# Blue Biofuels, Inc.: Form 10-K for the period ended Dec 31, 2021

- Company: [Blue Biofuels, Inc.](/companies/biof.md) (CIK 1549145)
- Form: 10-K
- Filed: 2022-02-25
- Accepted by EDGAR: Feb 24, 2022, 19:10 ET
- Period: 2021-12-31
- Accession: 0001493152-22-005446
- Inline XBRL: yes
- Main document: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1549145/000149315222005446/form10k.htm
- All documents and exhibits: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1549145/000149315222005446/

## Figures reported in this filing

Standardized XBRL line items for the period ended 2021-12-31.

| Line item | Period | Value | XBRL concept |
| --- | --- | ---: | --- |
| Research and development | 12 months, 2021-01-01 to 2021-12-31 | $1.1m | us-gaap:ResearchAndDevelopmentExpense |
| Operating income | 12 months, 2021-01-01 to 2021-12-31 | −$2.2m | us-gaap:OperatingIncomeLoss |
| Net income | 12 months, 2021-01-01 to 2021-12-31 | −$2.1m | us-gaap:NetIncomeLoss |
| Basic EPS | 12 months, 2021-01-01 to 2021-12-31 | −$0.01 | us-gaap:EarningsPerShareBasic |
| Operating cash flow | 12 months, 2021-01-01 to 2021-12-31 | −$2.5m | us-gaap:NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities |
| Capital expenditure | 12 months, 2021-01-01 to 2021-12-31 | $216.4k | us-gaap:PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment |
| Cash and equivalents | at 2021-12-31 | $1.2m | us-gaap:CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue |
| Current assets | at 2021-12-31 | $1.2m | us-gaap:AssetsCurrent |
| Total assets | at 2021-12-31 | $1.8m | us-gaap:Assets |
| Current liabilities | at 2021-12-31 | $496.2k | us-gaap:LiabilitiesCurrent |
| Total liabilities | at 2021-12-31 | $3.2m | us-gaap:Liabilities |
| Shareholders' equity | at 2021-12-31 | −$1.4m | us-gaap:StockholdersEquity |

## Business

As filed, 13,583 characters.

### Background

### Business Overview

Blue Biofuels, Inc., was incorporated in Nevada on March 28, 2012, as Alliance Media Group Holdings, Inc. Since December 2013, Blue Biofuels, Inc. (the “Company”) has been a technology company focused on emerging technologies in the renewable energy, biofuels, and bioplastics technologies sectors.

In early 2018, the Company’s chief executive officer (“CEO”) Ben Slager invented a new technology system referred to as Cellulose-to-Sugar or CTS 2.0, and the Company filed a process patent application for this technology. Mr. Slager has since further developed the system with laboratory personnel. The patent on the CTS 2.0 (U.S. Patent No. 10,994,255) was awarded in 2021. The same patent was filed in all major jurisdictions of the world including the European Patent Organization, Australia, Brazil, China, Japan, the African Regional Intellectual Property Organization, and the Russian Federation. In addition to this patent, the Company has filed provisional patent applications for six additional patents that are currently pending.

Mr. Slager has further developed the system with laboratory personnel. The CTS 2.0 process is a continuous mechanical/chemical dry process for converting cellulose material into sugar and lignin, as compared to the CTS 1.0 which is a batch process that the Company previously licensed. The CTS 2.0 process creates molecular contact between two reactive solid components instead of competing systems where the reaction takes place between two liquid or gas components in a batch process. The reactants are (1) the cellulose, which is broken down into its components being sugars and lignin; and (2) a catalyst, abundantly available in the market from regular suppliers, and separated from reactor components and reused. The CTS 2.0 mechanical/chemical process allows for exact process control to ensure that all the material passing through it does so on the reaction parameters through which optimal efficiency is achieved.

