Service Corp International: Form 10-K for the period ended Dec 31, 2013
Filed with the SEC on Feb 14, 2014 and accepted by EDGAR at Feb 14, 2014, 15:37 ET.
Business
As filed, 21,301 characters, with its headings, lists and tables. Extracted from the main document; charts and exhibits are in the original on sec.gov.
General
We are North America’s largest provider of deathcare products and services, with a network of funeral homes and cemeteries unequaled in geographic scale and reach. At December 31, 2013, we operated 1,644 funeral service locations and 514 cemeteries (including 283 funeral service/cemetery combination locations) in North America, which are geographically diversified across 43 states, eight Canadian provinces, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. Our funeral segment also includes the operations of 12 funeral homes in Germany that we intend to exit when economic values and conditions are conducive to a sale. Our funeral service and cemetery operations consist of funeral service locations, cemeteries, funeral service/cemetery combination locations, crematoria, and related businesses. We sell cemetery property and funeral and cemetery merchandise and services at the time of need and on a preneed basis.
History
We were incorporated in Texas in July of 1962. Our original business plan was based on efficiencies of scale, specifically reducing overhead costs by sharing resources such as embalming, accounting, transportation, and personnel among funeral homes in a business “cluster.” After proving the plan’s effectiveness in Houston in the early 1960s, SCI set out to apply this operating strategy through the acquisition of deathcare businesses in other markets. It was the beginning of a three-decade period of expansion that would create a North American network of nearly 1,400 funeral homes and cemeteries by the end of 1992. Beginning in 1993, we expanded beyond North America, acquiring major deathcare companies in Australia, the United Kingdom, and France, plus smaller holdings in other European countries and South America. By the end of 1999, our global network numbered more than 4,500 funeral service locations, cemeteries, and crematories in more than 20 countries.
During the mid to late 1990s, acquisitions of deathcare facilities became extremely competitive, resulting in increased prices for acquisitions and substantially reduced returns on invested capital. In 1999, we significantly reduced our level of acquisition activity and over the next several years implemented various initiatives to pay down debt, increase cash flow, reduce overhead costs, and increase efficiency. We divested our international businesses and many North American funeral homes and cemeteries that were either underperforming or did not fit our long-term strategy. At the same time, we began to capitalize on the strength of our network by introducing to North America the first transcontinental brand of deathcare services and products — Dignity Memorial® (See www.dignitymemorial.com (http://www.dignitymemorial.com)). Information contained on our website is not part of this report.
In late 2006, having arrived at a position of significant financial strength and improved operating efficiency, we acquired the then second largest company in the North American deathcare industry, Alderwoods Group. In early 2010, we acquired the then fifth largest company in the North American deathcare industry, Keystone North America. In June of 2011, we acquired 70% of the outstanding shares of The Neptune Society, Inc. (Neptune), which is the nation's largest direct cremation organization. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, we acquired an additional 20% of the outstanding shares of Neptune increasing our ownership from 70% to 90%.
In December 2013, we purchased Stewart Enterprises, Inc. (Stewart), the second largest operator of funeral homes and cemeteries in North America. This transaction provides us with an opportunity for growth consistent with our capital deployment strategy and will allow us the ability to serve a number of new, complementary areas, while enabling us to capitalize on what we believe will produce significant synergies and operating efficiencies.
Funeral and Cemetery Operations
Worldwide, we have 1,656 funeral service locations and 514 cemeteries (including 283 funeral service/cemetery combination locations) covering 43 states, eight Canadian provinces, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and Germany. See Note 16 in Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, for financial information about our business segments and geographic areas.
Our funeral service and cemetery operations consist of funeral service locations, cemeteries, funeral service/cemetery combination locations, crematoria, and related businesses. We provide all professional services relating to funerals and cremations, including the use of funeral facilities and motor vehicles and preparation and embalming services. Funeral-related merchandise, including caskets, casket memorialization products, burial vaults, cremation receptacles, cremation memorial products, flowers, and other ancillary products and services, is sold at funeral service locations. Our cemeteries provide cemetery property interment rights, including developed lots, lawn crypts, and mausoleum spaces and sell cemetery-related merchandise and services, including stone and bronze memorials, markers, merchandise installations, and burial openings and closings.
We also sell preneed funeral and cemetery products and services whereby a customer contractually agrees to the terms of certain products and services to be delivered and performed in the future. We define these sales as preneed sales. As a result of such preneed sales, our backlog of unfulfilled preneed funeral and preneed cemetery contracts was $8.9 billion and $7.4 billion at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
Funeral service/cemetery combination locations are those businesses in which a funeral service location is physically located within or adjoining a cemetery that we own. Combination locations allow certain facility, personnel, and equipment costs to be shared between the funeral service location and cemetery. Such combination facilities typically can be more cost competitive and have higher gross margins than if the funeral and cemetery operations were operated separately. Combination locations also create synergies between funeral and cemetery preneed sales force personnel and give families added convenience to purchase both funeral and cemetery products and services at a single location. We have the largest number of combination locations in North America. Fifty-five percent of our cemeteries are part of a combination location. Our combination operations include Rose Hills, the largest combination operation in the United States, performing over 4,500 funeral services and 8,000 cemetery interments per year.
In 2013 our operations in the United States and Canada were organized into 30 major markets, 47 metro markets, and 64 main street markets. Each market is led by a market manager or director with responsibility for funeral and/or cemetery operations and preneed sales. Within each market, the funeral homes and cemeteries share common resources such as personnel, preparation services, and vehicles. There are four market support centers in North America to assist market directors with financial, administrative, pricing, and human resource needs. These support centers are located in Houston, Miami, New York, and Los Angeles. The primary functions of the support centers are to help facilitate the execution of corporate strategies, coordinate communication between the field and corporate offices, and serve as liaisons for the implementation of policies and procedures.
The following table at December 31, 2013 provides the number of our funeral homes and cemeteries by country, and by state, territory, or province:
| Country, State/Territory/Province United States | Number of Funeral Homes | Number of Cemeteries | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | 38 | 14 | 52 |
| Arizona | 34 | 11 | 45 |
| Arkansas | 13 | 3 | 16 |
| California | 183 | 37 | 220 |
| Colorado | 25 | 11 | 36 |
| Connecticut | 19 | — | 19 |
| District of Columbia | 1 | — | 1 |
| Florida | 151 | 72 | 223 |
| Georgia | 37 | 24 | 61 |
| Hawaii | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| Idaho | 6 | 1 | 7 |
| Illinois | 49 | 24 | 73 |
| Indiana | 41 | 9 | 50 |
| Iowa | 4 | 2 | 6 |
| Kansas | 11 | 6 | 17 |
| Kentucky | 15 | 5 | 20 |
| Louisiana | 30 | 10 | 40 |
| Maine | 11 | — | 11 |
| Maryland | 19 | 16 | 35 |
| Massachusetts | 26 | — | 26 |
| Michigan | 38 | — | 38 |
| Minnesota | 12 | 2 | 14 |
| Mississippi | 21 | 4 | 25 |
| Missouri | 29 | 11 | 40 |
| Nebraska | 4 | 2 | 6 |
| Nevada | 14 | 6 | 20 |
| New Hampshire | 6 | — | 6 |
| New Jersey | 21 | — | 21 |
| New York | 86 | — | 86 |
| North Carolina | 59 | 20 | 79 |
| Ohio | 43 | 13 | 56 |
5
| Oklahoma | 14 | 7 | 21 |
| Oregon | 17 | 4 | 21 |
| Pennsylvania | 24 | 20 | 44 |
| Puerto Rico | 13 | 8 | 21 |
| Rhode Island | 4 | — | 4 |
| South Carolina | 13 | 11 | 24 |
| Tennessee | 43 | 21 | 64 |
| Texas | 171 | 68 | 239 |
| Utah | 4 | 3 | 7 |
| Vermont | 4 | — | 4 |
| Virginia | 41 | 26 | 67 |
| Washington | 47 | 16 | 63 |
| West Virginia | 14 | 12 | 26 |
| Wisconsin | 16 | 3 | 19 |
| Canada | |||
| Alberta | 9 | — | 9 |
| British Columbia | 37 | 7 | 44 |
| Manitoba | 4 | 3 | 7 |
| New Brunswick | 5 | — | 5 |
| Nova Scotia | 11 | — | 11 |
| Ontario | 46 | — | 46 |
| Quebec | 44 | — | 44 |
| Saskatchewan | 15 | — | 15 |
| Germany | 12 | — | 12 |
| Total (1) | 1,656 | 514 | 2,170 |
(1) Includes businesses held for sale at December 31, 2013.
We believe we have satisfactory title to the properties owned and used in our business, subject to various liens, encumbrances, and easements that are incidental to ownership rights and uses and do not materially detract from the value of the property. We also lease a number of facilities that we use in our business under both capital and operating leases.
At December 31, 2013, we owned approximately 86% of the real estate and buildings used at our facilities, and the remainder of the facilities were leased. At December 31, 2013, our 514 cemeteries contained a total of approximately 36,500 acres, of which approximately 61% was developed.
A map of our locations in North America is presented below:
Competition
Although there are several public companies that own funeral homes and cemeteries, the majority of deathcare businesses in North America are locally-owned, independent operations. We estimate that our funeral and cemetery market share in North America is approximately 16% based on estimated total industry revenues. The position of a single funeral home or cemetery in any community is a function of the name, reputation, and location of that funeral home or cemetery, although competitive pricing, professional service and attention, and well-maintained locations are also important.
We believe we have an unparalleled network of funeral service locations and cemeteries that offer high-quality products and services at prices that are competitive with local competing funeral homes, cemeteries, and retail locations. Within this network, the funeral service locations and cemeteries operate under various names as most operations were acquired as existing businesses. We have co-branded our funeral operations in North America under the name Dignity Memorial®. We believe our transcontinental branding strategy gives us a strategic advantage and identity in the industry. While this branding process is intended to emphasize our seamless national network of funeral service locations and cemeteries, the original names associated with acquired operations, and their inherent goodwill and heritage, generally remain the same. For example, Geo. H. Lewis & Sons Funeral Directors is now Geo. H. Lewis & Sons Funeral Directors, a Dignity Memorial® provider.
Strategies for Growth
We believe we are well-positioned for long-term profitable growth. We are the largest company in the North American deathcare industry with unparalleled scale on both a national and local basis and are poised to benefit from the aging of America. We have demonstrated that we can generate significant and consistent cash flow, even in difficult economic times. This, coupled with our financial position and strong liquidity, allows us to deploy our available free cash flow to enhance the value of the company. Our free cash flow deployment focus is centered on strategic acquisitions, share repurchases, dividends, and opportunistic debt repurchases when we believe we can reduce liquidity risk and enhance our near-term maturity profile.
Acquisition of Stewart Enterprises. 2014 will be a year of meaningful growth for the company as a result of the acquisition of Stewart in December 2013. The addition of Stewart expands and complements our existing footprint in the highly fragmented funeral and cemetery industry in North America. We expect to generate approximately $60 million in annual cost savings from the combined companies. These synergies are generally expected to comprise reduced back-office systems and infrastructure costs, elimination of duplicate public company and management structure costs, and improved purchasing power. We expect to realize half, or $30 million, of these synergies in 2014 with the remaining half to be achieved in 2015.
Growing our Preneed Backlog. We believe our size and scale gives us a significant advantage in preneed selling strategies and that growth in preneed sales will ultimately lead to market share growth over the long term. In 2013, our comparable cemetery preneed sales increased 8.0% over the previous year and comparable preneed funeral sales increased 11.1%. Our aggregate funeral and cemetery preneed sales production in 2013 exceeded $1.3 billion. From this base we expect continued growth with the addition of Stewart in 2014. We recognize this level of activity is unmatched in our industry and gives us a tremendous competitive advantage. Our backlog of preneed funeral and cemetery revenues at the end of 2013 was approximately $9 billion which bodes well for future earnings and cash flow.
According to the United States Census Bureau, currently, the number of Americans that are 60 and older are approximately 61 million and this number is expected to grow to more than 77 million by 2020, resulting in a growing number of people that will be interested in preneed options. In 2009, we began to invest in developing the key infrastructure to deliver superior sales production growth in anticipation of the baby boomers entering the “stage in life” of early 60’s to early 70’s where they are most likely to consider pre-arrangement traditionally. Our success from 2010 thru 2012 was almost exclusively generated through enhanced sales force productivity as the size of our sales team remained relatively flat. More recently in 2013 and looking forward to 2014, we are investing in recruiters, trainers, and sales managers to support our effort to sell through an expanded sale force. During 2013 we added over 250 (or 7%) to our sales counselor team to 3,850.
Staying Relevant to our Consumers. In a world of change, we are focused on staying relevant to our consumers. We have streamlined and improved our interaction with consumers through the use of technology and through enhanced packaged offerings. We continue to develop new products and services including event and reception services, floral offerings, an enhanced cemetery merchandise program, and other contemporary products and services.
With an increasing preference for cremation in North America, we are also focused on product and service offerings that appeal specifically to cremation customers. In addition, we continue to expand our direct cremation brand of businesses we refer to collectively as SCI Direct which now operates in 19 states.
Leveraging our Scale. Our size and broad geographic network of businesses give us a significant advantage in this industry. We continue to drive operating discipline and leverage our scale through the standardization of processes and the use of key performance metrics for staffing and other operational and administrative activities. We continually examine our purchasing spend to look for ways to consolidate our supplier base, modify processes and policies for more efficient purchasing, and employ metrics to manage and improve supplier performance. Our recent investment in updating our purchasing system is streamlining the handling, approval, and payment of vendor invoices as well as providing greater visibility into company expenditures. Additionally, many of our accounting and administrative functions are outsourced to third party providers providing for greater efficiency.
Managing and Growing the Footprint. We are managing our network of business locations by positioning each business location to support the preferences of its local customer base, while monitoring each market for changing demographics and competitive dynamics. We expect to continue to pursue selective business expansion through construction or targeted acquisitions of cemeteries and funeral homes with a focus on the highest return customer categories or where we can leverage scale. We believe our unparalleled business footprint and geographic diversity uniquely positions us to benefit from the aging consumer.
Employees
At December 31, 2013, we employed 16,476 (16,440 in North America) individuals on a full-time basis and 9,243 (9,238 in North America) individuals on a part-time basis. Of the full-time employees, 15,573 were employed in the funeral and cemetery operations and 903 were employed in corporate or other overhead activities and services. All eligible employees in the United States who so elect are covered by our group health and life insurance plans. Employees covered by a collective bargaining agreement are typically covered by union health plans and are not eligible to participate in the our health insurance plan. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, there were 9,706 and 7,284 employees who had elected to participate in our group health insurance plans. Eligible employees in the United States are covered by retirement plans of SCI or various subsidiaries, while international employees are covered by other SCI (or SCI subsidiary) defined or government-mandated benefit plans. Approximately 3.0% of our employees in North America are represented by unions. Although labor disputes occur from time to time, relations with employees are generally considered favorable.
Regulation
Our operations are subject to regulations, supervision, and licensing under numerous foreign, federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, and regulations, including extensive regulations concerning trust funds, preneed sales of funeral and cemetery products and services, and various other aspects of our business. We strive to comply in all material respects with the provisions of these laws, ordinances, and regulations. Since 1984, we have operated in the United States under the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) comprehensive trade regulation rule for the funeral industry. The rule contains requirements for funeral industry practices, including extensive price and other affirmative disclosures and imposes mandatory itemization of funeral goods and services.
