# New Mountain Finance Corp: Form 10-Q for the period ended Jun 30, 2018

- Company: [New Mountain Finance Corp](/companies/nmfc.md) (CIK 1496099)
- Form: 10-Q
- Filed: 2018-08-07
- Accepted by EDGAR: Aug 7, 2018, 16:34 ET
- Period: 2018-06-30
- Accession: 0001496099-18-000008
- Inline XBRL: no
- Main document: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1496099/000149609918000008/nmfc-063018x10q.htm
- All documents and exhibits: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1496099/000149609918000008/

## Management's discussion and analysis

As filed, 119,065 characters.

The information in management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations relates to New Mountain Finance Corporation, including its wholly-owned direct and indirect subsidiaries (collectively, "we", "us", "our", "NMFC" or the "Company").

### Forward-Looking Statements

The information contained in this section should be read in conjunction with the financial data and consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report. Some of the statements in this report (including in the following discussion) constitute forward-looking statements, which relate to future events or our future performance or our financial condition. The forward-looking statements contained in this section involve a number of risks and uncertainties, including:

- statements concerning the impact of a protracted decline in the liquidity of credit markets;
- the general economy, including interest and inflation rates, and its impact on the industries in which we invest;
- our future operating results, our business prospects and the adequacy of our cash resources and working capital;
- the ability of our portfolio companies to achieve their objectives;
- our ability to make investments consistent with our investment objectives, including with respect to the size, nature and terms of our investments;
- the ability of New Mountain Finance Advisers BDC, L.L.C. (the "Investment Adviser") or its affiliates to attract and retain highly talented professionals;
- actual and potential conflicts of interest with the Investment Adviser and New Mountain Capital L.L.C. ("New Mountain Capital", defined as New Mountain Capital Group, L.L.C. and its affiliates); and
- the risk factors set forth in *Item 1A.—Risk Factors* contained in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 and in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.

Forward-looking statements are identified by their use of such terms and phrases such as “anticipate”, “believe”, “continue”, “could”, “estimate”, “expect”, “intend”, “may”, “plan”, “potential”, “project”, “seek”, “should”, “target”, “will”, “would” or similar expressions. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements for any reason, including the factors set forth in *Item 1A.—Risk Factors* contained in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 and in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.

We have based the forward-looking statements included in this report on information available to us on the date of this report. We assume no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law. Although we undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements, you are advised to consult any additional disclosures that we may make directly to you or through reports that we have filed or in the future may file with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"), including annual reports on Form 10-K, registration statements on Form N-2, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K.

### Overview

We are a Delaware corporation that was originally incorporated on June 29, 2010 and completed our initial public offering ("IPO") on May 19, 2011. We are a closed-end, non-diversified management investment company that has elected to be regulated as a business development company ("BDC") under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940 Act"). As such, we are obligated to comply with certain regulatory requirements. We have elected to be treated, and intend to comply with the requirements to continue to qualify annually, as a regulated investment company ("RIC") under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"). NMFC is also registered as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the "Advisers Act"). Since our IPO, and through June 30, 2018, we raised approximately $614.6 million in net proceeds from additional offerings of common stock.

The Investment Adviser is a wholly-owned subsidiary of New Mountain Capital. New Mountain Capital is a firm with a track record of investing in the middle market. New Mountain Capital focuses on investing in defensive growth companies across its private equity, public equity and credit investment vehicles. The Investment Adviser manages our day-to-day operations and provides us with investment advisory and management services. New Mountain Finance Administration, L.L.C. (the "Administrator”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of New Mountain Capital, provides the administrative services necessary to conduct our day-to-day operations.

Our wholly-owned subsidiary, New Mountain Finance Holdings, L.L.C. (“NMF Holdings), is a Delaware limited liability company whose assets are used to secure NMF Holdings’ credit facility. NMF Ancora Holdings Inc. (“NMF Ancora”), NMF QID NGL Holdings, Inc. (“NMF QID”) and NMF YP Holdings Inc. (“NMF YP”), our wholly-owned subsidiaries, are structured as Delaware entities that serve as tax blocker corporations which hold equity or equity-like investments in portfolio companies organized as limited liability companies (or other forms of pass-through entities). We consolidate our tax blocker corporations for accounting purposes. The tax blocker corporations are not consolidated for income tax purposes and may incur income tax expense as a result of their ownership of the portfolio companies. Additionally, our wholly-owned subsidiary, New Mountain Finance Servicing, L.L.C. (“NMF Servicing”), serves as the administrative agent on certain investment transactions. New Mountain Finance SBIC, L.P. (“SBIC I”) and its general partner, New Mountain Finance SBIC G.P., L.L.C. (“SBIC I GP”), were organized in Delaware as a limited partnership and limited liability company, respectively. New Mountain Finance SBIC II, L.P. (“SBIC II”) and its general partner, New Mountain Finance SBIC II G.P., L.L.C. (“SBIC II GP”), were also organized in Delaware as a limited partnership and limited liability company, respectively. SBIC I, SBIC I GP, SBIC II and SBIC II GP are our consolidated wholly-owned direct and indirect subsidiaries. SBIC I and SBIC II received a licenses from the United States ("U.S.") Small Business Administration (the “SBA”) to operate as a small business investment company (“SBIC”) under Section 301(c) of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended (the “1958 Act”). Our wholly-owned subsidiary, New Mountain Net Lease Corporation ("NMNLC"), a Maryland corporation, was formed to acquire commercial real properties that are subject to "triple net" leases and intends to qualify as a real estate investment trust, or REIT, within the meaning of Section 856(a) of the Code.

Our investment objective is to generate current income and capital appreciation through the sourcing and origination of debt securities at all levels of the capital structure, including first and second lien debt, notes, bonds and mezzanine securities. The first lien debt may include traditional first lien senior secured loans or unitranche loans. Unitranche loans combine characteristics of traditional first lien senior secured loans as well as second lien and subordinated loans. Unitranche loans will expose us to the risks associated with second lien and subordinated loans to the extent we invest in the “last out” tranche. In some cases, our investments may also include equity interests.

Our primary focus is in the debt of defensive growth companies, which are defined as generally exhibiting the following characteristics: (i) sustainable secular growth drivers, (ii) high barriers to competitive entry, (iii) high free cash flow after capital expenditure and working capital needs, (iv) high returns on assets and (v) niche market dominance. Similar to us, SBIC I's and SBIC II's investment objectives are to generate current income and capital appreciation under our investment criteria. However, SBIC I's and SBIC II's investments must be in SBA eligible small businesses. Our portfolio may be concentrated in a limited number of industries. As of June 30, 2018, our top five industry concentrations were business services, software, healthcare services, education and investment funds.

As of June 30, 2018, our net asset value was $1,032.6 million and our portfolio had a fair value of approximately $2,098.0 million in 89 portfolio companies, with a weighted average yield to maturity at cost for income producing investments ("YTM at Cost") of approximately 11.1% and a weighted average yield to maturity at cost for all investments ("YTM at Cost for Investments") of approximately 10.9%. The YTM at Cost calculation assumes that all investments, including secured collateralized agreements, not on non-accrual are purchased at cost on the quarter end date and held until their respective maturities with no prepayments or losses and exited at par at maturity. The YTM at Cost for Investments calculation assumes that all investments, including secured collateralized agreements, are purchased as cost on the quarter end date and held until their respective maturities with no prepayments or losses and exited at par at maturity. YTM at Cost and YTM at Cost for Investments calculations exclude the impact of existing leverage. YTM at Cost and YTM at Cost for Investments uses the London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") curves at each quarter's end date. The actual yield to maturity may be higher or lower due to the future selection of the LIBOR contracts by the individual companies in our portfolio or other factors.

### Recent Developments

On July 5, 2018, we entered into a third supplement (the ‘‘Supplement’’) to our Amended and Restated Note Purchase Agreement, dated September 30, 2016 (the ‘‘NPA’’). Pursuant to the Supplement, on July 5, 2018, we issued to an institutional investor identified therein, in a private placement, $50.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 5.36% Series 2018B Notes due June 28, 2023 (the "2018B Unsecured Notes") as an additional series of notes under the NPA. Except as set forth in the Supplement, the 2018B Unsecured Notes have the same terms as the $90.0 million in aggregate principal amount of the 5.313% Notes due May 15, 2021, the $55.0 million in aggregate principal amount of the 4.76% Series 2017A Notes due July 15, 2022 and the $90.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 4.87% Series 2018A Notes due January 30, 2023 (collectively, the ‘‘Prior Notes’’) that we previously issued pursuant to the NPA, the first supplement and the second supplement thereto, respectively. The Supplement includes certain additional covenants and terms, including, without limitation, a requirement that we not exceed a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.65 to 1.00 at the time of incurring additional indebtedness and a requirement that we not exceed a secured debt ratio of 0.70 to 1.00 at any time. The 2018B Unsecured Notes will rank equal in priority with our other unsecured indebtedness, including the Prior Notes. Interest on the 2018B Unsecured Notes will be payable semi-annually in arrears on January 15 and July 15 of each year, commencing on January 15, 2019.

On July 5, 2018, we entered into Amendment No. 4 (the ‘‘Amendment’’) to our NMFC Credit Facility (as defined below). The Amendment reduces the minimum asset coverage ratio that we must maintain at the time of any borrowing under the NMFC Credit Facility (as defined below) and as of each quarter end from 2.00 to 1.00 to 1.50 to 1.00. The Amendment also includes a requirement that we not exceed a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.65 to 1.00 at the time of incurring additional indebtedness and a requirement that we not exceed a secured debt ratio of 0.70 to 1.00 at any time.

On August 1, 2018, our board of directors declared a third quarter 2018 distribution of $0.34 per share payable on September 28, 2018 to holders of record as of September 14, 2018.

### Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and revenues and expenses during the periods reported. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates. We have identified the following items as critical accounting policies.

### Basis of Accounting

We consolidate our wholly-owned direct and indirect subsidiaries: NMF Holdings, NMF Servicing, NMNLC, SBIC I, SBIC I GP, SBIC II, SBIC II GP, NMF Ancora, NMF QID and NMF YP. We are an investment company following accounting and reporting guidance as described in Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946, *Financial Services—Investment Companies*, ("ASC 946").

### Valuation and Leveling of Portfolio Investments

At all times consistent with GAAP and the 1940 Act, we conduct a valuation of assets, which impacts our net asset value.

We value our assets on a quarterly basis, or more frequently if required under the 1940 Act. In all cases, our board of directors is ultimately and solely responsible for determining the fair value of our portfolio investments on a quarterly basis in good faith, including investments that are not publicly traded, those whose market prices are not readily available and any other situation where our portfolio investments require a fair value determination. Security transactions are accounted for on a trade date basis. Our quarterly valuation procedures are set forth in more detail below:

(1) Investments for which market quotations are readily available on an exchange are valued at such market quotations based on the closing price indicated from independent pricing services.

(2) Investments for which indicative prices are obtained from various pricing services and/or brokers or dealers are valued through a multi-step valuation process, as described below, to determine whether the quote(s) obtained is representative of fair value in accordance with GAAP.

a. Bond quotes are obtained through independent pricing services. Internal reviews are performed by the investment professionals of the Investment Adviser to ensure that the quote obtained is representative of fair value in accordance with GAAP and, if so, the quote is used. If the Investment Adviser is unable to sufficiently validate the quote(s) internally and if the investment's par value or its fair value exceeds the materiality threshold, the investment is valued similarly to those assets with no readily available quotes (see (3) below); and

b. For investments other than bonds, we look at the number of quotes readily available and perform the following procedures:

i. Investments for which two or more quotes are received from a pricing service are valued using the mean of the mean of the bid and ask of the quotes obtained;

ii. Investments for which one quote is received from a pricing service are validated internally. The investment professionals of the Investment Adviser analyze the market quotes obtained using an array of valuation methods (further described below) to validate the fair value. If the Investment Adviser is unable to sufficiently validate the quote internally and if the investment's par value or its fair value exceeds the materiality threshold, the investment is valued similarly to those assets with no readily available quotes (see (3) below).

(3) Investments for which quotations are not readily available through exchanges, pricing services, brokers, or dealers are valued through a multi-step valuation process:

a. Each portfolio company or investment is initially valued by the investment professionals of the Investment Adviser responsible for the credit monitoring;

b. Preliminary valuation conclusions will then be documented and discussed with our senior management;

c. If an investment falls into (3) above for four consecutive quarters and if the investment's par value or its fair value exceeds the materiality threshold, then at least once each fiscal year, the valuation for each portfolio investment for which we do not have a readily available market quotation will be reviewed by an independent valuation firm engaged by our board of directors; and

d. When deemed appropriate by our management, an independent valuation firm may be engaged to review and value investment(s) of a portfolio company, without any preliminary valuation being performed by the Investment Adviser. The investment professionals of the Investment Adviser will review and validate the value provided.

For investments in revolving credit facilities and delayed draw commitments, the cost basis of the funded investments purchased is offset by any costs/netbacks received for any unfunded portion on the total balance committed. The fair value is also adjusted for the price appreciation or depreciation on the unfunded portion. As a result, the purchase of a commitment not completely funded may result in a negative fair value until it is called and funded.

The values assigned to investments are based upon available information and do not necessarily represent amounts which might ultimately be realized, since such amounts depend on future circumstances and cannot be reasonably determined until the individual positions are liquidated. Due to the inherent uncertainty of determining the fair value of investments that do not have a readily available market value, the fair value of our investments may fluctuate from period to period and the fluctuations could be material.

GAAP fair value measurement guidance classifies the inputs used in measuring fair value into three levels as follows:

Level I—Quoted prices (unadjusted) are available in active markets for identical investments and we have the ability to access such quotes as of the reporting date. The type of investments which would generally be included in Level I include active exchange-traded equity securities and exchange-traded derivatives. As required by Accounting Standards Codification Topic 820, *Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures* ("ASC 820"), we, to the extent that we hold such investments, do not adjust the quoted price for these investments, even in situations where we hold a large position and a sale could reasonably impact the quoted price.

