Listed

Vornado Realty Trust: Form 10-K for the period ended Dec 31, 2023

Filed with the SEC on Feb 12, 2024 and accepted by EDGAR at Feb 12, 2024, 16:21 ET.

Share

Business

As filed, 19,787 characters, with its headings, lists and tables. Extracted from the main document; charts and exhibits are in the original on sec.gov.

Vornado is a fully‑integrated REIT and conducts its business through, and substantially all of its interests in properties are held by, the Operating Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership. Accordingly, Vornado’s cash flow and ability to pay dividends to its shareholders are dependent upon the cash flow of the Operating Partnership and the ability of its direct and indirect subsidiaries to first satisfy their obligations to creditors. Vornado is the sole general partner of and owned approximately 91.0% of the common limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership as of December 31, 2023.

We currently own all or portions of:

New York:

  • 57 Manhattan operating properties consisting of:
  • 20.4 million square feet of office space in 30 of the properties;
  • 2.4 million square feet of street retail space in 50 of the properties;
  • 1,662 units in five residential properties;
  • Multiple development sites, including 350 Park Avenue, Sunset Pier 94 Studios and the Hotel Pennsylvania site;
  • A 32.4% interest in Alexander’s, Inc. (“Alexander’s”) (NYSE: ALX), which owns five properties in the greater New York metropolitan area, including 731 Lexington Avenue, the 1.1 million square foot Bloomberg, L.P. headquarters building, and The Alexander, a 312-unit apartment tower in Queens;
  • Signage throughout the Penn District and Times Square; and
  • Building Maintenance Services LLC ("BMS"), a wholly owned subsidiary, which provides cleaning and security services for our buildings and third parties.

Other Real Estate and Investments:

  • The 3.7 million square foot THE MART in Chicago;
  • A 70% controlling interest in 555 California Street, a three-building office complex in San Francisco’s financial district aggregating 1.8 million square feet; and
  • Other real estate and investments.

OBJECTIVES AND STRATEGY

Our business objective is to maximize Vornado shareholder value. We intend to achieve this objective by continuing to pursue our investment philosophy and to execute our operating strategies through:

  • maintaining a superior team of operating and investment professionals and an entrepreneurial spirit;
  • investing in properties in select markets, such as New York City, where we believe there is a high likelihood of capital appreciation;
  • acquiring quality properties at a discount to replacement cost and where there is a significant potential for higher rents;
  • developing and redeveloping properties to increase returns and maximize value; and
  • investing in operating companies that have a significant real estate component.

We expect to finance our growth, acquisitions and investments using internally generated funds and proceeds from asset sales and by accessing the public and private capital markets. We may also offer Vornado common or preferred shares or Operating Partnership units in exchange for property and may repurchase or otherwise reacquire these securities in the future.

DISPOSITIONS

We completed the following sale transactions during 2023:

  • $100 million sale of four Manhattan retail properties located at 510 Fifth Avenue, 148–150 Spring Street, 443 Broadway and 692 Broadway;
  • $71 million sale by Alexander’s (32.4% interest) of its Rego Park III land parcel;
  • $24 million sale of The Armory Show located in New York; and
  • $24 million net proceeds from the sale of two condominium units at 220 Central Park South (“220 CPS”).

FINANCINGS

We completed the following financing transactions during 2023:

  • $1.2 billion of interest rate swap arrangements;
  • $950 million 1.00% SOFR interest rate cap arrangement for the 1290 Avenue of the Americas mortgage loan (70.0% ownership);
  • $355 million restructuring of 697-703 Fifth Avenue (44.8% ownership);
  • $183 million construction loan for Sunset Pier 94 Studios (49.9% ownership);
  • $129 million refinancing of 512 West 22nd Street (55% ownership);
  • $75 million refinancing of 150 West 34th Street; and
  • $54 million refinancing of 825 Seventh Avenue office condominium (50% ownership).

DEVELOPMENT / REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS AND OPPORTUNITIES

PENN District

PENN 2

We are redeveloping PENN 2, a 1,795,000 square foot (as expanded) office building, located on the west side of Seventh Avenue between 31st and 33rd Street. The development cost of this project is estimated to be $750,000,000, of which $638,959,000 has been expended as of December 31, 2023.

Hotel Pennsylvania Site

Demolition of the existing building was completed in the third quarter of 2023.

We are also making districtwide improvements within the PENN District. The development cost of these improvements is estimated to be $100,000,000, of which $47,424,000 has been expended as of December 31, 2023.

Sunset Pier 94 Studios

On August 28, 2023, we, together with Hudson Pacific Properties and Blackstone Inc. (“HPP/BX”), formed a joint venture to develop Sunset Pier 94 Studios, a 266,000 square foot purpose-built studio campus in Manhattan. We own a 49.9% equity interest in the joint venture. The development cost of the project is estimated to be $350,000,000, which will be funded with $183,200,000 of construction financing and $166,800,000 of equity contributions. Our share of equity contributions will be funded by (i) our $40,000,000 Pier 94 leasehold interest contribution and (ii) $34,000,000 of cash contributions, which are net of an estimated $9,000,000 for our share of development fees and reimbursement for overhead costs incurred by us. HPP/BX will fund 100% of cash contributions until such time that its capital account is equal to Vornado’s, after which equity will be funded in accordance with each partner’s respective ownership interest. We have funded $7,994,000 of cash contributions as of December 31, 2023. For further information about this transaction, see page 38, Part II, Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Overview, in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

350 Park Avenue

On January 24, 2023, we and the Rudin family (“Rudin”) completed agreements with Citadel Enterprise Americas LLC (“Citadel”) and with an affiliate of Kenneth C. Griffin, Citadel’s Founder and CEO (“KG”), for a series of transactions relating to 350 Park Avenue and 40 East 52nd Street. In connection therewith, we entered into a joint venture with Rudin (the “Vornado/Rudin JV”) that purchased 39 East 51st Street for $40,000,000, funded on a 50/50 basis by Vornado and Rudin. 39 East 51st Street will be combined with 350 Park Avenue and 40 East 52nd Street to create a premier development site (the “Site”). From October 2024 to June 2030, KG will have the option to either (i) acquire a 60% interest in a joint venture with the Vornado/Rudin JV (with Vornado having an effective 36% interest in the entity) to build a new 1,700,000 square foot office tower, valuing the Site at $1.2 billion or (ii) purchase the Site for $1.4 billion ($1.085 billion to Vornado). From October 2024 to September 2030, the Vornado/Rudin JV will have the option to put the Site to KG for $1.2 billion ($900,000,000 to Vornado). For further information about this transaction and the options available to each of the parties, see page 37, Part II, Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Overview, in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

We are also evaluating other development and redevelopment opportunities at certain of our properties in Manhattan including, in particular, the PENN District.

There can be no assurance that the above projects will be completed, completed on schedule or within budget.

ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY INITIATIVES

We have long believed a focus on environmental sustainability is responsible management of our business and important to our tenants, investors, employees and communities that we serve. It has been central to Vornado's business strategy for over 15 years. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee of Vornado's Board of Trustees is assigned with oversight of Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) matters, which includes climate change risk. Environmental sustainability initiatives are carried out by a dedicated team of professionals that work directly with our business units.

Vornado is an industry leader in sustainability, owning and operating more than 25 million square feet of LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) certified buildings, representing 95% of our in-service office portfolio, with over 24 million square feet at LEED Gold or Platinum. In 2023, we (i) ranked #1 in the US Diversified Office/Retail REIT peer group by GRESB, and received the “Green Star” distinction for the eleventh consecutive year and GRESB's five star rating, (ii) received the Leader in the Light Award by the National Association for Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT) for diversified REITs for the thirteenth time, and (iii) were recognized as an EPA ENERGY STAR Partner of the Year with the distinction of having demonstrated eight years of sustained excellence.

We prioritize addressing climate change and in 2019 adopted a 10-year plan to make our buildings carbon neutral by 2030 (“Vision 2030”). Vision 2030 is a multi-faceted approach that prioritizes energy reduction, recovery, and renewable power. We rely on technology, as well as meaningful stakeholder collaboration with our tenants, our employees, and our communities, to achieve this plan. Our commitment to carbon neutrality and associated emissions reduction targets have been approved by the Science Based Targets Initiative as consistent with a 1.5°C climate scenario, the most ambitious goal of the Paris Agreement.

We consider sustainability in all aspects of our business, including the design, construction, retrofitting and ongoing maintenance and operations of our portfolio of buildings. We operate our buildings sustainably and efficiently by seeking to establish best practices in energy and water consumption, carbon reduction, resource and waste management and ecologically sensitive procurement. Our policies, from 100% green cleaning to procuring 100% renewable electricity certificates to energy efficiency, are implemented across our entire portfolio. We undertake significant outreach with our tenants, employees and investors regarding Vornado’s sustainability programs and strategies.

We gather data to measure progress against our goals, align our goals with our tenants, plan for our longer-term projects and engage with our stakeholders in meaningful ways. We use carbon accounting software, energy audits and models and building automation software to measure and track our portfolio-wide waste, water and energy reduction strategies, create roadmaps for each building to understand how to achieve carbon neutrality and provide accurate and actionable data for our measurement, verification and reporting requirements.

Our 2022 and 2023 long-term performance plan awards specifically tie a portion of senior management’s compensation to the achievement of certain ESG targets, including reductions in greenhouse emissions, achieving a specified GRESB score and targeting a specified percentage of LEED Gold or Platinum certified square footage in our office portfolio.

We are committed to transparent reporting of sustainability performance indicators and publish an annual ESG Report in accordance with the Global Reporting Initiative and aligned with the metrics codified by the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board and in 2023 published a report in accordance with the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures. We also submit public reports to CDP, CSA (the S&P Global Corporate Sustainability Assessment) and EP100 (global initiative led by Climate Group). Further details on our environmental sustainability initiatives and strategy, including our Vision 2030 Roadmap, can be found in our 2022 ESG Report at (vno.com/sustainability). There can be no assurance that our Vision 2030 commitment will be achieved in the planned time frame. The ESG Report is not incorporated by reference and should not be considered part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

HUMAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT

As of December 31, 2023, we had 2,935 employees, consisting of (i) 2,437 employees of Building Maintenance Services LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary, which provides cleaning, security, engineering and parking services primarily to our New York properties, (ii) 394 employees in our corporate office, leasing, and property management, and (iii) 104 employees of THE MART. The foregoing does not include employees of partially owned entities.

Human capital management is critical to our success and our employees are the foundation of our human capital.

Compensation, Benefits and Employee Wellbeing

To attract and retain the best-qualified talent and to help our employees stay healthy, balance their work and personal lives, and meet their financial and retirement goals, we offer competitive benefits including, but not limited to, market-competitive compensation, healthcare (medical, dental and vision coverage), a health savings account, 401(k) and employer match, dependent care flexible spending account, parental leave, adoption/surrogacy benefits, short-term and long-term disability insurance, life insurance, time off/paid holidays, tuition reimbursement, subsidized gym memberships, employee wellness programs and incentives, in-workplace vaccinations, commuter benefits, an employee assistance program and workplace flexibility.

HUMAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT - CONTINUED

Talent Development

To foster talent and growth, we provide training and continuing education, promote career and personal development, and encourage innovation and engagement. To achieve our talent development goals, we provide tuition reimbursement for our employees’ continuing education and professional development, and the opportunity to participate in a variety of training and networking engagements.

Culture and Engagement

Our employees are critical to our success, and we believe creating a positive and inclusive culture is essential to attracting and retaining engaged employees. We seek to retain our employees by actively engaging with our workforce and we solicit their feedback through our divisional leaders and employee surveys. We use their feedback to create and continually enhance programs that support their needs.

Through our volunteer program, Vornado Volunteers, employees are granted one day of paid time off per calendar year to volunteer for a cause of their choice.

Diversity and Inclusion

Vornado is a diverse and inclusive environment that empowers the individual and enriches the employment experience. We have published Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) data since 2017 and have a broadly diverse workforce across both our corporate base as well as our BMS division. Our employee demographics data can be found in our 2022 ESG report (vno.com/sustainability), which is not incorporated by reference and should not be considered part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Health and Wellness

As a building owner and landlord to thousands of business tenants, we focus on maintaining and improving the health of our indoor environments, as well as communicating the value of our health and wellness programs with consistency and clarity to our stakeholders. We believe that consistent health programming and communications protocols not only mitigate health risks within our buildings, but they also create a responsible behavior framework for our employees, our tenants, and our visitors.

Labor Relations

BMS employs and manages janitorial and security staff who are members of 32BJ SEIU and engineering staff who are members of Local 94 of the International Union of Operating Engineers AFL-CIO. Through our active participation in the Realty Advisory Board on Labor Relations, we work collaboratively with both unions and consider our relations with our union employees to be very positive.

For additional information on human capital matters, please see our most recent ESG report, available for download on our website at www.vno.com (http://www.vno.com) and in digital format at vno.com/sustainability. This report and other information on our website are not incorporated by reference into and do not form any part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

COMPETITION

We compete with a large number of real estate investors, property owners and developers, some of whom may be willing to accept lower returns on their investments. Principal factors of competition are rents charged, tenant concessions offered, attractiveness of location, the quality of the property and the breadth and the quality of services provided. Our success depends upon, among other factors, trends of the global, national, regional and local economies, the financial condition and operating results of current and prospective tenants and customers, availability and cost of capital, construction and renovation costs, taxes, governmental regulations, legislation, population and employment trends. See "Risk Factors" in Item 1A for additional information regarding these factors.

SEGMENT DATA

We operate in the following reportable segments: New York and Other. Financial information related to these reportable segments for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 is set forth in Note 23 – Segment Information to our consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

TENANTS ACCOUNTING FOR OVER 10% OF REVENUES

None of our tenants accounted for more than 10% of total revenues in any of the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021.

CERTAIN ACTIVITIES

We do not base our acquisitions and investments on specific allocations by type of property. We have historically held our properties for long‑term investment; however, it is possible that properties in our portfolio may be sold or otherwise disposed of when circumstances warrant. Further, we have not adopted a policy that limits the amount or percentage of assets which could be invested in a specific property or property type. Generally our activities are reviewed and may be modified from time to time by Vornado’s Board of Trustees without the vote of our shareholders or Operating Partnership unitholders.

PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES

Our principal executive offices are located at 888 Seventh Avenue, New York, New York 10019; telephone (212) 894‑7000.

MATERIALS AVAILABLE ON OUR WEBSITE

Copies of our Annual Report on Form 10‑K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10‑Q, Current Reports on Form 8‑K and amendments to those reports, as well as Reports on Forms 3, 4 and 5 regarding officers, trustees and 10% beneficial owners, filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a), 15(d) or 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 are available free of charge through our website (www.vno.com (http://www.vno.com)) as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. Also available on our website are copies of our Audit Committee Charter, Compensation Committee Charter, Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee Charter, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, and Corporate Governance Guidelines. In the event of any changes to these charters or the code or guidelines, revised copies will also be made available on our website. Copies of these documents are also available directly from us free of charge. Our website also includes other financial and non-financial information, including certain non-GAAP financial measures, none of which is a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Copies of our filings under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 are also available free of charge from us, upon request.

Risk factors

As filed, 75,213 characters, with its headings, lists and tables. Extracted from the main document; charts and exhibits are in the original on sec.gov.

Material factors that may adversely affect our business, operations and financial condition are summarized below. We refer to the equity and debt securities of both Vornado and the Operating Partnership as our “securities” and the investors who own shares of Vornado or units of the Operating Partnership, or both, as our “equity holders.” The risks and uncertainties described herein may not be the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently believe to be immaterial may also adversely affect our business, operations and financial condition. See “Forward-Looking Statements” contained herein on page 6.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS AND OPERATIONS

We may be adversely affected by trends in office real estate, including work from home trends.

In 2023, approximately 78% of our net operating income (“NOI” a non-GAAP measure) is from our office properties. Work from home, flexible or hybrid work schedules, open workplaces, videoconferencing, and teleconferencing remain prevalent in certain situations following the COVID-19 pandemic. Changes in tenant space utilization, including from the continuation of work from home and flexible work arrangement policies, may continue to cause office tenants to reassess their long-term physical space needs, which could have an adverse effect on our business.

Further, as office tenants reevaluate their physical space needs and focus on attracting and retaining talent, many tenants have become more selective and are focused on leasing space in high-quality, modern and well-amenitized buildings near transit hubs. These factors have resulted in increased competition among landlords to attract tenants, significant landlord capital expenditures for a building to maintain Class A status and may negatively impact the value of older and less desirable office space. This could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

A significant portion of our properties is located in the New York metropolitan area and is affected by the economic cycles and risks inherent to this area.

In 2023, approximately 88% of our NOI is from properties located in the New York metropolitan area. We may continue to concentrate a significant portion of our future acquisitions, development and redevelopment in this area. Real estate markets are affected by economic downturns and we cannot predict how economic conditions will impact this market in either the short or long term. Declines in the economy and declines in the New York metropolitan area real estate market have impacted and could continue to impact our financial performance and the value of our properties. In addition to the factors affecting the national economic condition generally, the factors affecting economic conditions in this area include:

  • financial performance and productivity of the media, advertising, professional services, financial, technology, retail, insurance and real estate industries;
  • business layoffs or downsizing;
  • any oversupply of, or reduced demand for, real estate;
  • industry slowdowns;
  • the effects of inflation;
  • increased interest rates;
  • relocations of businesses;
  • changing demographics;
  • increased work from home and use of alternative work places;
  • changes in the number of domestic and international tourists to our markets (including as a result of changes in the relative strengths of world currencies);
  • the fiscal health of New York State and New York City governments and local transit authorities;
  • quality of life conditions;
  • infrastructure quality;
  • increased government regulation and costs of complying with such regulations; and
  • changes in rates or the treatment of the deductibility of state and local taxes.

It is impossible for us to predict the future effect of trends in the economic and investment climates of the geographic areas in which we concentrate, and more generally of the United States, or the real estate markets in these areas. Local, national or global economic downturns could negatively affect the value of our properties, our businesses and profitability.

We are subject to risks that affect the general and New York City retail environments.

In 2023, approximately 17% of our NOI is from Manhattan retail properties. These properties are affected by the general and New York City retail environments, including the level of consumer spending and consumer confidence, Manhattan tourism, office and residential occupancy rates, employer remote-working policies, the threat of terrorism or other criminal acts, increasing competition from online retailers and other retail centers, and the impact of technological change upon the retail environment generally. These factors could adversely affect the financial condition of our retail tenants, or result in the bankruptcy of such tenants, and the willingness of retailers to lease space in our retail locations, which could have an adverse effect on the value of our properties, our business and profitability.

Our performance and the value of an investment in us are subject to risks associated with our real estate assets and with the real estate industry.

The value of our real estate and the value of an investment in us fluctuates depending on conditions in the general economy and the real estate business. These conditions may also adversely impact our revenues and cash flows.

