United Fire Group Inc: Form 10-K for the period ended Dec 31, 2025

OVERVIEW

Founded in 1946, United Fire Group, Inc. ("UFG", the "Registrant", the "Company", "we", "us", or "our") and its subsidiaries are engaged in the business of writing property and casualty insurance through a network of independent agencies. Our insurance company subsidiaries are currently licensed as property and casualty insurers in all 50 states, plus the District of Columbia. Our principal executive office is located at 118 Second Avenue SE, Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52401.

The Company owns 100 percent of United Fire & Casualty Company ("UF&C"), which owns 100 percent of eight subsidiaries: (1) Addison Insurance Company; (2) Lafayette Insurance Company; (3) United Fire & Indemnity Company; (4) Mercer Insurance Company; (5) Financial Pacific Insurance Company; (6) UFG Specialty Insurance Company; (7) United Real Estate Holdings LLC and (8) McIntyre Cedar UK Limited. Mercer Insurance Company owns 100 percent of two subsidiaries: (1) Franklin Insurance Company; and (2) Mercer Insurance Company of New Jersey, Inc. McIntyre Cedar UK Limited owns 100 percent of McIntyre Cedar Corporate Member LLP.

PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE BUSINESS

Commercial Lines Business

Our business is comprised primarily of commercial lines of property and casualty insurance, including surety bonds. Our primary commercial policies are tailored business packages that include the following lines of business: fire and allied lines, other liability, automobile, workers' compensation and surety. Our core commercial products support a wide variety of customers, including small business owners and middle market businesses operating in industries such as construction, services, retail trade, financial and manufacturing, through approximately 850 independent property and casualty agencies, along with contract surety and commercial surety bonds offered through approximately 160 surety agencies.

We partner with managing general agents ("MGAs") to offer delegated underwriting programs providing niche products, including marine specialty, professional liability and earthquake coverages. We also provide specialty and surplus lines coverage written exclusively through wholesale brokers on an admitted and non-admitted basis. Through its McIntyre Cedar Corporate Member ("MCCM”) subsidiary, the Company is a member of Lloyd's of London ("Lloyd's"). Lloyd's operates as an insurance marketplace whereby members join syndicates to underwrite insurance through a managing agent in return for receiving premiums. The Company participates in multiple syndicates that cover a range of property and casualty insurance and reinsurance lines.

The Company offers reinsurance coverage for property and casualty insurance through traditional treaty reinsurance channels. The reinsurance operation supports primarily commercial lines of business but also assumes risk in professional, financial and personal lines of insurance.

All of our property and casualty insurance subsidiaries belong to an intercompany reinsurance pooling arrangement. Pooling arrangements permit the participating companies to rely on the capacity of the entire pool's capital and surplus, rather than being limited to policy exposures of a size commensurate with each participant's own surplus level. Under such arrangements, the members share substantially all of the insurance business that is written and allocate the combined premiums, losses and expenses based on percentages defined in the arrangement.

For a more detailed discussion of our products, refer to the "Business Overview" section in Part II, Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations".

Personal Lines Business

Our personal fire and allied lines includes proportional assumed reinsurance for homeowners multi-peril coverage. In 2020, the Company announced its intent to withdraw as a direct writer of personal lines insurance. As of December 31, 2025, no exposure to direct personal lines of business remains.

Operating Segments

We operate as one operating segment. Our revenues are primarily derived from premiums earned for property and casualty insurance products issued to customers. For additional information, see Note 10, "Segment Information," in Part II, Item 8, "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data."

Pricing

Pricing levels for our property and casualty insurance products are influenced by many factors, including an estimation of expected losses; the expenses of producing, issuing and servicing business and managing claims; the time value of money associated with such loss and expense cash flows; and a reasonable allowance for profit. We have a disciplined approach to underwriting and risk management that emphasizes profitable growth rather than premium volume or market share.

Seasonality

Our property and casualty insurance business experiences seasonality with regard to written premium, which is generally highest in January and July and lowest during the fourth quarter. Although we experience seasonality, premium is earned ratably over the period of coverage. Losses and loss settlement expenses incurred tend to remain consistent throughout the year, with the exception of catastrophe losses which generally are highest in the second and third quarters. Catastrophes inherently are unpredictable and can occur at any time during the year from man-made or natural disaster events that include, but are not limited to, hail, tornadoes, hurricanes and windstorms.

Competition

The property and casualty insurance industry is highly competitive. We compete with numerous property and casualty insurance companies in the regional and national market, some of which are substantially larger and have considerably greater financial and other resources. Except for regulatory considerations, there are limited barriers to entry into the insurance industry. Our competitors may be domestic or foreign, as well as licensed or unlicensed. The exact number of competitors within the industry is not known. Insurers compete on the basis of reliability, financial strength and stability, ratings, underwriting consistency, service, business ethics, price, performance, capacity, policy terms and coverage conditions.

In addition, because our primary commercial products are marketed exclusively through independent insurance agencies, all of which represent more than one company, we face competition within each agency and competition to retain qualified independent agents. Our competitors include companies that market their products through independent agents, exclusive agents, as well as companies that sell insurance directly to their customers.

Because we rely solely on independent agencies to market our primary commercial products, we offer a competitive commissions program and a rewarding profit-sharing plan as incentives for agents to place high-quality property and casualty insurance business with us. We tier our agents to objectively recognize our top performers including additional compensation in our profit-sharing plan. We offer incentive trips and promotions to build UFG loyalty.

Our competitive advantages include our commitments to:

• Strong agency relationships:
• Highly-experienced personnel focused on strong service-oriented relationships.
• A team of regional managers is responsible for deepening the agency relationships needed to drive profitable growth and the field execution of underwriting strategies for the core commercial business.
• Exceptional service: Our agents and policyholders always have the ability to speak with a real person.
• Fair and prompt claims handling: We view claims handling experiences as an opportunity to demonstrate our exemplary customer service to our policyholders.
• Specialized underwriting expertise: We empower our underwriters with the knowledge and tools needed to make good decisions for the Company.
• Superior loss control services: Our loss control representatives make multiple visits to policyholder businesses and job sites each year to ensure safety and make loss prevention recommendations.
• Effective and efficient use of technology: We use technology to provide enhanced service to our agents and policyholders, not to replace our personal relationships, but to reinforce them.

REINSURANCE

Incorporated by reference from the "Reinsurance" section in Part II, Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and Note 4 "Reinsurance" contained in Part II, Item 8, "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data."

RESERVES

Incorporated by reference from the "Critical Accounting Estimates" section in Part II, Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and Note 5 "Reserves for Losses and Loss Settlement Expenses" in Part II, Item 8, "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data."

INVESTMENTS

Incorporated by reference from Part II, Items 7 and Item 7A, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," and "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk" under the headings "Investments," "Market Risk" and "Critical Accounting Estimates," Note 1 "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" under the heading "Investments," Note 2 "Investments," and Note 3 "Fair Value of Financial Instruments," contained in Part II, Item 8, "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data."

COMPLIANCE WITH GOVERNMENT REGULATION

The insurance industry is subject to comprehensive and detailed regulation and supervision. Each jurisdiction in which we operate has established supervisory agencies with broad administrative powers. We are not aware of any currently proposed or recently enacted state or federal regulation that would have a material impact on our operations; however, changes to such regulations and the potential impact of such regulations is difficult to predict.

State Regulation

We are subject to extensive regulation, primarily at the state level. The method, extent and substance of such regulation varies by state, but generally has its source in National Association of Insurance Commissioners ("NAIC") model laws and regulations that establish standards and requirements for conducting the business of insurance and that delegate regulatory authority to a state regulatory agency. Moreover, the NAIC Accreditation Program requires state regulatory agencies to meet baseline standards of solvency regulation, particularly with respect to regulation of multi-state insurers. In general, such regulation is intended for the protection of those who purchase or use our insurance products, and not our shareholders. These rules have a substantial effect on our business and relate to a wide variety of matters including: insurance company licensing and examination; the licensing of insurance agents and adjusters; price setting or premium rates; trade practices; approval of policy forms; claims practices; restrictions on transactions between our subsidiaries and their affiliates, including the payment of dividends; investments; underwriting standards; advertising and marketing practices; capital adequacy; and the collection, remittance and reporting of certain taxes, licenses and fees.

The state laws and regulations that have the most significant effect on our insurance operations and financial reporting are discussed below.

Insurance Holding Company Regulation

We are regulated as an insurance holding company system in the states of domicile of our property and casualty insurance companies: Iowa (UF&C, UFG Specialty Insurance Company and Addison Insurance Company), California (Financial Pacific Insurance Company), Louisiana (Lafayette Insurance Company), New Jersey (Mercer Insurance Company of New Jersey, Inc.), Pennsylvania (Mercer Insurance Company and Franklin Insurance Company) and Texas (United Fire & Indemnity Company and its affiliate, United Fire Lloyds, which is organized as a Texas Lloyds plan). These regulations require that we annually furnish financial and other information about the operations of the individual companies within our holding company system. Generally, the insurance laws of these states provide that notice to the state insurance commissioner is required before finalizing any transaction affecting the ownership or control of an insurer and before finalizing certain material transactions between an insurer and any person or entity within its holding company system. In addition, some of those transactions cannot be finalized without the state insurance commissioner's prior approval.

The Model Insurance Holding Company System Regulatory Act, as amended (the "Amended Model Act") identified the concept of "enterprise risk" within an insurance company holding system. Enterprise risk is defined as any activity, circumstance, event or series of events involving one or more affiliates of an insurer that, if not remedied promptly, is likely to have a material adverse effect upon the financial condition or the liquidity of the insurer or its insurance holding company system as a whole. The Amended Model Act imposes more extensive informational requirements on us, including requiring us to prepare an annual enterprise risk report that identifies the material risks within our insurance company holding system that could pose enterprise risk to our licensed insurers.

Restrictions on Shareholder Dividends

As an insurance holding company with no significant independent operations or source of revenue, our capacity to pay dividends to our shareholders is based on the ability of our insurance company subsidiaries to pay dividends to us. The ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends to us is regulated by the laws of their state of domicile. Under these laws, insurance companies must provide advance informational notice to the domicile state insurance regulatory authority prior to payment of any dividend or distribution to its shareholders. Prior approval from the state insurance regulatory authority must be obtained before payment of an "extraordinary dividend" as defined under the state's insurance code. The amount of ordinary dividends that may be paid to us is subject to certain limitations, the amounts of which change each year. In all cases, we may pay dividends only from our earned surplus. Refer to Part II, Item 5, "Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities" under the heading "Dividends" and Note 6 "Statutory Reporting, Capital Requirements and Dividends and Retained Earnings Restrictions," in Part II, Item 8, "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" for additional information.

Price Regulation

Our primary commercial business is subject to regulatory constraints. Nearly all states have insurance laws requiring us to file rating manuals, policy or coverage forms, and other information with the state's regulatory authority. In certain states, rating manuals, policy forms, or both, must be approved prior to use. While insurance laws vary from state to state, their objectives are generally the same: an insurance rate cannot be excessive, inadequate, or unfairly discriminatory. The speed with which we can change our rates in response to competition or in response to increasing costs depends, in part, on the responsiveness of state regulators to allow adequate rates for the business we write. Pricing and product changes in our other businesses, though still subject to certain regulatory oversight, are afforded more flexibility by regulators to respond to emerging operating and claims costs and overall market dynamics.

Investment Regulation

We are subject to various state regulations requiring investment portfolio diversification and limiting the concentration of investments we may maintain in certain asset categories. Failure to comply with these regulations leads to the treatment of nonconforming investments as non-admitted assets for purposes of measuring statutory surplus. Further, in some instances, state regulations require us to sell certain nonconforming investments.

Exiting Geographic Markets; Canceling and Non-renewing Policies

Most states regulate our ability to exit a market. For example, states limit, to varying degrees, our ability to cancel and non-renew insurance policies. Some states prohibit us from withdrawing one or more types of insurance business from the state, except upon prior regulatory approval. Regulations that limit policy cancellation and non-renewal may restrict our ability to exit unprofitable markets.

Insurance Guaranty Associations

Each state has insurance guaranty association laws. Membership in a state's insurance guaranty association is generally mandatory for insurers wishing to do business in that state. Under these laws, associations may assess their members for certain obligations that insolvent insurance companies have incurred with regard to their policyholders and claimants.

Typically, states assess each solvent association member with an amount related to that member's proportionate share of business written by all association members within the state. Most state guaranty associations allow solvent insurers to recoup the assessments they are charged through future rate increases, surcharges or premium tax credits. However, there is no assurance that we will ultimately recover these assessments. We cannot predict the amount and timing of any future assessments or refunds under these laws.

Shared Market and Joint Underwriting Plans

State insurance regulations often require insurers to participate in assigned risk plans, reinsurance facilities and joint underwriting associations. These are mechanisms that generally provide applicants with various types of basic insurance coverage that may not otherwise be available to them through voluntary markets. Such mechanisms are most commonly instituted for automobile and workers' compensation insurance, but many states also mandate participation in Fair Access to Insurance Requirements Plans or Windstorm Plans, which provide basic property coverage. Participation is based upon the amount of a company's voluntary market share in a particular state for the classes of insurance involved. Policies written through these mechanisms may require different underwriting standards and may pose greater risk than those written through our voluntary application process.

Statutory Accounting Principles

For public reporting, insurance companies prepare financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"). However, state laws require us to calculate and report certain data according to statutory accounting principles as defined in the NAIC Accounting Practices and Procedures Manual. While not a substitute for any GAAP measure of performance, statutory data is frequently used by independent rating agencies and industry analysts to facilitate comparisons of insurance companies.

Insurance Reserves

State insurance laws require that insurance companies analyze the adequacy of their reserves annually. Our appointed actuary must submit an opinion that our statutory reserves are adequate to meet policy claims-paying obligations and related expenses.

Financial Solvency Ratios

The NAIC annually calculates 13 financial ratios to assist state insurance regulators in monitoring the financial condition of insurance companies. A "usual range" of results for each of these ratios is used by insurance regulators as a benchmark. Departure from the usual range on four or more of the ratios could lead to inquiries from individual state insurance departments as to certain aspects of a company's business. In addition to the financial ratios, states also require us to calculate a minimum capital requirement for each of our insurance companies based on individual company insurance risk factors. These "risk-based capital" results are used by state insurance regulators to identify companies that require regulatory attention or the initiation of regulatory action. At December 31, 2025, all of our insurance companies had capital in excess of the required minimum levels.

Federal Regulation

Although the federal government and its regulatory agencies generally do not directly regulate the business of insurance, federal initiatives and legislation often have an impact on our business. These initiatives and legislation include tort reform proposals, proposals addressing natural catastrophe exposures, terrorism risk mechanisms, federal financial services reforms, various tax proposals affecting insurance companies, and possible regulatory limitations, impositions and restrictions arising from other legislative action.

Various legislative and regulatory efforts to reform the tort liability system have impacted and will continue to impact our industry. Although there has been some tort reform with positive impact to the insurance industry, new causes of action and theories of damages continue to be proposed in state court actions or by federal or state legislatures that continue to expand liability for insurers and their policyholders. For example, some state legislatures have from time-to-time considered legislation addressing direct actions against insurers related to bad faith claims. As a result of this unpredictability in the law, insurance underwriting is expected to continue to be difficult in commercial lines, professional liability and other specialty coverages.

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act ("Dodd Frank") expanded the federal presence in insurance oversight and increased regulatory requirements that are applicable to us. Dodd-Frank's requirements include streamlining the state-based regulation of reinsurance and non-admitted insurance (property or casualty insurance placed with insurers that are eligible to accept insurance, but are not licensed to write insurance in a particular state). Dodd-Frank also established the Federal Insurance Office within the U.S. Department of the Treasury that is authorized to, among other things, gather data and information to monitor aspects of the insurance industry, identify issues in the regulation of insurers about insurance matters, and preempt state insurance measures under certain circumstances.