Level II—Pricing inputs are observable for the investments, either directly or indirectly, as of the reporting date, but are not the same as those used in Level I. Level II inputs include the following:

- Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets;
- Quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in non-active markets (examples include corporate and municipal bonds, which trade infrequently);
- Pricing models whose inputs are observable for substantially the full term of the asset or liability (examples include most over-the-counter derivatives, including foreign exchange forward contracts); and
- Pricing models whose inputs are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data through correlation or other means for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.

Level III—Pricing inputs are unobservable for the investment and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the investment.

The inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels. In all instances when the inputs fall within different levels of the hierarchy, the level within which the fair value measurement is categorized is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. As such, a Level III fair value measurement may include inputs that are both observable and unobservable. Gains and losses for such assets categorized within the Level III table below may include changes in fair value that are attributable to both observable inputs and unobservable inputs.

The inputs into the determination of fair value require significant judgment or estimation by management and consideration of factors specific to each investment. A review of the fair value hierarchy classifications is conducted on a quarterly basis. Changes in the observability of valuation inputs may result in the transfer of certain investments within the fair value hierarchy from period to period. Reclassifications impacting the fair value hierarchy are reported as transfers in/out of the respective leveling categories as of the beginning of the period in which the reclassifications occur.

The following table summarizes the levels in the fair value hierarchy that our portfolio investments fall into as of June 30, 2018:

*(in thousands)*

|  | Total | Level I | Level II | Level III |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| First lien | $828,387 | $— | $117,309 | $711,078 |
| Second lien | 713,974 | — | 332,109 | 381,865 |
| Subordinated | 67,801 | — | 26,675 | 41,126 |
| Equity and other | 487,856 | 14 | — | 487,842 |
| Total investments | $2,098,018 | $14 | $476,093 | $1,621,911 |

We generally use the following framework when determining the fair value of investments where there are little, if any, market activity or observable pricing inputs. We typically determine the fair value of our performing debt investments utilizing an income approach. Additional consideration is given using a market based approach, as well as reviewing the overall underlying portfolio company's performance and associated financial risks. The following outlines additional details on the approaches considered:

***Company Performance, Financial Review, and Analysis:*** Prior to investment, as part of our due diligence process, we evaluate the overall performance and financial stability of the portfolio company. Post investment, we analyze each portfolio company's current operating performance and relevant financial trends versus prior year and budgeted results, including, but not limited to, factors affecting its revenue and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization ("EBITDA") growth, margin trends, liquidity position, covenant compliance and changes to its capital structure. We also attempt to identify and subsequently track any developments at the portfolio company, within its customer or vendor base or within the industry or the macroeconomic environment, generally, that may alter any material element of our original investment thesis. This analysis is specific to each portfolio company. We leverage the knowledge gained from our original due diligence process, augmented by this subsequent monitoring, to continually refine our outlook for each of our portfolio companies and ultimately form the valuation of our investment in each portfolio company. When an external event such as a purchase transaction, public offering or subsequent sale occurs, we will consider the pricing indicated by the external event to corroborate the private valuation.

For debt investments, we may employ the Market Based Approach (as described below) to assess the total enterprise value of the portfolio company, in order to evaluate the enterprise value coverage of our debt investment. For equity investments or in cases where the Market Based Approach implies a lack of enterprise value coverage for the debt investment, we may additionally employ a discounted cash flow analysis based on the free cash flows of the portfolio company to assess the total enterprise value.

After enterprise value coverage is demonstrated for our debt investments through the method(s) above, the Income Based Approach (as described below) may be employed to estimate the fair value of the investment.

***Market Based Approach:*** We may estimate the total enterprise value of each portfolio company by utilizing market value cash flow (EBITDA) multiples of publicly traded comparable companies and comparable transactions. We consider numerous factors when selecting the appropriate companies whose trading multiples are used to value our portfolio companies. These factors include, but are not limited to, the type of organization, similarity to the business being valued, and relevant risk factors, as well as size, profitability and growth expectations. We may apply an average of various relevant comparable company EBITDA multiples to the portfolio company's latest twelve month ("LTM") EBITDA or projected EBITDA to calculate the enterprise value of the portfolio company. Significant increases or decreases in the EBITDA multiple will result in an increase or decrease in enterprise value, which may result in an increase or decrease in the fair value estimate of the investment. In applying the market based approach as of June 30, 2018, we used the relevant EBITDA multiple ranges set forth in the table below to determine the enterprise value of our portfolio companies. We believe these were reasonable ranges in light of current comparable company trading levels and the specific portfolio companies involved.

***Income Based Approach:*** We also may use a discounted cash flow analysis to estimate the fair value of the investment. Projected cash flows represent the relevant security's contractual interest, fee and principal payments plus the assumption of full principal recovery at the investment's expected maturity date. These cash flows are discounted at a rate established utilizing a yield calibration approach, which incorporates changes in the credit quality (as measured by relevant statistics) of the portfolio company, as compared to changes in the yield associated with comparable credit quality market indices, between the date of origination and the valuation date. Significant increases or decreases in the discount rate would result in a decrease or increase in the fair value measurement. In applying the income based approach as of June 30, 2018, we used the discount ranges set forth in the table below to value investments in our portfolio companies.

The unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of our Level III investments as of June 30, 2018 were as follows:

*(in thousands)*

| Type | Fair Value as of June 30, 2018 | Approach | Unobservable Input | Range Low | High | Weighted Average |
| --- | ---: | --- | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| First lien | $527,399 | Market & income approach | EBITDA multiple | 2.0x | 19.8x | 11.5x |
|  |  |  | Revenue multiple | 3.5x | 6.3x | 5.5x |
|  |  |  | Discount rate | 7.3% | 12.9% | 9.8% |
|  | 100,379 | Market quote | Broker quote | N/A | N/A | N/A |
|  | 83,300 | Other | N/A(1) | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Second lien | 211,125 | Market & income approach | EBITDA multiple | 8.0x | 16.0x | 11.4x |
|  |  |  | Revenue multiple | 1.0x | 1.1x | 1.1x |
|  |  |  | Discount rate | 9.7% | 12.8% | 11.3% |
|  | 170,740 | Market quote | Broker quote | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Subordinated | 41,126 | Market & income approach | EBITDA multiple | 5.5x | 12.5x | 9.4x |
|  |  |  | Discount rate | 8.1% | 21.8% | 15.6% |
| Equity and other | 487,347 | Market & income approach | EBITDA multiple | 0.4x | 18.0x | 11.9x |
|  |  |  | Revenue multiple | 1.0x | 1.1x | 1.1x |
|  |  |  | Discount rate | 7.0% | 26.1% | 12.7% |
|  | 495 | Black Scholes analysis | Expected life in years | 7.8 | 7.8 | 7.8 |
|  |  |  | Volatility | 35.8% | 35.8% | 35.8% |
|  |  |  | Discount rate | 2.9% | 2.9% | 2.9% |
|  | $1,621,911 |  |  |  |  |  |

(1) Fair value was determined based on transaction pricing or recent acquisition or sale as the best measure of fair value with no material changes in operations of the related portfolio company since the transaction date.

### NMFC Senior Loan Program I LLC

NMFC Senior Loan Program I LLC ("SLP I") was formed as a Delaware limited liability company on May 27, 2014 and commenced operations on June 10, 2014. SLP I is a portfolio company held by us. SLP I is structured as a private investment fund, in which all of the investors are qualified purchasers, as such term is defined under the 1940 Act. Transfer of interests in SLP I is subject to restrictions and, as a result, such interests are not readily marketable. SLP I operates under a limited liability company agreement (the "SLP I Agreement") and will continue in existence until July 31, 2020, subject to earlier termination pursuant to certain terms of the SLP I Agreement. The term may be extended pursuant to certain terms of the SLP I Agreement and SLP I's re-investment period is through July 31, 2018. SLP I invests in senior secured loans issued by companies within our core industry verticals. These investments are typically broadly syndicated first lien loans.

SLP I is capitalized with $93.0 million of capital commitments and $265.0 million of debt from a revolving credit facility and is managed by us. Our capital commitment is $23.0 million, representing less than 25.0% ownership, with third party investors representing the remaining capital commitments. As of June 30, 2018, SLP I had total investments with an aggregate fair value of approximately $347.2 million, debt outstanding of $251.6 million and capital that had been called and funded of $93.0 million. As of December 31, 2017, SLP I had total investments with an aggregate fair value of approximately $348.7 million, debt outstanding of $223.7 million and capital that had been called and funded of $93.0 million. Our investment in SLP I is disclosed on our Consolidated Schedule of Investments as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017.

We, as an investment adviser registered under the Advisers Act, act as the collateral manager to SLP I and are entitled to receive a management fee for our investment management services provided to SLP I. As a result, SLP I is classified as our affiliate. No management fee is charged on our investment in SLP I in connection with the administrative services provided to SLP I. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, we earned approximately $0.3 million and $0.6 million, respectively, in management fees related to SLP I, which is included in other income. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, we earned approximately $0.3 million and $0.6 million, respectively, in management fees related to SLP I, which is included in other income. As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, approximately $0.9 million and $0.3 million, respectively, of management fees related to SLP I was included in receivable from affiliates. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, we earned approximately $0.8 million and $1.6 million, respectively, of dividend income related to SLP I, which is included in dividend income. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, we earned approximately $0.8 million and $1.8 million, respectively, of dividend income related to SLP I, which is included in dividend income. As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, approximately $1.0 million and $0.8 million, respectively, of dividend income related to SLP I was included in interest and dividend receivable.

### NMFC Senior Loan Program II LLC

NMFC Senior Loan Program II LLC ("SLP II") was formed as a Delaware limited liability company on March 9, 2016 and commenced operations on April 12, 2016. SLP II is structured as a private joint venture investment fund between us and SkyKnight Income, LLC (“SkyKnight”) and operates under a limited liability company agreement (the "SLP II Agreement"). The purpose of the joint venture is to invest primarily in senior secured loans issued by portfolio companies within our core industry verticals. These investments are typically broadly syndicated first lien loans. All investment decisions must be unanimously approved by the board of managers of SLP II, which has equal representation from us and SkyKnight. SLP II has a three year investment period and will continue in existence until April 12, 2021. The term may be extended for up to one year pursuant to certain terms of the SLP II Agreement.

SLP II is capitalized with equity contributions which were called from its members, on a pro-rata basis based on their equity commitments, as transactions are completed. Any decision by SLP II to call down on capital commitments requires approval by the board of managers of SLP II. As of June 30, 2018, we and SkyKnight have committed and contributed $79.4 million and $20.6 million, respectively, of equity to SLP II. Our investment in SLP II is disclosed on our Consolidated Schedule of Investments as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017.

On April 12, 2016, SLP II closed its $275.0 million revolving credit facility with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, which matures on April 12, 2021 and currently bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 1.60% per annum. As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, SLP II had total investments with an aggregate fair value of approximately $368.9 million and $382.5 million, respectively, and debt outstanding under its credit facility of $267.9 million and $266.3 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, none of SLP II's investments were on non-accrual. Additionally, as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, SLP II had unfunded commitments in the form of delayed draws of $7.0 million and $4.9 million, respectively. Below is a summary of SLP II's portfolio, along with a listing of the individual investments in SLP II's portfolio as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017:

*(in thousands)*

|  | June 30, 2018 | December 31, 2017 |
| --- | ---: | ---: |
| First lien investments (1) | 374,972 | 386,100 |
| Weighted average interest rate on first lien investments (2) | 6.51% | 6.05% |
| Number of portfolio companies in SLP II | 33 | 35 |
| Largest portfolio company investment (1) | 17,183 | 17,369 |
| Total of five largest portfolio company investments (1) | 80,614 | 81,728 |

(1) Reflects principal amount or par value of investments.

(2) Computed as the all in interest rate in effect on accruing investments divided by the total principal amount of investments.