The 100% owned CTS 2.0 system can convert virtually any cellulosic material – like grasses, wood, paper, farm waste, yard waste, forestry products, energy crops like hemp or king grass, and the cellulosic portion of municipal solid waste – into sugars and subsequently into biofuels and bioplastics without the use of expensive enzymes or harmful liquid acids or bases. CTS 2.0 is environmentally friendly in that it recycles the water and catalyst, and has a near zero carbon footprint in that the amount of added atmospheric carbon created by burning the biofuels produced by CTS 2.0 is reabsorbed by the plant-based feedstock used in the CTS 2.0 system in the next harvest.

CTS 2.0 is different from other commercial processes that are used to convert cellulose into sugar. Other processes use expensive enzymes, or expensive and harmful chemicals like strong acids or bases, and some processes use steam at high temperature or high pressure.

The CTS 2.0 system converts plant-based feedstock into two product streams, soluble sugars and lignin, each of which can be converted into multiple products: (1) sugars can be further processed into cellulosic ethanol and other biofuels like jet fuel, and potentially into bio chemicals; and (2) Lignin can be used in ion exchange resins, specialty chemicals, or to create bioplastics. Lignin can also be burned as a renewable fuel.

CTS has different co-products than other processes. Our primary co-product is sulfur-free lignin. Other cellulosic ethanol processes do not yield sulfur-free high purity lignin because their processes destroy or contaminate the lignin. Most ethanol producers use corn, not cellulose, and the co-products of corn ethanol production are distillers grains animal feed and corn oil. Our lignin potentially can be converted into biodegradable bioplastics, or be used in ion exchange resins or specialty chemicals. Revenue streams from lignin can potentially be higher than from ethanol. We are also looking into whether the CTS process can produce nanocellulose profitably, which is used in pharmaceutical products and potentially could sell for over $1 per gram.

At a commercial scale, our management expects to be able to produce ethanol at a lower cost per gallon than existing commercial corn or cellulosic ethanol producers due to the fact that the CTS 2.0 process is uncomplicated and efficient, and is expected to have high value by-products. We believe a significant difference between CTS 2.0 and corn ethanol is the wide range of feedstocks that CTS 2.0 can process compared to corn. The CTS 2.0 feedstocks are not food and have much lower costs than corn. In addition, while in corn ethanol only the corn is used, the CTS 2.0 uses the whole plant or its waste products.

The promise of the CTS technology led the Company’s management and board to restructure the Company through chapter 11. Prior management had taken on various short-term high interest usurious “toxic” notes that converted into common stock at a fixed discount to the market price in 2017 and early 2018, and various other debts that the Company could not pay at that time. The Company’s new board and management determined that a chapter 11 bankruptcy filing was its only plausible alternative to save the company as a going concern for the benefit of creditors and stockholders. The Company voluntarily filed for Chapter 11 on October 22, 2018, in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in the Southern District of Florida. Management fought, eliminated, and restructured millions in debts and disputed debts, and exited Chapter 11 on September 18, 2019, while keeping all classes, including the shareholders, unimpaired. The Company’s debts were either voided, renegotiated down and paid off, or renegotiated to be paid out of future revenues ($1,820,630) or renegotiated to be paid out of future profits ($917,502). These are reflected on the Company’s financial statements. A complete copy of the Plan of Reorganization was filed as Exhibit 2(a) of the Company’s 2020 financial statements. Having paid all debts that needed to be paid, the bankruptcy case was closed on October 25, 2019.

Throughout this bankruptcy period and thereafter, the Company has proceeded with engineering and development of its technology towards commercialization. The Company has built several prototypes of the CTS 2.0 system to further develop the process. The Company completed its upgraded 4th generation CTS 2.0 prototype system in 2021, which was designed to be a representative scale with nearly all systems and parameters anticipated in a full-scale industrial system. The Company decided to complete all the parameter optimizations possible with its 4th generation system before scaling up to a 5th generation system because the parameter optimizations lead to design improvements that have been done more cost effectively at that scale. The Company has recently finalized its 4th generation testing with great success as it was able to generate a 99%+ conversion of the cellulosic material into soluble sugars suitable for further processing into cellulosic ethanol. The Company is now moving into its 5th generation system.

