Coeur Mining, Inc.: Form 10-Q for the period ended Mar 31, 2026

The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) provides information that management believes is relevant to an assessment and understanding of the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Coeur Mining, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively the “Company”, “our”, or “we”). We use certain non-GAAP financial performance measures in our MD&A. For a detailed description of these measures, please see “Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures” at the end of this Item. We provide *Costs applicable to sales (“*CAS”) allocation, referred to as the co-product method, based on revenue contribution for Palmarejo and Rochester and based on the primary metal, referred to as the by-product method, for Rainy River, New Afton, and Wharf. Revenue from secondary metal, such as silver at Rainy River, New Afton, and Wharf, is treated as a cost credit.

Overview

We are a U.S.-based, well-diversified, growing precious metals producer with seven wholly-owned North American operations: the New Afton gold-copper mine in British Columbia, Canada, the Rainy River gold-silver mine in Ontario, Canada, the Las Chispas silver-gold mine in Sonora, Mexico, the Palmarejo gold-silver mine in Chihuahua, Mexico, the Rochester silver-gold mine in Nevada, the Kensington gold mine in Alaska and the Wharf gold mine in South Dakota. In addition, the Company wholly-owns the Silvertip polymetallic critical minerals exploration project in British Columbia, Canada.

First Quarter Highlights

For the quarter, Coeur reported revenue of $856 million and cash provided by operating activities of $341 million. We reported GAAP net income of $247 million, or $0.35 per diluted share. On a non-GAAP adjusted basis1, the Company reported EBITDA of $475 million and net income of $254 million or $0.36 per diluted share.

• Solid production and cost performance in line with 2026 guidance – Operating strength across the portfolio led to first quarter production of 96,503 ounces of gold and 4.4 million ounces of silver, representing year-over-year increases of 11% and 18%, respectively. Full-year 2026 production remains on-track to reach 680,000 - 815,000 ounces of gold, 18.7 - 21.9 million ounces of silver, and 50 - 65 million pounds of copper
• Record financial results – First quarter free cash flow totaled $267 million despite several first-quarter specific outflows totaling over $200 million. Quarterly adjusted EBITDA1 increased 12% versus the prior quarter and nearly quadrupled year-over-year to a record $475 million, driving the last-twelve-month total to nearly $1.4 billion. Average realized prices for gold and silver increased 15% and 53%, respectively, compared to the fourth quarter
• Strong financial position and growing liquidity resulting in updated financial policy – Cash and cash equivalents of $843 million represented an increase of 52% compared to the prior quarter and a near eleven-fold increase compared to the prior-year period. On March 23, 2026, Coeur announced an expanded $750 million share repurchase program and the establishment of an inaugural dividend policy of $0.02 per share of Coeur common stock paid semiannually, with the first dividend expected to be paid during the second quarter of 2026. The Company also entered into a new $1 billion revolving credit facility during the first quarter
• New Gold transaction completed; integration efforts advancing on schedule – During the eleven days of the first quarter following completion of the New Gold transaction on March 20, 2026, New Afton and Rainy River contributed production of 14,145 ounces of gold, 22,989 ounces of silver and 1.4 million pounds of copper. Ongoing organizational integration initiatives are progressing according to plan
• New Afton’s K-Zone maiden resource adds to Coeur’s pipeline of attractive growth projects – On March 23, 2026, Coeur filed updated technical reports for New Afton and Rainy River, which included an initial resource at New Afton’s K-Zone totaling 47.6 million tonnes of measured and indicated mineral resources, containing an estimated 715,000 ounces of gold, 2.9 million ounces of silver and 606 million pounds of copper. Inferred mineral resources totaled 5.9 million tonnes containing 86,000 ounces of gold, 309,000 ounces of silver, and 77 million pounds of copper
• Updated Rainy River technical report highlights mine life expansion – New life of mine plan reflects strong production and cash flow profile including a two-year mine life extension to 2035

Selected Financial and Operating Results

(1) See “Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures”. Includes costs of $85 million, $3 million, and $27 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026, December 31, 2025 and March 31, 2025, respectively, related to the purchase price allocation (“PPA”) ascribed to Inventory at New Afton, Rainy River and Las Chispas.

(2) Includes finance leases. Net of debt issuance costs and premium received.

Consolidated Financial Results

Revenue

We sold 108,420 gold ounces, 4.4 million silver ounces, and 3.4 million copper pounds, compared to 111,273 gold ounces, 4.6 million silver ounces and zero copper pounds. Revenue increased by $181 million, or 27%, as a result of 15% and 53% increases in average realized gold and silver prices, respectively, and sales of 3.4 million copper pounds from acquired inventory at New Afton, partially offset by a 3% and 5% decrease in gold and silver ounces sold, respectively. The decrease in gold ounces sold was the result of temporarily-reduced crushing capacity at Wharf, lower mill throughput at Kensington and Palmarejo, lower grades at Rochester and Kensington, and lower placement rates at Rochester. This was partially offset by post-acquisition sales at Rainy River and New Afton. The decrease in silver ounces sold was the result of lower mill throughput at Palmarejo, and lower placement rates at Rochester, partially offset by higher mill throughput and recoveries at Las Chispas. Gold, silver, and copper represented 56%, 42%, and 2% of first quarter 2026 sales revenue, respectively, compared to 63%, 37%, and nil of fourth quarter 2025 sales revenue, respectively.

The following table summarizes consolidated metal sales:

In thousands

Costs Applicable to Sales

Costs applicable to sales increased $114 million, or 53%, primarily driven by post-acquisition sales at Rainy River and New Afton as well as the impact of the purchase price allocation (“PPA”) ascribed to Inventory of $85 million compared to $3 million in the fourth quarter of 2025, partially offset by lower gold ounces sold at Wharf. For a complete discussion of costs applicable to sales, see Results of Operations below.

Amortization

Amortization increased $26 million, or 36%, as a result of post-acquisition sales at Rainy River and New Afton, and higher gold and silver ounces sold at Las Chispas, partially offset by lower gold and silver ounces sold at Palmarejo, Rochester, Kensington and Wharf.

Expenses

General and administrative expenses increased $6 million, or 42%, primarily due to higher stock-based compensation and annual incentive costs.

Exploration expense increased $7 million, or 39%, primarily due to planned increased drilling at Las Chispas, Kensington and Wharf.

Pre-development, reclamation, and other expenses increased $6 million, or 25%, as a result of higher transaction costs associated with the acquisition of New Gold.

The following table summarizes pre-development, reclamation, and other expenses:

In thousands

Other Income and Expenses

The Company incurred $2 million of debt extinguishment costs following the termination of the $400 million revolving credit facility and its replacement with a new $1.0 billion revolving credit facility.

Interest expense (net of capitalized interest) was unchanged at $6 million as interest on the $400 million of debt assumed from the New Gold Transaction was offset by lower interest paid on finance leases. The new $1.0 billion RCF had no outstanding amount drawn as of March 31, 2026.

Other, net increased to a gain of $8 million compared to $6 million as a result of higher interest income, partially offset by lower foreign exchange rate gains.

Income and Mining Taxes

Income and mining tax expense of approximately $102 million resulted in an effective tax rate of 29.2% for three months ended March 31, 2026. This compares to income tax expense of $113 million for an effective tax rate of 34.4% for three months ended December 31, 2025. The comparability of the Company’s income and mining tax (expense) benefit and effective tax rate for the reported periods was impacted by multiple factors, primarily: (i) U.S. valuation allowance release; (ii) foreign exchange rates; (iii) variations in our income before income taxes; (iv) geographic distribution of that income; (v) the impact of uncertain tax positions; (vi) mining taxes; (vii) excess of tax benefits from share-based compensation; and (viii) percentage depletion. Fluctuations in foreign exchange rates on deferred tax balances decreased income and mining tax expense by $2 million and increased income and mining tax expense by $6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively. The impact of foreign exchange rates on deferred tax balances is predominantly due to the Mexican Peso and deferred taxes resulting from Las Chispas purchase price accounting. Therefore, the effective tax rate will fluctuate, sometimes significantly, period to period.

The following table summarizes the components of the Company’s income (loss) before tax and income and mining tax (expense) benefit:

In thousands

A valuation allowance is provided for deferred tax assets for which it is more likely than not that the related tax benefits will not be realized. The Company analyzes its deferred tax assets and, if it is determined that the Company will not realize all or a portion of its deferred tax assets, it will record or increase a valuation allowance. Conversely, if it is determined that the Company will ultimately be more likely than not able to realize all or a portion of the related benefits for which a valuation allowance has been provided, all or a portion of the related valuation allowance will be reduced. There are a number of factors that impact the Company’s ability to realize its deferred tax assets. For additional information, please see “Item 1A - Risk Factors”.

The Company has historically provided a valuation allowance against a portion of its U.S. net deferred tax assets. In the first quarter of 2026, the Company released $1 million of valuation allowance against its U.S. net deferred tax assets, resulting in a non-cash deferred tax benefit. The $1 million valuation allowance release is related to forecasted future year income. The timing of this valuation allowance release was primarily due to the cumulative income position for the most recent three-year period and projected future earnings.

The Company continues to maintain a valuation allowance against approximately $56 million of U.S. federal and state deferred tax assets as of March 31, 2026, because the Company has concluded it is not more likely than not to be realized.

The exact timing and amount of any valuation allowance release are subject to change, depending upon the Company’s future profitability and the net deferred tax assets available.

Net Income

Net income was $247 million, or $0.35 per diluted share, compared to $215 million, or $0.33 per diluted share. The increase in net income was driven by a 15% and 53% increase in average realized gold and silver prices, respectively, and post-acquisition sales at Rainy River and New Afton. This was partially offset by a 3% and 5% decrease in gold and silver ounces sold, respectively, post-acquisition costs applicable to sales at Rainy River and New Afton, higher general and administrative and exploration costs, and higher income and mining taxes. Adjusted net income was $253 million, or $0.36 per diluted share, compared to $227 million, or $0.35 per diluted share (see “Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures”).

Revenue

We sold 108,420 gold ounces, 4.4 million silver ounces, and 3.4 million copper pounds, compared to 89,316 gold ounces, 3.9 million silver ounces and zero copper pounds. Revenue increased by $496 million, or 138%, as a result of 21% and 12% increases in gold and silver ounces sold, respectively, sales of 3.4 million copper pounds from acquired inventory at New Afton, and a 66% and 159% increase in average realized gold and silver prices, respectively.

The increase in gold ounces sold was primarily due to full-quarter sales at Las Chispas and post-acquisition sales at Rainy River and New Afton, partially offset by lower mill throughput at Kensington and temporarily-reduced crushing capacity at Wharf. The increase in silver ounces sold resulted from full-quarter sales at Las Chispas, higher placement rates at Rochester, partially offset by lower grades at Palmarejo and Rochester. Gold, silver and copper represented 56%, 42% and 2% of sales revenue during the first quarter of 2026, respectively, compared to 65%, 35% and nil during the first quarter of 2025, respectively.

