As of December 31, 2008, the Company operated 12 full-service banking offices, of which four were owned and eight were leased. None of the lessors of the properties leased by the Company are affiliated with the Company or the Bank and all of the properties are located in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The Company is headquartered at its owner occupied main branch located on the corner of Blakely and Drinker Streets in Dunmore, PA.

The following table provides information with respect to the principal properties from which the Bank conducts business:

| Location | Owned / leased\* | Type of use | Full service | Drive-thru | ATM |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Drinker & Blakely Sts., Dunmore, PA | Owned | Main Branch (1) (2) | x | x | x |
| 111 Green Ridge St., Scranton, PA | Leased | Green Ridge Branch (2) | x | x | x |
| 139 Wyoming Ave., Scranton, PA | Leased | Scranton Branch | x |  | x |
| 1311 Morgan Hwy., Clarks Summit, PA | Leased | Abington Branch (3) | x | x | x |
| Industrial Park Rd., Dunmore, PA | Owned | Keystone Industrial Park Branch | x | x | x |
| 338 North Washington Ave., Scranton, PA | Owned | Financial Center Branch (4) | x |  | x |
| 4010 Birney Ave., Moosic, PA | Leased | Moosic Branch | x | x | x |
| 801 Wyoming Ave., West Pittston, PA | Leased | West Pittston Branch | x |  | x |
| 1598 Main St., Peckville, PA | Leased | Peckville Branch | x | x | x |
| 247 Wyoming Ave., Kingston, PA | Leased | Kingston Branch | x | x | x |
| 511 Scranton-Carbondale Hwy., Eynon, PA | Leased | Eynon Branch | x | x | x |
| 400 S. Main St., Scranton, PA | Owned | West Scranton Branch(2) | x | x | x |

\*All of the owned properties are free of encumbrances

(1) Executive and administrative, commercial lending, trust and asset management services are located at this facility.

(2) This office has two automated teller machines (ATMs).

(3) In addition, there is a banking facility located in the Clarks Summit State Hospital. The office is leased from the hospital under a lease-for-service-provided agreement with service limited to employees and patients of the hospital.

(4) Executive, mortgage and consumer lending, finance and operational offices are located in this building. A portion of the building is leased to a non-related entity.

The Bank maintains several free-standing 24-hour ATMs located at the following locations in Pennsylvania:

- U.S. Mini Marts, Inc., 511 Main St., Childs
- Marywood University, 2300 Adams Ave., Nazareth and Regina Halls, Scranton
- Snö Mountain Ski Resort, 1000 Montage Mountain Rd., Moosic
- Shoppes at Montage, 1035 Shoppes Blvd., Moosic

During 2008, the Company closed its Pittston branch office located at 403 Kennedy Blvd., Pittston.

Other real estate owned includes all foreclosed properties listed for sale. Upon possession, foreclosed properties are recorded on the Company’s balance sheet at the lower of cost or fair value.

## Legal proceedings

As filed, 668 characters.

The nature of the Company’s business generates some litigation involving matters arising in the ordinary course of business. However, in the opinion of the Company after consulting with legal counsel, no legal proceedings are pending, which, if determined adversely to the Company or the Bank, would have a material effect on the Company’s undivided profits or financial condition. No legal proceedings are pending other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to the business of the Company and the Bank. In addition, to management’s knowledge, no governmental authorities have initiated or contemplated any material legal actions against the Company or the Bank.

## Management's discussion and analysis

As filed, 142,184 characters.

### Critical accounting policies

The presentation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect many of the reported amounts and disclosures. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

A material estimate that is particularly susceptible to significant change relates to the determination of the allowance for loan losses. Management believes that the allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2008 is adequate and reasonable. Given the subjective nature of identifying and valuing loan losses, it is likely that well-informed individuals could make different assumptions, and could, therefore calculate a materially different allowance value. While management uses available information to recognize losses on loans, changes in economic conditions may necessitate revisions in the future. In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Company’s allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may require the Company to recognize adjustments to the allowance based on their judgment of information available to them at the time of their examination.

Another material estimate is the calculation of fair values of the Company’s investment securities. Except for the Company’s investment in corporate bonds, consisting of preferred term securities, market values on the other investment securities are determined by prices provided by a third-party vendor, who is a provider of financial market data, analytics and related services to financial institutions. For the trust preferred term securities, management was unable to obtain readily attainable and realistic pricing from market traders due to lack of active market participants and therefore management has determined that the market for these securities is currently inactive. In order to determine the market value of the preferred term securities, management relied on the use of an income valuation approach (present value technique) that maximizes the use of relevant observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs the results of which are more representative of fair value than the market approach valuation technique used for the other investment securities.

Based on experience, management is aware that estimated fair values of investment securities tend to vary among valuation services. Accordingly, when selling investment securities, management may obtain price quotes from more than one source. As described in Notes 1 and 3 of the consolidated financial statements, the large majority of the Company’s investment securities are classified as available-for-sale (AFS). AFS securities are carried at fair value on the consolidated balance sheet, with unrealized gains and losses, net of income tax, reported separately within shareholders’ equity through accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).

The fair value of residential mortgage loans, classified as AFS, is obtained from the Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) or the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB). Generally, the market to which the Company sells mortgages it originates for sale is restricted and price quotes from other sources are not typically obtained. On occasion, the Company may transfer loans from the loan and lease portfolio to loans AFS. Under these rare circumstances, pricing may be obtained from other entities and the loans are transferred at the lower of cost or market value and simultaneously sold. For a further discussion on the accounting treatment of AFS loans, see the section entitled “Loans available-for-sale,” contained within management’s discussion and analysis. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, loans classified as AFS consisted of residential mortgages.

All significant accounting policies are contained in Note 1, “Nature of operations and summary of significant accounting policies,” within the notes to consolidated financial statements and incorporated by reference in Part II, Item 8.

The following discussion and analysis presents the significant changes in the financial condition and in the results of operations of the Company as of December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 and for each of the years then ended. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes included in Part II, Item 8 of this report.

### Comparison of Financial Condition as of December 31, 2008

### and 2007 and Results of Operations for each of the Years then Ended

### Financial Condition

### Overview

The national economy continued to falter with particular emphasis on the deterioration of the housing and real estate markets. The current economy has been marked by contractions in the availability of commercial and consumer credit, falling home prices, increasing home foreclosures and rising unemployment. In response, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), reduced the federal funds rates seven times during 2008 to unprecedented levels, approaching zero and has resulted in a much more positively sloped yield curve during the current year. The shape of the yield curve will present opportunities, however the local economy is not insulated from the disruptions and volatility that continues to plague the national economy thereby requiring the Company to operate in a very difficult interest rate environment, the likes of which have been unseen for many decades. The management team of the Company is poised to address the issues at hand and will implement strategies to navigate through these uncertain times.

Consolidated assets decreased $11,694,000, or 2%, during the year ended December 31, 2008 to $575,719,000. The decline was the result of decreases in total borrowings of $12,235,000, or 12%, and a decrease in total shareholders’ equity of $6,231,000 partially offset by a 2%, or $7,604,000 increase in deposits. The decline in shareholders’ equity was primarily from increased unrealized net losses in the securities AFS portfolio, the declaration of cash dividends and the repurchase of the Company’s capital stock (treasury stock). During 2008, the carrying amount of the investment portfolios declined by $38,797,000, or 32%, while the loan portfolios increased $14,040,000, or 3% to $436,291,000 as of December 31, 2008. Other increases included premises and equipment, the net deferred tax asset, bank owned life insurance, FHLB stock, the carrying value of the derivative contract and prepaid expenses. Cash increased $2,362,000 since 2007.

The following table is a comparison of condensed balance sheet accounts and percentage to total assets at December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 (thousands of dollars):

| Assets: | 2008 Amount | Percent | 2007 Amount | Percent | 2006 Amount | Percent |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $12,771 | 2.2% | $10,409 | 1.8% | $13,801 | 2.4% |
| Investment securities | 84,188 | 14.6 | 122,984 | 20.9 | 100,411 | 17.9 |
| Federal Home Loan Bank Stock | 4,781 | 0.8 | 3,303 | 0.6 | 3,795 | 0.7 |
| Loans and leases, net | 436,291 | 75.8 | 422,252 | 71.9 | 417,321 | 74.2 |
| Bank premises and equipment | 16,056 | 2.8 | 12,965 | 2.2 | 11,324 | 2.0 |
| Life insurance cash surrender value | 8,808 | 1.5 | 8,489 | 1.4 | 8,178 | 1.5 |
| Other assets | 12,824 | 2.3 | 7,011 | 1.2 | 7,488 | 1.3 |
| Total assets | $575,719 | 100.0% | $587,413 | 100.0% | $562,318 | 100.0% |
| **Liabilities:** |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Total deposits | $433,312 | 75.3% | $425,708 | 72.5% | $410,335 | 73.0% |
| Short-term borrowings | 38,130 | 6.6 | 39,656 | 6.7 | 33,656 | 6.0 |
| Long-term debt | 52,000 | 9.0 | 62,709 | 10.7 | 62,536 | 11.1 |
| Other liabilities | 3,316 | 0.6 | 4,149 | 0.7 | 4,179 | 0.7 |
| Total liabilities | 526,758 | 91.5 | 532,222 | 90.6 | 510,706 | 90.8 |
| Shareholders’ equity | 48,961 | 8.5 | 55,191 | 9.4 | 51,612 | 9.2 |
| Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | $575,719 | 100.0% | $587,413 | 100.0% | $562,318 | 100.0% |

A comparison of net changes in selected balance sheet categories as of December 31, are as follows:

|  | Assets% |  | Earning assets \*% |  | Deposits% |  | Short-term borrowings% |  | Other borrowings% |  |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| 2008 | $(11,693,558) | (2) | $(22,808,541) | (4) | $7,603,571 | 2 | $(1,526,650) | (4) | $(10,708,677) | (17) |
| 2007 | 25,094,567 | 4 | 26,073,807 | 5 | 15,373,766 | 4 | 6,000,204 | 18 | 172,467 | — |
| 2006 | 18,257,290 | 3 | 21,202,050 | 4 | 30,835,955 | 8 | 4,883,153 | 17 | (21,167,978) | (25) |
| 2005 | 7,385,560 | 1 | 2,784,580 | 1 | 13,883,305 | 4 | (21,761,049) | (43) | 12,585,000 | 18 |
| 2004 | (38,540,328) | (7) | (35,884,098) | (7) | (35,827,211) | (9) | (4,222,932) | (8) | (756,846) | (1) |

\* Earning assets exclude loans placed on non-accrual status.

### Deposits

The Bank is a community-based commercial financial institution, member FDIC, which offers a variety of deposit accounts with varying ranges of interest rates and terms. Deposit products include savings accounts, interest-bearing checking (NOW), money market, non-interest bearing checking (DDAs) and certificates of deposit accounts. Certificates of deposit accounts, or CDs, are deposits with stated maturities ranging from seven days to ten years. The flow of deposits is significantly influenced by general economic conditions, changes in prevailing interest rates, pricing and competition. Most of the Company’s deposits are obtained from the communities surrounding its 12 branch offices and all deposits are insured by the FDIC up to the full extent permitted by law. The Bank attempts to attract and retain deposit customers via sales and marketing efforts, new products, quality service, competitive rates and maintaining long-standing customer relationships. To determine deposit product interest rates, the Company considers local competition, market yields and the rates charged for alternative sources of funding such as short- and long-term borrowings. Though we tend to experience intense competition for deposits, our interest rate setting strategy includes consideration of the Company’s liquidity needs, balance sheet structure and cost effective strategies that are mindful of the current interest rate environment.

The following table represents the components of total deposits as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 (thousands of dollars):

|  | 2008 Amount | Percent | 2007 Amount | Percent |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Money market | $96,738 | 22.3% | $87,892 | 20.6% |
| NOW | 50,124 | 11.6 | 54,695 | 12.9 |
| Savings and clubs | 41,326 | 9.5 | 40,125 | 9.4 |
| Certificates of deposit | 173,681 | 40.1 | 178,200 | 41.9 |
| Total interest-bearing | 361,869 | 83.5 | 360,912 | 84.8 |
| Non-interest-bearing | 71,443 | 16.5 | 64,796 | 15.2 |
| Total deposits | $433,312 | 100.0% | $425,708 | 100.0% |

Total deposits increased $7,604,000, or 2%, during 2008 to $433,312,000. The growth in deposits was mostly from increases in money markets $8,846,000 and DDAs of $6,647,000, or 10% each, partially offset by declines in NOW and certificates of deposit accounts of $4,571,000 and $4,519,000, respectively. The majority of the increase in DDAs was from a temporary deposit from a corporate trust account which has since been withdrawn. The new West Scranton branch office that opened during the third quarter of 2008 and the related bank-wide promotions, superior customer service, increased deposit business from our existing and new commercial customers all contributed to the net increase in deposits. The continued increases in money market accounts that the Company has experienced is from success in our deposit-gathering strategies in conjunction with promotional interest rates tailored to depositors’ needs. We attribute the decline in certificate of deposit accounts to the lower and highly volatile interest rate environment that exists today compared to a year ago.

The maturity distribution of certificate of deposit accounts at December 31, 2008 is as follows:

|  | Three months or less | Three to six Months | Six to twelve months | Over twelve months | Total |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| CDs of $100,000 or more | $20,438,339 | $10,989,353 | $29,534,467 | $13,288,607 | $74,250,766 |
| CDs of less than $100,000 | 13,641,073 | 14,907,570 | 49,896,837 | 20,984,669 | 99,430,149 |
| Total CDs | $34,079,412 | $25,896,923 | $79,431,304 | $34,273,276 | $173,680,915 |

Approximately 80% of the CDs are scheduled to mature within one year. Renewing CDs may re-price to lower or higher market rates depending on the direction of interest rate movements, the shape of the yield curve, competition, the rate profile of the maturing accounts and depositor preference for alternative products. To help reduce the financial impact of the unpredictable and highly volatile interest rate environment, management intends to continue to deploy strategies that will diversify the deposit mix across the entire spectrum of products offered. As always, consideration will be afforded to customer retention and new customer relationships.

### Short-term borrowings

In addition to deposits, other funding sources available to the Company are overnight funds purchased from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh (FHLB), fed funds purchased from correspondent banks and repurchase agreements with individuals, businesses and public entities. The Company uses overnight funding for asset growth, deposit run-off and short-term liquidity needs.