Dodd-Frank and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act also contain several provisions related to corporate governance and disclosure matters. In response to Dodd-Frank, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") has adopted or proposed rules regarding director independence, director and officer hedging activities, executive compensation clawback policies, compensation advisor independence, pay versus performance disclosures, internal pay equity disclosures, and shareholder proxy access. These laws require or permit national stock exchanges or associations, such as the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (the "Nasdaq Stock Market"), where we list our equity securities, to mandate certain governance practices. We continue to monitor developments under Dodd-Frank (and federal regulation more broadly) and their impact on us, insurers of similar size and the insurance industry as a whole.

FINANCIAL STRENGTH AND ISSUER CREDIT RATING

Our financial strength is regularly reviewed by an independent rating agency that assigns a rating based upon criteria such as results of operations, capital resources and minimum policyholders' surplus requirements. An insurer's financial strength rating is one of the primary factors evaluated by those in the market to purchase insurance. A poor rating indicates that there is an increased likelihood that the insurer could become insolvent and therefore not able to fulfill its obligations under the insurance policies it issues. This rating can also affect an insurer's level of premium writings, the lines of business it can write and the market value of its securities. A.M. Best also assigns long-term issuer credit ratings based on a company's ability to repay its debts.

Our property and casualty subsidiaries (collectively known as "United Fire & Casualty Group") are rated by A.M. Best Company, Inc. ("A.M. Best") on a group basis. The table below shows the current ratings assigned to our companies by A.M. Best.

According to A.M. Best, companies rated "A-" have "an excellent ability to meet their ongoing obligations to policyholders." The outlook of these credit ratings is stable and there was no change in the outlook in December 2025. Refer to Part I, Item 1A. "Risk Factors" for additional information on financial strength and issuer credit ratings.

HUMAN CAPITAL

Organization core values

Working together as one, we are always striving to deliver on our promises of employee success, policyholder protection, agent opportunity, shareholder value and community support. This unified ideology guides every aspect of the way we conduct business at UFG.

Strategy for success

Our "One UFG: Boldly Forward" strategy unites our people in purpose and drives our mission of superior operational and financial performance. It is centered on five strategic pillars of long-term profitability, diversified growth, people development, continuous innovation and expense management. These pillars provide us with a strong foundation for success as we work together to deliver on our promises to all UFG stakeholders.

Corporate culture

We are committed to cultivating and preserving a culture that fosters the success of our employees. Our purpose is to invest in people to build enduring relationships with those we serve. We invite our people to bring their authentic whole self to work, be inspired to form lasting relationships and to do their best each day.

Our commitment is reinforced through initiatives centered on our people, partners, and philanthropy, creating a work environment built on the premise of a strong sense of belonging that encourages:

a. Respectful communication and cooperation between all employees.

b. Teamwork and participation that empowers and advances all perspectives.

c. Work-life balance to accommodate employees' varying needs.

d. Giving back to the communities we serve to advance change and promote greater understanding and respect.

At UFG, inclusive conduct is centered on:

a. Treating others with dignity and respect at all times, because how we act is as important as what we accomplish.

b. Meeting the evolving needs of our expansive risk profile though investment in our talent through training and recruiting.

c. Always operating with integrity.

d. Continuously listening to our people, agents, partners, vendors, and community to effectuate our goals.

e. Deepening our sensitivity and understanding towards others, we can connect in a meaningful way.

f. Ensuring that employees exhibit conduct that reflects inclusion during work, at work functions on or off the work site, and at all other company-sponsored and company-participating events. Inclusive conduct applies to all in-office, hybrid and remote employees.

It is through our shared awareness and commitment to these principles that we foster a culture of belonging, where everyone is welcome, respected and appreciated.

Employee data

* The 2023 voluntary turnover rate includes employees who accepted the Company's early retirement plan offering.

Fulfilling careers; health, safety and wellness; compensation and benefits; talent development

Employee success is part of UFG's mission, therefore, health, wellness and education are core cultural values. Our investment in employee health and well-being is built on our foundation of helping people enhance their lives.

Our commitment to advancing the mental and physical health of our people includes a variety of fitness and educational offerings to help employees make healthy choices. We also offer on-site wellness centers at several of our offices or stipends at other branch locations.

Sustainability as a Driver of Shareholder Value

As a property and casualty insurer, UFG is acutely aware of the growing risks to business, insureds and communities stemming from sustainability issues. A few of our 2025 sustainability-related achievements include:

• Reduction in Fleet Vehicles

From 2023 through the end of 2025 we minimized the size of our fleet by 68% and reduced miles driven by over 50%. This reduction significantly decreased our carbon footprint and reduced greenhouse gas emissions.

• GHG Emission Targets and Sustainability Reporting

We recently implemented a sustainability platform that will allow us to measure, manage, and report sustainability metrics. Sustainability reporting and GHG emission data are disclosed to our employees, shareholders, and insureds on our public facing website at www.ufginsurance.com (http://www.ufginsurance.com).

COMPANY WEBSITE AND AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION

The Company's website is www.ufginsurance.com (http://www.ufginsurance.com). Information on the Company's website is not incorporated by reference herein and is not a part of this Form 10-K. We provide free and timely access to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, proxy statements, beneficial ownership reports on Forms 3, 4 and 5 and amendments to reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a), 15(d) or 16(a) of the Exchange Act. Such reports are made available as soon as reasonably practicable after they are filed with or furnished to the SEC. To access these filings, go to the Company's website and under the "Investors" heading, click on "Financials" then "SEC Filings."

Our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct is also available at www.ufginsurance.com (http://www.ufginsurance.com) in the Investor Relations section. To view it, under the "Investors" tab, select "Governance," then "Governance Documents" and then "Code of Ethics and Business Conduct."

Free paper copies of any materials that we file with or furnish to the SEC can also be obtained by writing to Investor Relations, United Fire Group, Inc., 118 Second Avenue SE, Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52401.

INFORMATION ABOUT OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following table sets forth information concerning the following executive officers as of February 26, 2026:

A brief description of the business experience of these officers follows:

Kevin J. Leidwinger became our President and Chief Executive Officer in August 2022. Prior to joining UFG, Mr. Leidwinger served as President and Chief Operating Officer at CNA Commercial from 2015 - 2022. Prior to joining CNA Commercial in 2015, he was global casualty manager for Chubb Commercial Insurance, and was responsible for the company's worldwide portfolio of general liability, workers' compensation, excess umbrella, auto errors and omissions, and environmental business.

Julie A. Stephenson joined UFG as our Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer in January 2023. Ms. Stephenson has over 25 years of experience in the insurance industry, most recently serving as global head of casualty reinsurance at Swiss Re. Prior to joining Swiss Re in 2021, she held the positions of Chief Operating Officer-Middle Market (2019-2021) and Commercial Chief Underwriting Officer (2015-2019) at CNA Insurance and Global Liability Manager for Chubb Insurance.

Eric J. Martin became Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in February 2023, after joining UFG as our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in April 2022. Prior to joining UFG, he served as Head of Enterprise Transformation at Transamerica Corporation (an insurance company), beginning in 2020. Mr. Martin also held numerous other positions at Transamerica including: Chief Operating Officer, Individual Solutions and Retail Affiliates (2019-2020); Senior Vice President, Controller and Head of Finance (2016-2019) and various other roles dating back to 2001.

Sarah E. Madsen became our Vice President, Chief Legal Officer, and Corporate Secretary in April 2022 and was appointed Senior Vice President in March 2024. Ms. Madsen previously served as Assistant General Counsel from 2018-2022. Prior to joining UFG, she served as corporate counsel for a national insurance and financial strategies firm, counsel for a global non-profit and was a partner at a St. Paul, MN-based law firm, where she practiced financial services, insurance, and commercial litigation. Ms. Madsen holds a CPCU designation.

Steven D. Hernandez became our Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer in May 2024. Prior to joining UFG, he served as Senior Vice President at CNA Insurance from 2016-2024 and held various leadership roles at Chubb Group of Insurance Companies.

Brian K. Rawlins became our Senior Vice President and Chief Claim Officer in November 2025. Prior to joining UFG, he held ascending leadership roles at CNA Insurance beginning in 2016, most recently serving as Vice President, Commercial Claim (General Liability and Auto) from 2021-2025. Prior to joining CNA Insurance, he held various other roles at Travelers and Nationwide Insurance.

We provide readers with the following discussion of risks and uncertainties relevant to our business. These are factors that we believe could cause our actual results to differ materially from our historic or anticipated results. We could also be adversely affected by other factors, in addition to those listed here. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial could have a material effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and/or liquidity.

Additional information concerning factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements is set forth in Part II, Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."

Strategic

The success of our strategy may be adversely impacted by various internal and external factors.

We have set a strategy to grow our business through six distinct business units. We expect to execute our strategy, but our success could be impacted by several different risks including but not limited to regulatory changes, economic conditions, advancements in technology, cybersecurity threats, operational risks, intense market competition, and talent risks. We continually monitor these risks and mitigate their potential likelihood and impact. We also adjust our strategy as needed as results are realized or projections indicate any potential weaknesses in the adequacy or execution of our strategic plan. Our efforts to successfully mitigate risks to our strategy are not guaranteed, which could have a material impact on our financial condition and the results of our operations.

Our core insurance business is dependent on strong and beneficial relationships with a large network of independent insurance agents. A strain in these relationships could result in loss of sufficient business opportunities within our expertise and stated risk appetite.

Our direct insurance products are marketed exclusively through independent insurance agencies, all of which represent more than one company. We face competition within each agency and competition to retain qualified independent agents. Our competitors include companies that market their products via independent agents, exclusive agents and companies that sell insurance directly to their customers.

Our distribution model is subject to the risks of possible loss of independent agencies for various reasons and the discretion agencies have to reduce their business with us. Other potential consequences of not maintaining strong and beneficial relationships include the loss of sufficient business opportunities within our specific risk appetite, impacting the quality of our underwriting and loss ratio. If the quality of the independent agencies with which we do business were to decline, policyholders might consider purchasing their insurance through different agencies or channels.

We will be at a competitive disadvantage if, over time, our competitors are more effective in pricing their products, development of new product offering, implementation of technology or data analytics.

We compete with many major U.S. and non-U.S. insurers and smaller regional companies, as well as mutual companies, specialty insurance companies, underwriting agencies, and diversified financial services companies, including banks, mutual funds, broker-dealers and asset-managers. Our competitors may attempt to increase their market share by lowering prices. Our competitors may also develop new products and capabilities that render our offerings less appealing. These situations may hinder our ability to retain existing business and/or procure new business.

We use various actuarial techniques and data analytics to understand our risk exposures such as frequency and severity of different types of insurance claims. The data we rely on for these analytics includes experience data from our own business (e.g., policies written, characteristics, coverages, and details of associated losses) and data attained from third parties, including industry results. We use outputs of predictive models and other analytics to assist in decision making related to underwriting, pricing, claims management (including reserving), and catastrophe risk exposure management. Although underwriting and pricing decisions are informed by these analytics, assumptions are required based on experienced judgment that may be incorrect or fail to contemplate external, unforeseeable factors. This may result in decisions that could result in an adverse impact on our business and financial results.

Emerging technology, including artificial intelligence, offers opportunities to underwrite and price business more efficiently and accurately, thus lowering costs. If we cannot use technology and data analytics as effectively as our competitors, our competitiveness and ability to write and retain business within our risk appetite will be impacted. This may reduce the profitability of the business we write and retain and negatively affect our ability to meet our business objectives.

Our strategy's success could be affected by our timely ability to recognize and adapt to our position in the insurance cycle.

The risk presented by market conditions presents a unique set of challenges in the property and casualty insurance industry. The property and casualty insurance marketplace is cyclical in nature and has historically been characterized by soft markets (periods of relatively high levels of price competition, less restrictive underwriting standards and generally low premium rates) followed by hard markets (periods of capital shortages resulting in a lack of insurance availability, relatively low levels of price competition, more selective underwriting of risks and relatively high premium rates). During soft markets, we may lose business to competitors offering competitive insurance at lower prices. We may reduce our premiums or limit premium increases leading to a reduction in our profit margins and revenues. During hard markets, we may underprice our competition resulting in adverse selection and missed opportunities for higher profit margins.

Changing weather patterns and climate change add to the unpredictability, frequency and severity of catastrophe losses and may adversely affect the results of our operations, liquidity and financial condition.

Long-term weather trends may be changing, a phenomenon that has been associated with extreme weather events linked to rising temperatures, including effects on global weather patterns, sea, land and air temperature, sea levels, rain, snow, and drought. Such changes in climate conditions could cause our underlying modeling data to be less accurate, limiting our ability to evaluate and manage our risk. Climate change also adds to the unpredictability of natural disasters and creates uncertainty as to future trends and exposures. Climate change presents risks in four categories to UFG:

(1) Physical Risk: The cost of natural perils may change. This is a concern for our property insurance underwriting strategy and, to a lesser extent, our real estate costs.

(2) Regulatory Risk: Certain regulatory bodies may impose laws that require UFG to report GHG emissions from our own operations and our strategies to mitigate emissions, resulting in compliance with such regulations requiring increased time and expense.

(3) Transition Risk: Financial risks arising from a global transition to a lower-carbon economy could impact long-term return on certain invested assets.

(4) Liability Risk: New areas of law enabling litigation alleging damage from climate change may present legal risk to UFG.

Underwriting

Our success depends primarily on our ability to underwrite risks effectively and adequately price the risks we insure.

The results of our operations and our financial condition depend on our ability to underwrite and set premium rates accurately for a wide variety of risks based on available information. Adequate rates are necessary to generate premiums sufficient to pay losses, loss settlement expenses and underwriting expenses and to earn a profit. To price our products accurately, we must collect and properly analyze a substantial amount of data, develop, and apply appropriate pricing techniques, closely monitor changes in trends and project both severity and frequency of losses with reasonable accuracy. We could underprice risks which would adversely affect our profit margins. Conversely, we could overprice risks, leading to reduced sales volume and competitiveness. Our ability to undertake these efforts successfully is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to:

(1) The availability of sufficient reliable data and our ability to properly analyze available data.

(2) Market and competitive conditions.

(3) Changes in medical care expenses and restoration costs.

(4) Our selection and application of appropriate pricing techniques.

(5) Changes in the regulatory market, applicable legal liability standards and in the civil litigation system generally.

The demand for property and casualty insurance can also vary significantly, rising as the overall level of economic activity increases and falling as that activity decreases. Fluctuations in demand and competition could produce underwriting results that would have a negative impact on the results of our operations and financial condition.

Claims

We may be unable to predict the rising cost of insurance claims resulting from changing societal expectations that lead to increasing litigation, broader definitions of liability, broader contract interpretations, more plaintiff-friendly legal decisions and larger compensatory jury awards.

We refer to these phenomena collectively as "social inflation" and they present a significant challenge in accurately pricing risk and managing the liabilities that arise on insurance policies. As a commercial casualty insurance company, we have always been sensitive to the effects of emerging claims and coverage issues, including class action lawsuits. But more recent trends such as litigation financing have led to an unprecedented number of large liability losses for us as well as our competitors.

These issues may adversely affect our business by either extending coverage beyond our underwriting intent or by increasing the number and/or size of claims, resulting in further increases in our reserves. The effects of these and other unforeseen emerging claims and coverage issues are difficult to predict. Further examples of these issues include:

(1) Judicial expansion of policy coverage and the impact of new theories of liability.

(2) An increase in plaintiffs targeting property and casualty insurers, including us, in purported class action litigation regarding claims handling and other practices.

(3) Medical developments that link health issues to specific causes, resulting in liability or workers' compensation (for example, cumulative trauma).

(4) Claims relating to unanticipated consequences of current or new technologies.

(5) An increase in the variety, number and size of claims relating to liability losses, which often present complex coverage and damage valuation questions.

