# Interparfums Inc: Form 10-Q for the period ended Mar 31, 2010

- Company: [Interparfums Inc](/companies/ipar.md) (CIK 822663)
- Form: 10-Q
- Filed: 2010-05-10
- Accepted by EDGAR: May 10, 2010, 16:16 ET
- Period: 2010-03-31
- Accession: 0001144204-10-025763
- Inline XBRL: no
- Main document: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/822663/000114420410025763/v183724_10q.htm
- All documents and exhibits: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/822663/000114420410025763/

## Management's discussion and analysis

As filed, 39,256 characters.

### Forward Looking Information

Statements in this report which are not historical in nature are forward-looking statements. Although we believe that our plans, intentions and expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance that such plans, intentions or expectations will be achieved. In some cases you can identify forward-looking statements by forward-looking words such as "anticipate," "believe," "could," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "may," "should," "will" and "would" or similar words. You should not rely on forward-looking statements because actual events or results may differ materially from those indicated by these forward-looking statements as a result of a number of important factors. These factors include, but are not limited to, the risks and uncertainties discussed under the headings “Forward Looking Statements” and "Risk Factors" in Inter Parfums' annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 and the reports Inter Parfums files from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Inter Parfums does not intend to and undertakes no duty to update the information contained in this report.

### Overview

We operate in the fragrance business, and manufacture, market and distribute a wide array of fragrances and fragrance related products. We manage our business in two segments, European based operations and United States based operations. Our prestige fragrance products are produced and marketed by our European operations through our 74% owned subsidiary in Paris, Inter Parfums, S.A., which is also a publicly traded company as 26% of Inter Parfums, S.A. shares trade on the Euronext. Prestige cosmetics and prestige skin care products represent less than 3% of consolidated net sales.

We produce and distribute our prestige products primarily under license agreements with brand owners, and prestige product sales represented approximately 91% of net sales for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009. We have built a portfolio of brands, which include Burberry, Lanvin, Van Cleef & Arpels, Jimmy Choo, Montblanc, Paul Smith, S.T. Dupont and Nickel whose products are distributed in over 120 countries around the world. Burberry is our most significant license, as sales of Burberry products represented 61% of net sales for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.

Our specialty retail and mass-market fragrance and fragrance related products are marketed through our United States operations and represented 9% of sales for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009. These products are sold under trademarks owned by us or pursuant to license or other agreements with the owners of the *Gap, Banana Republic, New York & Company, Brooks Brothers, bebe* and *Jordache* trademarks.

We grow our business in two distinct ways. First, we grow by adding new brands to our portfolio, either through new licenses, new specialty retail agreements or out-right acquisitions of brands. Second, we grow through the introduction of new products and supporting new and established products through advertising, merchandising and sampling as well as phasing out existing products that no longer meet the needs of our consumers. The economics of developing, producing, launching and supporting products influence our sales and operating performance each year. Our introduction of new products may have some cannibalizing effect on sales of existing products, which we take into account in our business planning.

Our business is not capital intensive, and it is important to note that we do not own manufacturing facilities. We act as a general contractor and source our needed components from our suppliers. These components are received at one of our distribution centers and then, based upon production needs, the components are sent to one of several third party fillers which manufacture the finished good for us and ship it back to our distribution center.

As with any business, many aspects of our operations are subject to influences outside our control. These factors include the effect of the current global economic recession and therefore the potential for further deterioration in consumer spending. The recent economic challenges and uncertainties in a number of countries where we do business, including the United States, have impacted our business. Although signs of a recovery have become apparent with improving sales trends beginning in the second half of 2009, the impact of this financial crisis was challenging for us in 2009 and may continue to be challenging for us in 2010.

Our reported net sales are impacted by changes in foreign currency exchange rates. If the U.S. dollar continues to strengthen, then there will be an adverse impact on our net sales in 2010. However, earnings are less affected by a strengthening dollar because in excess of 30% of net sales of our European operations are denominated in U.S. dollars, while all costs of our European operations are incurred in euro. Our Company addresses certain financial exposures through a controlled program of risk management that includes the use of derivative financial instruments. We primarily enter into foreign currency forward exchange contracts to reduce the effects of fluctuating foreign currency exchange rates.

