Banner Corp: Form 10-K for the period ended Dec 31, 2024

General

Banner is a bank holding company incorporated in the State of Washington which wholly owns one subsidiary bank, Banner Bank. The Bank is a Washington-chartered commercial bank that conducts business from its main office in Walla Walla, Washington and, as of December 31, 2024, it had 135 branch offices and 13 loan production offices located in Washington, Oregon, California, Idaho and Utah. Banner is subject to regulation by the Federal Reserve. The Bank is subject to regulation by the Washington State Department of Financial Institutions-Division of Banks (the DFI) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the FDIC). As of December 31, 2024, we had total consolidated assets of $16.20 billion, net loans of $11.20 billion, total deposits of $13.51 billion and total shareholders’ equity of $1.77 billion. Banner’s common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the ticker symbol “BANR.”

The Bank is a regional bank that offers a wide variety of commercial banking services and financial products to individuals, businesses and public sector entities in its primary market areas. The Bank’s primary business is that of traditional banking institutions, accepting deposits and originating loans in locations surrounding our offices in Washington, Oregon, California, Idaho and Utah. The Bank is also an active participant in secondary loan markets, engaging in mortgage banking operations through the origination and sale of one- to four-family residential loans. Lending activities include commercial business and commercial real estate loans, agriculture business loans, construction, land and land development loans, one- to four-family residential loans, multifamily real estate loans, U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) loans and consumer loans.

We continue to invest in our delivery platform across the franchise with a primary emphasis on strengthening our presence in the higher growth regions of our markets. In addition, we continue to improve the efficiency of our branch delivery channel by making investments in streamlining the origination of new loan and deposit accounts while simultaneously enhancing our digital service and account origination capabilities. During the past few years, client adoption of mobile and digital banking has accelerated while physical branch transaction volume has declined. Banner anticipates this shift in client service delivery channel preference will continue and we strive to provide digital tools that support our client’s banking needs.

We also focus on expanding our product offerings and investing heavily in marketing campaigns designed to significantly increase the brand awareness for the Bank. These marketing investments are a significant element in our strategy to grow client relationships and increase our market presence, while allowing us to better serve existing and future clients. We believe our branch network, broad product line and heightened brand awareness have created a franchise that is well positioned for growth and successful execution of our super community bank model. Our overall strategy is focused on delivering clients—including middle market and small businesses, business owners, their families and employees—a compelling value proposition by providing the financial sophistication and breadth of products of a regional bank while retaining the appeal, responsiveness, and superior service level of a community bank.

The Company’s successful execution of its super community bank model and strategic initiatives has delivered solid core operating results and profitability over the last several years. The Company’s longer term strategic initiatives continue to focus on originating high quality assets and client acquisition, which we believe will continue to generate strong revenue while maintaining the Company’s moderate risk profile. In addition, our strategic initiatives relate to efficiency, talent retention and technology improvements.

Our operating results depend primarily on our net interest income, which is the difference between interest income on interest-earning assets, consisting primarily of loans and investment securities, and interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities, composed primarily of client deposits, Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines (FHLB) advances, other borrowings, subordinated notes, and junior subordinated debentures. Net interest income is a function of our interest rate spread, which is the difference between the yield earned on interest-earning assets and the average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities, as well as a function of the average balances of interest-earning assets, interest-bearing liabilities and non-interest-bearing funding sources including non-interest-bearing deposits.

Our net income is also affected by the level of our non-interest income, including deposit fees and other service charges, results of mortgage banking operations—which includes gains and losses on the sale of loans and servicing fees—gains and losses on the sale of securities, as well as our non-interest expenses and provisions for credit losses and income taxes.

Lending Activities

General: All of our lending activities are conducted through the Bank and its subsidiary, Community Financial Corporation, a residential construction lender located in Portland, Oregon. We offer a wide range of loan products to meet the demands of our clients and our loan portfolio is very diversified by product type, borrower and geographic location within our market area. We originate loans for our portfolio and for sale in the secondary market. Management’s strategy has been to maintain a well-diversified portfolio with a significant percentage of assets in the loan portfolio having more frequent interest rate repricing terms or shorter maturities than traditional long-term fixed-rate mortgage loans. As part of this effort, we offer a variety of floating or adjustable interest rate products that correlate more closely with our cost of interest-bearing funds, particularly loans for commercial business and real estate, agricultural business, and construction and development purposes. In response to client demand, we also originate fixed-rate loans, including fixed interest rate mortgage loans with terms of up to 30 years. The relative amount of fixed-rate loans and adjustable-rate loans that can be originated at any time is largely determined by the demand for each in a competitive environment.

Our lending activities are primarily directed toward the origination of commercial real estate and business loans. Commercial real estate loans include owner-occupied, investment properties and multifamily real estate. We also originate one- to four-family residential and construction, and land and land development loans, of which a significant component are one- to four-family residential construction loans. Throughout 2024, sales of completed homes continued to outpace new originations due to constrained housing inventories. Our commercial business lending is directed toward meeting the credit and related deposit and treasury management needs of various small- to medium-sized business and agribusiness borrowers operating in our primary market areas. To a lesser extent, our commercial business lending has also included participation in certain national syndicated loans. Typically, most of the one- to four-family residential loans that we originate are sold in the secondary markets with net gains on sales and loan servicing fees reflected in our revenues from mortgage banking. However, demand for these loans slowed in 2023 and 2024 due to high interest rates, which reduced refinance activity. Additionally, the higher rate environment has impacted the refinancing of custom construction loans into the secondary market upon project completion, leading to a significant increase in the retention of one- to four-family residential loan production held in the portfolio. Our consumer lending is primarily directed at meeting demand from our existing deposit clients. At December 31, 2024 our net loan portfolio totaled $11.35 billion compared to $10.81 billion at December 31, 2023.

One- to Four-Family Residential Real Estate Lending: We originate loans secured by first mortgages on one- to four-family residences in the markets we serve. Through our mortgage banking activities, we sell one- to four-family residential loans on either a servicing-retained or servicing-released basis. We have generally sold a significant portion of our conventional one- to four-family residential loan originations and nearly all of our government insured loans in the secondary market. As of December 31, 2024 14% of the loan portfolio, $1.59 billion, consisted of permanent one- to four-family residences.

We offer fixed- and adjustable-rate mortgages (ARMs) at rates and terms competitive with market conditions, primarily with the intent of selling these loans into the secondary market. Fixed-rate loans generally are offered on a fully amortizing basis for terms ranging from 10 to 30 years at interest rates and fees that reflect current secondary market pricing. Most ARM products offered by us adjust annually after an initial period ranging from one to five years, subject to a limitation on the annual adjustment and a lifetime rate cap. For a small portion of the portfolio, where the initial period exceeds one year, the first interest rate change may exceed the annual limitation on subsequent adjustments. Our ARM products most frequently adjust based upon the average yield on Treasury securities adjusted to a constant maturity of one year or other indices plus a margin or spread above the index. ARM loans held in our portfolio may allow for interest-only payments for an initial period, up to five years, but do not provide for negative amortization of principal and carry no prepayment restrictions. The retention of ARM loans in our loan portfolio can help reduce our exposure to changes in interest rates.

Our residential loans are generally underwritten and documented in accordance with the guidelines established by the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac or FHLMC) and the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae or FNMA). Government insured loans are underwritten and documented in accordance with the guidelines established by the Department of Housing and Urban Development and the Department of Veterans Affairs. In the loan approval process, we assess the borrower’s ability to repay the loan, the adequacy of the proposed security, the employment stability of the borrower and the creditworthiness of the borrower. For ARM loans, our standard practice provides for underwriting based upon fully indexed interest rates and payments. Generally, we will lend up to 95% of the lesser of the appraised value or purchase price of the property on conventional loans, although higher loan-to-value ratios are available on secondary market programs. We require private mortgage insurance on conventional residential loans with a loan-to-value ratio at origination exceeding 80%.

Construction, Land and Land Development Lending: Historically, we have invested a significant portion of our loan portfolio in residential construction and land loans to professional home builders and developers. Our land loans are typically on improved or entitled land, versus raw land. On a more limited basis, we also make land and land development loans to developers, builders and individuals to finance the acquisition and/or development of improved lots or unimproved land. In making land loans, we follow more conservative underwriting policies than those for construction loans but maintain similar disbursement and monitoring procedures. The initial term on land loans is typically one to three years with interest-only payments, payable monthly, with provisions for principal reduction as lots are sold and released.

We also make construction loans to qualified owner occupants, which upon completion of the construction phase convert to long-term amortizing one- to four-family residential loans that are eligible for sale in the secondary market. We regularly monitor our construction and land loan portfolios and the economic conditions and housing inventory in each of our markets and increase or decrease this type of lending as we observe market conditions change. Our residential construction and land and land development lending has been increasing recently in select markets and has made a meaningful contribution to our net interest income and profitability. We also originate construction loans for commercial and multifamily real estate.

Construction and land lending affords us the opportunity to achieve higher interest rates and fees with shorter terms to maturity than are generally available on other types of lending. Construction and land lending, however, involves a higher degree of risk than other lending opportunities. We attempt to address these risks by adhering to strict underwriting policies, disbursement procedures and monitoring practices, and the portfolio remains well diversified with respect to sub-markets, price ranges and borrowers.

Commercial and Multifamily Real Estate Lending: We originate loans secured by multifamily and commercial real estate, including loans for construction of multifamily and commercial real estate projects. Commercial real estate loans are made for both owner-occupied and investor-owned properties. Multifamily and commercial real estate lending affords us an opportunity to receive interest at rates higher than those generally available from one- to four-family residential lending. In originating multifamily and commercial real estate loans, we consider the location, marketability and overall attractiveness of the properties. Our underwriting guidelines for multifamily and commercial real estate loans require an appraisal from a qualified independent appraiser, as well as an environmental risk assessment and an economic analysis of each property with regard to annual revenue and expenses, debt service coverage and fair value to determine the maximum loan amount. In the approval process, we assess the borrower’s willingness and ability to manage the property and repay the loan and the adequacy of the collateral in relation to the loan amount. Our multifamily real estate portfolio, totaling $894.4 million as of December 31, 2024, is well diversified and consists mostly of affordable housing projects. Our commercial real estate portfolio, totaling $3.86 billion as of December 31, 2024, is granular in nature and geographically diversified.

Multifamily and commercial real estate loans originated by us are both fixed- and adjustable-rate loans with intermediate terms of generally five to 10 years. A significant portion of our multifamily and commercial real estate loans are linked to various FHLB advance rates, certain prime rates, US Treasury rates, or other market rate indices. Rates on these adjustable-rate loans generally adjust with a frequency of one to five years after an initial fixed-rate period ranging from one to 10 years. Our commercial real estate portfolio consists of loans on a variety of property types with no large concentrations by property type, location or borrower. At December 31, 2024, the average size of our commercial real estate loans was $1.2 million, with the largest commercial real estate loan, in terms of an outstanding balance, totaling $23.8 million.

Commercial Business Lending: We are active in small- to medium-sized business lending. Our commercial bankers are focused on local markets and devote a great deal of effort to developing client relationships and providing these types of borrowers with a full array of products and services delivered in a thorough and responsive manner. Our experienced commercial bankers and senior credit staff help us meet our commitment to small business lending while also focusing on corporate lending opportunities for borrowers with credit needs generally in a $3 million to $25 million range. In addition to providing earning assets, commercial business lending has helped us increase our deposit base. In recent years, our commercial business lending has included modest participation in certain national syndicated loans, including shared national credits. We also originate smaller balance business loans, principally through our retail branch network, using our QuickStep business loan program, which is closely aligned with our consumer lending operations and relies on centralized underwriting procedures. QuickStep business loans are available up to $1.0 million, business lines of credit are available up to $500,000 and owner-occupied real estate loans are available up to $2.0 million.

Commercial business loans may entail greater risk than other types of loans. Conventional commercial business loans generally provide higher yields or related revenue opportunities than many other types of loans but also require more administrative and management attention. Loan terms, including the fixed or adjustable interest rate, the loan maturity and the collateral considerations, vary significantly and are negotiated on an individual loan basis.

We underwrite our conventional commercial business loans on the basis of the borrower’s cash flow and ability to service the debt from earnings rather than on the basis of the underlying collateral value. We seek to structure these loans so that they have more than one source of repayment. The borrower is required to provide us with sufficient information to allow us to make a prudent lending determination. In most instances, this information consists of at least three years of financial statements and tax returns, a statement of projected cash flows, current financial information on any guarantor and information about the collateral. Loans to closely held businesses typically require personal guarantees by the principals. Our commercial business loan portfolio is geographically dispersed across the market areas serviced by our branch network and there are no significant concentrations by industry or product.

Our commercial business loans may be structured as term loans or as lines of credit. Commercial business term loans are generally made to finance the purchase of fixed assets and have maturities of five years or less. Commercial business lines of credit are typically made for the purpose of providing working capital and are usually approved with a term of one year. Adjustable- or floating-rate loans are primarily tied to prime and Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) indices.

Agricultural Lending: Agriculture is a major industry in several of our markets. We make agricultural loans to borrowers with a strong capital base, sufficient management depth, proven ability to operate through agricultural cycles, reliable cash flows and adequate financial reporting. Payments on agricultural loans depend, to a large degree, on the results of operations of the related farm entity. The repayment is also subject to other economic and weather conditions and market prices for agricultural products, which can be highly volatile.

Agricultural operating loans generally are made as a percentage of the borrower’s anticipated income to support budgeted operating expenses. These loans are secured by a blanket lien on all crops, livestock, equipment, accounts and products and proceeds thereof. In the case of crops, consideration is given to projected yields and prices from each commodity. The interest rate is normally floating, based on the prime rate or another index, plus a negotiated margin. Because these loans are made to finance a farm’s or ranch’s annual operations, they are usually written on a one-year review and renewable basis. The renewal is dependent upon the prior year’s performance and the forthcoming year’s projections as well as the overall financial strength of the borrower. We carefully monitor these loans and related variance reports on income and expenses compared to budget estimates. To meet the seasonal operating needs of a farm, borrowers may qualify for single payment notes, revolving lines of credit and/or non-revolving lines of credit.

In underwriting agricultural operating loans, we consider the cash flow of the borrower based upon the expected operating results and the value of collateral used to secure the loans. Collateral generally consists of cash crops produced by the farm, such as milk, grains, fruit, grass seed, peas, sugar beets, mint, walnuts, onions, potatoes, corn and alfalfa, or livestock. In addition to considering cash flow and obtaining a blanket security interest in the farm’s cash crop, we may also collateralize an operating loan with the farm’s operating equipment, breeding stock, real estate and federal agricultural program payments to the borrower.

We also originate loans to finance the purchase of farm equipment. Loans to purchase farm equipment are made for terms of up to seven years. On occasion, we also originate agricultural real estate loans secured primarily by first liens on farmland and improvements thereon located in our market areas, although generally only to service the needs of our existing clients. Loans are generally written in amounts ranging from 50% to 75% of the tax assessed or appraised value of the property for terms of five to 20 years. These loans typically have interest rates that adjust at least every five years based upon a Treasury index or FHLB advance rate plus a negotiated margin. Fixed-rate loans are granted on terms usually not to exceed five years. In originating agricultural real estate loans, we consider the debt service coverage of the borrower’s cash flow, the appraised value of the underlying property, the experience and knowledge of the borrower, the borrower’s past performance with us and the market area. These loans normally are not made to start-up businesses and are reserved for existing clients with substantial equity and a proven history.

Among the more common risks to agricultural lending can be weather conditions and disease. These risks may be mitigated through multi-peril crop insurance. Commodity prices also present a risk, which may be mitigated using set price contracts. Normally, required beginning and projected operating margins provide for reasonable reserves to offset unexpected yield and price deficiencies. In addition to these risks, we also consider management succession, life insurance and business continuation plans when evaluating agricultural loans.

Consumer and Other Lending: We originate a variety of consumer loans, including home equity lines of credit; automobile, boat and recreational vehicle loans; and loans secured by deposit accounts. While consumer lending has traditionally been a small part of our business, with loans made primarily to accommodate our existing client base, it has received consistent emphasis in recent years. Part of this emphasis includes a Banner Bank-owned credit card program. Similar to other consumer loan programs, we focus this credit card program on our existing client base to add to the depth of our client relationships. In addition to earning balances, credit card accounts produce non-interest revenues through interchange fees and other activity-based revenues. Our underwriting of consumer loans is focused on the borrower’s credit history and ability to repay the debt as evidenced by documented sources of income.

Loan Solicitation and Processing: We originate real estate loans in our market areas by direct solicitation of builders, developers, depositors, walk-in clients, real estate brokers and visitors to our website. One- to four-family residential loan applications are taken by our mortgage loan officers or through our website and are processed in branch or regional locations. In addition, we have specialized loan origination units focused on construction and land development, commercial real estate and multifamily real estate loans. Most underwriting and loan administration functions for our real estate loans are performed by loan personnel at central locations.

In addition to commercial real estate loans, our commercial bankers solicit commercial and agricultural business loans through call programs focused on local businesses and farmers. While commercial bankers are delegated reasonable lending authority based upon their qualifications, credit decisions on significant commercial and agricultural loans are made by senior credit officers based on their lending authority or, if required, by the Credit Risk Committee of the Board of Directors of the Bank.

We originate consumer loans and small business (including QuickStep) commercial business loans through various marketing efforts directed primarily toward our existing deposit and loan clients. Consumer and small business commercial business loan applications are primarily underwritten and documented by centralized administrative personnel.

Loan Originations, Sales and Purchases

While we originate a variety of loans, our ability to originate each type of loan is dependent upon the relative client demand and competition in each market we serve. For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, we originated loans, net of repayments, including our participation in syndicated loans and loans held for sale of $984.7 million and $886.8 million, respectively.

We sell many of our newly originated one- to four-family residential loans to secondary market purchasers as part of our interest rate risk management strategy. We previously originated multifamily real estate loans for sale in the secondary market, but discontinued this line of business during the fourth quarter of 2023. Sales of loans generally are beneficial to us because these sales may generate income at the time of sale, provide funds for additional lending and other investments, increase liquidity or reduce interest rate risk. We sell one- to four-family residential loans on both a servicing-retained and a servicing-released basis. All loans are sold without recourse but subject to the standard representations and warranties contained in the loan sale agreement. The decision to hold or sell loans is based on asset liability management goals, strategies and policies and on market conditions. In addition, we generally sell the guaranteed portion of SBA loans.

We periodically purchase whole loans, loan participation interests, and participate in syndications, including shared national credits. These purchases are made during periods of reduced loan demand in our primary market area and to support our Community Reinvestment Act lending activities. Any such purchases or loan participations are generally made on terms consistent with our underwriting standards; however, the loans may be located outside of our normal lending area.

Loan Servicing

We receive fees from a variety of institutional owners in return for performing the traditional services of collecting individual payments and managing portfolios of sold loans. At December 31, 2024, we were servicing $3.18 billion of loans for others. Loan servicing includes processing payments, accounting for loan funds and collecting and paying real estate taxes, hazard insurance and other loan-related items such as private mortgage insurance. In addition to earning fee income, we retain certain amounts in escrow for the benefit of the lender for which we incur no interest expense but are able to invest the funds into earning assets.

Mortgage and SBA Servicing Rights: We record mortgage servicing rights (MSRs) with respect to loans we originate and sell in the secondary market on a servicing-retained basis and SBA servicing rights with respect to the guaranteed portion of SBA loans we sell. The value of MSRs is capitalized and amortized in proportion to, and over the period of, the estimated future net servicing income. Management periodically evaluates the estimates and assumptions used to determine the carrying values of MSRs and the amortization of MSRs. MSRs generally are adversely affected by higher levels of current or anticipated prepayments resulting from decreasing interest rates. MSRs are evaluated for impairment based upon the fair value of the rights as compared to amortized cost. Impairment is recognized through a valuation allowance, to the extent that fair value is less than the capitalized carrying amount. SBA servicing rights are initially recorded and carried at fair value. Any change in the fair value of SBA servicing rights is recorded in non-interest income.

Asset Quality

Classified Assets: State and federal regulations require that the Bank review and classify its problem assets on a regular basis. In addition, in connection with examinations of insured institutions, state and federal examiners have authority to identify problem assets and, if appropriate, require them to be classified. Historically, we have not had any meaningful differences of opinion with the examiners with respect to asset classification. The Bank’s Credit Policy Division reviews detailed information with respect to the composition and performance of the loan portfolios, including information on risk concentrations, delinquencies and classified assets for the Bank. The Credit Policy Division approves all recommendations for new classified loans or, in the case of smaller-balance homogeneous loans including residential real estate and consumer loans, it has approved policies governing such classifications, or changes in classifications, and develops and monitors action plans to resolve the problems associated with the assets. The Credit Policy Division also approves recommendations for establishing the appropriate level of the allowance for credit losses. Significant problem loans are transferred to the Bank’s Special Assets Department for resolution or collection activities. We review asset quality at least quarterly.

Allowance for Credit Losses: In originating loans, we recognize that losses will be experienced and that the risk of loss will vary with, among other things, the type of loan being made, the creditworthiness of the borrower over the term of the loan, general economic conditions and, in the case of a secured loan, the quality of the security for the loan. The allowance for credit losses is maintained at a level sufficient to provide for expected credit losses over the life of the loan based on evaluating specific risk characteristics in the current loan portfolio and forecasted economic conditions, as well as historical credit loss experience. We increase our allowance for credit losses by charging a provision for credit losses against income.

Real Estate Owned: Real estate owned (REO) is property acquired by foreclosure or receiving a deed in-lieu-of foreclosure and is recorded at the estimated fair value of the property, less expected selling costs. Development and improvement costs relating to the property are capitalized to the extent they add value to the property. The carrying value of the property is periodically evaluated by Management and, if necessary, allowances are established to reduce the carrying value to net realizable value. Gains or losses at the time the property is sold are credited or charged to operations in the period in which they are realized. The amounts we will ultimately recover from REO may differ substantially from the carrying value of the assets because of market factors beyond our control or because of changes in our strategies for recovering the investment.

Investment Activities

Investment Securities: Under Washington state law and FDIC regulation, banks are permitted to invest in various types of marketable securities. Authorized securities include but are not limited to Treasury obligations, securities of various federal agencies (including government-sponsored enterprises), mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities, certain certificates of deposit of insured banks and savings institutions, bankers’ acceptances, repurchase agreements, federal funds, commercial paper, corporate debt and equity securities and obligations of states and their political subdivisions. Our investment policies are designed to provide and maintain adequate liquidity and to generate favorable rates of return without incurring undue interest rate risk or credit risk. Our policies generally limit investments to U.S. Government and agency (including government-sponsored entities) securities, municipal bonds, certificates of deposit, corporate debt obligations and mortgage-backed securities. Investment in mortgage-backed securities may include those issued or guaranteed by Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae, Government National Mortgage Association (Ginnie Mae or GNMA) and investment grade privately issued mortgage-backed securities, and collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs). All of our investment securities, including those with a credit rating, are subject to market risk in so far as a change in market rates of interest or other conditions may cause a change in an investment’s earnings performance and/or market value.

