Elauwit Connection, Inc.: Form 10-Q/A for the period ended Sep 30, 2025

The following discussion reviews the operating results of Elauwit Connection, Inc. (“Elauwit,” the “Company,” “we,” “our,” or “us”) for the three months ended September 30, 2025 (the “third quarter”), the nine months ended September 30, 2025 (the “nine months”), the respective prior year periods ended September 30, 2024 (the “prior year periods”), and our financial condition as of September 30, 2025, and should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this report and our other documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A (this “Form 10-Q”) are qualified by the cautionary statement included under the next sub-heading, “Forward-Looking Statements.”

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

In addition to historical information, this Form 10-Q contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), which provides a “safe harbor” for forward-looking statements made by us. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, including statements concerning our plans, objectives, goals, beliefs, business strategies, future events, business conditions, results of operations, financial position, business outlook, business trends, and other information, may be forward-looking statements. Words such as “aim,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “can,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “goal,” “intend,” “may,” “might,” “outlook,” “plan,” “potential,” “seek,” “will,” “would” and variations of such words or similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements are not historical facts, and are based upon our current expectations, beliefs, estimates and projections, and various assumptions, many of which, by their nature, are inherently uncertain and beyond our control. Our expectations, beliefs, estimates, and projections are expressed in good faith and we believe there is a reasonable basis for them. However, there can be no assurance that our expectations, beliefs, estimates, and projections will occur or can be achieved. Actual results may vary materially from what is expressed in or indicated by the forward-looking statements.

These forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical results or anticipated results, including:

• our history of losses and our ability to continue as a going concern;
• our ability to obtain additional financing and fund our operations;
• our market opportunity;
• the effects of increased competition and innovations by new and existing competitors in our market and our ability to adapt to and anticipate changes in technology;
• our ability to maintain and grow relationships with property owners and network partners and increase our customer base;
• our ability to consistently win competitive RFP processes, become a preferred or sole supplier for new-build projects, increase our gross margins with newer customer relationships, and capitalize on the opportunities in our pipeline;
• our reliance on manufacturers to obtain the materials necessary to provide our services;
• the potential effects of delays or disruptions in property development;
• the future growth of the network services industry and demands of our customers;
• our ability to pay our debts as they come due;
• our ability to grow the business and effectively manage or sustain our growth;
• future revenue, hiring plans, expenses and capital expenditures;
• our ability to comply with new or modified laws and regulations that currently apply or become applicable to our business or the business of our customers;
• our ability to recruit and retain key employees and management personnel;
• our financial performance and capital requirements;
• our ability to maintain, protect, and enhance our intellectual property;
• the restatement of our financial statements, the material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting and the potential insufficiency of our disclosure controls and procedures to detect errors or acts of fraud; and
• the potential lack of liquidity and trading of our securities.

RESTATEMENT OF PREVIOUSLY ISSUED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

This “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” has been amended and restated to give effect to the restatement of our financial statements, as more fully described in Note 2, “Restatement of Previously Issued Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.” For further detail regarding the restatement, see Note 2.

BUSINESS OVERVIEW

Elauwit is a customer-centric service provider of broadband Internet networks for the multifamily and student housing property sectors across the United States. Our managed WiFi networks provide property-wide Internet access for residents, guests, property management staff, and third-party technology vendors at each property we serve. We provide our service offering wholesale to REITs, property ownership groups, and property management companies, engaged in our target real estate sectors, who then offer the service to their residents.

In building out a managed WiFi network, we provide network design, project management, network engineering, network installation, and quality control. As part of our service delivery model, we provide dedicated bandwidth, 24/7 network monitoring, network maintenance, and resident support.

Our mission is to be the leading experience provider of Internet access solutions. For our property ownership clients, this means clear communication and timely execution. For the end users of our service, residents and their guests, this means dedication to the objective of providing an excellent resident experience. We differentiate ourselves in the area of resident experience by building reliable networks, responding to service requests quickly, establishing support protocols that lead to industry-leading first touch resolution metrics, and communicating effectively with key stakeholders throughout.

While anyone can claim top tier operational capabilities, we have grown quickly through word-of-mouth, as a trusted partner for real estate development and ownership groups. We have an excellent track record of repeat business from parties we contract with. Internet access has become a utility, but unlike electricity and water, reliability is not something property owners can take for granted. Our performance has created the opportunity to expand within ownership portfolios and is a key aspect of our growth strategy moving forward.

We closely monitor the challenges and needs of development and ownership groups in the real estate sectors in focus. A continued theme has been the fragmented market of service providers in the space in which we operate and issues stemming out of such. We view these issues to be a large opportunity for our business and an indication that consolidation is likely in the near future. We aim to be a driver of consolidation.

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

Initial Public Offering

On November 4, 2025, we entered into an Underwriting Agreement (the “Underwriting Agreement”) with Craig-Hallum Capital Group LLC, as representative of the underwriters (the “Representative”), for an underwritten public offering (the “Offering”) of 1,667,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share (“common stock”). The public offering price was $9.00 per share of common stock and the underwriters agreed to purchase 1,667,000 shares of common stock at a 7.0% discount to the public offering price. We granted the Representative a 45-day option to purchase up to an additional 250,050 shares of common stock to cover over-allotments, if any. The gross proceeds from the Offering were approximately $15.0 million, before deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and other offering expenses. Following the closing of the Offering, we believe we are in compliance with all applicable listing requirements of the Nasdaq Capital Market (“Nasdaq”).

Pursuant to the Underwriting Agreement, we issued to the Representative, as a portion of the underwriting compensation payable to the Representative, warrants (“Representative’s Warrants”) to purchase up to a total of 116,690 shares of common stock. The Representative’s Warrants have an exercise price of $10.35 per share, are initially exercisable 180 days after the effective date of the Offering and have a term of five years from such effective date.

On November 21, 2025, the Representative partially exercised its over-allotment option to purchase 68,989 additional shares of common stock for gross proceeds of approximately $0.6 million, before deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and other offering expenses. In connection with the closing of the partial over-allotment option exercise, on November 24, 2025, we also issued Representative’s Warrants to purchase up to 4,830 shares of common stock to the Representative.

Put-Call Agreement

On November 14, 2025, we repurchased 123,456 shares of common stock from each of Baron Hunter Group, LLC (“Baron Hunter”) and Steele Creek Partners LLC (“Steele Creek”), pursuant to a Put-Call Agreement, dated August 20, 2024, by and between us, Baron Hunter and Steele Creek, as amended on August 11, 2025 (the “Put-Call Agreement”). Pursuant to the Put-Call Agreement, we repurchased the shares of common stock at a price of $8.10 per share, resulting in payments of $1.0 million to each of Baron Hunter and Steele Creek.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (As Restated)

Summary

Highlights for the third quarter and nine months include:

• Topline revenue growth of 153.4% and 200.0% for the third quarter and nine months, respectively over the prior year periods. The robust pace of network construction activities and activations ramping throughout 2024 continued into the nine months, driving strong topline growth.
• Gross margin of 29.7% and 22.4% for the third quarter and nine months, respectively, primarily from network construction activities with an increased rate of network activations in the third quarter whereby we recognize the majority of contribution from a given project. Over time, we expect our gross margin to increase as higher margin recurring service fees constitute a growing share of revenues.
• Operating expenses for the third quarter and nine months increased by 61.6% and 61.2% over the prior year periods, primarily driven by continued growth in our project management and network engineering functions, as well as expenses associated with the preparation for being a publicly traded company.
• Backlog as of September 30, 2025 was $30.3 million, compared to $27.1 million as of September 30, 2024.
• Contracted units as of September 30, 2025 were 32,826, compared to 25,907 as of September 30, 2024.
• Activated units as of September 30, 2025 were 16,964 compared to 6,765 as of September 30, 2024.
• Billed units as of September 30, 2025 were 10,710 compared to 5,171 as of September 30, 2024.
• Recurring service revenue was $0.8 million for the third quarter compared to $0.3 million for the prior year period.