The following table summarizes consolidated metal sales:

In thousands

Costs Applicable to Sales

Costs applicable to sales increased $126 million, or 62%, primarily due to the post-acquisition sales at Rainy River and New Afton, full-quarter sales at Las Chispas and higher operating costs at Palmarejo, Rochester and Kensington, partially offset lower gold ounces sold Wharf. Cost applicable to sales includes the impact of the PPA ascribed to Inventory of $85 million compared to $27 million during the first quarter of 2025. For a complete discussion of costs applicable to sales, see Results of Operations below.

Amortization

Amortization increased $57 million, or 132%, as a result of post-acquisition sales at Rainy River and New Afton, full-quarter sales at Las Chispas, partially offset lower gold ounces sold at Palmarejo and Wharf.

Expenses

General and administrative expenses increased $8 million, or 56%, primarily due to higher stock-based compensation, annual incentive, outside service, and audit fees.

Exploration expense increased $6 million, or 31%, driven by planned higher resource expansion drilling activity at all locations, and full-quarter exploration expense at Las Chispas.

Pre-development, reclamation, and other expenses increased $13 million, or 76%, primarily due to higher transaction costs related to the acquisition of New Gold.

The following table summarizes pre-development, reclamation, and other expenses:

In thousands

Other Income and Expenses

The Company incurred $2 million of debt extinguishment costs following the termination of the $400 million revolving credit facility and its replacement with the new $1.0 billion revolving credit facility.

Interest expense (net of capitalized interest) decreased to $6 million from $10 million due to lower interest paid under the RCF driven by lower average debt levels and interest rate, partially offset by higher interest paid under finance lease obligations driven by new finance leases in the second half of 2025. The new $1.0 billion RCF had no outstanding amount drawn as of March 31, 2026.

Other, net increased to a gain of $8 million compared to $0.4 million as a result of higher interest income.

Income and Mining Taxes

Income and mining tax expense of approximately $102 million resulted in an effective tax rate of 29.2% for the first quarter of 2026. This compares to income tax expense of $18 million for an effective tax rate of 35.6% for the first quarter of 2025. The comparability of the Company’s income and mining tax (expense) benefit and effective tax rate for the reported periods was impacted by multiple factors, primarily: (i) variations in our income before income taxes; (ii) geographic distribution of that income; (iii) mining taxes; (iv) percentage depletion; (v) excess of tax benefits from share-based compensation; (vi) foreign exchange rates; (vii) U.S. valuation allowance release; and (viii) the impact of uncertain tax positions. Fluctuations in foreign exchange rates on deferred tax balances decreased income and mining tax expense by $2 million and $0.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively. The impact of foreign exchange rates on deferred tax balances is predominantly due to the Mexican Peso and deferred taxes resulting from Las Chispas purchase price accounting. Therefore, the effective tax rate will fluctuate, sometimes significantly, period to period.

The following table summarizes the components of the Company’s income (loss) before tax and income and mining tax (expense) benefit:

In thousands

A valuation allowance is provided for deferred tax assets for which it is more likely than not that the related tax benefits will not be realized. The Company analyzes its deferred tax assets and, if it is determined that the Company will not realize all or a portion of its deferred tax assets, it will record or increase a valuation allowance. Conversely, if it is determined that the Company will ultimately be more likely than not able to realize all or a portion of the related benefits for which a valuation allowance has been provided, all or a portion of the related valuation allowance will be reduced. There are a number of factors that impact the Company’s ability to realize its deferred tax assets. For additional information, please see “Item 1A - Risk Factors”.

The Company has historically provided a valuation allowance against a portion its U.S. net deferred tax assets. In the first quarter of 2026, the Company released $1 million of valuation allowance against its U.S. net deferred tax assets, resulting in a non-cash deferred tax benefit. The $1 million valuation allowance release is related to forecasted future year income. The timing of this valuation allowance release was primarily due to the cumulative income position for the most recent three-year period and projected future earnings.

The Company continues to maintain a valuation allowance against approximately $56 million of U.S. federal and state deferred tax assets as of March 31, 2026, because the Company has concluded it is not more likely than not to be realized.

The exact timing and amount of any valuation allowance release are subject to change, depending upon the Company’s future profitability and the net deferred tax assets available.

Net Income

Net income was $247 million, or $0.35 per diluted share, compared to $33 million, or $0.06 per diluted share. The increase in net income was driven by a 21% and 12% increase in gold and silver ounces sold, respectively, which includes post-acquisition sales at Rainy River and New Afton and full-quarter sales at Las Chispas, a 66% and 159% increase in average realized gold and silver prices, respectively, and lower interest expense This was partially offset by post-acquisition costs applicable to sales at Rainy River and New Afton, higher general and administrative, exploration, and Transaction costs. Adjusted net income was $253 million, or $0.36 per diluted share, compared to $40 million, or $0.08 per diluted share (see “Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures”).

2026 Guidance

The Company has reaffirmed its full-year 2026 guidance, including production, CAS, capital expenditures, depreciation, depletion and amortization (“DD&A”), exploration, general and administrative expenses (“G&A”), and income and mining tax.

Overall cost guidance reflects higher expected royalty expense driven by stronger realized metal prices, particularly at Rochester, the impact of a stronger Mexican peso, inflation of 3% to 5% across the portfolio, and higher planned maintenance costs. For our co-product mines (New Afton, Las Chispas, Palmarejo, and Rochester), costs are allocated to gold, silver, and copper based on their relative revenue contribution. Given the higher expected contribution of silver to total revenue due to the outperformance of silver’s price relative to the gold price, silver CAS per ounce is expected to be higher in 2026, consistent with the trend seen in the second half of 2025.

2026 Production Guidance

34

2026 Adjusted Costs Applicable to Sales Guidance

2026 Capital, DD&A, Exploration, G&A and Income and Mining Tax Guidance

Note: The Company’s guidance figures assume estimated prices of $4,550/oz gold, $77.50/oz silver, and $5.00/lb copper, as well as CAD of 1.38 and MXN of 18.00. Guidance figures exclude the impact of any metal sales or foreign exchange hedges.

The normalized effective tax rate excludes items that are not reflective of Coeur’s underlying performance, such as the impacts of foreign currency on deferred taxes, taxes related to prior periods, and one-time, non-cash, tax valuation allowance adjustments.

Results of Operations

New Afton, Canada

(1) See Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures. Includes the impact of $2,560 and $3.10 on costs applicable to sales per gold ounce and copper pound sold, respectively, attributable to PPA ascribed to Inventory of $20 million in the first quarter of 2026.

Three Months Ended March 31, 2026

New Afton results represent eleven days of post-acquisition activity subsequent to the acquisition of New Gold on March 20, 2026. Metal sales were $38 million, or 4% of Coeur’s metal sales. Costs applicable to sales per gold ounce and copper pound sold includes $2,560 and $3.10, respectively, of costs related to the expensing of $20 million of PPA that was ascribed to Inventory. Amortization totaled $14 million. Capital expenditures were not significant.

Rainy River, Canada

(1) See Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures. Includes the impact of $3,026 on costs applicable to sales per gold ounce sold, attributable to PPA ascribed to Inventory of $65 million in the first quarter of 2026.

Three Months Ended March 31, 2026

Rainy River results represent eleven days of post-acquisition activity subsequent to the acquisition of New Gold on March 20, 2026. Metal sales were $96 million, or 11% of Coeur’s metal sales. Costs applicable to sales per gold ounce sold includes $3,026 of costs related to the expensing of $65 million of PPA that was ascribed to Inventory. Amortization totaled $17 million. Capital expenditures were $6 million.

Las Chispas, Mexico

(1) See Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures. Includes the impact of $1,351 and $15.22 on costs applicable to sales per gold and silver ounce sold, respectively, attributable to PPA ascribed to Inventory of $27.0 million in the first quarter of 2025. Includes the impact of $101 and $1.33 on costs applicable to sales per gold and silver ounce sold, respectively, attributable to PPA ascribed to Inventory of $3 million in the fourth quarter of 2025.

Gold and silver production increased 2% and 8%, respectively, as a result of a 4% increase in mill throughput and higher average gold grade and silver recoveries. Metal sales were $194 million, or 23% of Coeur’s metal sales, compared with $135 million, or 20% of Coeur’s metal sales. Revenue increased by $59 million, or 44%, of which $51 million was due to higher average realized gold and silver prices and $8 million was the result of higher volume of gold and silver production. Costs applicable to sales per gold and silver ounce decreased 22% and increased 2%, respectively, due to the mix of gold and silver sales, which impacted co-product cost allocation, higher production and the absence of impact of PPA in 2026, partially offset by higher labor costs. Amortization increased by $3 million to $35 million as a result of higher gold and silver ounces sold. Capital expenditures remained comparable at $13 million.

Las Chispas results represent post-acquisition activity subsequent to the acquisition of SilverCrest on February 14, 2025, which drove the gold and silver production increase of 109% and 107%, respectively. Metal sales were $58 million, or 23% of Coeur’s metal sales, compared with $58 million, or 16% of Coeur’s metal sales. Revenue increased by $136 million, or 234%, of which $70 million was due to higher gold and silver prices, and $66 million was attributable to higher volume of gold and silver production. Costs applicable to sales per gold and silver ounce decreased 64% and 44%, respectively, due to the mix of gold and silver sales which impacted co-product cost allocation, and the absence of PPA that was ascribed to Inventory in 2026. In the prior year quarter, costs applicable to sales per gold and silver ounce sold includes $1,351 and $15.22, respectively, of costs related to the expensing of the $27 million of PPA. Amortization and capital expenditures increased to $35 million and $13 million, respectively, due to a full-quarter of results in 2026.

Palmarejo, Mexico

(1) See Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures.

Gold and silver production decreased 11% and 6%, respectively, as a result of a 6% decrease in mill throughput and lower gold and silver grades, partially offset by higher average gold and silver recoveries. Metal sales were $188 million, or 22% of Coeur’s metal sales, compared with $143 million, or 21% of Coeur’s metal sales. Revenue increased by $46 million, or 32%, of which $53 million was due to higher average realized gold and silver prices, partially offset by $7 million as a result of lower volume of gold and silver production. Costs applicable to sales per gold and silver ounce decreased 11% and increased 26%, respectively, due to the mix of gold and silver sales, which impacted co-product cost allocation, higher labor costs and lower production. Amortization decreased by $2 million to $7 million as a result of lower gold and silver ounces sold. Capital expenditures remained comparable at $9 million as higher underground development expenditures offset lower mining equipment purchases.

Gold production remained comparable and silver production decreased 12%, as a result of a decrease in gold and silver grades, partially offset by an increase of 10% in mill throughput and higher average gold and silver recoveries. Metal sales were $188 million, or 22% of Coeur’s metal sales, compared with $96 million, or 27% of Coeur’s metal sales. Revenue increased by $92 million, or 97%, of which $106 million was due to higher gold and silver prices, partially offset by $14 million due to lower volume of gold and silver production. Costs applicable to sales per gold and silver ounce decreased 14% and increased 60%, respectively, due to the mix of gold and silver sales which impacted co-product cost allocation, higher labor and consumable costs, and favorable impact of exchange rates in the first quarter of 2025. Amortization decreased by $2 million to $7 million due to lower silver ounces sold. Capital expenditures increased from $6 million to $9 million due to the higher underground development.