Derivatives: We are party to various derivative instruments that are used for asset and liability management and client financing needs. Derivative instruments are contracts between two or more parties that have a notional amount and an underlying variable, require no net investment and allow for the net settlement of positions. The notional amount serves as the basis for the payment provision of the contract and takes the form of units, such as shares or dollars. The underlying variable represents a specified interest rate, index, or other component. The interaction between the notional amount and the underlying variable determines the number of units to be exchanged between the parties and influences the market value of the derivative contract.

Our predominant derivative and hedging activities involve interest rate swaps related to certain term loans, interest rate lock commitments to borrowers, and forward sales contracts associated with mortgage banking activities. Generally, these instruments help us manage exposure to market risk and meet client financing needs. Market risk represents the possibility that economic value or net interest income will be adversely affected by fluctuations in external factors such as market-driven interest rates and prices or other economic factors.

Deposit Activities and Other Sources of Funds

General: Deposits, FHLB advances (or other borrowings) and loan repayments are our major sources of funds for lending and other investment purposes. Scheduled loan repayments are a relatively stable source of funds, while deposit inflows and outflows and loan prepayments are influenced by general economic, interest rate and money market conditions and may vary significantly. Borrowings may be used on a short-term basis to compensate for reductions in the availability of funds from other sources. Borrowings may also be used on a longer-term basis to fund loans and investments, and to manage interest rate risk.

We face competition from various financial institutions and intermediaries for deposits. Competition is particularly intense for transaction balances and savings deposits, with commercial banks, credit unions, and non-bank entities such as securities brokerage firms, mutual funds, and large corporations with nationwide office networks, actively competing for market share. Our efforts, including acquisitions, branch relocations, renovations, and marketing campaigns, are primarily focused on expanding deposit client relationships and balances. Additionally, our electronic and digital banking services, such as debit card and ATM programs, internet banking, remote deposit, and mobile banking, are designed to enhance client engagement, drive deposit growth, and generate fee income. Core deposits, consisting of non-interest-bearing checking accounts and interest-bearing transaction and savings accounts, constitute a fundamental element of our business strategy. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, core deposits represented 89% of total deposits.

Deposit Accounts: We generally attract deposits from within our primary market areas by offering a broad selection of deposit instruments, including non-interest-bearing checking accounts, interest-bearing checking accounts, money market deposit accounts, regular savings accounts, certificates of deposit, treasury management services and retirement savings plans. Deposit account terms vary according to the minimum balance required, the time periods the funds must remain on deposit and the interest rate, among other factors. In determining the terms of deposit accounts, we consider current market interest rates, profitability to us, matching deposit and loan products and client preferences and concerns.

Borrowings: While deposits are the primary source of funds for our lending and investment activities and for general business purposes, we also use borrowings to supplement our supply of lendable funds, to meet deposit withdrawal requirements and to more efficiently leverage our capital position. The FHLB serves as our primary borrowing source. The FHLB provides credit for member financial institutions such as the Bank. As a member, the Bank is required to own capital stock in the FHLB and is authorized to apply for advances on the security of that stock and certain of its mortgage loans and securities, provided that certain credit worthiness standards have been met. Limitations on the amount of advances are based on the financial condition of the member institution, the adequacy of collateral pledged to secure the credit, and FHLB stock ownership requirements. The Federal Reserve Bank serves as an additional source of borrowing capacity. The Federal Reserve Bank provides credit based upon acceptable loan collateral, which includes certain loan types not eligible for pledging to the FHLB.

In addition, the Bank has federal funds line of credit agreements with other financial institutions. Availability of lines is subject to federal funds balances available for loan and continued borrower eligibility. These lines are intended to support short-term liquidity needs and the agreements may restrict consecutive day usage.

We issue retail repurchase agreements, generally due within 90 days, as an additional source of funds, primarily in connection with treasury management services provided to our larger deposit clients. We also may borrow funds using secured wholesale repurchase agreements with securities brokers.

Between 2002 and 2007, we issued junior subordinated debentures in conjunction with the sale of trust preferred securities (TPS). These securities were sold through special purpose business trusts established by Banner and were privately offered to pooled investment vehicles. The proceeds from the junior subordinated debentures issuances were predominantly invested as additional paid-in capital at the Bank. In addition, through acquisitions, Banner acquired additional junior subordinated debentures. During 2020, we issued and sold 5.0% fixed-to-floating subordinated notes, which are callable in 2025 and mature in 2030. The subordinated notes become floating-rate notes based on SOFR in June 2025.

Personnel

Human Capital

At Banner, our employees are a critical component of our success. Because our business success depends on our ability to retain, develop and attract top talent, we seek to provide a work environment that offers professional development opportunities, career growth, competitive compensation and comprehensive benefits. Employing the best talent we can—including individuals who possess a broad range of experiences, backgrounds and skills—better positions us to anticipate and meet the needs of our business and our clients.

As our business grows and evolves, the demand for qualified candidates continues to grow. Meanwhile, the pool of experienced candidates in the financial services industry is shrinking, presenting a growing challenge in securing top talent. To address this challenge, we have developed and continue to enhance a robust and comprehensive company-wide talent management program. This program encompasses talent acquisition and selection, performance coaching, career development, retention of top talent and succession planning. Our Board of Directors, through its Compensation and Human Capital Committee, provides oversight for our human capital strategies and compensation programs.

Talent Acquisition and Attrition. To cultivate and recruit hard-to-fill positions, we partner closely with several colleges and universities with well-known programs relevant to our business. In 2024, we continued our Flexible Workplace Program that was formally launched in 2022, which provides hybrid and remote career opportunities. The program aims to support hiring from an expanded group of candidates, improve the work experience for our employees, strengthen our leadership pipeline and promote employee retention. Our voluntary employee turnover rate in 2024 decreased to 13%, compared to 15% in 2023.

Our employment application and hiring processes do not solicit prior compensation information from candidates. This approach helps ensure our new hire compensation is based on individual qualifications and roles, rather than being influenced by a candidate’s previous compensation history. We also accept relevant experience as an alternative to formal education requirements for many roles, to support expanded candidate pools. In 2023, Banner initiated a partnership with BankWork$, an organization dedicated to assisting young adults from under-resourced communities in building meaningful careers in banking. This partnership continued in 2024 with an expansion of the program to additional geographic areas. This collaboration includes a free, eight-week career training program, placement assistance, and ongoing coaching.

In 2024, we hired 356 new employees into our workforce. As of December 31, 2024, approximately 39% of our workforce was working hybrid or remotely. Our willingness to accommodate flexible work arrangements underscores our commitment to fostering an inclusive workplace.

Talent Development. We invest significant resources developing the talent needed to meet our business goals and to make us an employer of choice. We offer our employees a variety of professional development opportunities, including participation in industry conferences, instructor-led continuing education and training sessions. We also make available online training sessions that focus on industry, regulatory, business and leadership topics to help employees achieve their career goals, build management skills and lead their teams.

To foster a culture of growth and professional development, we launched a new leadership development program in 2024. This comprehensive program represents a significant investment in our leaders and aims to align our leadership skills with the Bank’s strategic goals. It’s also part of our dedication to building a strong talent pipeline that develops talent, drives vision and purpose, cultivates innovation and a strategic mindset, and encourages continuous learning through experimentation. Centered around eight core competencies, the program is designed to equip leaders with the skills needed to navigate the evolving financial landscape and support the Bank’s long-term objectives.

To encourage advancement and growth within our organization, we provide information and guides to help individuals design their own career paths. With this strong focus on internal talent development, we filled 30% of all open positions in 2024 with internal candidates.

As part of our commitment to continuous learning, we require all employees to complete a variety of online training courses annually. These include both job-specific and general courses covering regulatory compliance, cybersecurity, fraud prevention, workplace standards, and ethics. We also encourage employees to enroll in outside education programs to broaden their knowledge and enhance job performance and facilitate career growth by providing tuition assistance to help employees obtain bachelor’s and master’s degrees. This comprehensive approach underscores our dedication to nurturing a skilled and empowered workforce.

Succession Planning. Recognizing the critical significance of succession planning for our CEO and other key executives, our Board of Directors takes an active role in overseeing and monitoring these efforts. Annually, the Board conducts a thorough review of our succession plans for senior leadership roles. The primary objective is to ensure that we consistently have the appropriate leadership talent in place, aligning with the organization’s long-term strategic plans. To facilitate this oversight, the Board’s Compensation and Human Capital Committee provides dedicated governance of talent development and succession planning for senior leadership roles.

Employee Engagement. We use anonymous employee surveys to gather valuable feedback on key initiatives, leveraging the results to enhance existing programs and develop new ones. In our commitment to fostering employee engagement and transparency, we share the survey results with our workforce. Additionally, senior leadership analyzes areas of progress or opportunities for improvement, prioritizing responsive actions and activities. In 2024, we conducted a company-wide engagement survey, achieving an overall engagement score of 86%, with 77% of employees participating. The survey results indicated that our employees demonstrate ethical conduct in business dealings, are knowledgeable about our clients’ needs, and understand their own contributions to the Bank’s goals. Beyond a formal engagement survey, we provide regular opportunities for managers and employees to ask questions, raise concerns and provide suggestions for ways to build a better and stronger company. Throughout 2024, this initiative included quarterly virtual meetings with employees to communicate results and progress on strategic initiatives. Additionally, in-person employee townhalls provided opportunities for employees to directly engage with Company leaders. This multifaceted approach supports open communication channels and strengthens our commitment to continuous improvement and employee satisfaction.

Total Rewards (Compensation and Benefits). We provide robust compensation and benefits programs to help meet the needs of our employees. These programs include, subject to eligibility policies, variable pay tied to performance for all employees, a 401(k) plan (including an employer match up to 4% of eligible earnings and immediate vesting), healthcare and insurance benefits, health savings and flexible spending accounts, paid time off, family care resources, flexible work schedules, employee assistance programs and tuition assistance. New employees are eligible for group benefits on the first day of the month following their hire date. For some employees, this means they become eligible for coverage in their first week of employment. We also grant long-term, stock-based incentive awards to a select group of senior leaders who we believe will play critical roles in the Company’s future. We believe our compensation program is competitive within the financial industry. We periodically review our plans and programs, as well as market surveys, to help ensure our compensation program is consistent with our level of performance and that we have a current understanding of peer practices.

We offer comprehensive health insurance coverage, including telehealth services, to employees working an average of at least 20 hours per week. Coverage is also available to eligible family members including domestic partners. Beyond traditional health insurance, we offer a range of mental health-related programs and benefits, including text-based and telehealth services, a 24-hour nurse line and an employee assistance program. Additionally, we offer virtual physical therapy benefits and virtual support for hypertension and diabetes, as well as subsidized child, adult and senior care planning services. To further support employees and their caregivers dealing with cancer, we offer cancer support services. This service provides dedicated cancer care coaches 24/7 to provide personalized guidance to navigate the complexities of cancer care.

In addition to our core benefits program, we recognize the importance of supporting employees during significant life events. Therefore, we offer parental leave, providing eight weeks of leave for both birth and non-birth parents, including adoption or surrogacy. Our benefits package also includes traditional sick leave up to 10 days per year and 12 weeks of short-term disability coverage. Furthermore, employees have the flexibility to take up to 16 paid personal hours each year to observe individual days of significance, such as religious holidays, culturally significant days, or other personal reasons. This comprehensive benefits package reflects our commitment to the well-being and work-life balance of our valued employees.

Pay Equity. Pay equity and pay transparency are fundamental to our compensation philosophy and core values. We began conducting thorough pay equity studies in 2017 in collaboration with external experts to methodically assess employee groups in similar roles. These studies consider various factors such as job location and experience to promote fair and objective pay comparisons. In 2024, we engaged a global workplace equity organization that provides a technology platform to measure, achieve and sustain pay and workplace equity. This technology enables us to embed workplace equity into our core business by conducting analyses as frequently as our business model and strategic goals necessitate. Through continuous monitoring, we remain committed to identifying and addressing any pay disparities, to support pay equity across our organization.

Incentive Compensation Risk Management. We strive to align incentives with the risk and performance frameworks of the Company. The Company’s “pay for performance” philosophy connects individual, operating unit and Company results to compensation, providing employees with opportunities to share in the Company’s overall growth and success. We develop, execute and govern all incentive compensation plans to discourage imprudent or excessive risk-taking and balance financial reward in a manner that supports our clients, employees and Company.

Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, and Advocacy. We seek to hire the best and brightest—including individuals who possess a broad range of experiences, backgrounds and skills. We believe that diverse perspectives and inclusive environments result in better outcomes for all our stakeholders and empower our employees to make more meaningful contributions within our Company and communities.

We aim to maintain a work environment where every employee is treated with dignity and respect, is free from discrimination and harassment, and is allowed to devote their full attention and best efforts to performing their job to the best of their ability. Further, we maintain a Respectful Workplace Policy in alignment with this commitment. We strive to operate with an “open door policy” where employee concerns can be discussed anytime directly with leadership or human resources team members. We regularly conduct employee engagement surveys and exit surveys to help collect meaningful feedback to inform our human capital practices. We have always championed the principles of fairness, respect, and opportunity, ensuring that all employees are recognized and rewarded based on their merit, talent, contributions, and performance.

Our cross-functional, employee-led IDEAs Council provides leadership and serves as a catalyst for inclusion initiatives across our organization. The council is intended to help develop effective strategies to attract, develop and retain top talent.

In 2024, we worked with the Department of Defense as a new employer partner in its Military Spouse Employment Partnership (MSEP). This partnership connects military spouses with employers committed to recruiting, hiring, promoting and retaining military spouses. As an MSEP partner, we have agreed to post job openings to the Partnership’s portal, increase employment opportunities for military spouses, provide career advancement opportunities to military spouses who perform well, and when possible, work to retain military spouses when they relocate. We also committed to tracking and reporting military spouse employment data.

As part of a multi-year employee engagement strategy, we launched our LGBTQ+ Employee Resource Group (ERG) to complement our four established groups: Black, Indigenous, People of Color (BIPOC), Veterans, Women in Leadership, and Working Parents and Caregivers. Our ERGs give employees the opportunity to discuss issues important to the group and are designed to support our business goals, while promoting an inclusive and supportive culture.

We have a strong team collectively capable of professionally operating the business and fulfilling our vision. The following tables illustrate our workforce composition by level as of December 31, 2024:

* Refers to director-level employees, not Board of Directors

* Refers to director-level employees, not Board of Directors

Health, Safety and Well-being. The success of our business is fundamentally connected to the well-being of our employees. We provide employees and their families with access to a variety of programs to support their physical and mental health. We offer a wellness coach benefit (which can also be shared with up to five friends and family) that provides unlimited free one-on-one personal coaching in several different categories such as fitness, nutrition, life coaching, and financial coaching, as well as a range of tools to improve sleep quality.

Volunteerism. We strive to be a good corporate citizen by encouraging employees to engage in the communities where they live and work. To encourage volunteering, we offer Community Connections, a program that offers employees up to 16 hours of paid time off to volunteer at non-profit organizations of their choice. We also encourage employees to serve in leadership roles in these organizations as part of their professional development. We are proud to support many local community organizations through financial contributions and employee-driven volunteerism, including Junior Achievement, United Way and hundreds of others.

Human Capital Metrics. We capture critical metrics regarding human capital management on a quarterly basis and report them to the Compensation and Human Capital Committee of the Board of Directors. The Human Capital Management Dashboard includes a mixture of trending and point-in-time metrics designed to provide information and analysis of workforce demographics; talent acquisition; workforce stability (retention, turnover, etc.); employee engagement; learning and development; and total rewards. As of December 31, 2024, we employed 1,925 full- and part-time employees and 10 temporary employees across our four-state footprint. Our employees are not represented by a collective bargaining agreement. As of December 31, 2024, 57% of our employees work in Washington State. We also have employees working in Oregon (19%), California (16%) and other states (8%). As of December 31, 2024, four generations were represented in our workplace with Millennials having the greatest representation (38%), followed by Gen-X (37%), Boomer (14%) and Gen-Z (11%).

Taxation

Tax-Sharing Agreement

The Company files its federal and state income tax returns on a consolidated basis under a tax-sharing agreement between Banner and the Bank, including the Bank’s subsidiaries. Each company of the consolidated group has calculated a minimum income tax which would be required if the individual subsidiary were to file federal and state income tax returns as a separate entity. Each subsidiary pays to Banner an amount equal to the estimated income tax due if it were to file as a separate entity. The payment is made on or about the time the subsidiary would be required to make such tax payments to the United States Treasury or the applicable State or Local Departments of Revenue. In the event the computation of the subsidiary’s federal or state income tax liability, after considering any estimated tax payments made, would result in a refund if the subsidiary were filing income tax returns as a separate entity, then Banner pays to the subsidiary an amount equal to the hypothetical refund. Banner is an agent for each subsidiary with respect to all matters related to the consolidated tax returns and refund claims. If Banner’s consolidated federal or state income tax liability is adjusted for any period, the liability of each party under the tax-sharing agreement is recomputed to give effect to such adjustments, and any additional payments required as a result of the adjustments are made within a reasonable time after the corresponding additional tax payments are made or refunds are received.

Federal Taxation

For tax reporting purposes, we report our income on a calendar year basis using the accrual method of accounting on a consolidated basis. We are subject to federal income taxation in the same manner as other corporations with some exceptions, including particularly the reserve for bad debts.

State and Local Taxation

Washington Taxation: We are subject to a Business and Occupation (B&O) tax which is imposed by the State of Washington on gross receipts. Interest received on loans secured by mortgages or deeds of trust on residential properties, residential mortgage-backed securities, and certain U.S. Government and agency securities is not subject to this tax.

California, Oregon, Idaho, Montana and Utah Taxation: Corporations with nexus in the states of California, Oregon, Idaho, Montana and Utah are subject to a corporate level income tax. In addition, the state of Oregon has a tax on Oregon corporate revenue. If a large percentage of our income were to come from these states, our state income tax provision would have an increased effect on our effective tax rate and results of operations.

Local Taxation: In addition to taxes payable to the state of Oregon, we are subject to local taxes in the Multnomah County and Portland-metro area based on our revenues in these jurisdictions.

Competition

We encounter significant competition both in attracting deposits and in originating loans. Our most direct competition for deposits comes from other commercial and savings banks, savings associations and credit unions with offices in our market areas. We also experience competition from securities firms, insurance companies, money market and mutual funds, and other investment vehicles. We expect continued strong competition from such financial institutions and investment vehicles in the foreseeable future, including competition from online banking competitors and “FinTech” companies that rely on technology to provide financial services. Our ability to attract and retain deposits depends on our ability to provide transaction services and investment opportunities that satisfy the requirements of depositors. We compete for deposits by offering a variety of accounts and financial services, including electronic banking capabilities, with competitive rates and terms, at convenient locations and business hours, and delivered with a high level of personal service and expertise.

Competition for loans comes principally from other commercial banks, loan brokers, mortgage banking companies, savings banks and credit unions and for agricultural loans from the Farm Credit Administration. The competition for loans is intense as a result of the large number of institutions competing in our market areas. We compete for loans primarily by offering competitive rates and fees and providing timely decisions and excellent service to borrowers.

Regulation

General: As a state-chartered, federally insured commercial bank, the Bank is subject to extensive regulation and must comply with various statutory and regulatory requirements, including prescribed minimum capital standards. The Bank is regularly examined by the FDIC and the Washington DFI and files periodic reports about its activities and financial condition with these banking regulators. The Bank’s relationship with depositors and borrowers is also regulated to a great extent by both federal and state law, especially in such matters as the ownership of deposit accounts and the form and content of mortgage and other loan documents.

Federal and state banking laws and regulations govern all areas of the operation of the Bank, including reserves, loans, investments, deposits, capital, issuance of securities, payment of dividends and establishment of branches. Federal and state bank regulatory agencies also have the general authority to limit the dividends paid by insured banks and bank holding companies if such payments should be deemed to constitute an unsafe and unsound practice and in other circumstances. The Federal Reserve and FDIC, as the respective primary federal regulators of Banner and of the Bank, have authority to impose penalties, initiate civil and administrative actions and take other steps intended to prevent banks from engaging in unsafe or unsound practices. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) is an independent bureau within the Federal Reserve System. The CFPB is responsible for the implementation of the federal financial consumer protection and fair lending laws and regulations and has authority to impose new requirements.

Any change in applicable laws, regulations, or regulatory policies may have a material effect on our business, operations, and prospects. We cannot predict the nature or the extent of the effects on our business and earnings that any fiscal or monetary policies or new federal or state legislation may have in the future.

The following is a summary discussion of certain laws and regulations applicable to Banner and the Bank, which is qualified in its entirety by reference to the actual laws and regulations.

Banner Bank

State Regulation and Supervision: As a Washington state-chartered commercial bank with branches in Washington, Oregon, Idaho and California, the Bank is subject not only to the applicable provisions of Washington law and regulations, but is also subject to Oregon, Idaho and California laws and regulations. These state laws and regulations govern the Bank’s ability to take deposits and pay interest thereon, to make loans on or invest in residential and other real estate, to make consumer loans, to invest in securities, to offer various banking services to its clients and to establish branch offices.

Deposit Insurance: The Deposit Insurance Fund of the FDIC insures deposit accounts of the Bank up to $250,000 per separately insured deposit relationship category. As insurer, the FDIC imposes deposit insurance premiums and is authorized to conduct examinations of, and to require reporting by, FDIC-insured institutions. No institution may pay a dividend if it is in default on its federal deposit insurance assessment. As of December 31, 2024, assessment rates ranged from five basis points to 32 basis points for all institutions, subject to adjustments for unsecured debt issued by the institution, unsecured debt issued by other FDIC-insured institutions, and brokered deposits held by the institution. The FDIC is required to update its analysis and projections for the Deposit Insurance Fund balance and reserve ratio at least semiannually and make necessary adjustments to the assessment rate schedules.

The FDIC may prohibit any insured institution from engaging in any activity determined by regulation or order to pose a serious risk to the deposit insurance fund. The FDIC may terminate the deposit insurance of any insured depository institution if it determines after a hearing that the institution has engaged or is engaging in unsafe or unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations, or has violated any applicable law, regulation, order or any condition imposed by an agreement with the FDIC. It also may suspend deposit insurance temporarily during the hearing process for the permanent termination of insurance if the institution has no tangible capital. If insurance of accounts is terminated, the accounts at the institution at the time of the termination, less subsequent withdrawals, shall continue to be insured for a period of six months to two years, as determined by the FDIC. Management is not aware of any existing circumstances which would result in termination of deposit insurance of the Bank.