The Company expects to have its 5th generation CTS 2.0 prototype, along with auxiliary equipment, completed within 6 to 12 months. The goal of the 5th generation system is to prove larger volume production, and to be an intermediate step to the final 6th generation which is intended to be the commercial volume system. The Company expects that the 5th generation system will be of sufficient size and handle sufficient capacity of feedstock to produce approximately one ton per day of the combination of sugar and lignin, which the Company believes will be sufficient to prove the commercial viability of the CTS 2.0 technology. Due to its mechanical nature and modularity, we anticipate that one plant would have multiple modular CTS systems. The Company expects to have a CTS 2.0 modular system ready for commercial production in 12-18 months.

However, commencing commercial production will require project financing. The project financing will either be for bolting on our CTS 2.0 system into an existing ethanol facility of a future potential joint venture partner, or for acquiring an ethanol facility and converting that to cellulosic ethanol production using our CTS 2.0 system, or for setting up a production facility for converting ethanol into jet fuel using the Vertimass Process that the Company has licensed.

We believe retrofitting existing ethanol plants with the CTS 2.0 technology may achieve more rapid commercialization than building new plants. After its first plant is profitable, the Company intends to grow with additional plants in the United States and explore international growth by either licensing the technology or forming joint ventures with foreign domestic partners to build plants ourselves.

The ethanol industry is highly competitive with over 200 ethanol plants in the United States alone. Currently, the vast majority use corn as the feedstock. Their profitability depends highly on the fluctuations between the price of corn and the price of ethanol. Since the Company does not plan to use corn, and plans on having long-term purchase agreements with cellulosic suppliers, we expect that our profitability will potentially be more consistent.

Any new biofuels plant that is built would require various government permits. In particular, renewable fuels are subject to rigorous testing and premarket approval requirements by the EPA’s Office of Transportation and Air Quality and regulatory authorities in other countries. In the U.S., various federal, and, in some cases, state statutes and regulations also govern or impact the manufacturing, safety, storage and use of renewable fuels. The process of seeking required approvals and the continuing need for compliance with applicable statutes and regulations requires the expenditure of resources. The Company anticipates raising the necessary capital for this as a part of its project-based financing. The Company would also need various government permits before commercializing products for the plastics industry.

The Energy Policy Act of 2005, which included the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) Program enforced by the US Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), mandates a certain amount of renewable fuel be blended into the transportation fuel used by all motor vehicles in the country. This Program provides monetary incentives to companies that produce renewable transportation fuel (including jet fuel), establishes Renewable Identification Numbers (RINs) or credits for each gallon of renewable transportation fuel produced in the United States, and breaks down those fuels into different D-codes based on the source of the renewable fuel. D3 is the code for renewable ethanol that comes from cellulosic materials. The EPA’s newly proposed revised mandate for cellulosic ethanol is for 510 million gallons of cellulosic biofuels be blended into the fuel supply in 2020, 620 million gallons for 2021, and 770 million gallons for 2022 (the D3 mandate). This mandate has increased every year and is statutorily mandated to increase in the future and become a larger portion of the full renewable fuels mandate, if and when cellulosic biofuels can be produced profitably in larger quantities than they are now. The RFS mandate for 2022 calls for 20.77 billion gallons of total renewable fuel, 15 billion from conventional biofuels (corn ethanol) and 5.77 billion from advanced biofuels, including cellulosic biofuels. The “blend wall” (or upper limit to the amount of ethanol that can be blended into U.S. gasoline and automobile performance and comply with the Clean Air Act) of limiting ethanol content in gasoline to 10%, limits the total amount of ethanol consumed in the United States. The value of the D3 RIN fluctuates, but as of this filing, it is approximately $3.40 per gallon of ethanol. To profit from these incentives, the Company plans to apply for these D3 RIN credits as it brings its first plant into commercial operation.

