Terawulf Inc.: Form 10-K for the period ended Dec 31, 2024

Overview

TeraWulf Inc. (“we,” “us,” “the Company,” or “TeraWulf”) is a vertically integrated owner and operator of next-generation digital infrastructure, primarily powered by predominantly zero-carbon energy. We develop and operate high-performance data centers optimized for both bitcoin mining and high-performance computing (“HPC”) workloads, leveraging clean, cost-effective, and reliable energy sources to drive long-term sustainability in digital infrastructure.

Our operations are anchored at the Lake Mariner Facility in upstate New York, strategically located on the shores of Lake Ontario (the “Lake Mariner Facility” or “Lake Mariner”). Developed on the site of a decommissioned coal-fired power plant, Lake Mariner is designed for scalable growth, with the capacity to expand up to 500 megawatts (“MW”) in the near term and 750 MW with certain transmission upgrades. This scale, combined with access to low-cost, predominantly zero-carbon power, makes Lake Mariner an attractive site for hyperscale and enterprise customers.

Since our public debut in December 2021, bitcoin mining has been our primary revenue driver. However, we have strategically expanded our focus to include HPC hosting and colocation services, positioning ourselves at the intersection of energy and digital compute infrastructure. A key milestone in this transition occurred on December 23, 2024, when we entered into long-term data center lease agreements with Core42 Holding US LLC (“Core42”), a G42 company specializing in sovereign cloud, AI infrastructure, and digital services, securing 72.5 MW of HPC hosting capacity at Lake Mariner for GPU compute workloads. The lease agreements include an option, exercisable through March 31, 2025, to expand by an additional 135 MW. This marks a significant step forward in our HPC hosting strategy, reinforcing our position in the rapidly growing market for artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning compute infrastructure.

We primarily operate through two wholly-owned subsidiaries:

• Lake Mariner Data LLC – we operate a fleet of high-performance bitcoin miners—primarily sourced from Bitmain Technologies Limited—to validate transactions on the bitcoin blockchain. As of December 31, 2024, we had an operational self-mining capacity of 195 MW, with an additional 50 MW under construction and expected to come online in the first half of 2025. Our focus remains on optimizing operational efficiencies to reduce costs and maximize bitcoin production.
• Wulf Compute LLC – established in 2024, we have constructed and are continuing to expand our purpose-built infrastructure to provide HPC hosting and colocation services for GPU-based workloads, AI, machine learning, and cloud computing applications. By leveraging our engineering expertise, scalable infrastructure, and cost-efficient power model, we aim to become a premier hosting provider for enterprises requiring high-density compute capacity.

We believe TeraWulf’s dual-purpose digital infrastructure strategy strengthens operational efficiency, diversifies revenue streams, and enhances our position in the evolving digital economy.

Business Strategy

TeraWulf’s strategy is built on leveraging our owned and scalable digital infrastructure to drive revenue and profitability through both bitcoin mining and HPC hosting. As a vertically integrated operator, we own and control our infrastructure, allowing us to optimize efficiency, reduce costs, and maintain a highly competitive cost structure.

We focus primarily on earning bitcoin through mining and selling the bitcoin generated for cash, activities directly related to growing our digital infrastructure and enhancing efficiencies in our operations (e.g., reducing our cost to mine). While bitcoin mining remains a core focus, we are strategically shifting an increasing portion of our infrastructure at Lake Mariner to support HPC hosting and colocation, capitalizing on the rapid growth of AI and cloud computing. Our transition to GPU-based workloads is a natural evolution of our platform, originally designed for bitcoin mining and now expanding to accommodate the growing demand for GPU-driven computing.

A key milestone in this strategy was the execution of our December 2024 data center lease agreements with Core42, securing an initial 72.5 MW of data center infrastructure and hosting capacity at Lake Mariner for GPU compute workloads. This capacity is expected to ramp up in 2025, with an option to expand near-term HPC hosting capacity for Core42 by an additional 135 MW. These agreements accelerate our entry into the fast-growing hyperscale data center market and strengthen our position in the evolving digital economy.

Our modular, scalable data center design enables us to efficiently co-locate HPC infrastructure near reliable, low-cost power sources, reducing energy costs while maintaining operational flexibility. As demand for AI, cloud computing, and machine learning continues to surge, our ability to design, build, and operate large-scale, sustainable data centers uniquely positions us to capitalize on this transformation.

Looking ahead, we remain focused on expanding our infrastructure, optimizing operations, and enhancing our competitive advantages in both bitcoin mining and HPC hosting. By prioritizing sustainable digital infrastructure and low-cost energy solutions, TeraWulf is well-positioned to drive long-term value for shareholders while shaping the future of energy-driven compute infrastructure.

We generate revenue by operating our digital infrastructure and mining computers as part of a blockchain transaction processing pool, receiving digital assets in the form of bitcoin in exchange for our activity. Our HPC hosting services will focus on providing colocation, cloud, and connectivity services for GPU-based HPC operations and will generate revenue through hosting fees paid by third-party customers.

Bitcoin, introduced in 2008, fundamentally transformed the landscape of digital currency by providing a decentralized mechanism for exchanging and preserving value. It operates on a consensus-based network, utilizing a public ledger termed as the “blockchain” to meticulously record every bitcoin transaction, allowing users to send and receive payments without the need for banks and other intermediaries. Bitcoin is not linked to any fiat currency or country’s monetary policy, therefore serves as a store of value outside of government control.

Bitcoin mining involves validating transactions through a proof-of-work consensus method, where miners solve complex mathematical problems to add transactions to the blockchain. The blockchain is maintained by a robust and public open-source architecture consisting of a network of computers, known as nodes, that work together to verify and validate new transactions. Because the blockchain is decentralized and transparent, all users can verify the legitimacy of a transaction without having to rely on a third party. This eliminates the need for intermediaries, which can be slow and expensive, and makes the network resistant to censorship and fraud. Bitcoin mining plays a key role in the maintenance and growth of the bitcoin network by providing the computational power needed to verify transactions and add new blocks to the blockchain. Factors such as computing capacity, electricity costs, and location play pivotal roles in mining operations. Generally, the greater the share a single mining rig can capture of the blockchain’s total network hashrate, or the aggregate hashrate deployed to solving a block on the bitcoin blockchain, the greater the rig’s chances of solving a block and therefore earning the reward.

Network difficulty, which is a measure of how hard it is for miners to solve a block on the bitcoin blockchain (and, thus, earn a mining reward), is determined by the network’s total hashrate (i.e., the total computational power devoted to solving a block), which is adjusted every 2,016 blocks (with a new block being added approximately every ten minutes). Therefore, as more miners join the network and the network’s global hashrate increases, its difficulty will increase. Conversely, if miners leave the network and its hashrate decreases, its difficulty will decrease.

Bitcoin Reward Halving

The bitcoin subsidy issued by the bitcoin network for solving a block is subject to periodic incremental halving. The network halving is a preprogrammed, fixed process of the bitcoin network where the bitcoin subsidy for solving a block received by miners is reduced by half approximately every four years. The network halving is a process designed to implement a periodic decreasing schedule of the issuance of new bitcoin into the market, which results in a predictable and controlled inflationary rate. The network halving will continue to occur on this schedule until the amount of bitcoin in existence reaches the cap of 21.0 million. After each halving, the decrease in the subsidy provided to miners from the bitcoin network leads to fewer rewards for miners and therefore a decrease in revenues should the price of bitcoin remain the same. Transaction fees, which together with the block subsidy comprise the block reward for successfully solving a block, are not directly impacted by the halving. On April 19, 2024, the bitcoin rewards issued for each block solved dropped from 6.25 to 3.125, effectively reducing the bitcoin earned from bitcoin mining by 50% (excluding transactions fee rewards).

Our Facilities

TeraWulf currently conducts its operations at its data center campus, the Lake Mariner Facility, in upstate New York. The Company has an operational mining capacity of 195 MW and is completing constructing an additional 50 MW of bitcoin mining capacity, expected to be operational in the first half of 2025. Additionally, TeraWulf is developing HPC data centers to provide hosting services for Core42, supporting up to 72.5 MW of data center infrastructure dedicated to GPU compute workloads. This capacity is expected to come online throughout 2025. Core42 also has an option, exercisable through March 31, 2025, to secure an additional 135 MW of data center infrastructure at the Lake Mariner Facility.

As of December 31, 2024, TeraWulf’s mining operations were powered by predominantly zero-carbon energy, underscoring our commitment to sustainability. Our energy sourcing methodology is based on electricity production data from the New York Independent System Operator (“NYISO”), specifically covering NYISO Zones A-E, where the Lake Mariner Facility is located. This approach aligns with the recommended geographic resolution for projected emissions factors for upstate New York, as published by the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority.

Lake Mariner Facility

Located at a site adjacent to the now-decommissioned coal-fired power plant in Barker, New York, the Lake Mariner Facility began mining bitcoin in March 2022. As of December 31, 2024, the Lake Mariner Facility is operating approximately 195 MW of bitcoin mining capacity at the site. The Company has an agreement in place with the Power Authority of the State of New York (“NYPA”) for 90 MW of high-load factor power to support its bitcoin mining operations (the “PPA”). The PPA was executed on February 12, 2022, and has a term of ten years from the date of commencement of NYPA’s power delivery. The Lake Mariner Facility is situated on an expansive site on the shores of Lake Ontario and has the ability to scale up to 500 MW of capacity in the near term and up to 750 MW with certain transmission upgrades..

Nautilus Cryptomine Facility Sale

On October 2, 2024, the Company sold its entire 25% equity interest in Nautilus Cryptomine LLC (“Nautilus”) to a subsidiary of Talen Energy Corporation (the “Talen Member”) for $85.0 million in cash, subject to a customary working capital adjustment (the “Nautilus Sale”). In connection with the Nautilus Sale, Nautilus transferred to the Company all of its right, title, and interest in and to all of its miners, including miners previously contributed by Talen Member, along with certain other related equipment owned by Nautilus. The Nautilus Sale included customary representations and warranties and standard covenants. Additionally, as part of the transaction, the Talen Member agreed to pay the Company 25% of the net proceeds received in excess of $300.0 million in the aggregate in any future sale of all or substantially all of the assets, or a majority of the equity interests, of Nautilus.

As a result of the Nautilus Sale, TeraWulf no longer has an ownership interest in Nautilus or any bitcoin mining operations located in Berwick, Pennsylvania (the “Nautilus Cryptomine Facility”). The Company remains focused on expanding its Lake Mariner Facility and expanding its digital infrastructure to support high-performance computing.

Environmental Considerations

TeraWulf prioritizes sustainability, sourcing the vast majority of its energy from clean, non-fossil fuel sources like hydroelectric and nuclear power—both of which produce zero carbon emissions.

While concerns about bitcoin mining’s energy consumption persist—particularly regarding reliance on non-renewable sources—there is often less recognition of its positive role in enhancing grid stability and strengthening energy infrastructure. At TeraWulf, we believe responsible mining practices can improve grid efficiency and resilience while accelerating the broader transition to clean energy.

Our Lake Mariner Facility plays a critical role in stabilizing the grid by helping operators balance supply and demand, particularly as intermittent renewable energy sources contribute more power. In 2024, we actively participated in three ancillary demand response programs in New York: the Commercial System Relief Program (CSRP), the Demand Side Ancillary Services Program (DSASP), and the Special Case Resource (SCR) program—reinforcing our commitment to grid reliability.

As of December 31, 2024, the energy powering our mining operations came from predominantly clean sources, primarily hydro and nuclear. Sustainability is embedded in our business strategy, driving operational efficiencies through cost-effective design and the use of carbon-free energy. We believe this approach differentiates TeraWulf in the industry—allowing us to attract and retain customers, generate strong cash flow, and mitigate operational risks.

Below is a breakdown detailing the regional and location-specific, as applicable, energy sources utilized to operate our bitcoin mining facilities for the year ended December 31, 2024:

(1) Source: NYISO’s 2021-2040 System & Resource Outlook.

(2) Zero carbon usage includes hydro, nuclear, solar and wind power resources.

(3) Carbon usage includes coal and gas power resources.

Our Strengths

Vertical Integration

TeraWulf’s ownership of its digital infrastructure—spanning bitcoin mining and HPC hosting—ensures operational efficiency, cost control, and reliability. Managing complex energy assets requires specialized expertise, and direct ownership enables seamless execution, supply chain oversight, and accountability. This approach enhances transparency for stakeholders while reinforcing TeraWulf’s commitment to sustainability and community engagement. By controlling its infrastructure, TeraWulf drives long-term success, resilience, and responsible growth.

Environmentally Clean

TeraWulf leads in sustainable bitcoin mining and HPC hosting, with the Lake Mariner Facility’s energy sourced from predominantly zero-carbon resources, primarily hydro and nuclear power, per NYISO. Our efficient design and sourcing of carbon-free energy enhance sustainability, attract customers, and drive cash flow. As demand for compute infrastructure accelerates, TeraWulf is strategically leveraging its scalable infrastructure and low-cost, predominantly zero-carbon energy advantage to support both bitcoin mining and HPC hosting.

Low-Cost Energy Supply

TeraWulf expects to maintain one of the industry's lowest electricity costs, estimated at approximately $0.045 per kilowatt-hour over the long term. Historically, market power costs at the Lake Mariner Facility have averaged around $0.040 per kilowatt-hour. Strategically located at structurally congested point in New York, the Lake Mariner Facility is well-positioned to optimize power usage and provide ancillary services to the electrical grid.

Scale Rapidly with Proprietary Expansion Pipeline

TeraWulf’s growth is fueled by its access to high-power operational data center capacity, competitive power arrangements, and deep expertise in energy infrastructure and operations. We strategically manage our assets to maximize cash flow and drive cost efficiencies, leveraging our scale for optimal performance. The Lake Mariner Facility can rapidly scale to 500 MW in the near term and up to 750 MW with targeted transmission upgrades. With a low-cost, predominantly zero-carbon power supply, TeraWulf is uniquely positioned to meet the surging demand for bitcoin mining and HPC hosting, solidifying its leadership in sustainable digital infrastructure.

Experienced Team

TeraWulf’s senior management team brings decades of experience in the energy infrastructure sector, with a proven track record as developers, owners, and operators of large-scale energy assets in the U.S. and internationally. This deep industry expertise provides us with a significant competitive advantage, positioning TeraWulf at the forefront of energy-efficient digital infrastructure. To align leadership incentives with long-term shareholder value, a substantial portion of senior management and director compensation is in the form of common equity interests in the Company.

Additionally, TeraWulf benefits from the expertise and support of Beowulf Electricity & Data Inc. (“Beowulf E&D”), which operates under the leadership of TeraWulf’s CEO. With more than 30 years of collective experience managing large-scale energy facilities, the Beowulf E&D team plays a critical role in ensuring the efficient development and operation of TeraWulf’s data center facilities.

Competition

We operate in a highly competitive industry with a growing number and scale of participants.

We compete with mining operations throughout the world to complete new blocks on the blockchain and earn the reward in the form of bitcoin. We compete on the basis of our total number of miners, the degree of mining difficulty, the efficiency of our mining operations and the fiat value of the mining reward.

With the fluctuation of bitcoin prices, we acknowledge the potential for additional miners to enter the market during periods of price increases. Conversely, during periods of price decline, less efficient miners may find it economically challenging to remain operational. We are confident TeraWulf maintains a competitive advantage by offering some of the most cost-effective unit economics in comparison to other publicly traded bitcoin miners.

The success of our HPC hosting and colocation services will greatly depend on our ability to retain and develop opportunities with our existing customer, attract new customers, and secure additional infrastructure. We compete with a diverse range of providers, including major data center real estate investment trusts (REITs), data center developers, hyperscalers, and bitcoin miners with infrastructure suited for HPC hosting. This competition is primarily centered on securing and developing high-power sites, as well as attracting the necessary capital to build or retrofit facilities for HPC workloads.

We believe our scalable digital infrastructure capacity, combined with the energy expertise, industry knowledge, and strong relationships of our development and operations team, uniquely position us to meet the surging demand for HPC infrastructure effectively.

Mining Equipment

We own specialized mining computers configured for the purpose of validating transactions on the bitcoin network. Substantially all of the miners we own were manufactured by Bitmain and incorporate application-specific integrated circuit (“ASIC”) chips specialized to solve blocks on the bitcoin blockchain in return for bitcoin digital asset rewards. As of December 31, 2024, we had deployed approximately 62,000 bitcoin miners at the Lake Mariner Facility, which represented 9.7 EH/s of self-mining capacity.