Standards for Safety and Soundness: The federal banking regulatory agencies have prescribed, by regulation, guidelines for all insured depository institutions relating to internal controls, information systems and internal audit systems; loan documentation; credit underwriting; interest rate risk exposure; asset growth; asset quality; earnings; and compensation, fees and benefits. The guidelines set forth the safety and soundness standards that the federal banking agencies use to identify and address problems at insured depository institutions. Each insured depository institution must implement a comprehensive written information security program that includes administrative, technical, and physical safeguards appropriate to the institution’s size and complexity and the nature and scope of its activities. The information security program must be designed to ensure the security and confidentiality of client information, protect against any unanticipated threats or hazards to the security or integrity of such information, protect against unauthorized access to or use of such information that could result in substantial harm or inconvenience to any client, and ensure the proper disposal of client and consumer information. Each insured depository institution must also develop and implement a risk-based response program to address incidents of unauthorized access to client information in client information systems. If the FDIC determines that an institution fails to meet any of these guidelines, it may require an institution to submit to the FDIC an acceptable plan to achieve compliance.

In October 2023, considering recent and historical bank failures, the FDIC proposed guidelines aimed at establishing corporate governance and risk management expectations for all insured state-chartered banks, excluding those who are members of the Federal Reserve, with total assets exceeding $10 billion. This initiative, conducted through rulemaking under Section 39 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, empowers the FDIC to set forth enforceable standards, incorporated as an appendix to Part 364 of its regulations. The guidelines focus on defining obligations of the board of directors, specifying board composition and committee structures, and outlining expectations for an independent risk management function. The FDIC aims to enhance a bank’s safety and soundness, minimizing the likelihood of failure and mitigating potential losses. The FDIC has not yet finalized the proposed guidelines and continues to evaluate the proposed guidelines in light of the comments received during the public comment period.

Capital Requirements: Bank holding companies, such as Banner, and federally insured financial institutions, such as the Bank, are required to maintain a minimum level of regulatory capital.

Banner and the Bank are subject to minimum required ratios for Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) capital, Tier 1 capital, total capital and the leverage ratio and a required capital conservation buffer over the required capital ratios.

Under the capital regulations, the minimum capital ratios are: (1) a CET1 capital ratio of 4.5% of risk-weighted assets; (2) a Tier 1 capital ratio of 6.0% of risk-weighted assets; (3) a total risk-based capital ratio of 8.0% of risk-weighted assets; and (4) a leverage ratio (the ratio of Tier 1 capital to average total consolidated assets) of 4.0%. CET1 generally consists of common stock; retained earnings; accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) unless an institution elects to exclude AOCI from regulatory capital; and certain minority interests; all subject to applicable regulatory adjustments and deductions. Tier 1 capital generally consists of CET1 and noncumulative perpetual preferred stock. Tier 2 capital generally consists of other preferred stock and subordinated debt meeting certain conditions plus an amount of the allowance for credit losses up to 1.25% of assets. Total capital is the sum of Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital.

Trust preferred securities issued by a bank holding company, such as the Company, with total consolidated assets of less than $15 billion before May 19, 2010, and treated as regulatory capital are grandfathered, but any such securities issued later are not eligible to be treated as regulatory capital. For institutions that grow above $15 billion as a result of an acquisition, the trust preferred securities are excluded from Tier 1 capital and instead included in Tier 2 capital. Mortgage servicing assets and deferred tax assets over designated percentages of CET1 are deducted from capital. In addition, Tier 1 capital includes AOCI, which includes all unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale debt and equity securities. However, because of our asset size, we were eligible to elect, and did elect, to permanently opt out of the inclusion of unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale debt and equity securities in our capital calculations.

For purposes of determining risk-based capital, assets and certain off-balance sheet items are risk-weighted from 0% to 1250%, depending on the risk characteristics of the asset or item.

In addition to the minimum CET1, Tier 1, leverage ratio and total capital ratios, Banner and the Bank must maintain a capital conservation buffer consisting of additional CET1 capital greater than 2.5% of risk-weighted assets above the required minimum risk-based capital levels in order to avoid limitations on paying dividends, repurchasing shares, and paying discretionary bonuses.

To be considered “well capitalized,” a bank holding company must have, on a consolidated basis, a total risk-based capital ratio of 10.0% or greater and a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6.0% or greater and must not be subject to an individual order, directive or agreement under which the FRB requires it to maintain a specific capital level. To be considered “well capitalized,” a depository institution must have a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 8.0%, a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 10.0%, a CET1 capital ratio of at least 6.5% and a leverage ratio of at least 5.0% and not be subject to an individualized order, directive or agreement under which its primary federal banking regulator requires it to maintain a specific capital level.

Upon adoption of CECL, a banking organization must record a one-time adjustment to its credit loss allowances as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption equal to the difference, if any, between the amount of credit loss allowances under the prior methodology and the amount required under CECL. Concurrent with enactment of the CARES Act, federal banking agencies issued an interim final rule that delayed the estimated impact on regulatory capital resulting from the adoption of CECL. The interim final rule provided banking organizations that implemented CECL before the end of 2020 the option to delay for two years the estimated impact of CECL on regulatory capital relative to regulatory capital determined under the prior incurred loss methodology, followed by a three-year transition period to phase out the aggregate amount of capital benefit provided during the initial two-year delay. The changes in the final rule applied only to those banking organizations that elected the CECL transition relief provided under the rule. Banner and the Bank elected this option, and 2024 was the last year of our three- year transition period.

Prompt Corrective Action: Federal statutes establish a supervisory framework for FDIC-insured institutions based on five capital categories: well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized and critically undercapitalized. An institution’s category depends upon where its capital levels are in relation to relevant capital measures. The well-capitalized category is described above. An institution that is not well capitalized is subject to certain restrictions on brokered deposits, including restrictions on the rates it can offer on its deposits generally. To be considered adequately capitalized, an institution must have the minimum capital ratios described above. Any institution which is neither well capitalized nor adequately capitalized is considered undercapitalized.

Undercapitalized institutions are subject to certain prompt corrective action requirements, regulatory controls and restrictions which become more extensive as an institution becomes more severely undercapitalized. Failure by the Bank to comply with applicable capital requirements would, if unremedied, result in progressively more severe restrictions on its activities and lead to enforcement actions, including, but not limited to, the issuance of a capital directive to ensure the maintenance of required capital levels and, ultimately, the appointment of the FDIC as receiver or conservator. Banking regulators will take prompt corrective action with respect to depository institutions that do not meet minimum capital requirements. Additionally, approval of any regulatory application filed for their review may be dependent on compliance with capital requirements. As of December 31, 2024, Banner and the Bank met the requirements to be “well capitalized” and the capital conservation buffer requirements.

Commercial Real Estate Lending Concentrations: The federal banking agencies have issued guidance on sound risk management practices for concentrations in commercial real estate lending. The particular focus is on exposure to commercial real estate loans that are dependent on the cash flow from the real estate held as collateral and that are likely to be sensitive to conditions in the commercial real estate market (as opposed to real estate collateral held as a secondary source of repayment or as an abundance of caution). The purpose of the guidance is not to limit a bank’s commercial real estate lending but to guide banks in developing risk management practices and capital levels commensurate with the level and nature of real estate concentrations. The guidance directs the FDIC and other bank regulatory agencies to focus their supervisory resources on institutions that may have significant commercial real estate loan concentration risk. A bank that has experienced rapid growth in commercial real estate lending, has notable exposure to a specific type of commercial real estate loan, or is approaching or exceeding the following supervisory criteria may be identified for further supervisory analysis with respect to real estate concentration risk:

• Total reported loans for construction, land development and other land represent 100% or more of the bank’s total regulatory capital; or
• Total commercial real estate loans (as defined in the guidance) represent 300% or more of the bank’s total regulatory capital and the outstanding balance of the bank’s commercial real estate loan portfolio has increased 50% or more during the prior 36 months.

The guidance provides that the strength of an institution’s lending and risk management practices with respect to such concentrations will be taken into account in supervisory guidance on evaluation of capital adequacy. As of December 31, 2024, the Bank’s aggregate recorded loan balances for construction, land development and land loans were 81% of total regulatory capital. In addition, at December 31, 2024, the Bank’s loans secured by commercial real estate represent 255% of total regulatory capital.

Activities and Investments of Insured State-Chartered Financial Institutions: Federal law generally limits the activities and equity investments of FDIC insured, state-chartered banks to those that are permissible for national banks. An insured state bank is not prohibited from, among other things, (1) acquiring or retaining a majority interest in a subsidiary, (2) investing as a limited partner in a partnership the sole purpose of which is direct or indirect investment in the acquisition, rehabilitation or new construction of a qualified housing project, provided that such limited partnership investments may not exceed 2% of the bank’s total assets, (3) acquiring up to 10% of the voting stock of a company that solely provides or re-insures directors’, trustees’ and officers’ liability insurance coverage or bankers’ blanket bond group insurance coverage for insured depository institutions, and (4) acquiring or retaining the voting shares of a depository institution if certain requirements are met.

Washington State has enacted laws regarding financial institution parity. These laws afford Washington-chartered commercial banks the same powers as Washington-chartered savings banks and provide that Washington-chartered commercial banks may exercise any of the powers that the Federal Reserve has determined to be closely related to the business of banking and the powers of national banks, subject to the approval of the Director in certain situations. Finally, the law provides additional flexibility for Washington-chartered banks with respect to interest rates on loans and other extensions of credit. Specifically, they may charge the maximum interest rate allowable for loans and other extensions of credit by federally chartered financial institutions.

Environmental Issues Associated with Real Estate Lending: The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) is a federal statute that generally imposes strict liability on all prior and present “owners and operators” of sites containing hazardous waste. However, Congress acted to protect secured creditors by providing that the term “owner and operator” excludes a person whose ownership is limited to protecting its security interest in the site. Since the enactment of the CERCLA, this “secured creditor exemption” has been the subject of judicial interpretations which have left open the possibility that lenders could be liable for cleanup costs on contaminated property that they hold as collateral for a loan. To the extent that legal uncertainty exists in this area, all creditors, including the Bank, that have made loans secured by properties with potentially hazardous waste contamination (such as petroleum contamination) could be subject to liability for cleanup costs, which often substantially exceed the value of the collateral property.

Federal Reserve System: The Federal Reserve has the authority to establish reserve requirements on transaction accounts or non-personal time deposits. These reserves may be in the form of cash or non-interest-bearing deposits with the regional Federal Reserve Bank. Interest-bearing checking accounts and other types of accounts that permit payments or transfers to third parties fall within the definition of transaction accounts and are subject to Regulation D reserve requirements, as are any non-personal time deposits at a bank. In March 2020, the Federal Reserve reduced requirements to zero percent to support lending to households and businesses. Currently, the Federal Reserve has stated it has no plans to re-impose reserve requirements. However, the Federal Reserve may adjust reserve requirement ratios in the future if conditions warrant.

Affiliate Transactions: Banner and the Bank are separate and distinct legal entities. Banner (and any non-bank subsidiary of Banner) is an affiliate of the Bank. Federal laws strictly limit the ability of banks to engage in certain transactions with their affiliates. Transactions deemed to be a “covered transaction” under Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act between a bank and an affiliate are limited to 10% of the bank’s capital and surplus and, with respect to all affiliates, to an aggregate of 20% of the bank’s capital and surplus. Further, covered transactions that are loans and extensions of credit generally are required to be secured by eligible collateral in specified amounts. Federal law also requires that covered transactions and certain other transactions listed in Section 23B of the Federal Reserve Act between a bank and its affiliates be on terms as favorable to the bank as transactions with non-affiliates.

Community Reinvestment Act: The Bank is subject to the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 (CRA), which requires that federal banking regulatory agencies assess a bank’s performance in meeting the credit needs of its community, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods. The regulatory agency’s assessment of the bank’s record is made available to the public and is considered when a bank applies to establish a new branch, relocate an existing office, merge, or acquire another federally regulated financial institution. The Bank received an “outstanding” rating in its most recent CRA examination.

On October 24, 2023, federal banking agencies, including the FDIC, issued a final rule to strengthen and modernize CRA regulations. The rule encourages banks to expand access to credit, investment, and banking services in low- and moderate-income communities; adapts to changes in the banking industry, such as mobile and internet banking; provides greater clarity and consistency in applying CRA regulations; and tailors CRA evaluations and data collection to bank size and type. The final rule establishes a new Retail Lending Test for institutions with total assets of $600 million or more, evaluating their record in originating and purchasing loans, including residential mortgage, multifamily, small business, small farm, and, in certain cases, automobile loans. Banks with total assets exceeding $2 billion will be subject to additional performance tests. The rule maintains the requirement for banks to delineate specific facility-based assessment areas around their main office, branches, and deposit-taking remote service facilities. It also allows banks to receive CRA credit for qualified community development activities, regardless of location. The final rule took effect on April 1, 2024, with staggered compliance dates; most provisions become applicable on January 1, 2026.

Dividends: The amount of dividends payable by the Bank to the Company depends upon its earnings and capital position, and is limited by federal and state laws, regulations and policies, including the capital conservation buffer requirement. Federal law further provides that no insured depository institution may make any capital distribution (which includes a cash dividend) if, after making the distribution, the institution would be “undercapitalized,” as defined in the prompt corrective action regulations. Moreover, the federal bank regulatory agencies also have the general authority to limit the dividends paid by insured banks if such payments should be deemed to constitute an unsafe and unsound practice. In addition, under Washington law, no bank may declare or pay any dividend in an amount greater than its retained earnings without the prior approval of the Washington DFI. The Washington DFI also has the power to require any bank to suspend the payment of any and all dividends.

Privacy Standards and Cybersecurity: The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 (GLBA) established a framework allowing affiliations among commercial banks, insurance companies, securities firms, and other financial service providers. Federal banking agencies, including the FDIC, have implemented guidelines mandating that financial institutions develop, implement, and maintain administrative, technical, and physical safeguards to protect client information. These guidelines emphasize risk management, particularly concerning information technology and third-party service providers. Additionally, the GLBA requires financial institutions to disclose their privacy policies to consumers, detailing information-sharing practices and providing options to opt out of certain disclosures.

The California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (CCPA), effective January 1, 2020, grants California residents rights regarding their personal information, including the rights to know, delete, and opt out of the sale of their data. The CCPA also introduces a private right of action for data breaches, potentially increasing liability for affected businesses. While the CCPA exempts personal information collected under the GLBA, this exemption does not extend to the private right of action for data breaches. In November 2020, California voters approved the California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA), which amended the CCPA by enhancing consumer privacy rights and establishing the California Privacy Protection Agency for enforcement. Compliance with the CCPA, CPRA, and similar state laws may necessitate the implementation of specific regulatory compliance and risk management controls. Non-compliance could result in substantial fines, penalties, legal actions, and reputational harm.

In 2022, federal banking agencies adopted a rule introducing new notification requirements for banking organizations and their service providers concerning significant cybersecurity incidents. Banks must notify their primary federal regulator as soon as possible, and no later than 36 hours after identifying a computer-security incident that materially affects, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the bank’s operations, its ability to deliver services, or the stability of the financial sector. Service providers are required to inform affected banks promptly if they experience an incident that has materially disrupted, or is likely to disrupt, services for four or more hours.

Anti-Money Laundering, Bank Secrecy and Client Identification: The Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (USA PATRIOT Act) was signed into law on October 26, 2001. The USA PATRIOT and Bank Secrecy Acts require financial institutions to develop programs to prevent financial institutions from being used for money laundering and terrorist activities. If such activities are detected, financial institutions are obligated to file suspicious activity reports with the U.S. Treasury’s Office of Financial Crimes Enforcement Network. Financial institutions must establish procedures to identify and verify the identity of clients seeking to open new financial accounts, and the beneficial owners of accounts. Bank regulators are directed to consider an institution’s effectiveness in combating money laundering when ruling on Bank Holding Company Act and Bank Merger Act applications. The Bank’s policies and procedures are designed to comply with the requirements of the USA PATRIOT Act.

Other Consumer Protection Laws and Regulations: The CFPB is empowered to exercise broad regulatory, supervisory and enforcement authority with respect to both new and existing consumer financial protection laws. The Bank and its affiliates and subsidiaries are subject to CFPB supervisory and enforcement authority.

The Bank is subject to a broad array of federal and state consumer protection laws and regulations that govern almost every aspect of its business relationships with consumers. While the list set forth below is not exhaustive, these include the Truth-in-Lending Act, the Truth in Savings Act, the Electronic Fund Transfers Act, the Expedited Funds Availability Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Housing Act, the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the Right to Financial Privacy Act, the Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act, the Fair Credit Billing Act, the Homeowners Protection Act, the Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act, flood insurance laws, consumer protection laws connected with the sale of insurance, federal and state laws prohibiting unfair and deceptive business practices, and various regulations that implement some or all of these areas. These laws and regulations mandate certain disclosure requirements and regulate how financial institutions must deal with clients when taking deposits, making loans, collecting loans, and providing other services. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations can subject the Bank to various penalties, including but not limited to, enforcement actions, injunctions, fines, civil liability, criminal penalties, punitive damages, and the loss of certain contractual rights.

Banner Corporation

General: Banner, as sole shareholder of the Bank, is a bank holding company registered with the Federal Reserve. Bank holding companies are subject to comprehensive regulation by the Federal Reserve under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, or the BHCA, and the regulations of the Federal Reserve. We are required to file quarterly reports with the Federal Reserve and provide additional information as the Federal Reserve may require. The Federal Reserve may examine us, and any of our subsidiaries. The Federal Reserve also has extensive enforcement authority over bank holding companies, including, among other things, the ability to assess civil money penalties, to issue cease and desist or removal orders and to require that a holding company divest subsidiaries (including its bank subsidiaries). In general, enforcement actions may be initiated for violations of law and regulations and unsafe or unsound practices. Banner is also required to file certain reports with, and comply with the rules and regulations of the SEC.

The Bank Holding Company Act (BHCA): Under the BHCA, Banner is supervised by the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve has a policy that a bank holding company is required to serve as a source of financial and managerial strength to its subsidiary banks and may not conduct its operations in an unsafe or unsound manner. In addition, the Dodd-Frank Act provides that a bank holding company must serve as a source of financial strength to its subsidiary banks. A bank holding company’s failure to meet its obligation to serve as a source of strength to its subsidiary banks will generally be considered by the Federal Reserve to be an unsafe and unsound banking practice or a violation of the Federal Reserve’s regulations or both. No regulations have yet been proposed by the Federal Reserve to implement the source of strength provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act. Banner and any subsidiaries that it may control are considered “affiliates” of the Bank within the meaning of the Federal Reserve Act, and transactions between the Bank and affiliates are subject to numerous restrictions. With some exceptions, Banner and its subsidiaries are prohibited from tying the provision of various services, such as extensions of credit, to other services offered by Banner or by its affiliates.

Acquisitions: The BHCA prohibits a bank holding company, with certain exceptions, from acquiring ownership or control of more than 5% of the voting shares of any company that is not a bank or bank holding company and from engaging in activities other than those of banking, managing or controlling banks, or providing services for its subsidiaries. Under the BHCA, the Federal Reserve may approve the ownership of shares by a bank holding company in any company, the activities of which the Federal Reserve has determined to be so closely related to the business of banking or managing or controlling banks as to be a proper incident thereto. These activities include: operating a savings institution, mortgage company, finance company, credit card company or factoring company; performing certain data processing operations; providing certain investment and financial advice; underwriting and acting as an insurance agent for certain types of credit-related insurance; leasing property on a full-payout, non-operating basis; selling money orders, travelers’ checks and U.S. Savings Bonds; real estate and personal property appraising; providing tax planning and preparation services; and, subject to certain limitations, providing securities brokerage services for clients.

Federal Securities Laws: Banner’s common stock is registered with the SEC under Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We are subject to information, proxy solicitation, insider trading restrictions and other requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act). In addition, the SEC has enacted rules related to the reporting of cybersecurity events that are material to the Company’s operations within a specified time frame.

The Dodd-Frank Act: The Dodd-Frank Act imposes various restrictions and an expanded framework of regulatory oversight for financial institutions, including depository institutions, and implements certain capital regulations applicable to Banner and the Bank that are discussed above under the section entitled “Capital Requirements.”

Among other things, the Dodd-Frank Act requires public companies, like Banner, to (i) provide their shareholders with a non-binding vote (a) at least once every three years on the compensation paid to executive officers and (b) at least once every six years on whether they should have a “say on pay” vote every one, two or three years; (ii) have a separate, non-binding shareholder vote regarding golden parachutes for named executive officers when a shareholder vote takes place on mergers, acquisitions, dispositions or other transactions that would trigger the parachute payments; (iii) provide disclosure in annual proxy materials about the relationship between executive compensation paid and the financial performance of the issuer; and (iv) disclose the ratio of the Chief Executive Officer’s annual total compensation to the median annual total compensation of all other employees.

The regulations to implement the provisions of Section 619 of the Dodd-Frank Act, commonly referred to as the Volcker Rule, contain prohibitions and restrictions on the ability of financial institutions holding companies and their affiliates to engage in proprietary trading and hold certain interests in, or have certain relationships with, various types of investment funds, including hedge funds and private equity funds. Banner is continuously reviewing its investment portfolio to determine if changes in its investment strategies are in compliance with Volcker Rule regulations.

Interstate Banking and Branching: The Federal Reserve must approve a bank holding company’s application to acquire control, or acquire all or substantially all the assets, of a bank located in a state other than the holding company’s home state, without regard to whether the transaction is prohibited by the laws of any state. The Federal Reserve may not approve the acquisition of a bank that has not been in existence for the minimum time period (not exceeding five years) specified by statutory law of the host state. Nor may the Federal Reserve approve an application if the applicant (and its depository institution affiliates) controls or would control more than 10% of the insured deposits in the United States or 30% or more of the deposits in the target bank’s home state or in any state in which the target bank maintains a branch. Federal law does not affect states’ authority to limit the percentage of total insured deposits in the state which may be held or controlled by a bank holding company to the extent such limitation does not discriminate against out-of-state banks or bank holding companies. Individual states may also waive the 30% state-wide concentration limit contained in the federal law.

Federal banking agencies are generally authorized to approve interstate merger transactions without regard to whether the transaction is prohibited by the law of any state. Interstate branch acquisitions are permitted only if the law of the state in which the branch is located permits such acquisitions. Interstate mergers and branch acquisitions are subject to the nationwide and statewide insured deposit concentration amounts described above. Under the Dodd-Frank Act, the federal banking agencies may generally approve interstate de novo branching.