Other
Our corporate headquarters are located at 1929 Allen Parkway, Houston, Texas 77019. The property consists of approximately 120,000 square feet of office space and 185,000 square feet of parking space. We own and utilize an additional building located in Houston, Texas for corporate activities containing a total of approximately 38,000 square feet of office space. We also lease approximately 29,000 square feet of office space in Houston, Texas, which we utilize for corporate activities. As a result of the acquisition of Stewart we own a building in Jefferson, Louisiana with approximately 98,200 square feet of office space that we intend to use in part for corporate activities.
We make available free of charge, on or through our website, our annual, quarterly, and current reports and any amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after electronically filing such reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Our website is http://www.sci-corp.com and our telephone number is (713) 522-5141. The SEC also maintains an internet site at http://www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically. The public may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.
Each of our Board of Directors’ standing committee charters, our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our Code of Ethics for Board Members, and our Code of Conduct for Officers and Employees are available, free of charge, through our website or, upon request, in print. We will post on our internet website all waivers to or amendments of our Code of Conduct for Officers and Employees, which are required to be disclosed by applicable law and rules of the New York Stock Exchange listing standards. Information contained on our website is not part of this report.
Risk factors
As filed, 29,369 characters, with its headings, lists and tables. Extracted from the main document; charts and exhibits are in the original on sec.gov.
Cautionary Statement on Forward-Looking Statements
The statements in this Form 10-K that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements made in reliance on the safe harbor protections provided under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may be accompanied by words such as “believe”, “estimate”, “project”, “expect”, “anticipate”, or “predict” that convey the uncertainty of future events or outcomes. These statements are based on assumptions that we believe are reasonable; however, many important factors could cause our actual consolidated results in the future to differ materially from the forward-looking statements made herein and in any other documents or oral presentations made by, or on behalf of, the Company. These factors are discussed below. We assume no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements made herein or any other forward-looking statements made by the Company, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.
Our affiliated funeral and cemetery trust funds own investments in equity securities, fixed income securities, and mutual funds, which are affected by market conditions that are beyond our control.
In connection with our preneed funeral and preneed cemetery merchandise and service sales, most affiliated funeral and cemetery trust funds own investments in equity securities, fixed income securities, and mutual funds. Our earnings and investment gains and losses on these securities and mutual funds are affected by financial market conditions that are beyond our control.
The following table summarizes our investment returns (realized and unrealized), excluding certain fees, on our trust funds for the years ended December 31:
| 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preneed funeral merchandise and service trust funds | 16.6% | 12.4% | 0.7% |
| Preneed cemetery merchandise and service trust funds | 19.3% | 13.4% | 0.7% |
| Perpetual care trust funds | 7.6% | 10.5% | 5.2% |
Generally, earnings or gains and losses on our trust investments are recognized, and we withdraw cash, when the underlying service is performed, merchandise is delivered, or upon contract cancellation; however, our cemetery perpetual care trusts recognize earnings, and in certain states, capital gains and losses, and we withdraw cash, when we incur qualifying cemetery maintenance costs.
If the investments in our trust funds experience significant declines in 2014 or subsequent years, there could be insufficient funds in the trusts to cover the costs of delivering services and merchandise or maintaining cemeteries in the future. We may be required to cover any such shortfall with cash flows from operations, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows. For more information related to our trust investments, see Notes 4, 5, and 6 in Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
If the fair market value of these trusts, plus any other amount due to us upon delivery of the associated contracts, were to decline below the estimated costs to deliver the underlying products and services, we would record a charge to earnings to record a liability for the expected losses on the delivery of the associated contracts. As of December 31, 2013, no such charge was required. For additional information, see Critical Accounting Policies in Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
We may be required to replenish our affiliated funeral and cemetery trust funds in order to meet minimum funding requirements, which would have a negative effect on our earnings and cash flow.
In certain states and provinces, we have withdrawn allowable distributable earnings including unrealized gains prior to the maturity or cancellation of the related contract. Additionally, some states have laws that either require replenishment of investment losses under certain circumstances or impose various restrictions on withdrawals of future earnings when trust fund values drop below certain prescribed amounts. In the event of market declines, we may be required to deposit portions or all of these amounts into the respective trusts in some future period. As of December 31, 2013, we had unrealized losses of $19.7 million in the various trusts within these states. See Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements, Contractual Obligations, and Commercial and Contingent Commitments in Part II, Item 7.
Our ability to execute our strategic plan depends on many factors, some of which are beyond our control.
Our strategic plan is focused on the continued implementation of key revenue initiatives, preneed production, and cost management. Many of the factors that impact our ability to execute our strategic plan, such as the number of deaths and general economic conditions, are beyond our control. Changes in operating conditions, such as supply disruptions and labor disputes, could negatively impact our operations. Our inability to achieve the levels of cost savings, productivity improvements, preneed production, or earnings growth anticipated by management could affect our financial performance. Our inability to complete acquisitions, divestitures, or strategic alliances as planned or to realize expected synergies and strategic benefits could impact our financial performance. We cannot give assurance that we will be able to execute any or all of our strategic plan. Failure to execute any or all of our strategic plan could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.
Our credit agreements contain covenants that may prevent us from engaging in certain transactions.
Our bank credit facility contains, among other things, various affirmative and negative covenants that may prevent us from engaging in certain transactions that might otherwise be considered beneficial to us. The covenants limit, among other things, our and our subsidiaries’ ability to:
- Incur additional indebtedness (including guarantee obligations);
- Create liens on assets;
- Engage in certain transactions with affiliates;
- Enter into sale-leaseback transactions;
- Engage in mergers, liquidations, and dissolutions;
- Sell assets;
- Pay dividends, distributions, and other payments in respect of our capital stock;
- Purchase our capital stock in the open market;
- Make investments, loans, or advances;
- Repay indebtedness or amend the agreements relating thereto;
- Create restrictions on our ability to receive distributions from subsidiaries; and
- Change our lines of business.
Our bank credit facility requires us to maintain certain leverage and interest coverage ratios. These covenants and coverage ratios may require us to take actions to reduce our indebtedness or act in a manner contrary to our strategic plan and business objectives. In addition, events beyond our control, including changes in general economic and business conditions, may affect our ability to satisfy these covenants. A breach of any of these covenants could result in a default of our indebtedness. If an event of default under our bank credit facility occurs, and such event of default continues unremedied for 30 days after we receive notice thereof, the lenders party thereto could elect to declare all amounts outstanding thereunder, together with accrued interest, immediately due and payable. Any such declaration would also result in an event of default under our Senior Indenture governing our various senior notes. For additional information, see Liquidity and Capital Resources in Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Note 10 in Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
If we lost the ability to use surety bonding to support our preneed funeral and preneed cemetery activities, we may be required to make material cash payments to fund certain trust funds.
We have entered into arrangements with certain surety companies whereby such companies agree to issue surety bonds on our behalf as financial assurance or as required by existing state and local regulations. The surety bonds are used for various business purposes; however, the majority of the surety bonds issued and outstanding have been issued to support our preneed funeral and cemetery activities. In the event all of the surety companies canceled or did not renew our surety bonds, which generally have twelve-month renewal periods, we would be required to either obtain replacement coverage or fund approximately $192.4 million into state-mandated trust accounts as of December 31, 2013. There can be no assurance that we would be able to obtain replacement coverage at a similar cost or at all.
The funeral home and cemetery industry continues to be increasingly competitive.
In North America, the funeral home and cemetery industry is characterized by a large number of locally-owned, independent operations. To compete successfully, our funeral service locations and cemeteries must maintain good reputations and high professional standards, as well as offer attractive products and services at competitive prices. In addition, we must market the Company in such a manner as to distinguish us from our competitors. We have historically experienced price competition from independent funeral home and cemetery operators, monument dealers, casket retailers, low-cost funeral providers, and other non-traditional providers of services and merchandise. If we are unable to successfully compete, our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows could be materially adversely affected.
Increasing death benefits related to preneed funeral contracts funded through life insurance or annuity contracts may not cover future increases in the cost of providing a price-guaranteed funeral service.
We sell price-guaranteed preneed funeral contracts through various programs providing for future funeral services at prices prevailing when the agreements are signed. For preneed funeral contracts funded through life insurance or annuity contracts, we receive in cash a general agency commission that typically averages approximately 19.8% of the total sale from the third-party insurance company. Additionally, we receive an increasing death benefit associated with the contract of approximately 1% per year in cash at the time the funeral is performed. There is no guarantee that the increasing death benefit will cover future increases in the cost of providing a price-guaranteed funeral service, and any such excess cost could be materially adverse to our future cash flows, revenues, and operating margins.
The financial condition of third-party insurance companies that fund our preneed funeral contracts may impact our future revenues.
Where permitted, customers may arrange their preneed funeral contract by purchasing a life insurance or annuity policy from third-party insurance companies. The customer/policy holder assigns the policy benefits to our funeral home to pay for the preneed funeral contract at the time of need. If the financial condition of the third-party insurance companies were to deteriorate materially because of market conditions or otherwise, there could be an adverse effect on our ability to collect all or part of the proceeds of the life insurance policy, including the annual increase in the death benefit, if we fulfill the preneed contract at the time of need.
Failure to collect such proceeds could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.
Unfavorable results of litigation, including currently pending class action cases concerning cemetery or burial practices, could have a material adverse impact on our financial statements.
As discussed in Note 12 of Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, we are subject to a variety of claims and lawsuits in the ordinary course of our business. Adverse outcomes in some or all of the pending cases may result in significant monetary damages or injunctive relief against us, as litigation and other claims are subject to inherent uncertainties. Any such adverse outcomes, in pending cases or other lawsuits that may arise in the future, could have a material adverse impact on our financial position, cash flows, and results of operations.
Unfavorable publicity could affect our reputation and business.
Since our operations relate to life events involving emotional stress for our client families, our business is dependent on consumer trust and confidence. Unfavorable publicity about our business generally or in relation to any specific location could affect our reputation and consumers’ trust and confidence in our products and services, thereby having an adverse impact upon our sales and financial results as well as the price of our common stock.
If the number of deaths in our markets declines, our cash flows and revenues may decrease.
If the number of deaths declines, the number of funeral services and interments performed by us could decrease and our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows could be materially adversely affected.
If we are not able to respond effectively to changing consumer preferences, our market share, revenues, and profitability could decrease.
Future market share, revenues, and profits will depend in part on our ability to anticipate, identify, and respond to changing consumer preferences. We may not correctly anticipate or identify trends in consumer preferences, or we may identify them later than our competitors do. In addition, any strategies we may implement to address these trends may prove incorrect or ineffective.
The continuing upward trend in the number of cremations performed in North America could result in lower revenues and gross profit.
There is a continuing upward trend in the number of cremations performed in North America as an alternative to traditional funeral service dispositions. In our North American operations during 2013, 50.2% of the comparable funeral services we performed were cremation cases compared to 48.8% and 44.3% performed in 2012 and 2011, respectively. The addition of Neptune Society fulfilled contracts to our comparable results has accelerated our cremation mix change. If we are unable to continue to expand our cremation memorialization products and services, and cremations remain a significant percentage of our funeral services, our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows could be materially adversely affected.
Our funeral home and cemetery businesses are high fixed-cost businesses.
The majority of our operations are managed in groups called “markets”. Markets are geographical groups of funeral service locations and cemeteries that share common resources such as operating personnel, preparation services, clerical staff, motor vehicles, and preneed sales personnel. Personnel costs, the largest component of our operating expenses, are the cost components most beneficially affected by this grouping. We must incur many of these costs regardless of the number of funeral services or interments performed. Because we cannot necessarily decrease these costs when we experience lower sales volumes, a sales decline may cause our margin percentages to decline at a greater rate than the decline in revenues.
Regulation and compliance could have a material adverse impact on our financial results.
Our operations are subject to regulation, supervision, and licensing under numerous foreign, federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, and regulations, including extensive regulations concerning trust funds, preneed sales of funeral and cemetery products and services, and various other aspects of our business. For example, the funeral home industry is regulated by the Federal Trade Commission, which requires funeral homes to take actions designed to protect consumers. Our facilities are also subject to stringent health, safety, and environmental regulations. Violations of applicable laws could result in fines or sanctions against us.
Businesses in general are subject to the impact of major legislation, including the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. Many provisions of these complex laws could impact our business, and many of the provisions require implementation through regulations that have not yet been promulgated. Although we do not know the ultimate impact of these laws, we expect such laws will increase our costs and the potential risks of failure to comply.
In addition, from time to time, governments and agencies propose to amend or add regulations, which could increase costs and decrease cash flows. For example, foreign, federal, state, local, and other regulatory agencies have considered and may enact additional legislation or regulations that could affect the deathcare industry. These include regulations that require more liberal refund and cancellation policies for preneed sales of products and services, limit or eliminate our ability to use surety bonding, increase trust requirements, require the deposit of funds or collateral to offset unrealized losses of trusts, and/or prohibit the common ownership of funeral homes and cemeteries in the same market. If adopted by the regulatory authorities of the jurisdictions in which we operate, these and other possible proposals could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.
Compliance with laws, regulations, industry standards, and customs concerning burial procedures and the handling and care of human remains is critical to the continued success of our business and any operations we may acquire. Litigation and regulatory proceedings regarding these issues could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows. We are continually monitoring and reviewing our operations in an effort to ensure that we are in compliance with these laws, regulations, and standards and, where appropriate, taking appropriate corrective action.
Increased costs, including potential increased health care costs, may have a negative impact on earnings and cash flows.
We may not be successful in maintaining our margins and may incur additional costs. On March 23, 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act became law, and one week later, the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 became effective, together enacting comprehensive health care reform in the United States. The legislation is likely to increase our health care costs. Many provisions of the law that could impact our business will not become effective until 2015, or later, and require implementation through regulations that have not yet been promulgated. Accordingly, the costs and other effects of the legislation, which may include the cost of compliance and potentially increased costs of providing for medical insurance for our employees, cannot be determined with certainty at this time. Some of the costs impacting our business are largely beyond our control. To the extent that we are unable to pass these cost increases on to our customers, they will have a negative impact on our earnings and cash flows.
Cemetery burial practice claims could have a material adverse impact on our financial results.
Our cemetery practices have evolved and improved over time. Most of our cemeteries have been operating for decades and, therefore, may have used practices and procedures that are outdated in comparison to today's standards. When cemetery disputes occur, we may be subjected to litigation and liability for improper burial practices, including (1) burial practices of a different era that are judged today in hindsight as being outdated, and (2) alleged violations of our practices and procedures by one or more of our associates. For example, the Sands case described elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K alleges improper burial practices dating from February 1985 to September 2009. In addition, since we acquired most of our cemeteries, we may be subject to litigation and liability based upon actions or events that occurred before we acquired or managed the cemeteries. Claims or litigation based upon our cemetery burial practices could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.
A number of years may elapse before particular tax matters, for which we have established accruals, are audited and finally resolved.
