# Orchid Island Capital, Inc.: Form 10-Q for the period ended Jun 30, 2026

- Company: [Orchid Island Capital, Inc.](/companies/orc.md) (CIK 1518621)
- Form: 10-Q
- Filed: 2026-07-24
- Accepted by EDGAR: Jul 24, 2026, 18:40 ET
- Period: 2026-06-30
- Accession: 0001437749-26-024400
- Inline XBRL: yes
- Main document: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1518621/000143774926024400/orc20260630_10q.htm
- All documents and exhibits: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1518621/000143774926024400/

## Figures reported in this filing

Standardized XBRL line items for the period ended 2026-06-30.

| Line item | Period | Value | XBRL concept |
| --- | --- | ---: | --- |
| Net income | 3 months, 2026-04-01 to 2026-06-30 | $89.2m | us-gaap:NetIncomeLoss |
| Net income | 6 months, 2026-01-01 to 2026-06-30 | $69.2m | us-gaap:NetIncomeLoss |
| Basic EPS | 3 months, 2026-04-01 to 2026-06-30 | $0.44 | us-gaap:EarningsPerShareBasic |
| Basic EPS | 6 months, 2026-01-01 to 2026-06-30 | $0.35 | us-gaap:EarningsPerShareBasic |
| Operating cash flow | 6 months, 2026-01-01 to 2026-06-30 | $130.2m | us-gaap:NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities |
| Dividends paid | 6 months, 2026-01-01 to 2026-06-30 | $131.0m | us-gaap:PaymentsOfDividendsCommonStock |
| Share repurchases | 6 months, 2026-01-01 to 2026-06-30 | $8.0m | us-gaap:PaymentsForRepurchaseOfCommonStock |
| Cash and equivalents | at 2026-06-30 | $682.6m | us-gaap:CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue |
| Total assets | at 2026-06-30 | $13.10bn | us-gaap:Assets |
| Total liabilities | at 2026-06-30 | $11.66bn | us-gaap:Liabilities |
| Shareholders' equity | at 2026-06-30 | $1.44bn | us-gaap:StockholdersEquity |

## Management's discussion and analysis

As filed, 90,291 characters.

The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes to those statements included in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q. Certain written statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that are not historical facts constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. Statements in this report addressing expectations, assumptions, beliefs, projections, future plans and strategies, future events, developments that we expect or anticipate will occur in the future, and future operating results, capital management, and dividend policy are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are based upon management’s beliefs, assumptions, and expectations as of the date of this report regarding future events and operating performance, considering all information currently available to us, and are applicable only as of the date of this report. Forward-looking statements generally can be identified by the use of words such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “plan,” “may,” “will,” “intend,” “should,” “could,” or similar expressions. We caution readers not to place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements, which are not historical facts and may be based on projections, assumptions, expectations, and anticipated events that do not materialize. Except as required by law, we are not obligated to, and do not intend to, update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. Forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q may include, but are not limited to, statements about interest rates, inflation, liquidity, pledging of our structured RMBS, funding levels and spreads, prepayment speeds, portfolio composition, positioning and repositioning, hedging levels, leverage ratio, dividends, investment and return opportunities, the supply and demand for Agency RMBS and the performance of the Agency RMBS sector generally, the effect of actual or expected actions of the U.S. government, including the Fed, market expectations, capital raising, future opportunities and prospects of the Company, the stock repurchase program, geopolitical uncertainty and general economic conditions (including the effects of artificial intelligence, wars, tariffs, trade wars, inflation, the U.S. deficit, and the strength of the U.S. dollar). As a result of many factors, such as those set forth under “Risk Factors” in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K, our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in such forward-looking statements.

### Overview

We are a specialty finance company that invests in residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”) which are issued and guaranteed by a federally chartered corporation or agency (“Agency RMBS”). Our investment strategy focuses on, and our portfolio consists of, two categories of Agency RMBS: (i) traditional pass-through ("PT") Agency RMBS, such as mortgage PT certificates issued by the Federal National Mortgage Association ("Fannie Mae"), the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation ("Freddie Mac" and together with Fannie Mae, the "Enterprises") or the Government National Mortgage Association ("Ginnie Mae" and, together with the Enterprises the “GSEs”) and collateralized mortgage obligations (“CMOs”) issued by the GSEs (“PT RMBS”) and (ii) structured Agency RMBS, such as interest-only securities (“IOs”), inverse interest-only securities (“IIOs”) and principal only securities (“POs”), among other types of structured Agency RMBS. We were formed by Bimini Capital Management, Inc. ("Bimini") in August 2010, commenced operations on November 24, 2010 and completed our initial public offering (“IPO”) on February 20, 2013. We are externally managed by Bimini Advisors, LLC ("Bimini Advisors," or our "Manager"), an investment adviser registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).

Our business objective is to provide attractive risk-adjusted total returns over the long term through a combination of capital appreciation and the payment of regular monthly distributions. We intend to achieve this objective by investing in the two categories of Agency RMBS described above. We seek to generate income from the net interest margin on our leveraged PT RMBS and structured Agency RMBS portfolio. We intend to fund our PT RMBS and structured Agency RMBS through short-term borrowings structured as repurchase agreements.

We operate so as to qualify to be taxed as a real estate investment trust ("REIT") under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"). We generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax to the extent that we currently distribute all of our REIT taxable income (as defined in the Code) to our stockholders and maintain our REIT qualification.

The Company’s common stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “ORC”.

### Capital Raising Activities

On June 11, 2024, we entered into an equity distribution agreement (the “June 2024 Equity Distribution Agreement”) with three sales agents pursuant to which we could offer and sell, from time to time, up to an aggregate amount of $250,000,000 of gross proceeds from the sales of shares of our common stock in transactions that were deemed to be “at the market” offerings and privately negotiated transactions. We issued a total of 30,513,253 shares under the June 2024 Equity Distribution Agreement for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $250.0 million and net proceeds of approximately $245.8 million, after commissions and fees, prior to its termination in February 2025.

On February 24, 2025, we entered into an equity distribution agreement (the “February 2025 Equity Distribution Agreement”) with four sales agents pursuant to which we could offer and sell, from time to time, up to an aggregate amount of $350,000,000 of gross proceeds from the sales of shares of our common stock in transactions that were deemed to be “at the market” offerings and privately negotiated transactions. On July 28, 2025, the February 2025 Equity Distribution Agreement was amended to increase the aggregate amount of gross proceeds from the sales of shares that may be offered by $150,000,000 to a total of $500,000,000. We issued a total of 59,492,504 shares under the February 2025 Equity Distribution Agreement for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $445.1 million and net proceeds of approximately $438.0 million, after commissions and fees, prior to its termination in October 2025.

On October 27, 2025, we entered into an equity distribution agreement (the “October 2025 Equity Distribution Agreement”) with four sales agents pursuant to which we may offer and sell, from time to time, up to an aggregate amount of $500,000,000 of gross proceeds from the sales of shares of our common stock in transactions that are deemed to be “at the market” offerings and privately negotiated transactions. From inception through June 30, 2026, we issued a total of 48,824,644 shares under the October 2025 Equity Distribution Agreement for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $360.9 million, and net proceeds of approximately $355.2 million, after commissions and fees. For the six months ended June 30, 2026, we issued a total of 18,558,681 shares under the October 2025 Equity Distribution Agreement for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $137.7 million, and net proceeds of approximately $135.5 million, after commissions and fees.

### Stock Repurchase Agreement

On July 29, 2015, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 400,000 shares of our common stock. The timing, manner, price and amount of any repurchases is determined by the Company in its discretion and is subject to economic and market conditions, stock price, applicable legal requirements and other factors. The authorization does not obligate the Company to acquire any particular amount of common stock, and the program may be suspended or discontinued at the Company’s discretion without prior notice. On February 8, 2018, the Board of Directors approved an increase in the stock repurchase program for up to an additional 904,564 shares of the Company’s common stock. Coupled with the 156,751 shares remaining from the original 400,000 share authorization, the increased authorization brought the total authorization to 1,061,315 shares, representing 10% of the Company’s then outstanding share count.

On December 9, 2021, the Board of Directors approved an increase in the number of shares of the Company’s common stock available in the stock repurchase program for up to an additional 3,372,399 shares, bringing the remaining authorization under the stock repurchase program to 3,539,861 shares, representing approximately 10% of the Company’s then outstanding shares of common stock.

On October 12, 2022, the Board of Directors approved an increase in the number of shares of the Company’s common stock available in the stock repurchase program for up to an additional 4,300,000 shares, bringing the remaining authorization under the stock repurchase program to 6,183,601 shares, representing approximately 18% of the Company’s then outstanding shares of common stock. This stock repurchase program has no termination date.

On June 22, 2026, the Board of Directors approved an increase in the number of shares of the Company’s common stock available in the stock repurchase program for up to an additional 25,000,000 shares, bringing the remaining authorization under the stock repurchase program to 26,612,580 shares, representing approximately 13.3% of the Company’s currently outstanding shares of common stock.

From the inception of the stock repurchase program through June 30, 2026, the Company repurchased a total of 7,364,383 shares at an aggregate cost of approximately $92.1 million, including commissions and fees, for a weighted average price of $12.51 per share. During the six and three months ended June 30, 2026, the Company repurchased a total of 1,106,557 shares at an aggregate cost of approximately $7.3 million, including commissions and fees, for a weighted average price of $6.64 per share. During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company repurchased a total of 1,113,224 shares at an aggregate cost of approximately $7.3 million, including commissions and fees, for a weighted average price of $6.52 per share. The remaining authorization under the stock repurchase program as of July 23, 2026 was 26,612,580 shares.

### Factors that Affect our Results of Operations and Financial Condition

A variety of industry and economic factors may impact our results of operations and financial condition. These factors include:

- interest rate trends;
- changes in our cost of funds, including decreases in the Fed Funds rate that are controlled by the Federal Reserve (the "Fed") that occurred in 2025, or potential additional changes in the Fed Funds rate;
- the difference between Agency RMBS yields and our funding and hedging costs;
- competition for, and supply of, investments in Agency RMBS;
- actions taken by the U.S. government, including the presidential administration, the Fed, the Federal Housing Financing Agency (the “FHFA”), the FDIC, Federal Housing Administration (the “FHA”), the Federal Open Market Committee (the “FOMC”) and the U.S. Treasury;
- prepayment rates on mortgages underlying our Agency RMBS and credit trends insofar as they affect prepayment rates; and
- other market developments, including bank failures.

In addition, a variety of factors relating to our business may also impact our results of operations and financial condition. These factors include:

- our degree of leverage;
- our access to funding and borrowing capacity;
- our borrowing costs;
- our hedging activities;
- the market value of our investments; and
- the requirements to maintain our qualification as a REIT and the requirements to qualify for a registration exemption under the Investment Company Act.

### Results of Operations

Described below are the Company’s results of operations for the six and three months ended June 30, 2026, as compared to the Company’s results of operations for the six and three months ended June 30, 2025.