The factors that affect the value of our real estate investments include, among other things:

  • global, national, regional and local economic conditions and geopolitical events;
  • competition from other available space, including co-working space and sub-leases;
  • local conditions such as an oversupply of space or a reduction in demand for real estate in the area;
  • how well we manage our properties;
  • the development and/or redevelopment of our properties;
  • changes in market rental rates;
  • trends in office real estate, including many tenants’ preferences for space in modern amenitized buildings which may require the landlord to incur significant capital expenditures;
  • increased competition from online shopping and its impact on retail tenants and their demand for retail space;
  • the timing and costs associated with property improvements and rentals;
  • whether we are able to pass all or portions of any increases in operating costs through to tenants;
  • changes in real estate taxes and other expenses;
  • fluctuations in interest rates;
  • the ability of state and local governments to operate within their budgets;
  • whether tenants and users such as customers and shoppers consider a property attractive;
  • changes in consumer preferences adversely affecting retailers and retail store values;
  • changes in tenant space utilization;
  • the financial condition of our tenants, including the extent of tenant bankruptcies or defaults;
  • consequences of any armed conflict involving, or terrorist attacks against, the United States or individual acts of violence in public spaces;
  • availability of financing on acceptable terms or at all;
  • inflation or deflation;
  • our ability to obtain adequate insurance;
  • government regulation, including changes in fiscal policies, taxation, and zoning laws;
  • potential liability and compliance costs associated with environmental or other laws or regulations;
  • natural disasters;
  • general competitive factors;
  • climate change; and
  • the impact of pandemics or outbreaks of other infectious diseases.

The rents or sales proceeds we receive and the occupancy levels at our properties may decline as a result of adverse changes in any of these factors. If rental revenues, sales proceeds and/or occupancy levels decline, we generally would expect to have less cash available for operating costs, to pay indebtedness and for distribution to equity holders. In addition, some of our major expenses, including mortgage payments, real estate taxes and maintenance costs generally do not decline when the related rents decline and maintenance costs can increase substantially in an inflationary environment. These factors may cause the value of our real estate assets to decline, which may result in non-cash impairment charges and the impact could be material.

Real estate is a competitive business and that competition may adversely impact us.

We compete with a large number of real estate investors, property owners and developers, some of whom may be willing to accept lower returns on their investments. Principal factors of competition are rents charged, tenant concessions offered, attractiveness of location, the quality of the property and the breadth and the quality of services provided. Substantially all of our properties face competition from similar properties in the same market, which may adversely impact the rents we can charge at those properties and our results of operations.

Our commercial office properties are located primarily in highly developed areas of the New York metropolitan area. Manhattan is the largest office market in the United States. The number of competitive office properties in the New York metropolitan area, which may be newer, more amenitized or better located than our properties, could have a material adverse effect on our ability to lease office space at our properties and on the effective rents we are able to charge.

We may be unable to renew leases, lease vacant space or relet space as leases expire on favorable terms.

When our tenants decide not to renew their leases upon their expiration, we may not be able to relet the space. Even if tenants do renew or we can relet the space, the terms of renewal or reletting, considering among other things, rent and concessions, the cost of improvements to the property and leasing commissions, may be on less economically favorable terms. In addition, changes in space utilization by our tenants may impact our ability to renew or relet space without the need to incur substantial costs in renovating or redesigning the internal configuration of the relevant property and/or space. If we are unable to promptly renew leases or relet the space on economically favorable terms, our cash flow and ability to service debt obligations and pay dividends and distributions to equity holders could be adversely affected.

Bankruptcy or insolvency of tenants may decrease our revenues, net income and available cash.

From time to time, some of our tenants have declared bankruptcy, and other tenants may declare bankruptcy, become insolvent or experience a material business downturn adversely affecting their ability to make timely rental payments in the future. If a tenant does not pay its rent, we may face delays enforcing our rights as landlord and may incur substantial legal and other costs. Even if we are able to enforce our rights, a tenant may not have recoverable assets. The bankruptcy or insolvency of a major tenant may delay our efforts to collect past-due balances under the relevant leases and could ultimately preclude collection of these amounts altogether. As a result, the bankruptcy or insolvency of, or nonpayment by, a major tenant could cause us to suffer lower revenues and operational difficulties, including leasing the remainder of the property, which could in turn result in decreased net income and funds available to pay our indebtedness or make distributions to equity holders.

Our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows have been and may continue to be adversely affected by outbreaks of highly infectious or contagious diseases.

Our business has been, and may continue to be, adversely affected by the economic and industry challenges created by highly infectious or contagious diseases, including the COVID-19 pandemic. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic caused retailers to reduce the number and size of their physical locations and increase reliance on e-commerce, and future infectious or contagious diseases could have a similar impact. Additionally, many office tenants have adopted work from home, hybrid and flexible work arrangements which may lead our office tenants to reassess their long-term physical space needs. Any future outbreak of a highly infectious or contagious disease could impact how people live, work and travel in ways that have affected and may in the future affect our properties. Over time, these factors could decrease the demand for office and retail space and ultimately decrease occupancy and/or rent levels across our portfolio, which may have a negative impact on our financial condition and/or access to capital and may have the effect of heightening other risks described under this heading “Risk Factors.”

Some of our potential losses may not be covered by insurance.

For our properties, we maintain general liability insurance with limits of $300,000,000 per occurrence and per property, of which $275,000,000, increased from $250,000,000 effective June 20, 2023, includes communicable disease coverage, and we maintain all risk property and rental value insurance with limits of $2.0 billion per occurrence, with sub-limits for certain perils such as flood and earthquake, excluding communicable disease coverage. Our California properties have earthquake insurance with coverage of $350,000,000 per occurrence and in the aggregate, subject to a deductible in the amount of 5% of the value of the affected property. We maintain coverage for certified terrorism acts with limits of $6.0 billion per occurrence and in the aggregate (as listed below), $1.2 billion for non-certified acts of terrorism, and $5.0 billion per occurrence and in the aggregate for terrorism involving nuclear, biological, chemical and radiological (“NBCR”) terrorism events, as defined by the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002, as amended to date and which has been extended through December 2027.

Penn Plaza Insurance Company, LLC (“PPIC”), our wholly owned consolidated subsidiary, acts as a re-insurer with respect to a portion of all risk property and rental value insurance and a portion of our earthquake insurance coverage, and as a direct insurer for coverage for acts of terrorism including NBCR acts. Coverage for acts of terrorism (excluding NBCR acts) is fully reinsured by third party insurance companies and the Federal government with no exposure to PPIC. For NBCR acts, PPIC is responsible for a deductible of $2,112,753 and 20% of the balance of a covered loss and the Federal government is responsible for the remaining portion of a covered loss. We are ultimately responsible for any loss incurred by PPIC.

Certain condominiums in which we own an interest (including the Farley Condominiums) maintain insurance policies with different per occurrence and aggregate limits than our policies described above.

We continue to monitor the state of the insurance market and the scope and costs of coverage for acts of terrorism and other events. However, we cannot anticipate what coverage will be available on commercially reasonable terms in the future. We are responsible for uninsured losses and for deductibles and losses in excess of our insurance coverage, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition, the impact of which could be material.

Actual or threatened terrorist attacks or other criminal acts may adversely affect the value of our properties and our ability to generate cash flow.

We have significant investments in the New York City, Chicago and San Francisco metropolitan areas. In response to a terrorist attack, the perceived threat of terrorism, or other criminal acts, tenants in these areas may choose to relocate their businesses to less populated, lower-profile areas of the United States that may be perceived to be less likely targets of future terrorist activity or have lower rates of crime and fewer customers may choose to patronize businesses in these areas. This, in turn, would trigger a decrease in the demand for space in these areas, which could increase vacancies in our properties and force us to lease space on less favorable terms. Furthermore, we may experience increased costs in security, equipment and personnel. As a result, the value of our properties and the level of our revenues and cash flows could decline materially.

The effects of climate change could have a concentrated impact on the areas where we operate and could adversely impact our results.

Our investments are concentrated in the New York City, Chicago and San Francisco metropolitan areas. Physical climate change, and natural disasters, including earthquakes, storms, storm surges, tornados, floods and hurricanes, could cause significant damage to our properties and the surrounding environment or area. Potentially adverse consequences of climate change, including rising sea levels and increased temperature fluctuations, could similarly have an impact on our properties and the economies of the metropolitan areas in which we operate. Government efforts to combat climate change may impact the cost of operating our properties. Over time, these conditions could result in declining demand for office and retail space in our buildings or the inability of us to operate the buildings at all. Climate change may also have indirect effects on our business by increasing the cost of (or making unavailable) property insurance on terms we find acceptable, increasing the cost of energy at our properties and requiring us to expend funds as we seek to repair and protect our properties against such risks. The incurrence of these losses, costs or business interruptions may adversely affect our operating and financial results.

Our properties are located in urban areas, which means the vitality of our properties is reliant on sound transportation and utility infrastructure. If that infrastructure is compromised in any way by an extreme weather event, such a compromise could have an adverse impact on our local economies and populations, as well as on our tenants’ ability to do business in our buildings.

Our properties are subject to transitional risks related to climate-related policy change.

De-carbonization of grid-supplied energy could lead to increased energy costs and operating expenses for our buildings. Retrofitting our building systems to consume less energy could lead to increased capital costs. Buildings which consume fossil fuel onsite may be subject to penalties in the future. In addition, the full transition of grid-supplied energy to renewable sources (as has been mandated by the Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act in New York State) could lead to increased energy costs and operating expenses for our buildings. Although these laws and regulations have not had any material adverse effects on our business to date, they could result in substantial costs, including compliance costs, increased energy costs, retrofit costs and construction costs. We cannot predict how future laws and regulations, or future interpretations of current laws and regulations, related to climate change will affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We may become subject to costs, taxes or penalties, or increases therein, associated with natural resource or energy usage, such as a “carbon tax” and by local legislation such as New York City’s Local Law 97, which sets limits on carbon emissions in our buildings and imposes penalties if we exceed those limits, and New York City’s Intro 2317, or the “gas ban” bill, which limits any onsite fossil fuel combustion in new construction and major renovations. These costs, taxes or penalties could increase our operating costs and decrease the cash available to pay our obligations or distribute to our equity owners.

Changes to tax laws could affect REITs generally, the trading of our shares and our results of operations, both positively and negatively, in ways that are difficult to anticipate.

The rules dealing with U.S. federal, state and local income taxation are constantly under review by persons involved in the legislative process and by the IRS and the Treasury Department. Changes to tax laws (which changes may have retroactive application) could adversely affect the taxation of REITs and their shareholders. We cannot predict whether, when, in what form, or with what effective dates, tax laws, regulations and rulings may be enacted, promulgated or decided, or technical corrections made, which could result in an increase in our, or our shareholders’, tax liability or require changes in the manner in which we operate in order to minimize increases in our tax liability. If such changes occur, we may be required to pay additional taxes on our assets or income and/or be subject to additional restrictions. These increased tax costs could, among other things, adversely affect the trading price for our common shares, our financial condition, our results of operations and the amount of cash available for the payment of dividends.

Significant inflation and future increases in the inflation rate could adversely affect our business and financial results.

Recent substantial increases in the rate of inflation and potential future elevated rates of inflation, both real and anticipated, may impact our business and results of operations. In a highly inflationary environment, we may be unable to raise rental rates at or above the rate of inflation, which could reduce our profit margins. In addition, our cost of labor and materials could increase, which could have an adverse impact on our business and financial results. Increased inflation could also adversely affect us by increasing costs of construction and renovation. While increases in most operating expenses at our properties can be passed on to our office and retail tenants, some tenants have fixed reimbursement charges and expenses at our residential properties may not be able to be passed on to residential tenants. Unreimbursed increased operating expenses may reduce cash flow available for payment of mortgage debt and interest and for distributions to shareholders.

We face risks associated with property acquisitions.

We have acquired in the past and intend to continue to pursue the acquisition of properties and portfolios of properties, including, but not limited to, large portfolios that would increase our size and could result in alterations to our capital structure. Furthermore, from time to time we have made, and in the future we may seek to make one or more, material acquisitions that we believe will maximize shareholder value. However, an announcement by us of one or more significant acquisitions could result in a quick and significant decline in the price of our securities. Our acquisition activities and their success are subject to the following risks:

  • we may be unable to complete an acquisition of a property or portfolio even after entering into an acquisition agreement, making a non-refundable deposit and incurring certain other acquisition-related costs;
  • we may be unable to obtain or assume financing for acquisitions on favorable terms or at all;
  • increased interest rates will increase the cost of acquiring properties through financing, reducing the opportunities for attractive acquisitions;
  • acquired properties may fail to perform as expected;
  • the actual costs of repositioning, redeveloping or maintaining acquired properties may be greater than our estimates and may require significantly greater time and attention of management than anticipated;
  • the acquisition agreement will likely contain conditions to closing, including completion of due diligence investigations to our satisfaction or other conditions that are not within our control, which may not be satisfied;
  • acquired properties may be located in new markets where we may face risks associated with a lack of market knowledge or understanding of the local economy, lack of business relationships in the area, costs associated with opening a new regional office and unfamiliarity with local governmental and permitting procedures;
  • we may acquire real estate through the acquisition of the ownership entity subjecting us to the risks of that entity and we may be exposed to the liabilities of properties or companies acquired, some of which we may not be aware of at the time of acquisition;
  • we may face competition for acquisition opportunities from other well-capitalized investors, including publicly traded and privately held REITs, private real estate funds, domestic and foreign financial institutions, life insurance companies, sovereign wealth funds, pension trusts, partnerships and individual investors, which may cause an increase in the purchase price for a desired acquisition property or result in a competitor acquiring the desired property instead of us; and
  • we may be unable to quickly and efficiently integrate new acquisitions, particularly acquisitions of portfolios of properties, into our existing operations, and this could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Any delay or failure on our part to identify, negotiate, finance and consummate such acquisitions in a timely manner and on favorable terms, or operate acquired properties to meet our financial expectations, could impede our growth and have an adverse effect on us, including our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and the market value of our securities. If we are unable to successfully acquire additional properties, our ability to grow our business could be adversely affected.

We are exposed to risks associated with property development, redevelopment and repositioning that could adversely affect us, including our financial condition and results of operations.

We are the owner of numerous development sites and continue to engage in redevelopment and repositioning activities with respect to our properties, and, accordingly, we are subject to certain risks, which could adversely affect us, including our financial condition and results of operations. These risks include, without limitation, (i) the availability and pricing of financing on favorable terms or at all; (ii) the availability and timely receipt of zoning and other regulatory approvals; (iii) cost overruns, especially in an inflationary environment, and untimely completion of construction (including risks beyond our control, such as weather or labor conditions, material shortages or supply chain delays); (iv) the potential for the fluctuation of occupancy rates and rents at redeveloped properties, which may result in our investment not being profitable; (v) start up, repositioning and redevelopment costs may be higher than anticipated; (vi) the potential that we may fail to recover expenses already incurred if we abandon development or redevelopment opportunities after we begin to explore them; (vii) the potential that we may expend funds on and devote management time to projects which we do not complete; (viii) the inability to complete leasing of a property on schedule or at all, resulting in an increase in carrying or redevelopment costs; (ix) the possibility that properties will be leased at below expected rental rates and (x) to the extent the redevelopment activities are conducted in partnership with third parties, the possibility of disputes with our joint venture development partners and the potential that we miss certain project milestone deadlines. These risks could result in substantial unanticipated delays or expenses, prevent the initiation or the completion of redevelopment activities or reduce the ultimate rents achieved on new developments. These outcomes could have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, the market value of our common shares and ability to satisfy our principal and interest obligations and to make distributions to our shareholders.

It may be difficult to sell real estate on a timely basis, which may limit our flexibility.

Real estate investments are relatively illiquid. Consequently, we may have limited ability to dispose of assets in our portfolio promptly in response to changes in economic or other conditions which could have an adverse effect on our sources of working capital and our ability to satisfy our debt obligations.

We may not be permitted to dispose of certain properties or pay down the debt associated with those properties when we might otherwise desire to do so without incurring additional costs. In addition, when we dispose of or sell assets, we may not be able to reinvest the sales proceeds and earn similar returns.

As part of an acquisition of a property, or a portfolio of properties, we may agree, and in the past have agreed, not to dispose of the acquired properties or reduce the mortgage indebtedness for a long-term period, unless we pay certain of the resulting tax costs of the seller. These agreements could result in us holding on to properties that we would otherwise sell and not pay down or refinance. In addition, when we dispose of or sell assets, we may not be able to reinvest the sales proceeds and earn returns similar to those generated by the assets that were sold.

From time to time we have made, and in the future we may seek to make investments in companies over which we do not have sole control. Some of these companies operate in industries with different risks than investing and operating real estate.

From time to time we have made, and in the future we may seek to make, investments in companies that we may not control, including, but not limited to, Alexander’s, our Fifth Avenue and Times Square JV, and other equity and loan investments. Although these businesses generally have a significant real estate component, some of them operate in businesses that are different from investing and operating real estate. Consequently, we are subject to operating and financial risks of those industries and to the risks associated with lack of control, such as having differing objectives than our partners or the entities in which we invest, or becoming involved in disputes, or competing directly or indirectly with these partners or entities. In addition, we rely on the internal controls and financial reporting controls of these entities and their failure to maintain effectiveness or comply with applicable standards may adversely affect us.

We are subject to risks involved in real estate activity through joint ventures and private equity real estate funds.

We currently own properties through joint ventures and private equity real estate funds with other persons and entities and may in the future acquire or own properties through joint ventures and funds when we believe circumstances warrant the use of such structures. Joint venture and fund investments involve risk, including: the possibility that our partners might refuse to make capital contributions when due and therefore we may be forced to make contributions to maintain the value of the property; that we may be responsible to our partners for indemnifiable losses; that our partners might at any time have business or economic goals that are inconsistent with ours; that third parties may be hesitant or refuse to transact with the joint venture or fund due to the identity of our partners; and that our partners may be in a position to take action or withhold consent contrary to our recommendations, instructions or requests. For certain of our joint venture arrangements, we and our respective joint venture partners have rights including the ability to trigger a buy-sell, put right or forced sale arrangement, which could cause us to sell our interest, or acquire our partner’s interest, or to sell the underlying asset, at a time when we otherwise would not have initiated such a transaction, without our consent or on unfavorable terms. In some instances, joint venture and fund partners may have competing interests in our markets that could create conflicts of interest. These conflicts may include compliance with the REIT requirements, and our REIT status could be jeopardized if any of our joint ventures or funds do not operate in compliance with REIT requirements. To the extent our partners do not meet their obligations to us or our joint ventures or funds, or they take action inconsistent with the interests of the joint venture or fund, we may be adversely affected.

We are exposed to risks related to our properties that are subject to ground leases arrangements which could adversely affect our results of operations.

We are the lessee under long-term ground lease arrangements at certain of our properties. Unless we purchase a fee interest in the underlying land or extend the terms of these leases prior to expiration, we will no longer operate these properties upon expiration of the leases, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. Furthermore, rent payments under such leasehold interests are periodically adjusted pursuant to the respective contractual arrangements, including the currently ongoing PENN 1 June 2023 rent reset process. These rent resets may result in materially higher rents that could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operation. Additionally, due to the greater risk in a loan secured by a leasehold interest than a loan secured by a fee interest, we face risks related to the availability and pricing of financing on favorable terms or at all for such ground leasehold interests.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR INDEBTEDNESS AND ACCESS TO CAPITAL

Significantly tighter capital markets and economic conditions have affected and may continue to materially affect our liquidity, financial condition and results of operations as well as the value of an investment in our debt and equity securities.

There are many factors that can affect the value of our debt and equity securities, including the state of the capital markets and the economy. Demand for office and retail space typically declines nationwide due to an economic downturn, bankruptcies, downsizing, layoffs and cost cutting. Government action or inaction may adversely affect the state of the capital markets. The cost and availability of credit may be adversely affected by illiquid credit markets and wider credit spreads, which may adversely affect our liquidity and financial condition, including our results of operations, and the liquidity and financial condition of our tenants. Recently, domestic and international financial markets have experienced unusual volatility, significant interest rate increases and continuing uncertainty. Liquidity has significantly tightened in overall financial markets. Consequently, there is greater uncertainty regarding our ability to access the credit markets in order to attract financing on reasonable terms. Additionally, the recent inflation environment has led to an increase in interest rates, which has had a direct and material increase on the interest expense of our borrowings. Our inability or the inability of our tenants to timely refinance maturing liabilities and access the capital markets to meet liquidity needs may materially affect our financial condition and results of operations and the value of our securities.