The Company has a strategy that includes using its low-cost high-purity lignin co-product to produce biodegradable bioplastics. The plastics industry is highly competitive. The Company would need various government permits before commercializing products in this space, and it is too preliminary to discuss more details.

The Company has also licensed the Vertimass Process to convert ethanol (from the CTS 2.0 process) into bio-jet fuel. There is no up-front or annual fee until we are converting ethanol into bio-jet fuel. The license agreement with Vertimass is the subject of a confidentiality agreement between the parties. Since we are not yet producing ethanol on a commercial scale, it is too preliminary to discuss details.

The Company believes that its management and consultants have significant experience in the development of technologies from concept to commercialization. As of this date, the Company has not generated any material revenues from its business.

### Description of the Company’s Securities

The Company is currently authorized to issue 1,000,000,000 Shares of Common Stock par value $0.001 and 10,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock par value $0.001. Each share of Company Common Stock is entitled to one (1) vote per share.

### Employees

The company currently employs seven full-time employees, five part-time employee and six consultants. The Company is in the process of hiring additional employees to more rapidly commercialize its technology.

## Properties

As filed, 733 characters.

### Offices

The Company maintains its corporate office at 3710 Buckeye Street, Suite 120, Palm Beach Gardens 33410. The Company’s telephone number is 888-607-3555. On August 30, 2019, the Company signed a lease for a period of twenty-four (24) months from November 1, 2019 through October 31, 2021. In December 2020, this lease was extended for twelve (12) months. Annual rent commenced at approximately $84,100 per annum and increases on a year-to-year basis by three percent (3%) over the base year. In addition, the Company is obligated to pay an amount equal to 10.41% of the operating expenses of the building together with sales tax on all amounts. This office space includes the Company’s research and demonstration facilities.

## Legal proceedings

As filed, 1,058 characters.

The Company is subject, from time to time, to litigation, claims and suits arising in the ordinary course of business. As of the date of filing, there are no material claims or suits whose outcomes could have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.

On June 21, 2018, Power Up Lending Group Ltd., sued both the Company and four of its managers, ex-managers, and directors of the Company in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The case was dropped against the Company and the claim discharged by the bankruptcy court upon Plan Confirmation on September 18, 2019. Power Up has continued a tort case against the individuals. Our director and officer insurance has agreed to cover our chief executive officer Benjamin Slager, chief financial officer Anthony Santelli, as well as ex-controller Dennis Lenaburg, in this case. Management believes the Complaint is frivolous. The defendants have filed amended answers and counterclaims as of the date of this filing, and the case has gone into the discovery phase.

## Management's discussion and analysis

As filed, 15,740 characters.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited financial statements and the notes thereto.

### Forward-Looking Statements

This annual report contains forward-looking statements and information relating to the Company that are based on the beliefs of its management as well as assumptions made by, and information currently available to, its management. When used in this report, the words “believe,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “estimate,” “intend”, “plan” and similar expressions, as they relate to the Company or its management, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements reflect management’s current view of the Company concerning future events and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including among many others: a general economic downturn; a downturn in the securities markets; federal or state laws or regulations having an adverse effect on proposed transactions that the Company desires to effect; Securities and Exchange Commission regulations which affect trading in the securities of “penny stocks”; and other risks and uncertainties. Should any of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those described in this report as anticipated, estimated or expected. The accompanying information contained in this registration statement, including, without limitation, the information set forth under the heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis and Plan of Operation — Risk Factors” identifies important additional factors that could materially adversely affect actual results and performance. You are urged to carefully consider these factors. All forward-looking statements attributable to the Company are expressly qualified in their entirety by the foregoing cautionary statement.

### Business Overview

Blue Biofuels, Inc (the “Company”) is a technology company focused on emerging technologies in the renewable energy, biofuels, and bioplastics technologies sectors.

