Citizens Financial Services Inc: Form 10-K for the period ended Dec 31, 2025

Citizens Financial Services, Inc. (the “Company”), a Pennsylvania corporation, was incorporated on April 30, 1984 to be the holding company for First Citizens Community Bank (the “Bank”), a Pennsylvania-chartered bank and trust company. During 2020, CZFS Acquisition Company, LLC (“CZFS”) was formed as a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, and subsequently the Company’s interest in the Bank was transferred to CZFS to facilitate the merger with MidCoast Community Bancorp, Inc. (“MidCoast”) and its wholly owned subsidiary, MidCoast Community Bank (“MC Bank”), which was completed on April 17, 2020. During 2024, the Company terminated the corporate existence of CZFS and the interest in the Bank was transferred back to the Company. On June 16, 2023, the Company acquired HV Bancorp, Inc. (“HVBC”) and its wholly owned subsidiary, Huntingdon Valley Bank (“HVB”). The Company is primarily engaged in the ownership and management of CZFS, its subsidiary, the Bank and the Bank’s wholly owned subsidiaries, First Citizens Insurance Agency, Inc. (“First Citizens Insurance”) and 1st Realty of PA LLC (“Realty”). During 2024, the Bank terminated the corporate existence of Realty.

AVAILABLE INFORMATION

A copy of the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current events reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to these reports, filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, are made available free of charge through the Company’s web site at www.firstcitizensbank.com (http://www.firstcitizensbank.com) as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission. Copies of the reports the Company files electronically with the Securities and Exchange Commission are also available through the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website at www.sec.gov (http://www.sec.gov). Information on our website shall not be considered as incorporated by reference into this Form 10-K.

FIRST CITIZENS COMMUNITY BANK

The Bank is a full-service bank engaged in a broad range of banking activities and services for individual, business, governmental and institutional customers. These activities and services principally include checking, savings, and time deposit accounts; residential, commercial and agricultural real estate, commercial and industrial, state and political subdivision and consumer loans; and a variety of other specialized financial services. The Trust and Investment division of the Bank offers a full range of client investment, estate, mineral management and retirement services.

The Bank’s main office is located at 15 South Main Street, Mansfield (Tioga County), Pennsylvania. In addition to the main office in Mansfield, the Bank operates 38 full service offices, two limited branch offices and two mortgage centers in its market areas. The Bank’s north central, Pennsylvania market area consists of the Pennsylvania Counties of Bradford, Clinton, Potter, Lycoming and Tioga in north central Pennsylvania. It also includes Allegany, Steuben, Chemung and Tioga Counties in Southern New York. The south-central Pennsylvania market consists of Lebanon county and portions of Berks, Lancaster and Schuylkill Counties in Pennsylvania. The Central Pennsylvania market consists of our offices in Centre, Clinton, Lycoming and Union counties and the surrounding communities. Our Delaware market consists of Wilmington and Dover, Delaware and portions of Chester County, Pennsylvania and was due to the MidCoast acquisition, which added two offices in Wilmington, Delaware and one office in Dover, Delaware. In November of 2020, the Bank opened a full-service branch in Chester County, Pennsylvania and in 2024, the Bank opened a limited production office in Georgetown, Delaware. The south east Pennsylvania market consists of Montgomery, Bucks and Philadelphia counties in Pennsylvania, as well as Burlington County New Jersey and was the result of the HVBC acquisition. The economy of the Bank’s market areas are diversified and include manufacturing industries, wholesale and retail trade, service industries, agricultural and the production of natural resources of gas and timber. We are dependent geographically upon the economic conditions in north central, central and south-central Pennsylvania, the southern tier of New York and the cities and surrounding areas of Wilmington and Dover, Delaware.

The economy of the Bank’s market areas are diversified and include manufacturing industries, wholesale and retail trade, service industries, agricultural and the production of natural resources of gas and timber. We are dependent geographically upon the economic conditions in north central, central south-east and south-central Pennsylvania, the southern tier of New York and the cities and surrounding areas of Wilmington and Dover, Delaware.

COMPETITION

The banking industry in the Bank’s service areas is intensely competitive, with competitors including local community banks, larger regional banks, and financial service providers such as consumer finance companies, thrifts, investment firms, mutual funds, insurance companies, credit unions, mortgage banking firms, financial companies, financial affiliates of industrial companies, FinTech and internet entities, and government sponsored agencies, such as Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae and Farm Credit. Competitive pressures continue to increase in our service areas as entities seek both loan and deposit growth, as well as geographic expansion. The Bank is generally competitive with all competing financial institutions in its service areas with respect to interest rates paid on time and savings deposits, service charges on deposit accounts and interest rates charged on loans.

Additional information related to our business and competition is included in Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

HUMAN CAPITAL RESOURCES

At December 31, 2025, we had a total of 405 employees, including 32 part-time and 8 commissioned employees and of which approximately 71% are women. The full-time equivalent of our total employees at December 31, 2025 was 380. As a financial institution, approximately 42% of our employees are employed at our branch and loan production offices. The success of our business is highly dependent on our employees, who provide value to our customers and communities through their dedication to our mission. Our employees are not represented by any collective bargaining group. Management considers its employee relations to be good.

We encourage and support the growth and development of our associates and, wherever possible, seek to fill positions by promotion and transfer from within the organization. Continual learning and career development are advanced through internally developed training programs and specialty education within banking and using universities that offer Banking Management programs. We believe our ability to attract and retain employees is a key to our success. Accordingly, we strive to offer competitive salaries and employee benefits to all employees and monitor salaries in our market areas. At December 31, 2025, 19% of our current staff had been with us for fifteen years or more.

The safety, health and wellness of our employees is a top priority. All employees are asked not to come to work when they experience signs or symptoms of illness. On an ongoing basis, we further promote the health and wellness of our associates by strongly encouraging work-life balance and sponsoring various wellness programs, whereby associates are compensated for incorporating healthy habits into their daily routines.

SUPERVISION AND REGULATION

GENERAL

The Bank is subject to extensive regulation, examination and supervision by the Pennsylvania Department of Banking and Securities (“PDB”) and, as a member of the Federal Reserve System, by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “FRB”). Federal and state banking laws and regulations govern, among other things, the scope of a bank’s business, the investments a bank may make, the reserves against deposits a bank must maintain, terms of deposit accounts, loans a bank makes, the interest rates a bank charges and collateral a bank takes, the activities of a bank with respect to mergers and consolidations and the establishment of branches. The Company is registered as a bank holding company and is subject to supervision and regulation by the FRB under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the “BHCA”).

PENNSYLVANIA BANKING LAWS

The Pennsylvania Banking Code (“Banking Code”) contains detailed provisions governing the organization, location of offices, rights and responsibilities of directors, officers, and employees, as well as corporate powers, savings and investment operations and other aspects of the Bank and its affairs. The Banking Code delegates extensive rule-making power and administrative discretion to the PDB so that the supervision and regulation of state-chartered banks may be flexible and readily responsive to changes in economic conditions and in savings and lending practices.

Pennsylvania law also provides Pennsylvania state-chartered institutions elective parity with the power of national banks, federal thrifts, and state-chartered institutions in other states as authorized by the FDIC, subject to a required notice to the PDB. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Act (“FDIA”), however, prohibits state-chartered banks from making new investments, loans, or becoming involved in activities as principal and equity investments which are not permitted for national banks unless (1) the FDIC determines the activity or investment does not pose a significant risk of loss to the Deposit Insurance Fund and (2) the bank meets all applicable capital requirements. Accordingly, the additional operating authority provided to the Bank by the Banking Code is restricted by the FDIA.

In April 2008, banking regulators in the States of New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (the “Interstate MOU”) to clarify their respective roles, as home and host state regulators, regarding interstate branching activity on a regional basis pursuant to the Riegle-Neal Amendments Act of 1997. The Interstate MOU establishes the regulatory responsibilities of the respective state banking regulators regarding bank regulatory examinations and is intended to reduce the regulatory burden on state-chartered banks branching within the region by eliminating duplicative host state compliance exams. Under the Interstate MOU, the activities of branches we established in New York would be governed by Pennsylvania state law to the same extent that federal law governs the activities of the branch of an out-of-state national bank in such host states. Issues regarding whether a particular host state law is preempted are to be determined in the first instance by the PDB. In the event that the PDB and the applicable host state regulator disagree regarding whether a particular host state law is pre-empted, the PDB and the applicable host state regulator would use their reasonable best efforts to consider all points of view and to resolve the disagreement.

COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT ACT

The Community Reinvestment Act, (“CRA”), as implemented by FRB regulations, provides that the Bank has a continuing and affirmative obligation consistent with its safe and sound operation to help meet the credit needs of its entire community, including low and moderate income neighborhoods. The CRA does not establish specific lending requirements or programs for financial institutions nor does it limit an institution’s discretion to develop the types of products and services that it believes are best suited to its particular community, consistent with the CRA. The CRA requires the FRB, in connection with its examination of the Bank, to assess the institution’s record of meeting the credit needs of its community and to take such record into account in its evaluation of certain corporate applications by such institution, such as mergers and branching. The Bank’s most recent rating was “Satisfactory”. Various consumer laws and regulations also affect the operations of the Bank. In addition to the impact of regulation, commercial banks are affected significantly by the actions of the FRB as it attempts to control the money supply and credit availability in order to influence the economy.

CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS

Federal regulations require FDIC-insured depository institutions, including state-chartered, FRB-member banks, to meet several minimum capital standards. These capital standards were effective January 1, 2015, and result from a final rule implementing regulatory amendments based on recommendations of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and certain requirements of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank Act”).

The capital standards require the maintenance of common equity Tier 1 capital, Tier 1 capital and total capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 4.5%, 6.0% and 8.0%, respectively, and a leverage ratio of at least 4% of Tier 1 capital. Common equity Tier 1 capital is generally defined as common stockholders’ equity and retained earnings. Tier 1 capital is generally defined as common equity Tier 1 and Additional Tier 1 capital. Additional Tier 1 capital generally includes certain noncumulative perpetual preferred stock and related surplus and minority interests in equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries. Total capital includes Tier 1 capital (common equity Tier 1 capital plus Additional Tier 1 capital) and Tier 2 capital. Tier 2 capital is comprised of capital instruments and related surplus meeting specified requirements, and may include cumulative preferred stock and long-term perpetual preferred stock, mandatory convertible securities, intermediate preferred stock and subordinated debt. Also included in Tier 2 capital is the allowance for loan and lease losses limited to a maximum of 1.25% of risk-weighted assets and, for institutions that have exercised an opt-out election regarding the treatment of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (“AOCI”), up to 45% of net unrealized gains on available-for-sale equity securities with readily determinable fair market values. The Company has exercised the AOCI opt-out option and therefore AOCI is not incorporated into common equity Tier 1 capital. Calculation of all types of regulatory capital is subject to deductions and adjustments specified in the regulations.

