# MID Penn Bancorp Inc: Form 10-K for the period ended Dec 31, 2021 - Company: [MID Penn Bancorp Inc](/companies/mpb.md) (CIK 879635) - Form: 10-K - Filed: 2022-03-15 - Accepted by EDGAR: Mar 15, 2022, 16:37 ET - Period: 2021-12-31 - Accession: 0001564590-22-010421 - Inline XBRL: yes - Main document: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/879635/000156459022010421/mpb-10k_20211231.htm - All documents and exhibits: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/879635/000156459022010421/ ## Figures reported in this filing Standardized XBRL line items for the period ended 2021-12-31. | Line item | Period | Value | XBRL concept | | --- | --- | ---: | --- | | Interest expense | 3 months, 2021-10-01 to 2021-12-31 | $3.3m | us-gaap:InterestExpense | | Interest expense | 12 months, 2021-01-01 to 2021-12-31 | $14.8m | us-gaap:InterestExpense | | Income tax | 3 months, 2021-10-01 to 2021-12-31 | −$17.0k | us-gaap:IncomeTaxExpenseBenefit | | Income tax | 12 months, 2021-01-01 to 2021-12-31 | $6.7m | us-gaap:IncomeTaxExpenseBenefit | | Net income | 3 months, 2021-10-01 to 2021-12-31 | $607.0k | us-gaap:NetIncomeLoss | | Net income | 12 months, 2021-01-01 to 2021-12-31 | $29.3m | us-gaap:NetIncomeLoss | | Diluted EPS | 3 months, 2021-10-01 to 2021-12-31 | $50.00 | us-gaap:EarningsPerShareDiluted | | Diluted EPS | 12 months, 2021-01-01 to 2021-12-31 | $2.71 | us-gaap:EarningsPerShareDiluted | | Basic EPS | 3 months, 2021-10-01 to 2021-12-31 | $0.05 | us-gaap:EarningsPerShareBasic | | Basic EPS | 12 months, 2021-01-01 to 2021-12-31 | $2.71 | us-gaap:EarningsPerShareBasic | | Diluted shares (weighted) | 12 months, 2021-01-01 to 2021-12-31 | 10,819,579 shares | us-gaap:WeightedAverageNumberOfDilutedSharesOutstanding | | Operating cash flow | 12 months, 2021-01-01 to 2021-12-31 | $65.9m | us-gaap:NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities | | Capital expenditure | 12 months, 2021-01-01 to 2021-12-31 | $3.5m | us-gaap:PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment | | Dividends paid | 12 months, 2021-01-01 to 2021-12-31 | $8.9m | us-gaap:PaymentsOfDividendsCommonStock | | Share repurchases | 12 months, 2021-01-01 to 2021-12-31 | $128.0k | us-gaap:PaymentsForRepurchaseOfCommonStock | | Total assets | at 2021-12-31 | $4.69bn | us-gaap:Assets | | Total liabilities | at 2021-12-31 | $4.20bn | us-gaap:Liabilities | | Shareholders' equity | at 2021-12-31 | $490.1m | us-gaap:StockholdersEquity | ## Business As filed, 59,056 characters. The disclosures set forth in this Item are qualified by the section captioned “Special Cautionary Notice Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” contained in Part II, Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and other cautionary statements set forth elsewhere in this report. ### Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. is a financial holding company incorporated in August 1991 in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. and its wholly owned bank and nonbank subsidiaries are collectively referred to herein as “Mid Penn” or the “Corporation.” On December 31, 1991, Mid Penn acquired, as part of the holding company formation, all of the outstanding common stock of Mid Penn Bank (the “Bank”), and the Bank became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Mid Penn. During the year ended December 31, 2020, Mid Penn established three nonbank subsidiaries, including MPB Financial Services, LLC, under which two additional nonbank subsidiaries have been established: (i) MPB Wealth Management, LLC, created to expand the wealth management function and services of the Corporation, and (ii) MPB Risk Services, LLC, created to fulfill the insurance needs of both existing and potential customers of the Corporation. As of December 31, 2021, the accounts and activities of these nonbank subsidiaries established in 2020 were not material to warrant separate disclosure or segment reporting. Mid Penn’s primary business is to supervise and coordinate the business of the Bank and its nonbank subsidiaries, and to provide them with the capital and resources to fulfill their respective missions. Mid Penn’s consolidated financial condition and results of operations consist almost entirely of that of the Bank, which is managed as a single business segment. At December 31, 2021, Mid Penn had total consolidated assets of $4,689,425,000 with total deposits of $4,002,016,000 and total shareholders’ equity of $490,076,000. The holding company and its nonbank subsidiaries currently do not own or lease any real property. The Bank owns or leases the banking offices as identified in Part I, Item 2. ### Mid Penn Bank Mid Penn Bank was organized in 1868 under a predecessor name, Millersburg Bank, and became a state-chartered bank in 1931. Millersburg Bank obtained trust powers in 1935, at which time its name was changed to Millersburg Trust Company. In 1971, Millersburg Trust Company adopted the name “Mid Penn Bank”. Mid Penn’s legal headquarters are located at 2407 Park Drive, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17110 and the Bank’s legal headquarters are located at 349 Union Street, Millersburg, Pennsylvania 17061. On March 1, 2015, in connection with the acquisition of Phoenix Bancorp, Inc. (“Phoenix”) by Mid Penn, Phoenix’s wholly-owned banking subsidiary, Miners Bank, was merged with and into the Bank, with the Bank being the surviving charter. On January 8, 2018, Mid Penn completed its acquisition of The Scottdale Bank and Trust Company (“Scottdale”) through the merger of Scottdale with and into the Bank (the “Scottdale Merger”). The Scottdale Merger resulted in the addition of five branches in Western Pennsylvania operating as “Scottdale Bank & Trust, a Division of Mid Penn Bank”. On July 31, 2018, Mid Penn completed its acquisition of First Priority Financial Corp. (“First Priority”) pursuant to which First Priority was merged with and into Mid Penn (the “First Priority Merger”), with Mid Penn being the surviving corporation in the First Priority Merger. As part of this acquisition, First Priority’s banking subsidiary, First Priority Bank, was merged with and into the Bank. The First Priority Merger resulted in the addition of eight offices in Southeastern Pennsylvania operating as “First Priority Bank, a Division of Mid Penn Bank”. During February 2021, Mid Penn announced the rebranding of branches and offices in its First Priority Bank Division in southeastern Pennsylvania to the Mid Penn Bank brand. On November 30, 2021, Mid Penn completed its acquisition of Riverview Financial Corporation (“Riverview”), the holding company for Riverview Bank, through the merger of Riverview with and into Mid Penn (the “Riverview Merger”). In connection with the Merger, Riverview Bank was merged with and into the Bank, with the Bank as the surviving institution. The Riverview merger resulted in the addition of twenty-three community banking offices and three limited purpose offices across Western Pennsylvania. Additional information related to the Riverview merger can be found in Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8 of this report. As of December 31, 2021, the Bank had sixty full-service retail banking locations in the Pennsylvania counties of Berks, Blair, Bucks, Centre, Chester, Clearfield, Cumberland, Dauphin, Fayette, Huntingdon, Lancaster, Lehigh, Luzerne, Lycoming, Montgomery, Northumberland, Perry, Schuylkill and Westmoreland. Mid Penn has no branches or offices located outside of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. On December 7, 2021, in connection with the Riverview merger, and as part of a Retail Network Optimization Plan adopted by Mid Penn Bank’s Board of Directors, the Corporation announced it intends to close sixteen of its retail locations throughout its expanded footprint. The branch closures occurred on or about March 4, 2022. As a result of this announcement, and in accordance with GAAP, Mid Penn has reclassified the assets associated with these retail locations to held for sale as of December 31, 2021. As of the date of this report, the Bank has forty-four full service offices. Mid Penn’s primary business consists of attracting deposits and loans from the Bank’s network of community banking offices. The Bank engages in full-service commercial banking and trust business, making available to the community a wide range of financial services, including, but not limited to, mortgage and home equity loans, secured and unsecured commercial and consumer loans, lines of credit, construction financing, farm loans, community development and local government loans and various types of time and demand deposits. The Pennsylvania Department of Banking and Securities and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) supervise the Bank. Deposits of the Bank are insured by the FDIC’s Deposit Insurance Fund (the “DIF”) to the maximum extent provided by law. In addition, the Bank provides a full range of trust and retail investment services. The Bank also offers other services such as online banking, telephone banking, cash management services, automated teller services and safe deposit boxes. #### Business Strategy The Bank provides services to commercial businesses and real estate investors, consumers, nonprofit organizations, and municipalities through its sixty full-service retail banking properties, one loan production office, one wealth management office, two corporate administrations office, and one operations facility, which are all based in Pennsylvania. Mid Penn’s primary markets reflect a diversified manufacturing and services base across nineteen Pennsylvania counties, including having several offices in and around the state capital region of Harrisburg. The Bank emphasizes developing long-term customer relationships, maintaining high quality service, and providing prompt responses to customer needs. Mid Penn believes that local relationship building and its prudent approach to lending are important factors in the success and growth of Mid Penn. ### Human Capital The majority of employees of the Corporation are employed by the Bank, with a shared services agreement to support the operation of the holding company. At December 31, 2021, the Bank had 567 full-time and 52 part-time employees. Additionally, Mid Penn’s nonbank subsidiaries employed 6 full-time employees as of December 31, 2021. The Corporation and its employees are not subject to a collective bargaining agreement and the Corporation believes it enjoys good relations with its employees. In 2020 Mid Penn entered into the American Banker “Best Banks to Work For” contest. Of the over 5,000 banks eligible to participate, we placed as the 20th Best Bank to Work For in the country and the best in Pennsylvania. We take a great deal of pride in that accomplishment as it is the strength of our morale -the basis of our culture - that enabled us to deliver on our uniquely designed daily strategic plans, the results of which were meaningful to our customers and instrumental to our performance. #### Diversity & Inclusion The Company believes that a diverse and inclusive workforce fosters an environment where everyone can thrive and be successful. As of December 31, 2021 approximately 70 of our workforce is female. We encourage membership within our Women’s Leadership Network which serves as an avenue for our female employees at all levels to make connections, share knowledge and experiences, learn about leadership, and enrich their professional development journeys. #### Training and Development We encourage and support the growth and development of our employees and, wherever possible, seek to fill positions by promotion within the organization. The training and development of our employees is a priority, and we continue to invest in tools, training programs and continuing education to help our employees build their knowledge, skills and experience. We provide in-house training to employees on topics including leadership and professional development, cybersecurity, risk and compliance and technology. #### Safety, Health and Welfare The safety, health and wellness of our employees is a top priority. During the COVID-19 pandemic, we continued to responsibly serve the needs of our customers while prioritizing the health and safety of our employees. We focused our commitments on protecting our employees and customers and on creating an environment where the employees could continue to provide world class customer service in a way never done, supporting the needs of our customer base when they needed it most. When the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania went into shutdown mode, we transitioned 80% of our employees to work from home virtually overnight. We were able to do that as a result of our diligent disaster recovery planning in the years leading up to 2020. We did not allow the employees to become isolated though, as we developed a Community Portal for them to stay connected with each other and to the Management Team. It also enabled each of those employees to take care of job #1: ensuring their own and their families’ health and welfare. #### Benefits On an ongoing basis, we further promote the health and wellness of our employees by strongly encouraging work-life balance. Our benefits package includes health care coverage, retirement benefits, life and disability insurance, wellness programs, paid time off and leave policies. #### Retention Employee retention helps us operate efficiently and offers continuity to our customers and the community. We believe our concern for our employees’ well-being, supporting our employees’ career goals, offering competitive wages and providing valuable benefits aids in retention of our employees. #### Community Involvement Mid Penn Bank is dedicated to supporting charitable community organizations through corporate donations, employee volunteerism and fundraising. In 2021, we increased our corporate contributions by sixteen percent and our employees demonstrated their commitment to our communities by personally giving $50,000 to charitable organizations within Mid Penn’s footprint through our Dress Down Friday program. ### Lending Activities The Bank offers a variety of loan products to its customers, including commercial real estate loans, residential real estate loans, commercial and industrial loans, and consumer loans. The Bank’s primary lending objectives are as follows: - to establish relationships with creditworthy customers who exhibit positive historical repayment trends, stable cash flows and secondary sources of repayment from tangible collateral; - to establish a diversified loan portfolio; and - to provide a satisfactory return to Mid Penn’s shareholders by properly pricing loans to include the cost of funds, administrative costs, bad debts, local economic conditions, competition, customer relationships, the term of the loan, credit risk, collateral quality and a reasonable profit margin. Credit risk is managed through portfolio diversification, underwriting policies and procedures, and loan monitoring practices. Lenders are provided with detailed underwriting policies for all types of credit risks accepted by the Bank and must obtain appropriate internal approvals for credit extensions. The Bank also maintains strict documentation requirements and robust credit quality assurance practices in order to identify credit portfolio weaknesses as early as possible, so any exposures that are discovered might be mitigated or potential losses reduced. The Bank generally secures its loans with real estate, with such collateral values dependent and subject to change based on real estate market conditions within its market area. As of December 31, 2021, the Bank’s highest concentration of credit is in commercial real estate. ### Investment Activities Mid Penn’s securities portfolio is a source for both liquidity and interest earnings and serves to support pledging requirements on public funds deposits through investments in primarily higher-quality, fixed-income debt securities. Mid Penn does not have any significant non-governmental concentrations within its investment securities portfolio. Mid Penn maintains both a held-to-maturity investment portfolio and an available-for-sale investment portfolio. Both portfolios are comprised primarily of lower-risk debt securities, including U.S. Treasury notes, U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities, U.S. agency notes, investment-grade municipal securities, and corporate bonds. The held-to-maturity portfolio was established to support the Bank’s growth in public fund deposits, which may require pledging of investment securities. The investments in the held-to-maturity portfolio are recorded on the balance sheet at book value (amortized cost), while the available-for-sale securities are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value. These debt securities derive fair values relative to investments of the same type and credit profile with similar maturity dates. As the interest rate environment changes, Mid Penn’s fair value of securities will change. This difference between the amortized cost and fair value of available-for-sale investment securities, or unrealized loss, amounted to $322,000 as of December 31, 2021. On an after-tax basis, this unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities resulted in a reduction to shareholders’ equity, through the accumulated other comprehensive loss component, of $254,000. No investments in either the held-to-maturity portfolio or available-for-sale portfolio as of December 31, 2021 were deemed to have other-than-temporary-impairment. The majority of the investments are high quality United States and municipal securities that, if held to maturity, are expected to result in no realized loss to the Bank. During the fourth quarter of 2019, Mid Penn early adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2019-04, *Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses, Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and Topic 825, Financial Instruments*), and as part of the adoption, reclassified 113 held-to-maturity debt securities with an aggregate amortized cost of $67,096,000 to the available for sale category. All 113 securities were subsequently sold during the fourth quarter of 2019 and Mid Penn recognized a pre-tax gain on the sales of $1,779,000. Please refer to Note 23, *Recent Accounting Pronouncements*, for more information regarding the adoption of ASU 2019-04. ### Deposits and Other Sources of Funds The Bank primarily uses deposits and, to a lesser extent, wholesale borrowings to finance lending and investment activities. Wholesale borrowing sources include advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh (the “FHLB”), overnight borrowings from the Bank’s other correspondent banking relationships, advances from the Federal Reserve’s Discount Window, or special program funding such as the funding that Mid Penn obtained during 2020 and 2021 from the Federal Reserve through the Paycheck Protection Program Liquidity Facility (“PPPLF”). Under the PPPLF, the Federal Reserve supplied financing to the Bank at a rate of 35 basis points (0.35%) for a term and amount determined based on the principal amount of PPP loans fully and specifically pledged as collateral in support of the PPPLF borrowings. Draws of PPPLF funds were required to be repaid to the Federal Reserve immediately after the specific PPP loans collateralizing the related draws were repaid to the Bank. As of December 31, 2021, Mid Penn had repaid the entire balance of PPPLF borrowings with no outstanding balance remaining. All borrowings, except for lines of credit with the Bank’s correspondent banks, require collateral in the form of loans or securities. Collateral levels, therefore, limit the extent of borrowings and the available lines of credit extended by the Bank’s creditors. As a result, generating and retaining retail deposits remains critical to the future funding and growth of the business. Deposit growth within the banking industry has been subject to strong competition from a variety of financial services companies. This competition may require financial institutions to adjust their product offerings and pricing to maintain and grow deposits. Additionally, the safety of traditional bank deposit products has remained an attractive option during periods of market volatility. Mid Penn’s ability to attract retail funds in the future will continue to be impacted by the public’s appetite for the safety of insured or local investments versus the returns offered by alternative choices as part of their personal investment mix. ### Competition The financial services and banking business is highly competitive, and the profitability of Mid Penn depends principally upon the Corporation’s ability to successfully compete in its market area. The Bank actively competes with other financial services companies for deposit, loan, trust and wealth management business. Competitors include other commercial banks, credit unions, savings banks, savings and loan associations, insurance companies, securities brokerage firms, finance companies, mutual funds, and product/service alternatives via the Internet. Financial institutions compete primarily on the quality of services rendered, interest rates on loans and deposits, service charges, the convenience of banking facilities, location and hours of operation and, in the case of loans to larger commercial borrowers, relative lending limits. Many competitors are larger than the Corporation and have significantly greater financial resources, personnel and locations from which to conduct business. In addition, the Bank is subject to banking regulations while certain non-banking competitors may not be subject to similar regulations. For more information, see the “Supervision and Regulation” section below and Item 1A, “Risk Factors”. Mid Penn has been able to compete effectively with other financial institutions by emphasizing customer-focused relationship management and services, convenient hours, efficient and friendly employees, a consultative sales approach, local decision making, and quality products. ### Supervision and Regulation #### General Financial holding companies and banks are extensively regulated under both federal and state laws. The regulation and supervision of the Corporation and particularly the Bank are primarily focused on the protection of depositors, the DIF, and the monetary system, and do not prioritize shareholder interests. Enforcement actions that may be imposed by federal and state banking regulators include the imposition of a conservator or receiver, cease-and-desist orders and written agreements, the termination of insurance on deposits, the imposition of civil money penalties, and removal and prohibition orders. If a banking regulator takes any enforcement action, the value of an equity investment in Mid Penn could be substantially reduced or eliminated. As of December 31, 2021, the Corporation was not subject to any supervisory enforcement actions. Federal and state banking laws contain numerous provisions affecting various aspects of the business and operations of Mid Penn and the Bank. Mid Penn is subject to, among others, the regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve”). The Bank is subject to, among others, the regulations of the Pennsylvania Department of Banking and Securities and the FDIC. The descriptions below of, and references to, applicable statutes and regulations are not intended to be complete lists or reflective of all applicable provisions or their effects on the Corporation. They are summaries of the more significant laws and regulations and are qualified in their entirety by reference to the complete provisions of such statutes and regulations. #### Holding Company Regulation Mid Penn is a registered financial holding company subject to supervision and regulation by the Federal Reserve. As such, it is subject to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (“BHCA”) and many of the Federal Reserve’s regulations promulgated thereunder. The Federal Reserve has broad enforcement powers over financial and bank holding companies, including the power to impose substantial fines and civil penalties. The BHCA requires Mid Penn to file an annual report with the Federal Reserve regarding the holding company and its subsidiary bank. The Federal Reserve Board also conducts examinations of the holding company. The Bank is not a member of the Federal Reserve System; however, the Federal Reserve possesses cease-and-desist powers over financial and bank holding companies and their subsidiaries where actions would constitute an unsafe or unsound practice or violation of law. The Federal Reserve Board also makes policy that applies to the declaration and distribution of dividends by financial and bank holding companies. The BHCA restricts a financial or bank holding company’s ability to acquire control of additional banks. In addition, the BHCA restricts the activities in which financial or bank holding companies may engage directly or through nonbank subsidiaries. #### Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Modernization Act Under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Modernization Act (“GLB”), bank holding companies that meet certain management, capital, and Community Reinvestment Act standards, are permitted to become financial holding companies. No prior regulatory approval will be required for a financial holding company to acquire a company, other than a bank or savings association, engaged in certain financial activities permitted under GLB. Activities cited by GLB as being financial in nature include: - securities underwriting, dealing and market making; - sponsoring mutual funds and investment companies; - insurance underwriting and agency; - merchant banking activities; and - activities that the Federal Reserve has determined by regulation to be closely related to banking. In addition to permitting financial holding companies’ entry into new lines of business, the law allows companies the freedom to streamline existing operations and to potentially reduce costs. The GLB may increase both opportunity and competition. In December 2019, Mid Penn made the election to change from a bank holding company to a financial holding company as its subsidiary bank was well capitalized under the FDIC Improvement Act’s prompt corrective action provisions, the holding company and Bank were deemed by the regulators to be well managed, and the Bank had at least a satisfactory rating under the Community Reinvestment Act. The required filing supporting this change was a declaration that the bank holding company wished to become a financial holding company and met all applicable requirements. Mid Penn made the election given the Corporation’s growth and the intended broadening spectrum of financial product and service offerings to potentially include, but not be limited to, insurance and wealth management services. #### Bank Regulation Mid Penn Bank, a Pennsylvania-chartered institution, is subject to supervision, regulation and examination by both the Pennsylvania Department of Banking and Securities and the FDIC. The deposits of the Bank are insured by the FDIC to the maximum extent provided by law. The FDIC assesses deposit insurance premiums, the amount of which depends in part on both the asset size and the condition of the Bank. Moreover, the FDIC may terminate deposit insurance of the Bank under certain circumstances. The federal and state banking regulatory agencies have broad enforcement powers over depository institutions under their jurisdiction, including the power to terminate deposit insurance, to impose fines and other civil and criminal penalties, and to appoint a conservator or receiver if any of a number of conditions is met. In addition, the Bank is subject to a variety of local, state and federal laws that affect its operations. Banking regulations affect a wide range of the Bank’s activities and operations, including, but not limited to, permissible types and amounts of loans, investments and other activities, capital adequacy, branching, interest rates on loans, compensation standards, payment of dividends, various bank account and bank service disclosures, and the safety and soundness of banking practices. #### Capital Requirements, Prompt Corrective Action and Basel III Capital Reforms Under risk-based capital requirements for financial or bank holding companies, Mid Penn is required to maintain a minimum ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets (including certain off-balance-sheet activities, such as standby letters of credit) of eight percent. At least half of the total capital is to be composed of common equity, retained earnings and qualifying perpetual preferred stock, less goodwill (“Tier 1 Capital”). The remainder may consist of subordinated debt, non-qualifying preferred stock and a limited amount of the loan loss allowance (“Tier 2 Capital”). Combined, the Tier 1 Capital and Tier 2 Capital comprise regulatory “Total Capital”. As of December 31, 2021, Mid Penn complied with these risk-based capital requirements. In addition, the Federal Reserve has established minimum leverage ratio requirements for bank holding companies. These requirements provide for a minimum leverage ratio of Tier 1 Capital to adjusted average quarterly assets (“leverage ratio”) equal to 3 percent for bank holding companies that meet certain specified criteria, including having the highest regulatory rating. All other bank holding companies will generally be required to maintain a leverage ratio of at least 4-5 percent. The requirements also provide that bank holding companies experiencing internal growth or making acquisitions will be expected to maintain strong capital positions substantially above the minimum supervisory levels without significant reliance on intangible assets. Furthermore, the requirements indicate that the Federal Reserve will continue to consider a “Tangible Tier 1 Leverage Ratio” (deducting all intangibles) in evaluating proposals for expansion or new activity. As of December 31, 2021, Mid Penn has met these leverage requirements, and the Federal Reserve