Dividends: The Federal Reserve has issued a policy statement on cash dividend payments by bank holding companies, which expresses its view that, although there are no specific regulations restricting dividend payments by bank holding companies other than state corporate laws, a bank holding company must maintain an adequate capital position and generally should not pay cash dividends unless the company’s net income for the past year is sufficient to fully fund the cash dividends and that the prospective rate of earnings appears consistent with the company’s capital needs, asset quality, and overall financial condition. The Federal Reserve policy statement also indicates that it would be inappropriate for a company experiencing serious financial problems to borrow funds to pay dividends. The capital conversion buffer requirement can also restrict Banner’s and the Bank’s ability to pay dividends. Further, under Washington law, Banner is prohibited from paying a dividend if, after making such dividend payment, it would be unable to pay its debts as they become due in the usual course of business. Banner is also prohibited from paying a dividend if its total liabilities, plus the amount that would be needed in the event Banner were to be dissolved at the time of the dividend payment exceed our total assets.

Stock Repurchases: A bank holding company, except for certain “well capitalized” and highly rated bank holding companies, is required to give the Federal Reserve prior written notice of any purchase or redemption of its outstanding equity securities if the gross consideration for the purchase or redemption, when combined with the net consideration paid for all such purchases or redemptions during the preceding 12 months, is equal to 10% or more of its consolidated net worth. The Federal Reserve may disapprove such a purchase or redemption if it determines that the proposal would constitute an unsafe or unsound practice or would violate any law, regulation, Federal Reserve order or any condition imposed by, or written agreement with, the Federal Reserve.

Corporate Information

Our principal executive offices are located at 10 South First Avenue, Walla Walla, Washington 99362. Our company website is www.bannerbank.com (http://www.bannerbank.com). The information contained on our website is not included as a part of, or incorporated by reference into, this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our Annual Report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to these reports, are available free of charge through our website, as soon as reasonably practicable after we have electronically filed such material with, or furnished such material to, the SEC.

An investment in our common stock is subject to risks inherent in our business. Before making an investment decision, you should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below together with all the other information included in this report. The risks described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, capital levels, cash flows, liquidity, results of operations and prospects. The market price of our common stock could decline significantly due to any of these identified or other risks, and you could lose some or all of your investment. The risks discussed below also include forward-looking statements, and our actual results may differ substantially from those discussed in these forward-looking statements. This report is qualified in its entirety by these risk factors.

Risks Related to Macroeconomic Conditions

Our business may be adversely affected by downturns in the national economy and the regional economies on which we depend.

Our operations are significantly affected by national and regional economic conditions. Weakness in the national economy, or the economies of the markets in which we operate, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and prospects. We provide banking and financial services primarily to businesses and individuals in the states of Washington, Oregon, California and Idaho, with all of our branches and most of our deposit clients located in these four states.

Our client base is highly concentrated in the Puget Sound area and eastern Washington. A deterioration in the business environment in these regions, or one or more businesses with a large employee base in these areas, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations and prospects. As we expand into other areas, such as San Diego, Sacramento, and throughout California, we face additional concentration risks in those markets. Furthermore, trade wars, tariffs, or shifts in trade policies between the United States and other nations could disrupt supply chains, increase costs for businesses, and reduce export opportunities for our clients. These developments may, in turn, negatively impact these businesses and, by extension, our operations and financial performance.

A downturn in economic conditions, be it due to inflation, recessive trends, geopolitical conflicts, adverse weather, severe fire or other natural disasters, or other factors, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations, including but not limited to:

• Reduced demand for our products and services, potentially leading to a decline in our overall loans or assets;
• Elevated instances of loan delinquencies, problematic assets, and foreclosures;
• An increase in our allowance for credit losses on loans;
• Declines in collateral values linked to our loans, thereby diminishing borrowing capacities and asset values tied to existing loans;
• Reduced net worth and liquidity of loan guarantors, possibly impairing their ability to meet commitments to us; and
• Reduction in our low-cost or non-interest-bearing deposits.

A decline in local economic conditions could disproportionately affect our earnings and capital compared to larger financial institutions with more geographically diverse real estate loan portfolios. Because our loan portfolio is predominantly secured by real estate, deterioration in real estate markets could impair borrowers’ ability to repay loans and reduce the value of the underlying collateral. Real estate values are influenced by a range of factors, including economic conditions, government policies, natural disasters (e.g., fires, earthquakes, flooding and tornadoes), and trade-related pressures affecting construction costs or material availability. Liquidating significant collateral during a period of depressed real estate values could negatively impact our financial condition and profitability.

Adverse changes in regional or general economic conditions may reduce our growth rate, impair our ability to collect loans and generally have a negative effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Monetary policy, inflation, deflation, and other external economic factors could adversely impact our financial performance and operations.

Our financial condition and results of operations are affected by credit policies of monetary authorities, particularly the Federal Reserve. Actions by monetary and fiscal authorities, including the Federal Reserve, could lead to inflation, deflation, or other economic phenomena that could adversely affect our financial performance. Higher U.S. tariffs on imported goods could exacerbate inflationary pressures by increasing the cost of goods and materials for businesses and consumers. This may particularly affect small to medium-sized businesses, as they are less able to leverage economies of scale to mitigate cost pressures compared to larger businesses. Consequently, our business clients may experience increased financial strain, reducing their ability to repay loans and adversely impacting our results of operations and financial condition. Furthermore, a prolonged period of inflation could cause wages and other costs to the Company to increase, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. Virtually all of our assets and liabilities are monetary in nature, and as a result, interest rates tend to have a more significant impact on our performance than general levels of inflation or deflation. However, interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or magnitude as the prices of goods and services, creating additional uncertainty in the economic environment.

Risks Related to Credit and Lending

Our loan portfolio includes loans with a higher risk of loss.

In addition to first-lien one- to four-family residential real estate lending, we originate construction and land and land development loans, commercial and multifamily real estate loans, commercial business loans, agricultural mortgage and business loans, and consumer loans, primarily within our market areas. As of December 31, 2024, we had $9.76 billion outstanding in these non-first-lien one- to four-family residential real estate loan categories, compared to $9.29 billion as of December 31, 2023. These loans present risks distinct from those associated with first-lien one- to four-family residential real estate lending for a number of reasons, including the following:

• Construction and Land Loans. At December 31, 2024, construction and land loans were $1.52 billion, or 14% of our total loan portfolio. This type of lending carries inherent uncertainties in estimating a property’s future value upon project completion and the overall cost (including interest) of the project. These challenges arise from difficulties in estimating construction costs, assessing market value upon project completion, and accounting for the impact of government regulations on real property. Accurately evaluating the total funds required to complete a project and determining the loan-to-value ratio for the completed project is often challenging. If construction cost estimates are inaccurate, we may be required to advance funds beyond the original loan commitment to ensure project completion. Additionally, if the appraised value of the completed project is overstated, we may have inadequate security for loan repayment, resulting in potential losses. Other risks include disputes between borrowers and builders, the failure of builders to pay subcontractors, and the concentration of higher loan amounts among a limited number of builders. A downturn in housing or the real estate market could increase delinquencies, defaults and foreclosures, and significantly impair the value of our collateral and our ability to sell the collateral upon foreclosure. Multiple loans to a single builder amplify these risks, as adverse developments in one loan or credit relationship could result in significant losses. At December 31, 2024, non-performing construction and land loans totaled $4.0 million, or 11% of total non-performing loans.

Some construction loans include interest reserves, where accumulated interest is added to the loan principal rather than requiring borrower payments during the loan term. Rising market interest rates can rapidly deplete these reserves before project completion and increase borrowing costs for end-purchasers, potentially reducing their ability to finance the home or diminishing demand for the project. Properties under construction are also challenging to sell and typically need to be completed before a sale can occur, complicating the management of problem construction loans. This may require advancing additional funds or contracting with another builder to complete the project, exposing us to market risks and potential losses on unpaid loan funds and associated costs.

Loans on land under development or held for future construction carry additional risks due to the lack of income generation and reduced collateral liquidity, both of which are highly influenced by supply and demand dynamics. These loans often involve substantial disbursements, with repayment dependent on the success of the project and the borrower’s ability to sell or lease the property or obtain permanent financing.

Our construction loans include both those secured by sales contracts or permanent loans for finished homes and speculative construction loans, where end-purchasers may not be identified during or after the construction period. Speculative construction loans present additional risks related to finding buyers for completed projects. To mitigate this risk, we actively monitor the number of unsold homes in our construction loan portfolio and local housing markets to maintain a balance between home sales and new loan originations. We also limit the number of speculative construction loans approved for each builder based on factors such as financial capacity, market demand, and the ratio of sold to unsold inventory. Additionally, we diversify risk by working with a large number of small- to mid-sized builders across a broad geographic region, encompassing multiple sub-markets within our service area.

• Commercial and Multifamily Real Estate Loans. At December 31, 2024, commercial and multifamily real estate loans were $4.76 billion, or 42% of our total loan portfolio. Many of these loans involve higher principal amounts than other types of loans, and some commercial borrowers maintain multiple loans with us. Consequently, an adverse development with respect to a single loan or credit relationship can expose us to a significantly greater risk of loss compared to an adverse development with respect to a one- to four-family residential mortgage loan. Repayment of these loans typically depends on the income generated from the property securing the loan, in amounts sufficient to cover operating expenses and debt service. This income may be adversely affected by changes in the economy or local market conditions. In addition, many of our commercial and multifamily real estate loans are not fully amortizing and include large balloon payments at maturity. These balloon payments may require the borrower to either sell or refinance the underlying property, potentially increasing the risk of default or non-payment. If we foreclose on a commercial or multifamily real estate loan, the holding period for the collateral is typically longer than for one- to four-family residential loans as a result of the smaller pool of potential buyers. At December 31, 2024, non-performing commercial and multifamily real estate loans totaled $2.2 million, or 6% of total non-performing loans.
• Commercial Business Loans. At December 31, 2024, commercial business loans were $2.42 billion, or 21% of our total loan portfolio. These loans are primarily made based on the borrower’s cash flow and, secondarily, on the underlying collateral provided by the borrower. A borrower’s cash flow can be unpredictable, and the value of collateral securing these loans may fluctuate. Most often, this collateral includes accounts receivable, inventory, equipment, or real estate. For loans secured by accounts receivable, the availability of funds for repayment may depend substantially on the borrower’s ability to collect amounts due from its clients. Other types of collateral securing commercial business loans may depreciate over time, be difficult to appraise, lack liquidity, or fluctuate in value depending on the success of the business. At December 31, 2024, non-performing commercial business loans totaled $7.1 million, or 19% of total non-performing loans.
• Agricultural Loans. At December 31, 2024, agricultural loans were $340.3 million, or 3% of our total loan portfolio. Repayment of agricultural loans depends on the successful operation of the business and is subject to numerous factors beyond the control of either us or the borrowers. These factors include adverse weather conditions that prevent crop planting or limit yields (such as hail, drought, and floods), loss of crops or livestock due to disease or other causes, declines in market prices for agricultural products (both domestically and internationally), and the impact of government regulations (including changes in price supports, subsidies, tariffs, and environmental policies). Additionally, many farms rely on a limited number of key individuals whose injury or death could significantly affect the farm’s successful operation. If the cash flow from a farming operation is diminished, the borrower’s ability to repay the loan may be impaired. As a result, agricultural loans may pose a greater degree of risk than other types of loans, particularly those that are unsecured or secured by rapidly depreciating assets, such as farm equipment (some of which is highly specialized and may have little or no resale market), or assets like livestock or crops. In such cases, repossessed collateral from a defaulted agricultural loan may not provide an adequate source of repayment for the outstanding loan balance due to the greater likelihood of damage, loss, or depreciation, or because the collateral’s assessed value exceeds its eventual realization value. At December 31, 2024, non-performing agricultural loans totaled $8.5 million, or 23% of total non-performing loans.
• Consumer Loans. At December 31, 2024, consumer loans were $721.4 million, or 6% of our total loan portfolio. Home equity lines of credit, which represented 87% of our total consumer loan portfolio at December 31, 2024, generally entail greater risk than one- to four-family residential mortgage loans where we are in the first lien position. For home equity lines secured by a second mortgage, it is less likely that we will recover all our loan proceeds in the event of default as the value of the property must be sufficient to cover repayment of the first mortgage loan and foreclosure-related costs before the second mortgage loan balance is repaid. For consumer loans that are unsecured or secured by rapidly depreciating assets, such as automobiles, any repossessed collateral from a defaulted loan may not provide an adequate source of repayment of the outstanding loan balance as a result of the higher likelihood of damage, loss, or depreciation. The remaining deficiency often does not justify further substantial collection efforts against the borrower. Additionally, consumer loan collections depend on the borrower’s financial stability, making them more vulnerable to adverse events such as job loss, divorce, illness, or personal bankruptcy. Furthermore, federal and state laws, including bankruptcy and insolvency laws, may limit the amount recoverable on these loans. Loans we purchased or indirectly originated may also expose us to claims and defenses by borrowers. In such cases, borrowers may assert claims and defenses against us as an assignee that they could have raised against the seller of the underlying collateral. At December 31, 2024, non-performing consumer loans totaled $4.9 million, or 13% of total non-performing loans.

Our business may be adversely affected by credit risk associated with residential property and declining property values.

At December 31, 2024, first-lien one- to four-family residential loans were $1.59 billion or 14% of our total loan portfolio. Our first-lien one- to four-family residential loans are primarily made based on the repayment ability of the borrower and the collateral securing these loans. Foreclosure on the loans requires the value of the property to be sufficient to cover the repayment of the loan, and the costs associated with foreclosure.

This type of lending is generally sensitive to regional and local economic conditions that significantly impact the ability of borrowers to meet their loan payment obligations, making loss levels difficult to predict. A downturn in the economy or the housing market in our market areas or a rapid increase in interest rates may reduce the value of the real estate collateral securing these types of loans and increase the risk that we would incur losses if borrowers default on their loans. Residential loans with high combined loan-to-value generally will be more sensitive to declining property values than those with lower combined loan-to-value ratios and therefore may experience a higher incidence of default and severity of losses. In addition, if the borrowers sell their homes, the borrowers may be unable to repay their loans in full from the sale proceeds. As a result, these loans may experience higher rates of delinquencies, defaults and losses, which will in turn adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. At December 31, 2024, non-performing one- to four-family residential loans totaled $10.4 million, or 28% of total non-performing loans.

Our allowance for credit losses on loans may not be sufficient to absorb losses in our loan portfolio, which would cause our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition to be adversely affected.

Lending money is a substantial part of our business and each loan carries a certain risk that it will not be repaid in accordance with its terms or that any underlying collateral will not be sufficient to assure repayment. This risk is affected by, among other things:

• cash flow of the borrower and/or the project being financed;
• in the case of a collateralized loan, the changes and uncertainties as to the future value of the collateral;
• the duration of the loan;
• the character and creditworthiness of the borrower; and
• changes in economic and industry conditions.

We maintain an allowance for credit losses that we believe is appropriate to provide for lifetime expected credit losses in our loan portfolio. The appropriate level of the allowance for credit losses is determined by Management through periodic reviews and consideration of several factors, including, but not limited to:

• our collective loss reserve, for loans evaluated on a pool basis with similar risk characteristics based on our life of loan historical default and loss experience, certain macroeconomic factors, reasonable and supportable forecasts, regulatory requirements, Management’s expectations of future events and certain qualitative factors; and
• our individual loss reserve, based on our evaluation of individual loans that do not share similar risk characteristics and the present value of the expected future cash flows or the fair value of the underlying collateral.

Determination of the appropriate level of the allowance for credit losses inherently involves a high degree of subjectivity and requires us to make significant estimates of current credit risks and future trends, all of which may undergo material changes. If our estimates are incorrect, the allowance for credit losses may not be sufficient to cover the expected losses in our loan portfolio, resulting in the need for increases in our allowance for credit losses through the provision for credit losses which is recorded as a charge against income. Management also recognizes that significant new growth in loan portfolios, new loan products and the refinancing of existing loans can result in portfolios comprised of unseasoned loans that may not perform in a historical or projected manner and will increase the risk that our allowance may be insufficient to absorb losses without significant additional provision.

Deterioration in economic conditions affecting borrowers, new information regarding existing loans, identification of additional problem loans and other factors, both within and outside of our control, may require an increase in the allowance for credit losses. If current conditions in the housing and real estate markets weaken, we expect we will experience increased delinquencies and credit losses.

The ongoing Los Angeles wildfires that began in January 2025 present heightened risks to our loan portfolio and the adequacy of our allowance for loan losses. Borrowers impacted by the fires may face financial hardship, leading to increased loan defaults and reduced repayment capacity. Damage to or destruction of properties securing loans may result in collateral value depreciation, further increasing potential losses. Additionally, inadequate insurance coverage or denied claims may limit recovery efforts and contribute to greater uncertainty in estimating credit losses. Local economic disruptions, such as business closures and job losses, may impair borrowers’ ability to meet financial obligations, requiring adjustments to our credit loss assumptions. The concentration of our loan portfolio in fire-prone areas further increases exposure, while the growing frequency and severity of wildfires due to climate change heightens long-term risks. These factors may necessitate increases to our allowance for loan losses to account for elevated credit risks. While we continuously evaluate our allowance to ensure it reflects current and expected risks, there can be no assurance it will be sufficient to cover actual losses, particularly in the context of ongoing and future wildfire-related challenges.

Bank regulatory agencies also periodically review our allowance for credit losses and may require an increase in the provision for credit losses or the recognition of further loan charge-offs, based on judgments different than those of Management. If charge-offs in future periods exceed the allowance for credit losses, we may need additional provision to increase the allowance for credit losses. Any increases in the allowance for credit losses will reduce net income and, most likely, capital, and may have a material negative effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Risks Related to Merger and Acquisition Strategy

We pursue a strategy of supplementing internal growth by acquiring other financial companies or their assets and liabilities, which we believe will help us fulfill our strategic objectives and enhance our earnings. We may be adversely affected by risks associated with growth through acquisitions.

As part of our general growth strategy, we periodically expand our business through acquisitions. While our primary focus is organic growth, from time to time we engage in discussions with potential acquisition targets as part of our ordinary business activities. There can be no assurance that we will successfully identify suitable acquisition candidates, complete acquisitions, successfully integrate acquired operations into our existing operations, or expand into new markets. Future acquisitions may dilute shareholder value or may have an adverse effect upon our operating results during the integration process. In addition, acquired operations may fail to achieve the profitability levels of our existing operations or meet performance expectations. Transaction-related expenses may also adversely affect our earnings, which could, in turn, negatively impact the value of our stock.

Acquiring banks, bank branches, or businesses involves several risks, including:

• we may be exposed to potential asset quality issues or unknown or contingent liabilities of the banks, businesses, assets, and liabilities we acquire. If these issues or liabilities exceed our estimates, our results of operations and financial condition may be materially negatively affected;
• higher than expected deposit attrition;
• potential diversion of our management’s time and attention;
• prices at which acquisitions can be made fluctuate with market conditions. We have experienced times during which acquisitions could not be made in specific markets at prices we considered acceptable and expect that we will experience this situation in the future;
• the acquisition of other entities generally requires integration of systems, procedures and personnel of the acquired entity into our company to make the transaction economically successful. This integration process is complicated and time-consuming and can also be disruptive to the clients of the acquired business. If the integration process is not conducted successfully and with minimal adverse effect on the acquired business and its clients, we may not realize the anticipated economic benefits of particular acquisitions within the expected time frame, and we may lose clients or employees of the acquired business. We may also experience greater than anticipated client losses even if the integration process is successful;
• to finance an acquisition, we may borrow funds, thereby increasing our leverage and diminishing our liquidity, or raise additional capital, which could dilute the interests of our existing shareholders;
• we have completed various acquisitions over the years that enhanced our rate of growth. We may not be able to sustain our past rate of growth or to grow at all in the future; and
• to the extent our costs of an acquisition exceed the fair value of the net assets acquired, the acquisition will generate goodwill that must be analyzed for impairment at least annually.

We may incur impairment to goodwill.

In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), we record assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination at their fair value with the excess of the purchase consideration over the net assets acquired resulting in the recognition of goodwill. As a result, acquisitions typically result in recording goodwill. We perform a goodwill evaluation at least annually to test for goodwill impairment. Our test of goodwill for potential impairment is based on a qualitative assessment by Management that takes into consideration macroeconomic conditions, industry and market conditions, cost or margin factors, financial performance and share price. Our evaluation of the fair value of goodwill involves a substantial amount of judgment. If our judgment was incorrect, or if events or circumstances change, and an impairment of goodwill was deemed to exist, we would be required to record a non-cash charge to earnings in our financial statements during the period in which such impairment is determined to exist. Any such charge could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

Risks Related to Market and Interest Rate Changes

Our results of operations, liquidity and cash flows are subject to interest rate risk.

Our earnings and cash flows are largely dependent upon our net interest income, which is significantly affected by interest rates. Interest rates are highly sensitive to factors beyond our control, such as general economic conditions and policies set by governmental and regulatory bodies, particularly the Federal Reserve. Increases in interest rates could reduce our net interest income, weaken the housing market by curbing refinancing activity and home purchases, and negatively affect the broader U.S. economy, potentially leading to slower economic growth or recessionary conditions.

We principally manage interest rate risk by managing our volume and mix of our earning assets and funding liabilities. If we are unable to manage this risk effectively, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially affected.

Our net interest margin, the difference between the yield on interest-earning assets and the cost of interest-bearing liabilities, can be adversely affected by interest rate changes. While yields on assets and costs of liabilities tend to move in the same direction, they may do so at different speeds, causing the margin to expand or contract. As our interest-bearing liabilities often have shorter durations than our interest-earning assets, a rise in interest rates may lead to funding costs increasing faster than asset yields, compressing our net interest margin. Additionally, changes in the slope of the yield curve, such as flattening or inversion, can further pressure our margins as funding costs rise relative to asset yields. Conversely, falling rates can initially reduce our net interest income as our floating-rate assets tend to be more immediately responsive to changes in market rates than most deposit liabilities. In addition, a decline in market interest rates could increase loan prepayments, leading to reinvestment in lower-yielding assets, reducing income.

In a rising rate environment, retaining deposits can become costlier. At December 31, 2024, we had $1.45 billion in certificates of deposit that mature within one year and $12.01 billion in non-interest-bearing, negotiable order of withdrawal (NOW) checking, savings and money market accounts. If deposit and borrowing rates rise faster than loan and investment yields, our net interest income and overall earnings could decline.

A substantial amount of our loans have adjustable interest rates, which may result in a higher rate of default in a rising interest rate environment. Additionally, a significant portion of our adjustable-rate loans include interest rate floors that prevent the loan’s contractual interest rate from falling below a specified level. At December 31, 2024, approximately 65% of our loan portfolio consisted of adjustable or floating-rate loans, and approximately $5.19 billion, or 70%, of those loans contained interest rate floors. The weighted average floor interest rate of these loans was 4.77%, and approximately $1.34 billion, or 26%, of these loans were at their floor interest rate. The presence of interest rate floors can increase income during periods of declining interest rates, as the rates on these loans cannot adjust downward below the floor. However, this benefit is subject to the risk that borrowers may refinance these loans to take advantage of lower rates. Furthermore, when loans are at their floor interest rates, our interest income may not rise as quickly as our cost of funds during periods of increasing interest rates, which could materially and adversely affect our results of operations.

