Pediatrix Medical Group, Inc.: Form 10-K for the period ended Dec 31, 2024

OVERVIEW

Pediatrix is a leading provider of physician services including newborn, maternal-fetal, and other pediatric subspecialty care. Our national network is comprised of affiliated physicians who provide clinical care in 36 states. During 2024, we formalized our practice portfolio management plans, resulting in a decision to exit almost all of our affiliated office-based practices, other than maternal-fetal medicine. As of December 31, 2024, these plans were completed. Additionally, we exited our primary and urgent care service line during 2024 based on a review of the cost and time that would be required to build the platform to scale. At December 31, 2024, our national network comprised approximately 2,335 affiliated physicians, including 1,335 physicians who provide neonatal clinical care, primarily within hospital-based neonatal intensive care units (“NICUs”), to babies born prematurely or with medical complications. We have over 490 affiliated physicians who provide maternal-fetal and obstetrical medical care to expectant mothers experiencing complicated pregnancies primarily in areas where our affiliated neonatal physicians practice. Our network also includes other pediatric subspecialists, including 240 physicians providing hospital-based pediatric care, over 230 physicians providing pediatric intensive care, and 20 physicians providing pediatric surgical care.

Pediatrix Medical Group, Inc. was incorporated in Florida in 2007, and is the successor to PMG Services, Inc., which was formerly known as Pediatrix Medical Group, Inc. and was incorporated in Florida in 1979. Our principal executive offices are located at 1301 Concord Terrace, Sunrise, Florida 33323 and our telephone number is (954) 384-0175.

OUR PHYSICIAN SPECIALTIES AND SERVICES

The following discussion describes our physician specialties and the care that we provide, either directly or through our affiliated professional contractors:

Neonatal Care

We provide clinical care to babies born prematurely or with complications within specific units at hospitals, primarily NICUs, through our network of affiliated neonatal physician subspecialists (“neonatologists”), neonatal nurse practitioners and other pediatric clinicians, who staff and manage clinical activities at over 350 NICUs in 30 states. Neonatologists are board-certified, or eligible-to-apply-for-certification, physicians who have extensive education and training for the care of babies born prematurely or with complications that require complex medical treatment. Neonatal nurse practitioners are registered nurses who have advanced training and education in assessing and treating the healthcare needs of newborns and infants as well as managing the needs of their families.

We partner with our hospital clients in an effort to enhance the quality of care delivered to premature and sick babies. Some of the nation's largest and most prestigious hospitals, including both not-for-profit and for-profit institutions, retain us to staff and manage their NICUs. Our affiliated neonatologists generally provide 24-hours-a-day, seven-days-a-week coverage in NICUs, support the local referring physician community and are available for consultation in other hospital departments. Our hospital partners benefit from our experience in managing complex intensive care units. Our neonatal physicians interact with colleagues across the country through an internal communications system to draw upon their collective expertise in managing challenging patient-care issues. Our neonatal physicians also work collaboratively with maternal-fetal medicine subspecialists to coordinate the care of mothers experiencing complicated pregnancies and their fetuses.

Maternal-Fetal Care

We provide inpatient and office-based clinical care to expectant mothers and their unborn babies through our affiliated maternal-fetal medicine subspecialists, obstetricians and other clinicians, such as maternal-fetal medicine nurse practitioners, certified nurse mid-wives, sonographers and genetic counselors. Maternal-fetal medicine subspecialists are board-certified, or eligible-to-apply-for-certification, obstetricians who have extensive education and training for the treatment of high-risk expectant mothers and their fetuses. Our affiliated maternal-fetal medicine subspecialists practice primarily in metropolitan areas where we have affiliated neonatologists to provide coordinated care for women with complicated pregnancies whose babies are often admitted to a NICU upon delivery. We believe continuity of treatment from mother and developing fetus during the pregnancy to the newborn upon delivery has improved the clinical outcomes of our patients.

Other Pediatric Subspecialty Care

Our network includes other pediatric subspecialists such as pediatric intensivists, pediatric hospitalists and pediatric surgeons, among others. In addition, our affiliated physicians seek to provide support services in other areas of hospitals, particularly in the pediatric emergency room, labor and delivery area, and nursery and pediatric departments, where immediate accessibility to specialized care may be critical.

Pediatric Intensive Care. Pediatric intensivists are hospital-based pediatricians with additional education and training in caring for critically ill or injured children and adolescents. Our affiliated physicians who provide this clinical care staff and manage pediatric intensive care units (“PICUs”) at over 60 hospitals.

Pediatric Hospitalists. Pediatric hospitalists are hospital-based pediatricians specializing in inpatient care and management of acutely ill children. Our affiliated hospital-based physicians provide this inpatient pediatric and newborn care in PICUs, well-born nurseries and pediatric emergency rooms at over 50 hospitals.

Pediatric Surgery. Pediatric surgeons provide specialized care for patients ranging from newborns to adolescents, for all problems or conditions that require surgical intervention, and often have particular expertise in the areas of neonatal, prenatal, trauma and pediatric oncology. Our affiliated physicians in this subspecialty include pediatric plastic and craniofacial surgeons and general and thoracic pediatric surgeons. Areas of particular expertise include management of neonatal and congenital anomalies, prenatal counseling, trauma management, pediatric oncology, gastrointestinal surgery, as well as common pediatric surgical conditions.

Other Newborn and Pediatric Care. Because our affiliated physicians and advanced nurse practitioners generally provide hospital-based coverage, they are situated to provide highly specialized care to address medical needs that may arise during a baby’s hospitalization. For example, as part of our ongoing efforts to support and partner with hospitals and the local referring physician community, our affiliated neonatologists, pediatric hospitalists and advanced nurse practitioners provide in-hospital nursery care to newborns through our newborn nursery program. This program is made available for babies during their hospital stay, which in the case of healthy babies typically consists of evaluation and observation, following which they are referred, and their hospital records are provided, to their pediatricians or family practitioners for follow-up care.

Newborn Hearing Screening Program. Our affiliated physicians also oversee our newborn hearing screening program. Since we launched this program in 1994, we believe that we have become the largest provider of newborn hearing screening services in the United States. In 2024, we screened over 805,000 babies for potential hearing loss at 340 hospitals across the nation. Over 40 states either require newborns to be screened for potential hearing loss before being discharged from the hospital or require that parents be offered the opportunity to submit their newborns to hearing screens. We contract or coordinate with hospitals to provide newborn hearing screening services.

Clinical Research, Education, Quality and Safety

As part of our ongoing commitment to improving patient care through evidence-based medicine, we also conduct clinical research, monitor clinical outcomes and implement clinical quality initiatives with a view to improving patient outcomes, shortening the length of hospital stays and reducing long-term health system costs. Our physician-centric approach to clinical research and continuous quality improvement has demonstrated improvements in clinical outcomes, while reducing the costs of care associated with complications as well as variability in protocols. We provide extensive continuing medical and nursing education to our affiliated clinicians in an effort to ensure that they have access to current treatment methodologies, national best practices and evidence-based guidelines. We believe that referring and collaborating physicians, hospitals, third-party payors and patients all benefit from our clinical research, education, quality and safety initiatives.

DEMAND FOR OUR SERVICES

Hospital-Based Care. Hospitals generally must provide cost-effective, quality care in order to enhance their reputations within their communities and desirability to patients, referring and collaborating physicians and third-party payors. In an effort to improve outcomes and manage costs, hospitals typically employ or contract with physician specialists to provide specialized care in many hospital-based units or settings. Hospitals traditionally staff these units or settings through affiliations with local physician groups or independent practitioners. However, management of these units and settings presents significant operational challenges, including variable admissions rates, increased operating costs, complex reimbursement systems and other administrative burdens. As a result, some hospitals choose to contract with physician organizations that have the clinical quality initiatives, information and reimbursement systems and management expertise required to effectively and efficiently operate these units and settings in the current healthcare environment. With continuing shifts to value-based reimbursement models, we anticipate that hospitals will continue to seek out experienced organizations with documented success in improving quality indicators and reducing costs. Demand for hospital-based physician services, including neonatology, is determined by a national market in which qualified physicians with advanced training compete for hospital contracts.

Neonatal Medicine. Of the over 3.6 million births in the United States annually, we estimate that 14%-15% require NICU admission. Numerous institutions conduct research to identify potential causes of premature birth and medical complications that often require NICU admission. Some common contributing factors include the presence of hypertension or diabetes in the mother, lack of prenatal care, complications during pregnancy, drug and alcohol abuse and smoking or poor nutritional habits during pregnancy. Babies admitted to NICUs typically have an illness or condition that requires the care of a neonatologist. Babies who are born prematurely or have a low birth weight often require neonatal intensive care services because of an increased risk for medical complications. We believe obstetricians generally prefer to perform deliveries at hospitals that provide a full complement of labor and delivery services, including a NICU staffed by board-certified, or eligible-to-apply-for-certification, neonatologists. Because obstetrics is a significant source of hospital admissions, hospital administrators have responded to these demands by establishing NICUs and contracting with independent neonatology group practices, such as our affiliated professional contractors, to staff and manage these units. As a result, NICUs within the United States tend to be concentrated in hospitals with higher volumes of births. There are approximately 7,300 board-certified neonatologists in the United States.

Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Expectant mothers with pregnancy complications often seek or are referred by their obstetricians to maternal-fetal medicine subspecialists. These subspecialists provide inpatient and office-based care to women with conditions such as diabetes, heart disease, hypertension, multiple gestation, recurrent miscarriage, family history of genetic diseases, suspected fetal birth defects and other complications during their pregnancies. We believe that improved maternal-fetal care has a positive impact on neonatal outcomes. Data on neonatal outcomes demonstrates that, in general, the likelihood of mortality or an adverse condition or outcome (referred to as “morbidity”) is reduced the longer a baby remains in the womb. There are approximately 3,000 board-certified maternal-fetal medicine subspecialists in the United States.

Other Pediatric Subspecialty Medicine. Other areas of pediatric subspecialty medicine are closely associated with maternal-fetal-newborn medical care. For example, pediatric intensivists are subspecialists who care for critically ill or injured children and adolescents in PICUs. There are approximately 3,100 board-certified pediatric intensivists in the United States. As another example, pediatric hospitalists are pediatricians who provide care in many hospital areas, including labor and delivery and the newborn nursery. In addition, pediatric surgeons provide specialized care for patients ranging from newborns to adolescents, for all problems or conditions affecting children that require surgical intervention, and often have particular expertise in the areas of neonatal, prenatal, trauma, and pediatric oncology. There are approximately 1,200 board-certified pediatric surgeons in the United States.

Physician Practice Administration. Administrative demands and cost containment pressures from a number of sources, principally commercial and government payors, make it increasingly difficult for physicians to effectively manage patient care, remain current on the latest procedures and efficiently administer non-clinical activities. As a result, we believe that physicians remain receptive to being affiliated with larger organizations that reduce administrative burdens, achieve economies of scale and provide value-added clinical research, education and quality initiatives. By relieving many of the burdens associated with the management of a subspecialty group practice, we believe that our practice administration services permit our affiliated physicians to focus on providing quality patient care and thereby contribute to improving patient outcomes, ensuring appropriate length of hospital stays and reducing long-term health system costs. In addition, our national network of affiliated physician practices, modeled around a traditional group practice structure, is managed by a non-clinical professional management team with proven abilities to achieve significant operating efficiencies in providing administrative support systems, interacting with physicians, hospitals and third-party payors, managing information systems and technologies, and complying with applicable laws, rules and regulations.

OUR BUSINESS STRATEGY

Our business objective is to enhance our position as a leading provider of physician and other complementary healthcare services. The key elements of our strategy to achieve this objective are:

• Build Upon Core Competencies. We have developed significant administrative expertise relating to our practice physician services. We have also facilitated the development of a clinical approach to the practice of medicine among our affiliated physicians through clinical data warehouses that include research, education and quality initiatives intended to advance the practice of medicine and care, improve the quality of care provided to our patients and reduce long-term health system costs. Analysis of the data within our clinical data warehouses across our neonatology and other pediatric subspecialty services allows us to provide feedback to our physicians and hospital partners and to develop and implement best practices, all with the goal of improving outcomes, creating efficiencies and ensuring patient satisfaction. As healthcare organizations are expected to increasingly be held accountable for the quality and cost of the care that they provide, we believe that our ability to capture this data within our clinical data warehouses adds value to our patients and our hospital and physician partners.
• Utilize Enhanced Technology Solutions. We have introduced several technology-enabled solutions that we believe will improve the efficiency of the work our affiliated physicians do each day. These include a more streamlined charge capture system, a cloud-based image access and storage solution, continued development of our cloud-based neonatology-specific notes system and upgrades to our office-based practices electronic health record system that are designed to be better for our physicians and improve the patient-facing portal for our patients and their families. We plan to continue to find ways to supply real

time data to our affiliated physician practices so that they can have visibility to, and more importantly, manage patient volumes.

• Promote Same-Unit and Organic Growth. We seek opportunities for increasing revenue from our hospital-based and office-based operations. For example, our affiliated hospital-based neonatal, maternal-fetal and other pediatric physicians are well situated to, and, in some cases, provide physician services in other departments, such as pediatric emergency rooms, newborn nurseries, or in situations where immediate accessibility to specialized obstetric and pediatric care may be critical. Our affiliated hospital-based and office-based physicians continue to pursue an organic growth strategy that involves working with our hospital partners to develop integrated service programs for which we become a provider of solutions across our existing service lines. An integrated program results in a broader offering of care across our specialties and permits the extension of our service lines in our markets. We have successfully executed this organic growth strategy and market partnership in many metropolitan areas and intend to continue this growth initiative in the future. In addition, we may pursue new contractual arrangements with hospitals, including possibly through joint ventures, either where we currently provide or do not currently provide physician services.

Additionally, with the goal of further expanding our organic growth, our national sales team pursues opportunities across our service lines by employing a targeting strategy with a specific focus and prioritization. This sales team works with existing hospital and other healthcare partners and also focuses on building new relationships with hospitals and other service providers to which we do not currently provide services in order to offer clinical and other solutions and respond to requests for proposals. Our growth teams are managed under one collaborative group that addresses acquisition and organic growth opportunities. The growth team partners with the operational leadership across each of our medical groups to execute our overall growth strategy.

• Adaptation of Telehealth. Our telehealth programs offer the latest in telemedicine, which is the use of telecommunication and information technology in order to provide clinical healthcare at a distance. Even before the COVID-19 pandemic, we focused on expanding our services in telemedicine as we have long expected that many pediatric subspecialties, as well as maternal-fetal medicine, would benefit in the future from having a robust platform in telemedicine. Telemedicine services are well documented as high quality, safe and efficient means of expanding physician services into metropolitan and rural communities. We have expanded our services to provide these remote programs to our hospital partners and to our existing service lines to supplement current coverage needs. We believe telehealth reduces overall healthcare spending, improves access to quality care and facilitates collaboration with specialists while improving patient engagement and satisfaction.
• Acquire Physician Practice Groups. We continue to seek to expand our operations by acquiring established physician practices in our core physician specialties. During 2024, we added one maternal-fetal medicine practice.
• Strengthen and Broaden Relationships With Our Partners. By managing many of the operational challenges associated with physician practices, encouraging clinical research, education, quality, and safety initiatives, and promoting timely intervention by our physicians, we believe that our business model is focused on improving the quality of care delivered to patients, promoting the appropriate length of their hospital stays and optimizing efficient use of health system resources. We believe that referring and collaborating physicians, hospitals, third-party payors and patients all benefit to the extent that we are successful in implementing our business model. In addition, we will concentrate efforts to become more responsive and proactive in strengthening and supporting our existing hospital and clinical practice relationships, as well as establishing new partnerships to expand the scope of our hospital-based, maternal-fetal medicine, hearing screening, and telehealth services that we provide. We focus our efforts in this area using a market-based approach and in each geographic area where we operate, we consider how we can solidify and/or expand our existing hospital, health system and clinical practice relationships and form new ones. We believe this is critical as hospitals and health systems seek to expand their service offerings and as the broader healthcare market seeks new solutions to operate more efficiently.

We also believe one of the greatest predictors of success in our partnerships at the hospital and health system level is a high degree of strategic alignment between our clinical leaders and our partners. This requires our clinicians to hone a skill set beyond just the practice of medicine. To this end, we maintain a Clinical Leadership Development Program where our affiliated clinicians from across the organization participate virtually and in person in a variety of leadership workshops to provide them with the best tools to foster positive productive relationships with our valued partners.

CLINICAL RESEARCH, EDUCATION, QUALITY AND SAFETY

As part of our patient focus and ongoing commitment to improving patient care through evidence-based medicine, we engage in clinical research, continuous quality improvement, safety and education initiatives. Our goal is to discover, understand and teach healthcare practices that enhance the abilities of clinicians to deliver quality care, thereby contributing to better patient outcomes and reduced long-term health care costs. These initiatives benefit our patients, clinicians, referring and collaborating physicians, hospital partners and third-party payors. Our goal is to enhance the value of our services, attract new and retain high-quality clinicians, improve clinical operations and enhance practice communication.

• Clinical Research. We conduct clinical research to discover ways to improve clinical care for our patients. We share our discoveries throughout the medical community by publishing our observations in peer-reviewed medical journals. To help facilitate and support research efforts, Pediatrix has a Research Advisory Committee (“RAC”). The goal of the RAC is to design, implement and maintain a program for clinical research oversight and support that enables our practices to conduct research that is safe, effective, financially viable and legally compliant. The RAC’s multi-disciplinary approach involves the collaboration of both clinical and business professionals, including finance, legal and compliance. With participating clinicians located throughout the country, the RAC supports a comprehensive scope of research efforts. This nationwide perspective allows us to better anticipate future needs and opportunities.
• Quality and Safety. Through the leadership of our affiliated clinicians, we have cultivated a culture of continuous quality improvement and safety, which is the cornerstone of our success and helps us to fulfill our mission. Our team of clinical experts leads and provides oversight of national quality and safety programs across various specialties and subspecialties.
• Continuous Quality Improvement (“CQI”). CQI initiatives are important for our clinicians. We provide our clinicians with the opportunity to collaborate and share best practices and facilitate access to valuable information, resources, and professional development tools. Our affiliated clinicians can identify areas for improvement, and then systematically monitor, study, learn, and implement change. Complex initiatives are derived and based on our long-standing CQI efforts, our value-based care initiatives, and various clinical quality collaboratives. Our quality metrics include standard clinical outcome reporting, trend analysis and threshold performance, which are provided to our affiliated clinicians.
• Patient Safety Organization (“PSO”). We have a federally-listed PSO, the mission of which is to improve the quality and safety of care rendered by our clinical providers through the collection and analysis of quality data. As a federally-listed PSO, our mission to improve the safety of care rendered is supported by the dissemination of best practices information and implementation of patient safety programs. We endorse High Reliability Organization (“HRO”) concepts to provide “Just Culture” training to our clinicians. The approach has been customized to meet our affiliated physician practices’ needs and is based on principles outlined by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (“AHRQ”), Institute for Healthcare Improvement, National Patient Safety Foundation and Team STEPPS, the teamwork system developed by the AHRQ and the Department of Defense.
• Education. We provide continuing medical and nursing education to our affiliated clinicians to ensure that they have access to current treatment methodologies, national best practices, and evidence-based guidelines. The Pediatrix Center for Research, Education, Quality and Safety is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education and accredited by the American Nurses Credentialing Center’s Commission on Accreditation. As an accredited provider of continuing medical

and nursing education, we offer a variety of live and online educational credit opportunities that can be accessed on demand by our providers and are in synergy with latest research publications and healthcare industry standards. We are continually expanding our learning materials to new subspecialties. In addition, each year, thousands of healthcare providers worldwide take advantage of educational programs hosted by Pediatrix. We believe that the number of clinicians both nationally and internationally who participate in these activities is evidence of the depth and breadth of our clinical expertise and position as an industry leader.

• Innovation. We believe collaborative innovation is a pathway towards excellence in research, education, quality and safety. Because of the critical role innovation plays, our team strives to integrate the latest technological advances, artificial or augmented intelligence, genomics and mobile applications into everyday care. Telehealth and mobile health, virtual reality, point-of-care diagnostics and advanced data analytics are currently shaping the future of medicine. Our team is actively engaged in integrating the latest innovations that can optimize clinical care delivery and augment our clinical research initiatives with the goal of further optimizing patient outcomes.

We believe that these initiatives have been enhanced by our integrated national presence together with our clinical and management information systems, which are an integral component of our clinical research and education activities. See “Our Information Systems.”

OUR INFORMATION SYSTEMS

We maintain several information systems that support our day-to-day operations, ongoing clinical initiatives and business analysis.

• BabySteps®. BabySteps is a clinical electronic documentation system used by our affiliated neonatal physicians and other clinicians to record clinical progress notes and certain laboratory reports and to provide them with a decision tree to assist them in certain situations with the selection of appropriate billing codes. During 2024, we focused on advancing the efficiency of clinical documentation, integration and interoperability, introducing new billing capabilities, and advancing the security posture of the BabySteps platform. We added new personalization features and practice specific templates to enhance and streamline the clinician experience and decrease clinician documentation burden, as well as hundreds of new integrations with hospital partners designed to increase workflow efficiency, decrease data entry errors, and advance our interoperability capabilities. We created two new modules, Newborn Express and Neo Express, to support charge capture and streamlined documentation of newborn and neonatology services, reducing the number of applications in use by clinicians, allowing for a simplified clinician experience and practice/organizational cost savings. In 2024, we received our initial HITRUST recognition for the BabySteps platform, validating our security posture both internally and with our external hospital partners. HITRUST is considered the gold standard for healthcare data security and compliance and is a certification that many of our hospital partners asked us to pursue. We believe HITRUST certification not only enhances our credibility in the industry, but also strengthens our commitment to protecting our patients’ data.
• Clinical Data Warehouse. BabySteps Cloud enables our affiliated physician practices to capture a consistent set of clinical information about the patients to whom we provide care. We de-identify and transfer data from the clinical documentation that resides in BabySteps to our “clinical data warehouse” that since inception has accumulated clinical information on more than 2.0 million patients and approximately 35 million patient days. With comprehensive reporting tools, our physicians can use this information to benchmark outcomes, enhance clinical decision-making and advance best practices at the bedside. Using a variety of clinical performance markers, our de-identified data warehouse also helps us track medication and procedure interactions, link treatments to outcomes and identify opportunities to enhance patient outcomes.
• pMD Charge Capture. Our electronic charge capture system is used to code and bill for pediatric intensive care clinicians, hospitalists, other hospital providers, as well as all hospital services delivered by our ambulatory providers. We also use administrative data derived from this system to drive quality assurance and quality improvement programs.
• Nextgen®. We have licensed the Nextgen Electronic Health Record (“EHR”) and Practice Management (“PM”), an integrated product line for our affiliated office-based physicians and other clinicians to record patient clinical documentation and manage the full revenue cycle. This product line provides additional benefits to our office-based practices, including clinical decision trees to assist physicians with the selection of compliant billing codes, medication management (including electronic prescription of controlled substance and prescription drug monitoring programs), promotion of consistent documentation, patient engagement tools, virtual visits and telemedicine tools, Artificial intelligence tools for streamlined clinician documentation, and data for research and education. We continue to evolve the NextGen EHR and PM to respond to regulatory updates and our evolving office-based services landscape.

Our management information systems are also an integral element of the billing and reimbursement process. We maintain systems that provide for electronic data interchange with payors that accept electronic submissions, including electronic claims submission, insurance benefits verification and claims processing and remittance advice, which enable us to track numerous and diverse third-party payor relationships and payment methods. Our information systems provide scalability and flexibility as payor groups upgrade their payment and reimbursement systems. We continually seek improvements to our systems to expedite the overall process, streamline information gathering from our clinical systems and improve efficiencies in the reimbursement process.

We maintain additional information systems designed to improve operating efficiencies of our affiliated practice groups, reduce physicians’ paperwork requirements and facilitate interaction among our affiliated physicians and their colleagues regarding patient care issues. Following the acquisition of a physician practice group, we implement systematic procedures to improve the acquired group’s operating and financial performance. One of our first steps is to convert a newly acquired group to our broad-based management information system. We also maintain a database management system to assist our business development and recruiting departments to identify potential practice group acquisitions and physician candidates.