Comparison of the Three Months Ended September 30, 2025 and 2024

Revenue

Revenue for the third quarter increased $2.9 million, or 153.4%, to $4.8 million compared to $1.9 million for the prior year period. This increase was primarily due to increased network construction activities and the activation of networks, driving the ramp in our recurring service revenues.

Cost of Revenue

Cost of revenue increased to $3.4 million for the third quarter, compared to $1.7 million for the prior year period. The increase in cost of revenue was due to increased network construction activities.

Gross Profit

Gross profit increased 562.0% to $1.4 million for the third quarter compared to $0.2 million for the prior year period. Our gross margin for the third quarter period increased to 29.7% compared to 11.4% for the prior year period, primarily due to increased network activations and greater recurring service revenues in which we realize higher gross margin levels than with our network construction activities. The increase in gross profit was driven by higher revenue levels and gross margin expansion.

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses were $1.8 million for the third quarter compared to $1.1 million for the prior year period. The increase was driven by continued growth in our project management and network engineering functions, as well as expenses associated with the preparation for being a publicly traded company.

Operating Income (Loss)

Higher gross profit from revenue increases paired with gross margin expansion resulted in operating loss of $0.4 million for the third quarter compared to operating loss of $0.9 million for the prior year period.

Interest Expense

Interest expense was $0.1 million for the third quarter, relatively flat with $0.1 million for the prior year period. The slight increase was primarily driven by increased network financing activities and borrowings for working capital. See Note 7, “Related Party Debt,” for additional information.

Net Income (Loss)

Net loss decreased $0.3 million to net loss of $0.6 million for third quarter compared to net loss of $1.0 million for the prior year period. The reasons for the decrease in net loss are discussed above.

Comparison of the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2025 and 2024

Revenue

Revenue for the nine months increased $10.4 million, or 200.0%, to $15.5 million compared to $5.2 million for the prior year period. This increase was primarily due to increased network construction activities and the activation of networks, driving the ramp in our recurring service revenues.

Cost of Revenue

Cost of revenue increased to $12.1 million for the nine months, compared to $4.3 million for the prior year period. The increase in cost of revenue was due to increased network construction activities.

Gross Profit

Gross profit increased 293.8% to $3.5 million for the nine months compared to $0.9 million for the prior year period. Our gross margin for the nine months period increased to 22.4% compared to 17.1% for the prior year period, primarily due to increased network activations and greater recurring service revenues in which we realize higher gross margin levels than with our network construction activities. The increase in gross profit was driven by higher revenue levels and gross margin expansion.

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses were $4.9 million for the nine months compared to $3.1 million for the prior year period. The increase was driven by continued growth in our project management and network engineering functions, as well as expenses associated with the preparation for being a publicly traded company.

Operating Loss

Higher gross profit from revenue increases paired with gross margin expansion resulted in a decrease in operating loss of $0.7 million to $1.5 million for the nine months compared to $2.2 million for the prior year period.

Interest Expense

Interest expense was $0.3 million for the nine months compared to $0.2 million for the prior year period. The increase was primarily driven by increased network financing activities and borrowings for working capital. See Note 7, “Related Party Debt,” for additional information.

Net Loss

Net loss decreased $0.5 million to $1.9 million for nine months compared to $2.4 million for the prior year period. The reasons for the decrease in net loss are discussed above.

Non-GAAP Measures

Adjusted earnings before interest (income) expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) is provided for informational purposes only and is not a measure of financial performance under accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (“GAAP”).

Management believes the presentation of adjusted EBITDA, reflecting non-GAAP adjustments, provides important supplemental information to investors and other users of our financial statements in evaluating the operating results of the Company. In particular, by excluding expenses that are not directly related to our operating performance, we are able to present a view of our underlying business that the management team uses to analyze our historical performance and plan for our future performance. Adjusted EBITDA is a key metric used by management and the Board of Directors to assess the Company’s financial and operating performance. This non-GAAP disclosure has limitations as an analytical tool, should not be viewed as a substitute for net income (loss) determined in accordance with GAAP, and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of the Company’s results as reported under GAAP, nor is it necessarily comparable to non-GAAP performance measures that may be presented by other companies.

The following tables present a reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA to net loss (the most comparable GAAP measure) in accordance with GAAP for the third quarter and nine months:

Key Performance Metrics

Management uses recurring service revenue, contracted units, activated units, billed units, and backlog as key performance metrics to assess our financial performance and results of operations. The measures of recurring service revenue, contracted units, activated units, billed units, and backlog may vary across the internet services or real estate industries. Therefore, our recurring service revenue, contracted units, activated units, billed units, and backlog measures are not necessarily comparable to similarity titled measures reported by other companies.

We define recurring service revenue as the monthly recurring service revenue initiated by network activation under our long-term service agreements. Management believes that the Company’s ability to retain and expand revenue from existing customers is an indicator of the long-term value of its customer relationships and potential future business opportunities.

We define contracted units as the total number of individual units waiting to be built or in the process of being installed across the properties using our networks. We believe this metric is useful to investors because it illustrates the total number of units we will serve once the construction process is complete.

We define activated units as the total number of individual units that are fully installed and on, but not yet collecting revenue due to onboarding process, across the properties using our networks. We believe this metric is useful for investors because it illustrates the total number of individual units we will collect revenue on once the onboarding process is complete, and can be tracked over time to show the reach of our networks.

We define billed units as the total number of individual units we are currently collect revenue on across the properties using our networks. We believe this metric is useful to investors because it illustrates the total number of individual units we collect revenue on and can be tracked over time to show the reach of our networks. We believe it is more useful to compare total billed units as opposed to total customers or total subscribers because our revenue is more closely tied to the number of units we serve than the total number of customers or subscribers.

Backlog is defined as the aggregate amount of a contract price allocated to remaining performance obligations. Total backlog can include network design and installation performance obligations and internet network services and hardware and internet services performance obligations. We believe tracking backlog is useful to investors because it illustrates the remaining performance obligations under our contracts and the revenue we expect to recognize in the future.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES (As Restated)

Going Concern Considerations

As of September 30, 2025, the Company had cash of approximately $0.8 million and had used approximately $1.3 million in cash for operating activities during the nine months then ended. The Company has incurred recurring net losses from operations and negative cash flows from operating activities since inception, with an accumulated deficit of approximately $12.3 million as of September 30, 2025.

Management expects operating losses and negative cash flows to continue for the foreseeable future as the Company invests in its commercial capabilities. As of September 30, 2025, these conditions raised substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for a period of one year from the date these financial statements were issued.

On November 6, 2025, the Company closed the Offering, raising gross proceeds of approximately $15.0 million. Based on the Company’s post-Offering liquidity position, forecasted cash flows, and available mitigating actions, management has concluded that substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern has been alleviated.

Liquidity

Our primary liquidity requirements are for working capital, debt repayment and Network-as-a-Service project deployment. Although income taxes are not currently a significant use of funds, after the benefits of our net operating loss carryforwards are fully recognized, they could become a material use of funds, depending on our future profitability and future tax rates. Our liquidity needs have been met primarily through equity offerings and related party loans.

As of September 30, 2025, we had approximately $0.8 million in cash. As of December 31, 2024, we had approximately $0.3 million in cash. We continue to manage our cash position in line with forecast network construction activities. During the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and the year ended December 31, 2024 (“fiscal 2024”), we used net cash in operating activities of $1.3 million and $3.9 million, respectively. As of September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, we had working capital deficit of $4.4 million and $2.5 million, respectively. Key drivers of our working capital position have been, and continue to be, network construction receivables and deferred revenue.