### Net Income (Loss) Summary

Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2026 was $69.2 million, or $0.35 per share. Net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2025 was $16.5 million, or $0.16 per share. Net income for the three months ended June 30, 2026 was $89.2 million, or $0.44 per share. Net loss for the three months ended June 30, 2025 was $33.6 million, or $0.29 per share. The components of net income (loss) for the six and three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, along with the changes in those components are presented in the table below:

*(in thousands)*

|  | Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 | 2025 | Change | Three Months Ended June 30, 2026 | 2025 | Change |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Interest income | $322,025 | $173,379 | $148,646 | $164,187 | $92,289 | $71,898 |
| Interest expense | (204,990) | (130,512) | (74,478) | (104,215) | (69,135) | (35,080) |
| Net interest income | 117,035 | 42,867 | 74,168 | 59,972 | 23,154 | 36,818 |
| (Losses) gains on RMBS and derivative contracts | (33,638) | (50,101) | 16,463 | 35,983 | (51,736) | 87,719 |
| Net portfolio income (loss) | 83,397 | (7,234) | 90,631 | 95,955 | (28,582) | 124,537 |
| Expenses | (14,160) | (9,222) | (4,938) | (6,763) | (4,996) | (1,767) |
| Net income (loss) | $69,237 | $(16,456) | $85,693 | $89,192 | $(33,578) | $122,770 |

26

### GAAP and Non-GAAP Reconciliations

In addition to the results presented in accordance with GAAP, our results of operations discussed below include certain non-GAAP financial information, including “Net Earnings Excluding Realized and Unrealized Gains and Losses”, “Economic Interest Expense,” “Economic Net Interest Income,” “Interest Income – Inclusive of Premium Amortization/Discount Accretion” and “Yield on Average RMBS – Inclusive of Premium Amortization/Discount Accretion.”

#### Net Earnings Excluding Realized and Unrealized Gains and Losses

We have elected to account for our Agency RMBS under the fair value option. Securities held under the fair value option are recorded at estimated fair value, with changes in the fair value recorded as unrealized gains or losses through the statements of comprehensive income (loss).

In addition, we have not designated our derivative financial instruments used for hedging purposes as hedges for accounting purposes, but rather hold them for economic hedging purposes. Changes in fair value of these instruments are presented in a separate line item in the Company’s statements of comprehensive income (loss) and are not included in interest expense. As such, for financial reporting purposes, interest expense and cost of funds are not impacted by the fluctuation in value of the derivative instruments.

Presenting net earnings excluding realized and unrealized gains and losses allows management to: (i) isolate the net interest income and other expenses of the Company over time, free of all fair value adjustments and (ii) assess the effectiveness of our funding and hedging strategies on our capital allocation decisions and our asset allocation performance. Our funding and hedging strategies, capital allocation and asset selection are integral to our risk management strategy, and therefore critical to the management of our portfolio. We believe that the presentation of our net earnings excluding realized and unrealized gains is useful to investors because it provides a means of comparing our results of operations to those of our peers who have not elected the same accounting treatment. Our presentation of net earnings excluding realized and unrealized gains and losses may not be comparable to similarly-titled measures of other companies, who may use different calculations. As a result, net earnings excluding realized and unrealized gains and losses should not be considered as a substitute for our GAAP net income (loss) as a measure of our financial performance or any measure of our liquidity under GAAP. The table below presents a reconciliation of our net income (loss) determined in accordance with GAAP and net earnings excluding realized and unrealized gains and losses.

Described below are the Company’s results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, and for each quarter in 2026 to date and 2025.

*Net Earnings Excluding Realized and Unrealized Gains and Losses*

*(in thousands, except per share data)*

| Three Months Ended | Net Income (Loss) (GAAP) | Realized and Unrealized Gains and Losses(1) | Net Income (Loss) Excluding Realized and Unrealized Gains and Losses | Per Share Net Income (Loss) (GAAP) | Realized and Unrealized Gains and Losses | Net Income (Loss) Excluding Realized and Unrealized Gains and Losses |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| June 30, 2026 | $89,193 | $35,983 | $53,210 | $0.44 | $0.18 | $0.26 |
| March 31, 2026 | (19,955) | (69,621) | 49,666 | (0.11) | (0.37) | 0.26 |
| December 31, 2025 | 103,408 | 70,742 | 32,666 | 0.62 | 0.43 | 0.19 |
| September 30, 2025 | 72,078 | 50,600 | 21,478 | 0.53 | 0.37 | 0.16 |
| June 30, 2025 | (33,578) | (51,736) | 18,158 | (0.29) | (0.45) | 0.16 |
| March 31, 2025 | 17,122 | 1,635 | 15,487 | 0.18 | 0.02 | 0.16 |
| **Six Months Ended** |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| June 30, 2026 | $69,238 | $(33,638) | $102,876 | $0.35 | $(0.17) | $0.52 |
| June 30, 2025 | (16,456) | (50,101) | 33,645 | (0.16) | (0.48) | 0.32 |

(1) Includes realized and unrealized gains (losses) on RMBS and derivative financial instruments, including net interest income or expense on interest rate swaps.

#### Economic Interest Expense and Economic Net Interest Income

We use derivative and other hedging instruments, specifically Fed Funds, SOFR, ERIS SOFR Swap, and T-Note futures contracts, short positions in U.S. Treasury securities, dual digital options, interest rate floors and caps, and interest rate swaps and swaptions, to hedge a portion of the interest rate risk on repurchase agreements in a rising rate environment.

We have not elected to designate our derivative holdings for hedge accounting treatment. Changes in fair value of these instruments are presented in a separate line item in our statements of comprehensive income (loss) and not included in interest expense. As such, for financial reporting purposes, interest expense and cost of funds are not impacted by the fluctuation in value of the derivative instruments.

For the purpose of computing economic net interest income and ratios relating to cost of funds measures, GAAP interest expense has been adjusted to reflect the realized and unrealized gains or losses on certain derivative instruments the Company uses, specifically Fed Funds, SOFR, ERIS SOFR Swap, and U.S. Treasury futures, dual digital options, interest rate floors and caps, and interest rate swaps and swaptions, that pertain to each period presented. We believe that adjusting our interest expense for the periods presented by the gains or losses on these derivative instruments would not accurately reflect our economic interest expense for these periods. The reason is that these derivative instruments may cover periods that extend into the future, not just the current period. Any realized or unrealized gains or losses on the instruments reflect the change in market value of the instrument caused by changes in underlying interest rates applicable to the term covered by the instrument, not just the current period. For each period presented, we have combined the effects of the derivative financial instruments in place for the respective period with the actual interest expense incurred on borrowings to reflect total economic interest expense for the applicable period. Interest expense, including the effect of derivative instruments for the period, is referred to as economic interest expense. Net interest income, when calculated to include the effect of derivative instruments for the period, is referred to as economic net interest income. This presentation includes gains or losses on all contracts in effect during the reporting period, covering the current period as well as periods in the future.

From time to time, we invest in TBAs, which are forward contracts for the purchase or sale of Agency RMBS at a predetermined price, face amount, issuer, coupon and stated maturity on an agreed-upon future date. The specific Agency RMBS to be delivered into the contract are not known until shortly before the settlement date. We may choose, prior to settlement, to move the settlement of these securities out to a later date by entering into a dollar roll transaction. The Agency RMBS purchased or sold for a forward settlement date are typically priced at a discount to equivalent securities settling in the current month. Consequently, forward purchases of Agency RMBS and dollar roll transactions represent a form of off-balance sheet financing. These TBAs are accounted for as derivatives and marked to market through the income statement. Gains or losses on TBAs are included with gains or losses on other derivative contracts and are not included in interest income for purposes of the discussions below.

We believe that economic interest expense and economic net interest income provide meaningful information to consider, in addition to the respective amounts prepared in accordance with GAAP. The non-GAAP measures help management to evaluate its financial position and performance without the effects of certain transactions and GAAP adjustments that are not necessarily indicative of our current investment portfolio or operations. The unrealized gains or losses on derivative instruments presented in our statements of comprehensive income (loss) are not necessarily representative of the total interest rate expense that we will ultimately realize. This is because as interest rates move up or down in the future, the gains or losses we ultimately realize, and which will affect our total interest rate expense in future periods, may differ from the unrealized gains or losses recognized as of the reporting date.

Our presentation of the economic value of our hedging strategy has important limitations. First, other market participants may calculate economic interest expense and economic net interest income differently than the way we calculate them. Second, while we believe that the calculation of the economic value of our hedging strategy described above helps to present our financial position and performance, it may be of limited usefulness as an analytical tool. Therefore, the economic value of our investment strategy should not be viewed in isolation and is not a substitute for interest expense and net interest income computed in accordance with GAAP.

The tables below present a reconciliation of the adjustments to interest expense shown for each period relative to our derivative instruments, and the income statement line item, gains (losses) on derivative instruments, calculated in accordance with GAAP for each quarter in 2026 to date and 2025.

*Gains (Losses) on Derivative Instruments*

*(in thousands)*

| Three Months Ended | Recognized in Income Statement (GAAP) | U.S. Treasury Short and TBA Securities Gain (Loss) Short Positions | Long Positions | Funding Hedges Attributed to Current Period (Non-GAAP) | Attributed to Future Periods (Non-GAAP) |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| June 30, 2026 | $62,400 | $(4,270) | $(347) | $12,953 | $54,064 |
| March 31, 2026 | 46,307 | (408) | 1,277 | 14,643 | 30,795 |
| December 31, 2025 | 14,048 | (3,478) | 158 | 19,578 | (2,210) |
| September 30, 2025 | (8,772) | (4,272) | 957 | 21,872 | (27,329) |
| June 30, 2025 | (53,286) | (7,662) | 472 | 20,937 | (67,033) |
| March 31, 2025 | (74,659) | 3,026 | 100 | 20,912 | (98,697) |
| **Six Months Ended** |  |  |  |  |  |
| June 30, 2026 | $108,707 | $(4,678) | $930 | $27,596 | $84,859 |
| June 30, 2025 | (127,945) | (4,636) | 572 | 41,849 | (165,730) |

*Economic Interest Expense and Economic Net Interest Income*

*(in thousands)*

| Three Months Ended | GAAP Interest Income | Interest Expense on Borrowings GAAP Interest Expense | Gains (Losses) on Derivative Instruments Attributed to Current Period(1) | Economic Interest Expense(2) | Net Interest Income GAAP Net Interest Income (Expense) | Economic Net Interest Income(3) |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| June 30, 2026 | $164,187 | $104,215 | $12,953 | $91,262 | $59,972 | $72,925 |
| March 31, 2026 | 157,838 | 100,775 | 14,643 | 86,132 | 57,063 | 71,706 |
| December 31, 2025 | 132,188 | 93,705 | 19,578 | 74,127 | 38,483 | 58,061 |
| September 30, 2025 | 108,434 | 81,515 | 21,872 | 59,643 | 26,919 | 48,791 |
| June 30, 2025 | 92,289 | 69,135 | 20,937 | 48,198 | 23,154 | 44,091 |
| March 31, 2025 | 81,090 | 61,377 | 20,912 | 40,465 | 19,713 | 40,625 |
| **Six Months Ended** |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| June 30, 2026 | $322,025 | $204,990 | $27,596 | $177,394 | $117,035 | $144,631 |
| June 30, 2025 | 173,379 | 130,512 | 41,849 | 88,663 | 42,867 | 84,716 |

(1) Reflects the effect of derivative instrument hedges for only the period presented.

(2) Calculated by adding the effect of derivative instrument hedges attributed to the period presented to GAAP interest expense.

(3) Calculated by adding the effect of derivative instrument hedges attributed to the period presented to GAAP net interest income.