PHYSICIAN PRACTICE GROUP ADMINISTRATION

We provide multiple administrative services to support the practice of medicine by our affiliated physicians and strive to improve operating efficiencies of our affiliated physician practice groups.

• Unit Management. A senior physician practicing medicine in each physician specialty or subspecialty practice that we manage acts as the medical director for that practice. Each medical director is responsible for the overall management of his or her practice, including staffing and scheduling, quality of care, professional discipline, utilization review, coordinating physician recruitment and monitoring the financial success within the practice. Medical directors also serve as a liaison with hospital administration, other physicians and the community.
• Staffing and Scheduling. We assist with staffing and scheduling physicians and advanced practice nurses within the units and practices that we manage. For example, each NICU is staffed by at least one specialist on site or available on call. We are responsible for managing and coordinating the process for the salaries and benefits paid and provided to our affiliated physicians and practitioners. In addition, we employ, compensate and manage all non-medical personnel for our affiliated physician practices.
• Recruiting and Credentialing. We have significant experience in locating, qualifying, recruiting, and retaining experienced physicians. We maintain an extensive nationwide database of neonatologists, maternal-fetal medicine physicians, and other pediatric subspecialty physicians. Our medical directors and physician leaders play a central role in the recruiting and interviewing process before candidates are introduced to other practice group physicians and hospital administrators. We verify the credentials, licenses and references of all prospective affiliated physician candidates. In addition to our database of physicians, we recruit nationally through trade advertising, referrals from our affiliated physicians and attendance at conferences.
• Billing, Collection and Reimbursement. We assume responsibility for assisting our affiliated physicians with contracting with third-party payors. We are responsible for billing, collection and reimbursement for services rendered by our affiliated physicians. In all instances, however, we do not assume responsibility for

charges relating to services provided by hospitals or other physicians with whom we collaborate. Such charges are separately billed and collected by the hospitals or other physicians. We provide our affiliated physicians and other clinicians with a training curriculum that emphasizes detailed documentation of and compliant coding protocols for all procedures performed and services provided, and we provide comprehensive internal auditing processes, all of which are designed to achieve compliant coding, billing and collection of revenue for physician services. We recently transformed our revenue cycle management function from an outsourced provider to a hybrid function that utilizes both our corporate personnel as well as one or more third-party service providers. See Item 1A. Risk Factors ─ “During 2024, we undertook a transformation of our revenue cycle management function from an outsourced provider to a hybrid function that utilizes both our corporate personnel as well as third-party service providers. Our failure to execute a hybrid revenue cycle management function efficiently and effectively may have a material impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and the trading price of our securities.”

• Risk Management. We maintain a risk management program focused on reducing risk, including the identification and communication of potential risk areas to our medical affairs staff. We maintain professional liability coverage for our national group of affiliated healthcare professionals. Through our risk management and medical affairs staff, we conduct risk management programs for loss prevention and early intervention in order to prevent or minimize professional liability claims.
• Compliance. We provide a multi-faceted compliance program that is designed to assist our affiliated practice groups in understanding and complying with the increasingly complex laws, rules and regulations that govern the provision of healthcare services.
• Other Services. We also provide management information systems, facilities management, legal support, marketing support and other services to our affiliated physicians and affiliated practice groups.

RELATIONSHIPS WITH OUR PARTNERS

Our business model, which has been influenced by the direct contact and daily interaction that our affiliated physicians have with their patients, emphasizes a patient-focused clinical approach that addresses the needs of our various “partners,” including hospitals, third-party payors, referring and collaborating physicians, affiliated physicians and, most importantly, our patients.

Hospitals and Other Customers

Our relationships with our hospital partners and other customers are critical to our operations. Hospitals control access to their units through the awarding of contracts and hospital privileges. We have been retained by approximately 395 hospitals to staff and manage clinical activities within specific hospital-based units and other departments. Our affiliated physicians are important components of obstetric, pediatric and surgical services provided at hospitals. Our hospital-based focus enhances our relationships with hospitals and creates opportunities for our affiliated physicians to provide patient care in other areas of the hospital. For example, our physicians may provide care in emergency rooms, nurseries, intensive care units and other departments where access to specialized obstetric and pediatric care may be critical. Our hospital partners benefit from our expertise in managing critical care units and other settings staffed with physician specialists, including managing variable admission rates, operating costs, complex reimbursement systems and other administrative burdens. We work with our hospital partners to enhance their reputation and market our services to referring physicians within the communities served by those hospitals. In addition, our affiliated physicians work with our hospital partners to develop integrated services programs for solutions within the services we provide. Integrated programs provide our hospital partners and us with incremental growth and result in a broader spectrum of care across our specialties and permit us to extend our patient service lines into our existing markets. Our relationships with our hospital partners are continually evolving with the goal of being viewed by them as a solutions provider across all of our specialties.

Under our contracts with hospitals, we have the responsibility to manage, in many cases exclusively, the provision of physician services for hospital-based units, such as NICUs, and other hospital settings. We typically are responsible for billing patients and third-party payors for services rendered by our affiliated physicians separately from other related charges billed by the hospital or other physicians to the same payors. Some of our hospital contracts require hospitals to pay us administrative fees. Some contracts provide for fees if the hospital does not generate sufficient patient volume in order to guarantee that we receive a specified minimum revenue level. We also receive fees from hospitals for administrative services performed by our affiliated physicians providing medical director services at the hospital. Administrative fees accounted for approximately 14% of our net revenue for 2024. Some of our contracts with hospitals require us to indemnify them and their affiliates for losses resulting from the negligence of our affiliated physicians. Our hospital contracts typically have terms of one to three years which can be terminated without cause by either party upon prior written notice, and renew automatically for additional terms of one to three years unless terminated early by any party. While we have in most cases been able to renew these arrangements, hospitals may cancel or not renew our arrangements, or reduce or eliminate our administrative fees in the future.

Third-Party Payors

Our relationships with government-sponsored or funded healthcare programs (“GHC Programs”), including Medicaid, and with managed care organizations and commercial health insurance payors are vital to our business. We seek to maintain professional working relationships with our third-party payors, streamline the administrative process of billing and collection, and assist our patients and their families in understanding their health insurance coverage and any balances due for co-payments, co-insurance, deductibles, or benefit limitations. In addition, through our quality initiatives and continuing research and education efforts, we have sought to enhance clinical care provided to patients, which we believe benefits third-party payors by contributing to improved patient outcomes and reduced long-term health system costs.

We receive compensation for professional services provided by our affiliated physicians to patients based upon rates for specific services provided, principally from third-party payors. Our billed charges are substantially the same for all parties in a particular geographic area, regardless of the party responsible for paying the bill for our services, but the payments we receive vary among payors. A significant portion of our net revenue is received from GHC Programs, principally state Medicaid programs.

Medicaid programs, which are jointly funded by the federal government and state governments, pay for medical and health-related services for certain categories of individuals and families generally who have low incomes or disabilities. Medicaid programs can be either standard fee-for-service payment programs or managed care programs in which states have contracted with health insurance companies to run local or state-wide health plans with features similar to health maintenance organizations. Our compensation rates under standard fee-for-service Medicaid programs are established by state governments and are not negotiated. Although Medicaid rates vary across the states, these rates are generally much lower in comparison to private-sector health plan rates. Rates under Medicaid managed care programs typically are negotiated but are also generally much lower in comparison to private-sector health plan rates.

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively, the “ACA”) allows states to expand their Medicaid programs to enroll more individuals through federal payments that fund most of the cost of increasing the Medicaid eligibility income limit from a state’s historical eligibility levels to 133% of the federal poverty level. As of December 31, 2024, 40 states and the District of Columbia have expanded Medicaid eligibility to cover this additional low-income patient population (including states that have adopted but not yet implemented expansion and those that are using an alternative approach to eligibility expansion) and other states are considering such expansion. All of the states in which we operate, however, already cover children in the first year of life and pregnant women if their household income is at or below 133% of the federal poverty level, and some states offer expanded coverage, with state eligibility thresholds that may range from 133% to 400% of the federal poverty level based on a combination of federal mandates and voluntary state expansions. In light of changes to the ACA, some of these states may eliminate, reduce or otherwise modify expanded enrollment eligibility. See Item 1A. Risk Factors ─ “State budgetary constraints and the uncertainty over the future of Medicaid could have an adverse effect on our reimbursement from Medicaid programs” and “Potential healthcare reform efforts may have a significant effect on our business.”

In order to participate in GHC Programs, we and our affiliated physician practices must comply with stringent and often complex standards, including enrollment and reimbursement requirements. Different states also impose varying standards for their Medicaid programs. See “Government Regulation—Government Regulatory Requirements.”

We also receive compensation pursuant to contracts with commercial payors that offer a wide variety of health insurance products, such as health maintenance organizations, preferred provider organizations and exclusive provider organizations that are subject to various state laws and regulations, as well as employer-sponsored coverage subject to federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) requirements. We seek to secure mutually agreeable contracts with payors that enable our affiliated physicians to be listed as in-network participants within the payors’ provider networks. We generally contract with commercial payors through our affiliated professional contractors. Subject to applicable laws, rules and regulations, the terms, conditions and compensation rates of our contracts with commercial third-party payors are negotiated and often vary across markets and among payors. In some cases, we contract with organizations that establish and maintain provider networks and then rent or lease such networks to the actual payor. Our contracts with commercial payors typically provide for discounted fee-for-service arrangements. Our contracts with commercial payors typically also grant each party the right to terminate the contracts without cause upon prior written notice and various notice periods.

If we do not have a contractual relationship with a health insurance payor, we generally bill the payor our full billed charges. If payment is less than billed charges, we bill the balance to the patient, subject to the requirements of the No Surprises Act (“NSA”) and other federal and state laws regulating such billing, which Congress or states may continue to enact. See Item 1A. Risk Factors – “Congress or states have, and may continue to, enact laws restricting the amount out-of-network providers of services can charge and recover for such services.” In addition, these contracts generally give commercial payors the right to audit our billings and related reimbursements for professional and other services provided by or through our affiliated physicians.

Although we maintain standard billing and collections procedures with appropriate discounts for prompt payment, we also provide discounts in certain hardship situations where patients and their families do not have financial resources necessary to pay the amount due for services rendered. Any amounts written off are based on the specific facts and circumstances related to each individual patient account.

Referring and Collaborating Physicians

Our relationships with our referring and collaborating physicians are critical to our success. Our affiliated physicians seek to establish and maintain professional relationships with referring physicians in the communities where they practice. Because patient volumes in our NICUs are based in part on referrals from other physicians, particularly obstetricians, it is important that we are responsive to the needs of referring physicians in the communities in which we operate. We believe that our community presence, through our hospital coverage and outpatient clinics, assists referring obstetricians, office-based pediatricians and family physicians with their practices. Our affiliated physicians provide comprehensive maternal-fetal, newborn and pediatric subspecialty care to patients using the latest advances in methodologies, supporting the local referring physician community with 24-hours-a-day, seven-days-a-week on-site or on-call coverage.

Affiliated Physicians and Practice Groups

Our relationships with our affiliated physicians are important. Our affiliated physicians are organized in traditional practice group structures. In accordance with applicable state laws, our affiliated practice groups are responsible for the provision of medical care to patients. Our affiliated practice groups are separate legal entities organized under state law as business corporations or professional associations, professional corporations, limited liability companies and partnerships, which we sometimes refer to as our “affiliated professional contractors”. Each of our affiliated professional contractors is owned by a licensed physician affiliated with the Company through employment or another contractual relationship. Our national infrastructure enables more effective and efficient sharing of new discoveries and clinical outcomes data, including best demonstrated processes, access to our sophisticated information systems, clinical research, and education.

Our business corporations and affiliated professional contractors employ or contract with physicians to provide clinical services in certain states. In most of our affiliated practice groups, each physician has entered into an employment agreement with us or one of our affiliated professional contractors providing for a base salary and incentive bonus eligibility and typically having a term of three to five years. We are typically responsible for billing patients and third-party payors on behalf of our affiliated professional contractors for services rendered by our affiliated physicians and, with respect to services provided in a hospital, separately from other charges billed by hospitals to the same payors. Each physician must hold a valid license to practice medicine in the state in which they provide patient care and must become a member of the medical staff, with appropriate clinical privileges, at each hospital at which they practice. Substantially all the physicians employed by us or our affiliated professional contractors have agreed not to compete within a specified geographic area during employment and for a certain period after termination of employment. Although we believe that the non-competition covenants of our affiliated physicians are reasonable in scope and duration and therefore generally enforceable under applicable state laws, we cannot predict whether a court or arbitration panel would enforce these covenants in any particular case. See Item 1A. Risk Factors–“A significant number of our affiliated physicians or other clinicians could leave our affiliated physician practices or our affiliated physician practices may be unable to enforce the non-competition covenants of departed physicians.” Our hospital contracts also typically require that we and the physicians performing services maintain minimum levels of professional and general liability insurance. We negotiate those policies and contract and pay the premiums for such insurance on behalf of the physicians.

Each of our affiliated professional contractors has entered into a comprehensive management agreement with a subsidiary of Pediatrix as the manager. Under the terms of these management agreements, and subject to state laws and other regulations, the manager is typically paid for its services based on the performance of the applicable practice group. See “Government Regulation—Fee Splitting; Corporate Practice of Medicine.”

COMPETITION

The physician services industry is highly fragmented. Competition in our business is generally based upon a number of factors, including reputation, experience and level of care and our affiliated physicians’ ability to provide cost-effective, quality clinical care. The nature of competition for our hospital-based practices differs significantly from competition for our office-based practices. Our hospital-based practices compete nationally with other health services companies and physician groups for hospital contracts and qualified physicians. In some instances, our hospital-based physicians also compete on a regional or local basis. For example, our neonatologists compete for referrals from local physicians and transports from surrounding hospitals. Our maternal-fetal medicine practices compete for patients with other office-based practices in this specialty.

Hospitals control access to their NICUs by awarding contracts and hospital clinical privileges, and our relationships with our hospital partners are critical to our operations. Because our operations consist primarily of physician services provided within hospital-based units, we compete with others for contracts with hospitals to provide services. We also compete with hospitals themselves to provide such services. Hospitals may employ neonatologists directly or contract with other physician groups to provide services either on an exclusive or non-exclusive basis. A hospital not otherwise competing with us may begin to do so by opening a new NICU or operating facility, expanding the capacity of an existing NICU, or, in the case of neonatal services, upgrading the level of its existing NICU. If the hospital chooses to do so, it may award the contract to operate the relevant facility to a competing group or company from within or outside the surrounding community. Our contracts with hospitals generally provide that they may be terminated without cause upon prior written notice.

The broader healthcare industry is also highly competitive. Companies in other segments of the industry as well as healthcare-focused and other private equity firms, some of which have financial and other resources greater than ours, may become competitors in providing neonatal, maternal-fetal and other pediatric subspecialty care.

GOVERNMENT REGULATION

The healthcare industry is governed by a framework of federal and state laws, rules and regulations that are extensive and complex and for which, in many cases, the industry has the benefit of only limited judicial and regulatory interpretation. The resources and costs required to comply with these laws, rules and regulations are high. If we or one of our affiliated practice groups or service businesses is found to have violated these laws, rules or regulations, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially, adversely affected. The ACA made numerous changes that have reshaped the United States healthcare delivery system. Further healthcare reform continues to attract significant legislative and administrative interest, legal challenges, regulatory and compliance requirements, new approaches and public attention that create uncertainty and the potential for additional changes. Healthcare reform implementation, additional legislation or regulations, and other changes in government policy or regulation may affect our reimbursement, restrict our existing operations, limit the expansion of our business or impose additional compliance requirements and costs, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and the trading price of our securities. See Item 1A. Risk Factors ─ “Potential healthcare reform efforts may have a significant effect on our business.” Additional changes at the state level, including changes in Medicaid Program administration, eligibility and coverage, as well as changes in the regulatory framework governing the provision of telemedicine services, and other legal developments, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and the trading price of our securities.

Licensing and Certification

Each state imposes licensing requirements on individual physicians and clinical professionals, and on facilities operated or utilized by healthcare companies like us. Many states require regulatory approval, including certificates of need, before establishing certain types of healthcare facilities, offering certain services or expending amounts in excess of statutory thresholds for healthcare equipment, facilities or programs. We and our affiliated physicians are also required to meet applicable Medicare supplier requirements under federal laws, rules and regulations and Medicaid provider requirements under federal and state laws, rules and regulations.

Fee Splitting; Corporate Practice of Medicine

Many states have laws that limit business corporations, such as Pediatrix, from practicing medicine, employing physicians to practice medicine, exercising control over medical decisions by physicians, or engaging in certain arrangements, such as fee splitting, with physicians. In light of these restrictions, we operate by maintaining long-term management contracts through our subsidiaries with affiliated professional contractors, which employ or contract with physicians to provide professional medical services. Under these arrangements, our manager subsidiaries perform only non-medical administrative services, do not represent that they offer medical services and do not exercise influence or control over the practice of medicine by the physicians and other licensed health professionals employed by the affiliated professional contractors. In states where fee splitting with a business corporation or manager is prohibited, the fees that are received from the affiliated professional contractors have been established on a basis that we believe complies with applicable laws, including that the management fee we receive is within fair market value for the services that we provide. Although the relevant laws in these states have been subject to limited judicial and regulatory interpretation, we believe that we are in compliance with applicable state laws in relation to the corporate practice of medicine and fee splitting. However, regulatory authorities or other parties, including our affiliated physicians, may assert that, despite these arrangements, we or our manager subsidiaries are engaged in the corporate practice of medicine or that the contractual arrangements with the affiliated professional contractors constitute unlawful fee splitting, in which case we or our affiliated physicians could be subject to administrative, civil or criminal remedies or penalties, the contracts could be found to be legally invalid and unenforceable, in whole or in part, or we could be required to restructure our contractual arrangements with our affiliated professional contractors.

Fraud and Abuse Provisions

Existing federal laws, as well as similar state laws, governing Medicare, Medicaid, other GHC Programs and other non-governmental arrangements and interactions, impose a variety of fraud and abuse prohibitions on healthcare companies like us. These laws are interpreted broadly and enforced aggressively by multiple government agencies, including the Office of Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services (“OIG”), the Department of Justice (“DOJ”), Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Service (“CMS”), and various state agencies.

Federal and state fraud and abuse laws apply to and affect our financial relationships and other ordinary and common business interactions with hospitals, referring physicians and other healthcare entities. In particular, the federal Anti-Kickback Statute makes it a crime to knowingly and willfully solicit, receive, offer, or pay any remuneration, in cash or in kind, directly or indirectly, in return for either referring items or services for which payment may be made in whole or in part by a GHC Program or purchasing, leasing, ordering, or arranging for or recommending the purchase, lease, or ordering of any service or item for which payment may be made in whole or in part by a GHC Program. In addition, the federal Physician Self-Referral law, commonly known as the “Stark Law,”

is a strict liability statute that prohibits a physician from making a referral to an entity for certain “designated health services” payable by Medicare if the physician, or an immediate family member of the physician, has a financial relationship with that entity, unless an exception applies. The entity is further prohibited from billing the Medicare program for designated health services furnished pursuant to a prohibited referral. The term “designated health services” includes, among other things, inpatient and outpatient hospital services, home health services, and clinical laboratory services. Further, the Stark Law, through the addition of section 1903(s) to the Social Security Act, prohibits the federal government from making federal financial participation payments to state Medicaid programs for designated health services furnished as a result of a referral that would violate the Stark Law if Medicare “covered the service to the same extent and under the same terms and conditions” as the state Medicaid Program. The DOJ and several state agencies have successfully argued that Section 1903(s) expands the Stark Law to Medicaid-covered claims, even absent a separate state self-referral law prohibiting the same conduct. These laws have been broadly interpreted by federal courts and agencies, and potentially subject many healthcare business arrangements to government investigation, enforcement and prosecution, which can be costly and time consuming, even if the business is ultimately found not to be in violation of any applicable law. Additionally, many of the states in which we operate also have similar anti-kickback and self-referral laws that apply to our government and non-government business, including in some cases, to patient self-pay services.

Violations of these laws are punishable by substantial penalties and other remedies, including monetary fines, civil penalties, administrative remedies, criminal sanctions (in the case of the federal anti-kickback statute and certain state anti-kickback laws), exclusion from participation in GHC Programs and forfeiture of amounts collected in violation of such laws. The government may also assert that a claim to a GHC Program for covered items or services resulting from a violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the federal civil False Claims Act (“FCA”).

There are a variety of other types of federal and state fraud and abuse laws, including laws authorizing the imposition of criminal, civil and administrative penalties for submitting false or fraudulent claims for reimbursement to GHC Programs. These laws include the FCA, which prohibits knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, false claims to GHC Programs, including Medicare, Medicaid, TRICARE (the program for military dependents and retirees), the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program, and insurance plans purchased through the ACA insurance exchanges where payments include federal funds. The FCA also makes the knowing retention of an identified overpayment from a GHC Program a separate basis for FCA liability. Substantial civil fines and treble damages, along with other remedies, including exclusion from GHC Programs, can be imposed for violating the FCA. Furthermore, the FCA does not require that the individual or company that presented or caused to be presented an allegedly false claim have actual knowledge of its falsity. The statute applies where the individual or company acted in “reckless disregard” or in “deliberate ignorance” of the truth or falsity of the claim. The FCA includes “whistleblower” provisions that permit private citizens to sue a claimant on behalf of the government and share in the amounts recovered under the law. In recent years, many cases have been brought against healthcare companies by the government and by “whistleblowers,” which have resulted in judgments and settlements involving substantial payments to the government by the companies involved. The cost to defend against allegations, even when the government declines to intervene, can be substantial.

In addition, the Civil Monetary Penalties Law imposes substantial civil monetary penalties against a person or entity that engages in other prohibited activities, such as presenting or causing to be presented a claim to a GHC Program that the person knows or should know is for an item or service that was not provided as claimed or for a claim that is false or fraudulent, or providing remuneration to a GHC Program beneficiary that the person or entity knows or should know is likely to influence the beneficiary’s selection of a particular provider, practitioner or supplier. For additional information regarding the healthcare fraud and abuse laws described above, see Item 1A. Risk Factors–“ The healthcare industry is highly regulated, and government authorities may determine that we have failed to comply with applicable laws, rules or regulations.”

If we or our affiliated professional contractors were excluded from participation in any GHC Programs, not only would we be prohibited from submitting claims for reimbursement under such programs, but we also would be unable to contract with other healthcare providers, such as hospitals, to provide services to them. It could also adversely affect our or our affiliated professional contractors’ ability to contract with, or obtain payment from, non-governmental payors.

Although we intend to conduct our business in compliance with all applicable federal and state fraud and abuse laws, many of the laws, rules and regulations applicable to us, including those relating to billing and those relating to financial relationships with physicians and hospitals, are broadly worded and may be interpreted or applied by prosecutorial, regulatory or judicial authorities in ways that we cannot predict. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that our arrangements or business practices will not be subject to government scrutiny or be alleged or found to violate applicable fraud and abuse laws. If there is a determination by a government authority that we have not complied with any of these laws, rules and regulations, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially, adversely affected. See “Government Investigations.” Additionally, federal and state fraud and abuse laws, rules and regulations are not static and amendments, clarifications, revisions, or other modifications to these laws may occur from time to time. For instance, on December 2, 2020, both CMS and the OIG published Final Rules substantially modifying the Anti-Kickback Statute, Civil Monetary Penalty Law, and the Stark Law regulations to foster arrangements that would promote care coordination, advance the delivery of value-based care, and protect consumers from harms caused by fraud and abuse. Changes reflected in OIG and CMS’s Final Rules could affect our operations and may cause us to modify certain arrangements, transactions, or other financial relationships. In addition, CMS and OIG periodically issue Advisory Opinions in response to requests from industry stakeholders regarding proposed arrangements and whether such arrangements comply with applicable fraud and abuse laws. While Advisory Opinions are only directly applicable to the requestor of the opinion, they provide notice to healthcare industry participants of the types of conduct that government agencies find to be permissible or impermissible under the applicable laws. OIG also releases Special Advisory Bulletins to put industry stakeholders on notice of the agency’s views on common practices within industry segments that it finds to be violative of the Anti-Kickback Statute, and potentially other laws. These agency advisories, along with publicized litigation and enforcement actions, could cause us to modify certain arrangements, transactions, or other financial relationships, which could affect our operations and impact our financial performance.