Capital Resources

On November 6, 2025, we closed the Offering and sold the underwriters 1,667,000 shares of common stock for gross proceeds of approximately $15.0 million, before deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and other offering expenses. On November 21, 2025, the Representative partially exercised its over-allotment option to purchase 68,989 shares of common stock for additional gross proceeds of approximately $0.6 million. See Note 14, “Subsequent Events,” for additional information.

As of September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, we had long-term debt of $2.2 million and $2.7 million, respectively.

We have financing arrangements with Endurance Financial LLC (“Endurance”), the manager of Endurance Opportunities I LLC (“Endurance Opportunities”), and Endurance Opportunities. On March 1, 2025 and March 25, 2025, we issued commercial promissory notes to Endurance in exchange for $1.0 million in total, that have a term of 18 months and 221 days, respectively, and on November 12, 2024, we issued a commercial promissory note to Endurance Opportunities in exchange for $0.25 million, that has a term 18 months, using certain account receivables as collateral for each of the commercial promissory notes (the “Endurance Notes”). The purpose of these facilities was to support our working capital position. On April 1, 2024 we entered into a Fixed Rate Loan Agreement with Endurance Opportunities for $1.0 million to refinance previously held long-term debt (the “Fixed Rate Loan Agreement”). On November 7, 2025, we paid off the outstanding principal and interest of the Fixed Rate Loan Agreement and the Endurance Notes, thereby satisfying these obligations in their entirety. See Note 14, “Subsequent Events,” for additional information.

During the nine months and fiscal 2024, we entered into various participation and agency agreements with Endurance Opportunities pursuant to which Endurance provided us with the financing necessary to support our Network-as-a-Service product offerings under certain network service agreements (the “NSAs”). During the nine months and fiscal 2024, we financed $0.3 million and $1.2 million, respectively, from Endurance Opportunities, and as of September 30, 2025, the NSAs had a balance of $1.4 million. See Note 7, “Related Party Debt,” for additional information.

On January 6, 2025, we entered into a SAFE agreement with an investor, pursuant to which we received an aggregate amount of $1.0 million. Following the closing of the Offering, the SAFE converted into 130,719 shares of common stock. See Note 10, “SAFE,” for additional information.

Cash Flow Analysis

Operating Activities

Net cash used in operating activities was $1.3 million for the nine months, compared to $3.1 million for the prior year period, primarily driven by higher revenue leading to a reduction in net loss.

Investing Activities

Net cash provided by investing activities was $0.0 million for the nine months, compared to $0.3 million for the prior year period, driven by a lack of transaction activity during the nine months compared to the cash acquired from the reverse recapitalization with DeltaMax, Inc. during the prior year period.

Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities was $1.8 million for the nine months, compared to $3.5 million for the prior year period, primarily driven by limited fundraising activity as we prepared for the Offering that closed in November 2025.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to use judgment in making estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses. The following accounting policies are based on, among other things, judgments and assumptions made by management that include inherent risks and uncertainties. Management’s estimates are based on historical experience, the relevant information available at the end of each period, and their judgment. Although management believes the judgment applied in preparing estimates is reasonable based on circumstances and information known at the time, actual results could differ materially from these estimates under different assumptions or market conditions. See Note 3, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” for information about our significant accounting policies.

See our prospectus filed with the SEC on November 4, 2025, which includes our audited consolidated financial statements for fiscal 2024 for a discussion of our critical accounting policies and use of estimates. There have been no material changes to our critical accounting policies and use of estimates discussed in the prospectus.

Accounts Receivable, Unbilled Receivables, Network Financing Receivables and Allowance for Credit Losses

Trade accounts receivable are recorded at invoiced amounts, net of allowance for expected credit losses (CECL), if applicable, and are unsecured and do not bear interest. Unbilled and network financing receivables are presented net of allowances for credit losses. Under the CECL impairment model, the Company develops and documents its allowance for credit losses on trade accounts receivable based on historical losses. The determination of portfolio segments is based primarily on the qualitative consideration of the credit risks driven by the customer type and macroeconomic factors, if any are deemed to drive credit loss. The Company also considers reasonable and supportable current information in determining its estimated loss rates, such as external forecasts, macroeconomic trends or other factors including customers’ credit risk and historical loss experience.

Revenue Recognition

We generate revenue from the following sources: (1) network design and installation and (2) internet network services. In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification 606 “Revenue Recognition,” there is significant judgment required in determining when to recognize revenue as performance obligations are satisfied. Recognition of network design and installation revenue occurs in line with incurred costs along set project milestones, with the most meaningful being delivery of provisioned network hardware to a client’s property, installation of the fiber backbone, and installation of endpoint electronics. Recognition of internet network services revenue occurs monthly as services are delivered.

Income Taxes

We utilize an asset and liability approach for financial accounting and reporting for income taxes. The provision for income taxes is based upon income or loss after adjustment for those permanent items that are not considered in the determination of taxable income.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 3, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q for information about recent accounting pronouncements.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

At the time our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2025 was filed on December 10, 2025 (the “Original Filing”), our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective due to the existence of material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. As described in Note 2, subsequent to the date of the Original Filing, errors were identified in the Company’s revenue recognition for certain network design and installation contracts, resulting in the restatement of the Company’s previously issued unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025. These errors are consistent with and directly related to the previously disclosed material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting.

In connection with the filing of this Form 10-Q, our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, reevaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2025 pursuant to Rule 13a-15 under the Exchange Act. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of September 30, 2025, our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) were not effective, due to the existence of material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting that we have yet to fully remediate.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

This Form 10-Q does not include a report of management’s assessment regarding internal control over financial reporting due to the transition period established by the SEC for newly public companies.

Remediation Plan

In connection with the restatement described in Note 2, management has implemented the following remediation measures to address the identified control deficiencies:

(1) A mandatory reconciliation between the POC workbook and the general ledger for each active contract prior to calculating and posting incremental revenue entries, performed by the outsourced accounting provider and reviewed and approved by the Chief Accounting Officer;

(2) Monthly analytical review of all unbilled revenue and deferred revenue balances by contract, including validation that each unbilled revenue balance has a contractual basis;

(3) Quarterly contract‑level revenue completeness testing comparing total cumulative revenue per the general ledger to total cumulative revenue per the POC workbook for every active contract; and

(4) Evaluation of enterprise resource planning systems to replace QuickBooks Online and eliminate reliance on external, uncontrolled workbooks for revenue recognition.

Remediation will not occur until the plan is implemented and there has been appropriate time for us to conclude through testing that the control operates effectively.

You should carefully consider the risks described below, which could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial condition. Our business faces significant risks and the risks described below may not be the only risks we face. Additional risks not presently known to us or that we currently believe are immaterial may materially affect our business, results of operations, or financial condition. If any of these risks occur, the trading price of our common stock could decline and you may lose all or part of your investment.

Risks Related to Our Business

We have a history of losses, expect to continue to incur losses in the near term and may not achieve or sustain profitability in the future.

We have incurred significant losses since our inception. We experienced net losses of approximately $1.9 million and $3.5 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, respectively. We expect our capital expenses and operational expenses to increase in the future due to investing in network construction activities and, therefore, our operating losses will continue or even increase at least through the near term. Our sales cycle is long, and a substantial amount of time could pass between when we begin the process of deploying our network for a project and when we are able recognize revenue or realize gross margin contributions from the project. Furthermore, to the extent that we are successful in increasing our customer base, we will also incur increased expenses to meet the demand of our customers. You should not rely upon our past results as indicative of future performance. We may not reach profitability in the near future or at any specific time in the future. If and when our operations do become profitable, we may not sustain profitability.