(6) Claims relating to potentially changing climate conditions, including higher frequency and severity of weather-related events.

(7) Adverse changes in loss cost trends, including inflationary pressure in medical cost and automobile repair costs.

Many of the policies we issue include exclusions and other conditions that define and limit coverage, which exclusions and conditions are designed to manage our exposure to certain types of risks and expanding theories of legal liability. In addition, many of our policies limit the period during which a policyholder may bring a claim under the policy, which period in many cases is shorter than the statutory period under which these claims can be brought by our policyholders. While these exclusions and limitations help us assess and control our loss exposure, it is possible that a court or regulatory authority could nullify or void an exclusion or limitation, or legislation could be enacted which modifies or bars the use of these exclusions and limitations. This could result in higher than anticipated losses by extending coverage beyond the intent of our underwriting. In some instances, these changes may not become apparent until sometime after we have issued the insurance policies that are affected by these changes. As a result, the full extent of liability under our insurance contracts may not be known for many years after a policy is issued.

We maintain an internal education plan on the risk of social inflation. We endeavor to find ways to keep claims out of litigation and manage downward the length of time that certain claims are open. We also steer our portfolio away from business that is most exposed to these trends, and we target business in our assumed reinsurance operations and other alternative distribution channels that offer shorter tail risks.

Our reserves for property and casualty insurance losses and loss settlement expenses are based on estimates and may be inadequate, adversely impacting our financial results.

We maintain insurance reserves to cover our estimated ultimate unpaid liability for claim and claim adjustment expenses, including the estimated cost of the claims adjustment process, for reported and unreported claims and for future policy benefits. Our reserves may prove to be inadequate, which may result in future charges to earnings and/or a downgrade of our financial strength rating or the financial strength ratings of our insurance company subsidiaries.

Insurance reserves represent our best estimate at a given point in time. They are not an exact calculation of liability but instead are complex estimates, which are a product of actuarial expertise and projection techniques based on assumptions and expectations about future events, many of which are highly uncertain.

The process of estimating claim and claim adjustment expense reserves involves a high degree of judgment. These estimates are based on historical data and the impact of various factors such as:

(1) Actuarial and statistical projections of the cost of settlement and administration of claims reflecting facts and circumstances known.

(2) Historical claims information and loss emergence patterns.

(3) Assessments of currently available data.

(4) Estimates of future trends in claims severity and frequency.

(5) Judicial theories of liability.

(6) Economic factors such as inflation.

(7) Estimates and assumptions regarding social, judicial and legislative trends, and actions such as class action lawsuits and judicial interpretation of coverages or policy exclusions.

(8) The level of insurance fraud.

Many of these factors are not quantifiable. The inherent uncertainties of estimating reserves are greater for certain types of liabilities, particularly those in which the various considerations affecting the type of claim are subject to change and in which long periods of time may elapse before a definitive determination of liability is made. Reserve estimates are continually refined in a regular and ongoing process as experience develops and further claims are reported and settled.

Actual loss and loss settlement expenses paid might exceed our reserves. If our loss reserves are insufficient, or if we believe our loss reserves are insufficient to cover our actual loss and loss settlement expenses, we will have to increase our loss reserves and incur charges to our earnings, which could indicate that premium levels were insufficient. As such, deviations from one or more of these assumptions could result in a material adverse impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements and our financial strength rating or the financial strength ratings of our insurance company subsidiaries could be downgraded.

For a detailed discussion of our reserving process and the factors we consider in estimating reserves, refer to the "Critical Accounting Estimates" section in Part II, Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."

We insure property that is exposed to various natural perils that can give rise to significant claims costs.

Our property and casualty insurance operations expose us to claims arising from catastrophic events affecting multiple policyholders. Such catastrophic events consist of various natural disasters, which may increase in severity and frequency due to climate change, including, but not limited to, hurricanes, tornadoes, hailstorms, wildfires, earthquakes, severe winter weather, volcanic eruptions, and man-made disasters such as terrorist acts (including biological, chemical or radiological events), explosions, infrastructure failures and results from political instability.

Property damage resulting from catastrophes is perhaps the largest short-term underwriting loss we face in the ordinary course of our business. Catastrophes may reduce our net income, cause substantial volatility in our financial results for any fiscal quarter or year or otherwise adversely affect our financial condition, liquidity or results of operations. Catastrophes may also negatively affect our ability to write new business.

In addition, as with catastrophe losses generally, it can require time for us to determine our ultimate losses associated with a particular catastrophic event. The inability to access portions of the impacted area, the complexity of the losses, legal and regulatory uncertainty, and the nature of the information available for certain catastrophic events may affect our ability to estimate the claims and claim adjustment expense reserves. Such complex factors include but are not limited to: determining the cause of the damage, evaluating general liability exposures, estimating additional living expenses, the impact of demand surge, infrastructure disruption, fraud, business interruption costs and reinsurance collectability.

The timing of a catastrophic occurrence at the end or near the end of a reporting period may also affect the information available to us when estimating claims and claim adjustment expense reserves for the reporting period. As our claims experience for a particular catastrophe develops, we may be required to adjust our reserves to reflect our revised estimates of the total cost of claims. However, because the occurrence and severity of catastrophes are inherently unpredictable and may vary significantly from year to year and region to region, historical results of operations may not be indicative of future results of operations.

Following catastrophes there may be legislative, administrative, and judicial decisions that seek to expand insurance coverage for claims beyond the original intent of the policies or seek to prevent the application of deductibles. Our ability to manage catastrophic exposure may be limited by public policy considerations, the political environment, changes in the general economic climate and/or social responsibilities.

Financial

We are subject to certain risks related to our investment portfolio that could negatively affect our profitability.

Our fixed maturity investments are professionally managed by New England Asset Management ("NEAM") as of February 1, 2024. NEAM’s investment decisions are governed by our management team and in accordance with our investment guidelines approved by our Board of Directors. Investment income is an important component of our net income and overall profitability. We invest premiums received from policyholders and other available cash to generate investment income and capital appreciation, while also maintaining sufficient liquidity to pay covered claims, operating expenses, and dividends. Our investment performance is sensitive to various factors including general economic conditions, changes in financial markets, global disruptions, and other factors beyond our control. Although our guidelines stress diversification in investment grade fixed income securities, our financial results may be adversely impacted by investment creditworthiness, fluctuations in interest rates, and disruptions in the financial and capital markets.

We seek to match the maturities of our investment portfolio with the estimated payment date of our loss and loss adjustment expense reserves to ensure strong liquidity and avoid having to liquidate securities to fund claims. Risks such as inadequate loss and loss adjustment reserves, a large natural catastrophe, or unfavorable trends in litigation could potentially result in the need to sell investments to fund these liabilities. This could result in significant realized losses depending on the conditions of the general market, interest rates and credit profile of individual securities. Further, our investment portfolio is subject to increased valuation uncertainties when investment markets are illiquid. The valuation of investments is more subjective when markets are illiquid, thereby increasing the risk that the estimated fair value (i.e., the carrying amount) of the portion of the investment portfolio that is carried at fair value in our financial statements is not reflective of prices at which actual transactions could occur.

We exercise prudence and significant judgment in analyzing and validating fair values, which are primarily provided by third parties, for securities in our investment portfolio, including those that are not regularly traded in active markets. We also exercise prudence and significant judgment in determining whether the impairment of particular investments is temporary or other-than-temporary. Due to the inherent uncertainties involved in these judgments, we may incur unrealized losses and subsequently conclude that other-than-temporary write downs of our investments are required.

A downgrade in our financial strength or issuer credit ratings could result in a loss of business and could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and liquidity.

Ratings are an important factor in establishing the competitive position of insurance companies. Third-party rating agencies assess and rate the claims-paying ability, capital strength and creditworthiness of insurers and reinsurers based on criteria established by the agencies. Financial strength ratings and issuer credit ratings are used by policyholders, insurers, reinsurers and insurance and reinsurance intermediaries as an important means of assessing the financial strength, creditworthiness and quality of insurers and reinsurers. These ratings are not evaluations directed to potential purchasers of our common stock, and are not recommendations to buy, sell or hold our common stock. These ratings are subject to change at any time and could be revised downward or revoked at the sole discretion of the rating agency.

The ratings assigned by A.M. Best are an important factor in marketing our products. Our ratings from A.M. Best affect our ability to retain our existing business, and to attract new business in our insurance operations. Failure to maintain our ratings could motivate current and future independent agents and policyholders to transact their business with higher rated competitors. If A.M. Best downgrades our ratings or publicly indicates that our ratings are under review, it is possible that we will not be able to compete as effectively, leading to a decrease in premium revenue and earnings. For example, many of our agencies and policyholders have guidelines that require us to have an A.M. Best financial strength rating of "A-" or higher. A reduction of our A.M. Best ratings below "A-" could prevent us from issuing policies to a portion of our current or future policyholders with ratings requirements.

The failure of our insurance company subsidiaries to maintain their current ratings could dissuade a lender or reinsurance company from conducting business with us. A ratings downgrade could also cause some of our existing liabilities to be subject to acceleration, additional collateral support, changes in terms, or creation of additional financial obligations. For more information, refer to the "Financial Strength and Issuer Credit Rating" section in Part I, Item 1 and Note 13 "Debt" contained in Part II, Item 8.

We may be unable to secure reinsurance capacity that provides necessary risk protection at a reasonable cost.

Our reinsurance strategy seeks to protect the Company from extremely adverse underwriting outcomes as well as unnecessary volatility in underwriting results. We purchase conservative levels of reinsurance as measured by our property catastrophe models, our economic capital model, and benchmarking with our peers.

We retain multiple reinsurance intermediaries to plan, create, and facilitate our ceded reinsurance placements. These intermediaries work closely with our risk, corporate underwriting, and finance departments to design reinsurance transactions that align with corporate strategy and risk appetite. Reinsurance transactions are supported by a large and diverse array of reinsurance providers to ensure that the capacity is reliable in each underwriting year. However, in hard reinsurance market conditions, reinsurance capacity can become constrained as reinsurers are pressed with concerns about capital or profitability. In these conditions, we may be unable to secure our desired reinsurance protection at a reasonable cost.

Lost reinsurance capacity could expose the Company to larger retained losses per loss occurrence, per risk, or per year in total. To mitigate this risk, we maintain a large panel of reinsurers and prefer to trade with partners that participate in each of our ceded programs. We transact with multiple intermediary companies to ensure full access to the entire reinsurance market. We monitor the credit quality of our reinsurance providers. We have a clear view of the criticality of various components of our reinsurance program. Finally, we maintain active dialogue with intermediaries and underwriters throughout the year.

Operations

We may be unable to attract, retain or effectively manage the succession of key personnel.

Our success depends on our ability to attract and retain key personnel, including members of our executive and senior management team. Any unplanned turnover or our failure to develop an adequate succession plan for one or more of our executive officers or other key positions could compromise our institutional knowledge base and erode our competitive advantage. The loss or limited availability of the services of one or more of our executive officers or other key personnel, or our inability to recruit and retain qualified executive officers or other key personnel in the future, could, at least temporarily, have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.

Unauthorized data access, cyber attacks and other security breaches could have an adverse impact on our business and reputation.

We rely on computer systems to conduct critical business functions, such as customer service, marketing and sales activities, customer relationship management and producing financial statements. Our business and operations rely on secure and efficient processing, storage and transmission of customer and Company data, including personally identifiable information. Our ability to effectively operate our business depends upon our ability, and the ability of certain third-party vendors and business partners, to access our computer systems to perform necessary business functions, such as providing quotes and product pricing, billing and processing premiums, administering claims, and reporting our financial results.

We retain confidential information on our computer systems, including customer information and proprietary business information belonging to us, our policyholders, third party claimants and vendors. Our business and operations depend upon our ability to safeguard this personally identifiable information. Our systems may be vulnerable to unauthorized access and hackers, computer viruses, and other scenarios in which our data may be compromised.

Cyber attacks involving these systems, or those of our third-party vendors, could be carried out remotely and from multiple sources and could interrupt, damage, or otherwise adversely affect the operations of these critical systems. Cyber attacks could result in the modification or theft of data, the distribution of false information, or the denial of service to users. Threats to data security can emerge from a variety of sources and change rapidly, resulting in the ongoing need to expend resources to secure our data in accordance with customer expectations and statutory and regulatory requirements.

Any compromise of the security of our data could expose us to liability and harm our reputation, which could affect our business and results of operations. We continually enhance our operating procedures and internal controls to effectively support our business and comply with our regulatory and financial reporting requirements, but there can be no assurances that we will be able to implement security measures adequate to prevent every security breach.

Although, to date, we have not identified any risks from cybersecurity threats, including as a result of any previous cybersecurity incidents that have, or are likely to, materially affect us, our business strategy, results of operation or financial condition, the scope and effect of any cyber attack may remain undetected for a period of time. We maintain cyber liability insurance coverage that provides both third-party liability and first-party insurance coverage; however, our insurance may be insufficient to cover all losses and expenses related to a cyber attack.

Federal and state policymakers have and will likely continue to propose increased regulation of the protection of personally identifiable information and appropriate protocols after a related cybersecurity breach. The New York Department of Financial Services has a cyber protection and reporting regulation for financial services companies. The NAIC has the Data Security Model Law based upon the New York regulation. We are in compliance with these regulations; however, ongoing efforts to address continually developing cybersecurity risks may result in a material adverse effect on our results of operations, liquidity, financial condition, and financial strength.

We are subject to comprehensive laws and regulations, which may have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Insurance is a highly regulated industry. We are subject to extensive supervision and regulation by the states in which we operate. As a public company, we are also subject to regulation at the federal level. Our ability to comply with these laws and regulations and obtain necessary and timely regulatory action is, and will continue to be, critical to our success. Examples of regulations that pose a risk to our ability to earn profits include but are not limited to:

• Required licensing
• Regulation of insurance rates, fees and approval of policy forms
• Restrictions on cancellation, nonrenewal or withdrawal
• Risk-based capital and capital adequacy requirements
• Transactions between insurance companies and their affiliates
• Required participation in guaranty funds and assigned risk pools
• Restrictions on the amount, type, nature, and quality of investments
• Terrorism risk insurance
• Accounting standards
• Corporate governance and public disclosure regulation
• Information privacy regulation
• Potential assessments for the provision of funds necessary for settlement of covered claims under certain policies provided by impaired, insolvent or failed insurance companies

Compliance with these laws and regulations requires us to incur administrative costs that decrease our profits. These laws and regulations may also prevent or limit our ability to underwrite and price risks accurately, obtain timely premium rate increases necessary to cover increased costs, discontinue unprofitable relationships or exit unprofitable markets and otherwise continue to operate our business profitably. In addition, our failure to comply with these laws and regulations could result in actions by state or federal regulators, including the imposition of fines and penalties or, in an extreme case, revocation of our ability to do business in one or more states. Finally, we could face individual, group and class action lawsuits by our policyholders and others for alleged violations of certain state laws and regulations. Each of these regulatory risks could have a negative effect on our profitability.

Macroeconomic conditions could materially and adversely affect our business, results of our operations, financial condition, and growth.

Macroeconomic conditions such as growth, inflation, market stability, and geopolitics can impact our operations, opportunities, and risk profile. Important sectors we follow include goods, services, and housing. Markets exhibit stability when credit is available, there is liquidity in the system, and banks are stable. Geopolitical concerns can also disrupt the business environment. All these factors can contribute to adverse financial consequences for UFG.

Shareholders

Our stock price could become more volatile, and your investment could lose value.

The market price of our common stock historically has been, and we expect will continue to be, subject to fluctuations. These fluctuations may be due to our operating results or factors specific to our operations (including those discussed elsewhere in our risk factors), changes in securities analysts' estimates of our future financial performance, ratings or recommendations, our results falling below our expectations and analysts' and investors' expectations, the failure of our capital return programs to meet analysts' and investors' expectations, significant catastrophe events, departure of key personnel, cyber attacks, or factors largely outside of our control, including those affecting the property and casualty insurance industry. The stock market in general has experienced price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the actual operating performance of listed companies. In addition, our stock is followed by a small number of analysts and the average daily trading volume tends to be low. These factors could adversely affect the price of our common stock.