The following table is a listing of the individual investments in SLP II's portfolio as of June 30, 2018:

*(in thousands)*

*(in thousands)*

*(in thousands)*

| Portfolio Company and Type of Investment Funded Investments - First lien: | Industry | Interest Rate (1) | Maturity Date | Principal Amount or Par Value | Cost | Fair Value (2) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Access CIG, LLC | Business Services | 5.84% (L + 3.75%) | 2/27/2025 | $8,870 | $8,827 | $8,898 |
| ADG, LLC | Healthcare Services | 6.84% (L + 4.75%) | 9/28/2023 | 16,948 | 16,815 | 16,694 |
| ASG Technologies Group, Inc. | Software | 5.59% (L + 3.50%) | 7/31/2024 | 5,449 | 5,424 | 5,427 |
| Beaver-Visitec International Holdings, Inc. | Healthcare Products | 7.09% (L + 5.00%) | 8/21/2023 | 14,738 | 14,622 | 14,756 |
| Brave Parent Holdings, Inc. | Software | 6.33% (L + 4.00%) | 4/18/2025 | 8,500 | 8,479 | 8,543 |
| CHA Holdings, Inc. | Business Services | 6.58% (L + 4.50%) | 4/10/2025 | 9,857 | 9,808 | 9,931 |
| CommerceHub, Inc. | Software | 5.86% (L + 3.75%) | 5/21/2025 | 2,500 | 2,487 | 2,512 |
| DigiCert, Inc. | Business Services | 6.84% (L + 4.75%) | 10/31/2024 | 9,975 | 9,929 | 9,977 |
| FPC Holdings, Inc. | Distribution & Logistics | 6.59% (L + 4.50%) | 11/18/2022 | 14,963 | 14,532 | 15,084 |
| Globallogic Holdings Inc. | Business Services | 6.08% (L + 3.75%) | 6/20/2022 | 4,665 | 4,637 | 4,677 |
| Greenway Health, LLC | Software | 6.08% (L + 3.75%) | 2/16/2024 | 14,849 | 14,788 | 14,869 |
| Idera, Inc. | Software | 6.60% (L + 4.50%) | 6/28/2024 | 12,555 | 12,443 | 12,750 |
| J.D. Power (fka J.D. Power and Associates) | Business Services | 6.34% (L + 4.25%) | 9/7/2023 | 13,290 | 13,244 | 13,340 |
| Keystone Acquisition Corp. | Healthcare Services | 7.58% (L + 5.25%) | 5/1/2024 | 5,360 | 5,313 | 5,356 |
| LSCS Holdings, Inc. | Healthcare Services | 6.52% (L + 4.25%) | 3/17/2025 | 6,384 | 6,373 | 6,384 |
| LSCS Holdings, Inc. | Healthcare Services | 6.34% (L + 4.25%) | 3/17/2025 | 1,264 | 1,263 | 1,264 |
| Market Track, LLC | Business Services | 6.58% (L + 4.25%) | 6/5/2024 | 11,880 | 11,828 | 11,880 |
| Medical Solutions Holdings, Inc. | Healthcare Services | 5.84% (L + 3.75%) | 6/14/2024 | 4,454 | 4,434 | 4,457 |
| Ministry Brands, LLC | Software | 6.10% (L + 4.00%) | 12/2/2022 | 2,127 | 2,118 | 2,127 |
| Ministry Brands, LLC | Software | 6.10% (L + 4.00%) | 12/2/2022 | 12,348 | 12,295 | 12,348 |
| Navex Global, Inc. | Software | 6.34% (L + 4.25%) | 11/19/2021 | 14,820 | 14,668 | 14,885 |
| Navicure, Inc. | Healthcare Services | 5.84% (L + 3.75%) | 11/1/2024 | 10,935 | 10,885 | 10,935 |
| NorthStar Financial Services Group, LLC | Software | 5.59% (L + 3.50%) | 5/25/2025 | 7,500 | 7,463 | 7,519 |
| Pathway Vet Alliance LLC (fka Pathway Partners Vet Management Company LLC) | Consumer Services | 6.34% (L + 4.25%) | 10/10/2024 | 286 | 285 | 287 |
| Pathway Vet Alliance LLC (fka Pathway Partners Vet Management Company LLC) | Consumer Services | 6.34% (L + 4.25%) | 10/10/2024 | 9,654 | 9,609 | 9,678 |
| Peraton Corp. (fka MHVC Acquisition Corp.) | Federal Services | 7.59% (L + 5.25%) | 4/29/2024 | 10,395 | 10,350 | 10,473 |
| Poseidon Intermediate, LLC | Software | 6.35% (L + 4.25%) | 8/15/2022 | 14,805 | 14,802 | 14,879 |
| Project Accelerate Parent, LLC | Business Services | 6.25% (L + 4.25%) | 1/2/2025 | 14,963 | 14,892 | 15,037 |
| PSC Industrial Holdings Corp. | Industrial Services | 5.84% (L + 3.75%) | 10/11/2024 | 10,448 | 10,352 | 10,448 |
| Quest Software US Holdings Inc. | Software | 6.58% (L + 4.25%) | 5/16/2025 | 15,000 | 14,926 | 14,994 |
| Salient CRGT Inc. | Federal Services | 7.84% (L + 5.75%) | 2/28/2022 | 13,982 | 13,875 | 14,192 |
| Severin Acquisition, LLC | Software | 7.11% (L + 4.75%) | 7/30/2021 | 14,812 | 14,760 | 14,868 |
| Sierra Acquisition, Inc. | Food & Beverage | 5.59% (L + 3.50%) | 11/11/2024 | 3,731 | 3,714 | 3,750 |
| WP CityMD Bidco LLC | Healthcare Services | 5.83% (L + 3.50%) | 6/7/2024 | 14,887 | 14,855 | 14,822 |
| YI, LLC | Healthcare Services | 6.33% (L + 4.00%) | 11/7/2024 | 1,464 | 1,470 | 1,475 |
| YI, LLC | Healthcare Services | 6.33% (L + 4.00%) | 11/7/2024 | 12,099 | 12,089 | 12,190 |
| Zywave, Inc. | Software | 7.34% (L + 5.00%) | 11/17/2022 | 17,183 | 17,117 | 17,183 |
| **Total Funded Investments** |  |  |  | **$367,940** | **$365,771** | **$368,889** |
| **Unfunded Investments - First lien:** |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Access CIG, LLC | Business Services | — | 8/27/2018 | $1,108 | $— | $3 |
| CHA Holdings, Inc. | Business Services | — | 10/10/2019 | 2,143 | (11) | 16 |
| LSCS Holdings, Inc. | Healthcare Services | — | 9/17/2018 | 336 | (2) | — |
| Ministry Brands, LLC | Software | — | 10/18/2019 | 1,869 | (9) | — |
| YI, LLC | Healthcare Services | — | 11/7/2018 | 1,576 | (8) | 12 |
| **Total Unfunded Investments** |  |  |  | $7,032 | $(30) | $31 |
|  |  |  |  | **$374,972** | **$365,741** | **$368,920** |

(1) All interest is payable in cash unless otherwise indicated. A majority of the variable rate debt investments bear interest at a rate that may be determined by reference to the LIBOR (L), the Prime Rate (P) and the alternative base rate (Base). For each investment, the current interest rate provided reflects the rate in effect as of June 30, 2018.

(2) Represents the fair value in accordance with ASC 820. Our board of directors does not determine the fair value of the investments held by SLP II.

The following table is a listing of the individual investments in SLP II's portfolio as of December 31, 2017:

*(in thousands)*

*(in thousands)*

*(in thousands)*

| Portfolio Company and Type of Investment Funded Investments - First lien | Industry | Interest Rate (1) | Maturity Date | Principal Amount or Par Value | Cost | Fair Value (2) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| ADG, LLC | Healthcare Services | 6.32% (L + 4.75%) | 9/28/2023 | $17,034 | $16,890 | $16,779 |
| ASG Technologies Group, Inc. | Software | 6.32% (L + 4.75%) | 7/31/2024 | 7,481 | 7,446 | 7,547 |
| Beaver-Visitec International Holdings, Inc. | Healthcare Products | 6.69% (L + 5.00%) | 8/21/2023 | 14,812 | 14,688 | 14,813 |
| DigiCert, Inc. | Business Services | 6.13% (L + 4.75%) | 10/31/2024 | 10,000 | 9,951 | 10,141 |
| Emerald 2 Limited | Business Services | 5.69% (L + 4.00%) | 5/14/2021 | 1,266 | 1,211 | 1,267 |
| Evo Payments International, LLC | Business Services | 5.57% (L + 4.00%) | 12/22/2023 | 17,369 | 17,292 | 17,492 |
| Explorer Holdings, Inc. | Healthcare Services | 5.13% (L + 3.75%) | 5/2/2023 | 2,940 | 2,917 | 2,973 |
| Globallogic Holdings Inc. | Business Services | 6.19% (L + 4.50%) | 6/20/2022 | 9,677 | 9,611 | 9,755 |
| Greenway Health, LLC | Software | 5.94% (L + 4.25%) | 2/16/2024 | 14,925 | 14,858 | 15,074 |
| Idera, Inc. | Software | 6.57% (L + 5.00%) | 6/28/2024 | 12,619 | 12,499 | 12,556 |
| J.D. Power (fka J.D. Power and Associates) | Business Services | 5.94% (L + 4.25%) | 9/7/2023 | 13,357 | 13,308 | 13,407 |
| Keystone Acquisition Corp. | Healthcare Services | 6.94% (L + 5.25%) | 5/1/2024 | 5,386 | 5,336 | 5,424 |
| Market Track, LLC | Business Services | 5.94% (L + 4.25%) | 6/5/2024 | 11,940 | 11,884 | 11,940 |
| McGraw-Hill Global Education Holdings, LLC | Education | 5.57% (L + 4.00%) | 5/4/2022 | 9,850 | 9,813 | 9,844 |
| Medical Solutions Holdings, Inc. | Healthcare Services | 5.82% (L + 4.25%) | 6/14/2024 | 6,965 | 6,932 | 7,043 |
| Ministry Brands, LLC | Software | 6.38% (L + 5.00%) | 12/2/2022 | 2,138 | 2,128 | 2,138 |
| Ministry Brands, LLC | Software | 6.38% (L + 5.00%) | 12/2/2022 | 7,768 | 7,735 | 7,768 |
| Navex Global, Inc. | Software | 5.82% (L + 4.25%) | 11/19/2021 | 14,897 | 14,724 | 14,971 |
| Navicure, Inc. | Healthcare Services | 5.11% (L + 3.75%) | 11/1/2024 | 15,000 | 14,926 | 15,000 |
| OEConnection LLC | Business Services | 5.69% (L + 4.00%) | 11/22/2024 | 15,000 | 14,925 | 14,981 |
| Pathway Partners Vet Management Company LLC | Consumer Services | 5.82% (L + 4.25%) | 10/10/2024 | 6,963 | 6,929 | 6,980 |
| Pathway Partners Vet Management Company LLC | Consumer Services | 5.82% (L + 4.25%) | 10/10/2024 | 291 | 290 | 292 |
| Peraton Corp. (fka MHVC Acquisition Corp.) | Federal Services | 6.95% (L + 5.25%) | 4/29/2024 | 10,448 | 10,399 | 10,526 |
| Poseidon Intermediate, LLC | Software | 5.82% (L + 4.25%) | 8/15/2022 | 14,881 | 14,877 | 14,955 |
| Project Accelerate Parent, LLC | Business Services | 5.94% (L + 4.25%) | 1/2/2025 | 15,000 | 14,925 | 15,038 |
| PSC Industrial Holdings Corp. | Industrial Services | 5.71% (L + 4.25%) | 10/11/2024 | 10,500 | 10,398 | 10,500 |
| Quest Software US Holdings Inc. | Software | 6.92% (L + 5.50%) | 10/31/2022 | 9,899 | 9,775 | 10,071 |
| Salient CRGT Inc. | Federal Services | 7.32% (L + 5.75%) | 2/28/2022 | 14,433 | 14,310 | 14,559 |
| Severin Acquisition, LLC | Software | 6.32% (L + 4.75%) | 7/30/2021 | 14,888 | 14,827 | 14,813 |
| Shine Acquisitoin Co. S.à.r.l / Boing US Holdco Inc. | Consumer Services | 4.88% (L + 3.50%) | 10/3/2024 | 15,000 | 14,964 | 15,108 |
| Sierra Acquisition, Inc. | Food & Beverage | 5.68% (L + 4.25%) | 11/11/2024 | 3,750 | 3,731 | 3,789 |
| TMK Hawk Parent, Corp. | Distribution & Logistics | 4.88% (L + 3.50%) | 8/28/2024 | 1,671 | 1,667 | 1,686 |
| University Support Services LLC (St. George's University Scholastic Services LLC) | Education | 5.82% (L + 4.25%) | 7/6/2022 | 1,875 | 1,875 | 1,900 |
| Vencore, Inc. (fka SI Organization, Inc., The) | Federal Services | 6.44% (L + 4.75%) | 11/23/2019 | 10,686 | 10,673 | 10,835 |
| WP CityMD Bidco LLC | Healthcare Services | 5.69% (L + 4.00%) | 6/7/2024 | 14,963 | 14,928 | 15,009 |
| YI, LLC | Healthcare Services | 5.69% (L + 4.00%) | 11/7/2024 | 8,240 | 8,204 | 8,230 |
| Zywave, Inc. | Software | 6.61% (L + 5.00%) | 11/17/2022 | 17,325 | 17,252 | 17,325 |
| **Total Funded Investments** |  |  |  | **$381,237** | **$379,098** | **$382,529** |
| **Unfunded Investments - First lien** |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Pathway Partners Vet Management Company LLC | Consumer Services | — | 10/10/2019 | $2,728 | $(14) | $7 |
| TMK Hawk Parent, Corp. | Distribution & Logistics | — | 3/28/2018 | 75 | — | 1 |
| YI, LLC | Healthcare Services | — | 11/7/2018 | 2,060 | (9) | (3) |
| **Total Unfunded Investments** |  |  |  | **$4,863** | **$(23)** | **$5** |
| **Total Investments** |  |  |  | **$386,100** | **$379,075** | **$382,534** |

(1) All interest is payable in cash unless otherwise indicated. A majority of the variable rate debt investments bear interest at a rate that may be determined by reference to the LIBOR (L), the Prime Rate (P) and the alternative base rate (Base). For each investment, the current interest rate provided reflects the rate in effect as of December 31, 2017.

(2) Represents the fair value in accordance with ASC 820. Our board of directors does not determine the fair value of the investments held by SLP II.