In determining the amount of risk-weighted assets for purposes of calculating risk-based capital ratios, assets, including certain off-balance sheet assets (e.g., recourse obligations, direct credit substitutes, residual interests) are multiplied by a risk weight factor assigned by the regulations based on the risks believed inherent in the type of asset. Higher levels of capital are required for asset categories believed to present greater risk. For example, a risk weight of 0% is assigned to cash and U.S. government securities, a risk weight of 50% is generally assigned to prudently underwritten first lien one- to four-family residential mortgages, a risk weight of 100% is assigned to commercial and consumer loans, a risk weight of 150% is assigned to certain past due loans and a risk weight of between 0% to 600% is assigned to permissible equity interests, depending on certain specified factors.

In addition to establishing the minimum regulatory capital requirements, the regulations limit capital distributions by the institution and certain discretionary bonus payments to management if an institution does not hold a “capital conservation buffer” consisting of 2.5% of common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets above the amount necessary to meet its minimum risk-based capital requirements.

The FRB has authority to establish individual minimum capital requirements in appropriate cases upon a determination that an institution’s capital level is or may become inadequate in light of the particular risks or circumstances.

As permitted by applicable federal regulation, the Bank has opted to use the community bank leverage ratio (the “CBLR”) framework for determining its capital adequacy, as discussed above. If a qualifying community bank fails to maintain the applicable minimum CBLR during the grace period, or if it is unable to restore compliance with the CBLR within the grace period, then it will revert to the Basel III capital framework and the normal Prompt Corrective Action capital categories will apply. At December 31, 2025, the Bank’s leverage ratio was 9.54%, which is more than the ratio required to be considered “well-capitalized” under the CBLR framework.

PROMPT CORRECTIVE ACTION RULES

Federal law establishes a system of prompt corrective action to resolve the problems of undercapitalized institutions. The law requires that certain supervisory actions be taken against undercapitalized institutions, the severity of which depends on the degree of undercapitalization. The FRB has adopted regulations to implement the prompt corrective action legislation as to state member banks. The regulations were amended to incorporate the previously mentioned increased regulatory capital standards that were effective January 1, 2015. An institution is deemed to be “well capitalized” if it has a total risk-based capital ratio of 10.0% or greater, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 8.0% or greater, a leverage ratio of 5.0% or greater and a common equity Tier 1 ratio of 6.5% or greater. An institution is “adequately capitalized” if it has a total risk-based capital ratio of 8.0% or greater, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6.0% or greater, a leverage ratio of 4.0% or greater and a common equity Tier 1 ratio of 4.5% or greater. An institution is “undercapitalized” if it has a total risk-based capital ratio of less than 8.0%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of less than 6.0%, a leverage ratio of less than 4.0% or a common equity Tier 1 ratio of less than 4.5%. An institution is deemed to be “significantly undercapitalized” if it has a total risk-based capital ratio of less than 6.0%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of less than 4.0%, a leverage ratio of less than 3.0% or a common equity Tier 1 ratio of less than 3.0%. An institution is considered to be “critically undercapitalized” if it has a ratio of tangible equity (as defined in the regulations) to total assets that is equal to or less than 2.0%.

Subject to a narrow exception, a receiver or conservator must be appointed for an institution that is “critically undercapitalized” within specified time frames. The regulations also provide that a capital restoration plan must be filed with the FRB within 45 days of the date an institution is deemed to have received notice that it is “undercapitalized”, “significantly undercapitalized” or “critically undercapitalized”. Compliance with the capital restoration plan must be guaranteed by any parent holding company up to the lesser of 5% of the depository institution’s total assets when it was deemed to be undercapitalized or the amount necessary to achieve compliance with applicable capital requirements. In addition, numerous mandatory supervisory actions become immediately applicable to an undercapitalized institution including, but not limited to, increased monitoring by regulators and restrictions on growth, capital distributions and expansion. The FRB could also take any one of a number of discretionary supervisory actions, including the issuance of a capital directive and the replacement of senior executive officers and directors. Significantly and critically undercapitalized institutions are subject to additional mandatory and discretionary measures.

STANDARDS FOR SAFETY AND SOUNDNESS

The federal banking agencies have adopted Interagency Guidelines prescribing Standards for Safety and Soundness in various areas such as internal controls and information systems, internal audit, loan documentation and credit underwriting, interest rate exposure, asset growth and quality, earnings and compensation, fees and benefits. The guidelines set forth the safety and soundness standards that the federal banking agencies use to identify and address problems at insured depository institutions before capital becomes impaired. If the FRB determines that a state member bank fails to meet any standard prescribed by the guidelines, the FRB may require the institution to submit an acceptable plan to achieve compliance with the standard.

ENFORCEMENT

The PDB maintains enforcement authority over the Bank, including the power to issue cease and desist orders and civil money penalties and remove directors, officers or employees. The PDB also has the power to appoint a conservator or receiver for a bank upon insolvency, imminent insolvency, unsafe or unsound condition or certain other situations. The FRB has primary federal enforcement responsibility over FRB-member state banks and has authority to bring actions against the institution and all institution-affiliated parties, including shareholders, who knowingly or recklessly participate in wrongful actions likely to have an adverse effect on the bank. Formal enforcement action may range from the issuance of a capital directive or a cease and desist order, to removal of officers and/or directors. Civil penalties cover a wide range of violations and can amount to $25,000 per day, or even $1 million per day in especially egregious cases. The FDIC, as deposit insurer, has the authority to recommend to the FRB that enforcement action be taken with respect to a member bank. If the FRB does not take action, the FDIC has authority to take such action under certain circumstances. In general, regulatory enforcement actions occur with respect to situations involving unsafe or unsound practices or conditions, violations of law or regulation or breaches of fiduciary duty. Federal and Pennsylvania law also establish criminal penalties for certain violations.

REGULATORY RESTRICTIONS ON BANK DIVIDENDS

The Bank may not declare a dividend without approval of the FRB, unless the dividend to be declared by the Bank’s Board of Directors does not exceed the total of: (i) the Bank’s net profits for the current year to date, plus (ii) its retained net profits for the preceding two years, less any required transfers to surplus.

Under Pennsylvania law, the Bank may only declare and pay dividends from its accumulated net earnings. In addition, the Bank may not declare and pay dividends from the surplus funds that Pennsylvania law requires that it maintain. Under these policies and subject to the restrictions applicable to the Bank, the Bank could have declared, during 2025, without prior regulatory approval, aggregate dividends of approximately $21.1 million, plus net profits earned to the date of such dividend declaration.

BANK SECRECY ACT

Under the Bank Secrecy Act (“BSA”), banks and other financial institutions are required to retain records to assure that the details of financial transactions can be traced if investigators need to do so. Banks are also required to report most cash transactions in amounts exceeding $10,000 made by or on behalf of their customers. Failure to meet BSA requirements may expose the Bank to statutory penalties, and a negative compliance record may affect the willingness of regulating authorities to approve certain actions by the Bank requiring regulatory approval, including acquisitions and opening new branches.

INSURANCE OF DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS

The Bank’s deposits are insured up to applicable limits by the Deposit Insurance Fund (“DIF”) of the FDIC. Under the FDIC’s risk-based assessment system, insured institutions are assigned to one of four risk categories based on supervisory evaluations, regulatory capital levels and certain other factors, with less risky institutions paying lower assessments. An institution’s assessment rate depends upon the category to which it is assigned, and certain adjustments specified by FDIC regulations.

As required by the Dodd-Frank Act, the FDIC has issued final rules implementing changes to the assessment rules. The rules change the assessment base used for calculating deposit insurance assessments from deposits to total assets, less tangible (Tier 1) capital. Since the new base is larger than the previous base, the FDIC also lowered assessment rates so that the rule would not significantly alter the total amount of revenue collected from the industry. The range of adjusted assessment rates is now 2.5 to 45 basis points of the new assessment base. The rule is expected to benefit smaller financial institutions, which typically rely more on deposits for funding, and shift more of the burden for supporting the insurance fund to larger institutions, which are thought to have greater access to nondeposit funding. No institution may pay a dividend if it is in default of its assessments. As a result of the Dodd-Frank Act, deposit insurance per account owner is $250,000 for all types of accounts.

The Dodd-Frank Act increased the minimum target DIF ratio from 1.15% to 1.35% of estimated insured deposits. The Dodd-Frank Act eliminated the 1.5% maximum fund ratio, instead leaving it to the discretion of the FDIC to establish a maximum fund ratio. The FDIC has exercised that discretion by establishing a long range fund ratio of 2%.

The FDIC has authority to increase insurance assessments. A significant increase in insurance premiums would likely have an adverse effect on the operating expenses and results of operations of the Bank. Management cannot predict what insurance assessment rates will be in the future.

Insurance of deposits may be terminated by the FDIC upon a finding that the institution has engaged in unsafe or unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations or has violated any applicable law, regulation, rule, order or regulatory condition imposed in writing. The management of the Bank does not know of any practice, condition or violation that might lead to termination of deposit insurance.

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Under FRB regulations, the Bank is required to maintain reserves against its transaction accounts (primarily NOW and regular checking accounts). These reserve requirements are subject to annual adjustment by the FRB. For 2025, the Bank would have been required to maintain average daily reserves equal to 3% on aggregate transaction accounts of up to and including $645.8 million, plus 10% on the remainder, and the first $37.8 million of otherwise reservable balances would have been exempt. In March 2020, the FRB reduced all reserve requirements to zero in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

PROHIBITIONS AGAINST TYING ARRANGEMENTS

State-chartered banks are prohibited, subject to some exceptions, from extending credit to or offering any other service, or fixing or varying the consideration for such extension of credit or service, on the condition that the customer obtain some additional service from the institution or its affiliates or not obtain services of a competitor of the institution.