Efforts to disrupt the structure, management or ownership of the Company could diminish the value of our common stock.

Certain provisions of our articles of incorporation and bylaws and applicable provisions of laws governing corporations and insurance companies may delay, deter or prevent a change of control of the Company, in particular through unsolicited transactions. Recent amendments to our bylaws included certain governance and structural defense enhancements to protect the Company and our shareholders in the event of an activist or takeover situation. However, any such effort to disrupt the Company, regardless of its success, may still adversely affect market prices for our common stock.

The ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends may affect our liquidity and ability to meet our obligations.

As an insurance holding company, we have no significant independent operations of our own. Our principal sources of funds are dividends and other payments received from our subsidiaries. We rely on those dividends for our liquidity, including payment of dividends to common shareholders and interest on long-term debt, and to make share repurchases. Dividends from those subsidiaries depend on their statutory surplus, earnings and regulatory restrictions.

State insurance laws limit the ability of insurance subsidiaries to pay dividends and require our insurance subsidiaries to maintain specified minimum levels of statutory capital and surplus. The actual ability to pay dividends may be further constrained by business and regulatory considerations, such as the impact of dividends on surplus, by our competitive position and by the amount of premiums that we can write. Ordinary dividend payments, or dividends that do not require prior approval by the insurance subsidiaries' domiciliary state insurance regulator are generally limited to amounts determined by a formula which varies by jurisdiction. Extraordinary dividends, on the other hand, require prior regulatory approval by the insurance subsidiaries' domiciliary state insurance regulator before they can be made.

In addition, competitive pressures generally require insurance companies to maintain insurance financial strength ratings. These restrictions and other regulatory requirements affect the ability of our insurance subsidiaries to make dividend payments to us. At times we may not be able to pay dividends on our common stock, or we may be required to seek prior approval from the applicable regulatory authority before we can pay any such dividends. In addition, the payment of dividends is within the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on numerous factors, including our financial condition, our capital requirements and other factors that our Board of Directors considers relevant.

Overview

We recognize the importance of assessing, identifying, and managing risks associated with cybersecurity threats. Our cybersecurity risks are identified and addressed through a comprehensive, cross-functional approach to develop strategies for preserving the confidentiality, integrity and availability of Company and customer information, identifying, preventing and mitigating cybersecurity threats, and effectively responding to cybersecurity incidents.

Oversight

Cybersecurity risk oversight is a focus area of our Risk Management Committee and the full Board of Directors. The Risk Management Committee's charter requires it to assist the Board of Directors in identifying and evaluating risks inherent in our business and to oversee and review the significant policies, procedures, and practices employed to manage risks. The Risk Management Committee receives a quarterly cybersecurity update from the Chief Administrative Officer (CAO), which is shared with the full Board of Directors. The Board of Directors discusses cybersecurity matters and risks on a quarterly basis or more frequently, as needed, at the recommendation of the Risk Management Committee.

The Company's enterprise risk management committee (the "ERM Committee") is tasked with, among other responsibilities, identifying and evaluating operational risks, which includes risks associated with information technology and cybersecurity. The ERM Committee includes senior leaders across business functions, including the Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Chief Operating Officer (COO), Chief Financial Officer (CFO), Chief Legal Officer, Chief Risk Officer (CRO) and CAO. The ERM Committee, as part of its comprehensive risk management duties, discusses Company strategies to prevent cyber attacks and the Company's response and remediation of threats. The CAO provides a quarterly report to the Risk Management Committee that summarizes cybersecurity risks, relevant events and other items of note identified by management or the ERM Committee. The ERM Committee meets independently of the Risk Management Committee. Certain members of the ERM Committee are invited to attend and participate in meetings of the Risk Management Committee.

In addition, we maintain internal "risk evaluation teams" dedicated to assessing and managing the entity-level risks facing the Company. There are two risk evaluation teams that relate to cybersecurity risk: Cyber Attack Prevention and Cyber Attack Recovery. The CAO and Vice President of Technology Operations participate in both risk evaluation teams. The CAO likewise serves on the Business Continuity Team as the business continuity technology lead, a role in which she comprehensively evaluates IT system readiness and preparedness should a business continuity event involving cybersecurity or technology interruption occur.

The lead management team member responsible for cybersecurity matters is the CAO, who has 20 years of experience in information technology and a B.A. in Management Information Systems. She is assisted by the Vice President of Technology Operations, the Information Security Manager and Corporate Counsel, Privacy. The CAO regularly reviews the lines of accountability and responsibility to ensure alignment with the ERM Committee.

Cybersecurity Program

We have adopted a Written Information Security Program (WISP) designed to align with the guidelines recommended by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). We make ongoing continuous improvements to our information security program; specifically in the implementation of secure remote access solutions with multifactor authentication, next-generation endpoint detection and remediation, cloud-based security controls, automated scanning and outside validation of security controls. Additionally, we require all employees to complete cybersecurity training at least annually, with additional training targeted for employees with greater data access. When a specific cyber threat is identified, we may create additional trainings with targeted content for our employees. As part of our efforts to manage our cybersecurity risks, we have engaged an independent firm to assist with conducting penetration tests and provide advice on our information security program. We also carry insurance to mitigate losses from cyber events.

We have processes in place to oversee and identify risks from cybersecurity threats associated with our use of third-party service providers. All proposed third parties are subject to a preliminary assessment to identify those that may handle or have access to company information and scope appropriate due diligence activities relating to the engagement. Third parties that may handle or have access to company information are subject to enhanced due diligence procedures prior to onboarding and security risk assessments at the time of onboarding, contract renewal, and upon detection of an increase in risk profile. We use a variety of inputs in such risk assessments, including information supplied by third-parties and information obtained through other channels. In addition, we require our providers to adhere to appropriate security requirements and controls, and we investigate security incidents that have impacted our third-party service providers, as appropriate.

We have established comprehensive incident response and recovery plans and intend to test and refine the effectiveness of those plans under the leadership of the Chief Human Resources Officer, who is accountable for the overall business continuity program at UFG. Our incident response and recovery plans address and guide our employees, management, and the Board of Directors on our response to a cybersecurity incident, including the requirements of notification, classification, analysis and communication of cybersecurity incidents based on the identified severity level. The ERM Committee is accountable for regularly reviewing and evaluating the corporate incident response plan and business continuity plan.

We have a process to appropriately identify and escalate incidents that would be considered "material" in nature and require disclosure under the SEC's reporting requirements. Our identification and escalation process requires any potentially material incidents to be escalated to the CAO, who would promptly meet with the ERM Committee to determine if the incident is considered material and trigger a reporting obligation through a Current Report on Form 8-K. We did not experience any material cyber incidents since the beginning of our last fiscal year.

Cybersecurity Threats

To date, we have not identified any risks from cybersecurity threats, including as a result of any previous cybersecurity incidents, that have, or are likely to, materially affect us, our business strategy, results of operation or financial condition. Refer to "Item 1A. Risk Factors" in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for additional discussion about cybersecurity-related risks.

Our headquarters are located in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, where we own approximately 235,000 square feet of office and building space. In addition, we lease office and building space throughout the U.S. primarily for underwriting and claims operations in those locations. We believe our existing facilities, both owned and leased, are in good condition and suitable for the conduct of our business.

In the normal course of its business, the Company is a party to a variety of legal proceedings. While the final outcome of these legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes all of the proceedings pending as of December 31, 2025 to be ordinary and routine and does not expect these legal proceedings to have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position or results of operations.

The following Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with Part II, Item 8, "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." Amounts (except per share amounts) are presented in thousands, unless otherwise noted.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This report may contain forward-looking statements about our operations, anticipated performance and other similar matters. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act") and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), for forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements are not historical facts and involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ from those expected and/or projected. Such forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections about United Fire Group, Inc. ("UFG," the "Registrant," the "Company," "we," "us," or "our"), the industry in which we operate, and beliefs and assumptions made by management. Words such as "expect(s)," "anticipate(s)," "intend(s)," "plan(s)," "believe(s)," "continue(s)," "seek(s)," "estimate(s)," "goal(s)," "remain(s) optimistic," "target(s)," "forecast(s)," "project(s)," "predict(s)," "should," "could," "may," "will," "might," "hope," "can" and other words and terms of similar meaning or expression in connection with a discussion of future operations, financial performance or financial condition, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. See Part I, Item 1A "Risk Factors" of this report for more information concerning factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements.

Risks and uncertainties that may affect the actual financial condition and results of the Company include, but are not limited to, the following:

• The success of our strategy may be adversely impacted by various internal and external factors;
• Our core insurance business is dependent on strong and beneficial relationships with a large network of independent insurance agents. A strain in these relationships could result in loss of sufficient business opportunities within our expertise and stated risk appetite;
• We will be at a competitive disadvantage if, over time, our competitors are more effective in pricing their products, development of new product offering, implementation of technology or data analytics;
• Our strategy's success could be affected by our timely ability to recognize and adapt to our position in the insurance cycle;
• Changing weather patterns and climate change add to the unpredictability, frequency and severity of catastrophe losses and may adversely affect the results of our operations, liquidity and financial condition;
• Our success depends primarily on our ability to underwrite risks effectively and adequately price the risks we insure;
• We may be unable to predict the rising cost of insurance claims resulting from changing societal expectations that lead to increasing litigation, broader definitions of liability, broader contract interpretations, more plaintiff-friendly legal decisions and larger compensatory jury awards;
• Our reserves for property and casualty insurance losses and loss settlement expenses are based on estimates and may be inadequate, adversely impacting our financial results;
• We insure property that is exposed to various natural perils that can give rise to significant claims costs;
• We are subject to certain risks related to our investment portfolio that could negatively affect our profitability;
• A downgrade in our financial strength or issuer credit ratings could result in a loss of business and could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and liquidity;
• We may be unable to secure reinsurance capacity that provides necessary risk protection at a reasonable cost;
• We may be unable to attract, retain or effectively manage the succession of key personnel;
• Unauthorized data access, cyber attacks and other security breaches could have an adverse impact on our business and reputation;
• We are subject to comprehensive laws and regulations, which may have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations;
• Macroeconomic conditions could materially and adversely affect our business, results of our operations, financial condition, and growth;
• Our stock price could become more volatile, and your investment could lose value;
• Efforts to disrupt the structure, management or ownership of the Company could diminish the value of our common stock; and
• The ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends may affect our liquidity and ability to meet our obligations.

These are representative of the risks, uncertainties, and assumptions that could cause actual outcomes and results to differ materially from what is expressed in forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report or as of the date they are made. Except as required under the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), we do not have any intention or obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.

BUSINESS OVERVIEW

Reportable Segments

We operate as one operating segment. Our revenues are primarily derived from premiums earned for property and casualty insurance products issued to customers. For additional information, see Note 10, Segment Information, in Part II, Item 8, "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data."

We review and report our results using lines of business. The following table shows the principal types of property and casualty insurance policies we write and issue, and in which lines of business they are reported:

* Personal lines direct business was discontinued in 2020 and no exposure to direct personal lines of business remains as of December 31, 2025.

(1) Treaty Reinsurance is split between proportional reinsurance (P) and non-proportional reinsurance (NP).

(2) Commercial lines "Surety" previously referred to as "Fidelity and surety."

Commercial other liability - primarily business insurance covering bodily injury and property damage including construction defect, excess and surplus lines excess casualty, and standard umbrella. Proportional assumed reinsurance on these lines and professional liability coverage managed by an MGA partner.

Commercial fire and allied lines - primarily multi-peril non-liability property coverage, inland marine. Proportional assumed reinsurance on these lines and earthquake coverage managed by an MGA partner.

Commercial automobile - physical damage to an insured's vehicle, as well as liabilities to third parties. Automobile physical damage insurance covers loss or damage to vehicles from collision, vandalism, fire, theft, flood or other causes. Automobile liability insurance covers bodily injury, damage to property resulting from automobile accidents caused by the insured, uninsured or under-insured motorists and the legal costs of defending the insured against lawsuits. Proportional reinsurance on these lines is also included.

Workers' compensation - business coverage for employees who are injured or become ill as a result of their job, including proportional assumed reinsurance for this coverage. Our workers' compensation insurance covers primarily small- to mid-sized accounts.

Surety - contract and commercial surety bond coverage which guarantees performance and payment by our bonded principals, protects owners from failure to perform on the part of our principals, and protects material suppliers and subcontractors from nonpayment by our contractors. Proportional reinsurance on these lines is also included.

Commercial miscellaneous - commercial theft coverage, boiler and machinery and ocean marine business managed by an MGA partner.

Personal - primarily proportional assumed reinsurance for personal lines.

Reinsurance assumed - primarily non-proportional assumed reinsurance and Lloyd's of London property and casualty syndicates.

Lloyd's of London ("Lloyds") Syndicates

The Company is a member of Lloyd's through its insurance subsidiary McIntyre Cedar Corporate Member LLP. Lloyd’s operates as an insurance marketplace whereby members join syndicates to underwrite property and casualty and reinsurance business through a managing agent in return for receiving premiums. The Company participates in Syndicate 1492, Syndicate 1729, Syndicate 1969, Syndicate 1971, Syndicate 4747, Syndicate 2988, Syndicate 1699, Syndicate 5623, Syndicate 2358, Syndicate 1955 and Syndicate 1609. The Company is required to maintain capital at Lloyd's, referred to as Funds at Lloyd's ("FAL"), to support the participation in these syndicates.

Pooling Arrangement

All of our property and casualty insurance subsidiaries belong to an intercompany reinsurance pooling arrangement. Pooling arrangements permit the participating companies to rely on the capacity of the entire pool's capital and surplus, rather than being limited to policy exposures of a size commensurate with each participant's own surplus level. Under such arrangements, the members share substantially all of the insurance business that is written and allocate the combined premiums, losses and expenses based on percentages defined in the arrangement.

Geographic Concentration

For the year ended December 31, 2025, 48.5 percent of our property and casualty premiums were written in Texas, California, Iowa, New Jersey, and Missouri.

Direct statutory written premium by our property and casualty insurance operations were distributed as follows for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023:

(In Thousands)

28

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

Management's discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our Consolidated Financial Statements. These statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"), which requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The following critical accounting estimates are those we believe affect the more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our financial statements. Additional information about other significant accounting policies and estimates may be found in Note 1 "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" in Part II, Item 8, "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data."

Investment Valuation

Upon acquisition, we classify investments in marketable securities as held-to-maturity, available-for-sale, or trading. We record investments in fixed maturity securities classified as available-for-sale and equity securities at fair value. Other long-term investments consist primarily of our interests in limited liability partnerships that are recorded on the equity method of accounting. We record mortgage loans at their amortized cost less any valuation allowance.

In general, investment securities are exposed to various risks, such as interest rate risk, credit risk, and overall market volatility risk. Therefore, it is reasonably possible that changes in the fair value of our investment securities that are reported at fair value will occur in the near term and such changes could materially affect the amounts reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements. Also, it is reasonably possible that changes in the value of our investments in limited liability partnerships could occur in the future and such changes could materially affect our results of operations as reported in our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Fair Value Measurement

Information specific to the fair value measurement of our financial instruments and disclosures is incorporated by reference from Note 3 "Fair Value of Financial Instruments" contained in Part II, Item 8.