### Recent Important Events

### Gap and Banana Republic

Although the initial term of our agreement with The Gap, Inc. covering the Gap and Banana Republic brands in the United States and Canada expired on August 31, 2009, we had entered into a series of short-term extension agreements to continue the relationship as it previously existed while we were in discussions with The Gap, Inc. for a formal extension of the agreement. In March 2010, we signed a new specialty retail agreement with The Gap, Inc. covering the Gap and Banana Republic brands in the United States and Canada, with terms and conditions similar to those of the original agreement. This new agreement expires December 31, 2011.

### Montblanc

In January 2010, we announced that we had entered into an exclusive worldwide license agreement with Montblanc International GMBH to create, produce and distribute perfumes and ancillary products under the Montblanc brand. Our rights under such license agreement, which takes effect on July 1, 2010 and runs through December 31, 2020, are subject to certain minimum sales, advertising expenditures and royalty payments as are customary in our industry. We also agreed to pay an upfront entry fee of €1 million for this license, and to purchase the inventory of the current licensee, which is anticipated to be approximately €4 million. Plans call for our first new Montblanc fragrance launch in 2011.

### Jimmy Choo

In October 2009, we entered into an exclusive worldwide license agreement with J Choo Limited, commencing on January 1, 2010, for the creation, development and distribution of fragrances under the Jimmy Choo brand. Our rights under such license agreement, which runs through 2022, are subject to certain minimum sales, advertising expenditures and royalty payments as are customary in our industry. Plans call for our first Jimmy Choo fragrance launch in early 2011.

### Discussion of Critical Accounting Policies

We make estimates and assumptions in the preparation of our financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates under different assumptions and conditions. We believe the following discussion addresses our most critical accounting policies, which are those that are most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations. These accounting policies generally require our management’s most difficult and subjective judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain.

The judgments used by management in applying critical accounting policies could be affected by a further and prolonged general deterioration in the economic environment, which could negatively influence future financial results and availability of continued financing. Specifically, subsequent evaluations of our accounts receivable, inventories, and deferred tax assets in light of the factors then prevailing, could result in significant changes in our allowance and reserve accounts in future periods, which in turn could generate significant additional charges. Similarly, the valuation of certain intangible assets could be negatively impacted by prolonged and severely depressed market conditions thus leading to the recognition of impairment losses. The following is a brief discussion of the more critical accounting policies that we employ.

### Revenue Recognition

We sell our products to department stores, perfumeries, specialty retailers, mass-market retailers, supermarkets and domestic and international wholesalers and distributors. Sales of such products by our domestic subsidiaries are denominated in U.S. dollars and sales of such products by our foreign subsidiaries are primarily denominated in either euro or U.S. dollars. Accounts receivable reflect the granting of credit to these customers. We generally grant credit based upon our analysis of the customer’s financial position as well as previously established buying patterns. We recognize revenues when merchandise is shipped and the risk of loss passes to the customer. Net sales are comprised of gross revenues less returns, trade discounts and allowances.

### Sales Returns

Generally, we do not permit customers to return their unsold products. However, on a case-by-case basis we occasionally allow customer returns. We regularly review and revise, as deemed necessary, our estimate of reserves for future sales returns based primarily upon historic trends and relevant current data. We record estimated reserves for sales returns as a reduction of sales, cost of sales and accounts receivable. Returned products are recorded as inventories and are valued based upon estimated realizable value. The physical condition and marketability of returned products are the major factors we consider in estimating realizable value. Actual returns, as well as estimated realizable values of returned products, may differ significantly, either favorably or unfavorably, from our estimates, if factors such as economic conditions, inventory levels or competitive conditions differ from our expectations.