The number of tax years with open tax audits varies depending on the tax jurisdiction. In the United States, the Internal Revenue Service is currently examining our tax returns for 1999 through 2005 and various state jurisdictions are auditing years through 2010. While it is often difficult to predict the final outcome or the timing of resolution of any particular tax matter, we believe that our accruals reflect the probable outcome of known tax contingencies. However, unfavorable settlement of any particular issue may reduce a deferred tax asset or require the use of cash, which may have a material adverse impact to our financial statements. Favorable resolution could result in reduced income tax expense reported in the financial statements in the future. See Note 9 of Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data for additional information.
Declines in overall economic conditions beyond our control could reduce future potential earnings and cash flows and could result in future impairments to goodwill and/or other intangible assets.
In addition to an annual review, we assess the impairment of goodwill and/or other intangible assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may be greater than fair value. Factors that could trigger an interim impairment review include, but are not limited to, a significant decline in our stock price, significant underperformance relative to historical or projected future operating results, and significant negative industry or economic trends. If these factors occur, we may have a triggering event, which could result in an impairment of our goodwill and/or other intangible assets. If economic conditions worsen causing deterioration in our operating revenues, operating margins and cash flows, we may have a triggering event that could result in an impairment of our goodwill and/or other intangible assets. Our cemetery segment, which has a goodwill balance of $321.2 million as of December 31, 2013, is more sensitive to market conditions and goodwill impairments because it is more reliant on preneed sales, which are impacted by customer discretionary spending. For additional information, see Critical Accounting Policies in Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Any failure to maintain the security of the information relating to our customers, their loved ones, our associates, and our vendors could damage our reputation, could cause us to incur substantial additional costs and to become subject to litigation, and could adversely affect our operating results.
In the ordinary course of our business, we receive certain personal information, in both physical and electronic formats, about our customers, their loved ones, our associates, and our vendors. In addition, our on-line operations at our websites depend upon the secure transmission of confidential information over public networks, including information permitting electronic payments. We maintain substantial security measures to protect, and to prevent unauthorized access to, such information. Nevertheless, it is possible that computer hackers and others (through cyberattacks, which are rapidly evolving and becoming increasingly sophisticated, or by other means) might defeat our security measures in the future and obtain the personal information of customers, their loved ones, our associates, and our vendors that we hold. Further, our associates, contractors, or third parties with whom we do business may attempt to circumvent our security measures in order to misappropriate such information, and may purposefully or inadvertently cause a breach involving such information. A breach of our security measures could adversely affect our reputation with our customers and their loved ones, associates, and vendors, as well as our operations, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity, and could result in litigation against us or the imposition of penalties. Moreover, a security breach could require that we expend significant additional resources to upgrade further the security measures that we employ to guard such important personal information against cyberattacks and other attempts to access such information and could result in a disruption of our operations.
We may fail to realize the anticipated benefits of the acquisition of Stewart.
The success of the acquisition of Stewart will depend, in part, on our ability to realize the anticipated cost savings from reduced back-office and infrastructure expenses, elimination of duplicative public company and management structure costs, and improved purchasing power through greater scale. However, to realize the anticipated benefits from the acquisition, we must successfully combine the businesses of SCI and Stewart in a manner that permits those costs savings to be realized. If we are not able to successfully achieve these objectives, the anticipated benefits of the acquisition may not be realized fully or at all or may take longer or cost more to realize than expected. It is possible that the integration process could result in the loss of valuable employees, the disruption of each company's ongoing businesses, or inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures, practices, and policies that could adversely impact our operations.
The acquisition of Stewart may result in unexpected consequences to our business and results of operations.
Although Stewart's businesses are generally subject to risks similar to those to which we are subject to in our existing operations, we may not have discovered all risks applicable to Stewart's businesses during the due diligence process. Some of these risks could produce unexpected and unwanted consequences for us. Undiscovered risks may result in us incurring financial liabilities, which could be material and have a negative impact on our business operations.
Our level of indebtedness following the completion of the acquisition of Stewart could adversely affect our ability to raise additional capital to fund our operations, limit our ability to react to changes in the economy or our industry, and prevent us from fulfilling our obligations under our indebtedness.
We have a significant amount of indebtedness which was increased substantially to complete the acquisition of Stewart Enterprises. Our substantial indebtedness could have important consequences, including the following:
- it may limit our ability to obtain additional debt or equity financing for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, debt service requirements, and general corporate or other purposes;
- a portion of our cash flows from operations will be dedicated to the payment of principal and interest on our indebtedness, including indebtedness we may incur in the future, and will not be available for other purposes, including to finance our working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, and general corporate or other purposes;
- it could limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry in which we operate and place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors that have less debt;
- it could make us more vulnerable to downturns in general economic or industry conditions or in our business, or prevent us from carrying out activities that are important to our growth;
- it could increase our interest expense if interest rates in general increase because a portion of our indebtedness, including all of our indebtedness under our senior credit facilities, bears interest at floating rates; and
- it could make it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with respect to our indebtedness, and any failure to comply with the obligations of any of our debt instruments, including any financial and other restrictive covenants, could result in an event of default under the agreements governing our other indebtedness which, if not cured or waived, could result in the acceleration of our indebtedness.
Any of the above listed factors could materially affect our business, cash flows, financial condition, and results of operations.
In addition to our high level of indebtedness, we also have significant rental and other obligations under our operating and capital leases for funeral service locations, cemetery operating and maintenance equipment, and transportation equipment. These obligations could further increase the risks described above.
Legal proceedings
As filed, 14,726 characters, with its headings, lists and tables. Extracted from the main document; charts and exhibits are in the original on sec.gov.
Information regarding legal proceedings is set forth in Note 12 of Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY
The following table sets forth as of February 14, 2014, the name and age of each executive officer of the Company, the office held, and the year first elected an officer.
| Officer Name | Age | Position | Year First Became Officer |
|---|---|---|---|
| R. L. Waltrip | 83 | Chairman of the Board | 1962 |
| Thomas L. Ryan | 48 | President and Chief Executive Officer | 1999 |
| Michael R. Webb | 55 | Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer | 1998 |
| Eric D. Tanzberger | 45 | Senior Vice President Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer | 2000 |
| Stephen M. Mack | 62 | Senior Vice President Operations | 1998 |
| Elisabeth G. Nash | 52 | Senior Vice President Operations Services | 2004 |
| Gregory T. Sangalis | 58 | Senior Vice President General Counsel and Secretary | 2007 |
| Philip C. Jacobs | 59 | Senior Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer | 2007 |
| Kenneth G. Myers, Jr. | 56 | Senior Vice President Operations | 2014 |
| Steven A. Tidwell | 52 | Senior Vice President Sales and Merchandising | 2010 |
| Sumner J. Waring, III | 45 | Senior Vice President Operations | 2002 |
| John H. Faulk | 38 | Vice President Business Development | 2010 |
| Joseph A. Hayes | 57 | Vice President Ethics and Business Conduct and Assistant General Counsel | 2007 |
| Gerry D. Heard | 49 | Vice President Sales | 2012 |
| Albert R. Lohse | 53 | Vice President Litigation and Risk Management | 2004 |
| John Del Mixon, II | 50 | Vice President Information Technology | 2010 |
| Tammy R. Moore | 46 | Vice President and Corporate Controller | 2010 |
Mr. Waltrip is the founder and Chairman of the Board of SCI. He has provided invaluable leadership to the Company for over 50 years. A licensed funeral director, Mr. Waltrip grew up in his family’s funeral business and assumed management of the firm in the 1950s. He began buying additional funeral homes in the 1960’s and achieved significant cost efficiencies through the “cluster” strategy of sharing pooled resources among numerous locations. Mr. Waltrip took the Company public in 1969. At the end of 2013, the network he began had grown to include more than 2,100 funeral service locations and cemeteries. Mr. Waltrip holds a Bachelor’s degree in business administration from the University of Houston.
Mr. Ryan was elected Chief Executive Officer of the Company in February 2005 and has served as President of SCI since July 2002. From 2002 to 2005, Mr. Ryan was Chief Operating Officer of SCI, and from 2000 to 2002 he was Chief Executive Officer of SCI European operations. From the time Mr. Ryan joined the Company in 1996, he served in a variety of financial management roles. In July 2002, Mr. Ryan returned to the United States where he was appointed President and Chief Operating Officer of SCI. Before joining SCI, Mr. Ryan was a Certified Public Accountant with Coopers & Lybrand LLP for eight years. He holds a Bachelor’s degree in Business Administration from the University of Texas at Austin. Mr. Ryan serves as Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the United Way of Greater Houston. Mr. Ryan also serves on the Board of Directors of the Greater Houston Partnership, Greater Houston Community Foundation Governing Board, and the University of Texas McCombs Business School Advisory Council. Other Directorships include Texas Industries, Inc., Weingarten Realty Investors, and Chesapeake Energy Corporation.
Mr. Webb was elected Chief Operating Officer of Service Corporation International in February 2005 and has served as Executive Vice President of SCI since July 2002. He joined the Company in 1991 when it acquired Arlington Corporation, a regional funeral and cemetery consolidator, where he was then Chief Financial Officer. Prior to joining Arlington Corporation, Mr. Webb held various executive financial and development roles at Days Inns of America and Telemundo Group, Inc. In 1993, Mr. Webb joined our corporate development group, which he later led on a global basis before accepting operational responsibility for our Australian and Hispanic businesses. He is a graduate of the University of Georgia, where he earned a Bachelor of Business Administration degree.
Mr. Tanzberger was appointed Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in June 2006, and was named Treasurer in July 2007. He joined the Company in August 1996 and held various financial management positions prior to being promoted to Corporate Controller in August 2002. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Tanzberger was Assistant Corporate Controller at Kirby Marine Transportation Corporation, an inland waterway barge and tanker company, from January through August 1996. Prior thereto, he was a Certified Public Accountant with Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P. for more than five years. Mr. Tanzberger holds a
Bachelor in Business Administration from the University of Notre Dame. He serves on the Board of Directors of New Orleans Medical Mission Services.
Mr. Mack joined the Company in 1973 as a resident director after graduating from Farmingdale State University of New York. He became Vice President of the Eastern Region in 1986, and in February 1998 Mr. Mack was appointed Vice President North American Funeral Operations. Mr. Mack was promoted to Senior Vice President Eastern Operations in August 2002, Senior Vice President Middle Market Operations in May 2004, and assumed the office of Senior Vice President Operations, his current position, in February 2014.
Ms. Nash joined SCI in 2002 as Managing Director of Strategic Planning and Process Improvement. Prior to joining SCI, Ms. Nash worked for the Pennzoil Corporation and held various senior management accounting and financial positions. In 2004, Ms. Nash was promoted to Vice President Process & Technology. In 2010, Ms. Nash was named Senior Vice President Operations Services. She is a graduate of Texas A&M University, where she received a Bachelor of Business Administration degree in Accounting.
Mr. Sangalis joined the Company in 2007 as Senior Vice President General Counsel and Secretary. In 2012, his responsibilities were expanded to include the human resources department. Mr. Sangalis previously served as Senior Vice President, Law and Administration for Team Inc., a leading provider of specialty industrial maintenance and construction services. Prior to that, Mr. Sangalis served as Managing Director and General Counsel of Main Street Equity Ventures II, a private equity investment firm, and as Senior Vice President General Counsel and Secretary for Waste Management, Inc., the leading provider of waste management services in North America. Mr. Sangalis holds a Bachelor’s degree in Finance from Indiana University and a Master of Business Administration from the University of Minnesota. He earned his Juris Doctorate from the University of Minnesota Law School where he graduated Cum Laude.
Mr. Jacobs joined SCI in 2007 as Senior Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Jacobs was employed by CompUSA as Chief Marketing Officer. Prior to that, he was employed by Publicis Worldwide as Chief Marketing Officer and prior to that held other management roles over the past 23 years at several of the nation’s top advertising agencies, as well as client-side positions. Mr. Jacobs holds a Bachelor of Science degree from the University of Tennessee and a Masters degree from Vanderbilt University.
Mr. Myers joined the Company in December 2013 when it acquired Stewart Enterprises, Inc., and he was appointed Senior Vice President Operations of the Company in February 2014. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Myers served Stewart Enterprises in a variety of senior executive positions from February 2006 through December 2013, most recently as Executive Vice President of Operations and Sales. Prior to that he was the Chief Executive Officer, President and Director of Conrad Industries, a publicly-traded company engaged in the construction and repair of government and commercial marine vessels and as Vice President of Avondale Industries, Inc., a publicly-traded company engaged in the design, construction, system integration, and repair of large, complex ships for commercial and government customers, which was subsequently acquired by Northrop Grumman Corporation. Mr. Myers holds a Bachelor's degree in Accounting from Nicholls State University.
Mr. Tidwell joined SCI as Vice President Main Street Market Operations in March 2010 and was promoted to Senior Vice President Sales and Marketing in August 2012. As a co-founder of Keystone North America, Inc., Mr. Tidwell served as its President and Chief Executive Officer from May of 2007 until it was acquired by SCI in March 2010. In his role, Mr. Tidwell worked closely with Keystone’s Senior Leadership Team to develop and implement organic growth strategies, as well as external growth and acquisition strategies. He began his career as a licensed Funeral Director and Embalmer in Nashville, Tennessee and has been actively involved in the funeral home and cemetery profession for three decades. He holds an Associate of Arts degree from John A. Gupton College and has attended executive management and leadership programs at the Harvard Business School, the Owen School of Business at Vanderbilt University, and the Center for Creative Leadership.
Mr. Waring, a licensed funeral director, joined the Company as an Area Vice President in 1996 when we merged with his family’s funeral business. Mr. Waring was appointed Regional President of the Northeast Region in 1999 and was promoted to Regional President of the Pacific Region in September 2001. Mr. Waring was promoted to Vice President Western Operations in August 2002 and assumed the office of Vice President Major Market Operations in November 2003. In February 2006, Mr. Waring was promoted to Senior Vice President Major Market Operations. In July 2008, Mr. Waring’s responsibilities were expanded to include business development. Mr. Waring holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration from Stetson University, a degree in Mortuary Science from Mt. Ida College and a Master of Business Administration degree from the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth.
Mr. Faulk joined SCI in March 2010 as Vice President Business Development, to oversee the Company’s strategic growth, including mergers and acquisitions, real estate, and construction. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Faulk worked for Bain & Company, Inc. since 2002. At Bain, he helped Fortune 500 Companies and specialty retailers identify profit growth opportunities and achieve strong operating results. He holds a Master’s degree in Business Administration from the Darden Graduate School of Business at the University of Virginia and a Bachelor’s degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Virginia.
Mr. Hayes was appointed Vice President Ethics and Business Conduct and Assistant General Counsel in November 2007. Mr. Hayes joined the Company in 1991 as corporate counsel. He was named Managing Counsel in 1996 and Assistant General Counsel in 2005. Prior to joining SCI, Mr. Hayes practiced law in Chicago and San Diego, specializing in securities, mergers and acquisitions, and commercial transactions. He received a Bachelor’s degree in Commerce from DePaul University and earned his Juris Doctorate from the University of California at Berkeley.
Mr. Heard was appointed Vice President Sales in August 2012. He began his career as a high school intern at a Company funeral home, where he continued to work while attending the University of Houston. In 1986, he joined the sales force as a Family Service Counselor and was promoted to the role of Sales Manager in 1989. Throughout his years with SCI, Mr. Heard was appointed to numerous leadership roles, including: Area Sales Director; Senior Managing Director of Sales, Houston and Gulf Regions; Managing Director of Sales for Middle Markets; Managing Director of North American Sales; and Senior Managing Director, Major Market Sales.