Repurchase agreements are offered in both sweep and fixed-term products. These agreements are non-insured interest-bearing liabilities that have a security interest in qualified pledged investments of the Bank. A sweep account is designed to ensure that on a daily basis, an attached DDA is adequately funded and excess DDA funds are transferred, or swept, into an interest-bearing overnight repurchase agreement account. In addition, the sweep is designed to transfer funds to the DDA as necessary to cover checks presented for payment. Due to the nature of the sweep product, they tend to be more volatile than the fixed-term product because the daily sweep is dependent on the level of available funds in depositor accounts. Customer liquidity and investment needs and changes in interest rates are the typical causes for variances in repurchase agreements, which during 2008 declined $11,412,000 from $20,504,000 at December 31, 2007. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, sweep accounts represented 93% and 62%, respectively, of total repurchase agreements. The low interest rate environment has caused our customers to seek higher rates in alternative products and as such the balances in the term-repurchase agreement declined by about 91%.

Overnight borrowings and repurchase agreements are included with short-term borrowings on the consolidated balance sheets. For a further discussion on short-term borrowings, see Note 7, “Short-term borrowings,” contained in the notes to consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8.

### Long-term debt

Long-term debt consists of borrowings from the FHLB. The weighted-average rate in effect on funds borrowed at December 31, 2008 was 5.35% compared to 5.26% as of December 31, 2007. The 2008 weighted-average rate was 92 basis points below the tax-equivalent yield of 6.27% on the Company’s portfolio of average interest-earning assets for the year ended December 31, 2008. Rates on $42,000,000 of the total long-term advances are currently fixed but are designed to adjust quarterly should market rates increase beyond the issues’ original or strike rates. Significant prepayment penalties are attached to the borrowings thereby creating a significant disincentive from paying off the relatively high cost advances. However, in the event underlying market rates drift above the rates currently paid on these borrowings, the FHLB rate will convert to a floating rate and the Company has the option, at that time, to repay or to renegotiate the converted advance rate. During December 2008, a $10,000,000 capped floating-rate long-term advance was paid off early. During February 2009, a $10,000,000, 5.32% fixed-rate advance was also paid off early. Whether or not the advance will be renewed will be predicated on the interest rate environment, demand for liquidity and relative cash-flows of deposits, demand for loan funding and prepayments of interest-earning assets.

At December 31, 2008, the Company had the ability to borrow an additional $117,348,000 from the FHLB, from their array of numerous funding products that are available at a varying terms and conditions.

### Investments

The Company’s investment policy is designed to complement its lending activities, generate a favorable return without incurring undue interest rate and credit risk, manage interest rate sensitivity, provide monthly cash flow and manage liquidity at acceptable levels. In establishing investment strategies, the Company considers its business, growth or restructuring plans, the economic environment, the interest rate sensitivity position, the types of securities held, permissible purchases, credit quality, maturity and re-pricing terms, call or average-life intervals and investment concentrations. The policy prescribes permissible investment categories that meet the policy standards and management is responsible for structuring and executing the specific investment purchases within these policy parameters. Management buys and sells investment securities from time-to-time depending on market conditions, business trends, liquidity needs, capital levels and structuring strategies. Investment security purchases provide a way to quickly invest excess liquidity in order to generate additional earnings. The Company generally earns a positive interest spread by assuming interest rate risk and using deposits and/or borrowings to purchase securities with longer maturities.

At the time of purchase, management classifies investment securities into one of three categories: trading, AFS or held-to-maturity (HTM). To date, management has not purchased any securities for trading purposes. Most of the securities purchased are classified as AFS even though there is no immediate intent to sell them. The AFS designation affords management the flexibility to sell securities and position the balance sheet in response to capital levels, liquidity needs or changes in market conditions. Securities AFS are carried at net fair values in the consolidated balance sheet with an adjustment to shareholders’ equity, net of tax, presented under the caption “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).” Securities designated as HTM represent debt securities that the Company has the ability and intent to hold until maturity and are carried at amortized cost. As of December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the aggregate fair value of securities HTM exceeded their respective aggregate amortized cost by $31,000 and $33,000, respectively.

Total investments decreased $38,797,000, including an $11,893,000 decline in the market value of AFS investments. During 2008, the Company sold approximately $48.4 million of mortgage-backed and agency securities, the proceeds of which were used to pay-down long-term debt, fund loan growth and fund the expansion of the Company’s branch network. The carrying value of investment securities, at December 31, 2008, was $84,188,000, or 15% of total assets compared to $122,984,000, or 21%, as of December 31, 2007.

The market values for corporate investment securities are very depressed relative to historical levels. For example, the yield spreads for the broad market of investment grade and high yield corporate bonds reached all time wide levels compared to treasury securities at the end of 2008 and remain near those levels today. Thus in today’s market, a low market price for a particular bond may only provide evidence of stress in the credit markets in general versus being an indicator of credit problems with a particular issuer.

As of December 31, 2008 the debt securities with unrealized losses have depreciated 27.4% compared to 2.4% at December 31, 2007. Management believes that the cause of the unrealized losses is related to changes in interest rates, instability in the capital markets or the limited trading activity due to recent debt market illiquid conditions and is not directly related to credit quality, which is consistent with its past experience. Nearly all of the securities in the portfolio have fixed rates or have predetermined scheduled rate changes, and many have call features that allow the issuer to call the security at par before its stated maturity without penalty.

Management performs a review of the investment portfolio quarterly to determine the cause of declines in the fair value of each security. The Company uses inputs provided by an independent third party to determine the fair values of its investment securities portfolio. Inputs provided by the third party are reviewed and corroborated by management. Evaluations of the causes of the unrealized losses are performed to determine whether impairment, if any, is temporary or other-than-temporary. Considerations such as the Company’s intent and ability to hold the securities to maturity, recoverability of the invested amounts over the intended holding period, severity in pricing decline, the interest rate environment, receipts of amounts contractually due and whether or not there is an active market for the security, for example, are applied in determining whether a security is other-than-temporarily impaired. If a decline in value is deemed to be other-than-temporary, the amortized cost of the security is reduced by the impairment amount and a corresponding charge to earnings is recognized. If at the time of sale, call or maturity the proceeds exceed the security’s amortized cost, the impairment charge may be fully or partially recovered and recorded as a gain on sale of investment securities.

At December 31, 2008, the securities with the most significant reductions in fair value and associated estimated unrealized losses were in the Company’s corporate bond portfolio consisting of collateralized debt obligation (CDO) securities that are backed by pooled trust preferred term securities (preferred term securities) issued by banks, thrifts and insurance companies.

The Company owns 13 issues of preferred term securities. The market for these securities at December 31, 2008 was not active and markets for similar securities are also not active. The inactivity was evidenced first by a significant widening of the bid-ask spread in the brokered markets in which preferred term securities trade and then by a significant decrease in the volume of trades relative to historical levels. The new issue market is also inactive as no new preferred term securities have been issued since 2007. There are currently very few market participants who are willing and or able to transact for these securities. Given conditions in the debt markets today and the absence of observable transactions in the secondary and new issue markets, fair value of the preferred term securities was determined as explained in Note 3, “Securities Investments,” contained within the notes to the consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8.

Based on the technique described in Note 3, the Company determined that as of December 31, 2008, the fair value of one of its preferred term securities had declined $430,000 below its cost basis and has been deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired. Accordingly, this amount has been recorded as an impairment charge and is included as a component of other income in the consolidated income statements for the year ended December 31, 2008. The market value of the Company’s investment in preferred term securities has declined by $9,958,000 since December 31, 2007. The Company intends to closely monitor the preferred term securities market and perform collateral sufficiency and cash flow analyses on at least a quarterly basis. Future analyses could yield results that may indicate further impairment has occurred and therefore require additional write-downs and corresponding other-than-temporary charges to current earnings. In addition to the impairment charge on the preferred term securities portfolio, the Company had an equity position in FNMA common stock whose fair value declined below its cost basis by $6,000 and has also been deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired and written down as of December 31, 2008. There were no other-than-temporary impairment write-downs recorded in 2007 or 2006.

A comparison of investments at December 31, for the three previous years is as follows:

|  | 2008 Amount | Percent | 2007 Amount | Percent | 2006 Amount | Percent |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| U.S. government agencies | $43,507,359 | 51.7% | $35,243,890 | 28.7% | $33,891,985 | 33.8% |
| Mortgage-backed securities | 12,438,721 | 14.8 | 58,767,109 | 47.8 | 42,900,005 | 42.7 |
| State & municipal subdivisions | 17,552,729 | 20.8 | 12,133,443 | 9.8 | 12,576,684 | 12.5 |
| Preferred term securities | 10,260,196 | 12.2 | 16,335,486 | 13.3 | 10,570,993 | 10.5 |
| Equity securities | 428,574 | 0.5 | 504,232 | 0.4 | 471,069 | 0.5 |
| Total | $84,187,579 | 100.0% | $122,984,160 | 100.0% | $100,410,736 | 100.0% |

The distribution of debt securities by stated maturity date at December 31, 2008 is as follows:

|  | One year or less | One through five years | Five through ten years | More than ten years | Total |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| U.S. government agencies | $— | $— | $7,917,994 | $35,589,365 | $43,507,359 |
| Mortgage-backed securities | — | — | 381,537 | 12,057,184 | 12,438,721 |
| State & municipal subdivisions | — | — | 2,788,460 | 14,764,269 | 17,552,729 |
| Preferred term securities | — | — | — | 10,260,196 | 10,260,196 |
| Total debt securities | $— | $— | $11,087,991 | $72,671,014 | $83,759,005 |

AFS securities are stated net of unrealized gains and losses. As of December 31, 2008, AFS debt securities were recorded with a net unrealized loss in the amount of $13,486,000. At December 31, 2008, AFS equity securities were recorded at $428,000 which included a net unrealized gain of $106,000.

The tax-equivalent yield on debt securities by stated maturity date at December 31, 2008, is as follows:

|  | One year or less | One through five years | Five through ten years | More than ten years | Total |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| U.S. government agencies | —% | —% | 5.07% | 5.87% | 5.74% |
| Mortgage-backed securities | — | — | 6.01 | 5.44 | 5.45 |
| State & municipal subdivisions | — | — | 5.47 | 5.90 | 5.83 |
| Preferred term securities | — | — | — | 4.00 | 4.00 |
| Total debt securities | —% | —% | 5.21% | 5.35% | 5.34% |

In the above table, the book yields on state & municipal subdivisions were adjusted to a tax-equivalent basis using the corporate federal tax rate of 34%. In addition, average yields on securities AFS are based on amortized cost and do not reflect unrealized gains or losses.

### Federal Home Loan Bank Stock

Investment in FHLB stock is required for membership in the organization and is carried at cost since there is no market value available. The amount the Company is required to invest is dependent upon the relative size of outstanding borrowings the Company has with the FHLB. Excess stock is typically repurchased from the Company at par if the level of borrowings declines to a predetermined level. In addition, the Company normally earns a return or dividend on the amount invested. In late December, the FHLB announced that it has suspended payment of dividends and the repurchase of excess capital stock to preserve its capital level. That decision was based on FHLB’s analysis and consideration of certain negative market trends and the impact those trends will have on their financial condition. Based on the financial results of the FHLB for the year-ended December 31, 2008, management believes that the suspension of both the dividend payments and excess capital stock repurchase is temporary in nature. The Company will continue to monitor the financial condition of the FHLB and assess its ability to resume these activities in the future.

### Loans and leases

Gross loans and leases increased $14,704,000, or 3%, from $426,249,000 at December 31, 2007, to $440,953,000 at December 31, 2008. Gross loans represented 77% and 73% of total assets at December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively.

In 2008, the Company originated $47,864,000 of commercial loans, $23,111,000 of residential mortgage loans and $21,354,000 of consumer loans. This compares to $32,919,000, $24,032,000 and $28,062,000, respectively, in 2007. Included in mortgage loans is $9,476,000 of real estate construction lines in 2008 and $12,515,000 in 2007. In addition for 2008, the Company originated lines of credit in the amounts of $50,664,000 for commercial borrowers and $11,866,000 in home equity and other consumer lines of credit.

The Company’s origination activity increased 9% in 2008 over 2007 despite operating in a very difficult economy. Only the residential real estate portfolio recorded a decline compared to 2007 and was more than offset by growth in commercial lending. The hiring of a new senior lender has enabled the Company to grow its commercial and CRE portfolio. During 2009, the Company will continue to channel efforts to develop total banking relationships with new customers and strengthen relationships with our existing base of loyal customers.

#### Commercial and Commercial Real Estate Loans:

Originations in commercial and commercial real estate (CRE) were relatively strong, as they fully exceeded scheduled principal curtailments and pre-payments thereby resulting in a commercial loan increase of $29,422,000 to $245,480,000 from $216,058,000, or 14% during 2008. During most of 2008, the Company bolstered the origination activities in the commercial loan business. Commercial lending successfully restructured its team of commercial loan officers led by the experienced newly hired senior lender. This team has effectively penetrated our markets and successfully developed new business relationships and re-kindled relationships with our existing commercial customer base.

*Residential Real Estate Loans:*

Residential real estate loans declined $18,468,000, or 16%, to $98,511,000 in 2008. In the beginning of 2008, the Company transferred approximately $28,103,000 to the loans AFS portfolio. The loans were subsequently sold. From time-to-time, management will evaluate the composition of the residential loan portfolio and based upon liquidity needs, interest rate risk and other considerations may transfer loans to the available-for-sale portfolio, at the lower of cost or market value, and simultaneously sell them. Excluding this transfer, the residential real estate loan portfolio would have grown $6,900,000 as origination activity exceeded maturities and pay-downs. Operating in a lower interest rate environment throughout most of 2008 with expectations of a continued period of low rates into 2009, the Company expects higher levels of prepayment and refinance activity in 2009.

#### Consumer Loans:

Though consumer loan originations were lower in 2008 compared to 2007, this sector increased $3,093,000, or 4%, during the year. The increase was mainly from lower principal pay-downs and increased draw activity from customers accessing their home equity available credit. While interest rates remain low, the Company expects the home equity business to continue to increase into 2009. During 2008, the Company established a new relationship with a local automobile dealership which should provide increased origination activity in consumer lending in the years ahead.

#### Real Estate Construction Loans:

Real estate construction loans increased $724,000, or 7%, at December 31, 2008 compared to December 31, 2007. These loans fund residential and commercial construction projects and then convert to a residential mortgage or to a commercial real estate loan usually within one year from the origination date. Generally, the converted loans will bear similar terms as the terms during the construction period. The increase in 2008 was caused by more commercial construction projects that had not yet converted to permanent financing.

#### Direct Financing Leases:

The balance represents tax-free leasing arrangements provided to municipal customers. For 2008, the activity represents scheduled run-off.