### Promotional Allowances

We have various performance-based arrangements with certain retailers. These arrangements primarily allow customers to take deductions against amounts owed to us for product purchases. The costs that our Company incurs for performance-based arrangements, shelf replacement costs and slotting fees are netted against revenues on our Company’s consolidated statement of income. Estimated accruals for promotions and advertising programs are recorded in the period in which the related revenue is recognized. We review and revise the estimated accruals for the projected costs for these promotions. Actual costs incurred may differ significantly, either favorably or unfavorably, from estimates if factors such as the level and success of the retailers’ programs or other conditions differ from our expectations.

### Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market value. Cost is principally determined by the first-in, first-out method. We record adjustments to the cost of inventories based upon our sales forecast and the physical condition of the inventories. These adjustments are estimates, which could vary significantly, either favorably or unfavorably, from actual requirements if future economic conditions or competitive conditions differ from our expectations.

### Equipment and Other Long-Lived Assets

Equipment, which includes tools and molds, is recorded at cost and is depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of such assets. Changes in circumstances such as technological advances, changes to our business model or changes in our capital spending strategy can result in the actual useful lives differing from our estimates. In those cases where we determine that the useful life of equipment should be shortened, we would depreciate the net book value in excess of the salvage value, over its revised remaining useful life, thereby increasing depreciation expense. Factors such as changes in the planned use of equipment, or market acceptance of products, could result in shortened useful lives.

We evaluate goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment at least annually during the fourth quarter, or more frequently when events occur or circumstances change, such as an unexpected decline in sales, that would more likely than not (i) reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its fair value or (ii) indicate that the carrying value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset may not be recoverable. Impairment of goodwill is evaluated using a two step process. The first step involves a comparison of the estimated fair value of the reporting unit to the carrying value of that unit. If the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit, the second step of the process involves comparison of the implied fair value of goodwill (based on industry purchase and sale transaction data) with its carrying value. If the carrying value of the reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized as an amount equal to the excess. For indefinite-lived intangible assets, the evaluation requires a comparison of the estimated fair value of the asset to the carrying value of the asset. If the carrying value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset exceeds its fair value, impairment is recorded.

Goodwill relates to our Nickel skin care business, which is primarily a component of our European operations. Testing goodwill for impairment requires us to estimate the fair value of the reporting unit using significant estimates and assumptions. The assumptions we make will impact the outcome and ultimate results of the testing. In making our assumptions and estimates, we use industry accepted valuation models and set criteria that are reviewed and approved by management and, in certain instances, we engage third party valuation specialists to advise us. The first step of our goodwill impairment evaluation has given rise to potential impairment indicators and, as a result of continued sales declines, we have been testing for impairment of goodwill on a quarterly basis. We have determined that we may be inclined to sell the Nickel business within the next few years. Therefore, as of December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2010, we have measured fair value of the business to be equal to the average amount offered by several potential purchasers of the Nickel business. As a result, the carrying amount of the goodwill exceeded its implied fair value resulting in an impairment loss of $1.7 million in 2009. However, we expect Nickel brand sales to remain steady over the next few years as the result of new product launches in combination with an expected economic recovery. In estimating future sales, we use our internal budgets developed from recent sales data for existing products and planned timing of new product launches. If sales for the reporting unit decreased 10% we could incur an additional goodwill impairment charge of $0.5 million. No further impairment charges were required in the first quarter of 2010.

To determine fair value of indefinite-lived intangible assets, we use an income approach, including the relief-from-royalty method. This method assumes that, in lieu of ownership, a third party would be willing to pay a royalty in order to obtain the rights to use the comparable asset. The relief-from-royalty calculations require us to make a number of assumptions and estimates concerning future sales levels, market royalty rates, future tax rates and discount rates. We use this method to determine if an impairment charge is required relating to our Nickel brand trademarks. For the year ended December 31, 2009, an impairment charge relating to the Nickel trademark in the amount of $0.54 million was recorded. No further impairment charges were required in the first quarter of 2010. We assumed a market royalty rate of 6% and a discount rate of 7.8%. The following table presents the impact a change in the following significant assumptions would have had on our impairment charge recognized for the year ended December 31, 2009 assuming all other assumptions remained constant:

### INTER PARFUMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

*(In thousands)*

|  | Change | Increase (decrease) to impairment charge |
| --- | ---: | ---: |
| Weighted average cost of capital | +10% | $(246) |
| Weighted average cost of capital | -10% | $307 |
| Future sales levels | +10% | $244 |
| Future sales levels | -10% | $(244) |

The fair values used in our evaluations are also estimated based upon discounted future cash flow projections using a weighted average cost of capital ranging from 8% to 9.5%. The cash flow projections are based upon a number of assumptions, including, future sales levels and future cost of goods and operating expense levels, as well as economic conditions, changes to our business model or changes in consumer acceptance of our products which are more subjective in nature. We believe that the assumptions that we have made in projecting future cash flows for the evaluations described above are reasonable and currently no impairment indicators exist for our indefinite-lived assets other than the Nickel trademarks referred to above. However, if future actual results do not meet our expectations, we may be required to record an impairment charge, the amount of which could be material to our results of operations.

Intangible assets subject to amortization are evaluated for impairment testing whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an amortizable intangible asset may not be recoverable. If impairment indicators exist for an amortizable intangible asset, the undiscounted future cash flows associated with the expected service potential of the asset are compared to the carrying value of the asset. If our projection of undiscounted future cash flows is in excess of the carrying value of the intangible asset, no impairment charge is recorded. If our projection of undiscounted future cash flows is less than the carrying value of the intangible asset, an impairment charge would be recorded to reduce the intangible asset to its fair value. The cash flow projections are based upon a number of assumptions, including future sales levels and future cost of goods and operating expense levels, as well as economic conditions, changes to our business model or changes in consumer acceptance of our products which are more subjective in nature. We believe that the assumptions we have made in projecting future cash flows for the evaluations described above are reasonable and currently no impairment indicators exist for our intangible assets subject to amortization. In those cases where we determine that the useful life of long-lived assets should be shortened, we would depreciate the net book value in excess of the salvage value (after testing for impairment as described above), over the revised remaining useful life of such asset thereby increasing amortization expense.

In determining the useful life of our Lanvin brand names and trademarks, we applied the provisions of ASC topic 350-30-35-3. The only factor that prevented us from determining that the Lanvin brand names and trademarks were indefinite life intangible assets was Item c. “Any legal, regulatory, or contractual provisions that may limit the useful life”. The existence of a repurchase option in 2025 may limit the useful life of the Lanvin brand names and trademarks to the company. However, this limitation would only take effect if the repurchase option were to be exercised and the repurchase price was paid. If the repurchase option is not exercised, then the Lanvin brand names and trademarks are expected to continue to contribute directly to the future cash flows of our company and their useful life would be considered to be indefinite.

With respect to the application of ASC topic 350-30-35-8, the Lanvin brand names and trademarks would only have a finite life to our company if the repurchase option were exercised, and in applying ASC topic 350-30-35-8 we assumed that the repurchase option is exercised. When exercised, Lanvin has an obligation to pay the exercise price and the Company would be required to convey the Lanvin brand names and trademarks back to Lanvin. The exercise price to be received (Residual Value) is well in excess of the carrying value of the Lanvin brand names and trademarks, therefore no amortization is required.

### Derivatives

We account for derivative financial instruments in accordance with ASC topic 815, which establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and for hedging activities. This topic also requires the recognition of all derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities on the balance sheet and that they are measured at fair value.

We occasionally use derivative financial instruments to hedge certain anticipated transactions and interest rates, as well as receivables denominated in foreign currencies. We do not utilize derivatives for trading or speculative purposes. Hedge effectiveness is documented, assessed and monitored by employees who are qualified to make such assessments and monitor the instruments. Variables that are external to us such as social, political and economic risks may have an impact on our hedging program and the results thereof.

### Income Taxes

Deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax consequences of temporary differences by applying enacted statutory tax rates applicable to future years to the difference between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of existing assets and liabilities. Tax benefits recognized are reduced by a valuation allowance where it is more likely than not that the benefits may not be realized.