Losses and Loss Settlement Expenses

Reserves for losses and loss settlement expenses are reported using our best estimate of the ultimate liability for claims that occurred prior to the end of any given reporting period but have not yet been paid. Before credit for reinsurance recoverables, these reserves were $1.9 billion and $1.8 billion at December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. We purchase reinsurance to mitigate the impact of large losses and catastrophic events. Loss and loss settlement expense reserves ceded to reinsurers were $213.6 million and $198.1 million at December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

Our reserves, before credit for reinsurance recoverables, by line of business as of December 31, 2025, were as follows:

(In Thousands)

(1) Commercial lines "Surety" previously referred to as "Fidelity and surety."

Case-Basis Reserves

For each of our lines of business, our experienced claims personnel estimate case-basis reserves for reported claims. Establishing the case reserve for an individual claim is subjective and complex, requiring us to estimate future payments and values sufficient to settle the claim. Setting a reserve for an individual claim is an inherently uncertain process. When we establish and adjust individual claim reserves, we do so based on our knowledge of the circumstances and facts of the claim at a point in time. Upon notice of a claim, we establish a preliminary (average claim cost) reserve based on the limited claim information initially reported. Subsequently, we conduct an investigation of each reported claim, which allows us to more fully understand the factors contributing to the loss and our potential exposure. This investigation may extend over a long period of time. As our claim investigation progresses, and as our claims personnel identify trends in claims activity, we may refine and adjust our estimates of case-basis reserves. To evaluate and refine our overall reserving process, we track and monitor all claims until they are settled and paid in full, with all salvage, subrogation claims, and liability deductible recoveries being resolved.

Our loss reserves include amounts related to both short-tail and long-tail lines of business. A short-tail insurance product is one where claim settlement values are known comparatively quickly. Final settlement values for long-tail insurance products are sometimes not known for many years. The longer the time span between the incidence of a loss and the settlement of the claim, the more the final settlement can vary from the reserves initially established. Accordingly, long-tail insurance products can have significant implications on the reserving process.

Our short-tail lines of business include fire and allied lines, commercial property, automobile physical damage and inland marine. The amounts of the case-based reserves that we establish for claims in these lines depend upon various factors, such as individual claim facts (including type of coverage and severity of loss), our historical loss experience and trends in general economic conditions (including changes in replacement costs, medical costs and inflation).

Our long-tail lines of business include workers' compensation and other liability. In addition, certain product lines such as commercial automobile, commercial multi-peril and surety include both long-tail coverages and short-tail coverages. For many long-tail liability claims, significant periods of time, ranging up to several years, may elapse between the occurrence of the loss, the reporting of the loss to us and the settlement of the claim. As a result, loss experience in the more recent accident years for the long-tail liability coverages has limited statistical credibility in our reserving process because a relatively small proportion of losses in these accident years are reported claims and an even smaller proportion are paid losses. In addition, long-tail liability claims are more susceptible to litigation and can be significantly affected by changing contract interpretations and the legal environment. Consequently, the estimation of loss reserves for long-tail coverages is more complex and subject to a higher degree of variability than for short-tail coverages.

The amounts of the case-basis loss reserves that we establish for claims in long-tail lines of business depend upon various factors, including individual claim facts (including type of coverage, severity of loss and underlying policy limits), company historical loss experience, legislative enactments, judicial decisions, legal developments in the awarding of damages, experience with alternative dispute resolution, changes in political attitudes and trends in general economic conditions, including the effects of inflation. As with our short-tail lines of business, we review and make changes to long-tail case-based reserves based on our review of continually evolving facts as they become available to us during the claims settlement process. Our adjustments to case-based reserves are reported in the financial statements in the period that new information arises about the claim. Examples of facts that become known that could cause us to change our case-based reserves include, but are not limited to: evidence that loss severity is different than previously assessed; new claimants who have presented claims; and the assessment that no coverage exists.

Incurred But Not Reported Reserves ("IBNR")

Most of our insurance policies are written on an occurrence basis that provides coverage if a loss occurs during the policy period, even if the insured reports the loss many years later. On a quarterly basis, the Company performs a detailed analysis of IBNR reserves. This analysis uses various projection methods to provide several estimates of ultimate loss or loss adjustment expense ("LAE") for each individual accident year and line of business. The projection methods include, but are not limited to, paid development; reported development; expected loss ratio methods; and Bornhuetter Ferguson methods on both a paid and reported basis. These methods may need to be adjusted for anomalies or outliers in the data, unusual internal or external trends, or other factors impacting the reliability/credibility of the historical company experience. Results of the projection methods are compared, and a point estimate of ultimate loss or LAE is established for each individual accident year and line of business. The specific projection methods used to establish point estimates vary depending on what is deemed most appropriate for a particular line of business and accident year. IBNR estimates are derived by subtracting reported loss from the final point estimates.

Senior management meets with our actuarial team and controller on a quarterly basis to review the adequacy of carried IBNR reserves based on the results of this actuarial analysis. Adjustments for changes in business and other factors not completely captured by the data within the actuarial analysis are made as deemed necessary. This method of establishing our IBNR reserves has consistently resulted in aggregate reserve levels that management believes are reasonable in comparison to the reserve estimates indicated by the actuarial analysis.

For our short-tail lines of business, IBNR reserves constitute a small portion of the overall reserves. These claims are generally reported and settled shortly after the loss occurs. In our long-tail lines of business, IBNR reserves constitute a relatively higher proportion of total reserves, because, for many liability claims, significant periods of time may elapse between the initial occurrence of the losses, the reporting of the losses to us, and the ultimate settlement of the losses.

Loss Settlement Expense Reserves

Loss settlement expense reserves include amounts ultimately allocable to individual claims, as well as amounts required for the general overhead of the claims handling operation that are not specifically allocable to individual claims. We do not establish case reserves for these expenses. Instead, on a quarterly basis, management performs a statistical analysis to estimate the required reserve for unpaid loss settlement expenses using historical data.

LAE is composed of two distinct kinds of expenses which are defense and cost containment ("DCC") and adjusting and other ("A&O"). These two expense types have different purposes and characteristics which necessitates different estimation methods in order to provide a quarterly estimate of the required reserve for unpaid expense which is generally referred to as an LAE IBNR reserve.

Reserves for unpaid DCC are estimated quarterly by line of business for each individual accident year using three methods: (1) Paid development, (2) Expected emergence of DCC, and (3) Bornhuetter Ferguson. Each of the three methods produces an estimate of the ultimate DCC cost for an individual accident year and the final estimate is generally a weighted average of the various methods. Inception to date paid DCC is subtracted from the final ultimate DCC estimate to provide the estimated DCC unpaid reserve for each individual accident year.

Reserves for unpaid A&O are estimated quarterly by line of business for each individual accident year using a single method. This method consists of applying a percentage factor to unpaid loss reserves. The percentage factor used differs by line of business and is established on an annual basis using year-end data. The percentage factor is evaluated and selected after reviewing the ratio of paid A&O to paid loss using calendar year data for the most recent five years.

Reinsurance Reserves

There are three distinct types of reserves for expected recoveries: (1) reported claim reserves, (2) loss IBNR, and (3) allocated LAE IBNR. Ceded reserves for reported claims are calculated by subtracting the primary retention from the claim value established by our claim adjuster. Ceded IBNR comes from multiple treaties and is reviewed quarterly by our reserving actuaries in conjunction with the direct IBNR. Multiple methods are utilized in the ceded IBNR which vary by line of business. These include estimates based on the relationship of ceded premium to direct premium, Bornhuetter Ferguson methods, and methods based on industry excess of loss factors. Some of our business is 100 percent ceded or based on a set quota share percentage. In those cases, ceded loss IBNR is typically formulaic based on direct loss IBNR. We will cede some allocated LAE expenses when we cede loss. Our ceded allocated LAE IBNR is estimated based on our ceded unpaid loss reserves and the general relation, by line of business, between LAE and loss.

Key Assumptions

The Company uses a number of key assumptions in establishing an estimate of loss and loss settlement expense reserves, including but not limited to the following: the Company's case-basis reserves reflect the most up-to-date information available about the unique circumstances of each individual known claim; judicial decisions or regulatory actions have been considered to the extent of our knowledge; new, emerging claim reporting and payment patterns will continue into the future consistent with the observable past; adjustments have been made for significant unique and unusual known claim events; and, to the best of our knowledge, there are no new, unidentified latent trends that would impact our overall reserves. These assumptions about future circumstances and expectations are inherently uncertain and subject to many risk factors including but not limited to heightened levels of inflation, increased litigation activity, changing weather patterns, and changing driver behaviors.

Therefore, our key assumptions are subject to change as actual claims occur and as we gain additional information about the variables that underlie our assumptions. Accordingly, management reviews and updates these assumptions periodically to ensure that the assumptions remain relevant and consistent with our current understanding of the environment. If necessary, management makes changes not only in the estimates derived from the use of these assumptions, but also in the assumptions themselves. Due to the inherent uncertainty in the loss reserving process, management believes that there is a reasonable chance that modification to key assumptions could individually, or in aggregate, result in reserve levels above or below the actual amount for which the related claims will eventually settle.

Adjustments to the reserves could be recorded in one year or multiple years, depending on when they are identified. This would also affect our financial position as our equity would be adjusted by an amount equal to the net income impact. Any deficiency that would be recognized in our loss and loss settlement expense reserves usually does not have a material effect on our liquidity because the claims have not been paid. Conversely, if our estimates of ultimate unpaid loss and loss settlement expense reserves prove to be redundant, our future earnings and financial position would be improved. We believe our approach produces recorded reserves that are reasonable as to their relative position within a range of reasonable reserves from year-to-year.

Historical experience suggests reserve levels can vary considerably for an individual year before ultimate settlement values are known, but variation for the aggregate ultimate loss typically would fall in the range of 2.5% to 5%. The table below provides some scenarios for the impact of this development volatility on our reported net loss and loss adjustment reserves of $1.7 billion as of December 31, 2025.

(In Thousands)

The reserves related to expenses not associated with individual claims (adjusting and other) are reviewed using a projected claim count model. The methodologies relied upon for the remainder of the reserves were not altered but additional considerations were added to our models to aid in selecting key assumptions. In estimating our 2025 loss and loss settlement expense reserves, we did not anticipate future events or conditions that were inconsistent with past development patterns.

Certain of our lines of business are subject to the potential for greater loss and loss settlement expense development than others, which are discussed below:

Other Liability Reserves

Other liability is considered a long-tail line of business, as it can take a relatively long period of time to settle claims from prior accident years. This is partly due to the lag time between the date a loss or event occurs that triggers coverage and the date when the claim is actually reported. Defense costs are also a part of the insured expenses covered by liability policies and can be significant, sometimes greater than the cost of the actual paid claims. For the majority of our products, defense costs are outside of the policy limit, meaning that the amounts paid for defense costs are not subtracted from the available policy limit.

Factors that can cause uncertainty in estimating reserves in this line include: reporting time lags; the number of parties involved in the underlying tort action; whether the "event" triggering coverage is confined to only one time period or is spread over multiple time periods; the potential dollars involved in the individual claim actions; whether such claims were reasonably foreseeable and intended to be covered at the time the contracts were written (i.e., coverage disputes); and the potential for mass claim actions.

Claims with longer reporting time lags may result in greater inherent risk. This is especially true for alleged claims with a latency feature, particularly where courts have ruled that coverage is spread over multiple policy years, hence involving multiple defendants (and their insurers and reinsurers) and multiple policies (thereby increasing the potential dollars involved and the underlying settlement complexity). Claims with long latencies also increase the potential time lag between writing a policy in a certain market and the recognition that such policy has potential mass tort and/or latent claim exposure.

Our reserve for other liability claims at December 31, 2025 was $972.3 million and consisted of 3,528 claims, compared with $912.7 million, consisting of 3,862 claims at December 31, 2024. Of the $972.3 million total reserve for other liability claims, $113.8 million is identified as DCC and $52.0 million is identified as A&O required in the settlement of claims.

Included in the other liability line of business are gross reserves for construction defect losses and loss settlement expenses. Construction defect exposure is unique because of its very long tail as claims can often take over six years to be reported to us and another four years to settle, on average. This exposure relates to a deficiency in the design or construction of a building or structure resulting from a failure to design or construct in a reasonably workmanlike manner, and/or in accordance with a buyer's reasonable expectation. In the cases involving latent defects, the determination of when a loss occurred is often unclear and governed by various theories that vary by state. Further, each state has a unique Statute of Repose that determines the length of time an insured has to report a claim generally from the date of substantial completion of a project.

In addition to these issues, other variables contribute to a high degree of uncertainty in establishing reserves for construction defect claims. These variables include: whether coverage exists; when losses occur; the size of each loss; expectations for future interpretive rulings concerning contract provisions; and the extent to which the assertion of these claims will expand geographically. In recent years, we have implemented various underwriting measures that we anticipate will mitigate the amount of construction defect losses experienced, including further consideration of insured endorsements; stricter underwriting guidelines on the writing of residential contractors; and increased utilization of loss control.

Asbestos and Environmental Reserves

Included in the commercial other liability and assumed reinsurance lines of business are reserves for asbestos and other environmental loss and loss settlement expenses. We record our best estimate of loss and loss settlement expense reserves, but the ultimate amounts paid upon settlement of such claims may be more or less than the amount of the reserves given the inherent uncertainties surrounding such claims and the likelihood these uncertainties will not be resolved for many years. At December 31, 2025 and 2024, we had $0.8 million and $0.7 million, respectively, in direct and assumed asbestos and other environmental loss and loss settlement expense reserves.

Catastrophe Event Reserves

Catastrophe losses are inherent risks of the property and casualty insurance business. Catastrophic events include, without limitation, hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes, hailstorms, wildfires, high winds, winter storms and other natural disasters, along with man-made exposures to losses resulting from acts of terrorism and political instability. Some types of catastrophes are more likely to occur at certain times within the year than others, which adds an element of seasonality to our property and casualty insurance claims. The frequency and severity of catastrophic events are difficult to accurately predict in any year. However, some geographic locations are more susceptible to these events than others.

We control our direct insurance exposures in regions that are prone to naturally occurring catastrophic events through a combination of geographic diversification, restrictions on the amount and location of new business production in such regions, and reinsurance. We regularly assess our concentration of risk in natural catastrophe exposed areas and consider the impacts of climate change and the unpredictability of future trends in adjusting our geographic concentrations. We have strategies and underwriting standards to manage these exposures through individual risk selection, subject to regulatory constraints, and through the purchase of catastrophe reinsurance coverage. We use catastrophe modeling and a risk concentration management tool to monitor and control our potential losses in natural catastrophe exposed areas, such as the Gulf Coast and East Coast, as well as in areas of exposure in other countries where we are exposed to a portion of an insurer's underwriting risk under our assumed reinsurance contracts. Despite our efforts to manage our catastrophe exposure, the extent of losses from a catastrophe is a function of both the total amount of insured exposure in an area affected by the event and the severity of the event. The occurrence of one or more severe natural catastrophic events in heavily populated areas could have a material effect on our results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.

The process of estimating and establishing reserves for losses incurred from catastrophic events is inherently uncertain and the actual ultimate cost of a claim, net of reinsurance recoveries, may vary materially from the estimated amount reserved. Catastrophe modeling generally relies on multiple inputs based on experience, science, engineering and history, and the selection of those inputs requires a significant amount of judgment. The modeling results may also fail to account for risks that are outside the range of normal probability or are otherwise unforeseen. Because of this, actual results may differ materially from those derived from our modeling assumptions.

Commercial Automobile Reserves

Commercial automobile claim reserves are established at exposure based on information either known and provided or obtained through the claims investigation. The perspective and experience of the claims staff, which may include assumptions as to how the claim will develop over time, is incorporated in the investigation. Exposures are identified and reserves established within 30 to 60 days depending on the complexity of the case.