We may need to raise additional capital, which may not be available on favorable terms, if at all, and which may cause dilution to holders of our common stock, restrict our operations or adversely affect our ability to operate our business.

If we need to raise additional funds due to unforeseen circumstances or material expenditures or if our operating results are worse than expected, we cannot be certain that we will be able to obtain additional financing on favorable terms, if at all, and any additional financings could result in additional dilution to holders of our common stock. Debt financing, if available, may involve agreements that include covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific actions such as incurring additional debt, expending capital, or declaring dividends, or which impose financial covenants on us that limit our ability to achieve our business objectives. If we need additional capital and cannot raise it on acceptable terms, we may not be able to meet our business objectives, our stock price may fall and holders of our securities may lose some or all of their investment.

Our indebtedness could have important consequences to you.

Our indebtedness could have important consequences to you. For example, it could:

• limit our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other general corporate requirements;
• require us to dedicate a portion of our cash flow from operations to payments on our debt, thereby reducing the availability of our cash flow for operations and other purposes;
• limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry in which we operate; and
• place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to competitors that may have proportionately less debt and greater financial resources.

If we were to default on our obligations under our outstanding debt arrangements, the counterparties may have the right to our assets. We could be required to dispose of material assets or operations to meet our debt service and other obligations, and the value realized on such assets or operations will depend on market conditions and the availability of buyers. Accordingly, any such sale may not, among other things, be for a sufficient dollar amount. If we were to otherwise attempt to sell material assets or operations, the foregoing encumbrances may limit our ability to dispose of material assets or operations. In the event that the counterparties enforced their rights to our assets, we may have to discontinue our business, and our investors could lose all or a part of their investment in us.

We have a relatively short operating history, which makes it difficult to evaluate our business and future prospects.

We have a relatively short operating history, which makes it difficult to evaluate our business and future prospects. Our business has been in existence only since December 2019. We have encountered, and will continue to encounter, risks and difficulties frequently experienced by growing companies in rapidly changing industries, including those related to:

• market acceptance of our current and future services;
• our ability to compete with other companies offering similar products and services;
• our ability to effectively market our services and attract new customers;
• the amount and timing of expenses, particularly expenses related to the installation of our Network-as-a-Service solutions, and expenses related to the maintenance and expansion of our business, operations and infrastructure;
• our ability to control costs, including our expenses;
• our ability to manage organic growth;
• changing regulatory environments and costs associated with compliance; and
• general economic conditions and events.

If we do not manage these risks successfully, our business and financial performance will be adversely affected.

Given our relatively limited operating history, we have historically earned most of our revenue from a limited number of ownership groups, and if we lose any of these ownership groups as customers or if we are unable to replace the revenue, our financial condition and results from operations would be materially and adversely affected.

Given our relatively limited operating history, we have historically earned most of our revenue from a limited number of ownership groups. During the third quarter, two ownership groups accounted for approximately 40% of our total revenue and during the prior year period, four ownership groups accounted for approximately 63% of our total revenue. During the nine months, three ownership groups accounted for approximately 53% of our total revenue and during the prior year period, five ownership groups accounted for approximately 65% of our total revenue. As of September 30, 2025, one ownership group accounted for approximately 36% of our accounts receivable balance. As of December 31, 2024, two ownership groups accounted for approximately 66% of our accounts receivable balance. Revenue from a single ownership group may comprise a material portion of our revenue at a certain point in time, primarily due to the timing of recognizing network construction revenue for a project, which comprises a significant portion of the Company’s expected revenue on a given project. This concentration of revenue from ownership groups leaves us exposed to the risks associated with the loss of one or more of these significant ownership groups as customers, which would materially and adversely affect our revenue and results of operations. If these ownership groups were to significantly reduce their relationship with us, or in the event that we are unable to replace the revenue through the provision of our services to additional ownership groups, our financial condition and results from operations could be negatively impacted, and such impact could be significant.

We could be directly or indirectly affected by potential regulatory changes to our industry and our financial condition, results of operations and business may be adversely affected.

The current regulatory environment for our Managed Services and Network-as-a-Service solutions is uncertain. We may be directly impacted by any federal or state regulation of our industry or indirectly impacted through any federal or state regulation that affects property owners. We are aware of state legislation in areas where we do not yet operate that could impact our revenue if we were to enter those markets. The legislation limits the markup or fee property owners can charge tenants for the services we provide and bill to property owners. In addition, any federal regulation related to bulk billing could limit our ability to effectively grow our business. If an ‘anti-bulk’ proposal were approved, property owners of multifamily housing properties would not be able to enter into bulk billing agreements with network service providers for a property, which would significantly adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

If we are unable to adapt to the speed of changes in wireless network infrastructure and anticipate market adoption of new technologies our financial condition, results of operations and business may be adversely impacted.

Our future success depends upon growing demand for wireless connected services. The demand for wireless connectivity may decrease or may grow more slowly than expected. Any such decrease in the demand or slowing rate of growth could have a material adverse effect on our business. The continued demand for wireless connectivity services depends on the continued proliferation of smartphones, tablets and other wireless connection enabled devices. Our revenue is derived from the demand from consumers for internet connectivity and from property owners attempting to provide consumers with greater connectivity. We may face challenges as we seek to increase the revenue generated from our Managed Services and Network-as-a-Service solutions.

A portion of our business depends on the continued integration of WiFi as a standard feature in internet connected devices. If WiFi ceases to be a standard feature in internet connected devices, or if the rate of integration of WiFi on devices decreases or is slower than expected, the market for our services may be substantially diminished.

We deliver value to our users by providing simple access to WiFi networks, regardless of whether we manage and operate the network, or the network is operated by a property owner. As a result, our business depends on our ability to anticipate and quickly adapt to changing technological standards and advances. If technological standards change and we fail to adapt accordingly, our business and revenue may be adversely affected.

A significant portion of our revenue is dependent on our relationships with our property owners and network partners, and if these relationships are impaired or terminated, or if our partners do not perform as expected, our business and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

We depend on our relationships with property owners in order to manage and operate our Managed Services and Network-as-a-Service solutions. These relationships allow us to generate revenue and new property owner relationships. Our agreements with our property owners and telecom operators are for defined periods and of varying durations. In order to maintain our relationships with property owners, we may need to upgrade our networks or make other changes to our products and services we provide, which would, in most cases, require significantly higher initial capital expenditures than we have historically incurred, and if we are unsuccessful, our relationships could be impaired. If property owners terminate or fail to renew these agreements, our ability to generate and retain property owner relationships would be diminished, which might result in a significant disruption of our business and adversely affect our operating results. Further, any delays in our ability to complete the upgrade of our networks or build out new networks could adversely affect our operating results.

A significant portion of our revenue depends on maintaining these relationships with network partners. Some network partners may compete with us for relationships with property owners and may decide to terminate our partnerships and instead develop competing retail products and services. Our network partner agreements are for defined periods and of varying durations. If our network partners terminate these agreements, or fail to renew these agreements, our ability to maintain property owner relationships could be diminished and our network reach could be reduced, which could result in a significant disruption of our business and adversely affect our operating results.

We depend on our relationships with our manufacturers for certain materials necessary to provide our services.

We depend on close relationships with our manufacturers for hardware and other materials necessary to provide our services to customers. Our ability to purchase at competitive prices and terms results from the volume of our purchases from these manufacturers. We purchase a substantial amount of the hardware necessary to provide our services from one hardware manufacturer. If this manufacturer were to experience shortages or financial difficulties or charge increased prices due to inflationary pressures or tariff uncertainty, and we are unable to purchase our desired volume of hardware on the same or better terms, or at all, our revenue and ability to service our customers could suffer considerably.