OTHER REGULATIONS

Interest and other charges collected or contracted for by the Bank are subject to state usury laws and federal laws concerning interest rates. The Bank’s operations are also subject to federal and state laws applicable to credit transactions, such as the:

• Truth-In-Lending Act, governing disclosures of credit terms to consumer borrowers;
• Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, requiring financial institutions to provide information to enable the public and public officials to determine whether a financial institution is fulfilling its obligation to help meet the housing needs of the community it serves;
• Equal Credit Opportunity Act, prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race, creed or other prohibited factors in extending credit;
• Fair Credit Reporting Act, governing the use and provision of information to credit reporting agencies;
• Fair Debt Collection Act, governing the manner in which consumer debts may be collected by collection agencies;
• Truth in Savings Act; and
• Rules and regulations of the various federal and state agencies charged with the responsibility of implementing such laws.

The Bank’s operations also are subject to the:

• Right to Financial Privacy Act, which imposes a duty to maintain confidentiality of consumer financial records and prescribes procedures for complying with administrative subpoenas of financial records;
• Electronic Funds Transfer Act and Regulation E promulgated thereunder, which govern automatic deposits to and withdrawals from deposit accounts and customers’ rights and liabilities arising from the use of automated teller machines and other electronic banking services;
• Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act (also known as “Check 21”), which gives “substitute checks,” such as digital check images and copies made from that image, the same legal standing as the original paper check;
• The USA PATRIOT Act, which requires banks operating to, among other things, establish broadened anti-money laundering compliance programs, due diligence policies and controls to ensure the detection and reporting of money laundering. Such required compliance programs are intended to supplement existing compliance requirements also applicable to financial institutions under the Bank Secrecy Act and the Office of Foreign Assets Control regulations; and
• The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which places limitations on the sharing of consumer financial information by financial institutions with unaffiliated third parties. Specifically, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act requires all financial institutions offering financial products or services to retail customers to provide such customers with the financial institution’s privacy policy and provide such customers the opportunity to “opt out” of the sharing of certain personal financial information with unaffiliated third parties.

HOLDING COMPANY REGULATION

The Company, as a bank holding company, is subject to examination, supervision, regulation, and periodic reporting under the BHCA, as administered by the FRB. The Company is required to obtain the prior approval of the FRB to acquire all, or substantially all, of the assets of any bank or bank holding company. Prior FRB approval is also required for the Company to acquire direct or indirect ownership or control of any voting securities of any bank or bank holding company if it would, directly or indirectly, own or control more than 5% of any class of voting shares of the bank or bank holding company.

A bank holding company is generally prohibited from engaging in, or acquiring, direct or indirect control of more than 5% of the voting securities of any company engaged in nonbanking activities. One of the principal exceptions to this prohibition is for activities found by the FRB to be so closely related to banking or managing or controlling banks as to be a proper incident thereto. Some of the principal activities that the FRB has determined by regulation to be closely related to banking are: (i) making or servicing loans; (ii) performing certain data processing services; (iii) providing securities brokerage services; (iv) acting as fiduciary, investment or financial advisor; (v) leasing personal or real property under certain conditions; (vi) making investments in corporations or projects designed primarily to promote community welfare; and (vii) acquiring a savings association.

A bank holding company that meets specified conditions, including that its depository institutions subsidiaries are “well capitalized” and “well managed,” can opt to become a “financial holding company.” A “financial holding company” may engage in a broader array of financial activities than permitted to a typical bank holding company. Such activities can include insurance underwriting and investment banking. The Company does not anticipate opting for “financial holding company” status at this time.

The Company is exempt from the FRB’s consolidated capital adequacy guidelines for bank holding companies because the Company’s consolidated assets are less than $3.0 billion as of June 30, 2025. The FRB consolidated capital adequacy guidelines are at least as stringent as those required for the subsidiary depository institutions.

A bank holding company is generally required to give the FRB prior written notice of any purchase or redemption of then outstanding equity securities if the gross consideration for the purchase or redemption, when combined with the net consideration paid for all such purchases or redemptions during the preceding 12 months, is equal to 10% or more of the Company’s consolidated net worth. The FRB may disapprove such a purchase or redemption if it determines that the proposal would constitute an unsafe and unsound practice, or would violate any law, regulation, FRB order or directive, or any condition imposed by, or written agreement with, the FRB. The FRB has adopted an exception to that approval requirement for well-capitalized bank holding companies that meet certain other conditions.

The FRB has issued a policy statement regarding the payment of dividends and other capital distributions by bank holding companies. In general, the FRB’s policies provide that dividends should be paid only out of current earnings and only if the prospective rate of earnings retention by the bank holding company appears consistent with the organization’s capital needs, asset quality and overall financial condition. The FRB’s policies also require that a bank holding company serve as a source of financial strength to its subsidiary banks by using available resources to provide capital funds during periods of financial stress or adversity and by maintaining the financial flexibility and capital-raising capacity to obtain additional resources for assisting its subsidiary banks where necessary. The Dodd-Frank Act codified the source of strength policy and requires the promulgation of implementing regulations. Under the prompt corrective action laws, the ability of a bank holding company to pay dividends may be restricted if a subsidiary bank becomes undercapitalized. These regulatory policies could affect the ability of the Company to pay dividends or otherwise engage in capital distributions.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Act makes depository institutions liable to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation for losses suffered or anticipated by the insurance fund in connection with the default of a commonly controlled depository institution or any assistance provided by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation to such an institution in danger of default. That law would have potential applicability if the Company ever held as a separate subsidiary a depository institution in addition to the Bank.

The status of the Company as a registered bank holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act will not exempt it from certain federal and state laws and regulations applicable to corporations generally, including, without limitation, certain provisions of the federal securities laws.

ACQUISITION OF THE HOLDING COMPANY

Under the Change in Bank Control Act (the “CIBCA”), a federal statute, a notice must be submitted to the FRB if any person (including a company), or group acting in concert, seeks to acquire 10% or more of the Company’s shares of outstanding common stock, unless the FRB has found that the acquisition will not result in a change in control of the Company. Under the CIBCA, the FRB generally has 60 days within which to act on such notices, taking into consideration certain factors, including the financial and managerial resources of the acquirer, the convenience and needs of the communities served by the Company and the Bank, and the anti-trust effects of the acquisition. Under the BHCA, any company would be required to obtain prior approval from the FRB before it may obtain “control” of the Company within the meaning of the BHCA. Control generally is defined to mean the ownership or power to vote 25% or more of any class of voting securities of the Company or the ability to control in any manner the election of a majority of the Company’s directors. An existing bank holding company would be required to obtain the FRB’s prior approval under the BHCA before acquiring more than 5% of the Company’s voting stock.

EFFECT OF GOVERNMENT MONETARY POLICIES

The earnings and growth of the banking industry are affected by the credit policies of monetary authorities, including the Federal Reserve System. An important function of the Federal Reserve System is to regulate the national supply of bank credit in order to control recessionary and inflationary pressures. Among the instruments of monetary policy used by the Federal Reserve to implement these objectives are open market activities in U.S. government securities, changes in the discount rate on member bank borrowings and changes in reserve requirements against member bank deposits. These operations are used in varying combinations to influence overall economic growth and indirectly, bank loans, securities, and deposits. These variables may also affect interest rates charged on loans or paid on deposits. The monetary policies of the Federal Reserve authorities have had a significant effect on the operating results of commercial banks in the past and are expected to continue to have such an effect in the future.

In view of the changing conditions in the national economy and in the money markets, as well as the effect of actions by monetary and fiscal authorities including the Federal Reserve System, no prediction can be made as to possible changes in interest rates, deposit levels, loan demand or their effect on the business and earnings of the Company and the Bank. Additional information is included under the caption “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The following discussion sets forth the material risk factors that could affect the Company’s consolidated financial condition and results of operations. Readers should not consider any descriptions of these factors to be a complete set of all potential risks that could affect the Company. Any risk factor discussed below could by itself, or combined with other factors, materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, results of operations, financial condition, capital position, liquidity, competitive position or reputation, including by materially increasing expenses or decreasing revenues, which could result in material losses or a decrease in earnings.

RISKS RELATED TO CHANGES IN MARKET INTEREST RATES

Changing interest rates may decrease our earnings and asset values.

Our net interest income is the interest we earn on loans and investments less the interest we pay on our deposits and borrowings. Our net interest margin is the difference between the yield we earn on our assets and the interest rate we pay for deposits and our other sources of funding. Changes in interest rates—up or down—could adversely affect our net interest margin and, as a result, our net interest income. Although the yield we earn on our assets and our funding costs tend to move in the same direction in response to changes in interest rates, one can rise or fall faster than the other, causing our net interest margin to expand or contract. Our liabilities tend to be shorter in duration than our assets, so they may adjust faster in response to changes in interest rates. As a result, when interest rates rise, our funding costs may rise faster than the yield we earn on our assets, causing our net interest margin to contract until the asset yields catch up. Changes in the slope of the “yield curve”—or the spread between short-term and long-term interest rates—could also reduce our net interest margin. Normally, the yield curve is upward sloping, meaning short-term rates are lower than long-term rates. Because our liabilities tend to be shorter in duration than our assets, when the yield curve flattens or even inverts, we could experience pressure on our net interest margin as our cost of funds increases relative to the yield we can earn on our assets.

Changes in interest rates also affect the value of the Bank’s interest-earning assets, and in particular the Bank’s securities portfolio. Generally, the value of fixed-rate securities fluctuates inversely with changes in interest rates. Unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale are reported as a separate component of stockholders’ equity, net of tax, while unrealized gains and losses on equity securities directly impact earnings. Decreases in the fair value of securities available for sale resulting from increases in interest rates could have an adverse effect on stockholders’ equity or net income.

Impact of Inflation

The effects of price changes and inflation can vary substantially for most financial institutions. While management believes that inflation affects the growth of total assets, it believes that it is difficult to assess the overall impact. Management believes this to be the case due to the fact that generally neither the timing nor the magnitude of the inflationary changes in the CPI coincides with changes in interest rates. The price of one or more of the components of the CPI may fluctuate considerably and thereby influence the overall CPI without having a corresponding effect on interest rates or upon the cost of those goods and services normally purchased by us. In years of high inflation and high interest rates, intermediate and long-term interest rates tend to increase, thereby adversely impacting the market values of investment securities, mortgage loans and other long-term fixed rate loans. In addition, higher short-term interest rates caused by inflation tend to increase the cost of funds. In other years, the opposite may occur. In addition, inflation increases the cost of goods and services we use in our business operations, such as electricity and other utilities, which increases our noninterest expenses. Our customers are also affected by inflation and the rising costs of goods and services used in their households and businesses, which could have a negative impact on their ability to repay their loans with us.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR LIQUIDITY

Access to Liquidity

Liquidity is the ability to meet cash flow obligations as they come due and cash flow needs on a timely basis and at a reasonable cost. The liquidity of the Bank is used to make loans and to repay deposit and borrowing liabilities as they become due, or are demanded by customers and creditors. Many factors affect the Bank’s ability to meet liquidity needs, including variations in the markets served by its network of offices, its mix of assets and liabilities, reputation and standing in the marketplace, and general economic conditions.