### Net Interest Income (Expense)

During the six months ended June 30, 2026, we earned net interest income of $117.0 million consisting of $322.0 million of interest income from RMBS assets offset by $205.0 million of interest expense on borrowings. For the comparable period ended June 30, 2025, we earned $42.9 million of net interest income, consisting of $173.4 million of interest income from RMBS assets offset by $130.5 million of interest expense on borrowings. The $148.6 million increase in interest income was due to a 35 basis point ("bp") increase in the yield on average RMBS, combined with a $4,780.8 million increase in average RMBS. The $74.5 million increase in interest expense was due to a $4,603.3 million increase in average outstanding borrowings, offset by a 44 bps decrease in the average cost of funds.

During the three months ended June 30, 2026, we earned net interest income of $60.0 million consisting of $164.2 million of interest income from RMBS assets offset by $104.2 million of interest expense on borrowings. For the comparable period ended June 30, 2025, we earned $23.2 million of net interest income, consisting of $92.3 million of interest income from RMBS assets offset by $69.1 million of interest expense on borrowings. The $71.9 million increase in interest income was due to a 36 basis point ("bp") increase in the yield on average RMBS, combined with a $4,573.6 million increase in average RMBS. The $35.1 million increase in interest expense was due to a $4,438.5 million increase in average outstanding borrowings, offset by a 43 bps decrease in the average cost of funds.

On an economic basis, our interest expense on borrowings for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 was $177.4 million and $88.7 million, respectively, resulting in $144.6 million and $84.7 million of economic net interest income, respectively.

On an economic basis, our interest expense on borrowings for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 was $91.3 million and $48.2 million, respectively, resulting in $72.9 million and $44.1 million of economic net interest income, respectively.

The tables below provide information on our portfolio average balances, interest income, yield on assets, average borrowings, interest expense, cost of funds, net interest income and net interest spread for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, and for each quarter in 2026 to date and 2025 on both a GAAP and economic basis.

*($ in thousands)*

| Three Months Ended | Average RMBS Held(1) | Interest Income | Yield on Average RMBS | Average Borrowings(1) | Interest Expense GAAP Basis | Economic Basis(2) | Average Cost of Funds GAAP Basis | Economic Basis(3) |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| June 30, 2026 | $11,439,353 | $164,187 | 5.74% | $10,975,819 | $104,215 | $91,262 | 3.80% | 3.33% |
| March 31, 2026 | 10,983,600 | 157,838 | 5.75% | 10,490,095 | 100,775 | 86,132 | 3.84% | 3.28% |
| December 31, 2025 | 9,492,369 | 132,188 | 5.57% | 9,061,222 | 93,705 | 74,127 | 4.14% | 3.27% |
| September 30, 2025 | 7,674,720 | 108,434 | 5.65% | 7,331,428 | 81,515 | 59,643 | 4.45% | 3.25% |
| June 30, 2025 | 6,865,727 | 92,289 | 5.38% | 6,537,260 | 69,135 | 48,198 | 4.23% | 2.95% |
| March 31, 2025 | 5,995,702 | 81,090 | 5.41% | 5,722,092 | 61,377 | 40,465 | 4.29% | 2.83% |
| **Six Months Ended** |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| June 30, 2026 | $11,211,476 | $322,025 | 5.74% | $10,732,957 | $204,990 | $177,394 | 3.82% | 3.31% |
| June 30, 2025 | 6,430,715 | 173,379 | 5.39% | 6,129,676 | 130,512 | 88,663 | 4.26% | 2.89% |

*($ in thousands)*

| Three Months Ended | Net Interest Income GAAP Basis | Economic Basis(2) | Net Interest Spread GAAP Basis | Economic Basis(4) |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| June 30, 2026 | $59,972 | $72,925 | 1.94% | 2.41% |
| March 31, 2026 | 57,063 | 71,706 | 1.91% | 2.47% |
| December 31, 2025 | 38,483 | 58,061 | 1.43% | 2.30% |
| September 30, 2025 | 26,919 | 48,791 | 1.20% | 2.40% |
| June 30, 2025 | 23,154 | 44,091 | 1.15% | 2.43% |
| March 31, 2025 | 19,713 | 40,625 | 1.12% | 2.58% |
| **Six Months Ended** |  |  |  |  |
| June 30, 2026 | $117,035 | $144,631 | 1.92% | 2.43% |
| June 30, 2025 | 42,867 | 84,716 | 1.13% | 2.50% |

(1) Portfolio yields and costs of borrowings presented in the tables above are calculated based on the average balances of the underlying investment portfolio/borrowings balances and are annualized for the periods presented. Average balances for quarterly periods are calculated using two data points, the beginning and ending balances.

(2) Economic interest expense and economic net interest expense presented in the table above includes the effect of our derivative instrument hedges for only the periods presented.

(3) Represents interest cost of our borrowings and the effect of derivative instrument hedges attributed to the period divided by average RMBS.

(4) Economic net interest spread is calculated by subtracting average economic cost of funds from realized yield on average RMBS.

### Interest Expense and the Cost of Funds

We had average outstanding borrowings of $10,733.0 million and $6,129.7 million and total interest expense of $205.0 million and $130.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. Our average cost of funds was 3.82% for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to 4.26% for the comparable period in 2025.

We had average outstanding borrowings of $10,975.8 million and $6,537.3 million and total interest expense of $104.2 million and $69.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. Our average cost of funds was 3.80% for the three months ended June 30, 2026, compared to 4.23% for the comparable period in 2025.

Our economic interest expense was $177.4 million and $88.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. There was a 42 bps increase in the average economic cost of funds to 3.31% for the six months ended June 30, 2026, from 2.89% for the six months ended June 30, 2025.

Our economic interest expense was $91.3 million and $48.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. There was a 38 bps increase in the average economic cost of funds to 3.33% for the three months ended June 30, 2026, from 2.95% for the three months ended June 30, 2025.

Since all of our repurchase agreements are short-term, changes in market rates directly affect our interest expense. Our average cost of funds calculated on a GAAP basis was 17 bps above the one-month average SOFR and 13 bps above the six-month average SOFR for the quarter ended June 30, 2026. Our average economic cost of funds was 30 bps below the average one-month SOFR and 34 bps below the average six-month SOFR for the quarter ended June 30, 2026. The average term to maturity of the outstanding repurchase agreements was 33 days at June 30, 2026 and 39 days at December 31, 2025.

The table below presents the one-month average and six-month average SOFR rates for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, and for each quarter in 2026 to date and 2025.

| Three Months Ended | Average SOFR One-Month | Six-Month | Average GAAP Cost of Funds Relative to Average One-Month SOFR | Six-Month SOFR | Average Economic Cost of Funds Relative to Average One-Month SOFR | Six-Month SOFR |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| June 30, 2026 | 3.63% | 3.67% | 0.17% | 0.13% | (0.30)% | (0.34)% |
| March 31, 2026 | 3.65% | 3.86% | 0.19% | (0.02)% | (0.37)% | (0.58)% |
| December 31, 2025 | 3.79% | 4.20% | 0.35% | (0.06)% | (0.52)% | (0.93)% |
| September 30, 2025 | 4.31% | 4.37% | 0.14% | 0.08% | (1.06)% | (1.12)% |
| June 30, 2025 | 4.32% | 4.37% | (0.09)% | (0.14)% | (1.37)% | (1.42)% |
| March 31, 2025 | 4.33% | 4.55% | (0.04)% | (0.26)% | (1.50)% | (1.72)% |
| **Six Months Ended** |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| June 30, 2026 | 3.64% | 3.77% | 0.18% | 0.05% | (0.33)% | (0.46)% |
| June 30, 2025 | 4.33% | 4.46% | (0.07)% | (0.20)% | (1.44)% | (1.57)% |

### Gains or Losses

The table below presents our gains or losses for the six and three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025.

*(in thousands)*

|  | Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 | 2025 | Change | Three Months Ended June 30, 2026 | 2025 | Change |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Realized gains (losses) on sales of RMBS | $924 | $(9,288) | $10,212 | $885 | $(7,990) | $8,875 |
| Unrealized (losses) gains on RMBS | (143,270) | 87,132 | (230,402) | (27,302) | 9,540 | (36,842) |
| Total (losses) gains on RMBS | (142,346) | 77,844 | (220,190) | (26,417) | 1,550 | (27,967) |
| Gains (losses) on interest rate futures | 8,659 | (23,630) | 32,289 | 4,222 | (8,688) | 12,910 |
| Gains (losses) on interest rate swaps | 104,355 | (100,251) | 204,606 | 63,353 | (37,408) | 100,761 |
| Gains (losses) on payer swaptions (short positions) | 932 | - | 932 | 932 | - | 932 |
| Losses on payer swaptions (long positions) | (1,490) | - | (1,490) | (1,490) | - | (1,490) |
| Losses on TBA securities (short positions) | (3,033) | (4,636) | 1,603 | (3,228) | (7,662) | 4,434 |
| Gains on TBA securities (long positions) | 930 | 572 | 358 | (347) | 472 | (819) |
| Losses on U.S. Treasury securities (short positions) | (1,645) | - | (1,645) | (1,042) | - | (1,042) |
| Total gains (losses) from derivative instruments | $108,708 | $(127,945) | $236,653 | $62,400 | $(53,286) | $115,686 |

31

We invest in RMBS with the intent to earn net income from the realized yield on those assets over their related funding and hedging costs, and not for the purpose of making short term gains from sales. However, we have sold, and may continue to sell, existing assets to acquire new assets, which our management believes might have higher risk-adjusted returns in light of current or anticipated interest rates, federal government programs or general economic conditions or to manage our balance sheet as part of our asset/liability management strategy. During the six months ended June 30, 2026, we received proceeds of $356.5 million from sales of RMBS, resulting in gains of approximately $0.9 million. During the six months ended June 30, 2025, we received proceeds of $733.9 million from sales of RMBS, resulting in losses of approximately $9.3 million.

Realized and unrealized gains and losses on RMBS are driven in part by changes in yields and interest rates, the spreads that Agency RMBS trade relative to comparable duration U.S. Treasuries or swaps, as well as varying levels of demand for RMBS, which affect the pricing of the securities in our portfolio. The unrealized gains and losses on RMBS may also include the premium lost as a result of prepayments on the underlying mortgages, decreasing unrealized gains or increasing unrealized losses as prepayment speeds or premiums increase. To the extent RMBS are carried at a discount to par, unrealized gains or losses on RMBS would also include discount accreted as a result of prepayments on the underlying mortgages, increasing unrealized gains or decreasing unrealized losses as speeds on discounts increase. Gains and losses on interest rate futures contracts are affected by changes in implied forward rates during the reporting period. The table below presents historical interest rate data for each quarter in 2026 to date and 2025.

|  | 5 Year U.S. Treasury Rate(1) | 10 Year U.S. Treasury Rate(1) | 15 Year Fixed-Rate Mortgage Rate(2) | 30 Year Fixed-Rate Mortgage Rate(2) | 90 Day Average SOFR(3) |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| June 30, 2026 | 4.19% | 4.42% | 5.82% | 6.43% | 3.63% |
| March 31, 2026 | 3.95% | 4.31% | 5.75% | 6.38% | 3.68% |
| December 31, 2025 | 3.72% | 4.16% | 5.44% | 6.15% | 4.01% |
| September 30, 2025 | 3.73% | 4.15% | 5.49% | 6.30% | 4.35% |
| June 30, 2025 | 3.80% | 4.23% | 5.89% | 6.77% | 4.34% |
| March 31, 2025 | 3.98% | 4.25% | 5.89% | 6.65% | 4.35% |

(1) Historical 5 and 10 Year U.S. Treasury Rates are obtained from quoted end of day prices on the Chicago Board Options Exchange.