We believe that alternative sources exist for most of the materials we need to provide our services, and we would not expect the loss of any one manufacturer to have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operations. If any of our manufacturers do not perform adequately or otherwise fail to supply the materials we need to provide our services, our inability to replace the manufacturers in a timely manner and on acceptable terms could increase our costs and could cause shortages or interruptions that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Because we purchase hardware and other materials, which are subject to cost variations related to commodity costs, inflationary pressures or tariffs, if we cannot pass along cost increases, our profitability would be negatively impacted.

If we are unable to consistently win competitive RFP processes, become a preferred or sole supplier for new-build projects, execute on our backlog, begin to increase our gross margins with newer customer relationships, access capital to deploy for Network-as-a-Service buildouts or to develop our sales and marketing teams, or capitalize on the opportunities in our pipeline, our financial condition, results of operations and business may be adversely impacted.

Many property development projects in the U.S. with 100 units or more now mandate a Managed Services approach for their residential Internet services. These projects increasingly source Managed Services providers through a competitive RFP process or directly from a trusted provider who the property owner has previously worked with. We selectively enter RFP processes where we believe our experience, quality, service reputation and standard pricing and terms will make us competitive, and the property owner is an existing customer or a potential long-term multi-property customer. We may submit RFPs or other offers for our services at rates that would result in relatively lower gross margin in order to remain competitive and/or initiate a relationship with a potential long-term multi-property customer. Our goal is to become a preferred or sole provider for property owners’ new-build projects, where we win Managed Services projects “automatically” instead of through a RFP processes. We cannot provide any assurance that we will consistently win every RFP process we enter, become a preferred or sole supplier for new-build projects, execute on our backlog, begin to increase our gross margins with newer customer relationships, access capital to deploy for Network-as-a-Service buildouts or develop our sales and marketing teams, or capitalize on the opportunities in our pipeline. If we are unable to do so, we may not be able to effectively grow our business, and our financial condition, results of operation and business may be adversely impacted.

Our performance may be impacted by general and regional economic volatility or an economic downturn.

An overall decline in economic activity could adversely impact our business and financial results. Economic uncertainty may reduce property owner spending as they make decisions on how to provide access to WiFi networks to consumers. Economic uncertainty could also result in changing preferences. Shifts in consumer spending and preferences could result in increased pressure from competitors or customers that may require us to increase promotional spending or reduce the prices of some of our services, which could then lower revenue and profitability. Accordingly, any change in property owner spending or consumer preferences related to access to WiFi networks could adversely affect the Company’s operating results.

Uncertain global economic conditions could adversely affect our business. Negative global and national economic trends, such as decreased consumer and business spending, high inflation, relatively higher interest rates for a prolonged period of time, tariffs, or the threat thereof, high unemployment levels and declining consumer and business confidence, pose challenges to our business and could result in declining revenue, profitability and cash flow. Additionally, we are subject to regional economic volatilities in the areas where we provide services. Unfavorable economic conditions may negatively affect demand for our services.

If we lose key personnel, including members of our management team, or are unable to attract and retain personnel on a cost-effective basis, our business could be harmed.

Our performance is substantially dependent on the continued services and performance of our senior management and our highly qualified team of engineers, many of whom have numerous years of experience and specialized expertise in our business and technology. If we are not successful in hiring and retaining highly qualified engineers, we may not be able to extend or maintain our engineering and technological expertise and our future product and service development efforts could be adversely affected. Additionally, the process of attracting and retaining suitable replacements for any executive officers or any of our highly qualified engineers we lose in the future would result in transition costs and would divert the attention of other members of our senior management from our existing operations. Additionally, such a loss could be negatively perceived in the capital markets.

Our success depends, in large part, on the continued contributions of Daniel McDonough, Jr., Barry Rubens, Taylor Jones and Sean Arnette. Although we are a party to employment agreements with Messrs. Rubens, Jones and Arnette and a consulting agreement with Baron Hunter Group, LLC, pursuant to which services will be provided to us through Mr. McDonough, we cannot assure you that each will remain with us for a specified period. In addition, our consulting agreement with Baron Hunter Group, LLC does not include a contractual restriction on Mr. McDonough’s ability to compete with us after the completion of the term of the consulting agreement. Although we have additional personnel that contribute to our business, the loss of any of these executives could harm our ability to implement our business strategy and respond to the rapidly changing market conditions in which we operate. Competitors who have lost key personnel have experienced reductions in service execution, network deployment and service quality. If we lose members of our senior management, this may significantly delay or prevent the achievement of our strategic objectives and adversely affect our operating results.

Our future success also depends on our ability to identify, attract, hire, train, retain and motivate highly skilled managerial, operations, business development and marketing personnel, especially personnel that has experience in our business and industry. We do not know whether we will be able to hire sufficient personnel to support our business strategy. The loss of the services of one or more of our key employees, or our inability to attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.

We may not successfully integrate assets from future acquisitions.

If we fail to accurately assess and successfully integrate any future acquisitions, we may not achieve the anticipated benefits, which could result in lower revenue, unanticipated operating expenses, and increased losses. Successful integration involves many challenges, including:

• the difficulty of integrating acquired operations and personnel with our existing operations;
• the diversion of our management’s attention as a result of evaluating, negotiating and integrating acquisitions;
• in some cases, our exposure to unforeseen liabilities of acquired companies;
• the loss of key employees of an acquired business operation; and
• the difficulty of developing, manufacturing, and marketing new products and services.

In addition, an acquisition could adversely impact cash flows, operating results, and stockholder interests, for many reasons, including:

• contingent consideration payments;
• the issuance of securities in connection with an acquisition or new business venture that dilutes or lessens the rights of our current stockholders;
• charges to our income to reflect the impairment of acquired intangible assets, including goodwill; and
• interest costs and debt service requirements for any debt incurred in connection with an acquisition or new business venture.

If we are not able to successfully integrate our acquisitions into our business, we could significantly increase our costs without realizing expected benefits, which would adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

If the integration of any or all of our future acquisitions is not successful, it could have a material adverse impact on our operating results and stock price.

Our future business acquisition efforts may not be successful, which may limit our growth or adversely affect our results of operations, and financing of any future acquisitions could result in stockholder dilution and increase our outstanding indebtedness. If we identify an appropriate acquisition candidate, we may not be able to successfully negotiate terms or finance the acquisition. If economic downturns or other matters of national or global concern continue for an extensive period of time or recur, our ability to pursue and consummate potential acquisitions could be materially adversely affected. In addition, to successfully complete targeted acquisitions, we may issue additional equity securities that could dilute our stockholders’ ownership, or we may incur additional debt, which could increase our existing indebtedness. If we fail to successfully acquire businesses, our growth and results of operations could be adversely affected.

The costs of our operations may exceed our estimates due to factors outside of our control, such as labor shortages, tariffs or increasing commodity prices for components used in our networks, and we may be unable to pass those costs to our customers, which would negatively impact our financial results.

We depend on our employees and engineers to design, install and manage our solutions. We rely on access to competitive, local labor supply, including skilled and unskilled positions, to operate our business consistently and reliably. Increased immigration enforcement may reduce the number of available workers for projects, increase costs or lead to delays in projects. Any labor shortage, and any disruption in our ability to hire workers would negatively affect our operations and financial condition. If we experience a sustained labor shortage, we may need to increase wages to attract workers, which would increase our costs. Furthermore, if commodity prices for components that are used in our networks were to increase, including due to inflationary pressures or the impact of tariffs on prices, the availability of hardware used in our solutions and our ability to obtain supplies through our existing supply chain could be restricted and we may be unable to pass those increased costs on to our customers. If we are unable to do so, our gross margin would decline, and our financial results would be negatively impacted. To the extent our real estate developer customers are impacted by the same external and market factors as we are, their ability to commence new development projects will be similarly negatively impacted. If our customers are unable to continue developing new properties because of a slowdown in the new construction market or other external factors, our ability to grow our operating results and financial condition may be negatively impacted.