While we employ asset and liability management strategies to mitigate interest rate risk, unexpected, substantial, or prolonged rate changes could materially affect our financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, our interest rate risk models and assumptions may not fully capture the impact of actual rate changes on our balance sheet or projected operating results.

Our securities portfolio may be negatively impacted by fluctuations in market value and interest rates.

Our securities portfolio may be impacted by fluctuations in market value, potentially reducing accumulated other comprehensive income and/or earnings. These fluctuations may result from changes in market interest rates, rating agency actions in respect to the securities, defaults by the issuer or with respect to the underlying securities, lower market prices, or limited investor demand. Our available-for-sale debt securities in an unrealized loss position are evaluated to determine whether the decline in fair value has resulted from credit losses or other factors. If a credit loss is identified, an allowance for credit losses is recorded, resulting in a charge against earnings. Because available-for-sale securities are reported at estimated fair value, changes in interest rates can adversely affect our financial condition. The fair value of fixed-rate securities generally moves inversely with interest rate changes. Unrealized gains and losses on these securities are reported as a separate component of AOCI, net of tax.

Decreases in the fair value of securities—available-for-sale resulting from increases in interest rates could have an adverse effect on shareholders’ equity. Additionally, there is no assurance that the declines in market value will not result in credit losses, which would lead to additional provisions for credit losses that could materially affect our net income and capital levels.

An increase in interest rates, change in the programs offered by secondary market purchasers or our ability to qualify for their programs may reduce our mortgage banking revenues, which would negatively impact our non-interest income.

Our mortgage banking operations provide a significant portion of our non-interest income, primarily through gains on the sale of one-to-four-family residential loans. These loans are sold pursuant to programs offered by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Ginnie Mae, and non-Government Sponsored Enterprise (“GSE”) investors, which collectively account for a substantial portion of the secondary market for such loans. Changes to these programs, our eligibility to participate, the criteria for loan acceptance, or related laws could materially and adversely affect our results of operations.

Mortgage banking is generally considered a volatile source of income because it depends largely on loan volume, which is influenced by prevailing market interest rates. In a rising or higher interest rate environment, our originations of mortgage loans may decrease, resulting in fewer loans that are available to be sold to investors. This would result in a decrease in mortgage banking revenues and a corresponding decrease in non-interest income. Our results of operations are also affected by the amount of non-interest expense associated with mortgage banking activities, including salaries and employee benefits, occupancy, equipment, data processing, and other operating costs. During periods of reduced loan demand, we may face challenges in reducing these expenses proportionately, which could adversely impact our results of operations.

Although we sell loans into the secondary market without recourse, we provide customary representations and warranties to buyers. If these representations and warranties are breached, we may be required to repurchase the loans, potentially incurring a loss.

Certain hedging strategies that we use to manage investment in mortgage loans held for sale and interest rate lock commitments may be ineffective to offset any adverse changes in the fair value of these assets due to changes in interest rates and market liquidity.

We use derivative instruments to economically hedge mortgage loans held for sale and interest rate lock commitments to offset changes in fair value resulting from changing interest rate environments. Our hedging strategies are susceptible to prepayment risk, basis risk, market volatility and changes in the shape of the yield curve, among other factors. In addition, hedging strategies rely on assumptions and projections regarding assets and general market factors. If these assumptions and projections prove to be incorrect or our hedging strategies do not adequately mitigate the impact of changes in interest rates, we may incur losses that would adversely impact earnings.

Risks Related to Regulatory, Legal and Compliance

New or proposed FDIC guidelines on corporate governance and risk management standards may affect our profitability, capital adequacy, and reputation.

In October 2023, the FDIC proposed guidelines to establish corporate governance and risk management standards for insured state nonmember banks with total consolidated assets of $10 billion or more. These guidelines focus on defining the responsibilities of the board of directors, specifying board composition and committee structures, establishing expectations for an independent risk management function, and introducing safeguards to prevent a "single point of failure" in risk management processes. If implemented, these guidelines could materially affect us and other banks subject to their requirements in the following ways:

• Compliance with the guidelines may elevate operational complexity and costs, potentially diminishing our net income and return on equity.
• The guidelines could mandate maintaining increased levels of capital or liquidity, which may restrict our ability to leverage assets and generate higher returns.
• The guidelines may subject us to heightened regulatory oversight and enforcement actions, which could adversely affect our reputation and market valuation.
• Banks subject to these guidelines, including us, may face competitive disadvantages compared to financial institutions not subject to similar standards.
• The guidelines’ emphasis on board responsibilities and independence may make it more challenging to attract and retain qualified directors willing to serve on our board.

The full implications of the proposed guidelines on our profitability, capital adequacy, and reputation remain uncertain at this time. However, the potential for increased operational burdens, reduced financial flexibility, and elevated regulatory risks underscores the importance of monitoring developments closely and adapting our governance and risk management practices to meet evolving regulatory expectations. Failure to effectively manage these challenges could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

New or changing tax, accounting, and regulatory rules and interpretations could significantly impact strategic initiatives, results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition.

The financial services industry is extensively regulated. Federal and state banking regulations are designed primarily to protect the deposit insurance funds and consumers, not to benefit our shareholders. Regulations may sometimes impose significant limitations on operations. Regulatory authorities have extensive discretion in connection with their supervisory and enforcement activities, including the imposition of restrictions on the operation of an institution, the classification of assets by the institution and the adequacy of an institution’s allowance for credit losses. Bank regulators also have the ability to impose conditions in the approval of merger and acquisition transactions.

Additionally, actions by regulatory agencies or significant litigation against us may lead to penalties that materially affect us. These regulations, along with the current tax, accounting, securities, insurance, and monetary laws, regulations, rules, standards, policies, and interpretations control the methods by which financial institutions conduct business, implement strategic initiatives and tax compliance, and govern financial reporting and disclosures. These laws, regulations, rules, standards, policies, and interpretations are constantly evolving and may change significantly over time. Any new regulations or legislation or change in existing regulations or oversight, whether a change in regulatory policy or a change in a regulator’s interpretation of a law or regulation, could have a material impact on our operations, increase our costs of regulatory compliance and of doing business and/or otherwise adversely affect us and our profitability. Further, changes in accounting standards can be both difficult to predict and involve judgment and discretion in their interpretation by us and our independent registered public accounting firm. Changes could materially impact, potentially even retroactively, how we report our financial condition and results of our operations, as could our interpretation of those changes. We cannot predict what restrictions may be imposed upon us with future legislation.

Climate change and related legislative and regulatory initiatives may materially affect the Company’s business and results of operations.

The effects of climate change continue to raise significant concerns about the state of the environment. However, under a new administration, federal policy may shift to reduce the emphasis on climate change initiatives and environmental regulations. This could include scaling back federal participation in international agreements, such as is occurring with the Paris Agreement, and reducing regulatory pressures on businesses, including banks, to address climate-related risks. Legislative and regulatory proposals aimed at combating climate change may face greater scrutiny or diminished priority.

The lack of empirical data regarding the financial and credit risks posed by climate change still makes it difficult to predict its specific impact on our financial condition and results of operations. However, the physical effects of climate change, such as more frequent and severe weather disasters, could directly affect us. For instance, such events may damage real property securing loans in our portfolios or reduce the value of that collateral. If our borrowers’ insurance is insufficient to cover these losses or if insurance becomes unavailable, the value of the collateral securing our loans could be negatively affected, potentially impacting our financial condition and results of operations. Moreover, climate change may adversely affect regional and local economic activity, harming our clients and the communities in which we operate. Regardless of changes in federal policy, the effects of climate change and their unknown long-term impacts could still have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Non-compliance with the USA PATRIOT Act, Bank Secrecy Act, or other laws and regulations could result in fines or sanctions and limit our ability to obtain regulatory approval of acquisitions.

The USA PATRIOT and Bank Secrecy Acts require financial institutions to develop programs to prevent financial institutions from being used for money laundering and terrorist activities. If such activities are detected, financial institutions are obligated to file suspicious activity reports with the U.S. Treasury’s Office of Financial Crimes Enforcement Network. These rules require financial institutions to establish procedures for identifying and verifying the identity of clients seeking to open new financial accounts. Failure to comply with these regulations could result in fines or sanctions and limit our ability to obtain regulatory approval of acquisitions. While we have developed policies and procedures designed to assist in compliance with these laws and regulations, no assurance can be given that these policies and procedures will be effective in preventing violations of these laws and regulations. Additionally, any perceived or actual failure to prevent money laundering or terrorist financing activities could significantly damage our reputation. These outcomes could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and growth prospects.

If our enterprise risk management framework is not effective at mitigating risk and loss to us, we could suffer unexpected losses and our results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

Our enterprise risk management framework seeks to achieve an appropriate balance between risk and return, which is critical to optimizing shareholder value. We have established processes and procedures intended to identify, measure, monitor, report, analyze and control the types of risks we face. These risks include liquidity, credit, market, interest rate, operational, legal and compliance, and reputational risks, among others. We also maintain a compliance program designed to identify, measure and report on our adherence to applicable laws, regulations, policies and procedures. Although we continuously assess and improve these programs, there can be no assurance that our risk management or compliance programs, along with other related controls, will effectively mitigate all risk and limit losses in our business. However, as with any risk management framework, there are inherent limitations to our risk management strategies as there may exist, or develop in the future, risks that we have not appropriately anticipated or identified. If our risk management framework proves ineffective, we could suffer unexpected losses and our business financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

Our business and financial results could be impacted materially by adverse results in legal proceedings.

Legal proceedings could result in judgments, significant management time and attention, or other adverse effects on our business and financial results. We establish estimated liabilities for legal claims when payments associated with claims become probable and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. We may incur losses for a matter even if we have not established an estimated liability. In addition, the actual cost of resolving a legal claim may be substantially higher than any amounts accrued for that matter. The ultimate resolution of any legal proceeding, depending on the remedy granted, could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Risks Related to Cybersecurity, Data and Fraud

We are subject to certain risks in connection with our use of technology.

Our security measures may not be sufficient to mitigate the risk of a cyber-attack. Communications and information systems are essential to our business operations, as we rely on these systems to manage our client relationships, maintain our general ledger, and support virtually all other aspects of our operations. Our business depends on the secure processing, storage, and transmission of confidential and other information through our computer systems and networks. Although we take protective measures and adapt them as circumstances evolve, our systems, software, and networks may remain vulnerable to breaches, fraudulent or unauthorized access, denial or degradation of service attacks, misuse, computer viruses, malware, or other cyber threats. If any of these events occur, they could compromise our or our clients’ confidential information, disrupt operations, or harm our clients or counterparties.

We may incur significant expenses to investigate and remediate security vulnerabilities, enhance protective measures, or address the impact of a cyber-attack. Such incidents could expose us to litigation, regulatory scrutiny, and financial losses not fully covered by insurance. They could also cause significant reputational damage, which may deter clients from using our services.

Cybersecurity risks are particularly acute in internet banking. Increases in criminal sophistication, advances in technology, or vulnerabilities in third-party systems (such as browsers and operating systems) could lead to breaches that compromise the security of data and transactions. A breach could discourage clients from using our online services, negatively impacting our business.

While we have developed and continue to invest in systems and processes to detect and prevent security breaches, no system is foolproof. Breaches could result in financial losses to us or our clients, reputational harm, additional compliance costs, business disruption, regulatory penalties, and potential legal liabilities. These outcomes could materially adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, and ability to grow our online services. In addition, our security measures may not protect us from system failures or interruptions. Although we have policies and procedures to mitigate such risks, we cannot guarantee their effectiveness. We also rely on third-party providers for data processing and operational support. While we carefully select these providers, we do not control their actions. If a third-party vendor experiences disruptions, cyber-attacks, or fails to meet our service standards, it could impair our ability to process transactions, deliver products and services, or conduct business. Transitioning to alternative vendors could involve significant delays and costs.

Further, information security risks may arise from the processing of client data by third-party vendors and their personnel. We cannot assure you that breaches, system failures, or interruptions will not occur or that they will be adequately addressed by us or our vendors. Additionally, our insurance coverage may not fully protect against all losses from such events.

If any of our third-party providers experience financial, operational, or technological difficulties, or if disruptions occur in our relationships with them, we may be required to find alternative service providers. This could involve negotiating less favorable terms or incurring substantial costs to implement new systems. Any of these occurrences, whether system failures, security breaches, or vendor disruptions, could damage our reputation, result in client and business losses, expose us to regulatory scrutiny and legal liabilities, and have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Our current and future uses of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and other emerging technologies may create additional risks.

The increasing adoption of AI in financial services presents significant opportunities but also introduces a range of risks that could impact our operations, regulatory compliance, and client trust. AI introduces model risk, where flawed algorithms or biased data could result in inaccurate credit decisions, compliance violations, or discriminatory outcomes in lending or client service. Cybersecurity threats, such as data breaches, adversarial attacks, and data poisoning, pose significant challenges, particularly as these systems handle large volumes of sensitive client information. Additionally, the opaque nature of some AI models, often referred to as "black-box" systems, raises regulatory compliance concerns, as regulators increasingly require transparency and explainability in AI-driven decision-making.

Operational risks also arise from potential system failures, over-reliance on AI, and integration challenges with existing infrastructure. Disruptions in AI systems could impact critical functions such as fraud detection, transaction monitoring, and client support. Ethical and reputational risks, including unintended consequences or perceived unfairness in AI-driven decisions, may erode client trust and expose us to regulatory scrutiny.

Mitigating these risks requires a robust governance framework, regularly testing and auditing of AI models, and strong human oversight. Investments in cybersecurity, data privacy protections, and employee training are critical to managing these risks.

We are subject to certain risks in connection with our data management or aggregation.

We are reliant on our ability to manage data and our ability to aggregate data in an accurate and timely manner to ensure effective risk reporting and management. Our ability to manage data and aggregate data may be limited by the effectiveness of our policies, programs, processes and practices that govern how data is acquired, validated, stored, protected and processed. While we regularly update our policies, programs, processes and practices, many of our data management and aggregation processes are manual and subject to human error or system failure. Failure to manage data effectively and to aggregate data in an accurate and timely manner may limit our ability to manage current and emerging risks, and to manage changing business needs.

Our business may be adversely affected by an increasing prevalence of fraud and other financial crimes.

The Bank is susceptible to fraudulent activity that may be committed against us or our clients which may result in financial losses or increased costs to us or our clients, disclosure or misuse of our information or our client’s information, misappropriation of assets, privacy breaches against our clients, litigation or damage to our reputation. Such fraudulent activity may take many forms, including check fraud, electronic fraud, wire fraud, phishing, social engineering and other dishonest acts. Nationally, reported incidents of fraud and other financial crimes have increased. We have also experienced losses due to apparent fraud and other financial crimes. While we have policies and procedures designed to prevent such losses, there can be no assurance that such losses will not occur.

Risks Related to Our Business and Industry Generally

Ineffective liquidity management could adversely affect our financial results and condition.

Effective liquidity management is essential to our business. We require sufficient liquidity to meet client loan requests, deposit maturities and withdrawals, payments on debt obligations, and other cash commitments under both normal operating conditions and unpredictable circumstances, including events causing industry or financial market stress. An inability to raise funds through deposits, borrowings, loan and investment security sales, or other sources could severely impact our liquidity. We rely on client deposits and, at times, borrowings from the FHLB of Des Moines and other wholesale funding sources to fund operations. Deposit flows and loan and mortgage-related security prepayments are strongly influenced by external factors, such as interest rate trends (both actual and perceived) and market competition. Changes to the FHLB of Des Moines’s lending policies or underwriting guidelines may limit our ability to borrow and adversely affect our liquidity. Although we have historically been able to replace maturing deposits and borrowings, future replacements may be challenging due to changes in our financial condition, the FHLB of Des Moines’s condition, or broader market disruptions. Our access to adequate funding could also be impaired by factors affecting us specifically or the financial industry generally, such as financial market disruptions, negative perceptions of the financial services sector, or deteriorating credit markets. Additional challenges to liquidity could arise from reduced business activity in our core markets, adverse regulatory actions, or negative operating results. Any significant decline in funding availability could impede our ability to originate loans, invest in securities, meet expenses, or fulfill obligations such as repaying borrowings and meeting deposit withdrawal demands, potentially resulting in a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Additionally, collateralized public funds (state and local municipal deposits secured by investment-grade securities) help reduce contingent liquidity risk by being less credit-sensitive, however, the pledging of collateral to secure these funds limits their availability as a reserve source of liquidity. While these deposits have historically provided stable funding, their availability depends on the fiscal policies and cash flow needs of individual municipalities.

Benefits of strategic initiatives may not be realized.

Our ability to compete depends on various factors, including our ability to develop and successfully execute strategic plans and initiatives. However, we may not achieve some or all of our strategic objectives. Expected cost savings and revenue growth from these initiatives may not materialize, and the costs of implementation may be greater than anticipated. Additionally, changes in economic conditions beyond our control, such as fluctuations in interest rates, may affect our ability to achieve our objectives. Failure to execute or achieve the anticipated outcomes of our strategic initiatives could negatively impact market perceptions of our company and impede our growth and profitability.

Development of new products and services may impose additional costs on us and may expose us to increased operational risk.

Our financial performance depends, in part, on our ability to develop and market innovative services and adopt new technologies that differentiate our products or create cost efficiencies while controlling related expenses. This reliance is heightened in the current “FinTech” environment, where financial institutions are heavily investing in emerging technologies, such as blockchain, and developing potentially industry-changing products, services, and standards.

The introduction of new products and services requires significant time and resources, including obtaining regulatory approvals. It also entails substantial risks and uncertainties, such as meeting technical and control requirements, keeping pace with rapid technological advancements, accessing client information, and making significant ongoing investments to ensure timely market entry at competitive prices. Additionally, preparing marketing, sales, and other materials that accurately describe the products, services, and their risks is critical.

Failure to manage these challenges increases the risk of operational lapses, which could result in financial liabilities. Factors such as regulatory and internal control requirements, capital demands, competitive alternatives, vendor relationships, and shifting market preferences also influence whether new initiatives can be successfully launched in a timely and appealing manner. If we fail to effectively address these risks in the development and implementation of new products or services, our business and reputation could suffer, potentially leading to a material adverse impact on our consolidated results of operations and financial condition.

We are dependent on key personnel and the loss of one or more of those key personnel may materially and adversely affect our prospects.

Competition for qualified employees in the banking industry is intense, with a limited pool of candidates experienced in community banking. Our success relies on attracting and retaining skilled management, loan origination, finance, administrative, marketing, and technical personnel, as well as on the continued contributions of key executives, including our president, and other critical employees. Losing any of these individuals could result in a challenging transition period and negatively impact our operations. Additionally, the experience and client relationships of our banking facility managers are vital to maintaining strong connections with the communities we serve. The loss of these key personnel or directors nearing retirement without suitable replacements could adversely affect our business.

We rely on other companies to provide key components of our business infrastructure.

We rely on numerous external vendors to provide products and services necessary for our day-to-day operations. Accordingly, our operations are exposed to risks associated with vendor performance under service level agreements. If a vendor fails to meet its contractual obligations due to changes in its organizational structure, financial condition, support for existing products and services, strategic focus, or any other reason, our operations could be disrupted, potentially causing a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations. Furthermore, we could be adversely affected if a vendor agreement is not renewed or is renewed on terms less favorable to us. Regulatory agencies also require financial institutions to remain accountable for all aspects of vendor performance, including activities delegated to third parties. Additionally, disruptions or failures in the physical infrastructure or operating systems supporting our business and clients, or cyber-attacks or security breaches involving networks, systems, or devices used by our clients to access our services, could lead to client attrition, regulatory fines or penalties, reputational damage, reimbursement or compensation costs, and increased compliance expenses. Any of these outcomes could materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Any inaccurate assumptions in our analytical and forecasting models could cause us to miscalculate our projected revenue or losses, which could adversely affect us.

We use analytical and forecasting models to estimate the effects of economic conditions on our financial assets and liabilities including our mortgage servicing rights. Those models include assumptions about interest rates and consumer behavior that may be incorrect. If our model assumptions are incorrect, improperly applied or inadequate, we may record higher than expected losses or lower than expected revenues which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Regulatory changes to Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (“DEI”) and Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) practices may adversely impact our reputation, compliance costs, and business operations.

In light of the recent executive order titled “Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity” which revokes previous mandates promoting DEI and directs federal agencies to combat “illegal DEI” practices in the private sector, we must reassess our ESG strategies to ensure compliance with the evolving regulatory environment. The order signals a shift in federal oversight and enforcement priorities, potentially affecting internal policies, hiring practices, supplier diversity programs, and corporate governance frameworks.

The executive order rescinds prior directives, such as Executive Order 11246, which required affirmative action and non-discriminatory practices by federal contractors. As a result, federal agencies may reevaluate existing contracts, scrutinize hiring and promotion policies, and take enforcement actions against companies perceived to be engaging in practices that do not align with the revised federal standards. Additionally, new guidance or rulemaking stemming from the executive order could impose restrictions on voluntary DEI initiatives, training programs, or supplier diversity efforts. These developments may necessitate changes to our internal policies, reporting obligations, and public disclosures, creating operational and compliance challenges.

Failure to align our DEI and ESG efforts with the current legal framework could result in reputational damage, legal challenges, and adverse impacts on our operations. Government investigations, enforcement actions, or private litigation challenging our DEI- and ESG-related policies could lead to financial penalties, increased legal costs, and potential restrictions on our ability to engage in government contracting. Moreover, various private third-party organizations continue to evaluate companies based on ESG and DEI practices. Unfavorable ratings from these entities could influence investor decisions, limit access to capital, and generate negative sentiment among stakeholders.

While the executive order aims to eliminate specific DEI programs, investors, customers, and other stakeholders may still expect transparency and commitment to broader ESG goals, including workforce diversity, community engagement, and responsible corporate governance. Companies that scale back DEI initiatives to comply with federal mandates may face backlash from institutional investors, advocacy groups, and employees who view such actions as a retreat from social responsibility commitments. Additionally, inconsistencies between federal and state-level DEI policies may create further complexities, as certain states continue to mandate affirmative action or corporate diversity disclosures. Moreover, the rapid pace of change in legal frameworks, regulatory guidance and enforcement priorities resulting from the recent Presidential transition yields considerably increased uncertainty and compounds the difficulty of establishing and maintaining compliance.

Adapting to the recent regulatory changes is crucial to maintaining our reputation, ensuring operational continuity, and meeting stakeholder expectations in the evolving ESG landscape. Noncompliance or perceived noncompliance with the executive order and related regulatory guidance could expose us to increased regulatory scrutiny, litigation risks, and limitations on business opportunities. At the same time, misalignment with investor and stakeholder expectations regarding ESG and DEI commitments could impair our brand value, reduce employee engagement and retention, and negatively impact our stock performance. Given these factors, we must carefully assess and adjust our policies, disclosures, and risk mitigation strategies to navigate the shifting legal and business environment effectively.