Suppliers

We have periodically entered into agreements with Bitmain to supply the majority of miners for our operations. Like agreements with other mining equipment manufacturers, these contracts typically require significant deposits paid months in advance of delivery, followed by additional monthly installment payments. These agreements also include terms that are generally favorable to the manufacturer.

Research and Development

TeraWulf’s strategic investments in research and development drive innovation across power management, data center infrastructure, and HPC hosting. Our expertise in designing, constructing, and operating proprietary data centers at scale sets us apart in the market.

With deep experience in mining equipment installation, operation, and optimization, we continuously refine our data center designs to maximize hardware performance and longevity. Leveraging our extensive knowledge of data center architecture and systems integration, we are evolving digital asset mining infrastructure to support the rigorous demands of HPC hosting. Our proprietary designs accommodate higher rack energy densities, meeting the increasing computational needs of AI and other advanced applications.

Additionally, we continuously seek to develop and/or identify hardware and software solutions to enhance operational efficiency and infrastructure management. Through sustained investment in research and development, we are expanding our platform capabilities, reinforcing our leadership in digital asset mining, and positioning ourselves for long-term growth in HPC hosting.

Regulation

Due to the relatively short history of digital assets, and their emergence as a new asset class, government regulation of blockchain and digital assets is constantly evolving, with increased interest expressed by U.S. and international regulators. We anticipate a heightened focus on regulatory oversight in the near future, and the potential ramifications of forthcoming regulations on our operations remain uncertain.

TeraWulf conscientiously monitors public policy and relevant legislation across all jurisdictions in which we operate. Our primary objective is to provide policymakers with informed insights and advocate for measures that promote the welfare of our employees and align with the overarching goals of the Company. Additionally, we strategically engage with carefully selected industry associations to collaboratively advance our public policy and business objectives.

Intellectual Property

TeraWulf utilizes specific hardware and software tailored for both its bitcoin mining operations and HPC hosting. Given the prevalence of open-source technology in the blockchain, cryptocurrency, and computing sectors, certain source code and software components may be subject to open-source licenses. In such cases, we strictly adhere to the terms outlined in the respective license agreements.

At present, TeraWulf neither possesses nor intends to pursue patents for its existing or planned bitcoin mining or HPC hosting operations. Instead, we safeguard our competitive advantages through trade secrets, trademarks, service marks, trade names, copyrights, and other intellectual property rights. Additionally, we anticipate procuring licenses for utilizing intellectual property rights owned and managed by third parties. In the future, TeraWulf may develop proprietary software applications to optimize and enhance both our cryptocurrency operations as well as our HPC hosting services.

Human Capital Resource Management

As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Annual Report”), TeraWulf has 12 full-time employees and officers. Additionally, employees of Beowulf E&D, a business overseen by TeraWulf’s CEO, support the Company’s ongoing business, including, among others, services related to construction, technical and engineering, operations and maintenance, procurement, information technology, finance and accounting, human resources, legal, risk management and external affairs consultation. All of TeraWulf’s and Beowulf E&D’s employees are located in the United States, primarily in New York, Maryland and Colorado. None of TeraWulf’s or Beowulf E&D’s employees are represented by a labor union or covered by collective bargaining agreements, and we have not experienced any work stoppages.

We recognize the pivotal role played by our workforce in the Company’s success and prioritize their well-being and dedication. To support our employees, TeraWulf offers a comprehensive benefits program tailored to their needs. This program encompasses a 401(k) retirement plan, flexible work hours, ample leave policies, and initiatives aimed at promoting mental and physical well-being. In accordance with our commitment to employee satisfaction, we conduct annual evaluations of our benefits offerings to ensure they remain aligned with the evolving needs of our workforce. Feedback from employees is actively sought to facilitate continuous improvement of our support systems.

Furthermore, each employee of TeraWulf and many employees of Beowulf E&D hold ownership in the Company through equity awards granted under our 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). The primary objective of the Plan is to attract, retain, and motivate employees, executive officers, and directors through the provision of stock-based compensation awards.

Diversity, Equity and Inclusion

TeraWulf is dedicated to cultivating a diverse and inclusive workforce. We prioritize hiring and recruitment based on merit and qualifications, recognizing the inherent value of varied perspectives and experiences.

The Company’s Diversity Policy serves as a fundamental framework, outlining TeraWulf’s commitment to fostering an inclusive environment where all individuals are treated with respect and esteem. We believe that embracing a range of perspectives not only enhances our organizational culture but also bolsters our capacity to respond to change and stimulate innovation.

Cybersecurity

TeraWulf has adopted a thorough strategy for information security and data governance, incorporating physical, procedural, and technical safeguards. These measures aim to safeguard sensitive information and protect our operations against unauthorized access. The Company has established a cybersecurity risk management program detailed in our Information Security and Cybersecurity Policy. This policy is designed to uphold the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of our critical systems and information.

As of the current filing date, we have not encountered significant impacts from recognized cybersecurity threats on our operations, business strategy, financial condition, or results of operations.

Insurance

For our Lake Mariner Facility, we carry replacement cost all-risk property insurance with a coverage limit of $100 million per occurrence. Given the current scarcity of business interruption insurance options for bitcoin mining, we actively monitor the global insurance market for alternative solutions. We also maintain separate cyber liability insurance policies with an aggregate limit of $10 million. Each year, we engage our insurance broker to solicit proposals from underwriters, either to renew our existing coverages or to update our policies as needed.

Corporate Information

TeraWulf was incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware in February 2021 and commenced trading on The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (the “Nasdaq”) under the symbol “WULF” on December 14, 2021. Our principal executive offices are located at 9 Federal Street, Easton, Maryland 21601. Our telephone number is (410) 770-9500 and our website address is www.terawulf.com (http://www.terawulf.com). Please note that the contents of, or information accessible through, our website are not part of this Annual Report).

Available Information

We maintain a link to investor relations information on our website, www.terawulf.com (http://www.terawulf.com), where we make available, free of charge, our filings with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), including our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC. All SEC filings are also available at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov (http://www.sec.gov). Our website and the information contained on or connected to our website are not incorporated by reference herein, and our web address is included as an inactive textual reference only.

Forward-Looking Statements

This Annual Report contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, which involve risks and uncertainties. All statements other than statements of historical facts contained in this Annual Report, including statements regarding our strategy, future operations, future financial position, future revenue, projected costs, prospects, plans, objectives of management, and expected market growth are forward-looking statements. These forward- looking statements are contained principally in the sections entitled “Risk Factors” and “Use of Proceeds.” Without limiting the generality of the preceding sentence, any time we use the words “expects,” intends,” “will,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “confident,” “continue,” “propose,” “seeks,” “could,” “may,” “should,” “estimates,” “forecasts,” “might,” “goals,” “objectives,” “targets,” “planned,” “projects,” and, in each case, their negative or other various or comparable terminology and similar expressions, we intend to clearly express that the information deals with possible future events and is forward-looking in nature. However, the absence of these words or similar expressions does not mean that a statement is not forward-looking. For TeraWulf, particular uncertainties that could cause our actual results to be materially different than those expressed in our forward-looking statements include, without limitation:

• conditions in the cryptocurrency mining industry, including any prolonged substantial reduction in cryptocurrency prices, and specifically, the value of bitcoin, which could cause a decline in the demand for TeraWulf’s services;
• competition among the various providers of data mining services;
• the need to raise additional capital to meet our business requirements in the future, which may be costly or difficult to obtain or may not be obtained (in whole or in part) and, if obtained, could significantly dilute the ownership interests of TeraWulf’s shareholders;
• the ability to implement certain business objectives and the ability to timely and cost-effectively execute integrated projects;
• adverse geopolitical or economic conditions, including a high inflationary environment and the implementation of new tariffs and more restrictive trade regulations;
• security threats or unauthorized or impermissible access to our data centers, our operations or our digital wallet;
• counterparty risk with respect to our digital asset custodian and our mining pool provider;
• employment workforce factors, including the loss of key employees;
• changes in governmental safety, health, environmental and other regulations, which could require significant expenditures;
• liability related to the use of TeraWulf’s services;
• currency exchange rate fluctuations; and
• other risks, uncertainties and factors included or incorporated by reference in this Annual Report, including those set forth under “Risk Factors” in this this Annual Report.

These forward-looking statements reflect our views with respect to future events as of the date of this Annual Report and are based on assumptions and subject to risks and uncertainties. Given these uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements represent our estimates and assumptions only as of the date of this Annual Report and, except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update or review publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise after the date of this Annual Report. We anticipate that subsequent events and developments will cause our views to change. You should read this Annual Report completely and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we expect. Our forward-looking statements do not reflect the potential impact of any future acquisitions, merger, dispositions, joint ventures or investments we may undertake. We qualify all of our forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements.

Risk Factor Summary

Below is a summary of the principal factors that make an investment in our common stock speculative or risky. This summary does not address all of the risks we face. Additional discussion of the risks summarized in this risk factor summary, and other risks that we face, can be found below and should be carefully considered, together with other information included in this Annual Report. See “Item 1A— Risk Factors.”

Risks Related to Our Business

• Our HPC business strategy may not perform as planned.
• If we fail to increase our hash rate, we may be unable to compete, and our results of operations could suffer.
• We expect the cost of acquiring new miners to continue to be affected by the ongoing global supply chain crisis.
• We may not be able to timely complete our future strategic growth initiatives or within our anticipated cost estimates, if at all.
• We may be unable to access sufficient additional capital for future strategic growth initiatives.
• Expansion of our Lake Mariner Facility potentially exposes us to additional risks.
• We have financed our strategic growth by issuing new shares of our common stock in public offerings, which dilutes the ownership interests of our current stockholders, and which may adversely affect the market price of our securities.
• We have a history of operating losses, and we may report additional operating losses in the future.
• The lack of regulation of digital asset exchanges which bitcoin, and other cryptocurrencies, are traded on may expose us to the effects of negative publicity resulting from fraudulent actors in the cryptocurrency space and can adversely affect an investment in the Company.

Risks Related to the Price of Bitcoin

• Our ability to achieve profitability is largely dependent on the price of bitcoin, which has historically been volatile.
• Bitcoin market exposure to financially troubled cryptocurrency-related companies may impact our reputation, the price of bitcoin and the profitability of our bitcoin mining operations.
• Bitcoin is subject to halving, and our bitcoin mining operations may generate less revenue as a result.
• Transaction fees may decrease demand for bitcoin and prevent expansion.
• Bitcoin faces significant scaling obstacles that can lead to high fees or slow transaction settlement times.

Risks Related to our Operations

• To remain competitive in our industry, we seek to grow our hash rate to match the growing network hash rate and increasing network difficulty of the bitcoin blockchain, and if we are unable to grow our hash rate at pace with the global network hash rate, our chance of earning bitcoin from our mining operations would decline.
• Because our miners are designed specifically to mine bitcoin and may not be readily adaptable to other uses, a sustained decline in bitcoin’s value could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
• Our reliance on third-party miners may subject our operations to an increased risk of design flaws.
• Our use of a third-party mining pool exposes us to certain risks.
• We may not be able to realize the benefits of forks.
• Cyber-attacks, data breaches or malware may disrupt our operations and trigger significant liability for us, which could harm our operating results and financial condition, and damage our reputation or otherwise materially harm our business.
• Incorrect or fraudulent bitcoin transactions may be irreversible and we could lose access to our bitcoin.
• Our business could be harmed by prolonged power and internet outages, shortages, or capacity constraints.
• Digital assets held by the Company are not subject to FDIC or SIPC protections.

Risks Related to Governmental Regulation and Enforcement

• Changing environmental regulation and public energy policy may expose our business to new risks.
• Regulatory changes or actions may alter the nature of an investment in us or restrict the use of cryptocurrencies in a manner that adversely affects our business, prospects, or operations.
• The implementation of new tariffs, more restrictive trade policies or the renegotiation of existing U.S. trade agreements may adversely affect our business, prospects, or operations.
• Our interactions with a blockchain may expose us to specially designated nationals (“SDN”) or blocked persons and new legislation or regulation could adversely impact our business or the market for cryptocurrencies.
• Bitcoin and bitcoin mining, as well as cryptocurrencies generally, may be made illegal in certain jurisdictions, including the ones we operate in, which could adversely affect our business prospects and operations.

Risks Related to Ownership of our Common Stock

• The trading price of shares of our common stock has been subject to volatility.
• We have financed our strategic growth through our at-the-market (“ATM”) offerings and issuances of our common stock. Holders of our common stock may experience dilution as a result of such issuances.
• We previously identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting and may identify additional material weaknesses in the future or otherwise fail to maintain an effective system of internal controls, any of which may result in material misstatements of our financial statements or cause us to fail to meet our periodic reporting obligations.

Our business faces many risks. Before deciding whether to invest in our common stock, you should carefully consider the risk factors discussed in this Annual Report. If any of the risks or uncertainties described herein actually occurs, our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flow could be materially and adversely affected. This could cause the trading price of our common stock to decline, resulting in a loss of all or part of your investment. The risks and uncertainties we have described are not the only ones facing our company. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also affect our business operations.

Risks Related to Our Business

Our HPC business strategy may not perform as planned.

We believe the potential for HPC hosting complements our current business model with expected stable, long-term and high margin revenue. We also believe that using our existing infrastructure for HPC customers provides more consistent dollar-based revenue and substantially less risk than our traditional bitcoin mining customers or our bitcoin self-mining operations. However, the success of our HPC hosting services may not develop as anticipated, and may be affected by factors such as the reliability and timing of power supply, supply chain disruption (including local labor availability), the implementation of new tariffs and more restrictive trade regulations and changes in in-house specialized expertise to manage the business. A failure to success implement our HPC business strategy may adversely affect our business, prospects, or operations.

If we fail to increase our hash rate, we may be unable to compete, and our results of operations could suffer.

Generally, a bitcoin miner’s chance of solving a block on the bitcoin blockchain and earning a bitcoin reward is a function of the miner’s hash rate (i.e., the amount of computing power devoted to supporting the bitcoin blockchain), relative to the global network hash rate. As greater adoption of bitcoin occurs, we expect the demand for bitcoin will increase further, drawing more mining companies into the industry and thereby increasing the global network hash rate. As new and more powerful miners are deployed, the global network hash rate will continue to increase, meaning a miner’s chance of earning bitcoin rewards will decline unless it deploys additional hash rate at pace with the industry. Accordingly, to compete in this highly competitive industry, we believe we will need to continue to acquire new miners, both to replace those lost to ordinary wear-and-tear and other damage, and to increase our hash rate to keep up with a growing global network hash rate.

We plan to increase our hash rate by acquiring newer, more effective and energy-efficient miners. These new miners are highly specialized servers that are very difficult to produce at scale. As a result, there are limited producers capable of producing large numbers of sufficiently effective miners, and, as demand for new miners has increased in response to increased bitcoin prices, we have observed the price of these new miners has increased. If we are unable to acquire enough new miners or access sufficient capital to fund our acquisitions, the results of our operations and financial condition could be adversely affected, as could investments in our securities.

We expect the cost of acquiring new miners and other digital infrastructure equipment to continue to be affected by ongoing challenges to the global supply chain.

Similarly, ongoing challenges to the global supply chain, coupled with increased demand for computer chips and semiconductors and resulting shortages, have resulted in production cost increases affecting the miners we employ in our bitcoin mining operations and other digital infrastructure equipment for our data centers, and their manufacturers have passed on increased production costs to purchasers like us. Therefore, we expect to continue to incur higher than usual costs to obtain and deploy new miners and other digital infrastructure equipment, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

We may not be able to timely complete our future strategic growth initiatives or within our anticipated cost estimates, if at all.

While our present expansion projects are proceeding on track with our expectations, we cannot guarantee we will complete these expansions (or any future strategic growth initiatives) on time or within our cost estimates, if at all, due in part to the ongoing challenges to the global supply chain, the implementation of new tariffs and more restrictive trade policies, increased inflation and changing conditions within the United States labor market. If we are unable to complete our planned expansions on schedule and within our anticipated cost estimates, our deployment of newly purchased miners may be delayed, which could affect our competitiveness and our results of operation, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and the market price for our securities.

We may be unable to access sufficient additional capital for future strategic growth initiatives.

The expansion of our miner fleet, our existing mining facilities and our digital infrastructure to support HPC hosting and colocation are capital-intensive projects, and we anticipate that future strategic growth initiatives will likewise continue to be capital-intensive. We expect to raise additional capital to fund these and other future strategic growth initiatives; however, we may be unable to do so in a timely manner, in sufficient quantities, or on terms acceptable to us, if at all. If we are unable to raise the additional capital needed to execute our future strategic growth initiatives, we may be less competitive in our industry and the results of our operations and financial condition may suffer, and the market price for our securities may be materially and adversely affected.