The Bank’s primary source of funding is customer deposits, gathered throughout its network of banking offices. Through its subsidiary (First Citizens Community Bank), the Company is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh (FHLB-Pittsburgh), which is one of 11 regional Federal Home Loan Banks. The Company has a line of credit with the FHLB-Pittsburgh that is secured by a blanket lien on its loan portfolio. Access to this line of credit is critical if a funding need arises. However, there can be no assurance that the FHLB-Pittsburgh will be able to provide funding when needed, nor can there be assurance that the FHLB-Pittsburgh will provide funds specifically to the Company should its financial condition deteriorate and/or regulators prevent that access. The inability to access this source of funds could have a materially adverse effect on the Company’s financial flexibility if alternate financing is not available at acceptable interest rates. The failure of the FHLB-Pittsburgh or the FHLB system in general, may materially impair the Corporation’s ability to meet short- and long-term liquidity needs or to meet growth plans. In addition, the Bank also maintains borrowing capacity with the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia. The Bank’s securities and loan portfolios provide a source of contingent liquidity that could be accessed in a reasonable time period through sales.

The Corporation’s management and Board of Directors, through the Asset-Liability Committee (the “ALCO”), monitor liquidity and the ALCO establishes and monitors acceptable liquidity ranges. The Bank actively manages its liquidity position through target ratios. Continual monitoring of these ratios, both historical and through forecasts under multiple rate scenarios, allows the Bank to employ strategies necessary to maintain adequate liquidity.

Changes in economic conditions, including consumer savings habits and availability of or access to capital, could potentially have a significant impact on the Bank’s liquidity position, which in turn could materially impact the Corporation’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR LENDING ACTIVITIES

Activities related to the drilling for natural gas in the Marcellus and Utica Shale formations impacts certain customers of the Bank.

Our north central Pennsylvania market area is predominately centered in the Marcellus and Utica Shale natural gas exploration and drilling area, and as a result, the economy in north central Pennsylvania is influenced by the natural gas industry. Loan demand, deposit levels and the market value of local real estate are impacted by this activity. While the Company does not lend to the various entities directly engaged in exploration, drilling or production activities, many of our customers provide transportation and other services and products that support natural gas exploration and production activities. Therefore, our customers are impacted by changes in the market price for natural gas, as a significant downturn in this industry could impact the ability of our borrowers to repay their loans in accordance with their terms. Additionally, exploration and drilling activities may be affected by federal, state and local laws and regulations such as restrictions on production, permitting, changes in taxes and environmental protection. Regulatory and market pricing of natural gas could also impact and/or reduce demand for loans and deposit levels or loan collateral values. These factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

Higher credit losses could require us to increase our allowance for credit losses through a charge to earnings.

When we loan money, we incur the risk that our borrowers do not repay their loans. We reserve for credit losses by establishing an allowance through a charge to earnings. The amount of this allowance is based on our assessment of credit losses inherent in our loan portfolio. The process for determining the amount of the allowance is critical to our financial results and condition. It requires subjective and complex judgments about the future, including forecasts of economic or market conditions that might impair the ability of our borrowers to repay their loans. We might underestimate the credit losses inherent in our loan portfolio and have credit losses in excess of the amount reserved. We might increase the allowance because of changing economic conditions. For example, in a rising interest rate environment, borrowers with adjustable-rate loans could see their payments increase. There may be a significant increase in the number of borrowers who are unable or unwilling to repay their loans, resulting in our charging off more loans and increasing our allowance. In addition, when real estate values decline, the potential severity of loss on a real estate-secured loan can increase significantly, especially in the case of loans with high combined loan-to-value ratios. A decline in the national economy and the local economies of the areas in which the loans are concentrated could result in an increase in loan delinquencies, foreclosures or repossessions resulting in increased charge-off amounts and the need for additional credit loss allowances in future periods. In addition, bank regulators may require us to make a provision for credit losses or otherwise recognize further loan charge-offs following their periodic review of our loan portfolio, our underwriting procedures, and our credit loss allowance. Any increase in our allowance for credit losses or loan charge-offs as required by such regulatory authorities could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Our allowance for credit losses amounted to $22.8 million, or 0.97% of total loans outstanding and 85.7% of nonperforming loans, on December 31, 2025. Our allowance for credit losses at December 31, 2025 may not be sufficient to cover future credit losses. A large loss could deplete the allowance and require increased provisions to replenish the allowance, which would decrease our earnings.

During 2023, the Bank implemented ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, which changed the impairment model for most financial assets. The underlying premise of the update was that financial assets measured at amortized cost should be presented at the net amount expected to be collected, through an allowance for credit losses that is deducted from the amortized cost basis. The allowance for credit losses should reflect management’s current estimate of credit losses that are expected to occur over the remaining life of a financial asset. The income statement was affected for the measurement of credit losses for newly recognized financial assets, as well as the expected increases or decreases of expected credit losses that have taken place during the period. The implementation of this standard did result in a decrease of $2.2 million to the Company’s allowance for credit losses effective January 1, 2023 compared to December 31, 2022.

Our emphasis on commercial real estate, agricultural real estate, construction and other commercial loan lending may expose us to increased lending risks.

At December 31, 2025, we had $1.22 billion in loans secured by commercial real estate, $347.4 million in agricultural real estate loans, $94.0 million in construction loans and $179.2 million in other commercial loans. Commercial real estate loans, agricultural real estate, construction and other commercial loans represented 51.8%, 14.8%, 4.0% and 7.6%, respectively, of our loan portfolio. At December 31, 2025, we had $18.3 million of reserves specifically allocated to these loan types. While commercial real estate, agricultural real estate, construction and other commercial loans are generally more interest rate sensitive and carry higher yields than do residential mortgage loans, these types of loans generally expose a lender to greater risk of non-payment and loss than single-family residential mortgage loans because repayment of the loans often depends on the successful operation of the property, the income stream of the borrowers and, for construction loans, the accuracy of the estimate of the property’s value at completion of construction and the estimated cost of construction. Such loans typically involve larger loan balances to single borrowers or groups of related borrowers compared to single-family residential mortgage loans. We monitor loan concentrations on an individual relationship and industry wide basis to monitor the amount of risk we have in our loan portfolio.

Agricultural loans are dependent for repayment on the successful operation and management of the farm property, the health of the agricultural industry broadly, and on the location of the borrower in particular, and other factors outside of the borrower’s control.

At December 31, 2025, our agricultural loans, consisting primarily of agricultural real estate loans and other agricultural loans, totaled $377.7 million, representing 16.1% of our total loan portfolio. The primary activities of our agricultural customers include dairy and beef farms, poultry and swine operations, crops and support businesses. Agricultural markets are highly sensitive to real and perceived changes in the supply and demand of agricultural products. Weaker prices could reduce the value of agricultural land in our local markets and thereby increase the risk of default by our borrowers or reduce the foreclosure value of agricultural land, animals and equipment that serves as collateral for certain of our loans. At December 31, 2025, the Company had loans to the dairy industry totaling $114.6 million, or 4.9% of total loans and 30.3% of total agricultural loans compared to 4.8% of total loans and 31.3% of total agricultural loans at December 31, 2024. As of December 31, 2025, we have loans to poultry producers for layers, broilers and turkeys totaling $110.2 million, or 4.7% of total loans and 29.2% of total agricultural loans.

Our agricultural loans are dependent on the profitable operation and management of the farm property securing the loan and its cash flows. The success of a farm property may be affected by many factors outside the control of the borrower, including:

• adverse weather conditions (such as hail, drought and floods), restrictions on water supply or other conditions that prevent the planting or harvesting of a crop or limit crop yields;
• loss of crops or livestock due to disease, like Avian influenza, or other factors;
• declines in the market prices or demand for agricultural products (both domestically and internationally), for any reason;
• increases in production costs (such as the costs of labor, rent, feed, fuel and fertilizer);
• the impact of domestic and international government policies and regulations (including changes in price supports, subsidies, government-sponsored crop insurance, minimum ethanol content requirements for gasoline, tariffs, trade barriers, trade agreements and health and environmental regulations);
• access to technology and the successful implementation of production technologies;
• changes in the general economy that could affect the availability of off-farm sources of income and prices of real estate for borrowers;
• and disruptions in the supply chain and the processing of product and delivery to the final retail channel

Lower prices for agricultural products may cause farm revenues to decline and farm operators may be unable to reduce expenses as quickly as their revenues decline. In addition, many farms are dependent on a limited number of key individuals whose injury or death could significantly affect the successful operation of the farm. If the cash flow from a farming operation is diminished, the borrower’s ability to repay the loan may be impaired. Consequently, agricultural loans may involve a greater degree of risk than residential mortgage lending, particularly in the case of loans that are unsecured or secured by rapidly depreciating assets such as farm equipment (some of which is highly specialized with a limited or no market for resale) or perishable assets such as livestock or crops. In such cases, any repossessed collateral for a defaulted agricultural operating loan may not provide an adequate source of repayment of the outstanding loan balance as a result of the greater likelihood of damage, loss or depreciation or because the assessed value of the collateral exceeds the eventual realization value.

Loan participations comprise a portion of our loan portfolio and a decline in loan participation volume could hurt profits and slow loan growth.

We have actively engaged in loan participations whereby we are invited to participate in loans, primarily commercial real estate and municipal loans, originated by another financial institution known as the lead lender. We have participated with other financial institutions in both our primary markets and out of market areas. We underwrite any loan we participate in as if we are originating the loan. The primary difference is that financial information is received from the participating financial institution and not the borrower. The loans we participate in as a purchaser totaled $121.0 million and $95.9 million at December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. As a percent of total loans, participation purchased loans were 5.1%, and 4.2% as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. Our profits and loan growth could be significantly and adversely affected if the volume of loan participations would materially decrease, whether because loan demand declines, loan payoffs, lead lenders may come to perceive us as a potential competitor in their respective market areas, or otherwise.