Government Regulatory Requirements

In order to participate in the Medicare program and the various state specific Medicaid programs, we and our affiliated physician practices must comply with stringent and often complex regulatory requirements. While our compliance program requires that we and our affiliated physician practices adhere to the laws, rules and regulations applicable to the government programs in which we participate, our failure to comply with these laws, rules and regulations could negatively affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. See “Government Regulation—Fraud and Abuse Provisions,” “Government Regulation—Compliance Program,” “Government Investigations” and “Other Legal Proceedings,” and Item 1A. Risk Factors — “Government-funded programs, private insurers or state laws and regulations may limit, reduce or make retroactive adjustments to reimbursement amounts or rates,” “We may become subject to billing investigations by federal and state government authorities and private insurers” and “The healthcare industry is highly regulated, and government authorities may determine that we have failed to comply with applicable laws, rules or regulations.”

In addition, GHC Programs are subject to statutory and regulatory changes, administrative rulings, interpretations and determinations, manual guidance, requirements for utilization review and new governmental funding restrictions, all of which may materially increase or decrease program payments, as well as affect the cost of providing services and the timing of payments to providers. Moreover, because GHC Programs generally provide for reimbursement on a fee-schedule, per-service or per-discharge basis rather than on a charge-related basis, we generally cannot increase our revenue through increases in the amount we charge for our services. To the extent our costs increase, we may not be able to recover our increased costs from these programs, and cost containment measures and market changes in non-governmental insurance plans have generally restricted our ability to recover or shift these increased costs to non-governmental payors. In addition, the healthcare industry is increasing the use of value-based reimbursement methodologies and accordingly, our reimbursement may be dependent upon our ability to achieve quality targets that change year over year. See Item 1A. Risk Factors – “Potential healthcare reform efforts may have a significant effect on our business.” In attempts to limit federal and state spending, there have been, and we expect that there will continue to be, a number of proposals to limit or reduce Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement for various services. Our business may be significantly and adversely affected by any such changes in reimbursement policies and other legislative initiatives aimed at reducing healthcare costs associated with Medicare, Medicaid and other GHC Programs.

Our business also could be adversely affected by reductions in or limitations of funding of GHC Programs or restrictions on or elimination of coverage for certain individuals or treatments under these programs.

Antitrust

The healthcare industry is subject to close antitrust scrutiny. The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”), the Antitrust Division of the DOJ and state Attorneys General all actively review and, in some cases, take enforcement action against business conduct and acquisitions in the healthcare industry. Private parties harmed by alleged anticompetitive conduct can also bring antitrust suits. Violations of antitrust laws may be punishable by substantial penalties, including significant monetary fines, civil penalties, criminal sanctions, consent decrees and injunctions prohibiting certain activities or requiring divestiture or discontinuance of business operations. Any of these penalties could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and the trading price of our securities.

HIPAA and Other Privacy, Security and Breach Notification Laws

Numerous federal and state laws, rules and regulations govern the collection, dissemination, use, privacy, security and confidentiality of personal information. For example, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, as amended, and its implementing regulations (collectively, “HIPAA”) impose requirements to protect the privacy and security of protected health information (“PHI”) and to provide notification in the event of a breach of PHI. Violations of HIPAA are punishable by civil money penalties and, in some cases, criminal penalties and imprisonment. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) Office for Civil Rights (“OCR”), which is responsible for enforcing HIPAA, also may enter into resolution agreements requiring the payment of a civil money penalty and/or the establishment of a corrective action plan to address violations of HIPAA. HIPAA also authorizes state attorneys general to file suit under HIPAA on behalf of state residents. Courts can award damages, costs and attorneys' fees related to violations of HIPAA in such cases. As part of our business operations, including in connection with medical record keeping, third-party billing, research and other services, we and our affiliated physician practices collect and maintain PHI regarding patients, which subjects us to compliance with HIPAA requirements.

Pursuant to HIPAA, HHS has adopted privacy regulations, known as the privacy rule, to govern the use and disclosure of PHI (the “Privacy Rule”). The Privacy Rule applies to “Covered Entities,” which are health plans, health care clearinghouses, and health care providers that engage in standardized transactions under HIPAA, and “Business Associates,” which are entities that perform functions or services for or on behalf of Covered Entities that involve the use or disclosure of PHI. The term “Business Associate” also includes “Subcontractors,” which are any entity to which a Business Associate delegates any function, activity or service, other than in the capacity of a member of that Business Associate’s workforce. PHI is broadly defined as any individually identifiable health information transmitted or maintained in any form, including electronic, paper or oral. As a general rule, a Covered Entity or Business Associate may not use or disclose PHI except as permitted under the Privacy Rule. We have implemented privacy policies and procedures, including training programs, and signed Business Associate Agreements, designed to comply with the requirements of HIPAA and the Privacy Rule.

HHS has also adopted data security regulations (the “Security Rule”) that require Covered Entities and Business Associates to implement administrative, physical and technical safeguards to protect the integrity, confidentiality and availability of PHI that is electronically created, received, maintained or transmitted (such as between us and our affiliated physician practices). We have implemented security policies, procedures and systems, including training programs, designed to comply with the requirements set forth in the Security Rule.

In addition, in 2009, Congress enacted the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (“HITECH”) Act as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. Among other changes to the laws governing PHI, HITECH required OCR to strengthen and expand HIPAA requirements, increase penalties for violations, give patients new rights to restrict uses and disclosures of their PHI, and impose a number of privacy and security requirements directly on Business Associates. A Covered Entity can also be held liable for violations of HIPAA resulting from the acts or omissions of any Business Associate acting as its agent.

Under HIPAA, as amended by regulations promulgated pursuant to HITECH, Covered Entities are required to report any unauthorized use or disclosure of PHI that meets the definition of a breach to affected individuals, HHS and, depending on the number of affected individuals, the media for the affected market. In addition, HIPAA requires Business Associates to report breaches of PHI relating to a particular Covered Entity to that Covered Entity. HITECH further authorizes state Attorneys General to bring civil actions in response to violations of HIPAA that threaten the privacy of state residents. We have adopted breach notification policies and procedures designed to comply with the applicable requirements set forth in HIPAA, as amended by HITECH.

Numerous state and certain other federal laws are designed to protect the privacy and security of health information and other personal information, including but not limited to state medical privacy laws, state laws protecting personal information, state data breach notification laws, state genetic privacy laws, human subjects research laws and federal and state consumer protection laws. These additional federal and state privacy and security-related laws may be more restrictive than HIPAA and could impose additional compliance obligations. For example, the Federal Trade Commission uses its consumer protection authority under Section 5 of the Federal Trade Act to initiate enforcement actions in response to alleged privacy and security violations as well as data breaches. The California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”), which went into effect on January 1, 2020, among other things, created new data privacy obligations for covered companies and provides new privacy rights to California residents. The CCPA also created a private right of action with statutory damages for certain data breaches, thereby potentially increasing risks associated with a data breach. California recently amended and expanded CCPA through another ballot initiative, the California Privacy Rights Act (“CPRA”), passed on November 3, 2020 and made effective as of January 1, 2023. The CPRA also created a new agency, the California Privacy Protection Agency (“CPPA”), which is authorized to issue substantive regulations and has resulted in increased privacy and information security enforcement. The CCPA regulations also impose proscriptive requirements on businesses regarding how to properly demonstrate compliance with the law's requirements. The CPRA provides even greater rights to consumers with respect to their data, such as the right to correction, data portability, access to information about processing and profiling activities, and opt-out rights. Although there are limited exemptions for PHI and the CCPA's implementation standards and enforcement practices are likely to remain uncertain for the foreseeable future, the CCPA may increase our compliance costs and potential liability. Laws similar to the CCPA have passed or have been proposed in several other states and also have been proposed at the federal level. To the extent these laws apply to our operations, they may ultimately have conflicting requirements that would further complicate compliance. Further, new health information standards, whether implemented pursuant to HIPAA, congressional action or otherwise, could have a significant effect on the manner in which we handle health-related information, and the cost of complying with these standards could be significant. While these new laws generally include exemptions for HIPAA-covered data, they add layers of complexity to compliance in the U.S. market, and could increase our compliance costs and adversely affect our business.

In addition, industry groups such as the payment card industry have developed self-regulatory guidelines for privacy and data security. In order to accept payments from payment cards through a third-party vendor, merchants must use payment card processing applications that have been validated under the Payment Application Data Security Standard (“PA-DSS”), and complete a self-assessment questionnaire that complies with the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (“PCI-DSS”). Failure to comply with PA-DSS and PCI-DSS may result in fines and penalties imposed by payment card brands, and/or termination of the merchant’s relationship with the bank it relies on to process payment card payments.

Additional states have passed privacy legislation or have indicated an intent to propose such legislation, particularly in light of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, which overturned Roe v. Wade and eliminated the constitutional right to abortion in the United States. In the wake of the Dobbs decision, there has been significant attention on the collection, use and disclosure of health information. For instance, on April 22, 2024, OCR issued a Final Rule, HIPAA Privacy Rule to Support Reproductive Health Care Privacy, which is intended to strengthen the Privacy Rule by prohibiting the disclosure of PHI related to lawful reproductive health care in certain circumstances. Additionally, the state of Washington passed the “My Health My Data Act” with respect to “consumer health data” which is defined as “personal information that is linked or reasonably linkable to a consumer and that identifies a consumer’s past, present, or future physical or mental health” and which went into effect in 2024 with additional privacy rights and compliance obligations. The Federal government has also responded by instructing federal agencies, such as the OCR and FTC, to use their existing authority to provide greater protections for consumers with respect to the use of their data, and more specifically, their health data. OCR released a bulletin in December 2022 titled “HIPAA Guidance on Use of Tracking Technologies” which expanded commonly understood interpretations of “individually identifiable health information” and placed limitations on covered entities and business associates’ use of online tracking technologies and related vendor engagements. Additionally, the FTC has been active with respect to enforcement of its Health Breach Notification Rule and in scrutinizing the use and disclosure of sensitive personal information. The FTC also finalized changes to the Health Breach Notification Rule in April 2024. We expect continued scrutiny by federal and state regulators, business partners, and consumers on our collection, use and disclosure of health information. This is of even greater significance with respect to our women’s health services and treatment of pregnant women. We expect to incur additional costs to ensure that our data privacy and security policies, procedures, and activities comply with applicable and evolving legal requirements.

These requirements are also subject to change. On December 10, 2020, OCR issued proposed revisions to the Privacy Rule aimed at reducing regulatory burdens that may exist in discouraging coordination of care, including creating an exception to the minimum necessary standard for healthcare coordination, and other proposals to increase patient access to their health information, among other changes. While a final rule has not yet been issued, if adopted, these proposed changes may require us to update our HIPAA policies and procedures to comply with the new requirements. Compliance with new privacy, security, and breach notification laws, regulations, requirements and self-regulatory guidelines may result in increased operating costs and may constrain or require us to alter our business model or operations. For example, changes to HIPAA promulgated pursuant to HITECH further restricted our ability to collect, disclose and use PHI and imposed additional compliance requirements on us.

Although we currently maintain liability insurance coverage intended to cover cyber liability and certain other privacy and security breach-related claims, we cannot ensure that our insurance coverage will be adequate to cover liabilities arising out of claims asserted against us in the future where the outcomes of such claims are unfavorable to us. Liabilities in excess of our insurance coverage, including coverage for cyber liability and certain other privacy and security breach-related claims, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and the trading price of our securities.

See also Item 1A. Risk Factors–“Information Systems, Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Risks” and Item 1C. Cybersecurity for additional information.

HIPAA Transaction Requirements

In addition to privacy, security, and breach notifications requirements, HIPAA establishes uniform electronic data transmission standards that all healthcare providers must use for electronic healthcare transactions. For example, claims for reimbursement that are transmitted electronically to third-party payors must comply with specific formatting standards, and these standards apply whether the payor is a government or a private entity. We report medical diagnoses under International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition (“ICD-10”). If claims are not reported properly under ICD-10 due to technical or coding errors or other implementation issues involving systems, including ours and those of our third-party payors, there can be a delay in the processing and payment of such claims, or a denial of such claims, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and the trading price of our securities.

Compliance Program

We maintain a compliance program that is designed to include the OIG’s seven fundamental elements of an effective compliance program and which reflects our commitment to complying with all laws, rules and regulations applicable to our business and that meets our ethical obligations in conducting our business (the “Compliance Program”). We believe our Compliance Program provides a solid framework to meet this commitment and our obligations as a provider of healthcare services, including:

• a Chief Compliance Officer who reports to our Board of Directors on a regular basis;
• a Compliance Committee consisting of our senior executives;
• a formal internal audit function, including an Associate Vice President of Internal Audit who reports to the Audit Committee on a regular basis;
• our Code of Conduct, which is applicable to our employees, independent contractors, officers and directors;
• our Code of Professional Conduct – Finance, which is applicable to our finance personnel, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer;
• a disclosure program that includes a mechanism to enable individuals to disclose on a confidential or anonymous basis to the Chief Compliance Officer or any person who is not in the disclosing individual’s chain of command, issues or questions believed by the individual to be a potential violation of criminal, civil, or administrative laws or of company policies or procedures;
• an organizational structure designed to integrate our compliance objectives into our corporate offices, regions and practices; and
• education, monitoring and corrective action programs designed to establish methods to promote the understanding of our Compliance Program and adherence to its requirements.

The foundation of our Compliance Program is our Code of Conduct, which is intended to be a comprehensive statement of the ethical and legal standards governing the daily activities of our employees, affiliated professionals, independent contractors, officers and directors. All of our personnel are required to abide by, and are given thorough education regarding, our Code of Conduct. In addition, all employees and affiliated professionals are expected to report incidents that they believe in good faith may be in violation of our Code of Conduct. We maintain a toll-free helpline to permit individuals to report compliance concerns on an anonymous or confidential basis, and to obtain answers to questions about our Code of Conduct. Our Compliance Program, including our Code of Conduct, is administered by our Chief Compliance Officer with oversight by our Chief Executive Officer, Compliance Committee and Board of Directors. Copies of our Code of Conduct and our Code of Professional Conduct – Finance are available on our website, www.Pediatrix.com (http://www.Pediatrix.com). Our website and the information contained therein or connected thereto are not incorporated into or deemed a part of this Form 10-K. Any amendments or waivers to our Code of Professional Conduct – Finance will be promptly disclosed on our website following the date of any such amendment or waiver.

GOVERNMENT INVESTIGATIONS

We expect that audits, inquiries and investigations from government authorities, agencies, contractors and payors will occur in the ordinary course of business. Such audits, inquiries and investigations and their ultimate resolutions, individually or in the aggregate, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and the trading price of our securities.

OTHER LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In the ordinary course of our business, we become involved in pending and threatened legal actions and proceedings, most of which involve claims of medical malpractice related to medical services provided by our affiliated physicians. Our contracts with hospitals generally require us to indemnify them and their affiliates for losses resulting from the negligence of our affiliated physicians and other clinicians. We may also become subject to other lawsuits, including with payors or other counterparties that could involve large claims and significant defense costs. We believe, based upon a review of pending actions and proceedings, that the outcome of such legal actions and proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and the trading price of our securities. The outcome of such actions and proceedings, however, cannot be predicted with certainty and an unfavorable resolution of one or more of them could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and the trading price of our securities.

Although we currently maintain liability insurance coverage intended to cover professional liability and certain other claims, we cannot ensure that our insurance coverage will be adequate to cover liabilities arising out of claims asserted against us in the future where the outcomes of such claims are unfavorable to us. With respect to professional liability risk, we self-insure a significant portion of this risk through our wholly owned captive insurance subsidiary. Liabilities in excess of our insurance coverage, including coverage for professional liability and certain other claims, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and the trading price of our securities. See “Professional and General Liability Coverage.”

PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE

We maintain professional and general liability insurance policies with third-party insurers generally on a claims-made basis, subject to deductibles, self-insured retention limits, policy aggregates, exclusions, and other restrictions, in accordance with standard industry practice. We believe that our insurance coverage is appropriate based upon our claims experience and the nature and risks of our business. However, we cannot predict whether any pending or future claim would be successful or, if successful, would not exceed the limits of available insurance coverage.

Our business entails an inherent risk of claims of medical malpractice against our affiliated physicians, clinicians and us. We contract and pay premiums for professional liability insurance that indemnifies us and our affiliated healthcare professionals generally on a claims-made basis for losses incurred related to medical malpractice litigation. Professional liability coverage is required in order for our affiliated physicians to maintain hospital privileges. Our self-insured retention under our professional liability insurance program is maintained primarily through a wholly owned captive insurance subsidiary. We record estimates in our Consolidated Financial Statements for our liabilities for self-insured retention amounts and claims incurred but not reported based on an actuarial valuation using historical loss information, claim emergence patterns and various actuarial assumptions. Liabilities for claims incurred but not reported are not discounted. Because many factors can affect historical and future loss patterns, the determination of an appropriate reserve involves complex, subjective judgment, and actual results may vary significantly from estimates. If the self-insured retention amounts and other amounts that we are actually required to pay materially exceed the estimates that have been reserved, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be materially, adversely affected.

HUMAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT

We believe our affiliated physicians, other clinical professionals and administrative employees are key to our success. As of December 31, 2024, we had approximately 2,335 practicing physicians affiliated with us, and we employed or contracted with approximately 1,970 other clinical professionals and approximately 2,150 other full-time and part-time employees. Our affiliated physicians and clinicians provide critical medical care through several women’s and children’s healthcare services across 36 states, providing care to the most vulnerable patient population in the country: expecting mothers and their newborns and children.

We believe that the success of our mission to “Take great care of the patient, every day and in every wayTM” is realized by the engagement and empowerment of our affiliated physicians, other clinicians and administrative employees. Our executive team, including our Senior Vice President of People Services, is responsible for developing and executing our human capital strategy. This includes the attraction, acquisition, development, engagement, compensation and retention of talent. Our People Services team reports to our Chief Executive Officer and regularly engages with our Chief Executive Officer and board of directors and its compensation and talent committee. Our People Services team is a core administrative support function of Pediatrix. Through its functional experts, our People Services team provides support, guidance and consultation in the areas of talent acquisition, employee wellness and safety programs, workplace policies and procedures, training and development and rewards strategies that include compensation, benefits and other rewards. It is the goal of the People Services team to support the needs of our organization and our workforce while serving as a trusted strategic partner to our management team.

We work together to make sound decisions for all of our operations teams and affiliated physician practices. Physicians spend years of their lives learning and training in the science of medicine in order to bring their knowledge and skill to the bedside of a patient. It is an art, honed through repeated patient interactions, that allows any clinician to translate science into compassionate care for our patients. But healthcare is also our business, so we must also take great care of the business. This requires us to work every day to put tools into the hands of our affiliated physicians and other clinical professionals so they can deliver high quality care to our patients.

Training and Leadership Development

We are committed to the continued development of our people and believe in fostering great leaders. Our Training and Development team is committed to providing an environment that fosters both individual and organizational development. Through its various training and educational programs, the training and development team supports the organization’s commitment to excellence and its mission to “Take great care of the patient, every day and in every wayTM”. We make available a catalog of over 11,000 courses to all audiences across subjects including business skills, leadership and management, office productivity, health and wellness and personal development, among others. The courses are designed to develop great people who become great leaders that will ultimately shape a great company. Our training materials were enhanced with additional resources to support remote work environments that have remained a valuable alternative for many of our employees.

One of the greatest predictors of success in our partnerships at the hospital and health system level is a high degree of strategic alignment between our clinical leadership and our partners. This requires that our clinicians have a skill set beyond just the practice of medicine.

Compliance Program and Training

Fundamental to our core values are people and a culture of integrity. Our Compliance Department is led by our Chief Compliance Officer. The Compliance Program is supported by a written Compliance Plan, which details the components, organizational structure and operational aspects of the Compliance Program. Although the Compliance Program is supported by numerous operational policies and procedures, there are some key elements that are critical to its success. These include a Compliance Committee; a written Code of Conduct; new hire and periodic compliance training for all employees; compliance reporting mechanisms; and periodic reports to our board of directors. Participation and completion of annual compliance training is a condition of employment for all employees.

Health and Well-Being

We care about the health and well-being of our affiliated clinicians, other clinical professionals and our administrative employees and their families and are committed to their health, safety and wellness. We support all of our colleagues in encouraging habits of wellness, increased awareness of factors and resources that contribute to overall well-being and inspire individuals to take responsibility for their own health. When individuals take great care of themselves, we can continue to take great care of our patients and take great care of our business.

We provide all our colleagues access to an Employee Assistance Program (“EAP”) that offers free and confidential assessments, short-term counseling, referrals, and follow-up services to employees who have personal and/or work-related problems. Our EAP addresses a broad and complex body of issues affecting mental and emotional well-being, such as alcohol and other substance abuse, stress, grief, family problems, and psychological disorders. EAP counselors also work in a consultative role with managers and supervisors to address employee and organizational challenges and needs. The EAP is designed to help our colleagues lead happier and more productive lives at home and at work. Our EAP services are available to all eligible employees, their spouses or domestic partners, dependent children, parents and parents-in-law. We encourage all of our employees and their family members to make full use of this resource which is designed to help maintain high employee productivity, health, and well-being in all aspects of life.

Total Rewards: Compensation and Benefits

We value our colleagues’ contributions to our success and strive to provide all of our colleagues with a competitive and comprehensive total rewards package. This includes robust compensation and benefits programs to help meet the needs of our affiliated physicians, other clinical professionals and administrative employees.

We take great care to ensure that our cash-based compensation packages are reflective of the market value for the work that our colleagues perform. We also understand that providing a comprehensive suite of employee benefits is essential to attracting, retaining and engaging world-class employees. Therefore, we regularly evaluate our benefit offerings to be sure we fully support our employees. In addition to base salaries, these offerings may include a combination of annual bonuses, stock-based compensation awards, an Employee Stock Purchase Plan, a 401(k) Plan, healthcare and insurance benefits, health savings and flexible spending accounts, paid time off, family leave, fertility benefits, and employee assistance programs, among many others.

GEOGRAPHIC COVERAGE

We provide physician services across 36 states. During 2024, approximately 67% of our net revenue was generated by operations in our five largest states. Our operations in Texas accounted for approximately 32% of our net revenue for the same period. Although we continue to seek to diversify the geographic scope of our operations, we may not be able to implement successfully or realize the expected benefits of any of these initiatives. Adverse changes or conditions affecting states in which our operations are concentrated, such as healthcare reforms, changes in laws, rules and regulations, reduced Medicaid reimbursements, an increase in the income level required to qualify for government healthcare programs or government investigations, may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and the trading price of our securities.

SERVICE MARKS

We have registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office the service marks “Pediatrix Medical Group and Design,” “Obstetrix Medical Group and Design,” “BabySteps,” the “Baby Design,” “iNewborn,” and “NEO Conference and Design,” among others.

AVAILABLE INFORMATION

Our annual proxy statements, annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those statements and reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 are available free of charge and may be printed out through our internet website, www.Pediatrix.com (http://www.Pediatrix.com), as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Our proxy statements and reports may also be obtained directly from the SEC's Internet website at www.sec.gov (http://www.sec.gov). Our internet website and the information contained therein or connected thereto are not incorporated into or deemed a part of this Form 10-K.

Our business is subject to a number of factors that could materially affect future developments and performance. In addition to factors affecting our business that have been described elsewhere in this Form 10-K, any of the following risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and the trading price of our securities. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial also may impair our business operations. We may update these risk factors in our periodic and other filings with the SEC.