A comparison of domestic loans at December 31, for the five previous periods is as follows:

|  | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Commercial and CRE | $245,479,992 | $216,057,882 | $218,213,216 | $216,288,597 | $221,968,137 |
| Residential real estate | 98,510,562 | 116,978,378 | 112,742,692 | 103,920,613 | 91,294,401 |
| Consumer | 85,091,205 | 81,998,093 | 77,729,520 | 74,070,328 | 61,487,608 |
| Real estate construction | 11,426,978 | 10,703,249 | 13,369,712 | 14,198,858 | 10,620,472 |
| Direct financing leases | 443,957 | 511,178 | 588,211 | 650,348 | 2,211,978 |
| Gross loans | 440,952,694 | 426,248,780 | 422,643,351 | 409,128,744 | 387,582,596 |
| Less: |  |  |  |  |  |
| Unearned discount | — | — | — | — | 48,423 |
| Allowance for loan losses | 4,745,234 | 4,824,401 | 5,444,303 | 5,984,649 | 5,987,798 |
| Net loans | $436,207,460 | $421,424,379 | $417,199,048 | $403,144,095 | $381,546,375 |
| Loans available-for-sale | $84,000 | $827,250 | $122,000 | $428,584 | $576,378 |

A comparison of gross loans by percent at year-end for the five previous periods is as follows:

|  | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Commercial and CRE | 55.7% | 50.7% | 51.6% | 52.9% | 57.3% |
| Residential real estate | 22.3 | 27.5 | 26.7 | 25.4 | 23.5 |
| Consumer | 19.3 | 19.2 | 18.4 | 18.1 | 15.9 |
| Real estate construction | 2.6 | 2.5 | 3.2 | 3.5 | 2.7 |
| Direct financing leases | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.6 |
| Gross loans | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |

The following table sets forth the maturity distribution of select components of the loan portfolio at December 31, 2008. Excluded from the table are residential real estate loans, consumer loans and direct financing leases (dollars in thousands):

|  | One-year or less | One to five Years | More than five years | Total |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Commercial and CRE | $20,276 | $57,026 | $168,178 | $245,480 |
| Real estate construction | 11,427 | — | — | 11,427 |
| Total | $31,703 | $57,026 | $168,178 | $256,907 |

Real estate construction loans are included in the one-year or less category since, by their nature, these loans are converted into residential and CRE loans within one year from the date the real estate construction loan was consummated. Upon conversion, the residential and CRE loans would normally mature after five years.

The following table sets forth the sensitivity changes in interest rates for commercial and CRE loans at December 31, 2008 (dollars in thousands):

|  | One to five Years | More than five years | Total |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Fixed interest rate | $38,807 | $46,121 | $84,928 |
| Variable interest rate | 64,070 | 56,801 | 120,871 |
| Total | $102,877 | $102,922 | $205,799 |

Non-refundable fees or costs associated with all loan originations are deferred. Using the principal reduction method, the deferral is released as charges or credits to loan interest income over the life of the loan.

There are no concentrations of loans to a number of borrowers engaged in similar activities exceeding 10% of total loans that are not otherwise disclosed as a category in the tables above. There are no concentrations of loans that, if resulted in a loss, would have a material adverse effect on the business of the Company. The Company’s loan portfolio does not have a material concentration within a single industry or group of related industries that is vulnerable to the risk of a near-term severe negative business impact.

### Loans available-for-sale

Generally, upon origination, certain residential mortgages are classified as AFS. In the event market rates increase, fixed-rate loans and adjustable-rate loans not immediately scheduled to re-price would no longer produce yields consistent with the current market. In a declining interest rate environment, the Company would be exposed to prepayment risk and, as rates on adjustable-rate loans decrease, interest income would be negatively affected. Consideration is given to the Company’s current liquidity position and projected future liquidity needs. To better manage interest rate and prepayment risk, loans meeting these conditions may be classified as AFS. The carrying value of loans AFS is at the lower of cost or estimated fair value. If the fair values of loans AFS fall below their original cost, the difference is written down and charged to current earnings. Any subsequent appreciation in the portfolio is credited to current earnings but only to the extent of previous write-downs.

Loans AFS at December 31, 2008 were $84,000 with a corresponding fair value of $85,000 compared to $827,000 and $843,000, respectively, at December 31, 2007. During 2008, residential mortgages with principal balances of $46,969,000 were sold into the secondary market and recognized net gains of approximately $261,000. Included in the sale was $28,103,000 of residential loans transferred from the loan and lease portfolio.

The Company retains mortgage servicing rights (MSRs) on loans sold into the secondary market. MSRs are retained so that the Company can continue the personal relationships they have established with their customers. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, the servicing portfolio balance of sold residential mortgage loans was $95,856,000 and $61,023,000, respectively.

### Allowance for loan losses

Management continually evaluates the credit quality of the Company’s loan portfolio and performs a formal review of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses (the allowance) on a quarterly basis. The allowance reflects management’s best estimate of the amount of credit losses in the loan portfolio. Management’s judgment is based on the evaluation of individual loans, past experience, the assessment of current economic conditions and other relevant factors including the amounts and timing of cash flows expected to be received on impaired loans. Those estimates may be susceptible to significant change. The provision for loan losses represents the amount necessary to maintain an appropriate allowance. Loan losses are charged directly against the allowance when loans are deemed to be uncollectible. Recoveries from previously charged-off loans are added to the allowance when received.

Management applies two primary components during the loan review process to determine proper allowance levels. The two components are a specific loan loss allocation for loans that are deemed impaired and a general loan loss allocation for those loans not specifically allocated. The methodology to analyze the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is as follows:

- identification of specific impaired loans by loan category;
- calculation of specific allowances where required for the impaired loans based on collateral and other objective and quantifiable evidence;
- determination of homogenous pools by loan category and eliminating the impaired loans;
- application of historical loss percentages (five-year average) to pools to determine the allowance allocation; and
- application of qualitative factor adjustment percentages to historical losses for trends or changes in the loan portfolio.

Allocation of the allowance for different categories of loans is based on the methodology as explained above. A key element of the methodology to determine the allowance is the Company’s credit risk evaluation process, which includes credit risk grading of individual commercial loans. Commercial loans are assigned credit risk grades based on the Company’s assessment of conditions that affect the borrower’s ability to meet its contractual obligations under the loan agreement. That process includes reviewing borrowers’ current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information and other information specific to each individual borrower. The changes in allocations in the commercial loan portfolio from period to period are based upon the credit risk grading system and from periodic reviews of the loan and lease portfolios.

Each quarter, management performs an assessment of the allowance and the provision for loan losses. The Company’s Special Assets Committee meets quarterly and the applicable lenders discuss each relationship under review and reach a consensus on the appropriate estimated loss amount based on Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 114, “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan,” (SFAS 114). The Special Assets Committee’s focus is on ensuring the pertinent facts are considered and the SFAS 114 reserve amounts are reasonable. The assessment process includes the review of all loans on a non-accruing basis as well as a review of certain loans to which the lenders or the Company’s Credit Administration function have assigned a criticized or classified risk rating.

Total charge-offs, net of recoveries, for the year ended December 31, 2008, were $1,019,000, compared to $560,000 in 2007. The majority of the increase occurred in the commercial portfolio and was attributable to non-performing loan dispositions and write-downs before transfers to ORE.

Combined consumer loan and lease financing net charge-offs increased from $237,000 at December 31, 2007 to $320,000 through December 31, 2008. Commercial loan net charge-offs were $358,000 for the year 2007 compared to $654,000 for 2008. Mortgage loans showed net Charge-offs of $45,000 in 2008 compared to net recoveries of $35,000 in 2007. For a discussion on the provision for loan losses, see the “Provision for loan losses,” located in the results of operations section of management’s discussion and analysis contained herein.

For a further discussion of delinquencies and net charge-offs, see the section entitled “Non-performing assets.” Additional discussion is in Note 1, “Nature of operations and summary of significant accounting policies — Allowance for loan losses,” and Note 4, “Loans and leases,” contained in the notes to consolidated financial statements, incorporated herein by reference.

Management believes that the current balance in the allowance for loan losses of $4,745,000 is sufficient to withstand the identified potential credit quality issues that may arise and others unidentified but are inherent to the portfolio. At December 31, 2008, management was unaware of any potential problem loans that have not been reviewed. Potential problem loans are those where there is known information that leads management to believe repayment of principal and/or interest is in jeopardy and the loans are currently neither on non-accrual status or past due 90 days or more. However, there could be certain instances which become identified over the upcoming year that may require additional charge-offs and/or increases to the allowance. The ratio of allowance for loan losses to total loans was 1.08% at December 31, 2008 compared to 1.13% at December 31, 2007.

The following table sets forth the activity in the allowance for loan losses and certain key ratios for the periods indicated (dollars in thousands):

|  | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Balance at beginning of period | $4,824 | $5,444 | $5,985 | $5,988 | $4,997 |
| Charge-offs: |  |  |  |  |  |
| Commercial and all other | 733 | 376 | 661 | 1,077 | 775 |
| Real estate | 45 | 90 | 109 | 21 | 266 |
| Consumer | 351 | 256 | 285 | 288 | 480 |
| Lease financing | — | — | — | 8 | 85 |
| Total | 1,129 | 722 | 1,055 | 1,394 | 1,606 |
| Recoveries: |  |  |  |  |  |
| Commercial and all other | 79 | 18 | 64 | 395 | 226 |
| Real estate | — | 125 | 1 | 11 | 20 |
| Consumer | 31 | 19 | 124 | 155 | 178 |
| Lease financing | — | — | — | — | 23 |
| Total | 110 | 162 | 189 | 561 | 447 |
| Net charge-offs | 1,019 | 560 | 866 | 833 | 1,159 |
| Provision (credit) for loan losses | 940 | (60) | 325 | 830 | 2,150 |
| Balance at end of period | $4,745 | $4,824 | $5,444 | $5,985 | $5,988 |
| Net charge-offs to average net loans outstanding | 0.24% | 0.13% | 0.21% | 0.22% | 0.30% |
| Allowance for loan losses to net charge-offs | 4.66 x | 8.62 x | 6.29 x | 7.18 x | 5.17 x |
| Allowance for loan losses to total loans | 1.08% | 1.13% | 1.29% | 1.46% | 1.54% |
| Loans 30 - 89 days past due and accruing | $1,858 | $4,698 | $2,571 | $1,609 | $4,317 |
| Loans 90 days or more past due and accruing | $604 | $26 | $81 | $197 | $557 |
| Non-accruing loans | $3,493 | $3,811 | $3,358 | $9,453 | $9,904 |
| Allowance for loan losses to loans 90 days or more past due and accruing | 7.85 x | 189.41 x | 67.54 x | 30.39 x | 10.75 x |
| Allowance for loan losses to non-accruing loans | 1.36 x | 1.27 x | 1.62 x | 0.63 x | 0.60 x |
| Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans | 1.16 x | 1.26 x | 1.58 x | 0.62 x | 0.57 x |
| Average net loans | $416,438 | $419,586 | $412,523 | $385,800 | $381,366 |

The allowance for loan losses can generally absorb losses throughout the loan and lease portfolios. However, in some instances an allocation is made for specific loans or groups of loans. Allocation of the allowance for loan losses for different categories of loans is based on the methodology used by the Company, as previously explained. The changes in the allocations from year-to-year are based upon year-end reviews of the loan and lease portfolios.

Allocation of the allowance among major categories of loans for the past five years is summarized in the following table. This table should not be interpreted as an indication that charge-offs in future periods will occur in these amounts or proportions, or that the allocation indicates future charge-off trends. The portion of the allowance designated as unallocated is within the Company’s policy guidelines.

|  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
|  | **2008%** | **2007%** | **2006%** | **2005%** | **2004%** |
| Category |  |  |  |  |  |
| Residential real estate | $710,981 15.0 | $636,899 13.2 | $578,117 10.6 | $595,092 9.9 | $451,349 7.5 |
| Consumer | 973,356 20.5 | 960,505 19.9 | 1,157,091 21.2 | 1,180,175 19.7 | 966,081 16.1 |
| Commercial and commercial real estate | 2,860,059 60.3 | 2,979,372 61.7 | 3,549,870 65.2 | 4,035,950 67.4 | 4,330,285 72.3 |
| Direct financing leases | 6,837 0.1 | 9,355 0.2 | 14,058 0.3 | 14,828 0.3 | 40,891 0.7 |
| Real estate construction | 67,141 1.4 | 52,634 1.1 | 59,617 1.1 | 59,953 1.0 | 46,465 0.8 |
| Unallocated | 126,860 2.7 | 185,636 3.9 | 85,550 1.6 | 98,651 1.7 | 152,727 2.6 |
| Total | $4,745,234 100.0% | $4,824,401 100.0% | $5,444,303 100.0% | $5,984,649 100.0% | $5,987,798 100.0% |

The allocation of the allowance for the commercial loan portfolio comprised 60%, or $2,860,000, of the total allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2008, of which approximately 10% is reserved for specifically identified non-performing commercial loan relationships. Collateral values were prudently valued to provide a conservative and realistic value of the collateral supporting these loans. The allocations to the other categories of loans are adequate compared to the actual three-year historical net charge-offs.

### Non-performing assets

The Company defines non-performing assets as accruing loans past due 90 days or more, non-accrual loans, restructured loans, other real estate owned (ORE) and repossessed assets. As of December 31, 2008, non-performing assets represented 0.96% of total assets compared to 0.67% at December 31, 2007.

The following table sets forth non-performing assets at December 31 (dollars in thousands):

|  | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Net loans, including loans available-for-sale | $436,291 | $422,252 | $417,321 | $403,573 | $382,123 |
| Loans past due 90 days or more and accruing | $604 | $26 | $81 | $197 | $557 |
| Non-accrual loans | 3,493 | 3,811 | 3,358 | 9,453 | 9,904 |
| Total non-performing loans | 4,097 | 3,837 | 3,439 | 9,650 | 10,461 |
| Restructured loans | — | — | — | — | — |
| Other real estate owned | 1,451 | 107 | 197 | — | 163 |
| Repossessed assets | — | — | — | 19 | 50 |
| Total non-performing assets | $5,548 | $3,944 | $3,636 | $9,669 | $10,674 |
| Non-accrual loans to net loans | 0.80% | 0.90% | 0.80% | 2.34% | 2.59% |
| Non-performing assets to net loans, foreclosed real estate and repossessed assets | 1.27% | 0.93% | 0.87% | 2.40% | 2.79% |
| Non-performing assets to total assets | 0.96% | 0.67% | 0.65% | 1.78% | 1.99% |
| Non-performing loans to net loans | 0.94% | 0.91% | 0.82% | 2.39% | 2.74% |

In the review of loans for both delinquency and collateral sufficiency, management concluded that there were a number of loans that lacked the ability to repay in accordance with contractual terms. The decision to place loans or leases on a non-accrual status is made on an individual basis after considering factors pertaining to each specific loan.