Rochester, United States

(1) Includes 6.5 million, 7.0 million and 5.5 million of crushed ore tonnes placed on the new leach pad in the three months ended March 31, 2026, December 31, 2025 and March 31, 2025, respectively.

(2) See Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures.

Gold and silver production decreased 20% driven by lower grades and placement rates of crushed and direct-to-pad (“DTP”) material during the quarter affected by hauling of overliner material for the pad expansion. Ore tonnes crushed during the quarter consisted of approximately 5.9 million tonnes (6.5 million tons) through the crushing circuit and 0.8 million tonnes (0.9 million tons) of DTP material. Ore tonnes placed during the quarter totaled 6.7 tonnes (7.4 million tons), a 28% (2.5 million tonnes) decrease from the prior quarter. Metal sales were $181 million, or 21% of Coeur’s metal sales, compared with $168 million, or 25% of Coeur’s metal sales in the prior year period. Revenue increased by $13 million, or 8%, of which $58 million was due to higher average realized gold and silver prices, partially offset by $45 million was due to a lower volume of gold and silver production. Costs applicable to sales per gold and silver ounce decreased 2% and increased 20%, respectively, as a result of the decrease in ore tonnes placed, higher labor and maintenance costs, and the mix of gold and silver sales which impacted co-production cost allocation. Amortization decreased to $16 million due to the decrease in gold and silver ounces sold. Capital expenditures increased to $23 million from $15 million due to equipment purchases and higher capitalized stripping related to the construction of a new open pit.

Three Months Ended March 31, 2026 compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2025

Gold and silver production increased 6% and 9%, respectively, driven by the increased production from the new leach pad driven by higher placement rates in prior quarters. Metal sales were $181 million, or 21% of Coeur’s metal sales, compared with $83 million, or 23% of Coeur’s metal sales in the prior year period. Revenue increased by $99 million, or 120%, of which $93 million was due to higher average realized gold and silver prices and $6 million was attributable to a higher volume of gold and silver production. Costs applicable to sales per gold and silver ounce decreased 14% and increased 30%, respectively, as a result of the increase in tonnes placed on the new leach pad and higher labor, consumable and maintenance costs. Amortization increased to $16 million due to higher gold and silver ounces sold. Capital expenditures increased to $23 million from $15 million due to equipment purchases and higher capitalized stripping related to the construction of a new open pit.

Kensington, United States

(1) See Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures.

Gold production decreased 31% as a result of lower mill throughput and grades. Metal sales were $109 million, or 13% of Coeur’s metal sales, compared to $124 million, or 18% of Coeur’s metal sales in the prior year period. Revenue decreased by $15 million, or 12%, of which $38 million was due to lower volume of gold production, partially offset by $23 million due to higher average realized gold prices. Costs applicable to sales per gold ounce increased 46% as lower freight and royalty costs were more than offset by lower production and higher maintenance costs. Amortization decreased to $9 million primarily due to a decrease in gold ounces sold. Capital expenditures decreased to $9 million due to the timing of expenditure payments.

Gold production decreased 10% as a result of lower mill throughput. Metal sales were $109 million, or 13% of Coeur’s metal sales, compared to $65 million, or 18% of Coeur’s metal sales in the prior year period. Revenue increased by $44 million, or 67%, of which $48 million was due to higher average realized gold prices, partially offset by $4 million resulting from lower volume of gold production. Costs applicable to sales per gold ounce increased 19% due to lower production, and higher labor, maintenance and royalty costs, partially offset by lower outside service costs. Amortization increased to $9 million resulting from a higher depletable base. Capital expenditures decreased to $9 million from $15 million due to a decrease in underground development, capitalized exploration and tailings dam expansion expenditures.

Wharf, United States

(1) See Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures.

Three Months Ended March 31, 2026 compared to Three Months Ended December 31, 2025

Gold production decreased 61% driven by lower material placed on the pads and the timing of recoveries. Ore tonnes placed during the first quarter were impacted by a fire incident at the tertiary crusher in the fourth quarter which occurred during regularly scheduled maintenance. Reduced crushing capacity has been partially offset with temporary crushers and repairs to the conveyor belts and electrical system components in the tertiary crusher. Commissioning of the repaired crusher is complete and is expected to allow a return to normal crushing and placement rates for the balance of 2026. Production is expected to progressively increase throughout the year as permanent crushing capacity is restored. Metal sales were $50 million, or 6% of Coeur’s metal sales, compared to $106 million, or 16% of Coeur’s metal sales in the prior year period. Revenue decreased by $56 million, or 53%, of which $77 million resulted from lower gold production, partially offset by $21 million due to higher average realized gold prices. Costs applicable to sales per gold ounce increased 41% due to lower ore tonnes placed and higher outside service costs, partially offset by lower labor and royalty costs. Amortization decreased to $1 million due to the decrease in gold ounces mined. Capital expenditures increased to $13 million from $4 million as a result of the crusher rebuild.

Gold production decreased 52% driven by lower material placed on the pads and the timing of recoveries. Ore tonnes placed during the first quarter were impacted by a fire incident at the tertiary crusher which occurred during regularly scheduled maintenance. Metal sales were $50 million, or 6% of Coeur’s metal sales, compared to $58 million, or 16% of Coeur’s metal sales in the prior year period. Revenue decreased by $9 million, or 15%, of which $53 million was due to lower gold production, partially offset by $44 million attributable to higher average realized gold prices. Costs applicable to sales per gold ounce increased 26% due to lower ore tonnes placed and higher outside service costs, partially offset by lower labor and royalty costs. Amortization decreased to $1 million as a result of lower gold ounces mined. Capital expenditures increased to $13 million from $7 million due to the crusher rebuild.

Silvertip, Canada

Exploration expenses totaled $9 million in the first quarter of 2026 compared to $5.8 million in the fourth quarter of 2025. Ongoing carrying costs at Silvertip totaled $3 million in both periods. Capital expenditures totaled $2 million in both periods.

Exploration expense totaled $9 million in 2026 as the Company continued to focus on expanding the mineral resources at Silvertip, which were supported by 249 meters of underground mine development. Ongoing carrying costs at Silvertip totaled $3 million in both periods. Capital expenditures totaled $2 million compared to $0.9 million in the prior year period.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At March 31, 2026, the Company had $846 million of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash and $1.0 billion available under the RCF. Future borrowing under the RCF may be subject to certain financial covenants. Cash and cash equivalents increased $290 million in the three months ended March 31, 2026 due to $128 million cash acquired in the New Gold Transaction, a 15% and 53% increase in average realized gold and silver prices, respectively, and post-acquisition sales at Rainy River and New Afton. This was partially offset by a 3% and 5% decrease in gold and silver ounces sold, respectively, transaction cost related payments of $30 million, $123 million of income and mining tax payments at Palmarejo and Las Chispas, vesting performance share cash settlement of $72 million, and $74 million of capital expenditures.

We currently believe we have sufficient sources of funding to meet our business requirements for the next twelve months and longer term. We expect to use cash provided by operating activities and the cash acquired through the acquisition of New Gold to fund near term capital requirements, including those described in this 10-Q Report for our 2026 capital expenditure guidance, and to repurchase shares pursuant to the Company’s Expanded Program. Our longer-term plans contemplate continued exploration to extend the mine lives at our operating sites, reduction of debt, and additional investment to progress exploration and study work at the Silvertip project. Our long-term target leverage ratio of Net Debt to the Last Twelve Months Adjusted EBITDA is 0.0 times Adjusted EBITDA. Our current net leverage ratio is (0.1) times Adjusted EBITDA as of March 31, 2026.

We also have additional obligations as part of our ordinary course of business, beyond those committed for capital expenditures and other purchase obligations and commitments for purchases of goods and services.

If and to the extent liquidity resources are insufficient to support short- and long-term expenditures, we may need to incur additional indebtedness or issue additional equity securities, among other financing options, which may not be available on acceptable terms or at all. This could have a material adverse impact on the Company, as discussed in more detail under “Item 1A – Risk Factors”.

Cash Provided by Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2026 was $341 million, compared to $375 million for the three months ended December 31, 2025 and $68 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025. Adjusted EBITDA for the three months ended March 31, 2026 was $475 million, compared to $424 million for the three months ended December 31, 2025 and $122 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 (see “Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures”). Net cash provided by operating activities was impacted by the following key factors for the applicable periods:

In thousands

41

Net cash provided by operating activities decreased $34 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026 compared to the three months ended December 31, 2025, primarily due to a 3% and 5% decrease in gold and silver ounces sold, timing of VAT collections at Palmarejo and Las Chispas, income and mining taxes paid at Palmarejo and Las Chispas, debt interest payments, and annual incentive payments. This was partially offset by a 15% and 53% increase in average realized gold and silver prices, respectively, and post-acquisition sales at Rainy River and New Afton. Revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2026 compared to the three months ended December 31, 2025 increased by $181 million, of which $194 million was due to higher average realized gold and silver prices, partially offset by $13 million due to lower volume of gold and silver which was partially offset by the addition of copper sales at New Afton in the current year.

Net cash provided by operating activities increased $273 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2025, primarily due to a 21% and 12% increase in gold and silver ounces sold, respectively, a 66% and 159% increase in average realized gold and silver prices, respectively, post-acquisition sales at Rainy River and New Afton, partially offset by higher ore placed on leach pads at Rochester and Wharf, and increased exploration, general and administrative, and income and mining tax expense. Revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2026 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2025 increased by $496 million, of which $354 million was the result of higher average gold and silver prices and $142 million was due to higher volume of gold, silver and copper sales.

Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities

Net cash provided by investing activities in the three months ended March 31, 2026 was $55 million compared to net cash used in investing activities of $61 million in the three months ended December 31, 2025. Cash provided by investing activities increased due to the cash acquired in the New Gold Transaction of $128 million, partially offset by capital expenditures related to the crusher rebuild and post-acquisition capital expenditures at New Gold. The Company incurred capital expenditures of $74 million in the three months ended March 31, 2026 compared with $61 million in the three months ended December 31, 2025 primarily related to the crusher rebuild at Wharf, post-acquisition expenditures at Rainy River, equipment purchases at Rochester, underground development at Palmarejo and Kensington in both periods, expanded tailings impoundment at Kensington and the construction of a water treatment facility at Wharf in the fourth quarter.

Net cash provided by investing activities in the three months ended March 31, 2026 was $55 million compared to $53 million in the three months ended March 31, 2025. Cash provided by investing activities remained comparable as the higher cash acquired in the New Gold Transaction compared to the SilverCrest Transaction was offset by an increase in capital expenditures. The Company incurred capital expenditures of $74 million in the three months ended March 31, 2026 compared with $50 million in the three months ended March 31, 2025.