### Results of Operations

### Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 as Compared to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009

*(in millions)*

| Net Sales | Three months ended March 31, 2010 | % Change | 2009 | % Change | 2008 |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| European based product sales | $108.3 | 32% | $82.0 | (26)% | $110.6 |
| United States based product sales | 11.1 | 32% | 8.4 | (33)% | 12.6 |
| Total net sales | $119.4 | 32% | $90.4 | (27)% | $123.2 |

Page 20

After declining 27% in the 2009 period as compared to 2008, net sales for the three months ended March 31, 2010 increased 32% to $119.4 million, as compared to $90.4 million for the corresponding period of the prior year. At comparable foreign currency exchange rates, net sales in 2010 increased 29%. While our sales results for 2009 reflect the global economic recession and its impact on our distributors and retail customers, the signs of recovery which became apparent in the second half of 2009 continued into 2010.

European based prestige product sales increased 32% to $108.3 million, as compared to $82.0 million for the corresponding period of the prior year. First quarter sales growth was due in great part to the launch and global rollout of Burberry *Sport* fragrances for men and women, as well as the continued strong performance of established Burberry scents. Burberry brand sales increased 33% to $72.9 million in 2010, as compared to $54.8 million in 2009. All of our prestige fragrance brands contributed to sales growth with double digit comparable quarter increases. In local currency, Lanvin brand sales increased 20% and Van Cleef and Arpels brand sales rose 55%.

We are seeing business recover in many geographic markets, especially Asia, South America, the Middle East and Western Europe where comparable sales rose 53%, 41%, 47% and 15%, respectively. While Eastern Europe has been moving in the right direction, North American sales came in slightly below last year’s first quarter.

Our plans for 2010 are well under way. In addition to Burberry *Sport* fragrances for men and women which launched during the first quarter of 2010, we are committing capital to further grow our largest brand through the launch of a cosmetics line for women in about 30 to 40 shops around the world. The Burberry cosmetics collection will include nearly 100 products for skin, lips and eyes. The launch of this cosmetics line will require a significant investment in the first year to develop the product, build cosmetic counters, hire and train personnel, and is expected to affect 2010 net income attributable to Inter Parfums, Inc. by approximately $1.5 million or $0.05 per diluted share. We believe that this is an essential step which will take Burberry to the next level of growth.

In addition, we are creating a new women’s scent for Lanvin, S.T. Dupont and Paul Smith and men’s and women’s scents for Van Cleef & Arpels.

With respect to our United States specialty retail and mass-market products, net sales increased 32% for the first quarter of 2010 after declining 33% for the first quarter of 2009. In 2008, we expanded our relationship with Gap Inc. with the signing of a licensing agreement for international distribution. After getting off to a strong start, international distribution suffered in early 2009 as a result of the global economic recession. In 2010, international distribution of specialty retail products benefitted from the economic recovery. In addition, our *bebe* signature fragrance has done especially well in overseas markets and we expanded *bebe* distribution into additional third party retail outlets. Finally, after a protracted period of declining sales, our mass market business is seeing the beginnings of a turnaround with sales growth of 20% for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the corresponding period of the prior year.

Plans for 2010 include expanded distribution of *Close*, a new Gap fragrance launched in 2009 at approximately 550 Gap stores and roughly 175 Gap Body stores nationwide. International distribution began in September, including an excusive launch at 240 Sephora doors in Europe. Total international distribution is expected to reach approximately 5,000 doors by the end of 2011. Two additional Gap scents are in the works along with additional ancillary products and holiday gift sets for launch later in 2010. Recent additions, *Republic of Men* and *Republic of Women*, were launched at Banana Republic stores in North America in late 2009 with international distribution following in 2010.

A new Brooks Brothers fragrance called *Black Fleece,* launched in the fall of 2009 and international distribution is now underway. In 2010, bebe *Sheer*, a fresh women’s scent has just launched in international markets and its domestic debut, along with several color cosmetic products and holiday gift sets, are planned for later this year.

In addition, we are actively pursuing other new business opportunities. However, we cannot assure that any new licenses, acquisitions or specialty retail agreements will be consummated.