has not advised Mid Penn of any specific minimum Tier 1 leverage ratio requirement. The Bank is subject to similar capital requirements adopted by the FDIC, and as of December 31, 2021, the Bank’s capital levels were sufficient to be considered “well-capitalized”. The FDIC has not advised the Bank of any specific minimum leverage ratios. The capital ratios of Mid Penn and the Bank are described in Note 18, *Regulatory Matters,* within Item 8, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, which are included herein. Banking regulators may further refine capital requirements applicable to banking organizations, including those discussed in the “Regulatory Capital Changes” section below. Changes to capital requirements could materially affect the profitability of Mid Penn or the fair value of Mid Penn stock. In addition to the required minimum capital levels described above, federal law establishes a system of “prompt corrective actions” which federal banking agencies are required to take, and certain actions which they have discretion to take, based upon the capital category into which a federally regulated depository institution falls. Regulations set forth detailed procedures and criteria for implementing prompt corrective action in the case of any institution that is not adequately capitalized. Under the rules, an institution will be deemed to be “adequately capitalized” if it exceeds the minimum federal regulatory capital requirements. However, it will be deemed “undercapitalized” if it fails to meet the minimum capital requirements, “significantly undercapitalized” if it has a Total Risk-Based Capital ratio that is less than 6 percent, a Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital ratio that is less than 3 percent, or a leverage ratio that is less than 3 percent, and “critically undercapitalized” if the institution has a ratio of tangible equity to total assets that is equal to or less than 2 percent. The prompt corrective action rules require an undercapitalized institution to file a written capital restoration plan, along with a performance guaranty by its holding company or a third party. In addition, an undercapitalized institution becomes subject to certain automatic restrictions including a prohibition on payment of dividends, a limitation on asset growth and expansion, in certain cases, a limitation on the payment of bonuses or raises to senior executive officers, and a prohibition on the payment of certain “management fees” to any “controlling person”. Institutions that are classified as undercapitalized are also subject to certain additional supervisory actions, including increased reporting burdens and regulatory monitoring, a limitation on the institution’s ability to make acquisitions, open new branch offices, or engage in new lines of business, obligations to raise additional capital, restrictions on transactions with affiliates, and restrictions on interest rates paid by the institution on deposits. In certain cases, bank regulatory agencies may require replacement of senior executive officers or directors, or sale of the institution to a willing purchaser. If an institution is deemed “critically undercapitalized” and continues in that category for four quarters, the statute requires, with certain limited exceptions, that the institution be placed in receivership. In July 2013, the federal banking agencies issued final rules to implement the Basel III regulatory capital reforms and changes required by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”). The final rules established a common equity tier 1 capital conservation buffer with a multi-year phase in to an eventual buffer of 2.5 percent of risk-weighted assets applicable to all banking organizations. If a banking organization fails to hold capital above the minimum capital ratios and the applicable capital conservation buffer for a given year, the bank could be subject to certain restrictions on capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments. The phase-in period for the capital conservation and countercyclical capital buffers for all banking organizations began on January 1, 2016 and were phased-in over a three-year period. The final rules called for the following minimum capital requirements, including the capital conservation buffer, effective at January 1, 2019 and subsequent years. | | Effective January 1, 2019 | | --- | ---: | | Common equity tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets | 7.0% | | Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets | 8.5% | | Total capital to risk-weighted assets | 10.5% | | Leverage ratio | 4.0% | The final rules also allowed community banks to make a one-time election not to include the additional components of accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) in regulatory capital and instead use the existing treatment under the general risk-based capital rules that excludes most AOCI components from regulatory capital. Mid Penn made the election not to include the additional components of AOCI in regulatory capital. The final rules permanently grandfathered non-qualifying capital instruments (such as trust preferred securities and cumulative perpetual preferred stock) issued before May 19, 2010 for inclusion in the Tier 1 Capital of banking organizations with total consolidated assets less than $15 billion as of December 31, 2009 and banking organizations that were mutual holding companies as of May 19, 2010. Consistent with the Dodd-Frank Act, the new rules replace the ratings-based approach to securitization exposures, which is based on external credit ratings, with the simplified supervisory formula approach in order to determine the appropriate risk weights for these exposures. Alternatively, banking organizations may use the existing gross-ups approach to assign securitization exposures to a risk weight category or choose to assign such exposures a 1,250 percent risk weight. Under the new rules, mortgage servicing assets (“MSAs”) and certain deferred tax assets (“DTAs”) are subject to stricter limitations than those applicable under the former general risk-based capital rule. The new rules also increase the risk weights for past-due loans, certain risk weights and credit conversion factors. Mid Penn and the Bank complied throughout the phase-in period, and currently remain in compliance, with all regulatory capital requirements. Accordingly, the final rules to implement the Basel III regulatory capital reforms and changes required by the Dodd-Frank Act did not have a material negative effect on Mid Penn’s financial condition or capital management activities for any period since the changes were implemented. #### Safety and Soundness Standards The federal banking regulatory agencies have adopted a set of guidelines prescribing safety and soundness standards for depository institutions such as the Bank. The guidelines establish general standards relating to management practices, internal controls and information systems, internal audit systems, loan documentation, credit underwriting, interest rate exposure, asset growth, asset quality, liquidity, capital, earnings, compensation, fees and benefits. In general, the guidelines require, among other things, appropriate systems and practices to identify and manage the risks and exposures specified in the guidelines. The guidelines prohibit excessive compensation as an unsafe and unsound practice and describe compensation as excessive when the amounts paid are unreasonable or disproportionate to the services performed by an executive officer, employee, director or principal shareholder. In addition, the agencies adopted regulations that authorize an agency to order an institution that has been given notice by an agency that it is not satisfying any of such safety and soundness standards to submit a compliance plan. If an institution is not satisfying certain safety and soundness standards and fails to submit to the banking regulatory agency an acceptable compliance plan or fails to implement an accepted plan, the agency may issue an order directing action to correct the deficiency and may issue an order directing other actions be taken, including restricting asset growth, restricting interest rates paid on deposits, restricting dividend payments to shareholders, and requiring an increase in the institution’s ratio of tangible equity to assets. For the periods reported in this Form 10-K and in the period subsequent to December 31, 2021, up to the date of the filing of this Form 10-K, Mid Penn was not subject to any such bank regulatory orders. #### Payment of Dividends and Other Restrictions Mid Penn’s holding company is a legal entity separate and distinct from the wholly owned Bank subsidiary. There are various legal and regulatory limitations on the extent to which the Bank can, among other things, finance, or otherwise supply funds to the holding company. Specifically, dividends from the Bank are the principal source of the holding company’s cash funds, and there are certain legal restrictions under Pennsylvania law and Pennsylvania banking regulations on the payment of dividends by state-chartered banks. The relevant regulatory agencies also have authority to prohibit Mid Penn and the Bank from engaging in what, in the opinion of such regulatory body, constitutes an unsafe or unsound banking practice. Depending upon the financial condition of the holding company and the Bank, the payment of dividends could be deemed by a regulatory agency to constitute such an unsafe or unsound practice. The holding company and the Bank were not subject to any such dividend prohibitions during the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019. #### Deposit Insurance The FDIC insures deposits of the Bank through the DIF. The FDIC maintains the DIF by assessing depository institutions an insurance premium. The amount each institution is assessed is based upon a variety of factors that include the level of assets and tangible equity, and the condition of the Bank (the degree of risk the institution poses to the insurance fund). The FDIC insures deposits up to $250,000. The Bank pays an insurance premium into the DIF based on a regulatory defined assessment calculation. The FDIC uses a risk-based premium system that assesses higher rates on those institutions that pose greater risks to the DIF. The FDIC places each institution in one of four risk categories using a two-step process based first on capital ratios (the capital group assignment) and then on other relevant information (the supervisory group assignment). Subsequently, the rate for each institution within a risk category may be adjusted depending upon different factors that either enhance or reduce the risk the institution poses to the DIF, including the unsecured debt, secured liabilities and brokered deposits related to each institution. Finally, certain risk multipliers may be applied to the adjusted assessment. Beginning with the second quarter of 2011 and as applicable continuously through to the current period, as mandated by the Dodd-Frank Act, the assessment base that the FDIC uses to calculate assessment premiums is the Bank’s average assets minus average tangible equity. As the asset base of the banking industry is larger than the deposit base, the range of assessment rates is a low of 2.5 basis points and a high of 45 basis points, per $100 of assets. The FDIC is required under the Dodd-Frank Act to establish assessment rates that will allow the DIF to achieve a reserve ratio of 1.35 percent of Insurance Fund insured deposits by September 2020. In addition, the FDIC has established a “designated reserve ratio” of 2 percent, a target ratio that, until it is achieved, will not likely result in the FDIC reducing assessment rates. In attempting to achieve the mandated 1.35 percent ratio, the FDIC is required to implement assessment formulas that charge banks over $10 billion in asset size more than banks under that size. These new formulas did not affect Mid Penn Bank as it was less than $10 billion in total assets size. During the third quarter of 2019, Mid Penn received notification from the FDIC that the FDIC’s Deposit Insurance Fund reserve ratio met a threshold resulting in the FDIC providing the Bank with a $492,000 credit, which was applied to the deposit insurance assessments for both the second and third quarters of 2019. #### Consumer Protection Laws A number of laws govern the relationship between the Bank and its customers. For example, the Community Reinvestment Act is designed to encourage services, investments, and lending activities in low- and moderate-income areas. The Home Mortgage Disclosure Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act attempt to minimize lending decisions based on impermissible criteria, such as race or gender. The Truth-in-Lending Act and the Truth-in-Savings Act require banks to provide certain disclosure of relevant terms related to loans and savings accounts, respectively. Anti-tying restrictions (which prohibit conditioning the availability or terms of credit on the purchase of another banking product) further restrict the Bank’s relationships with its customers. The Bank maintains a comprehensive compliance management program to promote its compliance with these and other applicable consumer protection laws and regulations. #### Privacy Laws The federal banking regulators have issued a number of regulations governing the privacy of consumer financial and customer information. The regulations limit the disclosure by financial institutions, such as the Corporation and Bank, of nonpublic personal information about individuals who obtain financial products or services for personal, family, or household purposes. Subject to certain exceptions allowed by law, the regulations cover information sharing between financial institutions and nonaffiliated third parties. More specifically, the regulations require financial institutions to provide: - initial notices to customers about their privacy policies, describing the conditions under which they may disclose nonpublic personal financial information to nonaffiliated third parties and affiliates; - annual notices of their privacy policies to their current customers; and - a reasonable method for consumers to “opt out” of disclosures to nonaffiliated third parties. #### Affiliate Transactions Transactions between the Bank and the Corporation, and/or its nonbank subsidiary affiliates are governed by Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act. An “affiliate” of a bank or savings institution is any company or entity that controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with the bank or savings institution. Generally, a subsidiary of a depository institution that is not also a depository institution is not treated as an affiliate of the bank for purposes of Sections 23A and 23B. Sections 23A and 23B are intended to protect insured depository institutions from suffering losses arising from transactions with non-insured affiliates, by limiting the extent to which a bank or its subsidiaries may engage in covered transactions with any one affiliate and with all affiliates of the bank in the aggregate, and requiring that such transactions be on terms that are consistent with safe and sound banking practices. #### The USA Patriot Act, Anti-Money Laundering and Anti-Terrorism Financing The Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (“USA Patriot Act”) broadened the application of anti-money laundering regulations to apply to additional types of financial institutions, such as broker-dealers, and strengthened the ability of the U.S. government to detect and prosecute international money laundering and the financing of terrorism. Under Title III of the USA Patriot Act, also known as the International Money Laundering Abatement and Anti-Terrorism Financing Act of 2001, all financial institutions, including Mid Penn and the Bank, are required in general to identify their customers, adopt formal and comprehensive anti-money laundering programs, scrutinize or prohibit altogether certain transactions of special concern, and be prepared to respond to inquiries from U.S. law enforcement agencies concerning their customers and their transactions. The principal provisions of Title III of the USA Patriot Act require that regulated financial institutions, including state-chartered banks: - establish an anti-money laundering program that includes training and audit components; - comply with regulations regarding the verification of the identity of any person seeking to open an account; - take additional required precautions with non-U.S. owned accounts; and - perform certain verification and certification of money laundering risk for their foreign correspondent banking relationships. Additional information-sharing among financial institutions, regulators, and law enforcement authorities is encouraged for financial institutions that comply with this provision and the authorization of the Secretary of the Treasury to adopt rules to further encourage cooperation and information-sharing. The USA Patriot Act also expanded the conditions under which funds in a U.S. interbank account may be subject to forfeiture and increased the penalties for violation of anti-money laundering regulations. Failure of a financial institution to comply with the USA Patriot Act’s requirements could have serious legal and reputational consequences for the institution. The effectiveness of a financial institution in combating money-laundering activities is a factor to be considered in any application submitted by the financial institution under the Bank Merger Act, which applies to the Bank. The Bank has adopted policies, procedures and controls to address compliance with the requirements of the USA Patriot Act under the existing regulations and will continue to revise and update its policies, procedures and controls to reflect changes required by the USA Patriot Act and implementing regulations. #### Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (“CARES”) Act was signed into law on March 27, 2020, and extended by the signing of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 into law on December 27, 2020, and further extended to May 31, 2021 by the PPP Extension Act of 2021. This legislation created the federal Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) which permitted eligible business entities to apply for loans through a participating financial institution to cover payroll, rent, and other business expenses during the COVID-19 pandemic. Mid Penn has been a significant participating lender under the PPP during both 2020 and 2021. The PPP loans, which are 100 percent guaranteed by the Small Business Administration (“SBA”), have up to a five-year term to maturity and carry a low interest rate of 1 percent throughout the loan term. The SBA may forgive the PPP loans if, among other criteria, at least 60 percent of the proceeds are used for payroll costs. Also, the borrowers will not have to make any payments for six months following the date of disbursement of the loan, though interest will continue to accrue during the deferment period. The SBA also provided a processing fee per loan to financial institutions who participated in the PPP, with the amount of such fee ranging from 1 percent to 5 percent as pre-determined by the SBA dependent upon the size of each respective credit. As of December 31, 2021, Mid Penn had received $38,880,000 of nonrefundable loan processing fees related to the loans disbursed as a result of Mid Penn’s PPP lending activities, consisting of (i) $20,883,000 of loan processing fees received related to PPP loans funded during the year ended December 31, 2020, and (ii) $17,997,000 of loan processing fees received related to PPP loans funded during the year ended December 31, 2021. In addition to receiving and deferring the processing fees, Mid Penn recorded and deferred related loan origination costs, and in accordance with ASC 310-20, Receivables—Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs, the processing fees and loan origination costs are being amortized to interest and fees on loans and leases on the Consolidated Statements of Income over the life of each respective loan. As of December 31, 2021, Mid Penn had $3,811,000 of PPP deferred loan processing fees not yet realized as income, consisting of (i) $27,000 of loan processing fees received related to PPP loans funded during the year ended December 31, 2020, and (ii) $3,784,000 of loan processing fees received related to PPP loans funded during the first half of 2021. Comparatively, as of December 31, 2020, Mid Penn had $7,746,000 of PPP deferred loan processing fees not yet realized as income, all resulting from PPP loans funded during the year ended December 31, 2020. Mid Penn recognized $21,954,000 of PPP processing fees during the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to $13,137,000 of PPP processing fees for the same period of 2020. PPP processing fees are reflected within interest and fees on loans and leases on the Consolidated Statements of Income. As of December 31, 2021, Mid Penn had $111,286,000 of net PPP loans outstanding ($115,097,000 of gross PPP loans, net of deferred PPP processing fees of $3,811,000). Comparatively, as of December 31, 2020, Mid Penn had $388,313,000 of net PPP loans outstanding ($396,059,000 of gross PPP loans, net of deferred PPP processing fees of $7,746,000). All PPP loans are recorded in the commercial and industrial loan portfolio classification. In addition to the creation of the PPP, the CARES Act also included several tax relief initiatives, including allowing net operating losses generated in 2018, 2019, or 2020 to be carried back up to five years. As a result of this change, the full-year tax provision through December 31, 2020 includes a $318,000 tax benefit as the result of carrying certain NOLs acquired from First Priority and Scottdale back to 2017 when the federal statutory tax rate was higher (34 percent versus 21 percent). See Note 17, *Income Taxes*, to the consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 for more details. #### JOBS Act In 2012, the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (the “JOBS Act”) became law. The JOBS Act is aimed at facilitating capital raising by smaller companies, banks, and bank holding companies. Certain changes implemented by the JOBS Act that impacted Mid Penn included (i) raising the threshold requiring registration under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") for banks and bank holdings companies from 500 to 2,000 holders of record, and (ii) raising the threshold for triggering deregistration under the Exchange Act for banks and bank holding companies from 300 to 1,200 holders of record. #### Dodd-Frank Act The Dodd-Frank Act, which became law in July 2010, significantly changed regulation of financial institutions and the financial services industry. Dodd-Frank created a Financial Services Oversight Council to identify emerging systemic risks and improve interagency cooperation, and centralized responsibility for consumer financial protection by creating a new agency, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which is responsible for implementing, examining and enforcing compliance with federal consumer financial laws. Dodd-Frank also permanently raised the current standard maximum deposit insurance amount to $250,000, established strengthened capital standards for banks, disallowed certain trust preferred securities from qualifying as Tier 1 Capital (subject to certain grandfather provisions for existing trust preferred securities), established new minimum mortgage underwriting standards, granted the Federal Reserve the power to regulate debit card interchange fees, and implemented corporate governance changes. #### Effects of Government Policy and Potential Changes in Regulation Changes in regulations applicable to the Corporation, the Bank, or its nonbank subsidiaries, or shifts in monetary or other government policies, could have a material effect on our business. The Corporation’s business is also affected by the state of the financial services industry in general. As a result of legal, economic, and competitive changes, management believes that the Corporation and the financial services industry will continue to experience an increased rate of change from both the opportunities and competitive challenges resulting from greater product and service offerings, technological advancements, and business combinations. From time to time, legislation is enacted that has the effect of increasing the compliance and operations requirements and the cost of doing business, changing the tax structure applicable to Mid Penn, limiting or expanding permissible activities, or affecting the competitive balance between banks and other financial institutions. Proposals to change the laws and regulations governing the operations and taxation of banks, bank holding companies and other financial institutions are frequently made in Congress, and before various bank regulatory agencies. Mid Penn cannot predict the likelihood of any major changes or the impact such changes might have on Mid Penn, the Bank, or the nonbank subsidiaries. Congressional bills and other proposals could result in additional significant changes to the financial services and banking system, including, but not limited to, provisions for limitations on deposit insurance coverage, changing the timing and method financial institutions use to pay for deposit insurance, expanding the power of banks by removing the restrictions on bank underwriting activities, changing the regulation of bank derivatives activities, and allowing commercial enterprises to own banks. As a consequence of the extensive regulation of commercial banking activities in the United States, the Bank’s business is particularly susceptible to being affected by federal legislation and regulations that may increase the costs of doing business or change the Corporation’s competitive landscape. Whether any future legislation will be enacted or additional regulations will be adopted, and how they might impact Mid Penn, cannot be determined at this time. Mid Penn’s earnings are, and will be affected by, domestic economic conditions and the monetary and fiscal policies of the United States government and its agencies. The monetary policies of the Federal Reserve have had, and will likely continue to have, an impact on the operating results of commercial banks because of the Federal Reserve’s power to implement national monetary policy to, among other things, promote employment, control inflation or combat recession. The Federal Reserve has a major impact on the loan and deposit rates offered by the Bank and its competitors, and on the levels of bank loans, investments and deposits, through its open market operations in United States government securities and through its regulation of, among other things, the discount rate on borrowings of member banks and the reserve requirements against member bank deposits. It is not possible to reasonably predict the nature, amount, frequency, and impact of future changes in monetary and fiscal policies. #### Environmental Laws Management does not anticipate that compliance with environmental laws and regulations will have any material effect on Mid Penn’s capital, expenditures, earnings, or competitive position. However, environmentally-related hazards have become a source of high risk and liability for some financial institutions. Additionally, the Pennsylvania Economic Development Agency, Fiduciary and Lender Environmental Liability Protection Act provides, among other things, protection to lenders from environmental liability and remediation costs under the environmental laws for releases and contamination caused by others. A lender who engages in activities involved in the routine practices of commercial lending, including, but not limited to, the providing of financial services, holding of security interests, workout practices, foreclosure or the recovery of funds from the sale of property shall not be liable under the environmental acts or common law equivalents to the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources or to any other person by virtue of the fact that the lender engages in such commercial lending practice. A lender, however, will be liable if it, its employees or agents, directly cause an immediate release or directly exacerbate a release of a regulated substance on or from the property, or knew and willfully compelled the borrower to commit an action which caused such release or to violate an environmental act. The Pennsylvania Economic Development Agency, Fiduciary and Lender Environmental Liability Protection Act does not limit federal liability, which still exists under certain circumstances. #### Corporate Governance The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“SOX”) and related regulations adopted by the SEC and NASDAQ addressed the following issues: corporate governance, auditor independence and accounting standards, executive compensation, insider loans, whistleblower protection, and enhanced and timely disclosure of corporate information. Mid Penn has established policies, procedures, and systems designed to promote compliance with these regulations. Section 404 of SOX requires publicly held companies to document, test and certify that their internal control systems over financial reporting are effective. Effective for year-end financial reports beginning with December 31, 2017, Mid Penn is subject to the independent attestation requirement under Section 404 of the SOX. The Bank remains subject to independent auditor attestation under FDIC regulation 363.3(b), which is a similar independent attestation requirement at the Bank level. ### Available Information Mid Penn’s common stock is registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act and is traded on NASDAQ under the trading symbol MPB. Mid Penn is subject to the informational requirements of the Exchange Act, and, accordingly, files reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. Mid Penn is an electronic filer with the SEC. The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The SEC’s Internet site address is www.sec.gov. Mid Penn’s headquarters are located at 2407 Park Drive, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17110, and its telephone number is 1-866-642-7736. Mid Penn’s website is **midpennbank.com** and Mid Penn makes available through its website, free of charge, its annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably possible after filing with the SEC. Mid Penn has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to all employees and this document is also available on Mid Penn’s website. The information included on our website is not considered a part of this document. ## Risk factors As filed, 55,753 characters. Before investing in Mid Penn common stock, an investor should carefully read and consider the risk factors described below, which are not intended to be all inclusive, and to review other information contained in this report and in our other filings with the SEC. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones facing Mid Penn’s holding company, the Bank, and nonbank subsidiaries. Additional risks and uncertainties that we are not aware of, or that we currently deem less significant, or that we are otherwise not specifically focused on, may also impact our business, results of operations, and our common stock. If any of these known or unknown risks or uncertainties actually occurs, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. If this were to happen, the market price of our common stock could decline significantly, and an investor could lose all or part of his or her investment in Mid Penn. Unless the context otherwise requires, references to “we,” “us,” “our,” “Mid Penn,” or “Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc.,” collectively refer to Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiaries, and specific references to the “Bank” refer to Mid Penn Bank, the wholly owned banking subsidiary of Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. ### Risks Related to Our Primary Business and Industry #### Mid Penn is subject to interest rate risk. Mid Penn’s earnings and cash flows are largely dependent upon the Bank’s net interest income. Net interest income is the difference between interest income earned on interest-earning assets such as loans and securities, and interest expense paid on interest-bearing liabilities such as deposits and borrowed funds. Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors that are beyond Mid Penn’s control, including general economic conditions and policies of various governmental and regulatory agencies and, in particular, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Changes in monetary policy, including changes in interest rates, could influence not only the interest income the Bank receives on loans and securities and the amount of interest expense it pays on deposits and borrowings, but such changes could also affect (i) the Bank’s ability to originate loans and obtain deposits, (ii) the fair value of financial assets and liabilities, and (iii) the average duration of mortgage-backed securities in the Bank’s investment portfolio. If the interest rates paid on deposits and other borrowings increase at a faster rate than the interest rates received on loans and other investments, Mid Penn’s net interest income, and therefore earnings, could be adversely affected. Earnings could also be adversely affected if the interest rates received on loans and investments fall more quickly than the interest rates paid on deposits and borrowings. Management believes it has implemented effective asset and liability management strategies and interest rate risk management activities to reduce the potential effects of changes in interest rates on Mid Penn’s results of operations. Any substantial, unexpected, prolonged, or rapid change in market interest rates could have a material adverse effect on the Bank’s net interest income and Mid Penn’s financial condition and results of operations. #### Mid Penn is subject to credit risk. As of December 31, 2021, approximately 86 percent of the Bank’s loan portfolio in Table 8 of Management’s Discussion and Analysis consisted of commercial real estate, commercial and industrial, and agricultural loans. These types of loans are generally viewed as having more risk of default than residential real estate loans or secured consumer loans. Commercial loans are also typically larger than residential real estate loans and consumer loans. Because the loan portfolio contains a significant number of commercial and industrial loans, and construction and commercial real estate loans with relatively large balances, the deterioration of one or a few of these loans could cause a significant increase in non-performing loans. In addition, Mid Penn’s credit risk may be exacerbated when the collateral held by Mid Penn cannot be readily realized or liquidated at prices sufficient to recover the full amount of the credit or derivative exposure due to Mid Penn. An increase in non-performing loans or collateral value deficiencies could result in a net loss of earnings from these loans, an increase in the provision for possible loan and lease losses and an increase in loan charge-offs, all of which could have a material adverse effect on Mid Penn’s financial condition and results of operations. *The allowance for loan and lease losses may be not be sufficient to cover actual loan and lease losses.* Mid Penn maintains an allowance for loan and lease losses, which is a reserve established that represents management’s best estimate of probable losses that have been incurred within the existing portfolio of loans. The allowance, in the judgment of management, is necessary to reserve for estimated loan and lease losses and risks inherent in the loan portfolio. The level of the allowance reflects management’s continuing evaluation of industry concentrations; specific credit risks; loan loss experience; current loan portfolio quality; changes in present economic, political and regulatory conditions; other external factors such as the ongoing pandemic; and unidentified losses inherent in the current loan portfolio. The determination of the appropriate level of the allowance for possible loan and lease losses inherently involves a high degree of subjectivity and requires Mid Penn to make significant estimates of current credit risks and future trends, all of which may undergo material changes. Changes in economic conditions affecting borrowers, the impact of the ongoing pandemic, new information regarding existing loans, identification of additional problem credits and other factors, both within and outside of Mid Penn’s control, may require an increase in the allowance. In addition, bank regulatory agencies periodically review Mid Penn’s allowance for possible loan and lease losses and may require an increase in the provision for possible loan and lease losses or the recognition of further loan charge-offs, based on judgments different than those of management. In addition, if charge-offs in future periods exceed the allowance, Mid Penn may need additional provisions to increase the allowance for possible loan and lease losses. Any increases in the allowance resulting from loan loss provisions will result in a decrease in net income and, possibly, capital, and may have a material adverse effect on Mid Penn’s financial condition and results of operations. *Competition from other financial institutions may adversely affect Mid Penn’s and the Bank’s profitability.* Mid Penn’s banking subsidiary faces substantial competition in originating both commercial and consumer loans. This competition comes principally from other banks, credit unions, savings institutions, mortgage banking companies and other lenders. Many of its larger competitors who offer loans enjoy advantages over the Bank, including greater financial resources and higher lending limits, a wider geographic presence, more accessible branch office locations, the ability to offer a wider array of services or more favorable pricing alternatives, as well as lower origination and operating costs. This competition could reduce Mid Penn’s net income by decreasing the number and size of loans that its banking subsidiary originates and the interest rates it may charge on these loans. In attracting business and consumer deposits, the Bank faces substantial competition from other insured depository institutions such as other commercial banks, savings institutions and credit unions, as well as institutions offering uninsured investment alternatives, including money market funds. Many of Mid Penn’s larger competitors who accept deposits also enjoy advantages over the Bank, including greater financial resources, more aggressive marketing campaigns, better brand recognition, and more convenient branch locations. These competitors may offer higher interest rates than Mid Penn, which could decrease the deposits that the Bank attracts or require an increase in rates and interest expense to retain existing deposits or attract new deposits. Increased deposit competition could adversely affect Mid Penn’s ability to generate the funds necessary for lending operations. As a result, Mid Penn may need to seek other sources of funds that may be more expensive to obtain and could increase its cost of funds. Mid Penn’s banking subsidiary and nonbank subsidiaries also compete with non-banking providers of financial services, such as brokerage firms, consumer finance companies, credit unions, insurance agencies and governmental organizations, which may offer more favorable terms. Some of its non-banking competitors are not subject to the same extensive and costly regulations that govern Mid Penn’s operations. As a result, such non-banking competitors may have advantages over Mid Penn’s banking subsidiary and nonbank subsidiaries in providing certain products and services. This competition may reduce or limit Mid Penn’s margins on banking services, revenues from nonbanking subsidiaries’ activities, reduce its market share and adversely affect its earnings and financial condition. *The discontinuance of LIBOR presents risks to the financial instruments originated, held or serviced by Mid Penn that use LIBOR as a reference rate.* The London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) and certain other “benchmarks” are the subject of recent national, international, and other regulatory guidance and proposals for reform. These reforms may cause such benchmarks to perform differently than in the past or have other consequences, which cannot be predicted. On July 27, 2017, the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”), which regulates LIBOR, publicly announced that it intends to stop persuading or compelling banks to submit LIBOR rates after 2021. Since then, regulators, industry groups and certain committees (e.g., the Alternative Reference Rates Committee) have, among other things, published recommended fall-back language for LIBOR-linked financial instruments, identified recommended alternatives for certain LIBOR rates (e.g., the Secured Overnight Financing Rate as the recommended alternative to U.S. Dollar LIBOR), and proposed implementations of the recommended alternatives in floating rate instruments. On November 30, 2020, ICE Benchmark Administration Limited (“IBA”), the benchmark administrator for the U.S. Dollar (“USD”) LIBOR announced a proposal to extend the publication of the most commonly used USD LIBOR settings until June 30, 2023. The administrator for LIBOR announced on March 5, 2021 that it will permanently cease to publish most LIBOR settings beginning on January 1, 2022 and cease to publish the overnight, one-month, three-month, six-month and 12-month USD LIBOR settings on July 1, 2023. Accordingly, the FCA has stated that is does not intend to persuade or compel banks to submit to LIBOR after such respective dates. Until such time, however, FCA panel banks have agreed to continue to support LIBOR. Banking regulators issued guidance strongly encouraging banks to cease entering into new contracts that use USD LIBOR as a reference rate as soon as practicable and in any event by December 31, 2021. There can be no assurances on which benchmark rate(s) may replace LIBOR or how LIBOR will be determined for purposes of financial instruments that are currently referencing LIBOR when it ceases to exist. The discontinuance of LIBOR may result in uncertainty or differences in the calculation of the applicable interest rate or payment amount depending on the terms of the governing documents, may adversely affect the value of Mid Penn’s floating rate obligations, loans, deposits, derivatives, and other financial instruments tied to LIBOR rates and may also increase operational and other risks to Mid Penn and the industry, including reputational and litigation risk. *The Basel III capital requirements require Mid Penn to maintain higher levels of capital, which could reduce profitability.* Basel III established higher levels of base capital, certain capital buffers, and a migration toward common equity as the key source of regulatory capital. Although these capital requirements have been phased in and met by Mid Penn, the Basel III requirements signal a growing effort by domestic and international bank regulatory agencies to require financial institutions, including depository institutions, to maintain higher levels of capital. The Basel III implementation activities and related regulatory capital targets required additional capital to support our business risk profile. Maintaining higher levels of capital potentially reduces opportunities to leverage interest-earning assets, which could limit the net interest income and profitability of Mid Penn, and adversely impact our financial condition and results of operations. *Acts of terrorism, natural disasters, global climate change, pandemics and global conflicts may have a negative impact on our business and operations.* Acts of terrorism, natural disasters, global climate change, pandemics, global conflicts or other similar events could have a negative impact on our business and operations. While we have business continuity plans in place, such events occurring or persisting, such as the current COVID-19 pandemic, could disrupt or delay the normal operations of our business and our facilities (including communications and technology), result in harm to or cause travel limitations on our employees, and have a similar impact on our clients, suppliers, third-party vendors and counterparties. These events also could impact us negatively to the extent that they result in reduced capital markets activity, lower asset price levels, or disruptions in general economic activity in the United States or abroad, or in financial market settlement functions. In addition, these or similar events may impact economic growth negatively, which could have an adverse effect on our business and operations and may have other adverse effects on us in ways that we are unable to predict. *As a participating lender in the SBA Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”), we are subject to additional risks of litigation from our clients or other parties regarding our processing of loans for the PPP and risks that the SBA may not fund some or all PPP loan guaranties.* On March 27, 2020, President Trump signed the CARES Act, which included a loan program administered through the SBA referred to as the PPP. Under the PPP, small businesses and other entities and individuals can apply for loans from existing SBA lenders and other approved regulated lenders that enroll in the program, subject to numerous limitations and eligibility criteria. We are participating as a lender in the PPP. The PPP opened on April 3, 2020; however, because of the short timeframe between the passing of the CARES Act and the opening of the PPP, there is some ambiguity in the laws, rules and guidance regarding the operation of the PPP, which exposes the Corporation to risks relating to noncompliance with the PPP. Since the opening of the PPP, several other larger banks have been subject to litigation regarding the process and procedures that such banks used in processing applications for the PPP. We may be exposed to the risk of litigation, from both clients and non-clients that approached us regarding PPP loans, regarding our process and procedures used in processing applications for the PPP. If any such litigation is filed against us and is not resolved in a manner favorable to us, it may result in significant financial liability or adversely affect our reputation. In addition, litigation can be costly, regardless of outcome. Any financial liability, litigation costs or reputational damage caused by PPP related litigation could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We also have credit risk on PPP loans if a determination is made by the SBA that there is a deficiency in the manner in which the loan was originated, funded, or serviced by us, such as an issue with the eligibility of a borrower to receive a PPP loan, which may or may not be related to the ambiguity in the laws, rules and guidance regarding the operation of the PPP. In the event of a loss resulting from a default on a PPP loan and a determination by the SBA that there was a deficiency in the manner in which the PPP loan was originated, funded, or serviced by us, the SBA may deny its liability under the guaranty, reduce the amount of the guaranty, or, if it has already paid under the guaranty, seek recovery of any loss related to the deficiency from us. *The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and measures taken to limit its spread could adversely affect Mid Penn’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.* The COVID-19 pandemic has negatively impacted economic and commercial activity and financial markets. Measures to contain the virus, such as stay-at-home orders, travel restrictions, closure of non-essential businesses, occupancy limitations and social distancing requirements, resulted in significant business and operational disruptions, including business closures, and mass layoffs and furloughs. Though most restrictions have been lifted or eased and consumer and business spending and unemployment levels have improved significantly, the economic recovery has been uneven, with industries such as travel, entertainment, hospitality and food service lagging, and, as of December 31, 2021, many companies have not returned workers to their offices. Supply chain disruptions precipitated by the abrupt economic slowdown have contributed to increased costs, lost revenue, and inflationary pressures for many segments of the economy. Further, a significant number of workers left their jobs during the COVID-19 pandemic, leading to wage inflation in many industries as businesses attempt to fill vacant positions. The extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic will ultimately affect our business is unknown and will depend, among other things, on the duration of the pandemic, the actions undertaken by national, state and local governments and health officials to contain the virus or mitigate its effects, the safety and effectiveness of the vaccines that have been developed and the extent to which they are accepted by the public, the development of effective therapies, and how quickly and to what extent economic conditions improve and normal business and operating conditions resume. The continuation of the COVID-19 pandemic and the efforts to contain the virus, including effects of economic stimulus, and the exhaustion or expiration of stimulus benefits, could: - reduce the demand for loans and other financial services; - result in increases in loan delinquencies, problem assets, and foreclosures; - cause the value of collateral for loans, especially real estate, to decline in value; - reduce the availability and productivity of our employees; - cause our vendors and counterparties to be unable to meet existing obligations to us; - negatively impact the business and operations of third-party service providers that perform critical services for our business; - cause the value of our securities portfolio to decline; and - cause the net worth and liquidity of loan guarantors to decline, impairing their ability to honor commitments to us. Any one or a combination of the above events could have a material, adverse effect on Mid Penn’s business, financial condition, and results of operations. *Interest rate volatility stemming from COVID-19 could negatively affect our net interest income, lending activities, deposits and profitability.* Our net interest income, lending activities, deposits and profitability could be negatively affected by volatility in interest rates caused by uncertainties stemming from COVID-19. In March 2020, the Federal Reserve lowered the target range for the federal funds rate to a range from 0 to 0.25 percent, citing concerns about the impact of COVID-19 on markets and stress in the energy sector. A prolonged period of extremely volatile and unstable market conditions would likely increase our funding costs and negatively affect market risk mitigation strategies. Higher income volatility from changes in interest rates and spreads to benchmark indices could cause a loss of future net interest income and a decrease in current fair market values of our assets. Fluctuations in interest rates will impact both the level of income and expense recorded on most of our assets and liabilities and the market value of all interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our net income, operating results, or financial condition. *If Mid Penn’s information systems are interrupted or sustain a breach in security, those events may negatively affect Mid Penn’s financial performance and reputation.* In conducting its business, Mid Penn relies heavily on its information systems. Maintaining and protecting those systems and data is difficult and expensive, as is dealing with any failure, interruption, or breach in security of these systems, whether due to acts or omissions by Mid Penn or by a third party, and whether intentional or not. Any such failure, interruption, or breach could result in failures or disruptions in Mid Penn’s customer relationship management, general ledger, deposit, loan, and other systems. A breach of Mid Penn’s information security may result from fraudulent activity committed against Mid Penn or its clients, resulting in financial loss to Mid Penn or its clients, or privacy breaches against Mid Penn’s clients. Such fraudulent activity may consist of check fraud, electronic fraud, wire fraud, “phishing”, social engineering, identity theft, or other deceptive acts. The policies, procedures, and technical safeguards put in place by Mid Penn to prevent or limit the effect of any failure, interruption, or security breach of its information systems and data may be insufficient to prevent or remedy the effects of any such occurrences. The occurrence of any failures, interruptions, or security breaches of Mid Penn’s information systems and data could damage Mid Penn’s reputation, cause Mid Penn to incur additional expenses, result in online services or other businesses becoming inoperable, subject Mid Penn to regulatory sanctions or additional regulatory scrutiny, or expose Mid Penn to civil litigation and possible financial liability, any of which could have a material adverse effect on Mid Penn’s financial condition and results of operations. *Mid Penn’s business operations and interaction with customers are increasingly done via technology and electronic delivery channels, and this has increased risks related to cyber-attacks and cyber incidents.* Mid Penn is exposed to the risk of cyber-attacks in the normal course of business. In general, cyber incidents can result from deliberate attacks or unintentional events. An increased level of attention in the industry is focused on cyber-attacks that include, but are not limited to, gaining unauthorized access to digital systems for purposes of misappropriating assets or sensitive information, corrupting data, or causing operational disruption. To combat against these attacks, Mid Penn has certain security systems and policies and procedures in place to prevent or limit the effect of the possible security breach of its information systems and it has insurance against some cyber-risks and attacks. While Mid Penn has not incurred any material losses related to cyber-attacks, nor is it aware of any specific or threatened cyber-incidents as of the date of this report, it may incur substantial costs and suffer other negative consequences if it falls victim to successful cyber-attacks. Such negative consequences could include remediation costs that may include liability for stolen assets or information and repairing system damage that cyber-attacks may have caused; deploying additional personnel and protection technologies, training employees, and engaging third party experts and consultants; lost revenues resulting from unauthorized use of proprietary information or the failure to retain or attract customers following an attack; litigation; and reputational damage adversely affecting customer or investor confidence. *We are required to make a number of judgments in applying generally accepted accounting standards, and different estimates and assumptions in the application of these accounting standards could result in a decrease in capital and/or other material changes to our reports of financial condition and results of operations.* Generally accepted accounting principles involve certain estimates and processes that are particularly susceptible to significant change, including those related to the determination of the allowance for loan losses and reserve for unfunded lending commitments, the fair value of and potential impairment of certain financial instruments including investment securities, income tax assets or liabilities (including deferred tax assets and any related valuation allowance), and share-based compensation. While we have identified critical accounting policies and have procedures and processes in place to support making the related judgments and estimates, changes to the processes, assumptions, or models in the application of these generally accepted accounting principles, and the impact to the related judgments and estimates could result in a decrease to net income and, possibly, capital and may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. From time to time, the Financial Accounting Standards Board and the SEC issues changes to or updated interpretations of the financial accounting and reporting guidance that governs the preparation of Mid Penn’s financial statements. These changes are beyond our control, can be difficult to predict, and could materially impact how we report our financial condition and results of operations. We could be required to apply new or revised guidance retrospectively, which may result in the revision of prior financial statements by material amounts. The implementation of new or revised guidance could also result in material adverse effects to our reported capital. #### Mid Penn’s mortgage banking income may experience significant volatility. Mortgage banking income is highly influenced by the level and direction of market forces including mortgage interest rates, and real estate and refinancing activity. In lower interest rate environments, the demand for mortgage loans and refinancing activity will tend to increase. This has the effect of increasing fee income but could adversely impact the estimated fair value of Mid Penn’s mortgage servicing rights as the rate of loan prepayments increase. In higher interest rate environments, the demand for mortgage loans and refinancing activity will generally be lower. This has the effect of decreasing mortgage loan originations and refinance activities, and related fee income opportunities. *Mid Penn could be required to repurchase mortgage loans or indemnify mortgage loan purchasers due to breaches of representations and warranties, borrower fraud, or certain borrower defaults, which could have a material adverse impact on our liquidity, results of operations and financial condition.* Mid Penn originates and sells a significant amount of residential mortgage loans into the secondary market. When Mid Penn sells mortgage loans, Mid Penn is required to make customary representations and warranties to purchasers about the mortgage loans and the manner in which they were originated. The agreements pursuant to which the loans are sold require Mid Penn to repurchase or substitute mortgage loans in the event there was a breach of any of these representations or warranties. In addition, Mid Penn may be required to repurchase mortgage loans as a result of borrower fraud or in the event of early payment default of the borrower on a mortgage loan. If repurchase and indemnity demands increase significantly, Mid Penn’s liquidity, results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected. *Mid Penn’s profitability depends significantly on economic conditions in Pennsylvania.* Unlike larger or regional financial institutions that are more geographically diversified, Mid Penn’s success is dependent to a significant degree on economic conditions in Pennsylvania, especially in the twelve counties and the specific markets primarily served by Mid Penn. The banking industry is affected by general economic conditions, including the effects of inflation, recession, unemployment, real estate values, trends in national and global economics, and other factors beyond our control. An economic recession or a delayed recovery over a prolonged period of time in Pennsylvania, or more specific to the counties or communities in Pennsylvania served by Mid Penn, could cause an increase in the level of the Bank’s non-performing assets and loan and lease losses, thereby causing operating losses, impairing liquidity, and eroding capital. Mid Penn cannot assure that adverse changes in the local and state economy supporting its market area would not have a material adverse effect on Mid Penn’s consolidated financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows. *Mid Penn is subject to claims and litigation pertaining to fiduciary responsibility.