The majority of non-performing assets for the period is attributed to non-accruing commercial business loans and non-accruing real estate loans in the process of foreclosure. Most of these loans are collateralized, thereby mitigating the Company’s potential for loss. In 2007, non-performing loans were $3,837,000 compared to $4,097,000 at year-end 2008. There were no repossessed assets at December 31, 2008 or 2007. ORE at December 31, 2008 consisted of four properties of which one had an agreement to sell pending at that time. ORE at year-end 2007, consisted of one property which was subsequently sold. The Special Assets Department had developed specific action plans for each of the Company’s non-performing loans. During 2008, several of those plans were brought to a conclusion resulting in repayments of non-performing loans. The non-accrual loans aggregated $3,493,000 at December 31, 2008, a reduction of $318,000 from year-end 2007. During 2008, approximately $4,946,000 of loans were placed in non-accrual status. These were partially offset by reductions or payoffs of $2,426,000, charge-offs of $916,000, $1,562,000 of transfers to ORE and $360,000 of loans that returned to performing status. Loans past due 90 days or more and accruing totaled $604,000 at December 31, 2008 compared to $26,000, at December 31, 2007. The majority of the increase was attributable to one residential mortgage migrating to the over 90 day category. Non-accrual loans were reduced by 8% to $3,493,000. The ORE balance rose from $107,000 to $1,450,000. This sizeable increase is a result of the collections process as the collateral securing non-accruing loans are taken in the foreclosure process. These three items comprise the non-performing assets of $5,548,000 at December 31, 2008. The percentage of non-performing assets to total assets was 0.96% at December 31, 2008, an increase from 0.67% at December 31, 2007, primarily due to the aforementioned ORE increase. Non-performing loans to net loans were 0.94% at December 31, 2008, and 0.91% at December 31, 2007. The 30-89 day past due loans at December 31, 2008 were $1,858,000 reduced from $4,698,000 at December 31, 2007. Contributing to the reduction was the repayment of previously delinquent loans and others which had been brought current.

During the latter part of January 2009 the Company was notified by a customer of a significant adverse business event causing management to place the customer’s $3,300,000 loan relationship on non-accruing status. Management does not expect this will have a material impact on income going forward.

Repossessed assets consist of previously financed vehicles held-for-sale. Subsequent to the loan or lease maturity, the borrower or lessee defaulted on their contract and the Company repossessed the unit. Repossessed assets are sold through either a private or public sale and any deficiency balance from the sale of the asset is charged to the allowance for loan losses. The Company terminated its automobile leasing business in 2005. There were no repossessed assets or restructured loans at December 31, 2007 or December 31, 2008.

Payments received on non-accrual loans are recognized on a cash basis. Payments are first applied against the outstanding principal balance, then to the recovery of any charged-off loan amounts. Any excess is treated as a recovery of interest income. During 2008, the Company collected approximately $311,000 of interest income recognized on the cash basis. If the non-accrual loans that were outstanding as of December 31, 2008 had been performing in accordance with their original terms, the Company would have recognized interest income with respect to such loans of $250,000 for the year ended December 31, 2008.

### Bank premises and equipment, net

Net of accumulated depreciation and disposals, premises and equipment increased $3,091,000. The Company purchased fixed assets or transferred assets from construction in process, a component of other assets in the consolidated balance sheet, of approximately $4,489,000 during 2008 compared to $3,293,000 in 2007. The increase was principally from the construction and completion of the Company’s West Scranton branch expansion project.

### Foreclosed assets held-for-sale

#### Other Real Estate Owned

ORE was $1,451,000 at December 31, 2008 consisting of four properties, one of which was under an agreement to be sold. The remaining three properties were listed for sale with a realtor. The one ORE property which had been owned at year end December 31, 2007 was sold.

### Cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance

The Company maintains bank owned life insurance (BOLI) for a chosen group of employees, namely its officers, where the Company is the owner and sole beneficiary of the policies. BOLI is classified as a non-interest earning asset. Increases in the cash surrender value are recorded as components of non-interest income. The BOLI is profitable from the appreciation of the cash surrender values of the pool of insurance and its tax-free advantage to the Company. This profitability is used to offset a portion of current and future employee benefit costs. The BOLI can be liquidated if necessary with associated tax costs. However, the Company intends to hold this pool of insurance, because it provides income that enhances the Company’s capital position. Therefore, the Company has not provided for deferred income taxes on the earnings from the increase in cash surrender value.

### Other assets

Other assets more than doubled in 2008 to $8,930,000 compared to 2007. The increase was caused predominately by the increase in the net deferred tax asst of $4,046,000 as a result of additional unrealized losses in the securities AFS portfolio. See Note 10, “Income Taxes,” for an analysis of the net deferred tax asset. Also contributing to the increase in other assets was an increase in the fair value of the Company’s derivative contract which is more fully explained in Note 1, “Nature of operations and summary of significant accounting policies,” and Note 12, “Fair value of financial instruments and derivatives,” contained within the notes to consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8.

### Results of Operations

### Earnings Summary

The Company’s results of operations depend primarily on net interest income. Net interest income is the difference between interest income and interest expense. Interest income is generated from yields on interest-earning assets, which consist principally of loans and investment securities. Interest expense is incurred from rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities, which consist of deposits and borrowings. Net interest income is determined by the Company’s interest rate spread (i.e., the difference between the yields earned on its interest-earning assets and the rates paid on its interest-bearing liabilities) and the relative amounts of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The interest rate spread is significantly impacted by: changes in interest rates and market yield curves and their related impact on cash flows; the composition and characteristics of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities; differences in the maturity and re-pricing characteristics of assets compared to the maturity and re-pricing characteristics of the liabilities that fund them and by the competition in our marketplace.

The Company’s profitability is also affected by the level of its non-interest income and expenses, provision for loan losses and provision for income taxes. Non-interest income consists mostly of service charges on the Bank’s deposit and loan products, trust and asset management service fees, increases in the cash surrender value of the bank owned life insurance (BOLI), net gains or losses from the sales of loans and securities AFS, sales of other real estate (ORE) properties and from other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) charges from investment securities. Non-interest expense consists of compensation and related employee benefit expenses, occupancy, equipment, data processing, advertising, marketing, professional fees, insurance and other operating overhead.

The Company’s profitability is significantly affected by general economic and competitive conditions, changes in market interest rates, government policies and actions of regulatory authorities. The Company’s loan portfolio is comprised principally of commercial and commercial real estate loans. The properties underlying the Company’s mortgages are concentrated in Northeastern Pennsylvania. Credit risk, which represents the possibility of the Company not recovering amounts due from its borrowers, is significantly related to local economic conditions in the areas where the properties are located as well as the Company’s underwriting standards. Economic conditions affect the market value of the underlying collateral as well as the levels of adequate cash flow and revenue generation from income-producing commercial properties.

### Overview

Net income for the year ended December 31, 2008 was $3,636,000, compared to $4,612,000 for the year ended December 31, 2007. During the same periods, diluted earnings per common share was $1.76 and $2.23, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company’s return on average assets (ROA) and return on average shareholders’ equity (ROE) were 0.62% and 6.81% compared to 0.80% and 8.65%, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2007. The current year included a non-operating, non-cash, after-tax charge of $288,000 related to an other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) in the Company’s security AFS portfolio that did not occur in 2007. In addition, during 2008, the Company recorded a provision for loan losses in the amount of $940,000 compared to a credit for loan losses of $60,000 in 2007. The provision for loan losses in 2008 was recorded in anticipation of credit quality deterioration ensuing from accelerated declines in economic conditions during the fourth quarter of 2008, in addition to growth in the commercial loan portfolio. Further contributing to the lower net income were lower non-interest interest income and higher non-interest expenses. These items were partially offset by an improvement in net interest income of $1,658,000, or 9%, to $19,277,000 in 2008 compared to $17,619,000 in 2007. The decline in ROA and ROE was caused by the decrease in net income.

The following table reconciles net income, as reported to pro forma net operating income for the years indicated:

|  | 2008 Amount | Per share | 2007 Amount | Per share |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Net income, as reported | $3,635,948 | $1.76 | $4,611,572 | $2.23 |
| OTTI | 435,665 | 0.21 | — | — |
| Tax effect | (148,126) | (0.07) | — | — |
| Net operating earnings | $3,923,487 | $1.90 | $4,611,572 | $2.23 |

29

### Net interest income

The following table sets forth a comparison of average balances of assets and liabilities and their related net tax equivalent yields and rates for 2008, 2007 and 2006 (dollars in thousands):

| Assets Interest-earning assets | 2008 Average balance | Interest | Yield/ rate | 2007 Average balance | Interest | Yield/ rate | 2006 Average balance | Interest | Yield/ rate |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| **Interest-bearing deposits** | $233 | $3 | 1.36% | $184 | $9 | 4.81% | $240 | $9 | 3.82% |
| **Investments:** |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| U.S. government agencies | 49,034 | 2,576 | 5.25 | 34,682 | 1,724 | 4.97 | 43,299 | 1,795 | 4.15 |
| Mortgage-backed securities | 35,294 | 1,833 | 5.19 | 51,781 | 2,540 | 4.91 | 42,999 | 1,944 | 4.52 |
| State and municipal | 15,813 | 1,014 | 6.41 | 12,267 | 780 | 6.36 | 14,485 | 927 | 6.40 |
| Other | 25,967 | 1,252 | 4.82 | 17,487 | 1,175 | 6.72 | 14,536 | 946 | 6.50 |
| **Total investments** | 126,108 | 6,675 | 5.29 | 116,217 | 6,219 | 5.35 | 115,319 | 5,612 | 4.87 |
| **Loans:** |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Commercial | 231,721 | 15,869 | 6.85 | 220,968 | 16,458 | 7.45 | 219,482 | 16,018 | 7.30 |
| Consumer | 71,089 | 4,872 | 6.85 | 68,395 | 4,625 | 6.76 | 65,011 | 4,200 | 6.46 |
| Real estate | 117,547 | 6,985 | 5.94 | 134,869 | 8,360 | 6.20 | 133,279 | 8,101 | 6.08 |
| Direct financing leases | 477 | 29 | 6.15 | 549 | 34 | 6.16 | 618 | 38 | 6.18 |
| **Total loans** | 420,834 | 27,755 | 6.60 | 424,781 | 29,477 | 6.94 | 418,390 | 28,357 | 6.78 |
| **Federal funds sold** | 3,342 | 91 | 2.73 | 1,948 | 103 | 5.28 | 2,479 | 123 | 4.97 |
| Total interest-earning assets | 550,517 | 34,524 | 6.27% | 543,130 | 35,808 | 6.59% | 536,428 | 34,101 | 6.36% |
| Non-interest earning assets | 33,301 |  |  | 32,328 |  |  | 28,495 |  |  |
| **Total Assets** | $583,818 |  |  | $575,458 |  |  | $564,923 |  |  |
| **Liabilities and shareholders’ equity** |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Interest-bearing liabilities |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| **Deposits:** |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Savings | $38,425 | $331 | 0.86% | $41,055 | $511 | 1.24% | $46,422 | $620 | 1.34% |
| NOW | 59,130 | 616 | 1.04 | 67,489 | 1,837 | 2.72 | 69,138 | 1,880 | 2.72 |
| MMDA | 93,465 | 2,460 | 2.63 | 84,000 | 3,658 | 4.35 | 68,476 | 2,948 | 4.30 |
| CDs \< $100,000 | 98,410 | 4,052 | 4.12 | 94,420 | 4,173 | 4.42 | 87,345 | 3,235 | 3.70 |
| CDs \> $100,000 | 80,389 | 3,638 | 4.53 | 66,998 | 3,168 | 4.73 | 67,129 | 2,791 | 4.16 |
| Clubs | 1,764 | 21 | 1.19 | 1,908 | 23 | 1.21 | 1,750 | 19 | 1.08 |
| **Total deposits** | 371,583 | 11,118 | 2.99 | 355,870 | 13,370 | 3.76 | 340,260 | 11,493 | 3.38 |
| **Repurchase agreements** | 12,074 | 103 | 0.85 | 19,580 | 465 | 2.38 | 23,391 | 624 | 2.67 |
| **Borrowed funds** | 74,530 | 3,463 | 4.65 | 71,573 | 3,825 | 5.34 | 79,627 | 4,244 | 5.33 |
| Total interest-bearing liabilities | 458,187 | 14,684 | 3.20% | 447,023 | 17,660 | 3.95% | 443,278 | 16,361 | 3.69% |
| Non-interest bearing deposits | 67,717 |  |  | 70,606 |  |  | 68,224 |  |  |
| Non-interest bearing liabilities | 4,503 |  |  | 4,499 |  |  | 3,771 |  |  |
| Total liabilities | 530,407 |  |  | 522,128 |  |  | 515,273 |  |  |
| Shareholders’ equity | 53,411 |  |  | 53,330 |  |  | 49,650 |  |  |
| **Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity** | $583,818 |  |  | $575,458 |  |  | $564,923 |  |  |
| Net interest income |  | $19,840 |  |  | $18,148 |  |  | $17,740 |  |
| Net interest spread |  |  | 3.07% |  |  | 2.64% |  |  | 2.67% |
| Net interest margin |  |  | 3.60% |  |  | 3.34% |  |  | 3.31% |

30

In the preceding table, interest income was adjusted to a tax-equivalent basis, using the corporate federal tax rate of 34%, to recognize the income from tax-exempt interest-earning assets as if the interest was taxable. This treatment allows a uniform comparison between yields on interest-earning assets. Loans include loans AFS and non-accrual loans but exclude the allowance for loan losses. Average balances are based on amortized cost and do not reflect unrealized gains or losses. Net interest margin represents net interest income divided by total average interest-earning assets.

Changes in net interest income are a function of both changes in interest rates and changes in volume of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The following table presents the extent to which changes in interest rates and changes in volumes of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities have affected the Company’s interest income and interest expense during the periods indicated. Information is provided in each category with respect to (1) the changes attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by the prior period rate), (2) the changes attributable to changes in interest rates (changes in rates multiplied by prior period volume) and (3) the net change. The combined effect of changes in both volume and rate has been allocated proportionately to the change due to volume and the change due to rate. Tax-exempt income was not converted to a tax-equivalent basis on the rate/volume analysis (dollars in thousands):

| Interest income: Loans and leases: | Years ended December 31, 2008 compared to 2007 Increase (decrease) due to Volume | Rate | Total | 2007 compared to 2006 Volume | Rate | Total |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Mortgage | $(1,040) | $(336) | $(1,376) | $97 | $163 | $260 |
| Commercial | 766 | (1,305) | (539) | 108 | 318 | 426 |
| Consumer | 178 | 66 | 244 | 219 | 203 | 422 |
| Total loans and leases | (96) | (1,575) | (1,671) | 424 | 684 | 1,108 |
| Investment securities, interest-bearing deposits and federal funds sold | 564 | (211) | 353 | 14 | 628 | 642 |
| Total interest income | 468 | (1,786) | (1,318) | 438 | 1,312 | 1,750 |
| Interest expense: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Deposits: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Certificates of deposit greater than $100,000 | 611 | (141) | 470 | (5) | 382 | 377 |
| Other | 81 | (2,803) | (2,722) | 520 | 980 | 1,500 |
| Total deposits | 692 | (2,944) | (2,252) | 515 | 1,362 | 1,877 |
| Other interest-bearing liabilities | (206) | (518) | (724) | (558) | (20) | (578) |
| Total interest expense | 486 | (3,462) | (2,976) | (43) | 1,342 | 1,299 |
| Net interest income | $(18) | $1,676 | $1,658 | $481 | $(30) | $451 |

The slope of the yield curve has returned to a more normal, positive slope in 2008 compared to 2007, but at unprecedented low levels. In several efforts to stimulate a recessing economy, the FOMC reduced short-term interest rates seven times during 2008, in intervals ranging from 25 to 75 basis points, sometimes occurring twice in a single month. In response to these actions, the national prime rate also decreased during 2008. National prime, the benchmark rate banks use to set rates on various lending and other interest sensitive products, decreased seven times for a total decrease of 400 basis points from 7.25% at December 31, 2007 to 3.25% at December 31, 2008. As a result of the short-term rate reductions, the yield curve has become positively sloped thereby resulting in opportunities for the Company to improve its net interest margin. However, operating in a very low, highly volatile interest rate environment will also present challenges in the coming year.