We have outstanding debt, and its cost may continue to increase and refinancing may not be available on acceptable terms and could affect our future operations.

As of December 31, 2023, our consolidated mortgages and unsecured indebtedness, excluding related premium, discount and deferred financing costs, totaled $8.3 billion. We rely on both secured and unsecured, variable rate and fixed rate debt to finance acquisitions and development activities and for working capital. We are subject to the risks normally associated with debt financing, including the risk that our cash flow from operations will be insufficient to meet our required debt service. Our debt service costs generally will not be reduced if conditions in the market or at our properties, such as the entry of new competitors or the loss of major tenants, cause a reduction in the income from our properties. Should such events occur, our operations may be adversely affected. If a property is mortgaged to secure payment of indebtedness and income from such property is insufficient to pay that indebtedness, the property could be foreclosed upon by the mortgagee resulting in our loss of the property.

If we are unable to obtain debt financing or refinance existing indebtedness upon maturity, our financial condition and results of operations would likely be adversely affected. In addition, the current interest rate environment has led to an increase in interest rates on our variable rate debt, including on new hedging instruments, and an increase in the cost of refinancing our existing debt and entering into new debt, all of which have reduced, and could continue to reduce, our operating cash flows. While certain of our debt is fixed by interest rate swap arrangements, the arrangements typically expire earlier than the mortgage loan maturity, resulting in future exposure to rising interest rates, which could further reduce our available cash. If the cost or amount of our indebtedness continues to increase or we cannot refinance our debt in sufficient amounts or on acceptable terms, we are at risk of credit rating downgrades and default on our obligations that could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

We may not be able to obtain capital to make investments.

We depend primarily on external financing to fund the growth of our business. This is because one of the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, for a REIT is that it distributes 90% of its taxable income, excluding net capital gains, to its shareholders. This, in turn, requires the Operating Partnership to make distributions to its unitholders. There is a separate requirement to distribute net capital gains or pay a corporate level tax in lieu thereof. Our access to debt or equity financing depends on the willingness of third parties to lend or make equity investments and on conditions in the capital markets generally. Although we believe that we will be able to finance any investments we may wish to make in the foreseeable future, there can be no assurance that new financing will be available or available on acceptable terms. For information about our available sources of funds, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Liquidity and Capital Resources” and the notes to the consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The hedge instruments we may use to manage our exposure to interest rate volatility involve risks.

The interest rate hedge instruments we may use to manage some of our exposure to interest rate volatility involve risks, including the risk that counterparties may fail to perform under these arrangements. If interest rates were to fall, these arrangements may cause us to pay higher interest on our debt obligations than would otherwise be the case. In addition, the use of such instruments may generate income that may not be treated as qualifying REIT income for purposes of the 75% gross income test or 95% gross income test. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that our hedging arrangements will qualify as “highly effective” cash flow hedges under applicable accounting standards. If our hedges do not qualify as “highly effective,” the changes in the fair value of these instruments would be reflected in our results of operations and could adversely impact our earnings.

Covenants in our debt instruments could adversely affect our financial condition and our acquisitions and development activities.

The mortgages on our properties contain customary covenants such as those that limit our ability, without the prior consent of the applicable lender, to further mortgage the applicable property or to reduce or change insurance coverage. Our unsecured indebtedness and debt that we may obtain in the future may contain customary restrictions, requirements and other limitations on our ability to incur indebtedness, including covenants that limit our ability to incur debt based upon the levels of certain ratios including total debt to total assets, secured debt to total assets, EBITDA to interest expense, and fixed charges, and that require us to maintain a certain ratio of unencumbered assets to unsecured debt. Our ability to borrow is subject to compliance with these and other covenants. In addition, failure to comply with our covenants could cause a default under the applicable debt instrument, and we may then be required to repay such debt with capital from such other sources or give possession of a secured property to the lender. Under those circumstances, other sources of capital may not be available to us or may be available only on unattractive terms. Further, depending on market conditions at the time of any refinancing, the covenants included as part of the terms of such refinancing may be more restrictive than the existing indebtedness.

In addition, our debt instruments contain customary covenants requiring us to maintain insurance. Although we believe that we have adequate insurance coverage for purposes of these agreements, we may not be able to obtain an equivalent amount of coverage at reasonable costs in the future. Further, if lenders insist on greater coverage than we are able to obtain it could result in acceleration of repayment of such debt instruments and adversely affect our ability to finance or refinance our properties and expand our portfolio.

A further downgrade in our credit ratings could materially and adversely affect our business and financial condition.

Our credit rating and the credit ratings assigned to our debt securities and our preferred shares have been recently downgraded and could change in the future based upon, among other things, our results of operations and financial condition. Our ratings are subject to ongoing evaluation by credit rating agencies, and any rating could be changed or withdrawn by a rating agency in the future if, in its judgment, circumstances warrant such action. Moreover, these credit ratings are not recommendations to buy, sell or hold our common shares or any other securities. If any of the credit rating agencies that have rated our securities downgrades or lowers its credit rating, or if any credit rating agency indicates that it has placed any such rating on a “watch list” for a possible downgrading or lowering, or otherwise indicates that its outlook for that rating is negative, such action could have a material adverse effect on our costs and availability of funding. For instance, if we fail to maintain the credit ratings currently assigned to our senior debt, the interest rates payable on outstanding debt under our unsecured term loan and revolving credit facilities would increase and we may be required to post additional collateral under certain of our existing loan agreements. Furthermore, any future lowering of our credit ratings or outlook would likely make it more difficult and/or more expensive for us to obtain additional debt financing. Our failure to maintain or improve our credit ratings could in turn have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, the trading/redemption price of our securities, and our ability to satisfy our debt service obligations and to pay dividends and distributions to our equity holders.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR ORGANIZATION AND STRUCTURE

We depend on dividends and distributions from our direct and indirect subsidiaries. The creditors and preferred equity holders of these subsidiaries are entitled to amounts payable to them by the subsidiaries before the subsidiaries may pay any dividends or distributions to us.

Substantially all of Vornado’s assets are held through the Operating Partnership which holds substantially all of its properties and assets through subsidiaries. The Operating Partnership’s cash flow is dependent on cash distributions to it by its subsidiaries, and in turn, substantially all of Vornado’s cash flow is dependent on cash distributions to it by the Operating Partnership. The creditors of each of Vornado’s direct and indirect subsidiaries are entitled to payment of that subsidiary’s obligations to them, when due and payable, before distributions may be made by that subsidiary to its equity holders. Thus, the Operating Partnership’s ability to make distributions to its equity holders depends on its subsidiaries’ ability first to satisfy their obligations to their creditors and then to make distributions to the Operating Partnership. Consequently, Vornado’s ability to pay dividends to its holders of common and preferred shares depends on the Operating Partnership’s ability first to satisfy its obligations to its creditors and make distributions to holders of its preferred units and then to make distributions to Vornado.

Furthermore, the holders of preferred units of the Operating Partnership are entitled to receive preferred distributions before payment of distributions to the Operating Partnership’s equity holders, including Vornado. Thus, Vornado’s ability to pay cash dividends to its equity holders and satisfy its debt obligations depends on the Operating Partnership’s ability first to satisfy its obligations to its creditors and make distributions to holders of its preferred units and then to its equity holders, including Vornado. As of December 31, 2023, there were six series of preferred units of the Operating Partnership not held by Vornado with a total liquidation value of $52,921,000.

In addition, Vornado’s participation in any distribution of the assets of any of its direct or indirect subsidiaries upon the liquidation, reorganization or insolvency is only after the claims of the creditors, including trade creditors and preferred equity holders, are satisfied.

Vornado’s Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust (the “declaration of trust”) sets limits on the ownership of its shares.

Generally, for Vornado to maintain its qualification as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code, not more than 50% in value of the outstanding shares of beneficial interest of Vornado may be owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals at any time during the last half of Vornado’s taxable year. The Internal Revenue Code defines “individuals” for purposes of the requirement described in the preceding sentence to include some types of entities. Under Vornado’s declaration of trust, as amended, no person may own more than 6.7% of the outstanding common shares of any class, or 9.9% of the outstanding preferred shares of any class, with some exceptions for persons who held common shares in excess of the 6.7% limit before Vornado adopted the limit and other persons approved by Vornado’s Board of Trustees. In addition, our declaration of trust includes restrictions on ownership of our common shares and preferred shares to preserve our status as a "domestically controlled qualified investment entity" within the meaning of Section 897 (h)(4)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. These restrictions on transferability and ownership may delay, deter or prevent a change in control of Vornado or other transaction that might involve a premium price or otherwise be in the best interest of equity holders.

The Maryland General Corporation Law (the “MGCL”) contains provisions that may reduce the likelihood of certain takeover transactions.

The MGCL imposes conditions and restrictions on certain “business combinations” (including, among other transactions, a merger, consolidation, share exchange, or, in certain circumstances, an asset transfer or issuance of equity securities) between a Maryland REIT and certain persons who beneficially own at least 10% of the corporation’s stock (an “interested shareholder”). Unless approved in advance by the board of trustees of the trust, or otherwise exempted by the statute, such a business combination is prohibited for a period of five years after the most recent date on which the interested shareholder became an interested shareholder. After such five-year period, a business combination with an interested shareholder must be: (a) recommended by the board of trustees of the trust, and (b) approved by the affirmative vote of at least (i) 80% of the trust’s outstanding shares entitled to vote and (ii) two-thirds of the trust’s outstanding shares entitled to vote which are not held by the interested shareholder with whom the business combination is to be effected, unless, among other things, the trust’s common shareholders receive a “fair price” (as defined by the statute) for their shares and the consideration is received in cash or in the same form as previously paid by the interested shareholder for his or her shares.

In approving a transaction, Vornado’s Board of Trustees may provide that its approval is subject to compliance, at or after the time of approval, with any terms and conditions determined by the Board of Trustees. Vornado’s Board of Trustees has adopted a resolution exempting any business combination between Vornado and any trustee or officer of Vornado or its affiliates. As a result, any trustee or officer of Vornado or its affiliates may be able to enter into business combinations with Vornado that may not be in the best interest of our equity holders. With respect to business combinations with other persons, the business combination provisions of the MGCL may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of Vornado or other transaction that might involve a premium price or otherwise be in the best interest of our equity holders. The business combination statute may discourage others from trying to acquire control of Vornado and increase the difficulty of consummating any offer.

Title 3, Subtitle 8 of the MGCL permits our Board of Trustees, without shareholder approval and regardless of what is currently provided in our declaration of trust or bylaws, to implement certain takeover defenses, including adopting a classified board or increasing the vote required to remove a trustee. Such takeover defenses may have the effect of inhibiting a third party from making an acquisition proposal for us or of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of us under the circumstances that otherwise could provide our common shareholders with the opportunity to realize a premium over the then current market price.

Vornado may issue additional shares in a manner that could adversely affect the likelihood of certain takeover transactions.

Vornado’s declaration of trust authorizes the Board of Trustees to:

  • cause Vornado to issue additional authorized but unissued common shares or preferred shares;
  • classify or reclassify, in one or more series, any unissued preferred shares;
  • set the preferences, rights and other terms of any classified or reclassified shares that Vornado issues; and
  • increase, without shareholder approval, the number of shares of beneficial interest that Vornado may issue.

Vornado’s Board of Trustees could establish a series of preferred shares whose terms could delay, deter or prevent a change in control of Vornado, and therefore of the Operating Partnership, or other transaction that might involve a premium price or otherwise be in the best interest of our equity holders, although Vornado’s Board of Trustees does not now intend to establish a series of preferred shares of this kind. Vornado’s declaration of trust and bylaws contain other provisions that may delay, deter or prevent a change in control of Vornado or other transaction that might involve a premium price or otherwise be in the best interest of our equity holders.

We may change our policies without obtaining the approval of our equity holders.

Our operating and financial policies, including our policies with respect to acquisitions of real estate or other companies, growth, operations, indebtedness, capitalization, dividends and distributions, are exclusively determined by Vornado’s Board of Trustees. Accordingly, our equity holders do not control these policies.

Steven Roth and Interstate Properties may exercise substantial influence over us. They and some of Vornado’s other trustees and officers have interests or positions in other entities that may compete with us.

As of December 31, 2023, Interstate Properties, a New Jersey general partnership, and its partners beneficially owned an aggregate of approximately 7.0% of the common shares of beneficial interest of Vornado and 26.0% of the common stock of Alexander’s, which is described below. Steven Roth, David Mandelbaum and Russell B. Wight, Jr. are the three partners of Interstate Properties. Mr. Roth is the Chairman of the Board of Trustees and Chief Executive Officer of Vornado, the managing general partner of Interstate Properties, and the Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of Alexander’s. Messrs. Mandelbaum and Wight are Trustees of Vornado and Directors of Alexander’s.

Because of these overlapping interests, Mr. Roth and Interstate Properties and its partners may have substantial influence over Vornado, and therefore over the Operating Partnership. In addition, certain decisions concerning our operations or financial structure may present conflicts of interest among Messrs. Roth, Mandelbaum and Wight and Interstate Properties and our other equity holders. In addition, Mr. Roth, Interstate Properties and its partners, and Alexander’s currently and may in the future engage in a wide variety of activities in the real estate business which may result in conflicts of interest with respect to matters affecting us, such as which of these entities or persons, if any, may take advantage of potential business opportunities, the business focus of these entities, the types of properties and geographic locations in which these entities make investments, potential competition between business activities conducted, or sought to be conducted, competition for properties and tenants, possible corporate transactions such as acquisitions and other strategic decisions affecting the future of these entities.

We manage and lease the real estate assets of Interstate Properties pursuant to a management agreement for which we receive an annual fee equal to 4% of annual base rent and percentage rent. See Note 22 – Related Party Transactions to our consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information.

There may be conflicts of interest between Alexander’s and us.

As of December 31, 2023, we owned 32.4% of the outstanding common stock of Alexander’s. Alexander’s is a REIT that has five properties, which are located in the greater New York metropolitan area. In addition to the 2.3% that they indirectly own through Vornado, Interstate Properties, which is described above, and its partners owned 26.0% of the outstanding common stock of Alexander’s as of December 31, 2023. Mr. Roth is the Chairman of the Board of Trustees and Chief Executive Officer of Vornado, the managing general partner of Interstate Properties, and the Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of Alexander’s. Messrs. Mandelbaum and Wight are Trustees of Vornado and Directors of Alexander’s and general partners of Interstate Properties. Ms. Mandakini Puri is a Trustee of Vornado and Director of Alexander’s.

We manage, develop and lease Alexander’s properties under management, development and leasing agreements under which we receive annual fees from Alexander’s. These agreements are described in Note 5 – Investments in Partially Owned Entities to our consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR COMMON SHARES AND OPERATING PARTNERSHIP CLASS A UNITS

The trading price of Vornado’s common shares has been volatile and may continue to fluctuate.

The trading price of Vornado’s common shares has been volatile and may continue to fluctuate widely as a result of several factors, many of which are outside our control. In addition, the stock market is subject to fluctuations in the share prices and trading volumes that affect the market prices of the shares of many companies. These broad market fluctuations have in the past and may in the future adversely affect the market price of Vornado’s common shares and the redemption price of the Operating Partnership’s Class A units. These factors include:

  • our financial condition and performance;
  • the financial condition of our tenants, including the extent of tenant bankruptcies or defaults;
  • actual or anticipated quarterly fluctuations in our operating results and financial condition;
  • our dividend policy;
  • the reputation of REITs and real estate investments generally and the attractiveness of REIT equity securities in comparison to other equity securities, including securities issued by other real estate companies, and fixed income securities;
  • uncertainty and volatility in the equity and credit markets;
  • interest rates increases;
  • changes in revenue or earnings estimates or publication of research reports and recommendations by financial analysts or actions taken by rating agencies with respect to our securities or those of other REITs;
  • failure to meet analysts’ revenue or earnings estimates;
  • speculation in the press or investment community;
  • strategic actions by us or our competitors, such as acquisitions or restructurings;
  • the extent of institutional investor interest in us;
  • the extent of short-selling of Vornado common shares and the shares of our competitors;
  • fluctuations in the stock price and operating results of our competitors;
  • share repurchase plans;
  • general financial and economic market conditions and, in particular, developments related to market conditions for office REITs and other real estate related companies and the New York City real estate market;
  • inflation;
  • local, domestic and international economic factors unrelated to our performance (including the macro-economic impact of geopolitical conflicts);
  • fiscal policies or inaction at the U.S. federal government level that may lead to federal government shutdowns or negative impacts on the U.S. economy;
  • changes in tax laws and rules; and
  • all other risk factors addressed elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

A significant decline in Vornado’s stock price could result in substantial losses for our equity holders.

Vornado has many shares available for future sale, which could hurt the market price of its shares and the redemption price of the Operating Partnership’s units.

The interests of equity holders could be diluted if we issue additional equity securities. As of December 31, 2023, Vornado had authorized but unissued 59,609,297 common shares of beneficial interest, $0.04 par value, and 58,387,098 preferred shares of beneficial interest, no par value; of which 22,186,690 common shares are reserved for issuance upon redemption of Class A Operating Partnership units, convertible securities and employee stock options and 11,200,000 preferred shares are reserved for issuance upon redemption of preferred Operating Partnership units. Any shares not reserved may be issued from time to time in public or private offerings or in connection with acquisitions. In addition, common and preferred shares reserved may be sold upon issuance in the public market after registration under the Securities Act or under Rule 144 under the Securities Act or other available exemptions from registration. We cannot predict the effect that future sales of Vornado’s common and preferred shares or Operating Partnership Class A and preferred units will have on the market prices of our securities.

In addition, under Maryland law, Vornado’s Board of Trustees has the authority to increase the number of authorized shares without shareholder approval.

Loss of our key personnel could harm our operations and adversely affect the value of our common shares and Operating Partnership Class A units.

We are dependent on the efforts of Steven Roth, the Chairman of the Board of Trustees and Chief Executive Officer of Vornado. While we believe that we could find a replacement for him and other key personnel, the loss of their services could harm our operations and adversely affect the value of our securities.

RISKS RELATED TO REGULATORY COMPLIANCE

Vornado may fail to qualify or remain qualified as a REIT and may be required to pay federal income taxes at corporate rates, which could adversely impact the value of our common shares.

Although we believe that Vornado will remain organized and will continue to operate so as to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, Vornado may fail to remain so qualified. Qualifications are governed by highly technical and complex provisions of the Internal Revenue Code for which there are only limited judicial or administrative interpretations and depend on various facts and circumstances that are not entirely within our control. In addition, legislation, new regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions may significantly change the relevant tax laws and/or the federal income tax consequences of qualifying as a REIT. If, with respect to any taxable year, Vornado fails to maintain its qualification as a REIT and does not qualify under statutory relief provisions, Vornado could not deduct distributions to shareholders in computing our taxable income and would have to pay federal income tax on its taxable income at regular corporate rates. The federal income tax payable would include any applicable alternative minimum tax. If Vornado had to pay federal income tax, the amount of money available to distribute to equity holders and pay its indebtedness would be reduced for the year or years involved, and Vornado would not be required to make distributions to shareholders in that taxable year and in future years until it was able to qualify as a REIT and did so. In addition, Vornado would also be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which qualification was lost, unless Vornado were entitled to relief under the relevant statutory provisions. Our failure to qualify as a REIT could impact our ability to expand our business and raise capital and adversely affect the value of our common shares.