(2) Historical 30 Year and 15 Year Fixed Rate Mortgage Rates are obtained from Freddie Mac’s Primary Mortgage Market Survey.

(3) Historical SOFR is obtained from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. The SOFR averages are compounded averages of the SOFR over rolling 30 and 180 calendar day periods.

### Unrealized Gains and Losses on PT RMBS

For the purpose of recording income on the Company’s investments in PT RMBS, interest income is based on the stated interest rate of the security. Using the fair value accounting method, premiums or discounts to the face value of the PT RMBS present at the date of purchase are not amortized. Premium lost and discount accretion resulting from monthly principal repayments are reflected in unrealized gains (losses) on RMBS in the statements of comprehensive income (loss). The following table adjusts the Company’s interest income as reported on the Company’s statements of comprehensive income for the periods indicated to show interest income adjusted for premium amortization and discount accretion on its mortgage-backed security investments. The purpose of presenting this non-GAAP measure of interest income is to provide management and investors with an alternative way of evaluating yield on RMBS that may be more comparable to some of the Company's peers who amortize premiums and discounts on their PT RMBS investments.

*($ in thousands)*

| Three Months Ended | Average RMBS Held | Interest Income | Yield on Average RMBS | Unrealized Gains (Losses) on PT RMBS As Reported(1) | (Premium Amortization)/ Discount Accretion(2) | Price Only Unrealized Gains (Losses) | Inclusive of Premium Amortization/ Discount Accretion Interest Income(3) | Yield on Average RMBS(3) |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| June 30, 2026 | $11,439,353 | $164,187 | 5.74% | $(27,326) | $(11,679) | $(15,647) | $152,508 | 5.33% |
| March 31, 2026 | 10,983,600 | 157,838 | 5.75% | (115,868) | (13,551) | (102,317) | 144,287 | 5.25% |
| December 31, 2025 | 9,492,369 | 132,188 | 5.57% | 53,960 | (7,412) | 61,372 | 124,776 | 5.26% |
| September 30, 2025 | 7,674,720 | 108,434 | 5.65% | 59,418 | (1,412) | 60,830 | 107,022 | 5.58% |
| June 30, 2025 | 6,865,727 | 92,289 | 5.38% | 9,264 | (1,471) | 10,735 | 90,818 | 5.29% |
| March 31, 2025 | 5,995,702 | 81,090 | 5.41% | 77,445 | 2,608 | 74,837 | 83,698 | 5.58% |

(1) As reported in the Company’s statements of comprehensive income (loss) using the fair value accounting method.

(2) Premium amortization/discount accretion for each period is calculated using the beginning of period market value of all securities. Amounts presented are intended to approximate amortization/accretion using the yield method over the life of the security based on premium/discount present at purchase date.

(3) Interest Income – Inclusive of Premium Amortization/Discount Accretion and Yield on Average RMBS – Inclusive of Premium Amortization/Discount Accretion are non-GAAP measures. See “—GAAP and Non-GAAP Reconciliations,” for a description of our non-GAAP measures.

### Expenses

For the six and three months ended June 30, 2026, the Company’s total operating expenses were approximately $14.2 million and $6.8 million, respectively, compared to approximately $9.2 million and $5.0 million for the six and three months ended June 30, 2025, respectively. The table below presents a breakdown of operating expenses for the six and three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025.

*(in thousands)*

|  | Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 | 2025 | Change | Three Months Ended June 30, 2026 | 2025 | Change |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Management fees | $8,111 | $5,729 | $2,382 | $4,123 | $2,982 | $1,141 |
| Allocated overhead | 1,371 | 1,190 | 181 | 585 | 582 | 3 |
| Incentive compensation | 1,830 | 21 | 1,809 | 415 | 228 | 187 |
| Directors fees and liability insurance | 635 | 672 | (37) | 323 | 334 | (11) |
| Audit, legal and other professional fees | 712 | 753 | (41) | 400 | 360 | 40 |
| Direct REIT operating expenses | 981 | 474 | 507 | 509 | 247 | 262 |
| Other administrative | 520 | 383 | 137 | 408 | 263 | 145 |
| Total expenses | $14,160 | $9,222 | $4,938 | $6,763 | $4,996 | $1,767 |

As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company had accrued a liability of $0.6 million for bonuses to be paid to the Manager's employees. During the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, the Company awarded shares of Company common stock with a fair value of $1.7 million and $0.3 million, respectively. Accrued incentive compensation for the six months ended June 30, 2026 includes a reversal of a $1.1 million under accrual of the December 31, 2025 liability. Incentive compensation for the six months ended June 30, 2025 includes a reversal of a $0.4 million over accrual of the December 31, 2024 liability.

We are externally managed and advised by Bimini Advisors, LLC (the “Manager”) pursuant to the terms of a management agreement. The management agreement has been renewed through February 20, 2027 and provides for automatic one-year extension options thereafter and is subject to certain termination rights. Under the terms of the management agreement, the Manager is responsible for administering the business activities and day-to-day operations of the Company. The Manager receives a monthly management fee in the amount of:

- One-twelfth of 1.5% of the first $250 million of the Company’s month-end equity, as defined in the management agreement,
- One-twelfth of 1.25% of the Company’s month-end equity that is greater than $250 million and less than or equal to $500 million, and
- One-twelfth of 1.00% of the Company’s month-end equity that is greater than $500 million.

The Manager also provides certain repurchase agreement trading, clearing and administrative services to the Company. In consideration for such services, the Company pays the following fees to the Manager:

- A daily fee equal to the outstanding principal balance of repurchase agreement funding in place as of the end of such day multiplied by 1.5 basis points for the amount of aggregate outstanding principal balance less than or equal to $5 billion, and multiplied by 1.0 basis point for any amount of aggregate outstanding principal balance in excess of $5 billion, and
- A fee for the clearing and operational services provided by personnel of the Manager equal to $10,000 per month.

The Company is obligated to reimburse the Manager for any direct expenses incurred on its behalf and to pay the Manager the Company’s pro rata portion of certain overhead costs set forth in the management agreement. Should the Company terminate the management agreement without cause, it will pay the Manager a termination fee equal to three times the average annual management fee, as defined in the management agreement, before or on the last day of the term of the agreement.

The following table summarizes the management fee and overhead allocation expenses for six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, and for each quarter in 2026 to date and 2025.

*($ in thousands)*

| Three Months Ended | Average Orchid MBS | Average Orchid Equity | Average Repurchase Agreements | Advisory Services Management Fee | Overhead Allocation | Repurchase Clearing and Administrative | Total |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| June 30, 2026 | $11,439,353 | $1,442,960 | $10,975,819 | $4,123 | $585 | $369 | $5,077 |
| March 31, 2026 | 10,983,600 | 1,365,471 | 10,490,095 | 3,988 | 786 | 353 | 5,127 |
| December 31, 2025 | 9,492,369 | 1,233,957 | 9,061,222 | 3,700 | 705 | 319 | 4,724 |
| September 30, 2025 | 7,674,720 | 1,108,307 | 7,331,428 | 3,294 | 887 | 277 | 4,458 |
| June 30, 2025 | 6,865,727 | 1,012,986 | 6,537,260 | 2,982 | 582 | 247 | 3,811 |
| March 31, 2025 | 5,995,702 | 902,590 | 5,722,092 | 2,747 | 608 | 227 | 3,582 |
| **Six Months Ended** |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| June 30, 2026 | $11,211,476 | $1,404,216 | $10,732,957 | $8,111 | $1,371 | $722 | $10,204 |
| June 30, 2025 | 6,430,715 | 957,788 | 6,129,676 | 5,729 | 1,190 | 474 | 7,393 |

### Financial Condition:

### Mortgage-Backed Securities

As of June 30, 2026, our RMBS portfolio consisted of $11.5 billion of Agency RMBS at fair value and had a weighted average coupon on assets of 5.52%. During the six months ended June 30, 2026, we received principal repayments of $863.5 million, compared to $332.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The average three month prepayment speeds for the quarters ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 were 10.9% and 10.1%, respectively.

The following table presents the 3-month constant prepayment rate (“CPR”) experienced on our RMBS portfolio, on an annualized basis, for the quarterly periods presented. CPR is a method of expressing the prepayment rate for a mortgage pool that assumes that a constant fraction of the remaining principal is prepaid each month or year. Specifically, the CPR in the chart below represents the three month prepayment rate of the securities in the respective asset category.

| Three Months Ended | Total Portfolio (%) |
| --- | ---: |
| June 30, 2026 | 10.9 |
| March 31, 2026 | 14.7 |
| December 31, 2025 | 15.7 |
| September 30, 2025 | 10.1 |
| June 30, 2025 | 10.1 |
| March 31, 2025 | 7.8 |

34

The following tables summarize certain characteristics of the Company’s RMBS portfolio as of June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025:

*($ in thousands)*

| Asset Category June 30, 2026 | Fair Value | Percentage of Entire Portfolio | Weighted Average Coupon | Weighted Average Maturity in Months | Longest Maturity |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | --- |
| Fixed Rate RMBS | $11,528,198 | 99.9% | 5.54% | 338 | 1-Jun-56 |
| Other | 11,966 | 0.1% | 3.39% | 204 | 25-Jul-48 |
| Total Mortgage Assets | $11,540,164 | 100.0% | 5.52% | 337 | 1-Jun-56 |
| **December 31, 2025** |  |  |  |  |  |
| Fixed Rate RMBS | $10,615,570 | 99.9% | 5.67% | 341 | 1-Jan-56 |
| Other | 13,088 | 0.1% | 3.25% | 210 | 25-Jul-48 |
| Total Mortgage Assets | $10,628,658 | 100.0% | 5.64% | 340 | 1-Jan-56 |

*($ in thousands)*

| Agency | June 30, 2026 Fair Value | Percentage of Entire Portfolio | December 31, 2025 Fair Value | Percentage of Entire Portfolio |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Fannie Mae | $6,022,655 | 52.2% | $5,675,461 | 53.4% |
| Freddie Mac | 5,517,509 | 47.8% | 4,953,197 | 46.6% |
| Total Portfolio | $11,540,164 | 100.0% | $10,628,658 | 100.0% |

As of June 30, 2026, the Company's portfolio had an effective duration of 3.180, indicating that an interest rate increase of 1.0% would be expected to cause a 3.180% decrease in the value of the RMBS in the Company’s investment portfolio. As of December 31, 2025, the Company's portfolio had an effective duration of 2.513, indicating that an interest rate increase of 1.0% would be expected to cause a 2.513% decrease in the value of the RMBS in the Company’s investment portfolio. These figures do not include the effect of the Company’s funding cost hedges. Effective duration quotes for individual investments are obtained from The Yield Book, Inc.

The following table presents a summary of portfolio assets acquired during the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, including securities purchased during the period that settled after the end of the period, if any.

*($ in thousands)*

|  | 2026 Total Cost | Average Price | Weighted Average Yield | 2025 Total Cost | Average Price | Weighted Average Yield |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| PT RMBS | $2,273,827 | $100.85 | 5.04% | $2,728,263 | $101.84 | 5.52% |

### Borrowings

As of June 30, 2026, we had established borrowing facilities in the repurchase agreement market with a number of commercial banks and other financial institutions and had borrowings in place with 33 of these counterparties. None of these lenders are affiliated with the Company. These borrowings are secured by the Company’s RMBS and cash, and bear interest at prevailing market rates. We believe our established repurchase agreement borrowing facilities provide borrowing capacity in excess of our needs.