* From time to time, customers may make claims and take legal action pertaining to Mid Penn’s performance of its fiduciary responsibilities. Whether customer claims and legal action related to Mid Penn’s performance of its fiduciary responsibilities are founded or unfounded, if such claims and legal actions are not resolved in a manner favorable to Mid Penn, the claims or related litigation processes may result in significant financial expense and liability, and/or adversely affect the market perception of Mid Penn and its products and services, as well as impact customer demand for those products and services. Any financial liability or reputation damage could have a material adverse effect on Mid Penn’s business, which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on Mid Penn’s financial condition and results of operations. *Mid Penn operates in a highly regulated environment and may be adversely affected by changes in federal, state and local laws and regulations.* The Corporation, the Bank, and its nonbank subsidiaries are collectively subject to extensive regulation, supervision and examination by federal and state banking authorities. The potential exists for additional or amended federal or state laws and regulations, or changes in supervisory policies or activities, to materially affect many aspects of Mid Penn’s operations, including capital levels, lending and funding practices, and liquidity standards. New laws and regulations may increase costs of regulatory compliance and of doing business and otherwise affect operations and may significantly affect the markets in which Mid Penn does business, the markets for and value of Mid Penn’s loans and investments, the ability to attract deposits at a reasonable cost, the fees charged, and ongoing operations, costs and profitability. Further, additional legislation and regulations that could significantly affect Mid Penn’s powers, authority and operations may be enacted or adopted in the future, which could have a material adverse effect on its financial condition and results of operations. Also, regulators have significant discretion and authority to prevent or remedy unsafe or unsound practices or violations of laws by banks and bank holding companies in the performance of their supervisory and enforcement duties. Any changes in applicable regulations or federal, state or local legislation, or the exercise of bank regulatory authority, may have a negative impact on Mid Penn’s results of operations, financial condition, and its ability to pay dividends on common stock. #### The soundness of other financial institutions may adversely affect Mid Penn. Financial services institutions are interrelated as a result of trading, clearing, counterparty, or other relationships. Mid Penn has exposure to many different industries and counterparties, and routinely executes transactions with counterparties in the financial services industry, including commercial banks, brokers and dealers, investment banks, and other institutional clients. Many of these transactions expose Mid Penn to credit risk and losses in the event of a default by a counterparty or client. Any such losses could have a material adverse effect on Mid Penn’s financial condition and results of operations. *Volatility in financial markets and the economy may have materially adverse effects on our liquidity and financial condition.* In the recent past, the capital and credit markets experienced extreme volatility and economic disruption, including the most recent volatility and market stresses from the COVID-19 pandemic. Adverse financial market and economic conditions can exert downward pressure on stock prices, security prices, and credit availability for certain issuers without regard to their underlying financial strength. If such levels of financial market and economic disruption and volatility return, there can be no assurance that Mid Penn will not experience adverse effects, which may materially affect its liquidity, financial condition, and profitability. *Mid Penn’s banking subsidiary may be required to pay higher FDIC insurance premiums or special assessments which may adversely affect its earnings.* Poor economic conditions and the resulting bank failures from the most recent recession stressed the DIF and increased the costs of the Bank’s FDIC insurance assessments. Future bank failures may prompt the FDIC to increase its premiums above the recently increased levels or to issue special assessments. Mid Penn generally is unable to control the amount of premiums or special assessments that its banking subsidiary is required to pay for FDIC insurance. Any future changes in the calculation or assessment of FDIC insurance premiums may have a material adverse effect on the results of Mid Penn’s operations and financial condition. *If we conclude that the decline in the value of any of our investment securities is other than temporary, we are required to write down the value of that security through a charge to earnings.* Mid Penn reviews its investment securities portfolio at each quarter-end reporting period to determine whether the fair value of individual securities or the portfolio as a whole is below the current carrying value. When the fair value of any of its investment securities has declined below its carrying value, Mid Penn is required to assess whether the decline is other than temporary. If Mid Penn concludes that the decline is other than temporary, it is required to write down the value of that security through a charge to earnings. Changes in the expected cash flows of these securities and/or prolonged price declines may result in Mid Penn concluding that impairment of these securities is other than temporary, which would require a charge to earnings to write down these securities to their fair value. Due to the complexity of the process, inputs, calculations and assumptions used in determining whether an investment is impaired, Mid Penn’s assessment of or disclosure of the impairment status of investments may not accurately reflect the actual impairment in the future. *Mid Penn is subject to environmental, social and governance ("ESG") risks that could adversely affect our results of operations, reputation, and the market price of our securities.* Mid Penn is subject to a variety of risks arising from ESG matters. ESG matters include environmental and climate change activism, diversity activism, and racial and social justice issues. Such matters may involve our personnel, customers, or third parties with whom we do business. Risks arising from ESG matters may adversely affect, among other things, our reputation and the market price of our securities. Further, Mid Penn may be exposed to negative publicity based on the identity and activities of our shareholders, those to whom we lend and with which we otherwise do business, and the public’s view of the approach and requirements of our state or federal regulators, customers, and business partners with respect to ESG matters. Any such negative publicity could arise through traditional media or electronic social media platforms. Mid Penn’s relationships and reputation with our existing and prospective customers and third parties with which we do business could be damaged if we were to become the subject of any such negative publicity. This, in turn, could have an adverse effect on Mid Penn’s ability to attract and retain customers and employees and could have a negative impact on the market price for our securities. Certain investors have begun to consider the steps taken and resources allocated by financial institutions and other commercial organizations with respect to ESG matters when making investment decisions. Certain investors are beginning to incorporate the business risks of ESG regulation and activism and the adequacy of companies’ responses to these into their investment decisions. These shifts in investing priorities may result in adverse effects on the market price of Mid Penn’s securities. The U.S. Congress, state legislatures and federal and state regulatory agencies, as well as certain stock exchanges, continue to propose numerous initiatives related to ESG matters. Similar and even more expansive initiatives are expected under the current administration, including potentially increasing supervisory expectations with respect to banks’ risk management practices, accounting practices, and credit portfolio concentrations management practices. The lack of empirical data surrounding the credit and other financial risks posed by ESG regulation and activism render it impossible to predict how specifically ESG matters may impact Mid Penn’s financial condition and results of operations. Federal and state banking regulators and supervisory authorities, investors and other stakeholders have increasingly viewed financial institutions as a tool to effect ESG activism, both directly and with respect to their customers, which may result in financial institutions coming under increased pressure regarding the disclosure and management of ESG matters. Given that ESG matters could impose systemic risks upon the financial sector, either via disruptions in economic activity resulting from activism, Mid Penn faces increasing focus on our resilience to ESG risks. Ongoing legislative or regulatory uncertainties and changes regarding ESG risk management and practices may result in higher regulatory, compliance, credit and reputational risks and costs. *Mid Penn is subject to environmental liability risk associated with lending activities.* A significant portion of Mid Penn’s loan portfolio is secured by real property. During the ordinary course of business, Mid Penn may foreclose on and take title to properties securing certain loans. In doing so, there is a risk that hazardous or toxic substances could be found on these properties. If hazardous or toxic substances are found, Mid Penn may be liable for remediation costs, as well as for personal injury and property damage. Environmental laws may require Mid Penn to incur substantial expenses and may materially reduce the affected property’s value or limit Mid Penn’s ability to use or sell the affected property. In addition, future laws or more stringent interpretations or enforcement policies with respect to existing laws may increase Mid Penn’s exposure to environmental liability. Although Mid Penn has policies and procedures to perform an environmental review before initiating any foreclosure action on real property, these reviews may not be sufficient to detect all potential environmental hazards. The remediation costs and any other financial liabilities associated with an environmental hazard could have a material adverse effect on Mid Penn’s financial condition and results of operations. *Mid Penn’s financial performance may suffer if its information technology is unable to keep pace with its growth or industry developments.* Effective and competitive delivery of Mid Penn’s products and services is increasingly dependent upon information technology resources and processes provided both internally and through third party vendors. In addition to better serving customers, the effective use of technology increases efficiency and enables Mid Penn to reduce costs. Mid Penn’s future success will depend, in part, upon its ability to address the needs of its customers by effectively and safely using technology to provide products and services to enhance customer convenience, attract customers who prefer technological delivery channels, and to create additional efficiencies in its operations. Many of Mid Penn’s competitors have greater resources to invest in technological improvements and infrastructure. Additionally, as technology and information security requirements in the financial services industry change and evolve, keeping pace becomes increasingly complex and expensive for Mid Penn. There can be no assurance that Mid Penn will be able to effectively keep pace with these technological advancements or the related substantial costs and investments required, which could adversely affect its financial condition and results of operations. *Growing by acquisition entails certain risks, and difficulties in integrating past or future acquisitions could adversely affect our business.* In 2018, Mid Penn completed acquisitions of both The Scottdale Bank & Trust Company and First Priority Financial Corp. and continued the integration of these acquisitions in the subsequent periods. Additionally, on November 30, 2021, Mid Penn completed its acquisition of Riverview Financial Corporation. Growth by acquisition involves substantial risks, as the ultimate success of such acquisitions may depend on, among other things, the ability to realize anticipated cost savings and to integrate the acquired companies and operation in a manner that does not result in decreased revenues. Excessive acquisition costs, conversion costs and the disruption of existing customer relationships in both the acquired companies and legacy markets may occur. If we are not able to successfully achieve the financial efficiencies or integration and growth objectives of acquisitions, the anticipated benefits of an acquisition may not be realized fully, or at all, or may take longer to realize than planned. Further, the asset quality or other financial characteristics of an acquired company may deteriorate from the date a merger or other acquisition agreement is entered into and when the transaction is completed or the post-merger period. Mid Penn has spent and may continue to spend significant resources identifying companies and businesses to acquire. The efficient and effective integration of any companies and businesses we acquire and integrate into our organization is critical to our growth. The recent Scottdale, First Priority, and Riverview mergers, and any future mergers or acquisitions, involve numerous risks including difficulties in integrating the culture, operations, technologies and personnel of the acquired companies, the diversion of management’s attention from other business concerns and the potential loss of customers. Failure to fully integrate the operations of Scottdale, First Priority, and Riverview successfully, or to integrate the operations of future acquisition targets, could harm Mid Penn’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. *We plan to pursue a growth strategy and there are risks associated with rapid growth.* We intend to pursue a growth plan consistent with our prior business strategy, including growth by acquisition, as well as leveraging our existing branch network or adding new branch locations or offices and personnel in current and adjacent markets we choose to serve. The Scottdale, First Priority, and Riverview mergers were part of our growth strategy. Our ability to manage growth successfully will depend on our ability to attract or retain qualified personnel, maintain cost controls and efficiencies, and ensure our areas of growth continue to meet our high asset quality standards, while attracting additional loans and deposits on favorable terms, as well as on factors beyond our control, such as economic conditions and competition in existing and new markets. If we grow too quickly and are not able to attract qualified personnel, control costs and maintain asset quality, this continued rapid growth could materially adversely affect our financial performance. ### Risks Related to Mid Penn Common Stock *The trading volume in Mid Penn’s common stock is less than that of other larger financial services companies.* Mid Penn’s common stock is listed for trading on NASDAQ (symbol: MPB); however, the trading volume in its common stock is less than that of other larger financial services companies. A public trading market having the desired characteristics of depth, liquidity and orderliness depends on the presence in the marketplace of willing buyers and sellers of Mid Penn’s common stock at any given time. This presence depends on the individual decisions of investors and general economic and market conditions over which Mid Penn has no control. Given the generally lower trading volume of Mid Penn’s common stock, significant sales of Mid Penn’s common stock, or the expectation of these sales, could cause Mid Penn’s stock price to fall. *The market price of Mid Penn common stock may fluctuate significantly, and this may make it difficult for investors to resell shares of common stock owned by them at times or at prices they find attractive.* The market price of our common stock as reported on NASDAQ is subject to constant change during business trading hours. We expect that the market price of Mid Penn common stock will continue to fluctuate and there can be no assurance about the stability or trend of market prices for Mid Penn common stock. Stock price volatility, particularly with a stock like ours with lower trading volumes than larger financial services companies, may make it difficult for investors to resell their Mid Penn common stock when they want and at times or prices that they find attractive. Mid Penn’s stock price may fluctuate significantly as a result of a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our control. These factors include those described elsewhere in this entire “Risk Factors” section, in this document, and our other filings with the SEC. *Mid Penn’s ability to pay dividends on its common stock, and principal and interest on its subordinated notes, depends primarily on dividends from its banking subsidiary, which is subject to regulatory limits.* Mid Penn is a bank holding company and its operations are conducted primarily by its banking subsidiary. Mid Penn’s ability to pay dividends on its common stock, and principal and interest on its subordinated notes, depends on its receipt of dividends from the Bank. Dividend payments from its banking subsidiary are subject to legal and regulatory limitations, generally based on net profits and retained earnings, imposed by the respective regulatory agencies that supervise the Bank. The ability of the Bank to pay dividends is also subject to profitability, financial condition, liquidity, and capital management limits. There is no assurance that Mid Penn’s banking subsidiary or other subsidiaries established in the future will be able to pay dividends, or that Mid Penn itself will generate adequate cash flow to pay dividends in the future. Federal Reserve policy, which applies to Mid Penn as a registered bank holding company, also provides that dividends by bank holding companies should generally be paid out of earnings from both the current period and a designated look-back period. Mid Penn’s ability to pay dividends on its common stock, or the amount of any dividends paid, could have a material adverse effect on the market price of its common stock. *Mid Penn may need to, or be required to, raise additional capital in the future, and capital may not be available when needed and on terms favorable to current stockholders.* Federal banking regulators require the Corporation and the Bank to maintain adequate levels of capital to support their operations. These capital levels are determined and dictated by law, regulation, and banking regulatory agencies. In addition, capital levels are also determined by Mid Penn’s management and board of directors, based on capital levels that they believe are necessary to support Mid Penn’s business operations. If Mid Penn raises capital through merger and acquisition activities, or through the issuance of additional shares of its common stock or other securities, it would likely dilute the ownership interests of current investors and could dilute the per share book value and earnings per share of its common stock. Furthermore, a capital raise through issuance of additional shares may have an adverse impact on Mid Penn’s stock price. New investors also may have rights, preferences and privileges senior to Mid Penn’s current common stockholders, which may adversely impact its current common stockholders. Mid Penn’s ability to raise additional capital will depend on conditions in the capital markets at that time, which are outside of its control, and on its financial performance. Accordingly, Mid Penn cannot be certain of its ability to raise additional capital on acceptable terms and acceptable time frames or to raise additional capital at all. If Mid Penn cannot raise additional capital in sufficient amounts when needed, its ability to comply with regulatory capital requirements could be materially impaired. Additionally, the inability to raise capital in sufficient amounts may adversely affect Mid Penn’s financial condition and results of operations. *Offerings of debt, which would be senior to Mid Penn’s common stock upon liquidation, and/or preferred equity securities which may be senior to our common stock for purposes of dividend distributions or upon liquidation, may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.* Mid Penn may attempt to increase its capital resources if the Corporation’s or the Bank’s capital ratios fall below the required minimums. The Corporation or the Bank could be required to raise additional capital by making additional offerings of debt or preferred equity securities, including medium-term notes, senior or subordinated notes and preferred stock. If a future liquidation of Mid Penn occurs, holders of debt securities and shares of preferred stock and lenders with respect to other borrowings are likely to receive distributions of available assets prior to the holders of our common stock. Additional equity offerings may dilute the holdings of existing shareholders or reduce the market price of our common stock, or both. Holders of Mid Penn common stock are not entitled to preemptive rights or other protections against dilution. Also, Mid Penn’s board of directors is authorized to issue one or more classes or series of preferred stock from time to time without any action on the part of the shareholders. The board of directors also has the power, without shareholder approval, to set the terms of any such classes or series of preferred stock that may be issued, including voting rights, dividend rights, and preferences over common stock with respect to dividends or upon our dissolution, winding up and liquidation and other terms. If Mid Penn issues preferred stock in the future that has a preference over its common stock with respect to the payment of dividends or upon our liquidation, dissolution or winding up, or if preferred stock is issued with voting rights that dilute the voting power of common stock, the rights of holders of Mid Penn’s common stock or the market price of the common stock could be adversely affected. *Pennsylvania Business Corporation Law and various anti-takeover provisions under our articles of incorporation and bylaws could impede the takeover of Mid Penn.* Various Pennsylvania laws affecting business corporations may have the effect of discouraging offers to acquire Mid Penn, even if the acquisition would be advantageous to shareholders. In addition, Mid Penn has various anti-takeover measures in place under its articles of incorporation and bylaws, including a supermajority vote requirement for mergers, the staggered election of Mid Penn’s board of directors, and the absence of cumulative voting. Any one or more of these laws or measures may impede the takeover of Mid Penn and may prevent its shareholders from taking part in a transaction in which they could realize a premium over the current market price of its common stock. #### Mid Penn’s common stock is not insured by any governmental entity. Although Mid Penn and the Bank are regulated by governmental agencies, Mid Penn common stock is not a deposit account or other obligation of the Bank or any other bank and, therefore, is not insured against loss by the FDIC, any other deposit insurance fund, any other governmental entity or by any other public or private entity. Investment in Mid Penn common stock is inherently risky for the reasons described elsewhere in this “Risk Factors” section, in this document, and our other filings with the SEC. Mid Penn common stock is also subject to the same market forces that affect the price of common stock in any other publicly traded company. As a result, investors who acquire Mid Penn common stock may lose some or all of their investment. ### General Risk Factors #### Mid Penn’s controls and procedures may fail or be circumvented. Management maintains Mid Penn’s internal controls, disclosure controls and procedures, and corporate governance policies and procedures, and periodically reviews and updates them. Any system of controls, however well designed and operated, is based in part on performance by personnel or certain assumptions and can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurances that the objectives of the system are met. Any failure or circumvention of Mid Penn’s controls and procedures or failure to comply with regulations related to controls and procedures could have a material adverse effect on Mid Penn’s business, results of operations, and financial condition. #### Mid Penn may not be able to attract and retain skilled personnel. Mid Penn’s success depends, in large part, on its ability to attract and retain qualified, key personnel. Competition for the best personnel in most activities engaged in by Mid Penn can be intense, and Mid Penn may not be able to hire or retain them. The unexpected loss of services of one or more of Mid Penn’s key personnel could have a material adverse impact on Mid Penn’s business because of their skills, knowledge of Mid Penn’s market, years of industry experience, and the difficulty of promptly finding qualified replacement personnel. ## Properties As filed, 1,878 characters. The Bank owns a building in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, located at 2407 Park Drive, which serves as the Corporation’s headquarters. The Bank also owns a building in Millersburg, Pennsylvania, located at 349 Union Street, which serves as the Bank’s headquarters. Additionally, the Bank owns one building in Halifax, Pennsylvania that serves as an operational support facility and one building in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania that serves as corporate administrative and operational support offices. Administrative space is also leased in Pottsville, Lancaster, and Chambersburg, Pennsylvania. As of December 31, 2021, the Bank’s retail office network was comprised of sixty full-service retail locations as detailed in the table below. | Pennsylvania Locations (by County) Retail Banking | Owned | Leased | Total | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Berks | 1 | 5 | 6 | | Blair | 1 | 1 | 2 | | Bucks | 1 | — | 1 | | Centre | — | 1 | 1 | | Chester | 1 | — | 1 | | Clearfield | 5 | — | 5 | | Cumberland | — | 3 | 3 | | Dauphin | 13 | 2 | 15 | | Fayette | 1 | — | 1 | | Huntington | 2 | — | 2 | | Lancaster | — | 3 | 3 | | Lehigh | 1 | — | 1 | | Luzerne | — | 2 | 2 | | Lycoming | 1 | — | 1 | | Montgomery | — | 1 | 1 | | Northumberland | — | 1 | 1 | | Perry | 1 | 1 | 2 | | Schuylkill | 6 | 3 | 9 | | Westmoreland | 3 | — | 3 | | | 37 | 23 | 60 | 25 On March 4, 2022, the Bank closed sixteen offices, which were located in Berks, Blair, Centre, Clearfield, Dauphin, Huntington, Lancaster, Lehigh, Lycoming, Northumberland, Perry, Schuylkill, and Westmoreland counties. All real estate owned by Mid Penn is free and clear of encumbrances. Mid Penn’s leases expire at various dates through the year 2039 and generally include options to renew. For additional information regarding the lease commitments, refer to Note 8, *Leases,* within Item 8, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. ## Legal proceedings As filed, 437 characters. Management is not aware of any litigation that would have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position of the Corporation. Mid Penn and the Bank have no proceedings pending other than ordinary, routine litigation occurring in the normal course of business. In addition, management does not know of any material proceedings contemplated by governmental authorities against Mid Penn, the Bank, or any of its properties. ## Management's discussion and analysis As filed, 117,886 characters. ### SPECIAL CAUTIONARY NOTICE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS Certain of the matters discussed in this document may constitute forward-looking statements for purposes of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and as such may involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of Mid Penn or the Bank to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. The words “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “estimate,” and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. Mid Penn’s actual results may differ materially from the results anticipated in these forward-looking statements due to a variety of factors, including, without limitation: - the effects of future economic conditions on Mid Penn, the Bank, its nonbank subsidiaries, and their markets and customers; - governmental monetary and fiscal policies, as well as legislative and regulatory changes; - future actions or inactions of the United States government, including a failure to increase the government debt limit or a prolonged shutdown of the federal government; - business or economic disruption from national or global epidemic or pandemic events; - the risks of changes in interest rates on the level and composition of deposits, loan demand, and the values of loan collateral, the value of investment securities, and interest rate protection agreements; - the effects of competition from other commercial banks, thrifts, mortgage banking firms, consumer finance companies, credit unions, securities brokerage firms, insurance companies, money market and other mutual funds and other financial institutions operating in Mid Penn’s market area and elsewhere, including institutions operating locally, regionally, nationally and internationally, together with such competitors offering banking products and services by mail, telephone, computer and the internet; - an increase in the Pennsylvania Bank Shares Tax