Below is certain summarized financial information for SLP II as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and June 30, 2017:

*(in thousands)*

*(in thousands)*

| Selected Balance Sheet Information: | June 30, 2018 | December 31, 2017 |
| --- | ---: | ---: |
| Investments at fair value (cost of $365,741 and $379,075, respectively) | $368,920 | $382,534 |
| Cash and other assets | 7,581 | 8,065 |
| Total assets | $376,501 | $390,599 |
| Credit facility | $267,870 | $266,270 |
| Deferred financing costs | (1,678) | (1,966) |
| Payable for unsettled securities purchased | — | 15,964 |
| Distribution payable | 3,960 | 3,500 |
| Other liabilities | 2,838 | 2,891 |
| Total liabilities | 272,990 | 286,659 |
| Members' capital | $103,511 | $103,940 |
| Total liabilities and members' capital | $376,501 | $390,599 |

*(in thousands)*

*(in thousands)*

*(in thousands)*

*(in thousands)*

| Selected Statement of Operations Information: | Three Months Ended June 30, 2018 | June 30, 2017 | Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 | June 30, 2017 |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Interest income | $6,134 | $5,630 | $11,764 | $10,803 |
| Other income | 36 | 102 | 58 | 316 |
| Total investment income | 6,170 | 5,732 | 11,822 | 11,119 |
| Interest and other financing expenses | 2,553 | 2,074 | 4,981 | 3,923 |
| Other expenses | 140 | 212 | 364 | 374 |
| Total expenses | 2,693 | 2,286 | 5,345 | 4,297 |
| Net investment income | 3,477 | 3,446 | 6,477 | 6,822 |
| Net realized gains on investments | 180 | 814 | 633 | 1,922 |
| Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments | (957) | (535) | (280) | (641) |
| Net increase in members' capital | $2,700 | $3,725 | $6,830 | $8,103 |

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, we earned approximately $3.2 million and $5.8 million, respectively, of dividend income related to SLP II, which is included in dividend income. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, we earned approximately $3.2 million and $6.6 million, respectively, of dividend income related to SLP II, which is included in dividend income. As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, approximately $3.2 million and $2.8 million, respectively, of dividend income related to SLP II was included in interest and dividend receivable.

We have determined that SLP II is an investment company under ASC 946; however, in accordance with such guidance we will generally not consolidate our investment in a company other than a wholly-owned investment company subsidiary. Furthermore, Accounting Standards Codification Topic 810, *Consolidation* ("ASC 810"), concludes that in a joint venture where both members have equal decision making authority, it is not appropriate for one member to consolidate the joint venture since neither has control. Accordingly, we do not consolidate SLP II.

### NMFC Senior Loan Program III LLC

NMFC Senior Loan Program III LLC ("SLP III") was formed as a Delaware limited liability company and commenced operations on April 25, 2018. SLP III is structured as a private joint venture investment fund between us and SkyKnight Income II, LLC (“SkyKnight II”) and operates under a limited liability company agreement (the "SLP III Agreement"). The purpose of the joint venture is to invest primarily in senior secured loans issued by portfolio companies within the our core industry verticals. These investments are typically broadly syndicated first lien loans. All investment decisions must be unanimously approved by the board of managers of SLP III, which has equal representation from us and SkyKnight II. SLP III has a five year investment period and will continue in existence until April 25, 2025. The investment period may be extended for up to one year pursuant to certain terms of the SLP III Agreement.

SLP III is capitalized with equity contributions which are called from its members, on a pro-rata basis based on their equity commitments, as transactions are completed. Any decision by SLP III to call down on capital commitments requires approval by the board of managers of SLP III. As of June 30, 2018, we and SkyKnight II have committed $80.0 million and $20.0 million, respectively, of equity to SLP III. As of June 30, 2018, the Company and SkyKnight II have contributed $42.8 million and $10.7 million, respectively, of equity to SLP III. Our investment in SLP III is disclosed on the our Consolidated Schedule of Investments as of June 30, 2018.

On May 2, 2018, SLP III closed its $300.0 million revolving credit facility with Citibank, N.A., which matures on May 2, 2023 and bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 1.70% per annum. As of June 30, 2018, SLP III had total investments with an aggregate fair value of approximately $157.3 million and debt outstanding under its credit facility of $90.4 million. As of June 30, 2018, none of SLP III's investments were on non-accrual. Additionally, as of June 30, 2018 , SLP III had unfunded commitments in the form of delayed draws of $12.1 million . Below is a summary of SLP III's portfolio, along with a listing of the individual investments in SLP III's portfolio as of June 30, 2018:

*(in thousands)*

|  | June 30, 2018 |
| --- | ---: |
| First lien investments (1) | 169,218 |
| Weighted average interest rate on first lien investments (2) | 5.95% |
| Number of portfolio companies in SLP III | 19 |
| Largest portfolio company investment (1) | 19,000 |
| Total of five largest portfolio company investments (1) | 79,000 |

(1) Reflects principal amount or par value of investment.

(2) Computed as the all in interest rate in effect on accruing investments divided by the total principal amount of investments.

The following table is a listing of the individual investments in SLP III's portfolio as of June 30, 2018:

*( in thousands)*

*( in thousands)*

*( in thousands)*

| Portfolio Company and Type of Investment Funded Investments - First lien | Industry | Interest Rate (1) | Maturity Date | Principal Amount or Par Value | Cost | Fair Value (2) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Access CIG, LLC | Business Services | 5.84% (L + 3.75%) | 2/27/2025 | $1,222 | $1,222 | $1,226 |
| Brave Parent Holdings, Inc. | Software | 6.33% (L + 4.00%) | 4/18/2025 | 8,500 | 8,479 | 8,543 |
| Certara Holdco, Inc. | Healthcare I.T. | 5.83% (L + 3.50%) | 8/15/2024 | 1,282 | 1,285 | 1,287 |
| CommerceHub, Inc. | Software | 5.86% (L + 3.75%) | 5/21/2025 | 15,000 | 14,925 | 15,074 |
| Dentalcorp of Canada ULC | Healthcare Services | 5.76% (L + 3.75%) | 6/6/2025 | 12,000 | 11,970 | 12,026 |
| Greenway Health, LLC | Software | 6.08% (L + 3.75%) | 2/16/2024 | 10,326 | 10,332 | 10,339 |
| Heartland Dental, LLC | Healthcare Services | 5.84% (L + 3.75%) | 4/30/2025 | 16,522 | 16,441 | 16,470 |
| Market Track, LLC | Business Services | 6.58% ( L + 4.25%) | 6/5/2024 | 1,188 | 1,182 | 1,188 |
| Ministry Brands, LLC | Software | 6.10% (L + 4.00%) | 12/2/2022 | 4,619 | 4,597 | 4,619 |
| National Intergovernmental Purchasing Alliance Company | Business Services | 6.08% (L + 3.75%) | 5/23/2025 | 15,000 | 14,987 | 14,981 |
| Netsmart Technologies, Inc. | Healthcare I.T. | 5.84% (L + 3.75%) | 4/19/2023 | 10,491 | 10,491 | 10,570 |
| NorthStar Financial Services Group, LLC | Software | 5.59% (L + 3.50%) | 5/25/2025 | 15,000 | 14,925 | 15,038 |
| Pathway Vet Alliance LLC | Consumer Services | 6.34% (L + 4.25%) | 10/10/2024 | 192 | 191 | 192 |
| Pelican Products, Inc. | Business Products | 5.48% (L + 3.50%) | 5/1/2025 | 5,000 | 4,988 | 5,008 |
| Quest Software US Holdings Inc. | Software | 6.58% (L + 4.25%) | 5/16/2025 | 15,000 | 14,926 | 14,994 |
| Sierra Enterprises, LLC | Food & Beverage | 5.59% (L + 3.50%) | 11/11/2024 | 2,494 | 2,491 | 2,506 |
| University Support Services LLC (St. George's University Scholastic Services LLC) | Education | 5.59% (L + 3.50%) | 7/17/2025 | 3,814 | 3,794 | 3,802 |
| WP CityMD Bidco LLC | Healthcare Services | 5.83% (L + 3.50%) | 6/7/2024 | 14,962 | 14,962 | 14,897 |
| YI, LLC | Healthcare Services | 6.33% (L + 4.00%) | 11/7/2024 | 3,988 | 4,003 | 4,018 |
| YI, LLC | Healthcare Services | 6.33% (L + 4.00%) | 11/7/2024 | 482 | 482 | 486 |
| **Total Funded Investments** |  |  |  | **$157,082** | **$156,673** | **$157,264** |
| **Unfunded Investments - First lien** |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Dentalcorp of Canada ULC | Healthcare Services | — | 6/6/2020 | $3,000 | $— | $7 |
| Heartland Dental, LLC | Healthcare Services | — | 4/30/2020 | 2,478 | — | (8) |
| Ministry Brands, LLC | Software | — | 10/18/2019 | 1,869 | (9) | — |
| Pathway Vet Alliance LLC | Consumer Services | — | 5/25/2020 | 3,083 | (15) | 8 |
| University Support Services LLC (St. George's University Scholastic Services LLC) | Education | — | 6/20/2025 | 1,186 | — | (4) |
| YI, LLC | Healthcare Services | — | 11/7/2018 | 520 | 4 | 4 |
| **Total Unfunded Investments** |  |  |  | **$12,136** | **$(20)** | **$7** |
| **Total Investments** |  |  |  | **$169,218** | **$156,653** | **$157,271** |

(1) All interest is payable in cash unless otherwise indicated. A majority of the variable rate debt investments bear interest at a rate that may be determined by reference to the LIBOR (L), the Prime Rate (P) and the alternative base rate (Base). For each investment, the current interest rate provided reflects the rate in effect as of June 30, 2018.

(2) Represents the fair value in accordance with ASC 820. Our board of directors does not determine the fair value of the investments held by SLP III.

Below is certain summarized financial information for SLP III as of June 30, 2018 and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018:

| Selected Balance Sheet Information: | June 30, 2018 |
| --- | ---: |
| Investments at fair value (cost of $156,653) | $157,271 |
| Cash and other assets | 3,407 |
| Total assets | $160,678 |
| Credit facility | $90,400 |
| Deferred financing costs | (3,138) |
| Payable for unsettled securities purchased | 16,689 |
| Other liabilities | 2,596 |
| Total liabilities | 106,547 |
| Members' capital | $54,131 |
| Total liabilities and members' capital | $160,678 |

| Selected Statement of Operations Information: | Three Months Ended June 30, 2018(1) | Six Months Ended June 30, 2018(1) |
| --- | ---: | ---: |
| Interest income | $790 | $790 |
| Other income | 22 | 22 |
| Total investment income | 812 | 812 |
| Interest and other financing expenses | 574 | 574 |
| Other expenses | 226 | 226 |
| Total expenses | 800 | 800 |
| Net investment income | 12 | 12 |
| Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments | 618 | 618 |
| Net increase in members' capital | $630 | $630 |

(1) SLP III commenced operations on April 25, 2018.

We have determined that SLP III is an investment company under ASC 946; however, in accordance with such guidance we will generally not consolidate our investment in a company other than a wholly-owned investment company subsidiary. Furthermore, Accounting Standards Codification Topic 810, *Consolidation*, concludes that in a joint venture where both members have equal decision making authority, it is not appropriate for one member to consolidate the joint venture since neither has control. Accordingly, we do not consolidate SLP III.

### New Mountain Net Lease Corporation

NMNLC was formed to acquire commercial real properties that are subject to "triple net" leases. NMNLC's investments are disclosed on our Consolidated Schedule of Investments as of June 30, 2018.

Below is certain summarized property information for NMNLC as of June 30, 2018:

*(in thousands)*

*(in thousands)*

| Portfolio Company | Tenant | Lease Expiration Date | Location | Total Square Feet | Fair Value as of June 30, 2018 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | ---: | ---: |
| NM NL Holdings, L.P. | FXI Inc. | 6/30/2038 | IN / MS / NM / OR / PA / Mexico | 2,122 | $20,229 |
| NM GLCR LP | Arctic Glacier U.S.A. | 2/28/2038 | CA | 214 | 14,750 |
| NM CLFX LP | Victor Equipment Company | 8/31/2033 | TX | 423 | 12,538 |
| NM APP Canada Corp. | A.P. Plasman, Inc. | 9/30/2031 | Canada | 436 | 8,475 |
| NM KRLN LLC | Kirlin Group, LLC | 6/30/2029 | MD | 95 | 8,462 |
| NM DRVT LLC | FMH Conveyors, LLC | 10/31/2031 | AR | 195 | 5,507 |
| NM APP US LLC | Plasman Corp, LLC / A-Brite LP | 9/30/2033 | AL / OH | 261 | 5,274 |
| NM JRA LLC | J.R. Automation Technologies, LLC | 1/31/2031 | MI | 88 | 2,240 |
|  |  |  |  |  | $77,475 |

### Collateralized agreements or repurchase financings

We follow the guidance in Accounting Standards Codification Topic 860, *Transfers and Servicing—Secured Borrowing and Collateral, (“*ASC 860”) when accounting for transactions involving the purchases of securities under collateralized agreements to resell (resale agreements). These transactions are treated as collateralized financing transactions and are recorded at their contracted resale or repurchase amounts, as specified in the respective agreements. Interest on collateralized agreements is accrued and recognized over the life of the transaction and included in interest income. As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, we held one collateralized agreement to resell with a cost basis of $30.0 million and $30.0 million, respectively, and a fair value of $25.2 million and $25.2 million, respectively. The collateralized agreement to resell is guaranteed by a private hedge fund. The private hedge fund is currently in liquidation under the laws of the Cayman Islands. Pursuant to the terms of the collateralized agreement, the private hedge fund was obligated to repurchase the collateral from us at the par value of the collateralized agreement. The private hedge fund has breached its agreement to repurchase the collateral under the collateralized agreement. The default by the private hedge fund did not release the collateral to us, therefore, we do not have full rights and title to the collateral. A claim has been filed with the Cayman Islands joint official liquidators to resolve this matter. The joint official liquidators have recognized our contractual rights under the collateralized agreement. We continue to exercise our rights under the collateralized agreement and continue to monitor the liquidation process of the private hedge fund. The fair value of the collateralized agreement to resell is reflective of the increased risk of the position.

### PPVA Black Elk (Equity) LLC

On May 3, 2013, we entered into a collateralized securities purchase and put agreement (the “SPP Agreement”) with a private hedge fund. Under the SPP Agreement, we purchased twenty million Class E Preferred Units of Black Elk Energy Offshore Operations, LLC (“Black Elk”) for $20.0 million with a corresponding obligation of the private hedge fund to repurchase the preferred units for $20.0 million plus other amounts due under the SPP Agreement. The majority owner of Black Elk was the private hedge fund. In August 2014, we received a payment of $20.5 million, the full amount due under the SPP Agreement.