Cash Used in Financing Activities

Net cash used in financing activities in the three months ended March 31, 2026 was $105 million compared with $26 million in the three months ended December 31, 2025. During the three months ended March 31, 2026, the Company cash settled $41 million of vested performance shares in connection with the Company’s Long-Term Incentive Program, and made cash payments of $54 million in connection with tax withholding on vested share-based compensation. During the three months ended March 31, 2025, the Company repurchased $2 million of common stock in connection with the Company’s Program, and prepaid $26 million in finance leases at Rochester and Kensington.

Net cash used in financing activities in the three months ended March 31, 2026 was $105 million compared to net cash used in financing activities was $98 million in the three months ended March 31, 2025. During the three months ended March 31, 2025, the Company repaid $85 million, net, under the RCF and made cash payments of $6 million in connection with tax withholding on vested share-based compensation.

In April 2026, the Company prepaid $41 million of Rochester finance leases, incurring a loss of $0.8 million related to termination fees.

On May 27, 2025, the Company announced a $75 million share repurchase program (the “Program”), effective through May 31, 2026. Under the Program, repurchases may be carried out from time to time through opportunistic open-market purchases or by other means in amounts and at prices that Coeur deems appropriate, subject to market and business conditions, applicable legal requirements and other considerations. On June 11, 2025, the Company entered into a 10b-18 share repurchase agreement (the “10b-18 Agreement”) and an issuer securities repurchase 10b5-1 plan (the “Company 10b5-1 Plan”) with BMO Capital Markets Corp. as the Company’s broker. On August 8, 2025, the Company and BMO Capital Markets Corp. amended the Company 10b5-1 Plan to modify certain terms of the arrangement (the “First Modified Company 10b5-1 Plan”). On November 12, 2025, the Company and BMO Capital Markets Corp. further amended the First Modified Company 10b5-1 Plan (the “Second Modified Company 10b5-1 Plan”). Pursuant to its terms, the Second Modified Company 10b5-1 Plan terminated on December 12, 2025.

On March 23, 2026, the Company announced an expanded $750 million share repurchase program (the “Expanded

Program”), which incorporates and supersedes the Company’s previous Program. Under the Expanded Program, repurchases may be carried out from time to time through opportunistic open-market purchases or by other means in amounts and at prices that Coeur deems appropriate, subject to market and business conditions, applicable legal requirements and other considerations.

The following table summarizes repurchases made in the three months ended March 31, 2026:

On March 23, 2026, the Company announced that the Board had approved an updated financial policy, under which Coeur anticipates paying a semi-annual dividend of $0.02 per share of Coeur common shares, beginning in the second and fourth quarter of 2026.

Critical Accounting Policies and Accounting Developments

See Note 2 -- Summary of Significant Accounting Policies contained in the 2025 10-K and Note 2 -- Summary of Significant Accounting Policies contained in this Report for the Company’s critical accounting policies and estimates.

Ore on Leach Pads

The heap leach process extracts silver and gold by placing ore on an impermeable pad and applying a diluted cyanide solution that dissolves a portion of the contained silver and gold, which are then recovered in metallurgical processes.

The Company uses several integrated steps to scientifically measure the metal content of ore placed on the leach pads. As the ore body is drilled in preparation for the blasting process, samples are taken of the drill residue which are assayed to determine estimated quantities of contained metal. The Company then processes the ore through crushing facilities where the output is again weighed and sampled for assaying. A metallurgical reconciliation with the data collected from the mining operation is completed with appropriate adjustments made to previous estimates. The crushed ore is then transported to the leach pad for application of the leaching solution. As the leach solution is collected from the leach pads, it is continuously sampled for assaying. The quantity of leach solution is measured by flow meters throughout the leaching and precipitation process. After precipitation, the product is converted to doré at the Rochester mine and a form of gold electrolytic cathodic sludge at the Wharf mine, representing the final product produced by each mine. The inventory is stated at lower of cost or net realizable value, with cost being determined using a weighted average cost method.

The historical cost of metal expected to be extracted within 12 months is classified as current and the historical cost of metals contained within the broken ore expected to be extracted beyond 12 months is classified as non-current. Ore on leach pads is valued based on actual production costs incurred to produce and place ore on the leach pad, less costs allocated to minerals recovered through the leach process.

The estimate of both the ultimate recovery expected over time and the quantity of metal that may be extracted relative to the time the leach process occurs requires the use of estimates, which are inherently inaccurate due to the nature of the leaching process. The quantities of metal contained in the ore are based upon actual weights and assay analysis. The rate at which the leach process extracts gold and silver from the crushed ore is based upon laboratory testing and actual experience of more than 20 years of leach pad operations at the Rochester mine and 30 years of leach pad operations at the Wharf mine. The assumptions used by the Company to measure metal content during each stage of the inventory conversion process includes estimated recovery rates based on laboratory testing and assaying. The Company periodically reviews its estimates compared to actual experience and revises its estimates when appropriate. The ultimate recovery will not be known until leaching operations cease. Variations between actual and estimated quantities resulting from changes in assumptions and estimates that do not result in write-downs to net realizable value are accounted for on a prospective basis. There are five reusable heap leach pads (load/offload) used at Wharf. Each pad goes through an approximate 24-month process of loading of ore, leaching and offloading which includes a neutralization and denitrification process. During the leaching cycle of each pad, revised estimated recoverable ounces for each of the pads may result in an upward or downward revision from time to time, which generally have not been significant. Updated recoverable ounce estimates are considered a change in estimate and are accounted for prospectively. As of March 31, 2026, the Company’s combined estimated recoverable ounces of gold and silver on the leach pads were 54,993 and 9.5 million, respectively.

Goodwill

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair value of the net assets acquired in a business acquisition. Goodwill is allocated to reporting units and tested for impairment annually as of December 31 and when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value. The Las Chispas mine is considered a distinct reporting unit for purposes of goodwill impairment testing. Based on the December 31, 2025 review, the Company concluded that Goodwill was not impaired.

The Company may elect to perform a qualitative assessment to determine if it is more likely than not that the fair value exceeds the carrying value. If the Company determines that it is more likely than not that the fair value is less than the carrying value, a quantitative goodwill impairment test is performed to determine the fair value of the reporting unit. The fair value of a reporting unit is determined using either the income approach utilizing estimates of discounted future cash flows or the market approach utilizing recent transaction activity for comparable properties. These approaches are considered Level 3 fair value measurements. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess, limited to the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit.

Other Liquidity Matters

We believe that our liquidity and capital resources in the U.S. are adequate to fund our U.S. and Canada operations and corporate activities. The Company has asserted a partial indefinite reinvestment of earnings from its Mexican operations as determined by management’s judgment about, and intentions concerning, the future operations of the Company. The Company does not believe that the amounts reinvested will have a material impact on liquidity.

In order to reduce indebtedness, fund future cash interest payments and/or amounts due at maturity or upon redemption and for general working capital purposes, from time to time we may (1) issue equity securities for cash in public or private offerings or (2) repurchase certain of our debt securities for cash or in exchange for other securities, which may include secured or unsecured notes or equity, in each case in open market or privately negotiated transactions. We evaluate any such transactions in light of prevailing market conditions, liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions, and other factors. The amounts involved may be significant and any debt repurchase transactions may occur at a substantial discount to the debt securities’ face amount.

Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures

Non-GAAP financial measures are intended to provide additional information only and do not have any standard meaning prescribed by generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). Unless otherwise noted, we present the Non-GAAP financial measures in the tables below. These measures should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for performance measures prepared in accordance with GAAP.

Adjusted Net Income

Management uses Adjusted net income to evaluate the Company’s operating performance, and to plan and forecast its operations. The Company believes the use of Adjusted net income reflects the underlying operating performance of our core mining business and allows investors and analysts to compare results of the Company to similar results of other mining companies. Management’s determination of the components of Adjusted net income is evaluated periodically and is based, in part, on a review of non-GAAP financial measures used by mining industry analysts. The tax effect of adjustments are based on statutory tax rates and the Company’s tax attributes, including the impact through the Company’s valuation allowance. The combined effective rate of tax adjustments may not be consistent with the statutory tax rates or the Company’s effective tax rate due to jurisdictional tax attributes and related valuation allowance impacts which may minimize the tax effect of certain adjustments and may not apply to gains and losses equally. Adjusted net income is reconciled to Net income in the following table:

In thousands except per share amounts

(1) For the three months ended March 31, 2026, tax effect of adjustments of $6 million (37.1%) are primarily related to the Transaction costs at Corporate. For the three months ended December 31, 2025, tax effect of adjustments of $4 million (27.1%) is primarily related to Transaction costs at Corporate and nonrecurring expenses at Palmarejo. For the three months ended March 31, 2025, tax effect of adjustments of $3 million (29.4%) are primarily related to the Transaction costs at Corporate.

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA

Management uses EBITDA to evaluate the Company’s operating performance, to plan and forecast its operations, and assess leverage levels and liquidity measures. The Company believes the use of EBITDA reflects the underlying operating performance of our core mining business and allows investors and analysts to compare results of the Company to similar results of other mining companies. Adjusted EBITDA is the basis of a measure used in the indenture governing the 2029 Senior Notes, 2032 Senior Notes, and the RCF to determine our ability to make certain payments and incur additional indebtedness. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not represent, and should not be considered an alternative to, Net income or Cash Flow from Operations as determined under GAAP. Other companies may calculate Adjusted EBITDA differently and those calculations may not be comparable to our presentation. Adjusted EBITDA is reconciled to Net income in the following table:

In thousands

Free Cash Flow

Management uses Free Cash Flow as a non-GAAP measure to analyze cash flows generated from operations. Free Cash Flow is Cash Provided By Operating Activities less Capital expenditures as presented on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The Company believes Free Cash Flow is also useful as one of the bases for comparing the Company’s performance with its competitors. Although Free Cash Flow and similar measures are frequently used as measures of cash flows generated from operations by other companies, the Company’s calculation of Free Cash Flow is not necessarily comparable to such other similarly titled captions of other companies.

The following table sets forth a reconciliation of Free Cash Flow, a non-GAAP financial measure, to Cash Provided By Operating Activities, which the Company believes to be the GAAP financial measure most directly comparable to Free Cash Flow.

(Dollars in thousands)

Operating Cash Flow Before Changes in Working Capital

Management uses Operating Cash Flow Before Changes in Working Capital as a non-GAAP measure to analyze cash flows generated from operations. Operating Cash Flow Before Changes in Working Capital is Cash Provided By Operating Activities excluding the change in Receivables, Prepaid expenses and other, Inventories and Accounts payable and accrued liabilities as presented on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The Company believes Operating Cash Flow Before Changes in Working Capital is also useful as one of the bases for comparing the Company’s performance with its competitors. Although Operating Cash Flow Before Changes in Working Capital and similar measures are frequently used as measures of cash flows generated from operations by other companies, the Company’s calculation of Operating Cash Flow Before Changes in Working Capital is not necessarily comparable to such other similarly titled captions of other companies.