While national prime decreased 400 basis points, the weighted-average national prime rate decreased to 5.09% in 2008 compared to 8.05% in 2007. The effect of this average decrease has been to exert extreme downward pressure on yields of the Company’s interest-earning assets. With rate cutting beginning in January 2008, this pressure existed with increasing momentum throughout all of 2008. The Company was able to more than offset this pressure by periodically adjusting rates on its interest-bearing deposits. In response to the swift downward shift in rates, the Company’s asset liability committee assessed, among other things, the impact the interest rate movements have had on its earning assets. Where necessary, rate adjustments to interest-bearing deposit and repurchase agreements were implemented and wholesale funding sources were utilized, all which helped minimize the effect rate changes have had on net interest income. The committee meets frequently and has successfully implemented rate setting strategies to mitigate the interest rate risk inherent in the balance sheet and has been able to preserve its net interest margin while always mindful of our customers’ needs.

As market rates fall along with national prime, loan originations, renewing commercial and residential loans and lines of credit should price below the average 2008 portfolio yields. In addition, the decrease in the Treasury yields and other capital market rates, which largely began during the second half of 2008, could continue to have an unfavorable impact on the Company’s total 2009 investment portfolio yield. The relative and predominantly lower interest rate environment of 2008 continued to have a negative impact on the Company’s interest-earning assets. Total interest income declined 4%, or $1,318,000 from $35,279,000 in 2007 to $33,961,000in 2008 and further caused the tax-equivalent yield on earning assets to decrease 32 basis points. The Company should continue to experience a period of sliding yields on its interest-earning assets during 2009, and in what appears to be a prolonged low interest rate environment.

Interest expense decreased $2,976,000, or 17%, from $17,660,000 in 2007 to $14,684,000 in 2008. The fast-falling, lower interest rate environment that was prevalent throughout most of 2008, required the Company to periodically reduce offering rates on both its deposit and repurchase agreement products. Though the Company recorded a net increase in average interest-bearing liabilities, due to deposit growth, interest expense on deposits declined by almost $3,000,000 in 2008 compared to 2007 caused by a 77 basis point decline on rates paid. The effect of the $15,713,000 increase in average interest-bearing deposits was an additional $692,000 in interest expense. In an effort to maintain reasonable interest rate spreads to its earning-assets, throughout 2008 the Company’s asset / liability committee has reduced rates paid on CDs as well as rates paid on transactional deposits. Rates on CD’s should naturally price lower as they mature. However, whether or not the Company can continue to reduce rates on transaction deposits that are currently priced at unprecedented low levels to maintain its interest rate spread will be predicated on the interest rate environment, liquidity position and competition. Interest expense on borrowings, including repurchase agreements, declined $724,000 during 2008, mostly from lower rates.

The resulting performance of the mix of the Company’s interest-sensitive assets and liabilities and the varying effects the severity of the yield curve slope has had during 2008, net interest income increased $1,658,000, or 9%, from $17,619,000 in 2007 to $19,277,000 in 2008. On a tax-equivalent basis, the net interest rate spread increased 43 basis points from 2.64% to 3.07% and the tax-equivalent margin improved 26 basis points, from 3.34% in 2007 to 3.60% in 2008, respectively. The improvement in spread and margin were due largely to lower rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities and more net interest income.

### Provision for loan losses

The provision for loan losses represents the necessary amount to charge against current earnings, the purpose of which is to increase the allowance for loan losses to a level that represents management’s best estimate of known and inherent losses in the Company’s loan portfolio. Loans and leases determined to be uncollectible are charged-off against the allowance for loan losses. The required amount of the provision for loan losses, based upon the adequate level of the allowance for loan losses, is subject to ongoing analysis of the loan portfolio. The Company’s Special Asset Committee meets periodically to review problem loans and leases. The committee is comprised of management, including the chief risk officer, loan workout officers and collection personnel. The committee reports quarterly to the Credit Administration Committee of the Board of Directors.

Management continuously reviews the risks inherent in the loan and lease portfolio. Specific factors used to evaluate the adequacy of the loan loss provision during the formal process include:

- specific loans that could have loss potential;
- levels of and trends in delinquencies and non-accrual loans;
- levels of and trends in charge-offs and recoveries;
- trends in volume and terms of loans;
- changes in risk selection and underwriting standards;
- changes in lending policies, procedures and practices;
- experience, ability and depth of lending management;
- national and local economic trends and conditions; and
- changes in credit concentrations.

Provisions for loan losses of $940,000 were made for the year ended December 31, 2008. In 2007, the Company did not need to make provisions and reduced the allowance for loan losses due to a reduced level of internally criticized and classified loans. The $940,000 provision for loan losses was recorded for anticipated credit quality deterioration, ensuing from accelerated declines in economic conditions during the fourth quarter of 2008, together with providing for over $30 million of loan growth throughout 2008. The provision increase occurred to reinforce and fund the allowance for loan losses balance as of December 31, 2008 to safeguard against possible future losses. The allowance for loan losses was $4,745,000 at December 31, 2008, and was $4,824,000 at December 31, 2007.

### Other income

For the year ended December 31, 2008, total other income was $4,578,000, $627,000, or 12% less than the $5,205,000 recorded during the year ended December 31, 2007. In 2008, a non-cash OTTI charge of $436,000 was recorded. There was no similar charge in 2007. The OTTI charge is related to the Company’s investment in a pooled preferred term security and a common stock equity position in FNMA. The carrying values of these securities were written down to their fair values during the third and fourth quarters as management has deemed the impairment to be other-than-temporary. Service charges on deposit related accounts declined $106,000, or 4%, in 2008 compared to 2007. Most of this decline was the result of lower volumes of overdraft transactions. During 2008, the Company recorded net losses from the disposal of premises and equipment of $36,000 compared to net gains of $98,000 recorded in 2007, or an adverse impact of approximately $134,000. The loss in 2008 was from the disposal of unused, obsolete capital equipment while in 2007 gains included the sales of two commercial facilities previously leased to non-related third parties. Further contributing to the non-interest income decline in 2008 were the gains recorded form the sale of foreclosed properties in 2007 of $144,000 compared to $43,000 in 2008. Partially offsetting these adverse changes in non-interest income were: $101,000 more gains from the sales of residential mortgages into the secondary market; fees earned from the Company’s trust services business and an increase in the cash surrender value of BOLI.

In 2009, the Company projects continued decline in service fees from deposit accounts, which in 2008 declined by nearly 4% from 2007, as the expectation there will be an even lower volume of overdraft transactions. In the current environment, it is difficult to determine whether this trend will continue.

### Other expenses

For the year ended December 31, 2008, other operating expenses grew $1,574,000, or 9%, from $16,637,000 for the year ended December 31, 2007. Merit and performance-based incentive increases, branch expansion and the related employee benefits, health care, and wider participation in the Company’s 401(k) plan caused salaries and employee benefit costs to rise $1,164,000, or 13%, for the twelve months ended December 31, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. Higher occupancy related expenses, a component of premises and equipment, increased $95,000, or 3%, due to a full year of depreciation and amortization on the Green Ridge branch relocation and the 2008 opening of the West Scranton branch. Branch expansion activities also included more advertising and marketing, up $33,000, or 5%, and other increased overhead including: office supplies, postage, data processing and FDIC premiums. Other expenses also increased by higher collection and ORE expenses associated with more legal and foreclosure costs.

As the Company enters 2009, management expects certain expenses to rise over and above normal expected inflationary increases. In 2009, the West Scranton branch will reflect a full year of operational expenses. For example occupancy related costs could amount to $230,000 more in 2009 than in 2008. The Company’s FDIC premium, which grew 1.5 times the 2007 level, will significantly increase even further, by increased premiums and also from the Company’s decision to voluntarily participate in the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program (TLGP). The Company anticipates up to $300,000 of additional premiums, but cannot quantify the effect of the TLGP premium impact as it will be determined by depositor sentiment for mitigating their personal risk.

In late February 2009, the FDIC voted to impose a special assessment of 20 basis points on all FDIC-insured banks to be collected on September 30, 2009. The Company anticipates that the special assessment will adversely affect earning by approximately $900,000 based on our current federally-insured deposit amounts. Furthermore, the FDIC has the authority, after June 30, 2009, to impose an additional 10 basis point emergency special assessment on all FDIC-insured banks if it estimates the reserve ratio of the Deposit Insurance Fund will fall to a level that it believes would adversely affect public confidence or to a level which would be close to zero or negative at the end of a calendar quarter. At this time we cannot estimate the probability of this event; however, any additional FDIC assessment and/or premium would be adverse to our 2009 earnings.

The ratio of non-interest expense less non-interest income (expense ratio) to average assets at December 31, 2008 and 2007 was 2.25% and 2.01%, respectively. The overhead expense ratio of the Company drifted upward due to higher non-interest expenses.

### Provision for income taxes

Income before provision for income taxes in 2008 decreased $1,543,000 from 2007. The effective federal income tax rate was 22.7% and 26.2% for the years ending December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The decrease in the effective tax rate is attributable to the decrease in pre-tax income.

### Comparison of Financial Condition as of December 31, 2007

### and 2006 and Results of Operations for each of the Years then Ended

### Financial Condition

### Overview

Consolidated assets increased $25,095,000, or 4%, during the year ended December 31, 2007 to $587,413,000. The increase resulted from increases in total deposits of $15,374,000, total borrowings of $6,173,000 and total shareholders’ equity of $3,579,000. During 2007, the carrying values of the investment and loan portfolios increased $22,573,000 and $4,931,000, respectively, while premises and equipment, net plus construction in process, a component of other assets in the consolidated balance sheet, increased $1,287,000. Cash decreased $3,392,000 since December 31, 2006.

### Deposits

Total deposits increased $15,373,000, or 4%, during 2007 to $425,708,000. The growth in deposits was from increases in money market and certificate of deposit accounts of $15,533,000 and $24,389,000, or 21% and 16%, respectively, partially offset by declines in NOW, savings and DDAs of $10,427,000, $5,176,000 and $8,946,000, respectively. Certificate of deposit accounts continued to grow as customers locked in rates during the declining interest rate environment. The increase in money market accounts, net of the decline in savings and club accounts, was from success in our deposit-gathering strategies in conjunction with promotional interest rates tailored to depositors’ needs. DDAs decreased 12% compared to December 31, 2006; however, management believed this outflow was related to customer transaction timing and therefore temporary rather than permanent.

### Short-term borrowings

During 2007, repurchase agreements declined to $20,504,000 from $22,224,000 at December 31, 2006. At December 31, 2007 and 2006, sweep accounts represented 62% and 70%, respectively, of total repurchase agreements. Investment security pre-refunding strategies and late-year deposit outflow resulted in an increase in overnight borrowings of $8,555,000 as of December 31, 2007 compared to December 31, 2006.

### Long-term debt

The weighted-average rate in effect on funds borrowed at December 31, 2007, was 5.26% compared to 5.15% as of December 31, 2006. The 2007 weighted-average rate was 133 basis points below the tax-equivalent yield of 6.59% on average earning assets for the year ended December 31, 2007. Rates on $42,000,000 of the total long-term advances are fixed but will adjust quarterly should market rates increase beyond the issues’ original or strike rates. As of December 31, 2007, the weighted-average rate on this convertible debt was 5.35%. To help reduce the Company’s reliance on overnight funding, during 2007 $16,000,000 of advances that had matured or converted, and carried a weighted-average interest rate of 4.78%, were replaced with fixed- and capped floating-rate advances. The new advances aggregated $20,000,000 that mature in 2009 and carried an initial weighted-average interest rate of 5.40%. As of December 31, 2007, the weighted-average interest rate on these advances amounted to 5.13%.

### Investments

As of December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the aggregate fair value of securities HTM exceeded their respective aggregate amortized cost by $33,000 and $29,000, respectively. Total investments increased $22,574,000, net of a $23,000 decline in the market value of AFS investments. The increase in the investment portfolio during 2007 was the result of investing excess liquidity stemming from deposit inflows and late-year overnight borrowings used as a pre-refunding strategy. The carrying value of investment securities, at December 31, 2007, was $122,984,000, or 21%, of total assets compared to $100,411,000, or 18%, as of December 31, 2006. Mortgage-backed securities, which amortize and provide monthly cash flow, continue to dominate the composition of the total investment portfolio representing 48% at December 31, 2007, compared to 43% at December 31, 2006.

The tax-equivalent yield on debt securities by stated maturity date at December 31, 2007, is as follows:

|  | One year or less | One through five years | Five through ten years | More than ten years | Total |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| U.S. government agencies | 3.00% | 4.83% | 4.90% | 5.99% | 5.25% |
| Mortgage-backed securities | 6.00 | 4.11 | 4.32 | 5.22 | 5.06 |
| State & municipal subdivisions | — | — | 5.55 | 5.71 | 5.69 |
| Preferred term securities | — | — | — | 6.25 | 6.25 |
| Total debt securities | 3.05% | 4.54% | 4.78% | 5.59% | 5.34% |

### Loans and leases

Gross loans and leases increased $3,606,000, or 1%, from $422,643,000 at December 31, 2006, to $426,249,000 at December 31, 2007. Gross loans represented 73% and 75% of total assets at December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively.

In 2007, the Company originated $32,919,000 of commercial loans, $24,032,000 of residential mortgage loans and $28,062,000 of consumer loans. This compares to $17,152,000, $21,431,000 and $29,565,000, respectively, in 2006. Included in mortgage loans is $12,515,000 of real estate construction lines in 2007 and $11,111,000 in 2006. In addition for 2007, the Company originated lines of credit in the amounts of $18,564,000 for commercial borrowers and $6,296,000 in home equity and other consumer lines of credit.