to which Mid Penn Bank’s capital stock is currently subject, or imposition of any additional taxes on the capital stock of Mid Penn or Mid Penn Bank; - impacts of the capital and liquidity requirements imposed by bank regulatory agencies; - the effect of changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by the regulatory agencies, as well as the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, Financial Accounting Standards Board, the SEC, and other accounting and reporting standard setters; - the costs and effects of litigation and of unexpected or adverse outcomes in such litigation; - technological changes; - our ability to implement business strategies, including our acquisition strategy; - our ability to successfully expand our franchise, including acquisitions or establishing new offices at favorable prices; - our ability to successfully integrate any banks, companies, offices, assets, labilities, customers, systems and management personnel we acquire into our operations and our ability to realize related revenue synergies and cost savings within expected time frames; - potential goodwill impairment charges, or future impairment charges and fluctuations in the fair values of reporting units or of assets in the event projected financial results are not achieved within expected time frames; - our ability to attract and retain qualified management and personnel; - results of regulatory examination and supervision processes; - the failure of assumptions underlying the establishment of reserves for loan and lease losses, the assessment of potential impairment of investment securities, and estimations of values of collateral and various financial assets and liabilities; - our ability to maintain compliance with the listing rules of NASDAQ; - our ability to maintain the value and image of our brand and protect our intellectual property rights; - volatility in the securities markets; - disruptions due to flooding, severe weather, or other natural disasters or Acts of God; - acts of war, terrorism, or global military conflict; - supply chain disruption; and - the factors described in Item 1A of this Annual Report. All written or oral forward-looking statements attributable to Mid Penn are expressly qualified in their entirety by these cautionary factors. This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations analyzes the major elements of Mid Penn’s consolidated financial statements from the view of management and should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation and Notes thereto and other detailed information appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The comparability of the results of operations for the year ended 2021, compared to 2020 and 2019, in general, have been materially impacted by the acquisition of Riverview Financial Corporation, which closed on November 30, 2021. For comparative purposes, some 2020 and 2019 balances have been reclassified to conform to the 2021 presentation. Such reclassifications had no impact on net income available to common shareholders or shareholders’ equity. Mid Penn is not aware of any current trends, events, uncertainties or any current recommendations by the regulatory authorities which, if they were to be implemented, would have a material effect on Mid Penn’s or the Bank’s liquidity, capital resources, or operations. #### Critical Accounting Estimates Mid Penn’s consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and conform to general practices within the banking industry for smaller reporting public companies. Application of certain principles involves significant judgments and estimates by management that have a material impact on the carrying value of certain assets and liabilities. The judgments and estimates used in applying these principles are based on historical experiences and other factors which are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Because of the nature of the judgments and estimates that have been made, actual results could differ from these judgments and estimates, which could have a material impact on the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the reported results of operations. Management of the Corporation considers the accounting judgments relating to the allowance for loan and lease losses, the evaluation of the Corporation’s investment securities for other-than-temporary impairment, the valuation of the Corporation’s goodwill for impairment, and the valuation of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations, to be the accounting areas that require the most subjective and complex judgments. The allowance for loan and lease losses represents management’s estimate of probable incurred credit losses inherent in the loan and lease portfolio. Determining the amount of the allowance for loan and lease losses is considered a critical accounting estimate because it requires significant judgment and the use of estimates related to the amount and timing of expected future cash flows on impaired loans, estimated losses on pools of homogeneous loans based on historical loss experience adjusted for subjectively determined qualitative factors, and consideration of current economic trends and conditions, all of which may be susceptible to significant change. The loan and lease portfolio also represents the largest asset type on the consolidated balance sheet. Throughout the remainder of this report, the terms “loan” or “loans” refers to both loans and leases. Valuations for the investment portfolio are determined using quoted market prices, where available. If quoted market prices are not available, investment valuation is based on pricing models, quotes for similar investment securities, and observable values based upon yield curves and spreads. In addition to valuation of securities, management must assess whether there are any declines where the fair value is below the carrying value of any investments such that the decline should be considered other than temporary or otherwise require an adjustment in carrying value and recognition of a loss in the consolidated statement of income. Certain intangible assets generated in connection with acquisitions are periodically assessed for impairment. Goodwill is tested at least annually for impairment, and if certain events occur which indicate goodwill might be impaired between annual tests, such as the potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, goodwill must be tested when such events occur. In making this assessment, Mid Penn considers a number of factors including operating results, business plans, economic projections, anticipated future cash flows, current market data, stock price, etc. Similarly, the amortized basis of the core deposit intangible asset and trade name intangible are periodically assessed for impairment. There are inherent uncertainties related to these factors and Mid Penn’s judgment in applying them to the analysis of core deposit intangible, trade name intangible, and goodwill impairment. Future changes in economic and operating conditions could result in goodwill or core deposit intangible or trade name intangible impairment in subsequent periods. Valuations of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations are measured at fair value as of the acquisition date. In many cases, determining the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed requires Mid Penn to estimate the timing and amount of cash flows expected to result from these assets and liabilities and to discount these cash flows at appropriate rates of interest, which require the utilization of significant estimates and judgment in accounting for the acquisition. #### Financial Summary #### 2021 versus 2020 As noted above, the comparability of the results of operations for the years ended 2021 and 2020, in general, have been materially impacted by the acquisition of Riverview, which closed on November 30, 2021. Mid Penn’s net income to common shareholders (earnings) for the year ended December 31, 2021 was $29,319,000 or $2.71 per common share basic and diluted, compared to earnings of $26,209,000 or $3.11 per common share basic and $3.10 per share diluted for the year ended December 31, 2020. The results for the year ended December 31, 2021 included the recognition of $21,954,000 of PPP loan processing fees generated as a result of Mid Penn’s participation in the PPP. These PPP fees are recognized into interest income over the term of the respective loan, or sooner if the loans are forgiven by the Small Business Administration or the borrowers otherwise pay down principal prior to a loan’s stated maturity. The twelve months ended December 31, 2021 also include merger and acquisition expenses of $3,067,000 resulting from the Riverview merger, which was announced on June 30, 2021 and legally closed on November 30, 2021. Additionally, during the fourth quarter of 2021, Mid Penn recognized non-recurring post-acquisition restructuring expenses totaling $9,880,000 consisting of (i) $2,292,000 related to branch closures as a result of the recently announced Retail Network Optimization Plan, and (ii) $7,588,000 of termination fees and severance costs in connection with the Riverview acquisition. Mid Penn also recognized other period costs related to the merger of $310,000. Total assets of Mid Penn were $4,689,425,000 as of December 31, 2021, reflecting an increase of $1,690,477,000 or 56 percent compared to total assets of $2,998,948,000 as of December 31, 2020. The majority of this increase reflects the assets acquired as a result of the Riverview merger on November 30, 2021 totaling $1,272,921,000. Total loans as of December 31, 2021 were $3,104,396,000 compared to $2,384,041,000 as of December 31, 2020, an increase of $720,355,000 since year-end 2020. This significant increase was driven by the Riverview acquisition. As of December 31, 2021, the outstanding balance of Riverview acquired loans was $811,038,000, net of purchase accounting adjustments. Total loans were also significantly impacted by both (i) organic loan growth within Mid Penn’s legacy markets of $191,245,000 equating to 9 percent organic growth since December 31, 2020, less (ii) net forgiveness of PPP loans originated by Mid Penn of $281,928,000. Organic loan growth occurred primarily within Mid Penn’s commercial real estate and commercial and industrial financing loan portfolios. Total deposits increased $1,527,436,000 or 62 percent, from $2,474,580,000 at December 31, 2020, to $4,002,016,000 at December 31, 2021. The increase in total deposits since year-end 2020 was attributable primarily to the balance of deposits assumed through the acquisition of Riverview totaling $1,052,435,000 as of December 31, 2021, net of purchase accounting adjustments. Organic deposit growth of $475,436,000 or 19 percent since December 31, 2020 was driven by significant increases in noninterest-bearing, interest-bearing, and money market deposits, primarily due to both expanded cash management and commercial deposit account relationships, and new deposits established as a result of Mid Penn’s PPP loan funding activities. Shareholders’ equity increased by $234,388,000 or 92 percent from $255,688,000 as of December 31, 2020 to $490,076,000 as of December 31, 2021, primarily due to both (i) the issuance of 4,519,776 shares of Mid Penn common stock on November 30, 2021, in connection with the acquisition of Riverview, and, (ii) the completion of the May 4, 2021 public offering of 2,990,000 shares of common stock at a price of $25.00 per share, with the aggregate gross proceeds of the offering totaling $74,750,000. The net proceeds of the offering after deducting the underwriting discount and offering expenses were $70,238,000. The additional shares issued as a result of the Riverview acquisition and the public offering significantly impacted the weighted average number of shares outstanding used for both the fourth quarter of 2021 and year-to-date 2021 earnings per share calculations. Regulatory capital ratios for both Mid Penn and its banking subsidiary exceeded regulatory “well-capitalized” levels at both December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020. Mid Penn’s return on average shareholders’ equity (“ROE”), a widely recognized performance indicator in the financial industry, was 8.91% in 2021 and 10.76% in 2020. Return on average assets (“ROA”), another performance indicator, was 0.83% in 2021 and 0.95% in 2020. For the year ended December 31, 2021, Mid Penn’s tax-equivalent net interest margin was 3.30 percent versus 3.48 percent during the year ended December 31, 2020. The overall decrease in net interest margin for the year ended December 31, 2021 was driven by the full-year impact to loan yields as a result of market rate cuts initiated by the Federal Open Market Committee (“FOMC”) in March 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The impact to loan yields was favorably offset by a decrease in the cost of funds, driven by deposit rate decreases in response to the above-mentioned market rate cuts. Additionally, the favorable impacts of the recognition of $21,954,000 of PPP fees within interest income, as well as volume-driven increases in interest income due to higher average balances of loans and federal funds sold, helped to lessen the impact of the lower loan yield on net interest margin. Further discussion of the net interest margin can be found in the Net Interest Income section below. Mid Penn’s allowance for loan and lease losses at December 31, 2021 was $14,597,000 or 0.47 percent of total loans as compared to $13,382,000 or 0.56 percent at December 31, 2020. Mid Penn had net loan charge-offs of $1,730,000 and $333,000 for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Further discussion of these items can be found in the Provision for Loan and Lease Losses section below. Total nonperforming assets were $10,497,000 at December 31, 2021, a decrease compared to nonperforming assets of $15,644,000 at December 31, 2020. Further discussion of the components of nonperforming assets can be found in the Credit Quality, Credit Risk, and Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses section below. The Corporation’s regulatory capital measures of Tier 1 Capital (to risk weighted assets) of $374,368,000 or 8.06 percent, and Total Capital (to risk weighted assets) of $452,527,000 or 14.6 percent, at December 31, 2021, are above the regulatory “well capitalized” requirements. Tier 1 Capital consists primarily of Mid Penn’s shareholders' equity less the value of goodwill and other intangible assets, and excluding the impact of the accumulated other comprehensive income/loss component. Total Capital includes the Tier 1 Capital, as well as Mid Penn’s qualifying subordinated debt and the allowance for loan and lease losses, within permitted regulatory limits. Risk-weighted assets are determined by assigning various levels of risk, in accordance with regulatory risk-weighting definitions, to different categories of assets and off-balance sheet activities. #### 2020 versus 2019 Mid Penn’s net income to common shareholders (earnings) for the year ended December 31, 2020 was $26,209,000 or $3.11 per common share basic and $3.10 per share diluted, compared to earnings of $17,701,000 or $2.09 per common share basic and diluted for the year ended December 31, 2019. The results for the year ended December 31, 2020 included the recognition of $13,137,000 of PPP loan processing fees generated as a result of Mid Penn’s participation in the PPP. These PPP fees are recognized into interest income over the term of the respective loan (most have a 24-month maturity), or sooner if the loans are forgiven by the Small Business Administration or the borrowers otherwise pay down principal prior to a loan’s stated maturity. Total assets of Mid Penn were $2,998,948,000 as of December 31, 2020, reflecting an increase of $767,773,000 or 34 percent compared to total assets of $2,231,175,000 as of December 31, 2019. Included in this increase is the significant volume of $388,313,000 of Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) loans outstanding, net of deferred fees, as of December 31, 2020. Total core banking loans (total loans excluding both the PPP portfolio and mortgage loans held for sale) increased to $1,995,728,000 as of December 31, 2020, representing an annualized core loan growth rate of over 13 percent since the end of 2019. The asset growth was funded primarily by both (i) $562,186,000 of deposit growth, representing an annual deposit growth rate of over 29 percent, including an increase of $226,188,000 in noninterest-bearing deposits for the year ended December 31, 2020; and (ii) a $167,829,000 net increase in borrowings, including $125,617,000 of funding obtained from the Federal Reserve through the Paycheck Protection Program Liquidity Facility (“PPPLF”). Under the PPPLF, the Federal Reserve supplies financing to the Bank at a rate of 35 basis points (0.35%) for a term and amount determined based on the principal amount of PPP loans fully and specifically pledged as collateral in support of the PPPLF borrowings. Draws of PPPLF funds must be repaid to the Federal Reserve immediately after the specific PPP loans collateralizing the related draws are repaid to the Bank. As part of the annual increase in borrowings, long-term debt increased from $32,903,000 at December 31, 2019 to $75,115,000 at December 31, 2020. During the second quarter of 2020, Mid Penn executed a new Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) two-year term lower cost borrowing of $70,000,000 to fund anticipated core loan growth. This increase was partially offset by the prepayment of $27,500,000 of higher-cost long-term FHLB borrowings. Mid Penn recognized $165,000 of FHLB prepayment penalties, which were recorded within other noninterest expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Income. Mid Penn recognized $93,000 of FHLB prepayment penalties during the year ended December 31, 2019 attributable to the prepayment of $20,000,000 of higher-cost FHLB borrowings. Subordinated debt outstanding increased $17,510,000 or 65 percent, from $27,070,000 at December 31, 2019 to $44,580,000 at December 31, 2020. The year-over-year increase reflects the net impact of three subordinated debt transactions: - In March 2020, Mid Penn issued an aggregate of $15,000,000 of Subordinated Notes due March 2030 (the “March 2020 Notes”) to accredited investors. The March 2020 Notes bear interest at a rate of 4 percent per year for the first five years and then float at the Wall Street Journal’s Prime Rate and are intended to be treated as Tier 2 capital for regulatory capital purposes. - In December 2020, Mid Penn issued an aggregate of $12,150,000 of Subordinated Notes due December 2030 (the “December 2020 Notes”) to accredited investors. The December 2020 Notes bear interest at a rate of 4.5 percent per year for the first five years and then float at the Wall Street Journal’s Prime Rate and are intended to be treated as Tier 2 capital for regulatory capital purposes. - Also, during the fourth quarter of 2020, Mid Penn redeemed $9,500,000 in subordinated debt assumed in 2018 in conjunction with Mid Penn’s acquisition of First Priority Bank. The First Priority Bank subordinated debt paid a high fixed rate of interest of 7 percent and was redeemed promptly following the expiration of the noncallable period and after receiving the required regulatory approval for the redemption. Mid Penn recognized prepayment fees of $143,000 related to the early redemption, which are included in other noninterest expenses. Mid Penn’s return on average shareholders’ equity (“ROE”), a widely recognized performance indicator in the financial industry, was 10.76% in 2020 and 7.67% in 2019. Return on average assets (“ROA”), another performance indicator, was 0.95% in 2020 and 0.82% in 2019. Mid Penn’s tax-equivalent net interest margin for the year ended December 31, 2020 was 3.48 percent versus 3.57 percent for the year ended December 31, 2019. The yield on interest-earning assets decreased from 4.83 percent for 2019 to 4.25 percent for 2020. The net interest margin and yields on loans and interest-earning assets reflect the recognition of PPP loan processing fees in total interest income. Though the average balance of interest-earning assets increased year over year, the yields on interest-earning assets declined due to both (i) the significant average balance of PPP loans, which earn interest at a rate of 1 percent while outstanding, and (ii) reductions in market interest rates and the impact on the yields of loans, investments, and overnight funds subsequent to December 2019 as a result of the 1.50 percent of combined Federal Open Market Committee (“FOMC”) rate cuts during March 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The total cost of deposits for the year ended December 31, 2020 favorably decreased to 0.72 percent compared to 1.19 percent for the year ended December 31, 2019 as a result of the aforementioned growth in noninterest-bearing deposits, and from deposit rate decrease adjustments made during the year, including those made in response to the March 2020 FOMC rate cuts. Further discussion of the net interest margin can be found in the Net Interest Income section below. Mid Penn’s allowance for loan and lease losses at December 31, 2020 was $13,382,000 or 0.56% of total loans (less unearned discount), as compared to $9,515,000 or 0.54% at December 31, 2019. Mid Penn had net loan charge-offs of $333,000 and $272,000 for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Further discussion of these items can be found in the Provision for Loan and Lease Losses section below. Total nonperforming assets were $15,644,000 at December 31, 2020, an increase compared to nonperforming assets of $12,157,000 at December 31, 2019. Further discussion of the components of nonperforming assets can be found in the Credit Quality, Credit Risk, and Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses section below. The Corporation’s regulatory capital measures of Tier 1 Capital (to risk weighted assets) of $188,501,000 or 9.6%, and Total Capital (to risk weighted assets) of $246,529,000 or 12.6%, at December 31, 2020, are above the regulatory “well capitalized” requirements. Tier 1 Capital consists primarily of Mid Penn’s shareholders' equity less the value of goodwill and other intangible assets, and excluding the impact of the accumulated other comprehensive income/loss component. Total Capital includes the Tier 1 Capital, as well as Mid Penn’s qualifying subordinated debt and the allowance for loan and lease losses, within permitted regulatory limits. Risk-weighted assets are determined by assigning various levels of risk, in accordance with regulatory risk-weighting definitions, to different categories of assets and off-balance sheet activities. ### TABLE 1: AVERAGE BALANCES, EFFECTIVE INTEREST DIFFERENTIAL AND INTEREST YIELDS *(Dollars in thousands)* | ASSETS: | Income and Rates on a Taxable Equivalent Basis for Years Ended December 31, 2021 Average Balance | Interest | | Average Rates | December 31, 2020 Average Balance | Interest | | Average Rates | December 31, 2019 Average Balance | Interest | | Average Rates | | --- | ---: | ---: | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | --- | ---: | | Interest Bearing Balances | $15,916 | $13 | | 0.08% | $3,593 | $39 | | 1.09% | $5,236 | $100 | | 1.91% | | Investment Securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Taxable | 124,692 | 2,257 | | 1.81% | 112,636 | 2,524 | | 2.24% | 149,187 | 3,442 | | 2.31% | | Tax-Exempt | 57,361 | 1,420 | (a) | 2.48% | 49,410 | 1,276 | (a) | 2.58% | 89,011 | 2,590 | (a) | 2.91% | | Total Securities | 182,053 | 3,677 | | 2.02% | 162,046 | 3,800 | | 2.35% | 238,198 | 6,032 | | 2.53% | | Federal Funds Sold | 567,647 | 809 | | 0.14% | 135,243 | 497 | | 0.37% | 63,436 | 1,222 | | 1.93% | | Loans and Leases, Net | 2,539,074 | 119,082 | (b) | 4.69% | 2,247,002 | 103,871 | (b) | 4.62% | 1,678,000 | 88,398 | (b) | 5.27% | | Restricted Investment in Bank Stocks | 7,351 | 345 | | 4.69% | 6,554 | 360 | | 5.49% | 5,964 | 424 | | 7.11% | | Total Earning Assets | 3,312,041 | 123,926 | | 3.74% | 2,554,438 | 108,567 | | 4.25% | 1,990,834 | 96,176 | | 4.83% | | Cash and Due from Banks | 38,518 | | | | 33,485 | | | | 30,134 | | | | | Other Assets | 169,946 | | | | 170,506 | | | | 145,996 | | | | | Total Assets | $3,520,504 | | | | $2,758,429 | | | | $2,166,964 | | | | | LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Interest-bearing Demand | $688,595 | $2,330 | | 0.34% | $538,385 | $3,423 | | 0.64% | $415,359 | $4,331 | | 1.04% | | Money Market | 842,107 | 3,157 | | 0.37% | 605,552 | 4,072 | | 0.67% | 443,248 | 7,355 | | 1.66% | | Savings | 218,546 | 237 | | 0.11% | 186,132 | 346 | | 0.19% | 187,927 | 641 | | 0.34% | | Time | 451,277 | 5,603 | | 1.24% | 443,607 | 8,558 | | 1.93% | 471,241 | 9,223 | | 1.96% | | Total Interest-bearing Deposits | 2,200,525 | 11,327 | | 0.51% | 1,773,676 | 16,399 | | 0.92% | 1,517,775 | 21,550 | | 1.42% | | Federal Funds Purchased | — | — | | 0.00% | — | — | | 0.00% | 3,739 | 111 | | 2.97% | | Short-term Borrowings | 153,850 | 539 | | 0.35% | 106,233 | 371 | | 0.35% | 12,818 | 359 | | 2.80% | | Long-term Debt | 75,483 | 831 | | 1.10% | 66,609 | 999 | | 1.50% | 54,634 | 1,580 | | 2.89% | | Subordinated Debt | 47,116 | 2,057 | | 4.37% | 38,740 | 1,958 | | 5.05% | 27,073 | 1,564 | | 5.78% | | Total Interest-bearing Liabilities | 2,476,974 | 14,754 | | 0.60% | 1,985,258 | 19,727 | | 0.99% | 1,616,039 | 25,164 | | 1.56% | | Noninterest-bearing Demand | 684,022 | | | | 505,094 | | | | 296,872 | | | | | Other Liabilities | 30,433 | | | | 24,435 | | | | 23,325 | | | | | Shareholders' Equity | 329,075 | | | | 243,642 | | | | 230,728 | | | | | Total Liabilities & Shareholders' Equity | $3,520,504 | | | | $2,758,429 | | | | $2,166,964 | | | | | Net Interest Income (taxable equivalent basis) | | $109,172 | | | | $88,840 | | | | $71,012 | | | | Taxable Equivalent Adjustment | | (604) | | | | (632) | | | | (864) | | | | Net Interest Income | | $108,568 | | | | $88,208 | | | | $70,148 | | | | Total Yield on Earning Assets | | | | 3.74% | | | | 4.25% | | | | 4.83% | | Rate on Supporting Liabilities | | | | 0.60% | | | | 0.99% | | | | 1.56% | | Average Interest Spread | | | | 3.15% | | | | 3.26% | | | | 3.27% | | Net Interest Margin | | | | 3.30% | | | | 3.48% | | | | 3.57% | (a) Includes tax equivalent adjustments (calculated using statutory rates of 21 percent) of $298,000, $268,000, and $544,000 for the years 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively, resulting from tax-free municipal securities in the investment portfolio. (b) Includes tax equivalent adjustments (calculated using statutory rates of 21 percent) of $306,000, $364,000, and $320,000 for the years 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively, resulting from tax-free municipal loans in the commercial loan portfolio. #### Net Interest Income Net interest income, Mid Penn's primary source of earnings, represents the difference between interest income received on loans, investments, and overnight funds, and interest expense paid on deposits and short- and long-term borrowings. Net interest income is affected by changes in interest rates and changes in average balances (volume) in the various interest-sensitive assets and liabilities. Interest and average rates in Table 1 above are presented on a fully taxable-equivalent basis. Tax-equivalent adjustments were calculated using a statutory corporate tax rate of 21 percent for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019. For purposes of calculating loan yields, average loan balances include nonaccrual loans. Loan fees of $25,474,000, $15,795,000 and $2,153,000 are included with loan interest income in Table 1 above for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, Mid Penn recognized $21,954,000 and $13,137,000 of PPP fees, respectively, which are included in loan fees. Similar fees were not recognized during the year ended December 31, 2019. ### TABLE 2: VOLUME ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN NET INTEREST INCOME *(Dollars in thousands on a Taxable Equivalent Basis)* | INTEREST INCOME: | 2021 Compared to 2020 Increase (Decrease) Due to Change In: Volume | Rate | Net | 2020 Compared to 2019 Increase (Decrease) Due to Change In: Volume | Rate | Net | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Interest Bearing Balances | $134 | $(160) | $(26) | $(31) | $(30) | $(61) | | Investment Securities: | | | | | | | | Taxable | 270 | (537) | (267) | (843) | (75) | (918) | | Tax-Exempt | 205 | (61) | 144 | (1,152) | (162) | (1,314) | | Total Securities | 475 | (598) | (123) | (1,995) | (237) | (2,232) | | Federal Funds Sold | 1,589 | (1,277) | 312 | 1,383 | (2,108) | (725) | | Loans and Leases, Net | 13,501 | 1,710 | 15,211 | 29,975 | (14,502) | 15,473 | | Restricted Investment Bank Stocks | 44 | (59) | (15) | 42 | (106) | (64) | | Total Interest Income | 15,743 | (384) | 15,359 | 29,374 | (16,983) | 12,391 | | INTEREST EXPENSE: | | | | | | | | Interest Bearing Deposits: | | | | | | | | Interest Bearing Demand | 955 | (2,048) | (1,093) | 1,283 | (2,191) | (908) | | Money Market | 1,591 | (2,506) | (915) | 2,693 | (5,976) | (3,283) | | Savings | 60 | (169) | (109) | (6) | (289) | (295) | | Time | 148 | (3,103) | (2,955) | (541) | (124) | (665) | | Total Interest Bearing Deposits | 2,754 | (7,826) | (5,072) | 3,429 | (8,580) | (5,151) | | Federal Funds Purchased | — | — | — | — | — | — | | Short-term Borrowings | 166 | 2 | 168 | 2,546 | (2,645) | (99) | | Long-term Debt | 133 | (301) | (168) | 346 | (927) | (581) | | Subordinated Debt | 423 | (324) | 99 | 674 | (280) | 394 | | Total Interest Expense | 3,476 | (8,449) | (4,973) | 6,995 | (12,432) | (5,437) | | NET INTEREST INCOME | $12,267 | $8,065 | $20,332 | $22,379 | $(4,551) | $17,828 | The effect of changing volume and rate, which cannot be segregated, has been allocated entirely to the rate column. Tax-exempt income is shown on a tax equivalent basis using a statutory corporate tax rate of 21 percent for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019. For the year ended