We may face possible adverse federal tax audits and changes in federal tax laws, which may result in an increase in our tax liability.

In the normal course of business, certain entities through which we own real estate either have undergone or may undergo tax audits. Although we believe that we have substantial arguments in favor of our positions, in some instances there is no controlling precedent or interpretive guidance. There can be no assurance that audits will not occur with increased frequency or that the ultimate result of such audits will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

At any time, the U.S. federal income tax laws governing REITs or the administrative interpretations of those laws may be amended. We cannot predict if or when any new U.S. federal income tax law, regulation, or administrative interpretation, or any amendment to any existing U.S. federal income tax law, Treasury regulation or administrative interpretation, will be adopted, promulgated or become effective and any such law, regulation, or interpretation may take effect retroactively. Vornado, its taxable REIT subsidiaries, and our security holders could be adversely affected by any such change in, or any new, U.S. federal income tax law, Treasury regulation or administrative interpretation.

We may face possible adverse state and local tax audits and changes in state and local tax law.

Because Vornado is organized and qualifies as a REIT, it is generally not subject to federal income taxes, but we are subject to certain state and local taxes. In the normal course of business, certain entities through which we own real estate either have undergone, or are currently undergoing, tax audits. Although we believe that we have substantial arguments in favor of our positions in the ongoing audits, in some instances there is no controlling precedent or interpretive guidance on the specific point at issue. There can be no assurance that audits will not occur with increased frequency or that the ultimate result of such audits will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

From time to time changes in state and local tax laws or regulations are enacted, which may result in an increase in our tax liability. A shortfall in tax revenues for states and municipalities in which we operate may lead to an increase in the frequency and size of such changes including changes in laws, regulations and administration of property and transfer taxes. If such changes occur, we may be required to pay additional taxes on our assets or income. These increased tax costs could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations and the amount of cash available for the payment of dividends and distributions to our security holders.

Compliance or failure to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (the "ADA") or other safety regulations and requirements could result in substantial costs.

The ADA generally requires that public buildings, including our properties, meet certain Federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. Noncompliance could result in the imposition of fines by the Federal government or the award of damages to private litigants and/or legal fees to their counsel. From time to time persons have asserted claims against us with respect to some of our properties under the ADA, but to date such claims have not resulted in any material expense or liability. If, under the ADA, we are required to make substantial alterations and capital expenditures in one or more of our properties, including the removal of access barriers, it could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations, as well as the amount of cash available for distribution to equity holders.

Our properties are subject to various federal, state and local regulatory requirements, such as state and local fire and life safety requirements. If we fail to comply with these requirements, we could incur fines or private damage awards. We do not know whether existing requirements will change or whether compliance with future requirements will require significant unanticipated expenditures that will affect our cash flow and results of operations.

We may incur significant costs to comply with environmental laws and environmental contamination may impair our ability to lease and/or sell real estate.

Our operations and properties are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations concerning the protection of the environment, including air and water quality, hazardous or toxic substances and health and safety. Under some environmental laws, a current or previous owner or operator of real estate may be required to investigate and clean up hazardous or toxic substances released at a property. The owner or operator may also be held liable to a governmental entity or to third parties for property damage or personal injuries and for investigation and clean-up costs incurred by those parties because of the contamination. These laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of the release of the substances or caused the release. The presence of contamination or the failure to remediate contamination may also impair our ability to sell or lease real estate or to borrow using the real estate as collateral. Other laws and regulations govern indoor and outdoor air quality including those that can require the abatement or removal of asbestos-containing materials in the event of damage, demolition, renovation or remodeling and govern emissions of and exposure to asbestos fibers in the air. The maintenance and removal of lead paint and certain electrical equipment containing polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) are also regulated by federal and state laws. We are also subject to risks associated with human exposure to chemical or biological contaminants such as molds, pollens, viruses and bacteria which, above certain levels, can be alleged to be connected to allergic or other health effects and symptoms in susceptible individuals. Our predecessor companies may be subject to similar liabilities for activities of those companies in the past. We could incur fines for environmental compliance and be held liable for the costs of remedial action with respect to the foregoing regulated substances or related claims arising out of environmental contamination or human exposure to contamination at or from our properties.

Each of our properties has been subject to varying degrees of environmental assessment. To date, these environmental assessments have not revealed any environmental condition material to our business. However, identification of new compliance concerns or undiscovered areas of contamination, changes in the extent or known scope of contamination, human exposure to contamination or changes in clean-up or compliance requirements could result in significant costs to us.

RISKS RELATED TO TECHNOLOGY, CYBERSECURITY AND DATA PROTECTION

The occurrence of cyber incidents, or a deficiency in our cyber security, as well as other disruptions to our IT networks and related systems, could negatively impact our business by causing a disruption to our operations, a compromise or corruption of our confidential information, and/or damage to our business relationships or reputation, all of which could negatively impact our financial results.

Our IT networks and related systems are essential to the operation of our business and our ability to perform day-to-day operations (including managing our building systems) and, in some cases, may be critical to the operations of certain of our tenants. We face risks associated with security breaches, whether through cyber-attacks, malware, ransomware, computer viruses, phishing, attachments to e-mails, persons who access our systems from inside or outside our organization, and other significant disruptions of our IT networks and related systems. Our suppliers, subcontractors, and joint venture partners face similar threats and an incident at one of these entities could adversely impact our business. These entities are typically outside our control and may have access to certain of our information with varying levels of security and cybersecurity resources. The risk of a security breach or disruption, particularly through cyber attack, including by computer hackers, foreign governments and cyber terrorists, has generally increased as the number, intensity and sophistication of attempted attacks from around the world have increased, including through the use of artificial intelligence. Although we have not experienced cyber incidents that are individually, or in the aggregate, material, the incidents we have experienced thus far have been mitigated by preventative, detective, and responsive measures that we have put in place. Although we make efforts to maintain the security and integrity of these types of IT networks and related systems, and we have implemented various measures to manage the risk of a security breach or disruption, there can be no assurance that our security efforts and measures will be effective or that attempted security breaches or disruptions would not be successful or damaging. Unauthorized parties, whether within or outside our company, may disrupt or gain access to our systems, or those of third parties with whom we do business, through human error, misfeasance, fraud, trickery, or other forms of deceit, including break-ins, use of stolen credentials, social engineering, phishing, computer viruses or other malicious codes, and similar means of unauthorized and destructive tampering. Even the most well protected information, networks, systems and facilities remain potentially vulnerable because the techniques used in such attempted security breaches evolve and generally are not recognized until launched against a target, and in some cases are designed to not be detected and, in fact, may not be detected. Accordingly, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate security barriers or other preventative measures, and thus it is impossible for us to entirely mitigate this risk.

A security breach or other significant disruption involving our IT networks and related systems could disrupt the proper functioning of our networks and systems and therefore our operations and/or those of certain of our tenants; result in the unauthorized access to, and destruction, loss, theft, misappropriation or release of, proprietary, confidential, sensitive or otherwise valuable information of ours or others, which others could use to compete against us or which could expose us to damage claims by third-parties for disruptive, destructive or otherwise harmful purposes and outcomes; result in our inability to maintain the building systems relied upon by our tenants for the efficient use of their leased space; require significant management attention and resources to remedy any damages that result; may require payments to the attackers; subject us to litigation claims for breach of contract, damages, credits, fines, penalties, governmental investigations and enforcement actions or termination of leases or other agreements; or damage our reputation among our tenants and investors generally. Any or all of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

A cyber attack or systems failure could interfere with our ability to comply with financial reporting requirements, which could adversely affect us. A cyber attack could also compromise the confidential information of our employees, tenants, customers and vendors. A successful attack could disrupt and materially affect our business operations, including damaging relationships with tenants, customers and vendors. Any compromise of our information security systems could also result in a violation of applicable privacy and other laws, significant legal and financial exposure, damage to our reputation, loss or misuse of the information (which may be confidential, proprietary and/or commercially sensitive in nature) and a loss of confidence in our security measures, which could harm our business.

For additional information on our cybersecurity risk management process, see Item 1C. Cybersecurity.

Cybersecurity

As filed, 4,040 characters, with its headings, lists and tables. Extracted from the main document; charts and exhibits are in the original on sec.gov.

Risk Management and Strategy

We employ a comprehensive risk management strategy for the assessment, identification and management of material risks stemming from cybersecurity threats. Our methodologies involve a systematic evaluation of potential threats, vulnerabilities, and their potential impacts on our organization’s operations, data, and systems.

Our cybersecurity risk management program is integrated into our overall enterprise risk management program, and shares common methodologies, reporting channels and governance processes that apply across the enterprise risk management program, including legal, compliance, strategic, operational, and financial risk areas.

Our cybersecurity risk management program includes:

  • Risk assessments designed to help identify material cybersecurity risks to our critical systems, information, and our broader enterprise IT environment;
  • A team principally responsible for managing (i) our cybersecurity risk assessment processes, (ii) our security controls and (iii) our response to cybersecurity incidents;
  • The use of external service providers, where appropriate, to assess, test or otherwise assist with aspects of our security controls;
  • Cybersecurity awareness training of our employees, incident response personnel and senior management, including through the use of third-party providers for regular mandatory trainings;
  • A cybersecurity incident response plan that includes procedures for responding to cybersecurity incidents; and
  • A risk management process for third-party service providers, suppliers, and vendors. We employ rigorous vetting processes and ongoing monitoring mechanisms designed to ensure their compliance with cybersecurity standards.

As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we are not aware of any risks from cybersecurity threats, including as a result of any previous cybersecurity incidents, that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect us, including our operations, business strategy, results of operations, or financial condition.

Governance

Our Board of Trustee’s considers cybersecurity risk as part of its risk oversight function and has delegated to the Audit Committee (the “Committee”) oversight of cybersecurity and other information technology risks. The Committee oversees management’s implementation of our cybersecurity risk management program.

The Committee receives periodic reports from management on our potential cybersecurity risks and threats and receives presentations on cybersecurity topics from our Chief Information Officer. The Committee reports to the full Board of Trustees regarding its activities, including those related to cybersecurity. The full Board of Trustees also receives briefings from management on cybersecurity matters as needed.

Our management team, including our Chief Information Officer, is responsible for assessing and managing our material risks from cybersecurity threats. The team has primary responsibility for our overall cybersecurity risk management program and supervises both our internal cybersecurity personnel and our retained external cybersecurity consultants. Our Chief Information Officer has many years of experience leading cybersecurity oversight and overall has broad, extensive experience with information technology, including security, auditing, compliance, systems and programming.

Our management team supervises efforts to prevent, detect, mitigate, and remediate cybersecurity risks and incidents through various means, which may include briefings from internal security personnel; threat intelligence and other information obtained from governmental, public or private sources, including external consultants engaged by us; and alerts and reports produced by security tools deployed in the IT environment. Our cybersecurity incident response plan governs our assessment and response upon the occurrence of a material cybersecurity incident, including the process for informing senior management and our Board of Trustees.

Properties

As filed, 16,695 characters, with its headings, lists and tables. Extracted from the main document; charts and exhibits are in the original on sec.gov.

PROPERTY LISTING

We operate in two reportable segments: New York and Other. The following pages provide details of our real estate properties as of December 31, 2023.

NEW YORK SEGMENT Property % Ownership Type % Occupancy Square Feet In Service Under Development or Not Available for Lease Total Property
PENN 1 (ground leased through 2098)(1) 100.0% Office / Retail 82.4% 2,329,000 228,000 2,557,000
1290 Avenue of the Americas 70.0% Office / Retail 99.8% 2,120,000 — 2,120,000
PENN 2 100.0% Office / Retail 100.0% 338,000 1,457,000 1,795,000
909 Third Avenue (ground leased through 2063)(1) 100.0% Office 95.0% 1,351,000 — 1,351,000
280 Park Avenue(2) 50.0% Office / Retail 95.3% 1,265,000 — 1,265,000
Independence Plaza, Tribeca (1,327 units)(2) 50.1% Retail / Residential 57.6% (3) 1,258,000 — 1,258,000
770 Broadway 100.0% Office / Retail 79.7% 1,183,000 — 1,183,000
PENN 11 100.0% Office / Retail 99.3% 1,149,000 — 1,149,000
100 West 33rd Street 100.0% Office / Retail 70.6% 1,114,000 — 1,114,000
90 Park Avenue 100.0% Office / Retail 95.2% 956,000 — 956,000
One Park Avenue 100.0% Office / Retail 95.0% 945,000 — 945,000
888 Seventh Avenue (ground leased through 2067)(1) 100.0% Office / Retail 86.5% 887,000 — 887,000
The Farley Building (ground and building leased through 2116)(1) 95.0% Office / Retail 91.4% 847,000 — 847,000
330 West 34th Street (65.2% ground leased through 2149)(1) 100.0% Office / Retail 75.7% 724,000 — 724,000
85 Tenth Avenue(2) 49.9% Office / Retail 84.5% 638,000 — 638,000
650 Madison Avenue(2) 20.1% Office / Retail 86.1% 601,000 — 601,000
350 Park Avenue 100.0% Office 100.0% 585,000 — 585,000
150 East 58th Street(4) 100.0% Office / Retail 83.2% 544,000 — 544,000
7 West 34th Street(2) 53.0% Office / Retail 100.0% 477,000 — 477,000
595 Madison Avenue 100.0% Office / Retail 89.5% 330,000 — 330,000
640 Fifth Avenue(2) 52.0% Office / Retail 92.3% 315,000 — 315,000
50-70 West 93rd Street (324 units)(2) 49.9% Residential 99.7% 283,000 — 283,000
Sunset Pier 94 Studios (ground and building leased through 2110)(1)(2) 49.9% Studio (5) — 266,000 266,000
260 Eleventh Avenue (ground leased through 2114)(1) 100.0% Office 100.0% 209,000 — 209,000
4 Union Square South 100.0% Retail 100.0% 204,000 — 204,000
61 Ninth Avenue (2 buildings) (ground leased through 2115)(1)(2) 45.1% Office / Retail 100.0% 194,000 — 194,000
512 West 22nd Street(2) 55.0% Office / Retail 85.2% 173,000 — 173,000
825 Seventh Avenue 51.2% Office(2) / Retail 80.1% 173,000 — 173,000
1540 Broadway(2) 52.0% Retail 78.5% 161,000 — 161,000
Paramus 100.0% Office 81.2% 129,000 — 129,000
666 Fifth Avenue (2)(6) 52.0% Retail 100.0% 114,000 — 114,000
1535 Broadway(2) 52.0% Retail / Theatre 100.0% 107,000 — 107,000
57th Street (2 buildings)(2) 50.0% Office / Retail 78.3% 103,000 — 103,000
689 Fifth Avenue(2) 52.0% Office / Retail 100.0% 98,000 — 98,000
150 West 34th Street 100.0% Retail 100.0% 78,000 — 78,000
655 Fifth Avenue(2) 50.0% Retail 100.0% 57,000 — 57,000
435 Seventh Avenue 100.0% Retail 100.0% 43,000 — 43,000
606 Broadway 50.0% Office / Retail 81.8% 36,000 — 36,000
697-703 Fifth Avenue(2) 44.8% Retail 100.0% 26,000 — 26,000
1131 Third Avenue 100.0% Retail 100.0% 23,000 — 23,000
131-135 West 33rd Street 100.0% Retail 100.0% 23,000 — 23,000

See notes on page 28.

PROPERTY LISTING – CONTINUED

NEW YORK SEGMENT – CONTINUED Property % Ownership Type % Occupancy Square Feet In Service Under Development or Not Available for Lease Total Property
715 Lexington Avenue 100.0% Retail 100.0% 22,000 — 22,000
537 West 26th Street 100.0% Retail 100.0% 17,000 — 17,000
334 Canal Street (4 units) 100.0% Retail / Residential —% (3) — 14,000 14,000
304-306 Canal Street (4 units) 100.0% Retail / Residential 100.0% (3) 4,000 9,000 13,000
40 East 66th Street (3 units) 100.0% Residential 100.0% 10,000 — 10,000
431 Seventh Avenue 100.0% Retail 100.0% 9,000 — 9,000
138-142 West 32nd Street 100.0% Retail 80.3% 8,000 — 8,000
339 Greenwich Street 100.0% Retail 100.0% 8,000 — 8,000
966 Third Avenue 100.0% Retail 100.0% 7,000 — 7,000
968 Third Avenue(2) 50.0% Retail 100.0% 7,000 — 7,000
137 West 33rd Street 100.0% Retail 100.0% 3,000 — 3,000
57th Street(2) 50.0% Land (5) — — —
Eighth Avenue and 34th Street 100.0% Land (5) — — —
Hotel Pennsylvania Site(7) 100.0% Land (5) — — —
Other (3 buildings) 100.0% Retail 65.4% 16,000 — 16,000
Alexander's, Inc.:
731 Lexington Avenue(2) 32.4% Office / Retail 98.9% 1,079,000 — 1,079,000
Rego Park II, Queens (6.6 acres)(2) 32.4% Retail 76.9% 616,000 — 616,000
Rego Park I, Queens (4.8 acres)(2) 32.4% Retail 100.0% 214,000 124,000 338,000
The Alexander Apartment Tower, Queens (312 units)(2) 32.4% Residential 95.2% 255,000 — 255,000
Flushing, Queens (1.0 acre ground leased through 2037)(1)(2) 32.4% Retail 100.0% 167,000 — 167,000
Total New York Segment 90.0% 24,632,000 2,098,000 26,730,000
Our Ownership Interest 89.4% 19,185,000 1,881,000 21,066,000

See notes on page 28.

PROPERTY LISTING – CONTINUED

OTHER SEGMENT Property THE MART: % Ownership Type % Occupancy Square Feet In Service Under Development or Not Available for Lease Total Property
THE MART, Chicago 100.0% Office / Retail / Trade show / Showroom 79.1% 3,669,000 — 3,669,000
527 West Kinzie, Chicago 100.0% Land (5) — — —
Other (2 properties)(2), Chicago 50.0% Retail 100.0% 19,000 — 19,000
Total THE MART 79.2% 3,688,000 — 3,688,000
Our Ownership Interest 79.2% 3,679,000 — 3,679,000
555 California Street:
555 California Street 70.0% Office / Retail 98.7% 1,506,000 — 1,506,000
315 Montgomery Street 70.0% Office / Retail 99.7% 235,000 — 235,000
345 Montgomery Street 70.0% Office / Retail —% 78,000 — 78,000
Total 555 California Street 94.5% 1,819,000 — 1,819,000
Our Ownership Interest 94.5% 1,274,000 — 1,274,000
Other:
Rosslyn Plaza, VA (197 units)(2) 45.6% Office / Residential 58.4% (3) 685,000 304,000 989,000
Fashion Centre Mall / Washington Tower, VA(2) 7.5% Office / Retail 93.5% 1,038,000 — 1,038,000
Wayne Towne Center, Wayne, NJ (ground leased through 2064)(1) 100.0% Retail 100.0% 686,000 4,000 690,000
Annapolis, MD (ground leased through 2042)(1) 100.0% Retail 100.0% 128,000 — 128,000
Atlantic City, NJ (11.3 acres ground leased through 2070 to VICI Properties for a portion of the Borgata Hotel and Casino complex) 100.0% Land 100.0% — — —
Total Other 89.2% 2,537,000 308,000 2,845,000
Our Ownership Interest 91.9% 1,202,000 144,000 1,346,000

(1) Term assumes all renewal options exercised, if applicable.