Workers' Compensation Reserves

Like the other liability line of business, workers' compensation losses and loss settlement expense reserves are based upon variables that create uncertainty in estimating the ultimate reserve. Estimates for workers' compensation are particularly sensitive to assumptions about medical cost inflation. Other variables we consider and that contribute to the uncertainty in establishing reserves for workers' compensation claims include: state legislative and regulatory environments; trends in jury awards; and mortality rates. Because of these variables, the process of reserving for the ultimate loss and loss settlement expense to be incurred requires the use of informed judgment and is inherently uncertain. Consequently, actual loss and loss settlement expense reserves may deviate from our estimates and such deviations may be significant. Our reserve for workers' compensation claims at December 31, 2025 was $108.8 million and consisted of 1,273 claims, compared with $115.6 million, consisting of 1,042 claims, at December 31, 2024.

Reserve Development

We recognized favorable development in our net reserves for prior accident years totaling $14.1 million and $1.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, and adverse development of $67.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2023.

The following table details the pre-tax impact on our financial results and financial condition of reasonably likely reserve development. Our lines of business that have historically been most susceptible to significant volatility in reserve development have been shown separately and utilize hypothetical levels of volatility of 5.0 percent and 10.0 percent. Our other, less volatile, lines of business have been aggregated and utilize hypothetical levels of volatility of 3.0 percent and 5.0 percent.

(In Thousands)

Reserve development is discussed in more detail under the heading "Losses and Loss Settlement Expense" in the "Results of Operations" section in this Item 7.

Appointed Actuary

The Company terminated the engagement with Regnier Consulting Group, Inc. ("Regnier") as its appointed actuary for the year ended December 31, 2024. Beginning with the 2024 reporting period, the Company's Vice President of Actuarial Reserving serves as the appointed actuary, approved by the Board of Directors. The Company has engaged a third party firm to provide an independent and unbiased assessment of the Company's reserves. We do not rely on the external consulting actuary's assessment to determine our recorded reserves; however, we review and discuss its observations on trends, key assumptions, and actuarial methodologies, and consider these items when determining our recorded reserves.

Pension Benefit Obligation

The process of estimating our pension benefit obligation and related benefit expense is inherently uncertain, and the actual cost of benefits may vary materially from the estimates recorded. These liabilities are particularly volatile due to their long-term nature and are based on several assumptions. The main assumptions used in the valuation of our pension benefit obligation are estimates related to: mortality of the employees and retirees eligible for benefits; expected long-term rates of return on investments; compensation increases; employee turnover; and liability discount rate. We have engaged an independent firm to assist in evaluating and establishing assumptions used in the valuation of our pension benefit obligations.

A change in any one or more of these assumptions is likely to result in an ultimate liability different from the original actuarial estimate. Such changes in estimates may be material. For example, a 100 basis point decrease in our estimated discount rate would increase the pension benefit obligation at December 31, 2025 by $20.9 million while a 100 basis point increase in the rate would decrease the pension benefit obligation by $17.3 million, for the same period.

A 100 basis point decrease in our estimated long-term rate of return on pension plan assets would increase the benefit expense for the year ended December 31, 2025 by $2.3 million, while a 100 basis point increase in the rate would decrease benefit expense by $2.3 million, for the same period. Corresponding with the impact on benefit expense, there would be an offsetting impact to pension plan assets.

In an effort to limit the impacts of interest rate exposure, in September 2023, we made a shift in our pension plan asset investment strategy to a liability driven investment ("LDI") approach to better match the timing of cash flows between payouts from the plan with cash flows from the asset portfolio as well as hedge interest rate risk between assets and liabilities.

NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

We evaluate profit or loss based upon operating and investment results. Profit or loss described in the following sections of this Management's Discussion and Analysis is reported on a pre-tax basis. Our primary sources of revenue are premiums and investment income. Major categories of expenses include losses and loss settlement expenses, underwriting and other operating expenses. Management uses metrics to provide financial statement users with a better understanding of results of operations, including adjusted operating income and three components of the loss ratio: underlying loss ratio, impacts of catastrophes and non-catastrophe prior period reserve development.

Adjusted operating income is calculated by excluding net investment gains and losses, after applicable federal and state income taxes from net income (loss). Management believes adjusted operating income is a meaningful measure for evaluating insurance company performance and a useful supplement to GAAP information because it better represents the normal, ongoing performance of our business. Investors and equity analysts who invest in and report on the insurance industry and the Company generally focus on this metric in their analyses.

Underlying loss ratio represents the net loss ratio less the impacts of catastrophes and non-catastrophe prior period reserve development. The underlying combined ratio represents the combined ratio less the impacts of catastrophes and non-catastrophe prior period reserve development. The Company believes that the underlying loss ratio and underlying combined ratio are meaningful measures to understand the underlying trends in the core business in the current accident year, removing the volatility of catastrophes and prior period impacts. Management believes separate discussions on catastrophe losses and prior period reserve development are important to understanding how the Company is managing catastrophe risk and in identifying developments in longer-tailed business.

Catastrophe losses is an operational measure that utilizes the designations of the Insurance Services Office ("ISO") and is reported with losses and loss adjustment expense amounts net of reinsurance recoverables, unless specified otherwise. In addition to ISO catastrophes, we also include as catastrophes those events which may include U.S. or international losses, that we believe are, or will be, material to our operations, either in amount or in number of claims made. Catastrophes are not predictable and are unique in terms of timing and financial impact. While management estimates catastrophe losses as incurred, due to the inherently unique nature of catastrophe losses, the impact in a reporting period is inclusive of catastrophes that occurred in the reporting period, as well as development on catastrophes that may have occurred in prior periods.

Prior period reserve development is the increase (unfavorable) or decrease (favorable) in incurred loss and loss adjustment expense reserves at the valuation dates for losses which occurred in previous calendar years. This measure excludes development on catastrophe losses.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following table includes the consolidated results of our operations for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, with more detailed components and discussion in the sections that follow. Discussions of the components of net income are presented on a pre-tax basis, unless otherwise noted.

Financial Highlights

(In Thousands)

NM = not meaningful

(1) Underlying loss ratio and underlying combined ratio are non-GAAP financial measures. See "Non-GAAP Financial Measures" in Part II, Item 7 for additional information.

Net Written Premium

Net written premium is the amount charged for insurance policy contracts issued and recognized on an annualized basis at the effective date of the policy. Net written premium is frequently used by industry analysts and other recognized reporting sources to facilitate comparisons of the performance of insurance companies. Management believes net written premium is a meaningful measure for evaluating insurance company sales performance and geographical expansion efforts. Net written premium for an insurance company consists of direct written premium and assumed premium, less ceded premium. The following shows our written premium for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023:

(In Thousands)

See 'Premiums' below for a description of the changes in premiums for the years presented.

Revenues

Premiums

Net earned premium is calculated on a pro-rata basis over the terms of the respective policies. Unearned premium reserves are established for the portion of written premium applicable to the unexpired terms of the insurance policies in force. The difference between net earned premium and net written premium is the change in unearned premium and the change in prepaid reinsurance premium. Direct earned premium is recognized ratably over the life of a policy and differs from direct written premium, which is recognized on the effective date of the policy. The following shows our earned premium for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023:

(In Thousands)

Direct Premium

Direct premium is the total policy premium, net of cancellations, associated with policies issued and underwritten by our property and casualty insurance business. Direct premium increased $150.1 million in 2025 as compared to 2024 and increased $92.0 million in 2024 as compared to 2023 primarily due to growth in our core commercial lines resulting from improved retention, increased pricing and substantial new business production.

Assumed Premium

Assumed premium is the total premium associated with the insurance risk transferred to us by other insurance and reinsurance companies pursuant to reinsurance contracts. Assumed premium decreased $7.3 million in 2025 as compared to 2024 due to targeted management actions of exiting certain reinsurance programs, while assumed premium increased $52.4 million in 2024 as compared to 2023 due to the addition of new programs and cedant growth.

Ceded Premium

Ceded premium is the portion of direct premium that we cede to our reinsurers under our reinsurance contracts. Ceded premium increased $26.8 million in 2025 due to growth in the subject premium base and ceded reinsurance premium adjustments. For 2024, the ratio of ceded premium to direct premium remained flat as compared to 2023, due to rate decreases in property offsetting rate increases in casualty.

Net Investment Income

Net investment income was $97.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, an increase of $15.6 million or 19.0% from the year ended December 31, 2024. The increase was primarily from our fixed income portfolio increase of $17.9 million or 25.7%, as a result of portfolio management actions, including investing at higher rates, and portfolio growth, offset by lower income on other long-term investments.

Net investment income was $82.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, an increase of $22.4 million or 37.5% from the year ended December 31, 2023. The increase was primarily from our fixed income portfolio increase of $13.5 million or 23.9%, as a result of portfolio management actions, including investing at higher rates and the strategic re-allocation of equity securities into fixed maturity securities.

The following table details our net investment income for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023:

(In thousands, except average yields)

(1) Fixed income securities yield excluding net unrealized investment gains/losses and expenses.

Refer to Note 2 "Investments" in Part II, Item 8 for more information on net investment income.

Net Investment Gains (Losses)

Net investment losses were $3.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 as compared to net investment losses of $5.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. The primary reason for the change relates to management actions within the Company's fixed income portfolio to reinvest at higher rates for the year ended December 31, 2024 and an impairment loss recognized on a commercial mortgage loan for the year ended December 31, 2025.

Net investment losses were $5.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 as compared to net investment gains of $1.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The primary reason for the change relates to management actions within the Company's fixed income portfolio to reinvest at higher rates.

Refer to Note 2 "Investments" in Part II, Item 8 for more information on investment gains and losses.

Benefits, Losses and Expenses

Losses and Loss Settlement Expenses

The following shows losses and loss settlement expenses for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023:

For the year ended December 31, 2025, our loss and loss settlement expenses were $19.8 million, or 2.7%, higher than 2024 and our net loss ratio improved 4.2 points. This was driven by the overall increase and growth in company business, improvement in the underlying loss ratio, favorable prior year development, and a favorable year for catastrophe losses. The underlying loss ratio improvement was driven in part by higher pricing, continued favorable frequency in most major lines, and favorable large loss experience in property lines.

The Company experienced $5.2 million of favorable development, excluding catastrophe losses, in our net reserves for prior accident years for the year ended December 31, 2025. Favorable development in commercial automobile and fire and allied lines was largely offset by adverse development in commercial other liability. The commercial automobile favorable development of $22.3 million is a function of favorable experience as well as case-basis and IBNR reserve strengthening in recent years. Favorable development in fire and allied lines of $10.0 million is driven in part by reactions to favorable large loss experience in recent accident years. Adverse development in commercial other liability reflects the company's continued response to increased loss settlements resulting from the impact of economic and social inflation, including increased litigation activity.

In 2025, our pre-tax catastrophe losses were $41.1 million, a decrease of $22.1 million compared to $63.2 million in 2024. In 2025, our catastrophe losses included 62 events. Catastrophe losses in 2025 added 3.2 points to the combined ratio, which is below our historical 10-year average. The Company continues to evaluate and limit our exposure in regions prone to naturally occurring catastrophic events through a combination of geographic diversification and restrictions on the amount and location of new business production in such regions. We intend to continue with targeted underwriting and rate initiatives in some regions and/or purchase additional reinsurance as necessary to reduce our exposure.

2024 Results

For the year ended December 31, 2024, our loss and loss settlement expenses were $24.8 million, or 3.2%, lower than 2023 and our net loss ratio improved 11.1 points. This was driven by improvement in the underlying loss ratio, no prior year development, and a favorable year for catastrophe losses. The underlying loss ratio improvement was driven in part by higher pricing, continued favorable frequency in most major lines, and favorable large loss experience in property and surety. Favorable results are partially offset by an increase in current and prior accident year loss estimates for other liability reflecting continued efforts to strengthen liability reserves subject to increasing economic and social inflation influences.

The Company experienced $0.2 million of favorable development, excluding catastrophe losses, in our net reserves for prior accident years for the year ended December 31, 2024. For non-catastrophe losses, favorable development in commercial automobile and fire and allied lines was offset by adverse development in commercial other liability. The commercial automobile favorable development of $34.5 million is a function of favorable experience as well as case-basis and IBNR reserve strengthening in recent years. Favorable development in fire and allied lines of $10.5 million is driven in part by reactions to favorable large loss experience in recent accident years. Adverse development in commercial other liability reflects the company's continued response to increased loss settlements resulting from the impact of economic and social inflation, including increased litigation activity.

In 2024, our pre-tax catastrophe losses were $63.2 million, a decrease of $1.0 million compared to $64.2 million in 2023. In 2024, our catastrophe losses included 74 events. Catastrophe losses in 2024 added 5.4 points to the combined ratio, which is below our historical 10-year average. The Company continues to evaluate and limit our exposure in regions prone to naturally occurring catastrophic events through a combination of geographic diversification and restrictions on the amount and location of new business production in such regions. We intend to continue with targeted underwriting and rate initiatives in some regions and/or purchase additional reinsurance as necessary to reduce our exposure.

2023 Results

For the year ended December 31, 2023, our loss and loss settlement expenses were $132.3 million, or 20.7%, higher than 2022 and our net loss ratio increased 7.4 points. The primary drivers were an increase in loss and loss settlement expenses of $80.4 million in commercial lines and $48.0 million in reinsurance assumed, partially offset by $64.2 million of catastrophe losses in 2023 for our direct and assumed reinsurance business as compared to $73.5 million in 2022.

The Company experienced $62.3 million of adverse development, excluding catastrophe losses, in our net reserves for prior accident years for the year ended December 31, 2023. Commercial other liability lines experienced adverse development of $52.9 million primarily in our excess and surplus lines excess casualty book along with some adverse development in standard umbrella and construction defect due to increasing severity pressures. The increases in these longer tail lines, especially in accident years 2016-2019, related to social and economic inflation, and prompted a re-evaluation of trend assumptions for more recent accident years. The commercial automobile line of business also experienced adverse development of $9.0 million related to increasing severity largely in post-COVID-19 accident years. Commercial fire and allied lines experienced adverse development of $4.4 million largely due to development on both catastrophe and non-catastrophe losses, primarily from accident year 2022. The assumed reinsurance line of business contributed an additional $3.5 million of adverse development largely driven by catastrophe losses.

In 2023, our pre-tax catastrophe losses were $64.2 million, a decrease of $9.3 million compared to $73.5 million in 2022. In 2023, our catastrophe losses included 61 events. Catastrophe losses in 2023 added 6.2 points to the combined ratio, which is below our historical 10-year average.

Amortization of Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs ("DAC")

The following is a summary of the components of DAC, including amortization:

(1) Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs includes impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on the Lloyd's of London business, which is included as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).

DAC is amortized over the period the related premium is earned. Amortization increased for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, primarily reflecting an increase in deferred underwriting costs associated with the growth of the business.

Net Loss Ratios by Line

The following table provides our net loss ratio for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023:

(In thousands, except ratios)

NM = not meaningful

(1) Commercial lines "Surety" previously referred to as "Fidelity and surety."

(2) Reinsurance assumed includes Lloyd's of London

Commercial Lines

The net loss ratio in our commercial lines of business was 58.9 percent in 2025 compared to 63.1 percent in 2024 and 76.5 percent in 2023. This result was driven by improvement in the underlying loss ratio, favorable prior year development, and a favorable year for catastrophe losses.

Commercial Other Liability

We write numerous types of risk that are exposed to liability losses in our direct and assumed books of business. This includes, but is not limited to, bodily injury, property damage, standard umbrella, excess liability, and product liability (including construction defect) loss and loss adjustment expenses.

The net loss ratio improved 9.6 points in 2025 compared to 2024. The improved loss ratio was driven by the underlying and prior period development. The Company has been strengthening reserves across our portfolio in response to increased loss settlements resulting from the impact of economic and social inflation, including increased litigation activity. Additional reserve strengthening took place in 2025 but to a lesser extent than 2024.

Commercial Fire and Allied Lines

The net loss ratio improved 7.4 points in 2025 compared to 2024. Drivers include favorable large loss experience compared to earlier years and favorable catastrophe experience in 2025.