We may implement new lines of business or offer new services within existing lines of business, which may not meet the changing needs of property owners.

As an early-stage company, we may implement new lines of business at any time. There are substantial risks and uncertainties associated with these efforts, particularly in instances where the markets are not fully developed and the needs of property owners are unknown. In developing and marketing new lines of business and/or new services, we may invest significant time and resources. Initial timetables for the introduction and development of new lines of business and/or new products or services may not be achieved, and price and profitability targets may not prove feasible. We may not be successful in introducing new services or adapting to changing needs of property owners, industry trends or developments in technology, or those new products may not achieve market acceptance. As a result, we could lose business, be forced to price services on less advantageous terms to retain or attract customers, or be subject to cost increases. As a result, our business, financial condition or results of operations may be adversely affected.

Damage to our reputation could negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our reputation and the quality of our brand are critical to our business and success with existing and future customers, and will be critical to our success as we seek to develop new relationships with property owners. Any incident that erodes customer loyalty for our brand could significantly reduce its value and damage our business. We may be adversely affected by any negative publicity, including any publicity related to the restatement of our financial statements, regardless of its accuracy. Also, there has been a marked increase in the use of social media platforms and similar devices, including blogs, social media websites and other forms of internet-based communications that provide individuals with access to a broad audience of consumers and other interested persons. The availability of information on social media platforms is virtually immediate as is its impact. Information posted may be adverse to our interests or may be inaccurate, each of which may harm our performance, prospects or business. The harm may be immediate and may disseminate rapidly and broadly, without affording us an opportunity for redress or correction.

If we are unable to protect our intellectual property rights, our business could suffer.

Our success depends, in part, on our ability to maintain as trade secrets our proprietary products, technologies and inventions and to maintain the confidentiality of our trade secrets and know-how, operate without infringing upon the proprietary rights of others and prevent others from infringing upon our business proprietary rights. Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, it is possible that competitors or other unauthorized third parties may obtain, copy, use or disclose our technologies, inventions, processes or improvements. We cannot assure you that any of our intellectual property rights will be enforceable, will not be challenged, invalidated or circumvented, or will otherwise provide us with meaningful protection or any competitive advantage. Our competitors may also be able to develop similar technology independently, or through the disclosure of trade secrets, and we may not be able to detect the unauthorized use of our proprietary technology or take appropriate steps to prevent such use. We may need to enter into intellectual property license agreements in the future, and if we are unable to obtain these licenses, our business could be harmed. Any of the foregoing events would lead to increased competition and lower revenues or gross margins, which could adversely affect our operating results.

We rely on a license to use the tradename “Elauwit” and if our license is terminated, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be adversely impacted.

We depend on the tradename “Elauwit” and the goodwill associated therewith to operate our business. On August 20, 2024, we entered into a tradename license agreement (the “License Agreement”) with Mr. McDonough, pursuant to which Mr. McDonough granted us an exclusive license to use the tradename “Elauwit” and the service marks, domain names and goodwill associated therewith as long as we operate our business. If we are found to be in material breach of any of the terms of the License Agreement and do not cure the breach, Mr. McDonough may terminate the License Agreement and we would not be able to use the tradename “Elauwit” or the related service marks and domain names, and we would lose all goodwill associated with the Elauwit brand. If our license is terminated, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be adversely impacted.

Our business could be negatively impacted by cyber security threats, attacks and other disruptions.

We face advanced and persistent attacks on our information infrastructure where we manage and store various proprietary information and sensitive/confidential data relating to our operations. These attacks may include sophisticated malware (viruses, worms, and other malicious software programs) and phishing emails that attack our products or otherwise exploit any security vulnerabilities. These intrusions sometimes may be zero-day malware that are difficult to identify because they are not included in the signature set of commercially available antivirus scanning programs. Experienced computer programmers and hackers may be able to penetrate our network security and misappropriate or compromise our confidential information or that of our customers or other third-parties, create system disruptions, or cause shutdowns. Additionally, sophisticated software and applications that we produce or procure from third-parties may contain defects in design or manufacture, including “bugs” and other problems that could unexpectedly interfere with the operation of the information infrastructure. A disruption, infiltration or failure of our information infrastructure systems or any of our data centers as a result of software or hardware malfunctions, computer viruses, cyber-attacks, employee theft or misuse, power disruptions, natural disasters or accidents could cause breaches of data security, loss of critical data and performance delays, which in turn could adversely affect our business.

Risks Related to Our Industry

Our industry is competitive and if we do not compete successfully, we could lose market share, experience reduced revenue or suffer losses.

The market for commercial wireless infrastructure solutions is competitive and impacted by technological change, and we expect competition with our current and potential competitors to intensify in the future. Some of our competitors have taken steps or may decide to more aggressively compete against us, particularly in the market for Managed Services and Network-as-a-Service solutions.

Our competitors, many of whom are also our partners, include a variety of telecom operators, network operators, and tower companies, including AT&T, Spectrum, Comcast, Pavlov Media, Single Digits, WhiteSky and Aerwave, and local operators. These and other competitors may compete directly with us to provide internet, Managed Services or Network-as-a-Service to our target customers. Many of our competitors are substantially larger than we are and have substantially longer operating histories. Competitors who do not currently offer Managed Services of Network-as-a-Service solutions may have a competitive advantage if they enter our market due to their expanded capabilities. We may not be able to fund or invest in certain areas of our business to the same degree as our competitors. Many have substantially greater marketing budgets and other financial and personnel resources necessary to build networks for customers. Some also have greater name and brand recognition and a larger base of customers than we have. In addition, our competitors may provide services that we generally do not. Users that desire these services may choose to obtain them from a competitor rather than from us.

Competition could increase our selling and marketing expenses and related customer acquisition costs. We may not have the financial resources, technical expertise or marketing and support capabilities to continue to compete successfully. A failure to respond to established and new competitors may adversely impact our business and operating results.

Construction risks to our customers’ development projects could affect our profitability.

We intend to continue to pursue opportunities to provide our Managed Services and Network-as-a-Service solutions to multifamily properties as part of our business strategy. Property development often includes long planning and development timelines, subjecting the projects to changes in market conditions. It can involve complex and costly activities, including significant environmental remediation or construction work. We may experience an increase in costs due to general disruptions that affect our customers’ cost of labor and/or materials, such as supply chain disruptions, trade disputes, tariffs, immigration issues, labor unrest, geopolitical conflicts or other factors that create inflationary pressures. Our customers may abandon property development opportunities that they have already begun to explore for a number of reasons, and as a result, we may fail to recover costs already incurred in exploring the opportunity to provide our solutions. Our customers may also be unable to obtain, or experience delays in obtaining, necessary zoning, occupancy, or other required governmental or third-party permits and authorizations, which could cause delays in our ability to monetize our solutions in a given market. These and other risks inherent in development projects could result in increased costs to our customers or the delay or abandonment of opportunities by our customers, which may affect our profitability.

Risks Related to Ownership of our Securities

A substantial percentage of the voting power of our common stock is consolidated among our executive officers and directors, which may prevent our stockholders from influencing significant corporate decisions.