Mr. Lohse joined SCI in 2000 as Managing Director of Litigation and has since been involved in the resolution of major litigation issues for the Company. Mr. Lohse was promoted to Vice President Corporate Governance in 2004 and to Vice President Litigation and Risk Management in 2007. Before joining the Company, Mr. Lohse was Managing Partner at McDade, Fogler, Maines & Lohse, where he conducted a general civil trial practice. Prior to that, he practiced tort and commercial litigation at Fulbright & Jaworski. Mr. Lohse received a Bachelor of Business Administration degree from the University of Texas and a Juris Doctorate from the University of Houston Law Center.
Mr. Mixon joined SCI in 1995 as a Project Manager in the Information Technology Department. He later served as Directeur Informatique for OGF, a former subsidiary company based in Paris, France. Most recently, he has led the Information Technology Department and the Outsourcing Management Office as Managing Director. Prior to SCI, Mr. Mixon worked for Andersen Consulting (now Accenture PLC) and served on active duty in the United States Army achieving the rank of Captain. He holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Commerce from Washington and Lee University and a Master of Science degree in Systems Management from the University of Southern California.
Mrs. Moore joined the Company in August 2002 as Manager of Financial Reporting. She was promoted to Director of Financial Reporting in 2004 and Managing Director and Assistant Controller in June 2006. In February 2010, she was promoted to Vice President and Corporate Controller and oversees all onshore and offshore general accounting, internal and external reporting, trust administration, customer service, and financial planning and analysis. Prior to joining the Company, Mrs. Moore was a Certified Public Accountant with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for more than three years. She holds a Bachelor of Business Administration degree in Accounting from the University of Texas at San Antonio.
Each officer of the Company is elected by the Board of Directors and holds their office until a successor is elected and qualified or until earlier death, resignation, or removal in the manner prescribed in the Bylaws of the Company. Each officer of a subsidiary of the Company is elected by the subsidiary’s board of directors and holds their office until a successor is elected and qualified or until earlier death, resignation, or removal in the manner prescribed in the Bylaws of the Subsidiary.
Management's discussion and analysis
As filed, 87,928 characters, with its headings, lists and tables. Extracted from the main document; charts and exhibits are in the original on sec.gov.
The Company
We are North America’s largest provider of deathcare products and services, with a network of funeral homes and cemeteries unequalled in geographic scale and reach. At December 31, 2013, we operated 1,644 funeral service locations and 514 cemeteries (including 283 combination locations) in North America, which are geographically diversified across 43 states, eight Canadian provinces, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. Our funeral segment also includes the operations of 12 funeral homes in Germany that we intend to exit when economic values and conditions are conducive to a sale. Our funeral service and cemetery operations consist of funeral service locations, cemeteries, funeral service/cemetery combination locations, crematoria, and related businesses. We sell cemetery property and funeral and cemetery products and services at the time of need and on a preneed basis.
Our financial position is enhanced by our $8.9 billion backlog of future revenues from both trust and insurance-funded sales at December 31, 2013, which is the result of preneed funeral and cemetery sales. Preneed arrangements provide us with a current opportunity to secure future market share while deterring the customer from going to a competitor in the future. We believe it adds to the stability and predictability of our revenue and cash flows. While revenue on the majority of preneed funeral sales is deferred until the time of need, sales of preneed cemetery property provides opportunities for full current revenue recognition (to the extent we collect 10% from the customer and the property is developed).
We believe we have the financial strength and flexibility to reward shareholders through dividends while maintaining a prudent capital structure and pursuing new opportunities for profitable growth.
Factors affecting our operating results include: demographic trends in terms of population growth and average age, which impact death rates and number of deaths; establishing and maintaining leading market share positions supported by strong local heritage and relationships; effectively responding to increasing cremation trends by selling complementary services and merchandise; controlling salary, merchandise costs, and other expense categories; and exercising pricing leverage related to our at-need revenues. The average revenue per funeral contract is influenced by the mix of traditional and cremation services because our average cremation service revenue is approximately half of the average revenue earned from a traditional burial service. To further enhance revenue opportunities we are developing memorialization products and services that specifically appeal to cremation customers. We believe that these additional products and services will help drive increases in the average revenue for a cremation in future periods.
For further discussion of our key operating metrics, see our Results of Operations and Cash Flow sections below.
Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources
Capital Allocation Considerations
We rely on cash flow from operations as a significant source of liquidity. Our cash flow from operating activities provided $384.7 million in 2013. In addition, as of December 31, 2013, we have $418.9 million in excess borrowing capacity under our bank credit facility. As of December 31, 2013, we have $146.4 million in current maturities of long-term debt, which primarily consists of 3.125% Senior Convertible Notes due July 2014, including related unamortized premiums, that we assumed as part of the acquisition of Stewart Enterprises, Inc. (Stewart). As of February 10, 2014, we have funded from our revolver an additional $110.0 million to partially fund $167.0 million in debt extinguishments of principal and premiums for our 3.125% Senior Convertible Notes due 2014 and our 3.375% Senior Convertible Notes due 2016 in the amounts of $107.9 million and $59.1 million, respectively. Due to these subsequent transactions, our borrowing capacity under our bank credit facility is $308.9 million at February 10, 2014. We did not incur any gains or losses as a result of these transactions.
Our bank credit facility requires us to maintain certain leverage and interest coverage ratios. As of December 31, 2013, we were in compliance with all of our debt covenants. Our financial covenant requirements and actual ratios as of December 31, 2013 are as follows:
| Per Credit Agreement | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| Leverage ratio | 5.00 (Max) | 4.05 |
| Interest coverage ratio | 3.00 (Min) | 6.21 |
We believe the sources of liquidity can be supplemented by our ability to access the capital markets for additional debt or equity securities. We believe that our $144.9 million of cash on hand, future operating cash flows, and the available capacity under our credit facility will give us adequate liquidity to meet our short-term needs as well as our long-term financial obligations. In July 2013, as part of establishing financing for the acquisition of Stewart Enterprises, Inc (Stewart), we issued $425 million in 5.375% Senior Notes due January 2022 and entered into a new $1.1 billion credit agreement due July 2018 with a syndicate of banks. The net proceeds of the $425 million 5.375% Senior Notes due January 2022 were held in escrow and released on December 23, 2013 in connection with the close of the Stewart acquisition. The credit agreement consists of a $500 million bank credit facility and a term loan of up to $600 million. The term loan was fully drawn and used to fund the Stewart acquisition. We used $30.0 million of cash advances against the bank credit facility to help partially fund the Stewart acquisition in December, however the bank credit facility will primarily exist to provide the company with flexibility for general corporate purposes and to give us access to capital markets to refinance our long-term debt if, and when, we choose to do so.
It is our intention to evaluate the best uses of our cash flow that will yield the highest value and return on capital. Our capital deployment strategy is prioritized as follows:
Reinvest in the core business. We expect to continue to focus on funding growth initiatives that generate increased profitability, revenue, and cash flows. Our primary internal growth initiative is to increase our funeral and cemetery preneed backlog to grow the Company over the long-term. We will also invest in the construction of funeral home facilities and in the construction of cemetery property to promote future cemetery sales growth. Lastly, from time to time we may have other smaller capital projects, primarily related to the improvement of processes and systems.
Invest in acquisitions. We intend to make acquisitions of funeral homes and cemeteries when pricing and terms are favorable. We expect an acquisition investment to earn an after-tax cash return that is in excess of our weighted average cost of capital with room for execution risk. We target businesses with favorable consumer segments and/or where we can achieve additional economies of scale.
On December 23, 2013, we acquired all of the outstanding shares of Stewart, the second largest operator of funeral homes and cemeteries in North America. This transaction provides us with an opportunity for growth consistent with our capital deployment strategy and will allow us the ability to serve a number of new, complementary areas, while enabling us to capitalize on what we believe will produce significant synergies and operating efficiencies.
Repurchase shares. Absent a strategic acquisition opportunity, we believe share repurchases are attractive at the appropriate price. Currently, we have approximately $190.1 million authorized under our share repurchase program. We intend to make purchases from time to time in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions, subject to market conditions, debt covenants, and normal trading restrictions. Our credit agreement contains covenants that limit our ability to repurchase our common stock. There can be no assurance that we will buy our common stock under our share repurchase program in the future.
Pay a dividend. Beginning in November 2007, we began to pay quarterly dividends of $0.04 per common share. The quarterly dividend has steadily increased over the past few years with the latest increase to $0.07 per common share approved by the Board of Directors on May 8, 2013. We intend to continue to grow our cash dividend commensurate with the growth of our free cash flow. While we intend to pay regular quarterly cash dividends for the foreseeable future, all future dividends are subject to limitations in our debt covenants and final determination by our Board of Directors each quarter upon review of our financial performance.
Repurchase debt. We will seek to make open market debt repurchases when it is opportunistic to do so relative to other capital deployment opportunities in order to manage our near-term debt maturity profile.
The Company has a relatively consistent annual cash flow stream which is generally resistant to down economic cycles. This cash flow stream is available to substantially reduce our long-term debt maturities should we choose to do so. Furthermore, the Company's capital expenditures are generally discretionary in nature and can be managed based on the availability of operating cash flow.
Cash Flow
We believe our ability to generate strong operating cash flow is one of our fundamental financial strengths and provides us with substantial flexibility in meeting operating and investing needs.
Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $15.5 million to $384.7 million in 2013 from $369.2 million in 2012. This increase was driven by:
- a $132.9 million increase in cash receipts from customers primarily due to preneed cash receipts from higher preneed sales;
- a $47.4 million increase in net trust fund withdrawals; and
- a $9.3 million increase in General Agency (GA) receipts due to an increase in preneed insurance production; partially offset by
- an $85.3 million increase in vendor payments;
- a $47.7 million increase in payroll; and
- a $40.8 million increase in acquisition costs primarily related to the Stewart acquisition.
Net cash provided by operating activities decreased $18.9 million to $369.2 million in 2012 from $388.1 million in 2011. This decrease was driven by:
- a $35.7 million increase in vendor payments resulting primarily from improved visibility into company expenditures as a result of our newly installed purchase order system;
- a $21.6 million increase in payroll;
- a $13.3 million decrease in net trust fund withdrawals; and
- a $17.0 million increase in cash tax payments; partially offset by
- a $58.9 million increase in cash receipts from customers resulting from increased revenues primarily from acquisitions and improved collection rates at existing locations; and
- an $8.8 million increase in General Agency (GA) receipts due in part to acquisitions.
Investing Activities
Cash flows from investing activities used $1,156.8 million in 2013 compared to using $175.0 million in 2012. This increase was primarily attributable to a $991.7 million increase in cash spent for acquisitions, net of cash acquired (primarily the Stewart acquisition in 2013).
Cash flows from investing activities used $175.0 million in 2012 compared to using $190.3 million in 2011. This decrease was primarily attributable to:
- a $34.1 million decrease in cash spent for acquisitions (primarily the Neptune acquisition in 2011); and
- a $2.7 million decrease in capital expenditures; partially offset by
- a $7.0 million decrease in withdrawals of restricted funds; and
- a $14.6 million decrease in cash receipts from divestitures.
Financing Activities
Financing activities provided $825.1 million in 2013 compared to using $231.5 million in 2012. This increase was primarily driven by:
- a $795.9 million increase in proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt (net of debt issuance costs);
- a $185.1 million decrease in repurchases of Company common stock;
- a $111.4 million decrease in debt payments; and
- a $3.1 million decrease in dividend payments; partially offset by
- a $20.3 million increase in purchases of non-controlling interests;
- a $12.1 million decrease in proceeds from exercise of stock options; and
- a $5.9 million decrease in bank overdrafts and other.
Financing activities used $231.5 million in 2012 compared to using $238.7 million in 2011. This decrease was primarily driven by:
- a $138.0 million increase in proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt (net of debt issuance costs);
- a $10.5 million decrease in repurchases of Company common stock;
- a $10.2 million increase in proceeds from exercise of stock options; and
- a $7.0 million increase in bank overdrafts and other; partially offset by
- a $137.3 million increase in debt payments;
- a $15.5 million increase in dividend payments;
- a $3.0 million increase in purchases of non-controlling interest; and
- a $2.7 million increase in capital lease payments.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements, Contractual Obligations, and Commercial and Contingent Commitments
We have assumed various financial obligations and commitments in the ordinary course of conducting our business. We have contractual obligations requiring future cash payments under existing contractual arrangements, such as debt maturities, interest on long-term debt, operating lease agreements, and employment, consulting, and non-competition agreements. We also have commercial and contingent obligations that result in cash payments only if certain events occur requiring our performance pursuant to a funding commitment.
The following table details our known future cash payments (on an undiscounted basis) related to various contractual obligations as of December 31, 2013.
(Dollars in millions)
| Contractual Obligations | Payments Due by Period 2014 | 2015-2016 | 2017-2018 | Thereafter | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt maturities(1) | $123.7 | $441.1 | $1,251.0 | $1,444.0 | $3,259.8 |
| Premium (discount) maturities(2) | 22.6 | 16.5 | 3.3 | (0.3) | 42.1 |
| Interest obligation on long-term debt(3) | 164.9 | 299.9 | 239.9 | 255.4 | 960.1 |
| Operating lease agreements(4) | 15.1 | 24.5 | 17.4 | 65.3 | 122.3 |
| Employment and management, consulting, and non-competition agreements(5) | 9.0 | 11.0 | 8.0 | 7.7 | 35.7 |
| Pension obligation(6) | 4.3 | 7.8 | 6.8 | 13.4 | 32.3 |
| Total contractual obligations | $339.6 | $800.8 | $1,526.4 | $1,785.5 | $4,452.3 |
(1) Our outstanding indebtedness contains standard provisions, such as payment delinquency default clauses and change of control clauses. In addition, our bank credit facility agreement contains a maximum leverage ratio and a minimum interest coverage ratio. See “Capital Allocation Considerations” and Note 10 in Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, for additional details related to our long-term debt.
(2) Subsequent to year-end, we paid off $35.8 million of the premiums through the extinguishment of our 3.125% Senior Convertible Notes due 2014 and 3.375% Senior Convertible Notes due 2016.
(3) Approximately 76% of our total debt is fixed rate debt for which the interest obligation was calculated at the stated rate. Future interest obligations on our floating rate debt are based on the current forward rate curve of the underlying index. See Note 10 in Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, for additional information related to our future interest obligations.
(3) The majority of our lease arrangements contain options to (i) purchase the property at fair value on the exercise date, (ii) purchase the property for a value determined at the inception of the leases, or (iii) renew for the fair rental value at the end of the primary lease term. Our leases primarily relate to funeral service locations and cemetery operating and maintenance equipment. See Note 12 in Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, for additional details related to our leases.
(4) We have entered into employment and management, consulting, and non-competition agreements that require us to make cash payments over the contractual period. The agreements have been primarily entered into with certain officers and employees and former owners of businesses acquired. Agreements with contractual periods less than one year are excluded. See Note 12 in Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, for additional details related to these agreements.
(5) See Note 15 in Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, for discussion of our pension plans.