The following is a summary of the principal risk factors described in this section:

• Economic conditions could have an adverse effect on our business.
• The birth rate in the United States has declined in past years and may decline further.
• Unfavorable changes or conditions could occur in the states where our operations are concentrated.
• Potential healthcare reform efforts may have a significant effect on our business.
• COVID-19 necessitated the delivery of certain healthcare services remotely via telehealth, which is subject to extensive federal and state regulation, as well as temporary waivers tied to the COVID-19 public health emergency, and certain flexibilities afforded to the provision and reimbursement of telehealth may be rolled back.
• The Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (“MACRA”) and potential changes to it may have an adverse effect on our business.
• The Transparency in Coverage Final Rule, which requires certain health plans and issuers to publish pricing information on in-network and out-of-network providers and make price comparison and cost-sharing information available to insureds, could have a material impact on our business.
• State budgetary constraints and the uncertainty over the future of Medicaid could have an adverse effect on our reimbursement from Medicaid programs.
• Congress or states have, and may continue to, enact surprise billing or other laws restricting the amount out-of-network providers of services can charge and recover for such services.
• Expanding eligibility of GHC Programs could adversely affect our reimbursement.
• Government-funded programs, private insurers, or state laws and regulations may limit, reduce, or make retroactive adjustments to reimbursement amounts or rates.
• We may become subject to billing investigations by federal and state government authorities and private insurers.
• The healthcare industry is highly regulated and government authorities may determine that we have failed to comply with applicable laws, rules or regulations.
• We undertook a transformation of our revenue cycle management function from an outsourced provider to a hybrid function that utilizes both our corporate personnel as well as one or more third-party service providers. Our failure to execute a hybrid revenue cycle management function efficiently and effectively may have a material impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and the trading price of our securities.
• We currently outsource, and from time to time in the future may outsource, a portion of our internal business functions to third-party providers. Outsourcing these functions has significant risks, and our failure to successfully manage these risks could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
• We may not find suitable acquisition candidates or successfully integrate our acquisitions. Our acquisitions may expose us to greater business risks and could affect our payor mix.
• We may not be able to successfully execute our same-unit and organic growth strategies.
• We are subject to litigation risks.
• We may not be able to collect reimbursements for our services from third-party payors.
• Our current indebtedness and any future indebtedness could adversely affect us by reducing our flexibility to respond to changing business and economic conditions and expose us to interest rate risk to the extent of any variable rate debt. In addition, a certain portion of our interest expense may not be deductible.
• We may not be able to successfully recruit, onboard and retain qualified physicians and other clinicians and other personnel, and our compensation expense for existing clinicians and other personnel may increase.
• We may not be able to maintain effective and efficient information systems or properly safeguard our information systems.
• Federal and state laws concerning the privacy and security of personal information may increase our costs and limit our ability to collect and use that information. Any failure or perceived failure by us to comply with such laws and regulations may harm our business and operations.

Risks Related to Macroeconomic Conditions

Economic conditions could have an adverse effect on our business.

Our operations and performance depend significantly on economic conditions. During the year ended December 31, 2024, the percentage of our patient service revenue being reimbursed under GHC Programs decreased as compared to the year ended December 31, 2023. If, however, economic conditions in the United States deteriorate, we could experience shifts toward GHC Programs, and patient volumes and reimbursement for services we provide could decline. Further, we could experience and have experienced shifts toward GHC Programs if changes occur in population demographics within geographic locations in which we provide services. Adverse economic conditions could also lead to additional increases in the number of unemployed and under-employed workers and a decline in the number of private employers that offer healthcare insurance coverage to their employees. Employers that do offer healthcare coverage may increase the required contributions from employees to pay for their coverage and increase patient responsibility amounts. In addition, certain private payors’ poor experience with the healthcare insurance exchanges and any uncertainty around the future of the ACA, and healthcare insurance exchanges may result in those payors exiting the healthcare insurance exchange marketplaces or the cessation of the healthcare insurance exchanges. As a consequence, the number of patients who participate in GHC Programs or who are uninsured or underinsured could increase. Payments received from GHC Programs are substantially less than payments received from private healthcare insurance programs (managed care and other third-party payors). Payments under policies issued through the healthcare insurance exchanges may be less than payments from private healthcare insurance programs and in some cases, patients’ responsibility for costs related to healthcare plans obtained through the healthcare insurance exchanges may be high and could increase in the future, and we may experience increased bad debt due to patients’ inability to pay for certain services. A payor mix shift from private healthcare insurance programs to GHC Programs or to healthcare insurance exchanges has resulted and may continue to result in an increase in our estimated provision for contractual adjustments and uncollectibles and a corresponding decrease in our net revenue, as well as a significant reduction in our average reimbursement rates. While we have developed a number of strategic initiatives across our organization, in both our shared services functions and our operational infrastructure, to address some of the effects of changes in economic conditions, there is no assurance that these initiatives will be successful in generating improvements in our general and administrative expenses and our operational infrastructure. If these initiatives are unsuccessful, it could have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and the trading price of our securities.

An erosion in the tax base caused by a general economic downturn can cause restrictions on the federal and state governments’ abilities to obtain financing and a decline in spending. If the economy were to contract (for example, as a result of a future global pandemic, international or domestic conflict, inflation, or as a result of a significant increase in prevailing interest rates), our government payors or other counterparties that owe us money could be delayed in obtaining, or may not be able to obtain, necessary funding and/or financing to meet their cash flow needs. As a result, we may face increased pricing pressure, termination of contracts, reimbursement rate cuts or reimbursement delays from Medicare and Medicaid and other governmental payors, which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and the trading price of our securities.

In addition, the U.S. federal government has implemented and threatened to implement tariffs on certain foreign goods and may implement additional or greater tariffs on foreign goods, which may have an impact on the cost of certain of our supplies and our operations if such tariffs remain in effect. The ultimate impact of any tariffs will depend on various factors, including if any tariffs are ultimately implemented, the timing of implementation, and the amount, scope and nature of the tariffs.

The birth rate in the United States has declined and may decline further.

Birth data for 2023 indicate that total births in the United States decreased compared to 2022. Provisional data for 2024 is not yet available. Future declines in births are possible, particularly if there is an economic recession, and could have an adverse effect on our patient volumes, net revenue, results of operations, cash flows, financial condition and the trading price of our securities.

Unfavorable changes or conditions could occur in the states where our operations are concentrated.

A majority of our net revenue in 2024 was generated by our operations in five states. In particular, Texas accounted for approximately 32% of our net revenue in 2024. See Item 1. Business—“Geographic Coverage.” Adverse changes or conditions affecting these particular states, such as healthcare reforms, changes in laws and regulations, increases in unreimbursed services arising from services furnished to undocumented noncitizens, reduced Medicaid eligibility or reimbursements and government investigations, economic conditions, weather conditions, and natural disasters may have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and the trading price of our securities.

The value of our common stock may fluctuate.

There has been significant volatility in the market price of securities of healthcare companies generally that we believe in many cases has been unrelated to operating performance. In addition, we believe that certain factors, such as actual and potential legislative and regulatory developments, including announced regulatory investigations, quarterly fluctuations in our actual or anticipated results of operations, lower revenue or earnings than those anticipated by securities analysts, not meeting publicly announced expectations, general economic and financial market conditions, and the effect of short interest in our common stock could cause the price of our common stock to fluctuate substantially.

The widespread outbreak of an illness or any other communicable disease, or any other public health crisis, and the governmental responses thereto, could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Widespread outbreaks of disease or other public health crises and responses thereto have in the past and may in the future negatively impact the global economy, disrupt global supply chains and create significant volatility and disruption of financial markets. For example, our operating results were significantly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic beginning in mid-March 2020, but volumes began to normalize in May 2020 and substantially recovered during the months of June 2020 through December 2020.

A future pandemic or outbreak, and any government response thereto, could result in a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, prospects and the trading prices of our securities, and could heighten many of the other risks associated with our business and indebtedness, including those described in this Form 10-K.

Risks Related to Governmental Changes and the Healthcare Regulatory Environment

Potential healthcare reform efforts may have a significant effect on our business.

We could be affected by potential changes to healthcare laws, rules and regulations, including changes to subsidies, healthcare insurance marketplaces and Medicaid expansion and contraction.

All federal and state government health care programs, including for example Medicare, Medicaid and the ACA, may be subject to change as a result of political, legislative, regulatory, and administrative developments, as well as judicial proceedings. The results of the 2024 federal election, including the election of President Trump and Republican control of both houses of Congress, may result in significant changes in, and have resulted in uncertainty with respect to, legislation, regulation, implementation or repeal of laws and rules related to government health programs, including Medicare and Medicaid. In addition, the staff of the Department of Government Efficiency (the "DOGE"), an executive administrative agency created by the second Trump Administration, have been provided access to key payment and contracting systems at CMS to look for opportunities for improving efficiency and to identify fraud and ineffective use of resources. While we cannot predict the actions of the DOGE, there is a possibility that changes will be made to CMS spending, which could ultimately affect our financial condition and results of operation.

While there have been multiple attempts to repeal or amend the ACA through legislative action and legal challenges, legislative attempts to completely repeal the ACA have been unsuccessful to date. However, another significant challenge to the ACA is advancing in federal courts. Specifically, in Braidwood Management v. Becerra, the plaintiffs argue that the ACA’s requirement that insurance cover certain preventive services without cost sharing is unconstitutional. On September 7, 2022, a federal district court in Texas ruled partly in favor of the plaintiffs and partly in favor of the Department of Health and Human Services, which is defending the ACA, finding, among other things, that the requirement that self-funded plans and insurers cover certain preventive services violates the plaintiffs' rights under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. The federal government appealed this decision to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, which subsequently issued an administrative stay of the district court’s ruling, thereby allowing the federal government to continue enforcing the preventive services requirement while the 5th Circuit considers the case. On June 21, 2024, the 5th Circuit issued a limited decision applicable only to the plaintiffs, finding that HHS exceeded its constitutional authority by delegating decision-making power to the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force ("USPSTF"). But the 5th Circuit overturned the district court’s decision to vacate the entire rule nationally, which reinstated the requirement for health plans to continue covering ACA-mandated preventive care services without cost sharing. On September 19, 2024, plaintiffs filed a petition for a writ of certiorari with the United States Supreme Court, arguing that HHS’ delegation to USPSTF violates the U.S. Constitution Appointments Clause, and seeking to have the preventive services coverage requirement thrown out. If the Supreme Court decides to hear the case and the plaintiffs succeed, millions of Americans could lose access to preventive care guaranteed by the ACA or be forced to pay out of pocket for these services, and such an outcome could materially impact our business.

The ACA provided premium tax credits to help make insurance more affordable for individuals and families with incomes between 100% and 400% of the federal poverty limit. The American Rescue Plan Act ("ARPA") enacted in March 2021, temporarily extended these tax credits to individuals with incomes above 400% of the federal poverty level and made the subsidy more generous for those below 400%. The ARPA tax credits were originally set to expire on January 1, 2023, but Congress through the Inflation Reduction Act, enacted in mid-2022, extended the expanded tax credits through 2025. Partially because of these changes, millions of people newly enrolled in health exchange plans. If these tax credits are allowed to lapse, many Americans could lose insurance coverage, and that change could have a material impact on our business.

The second Trump Administration may seek to advance changes to the U.S. healthcare system, including changes to the ACA that would eliminate or reduce certain subsidies, modify certain benefits and allow competition from short-term limited duration insurance products, all of which could result in fewer people with insurance, or fewer people with ACA compliant insurance, and these changes could have a material impact on our business. We cannot say for certain whether there will be additional future challenges to the ACA or what impact, if any, such challenges may have on our business. Changes resulting from these proceedings, and any legislative or administrative change to the current healthcare financing system, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and the trading price of our securities.

In addition to the ACA, there could be changes to other GHC Programs, such as a change to the Medicaid program design or Medicaid coverage and reimbursement rates set forth under federal or state law. Historically, Congress and the Administration sought to convert Medicaid into a block grant or to institute per capita spending caps, among other things. These changes, if implemented, could eliminate the guarantee that everyone who is eligible and applies for Medicaid benefits would receive them and could potentially give states new authority to restrict eligibility, cut benefits and/or make it more difficult for people to enroll. Additionally, several states are considering and pursuing changes to their Medicaid programs, such as requiring recipients to engage in employment or education activities as a condition of eligibility for most adults, disenrolling recipients for failure to pay a premium, or adjusting premium amounts based on income.

Many states have transitioned a substantial portion of their Medicaid program beneficiaries into Managed Medicaid Plans, which are administered by commercial insurance companies. Managed Medicaid Plans have some flexibility to set rates for providers, but many states require minimum provider rates in their contracts with such plans. Each year, CMS releases the annual Medicaid Managed Care Rate Development Guide which provides federal baseline rules for setting reimbursement rates in managed care plans. We could be affected by lower reimbursement rates in some or all of the Managed Medicaid Plans with which we participate. We could also be materially impacted if we are dropped from the provider network in one or more of the Managed Medicaid Plans with which we currently participate. In Florida, more than 75% of the Medicaid population participates in a Managed Medicaid Plan, with even higher participation rates for children.

In response to the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency (“PHE”), Congress passed the Family First Coronavirus Response Act, which provided state Medicaid programs a 6.2 percentage point increase in the Federal Medical Assistance Percentage (“FMAP”) if states meet certain maintenance of eligibility (“MOE”) requirements that ensure continuous coverage for current enrollees. As a result, all Medicaid beneficiaries were continuously enrolled in Medicaid during much of the COVID-19 PHE. Legislation enacted in late 2022 phased down the FMAP increase from April 1, 2023 to December 31, 2023. To continue receiving the increased FMAP during that transition period, states were required to conduct Medicaid eligibility redeterminations and renewals beginning April 1, 2023. As of December 31, 2023, there will be no additional increase in FMAP. More than 13 million people enrolled in Medicaid lost coverage as a result of these changes, and more disenrollments are expected. This change could have a material impact on our business.

Moreover, certain potentially material changes seem likely with respect to government reimbursement and the healthcare industry in general. For instance, the 2024 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule decreased the 2024 conversion factor (i.e., the amount Medicare pays per relative value unit (wRVU)) by nearly 3.4% from the 2023 amount. Congress enacted legislation to moderate some of these cuts, but Medicare payments to physicians still decreased in 2024. For 2025, Medicare payments to physicians may again decrease. These reductions adversely affect reimbursement for physician services and could also negatively impact other GHC Program reimbursement and commercial payor reimbursement. These changes could materially impact our business.

We cannot predict with any assurance the ultimate effect of these laws and resulting changes to payments under GHC Programs, nor can we provide any assurance that they will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and the trading price of our securities. Further, any fiscal tightening impacting GHC Programs or changes to the structure of any GHC Programs could have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and the trading price of our securities.

COVID-19 necessitated the delivery of certain healthcare services remotely via telehealth, which is subject to extensive federal and state regulation, as well as temporary waivers tied to the COVID-19 public health emergency, and certain flexibilities afforded to the provision and reimbursement of telehealth may be rolled back.

In an effort to address shelter-in-place, quarantine, executive order or related measures to combat the spread of COVID-19, as well as the perceived need by individuals to continue such practices to avoid infection and to provide safe access to care for our patients, we converted certain in-person visits to telehealth visits and have continued to provide services in this manner. There is significant variation in demand, consumer acceptance, and market adoption of telehealth services. The provision of telehealth is largely regulated at the state level and can include, among other things, variations in the definition of telehealth, physician/patient relationship requirements, informed consent for telehealth services, licensure, scope of practice, covered modalities, electronic prescribing, coverage and reimbursement, and privacy and security requirements. Our ability to conduct telehealth services and provide medical services in a particular jurisdiction is directly dependent upon the applicable laws governing remote healthcare, the practice of medicine and healthcare delivery in general in such location, which are subject to changing political, regulatory and other influences. While numerous federal agencies released waivers to ease regulatory obstacles to the adoption of telehealth, many of these waivers do not override applicable state laws. States have adopted waivers as well but differ in the scope and application of such waivers and also on the time period the waiver is available. Many state waivers in relation to COVID-19 have already expired. On a federal level, CMS created flexibilities for the provision and reimbursement of telehealth for Medicare beneficiaries during the COVID-19 PHE. While some of these flexibilities have been permanently extended, others are still permitted subject to temporally limited authorizations. For example, in the calendar year 2025 Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule, CMS authorized Medicare coverage of certain telehealth services on a provisional basis through 2025. If Congress or a federal agency does not act to again extend these flexibilities, they could expire, and these changes could materially impact our business.

Evolving interpretations and acceptance of telehealth by medical boards, state attorneys general and other regulatory or administrative bodies require us to monitor our compliance with law in every jurisdiction in which we operate, on an ongoing basis, and we cannot provide assurance that our activities and arrangements, if challenged, will be found to be in compliance with the law. Monitoring regulatory changes at the federal and state levels has and will continue to incur costs for us and may result in making changes to our business operations to ensure continued compliance. Challenges also exist with respect to coverage and reimbursement of telehealth services by both commercial and governmental payors. Unless Congress enacts permanent telehealth coverage, the flexibilities and additional billing codes that are currently available will not be available indefinitely. If telehealth services achieve coverage, there is no guarantee that reimbursement will be equivalent to in-person care and may negatively impact our financial condition. Individual and healthcare industry concerns or negative publicity regarding patient confidentiality and privacy in the context of telehealth could limit market acceptance of our healthcare services when delivered remotely. If any of these events occur, it could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and the trading price of our securities.

The Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (“MACRA”) and potential changes to it may have an adverse effect on our business.

MACRA contains numerous measures that could affect us, including, requirements that physicians participate in quality measurement programs that differentiate payments to physicians under Medicare based on quality and cost of care, rather than the quantity of procedures performed. The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (“MIPS”) allows eligible physicians to receive incentive payments based on the achievement of certain quality and cost metrics, among other measures, and be reduced for those who are underperforming against those same metrics and measures. We currently anticipate that our affiliated physicians will continue to be eligible to receive bonus payments in 2025 through participation in the MIPS, although the amounts of such bonus payments are not expected to be material. We will continue to operationalize the provisions of MACRA and assess any further changes to the law or additional regulations enacted pursuant to the law.

We cannot predict with any assurance the ultimate effect of MACRA and resulting changes to payments under GHC Programs, nor can we provide any assurance that they will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and the trading price of our securities. Further, any fiscal tightening impacting GHC Programs or changes to the structure of any GHC Programs could have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and the trading price of our securities.

The Transparency in Coverage Final Rule, which requires certain health plans and issuers to publish pricing information on in-network and out-of-network providers and make price comparison and cost-sharing information available to insureds, could have a material impact on our business.

The Transparency in Coverage Final Rule, published November 12, 2020, aims to put health pricing information into the hands of consumers and allow them to select their providers based, in part, on cost. The final rule was phased in between July 2022 and January 2024 and imposed two main requirements. First certain health plans and insurers are required to publish on a public website machine-readable files containing information on their in-network negotiated rates, billed charges and allowed amounts paid for out-of-network providers, and the negotiated rate and historical net price for prescription drugs. Second certain health plans and issuers must report to their covered members, through a self-service pricing tool, certain pricing information (including the in-network rate and out-of-network allowed amounts) and cost-sharing obligations for all covered items and services. These requirements remain subject to change, and we cannot predict how the availability of this health pricing information may impact our business operations and patient volumes. Moreover, Congress is considering legislation that imposes additional transparency requirements on providers. If patients choose to use services of less costly providers, we could see a reduction in patient volumes or decide to reduce the prices of our services to compensate, either of which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and the trading price of our securities.

State budgetary constraints and the uncertainty over the future of Medicaid could have an adverse effect on our reimbursement from Medicaid programs.

The ACA allowed states to expand their Medicaid programs through federal payments that fund most of the cost of increasing the Medicaid eligibility income limit from a state’s historic eligibility levels to 133% of the federal poverty level. As of December 31, 2024, 40 states, and the District of Columbia, adopted the expansion of Medicaid eligibility. All of the states in which we operate, however, already cover children in the first year of life and pregnant women if their household incomes are at or below 133% of the federal poverty level. If states that expanded Medicaid reduce or eliminate eligibility for certain individuals, the number of patients who are uninsured could increase. Some states may seek to maintain expanded eligibility and could offset the cost by further reducing payments to providers of services. In some states, we could experience delayed or reduced Medicaid payment for services furnished to program enrollees. Moreover, Democrats in Congress have sought to expand Medicaid or Medicaid-like coverage in states that have not yet expanded Medicaid. They also have sought to reduce payments to certain hospitals in some of these states. Should any of these changes take effect, we cannot predict with any assurance the ultimate effect to reimbursements for our services.

Congress and the second Trump Administration may also seek substantial reforms to Medicaid law and the ability of states to design Medicaid programs. Any changes, if enacted, could reduce or eliminate eligibility for certain individuals or reduce payments to providers of services. As a result, we could experience an increase in the number of uninsured patients and delayed or reduced Medicaid payment for services furnished to program enrollees.

In addition, many states are continuing to collect less tax revenue than they did historically and as a consequence continue to face budget shortfalls and underfunded pension and other obligations. Although shortfalls have been declining in more recent budgetary years, they are still significant by historical standards. The financial condition of the states in which we do business could lead to reduced or delayed funding for Medicaid programs and, in turn, reduced or delayed reimbursement for physician services, which could adversely affect our results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.

Any changes to Medicaid eligibility, enrollment, financing or reimbursement could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and the trading price of our securities.

Congress or states have, and may continue to, enact laws restricting the amount out-of-network providers of services can charge and recover for such services.

In late 2020, Congress enacted legislation intended to protect patients from “surprise” medical bills when services are furnished by providers who are not in network with the patient’s insurer (the “No Surprises Act” or the "NSA"). Effective January 1, 2022, if a patient’s insurance plan is subject to the NSA, the patient generally may not be balance billed in excess of their plan’s in-network cost-sharing amount for the provision of emergency care rendered by an out-of-network provider at certain in-network or out-of-network facilities. The NSA also prohibits an out-of-network provider from balance billing a patient for the provision of non-emergency services rendered in connection with a patient’s visit at certain in-network facilities, unless, for certain services, the patient is notified in advance and provides consent to being balance billed in accordance with technical requirements set forth in the NSA. Notably, however, there are certain services for which a balance billing is always prohibited and consent to do so may never be obtained, including emergency, anesthesia, pathology, radiology, laboratory, and neonatology services. Providers that violate these surprise billing prohibitions may be subject to enforcement action by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) or by states, one or both of which may be tasked with investigating potential non-compliance as a result of patient complaints, as well as federal civil monetary penalties and any state-specific penalties. To that end, many states have similar legislation on this topic that continue to evolve.

As noted above, under the NSA, patients may not be balance billed in excess of their in-network cost-sharing amount. Insurers are required to calculate the patient’s total cost-sharing amount pursuant to rules set forth in the NSA and its implementing regulations which, in some cases, can be calculated by reference to the applicable “qualifying payment amount” (or the “QPA,” which is generally defined as the median contracted rate in a specific area) for the items or services furnished. Patient cost-sharing amounts for items and services subject to the NSA count toward the patient’s health plan deductible and out-of-pocket cost-sharing limits.

For claims subject to the NSA, including many emergency care services, out-of-network providers (and facilities, in the emergency care context) are paid an initial payment by the plan. If a provider (or facility, in the emergency care context) receives a payment denial or is unsatisfied with the out-of-network rate paid by the plan and the parties are unable to resolve the dispute, either party can initiate an Independent Dispute Resolution (“IDR”) process, which is essentially an arbitration process whereby a certified IDR entity evaluates proposed offers from both the provider/facility and the plan and makes a determination based on several factors, including, but not limited to, the QPA. The outcome of each IDR dispute is generally binding on both the provider/facility and plan with respect to the particular claims at issue in that dispute but may not affect an insurer’s future offers of payment. The NSA interim final rules establishing the IDR process have been subject to a series of legal challenges that resulted in the Eastern District of Texas vacating certain provisions of such rules and related guidance documents in 2023, with the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirming several of these holdings. In October 2023, CMS issued a proposed rule that included new provisions governing the IDR process. That and other rulemaking remains ongoing, and litigation related to the QPA also remains ongoing.

The NSA balance billing prohibitions, coupled with the complexity and uncertainty of the IDR process, could limit the amount Pediatrix can charge and recover for items and services we furnish where we have not contracted with the patient’s insurer, and therefore could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and the trading price of our securities. Moreover, these measures could affect our ability to contract with certain payors under historically similar terms and may cause (and the prospect of these changes may have caused) payors to terminate their contracts with us and our affiliated physician practices, further affecting our business, financial condition, operations, cash flows and the trading price of our securities.