Expansion of our Lake Mariner Facility potentially exposes us to additional risks.

Expansion of our existing mining facilities and digital infrastructure to support HPC hosting and colocation potentially exposes us to additional risks, including risks related to, among other sources: construction delays; lack of availability of parts and/or labor, increased prices as a result, in part, of inflation, and delays for data center equipment; labor disputes and work stoppages, including interruptions in work due to pandemics, epidemics, and other health risks; unanticipated environmental issues and geological problems; delays related to permitting and approvals to commence operations from public agencies and utility companies; and delays in site readiness leading to our failure to meet commitments made in connection with such expansion. All construction-related projects depend on the skill, experience, and attentiveness of our personnel throughout the design and construction process. Should a designer, general contractor, significant subcontractor or key supplier experience financial difficulties or other problems during the design or construction process, we could experience significant delays, increased costs to complete the project and/or other negative impacts to our expected returns.

If we are unable to overcome these risks and additional pressures to complete our expansion and construction projects in a timely manner, if at all, we may not realize their anticipated benefits, and our business and financial condition may suffer as a result.

Economic and geopolitical events and macroeconomic conditions may create increased uncertainty and price changes.

We are subject to price volatility and uncertainty due to geopolitical crises and economic downturns. Such geopolitical crises and global economic downturns may be a result of invasion, or possible invasion by one nation of another, global outbreaks of various epidemics or disease, the implementation of new tariffs and more restrictive trade regulations, leading to increased inflation and supply chain volatility. Such crises will likely continue to have an effect on our ability to do business in a cost-effective manner. Inflation has caused the price of materials to increase leading to increased expenses to our business. Global crises and economic downturns may also have the effect of discouraging investment in bitcoin as investors shift their investments to less volatile assets. Such shifts could have a materially adverse effect on our business, operations and the value of the bitcoin we mine.

Sustaining our growth plans will require the ongoing readiness and solvency of our suppliers and vendors, a stable and motivated production workforce, and government cooperation, each of which may be affected by macroeconomic factors outside of our immediate control. We cannot predict the duration or direction of current or new global trends or their sustained impact. Ultimately, we continue to monitor macroeconomic conditions to remain flexible and to optimize and evolve our business as appropriate, and we will have to accurately project demand and infrastructure requirements globally and deploy our workforce and capital resources accordingly. If we experience unfavorable global market conditions, or if we cannot or do not maintain operations at a scope that is commensurate with such conditions or are later required to or choose to suspend such operations, our business, prospects, financial condition, and operating results may be harmed.

Enhanced tariff, import/export restrictions, or other trade barriers may have an adverse impact on global economic conditions.

There have been, and continue to be, uncertainties with respect to the global economy and trade relations between the U.S. and other countries globally, including trade policies, treaties, tariffs, and customs duties and taxes. Implementation of more restrictive trade policies or the renegotiation of existing U.S. trade agreements or trade agreements of other countries where we procure supplies and materials for our digital infrastructure could negatively impact our business results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition. Tariffs, sanctions and other barriers to trade could adversely affect the business of our customers and suppliers, which could in turn negatively impact our net revenue and results of operations. If tariffs, trade restrictions or trade barriers are expanded or increased, then our exposure to future taxes and duties on imported products and components could be significant and could have a material effect on our financial results.

We cannot predict the extent to which the U.S. or other countries will impose new or additional quotas, duties, tariffs, taxes, or other similar restrictions upon the import of goods and services in the future, nor can we predict future trade policy or the terms of any renegotiated trade agreements and their impact on our business. The continuing adoption or expansion of trade restrictions, the occurrence of a trade war, or other governmental action related to tariffs or trade agreements or policies has the potential to adversely impact demand for our HPC data centers, our costs, our customers, our suppliers, and the U.S. economy, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, and financial condition.

We may be harmed by increased costs to procure power, prolonged power outages, shortages or capacity constraints as well as insufficient access to power.

Any power outages, shortages, capacity constraints or significant increases in the cost of power may have an adverse effect on our business and our results of operations.

We rely on third parties, third party infrastructure, governments, and global supplies to provide a sufficient amount of power to maintain our bitcoin mining and HPC data center operations to meet the needs of our current and future HPC hosting and colocation customers. Any limitation on the delivered energy supply could limit our ability to operate our bitcoin mining and HPC data centers. These limitations could have a negative impact on the Lake Mariner Facility or limit our ability to grow our business, which could negatively affect our financial performance and results of operations. Each new HPC data center requires access to significant quantities of electricity. Limitations on generation, transmission and distribution may limit our ability to obtain sufficient power capacity for potential expansion sites or existing markets. Utility companies may impose onerous operating conditions to any approval or provision of power or we may experience significant delays and substantial increased costs to provide the level of electrical service required by our current or future data center designs.

We depend on significant customers for our HPC data centers.

Many factors, including global economic conditions, may cause our HPC data center customers to experience a downturn in their businesses or otherwise experience a lack of liquidity, which may weaken their financial condition and impact our estimates as to the probability of collectability of payments, and ultimately result in their failure to make timely rental and other payments or their default under their agreements with us. Further, the development of new technologies, the adoption of new industry standards or other factors could render our HPC data center customers’ current products and services obsolete or unmarketable and contribute to a downturn in their businesses, thereby increasing the likelihood that they default under their leases, become insolvent or file for bankruptcy. If a customer defaults or fails to make timely rent or other payments, we may experience delays in enforcing our rights as landlord and may incur substantial costs in protecting our investment, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

If a customer becomes a debtor in a case under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, we cannot evict the customer solely because of the bankruptcy. In addition, the bankruptcy court might authorize the customer to reject and terminate its contracts with us. Our claim against the customer for unpaid, future rent and other payments would be subject to a statutory cap that might be substantially less than the remaining amounts actually owed under their agreements with us. In either case, our claim for unpaid rent and other amounts would likely not be paid in full. Our revenue could be materially adversely affected if a significant customer were to become bankrupt or insolvent, suffer a downturn in its businesses, fail to renew its contract or renew on terms less favorable to us than its current terms.

Our contracts with HPC data center customers could subject us to significant liability.

In the ordinary course of business, we aim to continuously enter into agreements with customers pursuant to which we provide data center space, power, environmental controls, physical security and connectivity products to our HPC hosting and colocation customers. These contracts typically contain indemnification and liability provisions, in addition to service level commitments, which could potentially impose a significant cost on us in the event of losses arising out of certain breaches of such agreements, services to be provided by us or our subcontractors or from third-party claims. HPC data center customers increasingly are looking to pass through their regulatory obligations and other liabilities to their outsourced data center providers and we may not be able to limit our liability or damages in an event of loss suffered by such customers whether as a result of our breach of an agreement or otherwise. If such an event of loss occurred, we could be liable for material monetary damages and could incur significant legal fees in defending against such an action, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

We may also develop space specifically for HPC data center customers pursuant to agreements signed prior to beginning or early in the development process. In those cases, if we fail to meet our development obligations under those agreements, these customers may be able to terminate their agreements and we would be required to find a new customer for this space. In addition, in certain circumstances we may lease HPC data center facilities prior to their completion. If we fail to complete the facilities in a timely manner, the customer may be entitled to terminate its agreement, seek damages or penalties against us or pursue other remedies and we may be required to find a new customer for the space. If we are not able to complete an HPC data center in a timely manner, if development costs are higher than we currently estimate, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flow could be materially adversely affected.

Additionally, a customer’s decision to lease space and power in our HPC data center typically involves a significant commitment of resources and due diligence on the part of our customers regarding the adequacy of our facilities. As a result, we may expend significant time and resources in pursuing a particular transaction that may not result in revenue. Economic conditions, including market downturns and the implementation of new tariffs and more restrictive trade regulations may impact customers’ ability to plan future business activities, which could cause customers to slow spending or delay decision-making. Our inability to adequately manage the risks associated with these developments may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Certain of our agreements with HPC data center customers may include restrictions on providing HPC hosting and colocation services to certain third parties, which could have a material adverse effect on us.

Certain of our customer agreements may prohibit us from providing HPC hosting and colocation services to certain third parties, including competitors of existing HPC data center customers. The existence of such restrictions could hinder our ability to enter into agreements with additional HPC data center customers, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Failure to successfully integrate acquired businesses could negatively impact our balance sheet and results of operations.

Strategic acquisitions and/or combinations are a component of our growth strategy and the success of any acquisition we make depends in part on our ability to integrate the acquired business and realize anticipated synergies. Integrating acquired businesses may involve unforeseen difficulties, may require a disproportionate amount of our management’s attention, and may require us to reallocate our resources, financial or otherwise.

For example, we may encounter challenges in the integration process such as: difficulties associated with managing the resulting larger and more complex company; conforming administrative and corporate structures and standards, controls, procedures and policies, business cultures, hiring and retention of key employees, and compensation and benefits structures, coordinating geographically dispersed operations; and our ability to deliver on our strategy going forward.

Further, our acquisitions may subject us to new liabilities and risks, some of which may be unknown. Although we and our advisors conduct due diligence on the operations of businesses we consider acquiring, there can be no guarantee that we are aware of all the liabilities of an acquired company. These liabilities, and any additional risks and uncertainties related to an acquired company not known to us or that we may deem immaterial or unlikely to occur at the time of the acquisition, could negatively impact our future business, financial condition, and results of operations.

We can give no assurance that we will ultimately be able to effectively integrate and manage the operations of any acquired business or realize anticipated synergies. The failure to successfully integrate the cultures, operating systems, procedures and information technologies of an acquired business could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

We may experience increased compliance costs as a result of our strategic acquisitions.

Future strategic acquisitions could carry substantial compliance burdens, which may limit our ability to realize the anticipated benefits of such acquisitions, and which may require our management and personnel to shift their focus to such compliance burdens and away from their other functions. Such increased costs and compliance burdens could affect our ability to realize the anticipated benefits of such strategic acquisitions, and our business, results of operations, and financial condition may suffer as a result.

We have financed our strategic growth primarily by issuing new shares of our common stock in public offerings, which dilutes the ownership interests of our current stockholders, and which may adversely affect the market price of our securities.

We have raised capital to finance the strategic growth of our business through public offerings of our common stock, and we expect to raise additional capital through similar public offerings to finance the completion of current and future expansion initiatives. We may not be able to obtain additional debt or equity financing on favorable terms, if at all, which could impair our growth and adversely impact our existing operations. From 2022 through 2024, a number of digital asset platforms and exchanges filed for bankruptcy and/or became the subjects of investigation by various governmental agencies for, among other things, fraud. These disruptions in the crypto asset market may impact our ability to obtain favorable financing. If we raise additional equity financing, our stockholders may experience dilution of their ownership interests, and the per share value of our common stock could decline. If we are unable to generate cash flows from operation sufficient to support our strategic growth, we may be required to adopt one or more alternatives, such as reducing or delaying investments or capital expenditures, selling assets, or obtaining additional equity financing on terms that may be onerous or highly dilutive. Furthermore, if we engage in debt financing, as we currently do, the holders of any debt we issue would likely have priority over the holders of shares of our common stock in terms of order of payment preference. We may be required to accept terms that restrict our ability to incur additional indebtedness or take other actions including accepting terms that require us to maintain specified liquidity or other ratios that could otherwise not be in the interests of our stockholders.

We have a history of operating losses, and we may report additional operating losses in the future.

Our primary business is bitcoin mining, and we have recorded historical losses and negative cash flows from our operations when the value of bitcoin we mine does not exceed our associated costs. Further, as part of our strategic growth plans, we have made capital investments in expanding our bitcoin mining operations and transitioning an increasing portion of our Lake Mariner Facility to support HPC hosting and colocation. However, future market prices of bitcoin are difficult to predict, and we cannot guarantee that our future revenue from bitcoin mining and HPC data center operations will exceed our associated costs.

The lack of regulation of digital asset exchanges which bitcoin, and other cryptocurrencies, are traded on may expose us to the effects of negative publicity resulting from fraudulent actors in the cryptocurrency space and can adversely affect an investment in the Company.

The digital asset exchanges on which bitcoin is traded are relatively new and largely unregulated. Many digital asset exchanges do not provide the public with significant information regarding their ownership structure, management teams, corporate practices, or regulatory compliance. As a result, the marketplace may lose confidence in, or may experience problems relating to, such digital asset exchanges, including prominent exchanges handling a significant portion of the volume of digital asset trading. From 2022 through 2024, a number of digital asset exchanges filed for bankruptcy proceedings and/or became the subjects of investigation by various governmental agencies for, among other things, fraud, causing a loss of confidence and an increase in negative publicity for the digital asset ecosystem. As a result, many digital asset markets, including the market for bitcoin, have experienced increased price volatility. The bitcoin ecosystem may continue to be negatively impacted and experience long term volatility if public confidence decreases.

These events are continuing to develop and it is not possible to predict, at this time, every risk that they may pose to us, our service providers, or the digital asset industry as a whole. A perceived lack of stability in the digital asset exchange market and the closure or temporary shutdown of digital asset exchanges due to business failure, hackers or malware, government-mandated regulation, or fraud may reduce confidence in digital asset networks and result in greater volatility in cryptocurrency values. These potential consequences of a digital asset exchange’s failure could adversely affect our business and an investment in the Company.

We depend on attracting and retaining officers, managers, and skilled professionals.

Our success depends, in large part, on our ability to hire, retain and motivate talented officers, leadership, and professionals. We cannot guarantee that such employees will be retained which may inhibit our management functions, strategic development, and other critical functions. Our growth may be constrained by human capital resource limitations as we compete with other companies for skilled employees. We will need to take strategic action to develop our pool of management and skilled employees as well as grow such pool to meet the demands of our corporate functions. If we are not able to do so, our business, and thus our ability to grow, may be materially adversely affected.

Risks Related to the Price of Bitcoin

Our ability to achieve profitability is largely dependent on the price of bitcoin, which has historically been volatile.

Our existing bitcoin mining operations and the expansions of our Lake Mariner Facility are largely based on our assumptions regarding the future value of bitcoin, which has been subject to significant historical volatility and may be subject to influence from malicious actors, real or perceived scarcity of bitcoin, political, economic, and regulatory conditions and speculation making bitcoin’s price more volatile or creating “bubble” type risks for the trading price of bitcoin. Further, unlike traditional stock exchanges, which have listing requirements and vet issuers, requiring companies to comply with rigorous listing standards and rules, which monitor transactions for fraud and other improprieties, markets for bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies tend to be unregulated or underregulated. In general, less stringent markets are perceived to have a higher risk of fraud or manipulation and any lack of oversight or perceived lack of transparency could reduce confidence in the price of bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, which could adversely affect the price of bitcoin. Bitcoin and crypto asset markets generally may be subject to increased scrutiny and regulation by the U.S. legislature and government agencies, and such evolving regulatory and legal environment may impact our bitcoin mining activities and therefore an impact on our business.

These factors make it difficult to accurately predict the future market price of bitcoin and may also inhibit consumer trust in, and market acceptance of, cryptocurrencies as a means of exchange, which could limit the future adoption of bitcoin and, as a result, our assumptions could prove incorrect. If our assumptions prove incorrect and the future price of bitcoin is not sufficiently high, our revenue from our bitcoin mining operations may not exceed our costs, and our operations may not be profitable, which would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Bitcoin market exposure to financially troubled cryptocurrency-related companies may impact our reputation, the price of bitcoin and the profitability of our bitcoin mining operations.

The failure of several cryptocurrency platforms has impacted and may continue to impact the broader cryptocurrency economy; the full extent of these impacts may not yet be known. Bitcoin is subject to price volatility resulting from financial instability, poor business practices, and fraudulent activities of players in the broader cryptocurrency market. When investors in cryptocurrency and cryptocurrency-based companies experience financial difficulty as a result of price volatility, poor business practices, and/or fraud, it has caused, and may continue to cause, loss of confidence in the cryptocurrency space, reputational harm to cryptocurrency assets, heightened scrutiny by regulatory authorities and law makers, and a steep decline in the value of bitcoin, among other material impacts. Such adverse effects have affected, and may in the future, affect the profitability of our bitcoin mining operations.

Bitcoin is subject to halving, and our bitcoin mining operations may generate less revenue as a result.

The number of new bitcoin awarded for solving a block is cut in half at mathematically predetermined intervals, known as “halving”. The next halving for the bitcoin blockchain is currently anticipated to occur in March 2028. While bitcoin prices have historically increased around these halving events, there is no guarantee that the price change will be favorable or would compensate for the reduction in mining rewards. If a corresponding and proportionate increase in the price of bitcoin does not follow future halving events, the revenue we earn from our bitcoin mining operations would see a decrease, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Transaction fees may decrease demand for bitcoin and prevent expansion.