The following table details our known potential or possible future cash payments (on an undiscounted basis) related to various commercial and contingent obligations as of December 31, 2013.
(Dollars in millions)
| Commercial and Contingent Obligations | Expiration by Period 2014 | 2015-2016 | 2017-2018 | Thereafter | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Surety obligations(1) | $192.4 | $— | $— | $— | $192.4 |
| Long-term obligations related to uncertain tax positions(2) | 0.2 | 85.0 | 1.8 | 94.5 | 181.5 |
| Letters of credit(3) | 32.9 | — | — | — | 32.9 |
| Pledged line of credit commitment(4) | 18.8 | — | — | — | 18.8 |
| Total commercial and contingent obligations | $244.3 | $85.0 | $1.8 | $94.5 | $425.6 |
(1) Represents the aggregate funding obligation associated with our surety bond arrangements assuming our surety partners did not renew any of our surety obligations and we could not find replacement surety assurance. See the section titled “Financial Assurances” following this table in this Form 10-K for more information related to our surety bonds.
(2) In accordance with the Income Tax Topic of the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC), we have recorded a liability for unrecognized tax benefits and related interest and penalties of $181.5 million as of December 31, 2013. See Note 9 in Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, for additional information related to our uncertain tax positions. These amounts are reflected in the periods when the statutes of limitations expire.
(3) We are occasionally required to post letters of credit, issued by a financial institution, to secure certain insurance programs or other obligations. Letters of credit generally authorize the financial institution to make a payment to the beneficiary upon the satisfaction of a certain event or the failure to satisfy an obligation. The letters of credit are generally posted for one-year terms and are usually automatically renewed upon maturity until such time as we have satisfied the commitment secured by the letter of credit. We are obligated to reimburse the issuer only if the beneficiary collects on the letter of credit. We believe it is unlikely we will be required to fund a claim under our outstanding letters of credit. As of December 31, 2013, the $32.3 million of our letters of credit were supported by our Bank credit facility, which expires in July 2018, and $0.6 million of our letters of credit are outside of our credit facility.
(4) With the acquisition of Stewart, the Florida Board of Funeral, Cemetery, and Consumer Services required us to maintain availability under our line of credit for surety bonds Stewart posted in Florida in lieu of trusting. This requirement expires on March 23, 2014. This $18.8 million is also included in Surety Obligations above.
Not included in the above table are potential funding obligations related to our funeral and cemetery merchandise and service trusts. In certain states and provinces, we have withdrawn allowable distributable earnings including unrealized gains prior to the maturity or cancellation of the related contract. Additionally, some states have laws that either require replenishment of investment losses under certain circumstances or impose various restrictions when trust fund values drop below certain prescribed amounts. In the event that our trust investments do not recover from market declines, we may be required to deposit portions or all of these amounts into the respective trusts in some future period. As of December 31, 2013, we had unrealized losses of $19.7 million in the various trusts within these states.
Financial Assurances
In support of our operations, we have entered into arrangements with certain surety companies whereby such companies agree to issue surety bonds on our behalf as financial assurance and/or as required by existing state and local regulations. The surety bonds are used for various business purposes; however, the majority of the surety bonds issued and outstanding have been used to support our preneed funeral and cemetery sales activities. The obligations underlying these surety bonds are recorded on the consolidated balance sheet as Deferred preneed funeral revenues and Deferred preneed cemetery revenues. The breakdown of surety bonds between funeral and cemetery preneed arrangements, as well as surety bonds for other activities, is described below.
(Dollars in millions)
| December 31, 2013 | December 31, 2012 | |
|---|---|---|
| Preneed funeral | $120.3 | $110.1 |
| Preneed cemetery: | ||
| Merchandise and services | 131.3 | 114.6 |
| Pre-construction | 2.9 | 7.2 |
| Bonds supporting preneed funeral and cemetery obligations | 254.5 | 231.9 |
| Bonds supporting preneed business permits | 2.8 | 2.9 |
| Other bonds | 17.9 | 17.2 |
| Total surety bonds outstanding | $275.2 | $252.0 |
When selling preneed funeral and cemetery contracts, we may post surety bonds where allowed by state law. We post the surety bonds in lieu of trusting a certain amount of funds received from the customer. The $254.5 million in bonds supporting preneed funeral and cemetery obligations differs from the $192.4 million potential funding obligation disclosed in our “Commercial and Contingent Obligations” table above because the amount of the bond posted is generally determined by the total amount of the preneed contract that would otherwise be required to be trusted, in accordance with applicable state law, at the time we enter into the contract. We would only be required to fund the trust for the portion of the preneed contract for which we have received payment from the customer, less any applicable retainage, in accordance with state law. For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, we had $18.5 million, $18.4 million, and $18.9 million, respectively, of cash receipts from sales attributable to bonded contracts. These amounts do not consider reductions associated with taxes, obtaining costs, or other costs.
Surety bond premiums are paid annually and are automatically renewable until maturity of the underlying preneed contracts, unless we are given prior notice of cancellation. Except for cemetery pre-construction bonds (which are irrevocable), the surety companies generally have the right to cancel the surety bonds at any time with appropriate notice. In the event a surety company were to cancel the surety bond, we are required to obtain replacement surety assurance from another surety company or fund a trust for an amount generally less than the posted bond amount. Management does not expect that we will be required to fund material future amounts related to these surety bonds due to a lack of surety capacity or surety company non-performance.
Preneed Funeral and Cemetery Activities and Backlog of Contracts
In addition to selling our products and services to client families at the time of need, we sell price-guaranteed preneed funeral and cemetery contracts, which provide for future funeral or cemetery services and merchandise. Since preneed funeral and cemetery services or merchandise will not be provided until sometime in the future, most states and provinces require that all or a portion of the funds collected from customers on preneed funeral and cemetery contracts be paid into merchandise and service trusts until the merchandise is delivered or the service is performed. In certain situations, as described above, where permitted by state or provincial laws, we post a surety bond as financial assurance for a certain amount of the preneed funeral or cemetery contract in lieu of placing funds into trust accounts. Where permitted by state or provincial law, customers may arrange their preneed funeral contract by purchasing a life insurance or annuity policy from third-party insurance companies.
Trust-Funded Preneed Funeral and Cemetery Contracts: The funds collected from customers are deposited into trust and primarily invested by independent trustees in accordance with state and provincial laws. We retain any funds above the amounts required to be deposited into trust accounts and use them for working capital purposes, generally to offset the selling and administrative costs of our preneed programs.
Investment earnings associated with the trust investments are expected to mitigate the inflationary costs of providing the preneed funeral and cemetery services and merchandise in the future for the prices that were guaranteed at the time of sale. Our preneed funeral and cemetery trust assets are consolidated and recorded in our consolidated balance sheet at fair market value. Investment earnings on trust assets are generally accumulated in the trust and distributed as the revenue associated with the preneed funeral or cemetery contract is recognized or canceled by the customer. In certain states and provinces, the trusts are allowed to distribute a portion of the investment earnings to us prior to that date.
If a preneed funeral or cemetery contract is canceled prior to delivery, state or provincial law determines the amount of the refund owed to the customer, if any, including the amount of the attributed investment earnings. Upon cancellation, we receive the amount of principal deposited to trust and previously undistributed net investment earnings and, where required, issue a refund to the customer. We retain excess funds, if any, and recognize the attributed investment earnings (net of any investment earnings payable to the customer) as revenues in our consolidated statement of operations. In certain jurisdictions, we may be obligated to fund any shortfall if the amounts deposited by the customer exceed the funds in trust. Funds in trust assets exceeded customer deposits at December 31, 2013. See Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements, Contractual Obligations, and Commercial and Contingent
Commitments for additional information about potential funding obligations related to our funeral and cemetery merchandise and service trusts. Based on our historical experience, we have included a cancellation reserve for preneed funeral and cemetery contracts in our consolidated balance sheet of $133.5 million and $131.3 million as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
While the contract is outstanding, cash flow is provided by the amount retained from funds collected from the customer and any distributed investment earnings. At the time of death maturity, we receive the principal and undistributed investment earnings from the funeral trust and any remaining receivable due from the customer. At the time of delivery or storage of cemetery merchandise and service items for which we were required to deposit funds to trust, we receive the principal and undistributed investment earnings from the cemetery trust. There is generally no remaining receivable due from the customer, as our policy is to deliver preneed cemetery merchandise and service items only upon payment of the contract balance in full. This cash flow at the time of service, delivery, or storage is generally less than the associated revenue recognized, thus reducing cash flow from operating activities.
The tables below detail our North America results of preneed funeral and cemetery production and maturities, excluding insurance contracts, for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.
(Dollars in millions)
| Funeral: Preneed trust-funded (including bonded): | North America Years Ended December 31, 2013 | 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| Sales production | $180.3 | $143.0 |
| Sales production (number of contracts) | 65,982 | 56,997 |
| Maturities | $189.3 | $188.7 |
| Maturities (number of contracts) | 53,562 | 53,360 |
| Cemetery: | ||
| Sales production: | ||
| Preneed | $559.6 | $504.8 |
| Atneed | 241.0 | 236.5 |
| Total sales production | $800.6 | $741.3 |
| Sales production deferred to backlog: | ||
| Preneed | $215.7 | $206.1 |
| Atneed | 180.6 | 176.3 |
| Total sales production deferred to backlog | $396.3 | $382.4 |
| Revenue recognized from backlog: | ||
| Preneed | $184.3 | $171.2 |
| Atneed | 178.7 | 176.3 |
| Total revenue recognized from backlog | $363.0 | $347.5 |
Insurance-Funded Preneed Funeral Contracts: Where permitted by state or provincial law, customers may arrange their preneed funeral contract by purchasing a life insurance or annuity policy from third-party insurance companies, for which we earn a commission as general sales agent for the insurance company. These general agency commissions (GA revenues) are based on a percentage per contract sold and are recognized as funeral revenues when the insurance purchase transaction between the customer and third-party insurance provider is completed. Direct selling costs incurred pursuant to the sale of insurance-funded preneed funeral contracts are expensed as incurred. The policy amount of the insurance contract between the customer and the third-party insurance company generally equals the amount of the preneed funeral contract. We do not reflect the unfulfilled insurance-funded preneed funeral contract amounts in our consolidated balance sheet. Approximately 76% and 78% of our North America preneed funeral production relates to insurance-funded preneed funeral contracts in 2013 and 2012, respectively.
The third-party insurance company collects funds related to the insurance contract directly from the customer. The life insurance contracts include a death benefit escalation provision, which is expected to offset the inflationary costs of providing the preneed funeral services and merchandise in the future at the prices that were guaranteed at the time of the preneed sale. The customer/policy holder assigns the policy benefits to our funeral home to pay for the preneed funeral contract at the time of need.
The table below details the North America results of insurance-funded preneed funeral production and maturities for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the number of contracts associated with those transactions.
(Dollars in millions)
| Preneed funeral insurance-funded: | North America Years Ended December 31, 2013 | 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| Sales production(1) | $570.1 | $515.8 |
| Sales production (number of contracts)(1) | 98,146 | 87,866 |
| General agency revenue | $106.5 | $94.0 |
| Maturities | $332.9 | $316.6 |
| Maturities (number of contracts) | 58,035 | 55,812 |
(1) Amounts are not included in our consolidated balance sheet.
North America Backlog of Preneed Funeral and Cemetery Contracts: The following table reflects our North America backlog of trust-funded deferred preneed funeral and cemetery contract revenues, including amounts related to Deferred preneed funeral and cemetery receipts held in trust at December 31, 2013 and 2012. Additionally, the table reflects our North America backlog of unfulfilled insurance-funded contracts (which are not included in our consolidated balance sheet) at December 31, 2013 and 2012. The backlog amounts presented are reduced by an amount that we believe will cancel before maturity based on historical experience.
The table also reflects our North America preneed funeral and cemetery receivables and trust investments (market and cost bases) associated with the backlog of deferred preneed funeral and cemetery contract revenues, net of the estimated cancellation allowance. We believe that the table below is meaningful because it sets forth the aggregate amount of future revenues we expect to recognize as a result of maturities of preneed sales in the future, as well as the amount of assets associated with those revenues. Because the future revenues exceed the asset amounts, future revenues will exceed the cash distributions actually received from the associated trusts.
(Dollars in billions)
| December 31, 2013 Market | Cost | December 31, 2012 Market | Cost | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deferred preneed funeral revenues | $0.69 | $0.69 | $0.53 | $0.53 |
| Deferred preneed funeral receipts held in trust | 1.67 | 1.59 | 1.34 | 1.32 |
| $2.36 | $2.28 | $1.87 | $1.85 | |
| Allowance for cancellation on trust investments | (0.22) | (0.22) | (0.15) | (0.15) |
| Backlog of trust-funded preneed funeral revenues | $2.14 | $2.06 | $1.72 | $1.70 |
| Backlog of insurance-funded preneed funeral revenues | 4.45 | 4.45 | 3.68 | 3.68 |
| Total backlog of preneed funeral revenues | $6.59 | $6.51 | $5.40 | $5.38 |
| Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments | $1.87 | $1.79 | $1.54 | $1.52 |
| Allowance for cancellation on trust investments | (0.18) | (0.18) | (0.14) | (0.14) |
| Assets associated with backlog of trust-funded deferred preneed funeral revenues, net of estimated allowance for cancellation | $1.69 | $1.61 | $1.40 | $1.38 |
| Insurance policies associated with insurance-funded deferred preneed funeral revenues, net of estimated allowance for cancellation | 4.45 | 4.45 | 3.68 | 3.68 |
| Total assets associated with backlog of preneed funeral revenues, net of estimated allowance for cancellation | $6.14 | $6.06 | $5.08 | $5.06 |
| Deferred preneed cemetery revenues | $0.92 | $0.92 | $0.86 | $0.86 |
| Deferred preneed cemetery receipts held in trust | 1.58 | 1.41 | 1.29 | 1.23 |
| $2.50 | $2.33 | $2.15 | $2.09 | |
| Allowance for cancellation on trust investments | (0.19) | (0.19) | (0.15) | (0.15) |
| Total backlog of deferred cemetery revenues | $2.31 | $2.14 | $2.00 | $1.94 |
| Preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments | $2.29 | $2.12 | $1.82 | $1.76 |
| Allowance for cancellation on trust investments | (0.19) | (0.19) | (0.16) | (0.16) |
| Total assets associated with backlog of deferred cemetery revenues, net of estimated allowance for cancellation | $2.10 | $1.93 | $1.66 | $1.60 |
The market value of our funeral and cemetery trust investments was based on a combination of quoted market prices, observable inputs such as interest rates or yield curves, and appraisals. For more information on how market values are estimated, see Critical Accounting Policies below. The difference between the backlog and asset amounts represents the contracts for which we have posted surety bonds as financial assurance in lieu of trusting, the amounts collected from customers that were not required to be deposited into trust, and allowable cash distributions from trust assets. The table also reflects the amounts expected to be received from insurance companies through the assignment of policy proceeds related to insurance-funded funeral contracts.