In addition to the balance billing prohibitions, the NSA also requires certain providers, including Pediatrix, and facilities, to develop and furnish a “Good Faith Estimate” (“GFE”) to individuals that details the expected charges for a scheduled item or service (although this requirement is currently only being partially enforced with respect to self-pay or uninsured patients). The GFE must include certain specific information such as, among other things, a detailed list of all items/services to be furnished and the amount the patient should be expected to pay for those items/services (which should not ultimately exceed $400 more than the estimated amount set forth on the GFE, or else patients can enter a designated arbitration process with the provider) and co-provider and co-facility cost estimates (though this requirement has not yet become enforceable). The GFE is also subject to certain highly technical formatting, timing, and dispute resolution requirements. The impact of the GFE requirements on the Company remains uncertain at this time, in part due to ongoing rulemaking around the NSA, as well as the delayed effective date of certain provisions of the GFE framework (as noted above related to co-providers and co-facilities and patients other than self-pay and uninsured), uncertainty around operational timeframes, potential penalties and patient reaction, among other things.

Additionally, the NSA, as well as some of existing state laws, require providers and facilities to make certain disclosures and post certain signage advising patients of their rights under the NSA, as well as disclosures about expected charges (when seeking consent to balance bill or when furnishing a GFE). These requirements impose administrative burdens that could increase our cost of doing business and expose us to compliance risk.

Expanding eligibility of GHC Programs could adversely affect our reimbursement.

In February 2018, Congress reauthorized the Children’s Health Insurance Program (“CHIP”) through 2027. Changes to CHIP or the ACA’s expansion of Medicaid coverage could cause patients who otherwise would have participated in private healthcare insurance programs to participate in GHC Programs, or vice versa, or cause patients who otherwise would have been covered by CHIP or Medicaid to lose insurance coverage altogether. Additional reform efforts could change the eligibility requirements for Medicaid and for other GHC Programs, including CHIP, and could increase the number of patients who participate in such programs or the number of uninsured patients.

In general, payments received from GHC Programs are substantially less than payments received from private healthcare insurance programs (managed care and other third-party payors). A shift in the mix of our payors from private healthcare insurance programs to government payors may result in an increase in our estimated provision for contractual adjustments and uncollectibles and a corresponding decrease in our net revenue, as well as a significant reduction in our average reimbursement rates. Additionally, if Congress does not act to extend CHIP beyond 2027, or if Congress extends CHIP but substantially alters the current program, we could be adversely affected if children in states where we do business lose Medicaid coverage or payments for services furnished to these children are delayed or reduced.

Government-funded programs, private insurers or state laws and regulations may limit, reduce or make retroactive adjustments to reimbursement amounts or rates.

A significant portion of our net revenue is derived from payments made by GHC Programs, principally Medicaid, including the managed care plans under the Medicaid program. These government-funded programs, as well as private insurers, have been and may continue to be subject to changes, including increased use of managed care organizations, value-based purchasing, and new patient care models to control the cost, eligibility for, use and delivery of healthcare services as a result of budgetary constraints and cost containment pressures due to unfavorable economic conditions, rising healthcare costs and for other reasons, including those described above under Item 1. Business—“Government Regulation—Government Regulatory Requirements.” Federal and state legislatures or administrators of these government-funded programs and private insurers may attempt other measures to control costs, including bundling of services and denial of, or reduction in, reimbursement for certain services and treatments. In addition, increased consolidation among private insurers is resulting in fewer and larger third-party payors with increased negotiating power. As a result, payments from government programs or private payors may decrease significantly.

In recent years, legislative and regulatory changes have resulted in limitations and reductions in payments to healthcare providers for certain services under the Medicare program. For example, Congress established automatic spending reductions under the Budget Control Act of 2011 (the “BCA”), resulting in a 2% reduction in Medicare payments that began in 2013 and extend through the first six months of the FY 2032 sequestration order. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, this reduction was temporarily suspended from May 1, 2020 through March 31, 2022, with subsequent reductions to 1% from April 1, 2022 until June 30, 2022. The 2% reduction was then reinstated and has been in effect since June 30, 2022. In addition, as a result of ARPA, an additional Medicare payment reduction of up to 4% was to take effect in January 2022; however, Congress delayed implementation of this reduction until 2025. Any downward adjustment in Medicare reimbursement rates may have a detrimental impact on our reimbursement rates not only for Medicare patients, but also for patients covered under Medicaid and other third-party payors, because a state’s Medicaid payments cannot exceed the payments it would have made had those patients been enrolled in traditional Medicare, and other third-party payors often base their reimbursement rates on a percentage of Medicare rates. It is difficult to predict whether, when or what other deficit reduction initiatives may be proposed by Congress. We anticipate that the federal deficit will continue to place pressures on GHC Programs.

Our business may also be materially affected by limitations on, or reductions in, reimbursement amounts or rates or elimination of coverage for certain individuals or treatments. Our business may also be materially affected by changes in medical codes for services that our affiliated clinicians provide if services under a new code are reimbursed at a lower rate. Moreover, because government-funded programs generally provide for reimbursements on a fee-schedule basis rather than on a charge-related basis, we generally cannot increase our revenue from these programs through increases in the amount we charge for our services. To the extent our costs increase, we may not be able to recover our increased costs from these programs, and cost containment measures and market changes in non-government-funded insurance plans have generally restricted our ability to recover, or shift to non-governmental payors, these increased costs. In addition, funds we receive from third-party payors are subject to audit with respect to the proper billing for physician and ancillary services and, accordingly, our revenue from these programs may be adjusted retroactively. Any retroactive adjustments to our reimbursement amounts could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and the trading price of our securities.

In addition, our agreements with certain third-party payors are terminable for various reasons. If an agreement with a third-party payor is terminated, we are generally required to seek reimbursement as an out-of-network provider. In the event we attempt to balance-bill patients, we may be limited in our ability to do so by certain state and federal laws and regulations, as discussed above. As these laws and regulations continue to develop, it could incentivize certain third-party payors to terminate agreements as a business strategy which could lower overall reimbursement to providers. Any reductions in reimbursement amounts could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and the trading price of our securities.

Adverse economic developments in the United States could lead to a reduction in federal government expenditures, including GHC Programs in which we participate, primarily Medicaid. In addition, if at any time the federal government is not able to meet its debt payments unless the federal debt ceiling is raised, and legislation increasing the debt ceiling is not enacted, the federal government may stop or delay making payments on its obligations, including funding for government programs in which we participate, primarily Medicaid. Failure of the government to make payments under these programs could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and the trading price of our securities. Further, if a federal government shutdown were to occur for a prolonged period of time, federal government payment obligations, including its obligations under Medicare and Medicaid, may be delayed. Similarly, if state government shutdowns were to occur, state payment obligations may be delayed. If the federal or state governments fail to make payments under these programs on a timely basis, our business could suffer, and our financial position, results of operations or cash flows may be materially affected.

We may become subject to billing investigations by federal and state government authorities and private insurers.

Federal and state laws, rules and regulations impose substantial penalties, including criminal and civil fines, monetary penalties, exclusion from participation in government healthcare programs and imprisonment, on entities or individuals (including any individual corporate officers or individual providers deemed responsible) that fraudulently or wrongfully bill government-funded programs or other third-party payors for healthcare services. CMS contracts with a variety of contractors to audit providers, such as Medicare Administrative Contractors (“MACs”), Unified Program Integrity Contractors (“UPICs”), and Recovery Audit Contractors (“RACs”). These audits can result in overpayment determinations and recoupments from providers. CMS may also impose Medicare payment suspensions based on billing irregularities or credible allegations of fraud or Medicare enrollment revocations based on a number of reasons, including billing irregularities. CMS requires states to maintain a Medicaid RAC program. States are required to contract with one or more eligible Medicaid RACs to review Medicaid claims for any overpayments or underpayments, and to recoup overpayments from providers on behalf of the state.

Federal laws, along with a growing number of state laws, allow a private person to bring a civil action in the name of the government for false billing violations. See Item 1. Business— “Government Regulation—Fraud and Abuse Provisions.” Further, identified overpayments from Medicare or Medicaid must be refunded to the government within 60 days of identification or the entity could be held liable under the federal False Claims Act (“FCA”), including for treble damages and substantial civil penalties, currently set at $13,946 up to $27,894 per false claim or statement for penalties assessed after January 15, 2024. In addition, our contracts with private insurers often provide such insurers with audit rights over payments made to us and the ability to seek recoupment for overpayments. We believe that audits, inquiries and investigations from government agencies, government contractors and private insurers will occur from time to time in the ordinary course of our business, which could result in substantial costs to us, legal actions by or against us, and a diversion of management’s time and attention. New regulations and heightened enforcement activity also could materially affect our cost of doing business and our risk of becoming the subject of an audit or investigation. We cannot predict whether any future audits, inquiries or investigations, or the public disclosure of such matters, likely would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and the trading price of our securities. See Item 1. Business—“Government Investigations.”

The healthcare industry is highly regulated, and government authorities may determine that we have failed to comply with applicable laws, rules or regulations.

The healthcare industry and physicians’ medical practices, including the healthcare and other services that we and our affiliated physicians provide, are subject to extensive and complex federal, state and local laws, rules and regulations, compliance with which imposes substantial costs on us. Applicable U.S. federal and state and non-U.S. healthcare laws and regulations include the following:

• the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, a criminal law, which prohibits, among other things, persons and entities from knowingly and willfully offering, paying, soliciting or receiving any remuneration, directly or indirectly, in cash or in kind, to induce or reward purchasing, leasing, ordering, or arranging for, referring, or recommending the purchase, lease or order of any good or service for which payment may be made, in whole or in part, under GHC Programs such as Medicare and Medicaid. A person or entity does not need to have actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it in order to have committed a violation. Violations of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute can result in significant civil monetary penalties and criminal fines, as well as imprisonment and exclusion from participation in GHC Programs;
• the federal civil False Claims Act, which may be enforced through civil whistleblower or qui tam actions and imposes significant civil penalties, treble damages and potential exclusion from GHC Programs

against individuals or entities for, among other things, knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, to the federal government, claims for payment that are false or fraudulent or for making a false record or statement material to an obligation to pay the federal government or for knowingly and improperly avoiding, decreasing or concealing an obligation to pay money to the federal government. Further, a violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute can serve as a basis for liability under the federal civil False Claims Act. There is also the federal Criminal False Claims Act, which is similar to the federal Civil False Claims Act and imposes criminal liability on those that make or present a false, fictitious or fraudulent claim to the federal government;

• the federal Civil Monetary Penalties Law (“CMPL”), which authorizes the imposition of substantial civil monetary penalties against an entity that engages in activities including, among others (1) knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, a claim for services not provided as claimed or that is otherwise false or fraudulent in any way; (2) arranging for or contracting with an individual or entity that is excluded from participation in federal health care programs to provide items or services reimbursable by a federal health care program; (3) violations of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute; or (4) failing to report and return a known overpayment;
• the Eliminating Kickbacks in the Recovery Act of 2018 (“EKRA”) establishes criminal penalties for paying, receiving, soliciting or offering any remuneration in return for referring a patient to a laboratory, clinical treatment facility or recovery home, or in exchange for an individual using the services of one of these entities. The EKRA prohibitions apply to services covered by GHC programs and by private health plans;
• the federal Physician Payment Sunshine Act, which requires applicable manufacturers of covered drugs, devices, biologics, and medical supplies for which payment is available under Medicare, Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program, among others, to annually track and report payments and other transfers of value provided to U.S.-licensed physicians, teaching hospitals, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, certified nurse anesthetists, anesthesiologist assistants and certified nurse-midwives, as well as certain ownership and investment interests held in the manufacturer by physicians and their immediate families;
• the federal Physician Self-Referral Law, commonly referred to as the Stark Law, is a strict liability civil law that prohibits physicians from making “referrals” for “designated health services,” payable by Medicare or Medicaid, to entities with which the physician or an immediate family member of the physician has a “financial relationship,” unless an exception applies. The Stark Law further prohibits entities which have received such referrals from filing claims with Medicare (or billing another individual, entity or third-party payor) for those referred services. The term “designated health services” includes, among other things, inpatient and outpatient hospital services, home health services, and clinical laboratory services;
• similar state law provisions pertaining to anti-kickback, fee splitting, self-referral and false claims, and other fraud and abuse issues which typically are not limited to relationships involving government-funded programs. In some cases, these laws prohibit or regulate additional conduct beyond what federal law affects, including applicability to items and services paid by commercial insurers and private pay patients. Penalties for violating these laws can range from physician licensure sanctions, fines and criminal sanctions;
• statutes created by HIPAA, which impose criminal liability for, among other things, knowingly and willfully executing or attempting to execute a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program, including private insurance plans, or, in any matter involving a healthcare benefit program, for knowingly and willfully making materially false, fictitious or fraudulent statements in connection with the delivery of or payment for health care benefits;
• federal and state regulations that broadly define provider and supplier affiliation and require providers to disclose to GHC Programs certain disclosable events including, without limitation, current or previous direct or indirect affiliations with providers or suppliers having uncollected debt to GHC Programs, being subject to payment suspension, being excluded from participation in GHC Programs or had such billing privileges denied or revoked, and that permit GHC Programs to deny or revoke provider or supplier

enrollment based upon such affiliations upon determining that the affiliations pose an undue risk of fraud, waste, or abuse;

• state laws that prohibit or limit general business corporations from practicing medicine, exercising control over physicians’ medical decisions or engaging in certain practices or financial arrangements, such as splitting fees with physicians. These laws and their interpretations vary from state to state and are enforced by state courts and regulatory authorities, each with broad discretion, and are subject to change and to evolving interpretations by state boards of medicine and state attorneys general, among others;
• federal and state laws governing participation in GHC Programs could result in denial of our application to become a participating provider or revocation of our participation or billing privileges, which in turn, could cause us to not be able to treat patients covered by the applicable program or prohibit us from billing for the treatment services provided to such patients;
• federal and state laws that prohibit providers from billing and receiving payment from Medicare and Medicaid for services unless the services are medically necessary, adequately and accurately documented, and billed using codes that accurately reflect the type and level of services rendered;
• federal and state laws and policies that require healthcare providers to maintain licensure, certification, or accreditation to enroll and participate in the Medicare and Medicaid programs, to report certain changes in their operations to the agencies that administer these programs;
• reassignment of payment rules that prohibit certain types of billing and collection practices in connection with claims payable by the Medicare or Medicaid programs;
• laws that regulate debt collection practices, as applied to our debt collection practices;
• federal and state laws pertaining to the provision and coverage of services by non-physician practitioners, such as advanced nurse practitioners, physician assistants and other clinical professionals, physician supervision of such services and reimbursement requirements that may be dependent on the manner in which the services are provided and documented; and
• federal laws that impose civil administrative sanctions for, among other violations, inappropriate billing of services to federal healthcare programs, inappropriately reducing hospital inpatient lengths of stay for such patients or employing individuals who are excluded from participation in federally funded healthcare programs.

In addition, we believe that our business will continue to be subject to increasing regulation, the scope and effect of which we cannot predict. See Item 1. Business—“Government Regulation.”

We may in the future become the subject of regulatory or other investigations, audits or proceedings, and our interpretations of applicable laws, rules and regulations may be challenged, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and the trading price of our securities. For example, in some states, we are dependent on our relationship with affiliated physician practices, which we do not own, to provide physician and other clinical services, and our business would be adversely affected if those relationships were disrupted or if our arrangements with our providers are found to violate state laws prohibiting the corporate practice of medicine or fee splitting, or if our contractual relationships with such entities cease to continue. Our contracts include management services agreements among other agreements with such affiliated physician practices, to which these practices reserve exclusive control and responsibility for all aspects of the practice of medicine and delivery of medical services. While we seek to substantially comply with the applicable state prohibitions on the corporate practice of medicine and fee splitting, these laws could impact our business operations, and state officials who administer these laws or other third parties may successfully challenge our contractual arrangements, which could subject us to civil and criminal penalties and require us to restructure our relationships with providers to comply with these statutes, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and operations. Additionally, state corporate practice of medicine doctrines often impose penalties on physicians themselves for aiding the corporate practice of medicine, which could impact physicians participating with our affiliated physician practices. See Item 1. Business—“Government Regulation—Fee Splitting; Corporate Practice of Medicine.”

Further, regulatory authorities or other parties also could assert that our relationships, including fee arrangements, among our affiliated professional contractors, hospital clients or referring physicians violate the anti-kickback, fee splitting, EKRA, or self-referral laws and regulations or that we have submitted false claims or otherwise failed to comply with government program reimbursement requirements. See Item 1. Business—“Government Regulation—Fraud and Abuse Provisions” and “—Government Regulatory Requirements.” In addition, violations of these laws are punishable by monetary fines, civil and criminal penalties, exclusion from participation in GHC Programs, and forfeiture of amounts collected in violation of such laws and regulations, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and the trading price of our securities. Additionally, federal and state fraud and abuse laws, rules and regulations are not static and amendments, clarifications, revisions, or other modifications to these laws may occur from time to time. For instance, on December 2, 2020, both CMS and OIG issued Final Rules revising the federal anti-kickback statute, the CMPL, and the Stark Law regulations to foster arrangements that would promote care coordination, advance the delivery of value-based care, and protect consumers from harms caused by fraud and abuse through additional new statutory definitions, safe harbors, and exceptions. Compliance with federal fraud and abuse laws such as the anti-kickback statute, the CMPL, and the Stark Law involves constant monitoring for regulatory changes, agency and court interpretations, and revisiting of arrangements based on new interpretations or clarifications, all of which will require ongoing compliance costs. In addition, these laws and their exceptions and safe harbors are complex and clear interpretations are not always available. Despite our efforts to comply, we cannot guarantee that a government agency will necessarily agree with our interpretations or that one or more of our arrangements will not be subject to challenge, nor can we provide any assurance that they will not have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and the trading price of our securities.

Government authorities or other parties may assert that our business practices violate antitrust laws.

The healthcare industry is subject to close antitrust scrutiny. The FTC, the Antitrust Division of the DOJ and state Attorneys General all actively review and, in some cases, take enforcement action against businesses, particularly in the healthcare industry. Private parties can also bring antitrust suits. Violations of antitrust laws may be punishable by substantial penalties, including significant monetary fines and treble damages, civil penalties, criminal sanctions, and consent decrees and injunctions prohibiting certain activities or requiring divestiture or discontinuance of business operations. Any of these penalties could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and the trading price of our securities.

Our affiliated physicians and other individual providers may not satisfy all conditions of payment or otherwise appropriately record or document services that they provide.

Our affiliated physicians and other individual providers are responsible for maintaining all required professional licensures or certifications in good standing, which is generally a condition of reimbursement in GHC Programs and in private insurance, and for appropriately recording and documenting the services that they provide. We use this information to seek reimbursement for their services from third-party payors. In addition, we utilize third-party contractors to perform certain revenue cycle management functions for healthcare providers, including medical coding. If our affiliated physicians or other individual providers and third-party contractors do not appropriately document, or where applicable, code for their services or our customers’ services, we could be subjected to administrative, regulatory, civil, or criminal investigations or sanctions and our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be materially adversely affected. We are further obligated under the federal overpayment statute and FCA to timely report and return any identified overpayments and to maintain reasonable internal audit mechanisms to identify overpayments. Failure to timely report and return overpayments to Medicare or Medicaid could subject us to liability under the federal FCA, and also equivalent false claims acts on the state level.

State healthcare transaction laws could adversely affect our operations.

Numerous states have implemented healthcare transaction review laws that typically require healthcare entities to provide pre-closing notice regarding “material” healthcare transactions to government agencies. These laws differ from the typical change of control processes that often apply to licensed healthcare facilities and providers. For example, these laws generally apply to “healthcare entities” regardless of licensure, and therefore apply to organizations that often do not require separate licensure. Furthermore, the reviews are more substantive in nature, often focusing on the impact of the proposed transaction on factors such as cost, quality, access, equity and competition. Healthcare transaction review law requirements vary significantly between states. Some states require notice, while others may require a cost and market impact review. Healthcare transaction review laws may affect the structure and timing of proposed transactions we may enter into or our ability to enter into transactions at all, which may have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Risks Related to Our Business Strategy

During 2024, we undertook a transformation of our revenue cycle management function from an outsourced provider to a hybrid function that utilizes both our corporate personnel as well as third-party service providers. Our failure to execute a hybrid revenue cycle management function efficiently and effectively may have a material impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and the trading price of our securities.

We undertook a transformation of our revenue cycle management function from an outsourced provider to a hybrid function that utilizes both our corporate personnel as well as third-party service providers that we engaged to support these activities. The success of this plan depends, in part, on our ability for our internal operations to handle certain revenue cycle management functions internally and to integrate the third-party service providers that we have engaged with our systems in a timely and efficient manner. If we are not able to successfully achieve these objectives, the anticipated benefits of this transformation may not be realized fully or at all or may take longer to realize than expected. These activities may be complex and time consuming and involve delays or additional and unforeseen expenses. In connection with this hybrid revenue cycle management function, we could experience a further reduction in revenue due to delays in collection efforts or the inability to collect from patients or third-party payors, claim denials, recoupments, or governmental and third-party audits, all of which may impact our profitability and cash flow. Further, the costs associated with any operational problems, delays in collections from payors, and errors and control issues may impact our ability to realize the intended benefits from this transformation and may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and the trading price of our securities.

We currently outsource, and from time to time in the future may outsource, a portion of our internal business functions to third-party providers. Outsourcing these functions has significant risks, and our failure to successfully manage these risks could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We currently, and from time to time in the future may, outsource portions of internal business functions, including our revenue cycle management functions, to third-party service providers. These functions are performed both domestically and in offshore locations, with our oversight. If our outsourcing partners fail to perform their obligations in a timely manner at satisfactory quality levels, in compliance with regulatory requirements, or if they are unable to attract or retain sufficient personnel with the necessary skill sets to meet our outsourcing needs, the efficiency, effectiveness and quality of our services could suffer. Reliance on third-party providers could have significant negative consequences, including significant disruptions in our operations and significantly increased costs to undertake such operations, either of which could damage our relationships with our patients and customers.

For example, our results of operations were previously negatively impacted by the performance of a third-party provider we used in connection with our revenue cycle management function, leading to our decision to transform our revenue cycle management function. In connection with the previous transition of our revenue cycle management function, we experienced a reduction in revenue due to delays in collection efforts or the inability to collect from patients or third-party payors, claim denials, recoupments, or governmental and third-party audits, all of which impacted our profitability and cash flow. The current or any future transitions in connection with our revenue cycle management function may have similar impacts on our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, our reliance on a workforce in other countries exposes us to disruptions in the business, political and economic environment in those regions. Further, any changes to existing laws or the enactment of new legislation restricting offshore outsourcing in the United States, or increasing the cost of using offshore services may adversely affect our ability to outsource functions to third-party offshore service providers. Our ability to manage any difficulties encountered could be largely outside of our control. In addition, federal government and third-party payors may have prohibitions or restrictions on the use of third-party service providers outside of the United States and/or require notice for the use of such third-party service providers. Diminished service quality from outsourcing, our inability to utilize offshore service providers or the failure to comply with restrictions on the use of third-party service providers could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and the trading price of our securities.

We may not find suitable acquisition candidates or successfully integrate our acquisitions. Our acquisitions may expose us to greater business risks and could affect our payor mix.