As the number of bitcoin currency rewards granted for solving a block in the bitcoin blockchain has decreased, transaction fees have increasingly been used to incentivize miners to continue to contribute to the bitcoin network. However, high bitcoin transaction fees may slow the adoption of bitcoin as a means of payment, which may decrease demand for bitcoin and future prices of bitcoin may suffer as a result. If bitcoin prices are not sufficiently high, our bitcoin mining revenue may not exceed our associated costs, and our results of operations and financial condition may suffer. Further, because the price of shares of our common stock may be linked to the price of bitcoin, if demand for bitcoin decreases, causing future bitcoin prices to decrease, the market price of our securities may be materially and adversely affected, limiting our ability to raise additional capital to fund our strategic growth plans and would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Bitcoin faces significant scaling obstacles that can lead to high fees or slow transaction settlement times.

Bitcoin (and cryptocurrencies, generally) face significant scaling obstacles that can lead to high fees or slow transaction settlement times and attempts to increase the volume of transactions may not be effective. Scaling cryptocurrencies is essential to the widespread acceptance of cryptocurrencies as a means of payment, including bitcoin. Many cryptocurrency networks face significant scaling challenges. For example, cryptocurrencies are limited with respect to how many transactions can occur per second. Participants in the cryptocurrency ecosystem debate potential approaches to increasing the average number of transactions per second that a network can handle and have implemented mechanisms or are researching ways to increase scale, such as increasing the allowable sizes of blocks, and therefore the number of transactions per block, and sharding (a horizontal partition of data in a database or search engine), which would not require every single transaction to be included in every single miner’s or validator’s block. There is, however, no guarantee that any of the mechanisms in place or being explored for increasing the scale of settlement of cryptocurrency transactions will be effective. If adoption of bitcoin (and cryptocurrencies, generally) as a means of payment does not occur on the schedule or scale we anticipate, the demand for bitcoin may stagnate or decrease, which could adversely affect future bitcoin prices, and our results of operations and financial condition, which could have a material adverse effect on the market price for our securities.

Risks Related to Our Operations

To remain competitive in our industry, we seek to grow our hash rate to match the growing network hash rate and increasing network difficulty of the bitcoin blockchain, and if we are unable to grow our hash rate at pace with the global network hash rate, our chance of earning bitcoin from our mining operations would decline.

As the adoption of bitcoin has increased, the price of bitcoin has generally appreciated, causing the demand for new bitcoin rewards for successfully solving blocks on the bitcoin blockchain to likewise increase. This has encouraged more miners to attempt to mine bitcoin, which increases the global network hash rate deployed in support of the bitcoin blockchain.

Because a miner’s relative chance of successfully solving a block and earning a new bitcoin reward is generally a function of the ratio of the miner’s individual hash rate relative to the global network hash rate, as the global network hash rate increases, a miner must increase its individual hash rate to maintain its chances of earning new bitcoin rewards.

Therefore, as new miners enter the industry and as miners deploy greater numbers of increasingly powerful machines, existing miners must seek to continually increase their hash rate to remain competitive. Thus, a feedback loop is created: as bitcoin gains popularity and its relative market price increases, more miners attempt to mine bitcoin and the bitcoin network hash rate is increased; in response, existing miners and new miners devote more and more hash rate to the bitcoin blockchain by deploying greater numbers of increasingly powerful machines in an attempt to ensure their ability to earn additional bitcoin rewards does not decrease. Compounding this feedback loop, the network difficulty of the bitcoin network (i.e., the amount of work (measured in hashes) necessary to solve a block) is periodically adjusted to maintain the pace of new block additions (with one new block added to the blockchain approximately every ten minutes), and thereby control the supply of bitcoin. As miners deploy more hash rate and the bitcoin network hash rate is increased, the bitcoin network difficulty is adjusted upwards by requiring more hash rate to be deployed to solve a block. Thus, miners are further incentivized to grow their hash rate to maintain their chance of earning new bitcoin rewards. In theory, these dual processes should continually replicate themselves until the supply of available bitcoin is exhausted. In response, miners have attempted to achieve greater hash rate by deploying increasingly sophisticated and expensive miners in ever greater quantities. Moreover, because there are very few manufacturers of miners capable of producing a sufficient number of miners of adequate quality to meet this need, scarcity results, leading to higher prices. Compounding this phenomenon, it has been observed that some manufacturers of bitcoin miners may increase the prices for new miners as the market price of bitcoin increases.

Accordingly, to maintain our chances of earning new bitcoin rewards and remaining competitive in our industry, we must seek to continually add new miners to grow our hash rate at pace with the growth in the bitcoin global network hash rate. However, as demand has increased and scarcity in the supply of new miners has resulted, the price of new miners has increased sharply, and we expect this process to continue in the future as demand for bitcoin increases. Therefore, if the price of bitcoin is not sufficiently high to allow us to fund our hash rate growth through new miner acquisitions and if we are otherwise unable to access additional capital to acquire these miners, our hash rate may stagnate and we may fall behind our competitors. If this happens, our chances of earning new bitcoin rewards would decline and, as such, our results of operations and financial condition may suffer.

Because our miners are designed specifically to mine bitcoin and may not be readily adaptable to other uses, a sustained decline in bitcoin’s value could adversely affect our business and results of operations.

We have invested substantial capital in acquiring miners using ASIC chips designed specifically to mine bitcoin using the 256-bit secure hashing algorithm (“SHA-256”) as efficiently and as rapidly as possible on our assumption that we will be able to use them to mine bitcoin and generate revenue from our operations. Therefore, our bitcoin mining operations focus exclusively on mining bitcoin, and our bitcoin mining revenue is based on the value of the bitcoin we mine. Accordingly, if the value of bitcoin declines and fails to recover, for example, because of the development and acceptance of competing blockchain platforms or technologies, including competing cryptocurrencies which our miners may not be able to mine, the revenue we generate from our bitcoin mining operations will likewise decline. Moreover, because our miners use these highly specialized ASIC chips, we may not be able to successfully repurpose them in a timely manner, if at all, to other uses, following a sustained decline in bitcoin’s value or if the bitcoin blockchain stops using SHA-256 for solving blocks. This would result in a material adverse effect on our business and could potentially impact our ability to continue as a going concern.

Our reliance on third-party miners may subject our operations to increased risk of design flaws.

The performance and reliability of our miners and our technology is critical to our reputation and our operations. We currently predominantly use Bitmain Technologies Limited (“Bitmain”) miners, and if there are issues with those machines, such as a design flaw in the ASIC chips they employ, our system could be substantially affected. Any system error or failure may significantly delay response times or even cause our system to fail. Any disruption in our ability to continue mining could result in lower yields and harm our reputation and business. Any exploitable weakness, flaw, or error common to the Bitmain miners we currently utilize could affect substantial portions of our miners; therefore, if a defect or other flaw exists and is exploited, a majority of, or all of our miner fleet could be adversely impacted. Any interruption, delay or system failure could result in financial losses, a decrease in the trading price of our common stock and damage to our reputation.

Our use of a third-party mining pool exposes us to certain risks.

We receive bitcoin rewards from our mining activity through a third-party mining pool operator, Foundry. Mining pools allow miners to combine their processing power, increasing their chances of solving a block and getting paid by the network. The rewards are distributed by the pool operator, proportionally to our contribution to the pool’s overall mining power, after deducting the applicable pool fee, if any, used to solve a block on the bitcoin blockchain. Should the pool operator’s system suffer downtime due to a cyber-attack, software malfunction or other issue, it could negatively impact our ability to mine and receive revenue, if we are unable to quickly switch to another pool or to self-mine without a pool. Furthermore, it is possible that the mining pool operator could fail to accurately record the total processing power provided to the pool for a given bitcoin mining application, which would inhibit our ability to confirm the proportion of that total processing power which we provided. While we have internal methods of tracking both the hash rate we provide and the total used by the pool, the mining pool operator uses its own record-keeping to determine our proportion of a given reward, which may not match our own. If we are unable to consistently obtain accurate proportionate rewards from our mining pool operator, we may not receive accurate block rewards from the pool, and we would have limited recourse to correct these inaccuracies. This could lead us to decide against further participation in a mining pool, or mining pools generally, which may affect the predictability of our mining returns, which could have an adverse effect on our business and operations.

If Foundry were to cease operations, there would be some delay and consequently lost revenue until we pointed our miners at our backup pool provider, which we would do by using a mass command issued with our management software. Furthermore, while we receive daily reports from Foundry detailing the total processing power provided to its mining pool and our proportion of that total processing power to determine the distribution of rewards to us, we are dependent on the accuracy of Foundry’s record keeping. We have little means of recourse against Foundry if we determine the proportion of the reward paid out to us by Foundry is incorrect, other than leaving Foundry’s pool altogether. If we are unable to consistently obtain accurate proportionate rewards from our pools, we may experience reduced rewards for our efforts, which would have an adverse effect on our business and operations. Additionally, were Foundry to cease operations, declare insolvency or file for bankruptcy, there is a reasonable risk that recovery of any mining rewards or fees for any given day that had not yet been delivered into our wallet held at NYDIG would be delayed or unrecoverable.

We may not be able to realize the benefits of forks.

The bitcoin blockchain is subject to modification based on a consensus of the users on its network. When a significant minority of users on the network agree to a modification that is not compatible with the prior network protocol, a “fork” of the network results, with one prong running the pre-modified protocol and the other running the modified protocol. The effect of such a fork would be the existence of two “versions” of the blockchain running in parallel that are not interchangeable, which requires exchange-type transactions to convert between the two forks. Additionally, it may be unclear following a fork which of the two protocols represents the original and which is the new protocol. Different metrics adopted by industry participants to determine which is the original asset following a fork in the bitcoin blockchain may include: referring to the blockchain with the greatest network hash rate, or to the “length” of blockchain (i.e., the time between the first transaction recorded in the blockchain’s distributed ledger and the date of the most recent transaction). Accordingly, it is possible that a fork may occur on the bitcoin blockchain that results in an asset different from our current bitcoin holdings, or a protocol different from SHA-256 (which our miners are specifically designed to operate), gaining predominance, and the value of our bitcoin assets may suffer, or we may not be able to adapt our miners to the new protocol. Therefore, we may not realize the economic benefit of a fork in the bitcoin blockchain, either immediately or ever, which could adversely affect an investment in our securities.

Cyber-attacks, data breaches or malware may disrupt our operations and trigger significant liability for us, which could harm our operating results and financial condition, and damage our reputation or otherwise materially harm our business.

As a publicly traded company, at times we experience cyber-attacks, such as phishing, and other attempts to gain unauthorized access to our systems, and we anticipate continuing to be subject to such attempts. There is an ongoing risk that some or all of our bitcoin could be lost or stolen as a result of one or more of these incursions. As we increase in size, we may become a more appealing target of hackers, malware, cyber-attacks or other security threats, and, despite our implementation of strict security measures, it is impossible to eliminate all such vulnerability. For instance, we may not be able to ensure the adequacy of the security measures employed by third parties, such as our service providers. Additionally, though we provide cybersecurity training for all employees, we cannot guarantee that we will not be affected by further phishing attempts. Efforts to limit the ability of malicious actors to disrupt the operations of the internet or undermine our own security efforts may be costly to implement and may not be successful. Such breaches, whether attributable to a vulnerability in our systems or otherwise, could result in claims of liability against us, damage our reputation and materially harm our business.

We rely on the well-known U.S. based third-party digital asset-focused custodian, NYDIG, to safeguard our bitcoin using cold storage. NYDIG receives and holds our custodied assets, which includes both our digital assets and any cash we may choose to custody with NYDIG. Only NYDIG holds the private keys to our wallet, and no one at the Company has access to our wallet’s private keys. If our third-party service provider experiences a security breach or cyber-attack and unauthorized parties obtain access to our bitcoin, we may lose some or all of our bitcoin and our financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. To date, we have not experienced a material cyber incident; however, we continue to encounter ongoing cyber-attacks and the occurrence of any such event in the future could subject us to liability to our customers, suppliers, business partners and others, or give rise to legal and/or regulatory action, which could damage our reputation or otherwise materially harm our business, operating results, and financial condition.

However, pursuant to our Digital Asset Custodial Agreement, dated as of March 10, 2022, between us and NYDIG (as may be amended, modified or supplemented from time to time, the “Custodial Agreement”), NYDIG has covenanted that it holds our digital assets in a segregated account that will at all times be identifiable in NYDIG’s database as being stored for our benefit; that NYDIG has no right, interest or title in our digital assets; and that our digital assets do not constitute an asset on the balance sheet of NYDIG. To the extent NYDIG holds any cash on our behalf, NYDIG may hold our cash in one or more omnibus “for benefit of customers” accounts at one or more U.S. insured depository institutions. However, at this time, the Company has no cash custodied, and has no immediate or future plans to custody, any cash with NYDIG. Furthermore, NYDIG has covenanted that our digital assets will not be commingled with other digital assets held by NYDIG, except temporarily (typically for no longer than 12 hours, but in no case longer than 72 hours) as an operational matter, if required, to effect a transfer into or out of our digital asset account. Significantly, NYDIG represents and warrants that beneficial and legal ownership of all our digital assets is, and will remain, freely transferable without the payment of money or value and that NYDIG has no ownership interest in our account.

While we believe that the Custodial Agreement provides our business with reasonable protections for our business’s operations and the safe storage of our digital assets, we make no assurances that storing our digital assets with NYDIG is free from risk, given the various risks enumerated above. To the best of our knowledge, NYDIG safely stores our digital assets in segregated accounts as represented in the Custodial Agreement; however, if NYDIG were to be in breach of the Custodial Agreement, our digital assets could be compromised. Additionally, if NYDIG were to cease operations, declare insolvency or file for bankruptcy, there is a reasonable risk that recovery of our assets, though kept in segregated accounts, would be delayed or unrecoverable. Additionally, if NYDIG were to cease operations, declare insolvency or file for bankruptcy, we do not have a readily available backup custodian at this time, and so we would need to self-custody our digital assets using cold storage until we could contract with another adequate custodian for the safe storage of our assets which may have a disruptive effect on our business. In the meantime, our mined bitcoin would continue to aggregate in our proprietary wallet until we found a suitable cold storage custodian.

Incorrect or fraudulent bitcoin transactions may be irreversible and we could lose access to our bitcoin.

Bitcoin transactions are not, from an administrative perspective, reversible without the consent and active participation of the recipient of the bitcoin from the transaction. Because of the decentralized nature of the bitcoin blockchain, once a transaction has been verified and recorded in a block that is added to the bitcoin blockchain, an incorrect transfer of a bitcoin or a theft thereof generally will not be reversible, and we may not have sufficient recourse to recover our losses from any such transfer or theft. It is possible that, through computer or human error, or through theft or criminal action, our bitcoin rewards could be transferred in incorrect amounts or to unauthorized third parties, or to uncontrolled accounts. Though recent high profile enforcement actions against individuals laundering stolen bitcoin have demonstrated some means of bringing malicious actors to justice for their theft, the stolen bitcoin is likely to remain unrecoverable. Furthermore, we utilize a third-party custodian for our bitcoin, and thus do not maintain a private key. However, if they lose access to our wallet, or if a malicious actor successfully denies the third-party custodian access to our wallet, we may be permanently denied access to the bitcoin held in the wallet corresponding to the lost, stolen or blocked keys. Though we have taken and continue to take reasonable steps to secure our data and to store our bitcoin with an institutional custodian, if we, or our third-party custodian were to experience data loss relating to our digital wallets, we could effectively lose access to and the ability to use our bitcoin assets. Moreover, we may be unable to secure insurance policies for our bitcoin assets at rates or on terms acceptable to us, if at all, and we may choose to self-insure. To the extent that we are unable to recover our losses from such action, error or theft, such events could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our business could be harmed by prolonged power and internet outages, shortages, or capacity constraints.

Our bitcoin mining and HPC data center operations require a significant amount of electrical power and access to high-speed internet to be successful. If we are unable to secure sufficient electrical power, or if we lose internet access for a prolonged period, we may be required to reduce our operations or cease them altogether. If this occurs, our business and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.

We may incur expenses or delays relating to such events outside of our control, which may not be covered by insurance, and such events could have a material adverse impact on our business, operating results and financial condition.

Digital assets held by the Company are not subject to FDIC or SIPC protections.

The Company does not hold its digital assets with a banking institution or a member of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) or the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (“SIPC”) and, therefore, its digital assets are not subject to the protections enjoyed by depositors with FDIC or SIPC member institutions.