As of June 30, 2026, we had obligations outstanding under the repurchase agreements of approximately $11.1 billion with a net weighted average borrowing cost of 3.77%. The remaining maturity of our outstanding repurchase agreement obligations ranged from 2 to 136 days, with a weighted average remaining maturity of 33 days. Securing the repurchase agreement obligations as of June 30, 2026 are RMBS with an estimated fair value, including accrued interest, of approximately $11.5 billion, and cash pledged to counterparties of approximately $111.5 million. Through July 24, 2026, we have been able to maintain our repurchase facilities with comparable terms to those that existed at June 30, 2026, with maturities through November 13, 2026.

The table below presents information about our period end, maximum and average balances of borrowings for each quarter in 2026 to date and 2025.

*($ in thousands)*

| Three Months Ended | Ending Balance of Borrowings | Maximum Balance of Borrowings | Average Balance of Borrowings | Difference Between Ending Borrowings and Average Borrowings Amount | Percent |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| June 30, 2026 | $11,086,915 | $11,139,168 | $10,975,819 | $111,096 | 1.01% |
| March 31, 2026 | 10,864,723 | 11,023,983 | 10,490,095 | 374,628 | 3.57% |
| December 31, 2025 | 10,115,466 | 10,119,839 | 9,061,222 | 1,054,244 | 11.63% |
| September 30, 2025 | 8,006,978 | 8,024,512 | 7,331,428 | 675,550 | 9.21% |
| June 30, 2025 | 6,655,879 | 6,655,879 | 6,537,260 | 118,619 | 1.81% |
| March 31, 2025 | 6,418,641 | 6,453,905 | 5,722,092 | 696,549 | 12.17% |

### Leverage

We use two primary measures of leverage. Economic leverage is calculated by dividing total liabilities, adjusted for our net notional TBA position and securities borrowed, by stockholders' equity. We include our net TBA position in our calculation of economic leverage because a forward contract to purchase or sell an Agency RMBS in the TBA market carries similar risks to an Agency RMBS purchased or sold in the cash market and funded with repurchase agreement liabilities. Adjusted leverage is calculated by dividing our repurchase agreements by stockholders' equity. Our economic leverage as of June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025 was 7.3 to 1. Our adjusted leverage as of June 30, 2026 was 7.7 to 1, compared to 7.4 to 1 as of December 31, 2025. The following table presents information related to our historical leverage.

*($ in thousands)*

|  | Ending Repurchase Agreements | Ending Total Liabilities | Ending Net TBA Positions | Ending Securities Borrowed | Ending Stockholders' Equity | Adjusted Leverage | Economic Leverage |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | --- | --- |
| June 30, 2026 | $11,086,915 | $11,662,854 | $(594,900) | $496,036 | $1,441,258 | 7.7:1 | 7.3:1 |
| March 31, 2026 | 10,864,723 | 11,279,585 | 95,000 | 359,202 | 1,391,808 | 7.8:1 | 7.9:1 |
| December 31, 2025 | 10,115,466 | 10,304,045 | (180,000) | 128,754 | 1,371,948 | 7.4:1 | 7.3:1 |
| September 30, 2025 | 8,006,978 | 8,052,945 | (32,000) | - | 1,086,090 | 7.4:1 | 7.4:1 |
| June 30, 2025 | 6,655,879 | 6,698,673 | - | - | 911,959 | 7.3:1 | 7.3:1 |
| March 31, 2025 | 6,418,641 | 6,448,407 | 200,000 | - | 855,879 | 7.5:1 | 7.8:1 |

### Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity is our ability to turn non-cash assets into cash, purchase additional investments, repay principal and interest on borrowings, fund overhead, fulfill margin calls and pay dividends. We have both internal and external sources of liquidity. However, our material unused sources of liquidity include cash balances, unencumbered assets and our ability to sell encumbered assets to raise cash. Our balance sheet also generates liquidity on an on-going basis through payments of principal and interest we receive on our RMBS portfolio. Management believes that we currently have sufficient short-term and long-term liquidity and capital resources available for (a) the acquisition of additional investments consistent with the size and nature of our existing RMBS portfolio, (b) the repayments on borrowings and (c) the payment of dividends to the extent required for our continued qualification as a REIT. We may also generate liquidity from time to time by selling our equity or debt securities in public offerings or private placements.

#### Internal Sources of Liquidity

Our internal sources of liquidity include our cash balances, unencumbered assets and our ability to liquidate our encumbered security holdings. Our balance sheet also generates liquidity on an on-going basis through payments of principal and interest we receive on our RMBS portfolio. Because our PT RMBS portfolio consists entirely of government and agency securities, we do not anticipate having difficulty converting our assets to cash should our liquidity needs ever exceed our immediately available sources of cash. Our structured RMBS portfolio also consists entirely of governmental agency securities, although they typically do not trade with comparable bid / ask spreads as PT RMBS. However, we anticipate that we would be able to liquidate such securities readily, even in distressed markets, although we would likely do so at prices below where such securities could be sold in a more stable market.

Our strategy for hedging our funding costs typically involves taking short positions in interest rate futures, interest rate swaps, interest rate swaptions or other instruments. When the market causes these short positions to decline in value we are required to meet margin calls with cash. This can reduce our liquidity position to the extent other securities in our portfolio move in price in such a way that we do not receive enough cash via margin calls to offset the derivative related margin calls. If this were to occur in sufficient magnitude, the loss of liquidity might force us to reduce the size of the levered portfolio, pledge additional structured securities to raise funds or risk operating the portfolio with less liquidity.

#### External Sources of Liquidity

Our primary external sources of liquidity are our ability to (i) borrow under master repurchase agreements, (ii) use the TBA security market and (iii) sell our equity or debt securities in public offerings or private placements. Our borrowing capacity will vary over time as the market value of our interest earning assets varies. Our master repurchase agreements have no stated expiration but can be terminated at any time at our option or at the option of the counterparty. However, once a definitive repurchase agreement under a master repurchase agreement has been entered into, it generally may not be terminated by either party. A negotiated termination can occur but may involve a fee to be paid by the party seeking to terminate the repurchase agreement transaction.

Under our repurchase agreement funding arrangements, we are required to post margin at the initiation of the borrowing. The margin posted represents the haircut, which is a percentage of the market value of the collateral pledged. To the extent the market value of the asset collateralizing the financing transaction declines, the market value of our posted margin will be insufficient, and we will be required to post additional collateral. Conversely, if the market value of the asset pledged increases in value, we would be over collateralized and we would be entitled to have excess margin returned to us by the counterparty. Our lenders typically value our pledged securities daily to ensure the adequacy of our margin and make margin calls as needed, as do we. Typically, but not always, the parties agree to a minimum threshold amount for margin calls so as to avoid the need for nuisance margin calls on a daily basis. Our master repurchase agreements do not specify the haircut; rather haircuts are determined on an individual repo transaction basis. Throughout the six months ended June 30, 2026, haircuts on our pledged collateral remained stable and as of June 30, 2026, our weighted average haircut was approximately 4.1% of the value of our collateral.

TBAs represent a form of off-balance sheet financing and are accounted for as derivative instruments. (See Note 5 to our Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q for additional details on our TBAs). Under certain market conditions, it may be uneconomical for us to roll our TBAs into future months and we may need to take or make physical delivery of the underlying securities. If we were required to take physical delivery to settle a long TBA, we would have to fund our total purchase commitment with cash or other financing sources and our liquidity position could be negatively impacted.

Our TBAs are also subject to margin requirements governed by the Mortgage-Backed Securities Division ("MBSD") of the FICC and by our Master Securities Forward Transaction Agreements (“MSFTAs”), which may establish margin levels in excess of the MBSD. Such provisions require that we establish an initial margin based on the notional value of the TBA, which is subject to increase if the estimated fair value of our TBAs or the estimated fair value of our pledged collateral declines. The MBSD has the sole discretion to determine the value of our TBAs and of the pledged collateral securing such contracts. In the event of a margin call, we must generally provide additional collateral on the same business day.

Settlement of our TBA obligations by taking delivery of the underlying securities as well as satisfying margin requirements could negatively impact our liquidity position. However, since we do not use TBA dollar roll transactions as our primary source of financing, we believe that we will have adequate sources of liquidity to meet such obligations.

In future periods, we expect to continue to finance our activities in a manner that is consistent with our current operations through repurchase agreements. As of June 30, 2026, we had cash and cash equivalents of $682.6 million. We generated cash flows of $1,163.4 million from principal and interest payments on our RMBS and had average repurchase agreements outstanding of $10.7 billion during the six months ended June 30, 2026.

As described more fully below, we may also access liquidity by selling our equity or debt securities in public offerings or private placements.

#### Capital Expenditures

At June 30, 2026, we had no material commitments for capital expenditures.

***Stockholders’ Equity***

On June 11, 2024, we entered into an equity distribution agreement (the “June 2024 Equity Distribution Agreement”) with three sales agents pursuant to which we could offer and sell, from time to time, up to an aggregate amount of $250,000,000 of gross proceeds from the sales of shares of our common stock in transactions that were deemed to be “at the market” offerings and privately negotiated transactions. We issued a total of 30,513,253 shares under the June 2024 Equity Distribution Agreement for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $250.0 million and net proceeds of approximately $245.8 million, after commissions and fees, prior to its termination in February 2025.

On February 24, 2025, we entered into an equity distribution agreement (the “February 2025 Equity Distribution Agreement”) with four sales agents pursuant to which we could offer and sell, from time to time, up to an aggregate amount of $350,000,000 of gross proceeds from the sales of shares of our common stock in transactions that were deemed to be “at the market” offerings and privately negotiated transactions. On July 28, 2025, the February 2025 Equity Distribution Agreement was amended to increase the aggregate amount of gross proceeds from the sales of shares that may be offered by $150,000,000 to a total of $500,000,000. We issued a total of 59,492,504 shares under the February 2025 Equity Distribution Agreement for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $445.1 million and net proceeds of approximately $438.0 million, after commissions and fees, prior to its termination in October 2025.

On October 27, 2025, we entered into an equity distribution agreement (the “October 2025 Equity Distribution Agreement”) with four sales agents pursuant to which we may offer and sell, from time to time, up to an aggregate amount of $500,000,000 of gross proceeds from the sales of shares of our common stock in transactions that are deemed to be “at the market” offerings and privately negotiated transactions. From inception through June 30, 2026, we issued a total of 48,824,644 shares under the October 2025 Equity Distribution Agreement for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $360.9 million, and net proceeds of approximately $355.2 million, after commissions and fees. For the six months ended June 30, 2026, we issued a total of 18,558,681 shares under the October 2025 Equity Distribution Agreement for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $137.7 million, and net proceeds of approximately $135.5 million, after commissions and fees.

### Outlook

#### Economic Summary

The second quarter of 2026 was pivotal in many ways. The Federal Reserve (“Fed”) transitioned from an easing bias to a hiking bias and a new Fed Chairman with a strong anti-inflation disposition was seated. Meanwhile, the war between the United States, Israel and Iran (the “Iran War”) appeared to be on course to wind down by June before conditions deteriorated materially. A near-term resolution now appears unlikely, allowing energy related inflationary pressures to persist.