Though loan originations increased in 2007 compared to 2006, and despite operating in an overall higher interest rate environment, payoffs and pay-downs were high in 2007 almost offsetting the originations. As a result, there was only a subtle increase in the loan portfolio.

#### Commercial and Commercial Real Estate Loans:

Though commercial and commercial real estate (CRE) originations were relatively strong, they were fully offset by scheduled principal curtailments and pre-payments, thereby resulting in a commercial loan decline of $2,155,000 to $216,058,000 from $218,213,000, or almost 1% during 2007. The Company hired a new senior lender and had restructured its existing team of commercial loan officers to better serve our existing customer base and strategically penetrate the markets for new business relationships.

*Residential Real Estate Loans:*

Residential real estate loans increased $4,235,000, or 4%, to $116,978,000 in 2007. Though operating in a higher interest rate environment, which tends to reduce the level of prepayment and refinance activity, the Company was able to continue to grow its residential real estate loan portfolio on the strength of its very dedicated staff of loan originators and transfers of construction loans to permanent financing.

#### Consumer Loans:

Consumer loans increased $4,269,000, or 6%, during 2007. The increase in this sector is mainly from less refinance and payoff activity caused by a relatively higher interest rate environment. This enabled the portfolio to grow despite a minor decline in loan originations.

#### Real Estate Construction Loans:

Real estate construction loans decreased by $2,666,000, or 20%, at December 31, 2007 compared to December 31, 2006. The decline in 2007 was caused by more residential construction loans converting to permanent mortgage loans; however, both categories remain strong.

#### Direct Financing Leases:

The balance represents tax-free leasing arrangements provided to municipal customers. For 2007, the activity represents scheduled run-off.

### Loans available-for-sale

Loans AFS at December 31, 2007, were $827,000, with a corresponding fair value of $843,000 compared to $122,000 and $123,000, respectively, at December 31, 2006. During 2007, residential mortgages and student loans with principal balances of $16,210,000 and $57,000, respectively, were sold into the secondary market and combined gains of approximately $159,000 were recognized. There were no sold SBA loans during 2007.

At December 31, 2007 and 2006, the servicing portfolio balance of sold residential mortgage loans was $61,023,000 and $53,112,000, respectively.

### Allowance for loan losses

Total charge-offs, net of recoveries, for the year ended December 31, 2007, were $560,000, compared to $865,000 in 2006. Combined consumer loan and lease financing net charge-offs increased slightly from $161,000 at December 31, 2006 to $237,000 through December 31, 2007. Commercial loan net charge-offs were $597,000 for the year 2006 compared to $357,000 for 2007. Mortgage loans showed net recoveries of $35,000 in 2007 compared to net charge-offs of $108,000 in 2006. This reversal from net mortgage charge-offs in 2006 to net recoveries in 2007 was the result of recording one large mortgage loan recovery of $107,000 on a loan which had been charged-off in a prior year.

### Non-performing assets

The majority of non-performing assets for the period was attributed to non-accruing commercial business loans and non-accruing real estate loans in the process of foreclosure. Most of these loans were collateralized, thereby mitigating the Company’s potential for loss. In 2006, non-performing loans were $3,439,000 compared to $3,837,000 at year-end 2007. There were no repossessed assets at December 31, 2007 or 2006. ORE at December 31, 2007 consisted of one property which had an agreement to sell pending. At year-end 2006, five residential properties were owned, all of which were sold. The Special Assets Department had developed specific action plans for each of the Company’s non-performing loans. During 2007, many of those plans came to a conclusion resulting in repayments of non-performing loans. The non-accrual loans aggregated $3,811,000 at December 31, 2007, an increase of $453,000 from year-end 2006. During 2007 approximately $3,075,000 of loans were placed in non-accrual status. These were partially offset by payoffs or pay-downs of $1,888,000, charge-offs of $236,000, $352,000 in transfers to ORE and $146,000 of loans that returned to performing status. Loans past due 90 days or more and accruing declined 68%, to $26,000, at December 31, 2007. The non-accrual loans rose by 14 % to $3,811,000 and ORE declined by 46 % to $107,000. These three items comprise the non-performing assets of $3,944,000. The percentage of non-performing assets to total assets was 0.67% at December 31, 2007, a minor change from 0.65% at December 31, 2006. Non-performing loans to net loans were 0.91% at December 31, 2007, and 0.82% at December 31, 2006.

During 2007, the Company collected $93,000 of interest income recognized on the cash basis. If the non-accrual loans that were outstanding as of December 31, 2007 had been performing in accordance with their original terms, the Company would have recognized interest income with respect to such loans of $391,000 for the year ended December 31, 2007.

### Bank premises and equipment, net

Net of accumulated depreciation and disposals, premises and equipment increased $1,640,467. During 2007, the Company purchased or transferred from construction in process approximately $3,293,000 compared to $852,000 in 2006. The increase was principally from the completion of the Company’s Green Ridge branch relocation construction project.

### Foreclosed assets held-for-sale

#### Other Real Estate Owned

ORE was $107,000 at December 31, 2007 consisting of one property, the sale of which is pending. The five residential properties which were owned at year end 2006 have all been sold.

### Other assets

The decrease in other assets of $384,000, or 8%, from December 31, 2006 was due mostly to the reduction of capitalized interim construction costs for the Company’s branch expansion and other projects and a decrease in the net deferred tax asset, partially offset by an increase in the market value of the Company’s derivative contract. See Note 10, “Income Taxes,” for an analysis of the net deferred tax asset. For a further discussion on the Company’s derivative contract, see Note 1, “Nature of operations and summary of significant accounting policies,” and Note 12, “Fair value of financial instruments and derivatives,” contained within the notes to consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8.

### Results of Operations

### Earnings Summary

Net income for the year ended December 31, 2007 was $4,612,000, compared to $4,125,000 for the year ended December 31, 2006. During the same periods, diluted earnings per common share was $2.23 and $2.01, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company’s ROA and ROE were 0.80% and 8.65%, respectively, compared to 0.73% and 8.31% for the year ended December 31, 2006. The improvement in net income was primarily from a 3%, or $451,000, increase in net interest income, a 15%, or $683,000, rise in non-interest income, partially offset be a 5%, or $758,000, increase in operating expenses. Also contributing to the improvement was a credit for loan losses of $60,000 during the twelve months ended December 31, 2007 compared to a provision of $325,000 in 2006. The improvement in ROA and ROE was largely due to the improvement in net income.

### Net interest income

The slope of the yield curve, which became inverted, or negatively sloped in 2006, had returned to a more normal, positive slope in 2007. An inverted yield curve presents challenges to banks because short-term rates are higher than long-term rates which tends to compress net interest income because deposit and borrowing terms are generally shorter than investment and loan terms. The FOMC reduced short-term interest rates three times during the second half of 2007. In response to these actions, national prime also decreased during 2007. National prime also decreased three times for a total decrease of 100 basis points from 8.25% at December 31, 2006 to 7.25% at December 31, 2007. As a result of the rate reductions, the yield curve had become more positively sloped thereby provided opportunities for the Company to bolster its net interest margin.

Though national prime decreased 100 basis points, the weighted-average national prime rate increased to 8.05% in 2007 compared to 7.96% in 2006. This phenomenon was caused by the first rate reduction occurring well into the third quarter. Thus, most of 2007 consisted of market rates that existed at the year-end 2006 level. The effect of this average increase pressured rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities and was only marginally offset by the effect rates had on interest earning-assets.

As expected, the relative and predominantly higher interest rate environment during 2007 continued to have a positive influence on the Company’s interest-earning assets. Total interest income increased 5%, from $33,530,000 in 2006 to $35,279,000 in 2007 and further, caused the tax-equivalent yield on earning assets to increase 23 basis points. Interest expense increased $1,299,000, or 8%, from $16,361,000 in 2006 to $17,660,000 in 2007. The cost of interest-bearing liabilities increased 26 basis points in 2007. The higher interest rate environment that was prevalent throughout most of 2007, in conjunction with higher average interest-bearing deposit balances, necessitated the need for the Company to increase offering rates on its deposit products. As a result, interest expense on deposits increased $1,877,000 during 2007, of which approximately $1,362,000 was caused by a 38 basis point rise in average rates. Average balances in interest-bearing deposits increased by $15,610,000 during 2007, resulting in an additional $515,000 in expense. Interest expense on borrowings, including repurchase agreements, declined $578,000 during 2007, due almost entirely to lower average balances.

As a result of the mix of the Company’s interest-sensitive assets and liabilities and the varying effects the slope of the interest rate yield curve has had during 2007, net interest income increased $451,000, or 3%, from $17,168,000 in 2006 to $17,619,000 in 2007. On a tax-equivalent basis, the net interest rate spread declined 3 basis points from 2.67% to 2.64% and the tax-equivalent margin improved 3 basis points, from 3.31% in 2006 to 3.34% in 2007, respectively. The decrease in spread was due to a larger increase in rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities than the increase in yields from interest-earning assets. The margin improvement was from more net interest income in 2007 compared to 2006.

### Provision for loan losses

A credit for loan losses of $60,000 was made to the allowance during 2007 compared to a provision for loan losses of $325,000 for the year ended December 31, 2006. In 2007, the Company did not need to make provisions and reduced the allowance for loan losses due to a reduced level of internally criticized and classified loans. These reductions occurred as a result of some adversely rated loans which were either upgraded in rating due to credit improvement or were repaid. The allowance for loan losses was $4,824,000 at December 31, 2007, compared to $5,444,000 at December 31, 2006. The reduced level of the allowance was due to the improved quality of the portfolio.

### Other income

For the year ended December 31, 2007, total other income was $5,205,000, an increase of $683,000, or 15%, from the $4,522,000 recorded during 2006. In 2007, the Company experienced growth in service charges on deposit accounts of $376,000, or 14%, and also recognized net gains of $144,000 from sales of foreclosed properties held-for-sale. An increase in overdraft charges was the principal reason for growth in deposit service charges. The significant gain from the sale of foreclosed properties was the result of excess collateral value compared to the carrying value. Further contributing to the increase in non-interest income were: increased sales activities of residential mortgages into the secondary market resulting in $62,000 more of gains compared to 2006; increases in BOLI earnings; higher revenue from financial services activities; and the disposal of premises and equipment that produced net gains of $98,000 in 2007 compared to net losses of $20,000 in 2006. Included in 2007 were the sales of two commercial facilities previously leased to non-related third parties.

### Other expense

For the twelve months ended December 31, 2007, other operating expenses were $16,637,000 compared to $15,878,000 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2006, a $758,000 or 5% increase. Merit and performance-based incentive increases caused salary and employee benefit costs to rise $377,000, or 5%, for the twelve months ended December 31, 2007 compared to the same period in 2006. Advertising and marketing related expenses were up $144,000, or 27%, due to activities associated with the grand opening and relocation project of Company’s Green Ridge branch office. Other expenses increased $225,000, or 6%, in 2007 compared to 2006 caused by increased professional services, ATM expense and other branch related operating costs.

The expense ratio at December 31, 2007 and 2006 was 2.01% and 2.02%, respectively. The overhead expense ratio of the Company remained comparable to the Uniform Bank Performance Report peer comparison group ratio.

### Provision for income taxes

Income before provision for income taxes in 2007 increased $760,000 from 2006. The effective federal income tax rate was 26.2% and 24.8% for the years ending December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The increase in the effective tax rate is attributed to an increase in pre-tax income and a decrease in tax-free income.

### Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations

The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business in order to meet the financing needs of its customers and in connection with the overall interest rate management strategy. These instruments involve, to a varying degree, elements of credit, interest rate and liquidity risk. In accordance with GAAP, these instruments are either not recorded in the consolidated financial statements or are recorded in amounts that differ from the notional amounts. Such instruments primarily include lending commitments, lease obligations and derivative instruments. For a further discussion on the Company’s derivative instrument, see Note 1, “Nature of operations and summary of significant accounting policies,” and Note 12, “Fair value of financial instruments and derivatives,” contained within the notes to consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8.

Lending commitments include commitments to originate loans and commitments to fund unused lines of credit. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since some of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.

In addition to lending commitments, the Company has contractual obligations related to operating lease commitments. Operating lease commitments are obligations under various non-cancelable operating leases on buildings and land used for office space and banking purposes.

The following table presents, as of December 31, 2008, the Company’s significant determinable contractual obligations and significant commitments by payment date. The payment amounts represent those amounts contractually due to the recipient, excluding interest (dollars in thousands):

| Contractual obligations: | One year or less | Over one year through three years | Over three years through five years | Over five years | Total |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Certificates of deposit | $138,896 | $29,544 | $4,433 | $808 | $173,681 |
| Long-term debt | 10,000 | 21,000 | 5,000 | 16,000 | 52,000 |
| Repurchase agreements | 11,412 | — | — | — | 11,412 |
| Operating leases | 368 | 666 | 682 | 3,844 | 5,560 |
| Significant commitments: |  |  |  |  |  |
| Letters of credit | 2,053 | 1,190 | — | 725 | 3,968 |
| Loan commitments\* | 25,613 | — | — | — | 25,613 |
| Total | $188,342 | $52,400 | $10,115 | $21,377 | $272,234 |

\*Available credit to borrowers in the amount of $68,379 is excluded from the above table since, by its nature, the borrowers may not have the need for additional funding, and, therefore, the credit may or may not be disbursed by the Company.

### Related Party Transactions

Information with respect to related parties is contained in Note 15, “Related party transactions,” within the notes to the consolidated financial statements, and incorporated by reference in Part II, Item 8.

### Impact of Accounting Standards and Interpretations

Information with respect to the impact of accounting standards is contained in Note 18, “Recent accounting pronouncements,” within the notes to the consolidated financial statements, and incorporated by reference in Part II, Item 8.

### Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices

The consolidated financial statements and notes thereto presented herein have been prepared in accordance with GAAP, which requires the measurement of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations in terms of historical dollars without considering the changes in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation. The impact of inflation is reflected in the increased cost of our operations. Unlike industrial businesses, most all of the Company’s assets and liabilities are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates have a greater impact on our performance than do the effects of general levels of inflation as interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or, to the same extent, as the price of goods and services.

### Capital Resources

The Company is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possible additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Company’s assets, liabilities and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Company’s capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk-weightings and other factors.

Under these guidelines, assets and certain off-balance sheet items are assigned to broad risk categories, each with prescribed risk weightings. The resulting capital ratios represent capital as a percentage of total risk-weighted assets and certain off-balance sheet items. The guidelines require all banks and bank holding companies to maintain a minimum ratio of total risk-based capital to total risk-weighted assets (Total Risk Adjusted Capital) of 8%, including Tier I capital to total risk-weighted assets (Tier I Capital) of 4% and Tier I capital to average total assets (Leverage Ratio) of at least 4%. Additional information with respect to capital requirements is contained in Note 14, “Regulatory matters,” within the notes to the consolidated financial statements, and incorporated by reference in Part II, Item 8.