We have expanded and continue to seek to expand our presence in new and existing metropolitan areas by acquiring established physician group practices. Our acquisition strategy involves numerous risks and uncertainties, including:

• We may not be able to identify suitable acquisition candidates or strategic opportunities or implement successfully, or realize the expected benefits of, any suitable opportunities. In addition, we compete for acquisitions with other potential acquirers, some of which may have greater financial or operational resources than we do. This competition may intensify due to the ongoing consolidation in the healthcare industry, which may increase our acquisition costs.
• We may not be able to complete acquisitions of physician practices or services companies, or we may complete acquisitions on less favorable terms as a result of changes in tax laws, healthcare fraud and abuse laws, financial market or other economic or market conditions.
• We may not be able to successfully integrate completed acquisitions, including our recent acquisitions. Integrating completed acquisitions into our existing operations involves numerous short-term and long-term risks, including diversion of our management’s attention, failure to retain key personnel, long-term value of acquired intangible assets and acquisition expenses. In addition, we may be required to comply with laws, rules and regulations that may differ not only from those of the states in which our operations are currently conducted but from an expansion in the service offerings we provide in certain states for which the laws, rules and regulations may be different.
• We cannot be certain that any acquired business will continue to maintain its pre-acquisition revenue and growth rates or be financially successful. In addition, we cannot be certain of the extent of any unknown or contingent liabilities of any acquired business, including liabilities for failure to comply with applicable laws, or liabilities relating to medical malpractice claims. Generally, we obtain indemnification agreements from the sellers of businesses acquired with respect to pre-closing acts, omissions and other similar risks. It is possible that we may seek to enforce indemnification provisions in the future against sellers who may no longer have the financial wherewithal to satisfy their obligations to us. Accordingly, we may incur material liabilities for past activities of acquired businesses.
• We could incur or assume indebtedness and issue equity in connection with acquisitions. The issuance of shares of our common stock for an acquisition may result in dilution to our existing shareholders and, depending on the number of shares that we issue, the resale of such shares could affect the trading price of our common stock.
• We may acquire businesses that derive a greater portion of their revenue from GHC Programs than what we recognize on a consolidated basis or that have business models with lower operating margins than ours. These acquisitions could affect our overall payor mix or operating results in future periods.
• Acquisitions of practices could entail financial and operating risks not fully anticipated. Such acquisitions could divert management's attention and our resources.
• An acquisition could be subject to challenge under the antitrust laws either before or after it is consummated. Such a challenge could involve substantial legal costs and divert management’s attention and resources and could result in us having to abandon the transaction or make a divestiture.

If we are not successful in integrating an acquisition, we may decide to dispose of such acquisition and may do so at a loss or record impairments in connection with such a disposition.

We may not be able to successfully execute our same-unit and organic growth strategies.

In addition to our acquisition growth strategy, we seek opportunities for increasing revenue from our existing operations through same-unit and organic growth strategies. We also seek opportunities to grow organically outside of our existing operations. We may not be able to successfully execute our same-unit and organic growth strategies for reasons including the following:

• We may not be able to expand the services that our affiliated physicians provide to our hospital partners.
• We may not be able to attract referrals to our office-based practices or neonatology transports to our hospital-based units.
• We may not be able to execute new contractual arrangements with hospitals, including through joint ventures, where we either currently provide or do not currently provide physician services.
• We may not be able to work with our hospital partners to develop integrated services programs for which we become a multi-specialty provider of solutions within the maternal-fetal, newborn and pediatric continuum of care.
• We may not accurately project same-unit and organic growth performance, including projections of revenue and operating expenses, or we may experience a shift in the mix of services that certain of our customers request from us, potentially resulting in lower margins.

In addition, certain of our organic growth strategies may involve risks and uncertainties similar to those for our acquisition strategy. See “We may not find suitable acquisition candidates or successfully integrate our acquisitions. Our acquisitions may expose us to greater business risks and could affect our payor mix.”

We may not effectively manage our growth.

We have historically experienced growth in our business, including growth outside of our core physician specialties. Growth in the number of our employees and affiliated physicians has in the past placed significant demands on our financial, operational and management resources. Significant growth may impair our ability to provide our services efficiently and to manage our employees adequately. Our future results of operations could be adversely affected if we are unable to manage our growth effectively.

Hospitals or other customers may terminate their agreements with us, our physicians may lose the ability to provide services in hospitals or administrative fees paid to us by hospitals may be reduced.

Our net revenue is derived primarily from fee-for-service billings for patient care and other services provided by our affiliated physicians and from administrative fees paid to us by hospitals. See Item 1. Business—“Relationships with Our Partners—Hospitals.” Our hospital partners or other customers may cancel or not renew their contracts with us, may reduce or eliminate our administrative fees in the future, or refuse to pay us our administrative fees if we fail to honor the terms of our agreement or fail to meet certain performance metrics under those agreements. Further, consolidation of hospitals, healthcare systems or other customers could adversely affect our ability to negotiate with these entities. Adverse economic conditions, including decreased federal and state funding to hospitals, could influence future actions of our hospital partners or other customers. In addition, hospitals may from time to time cancel or delay certain elective procedures in order to address increasing demand for beds by other patients. To the extent that our arrangements with our hospital partners or other customers are canceled or are not renewed or replaced with other arrangements having at least as favorable terms, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected. In addition, to the extent our affiliated physicians lose their privileges in hospitals or hospitals enter into arrangements with or employ other physicians, including our existing affiliated physicians, our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be adversely affected.

Risks Related to Operating our Business

We are dependent upon our key management personnel for our future success and loss of our key management and other personnel or an inability to attract new management and other personnel could impact our business.

Our success depends to a significant extent on the continued contributions of our key management personnel for the management of our business and implementation of our business strategy. We experienced significant management turnover in 2024 and the further loss of or changes in key management personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and the trading price of our securities. Management transition is often difficult and inherently causes some loss of institutional knowledge and a learning curve for new executives, which could negatively affect our results of operations and financial condition. Our ability to execute our business strategies may be adversely affected by the uncertainty associated with any such transition, and the time and attention from the board and management needed to fill vacant roles and train new employees could disrupt our business. Competition is intense for qualified employees, and the loss of qualified employees or an inability to attract, retain and motivate additional highly skilled employees required for the operation and growth of our business could hinder our ability to successfully carry out our strategy.

Our quarterly results will likely fluctuate from period to period.

We have historically experienced and expect to continue to experience quarterly fluctuations in net revenue and net income. For example, we typically experience negative cash flow from operations in the first quarter of each year, principally as a result of bonus payments to affiliated physicians as well as discretionary matching contributions for participants in our qualified contributory savings plans. In addition, a significant number of our employees and associated professional contractors (primarily affiliated physicians) exceed the level of taxable wages for social security contributions during the first and second quarters. As a result, we incur a significantly higher payroll tax burden and our net income is lower during those quarters. Moreover, a lower number of calendar days are present in the first and second quarters of the year as compared to the remainder of the year. Because we provide services in the NICU on a 24-hours-a-day basis, 365 days a year, any reduction in service days will have a corresponding reduction in net revenue. In addition, any reduction in office days in our office-based practices will also have a corresponding reduction in net revenue. We also have significant fixed operating costs, including costs for our affiliated physicians, and as a result, are highly dependent on patient volume and capacity utilization of our affiliated physicians to sustain profitability. Quarterly results may also be impacted by the timing of acquisitions and any fluctuation in patient volume. As a result, our results of operations for any quarter are not indicative of results of operations for any future period or full fiscal year.

We may write-off intangible assets, such as goodwill.

The carrying value of our intangible assets, which consists primarily of goodwill related to our acquisitions, is subject to testing at least annually, and more frequently if impairment indicators exist. Under current accounting standards, goodwill is tested for impairment on at least an annual basis and more frequently if impairment indicators exist, and we have been subject to impairment losses as circumstances have changed after acquisition. For example, during 2024, we recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $150.6 million. If we record additional impairment losses related to our goodwill in the future, it could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and the trading price of our securities.

We are subject to medical malpractice and other lawsuits that may not covered by insurance.

Our business entails an inherent risk of claims of medical malpractice against our affiliated physicians and us. We may also be subject to other lawsuits which may involve large claims and significant defense costs. Although we currently maintain liability insurance coverage intended to cover professional liability and other claims, there can be no assurance that our insurance coverage will be adequate to cover liabilities arising out of claims asserted against us where the outcomes of such claims are unfavorable to us. Generally, we self-insure our liabilities to pay retention amounts for professional liability matters through a wholly owned captive insurance subsidiary. Liabilities in excess of our insurance coverage, including coverage for professional liability and other claims, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and the trading price of our securities. See Item 1. Business—“Other Legal Proceedings” and— “Professional and General Liability Coverage.”

The reserves that we have established related to our professional liability losses are subject to inherent uncertainties and if actual costs exceed our estimates this may lead to a reduction in our net earnings.

We have established reserves for losses and related expenses that represent estimates involving actuarial projections. These actuarial projections are developed at a given point in time and represent our expectations of the ultimate resolution and administration of costs of losses incurred with respect to professional liability risks for the amount of risk retained by us. Insurance reserves are inherently subject to uncertainty. Our reserve estimates are based on actuarial valuations using historical claims, demographic factors, industry trends, severity and exposure factors and other actuarial assumptions. The estimates of projected ultimate losses are developed at least annually. Our reserves have been, and could further be, significantly affected should current and future occurrences differ from historical claim trends and expectations. While claims are monitored closely when estimating reserves, the complexity of the claims and wide range of potential outcomes often hamper timely adjustments to the assumptions used in these estimates. Actual losses and related expenses may deviate, perhaps substantially, from the reserve estimates reflected in our financial statements. If our estimated reserves are determined to be inadequate, we have been and could further be required to increase reserves at the time the deficiency is determined. See Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—“Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates—Professional Liability Coverage.”

We are subject to litigation risks.

From time to time, we are involved in various litigation matters and claims, including regulatory proceedings, administrative proceedings, governmental investigations, and contract disputes, as they relate to our services and business. We may face potential claims or liability for, among other things, breach of contract, defamation, libel, fraud, negligence or data breaches. Our contracts with hospitals generally require us to indemnify them and their affiliates for losses resulting from the negligence of our affiliated physicians and other clinicians. We may also face employment-related litigation, including claims of age discrimination, sexual harassment, gender discrimination, immigration violations, or other local, state, and federal labor law violations. Because of the uncertain nature of litigation and insurance coverage decisions, the outcome of such actions and proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty and an unfavorable resolution of one or more of them could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and the trading price of our securities. In addition, legal fees and costs associated with prosecuting and defending litigation matters could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operation and the trading price of our securities.

We may not be able to collect reimbursements for our services from third-party payors.

A significant portion of our net revenue is derived from reimbursements from various third-party payors, including GHC Programs, private insurance plans and managed care plans, for services provided by our affiliated professional contractors. We are responsible for submitting reimbursement requests to these payors and collecting the reimbursements, and we assume the financial risks relating to uncollectible and delayed reimbursements. In the current healthcare environment, payors continue efforts to control expenditures for healthcare, including revisions to coverage and reimbursement policies. Due to the nature of our business and our participation in government-funded and private reimbursement programs, we are involved from time to time in inquiries, reviews, audits and investigations by governmental agencies and private payors of our business practices, including assessments of our compliance with coding, billing and documentation requirements. We may be required to repay these agencies or private payors if a finding is made that we were incorrectly reimbursed within a certain time period, or we may become involved in disputes with payors and could be subjected to pre-payment and post-payment reviews, which can be time-consuming and result in non-payment or delayed payment for the services we provide. We may also experience difficulties in collecting reimbursements because third-party payors may seek to reduce or delay reimbursements to which we are entitled for services that our affiliated physicians have provided, they experience administrative issues that result in a delay in reimbursements, or pursuant to binding arbitration proceedings for out-of-network items or services. Further, GHC Programs, private insurance plans and managed care plans are increasingly requiring that services we provide be reviewed and approved prior to provision of such services. These prior authorization reviews increase our administrative costs and delay payments, which materially impact our business. In addition, GHC Programs may deny or revoke our application to become a participating provider if we do not disclose certain events relating to our affiliates or for other reasons that could cause us to not be able to provide services to patients or prohibit us from billing for such services. GHC Programs may also suspend our payments pending an audit or investigation, which could last for an extended period of time. If we are not reimbursed fully or in a timely manner for such services or there is a finding that we were incorrectly reimbursed, our revenue, cash flows and financial condition could be materially, adversely affected. In addition, we may choose to challenge certain GHC reimbursement decisions through administrative appeal mechanisms. Any backlog in appeals may further affect our ability to collect reimbursement for services rendered.

In addition, adverse economic conditions could affect the timeliness and amounts received from our third-party and government payors which would impact our short-term liquidity needs.

Risks Related to our Capital Structure

Our current indebtedness and any future indebtedness could adversely affect us by reducing our flexibility to respond to changing business and economic conditions and expose us to interest rate risk to the extent of any variable rate debt. In addition, a certain portion of our interest expense may not be deductible.

As of December 31, 2024, our total indebtedness was $615.6 million, of which $400.0 million was at fixed interest rates and $215.6 million was at variable rates. We also had $450.0 million of additional borrowing capacity under our revolving line of credit which was subject to a variable interest rate. Other debt we incur also could be variable rate debt. In addition, United States tax law places certain limitations on the deductibility of interest expense at a percentage of taxable income. If interest rates continue to increase, any variable rate debt will create higher debt service requirements, and if interest expense increases beyond a specified percentage of taxable income, a portion of that interest expense may not be deductible for income tax purposes, which could adversely affect our results of operations and cash flows.

We have limited restrictions on incurring substantial additional indebtedness in the future. Our current indebtedness and any future increases in leverage could have adverse consequences on us, including:

• a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations will be required to service interest and principal payments on our debt and will not be available for operations, working capital, capital expenditures, expansion, acquisitions, dividends or general corporate or other purposes;
• our ability to obtain additional financing in the future may be impaired;
• we may be more highly leveraged than our competitors, which may place us at a competitive disadvantage;
• our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and industry may be limited; and
• we may be more vulnerable in the event of a downturn in our business, our industry or the economy in general.

Our ability to make payments on and to refinance our debt will depend on our ability to generate cash in the future. This, to a certain extent, is subject to general economic, business, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory, and other factors that are beyond our control. We cannot assure you that our business will generate sufficient cash flow from operations or that future borrowings will be available under our revolving line of credit in an amount sufficient to enable us to pay our debt or to fund our other liquidity needs.

Any failure to make payments of interest and principal on our outstanding indebtedness on a timely basis would likely result in other defaults, disrupt our operations and cause a reduction of our credit rating, which could further harm our ability to finance or refinance our obligations and business operations.

If our cash flows and capital resources are insufficient to fund our debt service requirements, we may be forced to reduce or delay acquisitions or other investments, or to seek additional capital, or restructure or refinance our indebtedness. Our ability to restructure or refinance our debt will depend on the condition of the capital markets and our financial condition at such time. We cannot assure you that we will be able to refinance any of our debt, including our revolving line of credit and senior notes, on commercially reasonable terms or at all.

Provisions of our articles and bylaws could deter takeover attempts, but our business could be negatively affected as a result of shareholder activism.

Our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, as amended, authorize our Board of Directors to issue up to 1,000,000 shares of undesignated preferred stock and to determine the powers, preferences and rights of these shares without shareholder approval. This preferred stock could be issued with voting, liquidation, dividend and other rights superior to those of the holders of common stock. The issuance of preferred stock under some circumstances could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control. In addition, provisions in our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, as amended, and Bylaws, including those relating to calling shareholder meetings, taking action by written consent and other matters, could render it more difficult or discourage an attempt to obtain control of Pediatrix through a proxy contest or consent solicitation, however, there is no assurance that these provisions would have such an effect. These provisions could limit the price that some investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock. Notwithstanding these provisions, we could, and have, become the target of activist shareholders who acquire ownership positions in our common stock and seek to influence our company. Responding to actions by activist shareholders can be costly and time-consuming, disrupt our business and divert the attention of our Board of Directors, management and employees. Additionally, perceived uncertainties as to our future direction, including the composition of our Board of Directors, as a result of shareholder activism may lead to the perception of a change in the direction of our business or other instability, which may be exploited by our competitors, cause concern to our current or potential customers and acquisition candidates, and make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified personnel, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows and the trading prices of our securities. In addition, the trading prices of our securities may experience periods of increased volatility as a result of shareholder activism.

Risks Related to Labor

We may not be able to successfully recruit, onboard and retain qualified physicians and other clinicians and other personnel, and our compensation expense for existing clinicians and other personnel may increase.

We are dependent upon our ability to recruit and retain a sufficient number of qualified physicians and other clinicians and other personnel to service existing units at hospitals and our affiliated physician practices and expand our business. We compete with many types of healthcare providers, including teaching, research and government institutions, hospitals and health systems and other practice and services groups, for the services of qualified clinicians. The U.S. is currently experiencing and is expected to continue to experience a nationwide healthcare professional shortage. Due to this increased exit from healthcare practice and lack of sufficient new talent to replace them, our recruiting efforts have become increasingly more competitive. We may not be able to continue to recruit new clinicians or other personnel or renew contracts with existing clinicians or other personnel on acceptable terms. We have and may seek to renew clinician contracts prior to their existing renewal date for various reasons, including to move clinicians to a different compensation structure. We may not be successful in these early renewal efforts, and further, clinical compensation may increase as a result of incremental compensation incentives that may be required by clinicians to agree to the change in compensation structure. In addition, the recruiting and onboarding process for certain of our physicians and other clinicians can take several months, or longer, to complete due to various requirements, including state licensing and hospital credentialing. Further, if the demand exceeds the supply for physicians and other clinicians and personnel either in general or in specific markets, we could experience an increase in compensation expense, including premium pay and agency labor costs. If we are unable to recruit new physicians, renew contracts on acceptable terms or onboard physicians, clinicians and other personnel in a reasonable period of time, our ability to service existing or new hospital units and staff existing or new office-based practices could be adversely affected. In addition, if we experience a higher rate of growth in compensation expense, our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and the trading price of our securities could be adversely affected.

A significant number of our affiliated physicians or other clinicians could leave our affiliated physician practices or our affiliated physician practices may be unable to enforce the non-competition covenants of departed physicians.

Our affiliated professional contractors usually enter into employment agreements with our affiliated physicians. Certain of our employment agreements can be terminated without cause by any party upon prior written notice. In addition, substantially all of our affiliated physicians have agreed not to compete within a specified geographic area for a certain period after termination of employment. The law governing non-compete agreements and other forms of restrictive covenants varies from state to state. Although we believe that the non-competition and other restrictive covenants applicable to our affiliated physicians are reasonable in scope and duration and therefore enforceable under applicable state law, courts and arbitrators in some states may be reluctant to enforce non-compete agreements and restrictive covenants against physicians. In addition, we have and may incur significant legal fees to pursue enforcement of such agreements and restrictive covenants. Further, the Federal Trade Commission issued a final rule that would prohibit employers from using non-compete clauses with workers. The rule would have been effective September 4, 2024, but is currently enjoined pending legal challenges. Certain states also have enacted or proposed prohibitions on using non-compete clauses with workers, including healthcare providers. Our affiliated physicians or other clinicians may leave our affiliated physician practices for a variety of reasons, including in order to provide services for other types of healthcare providers, such as teaching, research and government institutions, hospitals and health systems and other practice groups. If a substantial number of our affiliated physicians or other clinicians leave our affiliated physician practices, we could incur significant legal fees to pursue enforcement of certain covenants within employment agreements or if our affiliated physician practices are unable to enforce the non-competition covenants in the employment agreements, our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be adversely affected.

Information Systems, Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Risks

We may not be able to maintain effective and efficient information systems or properly safeguard our information systems.

Our operations are dependent on uninterrupted performance of our information systems. Failure to maintain reliable information systems, disruptions in our existing information systems or the implementation of new systems could disrupt business operations or cause errors and delays in billings and collections, difficulty satisfying requirements under hospital contracts, disputes with patients and payors, violations of patient privacy, confidentiality, and other regulatory requirements, increased administrative expenses and other adverse consequences.

Information security risks have generally increased in recent years because of new technologies and tactics of cyber criminals. Despite our layered security controls and our continuous monitoring and testing (by both internal and external parties) of such controls, experienced cyber criminals have been and may be able to penetrate our information systems, misappropriate or compromise sensitive patient or personnel information or proprietary or confidential information, create system disruptions or cause shutdowns. They also may be able to develop and deploy viruses, worms and other malicious software programs that disable our systems or otherwise exploit security vulnerabilities, or attempt to fraudulently induce employees to take actions, including to release confidential or sensitive information or make fraudulent payments, through illegal electronic spamming, phishing or other tactics. For example, in February 2024, Change Healthcare, a subsidiary of UnitedHealth Group and a major processor of U.S. medical claims, was the subject of a well-publicized cyberattack. This event caused significant delays and disruptions in payments to hospitals, physicians, pharmacists, and other health care providers across the country, including us. While this cyberattack did not have a material impact on us or our operations, future cyber attacks on us or our third-party providers could have a material impact on our business.

A failure in or breach of our information systems as a result of cybersecurity attacks or other tactics could disrupt our business, has resulted and may result in the disclosure or misuse of PHI, personal information, or confidential or proprietary business information, and has caused or may cause financial loss, damage our reputation, increase our administrative expenses, and expose us to additional risk of liability to federal or state governments, individuals, or classes of individuals. Although we believe that we have reasonable and appropriate information security procedures and other safeguards in place, as cybersecurity threats continue to evolve, we have been and may be required to expend additional resources to continue to enhance our information security measures or to investigate and remediate information security vulnerabilities. Our remediation efforts may not be successful and could result in interruptions to our operations (including, without limitation, our billing processes), delays or cessation of service and loss of existing or potential customers. In addition, breaches of our security measures and the unauthorized dissemination of patient healthcare and other sensitive information, personal information, or proprietary or confidential information about us, our patients, clients or customers, or other third-parties, could expose such persons to the risk of financial or medical identity theft. It could also expose us or such persons to a risk of loss or misuse of this information, result in litigation, or potential liability, cause damage to our brand and reputation or otherwise harm our business. Under certain circumstances, we could also be excluded temporarily or permanently from certain commercial or GHC Programs. Any of these disruptions or breaches of security could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and the trading price of our securities.

We may experience difficulties implementing or enhancing technology, software and processes.

We are engaged in various implementation and enhancement efforts for new technology, software and processes. These solutions are designed to provide greater efficiency and flexibility across our enterprise. In implementing and enhancing various solutions and processes, we may experience significant delays, increased costs and other difficulties. Any significant disruption or deficiency in the design and implementation of these solutions and processes could adversely affect our ability to operate our business. While we have invested significant resources in planning and project management, unforeseen implementation or enhancement issues may arise. In addition, our efforts to centralize various business processes and functions within our organization in connection with our system implementations may disrupt our operations. Any implementation or enhancement issues or business operation disruptions could have a material effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, internal control over financial reporting and the trading price of our securities.

Hospitals could limit our ability to use our information management systems in our units by requiring us to use their own information management systems.

Our information management systems are used to support our day-to-day operations and ongoing clinical research and business analysis. If a hospital prohibits us from using our own information management systems, it may interrupt the efficient operation of our information systems which, in turn, may limit our ability to operate important aspects of our business, including billing and reimbursement as well as research and education initiatives. This inability to use our information management systems at hospital locations may have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Federal and state laws concerning the privacy and security of personal information may increase our costs and limit our ability to collect and use that information. Any failure or perceived failure by us to comply with such laws and regulations may harm our business and operations.

The global data protection landscape is rapidly evolving, and we may be or become subject to or affected by numerous federal and state laws, rules and regulations govern the collection, dissemination, use, security and confidentiality of personal information, including individually identifiable health information. These laws include, for example and without limitation:

• Federal and state laws related to the confidentiality, privacy and security of personal information, including PHI, that limit the manner in which we may use and disclose that information, impose obligations to safeguard that information and require that we notify third parties in the event of a breach. For example, HIPAA limits how Covered Entities and Business Associates may use and disclose PHI, provides certain rights to individuals with respect to their PHI, imposes certain obligations for safeguarding the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of PHI that is electronically transmitted or electronically stored, and imposes notification requirements in the event of a breach of unsecured PHI;
• Other federal and state laws establish additional requirements for protecting the privacy and security of identifiable consumer health information. For instance, the state of Washington enacted the “My Health My Data Act” which regulates “consumer health data” which is defined as “personal information that is linked or reasonably linkable to a consumer and that identifies a consumer’s past, present, or future physical or mental health.” The “My Health My Data Act” provides exemptions for PHI and similar information maintained by a covered entity or business associate in compliance with HIPAA, personal data collected in the context of certain research activities, including data subject to 45 C.F.R. Parts 46, 50, and 56, and personal information that has been de-identified. Nevada also enacted a similar Consumer Health Data Privacy Law, and Connecticut amended its consumer privacy law to include provisions specific to consumer health information. Additional states have contemplated enacting similar laws;
• Several states have enacted comprehensive consumer privacy laws with data privacy rights, such as the CCPA, as amended by the CPRA. While these laws generally include exemptions for PHI and similar

information maintained by a covered entity or business associate in compliance with HIPAA, personal information that is generated in connection with certain clinical trials, and personal information that has been de-identified, they add layers of complexity to compliance in the U.S. market, and could increase our compliance costs and adversely affect our business;

• Federal and state consumer protection laws, including the FTC’s authority under Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, prohibit unfair and deceptive acts and practices related to privacy and data security. The FTC and many state attorneys general interpret these federal and state consumer protection laws to require transparency, fairness, and accountability for the processing and security of personal information, including health-related information. For instance, the FTC's enforcement of the Health Breach Notification Rule has increased in recent years; and
• Federal and state laws regulating the conduct of research with human subjects, which include restrictions and requirements relating to the confidentiality of information collected or generated about human subjects participating in research.