On May 22, 2026, Kevin Warsh became the new Chairman of the Fed, replacing Jerome Powell as Chairman. The new Chairman brings an elevated level of vigor in addressing the persistently high inflation that has exceeded the Fed’s 2% target for approximately 5 years. Even before Chairman Warsh assumed his new role, the FOMC appeared to be shifting its bias away from additional easing toward hiking. At the Fed’s meeting on April 29, 2026, there were three votes in favor of signaling a more two-side characterization of the Fed’s future interest rate decisions. At Chairman Warsh’s first press conference on June 17, 2026, all doubt regarding the bias of the FOMC was put to rest. The new Chairman was very stern in declaring his highest priority was bringing inflation back to the Fed’s target.

The Iran War appeared to be nearing conclusion when a ceasefire was announced on April 8, 2026, and a formal Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) was signed by the parties on June 17, 2026. Shipping traffic through the Strait of Hormuz (“SOH”) was slowly returning to pre-war levels, and market volatility materially subsided. However, shortly after the MOU was signed, hostilities between the parties began to escalate and shipping traffic through the SOH has slowed significantly again. Commodity prices have rebounded in turn and are slowly heading back toward the peak levels reached in the early days of the war. At this point, there is no obvious path to an end to the war, as the two crucial points of disagreement – control over the SOH and the status of Iran’s nuclear capability – seem unlikely to be resolved diplomatically. Unless and until the war pivots again toward a peaceful resolution, upward pressure on commodity prices seems likely to persist, adding to already elevated levels of inflation in the United States and globally.

Developments in the Iran War have only exacerbated problems for the new Fed Chair and the FOMC. The economy in the United States has proven to be very resilient in the face of inflation, particularly elevated commodity prices and disruptions to critical supply channels. At the beginning of 2026, the labor market appeared to be stable, yet at low levels of job growth. During the second quarter of 2026, the labor market appeared to pivot as job growth rebounded. Consumer spending has also remained robust. If the war remains unresolved for an extended period, the Fed will likely need to act and increase the Fed Funds rate. Data for June 2026 released in July – namely the jobs report and the consumer price index and producer price index – were all weak. As a result, market pricing of Fed hikes over the balance of 2026 and into 2027 has subsided. Unless this data remains weak, the market is likely to see higher funding levels.

#### Interest Rates

Consistent with the pivot in the outlook for Fed policy during the quarter, the nominal rates curve moved higher and flatter during the second quarter of 2026. Specifically, the yield on the 2-year U.S. Treasury note increased from 3.796% at March 31, 2026 to 4.175% at June 30, 2026, while the yield on the 10-year U.S. Treasury note increased from 4.319% at March 31, 2026 to 4.466% at June 30, 2026. As a result, the curve between these two points flattened by approximately 9 basis points. Most proxies for the shape of the rates curve show comparable – or greater – levels of flattening during the second quarter of 2026. The primary impetus for the movements in the nominal U.S. Treasury curve and the swap curve was the pivot in market expectations for Fed Funds rate going forward. At March 31, 2026, market expectations for the Fed Funds rate (based on Fed Funds futures contracts) were for slightly more than one rate cut by year end and two cuts by mid-2027. By the end of the second quarter of 2026, Fed Funds futures implied nearly two hikes by year-end and in excess of three hikes by the end of first quarter of 2027. Current pricing, reflecting the soft June 2026 data released in early July, is unchanged in terms of year-end levels but now reflects very modest cuts in early 2027.

The Fed ended its quantitative tightening program, which reduced its balance sheet via the maturation of its holdings, and began reinvesting them into additional U.S. Treasury holdings on December 1, 2025. Run-off from the Agency RMBS holdings is now directed toward purchasing U.S. Treasuries. The Fed also announced its intention, via Reserve Management Purchases (“RMPs”), to grow its balance sheet over time to maintain a stable relationship between the size of its balance sheet and the economy. These steps resulted in increased purchases of U.S. Treasuries by the Fed. When the RMP program was first introduced, U.S. Treasury purchases were $40 billion per month, although they have declined since and are currently $10 billion per month. However, even at the lower level of purchases the program has been successful at taking pressure off of the overnight funding markets, as market participants such as money-market funds had fewer options to deploy their liquidity and therefore increased the pool of available funds for the overnight repurchase agreement (“repo”) funding markets. As a result, funding levels available to the Company in the repo markets – typically expressed as a spread over SOFR – have remained stable during the second quarter, continuing the trend we saw during the first quarter of 2026.

#### The Agency RMBS Market

Interest rate volatility spiked meaningfully after the outbreak of the Iran War, consistent with the increase in interest rates across the curve. Volatility peaked just before the first quarter of 2026 ended, with the Merrill Lynch Option Volatility Estimate Index reaching 115.02. Following the announcement of a ceasefire on April 8, 2026, rate volatility dropped nearly to pre-war levels by mid-April and remained relatively stable throughout the balance of the second quarter. Implied interest rate volatility has remained range bound at low levels since the end of the second quarter. As is typically the case, subdued levels of implied interest rate volatility and range-bound interest rates are conducive to Agency RMBS market performance, and the sector had a positive quarter in both absolute and excess returns. For the second quarter of 2026, the Agency RMBS sector generated a total return of 0.6% and 0.5% versus comparable duration swaps. By comparison, the high-yield and investment-grade corporate bond sectors produced returns of 2.5% and 1.4%, respectively, and excess returns of 2.4% and 1.5%, respectively, versus comparable duration swaps over the same period.

Within Agency RMBS for the second quarter of 2026, conventional 30-year mortgages generated a total return of 0.6%, 15-year mortgages generated a total return of 0.1% and Ginnie Mae 30-year mortgages generated a total return of 0.7%. Versus comparable duration swaps, the returns were 0.6%, 0.0% and 0.6% for 30-year conventional, 15-year conventional and Ginnie Mae 30-year mortgages, respectively. The Company invests predominantly in 30-year conventional mortgages. Returns with the 30-year stack were lowest for lower coupons and increased for progressively higher coupons, with returns for coupons 4% and lower between 0.2% and 0.5%, and above 1.0% for coupons of 5% and higher. This is consistent with higher interest rates, lower prepayment expectations and the durations of the various coupons inversely related to coupon – the lower the coupon the higher the duration, and visa-versa. Conversely, excess returns were best for middle coupons – between the 4.5% and 6.0% coupons, with lower and higher coupons lagging. Excess returns for middle coupons were between 0.7% and 1.2%, while the lower and higher coupons ranged between 0.3% and 0.8%.

#### Recent Legislative and Regulatory Developments

In response to the deterioration in the markets for U.S. Treasuries, Agency RMBS and other mortgage and fixed income markets resulting from the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Fed implemented a program of quantitative easing. Through November of 2021, the Fed was committed to purchasing $80 billion of U.S. Treasuries and $40 billion of Agency RMBS each month. In November of 2021, it began tapering its net asset purchases each month, ended net asset purchases by early March of 2022, and ended asset purchases entirely in September of 2022. On May 4, 2022, the FOMC announced a plan for reducing the Fed’s balance sheet. In June of 2022, in accordance with this plan, the Fed began reducing its balance sheet by a maximum of $30 billion of U.S. Treasuries and $17.5 billion of Agency RMBS each month. On September 21, 2022, the FOMC announced the Fed’s decision to continue reducing its balance sheet by a maximum of $60 billion of U.S. Treasuries and $35 billion of Agency RMBS per month. On May 1, 2024, the FOMC announced the Fed’s decision to reduce its balance sheet by a maximum of $25 billion of U.S. Treasury securities and remove the cap on Agency RMBS reduction, with any amounts in excess of $35 billion per month being reinvested in U.S. Treasury securities. On March 19, 2025, the FOMC announced the Fed’s decision to reduce its balance sheet by a maximum of $5 billion of U.S. Treasury securities beginning April 1, 2025. Relatively high interest rates and slow prepayment speeds kept the balance sheet reduction for Agency RMBS below $20 billion per month throughout 2024 and 2025. On December 1, 2025, the Fed ended quantitative tightening and began reinvesting all proceeds from maturing Agency RMBS up to a $35 billion per month cap in U.S. Treasuries and announced that it would begin buying an additional $40 billion per month of U.S. Treasuries via RMPs in order to maintain an ample level of reserves on an ongoing basis. RMPs were reduced to $25 billion per month in April 2026, and further reduced to $10 billion per month in May 2026, As of June 30, 2026, the Fed had reduced its balance sheet for Agency RMBS by approximately $792 billion from the peak of approximately $2.7 trillion to approximately $1.9 trillion, shedding approximately 58% of the Agency RMBS added during pandemic quantitative easing and representing the lowest level since August 2020.

On September 14, 2021, the U.S. Treasury and the FHFA suspended certain policy provisions in the Enterprise capital framework established in December 2020, including limits on loans acquired for cash consideration, multifamily loans, loans with higher risk characteristics and second homes and investment properties (the "September 2021 Provisions"). Effective April 26, 2022, the FHFA further amended this framework by, among other things, replacing the fixed leverage buffer equal to 1.5% of an Enterprise’s adjusted total assets with a dynamic leverage buffer equal to 50% of an Enterprise’s stability capital buffer, reducing the risk weight floor from 10% to 5%, and removing the requirement that the Enterprises must apply an overall effectiveness adjustment to their credit risk transfer exposures. On June 14, 2022, the Enterprises announced that they would each charge a 50 bps fee for commingled securities issued on or after July 1, 2022 to cover the additional capital required for such securities under the Enterprise capital framework, which was subsequently reduced on January 19, 2023 to 9.375 bps for commingled securities issued on or after April 1, 2023 to address industry concern that the fee posed a risk to the fungibility of the Uniform Mortgage-Backed Security and negatively impacted liquidity and pricing in the market for TBA securities. On November 30, 2023, the FHFA published a final rule, which became effective April 1, 2024, which reduced the risk weight and credit conversion factor for guarantees on commingled securities to 5% and 50%, respectively; replaced the current exposure methodology with the standardized approach for counterparty credit risk as the method for computing exposure and risk-weighted asset amounts for derivatives and cleared transactions; updated the credit score assumption to 680 for single-family mortgage exposures originated without a representative credit score; and introduced a risk weight of 20% for guarantee assets. On January 2, 2025, the U.S. Treasury and FHFA entered into a letter agreement deleting the September 2021 Provisions entirely, as well as providing additional guidance on the process for a potential end to the conservatorship of the Enterprises. Throughout 2025 and early 2026, there was some speculation in the market regarding progress towards an end to the conservatorship, including through an initial public offering, but no definitive action has been taken and many analysts believe additional capital is needed before the Enterprises can safely exit conservatorship.

On July 27, 2023, the federal banking regulators, including the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, (the “OCC”) the FDIC and the Fed, jointly issued a proposed rule that would revise large bank capital requirements (the “2023 Basel III Endgame”). The 2023 Basel III Endgame, if implemented as originally proposed, would have significantly increased the credit weight risk for balance-sheet mortgages and for Agency RMBS sold to the GSEs, which could have disincentivized banks from originating mortgages for sale to the GSEs and impacted pricing in the Agency RMBS markets. The comment period for the 2023 Basel III Endgame closed on January 16, 2024, and the proposed rule was met with strong objections from the banking industry.