*(in millions)*

| Gross margin | Three months ended March 31, 2010 | 2009 |
| --- | ---: | ---: |
| Net sales | $119.4 | $90.4 |
| Cost of sales | 47.7 | 36.8 |
| Gross margin | $71.7 | $53.6 |
| Gross margin as a % of net sales | 60% | 59% |

Gross margin was 60% in 2010 and 59% in 2009. The gross margin improvement is primarily the result of product mix. We expected a small decline in gross margin due to the 30 basis point benefit achieved in the 2009 period from our cash flow hedging activities. We are carefully watching foreign currency exchange rates as a result of the effect that a strong U.S. dollar relative to the euro has on our European based product sales to United States customers. Sales to these customers are denominated in dollars while our costs are incurred in euro. Therefore, from a profit standpoint, a strong U.S. dollar benefits our gross margin.

Generally, we do not bill customers for shipping and handling costs and such costs, which aggregated $1.3 million and $1.2 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, are included in selling, general and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of income. As such, our Company’s gross profit may not be comparable to other companies which may include these expenses as a component of cost of goods sold.

### Selling, general & administrative expenses

*(in millions)*

|  | Three months ended March 31, 2010 | 2009 |
| --- | ---: | ---: |
| Selling, general & administrative expenses | $55.7 | $43.3 |
| Selling, general & administrative expenses as a % of net sales | 47% | 48% |

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 29% for the three months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to the corresponding period of the prior year. As a percentage of sales selling, general and administrative expenses were 47% and 48% for the three month period ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Promotion and advertising included in selling, general and administrative expenses aggregated approximately $18.9 million (15.8% of net sales) and $13.0 million (14.4% of net sales) for the three month period ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Our 2010 first quarter sales include a significant contribution from the global launch of Burberry *Sport* for men and women. All of our Burberry fragrance launches are supported with a significant advertising program.

Royalty expense included in selling, general, and administrative expenses aggregated $11.2 million (9.4% of net sales) and $8.5 million (9.4% of net sales), for the three month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Income from operations increased 56% to $16.0 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2010, as compared to $10.3 million for the corresponding period of the prior year. Operating margins were 13.4% of net sales in the current period as compared to 11.4% for the corresponding period of the prior year.

Interest expense aggregated $0.6 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2010, as compared to $1.3 million in 2009. We use the credit lines available to us, as needed, to finance our working capital needs as well as our financing needs for acquisitions. Loans payable – banks and long-term debt including current maturities aggregated $34.6 million as of December 31, 2009, as compared to $55.0 million as of December 31, 2008. In connection with certain debt facilities, we entered into swap transactions. These derivative instruments are recorded at fair value and changes in fair value are reflected in the consolidated statements of income. During the first quarter of 2009, we recorded a charge to interest expense of $0.2 million relating to the change in the fair value of interest rate swaps.

Foreign currency gains or (losses) aggregated ($2.4) million and $1.4 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. We enter into foreign currency forward exchange contracts to manage exposure related to certain foreign currency commitments. During the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2008, we entered into foreign currency forward exchange contracts to hedge approximately 80% of our 2009 sales expected to be invoiced in U.S. dollars. Hedge effectiveness excludes the portion of the fair value of the foreign currency forward exchange contract attributable to the change in spot-forward difference which is reported in current period earnings and resulted in most of the gains and losses referred to above.

Our effective income tax rate was 33% for both the three month period ended March 31, 2010 and 2009. Our effective tax rates differ from statutory rates due to the effect of state and local taxes and tax rates in foreign jurisdictions. Our effective tax rate is usually around 35%. The lower rates achieved during the first quarter of 2010 and 2009 are due to losses in our United States segment which carry a higher effective rate due to state and local taxes. No significant changes in tax rates were experienced nor were any expected in jurisdictions where we operate.