In August 2017, a trustee (the “Trustee”) for Black Elk informed us that the Trustee intended to assert a fraudulent conveyance claim (the “Claim”) against us and one of its affiliates seeking the return of the $20.5 million repayment. Black Elk filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition pursuant to the United States Bankruptcy Code in August 2015. The Trustee alleges that individuals affiliated with the private hedge fund conspired with Black Elk and others to improperly use proceeds from the sale of certain Black Elk assets to repay, in August 2014, the private hedge fund’s obligation to us under the SPP Agreement. We were unaware of these claims at the time the repayment was received. The private hedge fund is currently in liquidation under the laws of the Cayman Islands.

On December 22, 2017, we settled the Trustee’s $20.5 million Claim for $16.0 million and filed a claim with the Cayman Islands joint official liquidators of the private hedge fund for $16.0 million that is owed to us under the SPP

Agreement. The SPP Agreement was restored and is in effect since repayment has not been made. We continue to exercise our rights under the SPP Agreement and continue to monitor the liquidation process of the private hedge fund. During the six months ended June 30, 2018, we received a $1.5 million payment from our insurance carrier in respect to the settlement. As of June 30, 2018, the SPP Agreement has a cost basis of $14.5 million and a fair value of $12.2 million, which is reflective of the higher inherent risk in this transaction.

### Revenue Recognition

*Sales and paydowns of investments:* Realized gains and losses on investments are determined on the specific identification method.

*Interest and dividend income:* Interest income, including amortization of premium and discount using the effective interest method, is recorded on the accrual basis and periodically assessed for collectability. Interest income also includes interest earned from cash on hand. Upon the prepayment of a loan or debt security, any prepayment penalties are recorded as part of interest income. We have loans and certain preferred equity investments in the portfolio that contain a payment-in-kind (“PIK”) interest or dividend provision. PIK interest and dividends are accrued and recorded as income at the contractual rates, if deemed collectible. The PIK interest and dividends are added to the principal or share balances on the capitalization dates and generally due at maturity or when redeemed by the issuer. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, we recognized PIK and non-cash interest from investments of $1.9 million and $3.6 million, respectively, and PIK and non-cash dividends from investments of $7.0 million and $13.8 million, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, we recognized PIK and non-cash interest from investments of $0.8 million and $1.7 million, respectively, and PIK and non-cash dividends from investments of $4.8 million and $6.3 million, respectively.

Dividend income on common equity is recorded on the record date for private portfolio companies or on the ex-dividend date for publicly traded portfolio companies. Dividend income on preferred securities is recorded as dividend income on an accrual basis to the extent that such amounts are deemed collectible.

*Non-accrual income:* Investments are placed on non-accrual status when principal or interest payments are past due for 30 days or more and when there is reasonable doubt that principal or interest will be collected. Accrued cash and un-capitalized PIK interest or dividends are reversed when an investment is placed on non-accrual status. Previously capitalized PIK interest or dividends are not reversed when an investment is placed on non-accrual status. Interest or dividend payments received on non-accrual investments may be recognized as income or applied to principal depending upon management’s judgment of the ultimate outcome. Non-accrual investments are restored to accrual status when past due principal and interest is paid and, in management’s judgment, are likely to remain current.

*Other income:* Other income represents delayed compensation, consent or amendment fees, revolver fees, structuring fees, upfront fees, management fees from a non-controlled/affiliated investment and other miscellaneous fees received and are typically non-recurring in nature. Delayed compensation is income earned from counterparties on trades that do not settle within a set number of business days after trade date. Other income may also include fees from bridge loans. We may from time to time enter into bridge financing commitments, an obligation to provide interim financing to a counterparty until permanent credit can be obtained. These commitments are short-term in nature and may expire unfunded. A fee is received for providing such commitments. Structuring fees and upfront fees are recognized as income when earned, usually when paid at the closing of the investment, and are non-refundable.

### Monitoring of Portfolio Investments

We monitor the performance and financial trends of our portfolio companies on at least a quarterly basis. We attempt to identify any developments within the portfolio company, the industry or the macroeconomic environment that may alter any material element of our original investment strategy.

We use an investment rating system to characterize and monitor the credit profile and expected level of returns on each investment in the portfolio. We use a four-level numeric rating scale as follows:

- Investment Rating 1—Investment is performing materially above expectations;
- Investment Rating 2—Investment is performing materially in-line with expectations. All new loans are rated 2 at initial purchase;
- Investment Rating 3—Investment is performing materially below expectations and while significant loss is not expected, the risk of loss has increased since the original investment; and
- Investment Rating 4—Investment is performing substantially below expectations and risks have increased substantially since the original investment. Payments may be delinquent. There is meaningful possibility that we will not recoup our original cost basis in the investment and may realize a substantial loss upon exit.

The following table shows the distribution of our investments on the 1 to 4 investment rating scale at fair value as of June 30, 2018:

*(in millions)*

| Investment Rating | June 30, 2018 Cost | Percent | Fair Value | Percent |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Investment Rating 1 | $133.8 | 6.5% | $139.5 | 6.7% |
| Investment Rating 2 | 1,896.9 | 92.1% | 1,944.4 | 92.7% |
| Investment Rating 3 | 13.5 | 0.6% | 6.8 | 0.3% |
| Investment Rating 4 | 16.5 | 0.8% | 7.3 | 0.3% |
|  | $2,060.7 | 100.0% | $2,098.0 | 100.0% |

As of June 30, 2018, all investments in our portfolio had an Investment Rating of 1 or 2 with the exception of three portfolio companies. As of June 30, 2018, one portfolio company had an Investment Rating of 3 and three portfolio companies had an Investment Rating of 4, which includes one portfolio company that had a portion of our investment included in Investment Rating 3 and a portion included in Investment Rating 4.

During the first quarter of 2018, we placed our first lien positions in Education Management II LLC on non-accrual status as the portfolio company announced its intention to wind down and liquidate the business. Our first lien positions and our preferred and commons shares in Education Management Corporation ("EDMC") have an investment rating of 4. As of June 30, 2018, our investments in EDMC with an Investment Rating of 4 had an aggregate cost basis of $1.5 million, an aggregate fair value of less than $0.1 million and total unearned interest income of less than $0.1 million for the three and six months then ended.

During the second quarter of 2018, we placed a portion of our second lien position in National HME, Inc. on non-accrual status and wrote down the aggregate fair value of our preferred shares in TW-NHME Holdings Corp. (together with our second lien position, "NHME") to $0. As of June 30, 2018, our investment in the second lien position in NHME had an aggregate cost basis of $28.4 million, an aggregate fair value of $13.7 million and total unearned interest income of $0.4 million and $0.4 million, respectively, for the three and six months then ended.

Our preferred shares and warrants in Ancora Acquisition LLC ("Ancora") have an investment rating of 4. As of June 30, 2018, our investments in Ancora had an aggregate cost basis of $0.1 million and an aggregate fair value of less than$0.1 million.

### Portfolio and Investment Activity

The fair value of our investments was approximately $2,098.0 million in 89 portfolio companies at June 30, 2018 and approximately $1,825.7 million in 84 portfolio companies at December 31, 2017.

The following table shows our portfolio and investment activity for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and June 30, 2017:

*(in millions)*

|  | Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 | June 30, 2017 |
| --- | ---: | ---: |
| New investments in 41 and 39 portfolio companies, respectively | $560.5 | $607.6 |
| Debt repayments in existing portfolio companies | 238.1 | 281.1 |
| Sales of securities in 6 and 11 portfolio companies, respectively | 58.7 | 49.4 |
| Change in unrealized appreciation on 34 and 53 portfolio companies, respectively | 30.0 | 44.6 |
| Change in unrealized depreciation on 60 and 27 portfolio companies, respectively | (27.1) | (10.5) |

### Recent Accounting Standards Updates

See *Item 1.—Financial Statements—Note 13. Recent Accounting Standards* for details on recent accounting standards updates.

### Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2018 and June 30, 2017

### Revenue

*(in thousands)*

|  | Three Months Ended June 30, 2018 | June 30, 2017 |
| --- | ---: | ---: |
| Interest income | $40,090 | $37,639 |
| Total dividend income | 12,346 | 9,670 |
| Other income | 2,162 | 2,710 |
| Total investment income | $54,598 | $50,019 |

Our total investment income increased by approximately $4.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2017. For the three months ended June 30, 2018, total investment income of $54.6 million consisted of approximately $35.5 million in cash interest from investments, approximately $1.9 million in PIK and non-cash interest from investments, approximately $1.0 million in prepayment fees, net amortization of purchase premiums and discounts of approximately $1.7 million, approximately $5.3 million in cash dividends from investments, $7.0 million in PIK and non-cash dividends from investments and approximately $2.2 million in other income. The 9% increase in total investment income primarily results from increased interest income which is attributable to larger invested balances and rising LIBOR rates. Our larger invested balances were driven by proceeds from our June 2017 and January 2018 unsecured notes issuances to originate new investments. The increase was also attributable to an increase in dividend income of approximately $2.6 million during the three months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2017. The increase is primarily due to distributions from our investments in NMNLC and PIK and non-cash dividend income from five equity positions. Other income during the three months ended June 30, 2018, which represents fees that are generally non-recurring in nature, was primarily attributable to upfront, amendment and consent fees received from thirteen different portfolio companies and management fees from a non-controlled affiliated portfolio company.

### Operating Expenses

*(in thousands)*

|  | Three Months Ended June 30, 2018 | June 30, 2017 |
| --- | ---: | ---: |
| Management fee | $9,301 | $8,275 |
| Less: management fee waiver | (1,495) | (1,485) |
| Total management fee | 7,806 | 6,790 |
| Incentive fee | 6,430 | 6,449 |
| Interest and other financing expenses | 12,824 | 9,045 |
| Professional fees | 708 | 722 |
| Administrative expenses | 822 | 662 |
| Other general and administrative expenses | 518 | 402 |
| Total expenses | 29,108 | 24,070 |
| Less: expenses waived and reimbursed | (276) | (4) |
| Net expenses before income taxes | 28,832 | 24,066 |
| Income tax expense | 45 | 155 |
| Net expenses after income taxes | $28,877 | $24,221 |

Our total net operating expenses increased by approximately $4.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2017. Our management fee increased by approximately $1.0 million, net of a management fee waivers for the three months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2017. The increase in management fees was attributable to larger invested balances, driven by the proceeds from our unsecured notes issuances and our use of leverage from our revolving credit facilities and SBA-guaranteed debentures to originate new investments.

Interest and other financing expenses increased by approximately $3.8 million during the three months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2017, primarily due to our issuances of our unsecured notes, higher drawn balances on our SBA-guaranteed debentures and NMFC Credit Facility (as defined below) and rising LIBOR rates. Our total professional fees, total administrative expenses and total other general and administrative expenses remained relatively flat for the three months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2017.

### Net Realized Gains (Losses) and Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation)

*(in thousands)*

|  | Three Months Ended June 30, 2018 | June 30, 2017 |
| --- | ---: | ---: |
| Net realized (losses) gains on investments | $(6,609) | $(26,453) |
| Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments | 5,087 | 27,852 |
| Net change in unrealized (depreciation) appreciation securities purchased under collateralized agreements to resell | — | (33) |
| (Provision) benefit for taxes | (1,066) | 164 |
| Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) | $(2,588) | $1,530 |

Our net realized losses and unrealized gains resulted in a net loss of approximately $2.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018 compared to net realized losses and unrealized gains resulting in a net gain of approximately $1.5 million for the same period in 2017. As movement in unrealized appreciation or depreciation can be the result of realizations, we look at net realized and unrealized gains or losses together. The net loss for the three months ended June 30, 2018 was primarily driven by the realized loss on our investment in American Tire Distributors, Inc. ("ATD") which was sold during the quarter ended June 30, 2018 due to ATD's reported loss of its largest supplier. Our realized losses were partially offset by the overall increase in the market prices of our investments during the period. The provision for income taxes was attributable to equity investments that are held as of June 30, 2018 in three of our corporate subsidiaries. The net gain for the three months ended June 30, 2017 was primarily driven by the overall increase in the market prices of our investments during the period. With the completion of the Transtar restructuring in April 2017, $27.6 million of previously recorded unrealized depreciation related to this investment was realized during the three months ended June 30, 2017.

### Results of Operations for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 and June 30, 2017

### Revenue

*(in thousands)*

|  | Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 | June 30, 2017 |
| --- | ---: | ---: |
| Interest income | $76,829 | $71,637 |
| Total dividend income | 24,703 | 16,403 |
| Other income | 5,955 | 5,286 |
| Total investment income | $107,487 | $93,326 |

Our total investment income increased by approximately $14.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2017. For the six months ended June 30, 2018, total investment income of $107.5 million consisted of approximately $68.3 million in cash interest from investments, approximately $3.6 million in PIK and non-cash interest from investments, approximately $2.3 million in prepayment fees, net amortization of purchase premiums and discounts of approximately $2.6 million, approximately $10.9 million in cash dividends from investments, $13.8 million in PIK and non-cash dividends from investments and approximately $6.0 million in other income. The 15% increase in total investment income primarily results from an increase in dividend income of approximately $8.3 million during the six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2017. The increase is primarily due to distributions from our investments in NMNLC and PIK and non-cash dividend income from five equity positions. Additionally contributing to the increase in total investment income is the increased interest income which is attributable to larger invested balances and rising LIBOR rates. Our larger invested balances were driven by the proceeds from our June 2018 and January 2018 unsecured notes issuances to originate new investments. Other income during the six months ended June 30, 2018, which represents fees that are generally non-recurring in nature, was primarily attributable to upfront, amendment and consent fees received from twenty-four different portfolio companies and management fees from a non-controlled affiliated portfolio company.