On November 25, 2025, the Fed, OCC and FDIC jointly adopted a final rule to revise the enhanced supplementary leverage ratio for globally systemically important bank holding companies (“GSIBs”). The rule, which became effective April 1, 2026 and may be adopted by banks subject to the rule as early as January 1, 2026, seeks to promote effective GSIB capital management and remove disincentives for banks to engage in low-risk activities, particularly in the U.S. Treasury market. This shift is expected to free up significant capital, allowing GSIBs greater discretion in asset allocation and potentially fostering increased lending and economic activity.

On March 19, 2026, the OCC, FDIC and the Fed rescinded the 2023 Basel III Endgame proposal and concurrently issued three revised notices of proposed rulemaking. The three proposals include (i) a revised Basel III Endgame proposal that would apply an expanded risk-based approach to Category I and Category II banking organizations, thus narrowing the mandatory scope from the 2023 proposal, with all other banking organizations permitted to opt in; (ii) a revised standardized approach proposal that would reduce risk weights for traditional lending activities for banking organizations not subject to the expanded risk-based approach; and (iii) a revised GSIB capital surcharge proposal. The OCC, FDIC, and the Fed estimate that the revised proposals would decrease aggregate common equity tier 1 capital requirements by approximately 4.8 percent for Category I and Category II banking organizations, in contrast to the significant capital increases that would have resulted under the 2023 Basel III Endgame. Additionally, the revised proposal would eliminate the requirement to deduct mortgage servicing assets from common equity tier 1 capital, instead assigning a 250% risk weight, which is designed to promote mortgage origination and servicing by banking organizations. The Fed voted 6-to-1 to advance all three proposals and the FDIC board voted unanimously in favor of the revised Basel III Endgame and standardized approach proposals. The comment period for the revised proposals closed on June 18, 2026, with the Fed indicating that they hope to release the final rule by the end of 2026.

The scope and nature of the actions the U.S. government or the Fed will ultimately undertake are unknown and will continue to evolve.

#### Effect on Us

Regulatory developments, movements in interest rates and prepayment rates affect us in many ways, including the following:

#### Effects on our Assets

A change in or elimination of the guarantee structure of Agency RMBS may increase our costs (if, for example, guarantee fees increase) or require us to change our investment strategy altogether. For example, the elimination of the guarantee structure of Agency RMBS may cause us to change our investment strategy to focus on non-Agency RMBS, which in turn would require us to significantly increase our monitoring of the credit risks of our investments in addition to interest rate and prepayment risks.

If prepayment rates are relatively low (due, in part, to the refinancing problems described above), lower long-term interest rates can increase the value of our Agency RMBS. This is because investors typically place a premium on assets with coupon/yields that are higher than coupon/yields available in the market. To the extent such securities pre-pay slower than would otherwise be the case, we benefit from an above market coupon/yield for longer, enhancing the return from the security. Although lower long-term interest rates may increase asset values in our portfolio, we may not be able to invest new funds in similarly yielding assets.

If prepayment levels increase, the value of any of our Agency RMBS that are carried at a premium to par that are affected by such prepayments may decline. This is because a principal prepayment accelerates the effective term of an Agency RMBS, which would shorten the period during which an investor would receive above-market returns (assuming the yield on the prepaid asset is higher than market yields). Also, prepayment proceeds may not be able to be reinvested in similar-yielding assets. Agency RMBS backed by mortgages with high interest rates are more susceptible to prepayment risk because holders of those mortgages are most likely to refinance to a lower rate. If prepayment levels decrease, the value of any of our Agency RMBS that are carried at a discount to par that are affected by such prepayments may increase. This is because a principal prepayment accelerates the effective term of an Agency RMBS, which would shorten the timeframe over which an investor would receive the principal of the underlying loans. Agency RMBS backed by mortgages with low interest rates are less susceptible to prepayment risk because holders of those mortgages are less likely to refinance to a higher rate. IOs and IIOs, however, may be the types of Agency RMBS most sensitive to increased prepayment rates. Because the holder of an IO or IIO receives no principal payments, the values of IOs and IIOs are entirely dependent on the existence of a principal balance on the underlying mortgages. If the principal balance is eliminated due to prepayment, IOs and IIOs essentially become worthless. Although increased prepayment rates can negatively affect the value of our IOs and IIOs, they have the opposite effect on POs. Because POs act like zero-coupon bonds, meaning they are purchased at a discount to their par value and have an effective interest rate based on the discount and the term of the underlying loan, an increase in prepayment rates would reduce the effective term of our POs and accelerate the yields earned on those assets, which would increase our net income.

Higher long-term rates can also affect the value of our Agency RMBS. As long-term rates rise, rates available to borrowers also rise. This tends to cause prepayment activity to slow and extend the expected average life of mortgage cash flows. As the expected average life of the mortgage cash flows increases, coupled with higher discount rates, the value of Agency RMBS declines. Some of the instruments we use to hedge our Agency RMBS assets, such as interest rate futures, swaps and swaptions, are stable average life instruments. This means that to the extent we use such instruments to hedge our Agency RMBS assets, our hedges may not adequately protect us from price declines, and therefore may negatively impact our book value. It is for this reason we use interest only securities in our portfolio. As interest rates rise, the expected average life of these securities increases, causing generally positive price movements as the number and size of the cash flows increase the longer the underlying mortgages remain outstanding. This makes interest only securities desirable hedge instruments for PT Agency RMBS.

Because we base our investment decisions on risk management principles rather than anticipated movements in interest rates, in a volatile interest rate environment we may allocate more capital to structured Agency RMBS with shorter durations. We believe these securities have a lower sensitivity to changes in long-term interest rates than other asset classes. We may attempt to mitigate our exposure to changes in long-term interest rates by investing in IOs and IIOs, which typically have different sensitivities to changes in long-term interest rates than PT RMBS, particularly PT RMBS backed by fixed-rate mortgages.

#### Effects on our borrowing costs

We leverage our PT RMBS and structured Agency RMBS through the use of short-term repurchase agreement transactions. The interest rates on our debt are determined by the short term interest rate markets. Increases in the Fed Funds rate or SOFR typically increase our borrowing costs, which could affect our interest rate spread if there is no corresponding increase in the interest we earn on our assets. The impact of these increases would be most prevalent with respect to our Agency RMBS backed by fixed rate mortgage loans because the interest rate on a fixed-rate mortgage loan does not change even though market rates may change.

In order to protect our net interest margin against increases in short-term interest rates, we may enter into interest rate swaps, which economically convert our floating-rate repurchase agreement debt to fixed-rate debt or utilize other hedging instruments such as Fed Funds, SOFR, ERIS SOFR Swap, and T-Note futures contracts, dual digital options or interest rate swaptions.

#### Summary

The Company invests exclusively in Agency RMBS securities and applies leverage utilizing repurchase agreement funding. The primary drivers of the performance of our assets – both absolute performance and performance relative to our hedges, are interest rates, their impact on both our asset prices and the level of prepayments, interest rate volatility, particularly the level of implied volatility in interest rate swaptions and various interest rate derivatives, and finally our funding levels. Accordingly, we have significant exposure to interest rates, and our performance is driven by our ability to select assets, manage our leverage, and our hedging strategy. As we entered 2026, interest rates had been range bound for more than 12 months, but the range was broken during the first quarter of 2026 as a result of the Iran War. After a brief respite in the conflict, rates moved higher once again as prospects for a resolution dimmed and a new Fed Chairman, Kevin Warsh, took control of the Fed, immediately expressing his strong conviction in ending the five-year period of inflation running above the Fed’s 2% target. Interest rate volatility, both realized and implied in interest rate options, has remained subdued outside of the temporary spike at the onset of the Iran War.

At the outset of 2026, there was uncertainty about how the risks facing the economy would ultimately drive Fed policy and the level of interest rates, with resulting impacts on risk assets and Agency RMBS. Inflation was elevated, but risks to the growth outlook were clearly present, creating a quandary for policy makers. This does not appear to be the case now. Growth has proven to be remarkably resilient, as has the labor market, and the growth of the economy is not a pressing concern for policy makers or markets. Inflation, however, remains well above the Fed’s target and the Iran War seems likely to persist, representing a continued source of commodity inflation. Data released for June in early July reflected a welcome decrease in the various inflation measures, but considerable doubt remains regarding the sustainability of these readings. Looking forward, the Iran War continues to be a dominant force driving the performance of all markets. At this point, it is unclear what the ultimate outcome of the war will be or when it will end. As for the economy and monetary policy, the outlook is no longer uncertain, as the path of inflation alone is likely to drive monetary policy and interest rate levels in the United States. The Company has maintained modest levels of leverage for the past several quarters and is likely to continue to do so given the prevailing market uncertainty.

### Critical Accounting Estimates

Our condensed financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP. GAAP requires our management to make some complex and subjective decisions and assessments. Our most critical accounting estimates involve decisions and assessments which could significantly affect reported assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. There have been no changes to our critical accounting estimates as discussed in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025.

### Dividends

In addition to other requirements that must be satisfied to continue to qualify as a REIT, we must pay annual dividends to our stockholders of at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding any net capital gains. REIT taxable income (loss) is computed in accordance with the Code and can be greater than or less than our financial statement net income (loss) computed in accordance with GAAP. These book to tax differences primarily relate to the recognition of interest income on RMBS, unrealized gains and losses on RMBS, and the amortization of losses on derivative instruments that are treated as funding hedges for tax purposes.

We intend to pay regular monthly dividends to our stockholders and have declared the following dividends since the completion of our IPO.

*(in thousands, except per share amounts)*

| Year | Per Share Amount | Total |
| --- | ---: | ---: |
| 2013 | $6.975 | $4,662 |
| 2014 | 10.800 | 22,643 |
| 2015 | 9.600 | 38,748 |
| 2016 | 8.400 | 41,388 |
| 2017 | 8.400 | 70,717 |
| 2018 | 5.350 | 55,814 |
| 2019 | 4.800 | 54,421 |
| 2020 | 3.950 | 53,570 |
| 2021 | 3.900 | 97,601 |
| 2022 | 2.475 | 87,906 |
| 2023 | 1.800 | 81,127 |
| 2024 | 1.440 | 96,309 |
| 2025 | 1.440 | 190,930 |
| 2026 - YTD(1) | 0.760 | 149,256 |
| Totals | $70.090 | $1,045,092 |

(1) On July 8, 2026, the Company declared a dividend of $0.10 per share to be paid on August 28, 2026. The effect of this dividend is included in the table above but is not reflected in the Company’s financial statements as of June 30, 2026.

## Market risk

As filed, 15,245 characters.

Market risk is the exposure to loss resulting from changes in market factors such as interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices and equity prices. The primary market risks that we are exposed to are interest rate risk, prepayment risk, spread risk, liquidity risk, extension risk and counterparty credit risk.

#### Interest Rate Risk

Interest rate risk is highly sensitive to many factors, including governmental monetary and tax policies, domestic and international economic and political considerations and other factors beyond our control.

Changes in the general level of interest rates can affect our net interest income, which is the difference between the interest income earned on interest-earning assets and the interest expense incurred in connection with our interest-bearing liabilities, by affecting the spread between our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Changes in the level of interest rates can also affect the rate of prepayments of our securities and the value of the RMBS that constitute our investment portfolio, which affects our net income, ability to realize gains from the sale of these assets and ability to borrow, and the amount that we can borrow against these securities.