Environmental liability associated with lending activities could result in losses.

In the course of our business, we may foreclose on and take title to properties securing our loans. If hazardous substances were discovered on any of these properties, we could be liable to governmental entities or third parties for the costs of remediation of the hazard, as well as for personal injury and property damage. Many environmental laws can impose liability regardless of whether we knew of, or were responsible for, the contamination. In addition, if we arrange for the disposal of hazardous or toxic substances at another site, we may be liable for the costs of cleaning up and removing those substances from the site even if we neither own nor operate the disposal site. Environmental laws may require us to incur substantial expenses and may materially limit use of properties we acquire through foreclosure, reduce their value or limit our ability to sell them in the event of a default on the loans they secure. In addition, future laws or more stringent interpretations or enforcement policies with respect to existing laws may increase our exposure to environmental liability.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR INVESTMENT SECURITIES

The Company’s investment securities portfolio is subject to credit risk, market risk, and liquidity risk, and declines in value in its investment securities portfolio may require it to record impairment charges that could have a material adverse effect on its results of operations and financial condition.

The Company’s investment securities portfolio has risks beyond its control that can significantly influence the portfolio’s fair value. These factors include, but are not limited to, changes in interest rates, changes in prepayment speeds, changes in general economic conditions, rating agency downgrades of the securities, defaults of the issuers of the securities and market liquidity. Any change in current accounting principles or interpretations of these principles could impact the Company’s assessment of fair value and thus its determination of other-than-temporary impairment of the securities in its investment securities portfolio. The Bank may be required to record other-than-temporary impairment charges on its investment securities if they suffer declines in value that are considered other-than-temporary. Numerous factors, including collateral deterioration underlying securities, lack of liquidity for resales of certain investment securities, absence of reliable pricing information for certain investment securities, adverse changes in business climate, adverse actions by regulators, or unanticipated changes in the competitive environment could negatively affect the Bank’s securities portfolio in future periods. An other-than-temporary impairment charge could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR SECONDARY MORTGAGE OPERATIONS

Income from secondary mortgage market operations is volatile, and we may incur losses or charges with respect to our secondary mortgage market operations which would negatively affect our earnings.

We generally sell in the secondary market the longer term fixed-rate residential mortgage loans that we originate, earning non-interest income in the form of gains on sale. When interest rates rise, the demand for mortgage loans tends to fall and may reduce the number of loans available for sale. In addition to interest rate levels, weak or deteriorating economic conditions also tend to reduce loan demand. Although we sell loans in the secondary market without recourse, we are required to give customary representations and warranties to the buyers. If we breach those representations and warranties, the buyers can require us to repurchase the loans and we may incur a loss on the repurchase. Because we generally retain the servicing rights on the loans we sell in the secondary market, we are required to record a mortgage servicing right asset, which we test annually for impairment. The value of mortgage servicing rights tends to increase with rising interest rates and to decrease with falling interest rates, with refinance activity increasing in falling rate environments. If we are required to take an impairment charge on our mortgage servicing rights our earnings would be adversely affected.

As a result of acquisitions, the Bank acquired a portfolio of loans sold to the FHLB, which were sold under the Mortgage Partnership Finance Program (“MPF”). While the Bank was not an active participant in the MPF program in 2025, we continue to evaluate the program to see if it would be beneficial to our customers and our performance. The MPF portfolio balance was $7,774,000 at December 31, 2025. The FHLB maintains a first-loss position for the MPF portfolio that totals $171,000. Should the FHLB exhaust its first-loss position, recourse to the Bank’s credit enhancement would be up to the next $197,000 of losses. The Bank has not experienced any losses for the MPF portfolio.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR MARKET AREA

The Company’s financial condition and results of operations are dependent on the economy in the Bank’s market area.

The Bank’s primary market area consists of the Pennsylvania Counties of Bradford, Clinton, Lycoming, Potter, and Tioga in north central Pennsylvania, Lebanon, Schuylkill, Berks and Lancaster in south central, Pennsylvania, Centre and Clinton in central Pennsylvania, and Allegany, Steuben, Chemung and Tioga Counties in southern New York. In Delaware, we consider the cities and surrounding areas of Wilmington and Dover, Delaware, as well as Kennett Square, Pennsylvania in Chester County, as primary market areas. With the acquisition of HVBC, we have expanded further into southeast Pennsylvania, including Montgomery, Bucks and Philadelphia Counties as well as Burlington County, New Jersey through the acquisition of five full service branches, four mortgage centers and one business banking facility. The majority of the Bank’s loans and deposits come from households and businesses whose primary address is located in the Bank’s primary market areas. Because of the Bank’s concentration of business activities in its market area, the Company’s financial condition and results of operations depend upon economic conditions in its market areas. Adverse economic conditions in our market areas could reduce our growth rate, affect the ability of our customers to repay their loans and generally affect our financial condition and results of operations. Conditions such as inflation, recession, unemployment, high interest rates and short money supply and other factors beyond our control may adversely affect our profitability. We are less able than a larger institution to spread the risks of unfavorable local economic conditions across a large number of diversified economies. Any sustained period of increased payment delinquencies, foreclosures or losses caused by adverse market or economic conditions in the States of Pennsylvania, New York, New Jersey and Delaware could adversely affect the value of our assets, revenues, results of operations and financial condition. Moreover, we cannot give any assurance we will benefit from any market growth or favorable economic conditions in our primary market areas if they do occur.

RISKS RELATED TO LAWS AND REGULATIONS

Regulation of the financial services industry is significant, and future legislation could increase our cost of doing business or harm our competitive position.

We are subject to extensive regulation, supervision and examination by the FRB and the PDB, our primary regulators, and by the FDIC, as insurer of our deposits. Such regulation and supervision govern the activities in which an institution and its holding company may engage and are intended primarily for the protection of the insurance fund and the depositors and borrowers of the Bank rather than for holders of our common stock. Regulatory authorities have extensive discretion in their supervisory and enforcement activities, including the imposition of restrictions on our operations, the classification of our assets and determination of the level of our allowance for credit losses. Any change in such regulation and oversight, whether in the form of regulatory policy, regulations, legislation or supervisory action, may have a material impact on our profitability and operations. Future legislative changes could require changes to business practices or force us to discontinue businesses and potentially expose us to additional costs, liabilities, enforcement action and reputational risk.

Our ability to pay dividends is limited by law.

Our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders largely depends on our receipt of dividends from the Bank. The amount of dividends that the Bank may pay to us is limited by federal and state laws and regulations. We also may decide to limit the payment of dividends even when we have the legal ability to pay them in order to retain earnings for use in our business.

Federal and state banking laws, our articles of incorporation and our by-laws may have an anti-takeover effect.

Federal law imposes restrictions, including regulatory approval requirements, on persons seeking to acquire control over us. Pennsylvania law also has provisions that may have an anti-takeover effect. These provisions may serve to entrench management or discourage a takeover attempt that shareholders consider to be in their best interest or in which they would receive a substantial premium over the current market price.

RISKS RELATED TO COMPETITION

Strong competition within the Bank’s market areas could hurt profits and slow growth.

The Bank faces intense competition both in making loans and attracting deposits. This competition has made it more difficult for the Bank to make new loans and at times has forced the Bank to offer higher deposit rates. Price competition for loans and deposits might result in the Bank earning less on loans and paying more on deposits, which would reduce net interest income. Competition also makes it more difficult to increase the volume of our loan and deposit portfolios. As of June 30, 2025, which is the most recent date for which information is made available by the FDIC, we held 34.1% of the FDIC insured deposits in Bradford, Potter and Tioga Counties, Pennsylvania, which was the second largest share of deposits out of eight financial institutions with offices in the area, and 6.1% of the FDIC insured deposits in Allegany County, New York, which was the third largest share of deposits out of three financial institutions with offices in this area. As of June 30, 2025, we held 9.1% of the FDIC insured deposits in Lebanon County, Pennsylvania, which was the fourth largest share out of the 12 financial institutions with offices in the County. As of June 30, 2025, we held 3.7% of the FDIC insured deposits in Clinton County, Pennsylvania, which was the eighth largest share out of the eight financial institutions with offices in the County. Our offices in Berks, Centre, Chester, Lancaster, Lycoming, Schuylkill, Montgomery, Bucks and Philadelphia Counties of Pennsylvania and our offices in Wilmington and Dover, Delaware and Burlington, New Jersey all have less than 3% of the FDIC insured deposits of the corresponding County as of June 30, 2025. This data does not include deposits held by credit unions. Competition also makes it more difficult to hire employees and more expensive to retain experienced employees. Some of the institutions with which the Bank competes have substantially greater resources and lending limits than the Bank has and may offer services that the Bank does not provide. Management expects competition to increase in the future as a result of legislative, regulatory and technological changes (fintech) and the continuing trend of consolidation in the financial services industry. The Bank’s profitability depends upon its continued ability to compete successfully in its market area.

Disintermediation of Banks

Customers can maintain funds that would have historically been held as bank deposits in brokerage accounts or mutual funds. Customers can also complete transactions such as paying bills and/or transferring funds directly without the assistance of banks. In addition, the emergence, adoption and evolution of new technologies that do not require intermediation, including distributed ledgers such as digital assets and blockchain, as well as advances in robotic process automation, could significantly affect the competition for financial services. The process of eliminating banks as intermediaries, known as “disintermediation,” could result in the loss of fee income, as well as the loss of customer deposits and the related income generated from those deposits. The loss of deposits would also decrease the amount of funds available to lend back to our communities. Further, many of our competitors have fewer regulatory constraints and may have lower cost structures than us. Additionally, due to their size, many competitors may be able to achieve economies of scale and, as a result, may offer a broader range of products and services as well as better pricing for those products and services than we can. Our ability to compete successfully depends on a number of factors, including, among other things, (i) the ability to develop, maintain and build long-term customer relationships based on top quality service, high ethical standards and safe, sound assets; (ii) the ability to expand within our marketplace and with our market position; (iii) the scope, relevance and pricing of products and services offered to meet customer needs and demands; (iv) the rate at which we introduce new products and services relative to our competitors; (v) customer satisfaction with our level of service; and (vi) industry and general economic trends. Failure to perform in any of these areas could significantly weaken our competitive position, which could adversely affect our growth and profitability, which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR OPERATIONS

We rely on our management and other key personnel, and the loss of any of them may adversely affect our operations.