As part of our business operations, including our medical record keeping, third-party billing, research and other services, we collect and maintain PHI and other personal information in paper and electronic format. Standards related to personal information, whether implemented pursuant to HIPAA, state laws, federal or state agency actions or otherwise, could have a significant effect on the manner in which we handle and our ability to collect, generate, and maintain personal information, including PHI, and how we communicate with payors, providers, patients and others. Compliance with these standards, which are diverse and complex, could impose significant costs on us or limit our ability to offer services, thereby negatively impacting the business opportunities available to us.

In addition to the laws above, we may see more stringent state and federal privacy legislation in future years, including potential changes to HIPAA, the enactment of a broad federal consumer privacy law, and the enactment of additional consumer privacy laws or health privacy laws in various states. The enactment of such legislation and increased focus on data protection may be more likely as the increase in cyber attacks has once again put a spotlight on data privacy and security in the U.S. and other jurisdictions. We cannot predict where new legislation might arise, the scope of such legislation, or the potential impact to our business and operations.

Further, we are also subject to a provision of the federal 21st Century Cures Act and related regulations that are intended to facilitate the appropriate exchange of electronic health information ("EHI"). Beginning in 2020, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ ("HHS") Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (“ONC”) promulgated final rules to support access, exchange, and use of EHI. Specifically, the information blocking regulations were implemented as part of the 21st Century Cures Act, and are primarily designed to facilitate technology interoperability and enable the free flow of EHI. The original information blocking regulations compliance date was April 5, 2021 and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) subsequently issued a final rule called the HTI-1 Rule that, among other things, revised the information blocking regulations, effective March 11, 2024.On August 5, 2024, ONC published in the Federal Register a proposed rule called the HTI-2 Proposed Rule that, among other things, will further revise the information blocking regulations, if finalized. Under the 21st Century Cures Act, health care providers that violate the information blocking prohibition will be subject to appropriate disincentives. On July 1, 2024, the HHS published in the Federal Register a final rule to establish such disincentives, effective July 31, 2024. Developers of certified information technology and health information networks/health information exchanges, however, may be subject to civil monetary penalties of up to $1 million per violation (adjusted for inflation). The HHS Office of Inspector General (“OIG”) has the authority to impose such penalties and on July 3, 2023, published a final rule in the Federal Register codifying new authority in regulation, which became effective September 1, 2023. On July 29, 2024, HHS published a statement in the Federal Register that, among other things, announced a reorganization of certain roles and functions and renamed ONC the Assistant Secretary for Technology Policy and Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, or ASTP/ONC. The impact on the information blocking rules to our business is currently unclear.

On December 1, 2022, the HHS Office for Civil Rights issued, and subsequently updated on March 18, 2024, and June 26, 2024, a bulletin on the requirements under HIPAA for online tracking technologies (e.g., cookies, pixels) to protect the privacy and security of PHI. This bulletin outlined the HHS OCR’s position on the use of online tracking technology vendors, when certain information received by such vendors constitutes PHI under HIPAA, and accordingly, when business associate agreements must be executed between covered entities, like the Company, and such vendors. We may incur additional expense to comply with this bulletin and future guidance from the HHS OCR's on online tracking technologies, and agency’s heightened focus on website tracking technologies could pose enforcement risk to the Company in the future.

If we are alleged to not comply with existing or new laws, rules and regulations related to PHI or other personal information we could be subject to litigation and to sanctions that include monetary fines, civil or administrative penalties, civil damage awards or criminal penalties, and incur reputational harm and a negative market perception. For example, entities that are found to be in violation of HIPAA as a result of a breach of unsecured PHI, a complaint about privacy practices or an audit by HHS may be subject to significant civil, criminal and administrative fines and penalties and/or additional reporting and oversight obligations if required to enter into a resolution agreement and corrective action plan with HHS to settle allegations of HIPAA non-compliance. HIPAA has ranges of increasing minimum penalty amounts tiered according to the entity’s degree of culpability. Breaches of unsecured PHI may also result in unexpected costs to us, upwards of millions of dollars, through third party litigation, contractual breach resolution, breach notification and remediation. In addition, we may experience reputational harm and a negative market perception when it comes to protecting patient data and other personal information that could influence our future operations. HIPAA also authorizes state Attorneys General to file suit on behalf of their residents for alleged violations of HIPAA. Courts may award damages, costs and attorneys’ fees related to violations of HIPAA in such cases. While HIPAA does not create a private right of action allowing individuals to sue us in civil court for violations of HIPAA, its standards have been used as the basis for establishing the duty of care in state civil suits such as those for negligence or recklessness.

Our compliance with frequently changing and increasingly burdensome regulations and requirements may cause us to incur substantial costs or require us to change our business practices, which may impact our financial condition. Any such claim, proceeding or action could harm our reputation, brand and business, force us to incur significant expenses in defense of such proceedings, distract our management, increase our costs of doing business, result in a loss of customers and suppliers or an inability to process credit card payments and may result in the imposition of monetary penalties. We may also be contractually required to indemnify and hold harmless third parties from the costs or consequences of non-compliance with any laws, regulations or other legal obligations relating to privacy or consumer protection or any inadvertent or unauthorized use or disclosure of data that we store or handle as part of operating our business.

Risks Related to Competition and Consolidation

Our industry is highly competitive.

The healthcare industry is highly competitive and subject to continual changes in the methods by which services are provided and the manner in which healthcare providers are selected and compensated. Because our operations consist primarily of physician services provided within hospital-based units, we compete with other healthcare services companies and physician groups for contracts with hospitals to provide our services to patients. We also face competition from hospitals themselves to provide our services.

Further, consolidation within the healthcare industry could strengthen certain competitors that provide services to hospitals and other customers. Companies in other healthcare industry segments, some of which have greater financial and other resources than ours, may become competitors in providing neonatal, maternal-fetal or other pediatric subspecialty care. Additionally, we face competition from healthcare-focused and other private equity firms. We may not be able to continue to compete effectively in this industry, additional competitors may enter metropolitan areas where we operate, and this increased competition may have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and the trading price of our securities.

Cybersecurity Risk Management and Strategy

We have developed and implemented a cybersecurity risk management program intended to protect the confidentiality, integrity and availability of our critical systems and information. As part of this program, we have processes in place that are designed to assess, identify and manage material risks from cybersecurity threats, which are part of the Company’s overall enterprise risk management process and have been embedded in the Company’s operating procedures, internal controls and information systems.

We design and assess our program based on various cybersecurity frameworks, such as the National Institute of Standards and Technology (“NIST”) 800-53, including derivatives such as NIST Cybersecurity Framework (“CSF”) and HITRUST, as well as NIST 800-66 and the Center for Internet Security (“CIS”). Recently we have obtained HITRUST certification for one of our core clinical applications, however this does not mean that overall we meet any particular technical standards, specifications, or requirements, but only that we use these standards as a guide to help us design and assess our program.

We rely on a multidisciplinary team, including our information security organization, legal department, management, and third-party service providers, as described further below, to assess, identify, and manage cybersecurity threats and risks.

Our cybersecurity risk management program includes:

• risk assessments designed to help identify material cybersecurity risks to our critical systems, information, services, and our broader enterprise information technology (“IT”) environment, including monitoring and evaluating our threat environment and our risk profile;
• a security governance council principally responsible for management’s oversight of our IT security;
• the use of external service providers, where appropriate, to assess, test, or otherwise assist with aspects of our cybersecurity controls;
• a third-party risk management process for service providers, suppliers and vendors covering compliance and technical controls;
• cybersecurity awareness training for our employees, incident response personnel and senior management; and
• a cybersecurity incident response plan with established procedures for assessing and responding to cybersecurity incidents, and that includes having an experienced incident response firm on retainer.

For information on the Company’s cybersecurity-related risks, see “Information Systems, Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Risks” in Item 1A. Risk Factors in this Form 10-K. While to date we have not identified any breaches from known cybersecurity threats, including as a result of any prior cybersecurity incidents, that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect us, including our business strategy, results of operations, or financial condition, the sophistication of cybersecurity threats continues to increase, and the preventive actions we take to reduce the risk of cybersecurity incidents and protect our systems and information may be insufficient. Accordingly, no matter how well our program is designed or implemented, we will not be able to anticipate all security breaches, and we may not be able to implement effective preventive measures against such security breaches in a timely manner.

Cybersecurity Governance

Our Board of Directors considers cybersecurity risk as part of its risk oversight function and oversees management’s implementation of our cybersecurity risk management program. Our Board of Directors has elected to exercise direct oversight over this area, rather than acting through one of its committees, given the increasing importance of cybersecurity matters and the cross-functional impacts of technology on our business. Our Board of Directors receives reports at least twice per year from members of senior management, including our Chief Information Security Officer (“CISO”) and Chief Compliance Officer, regarding the Company’s information systems and technology and associated policies, processes, and practices for managing and mitigating cybersecurity and technology-related risks. Our Board of Directors also meets with external advisors to discuss technology and cybersecurity risks applicable to the Company and obtains perspectives which inform senior management’s discussions with our Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors has delegated oversight of the process for determining disclosure required with respect to cybersecurity incidents to its Audit Committee.

At the management level, our information security organization is led by our CISO, who is responsible for cybersecurity risk management, with oversight by our Board of Directors. Our CISO has more than 20 years of experience in information security and IT risk management. He has specific experience in the following information security areas: security governance and policy, information security strategy and planning, penetration testing, vulnerability management, cybersecurity threat intelligence, incident response, third party risk management, cloud security, application security, identity and access management, data loss prevention, and security awareness.

Our CISO is informed about and monitors prevention, detection, mitigation, and remediation efforts through regular communication and reporting from professionals in the information security organization, many of whom hold cybersecurity certifications such as a Certified Information Systems Security Professional ("CISSP"), Certified Data Privacy Solutions Engineer ("CDPSE"), or Security+ and through the use of technological tools and software and results from third-party audits. Our cybersecurity incident response framework is governed by a cybersecurity incident response plan, which sets out our approach for categorizing, responding to, and mitigating cybersecurity incidents. We have an incident response team comprised of our CISO, executive leaders, management and internal and external legal counsel, whose primary responsibilities include:

• Evaluating and validating the impact of an incident;
• Approving certain incident response countermeasures and remediation actions;
• Escalating incidents and response countermeasures for approval; and
• Acting in an advisory capacity in support of cybersecurity incident remediation, as appropriate.

We have also established a security governance council (the “Council”) to further strengthen our cybersecurity risk management activities across the Company. The Council includes our Chief Executive Officer, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, Executive Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Administrative Officer and Secretary, Senior Vice President, Operations, Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer, Senior Vice President, People Services, Vice President and Chief Information Security Officer, Vice President, Chief Compliance Officer, and Associate Vice President, Internal Audit. The Council meets quarterly and is responsible for management’s oversight of our IT security in a cohesive and holistic manner that is designed to enable optimal decision-making.

Our corporate office building, which we own, is located in Sunrise, Florida and contains 80,000 square feet of office space. We also lease space in medical office buildings affiliated with hospitals and other facilities for our business and medical offices, and other needs. We believe that our facilities and the equipment used in our business are in good condition, in all material respects, and sufficient for our present needs.

The information required by this Item is included in and incorporated herein by reference to Item 1. Business of this Form 10-K under “Government Investigations” and “Other Legal Proceedings.”

The following discussion highlights the principal factors that have affected our financial condition and results of operations as well as our liquidity and capital resources for the periods described. This discussion should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K. This discussion contains forward-looking statements. Please see the explanatory note concerning “Forward-Looking Statements” preceding Part I of this Form 10-K and Item 1A. Risk Factors for a discussion of the uncertainties, risks and assumptions associated with these forward-looking statements. The operating results for the periods presented were not significantly affected by inflation.

This section generally discusses 2024 and 2023 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2024 and 2023. Discussions of 2022 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2023 and 2022 are not included in this Form 10-K and can be found in “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part II, Item 7 of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 filed with the SEC on February 20, 2024 (the “2023 Annual Report”) and are incorporated herein by reference.

OVERVIEW

Pediatrix is a leading provider of physician services including newborn, maternal-fetal and other pediatric subspecialty care. Our national network is comprised of affiliated physicians who provide clinical care in 36 states. At December 31, 2024, our national network comprised approximately 2,335 affiliated physicians, including 1,335 physicians who provide neonatal clinical care, primarily within hospital-based neonatal intensive care units (“NICUs”), to babies born prematurely or with medical complications. We have 490 affiliated physicians who provide maternal-fetal and obstetrical medical care to expectant mothers experiencing complicated pregnancies primarily in areas where our affiliated neonatal physicians practice. Our network also includes other pediatric subspecialists, including 240 physicians providing hospital-based pediatric care, over 230 physicians providing pediatric intensive care, and 20 physicians providing pediatric surgical care.

General Economic Conditions and Other Factors

Our operations and performance depend significantly on economic conditions. During the year ended December 31, 2024, the percentage of our patient service revenue being reimbursed under government-sponsored or funded healthcare programs (“GHC Programs”) decreased as compared to the year ended December 31, 2023. We could, however, experience shifts toward GHC Programs if changes occur in economic behaviors or population demographics within geographic locations in which we provide services, including an increase in unemployment and underemployment as well as losses of commercial health insurance. Payments received from GHC Programs are substantially less for equivalent services than payments received from commercial insurance payors. In addition, costs of managed care premiums and patient responsibility amounts continue to rise, and accordingly, we may experience lower net revenue resulting from increased bad debt due to patients’ inability to pay for certain services. See Item 1A. Risk Factors, in this Form 10-K for additional discussion on the general economic conditions in the United States and recent developments in the healthcare industry that could affect our business.

Practice Portfolio Management Plan and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

During the second quarter of 2024, we formalized our physician practice optimization plans, resulting in a decision to exit almost all of our affiliated office-based practices, other than maternal-fetal medicine. Over the course of many years, we expanded our pediatric service lines and footprint to provide specialized care to more patients, including through our office-based portfolio of practices. This added complexity to our operations over time and, accordingly, increased costs that resulted in operating challenges primarily for our office-based portfolio of practices. Recognizing this and our need to adapt to the current healthcare climate, during the second quarter, we made the decision to return to a hospital-based and maternal-fetal medicine-focused organization. Accordingly, a recoverability assessment for each impacted individual physician practice was performed, and the estimated future cash flows related to the physician practices did not support the carrying value of the specifically identified individual long-lived assets. As a result, we recorded fixed asset impairments of $20.1 million, operating lease right-of-use asset impairments of $12.5 million and intangible asset impairments of $7.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2024. The operating lease right-of-use impairments are recorded within the transformational and restructuring related expenses line item. As of December 31, 2024, the planned exits of our pediatric office-based practices were completed.

Exit of Primary and Urgent Care Service Line

During 2024, we made the decision to exit our primary and urgent care service line based on a review of the cost and time that would be required to build the platform to scale. The total loss on disposal of these businesses was $11.0 million.

“Surprise” Billing Legislation

In late 2020, Congress enacted the No Surprises Act (“NSA”) legislation intended to protect patients from “surprise” medical bills when certain services are furnished by providers who are not in-network with the patient’s insurer. Effective January 1, 2022, if a patient’s insurance plan or coverage is subject to the NSA, providers are not permitted to send such patient an unexpected or “surprise” medical bill that arises from out-of-network emergency care provided at certain out-of-network facilities or at certain in-network facilities by out-of-network emergency providers, as well as nonemergency care provided at certain in-network facilities by out-of-network providers without the patient’s informed consent (as defined by the NSA). Many states have legislation on this topic and will continue to modify and review their laws pertaining to surprise billing.

For claims subject to the NSA, insurers are required to calculate the patient’s total cost-sharing amount pursuant to rules set forth in the NSA and its implementing regulations which, in some cases, can be calculated by reference to the applicable qualifying payment amount for the items or services received. The patient’s cost-sharing amount for out-of-network services covered by the NSA must be no more than the patient’s in-network cost-sharing amounts. Patient cost-sharing amounts for items and services subject to the NSA count toward the patient’s health plan deductible and out-of-pocket cost-sharing limits. For claims subject to the NSA, providers are generally not permitted to balance bill patients beyond this cost-sharing amount. An out-of-network provider is only permitted to bill a patient more than the cost-sharing amount allowed under the NSA for certain types of services if the provider satisfies all aspects of an informed consent process set forth in the NSA’s implementing regulations. Providers that violate these surprise billing prohibitions may be subject to enforcement actions by CMS or by states, one or both of which may be tasked with investigating potential non-compliance as a result of patient complaints, as well as any state-specific penalties enforcement action and federal civil monetary penalties.

For claims subject to the NSA, including many emergency care services, out-of-network providers will be paid an initial amount determined by the plan; if a provider is not satisfied with the initial amount paid for the services, the provider can pursue recourse through an independent dispute resolution ("IDR") process. The outcome of each IDR dispute is generally binding on both the provider and payor with respect to the particular claims at issue in that dispute but may not affect an insurer’s future offers of payment. Accordingly, we cannot predict how these IDR results will compare to the rates that our affiliated physicians customarily receive for their services. These measures could limit the amount we can charge and recover for services we furnish where we have not contracted with the patient’s insurer, and therefore could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and the trading price of our securities. See Item 1A. Risk Factors ─“Congress or states have, and may continue to, enact laws restricting the amount out-of-network providers of services can charge and recover for such services.”

Healthcare Reform

The ACA has altered how health care is delivered and reimbursed in the U.S. and contains various provisions, including the establishment of health insurance exchanges to facilitate the purchase of qualified health plans, expanded Medicaid eligibility, subsidized insurance premiums and additional requirements and incentives for businesses to provide healthcare benefits. Other provisions of the ACA have expanded the scope and reach of the FCA and other healthcare fraud and abuse laws. The status of the ACA may be subject to change as a result of political, legislative, regulatory, and administrative developments, as well as judicial proceedings. As a result, we could be affected by potential changes to various aspects of the ACA, including changes to subsidies, healthcare insurance marketplaces and Medicaid expansion. We cannot say for certain whether there will be additional future challenges to the ACA or what impact, if any, such challenges may have on our business. Changes resulting from various legal proceedings, and any legislative or administrative change to the current healthcare financing system, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and the trading price of our securities. See Item 1A. Risk Factors ─ “Potential healthcare reform efforts may have a significant effect on our business.”

In addition to the ACA, there could be changes to other GHC Programs, such as a change to the Medicaid program design or Medicaid coverage and reimbursement rates set forth under federal or state law. These changes, if implemented, could eliminate the guarantee that everyone who is eligible and applies for Medicaid benefits would receive them and could potentially give states new authority to restrict eligibility, cut benefits and/or make it more difficult for people to enroll. See Item 1. Business – “Relationship With Our Partners – Government Regulatory Requirements” and see also Item 1A. Risk Factors ─ “Potential healthcare reform efforts may have a significant effect on our business.” Moreover, the expiration of the COVID-19 national emergency and public health emergency declarations in May 2023 may impact the coverage for and access to certain services for Medicaid patients. Expiration of the national emergency and public health emergency declarations will also end waivers for the provision of certain services, and returning our services to a pre-pandemic regulatory state similarly may increase our exposure to legal, regulatory, compliance and clinical risks.

Medicaid Expansion

The ACA also allows states to expand their Medicaid programs through federal payments that fund most of the cost of increasing the Medicaid eligibility income limit from a state’s historic eligibility levels to 133% of the federal poverty level. See Item 1. Business – “Relationship With Our Partners – Third-Party Payors.” All of the states in which we operate, however, already cover children in the first year of life and pregnant women if their household income is at or below 133% of the federal poverty level. Recently, Democrats in Congress have sought to expand Medicaid or Medicaid-like coverage in states that have not yet expanded Medicaid. They also have sought to reduce payments to certain hospitals in some of these states. See Item 1A. Risk Factors – “State budgetary constraints and the uncertainty over the future of Medicaid could have an adverse effect on our reimbursement from Medicaid programs.” Should any of these changes take effect, we cannot predict with any assurance the ultimate effect on reimbursements for our services.

RCM Services Agreement

On October 30, 2023, we provided notice to R1RCM that we were terminating that certain Services Agreement, dated May 12, 2021, as amended, by and between our wholly owned subsidiary PMG Services, Inc. and R1RCM, effective as of December 15, 2023 (the "Services Agreement"). Our termination of the Services Agreement was in connection with R1RCM’s performance, specifically R1RCM's failure to meet certain service levels set forth in the Services Agreement. R1RCM was the primary provider of our enterprise revenue cycle management services. During 2024, we transitioned to a hybrid revenue cycle management function that utilizes both our corporate personnel and a new third party RCM provider. See Item 1A. Risk Factors ─ “During 2024, we undertook a transformation of our revenue cycle management function from an outsourced provider to a hybrid function that utilizes both our corporate personnel as well as third-party service providers. Our failure to execute a hybrid revenue cycle management function efficiently and effectively may have a material impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and the trading price of our securities.”

2024 Acquisition Activity

During 2024, we acquired one maternal-fetal medicine practice. Based on our experience, we expect that we can improve the results of acquired physician practices in various ways, including improved collections, identification of growth initiatives and operating and cost savings based upon the significant infrastructure that we have developed.

Goodwill Impairment

Goodwill is tested for impairment on at least an annual basis, in accordance with the subsequent measurement provisions of the accounting guidance for goodwill. Consistent with prior years, we performed our annual impairment analysis in the third quarter, specifically as of July 31, 2024. At that date, we elected to perform a quantitative assessment and determined no impairment existed.

During the second quarter of 2024, we experienced a triggering event, due to a sustained decline in our stock price and a market capitalization below our book equity value. This assessment resulted in a non-cash impairment charge of $126.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. Recognition of this non-cash charge against goodwill resulted in a tax benefit which generated an additional deferred tax asset of $24.2 million that increased our book value. An incremental non-cash charge was required to reduce our book value to its previously determined fair value. Accordingly, we recorded the incremental non-cash charge of $24.2 million for a total non-cash charge of $150.6 million.

Transformation and Restructuring Related Initiatives

From time to time we develop strategic initiatives across our organization, in both our shared services functions and our operational infrastructure, with a goal of generating improvements in our general and administrative expenses and our operational infrastructure. We have included the expenses, which in certain cases represent estimates, related to such activity on a separate line item in our consolidated statements. During 2024, our transformation and restructuring related expenses relate specifically to our practice portfolio management activities, revenue cycle management transition activities and position eliminations across various shared services and operations departments.

Geographic Coverage

During 2024 and 2023, approximately 67% of our net revenue from continuing operations was generated by operations in our five largest states. During 2024 and 2023, our five largest states consisted of Texas, Florida, Georgia, California, and Washington. During both 2024 and 2023, our operations in Texas accounted for approximately 32% of our net revenue.

Payor Mix

We bill payors for professional services provided by our affiliated physicians to our patients based upon rates for specific services provided. Our billed charges are substantially the same for all parties in a particular geographic area regardless of the party responsible for paying the bill for our services. We determine our net revenue based upon the difference between our gross fees for services and our estimated ultimate collections from payors. Net revenue differs from gross fees due to (i) managed care payments at contracted rates, (ii) GHC Program reimbursements at government-established rates, (iii) various reimbursement plans and negotiated reimbursements from other third-parties, and (iv) discounted and uncollectible accounts of private-pay patients.

Our payor mix is composed of contracted managed care, government, principally Medicaid, other third-parties and private-pay patients. We benefit from the fact that most of the medical services provided in the NICU are classified as emergency services, a category typically classified as a covered service by managed care payors.

The following is a summary of our payor mix, expressed as a percentage of net revenue from continuing operations, exclusive of administrative fees and miscellaneous revenue, for the periods indicated:

The payor mix shown in the table above is not necessarily representative of the amount of services provided to patients covered under these plans. For example, the gross amount billed to patients covered under GHC Programs for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 represented approximately 53% and 55%, respectively, of our total gross patient service revenue. These percentages of gross revenue and the percentages of net revenue provided in the table above include the payor mix impact of acquisitions completed through December 31, 2024.