In early 2018, our chief executive officer (“CEO”) Ben Slager invented a new technology system referred to as Cellulose-to-Sugar or CTS 2.0, and the Company filed, and recently received, a patent application for this technology. The CTS 2.0 process is a continuous mechanical/chemical dry process for converting cellulose material into sugar and lignin.

The CTS 2.0 system converts plant-based feedstock into two product streams, soluble sugars and lignin, each of which can be converted into multiple products: (1) sugars can be further processed into cellulosic ethanol and other biofuels like jet fuel, and potentially into bio chemicals; and (2) Lignin can be used in ion exchange resins, specialty chemicals, or to create bioplastics. Lignin can also be burned as a renewable fuel.

The Company expects to have its 5th generation CTS 2.0 prototype, along with auxiliary equipment, completed in 2022. The goal of the 5th generation system is to prove larger volume production, and to be an intermediate step to the final 6th generation which is intended to be a commercial volume system.

### Plan of Operation

The Company’s strategy is to diversify its product portfolio to include a number of product lines. These potentially include (1) biofuels – such as ethanol, or converting ethanol into higher biofuels like jet-fuel and the like; (2) selling sulfur-free lignin to ion exchange resin producers; (3) making bioplastics from lignin; or, (4) using the sugars and lignin to make biochemicals. We believe that one or more of these co-products could potentially be profitable for the Company.

Our goal is to develop our CTS 2.0 technology to a commercial scale and then seek to either enter into a joint venture or acquire existing corn ethanol plants to install the CTS 2.0 technology. The Company is also looking into converting ethanol to jet fuel. To minimize dilution to shareholders, we will seek project-based financing to build (or acquire and retrofit) or joint venture with existing ethanol producers to produce cellulosic ethanol and lignin/bioplastics and other specialty chemicals from our CTS 2.0 system. We believe retrofitting existing plants with the CTS 2.0 technology may achieve more rapid commercialization than building new plants. If its first plant is profitable, the Company intends to grow with additional plants in the United States and explore international growth by either licensing the technology or forming joint ventures with foreign domestic partners to build plants ourselves.

The Energy Policy Act of 2005, which included the Renewable Fuel Standard Program enforced by the US Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), mandates a certain amount of renewable fuel be blended into the transportation fuel used by all vehicles in the country. This Program provides monetary incentives to companies that produce renewable transportation fuel, and establishes Renewable Identification Numbers (“RINs”) or credits for each gallon of renewable transportation fuel produced in the United States, and breaks down those fuels into different D-codes depending on the source of the renewable fuel. D3 is the code for renewable ethanol that comes from cellulosic materials. (D6 is for corn ethanol). The value of the D3 RIN fluctuates, but as of this filing, it is approximately $3.40 per gallon of ethanol. To profit from these incentives, the Company plans to apply for these D3 RIN credits as it brings its first plant into commercial operation.

The Company believes that its management and consultants have significant experience in the development of technologies from concept to commercialization. As of this date, the Company has generated $194,319 in revenue, however it has not generated any revenues from its core business.

### Capital Formation

From January 1, 2021 through the date of filing, 13,455,008 warrants were exercised for proceeds of $1,302,817.

From January 1, 2021, through the date of filing, the Company issued 10,543,332 shares at prices ranging from $0.075 to $0.25 per share for proceeds of $2,260,750.

From January 1, 2021, through the date of filing, 500,000 options were exercised for proceeds of $20,400.

From January 1, 2021 through the date of filing, the Company issued an aggregate of 515,700 shares of its common stock for services valued at $120,152.

From January 1, 2021 through the date of filing, the Company issued an aggregate of 1,166,667 warrants for services. Using a Black-Scholes asset-pricing model, these warrants were valued at $72,090. These warrant have all been exercised.

From January 1, 2021 through the date of filing, the company issued 7,080,000 shares in exchange for convertible debt of $279,000.