The following table sets forth a reconciliation of Operating Cash Flow Before Changes in Working Capital, a non-GAAP financial measure, to Cash Provided By Operating Activities, which the Company believes to be the GAAP financial measure most directly comparable to Operating Cash Flow Before Changes in Working Capital.

(Dollars in thousands)

Net Debt and Leverage Ratio

Management defines Net Debt, a non-GAAP financial measure, as Total Debt less Cash and Cash Equivalents. We define Leverage Ratio, a non-GAAP financial measure, as the ratio of Net Debt to the Last Twelve Months Adjusted EBITDA. Management believes Net Debt and Leverage Ratio are important measures to monitor our financial flexibility and evaluate the strength of our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Net Debt and Leverage Ratio have limitations as analytical tools and may vary from similarly titled measures used by other companies. Net Debt and Leverage Ratio should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for an analysis of our results prepared and presented in accordance with GAAP.

The following table presents a reconciliation of Total Debt, the most directly comparable financial measure calculated in accordance with GAAP, to Net Debt for each of the periods presented.

(Dollars in thousands)

47

Costs Applicable to Sales

Management uses CAS to evaluate the Company’s current operating performance and life of mine performance from discovery through reclamation. We believe these measures assist analysts, investors and other stakeholders in understanding the costs associated with producing gold, silver and copper, as well as assessing our operating performance and ability to generate free cash flow from operations and sustaining production. These measures may not be indicative of operating profit or cash flow from operations as determined under GAAP. Management believes that allocating CAS to gold, silver and copper based on gold, silver and copper metal sales relative to total metal sales best allows management, analysts, investors and other stakeholders to evaluate the operating performance of the Company. Other companies may calculate CAS differently as a result of reflecting the benefit from selling non-silver metals as a by-product credit, converting to silver equivalent ounces, and differences in underlying accounting principles and accounting frameworks such as in IFRS Accounting Standards.

Three Months Ended March 31, 2026

(1) Includes the impact of the preliminary purchase price allocation ascribed to Inventory of $21 million.

(2) Includes the impact of the preliminary purchase price allocation ascribed to Inventory of $65 million.

Three Months Ended December 31, 2025

48

(1) Includes the impact of the preliminary purchase price allocation ascribed to Inventory of $3 million.

Three Months Ended March 31, 2025

(1) Includes the impact of the preliminary purchase price allocation ascribed to Inventory of $27 million.

Reconciliation of Costs Applicable to Sales for 2026 Guidance

49

Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements

This Report contains numerous forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) relating to the Company’s gold, silver and copper mining business, including statements regarding operations and activities at the Company’s properties, exploration and development efforts, mine lives, strategies, inflation, hedging strategies, tax rates and treatment, realization of deferred tax assets, expectations about the recovery of unduly paid VAT in Mexico, the Franco-Nevada Gold Stream Agreement at Palmarejo, liquidity management, financing plans, risk management strategies, capital allocation, and anticipated production, costs, expenses, and cash flow. Such forward-looking statements are identified by the use of words such as “believes,” “intends,” “expects,” “hopes,” “may,” “should,” “plan,” “projected,” “contemplates,” “anticipates” or similar words. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. The factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements include (i) the risk factors set forth in Part II, Item 1A of this Report and in “Risk Factors” section of the 2025 10-K, and the risks set forth in this MD&A and Item 3 of this Report, (ii) the risks and hazards inherent in the mining business (including risks inherent in developing large-scale mining projects, environmental hazards, industrial accidents, weather or geologically related conditions), (iii) changes in the market prices of gold, silver, copper, lead and zinc and a sustained lower price or higher treatment and refining charge environment, (iv) the uncertainties inherent in the Company’s production, exploratory and developmental activities, including risks relating to permitting and regulatory delays (including the impact of government shutdowns), mining law changes, ground conditions and grade and recovery variability, (v) any future labor disputes or work stoppages (involving the Company and its subsidiaries or third parties), (vi) the uncertainties inherent in the estimation of mineral reserves and resources, (vii) changes that could result from the Company’s future acquisition of new mining properties or businesses, (viii) the loss of access to any third-party smelter or refiner to whom the Company markets its production, (ix) the potential effects of a future pandemic, equipment and materials availability, inflationary pressures, changes in applicable tax laws or regulatory interpretations and impacts from tariffs or other trade barriers (x) the effects of environmental and other governmental regulations, (xi) the risks inherent in the ownership or operation of or investment in mining properties or businesses in foreign countries, (xii) breaches or lapses in the security of technology systems on which the Company relies, which could compromise the data stored within them, as well as failure to comply with ever-evolving global privacy and security regulatory obligations, and (xiii) the Company’s ability to raise additional financing necessary to conduct its business, make payments or refinance its debt. Readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements. The Company disclaims any intent or obligation to update publicly these forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

The Company is exposed to various market risks as a part of its operations and engages in risk management strategies to mitigate these risks. The Company continually evaluates the potential benefits of engaging in these strategies based on current market conditions. The Company does not actively engage in the practice of trading derivative instruments for profit. Additional information about the Company’s derivative financial instruments may be found in Note 13 -- Derivative Financial Instruments & Hedging Activities in the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. This discussion of the Company’s market risk assessments contains “forward looking statements”. For additional information regarding forward-looking statements and risks and uncertainties that could impact the Company, please refer to “Item 2 - Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements” in this Report. Actual results and actions could differ materially from those discussed below.

Gold, Silver and Copper Prices

Gold, silver and copper prices may fluctuate widely due to numerous factors, such as U.S. dollar strength or weakness, global political and economic conditions, demand, investor sentiment, inflation or deflation, and global mine production. The Company’s profitability and cash flow may be significantly impacted by changes in the market price of gold, silver and copper.

Decreases in the market price of gold, silver and copper can also significantly affect the value of our metal inventory, stockpiles and leach pads, and it may be necessary to record a write-down to the net realizable value, as well as significantly impact our carrying value of long-lived assets.

Net realizable value represents the estimated future sales price based on short-term and long-term metals prices, less estimated costs to complete production and bring the product to sale. The primary factors that influence the need to record write-downs of our stockpiles, leach pads and product inventory include short-term and long-term metals prices and costs for production inputs such as labor, fuel and energy, materials and supplies as well as realized ore grades and recovery rates. The significant assumptions in determining the stockpile, leach pad and metal inventory adjustments at March 31, 2026 included production cost and capitalized expenditure assumptions unique to each operation, a short-term and long-term gold price of $4,873 and $3,992 per ounce, respectively, and a short-term and long-term silver price of $84.33 and $54.91 per ounce, and a short-term copper price of $5.83 per pound.

The net realizable value measurement involves the use of estimates and assumptions unique to each mining operation regarding current and future operating and capital costs, metal recoveries, production levels, commodity prices, proven and probable reserve quantities, engineering data and other factors. A high degree of judgment is involved in determining such assumptions and estimates and no assurance can be given that actual results will not differ significantly from those estimates and assumptions.

Hedging

To mitigate the risks associated with metal price fluctuations, the Company may enter into option contracts to hedge future production. The Company had forward contracts for gold and silver that settled monthly through June 2024 in order to protect cash flow during the Rochester expansion ramp-up. The contracts were net cash settled and, if the spot price of gold at the time of expiration was lower than the fixed price or higher than the fixed prices, it resulted in a realized gain or loss, respectively. The forward contracts exposed us to (i) credit risk in the form of non-performance by counterparties for contracts in which the contract price is below the spot price of a commodity, and (ii) price risk to the extent that the spot price exceeds the contract price for quantities of our production covered under contract positions. To reduce counter-party credit exposure, the Company entered into contracts with institutions management deems credit-worthy and limits credit exposure to each institution. For additional information, please see the section titled “Item 1A - Risk Factors” in this Report.

Provisional Metal Sales

The Company enters into sales contracts with third-party smelters and refiners which, in some cases, provide for a provisional payment based upon preliminary assays and quoted metal prices. The provisionally priced sales contracts contain an embedded derivative that is required to be separated from the host contract. Depending on the difference between the price at the time of sale and the final settlement price, embedded derivatives are recorded as either a derivative asset or liability. The embedded derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting and, as a result, are marked to the market gold, silver and copper price at the end of each period from the provisional sale date to the date of final settlement. The mark-to-market gains and losses are recorded in earnings. At March 31, 2026, the Company had outstanding provisionally priced sales of 16,743 ounces of gold at an average price of $4,795 and of 11 million pounds of copper at an average price of $5.58. Changes in gold and copper prices resulted in provisional pricing mark-to-market loss of $1 million and gain of $1 million for gold and copper, respectively, during the three months ended March 31, 2026. A 10% change in realized gold and copper prices would cause revenue to vary by $8 million and $6 million for gold and copper, respectively.

Gold and Copper swap

Prior to completing the New Gold Transaction, New Gold had entered into gold and copper swap contracts to reduce exposure to gold and copper prices. The embedded derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting and are marked to market through earnings each period until final settlement. At March 31, 2026, the Company had outstanding gold and copper swap contracts of 7,550 ounces of gold at an average price of $4,964 and of 11 million pounds of copper at an average price of $5.63. Changes in gold and copper prices resulted in swap contract gain of $1 million and $0.2 million for gold and copper, respectively, during 11 days ended March 31, 2026.

Foreign Currency

The Company operates, or has mineral interests, in several foreign countries including Canada, Mexico, and New Zealand, which exposes it to foreign currency exchange rate risks. Foreign currency exchange rates are influenced by world market factors beyond the Company’s control, such as supply and demand for U.S. and foreign currencies and related monetary and fiscal policies. Fluctuations in local currency exchange rates in relation to the U.S. dollar may significantly impact profitability and cash flow.

Foreign Exchange Hedging

To manage foreign currency risk, the Company may enter into foreign currency forward exchange contracts. In 2020, the Company entered into foreign currency forward contracts to manage this risk and designated these instruments as cash flow hedges of forecasted foreign denominated transactions. The Company had no outstanding foreign currency forward exchange contracts at March 31, 2026.

Interest Rates

Interest Rate Hedging

The Company may use financial instruments to manage exposures to changes in interest rates on loans, which exposes it to credit risk and market risk. Credit risk is the failure of the counterparty to perform under the terms of the derivative contract. When the fair value of a derivative contract is positive, the counterparty owes the Company, which creates credit risk for the Company. When the fair value of a derivative contract is negative, the Company owes the counterparty and, therefore, it does not pose credit risk. The Company seeks to minimize the credit risk in derivative instruments by entering into transactions with what it believes are high-quality counterparties. Market risk is the adverse effect on the value of a financial instrument that results from a change in interest rates. The Company had no outstanding interest rate swaps at March 31, 2026.

Investment Risk

Equity Price Risk

The Company’s equity securities were not significant at March 31, 2026.