(2) Denotes property not consolidated in the accompanying consolidated financial statements and related financial data included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K.

(3) Excludes residential occupancy statistics.

(4) Includes 962 Third Avenue (the Annex building to 150 East 58th Street) 50.0% ground leased through 2118 (assuming all renewal options are exercised).

(5) Properties under development or to be developed.

(6) 75,000 square feet is leased from 666 Fifth Avenue office condominium.

(7) Demolition of the existing building was completed in the third quarter of 2023.

TOP 10 TENANTS BASED ON ANNUALIZED ESCALATED RENTS(1) (AT SHARE):

Tenant Square Footage At Share Annualized Escalated Rents At Share % of Total Annualized Escalated Rents At Share
Meta Platforms, Inc. 1,451,153 $167,180 9.3%
IPG and affiliates 1,044,715 69,186 3.9%
Citadel 585,460 62,498 3.5%
New York University 685,290 48,886 2.7%
Google/Motorola Mobility (guaranteed by Google) 759,446 41,765 2.3%
Bloomberg L.P. 306,768 41,279 2.3%
Amazon (including its Whole Foods subsidiary) 312,694 30,699 1.7%
Neuberger Berman Group LLC 306,612 28,184 1.6%
Swatch Group USA 11,957 27,333 1.5%
Madison Square Garden & Affiliates 408,031 27,326 1.5%

See note below.

ANNUALIZED ESCALATED RENTS(1) (AT SHARE) BY TENANT INDUSTRY:

Industry Office: Percentage
Financial Services 22%
Technology 16%
Professional Services 7%
Advertising/Marketing 5%
Entertainment and Electronics 4%
Real Estate 3%
Insurance 3%
Education 3%
Apparel 2%
Engineering, Architect & Surveying 2%
Health Services 2%
Communications 1%
Government 1%
Other 6%
77%
Retail:
Apparel 5%
Luxury Retail 4%
Banking 2%
Restaurants 2%
Grocery 1%
Other 4%
18%
Showroom 5%
Total 100%

(1) Represents monthly contractual base rent before free rent plus tenant reimbursements multiplied by 12. Annualized escalated rents at share include leases signed but not yet commenced in place of current tenants or vacancy in the same space.

NEW YORK

As of December 31, 2023, our New York segment consisted of 26.7 million square feet in 60 properties. The 26.7 million square feet is comprised of 20.4 million square feet of Manhattan office in 30 of the properties, 2.4 million square feet of Manhattan street retail in 50 of the properties, 1,662 units in five residential properties, and our 32.4% interest in Alexander’s, which owns five properties in the greater New York metropolitan area, including 731 Lexington Avenue, the 1.1 million square foot Bloomberg, L.P. headquarters building, and The Alexander, a 312-unit apartment tower in Queens. The New York segment also includes nine garages totaling 1.6 million square feet (4,685 spaces).

As of December 31, 2023, the occupancy rate for our New York segment was 89.4%.

Occupancy and weighted average annual rent per square foot:

Office:

As of December 31, Total Square Feet In Service Square Feet Vornado's Ownership Interest In Service Square Feet At Share Occupancy Rate Weighted Average Annual Escalated Rent Per Square Foot
2023 20,383,000 18,699,000 16,001,000 90.7% $86.30
2022 19,902,000 18,724,000 16,028,000 91.9% 83.98
2021 20,630,000 19,442,000 16,757,000 92.2% 80.01
2020 20,586,000 18,361,000 15,413,000 93.4% 79.05
2019 20,666,000 19,070,000 16,195,000 96.9% 76.26

Retail:

As of December 31, Total Square Feet In Service Square Feet Vornado's Ownership Interest In Service Square Feet At Share Occupancy Rate Weighted Average Annual Escalated Rent Per Square Foot
2023 2,394,000 2,123,000 1,684,000 74.9% $224.88
2022 2,556,000 2,289,000 1,851,000 74.4% 215.72
2021 2,693,000 2,267,000 1,825,000 80.7% 214.22
2020 2,690,000 2,275,000 1,805,000 78.8% 226.38
2019 2,712,000 2,300,000 1,842,000 94.5% 209.86

Occupancy and average monthly rent per unit:

Residential:

As of December 31, Total Number of Units Vornado's Ownership Interest Total Number of Units Occupancy Rate Average Monthly Rent Per Unit
2023 1,974 939 96.8% $4,115
2022 1,976 941 96.7% 3,882
2021 1,986 951 97.0% 3,776
2020 1,995 960 84.9% 3,714
2019 1,996 960 97.5% 3,902

30

NEW YORK – CONTINUED

Lease expirations as of December 31, 2023 (at share):

Year Office: Number of Expiring Leases Square Feet of Expiring Leases(1) Total Percentage of New York Square Feet Per Square Foot Annualized Escalated Rents of Expiring Leases
Fourth Quarter 2023(2) 12 223,000 1.6% $23,965,000 $107.47
2024 76 713,000 5.0% 63,535,000 89.11 (3)
2025 67 586,000 4.1% 45,758,000 78.09
2026 79 1,163,000 8.1% 94,536,000 81.29
2027 95 1,301,000 9.1% 102,958,000 79.14
2028(4) 65 1,044,000 7.3% 84,045,000 80.50
2029 59 1,241,000 8.7% 100,418,000 80.92
2030 50 643,000 4.5% 54,540,000 84.82
2031 31 891,000 6.2% 80,847,000 90.74
2032 22 958,000 6.7% 94,504,000 98.65
2033 21 502,000 4.0% 42,938,000 85.53
Retail:
Fourth Quarter 2023(2) 3 11,000 1.0% $1,122,000 $102.00
2024 11 197,000 17.7% 20,532,000 104.22 (5)
2025 12 50,000 4.5% 13,076,000 261.52
2026 10 82,000 7.3% 26,414,000 322.12
2027 10 32,000 2.9% 20,509,000 640.91
2028 9 32,000 2.9% 14,731,000 460.34
2029 14 53,000 4.7% 27,460,000 518.11
2030 21 153,000 13.7% 23,416,000 153.05
2031 24 68,000 6.1% 30,383,000 446.81
2032 21 57,000 5.1% 29,537,000 518.19
2033 7 17,000 1.5% 6,022,000 354.24

(1) Excludes storage, vacancy and other.

(2) Includes month-to-month leases, holdover tenants, and leases expiring on the last day of the current quarter.

(3) Based on current market conditions, we expect to re-lease this space at rents between $85 to $95 per square foot.

(4) Excludes the expiration of 492,000 square feet at 909 Third Avenue for U.S. Post Office as we assume the exercise of all renewal options through 2038 given the below-market rent on their options.

(5) Based on current market conditions, we expect to re-lease this space at rents between $125 to $150 per square foot.

Alexander’s

As of December 31, 2023, we own 32.4% of the outstanding common stock of Alexander’s, which owns five properties in the greater New York City aggregating 2.5 million square feet, including 731 Lexington Avenue, the 1.1 million square foot Bloomberg L.P. headquarters building. As of December 31, 2023, Alexander's had an occupancy rate of 92.6% and a weighted average annual rent per square foot of $107.78.

OTHER REAL ESTATE AND INVESTMENTS

THE MART

We own the 3.7 million square foot THE MART in Chicago, whose largest tenant is Motorola Mobility at 609,000 square feet, the lease of which is guaranteed by Google. As of December 31, 2023, THE MART had an occupancy rate of 79.2% and a weighted average annual rent per square foot of $52.06.

555 California Street

We own a 70% controlling interest in a three-building office complex aggregating 1.8 million square feet, located at California and Montgomery Streets in San Francisco’s financial district (“555 California Street”). As of December 31, 2023, 555 California Street had an occupancy rate of 94.5% and a weighted average annual rent per square foot of $94.93.

As filed, 291 characters, with its headings, lists and tables. Extracted from the main document; charts and exhibits are in the original on sec.gov.

We are from time to time involved in legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In our opinion, after consultation with legal counsel, the outcome of such matters is not expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Management's discussion and analysis

As filed, 82,039 characters, with its headings, lists and tables. Extracted from the main document; charts and exhibits are in the original on sec.gov.

Page Number
Overview 35
Critical Accounting Estimates 42
Net Operating Income At Share by Segment for the Years Ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 43
Results of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2023 Compared to December 31, 2022 46
Related Party Transactions 49
Liquidity and Capital Resources 50
Funds From Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 56

34

Introduction

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes included under Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Our Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations ("MD&A") within this section is focused on the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, including year-to-year comparisons between these years. Our MD&A for the year ended December 31, 2021, including year-to-year comparisons between 2022 and 2021, can be found in Part II, Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022.

Overview

Vornado Realty Trust (“Vornado”) is a fully‑integrated real estate investment trust (“REIT”) and conducts its business through, and substantially all of its interests in properties are held by, Vornado Realty L.P., (the “Operating Partnership”) a Delaware limited partnership. Accordingly, Vornado’s cash flow and ability to pay dividends to its shareholders are dependent upon the cash flow of the Operating Partnership and the ability of its direct and indirect subsidiaries to first satisfy their obligations to creditors. Vornado is the sole general partner of and owned approximately 91.0% of the common limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership as of December 31, 2023. All references to the “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” mean collectively Vornado, the Operating Partnership and those subsidiaries consolidated by Vornado.

We own and operate office and retail properties with a concentration in the New York metropolitan area. In addition, we have a 32.4% interest in Alexander’s, Inc. (“Alexander’s”) (NYSE: ALX), which owns five properties in the greater New York metropolitan area, as well as interests in other real estate and investments.

Our business objective is to maximize Vornado shareholder value, which we measure by the total return provided to our shareholders. Below is a table comparing Vornado’s performance to the FTSE NAREIT Office Index (“Office REIT”) and the MSCI US REIT Index (“MSCI”) for the following periods ended December 31, 2023:

Total Return(1) Vornado Office REIT MSCI
Three-month 25.8% 23.5% 16.0%
One-year 39.2% 2.0% 13.7%
Three-year (12.7%) (22.3%) 22.8%
Five-year (40.3%) (16.8%) 42.9%
Ten-year (33.9%) 7.0% 108.0%

(1) Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future performance.

We intend to achieve this objective by continuing to pursue our investment philosophy and to execute our operating strategies through:

  • maintaining a superior team of operating and investment professionals and an entrepreneurial spirit;
  • investing in properties in select markets, such as New York City, where we believe there is a high likelihood of capital appreciation;
  • acquiring quality properties at a discount to replacement cost and where there is a significant potential for higher rents;
  • developing and redeveloping properties to increase returns and maximize value; and
  • investing in operating companies that have a significant real estate component.

We expect to finance our growth, acquisitions and investments using internally generated funds and proceeds from asset sales and by accessing the public and private capital markets. We may also offer Vornado common or preferred shares or Operating Partnership units in exchange for property and may repurchase or otherwise reacquire these securities in the future.

We compete with a large number of real estate investors, property owners and developers, some of whom may be willing to accept lower returns on their investments. Principal factors of competition are rents charged, tenant concessions offered, attractiveness of location, the quality of the property and the breadth and the quality of services provided. Our success depends upon, among other factors, trends of the global, national, regional and local economies, the financial condition and operating results of current and prospective tenants and customers, availability and cost of capital, construction and renovation costs, taxes, governmental regulations, legislation, population and employment trends. See “Risk Factors” in Item 1A for additional information regarding these factors.

Our business has been, and may continue to be, affected by increased interest rates, the effects of inflation and other uncertainties including the potential for an economic downturn. These factors could have a material impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Year Ended December 31, 2023 Financial Results Summary

Net income attributable to common shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2023 was $43,378,000, or $0.23 per diluted share, compared to net loss attributable to common shareholders of $408,615,000, or $2.13 per diluted share, for the year ended December 31, 2022. The years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 include certain items that impact net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders, which are listed in the table below. The aggregate of these items, net of amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests, decreased net income attributable to common shareholders by $7,908,000, or $0.04 per diluted share, for the year ended December 31, 2023 and increased net loss attributable to common shareholders by $535,083,000, or $2.79 per diluted share, for the year ended December 31, 2022.

Funds from operations ("FFO") attributable to common shareholders plus assumed conversions for the year ended December 31, 2023 was $503,792,000, or $2.59 per diluted share, compared to $638,928,000, or $3.30 per diluted share, for the year ended December 31, 2022. The years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 include certain items that impact FFO, which are listed in the table below. The aggregate of these items, net of amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests, decreased FFO by $4,359,000, or $0.02 per diluted share, for the year ended December 31, 2023 and increased FFO by $30,036,000, or $0.15 per diluted share, for the year ended December 31, 2022.

The following table reconciles the difference between our net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders and our net income attributable to common shareholders, as adjusted:

(Amounts in thousands)

Certain expense (income) items that impact net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders: For the Year Ended December 31, 2023 2022
Real estate impairment losses on wholly owned and partially owned assets $73,289 $595,488
Net gain on contribution of Pier 94 leasehold interest to joint venture (35,968) —
After-tax net gain on sale of The Armory Show (17,076) —
Our share of Alexander's gain on sale of Rego Park III land parcel (16,396) —
Our share of income from real estate fund investments (14,379) (1,671)
After-tax net gain on sale of 220 Central Park South ("220 CPS") condominium units and ancillary amenities (11,959) (35,858)
Deferred tax liability on our investment in the Farley Building (held through a taxable REIT subsidiary) 11,722 13,665
Credit losses on investments 8,269 —
Other 10,342 3,749
7,844 575,373
Noncontrolling interests' share of above adjustments and assumed conversion of dilutive potential common shares 64 (40,290)
Total of certain expense (income) items that impact net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders $7,908 $535,083

The following table reconciles the difference between our FFO attributable to common shareholders plus assumed conversions and our FFO attributable to common shareholders plus assumed conversions, as adjusted:

(Amounts in thousands)

Certain (income) expense items that impact FFO attributable to common shareholders plus assumed conversions: For the Year Ended December 31, 2023 2022
Our share of income from real estate fund investments $(14,379) $(1,671)
After-tax net gain on sale of 220 CPS condominium units and ancillary amenities (11,959) (35,858)
Deferred tax liability on our investment in the Farley Building (held through a taxable REIT subsidiary) 11,722 13,665
Credit losses on investments 8,269 —
Other 11,043 (8,412)
4,696 (32,276)
Noncontrolling interests' share of above adjustments (337) 2,240
Total of certain (income) expense items that impact FFO attributable to common shareholders plus assumed conversions, net $4,359 $(30,036)

36

Same Store Net Operating Income ("NOI") At Share

The percentage increase (decrease) in same store NOI at share and same store NOI at share - cash basis of our New York segment, THE MART and 555 California Street are below.

Year Ended December 31, 2023 compared to December 31, 2022: Total New York THE MART(1) 555 California Street(2)
Same store NOI at share % increase (decrease) 0.4% 2.2% (34.8)% 26.3%
Same store NOI at share - cash basis % increase (decrease) 0.6% 2.8% (37.2)% 26.6%

(1) 2022 includes prior period accrual adjustment related to changes in the tax-assessed value of THE MART.

(2) 2023 includes our $14,103,000 share of the receipt of a tenant settlement, net of legal expenses.

Calculations of same store NOI at share, reconciliations of our net income (loss) to NOI at share, NOI at share - cash basis and FFO and the reasons we consider these non-GAAP financial measures useful are provided in the following pages of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Dividends/Share Repurchase Program

On December 5, 2023, Vornado’s Board of Trustees declared a dividend of $0.30 per common share. Together with the $0.375 per share common dividend already paid in the first quarter of 2023, this resulted in an aggregate 2023 common dividend of $0.675 per common share. We anticipate that our common share dividend policy for 2024 will be to pay one common share dividend in the fourth quarter.

On April 26, 2023, our Board of Trustees authorized the repurchase of up to $200,000,000 of our outstanding common shares under a newly established share repurchase program.

During the year ended December 31, 2023, we repurchased 2,024,495 common shares for $29,143,000 at an average price per share of $14.40. As of December 31, 2023, $170,857,000 remained available and authorized for repurchases.

350 Park Avenue

On January 24, 2023, we and the Rudin family (“Rudin”) completed agreements with Citadel Enterprise Americas LLC (“Citadel”) and with an affiliate of Kenneth C. Griffin, Citadel’s Founder and CEO (“KG”), for a series of transactions relating to 350 Park Avenue and 40 East 52nd Street.

Pursuant to the agreements, Citadel master leases 350 Park Avenue, a 585,000 square foot Manhattan office building, on an “as is” basis for ten years, with an initial annual net rent of $36,000,000. Per the terms of the lease, no tenant allowance or free rent was provided. Citadel has also master leased Rudin’s adjacent property at 40 East 52nd Street (390,000 square feet).

In addition, we entered into a joint venture with Rudin (the “Vornado/Rudin JV”) which was formed to purchase 39 East 51st Street. Upon formation of the KG joint venture described below, 39 East 51st Street will be combined with 350 Park Avenue and 40 East 52nd Street to create a premier development site (collectively, the “Site”). On June 20, 2023, the Vornado/Rudin JV completed the purchase of 39 East 51st Street for $40,000,000, which was funded on a 50/50 basis by Vornado and Rudin.

From October 2024 to June 2030, KG will have the option to either:

  • acquire a 60% interest in a joint venture with the Vornado/Rudin JV that would value the Site at $1.2 billion ($900,000,000 to Vornado and $300,000,000 to Rudin) and build a new 1,700,000 square foot office tower (the “Project”) pursuant to East Midtown Subdistrict zoning with the Vornado/Rudin JV as developer. KG would own 60% of the joint venture and the Vornado/Rudin JV would own 40% (with Vornado owning 36% and Rudin owning 4% of the joint venture along with a $250,000,000 preferred equity interest in the Vornado/Rudin JV).
  • at the joint venture formation, Citadel or its affiliates will execute a pre-negotiated 15-year anchor lease with renewal options for approximately 850,000 square feet (with expansion and contraction rights) at the Project for its primary office in New York City;
  • the rent for Citadel’s space will be determined by a formula based on a percentage return (that adjusts based on the actual cost of capital) on the total Project cost;
  • the master leases will terminate at the scheduled commencement of demolition;
  • or, exercise an option to purchase the Site for $1.4 billion ($1.085 billion to Vornado and $315,000,000 to Rudin), in which case the Vornado/Rudin JV would not participate in the new development.

Further, the Vornado/Rudin JV will have the option from October 2024 to September 2030 to put the Site to KG for $1.2 billion ($900,000,000 to Vornado and $300,000,000 to Rudin). For ten years following any put option closing, unless the put option is exercised in response to KG’s request to form the joint venture or KG makes a $200,000,000 termination payment, the Vornado/Rudin JV will have the right to invest in a joint venture with KG on the terms described above if KG proceeds with development of the Site.

Sunset Pier 94 Studios Joint Venture

On August 28, 2023, we, together with Hudson Pacific Properties and Blackstone Inc., formed a joint venture (“Pier 94 JV”) to develop a 266,000 square foot purpose-built studio campus at Pier 94 in Manhattan (“Sunset Pier 94 Studios”). In connection therewith:

  • We contributed our Pier 94 leasehold interest to the joint venture in exchange for a 49.9% common equity interest and an initial capital account of $47,944,000, comprised of (i) the $40,000,000 value of our Pier 94 leasehold interest contribution and (ii) a $7,994,000 credit for pre-development costs incurred. Hudson Pacific Properties (“HPP”) and Blackstone Inc. (together, “HPP/BX”) received an aggregate 50.1% common equity interest in Pier 94 JV and an initial capital account of $22,976,000 in exchange for (i) a $15,000,000 cash contribution upon the joint venture’s formation and (ii) a $7,976,000 credit for pre-development costs incurred. HPP/BX will fund 100% of cash contributions until such time that its capital account is equal to Vornado’s, after which equity will be funded in accordance with each partner’s respective ownership interest.
  • The lease of Pier 94 with the City of New York was amended and restated to allow for the contribution to Pier 94 JV and to remove Pier 92 from the lease’s demised premises. The amended and restated lease expires in 2060 with five 10-year renewal options.
  • Pier 94 JV closed on a $183,200,000 construction loan facility ($100,000 outstanding as of December 31, 2023) which bears interest at SOFR plus 4.75% and matures in September 2025, with one one-year as-of-right extension option and two one-year extension options subject to certain conditions. VRLP and the other partners provided a joint and several completion guarantee.