### Operating Expenses

*(in thousands)*

|  | Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 | June 30, 2017 |
| --- | ---: | ---: |
| Management fee | $17,993 | $15,889 |
| Less: management fee waiver | (2,817) | (2,841) |
| Total management fee | 15,176 | 13,048 |
| Incentive fee | 12,864 | 11,857 |
| Less: incentive fee waiver | — | (1,800) |
| Total incentive fee | 12,864 | 10,057 |
| Interest and other financing expenses | 24,114 | 17,421 |
| Professional fees | 1,402 | 1,572 |
| Administrative expenses | 1,761 | 1,370 |
| Other general and administrative expenses | 928 | 868 |
| Total expenses | 56,245 | 44,336 |
| Less: expenses waived and reimbursed | (276) | (474) |
| Net expenses before income taxes | 55,969 | 43,862 |
| Income tax expense | 61 | 235 |
| Net expenses after income taxes | $56,030 | $44,097 |

Our total net operating expenses increased by approximately $11.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2017. Our management fee increased by approximately $2.1 million, net of a management fee waiver, for the six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2017. The increase in management fees was attributable to larger invested balances, driven by the proceeds from our April 2017 primary offering of our common stock, our unsecured notes issuances and our use of leverage from our revolving credit facilities and SBA-guaranteed debentures to originate new investments. Our incentive fees increased by approximately $2.8 million, net of an incentive fee waiver, for the six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2017, which was mainly attributable to an incentive fee waiver by the Investment Adviser for the six months ended June 30, 2017 of approximately $1.8 million.

Interest and other financing expenses increased by approximately $6.7 million during the six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2017, primarily due to our issuances of unsecured notes, higher drawn balances on our SBA-guaranteed debentures and NMFC Credit Facility (as defined below) and rising LIBOR rates. Our total professional fees, total administrative expenses and total other general and administrative expenses remained relatively flat for the six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2017.

### Net Realized Gains (Losses) and Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation)

*(in thousands)*

|  | Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 | June 30, 2017 |
| --- | ---: | ---: |
| Net realized (losses) gains on investments | $(6,403) | $(25,627) |
| Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments | 2,919 | 34,057 |
| Net change in unrealized (depreciation) appreciation securities purchased under collateralized agreements to resell | (12) | (833) |
| (Provision) benefit for taxes | (984) | 919 |
| Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) | $(4,480) | $8,516 |

Our net realized losses and unrealized gains resulted in a net loss of approximately $4.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 compared to net realized losses and unrealized gains resulting in a net gain of approximately $8.5 million for the same period in 2017. As movement in unrealized appreciation or depreciation can be the result of realizations, we look at net realized and unrealized gains or losses together. The net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2018 was primarily driven by the realized loss on our investment in ATD, which was sold during the quarter ended June 30, 2018 due to ATD's reported loss of its largest supplier. The provision for income taxes was attributable to equity investments that are held as of June 30, 2018 in three of our corporate subsidiaries. The net gain for the six months ended June 30, 2017 was primarily driven by the overall increase in the market prices of our investments during the period. With the completion of the Transtar restructuring in

April 2017, $27.6 million of previously recorded unrealized depreciation related to this investment was realized during the three months ended June 30, 2017.

### Liquidity and Capital Resources

The primary use of existing funds and any funds raised in the future is expected to be for repayment of indebtedness, investments in portfolio companies, cash distributions to our stockholders or for other general corporate purposes.

Since our IPO, and through June 30, 2018, we raised approximately $614.6 million in net proceeds from additional offerings of our common stock.

Our liquidity is generated and generally available through advances from the revolving credit facilities, from cash flows from operations, and, we expect, through periodic follow-on equity offerings. In addition, we may from time to time enter into additional debt facilities, increase the size of existing facilities or issue additional debt securities, including unsecured debt and/or debt securities convertible into common stock. Any such incurrence or issuance would be subject to prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual and regulatory restrictions and other factors. In accordance with the 1940 Act, with certain limited exceptions, we are only allowed to borrow amounts such that our asset coverage, calculated pursuant to the 1940 Act, is at least 150.0% after such borrowing. On March 23, 2018, the Small Business Credit Availability Act (the “SBCA”) was signed into law, which included various changes to regulations under the federal securities laws that impact BDCs. The SBCA included changes to the 1940 Act to allow BDCs to decrease their asset coverage requirement to 150.0% from 200.0% under certain circumstances. On April 12, 2018, our board of directors, including a ‘‘required majority’’ (as such term is defined in Section 57(o) of the 1940 Act) approved the application of the modified asset coverage requirements set forth in Section 61(a)(2) of the 1940 Act, as amended by the SBCA and recommended the submission of a proposal for stockholders to approve the application of the 150.0% minimum asset coverage ratio to us at a special meeting of stockholders, which was held on June 8, 2018. The stockholder proposal was approved by the required votes of our stockholders at such special meeting of stockholders, and thus we became subject to the 150.0% minimum asset coverage ratio on June 9, 2018. As a result of our exemptive relief received on November 5, 2014, we are permitted to exclude our SBA-guaranteed debentures from the 150.0% asset coverage ratio that the we are required to maintain under the 1940 Act. As of June 30, 2018, our asset coverage ratio was 210.9%.

At June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, we had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $33.9 million and $34.9 million, respectively. Our cash used in operating activities during the six months ended June 30, 2018 and June 30, 2017 was approximately $158.3 million and $211.2 million, respectively. We expect that all current liquidity needs will be met with cash flows from operations and other activities.

### Borrowings

***Holdings Credit Facility—***On December 18, 2014, we entered into the Second Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, among us, as the Collateral Manager, NMF Holdings, as the Borrower, Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, as the Administrative Agent and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as the Lender and Collateral Custodian, which is structured as a revolving credit facility and matures on December 18, 2019. On October 24, 2017 we entered into the Third Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement (the "Holdings Credit Facility"), among us as the Collateral Manager, NMF Holdings as the Borrower and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as the Administrative Agent and Collateral Custodian, which extended the maturity date to October 24, 2022.

The maximum amount of revolving borrowings available under the Holdings Credit Facility is $495.0 million. Under the Holdings Credit Facility, NMF Holdings is permitted to borrow up to 25.0%, 45.0% or 70.0% of the purchase price of pledged assets, subject to approval by Wells Fargo Bank, National Association. The Holdings Credit Facility is non-recourse to us and is collateralized by all of the investments of NMF Holdings on an investment by investment basis. All fees associated with the origination or upsizing of the Holdings Credit Facility are capitalized on our Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities and charged against income as other financing expenses over the life of the Holdings Credit Facility. The Holdings Credit Facility contains certain customary affirmative and negative covenants and events of default. In addition, the Holdings Credit Facility requires us to maintain a minimum asset coverage ratio. The covenants are generally not tied to mark to market fluctuations in the prices of NMF Holdings investments, but rather to the performance of the underlying portfolio companies.

The Holdings Credit Facility bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 1.75% per annum for Broadly Syndicated Loans (as defined in the Loan and Security Agreement) and LIBOR plus 2.50% per annum for all other investments. Effective April 1, 2018, the Holdings Credit Facility bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 1.75% per annum for Broadly Syndicated Loans (as defined in the Loan and Security Agreement) and LIBOR plus 2.25% per annum for all other investments. The Holdings Credit Facility also charges a non-usage fee, based on the unused facility amount multiplied by the Non-Usage Fee Rate (as defined in the Loan and Security Agreement).

The following table summarizes the interest expense, non-usage fees and amortization of financing costs incurred on the Holdings Credit Facility for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and June 30, 2017.

*(in millions)*

|  | Three Months Ended June 30, 2018 | June 30, 2017 | Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 | June 30, 2017 |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Interest expense | $3.6 | $2.9 | $6.7 | $5.6 |
| Non-usage fee | $0.2 | $0.2 | $0.4 | $0.4 |
| Amortization of financing costs | $0.6 | $0.4 | $1.2 | $0.8 |
| Weighted average interest rate | 4.1% | 3.2% | 4.0% | 3.2% |
| Effective interest rate | 5.0% | 3.9% | 5.0% | 3.9% |
| Average debt outstanding | $351.5 | $356.3 | $337.3 | $351.2 |

As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the outstanding balance on the Holdings Credit Facility was $390.5 million and $312.4 million, respectively, and NMF Holdings was in compliance with the applicable covenants in the Holdings Credit Facility on such dates.

***NMFC Credit Facility—***The Senior Secured Revolving Credit Agreement, as amended (together with the related guarantee and security agreement, the "NMFC Credit Facility"), dated June 4, 2014 , among us, as the Borrower, Goldman Sachs Bank USA, as the Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent, and Goldman Sachs Bank USA, Morgan Stanley Bank, N.A. and Stifel Bank & Trust, as Lenders, is structured as a senior secured revolving credit facility and matures on June 4, 2019. On February 27, 2018, we entered into an amendment to the NMFC Credit Facility which extended the maturity date to June 4, 2022. The NMFC Credit Facility is guaranteed by certain of our domestic subsidiaries and proceeds from the NMFC Credit Facility may be used for general corporate purposes, including the funding of portfolio investments.

As of June 30, 2018, the maximum amount of revolving borrowings available under the NMFC Credit Facility was $150.0 million. We are permitted to borrow at various advance rates depending on the type of portfolio investment as outlined in the Senior Secured Revolving Credit Agreement. All fees associated with the origination of the NMFC Credit Facility are capitalized on our Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities and charged against income as other financing expenses over the life of the NMFC Credit Facility. The NMFC Credit Facility contains certain customary affirmative and negative covenants and events of default, including certain financial covenants related to asset coverage and liquidity and other maintenance covenants.

The NMFC Credit Facility generally bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 2.50% per annum or the prime rate plus 1.50% per annum, and charges a commitment fee, based on the unused facility amount multiplied by 0.375% per annum (as defined in the Senior Secured Revolving Credit Agreement).

The following table summarizes the interest expense, non-usage fees and amortization of financing costs incurred on the NMFC Credit Facility for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and June 30, 2017.

*(in millions)*

|  | Three Months Ended June 30, 2018 |  | June 30, 2017 |  | Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 | June 30, 2017 |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Interest expense | $1.5 |  | $0.8 |  | $2.4 | $1.1 |
| Non-usage fee | $— | (1) | $— | (1) | $0.1 | $0.1 |
| Amortization of financing costs | $0.1 |  | $0.1 |  | $0.2 | $0.2 |
| Weighted average interest rate | 4.5% |  | 3.5% |  | 4.4% | 3.5% |
| Effective interest rate | 4.9% |  | 4.2% |  | 5.0% | 4.5% |
| Average debt outstanding | $135.8 |  | $87.9 |  | $108.9 | $61.4 |

(1) For the three months ended June 30, 2018 and June 30, 2017, the total non-usage fee was less than $50 thousand.

As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the outstanding balance on the NMFC Credit Facility was $150.0 million and $122.5 million, respectively, and NMFC was in compliance with the applicable covenants in the NMFC Credit Facility on such dates.

***Convertible Notes—***On June 3, 2014, we closed a private offering of $115.0 million aggregate principal amount of unsecured convertible notes (the "Convertible Notes"), pursuant to an indenture, dated June 3, 2014 (the "Indenture"). The Convertible Notes were issued in a private placement only to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"). As of June 3, 2015, the restrictions under Rule 144A under the Securities Act were removed, allowing the Convertible Notes to be eligible and freely tradable without restrictions for resale pursuant to Rule 144(b)(1) under the Securities Act. On September 30, 2016, we closed a public offering of an additional $40.3 million aggregate principal amount of the Convertible Notes. These additional Convertible Notes constitute a further issuance of, rank equally in right of payment with, and form a single series with the $115.0 million aggregate principal amount of Convertible Notes that we issued on June 3, 2014.

The Convertible Notes bear interest at an annual rate of 5.0%, payable semi-annually in arrears on June 15 and December 15 of each year, which commenced on December 15, 2014. The Convertible Notes will mature on June 15, 2019 unless earlier converted or repurchased at the holder's option.

The following table summarizes certain key terms related to the convertible features of our Convertible Notes as of June 30, 2018.

|  | June 30, 2018 |
| --- | ---: |
| Initial conversion premium | 12.5% |
| Initial conversion rate(1) | 62.7746 |
| Initial conversion price | $15.93 |
| Conversion premium at June 30, 2018 | 11.7% |
| Conversion rate at June 30, 2018(1)(2) | 63.2794 |
| Conversion price at June 30, 2018(2)(3) | $15.80 |
| Last conversion price calculation date | June 3, 2018 |

(1) Conversion rates denominated in shares of common stock per $1.0 thousand principal amount of the Convertible Notes converted.

(2) Represents conversion rate and conversion price, as applicable, taking into account certain de minimis adjustments that will be made on the conversion date.

(3) The conversion price in effect at June 30, 2018 was calculated on the last anniversary of the issuance and will be calculated again on the next anniversary, unless the exercise price shall have changed by more than 1.0% before the anniversary.

The conversion rate will be subject to adjustment upon certain events, such as stock splits and combinations, mergers, spin-offs, increases in distributions in excess of $0.34 per share per quarter and certain changes in control. Certain of these adjustments, including adjustments for increases in distributions, are subject to a conversion price floor of $14.05 per share. In no event will the total number of shares of common stock issuable upon conversion exceed 71.1893 per $1.0 thousand principal amount of the Convertible Notes. We have determined that the embedded conversion option in the Convertible Notes is not required to be separately accounted for as a derivative under GAAP.

The Convertible Notes are unsecured obligations and rank senior in right of payment to our existing and future indebtedness that is expressly subordinated in right of payment to the Convertible Notes; equal in right of payment to our existing and future unsecured indebtedness that is not so subordinated; effectively junior in right of payment to any of our secured indebtedness (including existing unsecured indebtedness that we later secure) to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness; and structurally junior to all existing and future indebtedness (including trade payables) incurred by our subsidiaries and financing vehicles. The issuance is considered part of the if-converted method for calculation of diluted earnings per share.