In October 2008, the U.S. Department of Treasury (Treasury), the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FRB) and the FDIC issued a joint statement announcing a voluntary capital purchase program where the Treasury will purchase senior preferred stock of certain financial institutions. The Treasury had allocated $250 billion under the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) created under the Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (ESSA) to purchase senior preferred stock in banks through the Capital Purchase Program. The Company received preliminary approval from the U.S. Treasury Department to participate in the TARP, however because of the Company’s strong capital position, the Company has decided not to participate as the effect of accepting the program was determined to not be in the best interest of the Company’s shareholders. At December 31, 2008, the Company’s total risk-based capital ratio was 13.6%, Tier 1 risk-based ratio was 12.6% and its leverage ratio was 9.9%. The Company currently exceeds the regulatory guidelines with the Company’s capital adequacy levels above the “well-capitalized” regulatory requirements.

During the second quarter of 2008 the Company’s Board of Directors announced its intent to initiate a capital stock repurchase program covering up to 50,000 shares of its outstanding capital stock. The repurchased shares would become treasury stock and could be available for issuance under the Company’s various stock-based compensation, employee stock purchase and dividend reinvestment (DRP) plans and for general corporate purposes. The repurchases will be made from time-to-time in open-market transactions, subject to availability, pursuant to safe harbor rule 10b-18 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Currently, the Company reacquired 12,255 shares, net of reissued shares to participants in the Company’s DRP, at a weighted-average cost of $28.70 per share. For a further discussion about this program, see “Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds” included in Part II, Item 5, “Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issue Purchases on Equity Securities,” above.

During the year-ended December 31, 2008, total shareholders’ equity decreased $6,231,000, or 11%, due principally from increased unrealized net losses in the securities AFS portfolio, the declaration of cash dividends and the repurchase of the Company’s capital stock (treasury stock). Conversely, shareholders’ equity was enhanced by current year earnings, stock issued from the Company’s Employee Stock Purchase and Dividend Reinvestment Plans, and an increase in the intrinsic value of the Company’s cash flow hedge instrument. The Company’s primary source of capital during the previous five years has been from the retention of equity in undistributed earnings of the Bank, as reflected below:

|  | Net Income | Cash dividends declared | Earnings Retained |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| 2008 | $3,635,948 | $2,068,680 | $1,567,268 |
| 2007 | 4,611,572 | 1,921,533 | 2,690,039 |
| 2006 | 4,125,283 | 1,801,361 | 2,323,922 |
| 2005 | 4,591,697 | 1,624,263 | 2,967,434 |
| 2004 | 3,364,474 | 1,610,423 | 1,754,051 |

At December 31, 2008, the Company reported a net unrealized loss of $8,831,000 from the securities AFS portfolio compared to a net unrealized loss of $982,000 as of December 31, 2007, or nearly nine times greater at the end of 2008. The large decrease in 2008 was caused by a faltering economy which has created uncertainty and in certain circumstances illiquidity in the financial and capital markets and has had a momentous impact on the volatility in fair value estimates and determination for securities in banks investment portfolios. Management believes these changes are due mainly to liquidity problems in the financial markets and to a lesser extent the deterioration in the creditworthiness of the issuers. Additional information with respect to the investment portfolio and a discussion on the related decline in fair value, is contained in Note 3, “Investment Securities,” within the notes to the consolidated financial statements, and incorporated by reference in Part II, Item 8.

### Liquidity

Liquidity management ensures that adequate funds will be available to meet customers’ needs for borrowings, deposit withdrawals and maturities and normal operating expenses of the Company. Current sources of liquidity are cash and cash equivalents, asset maturities and pay-downs within one year, loans and investments AFS, growth of core deposits, growth of repurchase agreements, increases of other borrowed funds from correspondent banks and issuance of capital stock. Although regularly scheduled investment and loan payments are a dependable source of daily funds, the sales of both loans and investments AFS, deposit activity and investment and loan prepayments are significantly influenced by general economic conditions and the level of interest rates. During a declining interest rate environment, prepayments from interest-sensitive assets tend to accelerate and provide significant liquidity which can be used to invest in other interest-earning assets but at lower market rates. Conversely, in a period of rising interest rates, prepayment from interest-sensitive assets tend to decelerate causing cash flow from mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities portfolio to decrease. Deposit inflow may accelerate and be invested at higher market interest rates. The Company closely monitors activity in the capital markets and takes appropriate action to ensure that the liquidity levels are adequate for funding, investing and operating activities.

During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company generated approximately $2.4 million of cash. During this period, the Company’s operations provided approximately $35.8 million primarily from the sales of mortgages AFS net of originations. Included in these sales were approximately $28.1 million of residential mortgage loans that were transferred to the loan AFS portfolio. This was partially offset by cash used for investing and financing of $33.4 million net, for loan growth, purchases of investment securities, facility expansion, the repayment of debt and shareholder dividends. In addition to operations, the Company’s primary sources of funds used for investing and financing was from the proceeds from the sales, calls and maturities of investment securities and from deposit generation.

As of December 31, 2008, the Company maintained $12,771,000 in cash and cash equivalents and $83,362,000 of investments and loans AFS. In addition, as of December 31, 2008, the Company had approximately $117,348,000 available to borrow from the FHLB, $19,700,000 available from other correspondent banks and $2,250,000 from the Discount Window from the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia. This combined total of $235,431,000 represented 41% of total assets at December 31, 2008. Management believes this level of liquidity to be strong and adequate to support current operations. For a discussion on the Company’s significant determinable contractual obligations and significant commitments, see “Off-balance sheet arrangements and contractual obligations,” above. During the third quarter of 2008, the Company terminated its relationship with a correspondent bank, due to inactivity, that previously provided access to $10,000,000 of liquidity in the form of short-term overnight borrowings. The Company is currently analyzing replacement correspondent banks to provide access to similar funding levels, if needed. The termination of the relationship does not have a significant effect on the Company’s liquidity position.

In October 2008, the FDIC announced the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program (TLGP) to strengthen confidence and encourage liquidity in the banking system. Among other things, this new program will provide full deposit insurance coverage for non-interest bearing deposit transaction accounts in FDIC-insured institutions regardless of the dollar amount. To protect its depositors, the Company is participating in the TLGP. Under the TLGP, all depositors who hold funds in non-interest bearing accounts, or interest-bearing accounts with an interest rate of 0.50% or less, including the Lawyers Trust Accounts, will have a temporary unlimited guarantee from the FDIC until December 31, 2009. The coverage of the TLGP is in addition to and separate from coverage available under the FDIC’s general deposit insurance rules, which insures accounts up to $250,000 until the end of 2009 unless extended.

### Management of interest rate risk and market risk analysis

The Company is subject to the interest rate risks inherent in its lending, investing and financing activities. Fluctuations of interest rates will impact interest income and interest expense along with affecting market values of all interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, except for those assets or liabilities with a short term remaining to maturity. Interest rate risk management is an integral part of the asset/liability management process. The Company has instituted certain procedures and policy guidelines to manage the interest rate risk position. Those internal policies enable the Company to react to changes in market rates to protect net interest income from significant fluctuations. The primary objective in managing interest rate risk is to minimize the adverse impact of changes in interest rates on net interest income along with creating an asset/liability structure that maximizes earnings.

*Asset/Liability Management.* One major objective of the Company when managing the rate sensitivity of its assets and liabilities is to stabilize net interest income. The management of and authority to assume interest rate risk is the responsibility of the Company’s Asset/Liability Committee (ALCO), which is comprised of senior management and members of the board of directors. ALCO meets quarterly to monitor the relationship of interest sensitive assets to interest sensitive liabilities. The process to review interest rate risk is a regular part of managing the Company. Consistent policies and practices of measuring and reporting interest rate risk exposure, particularly regarding the treatment of non-contractual assets and liabilities, are in effect. In addition, there is an annual process to review the interest rate risk policy with the board of directors which includes limits on the impact to earnings from shifts in interest rates.

*Interest Rate Risk Measurement.* Interest rate risk is monitored through the use of three complementary measures: static gap analysis, earnings at risk simulation and economic value at risk simulation. While each of the interest rate risk measurements has limitations, taken together they represent a reasonably comprehensive view of the magnitude of interest rate risk in the Company and the distribution of risk along the yield curve, the level of risk through time and the amount of exposure to changes in certain interest rate relationships.

*Static Gap.* The ratio between assets and liabilities re-pricing in specific time intervals is referred to as an interest rate sensitivity gap. Interest rate sensitivity gaps can be managed to take advantage of the slope of the yield curve as well as forecasted changes in the level of interest rate changes.

To manage this interest rate sensitivity gap position, an asset/liability model commonly known as cumulative gap analysis is used to monitor the difference in the volume of the Company’s interest sensitive assets and liabilities that mature or re-price within given time intervals. A positive gap (asset sensitive) indicates that more assets will re-price during a given period compared to liabilities, while a negative gap (liability sensitive) has the opposite effect. The Company employs computerized net interest income simulation modeling to assist in quantifying interest rate risk exposure. This process measures and quantifies the impact on net interest income through varying interest rate changes and balance sheet compositions. The use of this model assists the ALCO to gauge the effects of the interest rate changes on interest-sensitive assets and liabilities in order to determine what impact these rate changes will have upon the net interest spread. At December 31, 2008 the Company maintained a one-year cumulative gap of positive $6.8 million, or 1.2%, of total assets. The effect of this gap position provided a mismatch of assets and liabilities which may expose the Company to interest rate risk during periods of falling interest rates. Conversely, in an increasing interest rate environment, net interest income could be positively impacted because more assets than liabilities will re-price upward during the one-year period.

Certain shortcomings are inherent in the method of analysis discussed above and presented in the next table. Although certain assets and liabilities may have similar maturities or periods of re-pricing, they may react in different degrees to changes in market interest rates. The interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities may fluctuate in advance of changes in market interest rates, while interest rates on other types of assets and liabilities may lag behind changes in market interest rates. Certain assets, such as adjustable-rate mortgages, have features which restrict changes in interest rates on a short-term basis and over the life of the asset. In the event of a change in interest rates, prepayment and early withdrawal levels may deviate significantly from those assumed in calculating the table. The ability of many borrowers to service their adjustable-rate debt may decrease in the event of an interest rate increase.

The following table reflects the re-pricing of the balance sheet or “gap” position at December 31, 2008 (dollars in thousands):

|  | Three months or less | Three to twelve months | One to three years | Over three years | Total |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $176 | $— | $— | $12,595 | $12,771 |
| Investment securities (1)(2) | 41,429 | 30,169 | 6,517 | 10,854 | 88,969 |
| Loans (2) | 120,778 | 55,961 | 113,196 | 146,356 | 436,291 |
| Fixed and other assets | — | 8,808 | — | 28,880 | 37,688 |
| Total assets | $162,383 | $94,938 | $119,713 | $198,685 | $575,719 |
| Total cumulative assets | $162,383 | $257,321 | $377,034 | $575,719 |  |
| Non-interest-bearing transaction deposits (3) | $— | $7,146 | $19,646 | $44,651 | $71,443 |
| Interest-bearing transaction deposits (3) | 56,325 | — | 50,504 | 81,363 | 188,192 |
| Certificates of Deposit | 33,464 | 105,430 | 29,597 | 5,186 | 173,677 |
| Repurchase agreements | 11,412 | — | — | — | 11,412 |
| Short-term borrowings | 26,718 | — | — | — | 26,718 |
| Long-term debt | — | 10,000 | 21,000 | 21,000 | 52,000 |
| Other liabilities | — | — | — | 3,316 | 3,316 |
| Total liabilities | $127,919 | $122,576 | $120,747 | $155,516 | $526,758 |
| Total cumulative liabilities | $127,919 | $250,495 | $371,242 | $526,758 |  |
| Interest sensitivity gap | $34,464 | $(27,638) | $(1,034) | $43,169 |  |
| Cumulative gap | $34,464 | $6,826 | $5,792 | $48,961 |  |
| Cumulative gap to total assets | 6.0% | 1.2% | 1.0% | 8.5% |  |

(1) Includes FHLB stock and the net unrealized gains/losses on available-for-sale securities.

(2) Investments and loans are included in the earlier of the period in which interest rates were next scheduled to adjust or the period in which they are due. In addition, loans were included in the periods in which they are scheduled to be repaid based on scheduled amortization. For amortizing loans and mortgage-backed securities, annual prepayment rates are assumed reflecting historical experience as well as management’s knowledge and experience of its loan products.

(3) The Company’s demand and savings accounts were generally subject to immediate withdrawal. However, management considers a certain amount of such accounts to be core accounts having significantly longer effective maturities based on the retention

42 experiences of such deposits in changing interest rate environments. The effective maturities presented are the recommended maturity distribution limits for non-maturing deposits based on historical deposit studies.

*Earnings at Risk and Economic Value at Risk Simulations.* The Company recognizes that more sophisticated tools exist for measuring the interest rate risk in the balance sheet that extend beyond static re-pricing gap analysis. Although it will continue to measure its re-pricing gap position, the Company utilizes additional modeling for identifying and measuring the interest rate risk in the overall balance sheet. The ALCO is responsible for focusing on “earnings at risk” and “economic value at risk”, and how both relate to the risk-based capital position when analyzing the interest rate risk.

*Earnings at Risk.* Earnings at risk simulation measures the change in net interest income and net income should interest rates rise and fall. The simulation recognizes that not all assets and liabilities re-price one-for-one with market rates (e.g., savings rate). The ALCO looks at “earnings at risk” to determine income changes from a base case scenario under an increase and decrease of 200 basis points in interest rate simulation models.

*Economic Value at Risk.* Earnings at risk simulation measures the short-term risk in the balance sheet. Economic value (or portfolio equity) at risk measures the long-term risk by finding the net present value of the future cash flows from the Company’s existing assets and liabilities. The ALCO examines this ratio quarterly utilizing an increase and decrease of 200 basis points in interest rate simulation models. The ALCO recognizes that, in some instances, this ratio may contradict the “earnings at risk” ratio.