The development cost of the project is estimated to be $350,000,000, which will be funded with $183,200,000 of construction financing (described above) and $166,800,000 of equity contributions. Our share of equity contributions will be funded by (i) our $40,000,000 Pier 94 leasehold interest contribution and (ii) $34,000,000 of cash contributions, which are net of an estimated $9,000,000 for our share of development fees and reimbursement for overhead costs incurred by us.

Upon contribution of the Pier 94 leasehold, we recognized a $35,968,000 net gain primarily due to the step-up of our retained investment in the leasehold interest to fair value. The net gain was included in “net gains on disposition of wholly owned and partially owned assets” on our consolidated statements of income for the year ended December 31, 2023.

Dispositions

Alexander's

On May 19, 2023, Alexander's completed the sale of the Rego Park III land parcel, located in Queens, New York, for $71,060,000, inclusive of consideration for Brownfield tax benefits and reimbursement of costs for plans, specifications and improvements to date. As a result of the sale, we recognized our $16,396,000 share of the net gain and received a $711,000 sales commission from Alexander’s, of which $250,000 was paid to a third-party broker.

The Armory Show

On July 3, 2023, we completed the sale of The Armory Show, located in New York, for $24,410,000, subject to certain post-closing adjustments, and realized net proceeds of $22,489,000. In connection with the sale, we recognized a net gain of $20,181,000 which is included in “net gains on disposition of wholly owned and partially owned assets” on our consolidated statements of income.

Manhattan Retail Properties Sale

On August 10, 2023, we completed the sale of four Manhattan retail properties located at 510 Fifth Avenue, 148–150 Spring Street, 443 Broadway and 692 Broadway for $100,000,000 and realized net proceeds of $95,450,000. In connection with the sale, we recognized an impairment loss of $625,000 which is included in “impairment losses, transaction related costs and other” on our consolidated statements of income.

220 Central Park South

During the year ended December 31, 2023, we closed on the sale of two condominium units at 220 CPS for net proceeds of $24,484,000 resulting in a financial statement net gain of $14,127,000 which is included in "net gains on disposition of wholly owned and partially owned assets" on our consolidated statements of income. In connection with these sales, $2,168,000 of income tax expense was recognized on our consolidated statements of income.

Financings

150 West 34th Street Loan Participation

On January 9, 2023, our $105,000,000 participation in the $205,000,000 mortgage loan on 150 West 34th Street was repaid, which reduced “other assets” and “mortgages payable, net” on our consolidated balance sheets by $105,000,000.

On October 4, 2023, we completed a $75,000,000 refinancing of 150 West 34th Street, of which $25,000,000 is recourse to the Operating Partnership. The interest-only loan bears a rate of SOFR plus 2.15% and matures in February 2025, with three one-year as-of-right extension options and an additional one-year extension option available subject to satisfying a loan-to-value test. The interest rate on the loan is subject to an interest rate cap arrangement with a SOFR strike rate of 5.00%, which matures in February 2026. The loan replaces the previous $100,000,000 loan, which bore interest at SOFR plus 1.86%.

697-703 Fifth Avenue (Fifth Avenue and Times Square JV)

On June 14, 2023, the Fifth Avenue and Times Square JV completed a restructuring of the 697-703 Fifth Avenue $421,000,000 non-recourse mortgage loan, which matured in December 2022. The restructured $355,000,000 loan, which had its principal reduced through an application of property-level reserves and funds from the partners, was split into (i) a $325,000,000 senior note, which bears interest at SOFR plus 2.00%, and (ii) a $30,000,000 junior note, which accrues interest at a fixed rate of 4.00%. The restructured loan matures in June 2025, with two one-year and one nine-month as-of-right extension options (March 2028, as fully extended). Any amounts funded for future re-leasing of the property will be senior to the $30,000,000 junior note.

512 West 22nd Street

On June 28, 2023, a joint venture, in which we have a 55% interest, completed a $129,250,000 refinancing of 512 West 22nd Street, a 173,000 square foot Manhattan office building. The interest-only loan bears a rate of SOFR plus 2.00% in year one and SOFR plus 2.35% thereafter. The loan matures in June 2025 with a one-year extension option subject to debt service coverage ratio, loan-to-value and debt yield requirements. The loan replaces the previous $137,124,000 loan that bore interest at LIBOR plus 1.85% and had an initial maturity of June 2023. In addition, the joint venture entered into the interest rate cap arrangement detailed in the table on the following page.

825 Seventh Avenue

On July 24, 2023, a joint venture, in which we have a 50% interest, completed a $54,000,000 refinancing of the office condominium of 825 Seventh Avenue, a 173,000 square foot Manhattan office and retail building. The interest-only loan bears a rate of SOFR plus 2.75%, with a 30 basis point reduction available upon satisfaction of certain leasing conditions, and matures in January 2026. The loan replaces the previous $60,000,000 loan that bore interest at LIBOR plus 2.35% and was scheduled to mature in July 2023.

Financings - continued

Interest Rate Swap and Cap Arrangements

We entered into the following interest rate swap and cap arrangements during the year ended December 31, 2023. See page 58, Part II, Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk - Derivatives and Hedging, in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information on our hedging instruments.

(Amounts in thousands)

Interest rate swaps: Notional Amount (at share) All-In Swapped Rate Expiration Date Variable Rate Spread
555 California Street (effective 05/24) $840,000 6.03% 05/26 S+205
PENN 11 (effective 03/24)(1) 250,000 6.34% 10/25 S+206
Unsecured term loan(2) 150,000 5.12% 07/25 S+129
Index Strike Rate
Interest rate caps:
1290 Avenue of the Americas (70.0% interest)(3) $665,000 1.00% 11/25 S+162
One Park Avenue (effective 3/24) 525,000 3.89% 03/25 S+122
640 Fifth Avenue (52.0% interest) 259,925 4.00% 05/24 S+111
731 Lexington Avenue office condominium (32.4% interest) 162,000 6.00% 06/24 Prime + 0
150 West 34th Street 75,000 5.00% 02/26 S+215
512 West 22nd Street (55.0% interest) 71,088 4.50% 06/25 S+200

(1) The $500,000 mortgage loan is currently subject to a $500,000 interest rate swap with an all-in swapped rate of 2.22% and expires in March 2024. In January 2024, we entered into a forward swap arrangement for the remaining $250,000 balance of the $500,000 PENN 11 mortgage loan which is effective upon the March 2024 expiration of the current in-place swap. Together with the forward swap above, the loan will bear interest at an all-in swapped rate of 6.28% effective March 2024 through October 2025.

(2) In addition to the swap disclosed above, the unsecured term loan, which matures in December 2027, is subject to various interest rate swap arrangements that were entered into in prior periods.

(3) In connection with the arrangement, we made a $63,100 up-front payment, of which $18,930 is attributable to noncontrolling interests. See Note 9 - Debt in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for details.

Leasing Activity For the Year Ended December 31, 2023

The leasing activity and related statistics below are based on leases signed during the period and are not intended to coincide with the commencement of rental revenue in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). Second generation relet space represents square footage that has not been vacant for more than nine months and tenant improvements and leasing commissions are based on our share of square feet leased during the period.

  • 2,133,000 square feet of New York Office space (1,661,000 square feet at share) at an initial rent of $98.66 per square foot and a weighted average lease term of 10.0 years. The changes in the GAAP and cash mark-to-market rent on the 1,476,000 square feet of second generation space were positive 6.2% and negative 2.0%, respectively. Tenant improvements and leasing commissions were $7.44 per square foot per annum, or 7.5% of initial rent.
  • 299,000 square feet of New York Retail space (239,000 square feet at share) at an initial rent of $118.47 per square foot and a weighted average lease term of 6.5 years. The changes in the GAAP and cash mark-to-market rent on the 131,000 square feet of second generation space were positive 20.7% and positive 18.8%, respectively. Tenant improvements and leasing commissions were $21.90 per square foot per annum, or 18.5% of initial rent.
  • 337,000 square feet at THE MART (332,000 square feet at share) at an initial rent of $52.97 per square foot and a weighted average lease term of 7.2 years. The changes in the GAAP and cash mark-to-market rent on the 244,000 square feet of second generation space were negative 3.3% and negative 7.8%, respectively. Tenant improvements and leasing commissions were $11.44 per square foot per annum, or 21.6% of initial rent.
  • 10,000 square feet at 555 California Street (7,000 square feet at share) at an initial rent of $134.70 per square foot and a weighted average lease term of 5.9 years. The changes in the GAAP and cash mark-to-market rent on the 4,000 square feet of second generation space were positive 12.8% and positive 2.4%, respectively. Tenant improvements and leasing commissions were $22.92 per square foot per annum, or 17.0% of initial rent.

Square footage (in service) and Occupancy as of December 31, 2023

(Square feet in thousands)

New York: Number of properties Square Feet (in service) Total Portfolio Our Share Occupancy %
Office 30 (1) 18,699 16,001 90.7%
Retail (includes retail properties that are in the base of our office properties) 50 (1) 2,123 1,684 74.9%
Residential - 1,974 units(2) 5 (1) 1,479 745 96.8% (2)
Alexander's 5 2,331 755 92.6% (2)
24,632 19,185 89.4%
Other:
THE MART 3 3,688 3,679 79.2%
555 California Street 3 1,819 1,274 94.5%
Other 11 2,537 1,202 91.9%
8,044 6,155
Total square feet as of December 31, 2023 32,676 25,340

See notes below.

Square footage (in service) and Occupancy as of December 31, 2022

(Square feet in thousands)

New York: Number of properties Square Feet (in service) Total Portfolio Our Share Occupancy %
Office 30 (1) 18,724 16,028 91.9%
Retail (includes retail properties that are in the base of our office properties) 56 (1) 2,289 1,851 74.4%
Residential - 1,976 units(2) 6 (1) 1,499 766 96.7% (2)
Alexander's 6 2,241 726 96.4% (2)
24,753 19,371 90.4%
Other:
THE MART 4 3,635 3,626 81.6%
555 California Street 3 1,819 1,273 94.7%
Other 11 2,532 1,197 92.6%
7,986 6,096
Total square feet as of December 31, 2022 32,739 25,467

(1) Reflects the Office, Retail and Residential space within our 65 and 71 total New York properties as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.

(2) The Alexander Apartment Tower (312 units) is reflected in Residential unit count and occupancy.

Critical Accounting Estimates

In preparing the consolidated financial statements we have made estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Accounting estimates are deemed critical if they involve a significant level of estimation uncertainty and have had or are reasonably likely to have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations. Below is a summary of the critical accounting estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. A discussion of our accounting policies is included in Note 2 - Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies to our consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Acquisitions of Real Estate

Upon the acquisition of real estate, we assess whether the transaction should be accounted for as an asset acquisition or as a business combination. Acquisitions of integrated sets of assets and activities that do not meet the definition of a business are accounted for as asset acquisitions. Our acquisitions of real estate generally will not meet the definition of a business because substantially all of the fair value is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or group of similar identifiable assets (i.e. land, buildings, and related identified intangible assets).

We assess the fair value of acquired assets (including land, buildings and improvements, identified intangibles, such as acquired above and below-market leases, acquired in-place leases and tenant relationships) and acquired liabilities and we allocate the purchase price on a relative fair value basis. We assess fair value based on estimated cash flow projections based on a number of factors such as historical operating results, known trends, and market/economic conditions and make key assumptions regarding the discount and capitalization rates used in our analyses. The use of different assumptions to value the acquired properties and allocate value between land and building could affect the revenues recognized over the terms of the leases at our properties and the expenses recognized over the property's estimated remaining useful life on our consolidated statements of income.

Impairment Analyses for Investments in Real Estate and Unconsolidated Partially Owned Entities

Our investments in consolidated properties, including any related right-of-use assets and intangible assets, and unconsolidated partially owned entities are individually reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. For our unconsolidated partially owned entities, we consider various qualitative factors to determine if a decrease in the value of our investment is other-than-temporary during our intended holding period. Assessing impairment can be complex and involves a high degree of subjectivity in determining if impairment indicators are present and in estimating the future undiscounted cash flows or the fair value of an asset. In particular, these estimates are sensitive to significant assumptions, including the estimation of future rental revenues, operating expenses, capital expenditures, discount rates and capitalization rates and our intent and ability to hold the related asset, all of which could be affected by our expectations about future market or economic conditions. These estimates can have a significant impact on the undiscounted cash flows or estimated fair value of an asset and could thereby affect the value of our real estate investments on our consolidated balance sheets as well as any potential impairment losses recognized on our consolidated statements of income.

During the year ended December 31, 2023, we recognized an aggregate $95,465,000 of impairment losses directly attributable to decreases in the value of depreciable real estate held by certain wholly owned and partially owned entities, of which $22,176,000 was attributable to noncontrolling interests. See Note 5 - Investments in Partially Owned Entities and Note 15 - Fair Value Measurements to our consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further details.

Impairment analyses are based on information available at the time the analyses are prepared. Estimates of future cash flows are subjective and are based, in part, on assumptions regarding future rental revenues, operating expenses, capital expenditures, discount rates and capitalization rates which could differ materially from actual results.

Collectability Assessments for Revenue Recognition

We evaluate on an individual lease basis whether it is probable that we will collect substantially all amounts due from our tenants and recognize changes in the collectability assessment of our operating leases as adjustments to rental revenue. Management exercises judgment in assessing collectability of tenant receivables and considers payment history, current credit status, publicly available information about the financial condition of the tenant, and other factors. Our assessment of the collectability of tenant receivables can have a significant impact on the rental revenue recognized in our consolidated statements of income.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 2 – Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies to our consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion concerning recent accounting pronouncements.

NOI At Share by Segment for the Years Ended December 31, 2023 and 2022

NOI at share represents total revenues less operating expenses including our share of partially owned entities. NOI at share - cash basis represents NOI at share adjusted to exclude straight-line rental income and expense, amortization of acquired below and above market leases, accruals for ground rent resets yet to be determined, and other non-cash adjustments. We consider NOI at share - cash basis to be the primary non-GAAP financial measure for making decisions and assessing the unlevered performance of our segments as it relates to the total return on assets as opposed to the levered return on equity. As properties are bought and sold based on NOI at share - cash basis, we utilize this measure to make investment decisions as well as to compare the performance of our assets to that of our peers. NOI at share and NOI at share - cash basis should not be considered alternatives to net income or cash flow from operations and may not be comparable to similarly titled measures employed by other companies.

Below is a summary of NOI at share and NOI at share - cash basis by segment for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022.

(Amounts in thousands)

For the Year Ended December 31, 2023 Total New York Other
Total revenues $1,811,163 $1,452,158 $359,005
Operating expenses (905,158) (733,478) (171,680)
NOI - consolidated 906,005 718,680 187,325
Deduct: NOI attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated subsidiaries (48,553) (15,547) (33,006)
Add: NOI from partially owned entities 285,761 274,436 11,325
NOI at share 1,143,213 977,569 165,644
Non-cash adjustments for straight-line rents, amortization of acquired below-market leases, net and other (3,377) (7,700) 4,323
NOI at share - cash basis $1,139,836 $969,869 $169,967

(Amounts in thousands)

For the Year Ended December 31, 2022 Total New York Other
Total revenues $1,799,995 $1,449,442 $350,553
Operating expenses (873,911) (716,148) (157,763)
NOI - consolidated 926,084 733,294 192,790
Deduct: NOI attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated subsidiaries (70,029) (45,566) (24,463)
Add: NOI from partially owned entities 305,993 293,780 12,213
NOI at share 1,162,048 981,508 180,540
Non-cash adjustments for straight-line rents, amortization of acquired below-market leases, net and other (10,980) (18,509) 7,529
NOI at share - cash basis $1,151,068 $962,999 $188,069

43

NOI At Share by Segment for the Years Ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 - continued

The elements of our New York and Other NOI at share for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 are summarized below.

(Amounts in thousands)

New York: For the Year Ended December 31, 2023 2022
Office $727,000 $718,686
Retail 188,561 205,753
Residential 21,910 19,600
Alexander's 40,098 37,469
Total New York 977,569 981,508
Other:
THE MART(1) 61,519 96,906
555 California Street(2) 82,965 65,692
Other investments 21,160 17,942
Total Other 165,644 180,540
NOI at share $1,143,213 $1,162,048

See notes below.

The elements of our New York and Other NOI at share - cash basis for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 are summarized below.

(Amounts in thousands)

New York: For the Year Ended December 31, 2023 2022
Office $726,914 $715,407
Retail 180,932 188,846
Residential 20,588 18,214
Alexander's 41,435 40,532
Total New York 969,869 962,999
Other:
THE MART(1) 62,579 101,912
555 California Street(2) 85,819 67,813
Other investments 21,569 18,344
Total Other 169,967 188,069
NOI at share - cash basis $1,139,836 $1,151,068

(1) 2022 includes prior period accrual adjustment related to changes in the tax-assessed value of THE MART.

(2) 2023 includes our $14,103 share of the receipt of a tenant settlement, net of legal expenses.

NOI At Share by Segment for the Years Ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 - continued

Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) to NOI At Share and NOI At Share - Cash Basis for the Years Ended December 31, 2023 and 2022

Below is a reconciliation of net income (loss) to NOI at share and NOI at share - cash basis for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022.

(Amounts in thousands)

For the Year Ended December 31, 2023 2022
Net income (loss) $32,888 $(382,612)
Depreciation and amortization expense 434,273 504,502
General and administrative expense 162,883 133,731
Impairment losses, transaction related costs and other 50,691 31,722
(Income) loss from partially owned entities (38,689) 461,351
Income from real estate fund investments (1,590) (3,541)
Interest and other investment income, net (41,697) (19,869)
Interest and debt expense 349,223 279,765
Net gains on disposition of wholly owned and partially owned assets (71,199) (100,625)
Income tax expense 29,222 21,660
NOI from partially owned entities 285,761 305,993
NOI attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated subsidiaries (48,553) (70,029)
NOI at share 1,143,213 1,162,048
Non-cash adjustments for straight-line rents, amortization of acquired below-market leases, net, and other (3,377) (10,980)
NOI at share - cash basis $1,139,836 $1,151,068

NOI At Share by Region(1)

Region: For the Year Ended December 31, 2023 2022
New York metropolitan area 88% 86%
Chicago, IL 6% 8%
San Francisco, CA(1) 6% 6%
100% 100%

(1) 2023 excludes our $14,103,000 share of the receipt of tenant settlement, net of legal expenses.