Risks Related to Holding Our Common Stock

Our growth or future losses may require us to raise additional capital in the future, but that capital may not be available when it is needed or the cost of that capital may be exceedingly high.

We are required by federal regulatory authorities to maintain adequate levels of capital to support our operations. We may at some point, however, need to raise additional capital to support continued growth or be required by our regulators to increase our capital resources. Any capital we obtain may result in the dilution of the interests of existing holders of our common stock. Our ability to raise additional capital, if needed, will depend on conditions in the capital markets at that time, which are outside our control, and on our financial condition and performance. Accordingly, we cannot make assurances that we will be able to raise additional capital if needed on terms that are acceptable to us, or at all. If we cannot raise additional capital when needed, our ability to further expand our operations could be materially impaired and our financial condition and liquidity could be materially and adversely affected. In addition, if we are unable to raise additional capital when required by our bank regulators, we may be subject to adverse regulatory action.

We rely on dividends from the Bank for substantially all our revenue at the holding company level.

We are an entity separate and distinct from our principal subsidiary, the Bank, and derive substantially all our revenue at the holding company level in the form of dividends from that subsidiary. Accordingly, we are, and will be, dependent upon dividends from the Bank to pay the principal of and interest on our indebtedness to satisfy our other cash needs and to pay dividends on our common stock. The Bank’s ability to pay dividends is subject to its ability to earn net income and to meet certain regulatory requirements. In the event the Bank is unable to pay dividends to us, we may not be able to pay dividends on our common stock at the same rate or at all. Also, our right to participate in a distribution of assets upon a subsidiary’s liquidation or reorganization is subject to the prior claims of the subsidiary’s creditors.

Our articles of incorporation contain a provision which could limit the voting rights of a holder of our common stock.

Our charter provides that any person or group who acquires beneficial ownership of our common stock in excess of 10% of the outstanding shares may not vote the excess shares. Accordingly, if a person acquires beneficial ownership of more than 10% of the outstanding shares of our common stock, that person’s voting rights with respect to our common stock will not be commensurate with their economic interest in our company.

Anti-takeover provisions could negatively affect our shareholders.

Provisions in our articles of incorporation and bylaws, the corporate laws of the state of Washington and federal laws and regulations could delay or prevent a third party from acquiring us, despite the possible benefit to our shareholders, or otherwise negatively affect the market value of our stock. These provisions, among others, include restrictions on voting shares of our common stock beneficially owned in excess of 10% of total shares outstanding; and advance notice requirements for nominations for election to our Board of Directors and for proposing matters that shareholders may act on at shareholder meetings. In addition, although we are in the process of transitioning from staggered three-year terms for directors to a declassified board structure in which each director will be elected for a one-year term, this transition is not complete. The partially staggered-terms structure will continue to serve as a relevant anti-takeover provision until the transition to a declassified board structure. Our articles of incorporation also authorize our Board of Directors to issue preferred or other stock, and preferred or other stock could be issued as a defensive measure in response to a takeover proposal. In addition, because we are a bank holding company, the ability of a third party to acquire us is limited by applicable banking laws and regulations. The Bank Holding Company Act requires any bank holding company to obtain the approval of the Federal Reserve before acquiring 5% or more of any class of our voting securities. Any entity that is a holder of 25% or more of any class of our voting securities, or in some circumstances a holder of a lesser percentage, is subject to regulation as a bank holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act. Under the Change in Bank Control Act of 1978, as amended, any person (or persons acting in concert), other than a bank holding company, is required to notify the Federal Reserve before acquiring 10% or more of any class of our voting securities.

Risk Management and Strategy

Our cybersecurity risk management and strategy are integrated into our enterprise-wide risk management program, leveraging a “three lines of defense” model to manage risk within the organization. Technology risk (including cybersecurity risk) is considered to be a key risk area for the Company, with Management measuring inherent risk, mitigating controls, and residual risk on a quarterly basis.

The ability to mitigate cybersecurity risks depends on an effective risk assessment process that identifies, measures, controls, and monitors material risks from cybersecurity threats. These threats include any potential unauthorized activities that could compromise the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of the Company’s information systems and data. Our Information Security Program includes a comprehensive information security risk assessment process that incorporates the following elements:

• Identifying threats, measuring risk, defining information security requirements, and implementing controls to reduce risk.
• Identifying reasonably foreseeable internal and external threats that may lead to unauthorized disclosure, misuse, alteration, or destruction of sensitive information or information systems.
• Assessing the likelihood and potential damage posed by these threats, considering the degree of information sensitivity and the Company’s operations, inclusive of substantive changes to people, processes and technology.
• Aligning the Information Security Program with the Company’s enterprise-wide risk management program, which identifies, measures, mitigates, and monitors risk.
• Evaluating the adequacy of policies, procedures, information systems, and other arrangements designed to control identified risks, considering the Company’s operations, inclusive of substantive changes to people, processes and technology.
• Conducting internal and third-party security assessments, including penetration testing.
• Overseeing third-party vendor risk through due diligence and monitoring.

The risk assessment process is designed to identify assets requiring risk reduction strategies and includes an evaluation of the key factors applicable to the operation. The Company conducts a variety of information security assessments throughout the year, both internally and through third-party specialists.

In designing our Information Security Program, we refer to established industry frameworks – in particular, the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) and guidance from the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). The FFIEC framework offers a set of guidelines to help financial institutions effectively manage and mitigate cybersecurity risks. ISO/IEC 27001 is an international standard developed by the ISO specifically for Information Security, Cybersecurity and Privacy Protection (ISCPP). These frameworks provide best practices for managing cybersecurity risks and ensuring information security, and we consider them to be aspirational benchmarks to help inform the design of our Information Security Program. While our program is designed to be robust, the sophistication and evolving nature of cyber threats mean no system can fully eliminate risk. For more information on how cybersecurity risk may affect the Company’s business strategy, results of operations or financial condition, please refer to Item 1A, Risk Factors — Risks Related to Cybersecurity, Data and Fraud.

The Company uses a cross-functional approach to identify, prevent, and mitigate cybersecurity threats and incidents. We have established procedures for the timely escalation and, when required, disclosure of cybersecurity incidents, supported by a formal incident response plan that outlines the steps the Company will take to respond to a cybersecurity incident. While cybersecurity risks could materially affect the Company, past incidents have not materially affected our business strategy, results of operations or financial condition. For further details on potential cybersecurity risks, see Item 1A, Risk Factors — Risks Related to Cybersecurity, Data and Fraud.

Governance

Our Board of Directors annually reviews and approves the Company’s Risk Appetite Statement, which defines key risk categories and associated metrics that are monitored quarterly by Management and reported to the Risk Committee. Management measures and reports inherent risk, mitigating controls, and residual risk for each key risk category and identifies and regularly discusses emerging risks with the Risk Committee.

The Company’s governance and oversight of cybersecurity risks are facilitated through our Information Security Program, which establishes administrative, technical, and physical safeguards designed to protect sensitive information in accordance with FDIC and FFIEC regulations. The program is tailored to align with the Company’s size, complexity and operational scope.

Cybersecurity risk management is led by our Chief Information Officer (CIO) and Chief Information Security Officer (CISO), supported by our information technology and information security teams. The Bank’s Chief Information Officer (CIO) provides direction and oversight for information technology and security across the Company, including existing and emerging initiatives. In this role, she leverages more than 26 years of information technology experience. The Bank’s Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) has been with the Company for more than 13 years and has maintained various applicable cybersecurity and IT audit certifications. Prior to joining the Bank, he worked for a Fortune 500 company and had 15 years of information technology experience working in networking, information security and information technology auditing.

Our Information Technology (IT) Management team is responsible for conducting risk assessments, designing the Information Security Program, overseeing service provider arrangements, establishing risk-based response programs for incidents involving unauthorized data access, providing staff training, conducting testing of key controls, systems, and procedures, and adjusting the program to reflect changes in people, processes, technology, sensitive information, threats, and the business environment (e.g., mergers, acquisitions, alliances, joint ventures, or outsourcing arrangements).

Our IT Management team reports annually to the Risk Committee on the status of the Information Security Program, including risk assessment, risk management and control decisions, service provider arrangements, results of independent testing, cybersecurity incidents and recommendations for improvements. Quarterly status updates are also provided to the Risk Committee.

The Board of Directors plays a crucial role, annually reviewing and approving our Information Security Program. The Board oversees efforts to develop, implement, and maintain an effective Information Security Program, including reviewing Management’s reporting on program effectiveness. The Board of Directors’ Corporate Governance/Nominating Committee considers IT and cybersecurity expertise when assessing potential director candidates to help ensure effective oversight by the Board of Directors.

We maintain a Cybersecurity Incident Response Team (CIRT) to handle technical aspects of the Company’s response to cybersecurity events and an Executive Cybersecurity Event Evaluation Team (ECEET) to assess potential business impacts and disclosure requirements related to cybersecurity events. Both teams may engage cybersecurity legal counsel and other external experts in connection with their respective activities. An escalation process facilitates updates to internal governance groups, including the Company’s Disclosure Committee and/or the Board of Directors’ Audit Committee, each of which also receives a quarterly report from the ECEET chair.

Banner maintains its administrative offices and main branch office, which is owned by us, in Walla Walla, Washington. As of December 31, 2024, we have 135 branch offices located in Washington, Oregon, California, and Idaho. Geographically, we have 65 branches located in Washington, 31 in Oregon, 30 in California and 9 in Idaho. Of these branch locations, approximately 59% are owned and 41% are leased facilities. In addition to the branch network, we also operate 13 loan production offices, seven of which are located in Washington, three in California, and one in each state of Oregon, Idaho and Utah. All loan production offices are leased facilities. The lease terms for our branch and loan production offices are not individually material. Lease expirations range from 4 months to 14 years. Administrative support offices are primarily in Washington, where we have eight facilities, of which we own two and lease six. Additionally, we have two leased administrative support offices in Idaho and three administrative support offices in Oregon, two owned and one leased. In the opinion of Management, all properties are adequately covered by insurance, are in a good state of repair and are appropriately designed for their present and future use.

In the normal course of our business, we have various legal proceedings and other contingent matters pending. These proceedings and the associated legal claims are often contested and the outcome of individual matters is not always predictable. Furthermore, in some matters, it is difficult to assess potential exposure because the legal proceeding is still in the pretrial stage. These claims and counter claims typically arise during the course of collection efforts on problem loans or with respect to actions to enforce liens on properties in which we hold a security interest, although we also are subject to claims related to employment matters. Claims related to employment matters may include, but are not limited to, claims by our employees of discrimination, harassment, violations of wage and hour requirements, or violations of other federal, state, or local laws and claims of misconduct or negligence on the part of our employees. Some or all of these claims may lead to litigation, including class action litigation, and these matters may cause us to incur negative publicity with respect to alleged claims. Our insurance may not cover all claims that may be asserted against us, and any claims asserted against us, regardless of merit or eventual outcome, may harm our reputation. Should the ultimate judgments or settlements in any litigation exceed our insurance coverage, they could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operation for any period. The ultimate outcome of these legal proceedings could be more or less than what we have accrued. We are not a party to any pending legal proceedings that we believe would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, operations or cash flows, except as set forth below.

As disclosed previously, a class and collective action lawsuit, Bolding et al. v. Banner Bank, US Dist. Ct., WD WA., was filed against Banner Bank on April 17, 2017. On February 22, 2024, the Court entered a written order granting final approval of a settlement agreement that resolved this lawsuit. The Bank submitted its final settlement payment during the third quarter of 2024 and does not anticipate any further funding obligations in connection with this lawsuit.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is intended to assist in understanding our financial condition and results of operations. The information contained in this section should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item IV of this Form 10-K.

Executive Overview

Banner’s successful execution of its super community bank model and strategic initiatives has delivered solid core operating results and profitability over the last several years. The Company’s longer term strategic initiatives continue to focus on originating high-quality assets and client acquisition, which we believe will continue to generate strong revenue while maintaining the Company’s moderate risk profile. We strive to uphold our core values, which are to do the right thing for our clients, communities, colleagues, company and shareholders; and to provide consistent and reliable strength through all economic cycles and change events.

2024 Financial Highlights

• Revenues were $608.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to $620.4 million for the prior year.
• Adjusted revenue* (the total of net interest income and total non-interest income adjusted for the net gain or loss on the sale of securities and the net change in valuation of financial instruments) was $614.8 million or the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to $643.9 million for the prior year.
• Net income of $168.9 million, or $4.88 per diluted share, for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to net income of $183.6 million, or $5.33 per diluted share for the prior year.
• Net interest income was $541.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to $576.0 million for the prior year.
• Net interest margin, on a tax equivalent basis, was 3.75% compared to 4.01% in the prior year.
• Mortgage banking revenue was $12.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to $11.8 million in the prior year.
• Income from deposit fees and other service charges was $43.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to $41.6 million for the prior year.
• Non-interest expense was $391.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to $382.5 million for the prior year.
• Return on average assets was 1.07% for year ended December 31, 2024, compared to 1.18% for the prior year.
• Efficiency ratio was 64.33%, compared to 61.66% in the prior year.
• Net loans receivable increased 5% to $11.20 billion at December 31, 2024, compared to $10.66 billion a year ago.
• Non-performing assets were $39.6 million, or 0.24% of total assets, at December 31, 2024, compared to $30.1 million, or 0.19% of total assets, a year ago.
• The allowance for credit losses - loans was $155.5 million, or 1.37% of total loans receivable, at December 31, 2024, compared to $149.6 million, or 1.38% of total loans receivable a year ago.
• Total deposits were $13.51 billion at December 31, 2024, compared to $13.03 billion a year ago.
• Core deposits represented 89% of total deposits at December 31, 2024.
• Cash dividends paid to shareholders were $1.92 per share, consistent with the prior year.
• Common shareholders’ equity per share increased to $51.49 at December 31, 2024, compared to $48.12 a year ago.
• Tangible common shareholders’ equity per share* decreased 1% to $40.57 at December 31, 2024, compared to $37.09 a year ago.

* Represents a non-GAAP financial measure. For a reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measure to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, see “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” below.

Selected Financial Data: The following condensed consolidated statements of financial condition and operations and selected performance ratios as of December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, and for the years then ended have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements.

FINANCIAL CONDITION DATA:

(In thousands, except shares)

35

(1) Includes available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities.

(2) Calculated using shares outstanding.

(3) Net income divided by average assets.

(4) Adjusted earnings (non-GAAP) divided by average assets.

(5) Net income divided by average common equity.

(6) Adjusted earnings (non-GAAP) divided by average equity.

(7) Net interest income as a percent of average interest-earning assets on a tax equivalent basis.

(8) Non-interest expenses divided by the total of net interest income and non-interest income.

(9) Non-performing loans consist of nonaccrual and 90 days past due loans still accruing interest.

(10) Represents a non-GAAP financial measure. For a reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, see, “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” below.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

Management has presented non-GAAP financial measures in this discussion and analysis because it believes that they provide useful and comparative information to assess trends in our core operations and to facilitate the comparison of our performance with the performance of our peers. However, these non-GAAP financial measures are supplemental and are not a substitute for any analysis based on GAAP. Where applicable, we have also presented comparable earnings information using GAAP financial measures. For a reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures, see the tables below. Because not all companies use the same calculations, our presentation may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures as calculated by other companies.

Adjusted revenue, diluted adjusted earnings per share and adjusted efficiency ratio are non-GAAP financial measures. To calculate the adjusted revenue, diluted adjusted earnings per share and adjusted efficiency ratio, we make adjustments to our GAAP revenues and expenses as reported on our Consolidated Statements of Operations. Management believes that these non-GAAP financial measures provide information to investors that is useful in evaluating the operating performance and trends of financial services companies, including the Company. The following tables set forth reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures (dollars in thousands, except share and per share data):

(1) Included in miscellaneous expenses in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

The ratio of tangible common shareholders’ equity to tangible assets is a non-GAAP financial measure. We calculate tangible common equity by excluding goodwill and other intangible assets from shareholders’ equity. We calculate tangible assets by excluding the balance of goodwill and other intangible assets from total assets. We believe this is consistent with the treatment by our bank regulatory agencies, which exclude goodwill and other intangible assets from the calculation of risk-based capital ratios. The following table sets forth the reconciliation of tangible equity and tangible assets (dollars in thousands, except share and per share data).

Critical Accounting Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires Management to make estimates, assumptions and judgments that affect amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements. These estimates, assumptions, and judgments are based on information available as of the date of the financial statements; accordingly, as this information changes, actual results could differ from the estimates, assumptions, and judgments reflected in the financial statements. Management believes the following estimates require difficult, subjective or complex judgments and, therefore, Management considers the following to be critical accounting estimates.

Allowance for Credit Losses: The allowance for credit losses reflects Management’s evaluation of our loans and their estimated loss potential, as well as the risk inherent in various components of the portfolio. Significant judgment and assumptions are applied in estimating the allowance for credit losses. These judgments, assumptions and estimates are susceptible to significant changes based on the current environment. Among the material estimates required to establish the allowance for credit losses are a reasonable and supportable forecast; a reasonable and supportable forecast period and the reversion period; value of collateral; strength of guarantors; the amount and timing of future cash flows for loans individually evaluated; and determination of the qualitative loss factors.

Management estimates the allowance for credit losses using relevant information, from internal and external sources, relating to past events, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. The allowance for credit losses is maintained at a level sufficient to provide for expected credit losses over the life of the asset based on evaluating historical credit loss experience and making adjustments to historical loss information for differences in the specific risk characteristics in the current portfolio. These factors include, among others, changes in the size and composition of the portfolio, differences in underwriting standards, delinquency rates, actual loss experience and current economic conditions.

Management considers various economic scenarios and forecasts to arrive at the estimate that most reflects Management’s expectations of future conditions. As of December 31, 2024, Management used a baseline forecast to estimate the allowance for credit losses. The selection of a more optimistic or pessimistic economic forecast would result in a lower or higher allowance for credit losses. While there are multiple economic forecast scenarios available, the use of a protracted slump economic forecast would have increased the allowance for credit losses - loans by approximately 11% as of December 31, 2024, where the use of a stronger near-term growth economic forecast would have resulted in a negligible decrease in the allowance for credit losses - loans as of December 31, 2024.

Management uses a scale to assign qualitative and environmental (QE) factor adjustments based on the level of estimated impact which requires a significant amount of judgment. Some QE factors impact all loan segments equally while others may impact some loan segments more or less than others. If Management’s judgment was different for a QE factor that impacts all loan segments equally, a five basis-point change in this QE factor would increase or decrease the allowance for credit losses by 3.7% as of December 31, 2024.

Fair Value Accounting and Measurement: We use fair value measurements to record certain financial assets and liabilities at their estimated fair value. A hierarchical disclosure framework associated with the level of pricing observability is utilized in measuring financial instruments at fair value. The degree of judgment utilized in measuring the fair value of financial instruments generally correlates to the level of pricing observability. Financial instruments with readily available active quoted prices or for which fair value can be measured from actively quoted prices generally will have a higher degree of pricing observability and a lesser degree of judgment utilized in measuring fair value. Conversely, financial instruments rarely traded or not quoted will generally have little or no pricing observability and a higher degree of judgment utilized in measuring fair value. Determining the fair value of financial instruments with unobservable inputs requires a significant amount of judgment. This includes the discount rate used to fair value our trust preferred securities and junior subordinated debentures. A 25 basis-point increase or decrease in the discount rate used to calculate the fair value of our trust preferred securities would result in a $514,000 decrease or increase in the reported fair value as of December 31, 2024, with an offsetting adjustment to our accumulated other comprehensive income. A 25 basis-point increase or decrease in the discount rate used to calculate the fair value of our junior subordinated debentures would result in a $1.3 million decrease or increase in the reported fair value as of December 31, 2024, with an offsetting adjustment to our accumulated other comprehensive income.

Comparison of Financial Condition at December 31, 2024 and 2023

General. Total assets increased to $16.20 billion at December 31, 2024, compared to $15.67 billion at December 31, 2023. The increase in assets was primarily due to loan growth and an increase in interest-bearing deposits, partially offset by the decrease in the securities portfolio in 2024.

Total loans receivable (gross loans less deferred fees and discounts and excluding loans held for sale) increased $544.2 million, or 5%, to $11.35 billion at December 31, 2024, from $10.81 billion at December 31, 2023. The increase in total loans receivable primarily reflects growth in multifamily real estate, commercial business, commercial real estate and one- to four-family residential loan balances.

The aggregate of securities and interest-bearing deposits decreased $73.1 million, or 2%, to $3.40 billion at December 31, 2024, compared to $3.48 billion a year earlier, primarily due to a decrease in securities, partially offset by an increase in interest-bearing deposits. Securities decreased to $3.11 billion at December 31, 2024, from $3.43 billion at December 31, 2023, primarily due to normal security portfolio cash flows. Fair value adjustments for securities designated as available-for-sale reflected a decrease of $5.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, which was included net of the associated tax benefit as a component of other comprehensive income. The average effective duration of our securities portfolio was approximately 6.6 years at December 31, 2024, compared to 6.5 years at December 31, 2023.

Deposits increased $484.9 million, or 4%, to $13.51 billion at December 31, 2024, from $13.03 billion at December 31, 2023, with core deposits increasing $462.7 million and certificates of deposit increasing $22.2 million. The increase in core deposits reflects increases in interest-bearing transaction and savings accounts. Core deposits were 89% of total deposits at both December 31, 2024 and 2023. Non-interest-bearing deposits decreased by $200.8 million, or 4%, to $4.59 billion from $4.79 billion at December 31, 2023, while interest-bearing transaction and savings accounts increased by $663.5 million, or 10%, to $7.42 billion at December 31, 2024, from $6.76 billion at December 31, 2023. Certificates of deposit increased $22.2 million, or 2%, to $1.50 billion at December 31, 2024, from $1.48 billion at December 31, 2023, primarily due to clients moving funds from core deposit accounts to higher yielding certificates of deposit, partially offset by a $57.7 million decrease in brokered deposits. We had $50.3 million of brokered deposits at December 31, 2024, compared to $108.1 million at December 31, 2023.

We had $290.0 million and $323.0 million of FHLB advances at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Other borrowings, consisting of retail repurchase agreements primarily related to client cash management accounts, decreased $57.6 million to $125.3 million at December 31, 2024, compared to $182.9 million at December 31, 2023. Junior subordinated debentures totaled $67.5 million at December 31, 2024, compared to $66.4 million at December 31, 2023. Subordinated notes, net of issuance costs, were $80.3 million at December 31, 2024, compared to $92.9 million at December 31, 2023. The decrease was due to the Bank’s purchase of $13.0 million of Banner’s outstanding subordinated debt during 2024.