As of December 3, 2025, our executive officers and directors own shares representing approximately 48.8% of the voting power of our common stock. As a result, our executive officers and directors may have the ability to control the outcome of matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions, such as a merger, other sale of our Company or our assets or significant acquisitions. This concentration of voting control will limit the ability of other stockholders to influence corporate matters and may cause us to make strategic decisions that could involve risks to you or that may not be aligned with your interests. Our directors and executive officers owe a fiduciary duty to our stockholders and are legally obligated to act in good faith and in a manner they reasonably believe to be in the best interests of our stockholders. As stockholders, these individuals are entitled to vote their shares in their own interests, which may not always be in the interests of our stockholders generally. The concentration of voting power held by our executive officers and directors may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

We have material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, which if left unremediated could materially and adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

At the time of the audit for our fiscal 2024 and fiscal 2023, we did not maintain effective controls over our internal control over financial reporting. Because we are a small company with few employees in our finance department, we had not documented our risk assessment or entity level controls, or formalized our review level controls. Further, at the time of the audit for fiscal 2024 and fiscal 2023, because this was the first time our financial statements were prepared in accordance with GAAP, we had not yet identified a consistent and repeatable approach to evaluate POC revenue that could be easily audited and evaluated. In addition, as described in Note 2, “Restatement of Previously Issued Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements,” during the preparation of our financial close for the quarter and year ended December 31, 2025, management identified errors in revenue recognition for certain network design and installation contracts, which were due in part to the inadequate design and implementation of internal controls and procedures to evaluate and monitor the accounting for the percentage-of-completion cost-to-cost input method for revenue recognition for these contracts. These errors resulted in the restatement of our previously issued unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the third quarter and nine months of 2025. There can be no assurance that management’s efforts to remediate these material weaknesses and control deficiencies will be successful. If we are unable to remediate these material weaknesses as a newly public company, our financial reporting may not be reliable and the market price of our common stock may be adversely affected.

We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the JOBS Act, and a “smaller reporting company” within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and we cannot be certain if the reduced disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies or smaller reporting companies will make our common stock less attractive to investors.

We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the JOBS Act. For as long as we continue to be an emerging growth company, we are permitted to, and intend to, take advantage of exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies, including (1) not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, (2) reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, (3) exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved, and (4) an extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards applicable to public companies. Additionally, we take advantage of certain reduced disclosure obligations as a “smaller reporting company” as defined in Item 10(f)(1) of Regulation S-K. To the extent we take advantage of such reduced disclosure obligations, it may also make comparison of our financial statements with other public companies difficult or impossible.

After we are no longer an “emerging growth company,” we expect to incur additional management time and cost to comply with the more stringent reporting requirements applicable to companies that are deemed accelerated filers or large accelerated filers, including complying with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. We cannot predict or estimate the amount of additional costs we may incur or the timing of such costs.

We have not and do not expect to declare any dividends to our stockholders in the foreseeable future.

We have not and do not anticipate declaring any cash dividends to holders of our common stock in the foreseeable future. Our stockholders have no contractual or other legal right to dividends that have not been declared. Any return to our stockholders will therefore be limited to the increase, if any, in the price of our common stock.

We may seek to raise funds, finance acquisitions or develop strategic relationships in the future by issuing securities that would dilute your ownership. Depending on the terms available to us, if these activities result in significant dilution, it may negatively impact the trading price of our common stock.

Any additional financing that we secure may require the granting of rights, preferences or privileges senior to, or pari passu with, those of our common stock. Any issuances by us of equity securities may be at or below the prevailing market price of our common stock and may have a dilutive impact on the ownership interest of our existing investors, which could cause the market price of our common stock to decline. We may also raise additional funds through the incurrence of debt or the issuance or sale of other securities or instruments senior to our shares of common stock, which may be highly dilutive. The holders of any securities or instruments we may issue may have rights superior to the rights of our stockholders. If we experience dilution from the issuance of additional securities and we grant superior rights to new securities over holders of our common stock, it may negatively impact the trading price of our shares.

A possible “short squeeze” due to a sudden increase in demand of our shares that largely exceeds supply may lead to price volatility in our shares of common stock.

Investors may purchase our common stock to hedge existing exposure in our common stock or to speculate on the price of our common stock. Speculation on the price of our shares may involve long and short exposures. To the extent aggregate short exposure exceeds the number of shares of our common stock available for purchase in the open market, investors with short exposure may have to pay a premium to repurchase our common stock for delivery to lenders of our shares. Those repurchases may in turn, dramatically increase the price of our shares of common stock until investors with short exposure are able to purchase additional common shares to cover their short position. This is often referred to as a “short squeeze.” A short squeeze could lead to volatile price movements in our common stock that are not directly correlated to the performance or prospects of our company and once investors purchase the common stock necessary to cover their short position the price of our common stock may decline.

Provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation (“certificate of incorporation”) and amended and restated bylaws (“bylaws”) could discourage a change in control, or an acquisition of us by a third party, even if the acquisition would be favorable to you, thereby adversely affecting existing stockholders.

Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws contain provisions that may have the effect of making more difficult or delaying attempts by others to obtain control of our Company, even when these attempts may be in the best interests of our stockholders. For example, our certificate of incorporation (i) authorizes our Board of Directors (the “Board”), without stockholder approval, to issue one or more series of preferred stock, which could have voting and conversion rights that adversely affect or dilute the voting power of the holders of our common stock; (ii) provides for a classified board structure in which only one-third of our directors will be elected at any annual meeting of stockholders and directors may only be removed for cause; (iii) does not provide for cumulative voting; (iv) designates the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware as the exclusive forum for certain litigation that may be initiated by our stockholders; (v) authorizes the Board to issue authorized but unissued shares of common stock without stockholder approval; and (vi) provides for limitations on the liability of, and the provisions of indemnification to, our officers and directors. Our bylaws also limit the ability of stockholders to call special meetings of the Board and require stockholders to provide us advance notice of any nominations of candidates for election to our Board or for proposing matters that can be acted upon by stockholders at meetings of stockholders. These provisions and others that could be adopted in the future could deter unsolicited takeovers or delay or prevent changes in our control or management, including transactions in which stockholders might otherwise receive a premium for their shares over then-current market prices. These provisions may also limit the ability of stockholders to approve transactions that they may deem to be in their best interests.

Our certificate of incorporation designates the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware as the exclusive forum for certain litigation that may be initiated by our stockholders, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or increase the stockholder’s costs in bringing such a claim.

Our certificate of incorporation specifies that, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware shall be the sole and exclusive forum for (i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf, (ii) any action asserting a claim of breach of fiduciary duty owed by any of our directors, officers, or other employee to us or to our stockholders, (iii) any action asserting a claim against us arising pursuant to any provision of the Delaware General Corporation Law, the certificate of incorporation or the bylaws or (iv) any action asserting a claim governed by the internal affairs doctrine. Any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in our securities shall be deemed to have notice of and to have consented to the provisions of our certificate of incorporation described above. However, this provision does not apply to suits brought to enforce a duty or liability created by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or any other claim for which the federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction. In addition, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware and the federal district courts will have concurrent jurisdiction for the resolution of any suit brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Securities Act.