### INTER PARFUMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

*(in thousands except per share data)*

|  | Three months ended March 31, 2010 | 2009 |
| --- | ---: | ---: |
| **Net income** | $8,950 | $7,256 |
| Less: Net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest | 2,400 | 1,828 |
| **Net income attributable to Inter Parfums, Inc.** | $6,550 | $5,428 |
| **Earnings per share:** |  |  |
| **Net income attributable to Inter Parfums, Inc. common shareholders:** |  |  |
| Basic | $0.22 | $0.18 |
| Diluted | $0.22 | $0.18 |
| **Weighted average number of shares outstanding:** |  |  |
| Basic | 30,192 | 30,166 |
| Diluted | 30,291 | 30,166 |

Net income increased 23% to $9.0 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2009, as compared to $7.3 million for the corresponding period of the prior year. Net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest aggregated 27% of net income in 2010 and 25% in 2009. Share issued by our French subsidiary Inter Parfums, S.A. pursuant to options exercised in 2010 diluted our ownership from approximately 75% as of December 31, 2009 to 74% as of March 31, 2010. Net income attributable to Inter Parfums, Inc. increased 21% to $6.6 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2010, as compared to $5.4 million for the corresponding period of the prior year.

Basic and diluted earnings per share increased 22% to $0.22 for the three month period ended March 31, 2010, as compared to $0.18 for the corresponding period of the prior year.

Weighted average shares outstanding aggregated 30.2 million for both the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009. On a diluted basis, average shares outstanding were 30.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to 30.2 million for the corresponding period of the prior year.

### Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our financial position remains strong. At March 31, 2010, working capital aggregated $195 million and we had a working capital ratio of 2.6 to 1. Cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments aggregated $103 million.

Cash provided by operating activities aggregated $8.6 million and $1.9 million for the three month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, working capital items used only $1.0 million in cash from operating activities as increases in inventories and accounts receivable were offset by increases in accounts payable and accrued expenses. The increase in accounts receivable of $15.4 million or 14% reflects favorable collection activity as sales rose 32% during the period. The higher than expected sales growth during the first quarter of 2010 also kept inventories down.

Cash flows used in investing activities in 2010 reflect the purchase of $8.3 million in short-term investments which are certificates of deposit with maturities slightly greater than three months. We also spent approximately $1.3 million for capital items. Our business is not capital intensive as we do not own any manufacturing facilities. However, we typically spend between $2.5 million and $3.5 million per year on tools and molds, depending on our new product development calendar. The balance of capital expenditures is for office fixtures, computer equipment and industrial equipment needed at our distribution centers. Capital expenditures in 2010 are expected to be in the range of $5.0 million to $5.5 million, considering our 2010 launch schedule. Proceeds from sale of stock of subsidiary reflect the proceeds from shares issued by our French subsidiary Inter Parfums, S.A. pursuant to options exercised in 2010.

Our short-term financing requirements are expected to be met by available cash on hand at March 31, 2010, cash generated by operations and short-term credit lines provided by domestic and foreign banks. The principal credit facilities for 2010 consist of a $15.0 million unsecured revolving line of credit provided by a domestic commercial bank and approximately $45.0 million in credit lines provided by a consortium of international financial institutions. As of March 31, 2010, short-term borrowings aggregated $7.2 million.

Our long-term credit facilities provides for principal and interest to be repaid in 20 quarterly installments. As of March 31, 2010, total long-term debt including current maturities aggregated $24.9 million.

In January 2010, the board of directors authorized an approximate 100% increase in the annual dividend to $0.26 per share. The first quarterly dividend of $0.065 per share was paid on April 15, 2010 to shareholders of record on March 31, 2010. The cash dividend for 2010 represents a small part of our cash position and is not expected to have any significant impact on our financial position.

We believe that funds provided by or used in operations can be supplemented by our present cash position and available credit facilities, so that they will provide us with sufficient resources to meet all present and reasonably foreseeable future operating needs.

Inflation rates in the U.S. and foreign countries in which we operate did not have a significant impact on operating results for the three month period ended March 31, 2010.