Increased scrutiny and changing expectations from stakeholders with respect to our environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices and the impacts of climate change may result in additional costs or risks.

Companies across many industries are facing increasing scrutiny related to their ESG practices. Investor advocacy groups, certain institutional investors, investment funds and other influential investors are also increasingly focused on ESG practices and in recent years have placed increasing importance on the non-financial impacts of their investments. Furthermore, increased public awareness and concern regarding environmental risks, including global climate change, has resulted and may continue to result in increased public scrutiny of our business and our industry, and our management team may divert significant time and energy away from our operations and towards responding to such scrutiny and reassuring our employees.

In addition, the physical risks of climate change may impact the availability and cost of materials and natural resources, sources and supply of energy, demand for bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, and could increase our insurance and other operating costs, including, potentially, to repair damage incurred as a result of extreme weather events or to renovate or retrofit facilities to better withstand extreme weather events. If environmental laws or regulations or industry standards are either changed or adopted and impose significant operational restrictions and compliance requirements on our operations, or if our operations are disrupted due to the physical impacts of climate change, our business, capital expenditures, results of operations, financial condition and competitive position could be negatively impacted. However, as a predominantly zero-carbon bitcoin miner, we believe we are advantageously positioned relative to our competitors in this regard.

We are currently making considerable investments in our information technology systems and processes. Difficulties from or disruptions to these efforts may interrupt our normal operations and adversely affect our business and results of operations.

We have been making considerable investments in our information technology systems and processes and expect such investment to continue for the foreseeable future in support of our bitcoin mining operations and our expansion into HPC hosting and colocation. These continuing investments and upgrades include the implementation of new tools and technologies to further streamline and automate processes, including with respect to procurement, and to support our compliance with evolving U.S. GAAP. These investments and upgrades and may take longer to complete and cost more than originally planned.. As a result of our continued work on these projects, we may experience difficulties with our systems and business disruptions. Any such difficulties or disruptions may adversely affect our business and results of operations.

The development and advancement in the efficiency of AI models presents risks and challenges that may adversely impact our business and operating results.

The introduction of, and advancement in the efficiency of AI models could potentially adversely affect data center usage by significantly reducing the computational power needed to train AI models, potentially leading to less demand for high-power density, liquid-cooled data center infrastructure and colocation facilities such as those we are building at the Lake Mariner Facility.. New advancements in AI models could also alter the way data centers are currently designed and utilized and may adversely affect our business and results of operations.

Risks Related to Governmental Regulation and Enforcement

Changing environmental regulation and public energy policy may expose our business to new risks.

Our bitcoin mining and HPC data center operations require a substantial amount of power and can only be successful, and ultimately profitable, if the costs we incur, including for electricity, are lower than the revenue we generate from our operations. As a result, any bitcoin mining and HPC data center facility we establish can only be successful if we can obtain sufficient electrical power for that facility on a cost-effective basis, and our establishment of new facilities requires us to find locations where that is the case. If new regulations are imposed, or if existing regulations are modified, the assumptions we made underlying our plans and strategic initiatives may be inaccurate, and we may incur additional costs to adapt our planned business, if we are able to adapt at all, to such regulations.

In addition, there continues to be a lack of consistent climate legislation, which creates economic and regulatory uncertainty for our business because the bitcoin mining industry, with its energy demand, may become a target for future environmental and energy regulation. New legislation and increased regulation regarding climate change could impose significant costs on us and our suppliers, including costs related to increased energy requirements, capital equipment, environmental monitoring and reporting, and other costs to comply with such regulations. Further, any future climate change regulations could also negatively impact our ability to compete with companies situated in areas not subject to such limitations.

Moreover, in the State of New York, we currently participate in energy demand response programs to curtail operations, return capacity to the electrical grid, and receive funds to offset foregone operational mining revenue when necessary, such as in extreme weather events. Furthermore, we, as well as other bitcoin miners, received a mandatory survey from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (the “EIA”), seeking extensive information regarding our facilities’ use of electricity, and certain information regarding our operations, solely for the month of January 2024. This request was subsequently withdrawn by the EIA; however, it is possible that mandatory surveys such as this will be used by the EIA to generate negative reports regarding the bitcoin mining and HPC data center industries’ use of power and other resources, which could spur additional negative public sentiment and adverse legislative and regulatory action against us or the bitcoin mining and HPC data center industries as a whole. Surveys and other regulatory actions could increase our cost of operations or otherwise make it more difficult for us to operate at our current locations.

Given the political significance and uncertainty around the impact of climate change and how it should be addressed, and energy disclosure and use regulations, we cannot predict how legislation and regulation will affect our financial condition and results of operations in the future in the United States. However, due to the use of predominantly zero-carbon power in our operations, we believe we are advantageously positioned relative to our competitors in this regard. Further, even without such regulation, increased awareness and any adverse publicity in the global marketplace about potential impacts on climate change or energy use by us or other companies in our industry could harm our reputation. Any of the foregoing could result in a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

We are subject to a highly-evolving regulatory landscape and any adverse changes to, or our failure to comply with, any laws and regulations could adversely affect our business, reputation, prospects or operations.

As cryptocurrencies have grown in both popularity and market size, governments around the world have reacted differently to cryptocurrencies; certain governments have deemed them illegal, and others have allowed their use and trade without restriction, while some jurisdictions, such as the United States, subject the mining, ownership and exchange of cryptocurrencies to certain, and in some cases overlapping, unclear and evolving regulatory requirements.

We currently only operate in the United States, and do not currently have any plans to expand our operations beyond the United States. As bitcoin has grown in popularity and in market size, the U.S. regulatory regime, namely the Federal Reserve Board, U.S. Congress and certain U.S. agencies (e.g., the SEC, the CFTC, FinCEN and the Federal Bureau of Investigation have begun to examine the operations of the bitcoin network, bitcoin users and the bitcoin exchange market. The complexity and evolving nature of our business and the significant uncertainty surrounding the regulation of the cryptocurrency industry requires us to exercise our judgment as to whether certain laws, rules, and regulations apply to us, and it is possible that governmental bodies and regulators may disagree with our conclusions. To the extent we have not complied with such laws, rules, and regulations, we could be subject to significant fines, revocation of licenses, limitations on our products and services, reputational harm, and other regulatory consequences, each of which may be significant and could adversely affect our business, operating results, and financial condition.

Potentially increasing regulation and regulatory scrutiny may result in new costs for the Company and Company’s management having to devote increased time and attention to regulatory matters, change aspects of the Company’s business or result in limits on the utility of bitcoin. In addition, regulatory developments and/or the Company’s business activities may require the Company to comply with certain regulatory regimes. Increasingly strict legal and regulatory requirements and any regulatory investigations and enforcement may result in changes to our business, as well as increased costs, and supervision and examination for ourselves and our service providers. Ongoing and future regulation and regulatory actions could also significantly restrict or eliminate the market for or uses of bitcoin and/or may adversely affect the Company’s business, reputation, financial condition and results of operations. Moreover, new laws, regulations, or interpretations may result in additional litigation, regulatory investigations, and enforcement or other actions. Adverse changes to, or our failure to comply with, any laws and regulations may have an adverse effect on our reputation and brand and our business, operating results, and financial condition.

The compliance costs of responding to new and changing regulations could adversely affect our operations.

We are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations, including those relating to the generation, storage, handling, and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes. Certain of these laws and regulations also impose joint and several liability, without regard to fault, for investigation and cleanup costs on current and former owners and operators of real property and persons who have disposed of or released hazardous substances into the environment. Our operations may involve the use of hazardous substances and materials, such as petroleum fuel for temporary generators, as well as batteries, cleaning solutions, and other materials.

The course of future legislation and regulation in the United States remains difficult to predict, and potential increased costs associated with new legislation or regulation cannot be estimated at this time.

Our interactions with a blockchain may expose us to specially designated nationals (“SDN”) or blocked persons and new legislation or regulation could adversely impact our business or the market for cryptocurrencies.

The Office of Financial Assets Control (“OFAC”) of the U.S. Department of Treasury requires us to comply with its sanction program and not conduct business with persons named on its SDN list. However, because of the pseudonymous nature of blockchain transactions we may inadvertently and without our knowledge engage in transactions with persons named on OFAC’s SDN list. Our Company’s policy prohibits any transactions with such SDN individuals, and we take all commercially reasonable steps to avoid such transactions, but we may not be adequately capable of determining the ultimate identity of the individual with whom we transact with respect to selling bitcoin assets. Moreover, there is a risk that some bad actors will continue to attempt to use cryptocurrencies, including bitcoin, as a potential means of avoiding federally imposed sanctions, such as those imposed in connection with the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

We are unable to predict the nature or extent of new and proposed legislation and regulation affecting the bitcoin industry, or the potential impact of the use of bitcoin by SDN or other blocked or sanctioned persons, which could have material adverse effects on our business and our industry more broadly. Further, we may be subject to investigation, administrative or court proceedings, and civil or criminal monetary fines and penalties as a result of any regulatory enforcement actions, all of which could harm our reputation and affect the value of our common stock.

Bitcoin and bitcoin mining, as well as cryptocurrencies generally, may be made illegal in certain jurisdictions, including the ones we operate in, which could adversely affect our business prospects and operations.

It is possible that state or federal regulators may seek to impose harsh restrictions or total bans on bitcoin mining which may make it impossible for us to do business without relocating our mining operations, which could be very costly and time consuming. Further, although bitcoin and bitcoin mining, as well as cryptocurrencies generally, are largely unregulated in most countries (including the United States), regulators could undertake new or intensify regulatory actions that could severely restrict the right to mine, acquire, own, hold, sell, or use cryptocurrency or to exchange it for traditional fiat currency such as the United States Dollar. Such restrictions may adversely affect us as the large-scale use of bitcoin as a means of exchange is presently confined to certain regions globally. Such circumstances could have a material adverse effect on us, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations and potentially the value of any bitcoin we mine or otherwise acquire or hold for our own account, and thus harm investors.

We may be at a higher risk of litigation and other legal proceedings due to heightened regulatory scrutiny of the cryptocurrency industry, which could ultimately be resolved against the Company, requiring material future cash payments or charges, which could impair our financial condition and results of operations.

The size, nature and complexity of the Company’s business could make it susceptible to various claims, both in litigation and binding arbitration proceedings, legal proceedings, and government investigations. The Company believes that since cryptocurrency mining, and the digital asset industry generally, is a relatively new business sector, it is more likely subject to government investigation and regulatory determination. Any claims, regulatory proceedings or litigation that could arise in the course of the Company’s business could have a material adverse effect on the Company, its business or operations, or the industry as a whole.

The Company may be classified as an inadvertent investment company.

The Company is not engaged in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities and does not hold itself out as being engaged in those activities. Under the Investment Company Act, however, a company may be deemed an investment company under Section 3(a)(1)(C) if the value of its investment securities is more than 40% of its total assets (exclusive of government securities and cash items) on a consolidated basis.

The Company will be engaging in digital asset mining, the outputs of which are cryptocurrencies, which may be deemed a security. In the event that the digital assets held by the Company exceed 40% of its total assets, exclusive of cash, the Company may inadvertently become an investment company. An inadvertent investment company can avoid being classified as an investment company if it can rely on one of the exclusions under the Investment Company Act. One such exclusion, namely Rule 3a-2 under the Investment Company Act, allows an inadvertent investment company a grace period of one year from the earlier of (i) the date on which an issuer owns securities and/or cash having a value exceeding 50% of the issuer’s total assets on either a consolidated or unconsolidated basis and (ii) the date on which an issuer owns or proposes to acquire investment securities having a value exceeding 40% of the value of such issuer’s total assets (exclusive of government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis. The Company is putting in place policies that it expects will work to keep the digital assets held by the Company at less than 40% of its total assets, liquidating its digital assets or seeking a no-action letter from the SEC if the Company is unable to maintain sufficient total assets or liquidate sufficient digital assets in a timely manner.

As Rule 3a-2 is available to a company no more than once every three years, and assuming no other exclusions are available to the Company, the Company would have to keep within the 40% limit for at least three years after it ceases being an inadvertent investment company. This may limit the Company’s ability to make certain investments or enter into joint ventures that could otherwise have a positive impact on the Company’s earnings. In any event, the Company does not intend to become an investment company engaged in the business of investing and trading securities.

Classification as an investment company under the Investment Company Act requires registration with the SEC. If an investment company fails to register, it would have to stop doing almost all business, and its contracts would become voidable. Registration is time consuming and restrictive and would require a restructuring of the Company’s operations, and the Company would be very constrained in the kind of business it could do as a registered investment company. Furthermore, the Company would become subject to substantial regulation concerning management, operations, transactions with affiliated persons and portfolio composition, and would need to file reports under the Investment Company Act regime. The cost of such compliance would result in the Company incurring substantial additional expenses, and the failure to register if required may adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

If federal or state legislatures or agencies initiate or release tax determinations that change the classification of bitcoins as property for tax purposes (in the context of when such bitcoins are held as an investment), such determination could have a negative tax consequence on the Company or its shareholders.

Current guidance from the Internal Revenue Service indicates that digital assets such as bitcoin should be treated and taxed as property and that transactions involving the payment of bitcoin for goods and services should be treated as barter transactions. While this treatment creates a potential tax reporting requirement for any circumstance where the ownership of a bitcoin passes from one person to another, usually by means of bitcoin transactions (including off-blockchain transactions), it would also apply capital gains treatment to those transactions which may adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

Risks Related to Ownership of Our Common Stock

The trading price of shares of our common stock has been subject to volatility.

The trading price of our common stock has been, and is likely to continue to be, volatile, and may be influenced by various factors including the risks, uncertainties and factors described in this Annual Report and our other filings with the SEC, as well as factors beyond our control or of which we may be unaware. If these risks happen and our business and results of operation suffer as a result, the market price of our securities may decline, which could have a material adverse effect on an investment in our securities.

Bitcoin is subject to price volatility resulting from financial instability, poor business practices, fraudulent activities of players in the market, and other factors outside of our control. Such factors may cause a decline in the price of bitcoin, which may affect the trading price of our shares of common stock. We have issued, and may continue to issue, new shares of our common stock, which has a dilutive effect.

We have financed our strategic growth through our at-the-market (ATM) offerings and issuances of our common stock.

Our ATM offerings allow us to raise capital as needed by tapping into the existing trading market for our shares by selling newly issued shares into the market depending on prevailing market prices. Our efforts to raise capital is for the purpose of executing on development plans and strategic growth opportunities as they arise; however, holders of our common stock may experience dilution as a result of our sales of newly issued shares of our common stock in such ATM offerings.

Because we do not currently intend to pay any cash dividends on our common stock, our stockholders will not be able to receive a return on their shares unless they sell them.

We currently intend to retain any future earnings to finance the development and expansion of our business. We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the near future. Unless we pay dividends, our stockholders will not be able to receive a return on their shares unless they sell them. There is no assurance that stockholders will be able to sell shares when desired.

We are and may continue to be subject to short selling strategies.

Short selling is the practice of selling securities that the seller does not own but rather has borrowed from a third party with the intention of buying identical securities back at a later date to return to the lender. The short seller hopes to profit from a decline in the value of the securities between the sale of the borrowed securities and the purchase of the replacement shares, as the short seller expects to pay less in that purchase than it received in the sale. As it is therefore in the short seller’s best interests for the price of the stock to decline, may short sellers publish, or arrange for the publication of, negative opinions regarding the relevant issuer and its business prospects to create negative market momentum and generate profits for themselves after selling a stock short. These short attacks have, in the past, led to selling of shares in the market.

We are, and may in the future may be, the subject of unfavorable allegations made by short sellers. For example, in August and October of this year, short sellers published reports that contained certain allegations against us that we believe to be misleading. Any such allegations may be followed by periods of instability in the market price of our shares of common stock and negative publicity. We may be constrained in the manner in which we can proceed against the relevant short seller by principles of freedom of speech, applicable federal or state law or issues of commercial confidentiality. In addition, any related inquiry or formal investigation from a governmental organization or other regulatory body, including any inquiry from the SEC or the U.S. Department of Justice, could result in a material diversion of our management’s time and could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. Such a situation could be costly and time consuming and could distract our management from operating our business. SEC investigations are generally fact-finding inquiries and do not necessarily mean that the SEC has concluded that we have violated the federal securities laws or that the SEC has a negative view of the Company. Even if such allegations are ultimately proven to be groundless, allegations against us could adversely impact our business, and cause downward pressure and increased volatility in the price of our shares of common stock. In October 2024, we received an inquiry from the SEC relating to the allegations in the recent short seller reports relating to the sources of electricity used in our operations and the proportion of energy attributable to zero-carbon energy sources. We believe these allegations to be misleading and cooperated fully with the SEC. On January 31, 2025, the SEC informed us that the investigation was closed and that the SEC does not intend to recommend an enforcement action by the SEC against the Company.