Trust Investments
In addition to selling our products and services to client families at the time of need, we sell price-guaranteed preneed funeral and cemetery contracts, which provide for future funeral or cemetery services and merchandise. Since preneed funeral and cemetery services or merchandise will not be provided until sometime in the future, most states and provinces require that all or a portion of the funds collected from customers on preneed funeral and cemetery contracts be paid into trusts and/or escrow accounts until the merchandise is delivered or the service is performed. Investment earnings associated with the trust investments are expected to mitigate the inflationary costs of providing the preneed funeral and cemetery services and merchandise in the future for the prices that were guaranteed at the time of sale.
Also, we are required by state and provincial law to pay a portion of the proceeds from the preneed or atneed sale of cemetery property interment rights into perpetual care trusts. For these investments, the original corpus remains in the trust in perpetuity and the net ordinary earnings are distributed and are intended to offset the expense to maintain the cemetery property. The majority of states require that net capital gains or losses are retained and added to the corpus, but certain states allow the net realized capital gains and losses to be included in the net ordinary earnings that are distributed.
Independent trustees manage and invest the majority of the funds deposited into the funeral and cemetery merchandise and service trusts as well as the cemetery perpetual care trusts. The majority of trustees are selected based on their respective geographic footprint and qualifications per state and provincial regulations. Most of the trustees engage the same independent investment advisor indirectly through SCI's wholly-owned registered investment advisor. These trustees, with input from the investment advisor, establish an investment policy that serves as an operating document to guide the investment activities of the trusts including asset allocation and manager selection. The investments are also governed by state and provincial guidelines. Asset allocation is based on the liability structure of each funeral, cemetery, and perpetual care trust. The investment advisor recommends investment managers to the trustees that are selected on the basis of various criteria set forth in the investment policy. The primary investment objectives for the funeral and cemetery merchandise and service trusts include (1) achieving growth of principal over time sufficient to preserve and increase the purchasing power of the assets and (2) preserving capital within acceptable levels of volatility and risk. Preneed funeral and cemetery contracts generally take years to mature. Therefore, the funds associated with these contracts are often invested for several market cycles. While cemetery perpetual care trusts share the same investment objectives as listed above, these trusts emphasize providing a steady stream of investment income with some capital appreciation. All of the trusts seek to control risk and volatility through a combination of asset styles, asset classes, and institutional investment managers.
As of the end of the year, 82% of our trusts were under the control and custody of two large financial institutions engaged as preferred trustees. The U.S. preferred trustees primarily use common trust fund structures as the investment vehicle for their trusts. Through the common trust fund structure, each respective trustee manages the allocation of assets through individual managed accounts or institutional mutual funds. In the event a particular state prohibits the use of a common trust fund as a qualified investment, the trustee utilizes institutional mutual funds. The U.S. trusts include a modest allocation to alternative investments, which are comprised primarily of private equity investments and real estate investment trusts. These investments are typically structured as limited liability companies (LLCs) and are managed by certain trustees. The trusts that are eligible to allocate a portion of their investments to alternative investments purchase units of the respective LLCs.
Fixed Income Securities
Fixed income investments are intended to preserve principal, provide a source of current income, and reduce overall portfolio volatility. The SCI trusts have direct investments primarily in government and corporate fixed income securities.
Canadian government fixed income securities are investments in Canadian federal and provincial government instruments. In many cases, regulatory restrictions mandate that the funds from the sales of preneed funeral and cemetery products sold in certain Canadian jurisdictions must be invested in these instruments.
Equity Securities
Equity investments have historically provided long-term capital appreciation in excess of inflation. The SCI trusts have direct investments primarily in domestic equity portfolios that include large, mid, and small capitalization companies of different investment objectives (i.e., growth and value). The majority of the equity portfolio is managed by multiple institutional investment managers that specialize in an objective-specific area of expertise. Our equity securities are exposed to market risk; however, we believe these securities are well-diversified. As of December 31, 2013, the largest single equity position represented less than 1% of the total equity securities portfolio.
Mutual Funds
The SCI trust funds employ institutional mutual funds where operationally or economically efficient. Institutional mutual funds are utilized to invest in various asset classes including US equities, non-US equities, convertible bonds, corporate bonds, government bonds, Treasury inflation protected securities (TIPS), high yield bonds, real estate investment trusts (REITs), and commodities. The mutual funds are governed by guidelines outlined in their individual prospectuses.
Private Equity
The objective of these investments is to provide high rates of return with controlled volatility. These investments are typically long-term in duration. These investments are diversified by strategy, sector, manager, and vintage year. Private equity exposure is typically accessed through LLCs established by certain preferred trustees. These LLCs invest in numerous limited partnerships, including private equity, fund of funds, distressed debt, and mezzanine financing. The trustees that have oversight of their respective LLCs work closely with the investment advisor in making all current investments.
Trust Investment Performance
The trust fund income recognized over a period of years from these investment assets can be volatile. During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Standard and Poor’s 500 Index increased 32.4% and the Barclay’s Aggregate Index decreased 2.0%, while the combined SCI trust assets increased 14.7%.
SCI, its preferred trustees, and the investment advisor continue to monitor the capital markets and the trusts on an ongoing basis. The preferred trustees, with input from the investment advisor, will take prudent action as needed to achieve the investment goals and objectives of the trusts.
Results of Operations — Years Ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011
Management Summary
Key developments in 2013 were as follows:
- Funeral gross profit increased $3.2 million, or 0.9%, due to higher case volume, higher average revenue per funeral service, higher recognized preneed revenues and higher General Agency revenues, partially offset by higher selling-related expenses related to preneed sales initiatives and inflationary increases in fixed expenses.
- Cemetery gross profit increased $23.2 million, or 13.2%, due to an increase in preneed property sales production and trust fund income, partially offset by higher selling-related expenses and inflationary increases in fixed expenses.
Results of Operations — Years Ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011
In 2013, we reported consolidated net income attributable to common stockholders of $143.8 million ($0.67 per diluted share) compared to net income attributable to common stockholders in 2012 of $152.5 million ($0.70 per diluted share) and net income attributable to common stockholders in 2011 of $144.9 million ($0.61 per diluted share). These results were impacted by certain significant items that impacted earnings, including:
(Dollars in thousands)
| 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net after-tax losses from the sale of assets | $(4,910) | $(1,571) | $(1,774) |
| Net after-tax gains (losses) from the early extinguishment of debt, net | $296 | $(14,366) | $(2,184) |
| Net after-tax expenses related to system and process transition costs | $(5,331) | $(5,905) | $(1,408) |
| Net after-tax expenses related to the Stewart acquisition and transition costs | $(33,229) | $— | $— |
| Net after-tax expenses related to legal defense fees and labor matters | $(7,384) | $— | $— |
| Change in certain tax reserves and other | $(4,853) | $(620) | $(2,629) |
Consolidated Versus Comparable Results — Years Ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011
The table below reconciles our consolidated GAAP results to our comparable, or “same store,” results for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011. We define comparable operations (or same store operations) as those funeral and cemetery locations owned by us for the entire period beginning January 1, 2012 and ending December 31, 2013. The following tables present operating results for funeral and cemetery locations that were owned by us for these years.
(Dollars in millions)
| 2013 North America Revenue | Consolidated | Less: Activity Associated with Acquisition/New Construction | Less: Activity Associated with Divestitures | Comparable |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Funeral revenue | $1,698.5 | $42.9 | $3.3 | $1,652.3 |
| Cemetery revenue | 852.0 | 4.3 | — | 847.7 |
| 2,550.5 | 47.2 | 3.3 | 2,500.0 | |
| Germany revenue | 5.9 | — | — | 5.9 |
| Total revenue | $2,556.4 | $47.2 | $3.3 | $2,505.9 |
| North America Gross Profits | ||||
| Funeral gross profits (losses) | $350.5 | $8.6 | $(0.6) | $342.5 |
| Cemetery gross profits (losses) | 198.6 | — | (0.3) | 198.9 |
| 549.1 | 8.6 | (0.9) | 541.4 | |
| Germany gross profits | 0.5 | — | — | 0.5 |
| Total gross profits (losses) | $549.6 | $8.6 | $(0.9) | $541.9 |
(Dollars in millions)
| 2012 North America Revenue | Consolidated | Less: Activity Associated with Acquisition/New Construction | Less: Activity Associated with Divestitures | Comparable |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Funeral revenue | $1,619.7 | $5.4 | $7.8 | $1,606.5 |
| Cemetery revenue | 784.7 | — | 0.2 | 784.5 |
| 2,404.4 | 5.4 | 8.0 | 2,391.0 | |
| Germany revenue | 6.1 | — | — | 6.1 |
| Total revenue | $2,410.5 | $5.4 | $8.0 | $2,397.1 |
| North America Gross Profits | ||||
| Funeral gross profits (losses) | $347.4 | $0.4 | $(2.4) | $349.4 |
| Cemetery gross profits (losses) | 175.4 | — | (0.3) | 175.7 |
| 522.8 | 0.4 | (2.7) | 525.1 | |
| Germany gross profits | 0.4 | — | — | 0.4 |
| Total gross profits (losses) | $523.2 | $0.4 | $(2.7) | $525.5 |
34
(Dollars in millions)
| 2011 North America Revenue | Consolidated | Less: Activity Associated with Acquisition/New Construction | Less: Activity Associated with Divestitures | Comparable |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Funeral revenue | $1,566.9 | $— | $14.6 | $1,552.3 |
| Cemetery revenue | 742.5 | — | 4.8 | 737.7 |
| 2,309.4 | — | 19.4 | 2,290.0 | |
| Germany revenue | 6.6 | — | — | 6.6 |
| Total revenue | $2,316.0 | $— | $19.4 | $2,296.6 |
| North America Gross Profits | ||||
| Funeral gross profits (losses) | $328.9 | $— | $(1.2) | $330.1 |
| Cemetery gross profits (losses) | 147.1 | — | (0.5) | 147.6 |
| 476.0 | — | (1.7) | 477.7 | |
| Germany gross profits | 0.5 | — | — | 0.5 |
| Total gross profits (losses) | $476.5 | $— | $(1.7) | $478.2 |
The following table provides the data necessary to calculate our consolidated average revenue per funeral service for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011. We calculate average revenue per funeral service by dividing consolidated funeral revenue, excluding General Agency (GA) revenues, recognized preneed revenues and certain other revenues to avoid distorting our averages of normal funeral services revenue, by the number of funeral services performed during the period. Recognized preneed revenues are preneed sales of items that are delivered at the time of sale, including memorial merchandise and travel protection insurance and are excluded from our calculation of consolidated average revenue per funeral service because the associated service has not yet been performed.
(Dollars in millions, except average revenue per funeral service)
| 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Consolidated funeral revenue | $1,704.4 | $1,625.8 | $1,573.5 |
| Less: Consolidated recognized preneed revenue | 75.6 | 55.8 | 33.8 |
| Less: Consolidated GA revenue | 106.5 | 94.0 | 86.8 |
| Less: Other revenue | 23.9 | 14.2 | 10.0 |
| Adjusted Consolidated funeral revenue | $1,498.4 | $1,461.8 | $1,442.9 |
| Consolidated funeral services performed | 286,851 | 283,516 | 277,983 |
| Consolidated average revenue per funeral service | $5,224 | $5,156 | $5,191 |
The following table provides the data necessary to calculate our comparable average revenue per funeral service for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011. We calculate average revenue per funeral service by dividing comparable funeral revenue, excluding General Agency (GA) revenues, recognized preneed revenues and other revenues to avoid distorting our averages of normal funeral services revenue, by the comparable number of funeral services performed during the period. Recognized preneed revenues are preneed sales of items that are delivered at the time of sale, including memorial merchandise and travel protection insurance and are excluded from our calculation of comparable average revenue per funeral services because the associated service has not yet been performed.
(Dollars in millions, except average revenue per funeral service)
| 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Comparable funeral revenue | $1,658.2 | $1,612.6 | $1,558.9 |
| Less: Comparable recognized preneed revenue | 69.9 | 54.4 | 33.6 |
| Less: Comparable GA revenue | 105.5 | 93.9 | 86.7 |
| Less: Other revenue | 16.5 | 14.2 | 9.9 |
| Adjusted Comparable funeral revenue | $1,466.3 | $1,450.1 | $1,428.7 |
| Comparable funeral services performed | 278,385 | 280,622 | 275,451 |
| Comparable average revenue per funeral service | $5,267 | $5,167 | $5,187 |
Funeral Results
Funeral Revenue
Consolidated revenues from funeral operations increased $78.6 million to $1,704.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 from $1,625.8 million for the same period in 2012. This increase is primarily attributable to the $45.7 million increase in comparable revenues described below and $37.5 million of additional revenues as the result of acquisitions in 2013 and 2012. These increases were partially offset by a decline of $4.5 million in revenues contributed by non-strategic assets that were divested throughout 2013 and 2012. Comparable revenues from funeral operations were $1,658.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to $1,612.6 million for the same period in 2012. This increase was primarily due to the 1.9% increase in average revenue per funeral service described below, an increase in recognized preneed revenues of $15.5 million, and a $11.6 million increase in GA revenues that resulted from increased preneed insurance production. These increases were partially offset by the 0.8% decrease in the number of comparable funeral services performed as described below.
Consolidated revenues from funeral operations increased $52.3 million in 2012 compared to the same period in 2011. This increase is primarily due to the increase in comparable revenues described below and $5.4 million of additional revenues as the result of acquisitions in 2012 and 2011, partially offset by a decline of $6.8 million in revenues contributed by non-strategic assets that were divested throughout 2012 and 2011. Our comparable funeral revenues increased $53.7 million, or 3.4%, in 2012 compared to the same period in 2011 primarily as a result of higher recognized preneed revenues of $20.7 million mostly from sales from the Neptune Society and a $7.2 million increase in GA revenues that resulted from increased preneed funeral insurance production.
Funeral Services Performed
Our consolidated funeral services performed increased 1.2% during the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to the same period in 2012, primarily as the result of acquisitions in 2013 and 2012, partially offset by a 0.8% decline in comparable funeral services performed noted below. Our comparable funeral services performed decreased 0.8% during the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to the same period in 2012. We believe the comparable decrease is consistent with trends experienced by other funeral service providers and industry vendors compared to the year ended December 31, 2012. Our comparable cremation rate of 50.0% in 2013 increased from 48.5% and 44.3% in 2012 and 2011, respectively. This growth in comparable cremations was generated mostly by cremations with service. While the average revenue for cremations with service is lower than that for traditional burials, we continue to expand our cremation memorialization product and service offerings, which have resulted in higher average sales for cremation services.
Average Revenue Per Funeral Service
Our consolidated average revenue per funeral service increased $68, or 1.3%, in 2013 compared to 2012, primarily due to the increase in comparable average revenue per funeral service described below. Our comparable average revenue per funeral increased $100, or 1.9%, in 2013 compared to the same period in 2012. Excluding an unfavorable Canadian currency impact and higher funeral trust fund income, the average revenue per funeral service experienced 1.6% growth despite the increase in cremation rates. The increase is primarily from initiatives centered around better consumer choice and flexibility, such as enhanced Dignity packaging, increased receptions and events offerings, and expansion of floral offering through e-commerce solutions.
Funeral Gross Profit
Consolidated funeral gross profits increased $3.2 million in 2013 compared to the same period in 2012. This increase is primarily attributable to $8.2 million of additional gross profits related to acquisitions that occurred in 2013 and 2012, partially offset by the decrease in comparable funeral gross profits described below.