December 31, 2021, Mid Penn’s tax-equivalent net interest margin was 3.30 percent versus 3.48 percent for the year ended December 31, 2020 and 3.57 percent for the year ended December 31, 2019. During 2021, taxable equivalent net interest income increased $20,332,000 or 23 percent compared to 2020. During 2020, taxable equivalent net interest income increased $17,828,000 or 25 percent compared to 2019. The primary sources of the increased taxable equivalent net interest income for the 2021 year included (i) $6,452,000 of interest income from core loan growth, (ii) reduced interest expense due to a lower cost of deposits, and (iii) the recognition of $21,954,000 of PPP loan processing fees generated as a result of Mid Penn’s participation in the PPP. These PPP fees are recognized into interest income over the term of the respective loan (most have a 24-month maturity), or sooner if the loans are forgiven by the Small Business Administration or the borrowers otherwise pay down principal prior to a loan’s stated maturity. The yield on interest-earning assets decreased to 3.74% in 2021, from 4.25% in 2020 and 4.83% in 2019. Though the average balance of interest-earning assets increased year over year, the yields on interest-earning assets declined due to both (i) the significant average balance of PPP loans, which earn interest at a rate of 1 percent while outstanding, and (ii) the full-year impact to loan yields as a result of market rate cuts initiated by the Federal Open Market Committee (“FOMC”) in March 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Interest expense for 2021 decreased by $4,973,000 or 25 percent when compared to 2020. Interest expense for 2020 decreased by $5,437,000 or 22 percent when compared to 2019. The cost of interest-bearing liabilities decreased to 0.60 percent in 2021 from 0.99 percent in 2020 and 1.56 percent in 2019. The decrease in the cost of interest-bearing liabilities in 2021 was primarily due to the deposit rate decreases made during the year, including the full-year impact of the lower deposit rates executed in response to the March 2020 FOMC rate cuts. Further changes to the future mix of the loan, investment, and deposit products in the Bank's portfolios, and the volume of variable rate and fixed rate instruments based upon new loan originations and investment purchases, may significantly change the net interest margin and the yields on earning-assets and the costs of interest-bearing liabilities. In addition, net interest income may be impacted by further interest rate actions of the Federal Reserve or other movements in market rates and the yield curve. Management continues to monitor the net interest margin closely. #### Provision for Loan and Lease Losses The provision for loan and lease losses is the expense necessary to maintain the allowance for loan and lease losses at a level adequate to absorb management’s estimate of probable losses inherent in the loan and lease portfolio. Mid Penn’s provision for loan and lease losses is based upon management’s monthly reviews of the loan portfolio throughout each year. The purpose of the monthly reviews is to assess loan quality, identify impaired loans and leases, analyze delinquencies, ascertain loan and lease growth, evaluate actual and potential charge-offs and recoveries, assess general economic conditions in the markets we serve, and determine appropriate loan loss provisions to maintain an adequate allowance. Mid Penn has maintained the allowance for loan and lease losses in accordance with Mid Penn’s portfolio credit risk and potential loss assessment process, which took into consideration the risk characteristics of the loan and lease portfolio, shifting collateral values, and the assessment of other relevant qualitative factors from December 31, 2020 to December 31, 2021. For the year ended December 31, 2021, the provision for loan and lease losses was $2,945,000, a decrease of 30 percent compared to a provision for loan losses of $4,200,000 for the year ended December 31, 2020. The allowance for loan losses and the related provision reflect Mid Penn’s continued application of the incurred loss method for estimating credit losses as Mid Penn is not yet required to adopt the current expected credit loss (“CECL”) accounting standard, which must be adopted on January 1, 2023. The allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total loans was 0.47 percent at December 31, 2021 compared to 0.56 percent at December 31, 2020 and 0.54 percent at December 31, 2019. The ratios as of December 31, 2021, were affected by the addition of the Riverview acquired loans, which, in accordance with purchase accounting principles, were recorded at fair value at the time of acquisition with no related allowance for loan losses. For the years ended December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, Mid Penn had net charge-offs of $1,729,000 and $333,000, respectively, compared to net recoveries of $272,000 during the same period of 2019. Loans charged off during 2021 were comprised of four commercial real estate, construction, and land development loans totaling $1,066,000, five commercial and industrial loans for $866,000, three mortgage loan for $13,000, four consumer loans to unrelated borrowers totaling $8,000, and $34,000 of overdrawn deposit account charge-offs. Mid Penn may need to make future adjustments to the allowance and the provision for loan and lease losses if economic conditions or loan credit quality or other relevant qualitative factors differ substantially from the assumptions used in making Mid Penn’s evaluation of the level of the allowance for loan losses as compared to the balance of outstanding loans. A summary of charge-offs and recoveries of loans and leases, as well as net charge-offs by loan category, are presented in Table 3. ### TABLE 3: ANALYSIS OF THE ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES *(Dollars in thousands)* | | Years ended December 31, 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Balance, beginning of year | $13,382 | $9,515 | $8,397 | $7,606 | $7,183 | | Loans and leases charged off: | | | | | | | Commercial and industrial | 866 | 45 | 217 | 142 | 25 | | Commercial real estate | 1,044 | 258 | 60 | 64 | 322 | | Commercial real estate - construction | 23 | 7 | 40 | 40 | — | | Residential mortgage | 13 | 4 | 29 | 60 | 102 | | Home equity | — | 58 | 18 | 185 | 20 | | Consumer | 42 | — | 64 | 37 | 28 | | Total loans and leases charged off | 1,988 | 372 | 428 | 528 | 497 | | Recoveries on loans and leases previously charged off: | | | | | | | Commercial and industrial | 13 | 3 | 45 | 1 | 26 | | Commercial real estate | 207 | 1 | 82 | 808 | 553 | | Commercial real estate - construction | 8 | 2 | — | — | — | | Residential mortgage | 11 | 3 | 9 | — | 4 | | Home equity | — | 3 | 5 | 1 | 5 | | Consumer | 19 | 27 | 15 | 9 | 7 | | Total loans and leases recovered | 258 | 39 | 156 | 819 | 595 | | Net charge-offs (recoveries) | 1,730 | 333 | 272 | (291) | (98) | | Provision for loan and lease losses | 2,945 | 4,200 | 1,390 | 500 | 325 | | Balance, end of year | $14,597 | $13,382 | $9,515 | $8,397 | $7,606 | ### RATIO OF NET CHARGE-OFFS AND RECOVERIES BY LOAN CATEGORY | | Years ended December 31, 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Commercial and industrial | 0.12% | 0.01% | 0.05% | 0.06% | 0.00% | | Commercial real estate | 0.07% | 0.03% | 0.00% | -0.11% | -0.05% | | Commercial real estate - construction | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.04% | 0.00% | | Residential mortgage | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.03% | 0.10% | | Home equity | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.02% | 0.33% | 0.04% | | Consumer | 0.26% | -0.36% | 0.54% | 0.39% | 0.61% | | Total ratio of net charge-offs (recoveries) during the year to total average loans outstanding, net of unearned discounts | 0.07% | 0.01% | 0.02% | -0.02% | -0.01% | 37 ### TABLE 4: NONINTEREST INCOME *(Dollars in thousands)* | | Years ended December 31, 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Income from fiduciary activities | $2,494 | $1,694 | $1,416 | | Service charges on deposits | 991 | 637 | 884 | | Net gain on sales of investment securities | 79 | 467 | 1,878 | | Earnings from cash surrender value of life insurance | 358 | 301 | 314 | | Mortgage banking income | 10,314 | 9,682 | 3,771 | | ATM debit card interchange income | 2,688 | 1,960 | 1,594 | | Merchant services income | 431 | 392 | 413 | | Net gain on sales of SBA loans | 969 | 442 | 831 | | Other income | 3,209 | 2,333 | 1,520 | | Total Noninterest Income | $21,533 | $17,908 | $12,621 | #### Noninterest Income #### 2021 versus 2020 For the year ended December 31, 2021, noninterest income totaled $21,533,000, an increase of $3,625,000 or 20 percent, compared to noninterest income of $17,908,000 for the year ended December 31, 2020. Mortgage banking income was $10,314,000 for the year ended December 31, 2021, an increase of $632,000 or 6 percent, compared to the year ended December 31, 2020. Mortgage interest rates declined as a result of market responses to the pandemic, and remained low in the twelve months since December 31, 2020, resulting in significantly increased mortgage loan originations and secondary-market loan sales and gains. Income from fiduciary and wealth management activities was $2,494,000 for the year ended December 31, 2021, an increase of $800,000 or 47 percent, compared to fiduciary income of $1,694,000 for the same period in 2020. These additional revenues were attributed to favorable growth in trust assets under management and increased sales of retail investment products. ATM debit card interchange income was $2,688,000 for the year ended December 31, 2021, an increase of $728,000 or 37 percent compared to interchange income of $1,960,000 for 2020. The increase resulted from increasing card-based transaction usage across our expanding checking account customer base. Service charges on deposits were $991,000 during the year ended December 31, 2021, reflecting an increase of $354,000 or 56 percent when compared to 2020, with this increase being driven primarily by an increase in non-sufficient funds fees and account analysis fees related to the growth in our cash management customer base. Net gains on sales of SBA loans were $969,000 for the year ended December 31, 2021, an increase of $527,000 or 119 percent compared to net gains on sales of SBA loans of $442,000 during 2020. During the first half of 2020, much of the focus of the SBA lending function was on the PPP loan program, resulting in a lower volume of traditional SBA loans being originated in 2020, while the volume of traditional SBA loan originations and sales have generally returned to pre-pandemic levels during the second half of the year ended December 31, 2021. Other income was $3,209,000 for the year ended December 31, 2021, an increase of $876,000 compared to other income of $2,333,000 for the year ended December 31, 2020. The increase in other income was primarily driven by higher volumes of fee-based income, including loan-level swap fees, wire transfer fees, letter of credit fees, and credit card program referrals and royalties. Net gains on sales of investment securities were $79,000 for the year ended December 31, 2021, a decrease of $388,000 compared to net gains on sales of securities of $467,000 for the year ended December 31, 2020. Sale volume and gains vary from period to period based upon market conditions, as well as investment portfolio and interest rate risk management activities. #### 2020 versus 2019 For the year ended December 31, 2020, noninterest income totaled $17,908,000, an increase of $5,287,000 or 42 percent, compared to noninterest income of $12,621,000 for the year ended December 31, 2019. Mortgage banking income was $9,682,000 for the year ended December 31, 2020, an increase of $5,911,000 or more than double the mortgage banking income of $3,771,000 recorded during 2019. As mortgage interest rates declined and remained low for most of 2020, Mid Penn significantly increased residential mortgage originations (both purchase and refinance activity) and secondary-market loan sales and gains during 2020. ATM debit card interchange income was $1,960,000 for the year ended December 31, 2020, an increase of $366,000 or 23 percent compared to interchange income of $1,594,000 for 2019. The increase resulted from increasing card-based transaction usage across our expanding checking account customer base. Income from fiduciary and wealth management activities was $1,694,000 for the year ended December 31, 2020, an increase of $278,000 or 20 percent, compared to fiduciary income of $1,416,000 for 2019. The increased revenues in 2020 were attributed to growth in trust assets under management and increased sales of retail investment products. Net gains on sales of investment securities were $467,000 for the year ended December 31, 2020, a decrease of $1,411,000 compared to net gains on sales of securities of $1,878,000 for the year ended December 31, 2019. During the fourth quarter of 2019, Mid Penn adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2019-04, *Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses, Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and Topic 825, Financial Instruments* and, as part of the adoption, Mid Penn reclassified several held-to-maturity debt securities with an aggregate amortized cost of $67,100,000 to the available-for-sale category. Through implementation of planned organic hedging activities as part of Mid Penn’s interest rate risk management, all the reclassified securities were subsequently sold, and Mid Penn realized a pre-tax gain on the sales of $1,779,000 in 2019. Investment sales and gains during the twelve months ended December 31, 2020 reflect the continued implementation of asset/liability management strategies, which included effectively using some of these gains to offset $165,000 of debt prepayment penalties, recorded within other noninterest expenses, associated with the early redemption of higher-cost FHLB advances. Service charges on deposits were $637,000 during the year ended December 31, 2020, reflecting a decrease of $247,000 or 28 percent when compared to 2019. The decrease is primarily due to less overdraft activity and decreased nonsufficient funds fees charged to deposit customers. Net gains on sales of SBA loans were $442,000 for the year ended December 31, 2020, a decrease of $389,000 or 47 percent compared to net gains on sales of SBA loans of $831,000 during 2019. Much of the decrease is due to the temporary shift of the resources in our SBA lending function to focus on the SBA-administered PPP loan processing, funding, and forgiveness during 2020. Other income was $2,333,000 for the year ended December 31, 2020, an increase of $813,000 compared to other income of $1,520,000 for the year ended December 31, 2019. The increase in other income was primarily driven by higher volumes of fee-based income, including loan-level swap fees, wire transfer fees, letter of credit fees, and credit card program referrals and royalties. ### TABLE 5: NONINTEREST EXPENSE *(Dollars in thousands)* | | Years ended December 31, 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Salaries and employee benefits | $41,711 | $37,758 | $32,360 | | Occupancy expense, net | 5,527 | 5,505 | 5,352 | | Equipment expense | 3,101 | 2,910 | 2,647 | | Software licensing and utilization | 6,332 | 5,286 | 4,394 | | FDIC Assessment | 1,888 | 1,680 | 839 | | Legal and professional fees | 1,979 | 1,665 | 1,679 | | Charitable contributions qualifying for State tax credits | 1,432 | 1,342 | 755 | | Mortgage banking profit-sharing expense | 2,571 | 2,004 | — | | (Gain) loss on sale/write-down of foreclosed assets | (25) | 333 | (15) | | Intangible amortization | 1,180 | 1,398 | 1,430 | | Merger and acquisition expense | 3,067 | — | — | | Post-acquisition restructuring expenses | 9,880 | — | — | | Director fees and benefits expense | 1,286 | 1,109 | 1,005 | | ATM debit card processing expense | 1,053 | 819 | 685 | | Meals, travel, and lodging expense | 968 | 644 | 1,036 | | Pennsylvania Bank Shares tax expense | 800 | 583 | 777 | | Marketing and advertising expense | 705 | 542 | 906 | | Telephone expense | 565 | 539 | 609 | | Insurance | 477 | 368 | 353 | | Corporate donations and sponsorships | 357 | 207 | 401 | | Investor services | 227 | 200 | 153 | | Loan collection costs | 262 | 197 | 487 | | OREO expense | 34 | 150 | 91 | | Other expenses | 5,728 | 5,338 | 4,009 | | Total Noninterest Expense | $91,105 | $70,577 | $59,953 | #### Noninterest Expense #### 2021 versus 2020 For the year ended December 31, 2021, noninterest expense totaled $91,105,000, an increase of $20,528,000 or 29 percent, compared to noninterest expense of $70,577,000 for the year ended December 31, 2020. Noninterest expenses incurred as a result of franchise expansion through the Riverview acquisition were the primary sources of the significant increase, with additional non-recurring post acquisition restructuring expenses being incurred in connection with the public announcement on December 7, 2021 of the planned closure and reclassification of certain Mid Penn locations to estimated fair value within assets held for sale, which are discussed in more detail below. During the year ended December 31, 2021, merger and acquisition expenses were $3,067,000 and included investment banking fees, merger-related legal expenses, and other professional fees for advisory, valuation, and consulting services associated with the acquisition of Riverview. Similar expenses were not recognized in 2020. Additionally, during the fourth quarter of 2021, Mid Penn recognized certain post-acquisition restructuring costs totaling $9,880,000. This total is comprised of (i) $7,588,000 of termination fees and severance costs, and (ii) $2,292,000 related to the December 7, 2021 announcement of a Retail Network Optimization Plan under which the Bank announced its intention to close sixteen of its retail locations throughout its expanded footprint. The branch closures occurred on or about March 4, 2022. As a result of this announcement, and in accordance with GAAP, Mid Penn has reclassified the assets associated with these retail locations to held for sale totaling $3,907,000 as of December 31, 2021. Mid Penn also recognized other period costs related to the merger of $310,000. Salaries and employee benefits were $41,711,000 for the year ended December 31, 2021, an increase of $3,953,000 or 10 percent, versus 2020, with the increase primarily attributable to (i) increased mortgage commissions expense commensurate with the significant increases in mortgage loan originations and secondary market sales gains from the mortgage banking group; (ii) increased bonus expense in recognition of our employees and the successes of Mid Penn during the twelve months ended December 31, 2021; (iii) increased medical expenses year-over-year; and (iv) the one-month impact of the salaries and benefits of employees added through the Riverview merger on November 30, 2021. Software licensing and utilization costs were $6,332,000 for the year ended December 31, 2021, an increase of $1,046,000 or 20 percent compared to $5,286,000 for the year ended December 31, 2020. This increase reflects the additional costs from both transaction volume-based charges, and licensing fees related to the addition of new staff and locations added since December 31, 2020. Mid Penn continues to invest in upgrades to internal systems, networks, storage capabilities, cybersecurity management, and data security mechanisms to enhance data management and security capabilities responsive to both the larger company profile and the increasing complexity of information technology management. FDIC assessment expense was $1,888,000 for the year ended December 31, 2021, an increase of $208,000 or 12 percent compared to $1,680,000 of FDIC assessment expense recognized during the year ended December 31, 2020. The total base assessment expense increased for 2021 when compared to 2020, primarily due to the significant year-over-year increase in total average assets of the Bank on which the assessment is based. Legal and professional fees were $1,979,000 for the year ended December 31, 2021, an increase of $314,000 or 19 percent compared to $1,665,000 of legal and professional fees recognized during the year ended December 31, 2020, with this increase being attributable to consulting expenses related to strengthening and enhancing Mid Penn’s commercial online banking facility, as well as other information technology and cybersecurity management activities. Mortgage banking profit-sharing expense totaled $2,571,000, an increase of $567,000 or 28 percent compared to $2,004,000 for year ended December 31, 2020, and related to payments accrued for or made to third-party principals commensurate with the earnings success within the Southeastern Pennsylvania mortgage banking group at Mid Penn. The gain on the sale of foreclosed assets was $25,000 during the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to a loss on the sale or write-down of foreclosed assets of $333,000 during the year ended December 31, 2020. The 2020 expense is attributable to write-downs taken on two related foreclosed assets totaling $358,000 during the year ended December 31, 2020. These write-downs were partially offset by $25,000 of collective gains on the sale of certain smaller foreclosed real estate properties during 2020. #### 2020 versus 2019 For the year ended December 31, 2020, noninterest expense totaled $70,577,000, an increase of $10,624,000 or 18 percent, compared to noninterest expense of $59,953,000 for the year ended December 31, 2019. Salaries and employee benefits were $37,758,000 for the year ended December 31, 2020, an increase of $5,398,000 or 17 percent, versus 2019, with the increase primarily attributable to (i) increased commissions expense, commensurate with the mortgage loan origination and sales success of the mortgage banking group; (ii) increased compensation expense for the substantial time and effort devoted to the PPP loan initiative by many of our business development officers and staff members during 2020; and (iii) the addition of private banking and insurance business development professionals in our new nonbank subsidiaries. Software licensing and utilization costs were $5,286,000 for the year ended December 31, 2020, an increase of $892,000 or 20 percent compared to $4,394,000 for the year ended December 31, 2019. This increase reflects the additional costs from both transaction volume-based charges, and licensing fees related to the addition of new staff and locations added since December 31, 2019, as well as costs associated with ensuring secure connectivity for an increased volume of employees working remotely in response to the COVID-19 pandemic restrictions. Additionally, Mid Penn continued to invest in upgrades to internal systems, networks, storage capabilities, cybersecurity management, and data security mechanisms to enhance data management and security capabilities responsive to both the larger company profile and increasing complexity of information technology management. FDIC assessment expense was $1,680,000 for the year ended December 31, 2020, an increase of $841,000 or more than double the $839,000 of FDIC assessment expense recognized during the year ended December 31, 2019. The lower assessment expense for the year ended December 31, 2019 reflected the receipt of $492,000 of FDIC small bank assessment credits in 2019. Similar credits were not received in 2020. Additionally, the total base assessment expense increased for 2020 when compared to 2019, primarily due to the significant year-over-year increase in total average assets of the Bank on which the assessment is based. Community and charitable contributions qualifying for State tax credits totaled $1,342,000 for the year ended December 31, 2020, an increase of $587,000 compared to similar program contributions of $755,000 for the year ended December 31, 2019. Mid Penn was approved by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to contribute an increased tax-credit-qualifying amount to participants within Pennsylvania’s Department of Community and Economic Development (“DCED”) Educational Improvement Tax Credit Program (“EITC”), and to moderate-to-low income housing projects in the DCED’s Neighborhood Assistance Program (“NAP”) during the year ended December 31, 2020. These EITC and NAP contributions in 2020 generated tax credits totaling $1,132,000 to be applied to Mid Penn’s Pennsylvania bank shares tax liability. These contributions and programs are also key elements of Mid Penn’s Community Reinvestment Act compliance activities. Pennsylvania bank shares tax expense was $583,000 for the year ended December 31, 2020, a decrease of $194,000 or 25 percent compared to $777,000 for the year ended December 31, 2019. The decrease in shares tax expense generally reflects the aforementioned larger dollar volume of EITC and NAP donations made, which qualified for PA shares tax credits. Mortgage banking profit-sharing expense totaled $2,004,000 for payments accrued for or made to third-party principals commensurate with the record-level of earnings success within the Southeastern Pennsylvania mortgage banking group at Mid Penn for the year ended December 31, 2020. Similar expenses were not recognized during the year ended December 31, 2019 as the group did not generate sufficient earnings in 2019 to qualify for profit-sharing to the third-party principals. Marketing and advertising expense was $542,000 for the year ended December 31, 2020, a decrease of $364,000 or 40 percent compared to $906,000 during the same period in 2019. The year of 2019 reflected additional advertising expense and promotional items expense to increase regional recognition and knowledge of Mid Penn’s First Priority Bank division and expanded mortgage origination operations in Southeastern Pennsylvania. Similar expenses were not recognized in 2020. Additionally, as a result of the pandemic, in-person promotional events were significantly reduced in 2020, resulting in less advertising and promotional items expense. The loss on the sale or write-down of foreclosed assets was $333,000 during the year ended December 31, 2020 as compared to a gain on the sale of foreclosed assets of $15,000 during the year ended December 31, 2019. The 2020 expense is attributable to write-downs taken on two related foreclosed assets totaling $358,000 during the year ended December 31, 2020. These write-downs were partially offset by $25,000 of collective gains on the sale of certain smaller foreclosed real estate properties during 2020. #### Investments Mid Penn’s investment portfolio is utilized primarily to support overall liquidity and interest rate risk management, to provide collateral supporting pledging requirements for public funds on deposit, and to generate additional interest income within reasonable risk parameters. Mid Penn’s investment portfolio includes both held-to-maturity securities and available-for-sale securities. Mid Penn’s portfolio of held-to-maturity securities, recorded at amortized cost, increased $200,965,000 to $329,257,000 as of December 31, 2021, as compared to $128,292,000 as of December 31, 2020. Mid Penn’s total available-for-sale securities portfolio increased $57,114,000 from $5,748,000 at December 31, 2020 to $62,862,000 at December 31, 2021. Mid Penn initiated a significant volume of purchases during the second half of 2021 in anticipation of pledging requirements as a result of the Riverview merger, as well as for both strategic portfolio and asset liability management objectives. The debt securities in Mid Penn’s available-for-sale portfolio are recorded at fair value, which is generally based upon a market price relative to other debt investments of the same type with similar maturity dates. As the interest rate environment and overall market yield curve changes, the fair value of securities changes accordingly. The fair values of securities can also be impacted by changing market supply and demand for certain types of securities. At December 31, 2021, the unrealized loss on available-for-sale investment securities resulted in a decrease in shareholders’ equity of $254,000 (comprised of a gross unrealized loss on securities of $322,000 net of a deferred income tax benefit of $68,000). At December 31, 2020, the unrealized loss on available-for-sale investment securities resulted in a decrease in shareholders’ equity of $2,000 (comprised of a gross unrealized loss on securities of $3,000 net of a deferred income tax benefit of $1,000). Mid Penn does not have any significant concentrations of non-governmental securities within its investment portfolio. Table 6 provides a summary of our investment securities, and maturity and yield information relating to debt securities is shown in Table 7. The weighted average yield of the investment securities are calculated on a fully taxable-equivalent basis using a statutory corporate tax rate of 21 percent for the year ended December 31, 2021. ### TABLE 6: INVESTMENT MATURITY AND YIELD *(Dollars in thousands)* | As of December 31, 2021 Available for sale securities, at fair value: | One Year and Less | After One Year thru Five Years | After Five Years thru Ten Years | After Ten Years | Total | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Mortgage-backed U.S. government agencies | $— | $— | $— | $49,480 | $49,480 | | State and political subdivision obligations | — | — | 302 | 3,612 | 3,914 | | Corporate debt securities | 250 | 2,967 | 6,251 | — | 9,468 | | | $250 | $2,967 | $6,553 | $53,092 | $62,862 | | Held to maturity securities, at amortized cost: | | | | | | | U.S. Treasury and U.S. government agencies | $3,003 | $18,425 | $143,178 | $12,392 | $176,998 | | Mortgage-backed U.S. government agencies | — | 2,377 | 14,245 | 44,703 | 61,325 | | State and political subdivision obligations | 962 | 31,124 | 36,583 | 9,567 | 78,236 | | Corporate debt securities | — | 5,142 | 8,926 | — | 14,068 | | | $3,965 | $57,068 | $202,932 | $66,662 | $330,627 | | Weighted Average Yields