Commercial Automobile

The net loss ratio improved 0.1 points in 2025 compared to 2024. The underlying result was favorable in 2025 compared to 2024 driven by consistent pricing increases and continued favorable frequency trends associated with more restrictive underwriting guidelines and exposure appetite. This was offset by prior year development which was favorable in 2025 but to a lesser extent than 2024.

Workers' Compensation

The net loss ratio improved 1.9 points in 2025 compared to 2024. The overall improvement was driven by favorable prior year development partially offset by some large loss experience in the current accident year.

Surety

The net loss ratio deteriorated 13.7 points in 2025 compared to 2024. When surety losses occur, our loss is determined by estimating the cost to complete the remaining work and to pay the contractor's unpaid bills, offset by contract funds due to the contractor, reinsurance, and the value of any collateral to which we may have access. 2025 was a return to longer term profitability levels and disciplined underwriting, while 2024 benefited from unusually early favorable large loss results.

Personal Lines

The net loss ratio improved 16.1 points in 2025 compared to 2024, due to proportional assumed reinsurance for homeowners multi-peril coverage included in personal fire and allied lines.

Reinsurance Assumed

The net loss ratio improved 2.8 points in 2025 compared to 2024. Our assumed reinsurance portfolio is comprised of contracts that provide reinsurance protection to unaffiliated insurance companies. We only reinsure companies with attractive expected profitability, relevant materiality, and strong reputation. Our reinsurance business focuses on long-term relationships. The 2025 non-catastrophe result was relatively consistent with 2024. The business is benefiting from increased pricing and tightly managed loss exposure. Some adverse prior year development was recognized in 2025 driven by worse than expected losses on a few accounts. The overall improvement in 2025 was driven by favorable catastrophe results.

Underwriting Expenses

The following is a summary of underwriting expenses, including the underwriting expense ratio:

(1) Expense ratio is calculated by dividing non-deferred underwriting expenses and amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs by net earned premium. The expense ratio measures a company's operational efficiency in producing, underwriting and administering its insurance

business.

The decrease in expense ratio in 2025 as compared to 2024 is driven by expense management actions and growth, partially offset by accelerated development of our new policy administration system implemented in 2025, and increased performance-based compensation for employees and agents due to current year achievements.

The increase in expense ratio in 2024 as compared to 2023 is due primarily to investments in talent to deepen expertise across the Company; accelerated development of the new policy administration system (implemented in 2025); and increased performance-based compensation for employees and agents due to current year achievements.

Interest Expenses

The following is a summary of interest expense:

Our long term debt obligations are $50.0 million of private placement notes issued in December 2020, and $70.0 million and $30.0 million of senior unsecured notes issued in May 2024 and July 2025, respectively. Interest expense increased in 2025 due to the issuance of the senior unsecured notes. Refer to Note 13 "Debt" in Part II, Item 8 for more information on long term debt.

Income Taxes

The following is a summary of income tax expense (benefit), including the effective tax rate:

(1) The effective tax rate is calculated by dividing 'Income tax expense (benefit)' by 'Income (loss) before income taxes'

The consolidated effective tax rate for 2025 was 20.1 percent, compared with 19.6 percent in 2024 and 25.2 percent in 2023. The effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2025 differs from the statutory rate of 21% primarily due to the net effect of tax-exempt municipal bond interest, state income taxes and interest on a federal tax refund.

Refer to Note 7 "Income Tax" in Part II, Item 8 for more information on income taxes, including deferred tax assets and liabilities.

Adjusted Operating Income (See "Non-GAAP Financial Measures")

The table below shows the adjustments made to reconcile Net income (loss) to Adjusted operating earnings:

Net Income Reconciliation

Adjusted operating income reported in 2025 was primarily due to an increase in net earned premium of $115.9 million combined with a decrease in the underlying loss ratio by 1.6 points to 56.3%, a decrease in the catastrophe loss ratio of 2.2 points to 3.2%, and favorable prior year reserve development of 0.4 points in 2025. In addition, net investment income increased by $15.6 million. The underwriting expense ratio improved 0.2 points to 35.7%.

Adjusted operating income reported in 2024 was primarily due to an increase in net earned premium of $142.2 million combined with a decrease in the underlying loss ratio by 4.3 points to 57.9%, a decrease in the catastrophe loss ratio of 0.8 points to 5.4%, and no prior year reserve development. In addition, net investment income increased by $23.2 million. The underwriting expense ratio increased 1.0 point to 35.9%

Adjusted operating loss reported in 2023 was primarily due to an increase in losses and loss settlement expenses of $132.1 million attributable to adverse reserve development of $67.8 million which added 6.0 points to the loss ratio. In addition, an increase in amortization of deferred acquisition costs of $32.0 million contributed to the operating loss. These were partially offset with an increase in net earned premium of $83.0 million and higher investment income of $15.0 million.

INVESTMENTS

Investment Philosophy

The Company's assets are invested to preserve capital and maximize total return while maintaining an appropriate balance of risk. The risk-adjusted return on our portfolio is an important component of overall financial results, but quality and safety of principal is the highest priority of our investment program. We administer our investment portfolio based on investment guidelines approved by management and the Investment Committee of our Board of Directors that comply with applicable statutory regulations. The portfolio is structured to be compliant with state insurance laws that prescribe the quality, concentration and type of investments that may be made by insurance companies.

We monitor our portfolio to appropriately manage risk, achieve portfolio objectives and maximize investment income as market conditions change. Our overall investment strategy is to stay fully invested (i.e., minimize cash balances). If additional cash is needed, we have the ability to take advances through the Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines ("FHLB Des Moines") facility. The Company entered into an investment management agreement with NEAM effective as of February 1, 2024, pursuant to which NEAM will provide investment management services.

Investment Portfolio

Our invested assets at December 31, 2025 totaled $2.5 billion as compared to $2.1 billion at December 31, 2024. We utilize a conservative investment philosophy, investing in a diversified portfolio of high-quality, intermediate-term taxable corporate bonds, taxable U.S. government and government agency bonds and tax-exempt U.S. municipal bonds.

The composition of our investment portfolio at December 31, 2025 is presented at carrying value in the following table:

(In Thousands, except ratios)

(1) Available-for-sale fixed maturity securities are carried at fair value.

(2) As a member of Lloyd’s, the Company participates in the Syndicate results which include the fair value of the investments. Starting in Q4 2024, these investments are included in other long-term investments. The fair value of Lloyd's syndicate investments included in other long-term investments was $127.9 million as of December 31, 2025. Also included in our "Other long-term investments" on the Consolidated Balance Sheets is our interest in limited liability partnerships with a current fair value of $99.2 million at December 31, 2025.

Credit Quality

The following table shows the composition of fixed maturity securities by credit rating at December 31, 2025 and 2024. Information contained in the table is generally based upon issuer credit ratings provided by external rating agencies.

(In Thousands)

As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, we did not have direct exposure to investments in subprime mortgages or other credit enhancement vehicles.

Duration

Our investment portfolio is invested primarily in fixed maturity securities whose fair value is susceptible to market risk, specifically interest rate changes. Duration is a measurement used to quantify our inherent interest rate risk and analyze our ability to match our invested assets to our reserve liabilities. Invested assets and reserve liability accounts with similar durations will have an offsetting effect of any change in interest rates. The primary purpose for matching invested assets and reserve liabilities is liquidity, and with appropriate matching, our investments will mature when cash is needed, preventing the need to liquidate other assets prematurely. Mismatches in the duration of assets and liabilities can cause significant fluctuations in our results of operations.

We analyze potential changes in the value of our investment portfolio due to the market risk factors noted above within the overall context of asset and liability management. A technique we use in the management of our investment portfolio specifically related to interest rate risk is the calculation of duration. Our actuaries estimate the payout pattern of our reserve liabilities to determine their duration, which is the present value of the weighted average payments expressed in years. We then establish a target duration for our investment portfolio so that at any given time the estimated cash generated by the investment portfolio will closely match the estimated cash required for the payment of the related reserves. We structure the investment portfolio to meet the target duration to achieve the required cash flow, based on liquidity and market risk factors.

The weighted average effective duration of our portfolio of fixed maturity securities was 4.3 years at December 31, 2025 compared to 4.2 years at December 31, 2024.

Refer to Note 2 "Investments" in Part II, Item 8 for more information on investment maturities.

Unrealized Investment Gains and Losses

Net unrealized investment losses, after tax, totaled $25.3 million, $72.2 million and $67.0 million as of December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The unrealized investment loss position improved from December 31, 2024 due to the decrease in the bond market interest rates during the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2025. The net unrealized investment losses in 2024 and 2023 were a result of continued elevated interest rates that resulted in a change in unrealized gains and losses.

Refer to Note 2 "Investments" in Part II, Item 8 for more information on net unrealized investment gains and losses.

Expected Credit Losses and Watch List

We prepare a watch list to identify securities to evaluate for expected credit losses. Factors used in preparing the watch list include fair values relative to amortized cost, ratings, negative ratings actions and other factors. Detailed analysis is performed for each security on the watch list to further assess the presence of credit impairment loss indicators and, where present, calculate an allowance for expected credit loss or direct write-down of a security’s amortized cost.

At December 31, 2025, our watch list included five fixed maturity securities in an unrealized loss position with an amortized cost of $13.4 million, no allowance for expected credit losses, unrealized losses of $0.6 million and a fair value of $12.5 million.

At December 31, 2024, our watch list included 10 fixed maturity securities in an unrealized loss position with an amortized cost of $21.8 million, no allowance for expected credit losses, unrealized losses of $2.2 million and a fair value of $24.0 million.

Refer to Note 2 "Investments" in Part II, Item 8 for more information on our investments.

REINSURANCE

Reinsurance is a contract by which one insurer, called the reinsurer, agrees to cover, under certain defined circumstances, a portion of the losses incurred by a primary insurer if a claim is made under a policy issued by the primary insurer. Our property and casualty insurance companies follow the industry practice of reinsuring a portion of their exposure to reduce the net liability on individual risks to predetermined limits and to protect us against catastrophic losses, such as a hurricane or tornado.

Ceded Reinsurance

Our reinsurance allows us to manage our risk, increase our underwriting capacity and protect us from large loss events. A summary of our key reinsurance programs are as follows:

Property & Casualty Core Excess of Loss ("XOL") Treaty

Our property and casualty working program, which we refer to as the core treaty, includes a multi-line layer which applies in excess of our retention, as well as property-only and casualty-only towers above the multi-line exhaustion point. Our core treaty incepts January 1, 2026, and each layer is fully placed with the exception of the new 5th Casualty that is 50% placed. The core treaty structure has changed from the 2025 treaty year including raising the multi-line retention and eliminating the annual aggregate deductible. The layer changes are summarized in the table below. Each layer includes provisions providing for extra-contractual and excess of policy limit losses and terrorism coverage. However, included coverage varies based on individual reinsurer participation of each layer. The multi-line treaty includes a provision that limits the per occurrence maximum limit to $12 million. Reinstatement is free and unlimited. This treaty provides coverage to the majority of the commercial property and casualty business that we write. The multi-line treaty combined with the property per risk provides for a combined limit of $46 million coverage excess of the $4 million retention, as compared to $3.0 million retention for the years 2022 through 2025, $2.5 million retention for the years 2021 through 2016, and $2.0 million for the years 2015 through 2012. The 1st Property Per Risk includes six free reinstatements of the full limit. The 2nd and 3rd Property Per Risk layers include one reinstatement to the full amount at the same premium. A semi-automatic property facultative treaty is in place providing coverage for a limit of $25 million excess of $50 million, which brings the combined treaty coverage limit available for an eligible risk to $71 million excess of $4 million. If we have a property risk that requires limits in excess of our reinsured limit, facultative reinsurance is obtained. The multi-line treaty combined with the casualty tower provides for a combined limit of $76 million excess of the $4 million retention, including the 5th layer co-participation. This treaty protects from a loss to an individual policyholder or clash event where an occurrence involves multiple policyholders. The 1st Casualty includes six free reinstatements of the full limit, while the Casualty 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th include a single reinstatement of the full limit at the same premium. The casualty layers include a provision that limits the maximum amount of any one life for workers' compensation losses. At times we may obtain separate casualty facultative reinsurance to cover specific exposures or policies, based on particular exposures presented by a policyholder.

49

Property Catastrophe XOL

Effective January 1, 2026, the Company continued the pillar occurrence in addition to the property catastrophe XOL ceded reinsurance programs. No substantive structural changes were made to the property catastrophe XOL or pillar occurrence. With respect to the pillar occurrence, the event retention for Named Storm and Earthquake remains at $5.0 million while the event retention for All Other Perils remains at $4.0 million. The property catastrophe XOL remains fully placed, while the pillar occurrence placement was increased to 85%. We did not experience any property catastrophe events that produced a ceded loss to either program in 2023, 2024 or 2025. Our corporate property catastrophe reinsurance program, effective January 1, 2026, is an XOL treaty. The program consists of $130.0 million in coverage for losses in excess of $20.0 million. The treaty protects from catastrophic events such as earthquakes, hail, windstorms, and fires. The treaty consists of three layers and is fully placed. It includes provisions providing for extra-contractual and excess of policy limit losses and contains exclusions for communicable diseases and cyber loss. The property casualty XOL treaty includes a terrorism exclusion. Additionally, each layer can be reinstated once to its full amount at the same premium. The property catastrophe treaty limit was increased as of January 1, 2026 and retention remained the same as the prior year.

Earthquake and Flood XOL Treaty

We delegate underwriting authority to write a portfolio of Pacific Coast earthquake business. This arrangement began in 2019. An XOL treaty, effective January 1, 2026, is in place to specifically and exclusively reinsure business written through this arrangement. This program consists of $190.0 million for losses in excess of $10.0 million and is fully placed. Each layer can be reinstated once to its full amount at the same premium.

Surety Per Principal XOL Treaty

Our surety treaty incepts on January 1, 2026 and is an XOL treaty. The program consists of $60.0 million in coverage for losses in excess of $5.0 million per principal. The first layer includes three paid reinstatements, while the second and third include one paid reinstatement. Losses are considered discovered to the treaty year in accordance with the contract terms and conditions. A new fourth layer was placed in 2026 to address business unit objectives and meet risk management priorities.

Terrorism Coverage

Our principal terrorism reinsurance protection is the coverage provided through the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2019 ("TRIPRA"), effective through December 31, 2027. TRIPRA coverage includes most direct commercial lines of business, including coverage for losses from nuclear, biological and chemical exposures if coverage was afforded by an insurer, with exclusions for commercial automobile insurance, burglary and theft insurance, surety, professional liability insurance and farm owners' multiple peril insurance. For calendar year 2025, the aggregate losses exceeding a threshold of $200.0 million industry-wide would be covered under this protection. Our TRIPRA deductible was $138.5 million for 2025 and our TRIPRA deductible is expected to be $159.2 million for 2026. Our catastrophe and non-catastrophe reinsurance programs provide limited coverage for terrorism exposure excluding nuclear, biological and chemical-related claims.

Assumed Reinsurance

The Company offers reinsurance coverage for property and casualty insurance through traditional treaty reinsurance channels and participates in the Lloyd's market through its corporate member at Lloyd's. We target diversifying risks that complement our direct portfolio. The following provides more detail on the type of assumed reinsurance business we target.

• Treaty reinsurance with regional property and casualty carriers, including casualty XOL, property per risk, and property catastrophe XOL.
• Treaty reinsurance with professional reinsurers and Lloyd's syndicates.
• Mortgage reinsurance with Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, private mortgage insurers and surety carriers.
• Treaty reinsurance on risks underwritten by managing general agents.
• Treaty reinsurance underwritten on our behalf through reinsurance intermediary management agreements (RIMA) that define underwriting boundaries by product, class and type.