### Contractual Obligations

The following table sets for a schedule of our contractual obligations over the periods indicated in the table, as well as our total contractual obligations ($ in thousands).

| Contractual Obligations | Payments due by period Total | Less than 1 year | Years 2-3 | Years 4-5 | More than 5 years |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Long-Term Debt (2) | $29,600 | $11,700 | $17,900 |  |  |
| Capital Lease Obligations |  |  |  |  |  |
| Operating Leases | $19,800 | $7,500 | $8,600 | $2,300 | $1,400 |
| Purchase obligations(1) | $1,210,700 | $134,700 | $313,300 | $327,400 | $435,300 |
| Other Long-Term Liabilities Reflected on the Registrant's Balance Sheet under GAAP |  |  |  |  |  |
| Total | $1,260,100 | $153,900 | $339,800 | $329,700 | $436,700 |

(1) Consists of purchase commitments for advertising and promotional items, minimum royalty guarantees, including fixed or minimum obligations, and estimates of such obligations subject to variable price provisions. Future advertising commitments were estimated based on planned future sales for the license terms that were in effect at December 31, 2009, without consideration for potential renewal periods and do not reflect the fact that our distributors share our advertising obligations.

(2) Interest due on the Company’s long-term debt is payable $0.70 million, $0.40 million and $0.07 million in 2010, 2011 and 2012, respectively.

## Market risk

As filed, 3,055 characters.

### General

We address certain financial exposures through a controlled program of risk management that primarily consists of the use of derivative financial instruments. We primarily enter into foreign currency forward exchange contracts in order to reduce the effects of fluctuating foreign currency exchange rates. We do not engage in the trading of foreign currency forward exchange contracts or interest rate swaps.

### Foreign Exchange Risk Management

We periodically enter into foreign currency forward exchange contracts to hedge exposure related to receivables denominated in a foreign currency and to manage risks related to future sales expected to be denominated in a foreign currency. We enter into these exchange contracts for periods consistent with our identified exposures. The purpose of the hedging activities is to minimize the effect of foreign exchange rate movements on the receivables and cash flows of Inter Parfums, S.A., our French subsidiary, whose functional currency is the Euro. All foreign currency contracts are denominated in currencies of major industrial countries and are with large financial institutions, which are rated as strong investment grade.

All derivative instruments are required to be reflected as either assets or liabilities in the balance sheet measured at fair value. Generally, increases or decreases in fair value of derivative instruments will be recognized as gains or losses in earnings in the period of change. If the derivative is designated and qualifies as a cash flow hedge, then the changes in fair value of the derivative instrument will be recorded in other comprehensive income.

Before entering into a derivative transaction for hedging purposes, we determine that the change in the value of the derivative will effectively offset the change in the fair value of the hedged item from a movement in foreign currency rates. Then, we measure the effectiveness of each hedge throughout the hedged period. Any hedge ineffectiveness is recognized in the income statement.

At March 31, 2010, we had foreign currency contracts in the form of forward exchange contracts in the amount of approximately U.S. $40 million and GB pounds 1.9 million which all have maturities of less than one year. We believe that our risk of loss as the result of nonperformance by any of such financial institutions is remote.

### Interest Rate Risk Management

We mitigate interest rate risk by monitoring interest rates, and then determining whether fixed interest rates should be swapped for floating rate debt, or if floating rate debt should be swapped for fixed rate debt. We entered into an interest rate swap in September 2007 on €22 million of debt, effectively exchanging the variable interest rate of 0.6% above the three month EURIBOR to a fixed rate of 4.42%. The remaining balance owed pursuant to this facility is as of March 31, 2010 was €11.0 million. This derivative instrument is recorded at fair value and changes in fair value are reflected in the accompanying consolidated statements of income.

## Controls and procedures

As filed, 1,207 characters.

### Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have reviewed and evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rule 13a-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the “Evaluation Date”). Based on their review and evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that as of the Evaluation Date our Company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

### Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that occurred during the quarterly period covered by this report on Form 10-Q that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

### Part II. Other Information

**Items 1, Legal Proceedings, 1A, Risk Factors, 3, Defaults Upon Senior Securities** and **5, Other Information**, are omitted as they are either not applicable or have been included in **Part I.**

Filed May 10, 2010.
Source: SEC EDGAR, the filing index for accession 0001144204-10-025763. Last ingested by Listed: Nov 4, 2026, 18:31 ET. No prices; not investment advice.