Comparable funeral gross profits decreased $6.8 million, or 1.9%, and the comparable gross margin percentage decreased from 21.7% to 20.7% when compared to the same period in 2012 primarily as a result of the increase in comparable revenue described above more than an offset by the following:
- a $11.6 million increase in general and administrative expenses including employee related costs and other professional fees;
- a $13.7 million increase in overhead expenses including investments in our sales support infrastructure and expenses related to legal defense fees and labor matters;
- a $12.6 million increase in comparable selling costs resulting from increased advertising and increased commissions for preneed production. Selling costs are recognized in the period incurred; however, the revenue associated with the preneed production is not recognized until the services are performed as described in Critical Accounting Policies, Recent Accounting Pronouncements, and Accounting Changes below
- a $5.7 million increase in direct costs of services performed as a result of the increase in funeral revenue described above; and
- a $3.1 million unfavorable impact related to an adjustment in self-insurance casualty reserves.
Consolidated funeral gross profits increased $18.4 million, or 5.6%, in 2012 as compared to 2011 primarily attributable to $0.4 million of additional profits related to acquisitions that occurred in 2012 and 2011 and the increase in comparable funeral gross profits described below.
- Gross profit from our comparable funeral locations increased $19.2 million, or 5.8%, in 2012 compared to 2011. This increase is primarily a result of the increase in comparable revenue described above being more than offset by;
- a $14.5 million increase in comparable selling costs resulting from increased advertising and increased commissions for preneed production. Selling costs are recognized in the period incurred; however, the revenue associated with the preneed production is not recognized until the services are performed as described in Critical Accounting Policies, Recent Accounting Pronouncements, and Accounting Changes below;
- an $13.1 million increase in salary expense largely resulting from the Neptune acquisition; and
- a $7.2 million increase in direct costs of services performed as the result of the increase in funeral revenue described above.
Cemetery Results
Cemetery Revenue
Consolidated revenues from our cemetery operations increased $67.3 million, or 8.6%, in 2013 compared to 2012 primarily as a result of the increase in comparable revenues described below and $4.3 million in additional revenues generated by acquisitions in 2013 and 2012, partially offset by a decline of $0.2 million in revenues contributed by non-strategic assets that were divested throughout 2013 and 2012. Comparable cemetery revenues increased $63.2 million, or 8.1%, in 2013 when compared with 2012. This increase was primarily driven by a $47.7 million increase in recognized preneed property revenues as a result of 2013 sales initiatives and an $10.7 million increase in trust fund income as the result of improved conditions in the equity and debt markets in 2013 compared to 2012.
Consolidated revenues from our cemetery operations increased $42.2 million, or 5.7%, in 2012 compared to 2011 primarily as a result of the increase in comparable revenues described below, partially offset by a decline of $4.6 million in revenues contributed by non-strategic assets that were divested throughout 2012 and 2011. Comparable cemetery revenues increased $46.8 million, or 6.3%, in 2012 when compared with 2011. This increase was primarily driven by a $43.0 million increase in recognized preneed property revenues and a $8.9 million increase in trust fund income as the result of improved conditions in the equity and debt markets in 2012 compared to 2011.
Cemetery Gross Profits
Consolidated cemetery gross profit increased $23.2 million, or 13.2%, in 2013 compared to 2012. This increase is the result of the increase in comparable gross profits. Comparable cemetery gross profits increased $23.2 million, or 13.2%, and our comparable gross margin percentage increased from 22.4% to 23.5% in 2013 compared to the same period in 2012. This increase is primarily the result of higher preneed revenues resulting from strong cemetery preneed production, partially offset by;
- a $17.1 million increase in selling costs stemming from increased advertising and increased commissions on preneed production;
- an $8.1 million increase in general and administrative expenses including employee related costs and other professional fees;
- a $7.4 million increase in overhead expenses including investments in our sales support infrastructure and expenses related to legal defense fees and labor matters;
- a $4.9 million increase in property and merchandise costs driven by higher revenues described above; and
- a $1.5 million unfavorable impact related to an adjustment in self-insurance casualty reserves.
Consolidated cemetery gross profit increased $28.3 million, or 19.2%, in 2012 compared to 2011. This increase is the result of the increase in comparable gross profits. Comparable cemetery gross profits increased $28.1 million, or 19.0%, and our comparable gross margin percentage increased from 20.0% to 22.4% in 2012 compared to the same period in 2011. This increase is primarily the result of the increase in comparable revenues described above, partially offset by;
- a $10.3 million increase in selling costs stemming from increased advertising and increased commissions on preneed production;
- a $3.8 million increase in property and merchandise costs driven by higher revenues described above; and
- a $2.3 million increase in general and administrative expenses including employee related costs and other professional fees.
Other Financial Statement Items
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses increased $33.2 million to $155.1 million in 2013 compared to $121.9 million in 2012. The increase is primarily due to $35.9 million of costs related to the acquisition of Stewart Enterprises partially offset by lower employee compensation expenses. General and administrative expenses increased $20.1 million to $121.9 million in 2012 compared to $101.8 million in 2011. The increase is primarily due to a $8.9 million increase in employee-related compensation plan expenses, a $6.9 million increase in acquisition and transition costs and a $6.5 million increase in general liability insurance claims.
Losses on Divestitures and Impairment Charges, Net
In 2013, we recognized a $6.3 million net pre-tax loss on asset divestitures and impairments. This loss was primarily due to the impairments and asset divestitures associated with non-strategic funeral and cemetery locations in the United States and Canada.
In 2012, we recognized a $1.5 million net pre-tax loss on asset divestitures and impairments. This loss was primarily due to the impairments and asset divestitures associated with non-strategic funeral and cemetery locations in the United States and Canada.
In 2011, we recognized a $11.0 million net pre-tax loss on asset divestitures and impairments. This loss was primarily due to the impairments and asset divestitures associated with non-strategic funeral and cemetery locations in the United States and Canada.
Interest Expense
Interest expense increased $7.3 million to $142.4 million in 2013 compared to $135.1 million in 2012. The increase in interest expense is primarily due to the issuance of our 5.375% Senior Notes due January 2022.
Interest expense increased $1.3 million to $135.1 million in 2012 compared to $133.8 million in 2011. The increase in interest expense is primarily due to the November 2012 issuance of our 4.50% Senior Notes due November 2020 and an increase in our balance on the bank credit facility, offset by lower interest expenses incurred on early extinguished debt.
Gains (Losses) on Early Extinguishment of Debt, Net
During 2013, we paid an aggregate of $31.8 million to repay our remaining $4.8 million 7.875% Debenture due February 2013, to retire $26.4 million in capital lease, and to extinguish $0.6 million in other debt. Certain of the above transactions resulted in the recognition of a gain $0.5 million recorded in Gains on early extinguishment of debt, net in our Consolidated Statement of Operations.
During 2012, we redeemed our 7.375% Senior Notes due October 2014 with an aggregate principal amount of $180.7 million. This transaction resulted in the recognition of a loss of $22.7 million recorded in Losses on early extinguishment of debt, net in our consolidated statement of operations, which represents the write-off of unamortized deferred loan costs of $1.3 million and $21.4 million in a make-whole provision paid in cash upon retiring the debt. This refinancing allowed the company to replace 7.375% debt due in 2014 with 4.5% debt due in 2020.
During 2011, we repaid $20.0 million of amounts drawn on our bank credit facility and made debt payments of $46.0 million, which included $3.8 million aggregate principal amount of our 7.875% Senior Notes due February 2013, $20.8 million aggregate principal amount of our 6.75% Senior Notes due April 2015, and $15.6 million aggregate principal amount of our 6.75% Senior Notes due April 2016. These transactions resulted in the recognition of a loss of $3.5 million recorded in Losses on early extinguishment of debt, net in our consolidated statement of operations, which represents the write-off of unamortized deferred loan costs of $0.4 million and $3.1 million in premium on the purchase of these notes.
Other (Expense) Income , Net
Other (expense) income, net decreased $4.3 million to $0.6 million of expense in 2013 compared to $3.7 million of income in 2012, primarily due to the favorable foreign currency from liability settlements in 2012 that did not occur in 2013.
Other (expense) income, net increased $4.5 million to $3.7 million of income in 2012 compared to $0.8 million of expense in 2011, primarily due to a favorable foreign currency from liability settlements between the U.S. and Canadian subsidiaries.
Provision for Income Taxes
The 2013 consolidated effective tax rate was 39.3%, compared to 37.3% and 35.2% in 2012 and 2011, respectively. The 2013 effective tax rate increased 2.0% over prior year primarily due to non-deductible transaction cost associated with the Stewart acquisition and the change in our FIN 48 liability.
We reached a partial settlement with the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") in connection with its audit of our affiliate's, SCI Funeral and Cemetery Purchasing Cooperative, 2003 - 2005 federal income tax returns. In connection with this settlement we reduced our 2012 tax expense by $3.1 million for adjustments to our "unrecognized tax benefits" - that is, the aggregate tax effect of differences between tax return positions and the benefits recognized in our financial statements. The lower effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2012 includes the benefit associated with the closure of that tax audit.
We sold our Puerto Rican subsidiary in the third quarter of 2011. Our outside tax basis in the business was significantly higher than our book basis. Consequently, we recognized a tax loss that was significantly higher than the book loss on the sale which is permanent in nature. The lower effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2011 as compared to 2013 and 2012 was primarily due to that sale.
Weighted Average Shares
The diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding was 216.0 million in 2013, compared to 219.1 million in 2012, and 236.7 million in 2011. The decrease in all years primarily reflects the impact of shares repurchased under our share repurchase program and a very minimal amount of shares forfeited by RSA participants for tax payments.
Critical Accounting Policies, Recent Accounting Pronouncements, and Accounting Changes
Our consolidated financial statements are impacted by the accounting policies used and the estimates and assumptions made by management during their preparation. See Note 2 in Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, for more information. Estimates and assumptions affect the carrying values of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the balance sheet date. Actual results could differ from such estimates due to uncertainties associated with the methods and assumptions underlying our critical accounting measurements. The following is a discussion of our critical accounting policies pertaining to revenue recognition, business combinations, valuation of goodwill, valuation of intangible assets, valuation of long-lived assets, loss contract analysis, the use of estimates, fair value measurements, and non-controlling interests.
Revenue Recognition
Funeral revenue is recognized when funeral services are performed or funeral merchandise is delivered. Our trade receivables primarily consist of amounts due for funeral services already performed. Revenue associated with cemetery merchandise and services is recognized when the service is performed or merchandise is delivered.
Under the Revenue Recognition Topic of the ASC revenue from constructed cemetery property is not recognized until a minimum percentage of the sales price has been collected. The revenues associated with a preneed cemetery contract, however, may be recognized as different contract events occur. Preneed sales of cemetery interment rights (cemetery burial property) are recognized when a minimum of 10% of the sales price has been collected and the property has been constructed or is available for interment. For services and non-personalized merchandise (such as vaults), we defer the revenues until the services are performed and the merchandise is delivered. For personalized marker merchandise, with the customer’s direction generally obtained at the time of sale, we can choose to order, store, and transfer title to the customer. In situations in which we have no further obligation or involvement related to the merchandise, we recognize revenues and record the cost of sales in accordance with the Revenue Recognition Topic of the ASC upon the earlier of vendor storage of these items or delivery in our cemetery.
Valuation of Goodwill
We record the excess of purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net assets acquired in business combinations as goodwill. Goodwill is tested annually for impairment by assessing the fair value of each of our reporting units. We test for impairment of goodwill in accordance with the Intangibles Topic of the ASC annually during the fourth quarter.
Our goodwill impairment test involves estimates and management judgment. In the first step of our goodwill impairment test, we compare the fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying amount, including goodwill. We determine fair value of each reporting unit using both a market and income approach. Our methodology considers discounted cash flows and multiples of EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) for both SCI, its competitors, and certain suppliers. The discounted cash flow valuation uses projections of future cash flows and includes assumptions concerning future operating performance and economic conditions that may differ from actual future cash flows. We do not record an impairment of goodwill in instances where the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount. If the aggregate fair value is less than the related carrying amount for a reporting unit, we compare the implied fair value of goodwill (as defined in the Intangibles Topic of the ASC) to the carrying amount of goodwill. If the carrying amount of reporting unit goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.
For our most recent annual impairment test performed in the fourth quarter, we used growth rates ranging from 1.2% to 7.1% over a five-year period, plus a terminal value determined using the constant growth method, in projecting our future cash flows and we used an 8.5% discount rate. Fair value was calculated as the sum of the projected discounted cash flows of our reporting units over the next five years plus terminal value at the end of those five years. Our terminal value was calculated using long-term growth rates of 2.5% and 2.9% for our funeral and cemetery reporting units, respectively.
In addition to our annual review, we assess the impairment of goodwill whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may be greater than fair value. Factors that could trigger an interim impairment review include, but are not limited to, significant underperformance relative to historical or projected future operating results and significant negative industry or economic trends. No interim goodwill impairments reviews were performed in 2013.
Valuation of Intangible Assets
Our intangible assets include customer relationships, trademarks and tradenames, and other assets primarily resulting from acquisitions. Our trademark and tradenames and water rights assets are considered to have an indefinite life and are not subject to amortization. We test for impairment of intangible assets in accordance with the Intangibles Topic of the ASC annually during the fourth quarter.
Our intangible assets impairment tests involve estimates and management judgment. For trademark and tradenames, our test uses the relief from royalty method whereby we determine the fair value of the assets by discounting the cash flows that represent a savings over having to pay a royalty fee for use of the trademark and tradenames. The discounted cash flow valuation uses projections of future cash flows and includes assumptions concerning future operating performance and economic conditions that may differ from actual future cash flows. For our most recent annual impairment test performed in the fourth quarter, we estimated that the pre-tax savings would be 4.0% of the revenues associated with the trademark and tradenames, based primarily on our research of intellectual property valuation and licensing databases. We also assumed a terminal growth rate of 2.5% and 2.9% for our funeral and cemetery segments, respectively, and discounted the cash flows at an 8.7% discount rate based on the relative risk of these assets to our overall business.
In addition to our annual review, we assess the impairment of intangible assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may be greater than the fair value. Factors that could trigger an interim impairment review include, but are not limited to, significant underperformance relative to historical or projected future operating results and significant negative industry or economic trends. No interim intangible impairment reviews were performed in 2013.
Valuation of Long-Lived Assets
We review the carrying value of our long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable, in accordance with the Intangibles and Property, Plant, and Equipment Topics of the ASC. This guidance requires that long-lived assets to be held and used are reported at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value. Fair value is based on an income approach that utilizes projections of undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by our long-lived assets.