(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and management necessarily applied its judgment in assessing the costs and benefits of such controls and procedures, which by their nature, can provide only reasonable assurance regarding management’s control objectives.

The design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events. Based upon the foregoing, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective and operating to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by it in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and to provide reasonable assurance that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

(b) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended March 31, 2026 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal control over financial reporting.

Item 1A – Risk factors of the 2025 10-K sets forth information relating to important risks and uncertainties that could materially adversely affect the Company’s business, financial conditions or operating results. Those risk factors have been supplemented and updated in this Form 10-Q. Except as supplemented and updated below, the risk factors set forth in the most recent Form 10-K remain current. Additional risks and uncertainties that the Company does not presently know or that it currently deems immaterial also may impair our business operations.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR INDUSTRY

Our results of operations, cash flows and operating costs are highly dependent upon the market prices of gold, silver, and copper and of key input commodities used in our business, which are volatile and beyond our control.

Gold, silver, and copper are actively traded commodities, and their prices are volatile. The high and low prices for each commodity during the 12 months ended December 31, 2025 are set forth in the following table:

Gold, silver, and copper prices are affected by many factors beyond the Company’s control, including U.S. dollar strength or weakness, speculation, global currency values, global and regional demand and production, political and economic conditions and other factors. In addition, Exchange Traded Funds (“ETFs”), which have substantially facilitated the ability of large and small investors to buy and sell precious metals, have become significant holders of gold, silver, and copper. Precious metals prices are also affected by prevailing interest rates and returns on other asset classes, expectations of the future rate of inflation and governmental monetary decisions regarding central bank holdings.

Because we derive all of our revenues from sales of these metals, our results of operations and cash flows will fluctuate as the prices of these metals change. A period of significant and sustained lower prices would materially and adversely affect our results of operations and cash flows. In response to environments of lower metal prices and/or higher treatment and refining charges, we may have to revise our operating plans, including reducing operating costs and capital expenditures, terminating or suspending mining operations at one or more of our properties and discontinuing certain exploration and development plans. These types of initiatives may not sufficiently offset reductions in revenues, and we may continue to incur losses associated with sustained lower metals prices and/or higher treatment and refining charges.

Operating costs at our mines are also affected by the price of input commodities, such as fuel, electricity, labor, chemical reagents, explosives, steel and concrete. Prices for these input commodities are volatile and can fluctuate due to conditions that are difficult to predict, including global competition for resources, inflation, currency fluctuations, consumer or industrial demand and other factors. An increase in the cost, or decrease in the availability, of input commodities, labor, or equipment, due to factors beyond the Company’s control may affect the timely conduct and cost of our operations and development projects. Continued volatility in the prices of commodities and other supplies we purchase could lead to higher costs, which would adversely affect results of operations and cash flows.

The estimation of mineral reserves and mineral resources is imprecise and depends upon subjective factors. Estimated mineral reserves and mineral resources may not be realized in actual production. Our results of operations and financial position may be adversely affected by inaccurate estimates.

The mineral reserve and mineral resource figures presented in our public filings are estimates made by our technical personnel and independent mining consultants with whom we contract. Mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates are a function of geological and engineering analyses that require us to make assumptions about production costs, recoveries and the market prices of gold, silver, copper, zinc, and lead. While the Company believes that its mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates are developed using well-established practices and with appropriate controls, mineral reserve and mineral resource estimation is an imprecise and subjective process. The accuracy of these estimates is a function of the quality of available data and of engineering and geological interpretation, judgment and experience. Assumptions about gold, silver, copper, zinc, and lead market prices are subject to great uncertainty as those prices fluctuate widely. Declines in the market prices of gold, silver, copper, zinc, or lead may render mineral reserves and mineral resources containing relatively lower grades of mineralization uneconomic to exploit, and we may be required to reduce mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates, discontinue development or mining at one or more of our properties or write down assets as impaired. Should we encounter mineralization or geologic formations at any of our mines or projects that are different from those predicted, we may adjust our mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates and alter our mining plans. No assurances can be given that all mineral reserves will be mined, as mineralized material that may qualify as reserves under applicable standards by virtue of being economic to mine may not generate attractive enough returns to be included in our mine plans, due to factors such as the impact of the gold streams at Palmarejo and Rainy River. As a result, we may elect not to mine portions of the mineralized material reported as reserves. In addition, no assurances can be given that any mineral resource estimate will ultimately be reclassified as proven or probable mineral reserves or that inferred resources will be upgraded to measured or indicated resources. Updates to our mining plans or new or updated technical or geological information may also impact anticipated metal recovery rates. Any of these adjustments may adversely affect actual operating performance, production, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR OPERATIONS

Our future growth will depend upon our ability to expand existing mines and develop and start-up new mines, either through exploration at existing properties or by acquisition of other mining companies or properties.

Because mines have limited lives based on proven and probable mineral reserves, our ability to achieve significant additional growth in revenues and cash flows will depend upon our success in further developing and expanding existing properties and the opportunistic acquisition or development and start-up of exploration projects or new mining properties, such as the acquisition of mining concessions from a subsidiary of Fresnillo plc that are located adjacent to the existing Palmarejo site, the acquisition of SilverCrest Metals Inc. (“SilverCrest”) in February 2025, which operates the Las Chispas mine in Sonora, Mexico (the “SilverCrest Transaction”) and the integration of two Canadian mines, New Afton and Rainy River, as part of Coeur’s recent acquisition of New Gold Inc..

While initial development of our operating mines has been substantially completed, development work continues to expand these mines while leveraging existing infrastructure. For example, with the completion of the New Gold Transaction, work continues to progress New Afton’s K-Zone, where a maiden resource was recently declared. Likewise, work at Rainy River continues to ramp up underground mining activities and supplement existing open pit operations. Palmarejo completed open pit mining several years ago and evolved to be an underground-only operation, developing new underground mining operations. At Rochester, we completed the POA 11 expansion in 2024, which is a significant additional expansion that includes a three-stage crushing facility, a new leach pad, and a new Merrill-Crowe processing facility and related infrastructure to support the extension of Rochester’s mine life. At Kensington, we amended our operating permit in 2022 to allow for an additional 10 years of mine life by providing for expanded tailings and waste rock storage, increased mill throughput, enhanced infrastructure and other benefits (“POA 1”). We recently completed a multi-year exploration and underground mine development program to extend Kensington’s mine life. Our ability to timely complete these and future mine expansion and mine life extension projects is dependent on numerous factors, many of which are outside of our control, including, among others, availability of funding on acceptable terms, timing of receipt of permits and approvals from regulatory authorities, obtaining materials and equipment, as well as construction, engineering and other services, at favorable prices and terms, and disputes with third-party providers of materials, equipment or services. Construction services performed by contractors create a risk of delays or additional costs resulting from, among other factors: inability to negotiate contracts with favorable pricing and terms; delays in performance of the services; failure of a contractor to comply with applicable laws and regulations; termination of a contract by a contractor before completion of the services; failure by a contractor to obtain necessary equipment or materials; mismanagement by a contractor of its workforce; and insolvency or other financial difficulty encountered by a contractor which results in a delay in services or termination of a contract with the contractor. Expected benefits from the Rochester expansion are based on estimates of a variety of key factors, including mineral reserves and resources, grade, recovery rates, the ability of processing infrastructure such as the refinery to meet higher throughput rates, and operating costs among others. However, achieving results in line with those estimates is subject to risks and uncertainties such as variability in grade, recovery rates and cost inputs and any inability of infrastructure to accommodate higher throughput. We cannot provide assurance that we will be able to successfully expand or extend the lives of existing mining operations, and a completed project may not yield the anticipated operational or financial benefits, such as expected availability, throughput, metal recovery rates, concentrate quality, unit costs, operating margin and/or cash flows, any of which may have a material negative impact on returns on invested capital, operating costs or cash flows.

Further, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to successfully develop and start-up new mining properties, restart mining and processing activities at the Silvertip exploration property, integrate the operations of the New Afton and Rainy River mines, or acquire additional mining properties on favorable economic terms or at all. Moreover, as a result of the Mineral Claim Consultation Framework in British Columbia, staking and registering additional mineral claims in British Columbia may become more difficult and there is the risk that claims may not be granted or may be subject to additional requirements, which could adversely affect the Company’s ability to acquire and maintain mineral tenure, advance exploration programs and plan or finance development activities in British Columbia.

We regularly evaluate and engage in discussions or negotiations regarding acquisition opportunities. Any transactions that we contemplate or pursue would involve risks and uncertainties and would be subject to competition from other mining companies. There can be no assurance with respect to the timing, likelihood or business effect of any possible transaction.

We may be unable to successfully integrate, may not realize the expected benefits of recent or future acquisitions or may face risks associated with divestitures.

We regularly explore opportunities to selectively acquire other businesses or assets or to divest ourselves of all or part of certain assets in support of our growth plans and strategic objectives. There can be no assurance that the anticipated benefits of past acquisitions, including the SilverCrest Transaction and the recently completed New Gold Transaction, or any future acquisition, will be realized on the originally anticipated timeline or at all. The success and the ability to realize the anticipated benefits of any acquisition will depend upon our ability to effectively manage the integration, performance and operations of entities or properties we acquire. The process of managing acquired businesses or assets may involve unforeseen challenges and may require a disproportionate amount of our resources, which may divert focus and resources from other strategic opportunities and/or from operational matters during this process. As an example, the ramp up of the Silvertip exploration property, acquired in late 2017, was slower and less profitable than originally anticipated, due primarily to more significant mill availability and maintenance challenges than were anticipated at the time Silvertip was acquired, as well as deteriorating zinc and lead market conditions.

As a result of the SilverCrest Transaction, Coeur’s business expanded to include the Las Chispas mine in Sonora, Mexico. The commercial viability of the Las Chispas operation is dependent on various elements, including mining and processing costs, deposit characteristics such as size, grade, and infrastructure accessibility, as well as the cyclical nature of metal prices and governmental regulations. Factors such as weather events, permit issues, infrastructure failures, and community-related concerns also pose threats to Las Chispas. While the precise impact of these factors is uncertain, their convergence may render the Las Chispas mine economically unfeasible, potentially leading to closure.

Further, with the completion of the New Gold Transaction, Coeur’s presence in Canada has grown with the two Canadian operations of the New Afton gold-copper mine and Rainy River gold mine. Integration of New Gold and these operations is a complex process that includes strategic decisions on, among other factors, business strategy, staffing and system integration. The combined company’s performance may be adversely impacted if post-closing integration efforts are not able to be achieved in a timely manner or if the efficiencies and benefits contemplated are not able to be realized. Additionally, management focus on integration matters could result in less attention on the Company’s existing operations that could impact the performance of the Company’s existing business. Further, the commercial viability of each operation depends on several factors, including but not limited to, metal prices, operating costs, the accuracy of mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates, the ability to achieve and maintain production rates and governmental regulations.