We are and will continue to be dependent upon the services of our executive management team. In addition, we will continue to depend on our ability to retain and recruit key commercial and agricultural loan officers. The unexpected loss of services of any key management personnel or commercial and agricultural loan officers could have an adverse effect on our business and financial condition because of their skills, knowledge of our market, years of industry experience and the difficulty of promptly finding qualified replacement personnel.

We are periodically subject to examination and regulation by a number of banking agencies and, depending upon the findings and determinations of these agencies, we may be required to make adjustments to our business that could adversely affect us.

Federal and state banking agencies periodically conduct examinations of our business, including compliance with applicable laws and regulations. If, as a result of an examination, a banking agency was to determine that the financial condition, capital resources, asset quality, asset concentration, earnings prospects, management, liquidity, sensitivity to market risk or other aspects of any of our operations has become unsatisfactory, or that we or our management is in violation of any law or regulation, it could take a number of different remedial actions as it deems appropriate. These actions include the power to enjoin “unsafe or unsound” practices, to require affirmative actions to correct any conditions resulting from any violation or practice, to issue an administrative order that can be judicially enforced, to direct an increase in our capital, to restrict our growth, to change the composition of our assets or liabilities, to assess civil monetary penalties against us and/or our officers or directors, to remove officers and directors and, if it is concluded that such conditions cannot be corrected or there is an imminent risk of loss to depositors, to terminate our deposit insurance. If we become subject to such regulatory actions, our business, results of operations and reputation may be negatively impacted.

We are subject to certain risks in connection with our use of technology.

Communications and information systems are essential to the conduct of our business, as we use such systems to manage our customer relationships, our general ledger, our deposits, our loans, and to deliver on-line and electronic banking services. Our operations rely on the secure processing, storage, and transmission of confidential and other information in our computer systems and networks. Although we take protective measures and endeavor to modify them as circumstances warrant, the security of our computer systems, software, and networks may be vulnerable to breaches, unauthorized access, misuse, computer viruses, or other malicious code and cyber attacks that could have a security impact.

In addition, breaches of security may occur through intentional or unintentional acts by those having authorized or unauthorized access to our confidential or other information or the confidential or other information of our customers, clients, or counterparties. If one or more of such events were to occur, the confidential and other information processed and stored in, and transmitted through, our computer systems and networks could potentially be jeopardized, or could otherwise cause interruptions or malfunctions in our operations or the operations of our customers, clients, or counterparties. This could cause us significant reputational damage or result in our experiencing significant losses from fraud or otherwise.

Furthermore, we may be required to expend significant additional resources to modify our protective measures or to investigate and remediate vulnerabilities or other exposures arising from operational and security risks. Also, we may be subject to litigation and financial losses that are either not insured against or not fully covered through any insurance we maintain.

We routinely transmit and receive personal, confidential, and proprietary information by e-mail and other electronic means. We have discussed and worked with our customers, clients, and counterparties to develop secure transmission capabilities, but we do not have, and may be unable to put in place, secure capabilities with all of these constituents, and we may not be able to ensure that these third parties have appropriate controls in place to protect the confidentiality of such information. Any interception, misuse, or mishandling of personal, confidential, or proprietary information being sent to or received from a customer, client, or counterparty could result in legal liability, regulatory action, and reputational harm, and could have a significant adverse effect on our competitive position, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our risk management framework may not be effective in mitigating risks and/or losses to us.

We have implemented a risk management framework to manage our risk exposure. This framework is comprised of various processes, systems and strategies, and is designed to manage the types of risk to which we are subject, including, among others, credit, market, liquidity, interest rate and compliance. Our framework also includes financial or other modeling methodologies which involve management assumptions and judgment. There is no assurance that our risk management framework will be effective under all circumstances or that it will adequately mitigate any risk or loss to us. If our framework is not effective, we could suffer unexpected losses and our business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects could be materially and adversely affected. We may also be subject to potentially adverse regulatory consequences.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR MERGER AND ACQUISITION ACTIVITY

Impairment of goodwill could require charges to earnings, which could result in a negative impact on our results of operations.

Our goodwill could become impaired in the future. If goodwill were to become impaired, it could limit the ability of the Bank to pay dividends to the Company, adversely impacting the Company’s liquidity and ability to pay dividends. The most significant assumptions affecting our goodwill impairment evaluation are variables including the market price of our Common Stock, projections of earnings, and the control premium above our current stock price that an acquirer would pay to obtain control of us. We are required to test goodwill for impairment at least annually or when impairment indicators are present. If an impairment determination is made in a future reporting period, our earnings and book value of goodwill will be reduced by the amount of the impairment. If an impairment loss is recorded, it will have little or no impact on the tangible book value of our Common Stock, or our regulatory capital levels, but such an impairment loss could significantly reduce the Bank’s earnings and thereby restrict the Bank’s ability to make dividend payments to us without prior regulatory approval, because Federal Reserve policy states the bank holding company dividends should be paid from current earnings. At December 31, 2025, the book value of our goodwill was $85.8 million, all of which was recorded at the Bank.

We may fail to realize all of the anticipated benefits of entering new markets.

As a result of completed and proposed acquisitions and the hiring of additional agricultural and commercial lending teams, the Company enters new banking market areas. The success of entering these new markets depends upon, in part, the Company’s ability to realize the anticipated benefits and cost savings from combining the businesses of the Company and the acquisition, as well as organically growing loans and deposits. To realize these anticipated benefits and cost savings, the businesses and individuals must be successfully combined and operated. If the Company is not able to achieve these objectives, the anticipated benefits, including growth and cost savings related to the combined businesses, may not be realized at all or may take longer to realize than expected. If the Company fails to realize the anticipated benefits of the acquisitions and the new employee hiring’s, the Company’s results of operations could be adversely affected.

Risk Management and Strategy

Cybersecurity is a critical component of our risk management program, given the increasing reliance on technology and potential of cyber threats. Our Information Security Officer is primarily responsible for the cybersecurity / information security program. The Information Security Officer reports directly to the Chief Operating Officer and periodically reports to the Audit and Examination Committee of our board of directors.

Our objective for managing cybersecurity risk is to avoid or minimize the impacts of external threat events or other efforts to penetrate, disrupt or misuse our systems or information. The structure of our information security program is designed around regulatory guidance and related industry standards. In addition, we leverage various cyber-related associations, threat intelligence feeds, and audits to facilitate and promote program effectiveness. The information security program is periodically reviewed by the Information Security Officer in collaboration with information technology management with the goal of addressing changing threats and conditions.

We employ a layered defensive strategy when designing our cybersecurity controls. We leverage people, processes, and technology as part of our efforts to manage and maintain cybersecurity controls. We employ a variety of preventative and detective tools designed to monitor, block, and provide alerts regarding suspicious activity, as well as to report on suspected threats. We have established processes and systems designed to mitigate cyber risk, including regular and on-going education and training for employees, preparedness simulations, and tabletop exercises. We engage in regular monitoring and assessments of our technology infrastructure using internal staff and third-party specialists. We conduct ongoing social engineering testing and training across our entire employee base. We maintain a vendor management program designed to identify, assess, and manage risks, including cybersecurity risks, associated with external service providers and our supply chain. Our internal audit group, as well as our independent auditors periodically review our processes, systems, and controls, including with respect to our information security program, to assess their design and operating effectiveness and make recommendations to strengthen our risk management program.

We maintain an Incident Response Plan that provides a documented framework for responding to actual or potential cybersecurity incidents, including engagement of appropriate third parties such as insurance providers and incident response professionals, and timely reporting to our CEO and Board of Directors as appropriate. The Incident Response Plan is coordinated by the Information Security Officer and key members of management are embedded into the Plan by its design. The Incident Response Plan facilitates coordination across multiple areas of our organization and is evaluated at least annually.

Notwithstanding our defensive measures and processes, the threat posed by cyber-attacks is always present. Our internal systems, processes, and controls are designed to mitigate loss from cyber-attacks. While we have experienced cybersecurity incidents in the past, risks from cybersecurity threats have not materially affected our company to date. For further discussion of risks from cybersecurity threats, see the section captioned “We are subject to certain risks in connection with our use of technology” in Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Governance

Our Information Security Officer is responsible for managing our information security program, inclusive of cybersecurity risk assessment, incident response, vulnerability assessment, threat intelligence, identity access governance, third-party risk management, and business continuity. Some of these responsibilities are carried out in collaboration with other internal departments, such as the information technology department. In any case, the Information Security Officer provides guidance, oversight, and monitoring of the information security program, and acts in an independent role, reporting directly to the Chief Operating Officer and subsequently to the Audit and Examination Committee of the board of directors. Our Information Security Officer has extensive bank operations experience, has attained Certified Banking Security Manager certification with the banking industry, and attends relevant cybersecurity training sessions on a regular basis. Our information technology department consists of technology professionals with varying degrees of education and experience. Our information technology management team has significant technology and operational experience, including experience in mitigating and responding to cybersecurity threats.

The Audit and Examination Committee of our board of directors is responsible for overseeing our information and cybersecurity risk management program, including management’s actions to identify, assess, mitigate, and remediate or prevent material cybersecurity issues and risks. Our Information Security Officer provides quarterly reports to the Audit and Examination Committee of our board of directors regarding the information security program, cybersecurity and/or privacy incidents, key cybersecurity initiatives, and other matters relating to cybersecurity processes. These reports may occur more frequently if a significant issue or incident is being addressed.

The headquarters of the Company and Bank are located at 15 South Main Street, Mansfield, Pennsylvania. The building contains the central offices of the Company and Bank. The Bank owns twenty-five banking facilities and leases twenty-two other facilities.

The net book value of owned banking facilities and leasehold improvements totaled $16,857,000 as of December 31, 2025. The properties are adequate to meet the needs of the employees and customers. We have equipped all of our facilities with current technological improvements for data processing.