We may not redeem the Convertible Notes prior to maturity. No sinking fund is provided for the Convertible Notes. In addition, if certain corporate events occur, holders of the Convertible Notes may require us to repurchase for cash all or part of their Convertible Notes at a repurchase price equal to 100.0% of the principal amount of the Convertible Notes to be repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest through, but excluding, the repurchase date.

The Indenture contains certain covenants, including covenants requiring us to provide financial information to the holders of the Convertible Note and the Trustee if we cease to be subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). These covenants are subject to limitations and exceptions that are described in the Indenture.

The following table summarizes the interest expense, amortization of financing costs and amortization of premium incurred on the Convertible Notes for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and June 30, 2017.

*(in millions)*

|  | Three Months Ended June 30, 2018 | June 30, 2017 |  | Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 | June 30, 2017 |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Interest expense | $2.0 | $2.0 |  | $3.9 | $3.9 |
| Amortization of financing costs | $0.3 | $0.3 |  | $0.6 | $0.6 |
| Amortization of premium | $(0.1) | $— | (1) | $(0.1) | $(0.1) |
| Effective interest rate | 5.7% | 5.7% |  | 5.7% | 5.7% |
| Average debt outstanding | $155.3 | $155.3 |  | $155.3 | $155.3 |

(1) For the three months ended June 30, 2017, the total amortization of premium was less than $50 thousand.

As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the outstanding balance on the Convertible Notes was $155.3 million and $155.3 million, respectively, and NMFC was in compliance with the terms of the Indenture on such dates.

***Unsecured Notes—***On May 6, 2016, we issued $50.0 million in aggregate principal amount of five-year unsecured notes that mature on May 15, 2021 (the “2016 Unsecured Notes”), pursuant to a note purchase agreement, dated May 4, 2016, to an institutional investor in a private placement. On September 30, 2016, we entered into an amended and restated note purchase agreement (the "NPA") and issued an additional $40.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 2016 Unsecured Notes to institutional investors in a private placement. On June 30, 2017, we issued $55.0 million in aggregate principal amount of five-year unsecured notes that mature on July 15, 2022 (the "2017A Unsecured Notes"), pursuant to the NPA and a supplement to the NPA. On January 30, 2018, we issued $90.0 million in aggregate principal amount of five year unsecured notes that mature on January 30, 2023 (the "2018A Unsecured Notes" and together with the 2016 Unsecured Notes and 2017A Unsecured Notes, the "Unsecured Notes") pursuant to the NPA and a second supplement to the NPA. The NPA provides for future issuances of Unsecured Notes in separate series or tranches. The Unsecured Notes are equal in priority with our other unsecured indebtedness, including our Convertible Notes.

The 2016 Unsecured Notes bear interest at an annual rate of 5.313%, payable semi-annually on May 15 and November 15 of each year, which commenced on November 15, 2016. The 2017A Unsecured Notes bear interest at an annual rate of 4.760%, payable semi-annually on January 15 and July 15 of each year, which commenced on January 15, 2018. The 2018A Unsecured Notes bear interest at an annual rate of 4.87%, payable semi-annually on February 15 and August 15 of each year, which commences on August 15, 2018. These interest rates are subject to increase in the event that: (i) subject to certain exceptions, the Unsecured Notes or we cease to have an investment grade rating or (ii) the aggregate amount of our unsecured debt falls below $150.0 million. In each such event, we have the option to offer to prepay the Unsecured Notes at par, in which case holders of the Unsecured Notes who accept the offer would not receive the increased interest rate. In addition, we are obligated to offer to prepay the Unsecured Notes at par if the Investment Adviser, or an affiliate thereof, ceases to be our investment adviser or if certain change in control events occur with respect to the Investment Adviser.

The NPA contains customary terms and conditions for unsecured notes issued in a private placement, including, without limitation, an option to offer to prepay all or a portion of the Unsecured Notes at par (plus a make-whole amount, if applicable), affirmative and negative covenants such as information reporting, maintenance of our status as a BDC under the 1940 Act and a RIC under the Code, minimum stockholders’ equity, minimum asset coverage ratio, and prohibitions on certain fundamental changes at NMFC or any subsidiary guarantor, as well as customary events of default with customary cure and notice, including, without limitation, nonpayment, misrepresentation in a material respect, breach of covenant, cross-default under other indebtedness of NMFC or certain significant subsidiaries, certain judgments and orders, and certain events of bankruptcy.

The following table summarizes the interest expense and amortization of financing costs incurred on the Unsecured Notes for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and June 30, 2017.

*(in millions)*

|  | Three Months Ended June 30, 2018 | June 30, 2017 | Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 | June 30, 2017 |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Interest expense | $2.9 | $1.2 | $5.5 | $2.4 |
| Amortization of financing costs | $0.1 | $0.1 | $0.3 | $0.2 |
| Weighted average interest rate | 5.0% | 5.3% | 5.1% | 5.3% |
| Effective interest rate | 5.3% | 5.8% | 5.4% | 5.8% |
| Average debt outstanding | $235.0 | $90.6 | $220.6 | $90.3 |

As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the outstanding balance on the Unsecured Notes was $235.0 million and $145.0 million, respectively, and we were in compliance with the terms of the NPA.

***SBA-guaranteed debentures—***On August 1, 2014 and August 25, 2017, respectively, SBIC I and SBIC II received SBIC licenses from the SBA to operate as SBICs.

The SBIC license allows SBICs to obtain leverage by issuing SBA-guaranteed debentures, subject to the issuance of a capital commitment by the SBA and other customary procedures. SBA-guaranteed debentures are non-recourse to us, interest only debentures with interest payable semi-annually and have a ten year maturity. The principal amount of SBA-guaranteed debentures is not required to be paid prior to maturity but may be prepaid at any time without penalty. The interest rate of SBA-guaranteed debentures is fixed on a semi-annual basis at a market-driven spread over U.S. Treasury Notes with ten year maturities. The SBA, as a creditor, will have a superior claim to the assets of SBIC I and SBIC II over our stockholders in the event SBIC I and SBIC II are liquidated or the SBA exercises remedies upon an event of default.

The maximum amount of borrowings available under current SBA regulations for a single licensee is $150.0 million as long as the licensee has at least $75.0 million in regulatory capital, receives a capital commitment from the SBA and has been through an examination by the SBA subsequent to licensing. In June 2018, the U.S. Senate passed the Small Business Investment Opportunity Act, which the President signed into law, that amended the 1958 Act by increasing the individual leverage limit from $150.0 million to $175.0 million, subject to SBA approvals.

As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, SBIC I had regulatory capital of $75.0 million and $75.0 million, respectively, and SBA-guaranteed debentures outstanding of $150.0 million and $150.0 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, SBIC II had regulatory capital of $42.5 million and $2.5 million, respectively, and $13.0 million and $0, respectively, of SBA-guaranteed debentures outstanding. The SBA-guaranteed debentures incur upfront fees of 3.425%, which consists of a 1.00% commitment fee and a 2.425% issuance discount, which are amortized over the life of the SBA-guaranteed debentures. The following table summarizes our SBA-guaranteed debentures as of June 30, 2018.

*(in millions)*

| Issuance Date Fixed SBA-guaranteed debentures: | Maturity Date | Debenture Amount | Interest Rate | SBA Annual Charge |
| --- | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| March 25, 2015 | March 1, 2025 | $37.5 | 2.517% | 0.355% |
| September 23, 2015 | September 1, 2025 | 37.5 | 2.829% | 0.355% |
| September 23, 2015 | September 1, 2025 | 28.8 | 2.829% | 0.742% |
| March 23, 2016 | March 1, 2026 | 13.9 | 2.507% | 0.742% |
| September 21, 2016 | September 1, 2026 | 4.0 | 2.051% | 0.742% |
| September 20, 2017 | September 1, 2027 | 13.0 | 2.518% | 0.742% |
| March 21, 2018 | March 1, 2028 | 15.3 | 3.187% | 0.742% |
| **Interim SBA-guaranteed debentures:** |  |  |  |  |
|  | September 1, 2028 (1) | 13.0 | 2.644% | 0.222% |
| **Total SBA-guaranteed debentures** |  | **$163.0** |  |  |

(1) Estimated maturity date as interim SBA-guaranteed debentures are expected to pool in September 2018.

Prior to pooling, the SBA-guaranteed debentures bear interest at an interim floating rate of LIBOR plus 0.30%. Once pooled, which occurs in March and September each year, the SBA-guaranteed debentures bear interest at a fixed rate that is set to the current 10-year treasury rate plus a spread at each pooling date.

The following table summarizes the interest expense and amortization of financing costs incurred on the SBA-guaranteed debentures for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and June 30, 2017.

*(in millions)*

|  | Three Months Ended June 30, 2018 | June 30, 2017 | Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 | June 30, 2017 |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Interest expense | $1.2 | $0.9 | $2.4 | $1.9 |
| Amortization of financing costs | $0.2 | $0.1 | $0.3 | $0.2 |
| Weighted average interest rate | 3.2% | 3.2% | 3.2% | 3.2% |
| Effective interest rate | 3.6% | 3.5% | 3.5% | 3.5% |
| Average debt outstanding | $154.3 | $124.3 | $152.2 | $123.0 |

The SBIC program is designed to stimulate the flow of private investor capital into eligible smaller businesses, as defined by the SBA. Under SBA regulations, SBICs are subject to regulatory requirements, including making investments in SBA-eligible businesses, investing at least 25.0% of its investment capital in eligible small businesses, as defined under the 1958 Act, placing certain limitations on the financing terms of investments, regulating the types of financing, prohibiting investments in small businesses with certain characteristics or in certain industries and requiring capitalization thresholds that limit distributions to us. SBICs are subject to an annual periodic examination by an SBA examiner to determine the SBIC's compliance with the relevant SBA regulations and an annual financial audit of its financial statements that are prepared on a basis of accounting other than GAAP (such as ASC 820) by an independent auditor. As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, SBIC I and SBIC II were in compliance with SBA regulatory requirements.

### Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We may become a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financial needs of our portfolio companies. These instruments may include commitments to extend credit and involve, to varying degrees, elements of liquidity and credit risk in excess of the amount recognized in the balance sheet. As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, we had outstanding commitments to third parties to fund investments totaling $115.5 million and $77.4 million, respectively, under various undrawn revolving credit facilities, delayed draw commitments or other future funding commitments.

We may from time to time enter into financing commitment letters or bridge financing commitments, which could require funding in the future. As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, we had commitment letters to purchase investments in an aggregate par amount of $20.1 million and $13.9 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, we had not entered into any bridge financing commitments which could require funding in the future.

As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, we owed $9.0 million and $12.0 million, respectively, related to a settlement agreement with a trustee of Black Elk Energy Offshore Operations, LLC. We began to make semi-annual payments of $3.0 million in June 2018, with the final payment due in December 2019.

As of June 30, 2018, we had unfunded commitments related to an equity investment in SLP III of $37.2 million, which may be funded at our discretion.

### Contractual Obligations

A summary of our significant contractual payment obligations as of June 30, 2018 is as follows:

*(in millions)*

|  | Contractual Obligations Payments Due by Period Total | Less than 1 Year | 1 - 3 Years | 3 - 5 Years | More than 5 Years |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Holdings Credit Facility(1) | $390.5 | $— | $— | $390.5 | $— |
| Unsecured Notes(2) | 235.0 | — | 90.0 | 145.0 | — |
| SBA-guaranteed debentures(3) | 163.0 | — | — | — | 163.0 |
| Convertible Notes(4) | 155.3 | 155.3 | — | — | — |
| NMFC Credit Facility(5) | 150.0 | — | — | 150.0 | — |
| Total Contractual Obligations | $1,093.8 | $155.3 | $90.0 | $685.5 | $163.0 |

(1) Under the terms of the $495.0 million Holdings Credit Facility, all outstanding borrowings under that facility ($390.5 million as of June 30, 2018) must be repaid on or before October 24, 2022. As of June 30, 2018, there was approximately $104.5 million of possible capacity remaining under the Holdings Credit Facility.

(2) $90.0 million 2016 Unsecured Notes will mature on May 15, 2021 unless earlier repurchased, $55.0 million of 2017A Unsecured Notes will mature on July 15, 2022 unless earlier repurchased and the $90.0 million in 2018A Unsecured Notes will mature on January 30, 2023 unless earlier repurchased.

(3) Our SBA-guaranteed debentures will begin to mature on March 1, 2025.

(4) The $155.3 million Convertible Notes will mature on June 15, 2019 unless earlier converted or repurchased at the holder’s option.

(5) Under the terms of the $150.0 million NMFC Credit Facility, all outstanding borrowings under that facility ($150.0 million as of June 30, 2018) must be repaid on or before June 4, 2022. As of June 30, 2018, there was no capacity remaining under the NMFC Credit Facility.

We have entered into the Investment Management Agreement with the Investment Adviser in accordance with the 1940 Act. Under the Investment Management Agreement, the Investment Adviser has agreed to provide us with investment advisory and management services. We have agreed to pay for these services (1) a management fee and (2) an incentive fee based on our performance.

We have also entered into the Administration Agreement with the Administrator. Under the Administration Agreement, the Administrator has agreed to arrange office space for us and provide office equipment and clerical, bookkeeping and record keeping services and other administrative services necessary to conduct our respective day-to-day operations. The Administrator has also agreed to maintain, or oversee the maintenance of, our financial records, our reports to stockholders and reports filed with the SEC.

If any of the contractual obligations discussed above are terminated, our costs under any new agreements that are entered into may increase. In addition, we would likely incur significant time and expense in locating alternative parties to provide the services we expect to receive under the Investment Management Agreement and the Administration Agreement.