Available for sale securities: | One Year and Less | After One Year thru Five Years | After Five Years thru Ten Years | After Ten Years | Total | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Mortgage-backed U.S. government agencies | — | — | — | 2.04% | 2.04% | | State and political subdivision obligations | — | — | 2.07% | 2.48% | 2.45% | | Corporate debt securities | 1.50% | 2.25% | 3.90% | — | 3.32% | | | 1.50% | 2.25% | 3.82% | 2.07% | 2.26% | | Held to maturity securities: | | | | | | | U.S. Treasury and U.S. government agencies | 1.50% | 1.34% | 1.71% | 2.04% | 1.69% | | Mortgage-backed U.S. government agencies | — | 3.03% | 2.84% | 1.95% | 2.20% | | State and political subdivision obligations | 2.89% | 2.49% | 2.27% | 2.36% | 2.38% | | Corporate debt securities | — | 2.42% | 3.25% | — | 2.95% | | | 1.14% | 2.13% | 1.96% | 2.03% | 1.99% | #### Loans Total loans as of December 31, 2021 were $3,104,396,000 compared to $2,384,041,000 as of December 31, 2020, an increase of $720,355,000 since year-end 2020. This significant increase was driven by the Riverview acquisition. As of December 31, 2021, the outstanding balance of Riverview acquired loans was $811,038,000, net of purchase accounting adjustments. Total loans were also significantly impacted by both (i) organic loan growth within Mid Penn’s legacy markets of $191,245,000 equating to 9 percent organic growth since December 31, 2020, less (ii) net forgiveness of PPP loans originated by Mid Penn of $281,928,000. Organic loan growth occurred primarily within Mid Penn’s commercial real estate and commercial and industrial financing loan portfolios. At December 31, 2021, loans (net of unearned income) represented 71 percent of earning assets, compared to 85 percent and 86 percent at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The majority of the Bank's loan portfolio is to businesses and individuals located within the Bank's primary market area of the Pennsylvania counties of Berks, Blair, Bucks, Centre, Chester, Clearfield, Cumberland, Dauphin, Fayette, Huntingdon, Lancaster, Lehigh, Luzerne, Lycoming, Montgomery, Northumberland, Perry, Schuylkill and Westmoreland. Commercial real estate, construction, and land development loans are collateralized mainly by mortgages on the income-producing real estate or land involved. Commercial, industrial, and agricultural loans are primarily made to business entities and may be secured by business assets, including commercial real estate, or may be unsecured. Residential real estate loans are secured by liens on the residential property. Consumer loans include installment loans, lines of credit and home equity loans. The Bank has no significant concentration of credit to any one borrower. The Bank’s highest concentration of credit by loan type is in commercial real estate financings. Maturity distribution by contractual maturity date and rate sensitivity information related to the loan portfolio is reflected in Table 7. ### TABLE 7: LOAN MATURITY AND INTEREST SENSITIVITY *(Dollars in thousands)* | As of December 31, 2021 | One Year and Less | One to Five Years | Five to Fifteen Years | Over Fifteen Years | Total | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Commercial and industrial | $43,172 | $240,944 | $152,900 | $182,546 | $619,562 | | Commercial real estate | 54,947 | 231,206 | 684,269 | 697,720 | 1,668,142 | | Commercial real estate, construction | 86,769 | 146,429 | 86,079 | 53,457 | 372,734 | | Residential mortgage | 12,064 | 20,528 | 116,302 | 174,329 | 323,223 | | Home equity | 4,809 | 15,675 | 33,351 | 56,471 | 110,306 | | Consumer | 1,011 | 3,041 | 1,176 | 5,201 | 10,429 | | | $202,772 | $657,823 | $1,074,077 | $1,169,724 | $3,104,396 | | Rate Sensitivity Predetermined rate | | | | | | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Commercial and industrial | $38,313 | $204,275 | $34,217 | $10,367 | $287,172 | | Commercial real estate | 32,121 | 171,547 | 78,699 | 18,849 | 301,216 | | Commercial real estate, construction | 38,121 | 72,977 | 21,153 | 3,181 | 135,432 | | Residential mortgage | 10,251 | 17,658 | 66,478 | 74,075 | 168,462 | | Home equity | 873 | 6,546 | 17,832 | 5,385 | 30,636 | | Consumer | 446 | 2,851 | 1,148 | 349 | 4,794 | | Floating or adjustable rate | | | | | | | Commercial and industrial | 4,857 | 36,670 | 118,681 | 172,182 | 332,390 | | Commercial real estate | 13,167 | 61,827 | 608,414 | 683,518 | 1,366,926 | | Commercial real estate, construction | 58,324 | 71,284 | 62,085 | 45,609 | 237,302 | | Residential mortgage | 1,813 | 2,096 | 45,148 | 105,704 | 154,760 | | Home equity | 4,037 | 9,904 | 20,194 | 45,535 | 79,671 | | Consumer | 449 | 188 | 28 | 4,970 | 5,635 | | | $202,772 | $657,823 | $1,074,077 | $1,169,724 | $3,104,396 | #### Credit Quality, Credit Risk, and Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses Other than as described herein, Mid Penn does not believe there are current significant credit-related trends, events or uncertainties relating to its loan portfolio that are reasonably expected to have a material impact on future results of operations, liquidity, or capital resources. Mid Penn recognizes that the effects of current and past economic conditions and other unfavorable business conditions, including the potential impact of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, may eventually adversely influence certain borrowers’ abilities to comply with their repayment terms. Mid Penn regularly monitors the financial strength of its borrowers, including those at higher risk of credit stress from the pandemic or its economic effects, and does not engage in practices which may be used to artificially shield certain borrowers from the negative economic or business cycle effects that may compromise their ability to repay. Mid Penn does not normally structure construction loans with interest reserve components or perform commercial real estate or other type of loan workouts whereby an existing loan was restructured into multiple new loans. Also, Mid Penn does not extend loans at maturity solely due to the existence of guarantees, without recognizing the credit as impaired. While the existence of a guarantee may be a mitigating factor in determining the proper level of allowance once impairment has been identified, the guarantee does not affect the impairment analysis. ### TABLE 8: NONPERFORMING ASSETS *(Dollars in thousands)* | Nonperforming Assets: | December 31, 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Nonaccrual loans | $9,547 | $15,047 | $11,471 | $10,749 | $10,575 | | Accruing troubled debt restructured loans | 435 | 463 | 490 | 517 | 544 | | Total nonperforming loans | 9,982 | 15,510 | 11,961 | 11,266 | 11,119 | | Foreclosed real estate | — | 134 | 196 | 1,017 | 189 | | Total nonperforming assets | 9,982 | 15,644 | 12,157 | 12,283 | 11,308 | | Accruing loans 90 days or more past due | 515 | — | — | — | — | | Total risk elements | $10,497 | $15,644 | $12,157 | $12,283 | $11,308 | | Nonperforming loans as a percentage of total loans outstanding | 0.32% | 0.65% | 0.68% | 0.69% | 1.22% | | Nonperforming assets as a percentage of total loans outstanding and other real estate | 0.32% | 0.66% | 0.69% | 0.76% | 1.24% | | Nonaccrual loans as a percentage of total loans | 0.31% | 0.63% | 0.65% | 0.66% | 1.16% | | Ratio of allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans | 146.23% | 86.28% | 79.55% | 74.53% | 68.41% | | Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans and leases | 0.47% | 0.56% | 0.54% | 0.52% | 0.84% | | Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of non-accrual loans | 152.90% | 88.93% | 82.95% | 78.12% | 71.92% | | Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of non-performing assets | 146.23% | 85.54% | 78.27% | 68.36% | 67.26% | Mid Penn assesses a specific allocation for both commercial loans and commercial real estate loans prior to partially or fully charging off the loan. If a partial charge off is taken, the remaining balance remains a nonperforming loan with the original terms and interest rate intact and is not treated as a restructured credit. Mid Penn held no foreclosed real estate as of December 31, 2021, compared to $134,000 at December 31, 2020, driven by the sale of several smaller foreclosed real estate properties in 2021. Total nonperforming assets were $10,497,000 at December 31, 2021, a decrease compared to nonperforming assets of $15,644,000 at December 31, 2020. The decrease in nonperforming assets was primarily the result of the successful workout of three nonaccrual commercial relationships totaling $10,956,000 occurring during the year ended December 31, 2021, though this decrease was partially offset by acquired impaired loans assumed in the Riverview transaction totaling $3,289,000 as of December 31, 2021. One loan relationship, which accounts for $2,278,000 of the nonperforming loan balance as of December 31, 2021, is discussed in more detail below. Loan relationship no. 1 - The contractual outstanding principal balance of this loan relationship was $2,278,000 at December 31, 2021 and was comprised of two loans acquired in 2018. These loans were transferred from accrual to nonaccrual status during the second quarter of 2020. These loans are collateralized primarily by commercial real estate, and, given that the fair value of the remaining collateral exceeds the outstanding principal balance, no specific allowance allocation has been currently assigned to this relationship. Management expects to recover the remaining outstanding balance through the sale of real estate collateral pledged in support of the loans. Mid Penn’s troubled debt restructured loans at December 31, 2021 totaled $819,000, of which $436,000 were accruing loans in compliance with the terms of the modification and $383,000 are included in the balance of total nonaccrual loans. Mid Penn entered into forbearance agreements on all loans currently classified as troubled debt restructured loans, and these agreements have resulted in additional principal repayment. The terms of these forbearance agreements vary and may include reductions in principal payments, reductions in interest rates, and/or repayment of the loan as collateral is sold. Further discussion of troubled debt restructured loans can be found in Note 6, *Loans and Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses*, within Item 8, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. As of December 31, 2021, there were no defaulted troubled debt restructured loans, as all troubled debt restructured loans were current with respect to their associated forbearance agreements. The following table provides additional analysis of partially charged off loans: ### TABLE 9: PARTIALLY CHARGED OFF LOANS *(Dollars in thousands)* | | December 31, 2021 | December 31, 2020 | | --- | ---: | ---: | | Period ending total loans outstanding (net of unearned income) | $3,104,396 | $2,384,041 | | Allowance for loan and lease losses | 14,597 | 13,382 | | Total Nonperforming loans | 9,982 | 15,510 | | Recorded investment in nonperforming and impaired loans with partial charge-offs | 107 | 836 | | Ratio of nonperforming loans with partial charge-offs to total loans | 0.00% | 0.04% | | Ratio of nonperforming loans with partial charge-offs to total nonperforming loans | 1.07% | 5.39% | | Coverage ratio net of nonperforming loans with partial charge-offs | 147.82% | 91.20% | | Ratio of total allowance to total loans less nonperforming loans with partial charge-offs | 0.47% | 0.56% | Mid Penn has not experienced any additional charge-offs on loans for which a partial charge-off had originally been taken during the periods presented. Mid Penn considers a commercial loan or commercial real estate loan to be impaired when it becomes 90 days or more past due and the collection efforts indicate that receipt of all contractual amounts due is not probable. Impairment may occur before a 90-day or more period of delinquency when it is probable, based upon the facts and circumstances, that Mid Penn will be unable to collect all contractual principal and interest due. This methodology assumes the borrower cannot or will not continue to make additional payments. At that time, the loan would likely be considered collateral dependent as the discounted cash flow (“DCF”) method would indicate no operating income is available to add to the respective loan’s collateral position; therefore, most impaired loans are deemed to be collateral dependent. Mid Penn evaluates loans for charge-off on a monthly basis. Policies that govern the recommendation for charge-off are unique to the type of loan being considered. Commercial loans rated as nonaccrual or lower will first have a collateral evaluation completed in accordance with the guidance on impaired loans. Once the collateral evaluation has been completed, a specific allocation of allowance is made based upon the results of the evaluation. The balance remains a nonperforming loan with the original terms and interest rate intact (not restructured). In the event the loan is unsecured, the loan would have been charged-off at the recognition of impairment. Commercial real estate loans rated as impaired will also have an initial collateral evaluation completed in accordance with the guidance on impaired loans. An updated real estate valuation is ordered and the collateral evaluation is modified to reflect any variation in value. A specific allocation of allowance is made for any anticipated collateral shortfall. The balance remains a nonperforming loan with the original terms and interest rate intact (not restructured). The process of charge-off for residential mortgage loans begins upon a loan becoming delinquent for 90 days and not in the process of collection. The existing appraisal is reviewed and a lien search is obtained to determine lien position and any instances of intervening liens. A new appraisal of the property will be ordered if deemed necessary by management and a collateral evaluation is completed. The loan will then be charged down to the value indicated in the evaluation. Consumer loans are recommended for charge-off after reaching delinquency of 90 days and the loan is not in the process of collection. The collateral shortfall of the consumer loan is recommended for charge-off at this point. As noted above, Mid Penn assesses a specific allocation for both commercial loans and commercial real estate loans. The balance remains a nonperforming loan with the original terms and interest rate intact (not restructured). In addition, Mid Penn takes a preemptive step when any commercial loan or commercial real estate loan becomes classified under its internal classification system. A preliminary collateral evaluation in accordance with the guidance on impaired loans is prepared using the existing collateral information in the loan file. This process allows Mid Penn to review both the credit and documentation files to determine the status of the information needed to make a collateral evaluation. This collateral evaluation is preliminary, but allows Mid Penn to determine if any potential collateral shortfalls exist. Larger groups of small-balance loans, such as residential mortgages and consumer installment loans are collectively evaluated for impairment. Accordingly, individual consumer and residential loans are not separately identified for impairment disclosures unless such loans are the subject of a restructuring agreement. Mid Penn’s loan rating system assumes any loans classified as substandard nonaccrual to be impaired, and most of these loans are considered collateral dependent; therefore, most of Mid Penn’s impaired loans, whether reporting a specific allocation or not, are considered collateral dependent. It is Mid Penn’s policy to obtain updated third-party valuations on all impaired loans collateralized by real estate as soon as practicable following the credit being classified as substandard non-accrual. Prior to receipt of the updated real estate valuation Mid Penn will use any existing real estate valuation to determine any potential allowance issues; however, no allowance recommendation will be made until such time as Mid Penn is in receipt of the updated valuation. The Asset Recovery department employs an electronic tracking system to monitor the receipt of and need for updated appraisals. To date, there have been no material time lapses noted with the above processes. In some instances, Mid Penn is not holding real estate as collateral and is relying on business assets (personal property) for repayment. In these circumstances, a collateral inspection is performed by Mid Penn personnel to determine an estimated value. The value is based on net book value, as provided by the financial statements, and discounted accordingly based on determinations made by management. Occasionally, Mid Penn will employ an outside service to provide a fair estimate of value based on auction or private sales. Management reviews the estimates of these third parties and discounts them accordingly based on management’s judgment, if deemed necessary. For impaired loans with no valuation allowance required, Mid Penn’s practice of obtaining independent third-party market valuations on the subject property as soon as practicable following being placed on nonaccrual status sometimes indicates that the loan to value ratio is sufficient to obviate the need for a specific allocation, despite significant deterioration in real estate values in Mid Penn’s primary market area. These circumstances are determined on a case-by-case analysis of the impaired loans. Mid Penn actively monitors the values of collateral on impaired loans. This monitoring may require the modification of collateral values over time or changing circumstances by some factor, either positive or negative, from the original values. All collateral values will be assessed by management at least every 12 months for possible revaluation by an independent third party. Mid Penn had loans with an aggregate balance of $9,982,000 which were deemed by management to be impaired at December 31, 2021, including $4,875,000 in loans from previous mergers which were acquired with credit deterioration. Of the $5,107,000 of impaired loan relationships excluding the loans acquired with credit deterioration, $308,000 were commercial and industrial relationships, $1,141,000 were commercial real estate relationships, $1,259,000 were residential relationships, $22,000 were commercial real estate – construction relationships, and $2,377,000 were home equity relationships. As of December 31, 2021, there were specific loan loss reserve allocations of $67,000 against the commercial and industrial relationships and $121,000 against the commercial real estate relationships. Management currently believes that the specific reserves are adequate to cover probable future losses related to these relationships. The allowance for loan losses is a reserve established in the form of a provision expense for loan and lease losses and is reduced by loan charge-offs net of recoveries. In addition to a loan review function that operates independently of the lending function, management monitors the loan portfolio at least monthly to identify changes to the credit risks in the portfolio so that an appropriate allowance is maintained. Based on an evaluation of the loan portfolio, management presents a monthly review of the allowance for loan and lease losses to the Board of Directors, indicating any changes in the allowance since the last review. In making the evaluation, management considers the results of recent regulatory examinations, which typically include a review of the allowance for loan and lease losses as an integral part of the examination process. As part of the examination process, federal or state regulatory agencies may require Mid Penn to recognize additions to the allowance based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination, which may not be currently available to management. In establishing the allowance, management evaluates on a quantitative basis individual classified loans and nonaccrual loans, and determines an aggregate reserve for those loans based on that review. In addition, an allowance for the remainder of the loan and lease portfolio is determined based on historical loss experience, adjusted by qualitative factors determined by management, within certain components of the portfolio. This determination inherently involves a higher degree of subjectivity and considers risk factors that may not have yet manifested themselves in historical loss experience. These factors include: - changes in international, national, regional, and local economic and business conditions and developments that affect the collectability of the portfolio, including the condition of various market segments; - changes in the volume and severity of past due loans, the volume of nonaccrual loans, and the volume and severity of adversely classified or graded loans; - changes in the value of underlying collateral for collateral-dependent loans; - changes in the experience, ability, and depth of lending management and other relevant staff; - changes in lending policies and procedures, including changes in underwriting standards and collection, charge-off, and recovery practices not considered elsewhere in estimating credit losses; - changes in the quality of the institution's loan review system; - changes in the nature and volume of the portfolio and in the terms of loans; - the effect of other external factors such as competition and legal and regulatory requirements on the level of estimated credit losses in the institution's existing portfolio; and - the existence and effect of any concentrations of credit and changes in the level of such concentrations. While the allowance for loan and lease losses is maintained at a level believed to be adequate by management to provide for probable losses inherent in the loan and lease portfolio, determination of the allowance is inherently subjective, as it requires estimates and consideration of the above-noted qualitative factors which may be susceptible to significant change. Changes in these estimates may impact the provisions charged to expense in future periods. Management believes, based on information currently available, that the allowance for loan and lease losses of $14,597,000 as of December 31, 2021 is adequate to cover specifically identifiable loan losses, as well as estimated losses inherent in our portfolio for which certain losses are probable but not specifically identifiable. The allocation of the allowance for loan and lease losses among the major classifications is shown in Table 10 as of December 31 of each of the past five years. ### TABLE 10: ALLOCATION OF THE ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES *(Dollars in thousands)* | | December 31, 2021 Amount% | | 2020 Amount% | | 2019 Amount% | | 2018 Amount% | | 2017 Amount% | | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Commercial and industrial | $3,439 | 23.6% | $3,066 | 22.9% | $2,341 | 24.6% | $2,391 | 28.5% | $1,795 | 23.6% | | Commercial real estate | 9,415 | 64.5% | 8,655 | 64.7% | 6,259 | 65.8% | 4,703 | 56.0% | 4,435 | 58.3% | | Commercial real estate, construction | 38 | 0.3% | 134 | 1.0% | 51 | 0.5% | 75 | 0.9% | 178 | 2.3% | | Residential mortgage | 459 | 3.1% | 429 | 3.2% | 417 | 4.4% | 453 | 5.4% | 428 | 5.6% | | Home equity | 560 | 3.8% | 507 | 3.8% | 442 | 4.6% | 528 | 6.3% | 423 | 5.6% | | Consumer | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 0.0% | 7 | 0.1% | 3 | 0.0% | | Unallocated | 684 | 4.6% | 590 | 4.4% | 3 | 0.0% | 240 | 2.9% | 344 | 4.5% | | | $14,597 | 100.0% | $13,382 | 100.0% | $9,515 | 100.0% | $8,397 | 100.0% | $7,606 | 100.0% | The increase in the allowance balance was the result of both organic loan growth during 2021, and from increases in the values of qualitative factors for both economic conditions and external factors given the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic impact. Management continues to monitor the portfolio very closely for pandemic-related stresses. See also the discussion in the Provision for Loan and Lease Losses section. The allowance for loan and lease losses at December 31, 2021 was $14,597,000 or 0.47 percent of total loans (less unearned discount), as compared to $13,382,000 or 0.56 percent at December 31, 2020, and $9,515,000 or 0.54 percent at December 31, 2019. #### Deposits and Other Funding Sources Mid Penn's primary source of funds are retail deposits from businesses, public funds depositors, and consumers in its market area. For the year ended December 31, 2021, total deposits increased by $1,527,436,000 or over 61 percent. Deposits as of year-end 2020 had increased by increased by $562,186,000 or over 29 percent since December 31, 2019. Deposit growth during the year ended December 31, 2021 was attributable primarily to the balance of deposits assumed through the acquisition of Riverview totaling $1,052,435,000 as of December 31, 2021, net of purchase accounting adjustments. Organic deposit growth of $475,436,000 or 19 percent since December 31, 2020 was driven by significant increases in noninterest-bearing, interest-bearing, and money market deposits, primarily due to both expanded cash management and commercial deposit account relationships, and new deposits established as a result of Mid Penn’s PPP loan funding activities. Deposit growth from year-end 2019 to year-end 2020 was led by substantial increases in noninterest-bearing balances and money market deposits, primarily due to both new and expanded cash management and commercial deposit account relationships, including those from new customers established as a result of Mid Penn’s PPP loan activities. Average balances and average interest rates applicable to the classifications of deposits for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019 are presented in Table 13. Mid Penn had no brokered time deposits as of December 31, 2021 and 2020 compared to $13,326,000 in brokered time deposits at December 31, 2019. The decrease in brokered certificates of deposits during 2020 was the result of brokered certificates of deposit assumed in the First Priority and Phoenix acquisitions which matured and were not replaced. ### TABLE 11: DEPOSITS BY MAJOR CLASSIFICATION *(Dollars in thousands)* | | Years Ended December 31, 2021 Average Balance | Average Rate | 2020 Average Balance | Average Rate | 2019 Average Balance | Average Rate | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Noninterest-bearing demand deposits | $684,022 | 0.00% | $505,094 | 0.00% | $296,872 | 0.00% | | Interest-bearing demand deposits | 688,595 | 0.34 | 538,385 | 0.64 | 415,359 | 1.04 | | Money market | 842,107 | 0.37 | 605,552 | 0.67 | 443,248 | 1.66 | | Savings | 218,546 | 0.11 | 186,132 | 0.19 | 187,927 | 0.34 | | Time | 451,277 | 1.24 | 443,607 | 1.93 | 471,241 | 1.96 | | | $2,884,547 | 0.39% | $2,278,770 | 0.72% | $1,814,647 | 1.19% | 49 The maturity distribution of time deposits of $100,000 or more are reflected in Table 12. ### TABLE 12: MATURITY OF TIME DEPOSITS $100,000 OR MORE *(Dollars in thousands)* | | December 31, 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Three months or less | $65,345 | $33,819 | $31,314 | | Over three months to twelve months | 141,141 | 116,798 | 148,449 | | Over twelve months | 112,212 | 77,344 | 92,041 | | | $318,698 | $227,961 | $271,804 | ### TABLE 13: UNINSURED DEPOSITS | | Uninsured Time Deposits | | --- | ---: | | Maturing in 2022 | $89,373 | | Maturing in 2023 | 23,151 | | Maturing in 2024 | 5,215 | | Maturing in 2025 | 1,240 | | Maturing in 2026 | 2,917 | | Maturing thereafter | - | | | $121,895 | Mid Penn held no short-term borrowings as of December 31, 2021. Short-term borrowings of $125,617,000 at December 31, 2020 consisted entirely of Mid Penn’s utilization of the Federal Reserve’s PPPLF. The PPPLF allows banks to pledge PPP loans as collateral to borrow funds for up to a term of five years (to match the term of the respective PPP loans) at an interest rate of 0.35 percent. The PPPLF borrowings were paid off during the year ended December 31, 2021. As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Bank had long-term debt outstanding in the amount of $81,270,000 and $75,115,000, respectively, consisting primarily of FHLB fixed rate advances as well as a finance lease liability executed in 2019. #### Capital Resources Shareholders' equity, or capital, is evaluated in relation to total assets and the risk associated with those assets. The detailed computation of Mid Penn’s regulatory capital ratios can be found in Note 18, *Regulatory Matters*, within Item 8, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The greater the Corporation’s capital resources, the more likely it is to meet its cash obligations and absorb unforeseen losses. Capital management practices have been, and will continue to be, of paramount importance to the Corporation in support of both its regulatory capital requirements and its shareholders. Shareholders’ equity increased by $234,388,000 or 92 percent from $255,688,000 as of December 31, 2020 to $490,076,000 as of December 31, 2021, primarily due to both (i) the issuance of 4,519,776 shares of Mid Penn common stock on November 30, 2021, in connection with the acquisition of Riverview, and, (ii) the completion of the May 4, 2021 public offering of 2,990,000 shares of common stock at a price of $25.00 per share, with the aggregate gross proceeds of the offering totaling $74,750,000. The net proceeds of the offering after deducting the underwriting discount and offering expenses were $70,238,000. The additional shares issued as a result of the Riverview acquisition and the public offering significantly impacted the weighted average number of shares outstanding used for both the fourth quarter of 2021 and year-to-date 2021 earnings per share calculations. Regulatory capital ratios for both Mid Penn and its banking subsidiary exceeded regulatory “well-capitalized” levels at both December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020. Shareholders’ equity increased by $17,814,000 or 7 percent from $237,874,000 as of December 31, 2019 to $255,688,000 as of December 31, 2020. The