Cybersecurity Risk Management and Strategy

We have developed and implemented a cybersecurity risk management program intended to protect the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of our critical systems and information. Our cybersecurity risk management program is one component of our information security program that guides continuous improvement to, and evaluates these security objectives for our critical systems, data, and operations. Additionally, our cybersecurity risk management program includes a cybersecurity incident response plan. Our approach to controls and risk management is based on guidance from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (“NIST”). This does not mean that we meet any particular technical standards, specifications, or requirements, but rather that we use NIST frameworks, guidance and recommendations to help us identify, assess, and manage cybersecurity controls and risks relevant to our business.

Our cybersecurity risk management program is integrated into our overall enterprise risk management program, and shares common methodologies, reporting channels and governance processes that apply across the enterprise risk management program to other legal, compliance, strategic, operational, and financial risk areas.

Our cybersecurity risk management program includes:

• identifying cybersecurity risks that could impact our facilities, third-party vendors/partners, operations, critical systems, information, and broader enterprise information technology environment. Risks are informed by threat intelligence, current and historical adversarial activity, and industry specify threats;
• risk assessments designed to help identify material cybersecurity risks to our critical systems, information, services, and our broader enterprise IT environment;
• an Information Security and Cybersecurity policy which establishes administrative, physical, and technical controls and procedures to protect data and systems;
• individuals, including employees and external third party service providers, who are responsible for managing our cybersecurity risk assessment processes, our security controls, and our response to cybersecurity incidents;
• the use of external service providers, where appropriate, to assess, test, monitor, respond or otherwise assist with aspects of our security controls;
• cybersecurity awareness training of our employees, incident response personnel, and senior management; and
• a cybersecurity incident response plan that includes procedures for responding to cybersecurity incidents.

We have not identified risks from known cybersecurity threats that have materially affected us, including our operations, business strategy, results of operations, or financial condition. We face risks from cybersecurity threats that, if realized, are reasonably likely to materially affect us, including our operations, business strategy, results of operations, or financial condition. See “Risk Factors - Cyberattacks, data breaches or malware may disrupt our operations and trigger significant liability for us, which could harm our operating results and financial condition, and damage our reputation or otherwise materially harm our business.”

Cybersecurity Governance

Our Board considers cybersecurity risk as part of its risk oversight function and oversees management’s implementation of our cybersecurity risk management program.

The Board receives periodic reports from management on our cybersecurity risks. In addition, management updates the Board, as necessary, regarding any material cybersecurity incidents, as well as any incidents with lesser impact potential. The Board also receives briefings from management on our cyber risk management program. Board members receive presentations on cybersecurity topics from our Vice President of Information Technology, risk management and internal security staff or external experts as part of the Board’s continuing education on topics that impact public companies.

Our management team is responsible for assessing and managing our material risks from cybersecurity threats. The team has primary responsibility for our overall cybersecurity risk management program and supervises both our internal cybersecurity personnel and our retained external cybersecurity consultants. Our information security organization is comprised of internal and external security and technology professionals. We continue to make investments in information security resources to mature, expand, and adapt our capabilities to address emerging cybersecurity risks and threats. In addition, we have a multifunctional cybersecurity committee comprised of information technology, operations, risk, and finance members who will meet quarterly to assess new vulnerabilities and threats, update risk assessments and assess the implementation of the Company’s cybersecurity risk management program. This committee will report periodically to the management team on matters involving cybersecurity risks and incidents.

Our Vice President of Information Technology also serves as our Chief Information Security Officer and is responsible for managing and implementing the Company’s Information Security and Cybersecurity policy, which can be found on the Company’s website. In addition, the Vice President of Information Technology sets company-wide control requirements, assesses adherence to controls, identifies and prioritizes cybersecurity risks, and oversees incident protection and response. The Vice President of Information Technology has over three decades of Information Technology experience overseeing cybersecurity as an integral part of the IT function.

Corporate Headquarters

TeraWulf maintains its principal corporate offices in Easton, Maryland and New York, New York. Office space at these locations is provided by Beowulf E&D, a company controlled by TeraWulf’s CEO, under an Administrative and Infrastructure Services Agreement dated April 27, 2021. Since January 1, 2023, the use of TeraWulf’s corporate offices has been covered under the base fee outlined in Amendment No. 1 to the Services Agreement (as amended, the “Services Agreement”). The Company considers its current office space adequate for its existing operations.

Lake Mariner Facility

TeraWulf owns and operates the Lake Mariner Facility, a high-performance digital infrastructure campus located in Barker, New York, on the site of a former coal-fired power plant. The facility began sustainably mining bitcoin in March 2022 and, as of December 31, 2024, has approximately 195 MW of operational mining capacity. The site is designed for scalable expansion, with the ability to increase capacity up to 500 MW in the near term and potentially 750 MW with targeted transmission upgrades.

The Lake Mariner Facility operates under a lease agreement with Somerset Operating Company, LLC (“Somerset”), a company controlled by TeraWulf’s CEO. Under the agreement, Lake Mariner leases approximately 157 acres in Niagara County, New York, for an initial term of 35 years which automatically renews for up to nine additional periods of five years each, unless Lake Mariner provides written notice to Somerset to terminate the lease at least six months prior to the expiration of the initial term or the then-current renewal term, as applicable. The Lake Mariner site’s strategic location provides access to low-cost, predominantly zero-carbon power, making it an optimal hub for both bitcoin mining and HPC hosting operations.

Nautilus Cryptomine Facility

Prior to divesting its interest, TeraWulf operated bitcoin mining activities at the Nautilus Cryptomine Facility, located in Berwick, Pennsylvania. The facility was operated under a ground lease agreement between Nautilus and Cumulus Data LLC (“Cumulus Data”), an affiliate of Talen Energy Corporation. The lease covered the site of the Nautilus Cryptomine Facility for an initial five-year term, with two three-year extension options and an additional interim extension option of up to six and a half months.

TeraWulf began mining bitcoin at the Nautilus Cryptomine Facility in Q1 2023, with 50 MW of operational capacity as of December 31, 2024. On February 28, 2024, the Company exercised its option to increase its energy allocation by an additional 50 MW, bringing its total attributable capacity to 100 MW.

On March 1, 2024, Cumulus Data sold substantially all its assets to an unaffiliated third party, including the land leased to Nautilus under the ground lease. In connection with the asset sale, the Nautilus ground lease was assigned to the purchaser of the assets, with no changes to its terms and conditions. Subsequently, on October 2, 2024, TeraWulf sold its entire 25% equity interest in Nautilus to Cumulus Coin LLC, allowing the Company to reallocate capital toward the expansion of its wholly owned digital infrastructure at Lake Mariner and its high-performance computing strategy.

From time to time, TeraWulf may be involved in various legal and administrative proceedings, lawsuits and claims incidental to the conduct of its business. Some of these proceedings, lawsuits or claims may be material and involve highly complex issues that are subject to substantial uncertainties and could result in damages, fines, penalties, non-monetary sanctions or relief. TeraWulf recognizes provisions for claims or pending litigation when it determines that an unfavorable outcome is probable, and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. Due to the inherent uncertain nature of litigation, the ultimate outcome or actual cost of settlement may materially vary from estimates. TeraWulf is not subject to any material pending legal and administrative proceedings, lawsuits or claims as of the date of this Annual Report. TeraWulf’s business and operations are also subject to extensive regulation, which may result in regulatory proceedings against TeraWulf.

The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with the other Items included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Annual Report”) and with the accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this report. All figures presented below represent results from continuing operations, unless otherwise specified. Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Consolidated Financial Statements. Unless the context otherwise requires, references in this Annual Report to the “Company,” “TeraWulf,” “we,” “us” or “our” refers to TeraWulf Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries. Certain statements contained in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations may be deemed forward-looking statements. See “Forward-Looking Statements.”

This MD&A generally discusses 2024 and 2023 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2024 and 2023. Discussions of 2022 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2023 and 2022 are not included, and can be found in "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part II, Item 7 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023.

Overview

We are a vertically integrated owner and operator of next-generation digital infrastructure, purpose-built to support bitcoin mining and HPC workloads. With a strong commitment to sustainability, our operations are powered predominantly by zero-carbon energy, reinforcing our focus on environmentally responsible data center operations in the United States. By leveraging clean, cost-effective, and reliable energy sources, we aim to drive long-term efficiency and resilience within the digital infrastructure sector.

Our primary operations are centered at the Lake Mariner Facility, strategically located on the shores of Lake Ontario. Developed on the site of a decommissioned coal-fired power plant, this expansive facility is designed for scalable growth, with the ability to expand up to 500 MW in the near term and up to 750 MW with targeted transmission upgrades. Purpose-built to support both bitcoin mining and GPU-driven HPC workloads, the Lake Mariner Facility is well-positioned to meet the rising demand for compute-intensive applications. This dual-purpose strategy enhances operational efficiency, diversifies revenue streams, and strengthens our position in the evolving digital economy.

Bitcoin and Blockchain

Bitcoin, introduced in 2008, revolutionized digital finance by enabling a decentralized system for exchanging and storing value without reliance on traditional financial institutions. It operates on a public ledger known as the “blockchain,” which records every transaction transparently and securely. This decentralized structure eliminates the need for intermediaries, enhancing transaction efficiency while making the network resilient to censorship and fraud. Unlike fiat currencies, bitcoin is not controlled by any government or central bank, reinforcing its role as a scarce, independent store of value.

Bitcoin mining is the process of validating transactions and securing the network through proof-of-work consensus, where miners solve complex cryptographic puzzles to add new blocks to the blockchain. The network is maintained by a global pool of distributed nodes, ensuring transaction integrity and preventing double-spending. Key factors influencing mining economics include computing power, energy costs, and network difficulty, with miners competing to maximize their share of the total computational power (hashrate) deployed on the bitcoin network. As more miners participate, the network difficulty adjusts dynamically every 2,016 blocks (approximately every two weeks) to maintain a consistent block creation rate.

Bitcoin Reward Halving

Bitcoin’s supply issuance follows a predefined halving schedule, reducing the block reward by 50% approximately every four years. This mechanism enforces a controlled supply of bitcoin, contributing to its scarcity and long-term value proposition. The total bitcoin supply is capped at 21 million coins, and halvings will continue until this limit is reached.

The most recent halving occurred on April 19, 2024, reducing the block reward from 6.25 to 3.125 bitcoin per block. While the halving decreases the direct mining subsidy, transaction fees remain an additional source of miner revenue. This built-in supply constraint influences mining economics and often plays a role in bitcoin’s long-term price dynamics.

Business Strategy

Our strategy is centered on leveraging our owned and scalable digital infrastructure to drive revenue and profitability through both bitcoin mining and HPC hosting. As a vertically integrated operator, we own and control our infrastructure, allowing us to optimize efficiency, reduce costs, and maintain a highly competitive cost structure.

While bitcoin mining remains a core focus, we are strategically transitioning an increasing portion of the Lake Mariner Facility to support HPC hosting and colocation. This shift allows us to capitalize on the growing demand for AI, machine learning, and cloud computing workloads while further optimizing our power utilization and digital infrastructure.

A key milestone in this transition occurred on December 22, 2024, when we signed a multi-year data center lease agreement with Core42, securing 72.5 MW of HPC hosting capacity at the Lake Mariner Facility for GPU compute workloads. This agreement includes an option to expand by an additional 135 MW through March 31, 2025, enabling total deployments to Core42 of up to 72.5 MW in 2025 and 135 MW in 2026. This development accelerates our HPC hosting expansion, positioning us at the intersection of energy and digital compute infrastructure. To support this expansion, we have expanded our digital infrastructure at the site, featuring advanced liquid cooling systems and Tier 3 redundancy. This infrastructure will be optimized for high-density compute workloads, reinforcing our ability to attract hyperscale and enterprise customers.

By prioritizing cost-efficient power utilization, sustainability, and scalable infrastructure, our strategy positions TeraWulf to maximize value creation while adapting to the evolving landscape of digital asset mining and AI-driven computing. Looking ahead, we remain focused on expanding our infrastructure, optimizing operations, and strengthening our competitive advantage in both bitcoin mining and HPC hosting.

Our Facilities

During the year ended December 31, 2024, we operated bitcoin mining activities at two data centers: the Lake Mariner Facility and the Nautilus Cryptomine Facility in central Pennsylvania. In October 2024, we sold our entire equity interest in Nautilus, allowing us to consolidate operations and reinvest in future infrastructure growth.

Lake Mariner Facility

Strategically located in Barker, New York, on the site of a former coal-fired power plant, the Lake Mariner Facility began operations in March 2022, designed to support sustainable bitcoin mining. As of December 31, 2024, the facility was operating 195 MW of bitcoin mining capacity, with an additional 50 MW under construction and expected to come online in the first half of 2025. Additionally, the Company is developing HPC data centers at the Lake Mariner Facility to provide HPC hosting services for Core42, supporting up to 72.5 MW of data center infrastructure dedicated to GPU compute workloads. This capacity is expected to come online throughout 2025. Core42 also has an option, exercisable through March 31, 2025, to secure an additional 135 MW of data center infrastructure at the Lake Mariner Facility.

The Company has a PPA with NYPA, securing 90 MW of high-load factor power to support its bitcoin mining operations. The PPA, executed in February 2022, has a ten-year term from the commencement of NYPA’s power delivery. The Lake Mariner Facility is built for scalable expansion, with the ability to grow up to 500 MW in the near term and potentially 750 MW with targeted transmission upgrades. Its strategic location and access to low-cost, predominantly zero-carbon energy make it a highly attractive site for both bitcoin mining and HPC workloads.

As of December 31, 2024, we owned approximately 62,000 miners, of which approximately 58,800 are operational at the Lake Mariner Facility with the remainder undergoing maintenance, awaiting disposal or on standby to replace miners under repair. These miners were comprised as follows:

As of December 31, 2024, our fleet of miners ranged in age from 0.1 to 2.6 years and have an average age of approximately 0.7 years. We do not have scheduled downtime for our miners; however, while we periodically perform unscheduled maintenance on our miners, such downtime has not been significant historically. When performing unscheduled maintenance, depending on the length of estimated repair time, we may replace a miner with a substitute miner to limit overall downtime. As of December 31, 2024, our fleet of miners at the Lake Mariner Facility had a range of energy efficiency from 15 to 23 joules per terahash (“j/th”) and has an average energy efficiency of 19.8 j/th.

Nautilus Cryptomine Facility

The Nautilus Cryptomine Facility, located in Berwick, Pennsylvania, was a joint venture between TeraWulf and Talen Member. The Nautilus Cryptomine Facility was a 200 MW bitcoin mining operation, situated adjacent to the 2.5-gigawatt nuclear-powered Susquehanna Station and was the first bitcoin mining site powered entirely by behind-the-meter, zero-carbon nuclear energy, operating under a fixed-rate power contract of 2.0 cents per kilowatt-hour for a five-year term, with options for two three-year renewals.

Under the terms of the joint venture agreement, TeraWulf held a 25% equity interest in Nautilus, while Talen Member held a 75% equity interest, with ownership subject to adjustments based on capital contributions. TeraWulf began mining bitcoin at the Nautilus Cryptomine Facility in the first quarter of 2023, with an allotted 50 MW of operational capacity prior to divesting its interest in Nautilus in October 2024. While holding a 25% equity stake, TeraWulf’s share of mined bitcoin was determined by relative hashrate contributions. The Company had contributed approximately 1.9 EH/s of the facility’s total 5.2 EH/s capacity, representing approximately 35.7% of the total hashrate attributed to the Company. At the time of TeraWulf’s ownership, the Nautilus Cryptomine Facility deployed approximately 48,000 miners, of which 15,800 miners were attributed to TeraWulf’s contributions to utilize its 50 MW allotment.

In October 2024, TeraWulf sold its entire equity interest in Nautilus, allowing the Company to reallocate capital toward expanding its digital infrastructure at the Lake Mariner Facility and advancing its HPC hosting strategy. As part of the transaction, Nautilus distributed to TeraWulf all of its right, title, and interest in its miners, as well as certain other related equipment. Following the sale, TeraWulf deployed 12,300 S19 XP miners and sold or otherwise disposed of 35,700 miners as of December 31, 2024.