This provision may have the effect of discouraging lawsuits against our directors, officers, employees and agents as it may limit any stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that the stockholder finds favorable for disputes with us or our directors, officers, employees or agents or increase the stockholder’s costs in bringing such a claim. The enforceability of similar choice of forum provisions in other companies’ certificates of incorporation has been challenged in legal proceedings, and it is possible that, in connection with any applicable action brought against us, a court could find the choice of forum provisions contained in our certificate of incorporation to be inapplicable or unenforceable in such action. If a court were to find the choice of forum provision contained in our certificate of incorporation to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

General Risk Factors

Litigation may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

From time to time in the normal course of our business operations, we may become subject to litigation involving intellectual property, data privacy and security, consumer protection, service disruption or failure, the restatement of our financial statements, and commercial disputes and other matters that may negatively affect our operating results if changes to our business operations are required. The cost to defend such litigation may be significant and may require a diversion of our resources. There also may be adverse publicity associated with litigation that could negatively affect customer perception of our business, regardless of whether the allegations are valid or whether we are ultimately found liable. As a result, litigation may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, insurance may not cover existing or future claims, be sufficient to fully compensate us for one or more of such claims, or continue to be available on terms acceptable to us. A claim brought against us that is uninsured or underinsured could result in unanticipated costs, thereby adversely affecting our results of operations and resulting in a reduction in the trading price of our stock.

An active, liquid and orderly trading market for our common stock may not develop and the price of our stock may be volatile.

Even though our common stock is currently listed on Nasdaq, we cannot predict the extent to which investor interest in our company will lead to the development of an active trading market in our securities or how liquid that market might become. If such a market does not develop or is not sustained, it may be difficult for our stockholders to sell shares of common stock when they wish to sell them, at a price that is attractive, or at all. There could be extreme fluctuations in the price of our common stock because there are a limited number of shares in our public float.

• whether we achieve our anticipated corporate objectives;
• actual or anticipated fluctuations in our quarterly or annual operating results;
• changes in our financial or operational estimates;
• our ability to implement our operational plans;
• termination of the Offering’s lock-up agreement or other restrictions on the ability of our stockholders to sell shares;
• changes in the economic performance or market valuations of companies similar to ours; and
• general economic or political conditions in the United States or elsewhere.

In addition, the stock market has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of those companies. Broad market and industry factors may seriously affect the market price of companies’ stock, including ours, regardless of actual operating performance. In addition, in the past, following periods of volatility in the overall market and the market price of a particular company’s securities, securities class action litigation has often been instituted against these companies. This litigation, if instituted against us, could result in substantial costs and a diversion of our management’s attention and resources.

There can be no assurance that we will be able to comply with the continued listing standards of Nasdaq, a failure of which could result in a delisting of our common stock.

Nasdaq requires that the trading price of listed stock remain above $1.00 in order for the stock to remain listed. If a listed stock trades below $1.00 for more than 30 consecutive trading days, then it is subject to delisting from Nasdaq. In addition, to maintain a listing on Nasdaq, we must satisfy minimum financial and other continued listing standards, including those regarding minimum stockholders’ equity, minimum publicly available shares, director independence and independent committee requirements and other corporate governance requirements, as well as the obligation to timely file all required Exchange Act reports. If we are unable to satisfy these standards, we could be subject to delisting, which would have a negative effect on the price of our common stock, impair your ability to sell or purchase our common stock when you wish to do so, and potentially cause you to lose the value of your investment in us. In the event of a delisting, we would expect to take actions to restore our compliance with the listing standards, but we can provide no assurance that any action we take to restore our compliance would allow our common stock to become listed again, stabilize the market price or improve the liquidity of our common stock, prevent our common stock from dropping below the minimum bid price requirement, or prevent future noncompliance with the listing requirements.

If our common stock is delisted from Nasdaq, our common stock may be eligible for trading on an over-the-counter market. If we are not able to obtain a listing on another stock exchange or quotation service for our common stock, it may be extremely difficult or impossible for stockholders to sell their shares of common stock. Moreover, if we are delisted from Nasdaq, but obtain a substitute listing for our common stock, it will likely be on a market with less liquidity, and therefore experience potentially more price volatility than experienced on Nasdaq. Stockholders may not be able to sell their shares of common stock on any such substitute market in the quantities, at the times, or at the prices that could potentially be available on a more liquid trading market. As a result of these factors, if our common stock is delisted from Nasdaq, the value and liquidity of our common stock would likely be significantly adversely affected. A delisting of our common stock from Nasdaq could also adversely affect our ability to obtain financing for our operations and/or result in a loss of confidence by investors, employees and/or business partners.

We will continue to incur increased costs and demands upon management as a result of complying with the laws and regulations affecting public companies, which could adversely affect our operating results.

As a public company, we will continue to incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses that are not incurred by private companies, including costs associated with public company reporting and corporate governance requirements. These requirements include compliance with Section 404 and other provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, as well as rules implemented by the SEC and Nasdaq. Complying with these rules and regulations substantially increases our legal and financial compliance costs and makes some activities more time-consuming and costly than if we were a private company. As a public company, it is more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and we may be required to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage year-over-year. As a result, it may be more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified individuals to serve on our Board or as our executive officers. The increased costs associated with operating as a public company will decrease our net income or increase our net loss and may require us to reduce costs in other areas of our business or increase the prices of our services. Additionally, if these requirements divert our management’s attention from other business concerns, they could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.

As a public company, we are obligated to develop and maintain proper and effective internal control over financial reporting. We may not complete our analysis of our internal control over financial reporting in a timely manner, or these internal controls may not be determined to be effective, which may adversely affect investor confidence in our company and, as a result, the value of our common stock.

We will be required, pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, to furnish a report by management on, among other things, the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting for the first fiscal year beginning after the effective date of the Offering. This assessment will need to include disclosure of any material weaknesses identified by our management in our internal control over financial reporting.

We are in the early stages of the costly and challenging process of compiling the system and processing documentation necessary to perform the evaluation needed to comply with Section 404. We may not be able to remediate our previously identified material weaknesses or any future material weaknesses, or to complete our evaluation, testing and any required remediation in a timely fashion. During the evaluation and testing process, if we identify one or more material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting or we are unable to timely remediate material weaknesses that have already been identified, we will be unable to assert that our internal controls are effective. If we are unable to assert that our internal control over financial reporting is effective, we could lose investor confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, which would have a material adverse effect on the price of our common stock.

If our shares of common stock become subject to the penny stock rules, it would become more difficult to trade our shares.

The SEC has adopted rules that regulate broker-dealer practices in connection with transactions in penny stocks. Penny stocks are generally equity securities with a price of less than $5.00, other than securities registered on certain national securities exchanges or authorized for quotation on certain automated quotation systems, provided that current price and volume information with respect to transactions in such securities is provided by the exchange or system. If we do not retain a listing on Nasdaq and if the price of our common stock is less than $5.00, our common stock will be deemed a penny stock. The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, before a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from those rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document containing specified information. In addition, the penny stock rules require that before effecting any transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from those rules, a broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive (i) the purchaser’s written acknowledgment of the receipt of a risk disclosure statement; (ii) a written agreement to transactions involving penny stocks; and (iii) a signed and dated copy of a written suitability statement. These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the trading activity in the secondary market for our common stock, and therefore stockholders may have difficulty selling their shares.

If we were to dissolve, the holders of our securities may lose all or substantial amounts of their investments.

If we were to dissolve as a corporation, as part of ceasing to do business or otherwise, we may be required to pay all amounts owed to any creditors before distributing any assets to the investors. There is a risk that in the event of such a dissolution, there will be insufficient funds to repay amounts owed to holders of any of our indebtedness and insufficient assets to distribute to our other investors, in which case investors could lose their entire investment.

If securities or industry analysts do not publish or cease publishing research or reports about us, our business or our market, or if they change their recommendations regarding our stock adversely, our stock price and trading volume could decline.

The trading market for our common stock will be influenced by the research and reports that industry or securities analysts may publish about us, our business, our market or our competitors. If any of the analysts who may cover us change their recommendation regarding our stock adversely, or provide more favorable relative recommendations about our competitors, our stock price would likely decline. If any analyst who may cover us were to cease coverage of our company or fail to regularly publish reports on us, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which in turn could cause our stock price or trading volume to decline.