increase in shareholders’ equity primarily reflects the growth in retained earnings through year-to-date net income, net of dividends paid and declared. Some of the year-over-year increase in shareholders’ equity was offset by the initiation of Mid Penn’s treasury stock repurchase program, which reflected total common stock buybacks of $1,795,000 as of December 31, 2020. A total of 92,652 common shares were repurchased at a discount to tangible book value per share, with an average cost of $19.37 per share. Shareholders’ equity increased by $14,664,000 or 7 percent from $223,209,000 as of December 31, 2018 to $237,874,000 as of December 31, 2019. The increase in shareholders’ equity during 2019 reflected (i) the growth in retained earnings through year-to-date net income of $17,701,000 net of dividends paid totaling $6,688,000, (ii) a $316,000 favorable prior period adjustment posted as part of the adoption of the new GAAP leasing standard, and (iii) other comprehensive income from the significant after-tax appreciation in the available-for-sale portfolio, much of which had been realized from securities sales during 2019. Mid Penn’s dividend payout philosophy looks to provide reasonable quarterly cash returns to shareholders while still retaining sufficient earnings to finance future growth and maintain sound capital levels. For additional information, see “Part II, Item 5, “Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer Repurchases of Equity Securities – Dividends”. Dividends paid and declared on common shares totaled $0.84 and $0.79, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2021. Dividends paid and declared on common shares totaled $0.77 and $0.82, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2020. Dividends paid and declared on common shares totaled $0.79 for the year ended December 31, 2019. The dividend payout ratio, which represents the percentage of annual net income returned to shareholders in the form of cash dividends, was 31 percent for 2021 and 25 percent for 2020. Mid Penn maintained regulatory capital levels, leverage ratios, and risk-based capital ratios as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, as follows: *(Dollars in thousands)* | Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. As of December 31, 2021 | Capital Adequacy Actual Amount | Ratio | Minimum for Basel III Capital Adequacy (a) Amount | Ratio | To Be Well-Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions Amount | Ratio | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets) | $374,368 | 8.1% | $185,764 | 4.0% | $N/A | N/A | | Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) | 365,084 | 11.7% | 217,579 | 7.0% | N/A | N/A | | Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) | 374,368 | 12.0% | 264,203 | 8.5% | N/A | N/A | | Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) | 452,527 | 14.6% | 326,369 | 10.5% | N/A | N/A | | Mid Penn Bank | | | | | | | | As of December 31, 2021 | | | | | | | | Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets) | $398,773 | 8.6% | $185,721 | 4.0% | $232,151 | 5.0% | | Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) | 398,773 | 12.8% | 217,446 | 7.0% | 201,914 | 6.5% | | Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) | 398,773 | 12.8% | 264,041 | 8.5% | 248,510 | 8.0% | | Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) | 413,442 | 13.3% | 326,169 | 10.5% | 310,637 | 10.0% | | Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. | | | | | | | | As of December 31, 2020 | | | | | | | | Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets) | $188,501 | 6.8% | $111,201 | 4.0% | $N/A | N/A | | Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) | 188,501 | 9.6% | 137,351 | 7.0% | N/A | N/A | | Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) | 188,501 | 9.6% | 166,783 | 8.5% | N/A | N/A | | Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) | 246,529 | 12.6% | 206,026 | 10.5% | N/A | N/A | | Mid Penn Bank | | | | | | | | As of December 31, 2020 | | | | | | | | Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets) | $218,676 | 7.9% | $111,166 | 4.0% | $138,958 | 5.0% | | Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) | 218,676 | 11.1% | 137,288 | 7.0% | 127,482 | 6.5% | | Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) | 218,676 | 11.1% | 166,707 | 8.5% | 156,901 | 8.0% | | Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) | 232,124 | 11.8% | 205,933 | 10.5% | 196,126 | 10.0% | (a) Minimum amounts and ratios include the full phase in of the capital conservation buffer of 2.5 percent required by the BASEL III framework. #### Subordinated Debt and Trust Preferred Securities #### Subordinated Debt Assumed November 2021 with the Riverview Acquisition On November 30, 2021, Mid Penn completed its acquisition of Riverview and assumed $25,000,000 of Subordinated Notes (the “Riverview Notes”). In accordance with purchase accounting principles, the Riverview Notes were assigned a fair value premium of $2,302,000. The notes are treated as Tier 2 capital for regulatory reporting purposes. The Riverview Notes were entered into by Riverview on October 6, 2020 with certain qualified institutional buyers and accredited institutional investors. The Riverview Notes have a maturity date of October 15, 2030 and initially bear interest, payable semi-annually, at a fixed annual rate of 5.75% per annum until October 15, 2025. Commencing on that date, the interest rate applicable to the outstanding principal amount due will be reset quarterly to an interest rate per annum equal to the then current three-month secured overnight financing rate (“SOFR”) plus 563 basis points, payable quarterly until maturity. Mid Penn may redeem the Notes at par, in whole or in part, at its option, anytime beginning on October 15, 2025. #### Trust Preferred Securities Assumed November 2021 with the Riverview Acquisition As a result of the merger with Riverview, Mid Penn assumed the subordinated debentures that Riverview had assumed in its acquisition of CBT Financial Corp. (“CBT”) on October 1, 2017 (the “CBT 2017 Notes”). In 2003, a trust formed by CBT issued $5,155,000 of floating rate trust preferred securities as part of a pooled offering of such securities. The interest rate prior to Riverview entering into a fixed interest rate swap in 2020 adjusted quarterly to the three-month LIBOR rate plus 2.95%. CBT issued subordinated debentures to the trust in exchange for ownership of all of the common securities of the trust and the proceeds of the offering; the debentures represent the sole asset of the trust. CBT became eligible to redeem the subordinated debentures, in whole but not in part, beginning in 2008 at a price of 100% of face value. The subordinated debentures must be redeemed no later than 2033. Similarly, in 2005, a trust formed by CBT issued $4,124,000 of fixed rate trust preferred securities as part of a pooled offering of such securities (the “CBT 2015 Notes”). CBT issued subordinated debentures to the trust in exchange for ownership of all the common securities of the trust and the proceeds of the offering; the debentures represent the sole asset of the trust. CBT became eligible to redeem the subordinated debentures, in whole but not in part, beginning in 2010 at a price of 100% of face value. Interest payments on the debentures may be deferred at any time at the election of Mid Penn for up to 20 consecutive quarterly periods. Interest on the debentures will accrue during the extension period, and all accrued principal and interest must be paid at the end of the extension period. During an extension period, Mid Penn may not declare or pay any dividends or distributions on, or redeem, purchase, acquire, or make a liquidation payment with respect to any of Mid Penn’s capital stock. In accordance with purchase accounting principles, the CBT 2017 Notes and CBT 2015 Notes assumed from Riverview were assigned a fair value premium of $6,000. The subordinated debentures are treated as Tier 1 capital for regulatory reporting purposes. #### Subordinated Debt Issued December 2020 On December 22, 2020, Mid Penn entered into agreements for and sold, at 100% of their principal amount, an aggregate of $12,150,000 of its Subordinated Notes due December 2030 (the “December 2020 Notes”) on a private placement basis to accredited investors. The December 2020 Notes are treated as Tier 2 capital for regulatory capital purposes. The December 2020 Notes will bear interest at a rate of 4.5% per year for the first five years and then float at the Wall Street Journal’s Prime Rate, provided that the interest rate applicable to the outstanding principal balance during the period the December 2020 Notes are floating will at no time be less than 4.5%. Interest is payable quarterly in arrears on March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31 of each year, beginning on March 31, 2021. The December 2020 Notes will mature on December 31, 2030 and are redeemable, in whole or in part, without premium or penalty, on any interest payment date on or after December 31, 2025 and prior to December 31, 2030, subject to any required regulatory approvals. Additionally, if (A) all or any portion of the December 2020 Notes cease to be deemed Tier 2 Capital, (B) interest on the December 2020 Notes fails to be deductible for United States federal income tax purposes or (C) Mid Penn will be considered an “investment company,” Mid Penn may redeem the December 2020 Notes, in whole but not in part, by giving 10 days’ notice to the holders of the December 2020 Notes. In the event of a redemption described in the previous sentence, Mid Penn will redeem the December 2020 Notes at 100% of the principal amount of the December 2020 Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon to but excluding the date of redemption. Holders of the December 2020 Notes may not accelerate the maturity of the December 2020 Notes, except upon the bankruptcy, insolvency, liquidation, receivership or similar event of the holding company or Mid Penn Bank, its principal banking subsidiary. Related parties held $750,000 of the December 2020 Notes as of December 31, 2021. #### Subordinated Debt Issued March 2020 On March 20, 2020, Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. entered into agreements with accredited investors who purchased $15,000,000 aggregate principal amount of Mid Penn Subordinated Notes due 2030 (the “March 2020 Notes”). As a result of Mid Penn’s merger with Riverview on November 30, 2021, $6,870,000 of the March 2020 Note balance was redeemed as Riverview was a holder of the March 2020 Notes. The balance of March 2020 Notes outstanding as of December 31, 2021 was $8,130,000. The March 2020 Notes are treated as Tier 2 capital for regulatory capital purposes. The March 2020 Notes bear interest at a rate of 4.0% per year for the first five years and then float at the Wall Street Journal’s Prime Rate, provided that the interest rate applicable to the outstanding principal balance during the period the March 2020 Notes are floating will at no time be less than 4.25%. Interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on June 30 and December 30 of each year, beginning on June 30, 2020, for the first five years after issuance and will be payable quarterly in arrears thereafter on March 30, June 30, September 30 and December 30. The March 2020 Notes will mature on March 30, 2030 and are redeemable in whole or in part, without premium or penalty, at any time on or after March 30, 2025 and prior to March 30, 2030. Additionally, if all or any portion of the March 2020 Notes cease to be deemed Tier 2 Capital, Mid Penn may redeem, on any interest payment date, all or part of the March 2020 Notes. In the event of a redemption described in the previous sentence, Mid Penn will redeem the March 2020 Notes at 100% of the principal amount of the 2020 Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon to but excluding the date of redemption. Holders of the March 2020 Notes may not accelerate the maturity of the March 2020 Notes, except upon the bankruptcy, insolvency, liquidation, receivership or similar event of the holding company or Mid Penn Bank, its principal banking subsidiary. Related parties held $1,700,000 of the March 2020 Notes as of December 31, 2021. #### Subordinated Debt Assumed July 2018 with the First Priority Acquisition On July 31, 2018, Mid Penn completed its acquisition of First Priority and assumed $9,500,000 of Subordinated Notes (the “First Priority Notes”). In accordance with purchase accounting principles, the First Priority Notes were assigned a fair value premium of $247,000. The notes were treated as Tier 2 capital for regulatory reporting purposes. The First Priority Notes agreements were entered into by First Priority on November 13, 2015 with five accredited investors pursuant to which First Priority issued subordinated notes totaling $9,500,000. The First Priority Notes had a maturity date of November 30, 2025, and bear interest at a fixed rate of 7.00% per annum. The Notes were non-callable for an initial period of five years and included provisions for redemption pricing between 101.5% and 100.5% of the liquidation value if called after five years but prior to the stated maturity date. On December 18, 2020, Mid Penn redeemed the $9,500,000 of subordinated debt assumed in 2018 in conjunction with Mid Penn’s acquisition of First Priority Bank. The First Priority subordinated debt was redeemed promptly following the expiration of the noncallable period and after receiving the required regulatory approval for the redemption. Mid Penn recognized redemption pricing fees of $143,000 in 2020 related to the early redemption, which are included in other noninterest expenses. On December 19, 2017, Mid Penn entered into agreements with investors to purchase $10,000,000 aggregate principal amount of its Subordinated Notes due 2028 (the “2017 Notes”). The 2017 Notes are treated as Tier 2 capital for regulatory capital purposes. The offering closed in December 2017. The 2017 Notes bear interest at a rate of 5.25% per year for the first five years and then float at the Wall Street Journal’s Prime Rate plus 0.50%, provided that the interest rate applicable to the outstanding principal balance will at no time be less than 5.0%. Interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on January 15 and July 15 of each year, beginning on July 15, 2018, for the first five years after issuance and will be payable quarterly in arrears thereafter on January 15, April 15, July 15, and October 15. The 2017 Notes will mature on January 1, 2028 and are redeemable in whole or in part, without premium or penalty, at any time on or after December 21, 2022, and prior to January 1, 2028. Additionally, Mid Penn may redeem the 2017 Notes in whole at any time, or in part from time to time, upon at least 30 days’ notice if: (i) a change or prospective change in law occurs that could prevent Mid Penn from deducting interest payable on the 2017 Notes for U.S. federal income tax purposes; (ii) an event occurs that precludes the 2017 Notes from being recognized as Tier 2 capital for regulatory capital purposes; or (iii) Mid Penn becomes required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. In the event of a redemption described in the previous sentence, Mid Penn will redeem the 2017 Notes at 100% of the principal amount of the 2017 Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon to but excluding the date of redemption. Holders of the 2017 Notes may not accelerate the maturity of the 2017 Notes, except upon the bankruptcy, insolvency, liquidation, receivership or similar event of Mid Penn or Mid Penn Bank. On December 9, 2015, Mid Penn entered into agreements with investors to purchase $7,500,000 aggregate principal amount of its Subordinated Notes (the “2015 Notes”) due 2025. Eighty percent of the balance of the 2015 Notes were treated as Tier 2 capital for regulatory capital purposes as of December 31, 2021. The 2015 Notes bear interest at a rate of 5.15% per year for the first five years and then float at the Wall Street Journal’s Prime Rate plus 0.50%, provided that the interest rate applicable to the outstanding principal balance will at no time be less than 4.0%. Interest is paid quarterly in arrears on January 1, April 1, July 1 and October 1 of each year, beginning on January 1, 2016. The 2015 Notes will mature on December 9, 2025 and are redeemable in whole or in part, without premium or penalty, at any time on or after December 9, 2020, and prior to December 9, 2025. Additionally, Mid Penn may redeem the 2015 Notes in whole at any time, or in part from time to time, upon at least 30 days’ notice if: (i) a change or prospective change in law occurs that could prevent Mid Penn from deducting interest payable on the 2015 Notes for U.S. federal income tax purposes; (ii) an event occurs that precludes the 2015 Notes from being recognized as Tier 2 capital for regulatory capital purposes; or (iii) Mid Penn becomes required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, in each case at 100% of the principal amount of the 2015 Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon to but excluding the date of redemption. Holders of the 2015 Notes may not accelerate the maturity of the 2015 Notes, except upon Mid Penn’s or Mid Penn Bank’s bankruptcy, insolvency, liquidation, receivership, or similar event. #### Income Taxes The provision for income taxes was $6,732,000 during the year ended December 31, 2021, an increase of $1,602,000 or 31 percent compared to $5,130,000 for the same period in 2020. The provision for income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2021 reflects an effective combined Federal and state tax rate of 19 percent, compared to an effective combined Federal and state tax rate of 16 percent for the year ended December 31, 2020. The full-year 2021 tax provision and effective tax rate reflects (i) the impact of tax-free income earned on municipal investments and loans, (ii) the impact of certain merger-related expenses which are nondeductible for Federal tax purposes, (iii) higher pre-tax income, and (iv) state income taxes that Mid Penn pays to the states of New Jersey and Maryland for revenues sourced in those respective states. The provision for income taxes was $5,130,000 during the year ended December 31, 2020, an increase of $1,405,000 or 38 percent compared to $3,725,000 for the same period in 2019. The provision for income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2020 reflects an effective combined Federal and state tax rate of 16 percent compared to an effective combined Federal and state tax rate of 17 percent for the year ended December 31, 2019. The full-year 2020 tax provision and effective tax rate reflects (i) the impact of tax-free income earned on municipal investments and loans, (ii) the impact of certain CARES Act provisions allowing for the carryback of federal tax net operating losses (NOLs) to prior periods in which the Federal tax rate was 34 percent totaling $318,000, (iii) the full-year impact of tax credits recognized related to Mid Penn’s investment in a low-income housing project in Dauphin County, Pennsylvania totaling $861,000, and (iv) state income taxes that Mid Penn pays to the states of New Jersey and Maryland for revenues sourced in those respective states. #### Liquidity Mid Penn's asset-liability management policy addresses the management of Mid Penn's liquidity position and its ability to raise sufficient funds to meet deposit withdrawals, fund loan growth and meet other operational needs. In addition to its cash and equivalents, Mid Penn utilizes its investments as a source of liquidity, along with deposit growth and increases in borrowings. For additional information, see Deposits and Other Funding Sources, which appears earlier in this discussion. Liquidity from investments is provided primarily through investment calls, sales of available-for-sale securities, prepayments on mortgage-backed securities, and from investments and interest-bearing balances with maturities of one year or less. The Bank can obtain funds from overnight borrowings, short-term borrowings, and long-term borrowings from the FHLB, up to the Bank’s maximum borrowing capacity with the FHLB, which was $935,225,000 at December 31, 2021. FHLB borrowings require the Bank to make certain restricted stock purchases in accordance with FHLB requirements. Borrowings with the FHLB are collateralized by certain qualifying loans and investment securities of the Bank. The Bank also has unused lines of credit with other correspondent banks amounting to $35,000,000 at December 31, 2021. Major sources of cash in 2021 came from the $446,045,000 net increase in deposits, net cash received in the Riverview acquisition of $315,287,000, and $341,155,000 of proceeds from sales of mortgage loans originated for sale. Major uses of cash in 2021 were $309,179,000 to fund the purchase of investment securities, $316,849,000 to fund mortgage loans originated for sale, and $125,617,000 to repay the entire balance of short-term PPPLF borrowings. Major sources of cash in 2020 came from the $562,186,000 net increase in deposits, $348,756,000 of proceeds from sales of mortgage loans originated for sale, and proceeds from short-term PPPLF borrowings of $125,617,000. Major uses of cash in 2020 were $623,153,000 to fund net portfolio loan growth (primarily commercial PPP loans), $356,158,000 to fund mortgage loans originated for sale, and $178,630,000 to fund the purchase of investment securities. #### Aggregate Contractual Obligations Table 14 represents Mid Penn’s substantial aggregate contractual obligations to make future cash payments as of December 31, 2021. ### TABLE 14: AGGREGATE CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS *(Dollars in thousands)* | | Financial Statements Note Reference | Total | Payments Due by Period One Year or Less | One to Three Years | Three to Five Years | More than Five Years | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Operating lease obligations | 8 | $12,682 | $2,426 | $3,905 | $2,725 | $3,626 | | Finance lease obligation | 8 | 4,677 | 217 | 469 | 518 | 3,473 | | Certificates of deposit | 9 | 634,437 | 381,438 | 202,326 | 44,524 | 6,149 | | Long-term debt | 11 | 78,526 | 70,588 | 7,609 | 294 | 35 | | Subordinated debt | 12 | 82,075 | 3,083 | 6,166 | 13,048 | 59,778 | | | | $812,397 | $457,752 | $220,475 | $61,109 | $73,061 | We are not aware of any other commitments or contingent liabilities which may have a material adverse impact on Mid Penn’s liquidity or capital resources. #### Effects of Inflation A bank's asset and liability structure is substantially different from that of an industrial company in that virtually all assets and liabilities of a bank are monetary in nature. Management believes the impact of inflation on its financial results depends principally upon Mid Penn's ability to measure its sensitivity to changes in interest rates and to take appropriate actions, as needed or controllable by the Bank, to mitigate the impacts of inflation on performance. Interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or at the same magnitude as the prices of other goods and services. As discussed previously, management seeks to manage the relationship between interest sensitive assets and liabilities in order to protect against wide interest rate fluctuations, including those resulting from inflation. Information included elsewhere in this report will assist in the understanding of how Mid Penn is positioned to react to changing interest rates and inflationary trends. In particular, the previously discussed risk factors, the composition of and yields on loans and investments, and the composition and costs of deposits and other interest-bearing liabilities, should be considered. #### Off-Balance Sheet Items Mid Penn makes contractual commitments to extend credit and extends lines of credit, which are subject to Mid Penn's credit approval and monitoring procedures. As of December 31, 2021, commitments to extend credit amounted to $930,660,000 compared to $654,977,000 as of December 31, 2020. Mid Penn also issues standby letters of credit to its customers. The risk associated with standby letters of credit is essentially the same as the credit risk involved in loan extensions to customers. Standby letters of credit increased to $55,609,000 at December 31, 2021, from $39,468,000 at December 31, 2020. ## Market risk As filed, 3,596 characters. As a financial institution, Mid Penn’s primary source of market risk is interest rate risk. Interest rate risk is the exposure to fluctuations in Mid Penn’s future earnings (earnings at risk) resulting from changes in interest rates. This exposure or sensitivity is a function of the repricing characteristics of Mid Penn's portfolio of assets and liabilities. Each asset and liability reprices either at maturity or during the life of the instrument. Interest rate sensitivity is measured as the difference between the volume of assets and liabilities that are subject to repricing in a future period of time. The principal purpose of asset-liability management is to maximize current and future net interest income within acceptable levels of interest rate risk while satisfying liquidity and capital requirements. Net interest income is increased by increasing the net interest margin and by volume growth. Thus, the goal of interest rate risk management is to maintain a balance between risk and reward such that net interest income is maximized while risk is maintained at an acceptable level. Mid Penn utilizes an asset-liability management model to measure the impact of interest rate movements on its interest rate sensitivity position. Mid Penn’s management also reviews the traditional maturity gap analysis regularly. Mid Penn does not always attempt to achieve an exact match between interest sensitive assets and liabilities because it believes that an actively managed amount of interest rate risk is inherent and appropriate in the management of Mid Penn’s profitability. Modeling techniques and simulation analysis involve assumptions and estimates that inherently cannot be measured with complete precision. Key assumptions in the analyses include maturity and repricing characteristics of assets and liabilities, prepayments on amortizing assets, non-maturing deposit sensitivity, and loan and deposit pricing. These assumptions are inherently uncertain due to the timing, magnitude and frequency of rate changes and changes in market conditions and management strategies, among other factors. However, the analyses are useful in quantifying risk and provide a relative gauge of Mid Penn’s interest rate risk position over time. Management reviews interest rate risk on a quarterly basis. This analysis includes earnings scenarios whereby interest rates are increased and decreased by 100, 200, and 300 basis points. These scenarios, detailed in Table 16, indicate that Mid Penn would experience enhanced net interest income over a one-year time frame due to upward interest rate changes, while a reduction in interest rates would result in a decline in net interest income over a one-year time frame; however, actual results could vary significantly from the calculations prepared by management. At December 31, 2021, all interest rate risk levels according to the model were within the tolerance limits of the Board-approved policy. ### TABLE 15: EFFECT OF HYPOTHETICAL CHANGES IN INTEREST RATES | December 31, 2021 Change in Basis Points | % Change in Net Interest Income | Policy Risk Limit | December 31, 2020 Change in Basis Points | % Change in Net Interest Income | Policy Risk Limit | | ---: | ---: | --- | ---: | ---: | --- | | 300 | 21.08% | ≥ -20% | 300 | 15.69% | ≥ -20% | | 200 | 13.70% | ≥ -15% | 200 | 10.03% | ≥ -15% | | 100 | 6.53% | ≥ -10% | 100 | 4.72% | ≥ -10% | | 0 | | | 0 | | | | (100) | -6.38% | ≥ -10% | (100) | -3.97% | ≥ -10% | | (200) | -13.11% | ≥ -15% | (200) | -9.30% | ≥ -15% | | (300) | -19.59% | ≥ -20% | (300) | -14.45% | ≥ -20% | 56 ## Controls and procedures As filed, 2,180 characters. ### Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures Mid Penn carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of its management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15 as of December 31, 2021. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer concluded, as of December 31, 2021, that Mid Penn’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective in recording, processing, summarizing, and reporting information required to be disclosed by Mid Penn within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and such information is accumulated and communicated to management to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Management’s Report on Internal Controls over Financial Reporting is located on page 58 of this report and is incorporated herein by reference. The scope of management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting excluded Riverview Financial Corporation, which Mid Penn acquired in a business combination on November 30, 2021. Total assets, excluding goodwill and intangibles assets, total liabilities, and total revenues of Riverview represented approximately 26 percent, 24 percent and 2 percent of the total assets, total liabilities and total revenues of Mid Penn’s Consolidated Financial Statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2021, respectively. Our independent registered public accounting firm, RSM US LLP, also attested to, and reported on, the effectiveness of Mid Penn’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021. RSM US LLP’s attestation report appears in Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplemental Data.” ### Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting There have been no changes in Mid Penn’s internal control over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of 2021 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Mid Penn’s internal control over financial reporting. Filed Mar 15, 2022. Source: SEC EDGAR, the filing index for accession 0001564590-22-010421. Last ingested by Listed: Nov 5, 2026, 18:25 ET. No prices; not investment advice.