Bitcoin Mining - Combined Facilities

As outlined above, several factors influence our ability to mine bitcoin profitably, including bitcoin’s USD value, mining difficulty, global hashrate, power costs, fleet energy efficiency, and overall data center efficiency. Among these, energy efficiency is a critical driver of profitability, as power costs represent the most significant direct expense in bitcoin mining. We believe we operate a highly efficient mining fleet, optimized to maximize output while minimizing energy consumption. To assess operational performance and effectiveness, the Company tracks key metrics, which we believe are also valuable to investors for evaluating our progress and benchmarking against industry peers.

The table below presents our miner efficiency and computing power as compared to the global computing power as of December 31, 2024 and 2023:

(1) Results as of December 31, 2023 reflect hashrate of mining operations at the Lake Mariner Facility and TeraWulf’s net share of hashrate produced at the Nautilus Cryptomine Facility.

(2) Total global hashrate obtained from YCHARTS (https://ycharts.com/indicators/bitcoin\_network\_hash\_rate)

(3) Joules of energy required to produce each terahash of processing power

(4) While nameplate inventory at the Lake Mariner Facility was 9.7 EH/s as of December 31, 2024 and was 5.5 EH/s for TeraWulf’s two facilities as of December 31, 2023, inclusive of gross total hosted miners, actual monthly hashrate performance depends on a variety of factors, including (but not limited to) performance tuning to increase efficiency and maximize margin, scheduled outages (scopes to improve reliability or performance), unscheduled outages, curtailment due to participation in various cash generating demand response programs, derate of ASICS due to adverse weather and ASIC maintenance and repair.

As of December 31, 2024, our operating hashrate represented approximately 1.4% of the total global hashrate, aligning with our share of global blockchain rewards. As of that date, this translated to approximately 6 bitcoin mined per day. To maintain profitability, we focus on optimizing operational efficiency and cost management, ensuring that our mining rewards consistently cover direct operating expenses.

The table below presents the average cost of mining each bitcoin, including bitcoin mined at the Lake Mariner Facility and the Company’s net share of bitcoin mined at the Nautilus Cryptomine Facility, for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 and the total energy cost per kWh utilized within the facilities.

(1) “Cost to mine one bitcoin” is a cash cost metric and does not include depreciation. Although the Company recognizes depreciation with respect to its mining assets, it does not consider depreciation in determining whether it is economical to operate its mining equipment. As a result, the Company does not consider the sunk costs or depreciation of past capital investments in its historical or forecasted breakeven analysis. If depreciation of our miner fleet were factored into the above cost of mining analysis, it would add $22,086 and $9,892 per bitcoin mined for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, bringing the total “cost to mine one bitcoin” to $47,354 and $18,598 for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.

(2) Computed as the weighted-average opening price of bitcoin on each respective day the mined bitcoin is earned. Excludes bitcoin earned from profit sharing associated with a bitcoin miner hosting agreement that expired in February 2024 at the Lake Mariner Facility.

(3) Excludes bitcoin earned from profit sharing associated with a bitcoin miner hosting agreement that expired in February 2024 at the Lake Mariner Facility of 6 and 64 bitcoin for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, and includes TeraWulf’s net share of bitcoin mined at the Nautilus Cryptomine Facility, based on the hashrate share attributed to the Company.

(4) Excludes energy expenses associated with a bitcoin miner hosting agreement that expired in February 2024 at the Lake Mariner Facility and includes TeraWulf’s net share of energy expense at the Nautilus Cryptomine Facility, based on aggregate nameplate power consumption of deployed miners attributed to TeraWulf’s contribution to Nautilus.

Power costs are the most significant expense in our bitcoin mining operations, accounting for 40.1% and 29.4% of the total value of bitcoin mined for the years ended ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The increase in power costs as a percentage of bitcoin mined in 2024 compared to 2023 was primarily driven by a near doubling of network difficulty and the bitcoin halving event in April 2024, which reduced block rewards. These impacts were partially offset by growth in our average operating hashrate and an increase in the average market value of each bitcoin mined.

Energy prices are highly volatile, influenced by global events that can drive nationwide fluctuations in power costs. At the Lake Mariner Facility, power costs are subject to variable market rates, which can change hourly based on wholesale electricity pricing. While this introduces some unpredictability, it also provides us with the flexibility to actively manage our energy consumption, optimizing for profitability and efficiency. Energy prices are also highly sensitive to weather conditions, such as winter storms and polar vortices, which can increase regional power demand and drive up costs. During such events, we may curtail operations to avoid consuming power at peak rates, or we may be curtailed under demand response programs in which we participate. For the years ended December 31, 2024, and 2023, the average aggregate realized power prices at the Lake Mariner Facility and Nautilus Cryptomine Facility were $0.043 and $0.032 per kilowatt hour, respectively.

Our management team continuously monitors market conditions to determine when and for how long to curtail operations. If curtailment is not mandated under demand response programs, we make real-time decisions to curtail mining whenever power prices exceed the value of the fixed bitcoin reward. As a result, curtailment increases when bitcoin’s value declines or energy prices rise, and decreases when bitcoin’s value appreciates or energy costs fall. These decisions are actively managed on an hour-by-hour basis to optimize profitability.

During the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, we curtailed operations at the Lake Mariner Facility in response to weather events, energy price spikes, and participation in demand response programs. The Company records expected payments to be received for demand response programs as a reduction in cost of revenue, which amounted to $8.6 million and $3.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.

The Company has purchased all miners with cash, without relying on limited recourse equipment financing for miner acquisitions. To support operations, invest in our joint venture, and purchase miners and other fixed assets, we have raised capital through both equity issuances and corporate-level debt. Costs related to these capital raises are not included in this analysis.

Miner acquisition costs, or capital expenditures, are not factored into the cost of mining analysis, as they do not impact the marginal cost of producing one bitcoin. Instead, these costs are recorded as property, plant, and equipment in the consolidated balance sheets. Depreciation of property, plant, and equipment is calculated using the straight-line method, with estimated useful lives of four years for miners and five years for computer equipment.

During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company recorded an accelerated depreciation expense of $5.1 million related to certain miners whose estimated useful lives were shortened due to planned replacement by April 2024. While our standard depreciation period for miners is four years, historically low power costs may allow for a longer actual useful life in certain cases. However, if depreciation were included in the cost of mining analysis, it would add $22,086 and $9,892 per bitcoin mined for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.

Estimating asset useful lives requires management judgment, particularly given the rapid evolution of next-generation mining rigs in industrial-scale bitcoin mining. Depreciation schedules may be adjusted if events, regulatory changes, or shifts in operating conditions indicate a need for revision. Management continuously evaluates factors such as future energy market conditions, operating costs, maintenance practices, and capital investment needs to ensure depreciation assumptions remain reasonable. When an asset’s estimated useful life is adjusted—either shortened or extended—depreciation provisions are updated accordingly, which could have a material impact on future financial results.

Recent Developments

In October 2024, the Company’s board of directors approved a share repurchase program authorizing the Company to repurchase up to $200.0 million of the Company’s outstanding shares of Common Stock through December 31, 2025. Subsequent to December 31, 2024 and through February 28, 2025, the Company repurchased 5,900,000 shares of its Common Stock for $33.3 million.

In December 2024, the Company entered into certain long-term data center lease agreements with Core42, a G42 company specializing in sovereign cloud, AI infrastructure, and digital services, to lease specified data center infrastructure comprising 72.5 MW of HPC hosting capacity at the Lake Mariner Facility to the customer to support the customer’s HPC operations (the “HPC Leases”). As of the date of this Annual Report, none of the HPC Leases had commenced and all are expected to commence at various dates in 2025, each having an initial term of ten years and granting the customer two five-year renewal options. Additionally, the HPC Leases provide Core 42 an option to expand near-term HPC hosting capacity by an additional 135 MW gross, which is equivalent to 108 MW of critical IT load, by March 31, 2025.

The HPC Leases provide for certain prepaid rent amounts (“Prepaid Rent”) representing the first 12 months base rent under each lease for a total of $90.0 million and shall be applied towards each month’s base rent for 24 months commencing on the respective commencement date of each lease until the Prepaid Rent is exhausted. As of the date of this Annual Report, the Company has received all $90.0 million of Prepaid Rent.

The Business Combination

On December 13, 2021, TeraWulf completed its business combination (the “Merger”) with IKONICS Corporation (“IKONICS”), through which the Company effectively acquired IKONICS and became a publicly traded entity on Nasdaq, which was the primary objective of the business combination.

As part of the Merger consideration, IKONICS shareholders received contractual contingent value rights (“CVR”) under a Contingent Value Rights Agreement (the “CVR Agreement”). Each IKONICS shareholder as of immediately prior to the Merger received one non-transferable CVR for each share of IKONICS common stock held at that time. The CVR holders were entitled to receive 95% of the Net Proceeds (as defined in the CVR Agreement) from any sale, transfer, disposition, spin-off, or licensing of IKONICS’ pre-merger business assets.

During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company fulfilled its CVR obligations, making $11.0 million in payments related to proceeds from the sale of net assets held for sale. As of December 31, 2023, the Company had completed all required distributions to CVR holders, and the CVR Agreement was deemed terminated.

Results of Operations - Comparative Results for the Years Ended December 31, 2024 and 2023

The Company generates revenue in the form of bitcoin by providing hash computation services to a mining pool operator to mine bitcoin and validate transactions on the global bitcoin network using miners owned by the Company. The earned bitcoin are routinely sold for U.S. dollars. The Company also earned revenue by providing bitcoin miner hosting services to third parties. While the Company may choose to mine other digital currencies, it has no plans to do so currently.

The Company’s business strategy centers on growing revenue and profitability by enhancing the capacity and efficiency of our bitcoin mining fleet while expanding our data center infrastructure to support HPC hosting activities. We plan to strategically develop the infrastructure necessary for profitability of bitcoin mining while pursuing adjacent high-value HPC hosting opportunities that leverage our power utilization and digital infrastructure. We are confident that our expertise in power infrastructure and digital asset mining can be favorably applied to the design, development, and operation of large-scale data centers. These data centers are optimized for high-value applications such as cloud computing, machine learning, and artificial intelligence. We will actively seek opportunities to expand into these areas using our knowledge, expertise, and existing infrastructure wherever favorable market opportunities arise.

Revenue

The following table presents revenue (in thousands):

Revenue for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 was $140.1 million and $69.2 million, respectively, an increase of $70.9 million. The increase was primarily attributed to an increase in the average price of bitcoin during the year ended December 31, 2024 of $65,824 as compared to $28,788 during the same period in the prior year and an increase in mining capacity at the Lake Mariner Facility to approximately 195 MW as of December 31, 2024 as compared to 110 MW as of December 31, 2023, partially offset by decreases in the total bitcoin mined due to impacts of the halving in April 2024 and the increase in network hashrate, resulting in total bitcoin mined of 2,177 bitcoin during the year ended December 31, 2024 as compared to 2,168 bitcoin during the same period in the prior year.

During the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 revenue from bitcoin miner hosting was $0.8 million and $7.5 million, respectively, a decrease due to the expiration of the Company’s bitcoin miner hosting contract with a customer in February 2024.

Costs and Expenses

The following table presents cost of revenue (exclusive of deprecation) (in thousands):

Cost of revenue (exclusive of depreciation) for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 was $62.6 million and $27.3 million, respectively, an increase of approximately $35.3 million. Cost of revenues is primarily comprised of power expense and the increase was primarily due to the increase in mining capacity due to infrastructure constructed and placed in service between December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2024 at the Lake Mariner Facility and, to a lesser extent, an increase in realized power prices during the year ended December 31, 2024 as compared to the same period in the prior year. The Company records proceeds related to participation in demand response programs as a reduction in cost of revenue in the period corresponding to the underlying demand response program period; the amount of aggregate proceeds received or expected to be received were $8.6 million and $3.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The Company is actively expanding its enrollment in such available programs in New York State.

The following table presents operating expenses (in thousands):

Operating expenses (including related party expenses) for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 were approximately $7.6 million and $4.9 million, respectively, a net increase of $2.7 million. Operating expenses increased primarily due to higher engineering expenses of $0.4 million and property insurance of $0.7 million. Operating expense - related party increased primarily due to $0.4 million in rent expense and $1.1 million due to increased staffing at the Lake Mariner Facility. These increases related to infrastructure constructed and placed in service between December 31, 2023 and 2024.

The following table presents selling, general and administrative expenses (in thousands):

Selling, general and administrative expenses (including related party expenses) for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 were $70.6 million and $37.0 million, respectively, a net increase of $33.6 million. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased primarily due to increased expense during the year ended December 31, 2024 as compared to the same period in the prior year of (i) stock-based compensation of $25.2 million, (ii) employee compensation and benefits of $5.7 million, (iii) travel expenses of $0.6 million, (iv) legal and other professional fees of $1.4 million, (v) charity, sponsorships and investor relations of $1.1 million and (vi) other public company costs of $1.1 million, partially offset by decreases in insurance expense of $0.9 million. Selling, general and administrative expenses – related party decreased a net $1.3 million in fees paid under the Services Agreement with Beowulf E&D primarily due to performance milestone expense incurred during the year ended December 31, 2023 that were not incurred during the year ended December 31, 2024, offset by an increase in the base fee as well as increased travel expense of $0.6 million.

Depreciation for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 was $59.8 million and $28.4 million, respectively. The increase was primarily due to the increase in mining capacity due to infrastructure constructed and placed in service between December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2024 at the Lake Mariner Facility. Additionally, during the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company recorded accelerated depreciation expense of $5.1 million related to certain miners of which the Company shortened their estimated useful lives based on anticipated replacement by April 30, 2024.

Gain on fair value of digital currency, net during the year ended December 31, 2024 was $2.2 million as a result of the Company adopting Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2023-08, Intangible – Goodwill and Other – Crypto Assets (Subtopic 350-60): Accounting for and Disclosure of Crypto Assets (“ASU 2023-08”), on January 1, 2024 which requires entities with certain crypto assets to subsequently measure such assets at fair value, with changes in fair value recorded in net income in each reporting period. Prior to the adoption of ASU 2023-08, the Company recorded impairment of digital currency of $3.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2023 representing the decline in bitcoin prices during the Company’s holding period of its bitcoin, which was not reversed during its holding period, and realized gain on sale of digital currency of $3.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2023 upon subsequent liquidation of bitcoin held. The Company elected to early adopt ASU 2023-08 effective January 1, 2024, resulting in a cumulative-effect change of $37,000 to increase the balance of digital currency with a corresponding decrease in the opening balance of accumulated deficit in the consolidated balance sheet as of January 1, 2024.

During the years ended December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, the Company recorded a loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment of $17.8 million and $1.2 million, respectively, related to disposals of miners and write-off of deposits on miners.

Interest expense

Interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 was $19.8 million and $34.8 million, respectively, a decrease of $15.0 million. Interest expense through July 2024 related primarily to the borrowings under the Loan, Guaranty and Security Agreement (the “LGSA”) with Wilmington Trust (the “Term Loans”), which had an original maturity date of December 1, 2024 and was fully repaid in July 2024 ahead of maturity. In October 2024, the Company completed a private offering of convertible senior notes due 2030 (the “2030 Convertible Notes”) which accrue 2.75% interest annually. The decrease in interest expense during the year ended December 31, 2024 as compared to the prior year is primarily due to early repayments of the Term Loans principal balance resulting in a decrease of amortization of debt issuance costs and debt discount of $8.1 million. Additionally, interest expense related to the stated interest rate decreased $9.4 million for the same reason, partially offset by $2.6 million of interest accrued during the year ended December 31, 2024 under the 2030 Convertible Notes and payable in May 2025.

Loss on extinguishment of debt

Loss on extinguishment of debt was $6.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 related to voluntary prepayments of the Term Loans in February and July 2024. The Company incurred prepayment fees of $1.3 million in connection with the voluntarily prepayments and derecognized unamortized debt discount of $5.0 million associated with the principal repaid. The Company made no prepayments on the principal balance of the Term Loans during the year ended December 31, 2023.

Income tax benefit

Income tax benefit was $0 for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023. Based upon the level of historical U.S. losses and future projections over the period in which the net deferred tax assets are deductible, at this time, management believes it is more likely than not that the Company will not realize the benefits of the remaining deductible temporary differences, and as a result the Company has recorded a full valuation allowance against its gross deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2024 and 2023.

Equity in net loss of investee, net of tax

Equity in net income (loss) of investee, net of tax for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 was $3.4 million and $(9.3) million, respectively, which represents TeraWulf’s proportional share of income or loss of Nautilus, which commenced operations in February 2023. The amount includes an impairment loss of $13.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2023 related to the distribution of miners from Nautilus to the Company whereby the miners were marked to fair value from book value on the date distributed. The impairment loss was the result of decreasing prices for miners between initial purchase and distribution.