In addition to the above, any acquisition would be accompanied by risks, including:

• a significant change in macroeconomic conditions, including commodity prices, treatment and refining charges or stock prices after we have committed to complete the transaction and established the purchase price or exchange ratio;
• additional debt incurred or issued to fund some or all of acquisition consideration, resulting in increased interest expense and other borrowing costs;
• issuance of equity securities as acquisition consideration (which occurred in the SilverCrest Transaction and the New Gold Transaction), resulting in ownership dilution of our existing stockholders;
• a material ore body may prove to be below our expectations;
• processing facilities may not operate as well as anticipated, and may require significant maintenance, downtime and capital investment, as was the case with the original mill at Silvertip;
• difficulties integrating and assimilating the operations and personnel of any acquired companies and supporting expanded operations, realizing anticipated synergies and maximizing the financial and strategic position of the combined enterprise, and maintaining uniform standards, policies and controls across the organization;
• difficulties or loss of social license to operate resulting from failure of efforts to establish positive relationships and/or agreements with local communities or local indigenous peoples; and
• the acquired business or assets may have significant liabilities, such as environmental liabilities, or significant capital expenditures that we failed to discover or have underestimated.

We cannot predict the impact of future acquisitions on the price of our common stock or ensure that we will be able to obtain necessary acquisition or development financing on acceptable terms or at all. Unprofitable acquisitions, or additional liabilities, indebtedness or issuances of securities in connection with such acquisitions or any future mine development, may negatively affect our results of operations.

In connection with dispositions, the Company may provide representations, warranties and indemnities customary for such transactions. There is a risk that the Company may incur liability in the future associated with assets it no longer owns or in which it has a reduced interest.

Our operations outside the United States also expose us to economic and operational risks.

Our operations outside the United States also expose us to economic and operational risks. Local economic conditions, as well as epidemics, pandemics or natural disasters, can cause shortages of skilled workers and supplies, increase costs and adversely affect the security of operations. In addition, higher incidences of criminal activity and violence in the area of some of our foreign operations, including drug cartel-related violence in Mexico, could adversely affect our ability to operate in an optimal fashion and may impose greater risks of extortion and theft, greater risks to our personnel and property, greater risks to the transport of materials to refineries, and greater risks to the supply of services and goods to our operations, including specialized equipment. These conditions, including security concerns in certain communities surrounding the Palmarejo complex impacting third-party deliveries of supplies to Palmarejo, could adversely impact our operations and lead to lower productivity and higher costs, which would adversely affect results of operations and cash flows.

In addition, acts of civil disobedience are not uncommon in certain areas of Mexico where our operations or projects are located. In recent years, many mining companies have been the targets of actions to restrict their legally entitled access to mining concessions or property. Such acts of civil disobedience often occur without warning and can result in significant direct and indirect costs. We cannot provide assurance that there will be no disruptions to site access in the future, which could adversely affect our business.

We sell gold doré, gold concentrate, silver doré, silver concentrate and copper concentrate, in U.S. dollars, but we conduct certain operations outside the United States in local currency. Currency exchange movements could also adversely affect our results of operations.

Our mining assets are subject to geotechnical and hydrological risks, and a related incident could materially and adversely impact our production, profitability and financial condition, as well as the value of our common stock.

Our mining assets are subject to geotechnical and hydrological risks which could impact the structural integrity of our mines, stockpiles, leach pads and tailings storage facilities. No assurances can be given that unanticipated adverse geotechnical and hydrological conditions, such as landslides, pit wall failures, underground cave-ins, fracturing, convergence, subsidence or tailings dam instability will not occur in the future or that such events will be detected in advance. Geotechnical and hydrological instabilities can be difficult to predict and are often affected by risks and hazards outside of our control, such as severe weather and considerable rainfall, which may lead to periodic floods, mudslides, wall instability and seismic activity, which may result in slippage of material. The occurrence of significant leach pad failures at third-party sites in recent years may result in the introduction of additional laws and regulations, which could result in additional operational and compliance costs for our sites. Some of these risks may be heightened further by the remote location of our operations.

Waste rock in the form of tailings generated as a by-product of processed ore is produced at the Kensington, New Afton, Palmarejo and Rainy River mines. We place tailings into engineered containments, underground as structural backfill, and as thickened tailings into a former open pit. In response to several recent tailings facility failures at third-party operations that have involved loss of life and resulted in severe property and environmental ecosystem damage, we completed a comprehensive review of our tailings facilities and operational practices to characterize our risk profile. We concluded that our tailings facilities represent a low exposure risk profile for several reasons, including that our tailings facilities were constructed using construction methods recognized in the industry as the most stable tailings facility design using high strength and chemically stable rock in construction. Our facilities are continuously monitored and inspected by internal resources as well as third-party industry qualified experts. The significant dam failure events at third-party locations that have occurred in recent years may lead to regulatory governance changes stemming from updated laws, regulation or guidance, which could result in increased operational and compliance costs if we need to make changes to existing facilities. The failure of a tailings facility at one of our mine sites could result in severe, and in some cases catastrophic, property and environmental damage and loss of life. Geotechnical or hydrological failures could result in limited or restricted access to mine sites, suspension of operations, government investigations, fines and penalties, lawsuits filed by parties who suffer injuries or property damage from such events, increased monitoring costs, remediation costs, loss of mineral reserves and resources and other impacts, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial position as well as the value of our common stock.

Our estimates of future production, costs, expenditures and financial results are imprecise, depend upon subjective factors, may not be realized in actual production and such estimates speak only as of their respective dates.

We have in the past, and may in the future, provide estimates and projections of our future production, costs, expenditures and financial results. Any such information is forward-looking. Neither our independent registered public accounting firm nor any other independent expert or outside party compiles or examines these forward-looking statements and, accordingly, do not express any opinion or any other form of assurance on these estimates and projections. Estimates and projections are made by our management and technical personnel and are qualified by, and subject to the assumptions contained or referenced in the filing, release or presentation in which they are made, including assumptions about the availability, accessibility, sufficiency and quality of mineralization, recovery rates, our costs of production, the market prices of gold and silver, and copper, our ability to sustain and increase production levels, the ability to produce and sell marketable concentrates and dorés and related treatment and refining charges, the sufficiency of our infrastructure, the performance of our personnel and equipment, our ability to maintain and obtain mining interests and permits, the state of government and community relations, and our compliance with existing and future laws and regulations. We sometimes state possible outcomes as high and low ranges which are intended to provide a sensitivity analysis as variables are changed but are not intended to represent that actual results could not fall outside of the suggested ranges. Actual results and experience may differ materially from these assumptions. Any production, cost, expenditure or financial results estimates speak only as of the date on which they are made, and we disclaim any intent or obligation to update such estimates, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Accordingly, these forward-looking statements should be considered in the context in which they are made, and undue reliance should not be placed on them.

Our use of derivative contracts to protect against market price volatility exposes us to risk of opportunity loss, mark-to-market fair value adjustments, potential cash collateral calls and exposure to counterparty credit risk.

We have in the past, and may in the future, enter into price risk management contracts to protect against fluctuations in the price of gold, and silver, and copper, foreign currency rates and changes in the prices of fuel and other input costs. These contracts could include forward sales or purchase contracts, futures contracts, purchased or sold put and call options and other derivative instruments. We entered into price risk management contracts on certain gold and silver sales in 2021, 2022, 2023 and 2024. We determined to implement these contracts to provide for a minimum level of revenue from the sales of the covered gold and silver ounces in order to mitigate the risk of not being able to fund all or a portion of the costs of several significant projects at our existing operations, such as the Rochester expansion, as well as provide greater certainty in our planning and budgeting process. The Company acquired existing zero cost collar hedges for 1,600 ounces of gold and 200,000 ounces of silver on February 14, 2025 as part of the SilverCrest Transaction. These hedges settled monthly through March 2025. As of December 31, 2025, no forward contracts remained outstanding. See Note 14 — Derivative Financial Instruments & Hedging Activities in the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The use of derivative instruments can expose us to risk of an opportunity loss and may also result in significant mark-to-market fair value adjustments, which may require us to post cash or other collateral or have a material adverse impact on reported financial results. Our exposure may be particularly acute for our derivative instruments accounted for as cash flow hedges because those contracts are cash net settled on a monthly basis. We are exposed to credit risk with contract counterparties, including, but not limited to, sales contracts and derivative contracts. In the event of nonperformance in connection with a contract, we could be exposed to a loss of value for that contract.

RISKS RELATED TO APPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS

We are subject to significant governmental regulations, including the U.S. Mine Safety and Health Act, the Health, Safety and Reclamation Code for Mines under the British Columbia Mines Act, the Ontario Occupational Health and Safety Act and Mines Act (Ontario) and Relevant Sections of the Mexican Official Regulations, and related costs and delays associated with compliance may negatively affect our business.

Mining activities are subject to extensive federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations governing environmental protection, natural resources, prospecting, development, production, post-closure reclamation, taxes, labor standards and occupational health and safety, including mine safety, toxic substances and other matters. The costs associated with compliance with such laws and regulations are substantial. Changes in existing laws, possible future laws and regulations, or more restrictive interpretations of current laws and regulations by governmental authorities, could cause additional expense, capital expenditures, restrictions on or suspensions of operations and delays in the development of new properties.

U.S. surface and underground mines like the Kensington, Rochester and Wharf mines are regularly inspected by the U.S. Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”). These inspections may lead to written citations or violation notices, which are reported in Exhibit 95.1 to this Report. Recently, MSHA has been conducting more comprehensive inspections of mining operations in general, focusing on miner health and critical safety hazards. Similar inspections are conducted at the Silvertip exploration property and New Afton Mine in British Columbia, Canada by the British Columbia Ministry of Mining and Critical Minerals, in Ontario at the Rainy River Mine by the Ministry of Labour, Immigration, Training and Skills Development and Ministry of Mines, in Mexico at the Palmarejo complex and Las Chispas mine by the Mexican Secretaria del Trabajo y Prevision Social (Secretary of Labor and Social Safety).

Recent amendments to mining, water and environmental laws in Mexico, and the subsequent corresponding regulations thereto, could impose additional restrictions on our ability to obtain and maintain mining and water rights and operate in Mexico, among other potentially adverse provisions. Legal actions challenging the validity and implementation of these recent amendments have been filed by various groups and the proceedings remain ongoing.

Failure to comply with applicable laws, regulations and permitting requirements may result in temporary or extended shutdowns, including orders issued by regulatory or judicial authorities causing operations to cease or be curtailed, which may require corrective measures, including the payment of fines or penalties, capital expenditures, installation of additional equipment or remedial actions, any of which could have a material, adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

Compliance with environmental regulations and litigation based on environmental regulations could require significant expenditures.