Total shareholders’ equity increased $121.6 million, to $1.77 billion at December 31, 2024, compared to $1.65 billion at December 31, 2023. The increase in shareholders’ equity primarily reflects $168.9 million of net income and an $11.9 million increase in AOCI. This increase was partially offset by $67.0 million of cash dividends paid or accrued to common shareholders. There were no shares of common stock repurchased during the year ended December 31, 2024. Common shareholder’s equity to total assets was 10.95% and 10.55% at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Tangible common shareholders’ equity (a non-GAAP financial measure), which excludes goodwill and other intangible assets was $1.40 billion, or 8.84% of tangible assets at December 31, 2024, compared to $1.27 billion, or 8.33% at December 31, 2023. The increase in tangible common shareholders’ equity as a percentage of tangible assets was primarily due to the previously mentioned increase in AOCI and an increase in retained earnings. The Company’s book value per share was $51.49 at December 31, 2024, compared to $48.12 per share a year ago, and its tangible book value per share (a non-GAAP financial measure) was $40.57 at December 31, 2024, compared to $37.09 per share a year ago. See, “Executive Overview - Non-GAAP Financial Measures” above for a reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures.

Investments. At December 31, 2024, our securities portfolio totaled $3.11 billion, consisting principally of mortgage-backed and mortgage-related securities. Our investment levels may be increased or decreased depending upon Management’s projections as to the demand for funds to be used in our loan origination, deposit and other activities, and upon yields available on investment alternatives. During the year ended December 31, 2024, our aggregate investment in securities decreased $326.8 million, primarily due to normal security portfolio cash flows and the sale of securities. Mortgage-backed securities decreased $219.4 million and U.S. Government and agency obligations decreased $26.3 million, while municipal bonds decreased $6.8 million, corporate debt obligations decreased $23.1 million and asset-backed securities decreased $50.1 million.

U.S. Government and Agency Obligations: Our portfolio of U.S. Government and agency obligations had a carrying value of $8.2 million (with an amortized cost of $8.8 million) at December 31, 2024, a weighted average contractual maturity of 13 years and a weighted average coupon rate of 4.11%. Many of the U.S. Government and agency obligations we own include call features which allow the issuing agency the right to call the securities at various dates prior to the final maturity.

Mortgage-Backed Obligations: At December 31, 2024, our mortgage-backed and mortgage-related securities had a carrying value of $2.24 billion ($2.56 billion at amortized cost, with a net unrealized loss adjustment of $319.0 million). The weighted average coupon rate of these securities was 2.60% and the weighted average contractual maturity was 26 years, although we receive principal payments on these securities each month resulting in a much shorter expected average life. As of December 31, 2024, 97% of the mortgage-backed and mortgage-related securities pay interest at a fixed rate.

Municipal Bonds: The carrying value of our tax-exempt bonds at December 31, 2024 was $493.5 million ($512.3 million at amortized cost), comprised of general obligation bonds (i.e., backed by the general credit of the issuer) and, to a lesser extent, revenue bonds (i.e., backed by revenues from the specific project being financed) issued by cities and counties and various housing authorities, and hospital, school, water and sanitation districts. We also had taxable bonds in our municipal bond portfolio, which at December 31, 2024 had a carrying value of $68.5 million ($79.9 million at amortized cost). Many of our qualifying municipal bonds are not rated by a nationally recognized credit rating agency due to the smaller size of the total issuance and a portion of these bonds have been acquired through direct private placement by the issuers. We have not experienced any defaults or payment deferrals on our current portfolio of municipal bonds. Our combined municipal bond portfolio is geographically diverse, with the majority within the states of Washington, Oregon, Texas and California. At December 31, 2024, our municipal bond portfolio, including taxable and tax-exempt, had a weighted average maturity of approximately 22 years and a weighted average coupon rate of 3.13%.

Corporate Bonds: Our corporate bond portfolio had a carrying value of $127.5 million ($134.0 million at amortized cost) at December 31, 2024. At December 31, 2024, the portfolio had a weighted average maturity of 11.0 years and a weighted average coupon rate of 4.82%.

Asset-Backed Securities: At December 31, 2024, our asset-backed securities portfolio had a carrying value of $170.8 million (with an amortized cost of $170.6 million), and was comprised of collateralized loan obligations. The weighted average coupon rate of these securities was 6.51% and the weighted average contractual maturity was 14 years. At December 31, 2024, 100% of these securities had adjustable interest rates tied to three-month SOFR.

The following tables set forth certain information regarding carrying values and percentage of total carrying values of our portfolio of securities—trading and securities—available-for-sale, both carried at estimated fair market value, and securities—held-to-maturity, carried at amortized cost, net of the allowance for credit losses - securities, as of December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 (dollars in thousands):

Table 1: Securities

(1) In the fourth quarter of 2023, our corporate bonds classified as trading were transferred to available-for-sale.

The following table shows the maturity or period to repricing of our available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities as of December 31, 2024 (dollars in thousands):

Table 2: Securities Available-for-Sale and Held-to-Maturity—Maturity/Repricing and Rates

(1) Tax-exempt weighted average yield is calculated on a tax equivalent basis using a federal tax rate of 21% and a tax disallowance of 10%.

Loans and Lending. Loans are our most significant and generally highest yielding earning assets. We attempt to maintain a portfolio of loans to total deposits ratio at a level designed to enhance our revenues, while adhering to sound underwriting practices and appropriate diversification guidelines in order to maintain a moderate risk profile. Our loan-to-deposit ratio at December 31, 2024, was 84%. We offer a wide range of loan products to meet the demands of our clients. Our lending activities are primarily directed toward the origination of commercial real estate and business loans. While we originate a variety of loans, our ability to originate each type of loan depends upon the relative client demand and competition in each market we serve. We continue to implement strategies designed to capture more market share and achieve increases in targeted loans. New loan originations and portfolio balances will continue to be significantly affected by economic activity and changes in interest rates.

The following table shows loan origination activity (excluding loans held for sale) for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 (in thousands):

Table 3: Loan Originations

One- to Four-Family Residential Lending: At December 31, 2024, $1.59 billion, or 14% of our loan portfolio, consisted of permanent loans on one- to four-family residences. We are active originators of one- to four-family residential loans in the communities we serve. Our balance of loans for one- to four-family residences increased by $73.2 million in 2024, compared to the prior year. The increase in one- to four-family residential loans during 2024 was primarily the result of a higher percentage of one- to four-family construction loans converting to one- to four-family residential loans and a larger percentage of new production being held in portfolio.

Construction, Land and Land Development Lending: Our construction loan originations have been relatively strong in recent years as builders have expanded production and experienced strong home sales in many markets where we operate. At December 31, 2024, construction, land and land development loans totaled $1.52 billion, or 14% of total loans. The largest shifts in this portfolio occurred in commercial construction and land and land development loans. Commercial construction loans decreased $47.6 million, or 28%, to $122.4 million at December 31, 2024, primarily due to the conversion of commercial construction loans to the commercial real estate portfolio upon the completion of the construction phase, partially offset by new loan production. Commercial construction loans represented approximately 1% of our total loan portfolio at December 31, 2024, comprised primarily of retail property construction projects. Land and land development loans increased $33.0 million, or 10%, to $369.7 million at December 31, 2024. Land and land development loans represented approximately 3% of our total loan portfolio at December 31, 2024 and was comprised of residential properties for personal use and development. Multifamily construction loans increased $9.7 million, or 2%, to $513.7 million at December 31, 2024. Multifamily construction loans represented approximately 5% of our total loan portfolio at December 31, 2024 and was comprised of affordable housing projects and, to a lesser extent, market rate multifamily projects across our footprint. One- to four-family construction loans decreased $12.2 million, or 2%, to $514.2 million at December 31, 2024. One- to four-family construction loans represented approximately 5% of our total loan portfolio at December 31, 2024, and included speculative construction loans, as well as “all-in-one” construction loans made to owner occupants that convert to permanent loans upon completion of the homes that, depending on market conditions, may be subsequently sold into the secondary market.

Commercial and Multifamily Real Estate Lending: We originate loans secured by commercial and multifamily real estate. These loans include both fixed- and adjustable-rate loans with intermediate terms of generally five to 10 years. At December 31, 2024, our loan portfolio included $3.86 billion of commercial real estate loans, or 34% of the total loan portfolio, and $894.4 million of multifamily real estate loans, or 8% of the total loan portfolio. The increase in commercial real estate loans was primarily the result of new loan production and the conversion of commercial construction loans to commercial real estate loans upon the completion of the construction phase. Our commercial real estate portfolio consists of loans on a variety of property types with no significant concentrations by property type, borrowers or locations. Approximately 12% of our commercial real estate portfolio was secured by retail property at December 31, 2024. Within this portfolio, we have limited exposure to the office sector, with only 6% of total loans secured by office properties, nearly 55% of which are owner-occupied. The increase in multifamily real estate loans was the result of the conversion of multifamily construction loans to multifamily real estate loans upon the completion of the construction phase.

Commercial Business Lending: Our commercial business lending is directed toward meeting the credit and related deposit needs of various small-to-medium-sized business and agribusiness borrowers operating in our primary market areas. In addition to providing earning assets, this type of lending has helped increase our deposit base. At December 31, 2024, commercial business loans, including small business scored, totaled $2.42 billion, or 21% of total loans. Our commercial business loan portfolio at December 31, 2024 reflects an increase of 6% from December 31, 2023. Our commercial business lending, to a lesser extent, includes participation in certain syndicated loans, including shared national credits which totaled $227.4 million, or 2% of our loan portfolio, at December 31, 2024.

Agricultural Lending: Agriculture is a major industry in our footprint. While agricultural loans are not a large part of our portfolio, we routinely make agricultural loans to borrowers with a strong capital base, sufficient management depth, proven ability to operate through agricultural cycles, reliable cash flows and adequate financial reporting. Payments on agricultural loans depend, to a large degree, on the results of operation of the related farm entity. The repayment is also subject to other economic and weather conditions as well as market prices for agricultural products, which can be highly volatile at times. At December 31, 2024, agricultural loans totaled $340.3 million, or 3% of the loan portfolio.

Consumer and Other Lending: Consumer lending has traditionally been a modest part of our business with loans made primarily to accommodate our existing client base. At December 31, 2024, our consumer loans increased $22.0 million to $721.4 million, or 6% of our loan portfolio, compared to December 31, 2023. As of December 31, 2024, 87% of our consumer loans were secured by one- to four-family residences through home equity lines of credit. Credit card balances totaled $45.2 million at December 31, 2024.

Loan Servicing Portfolio: At December 31, 2024, we were servicing $3.18 billion of loans for others and held $12.7 million in escrow for our portfolio of loans serviced for others. The loan servicing portfolio at December 31, 2024 was comprised of $1.36 billion of Freddie Mac residential mortgage loans, $1.00 billion of Fannie Mae residential mortgage loans, $430.7 million of Oregon Housing residential mortgage loans, $65.5 million of SBA loans and $314.5 million of other loans serviced for a variety of investors. The portfolio included loans secured by property located primarily in the states of Washington, Oregon, Idaho and California. For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, we recognized $8.2 million and $7.8 million of loan servicing income in our results of operations, respectively.

The following table sets forth the composition of the Company’s loan portfolio, net of discounts and deferred fees and costs, by type of loan as of the dates indicated (dollars in thousands):

Table 4: Loan Portfolio Analysis

45

The following table sets forth the Company’s loans by geographic concentration at December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 (dollars in thousands):

Table 5: Loans by Geographic Concentration

The geographic concentration of our commercial real estate portfolio, as of December 31, 2024, was 48% in Washington and 26% in California.

The following table sets forth certain information at December 31, 2024 regarding the dollar amount of loans maturing in our portfolio based on their contractual terms to maturity, but does not include scheduled payments or potential prepayments. Demand loans, loans having no stated schedule of repayments and no stated maturity, and overdrafts are reported as due in one year or less. Loan balances are net of unamortized premiums and discounts and exclude loans held for sale (in thousands):

Table 6: Loans by Maturity

Contractual maturities of loans do not necessarily reflect the actual life of such assets. The average life of loans typically is substantially less than their contractual maturities because of principal repayments and prepayments. In addition, due-on-sale clauses on certain mortgage loans generally give us the right to declare loans immediately due and payable in the event that the borrower sells the real property subject to the mortgage and the loan is not repaid. The average life of mortgage loans tends to increase, however, when current mortgage loan market rates are substantially higher than rates on existing mortgage loans and, conversely, decreases when rates on existing mortgage loans are substantially higher than current mortgage loan market rates.

The following table sets forth the dollar amount of all loans maturing after December 31, 2025 which have fixed interest rates and floating or adjustable interest rates (in thousands):

Table 7: Loans Maturing after One Year

Deposits. We compete with other financial institutions and financial intermediaries in attracting deposits and we generally attract deposits within our primary market areas. Much of the focus of our expansion and current marketing efforts have been directed toward attracting additional deposit client relationships and balances.

One of our key strategies is to strengthen our franchise by emphasizing core deposit activity in non-interest-bearing and other transaction and savings accounts with less reliance on higher cost certificates of deposit. This strategy is intended to help control our cost of funds and increase the opportunity for deposit fee revenues, while stabilizing our funding base. Total deposits increased $484.9 million, or 4%, to $13.51 billion at December 31, 2024 from $13.03 billion at December 31, 2023. The increase in deposits during the year ended December 31, 2024 was due to an increase in core deposits, primarily interest-bearing transaction and savings accounts. Core deposits were 89% of total deposits at both December 31, 2024 and 2023.

The following table sets forth the balances of deposits in the various types of accounts offered by the Bank at the dates indicated (dollars in thousands):

Table 8: Deposits

48

The following table indicates the amount of the Bank’s certificates of deposit with balances in excess of the FDIC insurance limit by time remaining until maturity as of December 31, 2024 (in thousands):

Table 9: Maturity Period—Certificates of Deposit in excess of the FDIC insurance limit

The following table provides additional detail on geographic concentrations of our deposits at December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 (in thousands):

Table 10: Geographic Concentration of Deposits

Borrowings. We had $290.0 million in FHLB advances at December 31, 2024. At that date, based on pledged collateral, the Bank had $2.95 billion of available credit capacity with the FHLB. At December 31, 2024, based upon our available unencumbered collateral, the Bank was eligible to borrow $1.52 billion from the Federal Reserve Bank, however, at that date we had no funds borrowed under this arrangement.

Other borrowings, consisting of retail repurchase agreements, which are primarily associated with client sweep account arrangements, decreased $57.6 million to $125.3 million at December 31, 2024 from $182.9 million at December 31, 2023. At December 31, 2024, retail repurchase agreements had a weighted average rate of 1.98% and were secured by pledges of certain mortgage-backed securities and agency securities. We had no borrowings under wholesale repurchase agreements at December 31, 2024.

At December 31, 2024, we had an aggregate of $86.5 million of junior subordinated debentures. This includes $75.0 million issued by us and $11.5 million acquired in our bank acquisitions. The junior subordinated debentures are carried at their estimated fair value of $67.5 million at December 31, 2024. At December 31, 2024, the junior subordinated debentures had a weighted average rate of 6.32%. Subordinated notes, net of issuance costs, were $80.3 million at December 31, 2024, compared to $92.9 million at December 31, 2023, and a weighted average interest rate of 5.00%. The decrease was due to the Bank’s purchase of $13.0 million of Banner’s outstanding subordinated debt from third parties during the year ended December 31, 2024.

Asset Quality. Maintaining a moderate risk profile by employing appropriate underwriting standards, avoiding excessive asset concentrations and aggressively managing troubled assets has been and will continue to be a primary focus for us.

Non-performing assets increased to $39.6 million, or 0.24% of total assets, at December 31, 2024, from $30.1 million, or 0.19% of total assets, at December 31, 2023. At December 31, 2024, our allowance for credit losses - loans was $155.5 million, or 421% of non-performing loans, compared to $149.6 million, or 506% of non-performing loans, at December 31, 2023.

The following table sets forth information with respect to our non-performing assets at the dates indicated (dollars in thousands):

Table 11: Non-Performing Assets

The increase in total non-performing loans was primarily due to increases in nonaccrual loans in the one- to four-family and agricultural business loan categories consisting of various borrowers with no meaningful concentrations. The increases in these categories reflect loans transferred to nonaccrual, partially offset by payoffs of nonaccrual loans during 2024.

For the year ended December 31, 2024, interest income was reduced by $2.0 million as a result of nonaccrual loan activity, which includes the reversal of $826,000 of accrued interest as of the date the loans were placed on nonaccrual. For the year ended December 31, 2023, interest income was reduced by $1.6 million as a result of nonaccrual loan activity, which includes the reversal of $569,000 of accrued interest as of the date the loans were placed on nonaccrual. For the year ended December 31, 2022, interest income was reduced by $725,000 as a result of nonaccrual loan activity, which includes the reversal of $322,000 of accrued interest as of the date the loan was placed on nonaccrual. There was no interest income recognized on nonaccrual loans during the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022.

The following table presents the Company’s portfolio of risk-rated loans and non-risk-rated loans by grade at the dates indicated (in thousands):

Table 12: Loans by Grade

The increase in substandard loans during the year ended December 31, 2024 was primarily due to increases in adversely classified loans, primarily in the commercial business and agricultural loan segments, partially offset by payoffs and paydowns. As of December 31, 2024, total substandard loans primarily consisted of loans within the commercial business, owner-occupied commercial real estate and agricultural loan segments.

Comparison of Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2024 and 2023

General. For the year ended December 31, 2024, net income was $168.9 million, or $4.88 per diluted share, compared to net income of $183.6 million, or $5.33 per diluted share for the year ended December 31, 2023. Current year results included a decrease in net interest income and an increase in non-interest expense, partially offset by an increase in non-interest income and a decrease in the provision for credit losses.

Our operating results depend largely on net interest income which decreased $34.3 million to $541.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to the prior year, primarily reflecting increased funding costs, partially offset by increased yields on loans due to new loans being originated at higher interest rates and adjustable rate loans repricing higher, as well as higher average loan balances. Revenues (net interest income and non-interest income) decreased $11.8 million, or 2%, to $608.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to the year ended December 31, 2023, primarily due to increased funding costs, partially offset by increased interest income on loans and a decrease in the net loss on the sale of securities during the year ended December 31, 2024.

We recorded a $7.6 million provision for credit losses for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to a $10.8 million provision for credit losses for the year ended December 31, 2023. The provision for credit losses for the year ended December 31, 2024, reflects risk rating downgrades, as well as growth in loan balances.

Total non-interest income for the year ended December 31, 2024 increased to $66.9 million compared to $44.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, primarily due to a decrease in the net loss on the sale of securities.

Total non-interest expense increased to $391.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to $382.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, largely as a result of increases in salary and employee benefits and payment and card processing services expense, partially offset by decreases in professional and legal expense and the amortization of core deposit intangibles.

Net Interest Income. Net interest income decreased $34.3 million, or 6%, to $541.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to $576.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, primarily reflecting increased funding costs, partially offset by increased yields on loans due to new loans being originated at higher interest rates and adjustable rate loans repricing higher, as well as higher average loan balances. The higher average yield on interest-earning assets, compared to the same period in the prior year, reflects the overall higher interest rate environment during 2024, despite the Federal Reserve reducing rates in late 2024. While interest rate cuts during the year led to lower funding costs and yields on interest-earning assets in the fourth quarter, the overall results for the year were largely shaped by the elevated interest rates during most of 2024.

The net interest margin on a tax equivalent basis of 3.75% for the year ended December 31, 2024, was 26 basis points lower than the prior year. The decrease in net interest margin reflects a 72 basis-point increase in the cost of funding liabilities, partially offset by a 39 basis-point increase in yields on average interest-earning assets. The increase in the overall cost of funding liabilities was primarily due to the increase in rates across all deposit and borrowing categories due to higher market rates. The higher funding costs was also impacted by a shift in the average balance of non-interest-bearing deposits to higher costing interest-bearing checking accounts, savings accounts and certificates of deposit. The increase in average yields on interest-earning assets during the current year reflects the benefit of variable rate interest-earning assets repricing higher due to rising interest rates, as well as new loans being originated at higher interest rates.

Interest Income. Interest income for the year ended December 31, 2024 was $766.1 million, compared to $701.6 million for the prior year, an increase of $64.5 million. This increase was a result of yields on interest-earning assets increasing 39 basis points to 5.26%, as well as the average balance of interest-earning assets increasing $157.8 million to $14.81 billion. The increased yield on interest-earning assets primarily reflects increases in the average yields on loans.

Interest income on loans increased $77.7 million from the prior year to $655.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. The increase was primarily due to the average loan yields increasing 39 basis points to 5.97%, reflecting the impact of higher interest rates. Average loans receivable increased $639.9 million to $11.12 billion, primarily reflecting increases in the average balances of one- to four-family residential, construction, land and land development, and multifamily real estate loans.

Interest and dividend income on investment securities decreased $13.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 due to a decline in the average balance of the investment securities portfolio. The combined average balance of total investment securities decreased $482.2 million to $3.68 billion (excluding the effect of fair value adjustments). The average yield on the combined portfolio increased to 3.11%, reflecting a three basis-point increase in the average yield on mortgage-backed securities and a 19 basis-point increase in the yield on other securities.

Interest Expense. Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2024 was $224.4 million, compared to $125.6 million for the prior year, an increase of $98.8 million, or 79%. The increase occurred as a result of a 72 basis-point increase in the average cost of all funding liabilities to 1.63% as well as the average balance of funding liabilities increasing $27.9 million to $13.76 billion. The increase in the average cost of our funding liabilities increased due to increases in the rates paid on our interest rate deposits to remain competitive in the elevated interest rate environment. The increase in the average balance of funding liabilities reflects increases in interest-bearing transaction and savings accounts and certificates of deposit, partially offset by lower average balances of money market accounts and non-interest bearing deposits.

Deposit interest expense increased $99.3 million to $199.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to the prior year, as a result of the average cost of total deposits increasing 74 basis points to 1.50% and the average balance of interest-bearing deposits increasing by $897.8 million. The increase in the average cost of deposits between the periods was primarily due to the average cost of interest-bearing deposits increasing 102 basis points to 2.32% for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to 1.30% in the prior year. The increase in the average cost of interest-bearing deposits was primarily the result of a 79 basis-point increase in the cost of interest-bearing checking accounts, a 116 basis-point increase in the cost of savings accounts, a 90 basis-point increase in the cost money market accounts and a 107 basis-point increase in the cost of certificates of deposit. The increase in the average balance of total interest-bearing deposits was primarily due to increases in the average balances of interest-bearing transaction and savings accounts and certificates of deposit, partially offset by lower average balances of money market accounts.

The average rate paid on total borrowings increased 60 basis points to 4.97%, reflecting a 24 basis-point increase in the average cost of FHLB advances, 92 basis-point increase in the average cost of other borrowings, and 38 basis-point increase in the average cost of our subordinated debt. The decrease in the average balance of total borrowings was largely due to a $36.9 million decrease in the average balance of FHLB advances and a $34.7 million decrease in the average balance of other borrowings.