### Purchases of Equity Securities

The Company has never purchased, nor does it own, any equity securities of any other issuer.

### Going Concern

The Company has incurred losses since inception, and although it currently has a working capital surplus, it may be unable to raise further capital. At December 31, 2021 the Company had a working capital surplus of $713,554 and had incurred accumulated losses of $48,821,403 since its inception. The Company expects to incur significant additional losses in connection with its continued start-up activities. As disclosed in Note 2 to the financial statements, there is substantial doubt as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern based upon recurring operating losses and its need to obtain additional financing to sustain operations. The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to obtain the necessary financing to meet its obligations and repay its liabilities when they become due and to generate sufficient revenues from its operations to pay its operating expenses.

### Results of Operations

### Comparison of the year ended December 31, 2021 to December 31, 2020

For the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company recognized $0 in revenue and also $0 in 2020.

For the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company’s general and administrative expenses decreased by $192,826 to $1,034,948 from $1,227,776 in 2020. This decrease is primarily due to non-cash options packages valued at $876,291 in 2020 as compared to $31,104 non-cash stock compensation in 2021, partially offset by increased salaries to $942,522 from $396,394 in 2020.

Interest expense decreased in the year ended December 31, 2021 by $156,420 to $33,772 from $190,192 in 2020. This decrease is due to the Company’s decision to accrue interest on the back pay due to management in 2020 followed by the repayment of most back pay in 2021.

For the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company received a loan forgiveness of $66,330 versus $0 in 2020.

### Research and Development

The Company expenses all research and development costs as incurred. For the years ended December 31, 2021, and 2020, the amounts charged to research and development expenses were $1,103,436 and $763,159, respectively.

The increase is due to the Company hiring additional laboratory personnel after successfully raising additional capital.

### Liquidity and Capital Resources

#### Liquidity

As of December 31, 2021 the Company had $1,164,664 in cash and total stockholders’ equity at December 31, 2021 was negative $1,396,046. As of December 31, 2020, the Company had $286,579 in cash and total stockholders’ equity at December 31, 2020 was negative $3,336,764. Total debt, including advances, accounts payable and other notes payable at December 31, 2021, together with interest payable thereon and contingent liabilities, was $3,234,293, a decrease of $994,973 from December 31, 2020, where it stood at $4,229,266. This decrease is primarily attributable to paying down back pay and $279,000 of convertible notes having converted. $2,738,132 of the remaining debt was renegotiated to be payable out of future revenue or future profits and otherwise does not come due.

During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, the Company’s operating expenses increased $180,933 to $2,171,868 from $1,990,935 in 2020. This increase can primarily be attributed to an increase in salaries.

During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, the Company’s investing activities used $233,132 in cash. This can be attributed to $216,390 used to purchase machinery and equipment, and $16,742 in patent expenses.

During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, the Company generated an aggregate of $3,576,467 through its financing activities, which is an increase of $2,272,757 from $1,303,710 during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020. This increase from the prior year can be attributed to $2,260,750 raised in private placements as compared to $887,380 in 2020, and $1,315,717 received from the exercise of warrants as compared to $350,000 in 2020.

#### Capital Resources

At this time, the Company has limited liquidity and capital resources. To continue funding its operations, the Company will need to generate revenue or obtain additional financing for current and future operations. The Company anticipates needing around $7.5 to $10 million to optimize and scale up its CTS 2.0 system to be commercially ready. The Company anticipates reaching this stage in around 12-18 months. There is no guarantee that we will achieve all of the additional funding that is needed.

As of the date of filing, the Company has raised $7,500 through the exercise of warrants in 2022, $3,576,467 in 2021, through the issuance of common stock and the exercise of warrants and options, in addition to $10,692,293 raised through the end of 2020 through its private placement offerings, and in addition to capital raised through debt or convertible notes. However, there is no guarantee that the company will be able to raise any additional capital on terms acceptable to the Company.