Quarterly Results

We have historically experienced and expect to continue to experience quarterly fluctuations in net revenue and net income. These fluctuations are primarily due to the following factors:

• There are fewer calendar days in the first and second quarters of the year, as compared to the third and fourth quarters of the year. Because we provide services in NICUs on a 24-hours-a-day basis, 365 days a year, any reduction in service days will have a corresponding reduction in net revenue.
• The majority of physician services provided by our office-based practices consist of office visits and scheduled procedures that occur during business hours. As a result, volumes at those practices fluctuate based on the number of business days in each calendar quarter.
• A significant number of our employees and our associated professional contractors, primarily physicians, exceed the level of taxable wages for social security during the first and second quarters of the year. As a result, we incur a significantly higher payroll tax burden and our net income is lower during those quarters.

We have significant fixed operating costs, including physician compensation, and, as a result, are highly dependent on patient volume and capacity utilization of our affiliated professional contractors to sustain profitability. Additionally, quarterly results may be affected by the timing of acquisitions and fluctuations in patient volume. As a result, the operating results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of results for any future period or for the full year.

Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) requires estimates and assumptions that affect the reporting of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements provides a summary of our significant accounting policies, which are all in accordance with GAAP. Certain of our accounting policies are critical to understanding our Consolidated Financial Statements because their application requires management to make assumptions about future results and depends to a large extent on management’s judgment, because past results have fluctuated and are expected to continue to do so in the future.

We believe that the application of the accounting policies described in the following paragraphs is highly dependent on critical estimates and assumptions that are inherently uncertain and highly susceptible to change. For all of these policies, we caution that future events rarely develop exactly as estimated, and the best estimates routinely require adjustment. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and assumptions, including those discussed below.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize patient service revenue at the time services are provided by our affiliated physicians. Our performance obligations relate to the delivery of services to patients and are satisfied at the time of service. Accordingly, there are no performance obligations that are unsatisfied or partially unsatisfied at the end of the reporting period with respect to patient service revenue. Almost all of our patient service revenue is reimbursed by GHC Programs and third-party insurance payors. Payments for services rendered to our patients are generally less than billed charges. We monitor our revenue and receivables from these sources and record an estimated contractual allowance to properly account for the anticipated differences between billed and reimbursed amounts.

Accordingly, patient service revenue is presented net of an estimated provision for contractual adjustments and uncollectibles. Management estimates allowances for contractual adjustments and uncollectibles on accounts receivable based upon historical experience and other factors, including days sales outstanding (“DSO”) for accounts receivable, evaluation of expected adjustments and delinquency rates, past adjustments and collection experience in relation to amounts billed, an aging of accounts receivable, current contract and reimbursement terms, changes in payor mix and other relevant information. Collection of patient service revenue we expect to receive is normally a function of providing complete and correct billing information to the GHC Programs and third-party insurance payors within the various filing deadlines and typically occurs within 30 to 60 days of billing. Contractual adjustments result from the difference between the physician rates for services performed and the reimbursements by GHC Programs and third-party insurance payors for such services. The evaluation of these historical and other factors involves complex, subjective judgments. On a routine basis, we compare our cash collections to recorded net patient service revenue and evaluate our historical allowance for contractual adjustments and uncollectibles based upon the ultimate resolution of the accounts receivable balance. These procedures are completed regularly in order to monitor our process of establishing appropriate reserves for contractual adjustments. We have not recorded any material adjustments to prior period contractual adjustments and uncollectibles in the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023, or 2022.

Some of our agreements require hospitals to pay us administrative fees. Some agreements provide for fees if the hospital does not generate sufficient patient volume in order to guarantee that we receive a specified minimum revenue level. We also receive fees from hospitals for administrative services performed by our affiliated physicians providing medical director or other services at the hospital.

DSO is one of the key factors that we use to evaluate the condition of our accounts receivable and the related allowances for contractual adjustments and uncollectibles. DSO reflects the timeliness of cash collections on billed revenue and the level of reserves on outstanding accounts receivable. Any significant change in our DSO results in additional analyses of outstanding accounts receivable and the associated reserves. We calculate our DSO using a three-month rolling average of net revenue. Our net revenue, net income and operating cash flows may be materially and adversely affected if actual adjustments and uncollectibles exceed management’s estimated provisions as a result of changes in these factors. As of December 31, 2024, our DSO was 47.6 days. We had approximately $1.34 billion in gross accounts receivable for continuing operations outstanding at December 31, 2024, and considering this outstanding balance, based on our historical experience, a reasonably likely change of 0.5% to 1.50% in our estimated collection rate would result in an impact to net revenue of $6.4 million to $19.1 million. The impact of this change does not include adjustments that may be required as a result of audits, inquiries and investigations from government authorities and agencies and other third-party payors that may occur in the ordinary course of business. See Note 19 to our Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-K.

Professional Liability Coverage

We maintain professional liability insurance policies with third-party insurers generally on a claims-made basis, subject to self-insured retention, exclusions and other restrictions. Our self-insured retention under our professional liability insurance program is maintained primarily through a wholly owned captive insurance subsidiary. We record liabilities for self-insured amounts and claims incurred but not reported based on an actuarial valuation using historical loss information, claim emergence patterns and various actuarial assumptions. Liabilities for claims incurred but not reported are not discounted. The average lag period from the date a claim is reported to the date it reaches final settlement is approximately four years, although the facts and circumstances of individual claims could result in lag periods that vary from this average. Our actuarial assumptions incorporate multiple complex methodologies to determine the best liability estimate for claims incurred but not reported and the future development of known claims, including methodologies that focus on industry trends, paid loss development, reported loss development and industry-based expected pure premiums. The most significant assumptions used in the estimation process include the use of loss development factors to determine the future emergence of claim liabilities, the use of frequency and trend factors to estimate the impact of economic, judicial and social changes affecting claim costs, and assumptions regarding legal and other costs associated with the ultimate settlement of claims. The key assumptions used in our actuarial valuations are subject to constant adjustments as a result of changes in our actual loss history and the movement of projected emergence patterns as claims develop. We evaluate the need for professional liability insurance reserves in excess of amounts estimated in our actuarial valuations on a routine basis, and as of December 31, 2024, based on our historical experience for continuing operations, a reasonably likely change of 4.0% to 10.0% in our estimates would result in an increase or decrease to net income of $3.5 million to $8.7 million. However, because many factors can affect historical and future loss patterns, the determination of an appropriate professional liability reserve involves complex, subjective judgment, and actual results may vary significantly from estimates.

Goodwill

We record acquired assets, including identifiable intangible assets and liabilities at their respective fair values, recording to goodwill the excess of purchase price over the fair value of the net assets acquired. Goodwill is tested for impairment at a reporting unit level on at least an annual basis in accordance with the subsequent measurement provisions of the accounting guidance for goodwill. When testing goodwill for impairment, we may assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of our single reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, including goodwill. Alternatively, we may bypass this qualitative assessment and perform the quantitative goodwill impairment test. We may use income and market-based valuation approaches to determine the fair value of our reporting units. These approaches focus on various significant assumptions, including the weighted average cost of capital discount factor, revenue growth rates and market multiples for revenue and earnings before interest, taxes and depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”). We also consider the economic outlook for the healthcare services industry and various other factors during the testing process, including hospital and physician contract changes, local market developments, changes in third-party payor payments and other publicly available information.

Non-GAAP Measures

In our analysis of our results of operations, we use various GAAP and certain non-GAAP financial measures. We have incurred certain expenses that we do not consider representative of our underlying operations, including transformational and restructuring related expenses. Accordingly, we report adjusted earnings before interest, taxes and depreciation and amortization (“Adjusted EBITDA”) from continuing operations, defined as income (loss) from continuing operations before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, and transformational and restructuring related expenses. Adjusted earnings per share (“Adjusted EPS”) from continuing operations has also been further adjusted for these items and consists of diluted income (loss) from continuing operations per common and common equivalent share adjusted for amortization expense, stock-based compensation expense, transformational and restructuring related expenses and any impacts from discrete tax events. For the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, both Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EPS are being further adjusted to exclude loss on disposal of businesses, impairment losses and the impacts from loss on the early extinguishment of debt, as relevant. We have included Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EPS in this Form 10-K because each is a key measure used by our management and board of directors to evaluate our operating performance, generate future operating plans and make strategic decisions.

We believe these measures, in addition to income (loss) from continuing operations, net income (loss) and diluted net income (loss) from continuing operations per common and common equivalent share, provide investors with useful supplemental information to compare and understand our underlying business trends and performance across reporting periods on a consistent basis. These measures should be considered a supplement to, and not a substitute for, financial performance measures determined in accordance with GAAP. In addition, since these non-GAAP measures are not determined in accordance with GAAP, they are susceptible to varying calculations and may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies. We encourage investors to review our financial statements and publicly-filed reports in their entirety and not to rely on any single financial measure.

For a reconciliation of each of Adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations and Adjusted EPS from continuing operations to the most directly comparable GAAP measures for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, refer to the tables below (in thousands, except per share data).

(1) A blended tax rate of 25% was used to calculate the tax effects of the adjustments for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively, other than for impairment losses for the year ended December 31, 2024, due to a portion of the expenses being non-deductible.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain information related to our continuing operations expressed as a percentage of our net revenue:

Year Ended December 31, 2024 as Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2023

Our net revenue was $2.01 billion for the year ended December 31, 2024, as compared to $1.99 billion for 2023. The increase in revenue of $18.3 million, or 0.9%, was primarily attributable to an increase in same-unit revenue, partially offset by a decrease in revenue from non-same unit activity, primarily resulting from practice dispositions. Same units are those units at which we provided services for the entire current period and the entire comparable period. Same-unit net revenue increased by $81.4 million, or 4.8%. The increase in same-unit net revenue was comprised of an increase of $47.8 million, or 2.8%, from net reimbursement-related factors, and $33.6 million, or 2.0%, related to patient service volumes. The net increase in revenue related to net reimbursement-related factors was primarily due to an increase in revenue resulting from a favorable shift in payor mix and an increase in administrative fees from our hospital partners. The increase in revenue from patient service volumes was related to increases across all of our service lines.

Practice salaries and benefits decreased by $7.4 million, or 0.5%, to $1.44 billion for the year ended December 31, 2024, as compared to $1.45 billion for 2023. The $7.4 million decrease was primarily related to non-same unit activity, primarily resulting from practice dispositions, partially offset by an increase in clinical compensation expense, including incentive compensation based on practice results and benefits, all at our existing units. The net increase in benefits primarily reflects increases in payroll taxes and group insurance costs.

Practice supplies and other operating expenses decreased by $7.1 million, or 5.7%, to $117.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, as compared to $124.8 million for 2023. The decrease was primarily attributable to non-same unit activity, primarily resulting from practice dispositions.

General and administrative expenses primarily include all billing and collection functions and all other salaries, benefits, supplies and operating expenses not specifically identifiable to the day-to-day operations of our physician practices and services. General and administrative expenses increased by $10.9 million, or 4.8%, to $238.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, as compared to $227.5 million for 2023. The net increase of $10.9 million is primarily related to increases in incentive compensation based on financial results and salaries expense for enhancement of revenue cycle management staffing, partially offset by lower expenses from net staffing reductions, travel, information technology and insurance expenses. General and administrative expenses as a percentage of net revenue was 11.8% for the year ended December 31, 2024, as compared to 11.4% for the same period in 2023.

Depreciation and amortization expense was $32.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, as compared to $36.2 million for 2023. The decrease was primarily related to lower depreciation resulting from fixed asset impairments recognized during 2024.

Transformational and restructuring related expenses were $64.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, as compared to $2.2 million for 2023. The expenses during 2024 reflect lease impairment and severance expenses resulting from our practice portfolio management activities, revenue cycle management transition activities, and position eliminations across various shared services and operations departments. The expenses during 2023 are directly related to the termination of our prior contract for revenue cycle management services.

Goodwill impairment was $150.6 million and $148.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.

Long-lived asset impairments were $27.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, resulting from practice portfolio management activities.

Loss on disposal of businesses was $9.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, primarily resulting from the disposals of the primary and urgent care practices.

Loss from operations was $68.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, as compared to income from operations of $7.3 million for 2023. Our operating margin was (3.4)% for the year ended December 31, 2024, as compared to 0.4% for the same period in 2023. The decrease in our operating margin was primarily due to impairment activity, transformational and restructuring expenses and loss on disposal of businesses, partially offset by net favorable impacts from same-unit results due to higher revenue. Excluding the impairment activity, transformational and restructuring related expenses and loss on disposal of businesses, our income from operations was $183.7 million and $157.9 million, and our operating margin was 9.1% and 7.9% for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. We believe excluding the impacts from the impairment activity, transformational and restructuring related activity and loss on disposal of businesses provides a more comparable view of our operating income and operating margin.

Total non-operating expenses were $32.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, as compared to $55.7 million for 2023. The net decrease in non-operating expenses was primarily related to an impairment loss of $20.0 million in the prior year related to a cost-method investment, an increase in investment income on higher cash balances and lower interest expense due to lower debt balances.

Our effective income tax rate (“tax rate”) was 2.2% for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to (24.9)% for the year ended December 31, 2023. The tax rates for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 are not meaningful as calculated due to the pre-tax loss and related tax effects of the non-cash goodwill impairment charges in each period. Excluding the effect of these items, our effective tax rate was 45.5% and 35.8% for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2024 reflects net discrete tax expense of $7.9 million, primarily related to a reduction in the carrying value of deferred tax assets due to practice management portfolio activities as well as stock-based compensation shortfalls. The tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2023 includes net discrete tax expense of $7.9 million, primarily related to the tax charge associated with the impairment of a cost-method investment as well as stock-based compensation shortfalls. After excluding discrete tax impacts and goodwill impairment-related effects for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, our tax rates were 29.4% and 27.9%, respectively. We believe excluding discrete tax impacts and goodwill impairment-related impacts on our tax rate provides a more comparable view of our effective income tax rate.

Loss from continuing operations was $99.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, as compared to $60.4 million for 2023. Adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations was $224.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, as compared to $200.4 million for 2023. The increase in our Adjusted EBITDA was primarily due to net favorable impacts in our same-unit results, primarily from higher revenue.

Diluted net loss per common and common equivalent share was $1.19 on weighted average shares outstanding of 83.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, as compared to $0.73 on weighted average shares outstanding of 82.2 million for 2023. Adjusted EPS was $1.51 for the year ended December 31, 2024, as compared to $1.26 for 2023.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

As of December 31, 2024, we had $229.9 million of cash and cash equivalents attributable to continuing operations as compared to $73.3 million at December 31, 2023. Additionally, we had working capital attributable to continuing operations of $205.5 million at December 31, 2024, an increase of $111.0 million from our working capital from continuing operations of $94.5 million at December 31, 2023. The increase in working capital is primarily due to net favorable impacts in our same-unit results, primarily from an increase in revenue.

Cash Flows

Cash provided by (used in) operating, investing and financing activities from continuing operations is summarized as follows (in thousands):

Operating Activities

We generated cash flow from operating activities for continuing operations of $217.3 million and $146.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The net increase in cash flow of $71.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2023, was primarily due to increases in cash flow from accounts payable and accrued expenses, other long-term assets, income taxes and long-term professional liabilities.

During the year ended December 31, 2024, cash flow from accounts receivable for continuing operations was $10.3 million, as compared to $26.3 million for the same period in 2023.

DSO is one of the key factors that we use to evaluate the condition of our accounts receivable and the related allowances for contractual adjustments and uncollectibles. DSO reflects the timeliness of cash collections on billed revenue and the level of reserves on outstanding accounts receivable. Our DSO for continuing operations was 47.6 days at December 31, 2024 as compared to 50.5 days at December 31, 2023. The 2.9 days decrease in DSO was primarily due to improved cash collections at existing units.

Our cash flow from operating activities is significantly affected by the payment of physician incentive compensation. A large majority of our affiliated physicians participate in our performance-based incentive compensation program and almost all of the payments due under the program are made annually in the first quarter. As a result, we typically experience negative cash flow from operations in the first quarter of each year and fund our operations during this period with cash on hand or funds borrowed under our Credit Agreement. In addition, during the first quarter of each year, we use cash to make any discretionary matching contributions for participants in our qualified contributory savings plans.

Investing Activities

During the year ended December 31, 2024, our net cash used in investing activities of $35.4 million consisted primarily of capital expenditures of $22.0 million, net purchases from maturities or sale of investments of $12.1 million and acquisition payments of $8.2 million. During the year ended December 31, 2023, our net cash used in investing activities for continuing operations of $48.2 million consisted primarily of capital expenditures of $33.3 million, net purchases from maturities or sale of investments of $9.0 million and acquisition payments of $6.7 million.

Financing Activities

During the year ended December 31, 2024, our net cash used in financing activities of $14.5 million primarily consisted of payments of $12.5 million on our Term A Loan (as defined below). During the year ended December 31, 2023, our net cash used in financing activities for continuing operations of $25.7 million primarily consisted of payments of $12.5 million on our Term A Loan, other activity of $8.8 million and net payments on our Credit Agreement of $4.0 million.

Liquidity

On February 11, 2022, we issued $400.0 million of 5.375% unsecured senior notes due 2030 (the “2030 Notes”). We used the net proceeds from the issuance of the 2030 Notes, together with $100.0 million drawn under our Revolving Credit Line (as defined below), $250.0 million of Term A Loan and approximately $308.0 million of cash on hand, to redeem (the “Redemption”) the 2027 Notes, which had an outstanding principal balance of $1.0 billion, and to pay costs, fees and expenses associated with the Redemption and the Credit Agreement Amendment (as defined below).

Interest on the 2030 Notes accrues at the rate of 5.375% per annum, or $21.5 million, and is payable semi-annually in arrears on February 15 and August 15. Our obligations under the 2030 Notes are guaranteed on an unsecured senior basis by the same subsidiaries and affiliated professional contractors that guarantee the Amended Credit Agreement (as defined below). The indenture under which the 2030 Notes are issued, among other things, limits our ability to (1) incur liens, (2) enter into sale and lease-back transactions, and (3) merge or dispose of all or substantially all of our assets, in all cases, subject to a number of customary exceptions. Although we are not required to make mandatory redemption or sinking fund payments with respect to the 2030 Notes, upon the occurrence of a change in control, we may be required to repurchase the 2030 Notes at a purchase price equal to 101% of the aggregate principal amount of the 2030 Notes repurchased plus accrued and unpaid interest.

Also in connection with the Redemption, we amended and restated the Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”, and such amendment and restatement, the “Credit Agreement Amendment”), concurrently with the issuance of the 2030 Notes. The Credit Agreement, as amended by the Credit Agreement Amendment (the “Amended Credit Agreement”), among other things, (i) refinanced the prior unsecured revolving credit facility with a $450.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility, including a $37.5 million sub-facility for the issuance of letters of credit (the “Revolving Credit Line”), and a new $250.0 million term A loan facility (“Term A Loan”) and (ii) removed JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as the administrative agent under the Credit Agreement and appointed Bank of America, N.A. as the administrative agent for the lenders under the Amended Credit Agreement.

The Amended Credit Agreement matures on February 11, 2027 and is guaranteed on an unsecured basis by substantially all of our subsidiaries and affiliated professional contractors. At our option, borrowings under the Amended Credit Agreement bear interest at (i) the Alternate Base Rate (defined as the highest of (a) the prime rate as announced by Bank of America, N.A., (b) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50% and (c) Term Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) for an interest period of one month plus 1.00% with a 1.00% floor) plus an applicable margin rate of 0.50% for the first two fiscal quarters after the date of the Credit Agreement Amendment, and thereafter at an applicable margin rate ranging from 0.125% to 0.750% based on our consolidated net leverage ratio or (ii) Term SOFR rate (calculated as the Secured Overnight Financing Rate published on the applicable Reuters screen page plus a spread adjustment of 0.10%, 0.15% or 0.25% depending on if we select a one-month, three-month or six-month interest period, respectively, for the applicable loan with a 0% floor), plus an applicable margin rate of 1.50% for the first two full fiscal quarters after the date of the Credit Agreement Amendment, and thereafter at an applicable margin rate ranging from 1.125% to 1.750% based on our consolidated net leverage ratio. The Amended Credit Agreement also provides for other customary fees and charges, including an unused commitment fee with respect to the Revolving Credit Line ranging from 0.150% to 0.200% of the unused lending commitments under the Revolving Credit Line, based on our consolidated net leverage ratio.

The Amended Credit Agreement contains customary covenants and restrictions, including covenants that require us to maintain a minimum interest coverage ratio, a maximum consolidated net leverage ratio and to comply with laws, and restrictions on the ability to pay dividends, incur indebtedness or liens and make certain other distributions subject to baskets and exceptions, in each case, as specified therein. Failure to comply with these covenants would constitute an event of default under the Amended Credit Agreement, notwithstanding the ability of the company to meet its debt service obligations. The Amended Credit Agreement includes various customary remedies for the lenders following an event of default, including the acceleration of repayment of outstanding amounts under the Amended Credit Agreement. In addition, we may increase the principal amount of the Revolving Credit Line or incur additional term loans under the Amended Credit Agreement in an aggregate principal amount such that on a pro forma basis after giving effect to such increase or additional term loans, we are in compliance with the financial covenants, subject to the satisfaction of specified conditions and additional caps in the event that the Amended Credit Agreement is secured.

At December 31, 2024, we had no outstanding indebtedness under the Revolving Credit Line, which had an available borrowing capacity of $450.0 million. For additional information on our total indebtedness, see Note 13 to our Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-K. At December 31, 2024, we believe we were in compliance, in all material respects, with the financial covenants and other restrictions applicable to us under the Amended Credit Agreement and the 2030 Notes.

The purchase of common stock by participants in our 1996 Non-Qualified Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended (the “ESPP”), generated cash proceeds of $3.6 million, $4.9 million and $5.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. Because purchases under the ESPP are dependent on several factors, including the market price of our common stock, we cannot predict the timing and amount of any future proceeds.

We maintain professional liability insurance policies with third-party insurers, subject to self-insured retention, exclusions and other restrictions. We self-insure our liabilities to pay self-insured retention amounts under our professional liability insurance coverage through a wholly owned captive insurance subsidiary. We record liabilities for self-insured amounts and claims incurred but not reported based on an actuarial valuation using historical loss information, claim emergence patterns and various actuarial assumptions. Our total liability related to professional liability risks at December 31, 2024 was $287.9 million, of which $30.4 million is classified as a current liability within accounts payable and accrued expenses in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. In addition, there is a corresponding insurance receivable of $28.5 million recorded as a component of other assets for certain professional liability claims that are covered by insurance policies.

At December 31, 2024, the Company had long term capital requirements comprised primarily of $400.0 million in senior notes, $49.9 million of operating lease liabilities and $5.7 million of finance lease liabilities. At December 31, 2024, our total liability for uncertain tax positions was $2.9 million.

We anticipate that funds generated from operations, together with our current cash on hand and funds available under our Amended Credit Agreement, will be sufficient to finance our working capital requirements, fund anticipated acquisitions and capital expenditures, fund expenses related to our transformational and restructuring activities, fund our share repurchase programs and meet our contractual obligations as described above for at least the next 12 months from the date of issuance of this Form 10-K.

We are subject to market risk primarily from exposure to changes in interest rates based on our financing, investing and cash management activities. We intend to manage interest rate risk through the use of a combination of fixed rate and variable rate debt. We borrow under our Amended Credit Agreement at various interest rate options based on the Alternate Base Rate or Term SOFR rate depending on certain financial ratios. At December 31, 2024, we had an outstanding principal balance of $215.6 million on our Amended Credit Agreement under our Term A Loan. Considering the total outstanding balance, a 1% change in interest rates would result in an impact to income before income taxes of $2.2 million per year.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding the prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the Company's financial statements.

Internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements prepared for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of the end of the period covered by this report. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in “Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013).” Based on our assessment we concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company's internal control over financial reporting was effective based on those criteria.

The Company's independent registered certified public accounting firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, has audited our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024 as stated in their report which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

No change in our internal control over financial reporting occurred during our last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.