The following table illustrates the simulated impact of an immediate 200 basis points upward or downward movement in interest rates on net interest income, net income and the change in the economic value (portfolio equity). This analysis assumed that interest-earning asset and interest-bearing liability levels at December 31, 2008 remained constant. The impact of the rate movements was developed by simulating the effect of the rate change over a twelve-month period from the December 31, 2008 levels:

| Earnings at risk: Percent change in: | Rates +200 | Rates -200 |
| --- | ---: | ---: |
| Net interest income | 1.3% | 5.1% |
| Net income | 6.1 | 19.7 |
| Economic value at risk: |  |  |
| Percent change in: |  |  |
| Economic value of equity | (7.8) | (8.3) |
| Economic value of equity as a percent of total assets | (0.6) | (0.7) |

Economic value has the most meaning when viewed within the context of risk-based capital. Therefore, the economic value may normally change beyond the Company’s policy guideline for a short period of time as long as the risk-based capital ratio (after adjusting for the excess equity exposure) is greater than 10%. At December 31, 2008, the Company’s risk-based capital ratio was 13.6%.

The table below summarizes estimated changes in net interest income over a twelve-month period beginning January 1, 2009, under alternate interest rate scenarios using the income simulation model described above (dollars in thousands):

| Change in interest rates | Net interest income | $ variance | % variance |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| +200 basis points | $19,729 | $259 | 1.3% |
| +100 basis points | 19,791 | 321 | 1.6 |
| Flat rate | 19,470 | — | — |
| -100 basis points | 20,067 | 597 | 3.1 |
| -200 basis points | 20,454 | 984 | 5.1 |

Simulation models require assumptions about certain categories of assets and liabilities. The models schedule existing assets and liabilities by their contractual maturity, estimated likely call date or earliest re-pricing opportunity. Mortgage-backed securities and amortizing loans are scheduled based on their anticipated cash flow including estimated prepayments. For investment securities, the Company uses a third-party service to provide cash flow estimates in the various rate environments. Savings, money market and interest-bearing checking accounts do not have a stated maturity or re-pricing term and can be withdrawn or re-price at any time. This may impact the margin if more expensive alternative sources of deposits are required to fund loans or deposit runoff. Management projects the re-pricing characteristics of these accounts based on historical performance and assumptions that it believes reflect their rate sensitivity. The model reinvests all maturities, repayments and prepayments for each type of asset or liability into the same product for a new like term at current product interest rates provided by management. As a result, the mix of interest-earning assets and interest bearing-liabilities is held constant.

*Derivative Financial Instruments.* As part of the Company’s overall interest rate risk strategy, the Company has adopted a policy whereby the Company may periodically use derivative instruments to minimize significant fluctuations in earnings caused by interest rate volatility. This interest rate risk management strategy entails the use of interest rate floors, caps and swaps. In October 2006, the Company entered into an interest rate floor derivative agreement on $20,000,000 notional value of its prime-based loan portfolio. The purpose of the hedge is to help protect the Company’s interest income in the event interest rates decline below a pre-determined contractual interest rate. The strategy is reflected in the scenarios for earnings and economic value at risk and the net interest income in the two immediately preceding tables. For a further discussion on the Company’s derivative contract, see Note 1, “Nature of operations and summary of significant accounting policies,” and Note 12, “Fair value of financial instruments and derivatives,” contained within the notes to consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8.

### Supervision and Regulation

The following is a brief summary of the regulatory environment in which the Company and the Bank operate and is not designed to be a complete discussion of all statutes and regulations affecting such operations, including those statutes and regulations specifically mentioned herein. Changes in the laws and regulations applicable to the Company and the Bank can affect the operating environment in substantial and unpredictable ways. We cannot accurately predict whether legislation will ultimately be enacted, and if enacted, the ultimate effect that legislation or implementing regulations would have on our financial condition or results of operations. While banking regulations are material to the operations of the Company and the Bank, it should be noted that supervision, regulation and examination of the Company and the Bank are intended primarily for the protection of depositors, not shareholders.

### Recent Legislation

***Financial Services Regulatory Relief Act of 2006.*** This federal act amends several federal banking laws to reduce redundant and costly regulatory burden. Among its many provisions, the act allows the payment of interest on certain reserve balances of depository institutions that are held at the Federal Reserve beginning in year 2011, requires banking regulatory agencies to streamline reports of condition and clarifies the authority of home and host state regulators with respect to supervision of interstate branches. The act was signed into law in October 2006.

***Federal Deposit Insurance Reform Act of 2005 and the Federal Deposit Insurance Reform Conforming Amendments Act of 2005.*** These federal acts were signed into law in February 2006 to amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act. These laws enact FDIC and banking industry deposit insurance reform proposals by amendments including: increasing the coverage for retirement accounts to $250,000 and indexing the coverage limit for retirement accounts to inflation as with the general deposit insurance coverage limit; merging the Bank Insurance Fund (BIF) and the Savings Association Insurance Fund (SAIF) into a new fund, the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF); establishing a percentage range within which the FDIC Board of Directors may set the FDIC’s Designated Reserve Ratio (DRR); allowing the FDIC to manage the pace at which the DRR varies within this range; eliminating the restrictions on premium rates based on the DRR and granting the FDIC Board the discretion to price deposit insurance according to risk for all insured institutions at all times.

***Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*** In July, 2002, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 was enacted. The stated goals of the Act are to increase corporate responsibility, to provide for enhanced penalties for accounting and auditing improprieties at publicly traded companies, and to protect investors by improving the accuracy and reliability of corporate disclosures pursuant to the securities laws.

The Act is the most far-reaching U.S. securities legislation enacted in decades. The Act generally applies to all companies, both U.S. and non-U.S., that file or are required to file periodic reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

The Act includes very specific additional disclosure requirements and corporate governance rules, requires the SEC and securities exchanges to adopt extensive additional disclosure, corporate governance and other related rules and mandates further studies of certain issues by the SEC. The Act adds new obligations and restrictions on directors and senior executives of public companies, such as requiring certification of financial statements, and new audit committee procedures. The Act represents significant federal involvement in matters traditionally left to state regulatory systems such as the regulation of the accounting profession, and to state corporate law such as the relationship between a board of directors and management and between a board of directors and its committees.

***USA PATRIOT Act of 2001.*** The Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (USA PATRIOT Act) was signed into law in October 2001. The USA PATRIOT Act broadened the application of anti-money laundering regulations to apply to additional types of financial institutions, such as broker-dealers, and strengthened the ability of the U.S. government to detect and prosecute international money laundering and the financing of terrorism. The principal provisions of Title III of the USA PATRIOT Act require that regulated financial institutions, including banks: (1) establish an anti-money laundering program that includes training and audit components; (2) comply with regulations regarding the verification of the identity of any person seeking to open an account; (3) take additional required precautions with regard to non-U.S. owned accounts; and (4) perform certain verification and certification of money laundering risk for their foreign correspondent banking relationships. The USA PATRIOT Act also expanded the conditions under which funds in a U.S. inter-bank account may be subject to forfeiture and increased the penalties for violation of anti-money laundering regulations. Failure of a financial institution to comply with the USA PATRIOT Acts requirements could have serious legal and reputational consequences for the institution. The Bank has adopted policies, procedures and controls to address compliance with the requirements of the USA PATRIOT Act under the existing regulations and will continue to revise and update its policies, procedures and controls to reflect changes required by the USA PATRIOT Act and implementing regulations.

As part of the USA PATRIOT Act, Congress adopted the International Money Laundering Abatement and Financial Anti-Terrorism Act of 2001 (IML Act). The IML Act amended the Bank Secrecy Act and adopted certain additional measures that increase the obligation of financial institutions, including the Bank, to identify their customers, watch for and report upon suspicious transactions, respond to requests for information by federal banking regulatory authorities and law enforcement agencies, and share information with other financial institutions. The Secretary of the Treasury has adopted several regulations to implement these provisions. The Bank is also barred from dealing with foreign “shell” banks. In addition, the IML Act expands the circumstances under which funds in a bank account may be forfeited. The IML Act also amended the Bank Holding Company Act and the Bank Merger Act to require the federal banking regulatory authorities to consider the effectiveness of a financial institution’s anti-money laundering activities when reviewing an application to expand operations. The Bank has in place a Bank Secrecy Act compliance program.

***Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999.*** This law authorized cross-industry affiliations between banks, securities firms, insurance companies and other financial service providers. This was landmark legislation that repealed the Glass-Steagall Act which since the 1930’s had prohibited such affiliations. Among other provisions, the Act provided new authority for banks and created a revised framework for regulating affiliated financial services institutions.

***Regulation W.*** Transactions between a bank and its “affiliates” are quantitatively and qualitatively restricted under the Federal Reserve Act. The Federal Deposit Insurance Act applies Sections 23A and 23B to insured nonmember banks in the same manner and to the same extent as if they were members of the Federal Reserve System. In 2002, the Federal Reserve Board issued Regulation W, which became effective in 2003. Regulation W codifies prior regulations under Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act and interpretative guidance with respect to affiliate transactions.

Regulation W incorporates the exemption from the affiliate transaction rules but expands the exemption to cover the purchase of any type of loan or extension of credit from an affiliate. Affiliates of a bank include, among other entities, the Bank’s holding company and companies that are under common control with the Bank. The Company is considered to be an affiliate of the Bank.

### Federal and State Legislation

From time-to-time, various types of federal and state legislation have been proposed that could result in additional regulations and restrictions on the business of the Company and the Bank. We cannot predict whether legislation will be adopted, or if adopted, how the new laws would affect our business. As a consequence, we are susceptible to legislation that may increase the cost of doing business. Management believes that the effect of any current legislative proposals on the liquidity, capital resources and the results of operations of the Company and the Bank will be minimal.

It is possible that there will be regulatory proposals which, if implemented, could have a material effect upon our liquidity, capital resources and results of operations. In addition, the general cost of compliance with numerous federal and state laws does have, and in the future may have, a negative impact on our results of operations. As with other banks, the status of the financial services industry can affect the Bank. Consolidations of institutions are expected to continue as the financial services industry seeks greater efficiencies and market share. Bank management believes that such consolidations may enhance the Bank’s competitive position as a community bank.

### Recent Developments

The global and U.S. economies are experiencing significantly reduced business activity as a result of, among other factors, disruptions in the financial system during the past year. Dramatic declines in the housing market during the past year, with falling home prices and increasing foreclosures and unemployment, have resulted in significant write-downs of asset values by financial institutions, including government-sponsored entities and major commercial and investment banks. These write-downs, initially of mortgage-backed securities but spreading to credit default swaps and other derivative securities have caused many financial institutions to seek additional capital, to merge with larger and stronger institutions and, in some cases, to fail.

Reflecting concern about the stability of the financial markets generally and the strength of counterparties, many lenders and institutional investors have reduced, and in some cases, ceased to provide funding to borrowers, including other financial institutions. The availability of credit, confidence in the financial sector, and level of volatility in the financial markets have been significantly adversely affected as a result. In recent weeks, volatility and disruption in the capital and credit markets has reached unprecedented levels. In some cases, the markets have produced downward pressure on stock prices and credit capacity for certain issuers without regard to those issuers’ underlying financial strength.

In response to the financial crises affecting the banking system and financial markets and going concern threats to investment banks and other financial institutions, on October 3, 2008, the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (the “EESA”) was signed into law. Pursuant to the EESA, the U.S. Treasury will have the authority to, among other things, purchase up to $700 billion of mortgages, mortgage-backed securities and certain other financial instruments from financial institutions for the purpose of stabilizing and providing liquidity to the U.S. financial markets. The EESA included a provision for a temporary increase in FDIC insurance from $100,000 to $250,000 per depositor through December 31, 2009.

On October 14, 2008, Secretary Paulson, after consulting with the Federal Reserve and the FDIC, announced that the Department of the Treasury will purchase equity stakes in a wide variety of banks and thrifts. Under this program, known as the Troubled Asset Relief Program (“TARP”) Capital Purchase Program, from the $700 billion authorized by the EESA, the Treasury will make $250 billion of capital available to U.S. financial institutions in the form of preferred stock. In conjunction with the purchase of preferred stock, the Treasury will receive warrants to purchase common stock with an aggregate market price equal to 15% of the preferred investment. Participating financial institutions will be required to adopt the Treasury’s standards for executive compensation and corporate governance for the period during which the Treasury holds equity issued under TARP Capital Purchase Program.

Also on October 14, 2008, after receiving a recommendation from the boards of the FDIC and the Federal Reserve, and consulting with the President, Secretary Paulson signed the systemic risk exception to the FDIC Act, enabling the FDIC to temporarily provide a 100% guarantee of the senior debt of all FDIC-insured institutions and their holding companies, as well as deposits in non-interest bearing transaction deposit accounts under a Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program. Coverage under the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program is available until November 12, 2008 without charge and thereafter at a cost of 75 basis points per annum for senior unsecured debt and 10 basis points per annum for non-interest bearing transaction deposits.

It is not clear at this time what impact the EESA, TARP Capital Purchase Program, the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program, other liquidity and funding initiatives of the Federal Reserve and other agencies that have been previously announced, and any additional programs that may be initiated in the future will have on the financial markets and the other difficulties described above, including the extreme levels of volatility and limited credit availability currently being experienced, or on the U.S. banking and financial industries and the broader U.S. and global economies. Further adverse effects could have an adverse effect on the Corporation and its business.

### Future Outlook

Based upon the current uncertain economic outlook and inability to predict when and by how much interest rates will change and whether rates will continue to fall or rise, the Company recognizes that there are challenges ahead. The Company is prepared to meet the challenges and effects of a volatile interest rate environment. Management believes that a significant impact on earnings depends on its ability to react to changes in interest rates.

The Company will continue to monitor interest rate sensitivity of its interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities to minimize any adverse effects on future earnings. The Company’s commitment to remain a community based organization is very strong. Our intention is to recognize a steady disciplined growth in the loan portfolios while increasing our base of core deposits. Review and implementation of policies and procedures along with adding innovative products and services will continue. These steps are designed to provide the Company with stability and the means to provide customer service and increase shareholder value.

## Market risk

As filed, 278 characters.

The information required by 7A is set forth at Item 7, under “Liquidity” and “Management of interest rate risk and market risk analysis,” contained within management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations and incorporated herein by reference.

## Controls and procedures

As filed, 3,261 characters.

As of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, an evaluation was carried out by the Company’s management, with the participation of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Based on such evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports the Company files or furnishes under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and regulations, and are operating in an effective manner. In addition, the SEC has extended the deadline for non-accelerated filers, such as the Company, for an auditor attestation on internal control over financial reporting to fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009. Furthermore, the Company made no changes in its internal controls over financial reporting or in other factors that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, these controls during the last fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2008.

### Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision of the

Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, and implemented in conjunction with management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

There are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any internal control, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of controls. Accordingly, even effective internal control can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation. Further, because of changes in conditions, the effectiveness of internal control may vary over time.

Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008. This assessment was based on criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting described in “Internal Control — Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on this assessment, management determined that, as of December 31, 2008, the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the SEC that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

Filed Mar 12, 2009.
Source: SEC EDGAR, the filing index for accession 0001104659-09-017064. Last ingested by Listed: Nov 6, 2026, 18:40 ET. No prices; not investment advice.