The Company is not involved in any pending legal proceedings other than routine legal proceedings occurring in the ordinary course of business. Such routine legal proceedings in the aggregate are believed by management to be immaterial to the Company’s consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT

We have made forward-looking statements in this document, and in documents that we incorporate by reference, that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements include information concerning possible or assumed future results of operations of the Company, the Bank, First Citizens Insurance, Realty or the Company on a consolidated basis. When we use words such as “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” or similar expressions, we are making forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements may prove inaccurate. For a variety of reasons, actual results could differ materially from those contained in or implied by forward-looking statements:

• Interest rates could change more rapidly or more significantly than we expect or remain inverted for a longer period than anticipated.
• The economy could change significantly in an unexpected way, which would cause the demand for new loans and the ability of borrowers to repay outstanding loans to change in ways that our models do not anticipate.
• The financial markets could suffer a significant disruption, which may have a negative effect on our financial condition and that of our borrowers, and on our ability to raise money by issuing new securities.
• It could take us longer than we anticipate implementing strategic initiatives, including expansions, designed to increase revenues or manage expenses, or we may be unable to implement those initiatives at all.
• Acquisitions and dispositions of assets and companies could affect us in ways that management has not anticipated.
• We may become subject to new legal obligations or the resolution of litigation may have a negative effect on our financial condition or operating results.
• We may become subject to new and unanticipated accounting, tax, regulatory or compliance practices or requirements. Failure to comply with any one or more of these requirements could have an adverse effect on our operations.
• We could experience greater loan delinquencies than anticipated, adversely affecting our earnings and financial condition.
• We could experience greater losses than expected due to the ever-increasing volume of information theft and fraudulent scams impacting our customers and the banking industry.
• We could lose the services of some or all of our key personnel, which would negatively impact our business because of their business development skills, financial expertise, lending experience, technical expertise and market area knowledge.
• The agricultural economy is subject to extreme swings in both the costs of resources and the prices received from the sale of products as a result of weather, government regulations, international trade agreements and consumer tastes, which could negatively impact certain of our customers.
• Loan concentrations in certain industries could negatively impact our results, if financial results or economic conditions deteriorate.
• A budget impasse in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and/or a Federal Government shutdown could impact our asset values, liquidity and profitability as a result of either delayed or reduced funding to school districts and municipalities who are customers of the Bank, as well as individuals who receive state and federal benefits.
• Companies providing support services related to the exploration and drilling of the natural gas reserves in our market area may be affected by federal, state and local laws and regulations such as restrictions on production, permitting, changes in taxes and environmental protection, which could negatively impact our customers and, as a result, negatively impact our loan and deposit volume and loan quality. Additionally, the activities the companies providing support services related to the exploration and drilling of the natural gas reserves may be dependent on the market price of natural gas. As a result, decreases in the market price of natural gas could also negatively impact these companies, our customers.

Additional factors are discussed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K under “Item 1A. Risk Factors.” These risks and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made and the Company does not undertake to update forward-looking statements to reflect circumstances or events that occur after the date of the forward-looking statements or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. Accordingly, past results and trends should not be used by investors to anticipate future results or trends.

INTRODUCTION

The following is management’s discussion and analysis of the significant changes in financial condition, the results of operations, capital resources and liquidity presented in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for the Company. The Company’s consolidated financial condition and results of operations consist almost entirely of the Bank’s financial condition and results of operations. Management’s discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes. Except as noted, tabular information is presented in thousands of dollars.

The Company engages in the general business of banking throughout our service area of Potter, Tioga, Clinton, Lycoming, Bradford and Centre counties in north central Pennsylvania, Lebanon, Berks, Schuylkill, Lancaster and Chester counties in south central Pennsylvania and Allegany County in southern New York. In Delaware, the primary areas are the Cities of Wilmington and Dover and the surrounding area. We also have a limited branch office in Union county, Pennsylvania, which primarily serves agricultural and commercial customers in the central Pennsylvania market. With the HVBC acquisition, we have expanded further into southeast Pennsylvania, including Montgomery, Bucks and Philadelphia Counties as well as Burlington County, New Jersey through the acquisition of five full service branches, four mortgage centers and one business banking facility. We maintain our central office in Mansfield, Pennsylvania. Presently we operate 47 banking facilities, 39 of which operate as bank branches. In Pennsylvania, the Company has full service offices located in Mansfield, Blossburg, Ulysses, Genesee, Wellsboro, Troy, Sayre, Canton, Gillett, Millerton, LeRaysville, Towanda, Rome, the Mansfield Wal-Mart Super Center, Mill Hall, Schuylkill Haven, Friedensburg, Mt. Aetna, Fredericksburg, Mount Joy, Ephrata, Fivepointville, State College, Kennett Square, Warrington, Williamsport, Plumsteadville, Philadelphia, two branches near the city of Lebanon and two branches in Huntington Valley. The Company has limited branch offices located in Winfield, Pennsylvania and Georgetown, Delaware. In New York, our office is in Wellsville. In Delaware, we have three branches in Wilmington and one in Dover. The mortgage centers acquired as part of the acquisition are located in Huntington Valley, PA and Mount Laurel, NJ. The business banking facility is located in Philadelphia, PA. In the fourth quarter of 2023, we opened a branch in Williamsport, Pennsylvania. During 2024, the Montgomeryville, PA mortgage office was closed and the Georgetown office was opened.

Risk identification and management are essential elements for the successful management of the Company. In the normal course of business, the Company is subject to various types of risk, including interest rate, credit, liquidity, reputational and regulatory risk.

Interest rate risk is the sensitivity of net interest income and the market value of financial instruments to the direction and frequency of changes in interest rates. Interest rate risk results from various re-pricing frequencies and the maturity structure of the financial instruments owned by the Company. The Company uses its asset/liability and funds management policies to control and manage interest rate risk.

Credit risk represents the possibility that a customer may not perform in accordance with contractual terms. Credit risk results from loans with customers and the purchasing of securities. The Company’s primary credit risk is in the loan portfolio. The Company manages credit risk by adhering to an established credit policy and through a disciplined evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses. Also, the investment policy limits the amount of credit risk that may be taken in the investment portfolio.

Liquidity risk represents the inability to generate or otherwise obtain funds at reasonable rates to satisfy commitments to borrowers and obligations to depositors. The Company has established guidelines within its asset/liability and funds management policy to manage liquidity risk. These guidelines include, among other things, contingent funding alternatives.

Reputational risk, or the risk to our business, earnings, liquidity, and capital from negative public opinion, could result from our actual or alleged conduct in a variety of areas, including legal and regulatory compliance, lending practices, corporate governance, litigation, ethical issues, or inadequate protection of customer information, which could include identify theft, or theft of customer information through third parties. We expend significant resources to comply with regulatory requirements. Failure to comply could result in reputational harm or significant legal or remedial costs. Damage to our reputation could adversely affect our ability to retain and attract new customers, and adversely impact our earnings and liquidity.

Regulatory risk represents the possibility that a change in law, regulations or regulatory policy may have a material effect on the business of the Company and its subsidiary. We cannot predict what legislation might be enacted or what regulations might be adopted, or if adopted, the effect thereof on our operations.

Readers should carefully review the risk factors described in other documents the Company files with the SEC, including the annual reports on Form 10-K, the quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and any current reports on Form 8-K filed by us.

TRUST AND INVESTMENT SERVICES; OIL AND GAS SERVICES

Our Investment and Trust Division is committed to helping our customers meet their financial goals. The Trust Division offers professional trust administration, investment management services, estate planning and administration, custody of securities and individual retirement accounts. In addition to traditional trust and investment services offered, we assist our customers through various oil and gas specific leasing matters from lease negotiations to establishing a successful approach to personal wealth management. Assets held by the Bank in a fiduciary or agency capacity for its customers are not included in the consolidated financial statements since such items are not assets of the Bank. As of December 31, 2025, and 2024, assets owned and invested by customers of the Bank through the Bank’s investment representatives totaled $317,895,000 and $395,869,000 million, respectively. Additionally, as summarized in the table below, the Trust Department had assets under management as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 of $194,841,000 and $180,710,000, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2025, $3,918,000 of new trust accounts were opened, $8,312,000 of additional contributions to trust accounts were made, $15,622,000 was distributed from trust accounts, and $2,081,000 of accounts were closed. As a result of market fluctuations, the fair value of the trust accounts increased approximately $19,604,000 during the year ended December 31, 2025. The following table reflects trust accounts by investment type and structure:

(market values - in thousands)

Our financial consultants offer full service brokerage and financial planning services throughout the Bank’s market areas. Appointments can be made at any Bank branch. Products such as mutual funds, annuities, health and life insurance are made available through our insurance subsidiary, First Citizens Insurance Agency, Inc.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Net income for the year ended December 31, 2025 was $36,572,000, which represents an increase of $8,754,000, or 31.5%, when compared to 2024 primarily due to an increase in net interest income after the provision for credit losses of $11,758,000. Net income for the year ended December 31, 2024 was $27,818,000, which represents an increase of $10,007,000, or 56.2%, when compared to 2023 due primarily to the absence of one-time costs associated with the HVBC acquisition that were recognized in 2023. Basic earnings per share were $7.62, $5.80 and $3.98 for 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively, while diluted earnings per share were $7.62, $5.79 and $3.98 for 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively.

Net income is influenced by five key components: net interest income, provision for credit losses, non-interest income, non-interest expenses, and the provision for income taxes.

Net Interest Income

The most significant source of revenue is net interest income; the amount by which interest earned on interest-earning assets exceeds interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities. Factors that influence net interest income are changes in volume of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities as well as changes in the associated interest rates.

The following table sets forth the Company’s average balances of, and the interest earned or incurred on, each principal category of assets, liabilities and stockholders’ equity, the related rates, net interest income and rate “spread” created.

Analysis of Average Balances and Interest Rates

(dollars in thousands)

(1) Averages are based on daily averages.

(2) Includes loan origination and commitment fees.

(3) Tax exempt interest revenue is shown on a tax equivalent basis for proper comparison using a statutory federal income tax rate of 21% for 2025, 2024 and 2023.

(4) Income on non-accrual loans is accounted for on a cash basis, and the loan balances are included in interest-earning assets.

(5) Interest rate spread represents the difference between the average rate earned on interest-earning assets and the average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities.

(6) Included dividend income

For purposes of the comparison, as well as the discussion that follows, this presentation facilitates performance comparisons between taxable and tax-free assets by increasing the tax-free income by an amount equivalent to the Federal income taxes that would have been paid if this income were taxable at the Federal statutory rate for the corresponding year. Accordingly, tax equivalent adjustments for investments and loans have been made accordingly to the previous table for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively (in thousands):

The following table shows the tax-equivalent effect of changes in volume and rates on interest income and expense (in thousands):

Analysis of Changes in Net Interest Income on a Tax-Equivalent Basis

(1) The portion of the total change attributable to both volume and rate changes during the year has been allocated to volume and rate components based upon the absolute dollar amount of the change in each component prior to allocation.