Additionally the Company recorded a gain on sale of equity interest in investee of $22.6 million in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2024 as a result of the sale of its entire 25% equity interest in Nautilus to the Talen Member in October 2024.

Non-GAAP Measure

To provide investors with additional information in connection with our results as determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principals in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”), we disclose Adjusted EBITDA as a non-GAAP measure. This measure is not a financial measure calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and it should not be considered as a substitute for net loss, operating loss, or any other measure calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies.

We define Adjusted EBITDA as net loss adjusted for (i) impacts of interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization; (ii) stock-based compensation expense, amortization of right-of-use asset and related party expense to be settled with respect to common stock, all of which are non-cash items that the Company believes are not reflective of its general business performance, and for which the accounting requires management judgment, and the resulting expenses could vary significantly in comparison to other companies; (iii) one-time, non-recurring transaction-based compensation expense related to the 2030 Convertible Notes (iv) equity in net income (loss) of investee, net of tax, related to Nautilus and the gain on sale of interest in Nautilus; (v) other income which is related to interest income or income for which management believes is not reflective of the Company’s ongoing operating activities; (vi) loss on extinguishment of debt and net losses on disposals of property, plant and equipment, net, which are not reflective of the Company’s general business performance and (vii) loss from discontinued operations, net of tax, which is not applicable to the Company’s future business activities. The Company’s Adjusted EBITDA also includes the impact of distributions from investee received in bitcoin related to a return on the Nautilus investment, which management believes, in conjunction with excluding the impact of equity in net income (loss) of investee, net of tax, is reflective of assets available for the Company’s use in its ongoing operations as a result of its investment in Nautilus.

Management believes that providing this non-GAAP financial measure allows for meaningful comparisons between the Company's core business operating results and those of other companies, and provides the Company with an important tool for financial and operational decision making and for evaluating its own core business operating results over different periods of time. In addition to management's internal use of non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA, management believes that Adjusted EBITDA is also useful to investors and analysts in comparing the Company’s performance across reporting periods on a consistent basis. Management believes the foregoing to be the case even though some of the excluded items involve cash outlays and some of them recur on a regular basis (although management does not believe any of such items are normal operating expenses necessary to generate the Company’s bitcoin related revenues). For example, the Company expects that share-based compensation expense, which is excluded from Adjusted EBITDA, will continue to be a significant recurring expense over the coming years and is an important part of the compensation provided to certain employees, officers, directors and consultants. Additionally, management does not consider any of the excluded items to be expenses necessary to generate the Company’s bitcoin related revenue.

The Company’s Adjusted EBITDA measure may not be directly comparable to similar measures provided by other companies in the Company’s industry, as other companies in the Company’s industry may calculate non-GAAP financial results differently. The Company's Adjusted EBITDA is not a measurement of financial performance under U.S. GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to net loss or any other measure of performance derived in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Although management utilizes internally and presents Adjusted EBITDA, the Company only utilizes that measure supplementally and does not consider it to be a substitute for, or superior to, the information provided by U.S. GAAP financial results. Accordingly, Adjusted EBITDA is not meant to be considered in isolation of, and should be read in conjunction with, the information contained in the Company’s consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

The following table is a reconciliation of the Company’s Adjusted EBITDA to its most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure (i.e., net loss) for the periods indicated (in thousands):

37

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of December 31, 2024, the Company had balances of cash and cash equivalents of $274.1 million, working capital of $229.6 million, total stockholders’ equity of $244.4 million and an accumulated deficit of $332.3 million. The Company incurred a net loss of $72.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. The Company began mining bitcoin in March 2022 and had 9.7 EH/s of operating capacity as of December 31, 2024. To date, the Company has relied primarily on proceeds from the sale of bitcoin, both self-mined and distributed from the joint venture which owned the Nautilus Cryptomine Facility, and its issuances of debt and equity to fund its principal operations.

The principal uses of cash are for the operation and buildout of data center facilities, debt service, and general corporate activities and, to a lesser extent in 2023, investments in the Nautilus joint venture related to mining facility buildout and general corporate activities. Cash flow information is as follows (in thousands):

Operating activities

Cash (used in) provided by operating activities for continuing operations was $(24.4) million and $4.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, reflecting a decrease of $28.6 million. During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company completed significant expansion of its bitcoin mining operations resulting in an increase in mining capacity at the Lake Mariner Facility to approximately 195 MW as of December 31, 2024 as compared to 110 MW as of December 31, 2023 which resulted in stable bitcoin earned during the period despite the impacts of the halving in April 2024. In addition, the average price of bitcoin increased during the year ended December 31, 2024 to $65,824 as compared to $28,788 during the same period in the prior year, resulting in an increase in revenue of $70.9 million. Power prices increased during the year ended December 31, 2024 as compared to prior year and cost of revenue (exclusive of depreciation) increased approximately $35.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 as compared to the prior year primarily due to the increase in mining capacity and the halving in April 2024. Additionally, prior to the repayment of the Term Loans in July 2024, the Company converted its bitcoin holdings nearly immediately to cash and the related proceeds from sales of digital currency were included within cash flows from operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows. Subsequently, proceeds from sales of digital currency of $67.4 million are included within cash flows from investing activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2024 as the Company no longer converts bitcoin into cash on a nearly immediate basis.

Investing activities

Cash used in investing activities was $91.2 million and $78.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The Company invested $267.9 million and $75.2 million in the buildout of its facilities at the Lake Mariner Facility for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, which included $69.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2024 related to infrastructure intended to support expansion into HPC leasing operations in 2025. Additionally, during the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company invested $2.8 million in its joint venture. During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company received proceeds from the sale of its equity interest in the joint venture of $86.1 million, proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment of $23.3 million, and proceeds from sales of digital currency not converted nearly immediately into cash of $67.4 million.

Financing activities

Cash provided by financing activities was $335.2 million and $119.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company received proceeds from (i) issuance of convertible notes, net of issuance costs paid, of $487.1 million, (ii) issuances of Common Stock, net of issuance costs, of $188.7 million and (iii) warrant exercises of $4.8 million. The cash provided by financing activities during the year ended December 31, 2024 was partially offset by principal payments on long-term debt of $139.4 million, repurchases of treasury stock of $118.2 million, purchases of capped call instruments of $60.0 million and payments related to tax withholdings related to net share settlements of stock-based compensation awards of $23.7 million. During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company received proceeds from (i) issuances of Common Stock, net of issuance costs, of $135.9 million (ii) proceeds from warrant exercises of $2.5 million, and (iii) issuance of convertible promissory notes of $1.3 million. The cash provided by financing activities during the year ended December 31, 2023 was partially offset by payments of contingent value rights liability related to the proceeds from sales of net assets held for sale of RM 101 of $11.0 million, principal payments on long-term debt of $6.6 million, and payments related to tax withholdings related to net share settlements of stock-based compensation awards of $2.0 million.

Financial Condition

The Company incurred a net loss of $72.4 million and reported cash used in operating activities of $24.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. As of December 31, 2024, the Company had balances of cash and cash equivalents of $274.1 million, working capital of $229.6 million, total stockholders’ equity of $244.4 million and an accumulated deficit of $332.3 million. The Company had 9.7 EH/s of operating capacity at the Lake Mariner Facility as of December 31, 2024. To date, the Company has relied primarily on proceeds from sales of bitcoin, both self-mined and distributed from the joint venture which owned the Nautilus Cryptomine Facility, and its issuances of debt and equity to fund its principal operations. Subsequent to December 31, 2024, the Company received $90.0 million of Prepaid Rent under its HPC Leases which shall be applied towards each month’s base rent for 24 months commencing on the respective commencement date of each lease until the Prepaid Rent is exhausted.

Critical Accounting Estimates

The above discussion and analysis of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations are based upon its consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions about future events that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Future events and their effects cannot be determined with absolute certainty. Therefore, the determination of estimates requires the exercise of judgment. Actual results inevitably will differ from those estimates, and such differences may be material to the financial statements.

See Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report for a summary of the Company’s significant accounting policies.

Digital currency

Digital currency is comprised of bitcoin earned as noncash consideration in exchange for providing hash computation services to a mining pool as well as consideration for bitcoin miner hosting services. From time to time, the Company also receives bitcoin as distributions-in-kind from its joint venture.

Bitcoin are accounted for as intangible assets with indefinite useful life and is included in current assets in the consolidated balance sheets due to the Company’s ability to sell it in a highly liquid marketplace and because the Company reasonably expects to liquidate its bitcoin to support operations within the next twelve months. The Company elected to early adopt ASU 2023-08 effective January 1, 2024, which requires digital currency to be valued at fair value each reporting period in accordance with ASC 820 with changes in fair value recorded in net income. Gains and losses from the remeasurement of digital currency are included within gain on fair value of digital currency, net in the consolidated statements of operations. The Company sells bitcoin and gains and losses from such transactions, measured as the difference between the cash proceeds and the cost basis of bitcoin as determined on a first-in-first-out basis, are also included within gain on fair value of digital currency, net in the consolidated statements of operations.

Prior to the adoption of ASU 2023-08, bitcoin was assessed for impairment annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate it is more likely than not that the asset is impaired. The Company elected to bypass the optional qualitative impairment assessment and to track its bitcoin activity daily for impairment assessment purposes. The Company performed an analysis each day to identify whether events or changes in circumstances, principally decreases in the quoted price of bitcoin on the active trading platform, indicated that it was more likely than not that its bitcoin were impaired. For impairment testing purposes, the lowest intraday trading price of bitcoin was identified at the single bitcoin level (one bitcoin). The excess, if any, of the carrying amount of bitcoin and the lowest daily trading price of bitcoin represented a recognized impairment loss. To the extent an impairment loss was recognized, the loss established the new cost basis of the asset. Subsequent reversal of previously recorded impairment losses was prohibited.

Bitcoin earned through mining activities is recorded as an adjustment in the consolidated statements of cash flows, reconciling net loss to cash flows from operating activities. Bitcoin received as distributions-in-kind from equity investees is disclosed in supplemental noncash investing activities.

Prior to the repayment of the Term Loans in July 2024 (see Note 9), bitcoin sales proceeds were included in cash flows from operating activities, as bitcoin was converted into cash immediately during that period. Following repayment of the Term Loans, bitcoin sales proceeds are now classified under cash flows from investing activities, as the Company no longer converts bitcoin into cash immediately upon mining.

Long-lived Assets

Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost, net of accumulated depreciation. Judgment is necessary in estimating the Company’s various assets’ useful lives. This includes evaluating the Company’s own usage experience with its currently owned assets, the quality of materials used in construction-related projects and, for its miners, the rate of technological advancement and market-related factors such as the price of bitcoin and the bitcoin network hashrate, which impact the value of the miners. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets (generally 5 years for computer equipment and 4 years for miners). Leasehold improvements and electrical equipment are depreciated over the shorter of their estimated useful lives or the lease term. Changes in depreciation and amortization, generally accelerated depreciation, are determined and recorded when estimates of the remaining useful lives or residual values of long-term assets change.

The Company reviews its long-lived assets, including property, plant and equipment, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset, or asset group, may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. Significant judgment is used when estimating future cash flows, particularly the price of bitcoin and the network hashrate. Any impairment loss recorded is measured as the amount by which the carrying value of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Should our estimates of useful lives, undiscounted cash flows, or asset fair values change, additional and potentially material impairments may be required, which could have a material impact on our reported financial results.

Stock-based compensation

The Company measures stock-based compensation cost related to share-based payment awards at the grant date of the award, based on the estimated fair value of the award. For restricted stock units (“RSUs”) with time-based vesting, the fair value is determined by the Company’s Common Stock price on the date of the grant. For RSUs with vesting based on market conditions (“PSUs”), the effect of the market condition is considered in the determination of fair value on the grant date using a Monte Carlo simulation model. Stock-based compensation expense for PSUs is recorded over the derived service period unless the market condition is satisfied in advance of the derived service period, in which case a cumulative catch-up is recognized as of the date of achievement. Stock-based compensation for PSUs is recorded regardless of whether the market conditions are met unless the service conditions are not met. The Company accounts for forfeitures as they occur. The Company uses significant judgment in determining the likelihood of meeting milestones and market conditions. Inputs into valuation models such as Monte Carlo simulations include both the Company’s and guideline public company historical and expected annual volatility and, depending on the inputs selected, the Company could calculate significantly different estimated grant date fair values, materially impacting the valuation of our stock-based awards and the stock-based compensation expense we recognize in future periods.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes pursuant to ASC 740, Income Taxes (“ASC 740”), which requires, among other things, an asset and liability approach to calculating deferred income taxes. The asset and liability approach requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities. A valuation allowance is provided to offset any net deferred tax assets for which management believes it is more likely than not that the net deferred tax asset will not be realized. The Company follows the provision of ASC 740 related to accounting for uncertain income tax positions. When tax returns are filed, it is more likely than not that some positions taken would be sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities, while others are subject to uncertainty about the merits of the position taken or the amount of the position that would be ultimately sustained. In accordance with the guidance of ASC 740, the benefit of a tax position is recognized in the financial statements in the period during which, based on all available evidence, management believes it is more likely that not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including the resolution of appeals or litigation processes, if any. Tax positions taken are not offset or aggregated with other positions. The tax benefits recognized in the consolidated financial statements from such positions are then measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon settlement with the applicable taxing authority. The portion of the benefits associated with the tax positions taken that exceeds the amount measured as described above should be reflected as a liability for uncertain tax benefits in the Company’s balance sheets along with any associated interest and penalties that would be payable to the taxing authorities upon examination. The most critical estimate for income taxes is the determination of whether to record a valuation allowance for any net deferred tax asset, including net loss carryforwards, whereby management must estimate whether it is more likely than not that the deferred tax asset would be realized.

The following discussion about our market risk exposures involves forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in our forward-looking statements. For more information regarding the forward-looking statements used in this section and elsewhere in this Annual Report, see the “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” at the forepart of this Annual Report.

Risk Regarding the Price of Bitcoin.

Our business and development strategy is focused on maintaining and expanding our bitcoin mining operations to maximize the amount of new bitcoin rewards we earn. As of December 31, 2024, our digital currency balance was comprised of 5 bitcoin recorded at its fair value of $0.5 million, all of which were produced from our bitcoin mining operations.

We cannot predict the future market price of bitcoin, the future value of which will affect revenue from our operations, and any future declines in the fair value of the bitcoin we mine and hold for our account would be reported in our financial statements and results of operations as a charge against net income, which could have a material adverse effect on the market price for our securities.

A 10% increase or decrease in both the price of bitcoin produced during the year ended December 31, 2024 and the fair value of bitcoin as of December 31, 2024 would have increased or decreased net loss by approximately $14.0 million.

A 10% increase or decrease in power prices during the year ended December 31, 2024 would have increased or decreased net loss by approximately $6.3 million.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Disclosure controls are procedures that are designed with the objective of ensuring that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time period specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls are also designed with the objective of ensuring that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In connection with this 2024 Form 10-K, our management evaluated, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer (our “Certifying Officers”), the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2024, pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) under the Exchange Act. Based upon that evaluation, our Certifying Officers concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2024.

We do not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures will prevent all errors and all instances of fraud. Disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the disclosure controls and procedures are met. Further, the design of disclosure controls and procedures must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all disclosure controls and procedures, no evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures can provide absolute assurance that we have detected all our control deficiencies and instances of fraud, if any. The design of disclosure controls and procedures also is based partly on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We periodically review our internal control over financial reporting as part of our efforts to ensure compliance with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. In addition, we routinely review our system of internal control over financial reporting to identify potential changes to our processes and systems that may improve controls and increase efficiency, with the goal of establishing and maintaining an effective internal control environment. Changes may include such activities as implementing new, more efficient systems, consolidating the activities of business units, migrating certain processes to our shared services organizations, formalizing policies and procedures, improving segregation of duties and increasing monitoring controls.

There were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2024, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting and for the assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. The internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and that receipts and our expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and our directors and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024. In making the assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, management has utilized the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, (2013 framework) (“COSO”). Based on our evaluation under the COSO criteria, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2024, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

Our independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP, has issued an audit report on management’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024. The report of Deloitte & Touche LLP is included below under the heading “Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.”

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the stockholders and the Board of Directors of TeraWulf Inc.

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of TeraWulf Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2024, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2024, of the Company and our report dated February 28, 2025 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.

Basis for Opinion

The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Houston, Texas

February 28, 2025