Environmental regulations mandate, among other things, the maintenance of air and water quality standards, land development and land reclamation, and set forth limitations on the generation, transportation, storage and disposal of solid and hazardous waste. Environmental legislation and environmental justice provisions are evolving in a manner that may require stricter standards and enforcement, increased fines and penalties for non-compliance, more stringent environmental assessments of proposed projects, and a heightened degree of responsibility for mining companies and their officers, directors and employees. We may incur environmental costs that could have a material adverse effect on financial condition and results of operations. Any failure to remedy an environmental problem could require us to suspend operations or enter into interim compliance measures pending completion of the required remedy. The environmental standards that ultimately may be imposed at a mine site affect the cost of remediation and could exceed the financial accruals that we have made for such remediation. The potential exposure may be significant and could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Moreover, governmental authorities and private parties may bring lawsuits based upon damage to property and injury to persons resulting from the environmental, health and safety impacts of prior and current operations, including operations conducted by other mining companies many years ago on properties that we currently or previously owned. These lawsuits could lead to the imposition of substantial fines, remediation costs, penalties and other civil and criminal sanctions. Substantial costs and liabilities, including for restoring the environment after the closure of mines, are inherent in our operations. We cannot assure that any such law, regulation, enforcement or private claim would not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Some of the mining waste from our U.S. mines currently are exempt to a limited extent from the extensive set of EPA regulations governing hazardous waste under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”). If the EPA were to repeal this exemption and designate these mining wastes as hazardous under RCRA, we would be required to make significant expenditures to manage the waste and to construct hazardous waste storage or disposal facilities. Under the Mercury Export Ban Act of 2008 (“MEBA”), incidental elemental mercury generated at our Rochester mine as part of the processing of ore may not be exported outside of the United States and is required to be stored in a facility designated by the U.S. Department of Energy (“DOE”) for long-term mercury management. The DOE is undergoing processes to designate such a facility and to establish storage and handling fees, which is not yet final. The outcome could result in material cost being incurred to ship and store mercury from our Rochester operation. In addition, if any of these wastes causes contamination in or damage to the environment at a U.S. mining facility, that facility could be designated as a “Superfund” site under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”). Under CERCLA, any present owner or operator of a Superfund site or the owner or operator at the time of contamination may be held jointly and severally liable regardless of fault and may be forced to undertake extensive remedial cleanup action or to pay for the cleanup efforts. The owner or operator also may be liable to federal, state and tribal/indigenous governmental entities for the cost of damages to natural resources, which could be substantial. Additional regulations or requirements also are imposed on our tailings and waste disposal areas in Alaska under the federal Clean Water Act (“CWA”), in Nevada under the Nevada Water Pollution Control Law which implements the CWA, in South Dakota under the South Dakota Water Pollution Control Act and the Administrative Rules of the State of South Dakota, in British Columbia (Canada) under the Health, Safety and Reclamation Code for Mines in British Columbia, the British Columbia Environmental Management Act and the Canadian Metal and Diamond Mining Effluent Regulations, in Ontario (Canada) under primarily the Environmental Protection Act, Ontario Water Resources Act and the Mining Act (Ontario) and in Mexico under the General Law of Ecological Balance and Protection of the Environment (the “GLEBPE”) and the regulations under the GLEBPE related to environmental protection in impact assessment matters.

Airborne emissions are subject to controls under air pollution statutes implementing the Clean Air Act in the U.S. and are regulated under the Environmental Management Act in British Columbia (Canada), the Environmental Protection Act in

Ontario (Canada) and the GLEBPE and the regulations under GLEBPE related to prevention and control of the pollution of the atmosphere in Mexico. In addition, there are numerous legislative and regulatory initiatives related to climate change, reductions in GHG emissions, or energy policy and adoption of these initiatives through legislative actions or administrative policy could have a material adverse effect on results of operations and cash flows. However, we are unable to predict the scope, nature and timing of any new or increased environmental laws and regulations and therefore cannot predict the ultimate impact of such laws and regulations on our business or financial results. We continue to monitor existing and proposed laws and regulations in the jurisdictions in which we operate to consider actions we may take to potentially mitigate any unfavorable impact of such laws or regulations.

In addition, U.S. environmental conservation efforts could result in the withdrawal of certain federal lands from mineral entry under relevant mining law, which could have the effect of restricting our current or future planned activities involving our unpatented mining claims on the affected public lands.

We are required to obtain and renew governmental permits in order to conduct operations, a process which is often costly and time-consuming. Our ability to obtain necessary government permits to expand operations or begin new operations may be materially affected by Indigenous Peoples, community stakeholders, or third-party activists.

In the normal course of our business, we are required to obtain, renew and amend governmental permits for exploration, operations and expansion of existing operations and for the development of new projects, such as the permits recently obtained for the Rochester expansion, POA 1 at Kensington and the main operating permit at Palmarejo. Obtaining, renewing and amending governmental permits is a complex and time-consuming process. The timeliness and success of permitting efforts are contingent upon many variables not within our control, including the interpretation of permit approval requirements administered by the applicable permitting authority, the ability to obtain consents from relevant third parties in certain situations, and government and third-party sentiment towards the mining industry generally. We may not be able to obtain, renew or amend permits that are necessary to our operations, or the cost and time required to obtain, renew or amend permits may exceed our expectations. Any unexpected delays or costs associated with the permitting process could impede or delay the development or operation of a mine, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our revenues and future growth. Any delay in obtaining, renewing or amending a permit may require us to revise mine plans or curtail expected production, which could have a material adverse effect on results of operations and cash flow. In addition, key permits and approvals may be revoked or suspended or may be changed in a manner that adversely affects our operations.

Private parties, including environmental activists, frequently attempt to intervene in the permitting process and to persuade regulators to deny necessary permits or seek to overturn permits that have been issued. Obtaining the necessary governmental permits is a complex and time-consuming process involving numerous jurisdictions and often involving public hearings and costly undertakings. These third-party actions can materially increase the costs and cause delays in the permitting process and could cause us to not proceed with the development or expansion of a mine. In addition, our ability to successfully obtain key permits and approvals to explore for minerals and to develop, operate and expand mines, as well as to conduct our operations, will likely depend on our ability to develop, operate, expand and close mines in a manner that is consistent with the creation of social and economic benefits in the surrounding communities, which may or may not be required by law. Our ability to obtain permits and approvals and to successfully operate in particular communities may be adversely impacted by real or perceived detrimental events associated with our activities or those of other mining companies affecting the environment, human health and safety of communities in which we operate.

We are subject to litigation and may be subject to additional litigation in the future.

We are currently, and may in the future become, subject to other litigation, arbitration or proceedings with other parties. The causes of potential future claims cannot be known, especially considering the complex activities and significant expenditures associated with mining activities, which may lead to various claims and may arise from, among other things, business activities, environmental laws, land use, royalty interest, contractor engagements, labor and employment matters, volatility in the stock price or alleged failures to comply with disclosure obligations. If decided adversely to us, these legal proceedings, or others that could be brought against us in the future, could have a material adverse effect on our financial position or prospects. Responding to disputes, even those that are without merit or ultimately decided in our favor, may require us to incur significant expense, devote significant resources, and may generate adverse publicity, which could materially and adversely affect our business. In the event of a dispute arising at our foreign operations, we may be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of foreign courts or arbitral panels or may not be successful in subjecting foreign persons to the jurisdiction of courts or arbitral panels in the United States. Our inability to enforce our rights and the enforcement of rights on a prejudicial basis by foreign courts or arbitral panels could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial position.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR COMMON STOCK

We have the ability to issue additional equity securities, including in connection with an acquisition of other companies, which would lead to dilution of our issued and outstanding common stock and may materially and adversely affect the price of our common stock.

The issuance of additional equity securities or securities convertible into equity securities, whether to acquire new companies or businesses or for other strategic benefits, would result in dilution of our existing stockholders’ equity ownership. For example, in our acquisition of SilverCrest we issued 1.6022 shares of Coeur common stock in exchange for each share of issued and outstanding common stock of SilverCrest, resulting in the issuance of approximately 239 million Coeur common shares. Similarly, as part of the New Gold Transaction, we issued 0.4959 shares of Coeur common stock in exchange for each share of issued and outstanding common stock of New Gold, resulting in the issuance of approximately 393 million Coeur common shares. The increase to the number of outstanding shares of Coeur’s common stock may impact the marketplace’s view of Coeur’s common stock and may lead to adverse changes in the stock’s trading volume and trading price.

Additionally, former SilverCrest shareholders who received Coeur common stock in the SilverCrest Transaction and New Gold shareholders who received Coeur common stock in the New Gold Transaction may choose to sell or otherwise dispose of such shares, or Coeur’s historic stockholders may decide to reduce their investment in Coeur as a result of the impact of the SilverCrest and New Gold Transactions to Coeur’s overall investment profile. These sales of our common stock (or the perception that these sales may occur) could have the effect of depressing the market price for our common stock. In addition, Coeur’s financial position following the completion an acquisition may differ from its financial position before the completion of an acquisition, and the results of Coeur’s operations and cash flows following the completion of an acquisition may be affected by factors different from those affecting its financial position or results of operations and cash flows prior to an acquisition, all of which could adversely affect the market price of Coeur common stock. Accordingly, the market price and performance of Coeur common stock subsequent to an acquisition is likely to be different from the performance of Coeur common stock prior to an acquisition, including the SilverCrest and New Gold Transactions.

Other issuances of Coeur common stock may also adversely affect the price of our common stock. In 2024, the Company completed the exchange of $5.9 million principal amount of its 5.125% Senior Notes (the “Senior Notes”) plus accrued interest for 1.8 million shares of its common stock, par value $0.01 per share, pursuant to a privately-negotiated agreement with such issuance of common stock made pursuant to the exemption from the registration requirements afforded by Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. In 2024, the Company also entered into subscription agreements with certain Canadian accredited investors for a private placement offering of an aggregate 7.7 million shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per shares, to be issued as “flow-through shares,” as defined in subsection 66(15) of the Income Tax Act (Canada).

We are authorized to issue, without stockholder approval, 10.0 million shares of preferred stock in one or more series, to establish the number of shares to be included in each series and to fix the designation, powers, preferences and relative participating, optional, conversion and other special rights of the shares of each series as well as the qualification, limitations or restrictions on each series. Any series of preferred stock could contain dividend rights, conversion rights, voting rights, terms of redemption, redemption prices, liquidation preferences or other rights superior to the rights of holders of our common stock. If we issue additional equity securities, the price of our common stock may be materially and adversely affected.

Holders of our common stock may not receive dividends.

Holders of our common stock are entitled to receive only such dividends as our Board may declare out of funds legally available for such payments. We are incorporated in Delaware and governed by the Delaware General Corporation Law. Delaware law allows a corporation to pay dividends only out of surplus, as determined under Delaware law or, if there is no surplus, out of net profits for the fiscal year in which the dividend was declared and for the preceding fiscal year. Under Delaware law, however, we cannot pay dividends out of net profits if, after we pay the dividend, our capital would be less than the capital represented by the outstanding stock of all classes having a preference upon the distribution of assets. Our ability to pay dividends is subject to our future earnings, capital requirements and financial condition, as well as our compliance with covenants related to existing or future indebtedness and would only be declared in the discretion of our Board of Directors.