Table 13, Analysis of Net Interest Spread, presents, for the periods indicated, our condensed average balance sheet information, together with interest income and yields earned on average interest-earning assets and interest expense and rates paid on average interest-bearing liabilities. Average balances are computed using daily average balances.

The following table provides an analysis of our net interest spread for the last three years (dollars in thousands):

Table 13: Analysis of Net Interest Spread

(footnotes follow)

(1) Average balances include loans accounted for on a nonaccrual basis and loans 90 days or more past due. Amortization of net deferred loan fees/costs is included with interest on loans.

(2) Average other non-interest-bearing liabilities include fair value adjustments related to junior subordinated debentures.

(3) Tax-exempt income is calculated on a tax equivalent basis. The tax equivalent yield adjustment to interest earned on loans was $8.7 million, $7.4 million and $5.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. The tax equivalent yield adjustment to interest earned on tax exempt securities was $4.1 million, $4.4 million and $4.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.

The following table sets forth the effects of changing rates and volumes on our net interest income during the periods shown (in thousands). Information is provided with respect to (i) effects on interest income attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate) and (ii) effects on interest income attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume). Effects on interest income attributable to changes in rate and volume (changes in rate multiplied by changes in volume) have been allocated between changes in rate and changes in volume (in thousands):

Table 14: Rate/Volume Analysis

Provision and Allowance for Credit Losses. We recorded an $8.6 million provision for credit losses - loans in the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to an $11.1 million provision for credit losses - loans in 2023.

The provision for credit losses - loans reflects the amount required to maintain the allowance for credit losses - loans at an appropriate level based upon Management’s evaluation of the adequacy of collective and individual loss reserves. The provision for credit losses - loans for the current year reflects an increase in our substandard loans in addition to growth in the loan portfolio. The prior year provision for credit losses - loans primarily reflected loan growth and a deterioration in forecasted economic conditions and indicators utilized to estimate credit losses, as well as increased charge-offs for the prior year. Future assessments of the expected credit losses will not only be impacted by changes to the reasonable and supportable forecast, but will also include an updated assessment of qualitative factors, as well as consideration of any required changes in the reasonable and supportable forecast reversion period.

The following table sets forth an analysis of our allowance for credit losses - loans for the periods indicated (dollars in thousands):

Table 15: Changes in Allowance for Credit Losses - Loans

55

The following table sets forth the breakdown of the allowance for credit losses - loans by loan category at the dates indicated (dollars in thousands):

Table 16: Allocation of Allowance for Credit Losses - Loans

The allowance for credit losses - unfunded loan commitments was $13.6 million at December 31, 2024 compared to $14.5 million at December 31, 2023. The decrease in the allowance for credit losses - unfunded loan commitments reflects a decrease in unfunded loan commitments.

The following table sets forth an analysis of our allowance for credit losses - unfunded loan commitments for the periods indicated (dollars in thousands):

Table 17: Changes in Allowance for Credit Losses - Unfunded Loan Commitments

56

Non-interest Income. The following table presents the key components of non-interest income for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 (dollars in thousands):

Table 18: Non-interest Income

Non-interest income increased for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to the year ended December 31, 2023. The increase was primarily due to decreases in the net loss recognized on the sale of securities and the net loss recognized on the valuation of financial instruments carried at fair value, as well as increases in miscellaneous income and deposit fees and other service charges.

Income from deposit fees and other service charges increased primarily as a result of an increase in fees related to overdrafts during the current year.

Revenue from mortgage banking operations, including gains from one- to four-family and multifamily loan sales and loan servicing fees, increased for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to the prior year. The volume of one- to four-family loans sold during the year ended December 31, 2024 increased compared to the prior year, although overall volumes remained low due to reduced refinancing and purchase activity in the current rate environment. We sold $408.9 million of one- to four-family loans held for sale for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to $256.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The increase was also impacted by increases in the pricing on the one- to four-family loans sold during the current year. Sales of one- to four-family loans held for sale for the year ended December 31, 2024, resulted in gains of $8.0 million, compared to $5.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The prior year period also reflected a downward lower of cost or market adjustment on multifamily loans held for sale. In 2023, the Bank discontinued the origination of multifamily loans for sale into the secondary market. All of the multifamily loans held for sale were transferred to the held for investment loan portfolio and the related lower of cost or market adjustment was reversed in the fourth quarter of 2023.

Miscellaneous income increased for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to the year ended December 31, 2023 primarily as a result of an increase in the gain on sale of SBA loans and a gain recognized on the sale of a non-performing loan during the fourth quarter of 2024.

The net loss on sale of securities during the year ended December 31, 2024, reflects strategic sales of securities, mostly in the first quarter of 2024, to minimize the impact of increasing rates on our securities portfolio. The net loss on the valuation of financial instruments carried at fair value were due to declines during 2024 in the market valuation of investment securities carried at fair value.

Non-interest Expense. The following table represents key elements of non-interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 (dollars in thousands).

Table 19: Non-interest Expense

Non-interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2024, increased compared to the same period in 2023. The increase was primarily due to increases in salary and employee benefits and payment and card processing services, partially offset by a decrease in professional and legal expenses.

Salary and employee benefits increased for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to the prior year, primarily as a result of normal annual salary and wage increases and an increase in loan production related commission expense, partially offset by lower medical expenses.

Payment and card processing services increased for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to the prior year, primarily reflecting an increase in online banking costs and fraud losses.

Professional and legal expenses decreased for the year ended December 31, 2024, from the year ended December 31, 2023, primarily due to a reduction in legal and consulting expenses as well as a one-time reduction in litigation settlement costs.

Income Taxes. For the year ended December 31, 2024, we recognized $40.6 million in income tax expense for an effective rate of 19.4%, which reflects our statutory tax rate reduced by the effect of tax-exempt income, certain tax credits, and tax benefits related to restricted stock vesting. Our blended federal and state statutory income tax rate is 23.7%, representing a blend of the statutory federal income tax rate of 21.0% and apportioned effects of the state and local jurisdictions where we do business. For the year ended December 31, 2023, we recognized $43.5 million in income tax expense for an effective tax rate of 19.1%.

Comparison of Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2023 and 2022

See Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, previously filed with the SEC.

Market Risk and Asset/Liability Management

Our financial condition and operations are influenced significantly by general economic conditions, including the absolute level of interest rates as well as changes in interest rates and the slope of the yield curve. Our profitability is dependent, to a large extent, on our net interest income, which is the difference between the interest received from our interest-earning assets and the interest expense incurred on our interest-bearing liabilities.

Our activities, like those of all financial institutions, inherently involve the assumption of interest rate risk. Interest rate risk is the risk that fluctuations in market interest rates will have an adverse impact on the institution’s earnings and underlying economic value. Interest rate risk is determined by the maturity and repricing characteristics of an institution’s assets, liabilities and off-balance-sheet contracts. Interest rate risk is measured by the variability of financial performance and economic value, resulting from changes in interest rates. Interest rate risk is the primary market risk affecting our financial performance.

Our greatest source of interest rate risk results from the mismatch of maturities or repricing intervals for rate sensitive assets, liabilities and off-balance-sheet contracts. This mismatch or gap is generally characterized by a substantially shorter maturity structure for interest-bearing liabilities than interest-earning assets, although our floating-rate assets tend to be more immediately responsive to changes in market rates than most deposit liabilities. Additional interest rate risk results from mismatched repricing indices and formula (basis risk and yield curve risk), and product caps and floors and early repayment or withdrawal provisions (option risk), which may be contractual or market driven, that are generally more favorable to clients than to us. An exception to this generalization is the beneficial effect of interest rate floors on a portion of our performing floating-rate loans, which help us maintain higher loan yields in periods when market interest rates decline significantly. However, in a declining interest rate environment as loans with floors are repaid, they generally are replaced with new loans which have lower interest rate floors. As of December 31, 2024, our loans with interest rate floors totaled $5.19 billion and had a weighted average floor rate of 4.77% compared to a current average note rate of 6.45%. As of December 31, 2024, our loans with interest rates at their floors totaled $1.34 billion and had a weighted average note rate of 4.48%. The Company actively manages its exposure to interest rate risk through ongoing adjustments to the mix of interest-earning assets and funding sources that affect the repricing speeds of loans, investments, interest-bearing deposits and borrowings.

The principal objectives of asset/liability management are: to evaluate the interest rate risk exposure; to determine the appropriate level of risk given our operating environment, business plan strategies, performance objectives, capital and liquidity constraints, and asset and liability allocation alternatives; and to manage our interest rate risk consistent with regulatory guidelines and policies approved by the Board of Directors. Through such management, we seek to reduce the vulnerability of our earnings and capital position to changes in the level of interest rates. Our actions in this regard are taken under the guidance of the Asset/Liability Management Committee, which is comprised of members of our senior management. The Committee closely monitors our interest sensitivity exposure, asset and liability allocation decisions, liquidity and capital positions, and local and national economic conditions, and attempts to structure the loan and investment portfolios and funding sources to maximize earnings within acceptable risk tolerances.

Sensitivity Analysis

Our primary monitoring tool for assessing interest rate risk is asset/liability simulation modeling, which is designed to capture the dynamics of balance sheet, interest rate and spread movements, and to quantify variations in net interest income resulting from those movements under different rate environments. The sensitivity of net interest income to changes in the modeled interest rate environments provides a measurement of interest rate risk. We also utilize economic value analysis, which addresses changes in estimated net economic value of equity arising from changes in the level of interest rates. The net economic value of equity is estimated by separately valuing our assets and liabilities under varying interest rate environments. The extent to which assets gain or lose value in relation to the gains or losses of liability values under the various interest rate assumptions determines the sensitivity of net economic value to changes in interest rates and provides an additional measure of interest rate risk.

The interest rate sensitivity analysis performed by us incorporates beginning-of-the-period rate, balance and maturity data, using various levels of aggregation of that data, as well as certain assumptions concerning the maturity, repricing, amortization and prepayment characteristics of loans and other interest-earning assets and the repricing and withdrawal of deposits and other interest-bearing liabilities into an asset/liability simulation model. We update and prepare simulation modeling at least quarterly for review by senior management and oversight by the directors. We believe the data and assumptions are realistic representations of our portfolio and possible outcomes under the various interest rate scenarios. Nonetheless, the interest rate sensitivity of our net interest income and net economic value of equity could vary substantially if different assumptions were used or if actual experience differs from the assumptions used.

The following tables set forth, as of December 31, 2024, the estimated changes in our net interest income over one-year and two-year time horizons for our rate ramp and rate shock interest rate sensitivity scenarios, and the estimated changes in economic value of equity for our rate shock interest rate sensitivity scenario based on the indicated interest rate environments (dollars in thousands):

Table 20: Interest Rate Risk Indicators - Rate Ramp

(1) Assumes a gradual change in market interest rates at all maturities during the first year; however, no rates are allowed to go below zero. The targeted Federal Funds Rate was between 4.25% and 4.50% at December 31, 2024.

Table 21: Interest Rate Risk Indicators - Rate Shock

(1) Assumes an instantaneous and sustained uniform change in market interest rates at all maturities; however, no rates are allowed to go below zero. The targeted Federal Funds Rate was between 4.25% and 4.50% at December 31, 2024.

Another monitoring tool for assessing interest rate risk is gap analysis. The matching of the repricing characteristics of assets and liabilities may be analyzed by examining the extent to which assets and liabilities are interest sensitive and by monitoring an institution’s interest sensitivity gap. An asset or liability is said to be interest sensitive within a specific time period if it will mature or reprice within that time period. The interest rate sensitivity gap is defined as the difference between the amount of interest-earning assets anticipated, based upon certain assumptions, to mature or reprice within a specific time period and the amount of interest-bearing liabilities anticipated to mature or reprice, based upon certain assumptions, within that same time period. A gap is considered positive when the amount of interest-sensitive assets exceeds the amount of interest-sensitive liabilities. A gap is considered negative when the amount of interest-sensitive liabilities exceeds the amount of interest-sensitive assets. Generally, during a period of rising rates, a negative gap would tend to adversely affect net interest income, while a positive gap would tend to result in an increase in net interest income. During a period of falling interest rates, a negative gap would tend to result in an increase in net interest income, while a positive gap would tend to adversely affect net interest income.

Certain shortcomings are inherent in gap analysis. For example, although certain assets and liabilities may have similar maturities or periods of repricing, they may react in different degrees to changes in market rates. Also, the interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities may fluctuate in advance of changes in market rates, while interest rates on other types may lag behind changes in market rates. Additionally, certain assets, such as ARM loans, have features that restrict changes in interest rates on a short-term basis and over the life of the asset. Further, in the event of a change in interest rates, prepayment and early withdrawal levels would likely deviate significantly from those assumed in calculating the table. Finally, the ability of some borrowers to service their debt may decrease in the event of a severe change in market rates.

Table 22, Interest Sensitivity Gap, presents our interest sensitivity gap between interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities at December 31, 2024. The following table sets forth the amounts of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities which are anticipated by us, based upon certain assumptions, to reprice or mature in each of the future periods shown. At December 31, 2024, total interest-earning assets maturing or repricing within one year exceeded total interest-bearing liabilities maturing or repricing in the same time period by $2.17 billion, representing a one-year cumulative gap to total assets ratio of 13.37%. The interest rate risk indicators and interest sensitivity gaps as of December 31, 2024, are within our internal policy guidelines and Management considers that our current level of interest rate risk is reasonable.

The following table provides a GAP analysis as of December 31, 2024 (dollars in thousands):

Table 22: Interest Sensitivity Gap

(footnotes follow)

(1) Adjustable-rate assets are included in the period in which interest rates are next scheduled to adjust rather than in the period in which they are due to mature, and fixed-rate assets are included in the period in which they are scheduled to be repaid based upon scheduled amortization, in each case adjusted to take into account estimated prepayments. Mortgage loans and other loans are not reduced for allowances for credit losses and non-performing loans. Mortgage loans, mortgage-backed securities, other loans and investment securities are not adjusted for deferred fees and unamortized acquisition premiums and discounts.

(2) Adjustable-rate liabilities are included in the period in which interest rates are next scheduled to adjust rather than in the period they are due to mature. Although regular savings, demand, interest-bearing checking, and money market deposit accounts are subject to immediate withdrawal, based on historical experience, Management considers a substantial amount of such accounts to be core deposits having significantly longer maturities. For the purpose of the gap analysis, these accounts have been assigned decay rates to reflect their longer effective maturities. If these accounts had been assumed to be short-term, the one-year cumulative gap of interest-sensitive assets would have been a negative $3.59 billion, or negative 22.19% of total assets at December 31, 2024. Interest-bearing liabilities for this table exclude certain non-interest-bearing deposits that are included in the average balance calculations.

Management is aware of the sources of interest rate risk and actively monitors and manages it to the extent possible. The Bank’s objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to reduce volatility in net interest income and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish this objective, the Bank uses interest rate swaps as part of its interest rate risk management strategy. The Bank enters into interest rate swaps with certain qualifying commercial loan clients. The Bank simultaneously enters into interest rate swaps with dealer counterparties, with identical notional amounts and terms. The net result of these interest rate swaps is that the client pays a fixed rate of interest and the Bank receives a floating rate.

Based on our analysis of the interest rate risk scenarios and our strategies for managing our risk, Management believes our current level of interest rate risk is reasonable.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our primary sources of funds are deposits, borrowings, proceeds from loan principal and interest payments and sales of loans, and the maturity of and interest income on mortgage-backed and investment securities. While maturities and scheduled amortization of loans and mortgage-backed securities are a predictable source of funds, deposit flows and mortgage prepayments are greatly influenced by market interest rates, economic conditions, competition and our pricing strategies.

Our primary investing activity is the origination of loans and, in certain periods, the purchase of securities or loans. During the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, our loan originations, including originations of loans held for sale, exceeded our loan repayments by $984.7 million and $886.8 million, respectively. There were $4.7 million of loans purchased during the year ended December 31, 2024, and no loans purchased during the year ended December 31, 2023. During the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, we received proceeds of $435.3 million and $280.6 million, respectively, from the sale of loans. Securities purchased during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 totaled $63.2 million and $58.2 million, respectively, and securities repayments, maturities and sales in those same periods were $369.9 million and $600.4 million, respectively.

Our primary funding source is deposits. Total deposits increased by $484.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2024, with core deposits increasing $462.7 million and certificates of deposit increasing $22.2 million. At December 31, 2024, core deposits totaled $12.01 billion, or 89%, of total deposits, compared with $11.55 billion, or 89% of total deposits at December 31, 2023. The increase in core deposits compared to the prior year quarter primarily reflects increases in interest-bearing transaction and savings accounts. Certificates of deposit are generally more vulnerable to competition and more price sensitive than other retail deposits and our pricing of those deposits varies significantly based upon our liquidity management strategies at any point in time. At December 31, 2024, certificates of deposit totaled $1.50 billion, or 11% of our total deposits, including $1.45 billion which were scheduled to mature within one year. Certificates of deposit totaled 11% of our total deposits at December 31, 2023.

We had $290.0 million of FHLB advances at December 31, 2024, compared to $323.0 million at December 31, 2023. Other borrowings at December 31, 2024 decreased $57.6 million to $125.3 million from December 31, 2023. Both the FHLB advances and other borrowings outstanding at December 31, 2024 mature during 2025.

We must maintain an adequate level of liquidity to ensure the availability of sufficient funds to accommodate deposit withdrawals, support loan growth, satisfy financial commitments and take advantage of investment opportunities. We use our sources of funds primarily to fund loan growth and deposit outflows. At December 31, 2024, we had outstanding loan commitments totaling $3.97 billion, primarily relating to undisbursed loans in process and unused credit lines. While representing potential growth in the loan portfolio and lending activities, this level of commitments is proportionally consistent with our historical experience and does not represent a departure from normal operations. For the year ending December 31, 2025, we have $18.9 million of purchase obligations under contracts with our key vendors to provide services, mainly information technology related contracts. In addition, at December 31, 2024, we had $14.1 million of commitments under operating lease agreements.

We generally maintain sufficient cash and readily marketable securities to meet short-term liquidity needs; however, our primary liquidity management practice to supplement deposits is to increase or decrease short-term borrowings, including FHLB advances and Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (FRBSF) borrowings. We maintain credit facilities with the FHLB, subject to collateral requirements and a sufficient level of ownership of FHLB stock. At December 31, 2024, under these credit facilities based on pledged collateral, the Bank had $2.95 billion of available credit capacity. Advances under these credit facilities totaled $290.0 million at December 31, 2024. In addition, the Bank has been approved for participation in the FRBSF’s Borrower-In-Custody program. Under this program, based on pledged collateral, the Bank had available lines of credit of approximately $1.52 billion as of December 31, 2024, subject to certain collateral requirements, namely the collateral type and risk rating of eligible pledged loans. We had no funds borrowed from the FRBSF at December 31, 2024 or 2023. At December 31, 2024, the Bank also had uncommitted federal funds line of credit agreements with other financial institutions totaling $125.0 million. No balances were outstanding under these agreements as of December 31, 2024 or 2023. Availability of lines is subject to federal funds balances available for loan and continued borrower eligibility. These lines are intended to support short-term liquidity needs and the agreements may restrict consecutive day usage. Management believes it has adequate resources and funding potential to meet our foreseeable liquidity requirements.

Banner is a separate legal entity from the Bank and, on a stand-alone level, must provide for its own liquidity and pay its own operating expenses and cash dividends. During 2024, Banner and the Bank entered into an intercompany loan agreement for $50.0 million, which reduced Banner’s cash balance while maintaining liquidity with the note receivable from the Bank. The note has a term of one year, automatically renewable each quarter. The note eliminates upon consolidation.

Banner’s primary sources of funds consist of capital raised through dividends or capital distributions from the Bank, although there are regulatory restrictions on the ability of the Bank to pay dividends. We currently expect to continue our current practice of paying quarterly cash dividends on our common stock, subject to our Board of Directors’ discretion to modify or terminate this practice at any time and for any reason without prior notice. Our current quarterly common stock dividend rate is $0.48 per share, as approved by our Board of Directors, which we believe is a dividend rate per share which enables us to balance our multiple objectives of managing and investing in the Bank, and returning a substantial portion of our cash to our shareholders. Assuming continued dividend payments during 2025 at this rate of $0.48 per share, our average total dividend paid each quarter would be approximately $16.5 million based on the number of outstanding shares at December 31, 2024. At December 31, 2024, Banner (on an unconsolidated basis) had liquid assets of $75.7 million.

During the year ended December 31, 2024, total shareholders’ equity increased $121.6 million to $1.77 billion. At December 31, 2024, tangible common shareholders’ equity, a non-GAAP financial measure which excludes goodwill and other intangible assets, was $1.40 billion, or 8.84% of tangible assets. See “Executive Overview - Non-GAAP Financial Measures” above for a reconciliation of total shareholders’ equity to tangible common shareholders’ equity.

Capital Requirements

Banner is a bank holding company registered with the Federal Reserve. Bank holding companies are subject to capital adequacy requirements of the Federal Reserve under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, and the regulations of the Federal Reserve. The Bank, as a state-chartered, federally insured commercial bank, is subject to the capital requirements established by the FDIC.

The capital adequacy requirements are quantitative measures established by regulation that require Banner and the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of capital. The Federal Reserve requires Banner to maintain capital adequacy that generally parallels the FDIC requirements. The FDIC requires the Bank to maintain minimum capital ratios of total capital, tier 1 capital, and common equity tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets as well as tier 1 leverage capital to average assets. In addition to the minimum capital ratios, the Bank must maintain a capital conservation buffer consisting of additional common equity tier 1 capital greater than 2.5% of risk-weighted assets above the required minimum levels in order to avoid limitations on paying dividends, engaging in share repurchases, and paying discretionary bonuses. At December 31, 2024, Banner and the Bank each exceeded all current regulatory capital requirements to be “well capitalized” and the fully phased-in capital conservation buffer requirement.

The following table shows the regulatory capital ratios for Banner and the Bank as of December 31, 2024.

Table 23: Regulatory Capital Ratios

The Management of Banner is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act). A control procedure, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that its objectives are met. Also, because of the inherent limitations in all control procedures, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. Additionally, in designing disclosure controls and procedures, our Management was necessarily required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible disclosure controls and procedures. The design of any disclosure controls and procedures is also based, in part, upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. As a result of these inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Further, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures: An evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act) was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and several other members of our senior management as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on their evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of December 31, 2024, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that the information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is (i) accumulated and communicated to our management (including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer) in a timely manner, and (ii) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.

(b) Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting: There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of the period covered by this Form 10-K that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting: Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we included a report of Management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal controls beginning on page 74 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024. The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, Moss Adams LLP, which audited the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2024 (included in Item 8 of this annual report), has issued an audit report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting beginning on page 75 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.