### Distributions and Dividends

Distributions declared and paid to stockholders for the six months ended June 30, 2018 totaled approximately $51.6 million.

The following table reflects cash distributions, including dividends and returns of capital, if any, per share that have been declared by our board of directors for the two most recent fiscal years and the current fiscal year to date:

| Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2018 | Date Declared | Record Date | Payment Date | Per Share Amount (1) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | ---: |
| Second Quarter | May 2, 2018 | June 15, 2018 | June 29, 2018 | $0.34 |
| First Quarter | February 21, 2018 | March 15, 2018 | March 29, 2018 | 0.34 |
|  |  |  |  | $0.68 |
| **December 31, 2017** |  |  |  |  |
| Fourth Quarter | November 2, 2017 | December 15, 2017 | December 28, 2017 | $0.34 |
| Third Quarter | August 4, 2017 | September 15, 2017 | September 29, 2017 | 0.34 |
| Second Quarter | May 4, 2017 | June 16, 2017 | June 30, 2017 | 0.34 |
| First Quarter | February 23, 2017 | March 17, 2017 | March 31, 2017 | 0.34 |
|  |  |  |  | $1.36 |
| **December 31, 2016** |  |  |  |  |
| Fourth Quarter | November 4, 2016 | December 15, 2016 | December 29, 2016 | $0.34 |
| Third Quarter | August 2, 2016 | September 16, 2016 | September 30, 2016 | 0.34 |
| Second Quarter | May 3, 2016 | June 16, 2016 | June 30, 2016 | 0.34 |
| First Quarter | February 22, 2016 | March 17, 2016 | March 31, 2016 | 0.34 |
|  |  |  |  | $1.36 |

(1) Tax characteristics of all distributions paid are reported to stockholders on Form 1099 after the end of the calendar year. For the years ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, total distributions were $100.9 million and $88.8 million, respectively, of which the distributions were comprised of approximately 71.50% and 89.46%, respectively, of ordinary income, 0.00% and 0.00%, respectively, of long-term capital gains and approximately 28.50% and 10.54%, respectively, of a return of capital. Future quarterly distributions, if any, will be determined by our board of directors.

We intend to pay quarterly distributions to our stockholders in amounts sufficient to maintain our status as a RIC. We intend to distribute approximately all of our net investment income on a quarterly basis and substantially all of our taxable income on an annual basis, except that we may retain certain net capital gains for reinvestment.

We maintain an "opt out" dividend reinvestment plan on behalf of our common stockholders, pursuant to which each of our stockholders' cash distributions will be automatically reinvested in additional shares of common stock, unless the stockholder elects to receive cash. See *Item 1— Financial Statements—Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies* for additional details regarding our dividend reinvestment plan.

### Related Parties

We have entered into a number of business relationships with affiliated or related parties, including the following:

- We have entered into the Investment Management Agreement with the Investment Adviser, a wholly-owned subsidiary of New Mountain Capital. Therefore, New Mountain Capital is entitled to any profits earned by the Investment Adviser, which includes any fees payable to the Investment Adviser under the terms of the Investment Management Agreement, less expenses incurred by the Investment Adviser in performing its services under the Investment Management Agreement.
- We have entered into the Administration Agreement with the Administrator, a wholly-owned subsidiary of New Mountain Capital. The Administrator arranges our office space and provides office equipment and administrative services necessary to conduct our respective day-to-day operations pursuant to the Administration Agreement. We reimburse the Administrator for the allocable portion of overhead and other expenses incurred by it in performing its obligations to us under the Administration Agreement, which includes the fees and expenses associated with performing administrative, finance, and compliance functions, and the compensation of our chief financial officer and chief compliance officer and their respective staffs. Pursuant to the Administration Agreement and further restricted by us, the Administrator may, in its own discretion, submit to us for reimbursement some or all of the

expenses that the Administrator has incurred on our behalf during any quarterly period. As a result, the amount of expenses for which we will have to reimburse the Administrator may fluctuate in future quarterly periods and there can be no assurance given as to when, or if, the Administrator may determine to limit the expenses that the Administrator submits to us for reimbursement in the future. However, it is expected that the Administrator will continue to support part of our expense burden in the near future and may decide to not calculate and charge through certain overhead related amounts as well as continue to cover some of the indirect costs. The Administrator cannot recoup any expenses that the Administrator has previously waived. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 approximately $0.5 million and $1.2 million, respectively, of indirect administrative expenses were included in administrative expenses, of which approximately $0.3 million and $0.3 million, respectively, of indirect administrative expenses were waived by the Administrator. As of June 30, 2018, $1.3 million of indirect administrative expenses were included in payable to affiliates.

- We, the Investment Adviser and the Administrator have entered into a royalty-free Trademark License Agreement, as amended, with New Mountain Capital, pursuant to which New Mountain Capital has agreed to grant us, the Investment Adviser and the Administrator a non-exclusive, royalty-free license to use the name "New Mountain" and "New Mountain Finance".

In addition, we have adopted a formal code of ethics that governs the conduct of our officers and directors. These officers and directors also remain subject to the duties imposed by the 1940 Act, the Delaware General Corporation Law and the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act.

The Investment Adviser and its affiliates may also manage other funds in the future that may have investment mandates that are similar, in whole or in part, to our investment mandates. The Investment Adviser and its affiliates may determine that an investment is appropriate for us and for one or more of those other funds. In such event, depending on the availability of such investment and other appropriate factors, the Investment Adviser or its affiliates may determine that we should invest side-by-side with one or more other funds. Any such investments will be made only to the extent permitted by applicable law and interpretive positions of the SEC and its staff, and consistent with the Investment Adviser's allocation procedures. On December 18, 2017, the SEC issued an exemptive order (the “Exemptive Order”), which superseded a prior order issued on June 5, 2017, which permits us to co-invest in portfolio companies with certain funds or entities managed by the Investment Adviser or its affiliates in certain negotiated transactions where co-investing would otherwise be prohibited under the 1940 Act, subject to the conditions of the Exemptive Order. Pursuant to the Exemptive Order, we are permitted to co-invest with our affiliates if a “required majority” (as defined in Section 57(o) of the 1940 Act) of our independent directors make certain conclusions in connection with a co-investment transaction, including, but not limited to, that (1) the terms of the potential co-investment transaction, including the consideration to be paid, are reasonable and fair to us and our stockholders and do not involve overreaching in respect of us or our stockholders on the part of any person concerned, and (2) the potential co-investment transaction is consistent with the interests of our stockholders and is consistent with our then-current investment objective and strategies.

## Market risk

As filed, 2,324 characters.

We are subject to certain financial market risks, such as interest rate fluctuations. During the six months ended June 30, 2018, certain of the loans held in our portfolio had floating interest rates. As of June 30, 2018, approximately 86.4% of investments at fair value (excluding investments on non-accrual, unfunded debt investments and non-interest bearing equity investments) represent floating-rate investments with a LIBOR floor (includes investments bearing prime interest rate contracts) and approximately 13.6% of investments at fair value represent fixed-rate investments. Additionally, our senior secured revolving credit facilities are also subject to floating interest rates and are currently paid based on one-month floating LIBOR rates.

The following table estimates the potential changes in net cash flow generated from interest income and expenses, should interest rates increase by 100, 200 or 300 basis points, or decrease by 25 basis points. Interest income is calculated as revenue from interest generated from our portfolio of investments held on June 30, 2018. Interest expense is calculated based on the terms of our outstanding revolving credit facilities, convertible notes and unsecured notes. For our floating rate credit facilities, we use the outstanding balance as of June 30, 2018. Interest expense on our floating rate credit facilities is calculated using the interest rate as of June 30, 2018, adjusted for the hypothetical changes in rates, as shown below. The base interest rate case assumes the rates on our portfolio investments remain unchanged from the actual effective interest rates as of June 30, 2018. These hypothetical calculations are based on a model of the investments in our portfolio, held as of June 30, 2018, and are only adjusted for assumed changes in the underlying base interest rates.

Actual results could differ significantly from those estimated in the table.

| Change in Interest Rates | Estimated Percentage Change in Interest Income Net of Interest Expense (unaudited) |  |
| --- | ---: | ---: |
| -25 Basis Points | 0.79% | (1) |
| Base Interest Rate | —% |  |
| +100 Basis Points | 7.64% |  |
| +200 Basis Points | 15.43% |  |
| +300 Basis Points | 23.22% |  |

(1) Limited to the lesser of the June 30, 2018 LIBOR rates or a decrease of 25 basis points.

## Controls and procedures

As filed, 1,920 characters.

### (a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of June 30, 2018 (the end of the period covered by this report), we, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act. Based on that evaluation, our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective and provided reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our periodic United States Securities and Exchange Commission filings is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the United States Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. However, in evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of such possible controls and procedures.

### (b) Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting

Management has not identified any change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2018 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

### PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

*The terms “we”, “us”, “our” and the “Company” refers to New Mountain Finance Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries.*

## Risk factors

As filed, 6,707 characters.

In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in *Item 1A. Risk Factors* in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, which could materially affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results. Other than as set forth below, there have been no material changes during the six months ended June 30, 2018 to the risk factors discussed in *Item 1A. Risk Factors* in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.

***The terms of our credit facilities may contractually limit our ability to incur additional indebtedness.***

We will need additional capital to fund new investments and grow our portfolio of investments. We intend to access the capital markets periodically to issue debt or equity securities or borrow from financial institutions in order to obtain such additional capital. We believe that having the flexibility to incur additional leverage could augment the returns to our stockholders and would be in the best interests of our stockholders. Even though our board of directors and our shareholders have approved a resolution permitting the Company to be subject to a 150.0% asset coverage ratio to be effective as of June 9, 2018, contractual leverage limitations under our existing credit facilities or future borrowings may limit our ability to incur additional indebtedness. Currently, our NMFC Credit Facility restricts our ability to incur additional indebtedness if after incurring such additional debt, our asset coverage ratio would be below 165.0%, amended from 200.0% on July 5, 2018. Also, the NMFC Credit Facility requires that we not exceed a secured debt ratio of 0.70 to 1.00 at any time. We cannot assure you that we will be able to negotiate a change to our credit facilities to allow us to incur additional leverage or that any such an amendment will be available to us on favorable terms. An inability on our part to amend the contractual asset coverage limitation and access additional leverage could limit our ability to take advantage of the benefits described above related to our ability to incur additional leverage and could decrease our earnings, if any, which would have an adverse effect on our results of operations and the value of our shares of common stock.

***Recent legislation may allow us to incur additional leverage which could increase the risk of investing in the Company.***

The 1940 Act generally prohibits us from incurring indebtedness unless immediately after such borrowing we have an asset coverage for total borrowings of at least 200.0% (i.e., the amount of debt may not exceed 50.0% of the value of our assets). However, on March 23, 2018, the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2018, which includes the SBCA, was signed into law. The SBCA amends the 1940 Act to permit a BDC to reduce the required minimum asset coverage ratio applicable to it from 200.0% to 150.0% (i.e., the amount of debt may not exceed 66.7% of the value of our assets), subject to certain requirements described therein. On April 12, 2018, our board of directors, including a ‘‘required majority’’ (as such term is defined in Section 57(o) of the 1940 Act) approved the application of the modified asset coverage requirements set forth in Section 61(a)(2) of the 1940 Act, as amended by the SBCA and recommended the submission of a proposal for stockholders to approve the application of the 150.0% minimum asset coverage ratio to the Company at a special meeting of stockholders, which was held on June 8, 2018. The stockholder proposal was approved by the required votes of the Company’s stockholders at such special meeting of stockholders, and thus the Company became subject to the 150.0% minimum asset coverage ratio on June 9, 2018. Changing the asset coverage ratio permits the Company to double its leverage, which results in increased leverage risk and increased expenses.

As a result of this legislation, we are able to increase our leverage up to an amount that reduces our asset coverage ratio from 200.0% to 150.0%. Leverage magnifies the potential for loss on investments in our indebtedness and on invested equity capital. As we use leverage to partially finance our investments, you will experience increased risks of investing in our securities. If the value of our assets increases, then leveraging would cause the net asset value attributable to our common stock to increase more sharply than it would have had we not leveraged. Conversely, if the value of our assets decreases, leveraging would cause net asset value to decline more sharply than it otherwise would have had we not leveraged our business. Similarly, any increase in our income in excess of interest payable on the borrowed funds would cause our net investment income to increase more than it would without the leverage, while any decrease in our income would cause net investment income to decline more sharply than it would have had we not borrowed. Such a decline could negatively affect our ability to pay common stock dividends, scheduled debt payments or other payments related to our securities. Leverage is generally considered a speculative investment technique.

In addition, in December 2015, the 2016 omnibus spending bill approved by the U.S. Congress and signed into law by the President increased the amount of SBA-guaranteed debentures that affiliated SBIC funds can have outstanding from $225.0 million to $350.0 million, subject to SBA approval. This new legislation may allow us to issue additional SBIC debentures above the $225.0 million of SBA-guaranteed debentures previously permitted pending application for and receipt of additional SBIC licenses. If we incur this additional indebtedness in the future, your risk of an investment in our securities may increase. The maximum amount of borrowings available under current SBA regulations for a single licensee is $150.0 million as long as the licensee has at least $75.0 million in regulatory capital, receives a capital commitment from the SBA and has been through an examination by the SBA subsequent to licensing. In June 2018, the U.S. Senate passed the Small Business Investment Opportunity Act, which the President signed into law, that amended the 1958 Act by increasing the individual leverage limit from $150.0 million to $175.0 million, subject to SBA approvals.

Filed Aug 7, 2018.
Source: SEC EDGAR, the filing index for accession 0001496099-18-000008. Last ingested by Listed: Nov 2, 2026, 19:12 ET. No prices; not investment advice.