The inability to obtain this funding either in the near term and/or longer term will materially affect the ability of the Company to implement its business plan of operations and jeopardize the viability of the Company. In that case, the Company may need to re-evaluate and revise its operations.

### Equity

As of December 31, 2021, shareholders’ equity was negative $(1,396,046).

There were 274,003,883 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2021.

There were no preferred shares outstanding.

The Company has paid no dividends.

### Critical Accounting Policies

#### Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements of the Company were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S. (“U.S. GAAP”) and include the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses of the Company’s majority-owned subsidiaries over which the Company exercised control, if any, and there are currently none.

#### Principles of Consolidation

The Company’s consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its then-existing subsidiaries, after elimination of intercompany accounts and transactions. Investments in business entities in which the Company lacks control but has the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies are accounted for using the equity method. The Company’s proportionate share of net income or loss of the entity is recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings.

#### Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the dates presented and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods presented. Significant estimates inherent in the preparation of the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include estimates of impairment assessment of identifiable intangible assets and valuation allowance for deferred tax assets. Estimates are based on past experience and other considerations reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

#### Stock Compensation

The Company recognizes the cost of all share-based payments under the relevant authoritative accounting guidance. Share-based payments include any remuneration paid by the Company in shares of the Company’s common stock or financial instruments that grant the recipient the right to acquire shares of the Company’s common stock. For share-based payments to employees, which consist only of awards made under the stock option plan described below, the Company accounts for the payments in accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 718, “Stock Compensation” (formerly referred to as SFAS No. 123(R)). Share-based payments to consultants, service providers and other non-employees are accounted for under in accordance with ASC Topic 718, ASC Topic 505, “Equity Payments to Non-Employees” or other applicable authoritative guidance

#### Seasonality

The Company’s operating results are not affected by seasonality.

#### Inflation

The Company’s business and operating results are not currently affected in any material way by inflation.

#### Contractual Obligations

As a “smaller reporting company” as defined by Item 10 of Regulation S-K, the Company is not required to provide this information.

#### Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on its financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.

## Market risk

As filed, 147 characters.

As a “smaller reporting company” as defined by Item 10 of Regulation S-K, the Company is not required to provide information required by this Item.

## Controls and procedures

As filed, 5,713 characters.

### Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Disclosure controls and procedures refer to controls and other procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

As required by Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act, our management has carried out an evaluation, with the participation and under the supervision of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as of December 31, 2021. Based upon, and as of the date of this evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer determined that our disclosure controls and procedures were sufficient.

### Management’s Annual Report on Internal Controls over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f)). The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the Company conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021 using the criteria established in “Internal Control - Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”).

A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. In its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, the Company determined that there were no control deficiencies that constituted material weaknesses. Control deficiencies that existed in 2020 have been rectified. The Company now has an independent financial expert on its Audit Committee; and the Company backs up all financial data and material agreements in the cloud so that in the event of theft, misplacement, or loss due to fire or other unmitigated factors, the Company should still retain all of its material financial data and agreements.

As a result, management has concluded that the Company maintains effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by COSO.

Material weaknesses in our disclosure controls and procedures may be identified in the future. Should we discover such conditions, we intend to remediate them as soon as practicable. We are committed to taking appropriate steps for remediation, as needed.

All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

### Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There has been a change in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with our evaluation we conducted of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020., that occurred during our fiscal year 2021 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. The Company now has an independent financial expert on its Audit Committee, and the Company now backs up all financial data and material agreements in the cloud so that in the event of theft, misplacement, or loss due to fire or other unmitigated factors, the Company should still retain all of its material financial data and agreements. In addition, the Company now has multiple persons reviewing and reconciling the bank account and our financial data.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the SEC that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

Filed Feb 25, 2022.
Source: SEC EDGAR, the filing index for accession 0001493152-22-005446. Last ingested by Listed: Oct 30, 2026, 17:19 ET. No prices; not investment advice.