We may utilize a variety of financial instruments in order to limit the effects of changes in interest rates on our operations. The principal instruments that we use are futures contracts, dual digital options, interest rate swaps and swaptions, and interest rate floors and caps. These instruments are intended to serve as an economic hedge against future interest rate increases on our repurchase agreement borrowings. Hedging techniques are partly based on assumed levels of prepayments of our Agency RMBS. If prepayments are slower or faster than assumed, the life of the Agency RMBS will be longer or shorter, which would reduce the effectiveness of any hedging strategies we may use and may cause losses on such transactions. Hedging strategies involving the use of derivative securities are highly complex and may produce volatile returns. Hedging techniques are also limited by the rules relating to REIT qualification. In order to preserve our REIT status, we may be forced to terminate a hedging transaction at a time when the transaction is most needed.

Our profitability and the value of our investment portfolio (including derivatives used for hedging purposes) may be adversely affected during any period as a result of changing interest rates, including changes in the forward yield curve.

Our portfolio of PT RMBS is typically comprised of fixed-rate RMBS, adjustable-rate RMBS (“ARMs”) and hybrid adjustable-rate RMBS. We generally seek to acquire low duration assets that offer high levels of protection from mortgage prepayments provided that they are reasonably priced by the market. Although the duration of an individual asset can change as a result of changes in interest rates, we strive to maintain a hedged PT RMBS portfolio with an effective duration of less than 2.0. The stated contractual final maturity of the mortgage loans underlying our portfolio of PT RMBS generally ranges up to 30 years. However, the effect of prepayments of the underlying mortgage loans tends to shorten the resulting cash flows from our investments substantially. Prepayments occur for various reasons, including refinancing of underlying mortgages and loan payoffs in connection with home sales, and borrowers paying more than their scheduled loan payments, which accelerates the amortization of the loans.

The duration of our IO and IIO portfolios will vary greatly depending on the structural features of the securities. While prepayment activity will always affect the cash flows associated with the securities, the interest only nature of IOs may cause their durations to become extremely negative when prepayments are high, and less negative when prepayments are low. Prepayments affect the durations of IIOs similarly, but the floating rate nature of the coupon of IIOs (which is inversely related to the level of one month SOFR) causes their price movements, and model duration, to be affected by changes in both prepayments and one month SOFR, both current and anticipated levels. As a result, the duration of IIO securities will also vary greatly.

Prepayments on the loans underlying our RMBS can alter the timing of the cash flows from the underlying loans to us. As a result, we gauge the interest rate sensitivity of our assets by measuring their effective duration. While modified duration measures the price sensitivity of a bond to movements in interest rates, effective duration captures both the movement in interest rates and the fact that cash flows to a mortgage related security are altered when interest rates move. Accordingly, when the contract interest rate on a mortgage loan is substantially above prevailing interest rates in the market, the effective duration of securities collateralized by such loans can be quite low because of expected prepayments.

We face the risk that the market value of our RMBS assets will increase or decrease at different rates than that of our hedging instruments. Accordingly, we assess our interest rate risk by estimating the duration of our assets and the duration of our hedge instruments. We generally calculate duration using various third party models. However, empirical results and various third party models may produce different duration numbers for the same securities.

The following sensitivity analysis shows the estimated impact on the fair value of our interest rate-sensitive investments and hedge positions as of June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, assuming rates instantaneously fall 200 bps, fall 100 bps, fall 50 bps, rise 50 bps, rise 100 bps and rise 200 bps, adjusted to reflect the impact of convexity, which is the measure of the sensitivity of our hedge positions and Agency RMBS’ effective duration to movements in interest rates. We have a negatively convex asset profile and a linear to slightly positively convex hedge portfolio (short positions). It is common for us to have losses in both directions.

All changes in value in the table below are measured as percentage changes from the investment portfolio value and net asset value at the base interest rate scenario. The base interest rate scenario assumes interest rates and prepayment projections as of June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025.

Actual results could differ materially from estimates, especially in the current market environment. To the extent that these estimates or other assumptions do not hold true, which is likely in a period of high price volatility, actual results will likely differ materially from projections and could be larger or smaller than the estimates in the table below. Moreover, if different models were employed in the analysis, materially different projections could result. Lastly, while the table below reflects the estimated impact of interest rate increases and decreases on a static portfolio, we may from time to time sell any of our agency securities as a part of the overall management of our investment portfolio.

*Interest Rate Sensitivity(1)*

| Change in Interest Rate As of June 30, 2026 | Portfolio Market Value(2)(3) | Book Value(2)(4) |
| --- | ---: | ---: |
| -200 Basis Points | (2.60)% | (20.79)% |
| -100 Basis Points | (0.70)% | (5.61)% |
| -50 Basis Points | (0.17)% | (1.36)% |
| +50 Basis Points | (0.18)% | (1.47)% |
| +100 Basis Points | (0.70)% | (5.58)% |
| +200 Basis Points | (2.56)% | (20.53)% |
| **As of December 31, 2025** |  |  |
| -200 Basis Points | (2.23)% | (17.30)% |
| -100 Basis Points | (0.65)% | (5.07)% |
| -50 Basis Points | (0.15)% | (1.14)% |
| +50 Basis Points | (0.29)% | (2.22)% |
| +100 Basis Points | (0.98)% | (7.62)% |
| +200 Basis Points | (3.27)% | (25.31)% |

(1) Interest rate sensitivity is derived from models that are dependent on inputs and assumptions provided by third parties as well as by our Manager and assumes there are no changes in mortgage spreads and assumes a static portfolio. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates.

(2) Includes the effect of derivatives and other securities used for hedging purposes.

(3) Estimated dollar change in investment portfolio value expressed as a percent of the total fair value of our investment portfolio as of such date.

(4) Estimated dollar change in portfolio value expressed as a percent of stockholders' equity as of such date.

In addition to changes in interest rates, other factors impact the fair value of our interest rate-sensitive investments, such as the shape of the yield curve, market expectations as to future interest rate changes and other market conditions. Accordingly, in the event of changes in actual interest rates, the change in the fair value of our assets would likely differ from that shown above and such difference might be material and adverse to our stockholders.

#### Prepayment Risk

Because residential borrowers have the option to prepay their mortgage loans at par at any time, we face the risk that we will experience a return of principal on our investments faster than anticipated. Various factors affect the rate at which mortgage prepayments occur, including changes in the level of and directional trends in housing prices, interest rates, general economic conditions, loan age and size, loan-to-value ratio, the location of the property and social and demographic conditions. Additionally, changes to government sponsored entity underwriting practices or other governmental programs could also significantly impact prepayment rates or expectations. Generally, prepayments on Agency RMBS increase during periods of falling mortgage interest rates and decrease during periods of rising mortgage interest rates. However, this may not always be the case. We may reinvest principal repayments at a yield that is lower or higher than the yield on the repaid investment, thus affecting our net interest income by altering the average yield on our assets.

#### Spread Risk

When the market spread widens between the yield on our Agency RMBS and benchmark interest rates, our net book value could decline if the value of our Agency RMBS falls by more than the offsetting fair value increases on our hedging instruments tied to the underlying benchmark interest rates. We refer to this as "spread risk" or "basis risk." The spread risk associated with our mortgage assets and the resulting fluctuations in fair value of these securities can occur independent of changes in benchmark interest rates and may relate to other factors impacting the mortgage and fixed income markets, such as actual or anticipated monetary policy actions by the Fed, market liquidity, or changes in required rates of return on different assets. Consequently, while we use futures contracts, dual digital options, interest rate swaps and swaptions, and interest rate caps and floors to attempt to protect against moves in interest rates, such instruments typically will not protect our net book value against spread risk.

#### Liquidity Risk

The primary liquidity risk for us arises from financing long-term assets with shorter-term borrowings through repurchase agreements. Our assets that are pledged to secure repurchase agreements are Agency RMBS and cash. As of June 30, 2026, we had unrestricted cash and cash equivalents of $682.6 million and unpledged securities of approximately $93.4 million (not including unsettled securities purchases or securities pledged to us) available to meet margin calls on our repurchase agreements and derivative contracts, and for other corporate purposes. However, should the value of our Agency RMBS pledged as collateral or the value of our derivative instruments suddenly decrease, margin calls relating to our repurchase and derivative agreements could increase, causing an adverse change in our liquidity position. Further, there is no assurance that we will always be able to renew (or roll) our repurchase agreements. In addition, our counterparties have the option to increase our haircuts (margin requirements) on the assets we pledge against repurchase agreements, thereby reducing the amount that can be borrowed against an asset even if they agree to renew or roll the repurchase agreement. Significantly higher haircuts can reduce our ability to leverage our portfolio or even force us to sell assets, especially if correlated with asset price declines or faster prepayment rates on our assets.

#### Extension Risk

The projected weighted average life and the duration (or interest rate sensitivity) of our investments is based on our Manager's assumptions regarding the rate at which the borrowers will prepay the underlying mortgage loans. In general, we use futures contracts, dual digital options and interest rate swaps and swaptions to help manage our funding cost on our investments in the event that interest rates rise. These hedging instruments allow us to reduce our funding exposure on the notional amount of the instrument for a specified period of time.

However, if prepayment rates decrease in a rising interest rate environment, the average life or duration of our fixed-rate assets or the fixed-rate portion of the ARMs or other assets generally extends. This could have a negative impact on our results from operations, as our hedging instrument expirations are fixed and will, therefore, cover a smaller percentage of our funding exposure on our mortgage assets to the extent that their average lives increase due to slower prepayments. This situation may also cause the market value of our Agency RMBS and CMOs collateralized by fixed rate mortgages or hybrid ARMs to decline by more than otherwise would be the case while most of our hedging instruments would not receive any incremental offsetting gains. In extreme situations, we may be forced to sell assets to maintain adequate liquidity, which could cause us to incur realized losses.

#### Counterparty Credit Risk

We are exposed to counterparty credit risk relating to potential losses that could be recognized in the event that the counterparties to our repurchase agreements and derivative contracts fail to perform their obligations under such agreements. The amount of assets we pledge as collateral in accordance with our agreements varies over time based on the market value and notional amount of such assets as well as the value of our derivative contracts. In the event of a default by a counterparty, we may not receive payments provided for under the terms of our agreements and may have difficulty obtaining our assets pledged as collateral under such agreements. Our credit risk related to certain derivative transactions is largely mitigated through daily adjustments to collateral pledged based on changes in market value and we limit our counterparties to registered central clearing exchanges and major financial institutions with acceptable credit ratings, monitoring positions with individual counterparties and adjusting collateral posted as required. However, there is no guarantee our efforts to manage counterparty credit risk will be successful and we could suffer significant losses if unsuccessful.

## Controls and procedures

As filed, 1,438 characters.

### Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this report (the “evaluation date”), we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer (the “CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (the “CFO”), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act. Based on this evaluation, the CEO and CFO concluded our disclosure controls and procedures, as designed and implemented, were effective as of the evaluation date (1) in ensuring that information regarding the Company is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, by our Manager's employees, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure and (2) in providing reasonable assurance that information we must disclose in our periodic reports under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods prescribed by the SEC’s rules and forms.

### Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no significant changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

## Risk factors

As filed, 339 characters.

A description of certain factors that may affect our future results and risk factors is set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025. As of June 30, 2026, there have been no material changes in our risk factors from those set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025.

Filed Jul 24, 2026.
Source: SEC EDGAR, the filing index for accession 0001437749-26-024400. Last ingested by Listed: Oct 24, 2026, 15:13 ET. No prices; not investment advice.