Results of Operations – Year Ended December 31, 2023 Compared to December 31, 2022

Revenues

Our revenues were $1,811,163,000 for the year ended December 31, 2023 compared to $1,799,995,000 in the prior year, an increase of $11,168,000. Below are the details of the increase by segment:

(Amounts in thousands)

(Decrease) increase due to: Rental revenues: Total New York Other
Acquisitions, dispositions and other $(42,082) $(30,417) $(11,665)
Development and redevelopment 3,855 3,855 —
Trade shows (223) — (223)
Same store operations 38,251 16,198 22,053 (1)
(199) (10,364) 10,165
Fee and other income:
BMS cleaning fees 4,264 5,078 (814)
Management and leasing fees 2,001 1,974 27
Other income 5,102 6,028 (926)
11,367 13,080 (1,713)
Total increase in revenues $11,168 $2,716 $8,452

See notes below.

Expenses

Our expenses were $1,565,167,000 for the year ended December 31, 2023 compared to $1,534,249,000 in the prior year, an increase of $30,918,000. Below are the details of the increase (decrease) by segment:

(Amounts in thousands)

(Decrease) increase due to: Operating: Total New York Other
Acquisitions, dispositions and other $(22,050) $(12,709) $(9,341)
Development and redevelopment 5,048 5,048 —
Non-reimbursable expenses 2,957 2,957 —
Trade shows 612 — 612
BMS expenses 4,831 5,645 (814)
Same store operations 39,849 16,389 23,460 (2)
31,247 17,330 13,917
Depreciation and amortization:
Acquisitions, dispositions and other (77,474) (77,474) —
Development and redevelopment 287 287 —
Same store operations 6,958 4,971 1,987
(70,229) (72,216) 1,987
General and administrative 29,152 (3) 4,014 25,138
Expense from deferred compensation plan liability 21,779 — 21,779
Impairment losses, transaction related costs and other 18,969 27,475 (4) (8,506)
Total increase (decrease) in expenses $30,918 $(23,397) $54,315

(1) 2023 includes the receipt of a $21,350 tenant settlement, of which $6,405 is attributable to noncontrolling interests.

(2) 2022 includes prior period accrual adjustments related to changes in the tax-assessed value of THE MART.

(3) Primarily due to non-cash expense related to the June 2023 equity compensation grant. See Note 12 - Stock-based Compensation in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for details.

(4) Primarily due to non-cash impairment losses ($45,007 in 2023 and $19,098 in 2022).

Results of Operations – Year Ended December 31, 2023 Compared to December 31, 2022 - continued

Income (Loss) from Partially Owned Entities

Below are the components of income (loss) from partially owned entities.

(Amounts in thousands)

Our share of net income (loss): Fifth Avenue and Times Square JV: Percentage Ownership as of December 31, 2023 2023 For the Year Ended December 31, 2022
Equity in net income(1) 51.5% $35,209 $55,248
Return on preferred equity, net of our share of the expense 37,416 37,416
Non-cash impairment loss — (489,859)
72,625 (397,195)
Partially owned office buildings(2)(3) Various (73,589) (110,261)
Alexander's Inc.(4) 32.4% 37,075 22,973
Other equity method investments(3)(5) Various 2,578 23,132
$38,689 $(461,351)

(1) 2023 includes (i) a $5,120 accrual of default interest which was forgiven by the lender as part of the restructuring of the 697-703 Fifth Avenue loan and is amortized over the remaining term of the restructured loan, reducing future interest expense and (ii) lower income from lease renewals at 697-703 Fifth Avenue and 666 Fifth Avenue, partially offset by a decrease in our share of depreciation and amortization expense compared to the prior year, primarily resulting from non-cash impairment losses recognized in prior periods.

(2) Includes interests in 280 Park Avenue, 650 Madison Avenue, 7 West 34th Street, 512 West 22nd Street, 61 Ninth Avenue, 85 Tenth Avenue and others.

(3) In 2023 and 2022, we recognized $50,458 and $93,353, respectively, of impairment losses.

(4) On May 19, 2023, Alexander’s completed the sale of the Rego Park III land parcel for $71,060. As a result of the sale, we recognized our $16,396 share of the net gain and received a $711 sales commission from Alexander’s, of which $250 was paid to a third-party broker.

(5) Includes interests in Independence Plaza, Rosslyn Plaza and others. 2022 includes $17,185 of net gains from dispositions of two investments.

Income from Real Estate Fund Investments

Below is a summary of income from the Vornado Capital Partners Real Estate Fund (“the Fund”) and the Crowne Plaza Times Square Hotel Joint Venture.

(Amounts in thousands)

For the Year Ended December 31, 2023 2022
Previously recorded unrealized loss on exited investments $247,575 $59,396
Net realized loss on exited investments (245,714) (54,255)
Net investment (loss) income (271) 6,130
Net unrealized loss on held investments — (7,730)
Income from real estate fund investments 1,590 3,541
Less loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated subsidiaries 12,789 (1,870)
Income from real estate fund investments net of noncontrolling interests in consolidated subsidiaries $14,379 $1,671

Interest and Other Investment Income, net

The following table sets forth the details of interest and other investment income, net.

(Amounts in thousands)

For the Year Ended December 31, 2023 2022
Interest on cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash $44,786 $7,553
Credit losses on investments (8,269) —
Amortization of discount on investments in U.S. Treasury bills 3,829 7,075
Interest on loans receivable 1,351 5,006
Other, net — 235
$41,697 $19,869

47

Results of Operations – Year Ended December 31, 2023 Compared to December 31, 2022 - continued

Interest and Debt Expense

Interest and debt expense was $349,223,000 for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to $279,765,000 in the prior year, an increase of $69,458,000. This was primarily due to (i) $98,348,000 of higher interest expense resulting from higher average interest rates on our debt, partially offset by (ii) $23,977,000 of higher capitalized interest and debt expense.

Net Gains on Disposition of Wholly Owned and Partially Owned Assets

Net gains on disposition of wholly owned and partially owned assets of $71,199,000 for the year ended December 31, 2023, primarily consists of (i) $35,968,000 upon contribution of our Pier 94 leasehold to Pier 94 JV primarily due to the step-up of our retained investment in the leasehold interest to fair value, (ii) $20,181,000 from the sale of The Armory Show, and (iii) $14,127,000 from the sale of two condominium units at 220 CPS. Net gains on disposition of wholly owned and partially owned assets of $100,625,000 for the year ended December 31, 2022, primarily consists of (i) $41,874,000 from the sale of three condominium units and ancillary amenities at 220 CPS, (ii) $31,876,000 from the sale of 40 Fulton Street, (iii) $15,213,000 from the sale of Center Building located at 33-00 Northern Boulevard in Long Island City, New York, (iv) $13,613,000 from the refund of New York City real property transfer tax paid in connection with the April 2019 Fifth Avenue and Times Square JV transaction, and (v) $2,919,000 from the sale of 484-486 Broadway.

Income Tax Expense

Income tax expense was $29,222,000 for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to $21,660,000 in the prior year, an increase of $7,562,000. This was primarily due to higher income tax expense incurred by our taxable REIT subsidiaries.

Net Loss Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Subsidiaries

Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated subsidiaries was $75,967,000 for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to $5,737,000 in the prior year, an increase of $70,230,000. This resulted primarily from the allocation of the impairment loss recognized on 606 Broadway and an increase in losses allocated to the redeemable noncontrolling interest in the Farley joint venture and the noncontrolling interests of Vornado Capital Partners Real Estate Fund.

Same Store Net Operating Income At Share

Same store NOI at share represents NOI at share from operations which are in service in both the current and prior year reporting periods. Same store NOI at share - cash basis is same store NOI at share adjusted to exclude straight-line rental income and expense, amortization of acquired below and above market leases, accruals for ground rent resets yet to be determined, and other non-cash adjustments. We present these non-GAAP measures to (i) facilitate meaningful comparisons of the operational performance of our properties and segments, (ii) make decisions on whether to buy, sell or refinance properties, and (iii) compare the performance of our properties and segments to those of our peers. Same store NOI at share and same store NOI at share - cash basis should not be considered alternatives to net income or cash flow from operations and may not be comparable to similarly titled measures employed by other companies.

Below are reconciliations of NOI at share to same store NOI at share for our New York segment, THE MART, 555 California Street and other investments for the year ended December 31, 2023 compared to December 31, 2022.

(Amounts in thousands)

Total New York THE MART 555 California Street Other
NOI at share for the year ended December 31, 2023 $1,143,213 $977,569 $61,519 $82,965 $21,160
Less NOI at share from:
Dispositions (1,270) (1,556) 286 — —
Development properties (26,748) (26,748) — — —
Other non-same store (income) expense, net (20,399) 761 — — (21,160)
Same store NOI at share for the year ended December 31, 2023 $1,094,796 $950,026 $61,805 $82,965 $—
NOI at share for the year ended December 31, 2022 $1,162,048 $981,508 $96,906 $65,692 $17,942
Less NOI at share from:
Dispositions (15,205) (13,158) (2,047) — —
Development properties (24,088) (24,088) — — —
Other non-same store income, net (32,838) (14,896) — — (17,942)
Same store NOI at share for the year ended December 31, 2022 $1,089,917 $929,366 $94,859 $65,692 $—
Increase (decrease) in same store NOI at share $4,879 $20,660 $(33,054) $17,273 $—
% increase (decrease) in same store NOI at share 0.4% 2.2% (34.8)% 26.3% —%

48

Results of Operations – Year Ended December 31, 2023 Compared to December 31, 2022 - continued

Same Store Net Operating Income At Share - continued

Below are reconciliations of NOI at share - cash basis to same store NOI at share - cash basis for our New York segment, THE MART, 555 California Street and other investments for the year ended December 31, 2023 compared to December 31, 2022.

(Amounts in thousands)

Total New York THE MART 555 California Street Other
NOI at share - cash basis for the year ended December 31, 2023 $1,139,836 $969,869 $62,579 $85,819 $21,569
Less NOI at share - cash basis from:
Dispositions (1,793) (2,016) 223 — —
Development properties (23,661) (23,661) — — —
Other non-same store income, net (29,547) (7,978) — — (21,569)
Same store NOI at share - cash basis for the year ended December 31, 2023 $1,084,835 $936,214 $62,802 $85,819 $—
NOI at share - cash basis for the year ended December 31, 2022 $1,151,068 $962,999 $101,912 $67,813 $18,344
Less NOI at share - cash basis from:
Dispositions (15,122) (13,256) (1,866) — —
Development properties (23,567) (23,567) — — —
Other non-same store income, net (33,665) (15,321) — — (18,344)
Same store NOI at share - cash basis for the year ended December 31, 2022 $1,078,714 $910,855 $100,046 $67,813 $—
Increase (decrease) in same store NOI at share - cash basis $6,121 $25,359 $(37,244) $18,006 $—
% increase (decrease) in same store NOI at share - cash basis 0.6% 2.8% (37.2)% 26.6% —%

Related Party Transactions

See Note 22 - Related Party Transactions to our consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion concerning related party transactions.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our cash requirements include property operating expenses, capital improvements, tenant improvements, debt service, leasing commissions, dividends to our shareholders, distributions to unitholders of the Operating Partnership, as well as acquisition and development and redevelopment costs. The sources of liquidity to fund these cash requirements include rental revenue, which is our primary source of cash flow and is dependent upon the occupancy and rental rates of our properties; proceeds from debt financings, including mortgage loans, senior unsecured borrowings, unsecured term loans and unsecured revolving credit facilities; proceeds from the issuance of common and preferred equity; and asset sales.

As of December 31, 2023, we have $3.2 billion of liquidity comprised of $1.3 billion of cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and $1.9 billion available on our $2.5 billion revolving credit facilities. The ongoing challenges posed by increased interest rates and the effects of inflation could adversely impact our cash flow from continuing operations but we anticipate that cash flow from continuing operations over the next twelve months together with cash balances on hand will be adequate to fund our business operations, cash distributions to unitholders of the Operating Partnership, cash dividends to our shareholders, debt amortization and recurring capital expenditures. Capital requirements for development and redevelopment expenditures and acquisitions may require funding from borrowings, equity offerings and/or asset sales.

We may from time to time repurchase or retire our outstanding debt securities or repurchase or redeem our equity securities. Such purchases, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, liquidity requirements and other factors. The amounts involved in connection with these transactions could be material to our consolidated financial statements.

On April 26, 2023, our Board of Trustees authorized the repurchase of up to $200,000,000 of our outstanding common shares under a newly established share repurchase program. As of December 31, 2023, $170,857,000 remained available and authorized for repurchases.

Summary of Cash Flows

Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash was $1,261,584,000 as of December 31, 2023, a $240,427,000 increase from the balance as of December 31, 2022.

Our cash flow activities are summarized as follows:

(Amounts in thousands)

For the Year Ended December 31, 2023 2022 (Decrease) Increase in Cash Flow
Net cash provided by operating activities $648,152 $798,944 $(150,792)
Net cash used in investing activities (128,788) (906,864) 778,076
Net cash used in financing activities (278,937) (801,274) 522,337
$240,427 $(909,194) $1,149,621

Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities primarily consists of cash inflows from rental revenues and operating distributions from our unconsolidated partially owned entities less cash outflows for property expenses, general and administrative expenses and interest expense. For the year ended December 31, 2023, net cash provided by operating activities of $648,152,000 was comprised of $673,731,000 of cash from operations, including distributions of income from partially owned entities of $172,873,000 and return of capital from real estate fund investments of $1,861,000, and a net decrease of $25,579,000 in cash due to the timing of cash receipts and payments related to changes in operating assets and liabilities.

Summary of Cash Flows - continued

Investing Activities

Net cash flow used in investing activities is impacted by the timing and extent of our development, capital improvement, acquisition and disposition activities during the year.

The following table details the net cash used in investing activities:

(Amounts in thousands)

For the Year Ended December 31, 2023 2022 Increase (Decrease) in Cash Flow
Development costs and construction in progress $(552,701) $(737,999) $185,298
Proceeds from maturities of U.S. Treasury bills 468,598 597,499 (128,901)
Additions to real estate (211,899) (159,796) (52,103)
Proceeds from sales of real estate 123,519 373,264 (249,745)
Proceeds from repayment of participation in 150 West 34th Street mortgage loan 105,000 — 105,000
Investments in partially owned entities (57,297) (33,172) (24,125)
Acquisitions of real estate and other (33,145) (3,000) (30,145)
Proceeds from sale of condominium units at 220 Central Park South 24,484 88,019 (63,535)
Distributions of capital from partially owned entities 18,869 34,417 (15,548)
Deconsolidation of cash and restricted cash held by a previously consolidated entity (14,216) — (14,216)
Purchase of U.S. Treasury bills — (1,066,096) 1,066,096
Net cash used in investing activities $(128,788) $(906,864) $778,076

Financing Activities

Net cash flow used in financing activities is impacted by the timing and extent of issuances of debt and equity securities, distributions paid to common shareholders and unitholders of the Operating Partnership as well as principal and other repayments associated with our outstanding debt.

The following table details the net cash used in financing activities:

(Amounts in thousands)

For the Year Ended December 31, 2023 2022 Increase (Decrease) in Cash Flow
Repayments of borrowings $(148,000) $(1,251,373) $1,103,373
Contributions from noncontrolling interests in consolidated subsidiaries 132,701 5,609 127,092
Dividends paid on common shares/Distributions to Vornado (129,066) (406,562) 277,496
Dividends paid on preferred shares/Distributions to preferred unitholders (62,116) (62,116) —
Distributions to redeemable security holders and noncontrolling interests in consolidated subsidiaries (38,970) (84,699) 45,729
Repurchase of common shares/Class A units owned by Vornado (29,183) — (29,183)
Deferred financing costs (4,424) (32,706) 28,282
Proceeds received from exercise of Vornado stock options and other 146 885 (739)
Repurchase of shares/Class A units related to stock compensation agreements and related tax withholdings and other (25) (85) 60
Proceeds from borrowings — 1,029,773 (1,029,773)
Net cash used in financing activities $(278,937) $(801,274) $522,337

51

Dividends

We anticipate that our common share dividend policy for 2024 will be to pay one common share dividend in the fourth quarter. If Vornado’s Board of Trustees were to declare a dividend consistent with our aggregate 2023 common dividend of $0.675, the Operating Partnership would be required to distribute (i) approximately $129,000,000 of cash to Vornado for distribution to its common shareholders and (ii) $11,475,000 of cash to third party Class A unitholders. Additionally, during 2024, Vornado expects to pay approximately $62,000,000 of cash dividends on outstanding preferred shares.

Debt

We have an effective shelf registration for the offering of our equity and debt securities that is not limited in amount due to our status as a “well-known seasoned issuer.” We have issued senior unsecured notes from a shelf registration statement that contain financial covenants that restrict our ability to incur debt, and that require us to maintain a level of unencumbered assets based on the level of our secured debt. Our unsecured revolving credit facilities and unsecured term loan contain financial covenants that require us to maintain minimum interest coverage and maximum debt to market capitalization ratios, and provide for increased interest rates in the event of a decline in the credit rating assigned to our senior unsecured notes. Our unsecured revolving credit facilities and unsecured term loan also contain customary conditions precedent to borrowing, including representations and warranties, and contain customary events of default that could give rise to accelerated repayment, including such items as failure to pay interest or principal. As of December 31, 2023, we are in compliance with all of the financial covenants required by our senior unsecured notes, our unsecured revolving credit facilities and our unsecured term loan.

A summary of our consolidated debt as of December 31, 2023 is presented below.

(Amounts in thousands)

Consolidated debt: As of December 31, 2023 Balance Weighted Average Interest Rate(1)
Fixed rate(2) $6,993,200 3.50%
Variable rate(3) 1,311,415 6.26%
Total 8,304,615 3.94%
Deferred financing costs, net and other (53,163)
Total, net $8,251,452

(1) Represents the interest rate in effect as of period end based on the appropriate reference rate as of the contractual reset date plus contractual spread, adjusted for hedging instruments, as applicable.

(2) Includes variable rate debt with interest rates fixed by interest rate swap arrangements and the $950,000 1290 Avenue of the Americas mortgage loan which is subject to a 1.00% SOFR interest rate cap arrangement.

(3) Includes variable rate mortgages subject to interest rate cap arrangements, except for the 1290 Avenue of the Americas mortgage loan discussed above. As of December 31, 2023, $1,034,119 of our variable rate debt is subject to interest rate cap arrangements. The interest rate cap arrangements have a weighted average strike rate of 4.50% and a weighted average remaining term of 10 months.

During 2024 and 2025, $169,815,000 and $1,329,800,000, respectively, of our outstanding consolidated debt matures, assuming the exercise of as-of-right extension options. We may refinance this maturing debt as it comes due or choose to repay it using cash and cash equivalents or our unsecured revolving credit facilities. We may also refinance or prepay other outstanding debt depending on prevailing market conditions, liquidity requirements and other factors. The amounts involved in connection with these transactions could be material to our consolidated financial statements.

Details of 2023 financing activities are provided in the “Overview” of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The contractual principal and interest repayments schedule of our consolidated debt as of December 31, 2023 is as follows:

(Amounts in thousands)

Total Less than 1 Year 1 – 3 Years 3 – 5 Years Thereafter
Notes and mortgages payable $6,694,477 $432,580 $1,864,750 $4,021,303 $375,844
Senior unsecured notes due 2025 466,406 15,750 450,656 — —
Senior unsecured notes due 2026 420,831 8,600 412,231 — —
Senior unsecured notes due 2031 438,324 11,900 23,800 23,800 378,824
Unsecured term loan 942,964 39,400 71,244 832,320 —
Revolving credit facilities 663,887 22,601 45,141 596,145 —
Total contractual principal(1) and interest(2) repayments $9,626,889 $530,831 $2,867,822 $5,473,568 $754,668

(1) Based on the contractual maturity of our loans, including as-of-right extension options, as of December 31, 2023.

(2) Estimated interest for variable rate debt based on the Term SOFR curve available as of December 31, 2023.