For the year ended December 31, 2025, we made strategic changes in the assumed portfolio to protect margins. Some of the casualty quota share agreements were not seeing rates keep up with loss trends and we elected to non-renew certain agreements. Partially offsetting the reduction in premiums due to these underwriting decisions, we continued to grow our mortgage reinsurance and financial lines reinsurance portfolio. We are also seeing successful, profitable growth with select managing general agents whom we reinsure, and we are growing our business in the Lloyd's market as the opportunities in that market are among the best available currently.

For the year ended December 31, 2024, we broadened the scope of our assumed portfolio by growing our client base and building around the renewal business. We grew our standard property and casualty treaty business while holding our property catastrophe retrocessional and Lloyd's businesses to only modest change. We engaged in the mortgage reinsurance market where conditions were favorable. We also incepted a few new managing general agent programs in the cyber liability and transactional liability markets.

For the year ended December 31, 2023 we continued to grow our assumed programs by renewing the programs added in 2022 and continuing to diversify our risks. We reduced exposure in property catastrophe retrocessional treaty and managing general agent treaty, while significantly growing our standard property and casualty treaty and Lloyd's businesses.

Reinsurer Credit Quality

We use many reinsurers, both domestic and foreign, which helps us to avoid concentrations of credit risk associated with our reinsurance. Our criteria for selecting reinsurance markets is to generally require capital and surplus of at least $500.0 million and an A.M. Best rating or an S&P rating of at least "A-." If a reinsurer is rated by both rating agencies, then both ratings must be at least an "A-." Our key reinsurance programs are placed with reinsurers holding a rating of A- or better as of December 31, 2025. For the small amount of reinsurance capacity we utilize that doesn't meet our criteria, markets are required to collateralize the risk.

The following table represents the primary reinsurers we utilize and their financial strength ratings as of December 31, 2025:

(1) Primary reinsurers participating in the property and casualty excess of loss programs.

(2) Primary reinsurers participating in the surety excess of loss program.

Refer to Part II, Item 8, Note 4 "Reinsurance" for further discussion of our reinsurance programs.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Liquidity measures our ability to generate sufficient cash flows to meet our short-term cash obligations and long-term cash obligations. Our cash inflows are primarily a result of the receipt of premiums, reinsurance recoveries, sales or maturities of investments, and investment income. Cash provided from these sources is used to fund the payment of losses and loss settlement expenses, the purchase of investments, operating expenses, dividends and interest payments and common stock repurchase, as well as pension plan contributions, as necessary. When considering our liquidity and cash flow, it is important to distinguish between the needs of our insurance subsidiaries and the needs of the holding company, United Fire Group, Inc. As an insurance holding company with no significant independent operations of our own, United Fire Group, Inc. derives its cash primarily from its insurance subsidiaries.

The sources of liquidity of the holding company are principally comprised of dividends from subsidiaries, existing surplus notes, investment income on holding company assets and the ability to raise long-term public financing under an SEC-filed registration statement or private placement offering. These sources of liquidity and cash flow support the general corporate needs of the holding company, interest and debt service, and investment in core businesses.

We monitor our capital adequacy to support our business on a regular basis. The future capital requirements of our business will depend on many factors, including our ability to write new business successfully and to establish premium rates and reserves at levels sufficient to cover losses. Our ability to underwrite is largely dependent upon the quality of our claims paying and financial strength ratings as evaluated by independent rating agencies. In particular, we require (1) sufficient capital to maintain our financial strength ratings, as issued by various rating agencies, at a level considered necessary by management to enable our insurance company subsidiaries to compete and (2) sufficient capital to enable our insurance company subsidiaries to meet the capital adequacy tests performed by regulatory agencies in the United States.

Cash outflows may be variable because of the uncertainty regarding settlement dates for losses. In addition, the timing and amount of individual catastrophe losses are inherently unpredictable and could increase our liquidity requirements. The timing and amount of reinsurance recoveries may be affected by reinsurer solvency and reinsurance coverage disputes.

The following table displays a summary of cash sources and uses in 2025, 2024 and 2023:

(In Thousands)

At December 31, 2025, our cash and cash equivalents included $44.8 million related to money market accounts, compared to $23.1 million at December 31, 2024.

Operating Activities

Net cash flows provided by operating activities totaled $269.7 million, $340.3 million and $171.7 million in 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The primary cash inflows from operating activities include insurance premiums and net investment income. The primary cash outflows from operating activities are comprised of payment of losses and loss settlement expenses, taxes and operating expenses. Our cash flows from operating activities were sufficient to meet our liquidity needs for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023.

Investing Activities

Cash in excess of operating requirements is generally invested in fixed maturity securities. Fixed maturity securities provide regular interest payments and allow us to match the duration of our liabilities. For further discussion of our investments, including our philosophy and portfolio, see the Investment heading subcategory "Investment Portfolio" section contained in Part II, Item 7 of Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Sales of investments and proceeds from calls or maturities of fixed maturity securities also can provide liquidity. During the next five years, $420.2 million, or 18.8 percent of our fixed maturity security portfolio will mature.

Net cash flows used in investing activities totaled $326.0 million, $292.5 million and $149.9 million in 2025, 2024, and 2023, respectively. In 2025, we had cash inflows from scheduled and unscheduled investment maturities, redemptions, prepayments, and sales of investments that totaled $394.5 million compared to $680.0 million and $162.1 million for the same period in 2024 and 2023, respectively. Our cash outflows for investment purchases totaled $714.0 million in 2025, compared to $960.6 million and $301.1 million for the same period in 2024 and 2023, respectively.

Financing Activities

Net cash flows provided by financing activities totaled $11.6 million and $51.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, due to the successful placement of $30.0 million and $70.0 million of senior unsecured notes in July 2025 and May 2024, respectively. Net cash flows used in financing activities totaled $16.5 million in 2023. The net cash flows used in financing activities are primarily the payment of cash dividends of $16.3 million, $16.2 million and $16.2 million in 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

As of December 31, 2025, our required annual payments relating to contractual and other obligations were as follows:

(In Thousands)

Loss and Loss Settlement Expense Reserves

The amounts presented are estimates of the dollar amounts and time periods in which we expect to pay out our gross loss and loss settlement expense reserves. Because the timing of future payments may vary from the stated contractual obligation, these amounts are estimates based upon historical payment patterns and may not represent actual future payments. Refer to "Critical Accounting Estimates — Losses and Loss Settlement Expenses" in this section for further discussion.

Long term debt

Our long term debt obligations are $50.0 million of private placement notes issued in December 2020, $70.0 million of senior unsecured notes issued in May 2024 and $30.0 million of senior unsecured notes issued in July 2025. For further discussion of our long term debt, refer to Part II, Item 8, Note 13 "Debt."

Operating Leases

Our operating lease obligations are for the rental of office space, vehicles, computer equipment and office equipment. For further discussion of our operating leases, refer to Part II, Item 8, Note 12 "Lease Commitments."

Profit-Sharing Commissions

We offer our agents a profit-sharing plan as an incentive for them to place high-quality property and casualty insurance business with us. Based on business produced by the agencies in 2025, property and casualty agencies expect to receive profit-sharing payments of $30.3 million in 2026.

Funding Commitments

Pursuant to agreements with our limited liability partnership investments, we are contractually committed through 2030 to make capital contributions upon request of the partnerships. The timing of these additional contributions is unknown and based upon the timing of when investments and agreements are executed or signed compared to when the actual commitments are funded or closed. Our remaining potential contractual obligation was $15.9 million at December 31, 2025.

Guaranty Fund Assessments

The Company is subject to guaranty fund and other assessments by the states in which it writes business. At December 31, 2025 the accrued liability for guaranty fund assessments was $0 and the premium tax benefit asset was $1.9 million. Guaranty fund assets are typically realized over the next five to 10 years. No discount is applied to the liability for assessments.

Legal Proceedings

The Company is a party to various claims and litigation incidental to its business, which, based on the facts and circumstances currently known, are not material to the Company's results of operations or financial position as of December 31, 2025.

Commitments for Capital Expenditures

Dividends

Dividends paid to shareholders totaled $16.3 million, $16.2 million and $16.2 million in 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Payment of any future dividends and the amounts of such dividends depends upon factors such as net income, financial condition, capital requirements, and general business conditions. We will only pay dividends if declared by our Board of Directors out of legally available funds.

As an insurance holding company with no significant independent operations of its own, United Fire Group, Inc. relies on dividends received from its insurance company subsidiaries in order to pay dividends to its common shareholders. Dividends payable by our insurance subsidiaries are governed by the laws in the states in which they are domiciled. In all cases, these state laws permit the payment of dividends only from earned surplus arising from business operations. For example, under Iowa law, the maximum dividend or distribution that may be paid within a 12-month period without prior approval of the Iowa Insurance Commissioner is generally restricted to the greater of 10 percent of statutory surplus as of the preceding December 31 less any dividends paid in the previous 12 months, or net income of the preceding calendar year on a statutory basis less any dividends paid in the previous 12 months, not greater than earned statutory surplus. Other states in which our insurance company subsidiaries are domiciled may impose similar restrictions on dividends and distributions. Based on these restrictions, at December 31, 2025 UF&C is able to make a maximum of $50.6 million in dividend payments without prior regulatory approval. These restrictions are not expected to have a material impact in meeting our cash obligations.

Share Repurchases

Under our share repurchase program, we may purchase our common stock on the open market or through privately negotiated transactions. The amount and timing of any purchases will be at our discretion and will depend upon a number of factors, including the share price, economic and general market conditions, and corporate and regulatory requirements. Our share repurchase program may be modified or discontinued at any time. The Board of Directors reauthorized the share repurchase program in August 2024 and extended the program through August 2026.

The Company did not repurchase any shares of our common stock during the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023. At December 31, 2025, we remain authorized to purchase up to one million shares of our common stock.

Credit Facilities

In December 2023, the Company became a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines ("FHLB Des Moines"). Membership allows access to loans or advances. As of December 31, 2025, there were no advances outstanding under the FHLB Des Moines agreement. Refer to Note 13 "Debt" in Part II, Item 8 for further information regarding the agreement with FHLB Des Moines.

Stockholders' Equity

Stockholders' equity increased 20.4 percent to $941.2 million at December 31, 2025, from $781.5 million at December 31, 2024. The increase is primarily attributed to net income of $118.2 million and a decrease in net unrealized losses on fixed maturity securities, net of tax, of $47.0 million, partially offset with shareholder dividends of $16.3 million. As of December 31, 2025, the book value per share of our common stock was $36.88, compared to $30.80 at December 31, 2024.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Information specific to accounting standards we adopted for the year ended December 31, 2025 or pending accounting standards we expect to adopt in the future is incorporated by reference from Note 1 "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" contained in Part II, Item 8, "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data."

Market Risk

Our Consolidated Balance Sheets include financial instruments whose fair values are subject to market risk. The active management of market risk is integral to our operations. Market risk is the potential for loss due to a decrease in the fair value of securities resulting from uncontrollable fluctuations, such as: interest rate risk, equity price risk, foreign exchange risk, credit risk, inflation, or geopolitical conditions. Our primary market risk exposures are: changes in interest rates, deterioration of credit quality of specific issuers, sectors or the economy as a whole, and an unforeseen decrease in the liquidity of securities we hold.

The carrying value of the Company's investment portfolio at December 31, 2025 and 2024 was $2.5 billion and $2.1 billion, respectively, of which 89.5% and 89.3%, respectively, was invested in fixed maturity securities. The primary market risks to our portfolio include interest rate risk, credit risk, and foreign currency exchange rate risk. Duration of the portfolio is a key calculation that is managed relative to the payout pattern of our reserve liabilities. The exposure to equity price risk was eliminated in 2024 with repositioning of equity securities into fixed maturity securities.

Interest Rate Risk

Interest rate risk is the price sensitivity of a fixed maturity security or portfolio of securities to changes in level of interest rates. Generally, there is an inverse relationship between changes in interest rates and changes in the price of a fixed maturity security. Plainly stated, if interest rates go up (down), bond prices go down (up). A vast majority of our holdings are fixed maturity and other interest rate sensitive securities that will decrease (increase) in value as interest rates increase (decrease). Available-for-sale fixed maturity securities are carried at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheets with unrealized gains or losses reported, net of tax, in accumulated other comprehensive income. A change in the prevailing interest rates generally translates into a change in the fair value of our fixed maturity securities, and by extension, our overall book value.

The amounts set forth in the following table detail the impact of hypothetical interest rate changes on the fair value of fixed maturity securities held at December 31, 2025. The sensitivity analysis measures the change in fair values arising from immediate changes in selected interest rate scenarios. We employed hypothetical parallel shifts in the yield curve of plus or minus 100 and 200 basis points in the simulations. Additionally, based upon the yield curve shifts, we employ estimates of prepayment speeds for mortgage-related products and the likelihood of call or put options being exercised within the simulations.

The selection of a 100-basis-point and 200-basis-point increase or decrease in interest rates should not be construed as a prediction by our management of future market events, but rather as an illustration of the potential impact of an event.

(In Thousands)

To the extent actual results differ from the assumptions utilized, our duration and interest rate measures could be significantly affected. As a result, these calculations may not fully capture the impact of nonparallel changes in the relationship between short-term and long-term interest rates.

Credit Risk

Credit risk is the willingness and ability of a borrower to repay on time and in full any principal and interest due to the lender. Losses related to credit risk are realized through the income statement and have a direct impact on earnings. We believe that we maintain the appropriate balance of risk in our portfolio, consistent with our Investment Policy Statement and ensure the portfolio is compensated appropriately for the credit risk it holds. We do have within our municipal bond holdings a small number of securities whose ratings were enhanced by third-party insurance for the payment of principal and interest in the event of an issuer default. Of the municipal securities in our investment portfolio, 86.2 percent and 93.1 percent were rated "AA" or above, and 100.0 percent and 100.0 percent were rated "A" or above at December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, without the benefit of insurance. Due to the underlying financial strength of the issuers of the securities, we believe that the loss of insurance would not have a material impact on our operations, financial position, or liquidity.

We have no direct exposure in any of the guarantors of our investments. Our five largest indirect exposures to financial guarantors accounted for $23.0 million and $10.8 million of our municipal securities at December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

Foreign currency exchange rate risk arises from the possibility that changes in foreign exchange rates will impact our financial results. Foreign currency exchange rate risk can occur as a result of investment holdings in foreign currency, settlement of amounts due to or from foreign reinsurers or our participation in Lloyd's. We consider this risk to be immaterial to our operations as of December 31, 2025.

Refer to Part II, Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" under the headings "Investments" and "Part II, Item 8, Note 2 "Investments" for more information on our investments.

EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, were designed and functioning effectively to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act are recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms. We believe that a control system, no matter how well designed and operated, cannot provide absolute assurance that the objectives of the control system are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected.

MANAGEMENT'S ANNUAL REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

The management of United Fire Group, Inc. is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. United Fire Group, Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of its Consolidated Financial Statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

As of December 31, 2025, United Fire Group, Inc.'s management assessed the effectiveness of United Fire Group Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting established in "Internal Control — Integrated Framework," issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework). Based on the assessment, United Fire Group, Inc.'s management determined that effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained as of December 31, 2025, based on those criteria.

Ernst & Young LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited the Consolidated Financial Statements of United Fire Group, Inc. included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, has audited the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025. Their attestation report, which expresses an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of United Fire Group, Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025, is included in this Item under the heading "Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm."

CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated our internal control over financial reporting to determine whether any changes occurred during the fiscal year to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. We believe our operational processes, internal controls over financial reporting and disclosures, and financial reporting systems are operating effectively in the present environment.

Based on our evaluation, there have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15) that occurred during the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2025 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of United Fire Group, Inc.

Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We have audited United Fire Group, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, United Fire Group, Inc. (the Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2025, and the related notes and financial statement schedules listed in the Index at Item 15(a)2 and our report dated February 26, 2026 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Ernst & Young LLP

Des Moines, Iowa

February 26, 2026

123