Assets to be disposed of and assets not expected to provide any future service potential are recorded at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value less estimated cost to sell. For additional information regarding impairment or disposal of long-lived assets, see Note 20 in Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Loss Contract Analysis
We perform an analysis to determine whether our preneed contracts are in a loss position, which would necessitate a charge to earnings. For this analysis, we add the sales prices of the underlying contracts and net realized earnings, then subtract net unrealized losses to derive the net amount of estimated proceeds for contracts as of the balance sheet date. We consider unrealized gains and losses based on current market prices quoted for the investments, and we do not include future expected returns on the investments in our analysis. We compare our estimated proceeds to the estimated direct costs to deliver our contracts, which consist primarily of funeral and cemetery merchandise costs and salaries, supplies, and equipment related to the delivery of a preneed contract. If a deficiency were to exist, we may record a charge to earnings and a corresponding liability for the expected loss on delivery of those contracts from our backlog. As of December 31, 2013, no such charge was required. Due to the positive margins of our preneed contracts and the trust portfolio returns we have experienced in prior years, we believe there is currently capacity for additional market depreciation before a loss contract would result.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States (GAAP) requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the carrying values of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the balance sheet date. Actual results could differ from such estimates due to uncertainties associated with the methods and assumptions underlying our critical accounting measurements. Key estimates used by management include:
Allowances — We provide various allowances and/or cancellation reserves for our funeral and cemetery preneed and atneed receivables, as well as for our preneed funeral and preneed cemetery deferred revenues. These allowances are based on an analysis of historical trends and include, where applicable, collection and cancellation activity. We also record an estimate of general agency revenues that may be canceled in their first year and revenue would be charged back by the insurance company. These estimates are impacted by a number of factors, including changes in economy, relocation, and demographic or competitive changes in our areas of operation.
Valuation of trust investments — The trust investments include marketable securities that are classified as available-for-sale in accordance with the Investments in Debt and Equity Securities Topic of the ASC. When available, we use quoted market prices for specific securities. When quoted market prices are not available for the specific security, fair values are estimated by using either quoted market prices for securities with similar characteristics or a fair value model with observable inputs that include a combination of interest rates, yield curves, credit risks, prepayment terms, rating, and tax exempt status.
The valuation of private equity and other investments requires significant management judgment due to the absence of quoted market prices, inherent lack of liquidity, and the long-term nature of such assets. The fair value of these investments is estimated based on the market value of the underlying real estate and private equity instruments. The underlying real estate value is determined using the most recent appraisals. The private equity instruments are valued based on reported net asset values discounted by 0% and 20% for risk and 0% to 10% for liquidity. See Fair Value Measurements below for additional information.
Legal liability reserves — Contingent liabilities, principally for legal matters, are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated in accordance with the Contingencies Topic of the ASC. Liabilities accrued for legal matters require judgments regarding projected outcomes and a range of loss based on historical experience and recommendations of legal counsel. However, litigation is inherently unpredictable and excessive verdicts do occur. As disclosed in Note 12 in Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, our legal exposures and the ultimate outcome of these legal proceedings could be material to operating results or cash flows in any given quarter or year.
Depreciation of long-lived assets — We depreciate our long-lived assets ratably over their estimated useful lives. These estimates of useful lives may be affected by such factors as changing market conditions or changes in regulatory requirements.
Valuation of assets acquired and liabilities assumed — We have applied the guidance in the Business Combinations Topic of the ASC to our business combinations. Tangible and intangible assets and liabilities assumed are recorded at their fair value and goodwill is recognized for any difference between the price of acquisition and our fair value determination. We have customarily estimated our purchase costs and other related transactions known to us at closing of the acquisition. To the extent that information not available to us at the closing date subsequently became available during the allocation period, we have adjusted our goodwill, assets, or liabilities associated with the acquisition.
Income taxes — We compute income taxes using the liability method. Our ability to realize the benefit of our federal, state, and foreign deferred tax assets requires us to achieve certain future earnings levels. We have established a valuation allowance against a portion of our deferred tax assets and we could be required to further adjust that valuation allowance if market conditions change materially and future earnings are, or are projected to be, significantly different than our current estimates.
We intend to permanently reinvest these undistributed foreign earnings in those businesses outside the United States. It is not practicable to determine the amount of federal income taxes, if any, that might become due if such earnings are repatriated.
We file income tax returns, including tax returns for our subsidiaries, with U.S. federal, state, local, and foreign jurisdictions. Our tax returns are subject to routine compliance review by the various federal, state, and foreign taxing authorities in the jurisdictions in which we have operated and filed tax returns in the ordinary course of business. We accrue tax expense to reduce our tax benefits in those situations where it is more likely than not that we will not prevail against the tax authorities should they challenge the tax return position that gave rise to the benefit. We believe that our tax returns are materially correct as filed, and we will vigorously defend any challenges and proposed adjustments to those filings made by the tax authorities. A number of years may elapse before particular tax matters, for which we have established accruals, are audited and finally resolved. The number of tax years that may be subject to a tax audit varies depending on the tax jurisdiction. While we have effectively concluded our 2003 - 2005 tax years with respect to our affiliate the COOP, SCI and Subsidiaries' tax years 1999 - 2005 remain under review at the IRS Appeals level. SCI and Subsidiaries received a letter of no change to its tax liability for the years 2008 - 2010. Furthermore, SCI and its affiliates are under audit by various state and foreign jurisdiction for years through 2010. While it is often difficult to predict the final outcome or the timing of resolution of any particular tax matter, we believe that our accruals reflect the probable outcome of known tax contingencies. Unfavorable settlement of any particular issue would reduce a deferred tax asset or require the payment of cash. Favorable resolution could result in reduced income tax expense reported in the financial statements in the future. Our tax accruals for uncertain tax positions are presented in the balance sheet within Other liabilities.
Pension cost — Our pension plans are frozen with no benefits accruing to participants except interest. Pension costs and liabilities are actuarially determined based on certain assumptions, including the discount rate used to compute future benefit obligations. Weighted-average discount rates used to determine net periodic pension cost were 2.90% and 4.05% as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. We verify the reasonableness of the discount rate by comparing our rate to the rate earned on high-quality fixed income investments, such as the Moody’s Aa index.
Insurance loss reserves — We purchase comprehensive general liability, morticians and cemetery professional liability, automobile liability, and workers’ compensation insurance coverages structured with high deductibles. This high-deductible insurance program means we are primarily self-insured for claims and associated costs and losses covered by these policies. Historical insurance industry experience indicates a high degree of inherent variability in assessing the ultimate amount of losses associated with casualty insurance claims. This is especially true with respect to liability and workers’ compensation exposures due to the extended period of time that transpires between when the claim might occur and the full settlement of such claim, often many years. We continually evaluate loss estimates associated with claims and losses related to these insurance coverages falling within the deductible of each coverage. Assumptions based on factors such as claim settlement patterns, claim development trends, claim frequency and severity patterns, inflationary trends, and data reasonableness will generally affect the analysis and determination of the “best estimate” of the projected ultimate claim losses. The results of these evaluations are used to both analyze and adjust our insurance loss reserves.
As of December 31, 2013, reported losses within our retention for workers’ compensation, general liability, and auto liability incurred during the period May 1, 1991 through December 31, 2013 were approximately $391.1 million over 22.7 years. The selected fully developed ultimate settlement value estimated was $437.4 million for the same period. Paid losses were $380.9 million indicating a reserve requirement of $78.0 million, including $21.5 million in reserves assumed as part of the acquisition of Stewart.
At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the balances in our reserve for workers’ compensation, general, and auto liability and the related activity were as follows:
(Dollars in millions)
| Balance at December 31, 2011 | $52.6 |
| Additions | 31.4 |
| Payments | (26.5) |
| Balance at December 31, 2012 | $57.5 |
| Additions | 26.2 |
| Acquisition | 21.5 |
| Payments | (27.2) |
| Balance at December 31, 2013 | $78.0 |
Fair Value Measurements
We measure the available-for-sale securities held by our funeral merchandise and service, cemetery merchandise and service, and cemetery perpetual care trusts at fair value on a recurring basis in accordance with the Fair Value Measurements Topic of the ASC. This guidance defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about instruments measured at fair value. The guidance establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements. The valuation hierarchy is based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date. The three levels are defined as follows:
- Level 1 — inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets;
- Level 2 — inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument; and
- Level 3 — inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.
An asset’s or liability’s categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Certain available-for-sale securities held by our funeral merchandise and service, cemetery merchandise and service, and cemetery perpetual care trusts have been classified in Level 3 of the hierarchy due to the significant management judgment required as a result of the absence of quoted market prices, inherent lack of liquidity, or the long-term nature of the securities. For additional disclosures required by FASB guidance for all of our available-for-sale securities, see Notes 4, 5, and 6 in Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements and Accounting Changes
For discussion of recent accounting pronouncements and accounting changes, see Note 3 in Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Market risk
As filed, 3,212 characters, with its headings, lists and tables. Extracted from the main document; charts and exhibits are in the original on sec.gov.
The market risk inherent in our financial instruments and positions includes the price risk associated with the marketable equity and debt securities included in our portfolio of trust investments, the interest rate risk associated with our floating rate debt, and the currency risk associated with our foreign operations (primarily in Canada). Our market-sensitive instruments and positions are considered to be “other-than-trading”. Our exposure to market risk as discussed below includes forward-looking statements and represents an estimate of possible changes in fair value or future earnings that might occur, assuming hypothetical changes in equity markets, interest rates, and currencies. Our views on market risk are not necessarily indicative of actual results that may occur, and they do not represent the maximum possible gains or losses that may occur. Actual fair value movements related to changes in equity markets, interest rates and currencies, along with the timing of such movements, may differ from those estimated.
Marketable Equity and Debt Securities — Price Risk
In connection with our preneed funeral operations and preneed cemetery merchandise and service sales, the related funeral and cemetery trust funds own investments in equity and debt securities and mutual funds, which are sensitive to current market prices.
Cost and market values as of December 31, 2013 are presented in Notes 4, 5, and 6 in Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. Also, see Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Financial Conditions, Liquidity, and Capital Resources, for discussion of trust investments.
Market-Rate Sensitive Instruments — Interest Rate Risk
At December 31, 2013 and 2012, approximately 76% and 87%, respectively, of our total debt consisted of fixed rate debt at a weighted average rate of 5.25% and 6.28%, respectively. The fair market value of our debt was $165.2 million more than its carrying value at December 31, 2013. A hypothetical 10% increase in interest rates associated with our floating rate debt would increase our interest expense by $1.3 million. See Note 10 and 11 in Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, for additional information.
Market-Rate Sensitive Instruments — Currency Risk
At December 31, 2013 and 2012, our foreign currency exposure was primarily associated with the Canadian dollar and the Euro. A 10% adverse change in the strength of the U.S. dollar relative to our foreign currency instruments would have negatively affected our income from our continuing operations, on an annual basis, by $1.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 and $2.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2012.
At December 31, 2013, approximately 3% of our stockholders’ equity and 15% of our operating income was denominated in foreign currencies, primarily the Canadian dollar. Approximately 4% of our stockholders’ equity and 13% of our operating income was denominated in foreign currencies, primarily the Canadian dollar, at December 31, 2012. We do not have an investment in foreign operations considered to be in highly inflationary economies.
Controls and procedures
As filed, 3,322 characters, with its headings, lists and tables. Extracted from the main document; charts and exhibits are in the original on sec.gov.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Based on this evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2013 were effective to ensure that information we are required to disclose in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13-a-15(f)). SCI’s internal control over financial reporting is a process, under the supervision of our CEO and CFO, designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Our management, with the participation of our CEO and CFO, has assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013 based on the framework in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2013.
Management has excluded Stewart from its assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013 because it was acquired by the Company in a purchase business combination during 2013. The total assets and total revenues of Stewart represent approximately 23% and less than 1%, respectively, of the related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2013.
The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2013 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Figures reported in this filing
Standardized line items from the XBRL in this filing, for the period ended 2013-12-31. Comparative periods it repeats are left out.
| Line item | Period | Value | XBRL concept |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 3 months2013-10-01 to 2013-12-31 | $668.6m | us-gaap:SalesRevenueNet |
| Revenue | 12 months2013-01-01 to 2013-12-31 | $2.56bn | us-gaap:Revenues |
| Cost of revenue | 3 months2013-10-01 to 2013-12-31 | $520.8m | us-gaap:CostOfRevenue |
| Cost of revenue | 12 months2013-01-01 to 2013-12-31 | $2.01bn | us-gaap:CostOfRevenue |
| Gross profit | 3 months2013-10-01 to 2013-12-31 | $147.8m | us-gaap:GrossProfit |
| Gross profit | 12 months2013-01-01 to 2013-12-31 | $549.6m | us-gaap:GrossProfit |
| Operating income | 3 months2013-10-01 to 2013-12-31 | $88.0m | us-gaap:OperatingIncomeLoss |
| Operating income | 12 months2013-01-01 to 2013-12-31 | $388.2m | us-gaap:OperatingIncomeLoss |
| Interest expense | 12 months2013-01-01 to 2013-12-31 | $142.4m | us-gaap:InterestExpense |
| Income tax | 3 months2013-10-01 to 2013-12-31 | −$21.1m | us-gaap:IncomeTaxExpenseBenefit |
| Income tax | 12 months2013-01-01 to 2013-12-31 | $96.6m | us-gaap:IncomeTaxExpenseBenefit |
| Net income | 3 months2013-10-01 to 2013-12-31 | $25.8m | us-gaap:NetIncomeLoss |
| Net income | 12 months2013-01-01 to 2013-12-31 | $143.8m | us-gaap:NetIncomeLoss |
| Diluted EPS | 3 months2013-10-01 to 2013-12-31 | $0.12 | us-gaap:EarningsPerShareDiluted |
| Diluted EPS | 12 months2013-01-01 to 2013-12-31 | $0.67 | us-gaap:EarningsPerShareDiluted |
| Basic EPS | 3 months2013-10-01 to 2013-12-31 | $0.12 | us-gaap:EarningsPerShareBasic |
| Basic EPS | 12 months2013-01-01 to 2013-12-31 | $0.68 | us-gaap:EarningsPerShareBasic |
| Diluted shares (weighted) | 12 months2013-01-01 to 2013-12-31 | 216,014,000 shares | us-gaap:WeightedAverageNumberOfDilutedSharesOutstanding |
| Operating cash flow | 12 months2013-01-01 to 2013-12-31 | $384.7m | us-gaap:NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities |
| Capital expenditure | 12 months2013-01-01 to 2013-12-31 | $113.1m | us-gaap:PaymentsToAcquireProductiveAssets |
| Dividends paid | 12 months2013-01-01 to 2013-12-31 | $57.2m | us-gaap:PaymentsOfDividendsCommonStock |
| Share repurchases | 12 months2013-01-01 to 2013-12-31 | $1.7m | us-gaap:PaymentsForRepurchaseOfCommonStock |
| Cash and equivalents | At period end2013-12-31 | $144.9m | us-gaap:CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue |
| Current assets | At period end2013-12-31 | $393.7m | us-gaap:AssetsCurrent |
| Total assets | At period end2013-12-31 | $12.91bn | us-gaap:Assets |
| Current liabilities | At period end2013-12-31 | $642.6m | us-gaap:LiabilitiesCurrent |
| Long-term debt | At period end2013-12-31 | $3.16bn | us-gaap:LongTermDebtNoncurrent |
| Current portion of debt | At period end2013-12-31 | $146.4m | us-gaap:LongTermDebtCurrent |
| Short-term borrowings | At period end2013-12-31 | $39.6m | us-gaap:CommercialPaper |
| Shareholders' equity | At period end2013-12-31 | $1.41bn | us-gaap:StockholdersEquity |
Source: SEC EDGAR, the filing index for accession 0000089089-14-000002. Last ingested by Listed: Nov 6, 2026, 13:24 ET. Listed shows no prices and gives no investment advice.