Capital Expenditures

Capital expenditures consist of expenditures to maintain and improve assets, tenant improvement allowances and leasing commissions. During 2024, we expect to incur $250,000,000 of capital expenditures for our consolidated properties. We plan to fund these capital expenditures from operating cash flow, existing liquidity, and/or borrowings. Our partially owned non-consolidated subsidiaries typically fund their capital expenditures without any additional equity contribution from us.

Development and Redevelopment Projects and Opportunities

Development and redevelopment expenditures consist of all hard and soft costs associated with the development and redevelopment of a property. We plan to fund these development and redevelopment expenditures from operating cash flow, existing liquidity, and/or borrowings. See detailed discussion below for our current development and redevelopment projects.

PENN District

PENN 2

We are redeveloping PENN 2, a 1,795,000 square foot (as expanded) office building, located on the west side of Seventh Avenue between 31st and 33rd Street. The development cost of this project is estimated to be $750,000,000, of which $638,959,000 has been expended as of December 31, 2023.

Hotel Pennsylvania Site

Demolition of the existing building was completed in the third quarter of 2023.

We are also making districtwide improvements within the PENN District. The development cost of these improvements is estimated to be $100,000,000, of which $47,424,000 has been expended as of December 31, 2023.

Sunset Pier 94 Studios

On August 28, 2023, we, together with HPP/BX, formed a joint venture to develop Sunset Pier 94 Studios, a 266,000 square foot purpose-built studio campus in Manhattan. We own a 49.9% equity interest in the joint venture. The development cost of the project is estimated to be $350,000,000, which will be funded with $183,200,000 of construction financing and $166,800,000 of equity contributions. Our share of equity contributions will be funded by (i) our $40,000,000 Pier 94 leasehold interest contribution and (ii) $34,000,000 of cash contributions, which are net of an estimated $9,000,000 for our share of development fees and reimbursement for overhead costs incurred by us. HPP/BX will fund 100% of cash contributions until such time that its capital account is equal to Vornado’s, after which equity will be funded in accordance with each partner’s respective ownership interest. We have funded $7,994,000 of cash contributions as of December 31, 2023. For further information about this transaction, see page 38, Part II, Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Overview, in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

350 Park Avenue

On January 24, 2023, we and the Rudin family (“Rudin”) completed agreements with Citadel Enterprise Americas LLC (“Citadel”) and with an affiliate of Kenneth C. Griffin, Citadel’s Founder and CEO (“KG”), for a series of transactions relating to 350 Park Avenue and 40 East 52nd Street. In connection therewith, we entered into a joint venture with Rudin (the “Vornado/Rudin JV”) that purchased 39 East 51st Street for $40,000,000, funded on a 50/50 basis by Vornado and Rudin. 39 East 51st Street will be combined with 350 Park Avenue and 40 East 52nd Street to create a premier development site (the “Site”). From October 2024 to June 2030, KG will have the option to either (i) acquire a 60% interest in a joint venture with the Vornado/Rudin JV (with Vornado having an effective 36% interest in the entity) to build a new 1,700,000 square foot office tower, valuing the Site at $1.2 billion or (ii) purchase the Site for $1.4 billion ($1.085 billion to Vornado). From October 2024 to September 2030, the Vornado/Rudin JV will have the option to put the Site to KG for $1.2 billion ($900,000,000 to Vornado). For further information about this transaction and the options available to each of the parties, see page 37, Part II, Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Overview, in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

We are also evaluating other development and redevelopment opportunities at certain of our properties in Manhattan including, in particular, the PENN District.

There can be no assurance that the above projects will be completed, completed on schedule or within budget.

Other Obligations

We have contractual cash obligations for certain properties that are subject to long-term ground and building leases. During 2024, $71,015,000 of lease payments are due, including fair market rent resets accounted for as variable rent and accruals for ground rent resets yet to be determined (see below). For 2025 and thereafter, we have $2,419,492,000 of future lease payments. We believe that our operating cash flow will be adequate to fund these lease payments.

Our future lease payments disclosed above include payments for our PENN 1 ground lease based on an amount estimated in January 2022, when we exercised the second of three 25-year renewal options. The first renewal period commenced June 2023 and, together with the second option exercise, extends the lease term through June 2073. The ground lease is subject to fair market value resets at each 25-year renewal period. The rent reset process for the June 2023 renewal period is currently ongoing and the timing is uncertain. The final fair market value determination may be materially higher or lower than our January 2022 estimate.

Insurance

For our properties, we maintain general liability insurance with limits of $300,000,000 per occurrence and per property, of which $275,000,000, increased from $250,000,000 effective June 20, 2023, includes communicable disease coverage, and we maintain all risk property and rental value insurance with limits of $2.0 billion per occurrence, with sub-limits for certain perils such as flood and earthquake, excluding communicable disease coverage. Our California properties have earthquake insurance with coverage of $350,000,000 per occurrence and in the aggregate, subject to a deductible in the amount of 5% of the value of the affected property. We maintain coverage for certified terrorism acts with limits of $6.0 billion per occurrence and in the aggregate (as listed below), $1.2 billion for non-certified acts of terrorism, and $5.0 billion per occurrence and in the aggregate for terrorism involving nuclear, biological, chemical and radiological (“NBCR”) terrorism events, as defined by the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002, as amended to date and which has been extended through December 2027.

Penn Plaza Insurance Company, LLC (“PPIC”), our wholly owned consolidated subsidiary, acts as a re-insurer with respect to a portion of all risk property and rental value insurance and a portion of our earthquake insurance coverage, and as a direct insurer for coverage for acts of terrorism including NBCR acts. Coverage for acts of terrorism (excluding NBCR acts) is fully reinsured by third party insurance companies and the Federal government with no exposure to PPIC. For NBCR acts, PPIC is responsible for a deductible of $2,112,753 and 20% of the balance of a covered loss and the Federal government is responsible for the remaining portion of a covered loss. We are ultimately responsible for any loss incurred by PPIC.

Certain condominiums in which we own an interest (including the Farley Condominiums) maintain insurance policies with different per occurrence and aggregate limits than our policies described above.

We continue to monitor the state of the insurance market and the scope and costs of coverage for acts of terrorism and other events. However, we cannot anticipate what coverage will be available on commercially reasonable terms in the future. We are responsible for uninsured losses and for deductibles and losses in excess of our insurance coverage, which could be material.

Our debt instruments, consisting of mortgage loans secured by our properties, senior unsecured notes and revolving credit agreements contain customary covenants requiring us to maintain insurance. Although we believe that we have adequate insurance coverage for purposes of these agreements, we may not be able to obtain an equivalent amount of coverage at reasonable costs in the future. Further, if lenders insist on greater coverage than we are able to obtain it could adversely affect our ability to finance or refinance our properties and expand our portfolio.

Other Commitments and Contingencies

We are from time to time involved in legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In our opinion, after consultation with legal counsel, the outcome of such matters is not currently expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Each of our properties has been subjected to varying degrees of environmental assessment at various times. The environmental assessments did not reveal any material environmental contamination. However, there can be no assurance that the identification of new areas of contamination, changes in the extent or known scope of contamination, the discovery of additional sites, or changes in cleanup requirements would not result in significant costs to us.

In July 2018, we leased 78,000 square feet at 345 Montgomery Street in San Francisco, CA, to a subsidiary of Regus PLC, for an initial term of 15 years. The obligations under the lease were guaranteed by Regus PLC in an amount of up to $90,000,000. The tenant purported to terminate the lease prior to space delivery. We commenced a suit on October 23, 2019 seeking to enforce the lease and the guaranty. On May 11, 2021, the court issued a final statement of decision in our favor and on January 31, 2023, the Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court's decision. On October 9, 2020, the successor to Regus PLC filed for bankruptcy in Luxembourg. In April 2023, we entered into a settlement with affiliates of the successor to Regus PLC, pursuant to which we agreed to discontinue all legal proceedings against the Regus PLC successor and its affiliates in exchange for a payment to us of $21,350,000, which is included in “rental revenues” on our consolidated statements of income for the year ended December 31, 2023, of which $6,405,000 is attributable to noncontrolling interest.

Other Commitments and Contingencies - continued

We may, from time to time, enter into guarantees including, but not limited to, payment guarantees to lenders of unconsolidated joint ventures for tax purposes, completion guarantees for development and redevelopment projects, and guarantees to fund leasing costs. These agreements terminate either upon the satisfaction of specified obligations or repayment of the underlying loans. As of December 31, 2023, the aggregate dollar amount of these guarantees is approximately $1,230,000,000, primarily comprised of payment guarantees for the mortgage loans secured by 640 Fifth Avenue, 7 West 34th Street, and 435 Seventh Avenue and the completion guarantee provided to the lender of Pier 94 JV. Other than these loans, our mortgage loans are non-recourse to us.

As of December 31, 2023, $30,233,000 of letters of credit were outstanding under one of our unsecured revolving credit facilities. Our unsecured revolving credit facilities contain financial covenants that require us to maintain minimum interest coverage and maximum debt to market capitalization ratios, and provide for increased interest rates in the event of a decline in the credit rating assigned to our senior unsecured notes. Our unsecured revolving credit facilities also contain customary conditions precedent to borrowing, including representations and warranties, and also contain customary events of default that could give rise to accelerated repayment, including such items as failure to pay interest or principal.

Our 95% consolidated joint venture (5% is owned by Related Companies ("Related")) developed and owns the Farley Building. In connection with the development of the property, the joint venture admitted a historic Tax Credit Investor partner. Under the terms of the historic tax credit arrangement, the joint venture is required to comply with various laws, regulations, and contractual provisions. Non-compliance with applicable requirements could result in projected tax benefits not being realized and, therefore, may require a refund or reduction of the Tax Credit Investor’s capital contributions. As of December 31, 2023, the Tax Credit Investor has made $205,068,000 in capital contributions. Vornado and Related have guaranteed certain of the joint venture’s obligations to the Tax Credit Investor.

As of December 31, 2023, we have construction commitments aggregating approximately $91,372,000.

Funds From Operations

FFO is computed in accordance with the definition adopted by the Board of Governors of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”). NAREIT defines FFO as GAAP net income or loss adjusted to exclude net gains from sales of certain real estate assets, impairment write-downs of certain real estate assets and investments in entities when the impairment is directly attributable to decreases in the value of depreciable real estate held by the entity, depreciation and amortization expense from real estate assets and other specified items, including the pro rata share of such adjustments of unconsolidated subsidiaries. FFO and FFO per diluted share are non-GAAP financial measures used by management, investors and analysts to facilitate meaningful comparisons of operating performance between periods and among our peers because it excludes the effect of real estate depreciation and amortization and net gains on sales, which are based on historical costs and implicitly assume that the value of real estate diminishes predictably over time, rather than fluctuating based on existing market conditions. The Company also uses FFO attributable to common shareholders plus assumed conversions, as adjusted for certain items that impact the comparability of period-to-period FFO, as one of several criteria to determine performance-based compensation for senior management. FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities and is not necessarily indicative of cash available to fund cash requirements and should not be considered as an alternative to net income as a performance measure or cash flow as a liquidity measure. FFO may not be comparable to similarly titled measures employed by other companies. The calculations of both the numerator and denominator used in the computation of income per share are disclosed in Note 13 – Income (Loss) Per Share/Income (Loss) Per Class A Unit, in our consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Details of certain items that impact FFO are discussed in the financial results summary of our “Overview.”

Below is a reconciliation of net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders to FFO attributable to common shareholders plus assumed conversions for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022.

(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

Reconciliation of net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders to FFO attributable to common shareholders plus assumed conversions: For the Year Ended December 31, 2023 2022
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders $43,378 $(408,615)
Per diluted share $0.23 $(2.13)
FFO adjustments:
Depreciation and amortization of real property $385,608 $456,920
Real estate impairment losses 22,831 (1) 19,098
Net gains on sale of real estate (53,305) (58,751)
Proportionate share of adjustments to equity in net income (loss) of partially owned entities to arrive at FFO:
Depreciation and amortization of real property 108,088 130,647
Net gain on sale of real estate (16,545) (169)
Real estate impairment losses 50,458 (2) 576,390
497,135 1,124,135
Noncontrolling interests' share of above adjustments (38,363) (77,912)
FFO adjustments, net $458,772 $1,046,223
FFO attributable to common shareholders $502,150 $637,608
Convertible preferred share dividends 1,642 1,320
FFO attributable to common shareholders plus assumed conversions $503,792 $638,928
Per diluted share $2.59 $3.30
Reconciliation of weighted average shares outstanding:
Weighted average common shares outstanding 191,005 191,775
Effect of dilutive securities:
Convertible securities 2,468 1,545
Share-based payment awards 851 250
Denominator for FFO per diluted share 194,324 193,570

(1) Net of $22,176 attributable to noncontrolling interests.

(2) Includes a $21,114 impairment loss on advances made for our interest in a joint venture, resulting from a decline in the value of the underlying building.

Market risk

As filed, 3,903 characters, with its headings, lists and tables. Extracted from the main document; charts and exhibits are in the original on sec.gov.

Derivatives and Hedging

We utilize various financial instruments to mitigate the impact of interest rate fluctuations on our cash flows and earnings, including hedging strategies, depending on our analysis of the interest rate environment and the costs and risks of such strategies. The following table summarizes our consolidated hedging instruments, all of which hedge variable rate debt, as of December 31, 2023.

(Amounts in thousands)

Interest rate swaps: Debt Balance Variable Rate Spread Notional Amount All-In Swapped Rate Expiration Date
555 California Street mortgage loan $1,200,000 S+205 $840,000 (1) 2.29% 05/24
Effective beginning 5/24 840,000 (1) 6.03% 05/26
770 Broadway mortgage loan 700,000 S+225 700,000 4.98% 07/27
PENN 11 mortgage loan 500,000 S+206 500,000 2.22% 03/24
Effective beginning 3/24(2) 250,000 6.34% 10/25
Unsecured revolving credit facility 575,000 S+114 575,000 3.87% 08/27
Unsecured term loan 800,000 S+129
Through 07/25 700,000 4.52% 07/25
07/25 through 10/26 550,000 4.35% 10/26
10/26 through 08/27 50,000 4.03% 08/27
100 West 33rd Street mortgage loan 480,000 S+165 480,000 5.06% 06/27
888 Seventh Avenue mortgage loan 259,800 S+180 200,000 4.76% 09/27
4 Union Square South mortgage loan 120,000 S+150 98,200 3.74% 01/25
Index Strike Rate
Interest rate caps:
1290 Avenue of the Americas mortgage loan(3) 950,000 S+162 950,000 1.00% 11/25
One Park Avenue mortgage loan 525,000 S+122 525,000 3.89% 03/25
Various mortgage loans 510,000 Various 510,000 Various Various

(1) Represents our 70.0% share of the $1.2 billion mortgage loan.

(2) In January 2024, we entered into a forward swap arrangement for the remaining $250,000 balance of the $500,000 PENN 11 mortgage loan which is effective upon the March 2024 expiration of the current in-place swap. Together with the forward swap above, the loan will bear interest at an all-in swapped rate of 6.28% effective March 2024 through October 2025.

(3) In connection with the arrangement, we made a $63,100 up-front payment, of which $18,930 was attributable to noncontrolling interests. See Note 9 - Debt in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for details.

The following table summarizes our hedging instruments of our unconsolidated subsidiaries (shown at our pro rata ownership interest) as of December 31, 2023.

(Amounts in thousands and at share)

Interest rate swaps: Debt Balance Variable Rate Spread Notional Amount All-In Swapped Rate Expiration Date
731 Lexington Avenue retail condominium (32.4% interest) $97,200 S+151 $97,200 1.76% 05/25
50-70 West 93rd Street (49.9% interest) 41,667 S+164 41,168 3.14% 06/24
Index Strike Rate
Interest rate caps:
640 Fifth Avenue (52.0% interest) 259,925 S+111 259,925 4.00% 05/24
731 Lexington Avenue office condominium (32.4% interest) 162,000 Prime+0 162,000 6.00% 06/24
61 Ninth Avenue (45.1% interest)(1) 75,543 S+146 75,543 4.39% 02/24
512 West 22nd Street (55.0% interest) 70,729 S+200 70,729 4.50% 06/25
Rego Park II (32.4% interest) 65,624 S+145 65,624 4.15% 11/24
Fashion Centre/Washington Tower (7.5% interest) 34,125 S+305 34,125 3.89% 05/24

(1) In February 2024, we entered into a 4.39% interest rate cap arrangement expiring January 2026 and effective upon expiration of the currently in-place cap.

Controls and procedures

As filed, 7,371 characters, with its headings, lists and tables. Extracted from the main document; charts and exhibits are in the original on sec.gov.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures: Vornado Realty L.P.’s management, with the participation of Vornado’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rule 13a‑15 (e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Based on such evaluation, Vornado’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting: There have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management of Vornado Realty Trust, sole general partner of Vornado Realty L.P., together with Vornado Realty L.P.’s consolidated subsidiaries (the “Company”), is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision of Vornado’s principal executive and principal financial officers to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of our financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

As of December 31, 2023, management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment, management has determined that our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023 was effective.

Our internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect transactions and dispositions of assets; provide reasonable assurances that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and Vornado’s trustees; and provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.

The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023 has been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report appearing on the following page, which expresses an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Partners of Vornado Realty L.P.

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Vornado Realty L.P. and subsidiaries (the “Partnership”) as of December 31, 2023, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Partnership maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2023, of the Partnership and our report dated February 12, 2024, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.

Basis for Opinion

The Partnership’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Partnership in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

New York, New York

February 12, 2024

Figures reported in this filing

Standardized line items from the XBRL in this filing, for the period ended 2023-12-31. Comparative periods it repeats are left out.

Figures reported in this filing
Line itemPeriodValueXBRL concept
Revenue12 months2023-01-01 to 2023-12-31$1.81bnus-gaap:Revenues
Income tax12 months2023-01-01 to 2023-12-31$29.2mus-gaap:IncomeTaxExpenseBenefit
Net income12 months2023-01-01 to 2023-12-31$105.5mus-gaap:NetIncomeLoss
Diluted EPS12 months2023-01-01 to 2023-12-31$0.23us-gaap:EarningsPerShareDiluted
Basic EPS12 months2023-01-01 to 2023-12-31$0.23us-gaap:EarningsPerShareBasic
Diluted shares (weighted)12 months2023-01-01 to 2023-12-31191,856,000 sharesus-gaap:WeightedAverageNumberOfDilutedSharesOutstanding
Operating cash flow12 months2023-01-01 to 2023-12-31$648.2mus-gaap:NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
Dividends paid12 months2023-01-01 to 2023-12-31$129.1mus-gaap:PaymentsOfDividendsCommonStock
Share repurchases12 months2023-01-01 to 2023-12-31$29.2mus-gaap:PaymentsForRepurchaseOfCommonStock
Cash and equivalentsAt period end2023-12-31$997.0mus-gaap:CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
Total assetsAt period end2023-12-31$16.19bnus-gaap:Assets
Total liabilitiesAt period end2023-12-31$9.84bnus-gaap:Liabilities
Long-term debtAt period end2023-12-31$2.56bnus-gaap:LongTermDebt
Shareholders' equityAt period end2023-12-31$5.51bnus-gaap:StockholdersEquity
Shares outstandingAt period end2023-12-31190,390,703 sharesdei:EntityCommonStockSharesOutstanding

Source: SEC EDGAR, the filing index for accession 0000899689-24-000005. Last ingested by Listed: Nov 2, 2026, 18:47 ET. Listed shows no prices and gives no investment advice.