2025 vs. 2024

Tax equivalent net interest income for 2025 was $99,109,000 compared to $87,446,000 for 2024, an increase of $11,663,000 or 13.3%. Total interest income increased $4,968,000, as loan interest income increased $1,718,000, and total investment income increased $3,250,000. Interest expense decreased $6,695,000 from 2024.

Total tax equivalent interest income from investment securities increased $3,599,000 in 2025 from 2024. The average balance of investment securities increased $22,647,000, which had an effect of increasing interest income by $574,000 due to volume. During 2025, the Bank made purchases to replace maturing securities, as well as making purchases to increase the size of the investment portfolio for pledging purposes, as well as enhancing yield. The average tax-effected yield on our investment portfolio increased from 2.44% in 2024 to 3.06% in 2025. The increase in the tax-effected yield is attributable to purchases made during 2024 and 2025, which were made in a higher market interest rate environment. As a result of the yield on investment securities increasing 62 basis points (bps) to 3.06%, interest income on investment securities increased $3,025,000, with the increase related to taxable securities. The investment strategy for 2025 used cashflow from the investment portfolio to increase convexity and improve yield as opportunities became available. As the rate cycle continues to progress, the bank will seek investments to improve portfolio yield while monitoring interest rate risk exposure under various rate environments and providing cash flow to meet liquidity needs as they arise. During 2025, the investment purchases made were primarily in mortgage-backed securities that provided the widest spread to treasuries and municipal securities that provided convexity to the Bank’s investment portfolio. The Company believes its investment strategy has appropriately mitigated its interest rate risk exposure for various rate environments, including a rising rate environment, while providing sufficient cashflows to meet liquidity needs.

Loan interest income increased $1,718,000 in 2025 from 2024. The average balance of our loan portfolio increased by $19,425,000 in 2025 compared to 2024, which resulted in an increase in interest income of $829,000 due to volume. The increase in average loans for 2025 was due to an increase in the average balance of outstanding student loans and an increase in agricultural loans. The average tax-effected yield on our loan portfolio was 6.26% for 2025 compared to 6.24% for 2024 resulting in an increase in loan interest income of $889,000.

• Interest income on residential mortgage loans increased $83,000. The average balance of residential mortgage loans decreased $9,979,000 due to loan payments and pay-offs from individuals refinancing loans on the secondary market. This resulted in a decrease of $475,000 due to volume. The change due to rate was an increase of $558,000 as the average yield on residential mortgages increased from 5.83% in 2024 to 6.02% in 2025 as loans originated and added to the portfolio are at higher rates than the average portfolio loan rate as of December 31, 2024.
• The average balance of construction loans decreased $46,794,000 from 2024 to 2025 as a result of projects in our Delaware market and the southeast Pennsylvania market being completed and the related construction loans either transferring to other portfolios or being paid off. This resulted in a decrease of $3,372,000 on total interest income due to volume. The average yield on construction loans decreased from 7.45% to 7.17%, which correlated to a $491,000 decrease in interest income and is due to a decrease in market interest due to the Federal Reserve decreasing the Fed Fund target rate in 2024 and 2025.
• Interest income on commercial loans increased $3,210,000 from 2024 to 2025 due to an increase in the average balance of commercial loans of $54,914,000. The growth was primarily attributable to completed construction projects converting to permanent financing. The increase in the average balance of these loans resulted in an increase in interest income due to volume of $3,494,000. Our lenders have been able to attract and retain loan relationships in their markets by providing excellent customer service and having attractive products. We believe our lenders are adept at customizing and structuring loans to customers that meet their needs and satisfy our commitment to credit quality. In many cases, the Bank works with the Small Business Administration (SBA) guaranteed loan programs to offset credit risk and to further promote economic growth in our market area. The average yield on commercial loans decreased 3 bps to 6.36% in 2025, resulting in a decrease in interest income due to rate of $284,000. The decrease in yield on commercial loans was due to a decrease in market interest due to the Federal Reserve decreasing the Fed Fund target rate in 2024 and 2025.
• Interest income on agricultural loans increased $2,249,000 from 2024 to 2025. The increase in the average balance of agricultural loans of $12,292,000 is primarily attributable to the south-central Pennsylvania market. The increase in the average balance of these loans resulted in an increase in interest income due to volume of $681,000. The average yield on agricultural loans increased from 5.41% in 2024 to 5.85% in 2025 due to the increase in market rates as well as the pay-off of an agricultural relationship that was previously on non-accrual status that paid several loans off during 2025 that generated $781,000 of additional interest income. This resulted in an increase in interest income due to rate of $1,568,000. We believe our lenders are adept at customizing and understanding the needs of individual borrowers, and have the expertise to structure loans for customers that meet their needs and satisfy our commitment to credit quality. In many cases, the Bank works with the United States Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) guaranteed loan programs to offset credit risk and to further promote economic growth in our market area.
• The average balance of other loans increased $12,181,000 as a result of an increase in outstanding student loans. This resulted in an increase of $626,000 on total interest income due to volume. The average tax equivalent yield on other loans decreased from 8.00% in 2024 to 7.18% in 2025, decreasing interest income by $445,000 in other loans. This decline is attributable to the decrease in market rates in 2025 due to the Federal Reserve decreasing the Fed Fund target rate in 2024 and 2025.

Total interest expense decreased $6,695,000 in 2025 compared to 2024. The majority of the decrease was due to a decrease in the average rate paid on interest bearing liabilities of 31 basis points to 2.69%, resulting in interest expense of $6,764,000. The decrease in rates was driven by the Federal Reserve decreasing the Fed Fund target rate in 2024 and 2025. The average rate on money markets decreased from 3.14% to 2.85%, resulting in a decrease in interest expense of $840,000. The average rate paid on savings accounts decreased 5 bps and resulted in a decrease in interest expense of $46,000. The average rate paid on NOW accounts decreased from 2.53% to 2.14% resulting in a decrease in interest expense of $2,820,000. The average rate paid on certificates of deposits decreased from 3.97% to 3.67% resulting in a decrease in interest expense of $1,400,000. The average rate paid on other borrowed funds decreased from 4.80% to 4.33% resulting in a decrease in interest expense of $1,545,000.

Average interest-bearing liabilities increased $10,418,000 million in 2025, with average interest-bearing deposits increasing $7,801,000 million and average other borrowings increasing $2,617,000. While there was an overall increase in average deposits, average NOW accounts and certificates of deposits decreased in total $50,081,000, decreasing interest expense $1,388,000, which offset the increase in interest expense of $1,277,000 from the average balance of money market accounts increasing $55,603,000. The increase in average deposits was due to organic growth across all regions of the Company and helped offset a decrease in average brokered deposits of $51,216,000. We continue to see customers exchange non-interest bearing deposits for interest bearing products that are both non-maturity and term. The average balance of other borrowed funds increased $2,617,000 which corresponds to an increase in interest expense of $126,000.

Our tax equivalent net interest margin for 2025 was 3.50% compared to 3.13% for 2024, with the change attributable to the yield of interest-earning assets increasing and the cost from interest-bearing liabilities decreasing during 2025. The yield on interest-earning assets increased primarily due to investment securities purchased during 2025 replacing investment cashflows from purchases made prior to 2023 in a much lower rate environment. Due to the Federal Reserve decreasing the Fed Fund target rate in late 2024 and in 2025. We experienced a decrease in the cost of interest-bearing deposits and borrowings. Inflation levels remain above the Fed’s target but the committee believes sufficient progress has been made to bring overnight rates down to what they consider the upper band of neutral in response to some weakening in employment. The yield curve has a positive slope but flatter relative to long term averages.

2024 vs. 2023

Tax equivalent net interest income for 2024 was $87,446,000 compared to $81,315,000 for 2023, an increase of $6,131,000 or 7.5%. Total interest income increased $27,135,000, as loan interest income increased $26,594,000, and total investment income increased $541,000. Interest expense increased $21,004,000 from 2023.

Total tax equivalent interest income from investment securities increased $426,000 in 2024 from 2023. The average balance of investment securities decreased $31,182,000, which had an effect of decreasing interest income by $632,000 due to volume. During 2024, the Bank had limited investment activity in the first half of the year and used investment cashflows to fund loan activity, as well as to offset seasonal deposit fluctuations. The average tax-effected yield on our investment portfolio increased from 2.20% in 2023 to 2.44% in 2024. The increase in the tax-effected yield is attributable to purchases made during 2023 and 2024, which were made in a higher market interest rate environment. As a result of the yield on investment securities increasing 24 basis points (bps) to 2.44%, interest income on investment securities increased $1,058,000, with the increase related to taxable securities. The investment strategy for 2024 was similar to 2023 in that cashflows from the investment portfolio were used to repay overnight borrowings as well as fund loan growth. The decrease in the average balance of the investment portfolio was due to investment repayments and maturities. During 2024, the investment purchases made were primarily in mortgage-backed securities that provided the widest spread to treasuries, which were primarily purchased at a discount.

In total, loan interest income increased $26,594,000 in 2024 from 2023. The average balance of our loan portfolio increased by $290,770,000 in 2024 compared to 2023, which resulted in an increase in interest income of $18,538,000 due to volume, primarily due to the HVBC acquisition completed in June 2023 being included in the Company’s results for the entirety of 2024 and an increase in the average balance of student loans. The average tax-effected yield on our loan portfolio was 6.24% for 2024 compared to 5.81% for 2023 resulting in an increase in loan interest income of $8,056,000. The tax-effected yield increased during 2024 due to a rise in market interest rates.

• Interest income on residential mortgage loans increased $4,840,000. The average balance of residential mortgage loans increased $65,321,000 as a result of the HVBC acquisition, resulting in an increase of $3,752,000 due to volume. The change due to rate was an increase of $1,088,000 as the average yield on residential mortgages increased from 5.47% in 2023 to 5.83% in 2023 as a result of the higher rate environment in 2023 and 2024.
• The average balance of construction loans increased $47,399,000 from 2023 to 2024 as a result of projects in our south eastern Pennsylvania market acquired as part of the HVBC acquisition, and the Delaware market, which resulted in an increase of $3,499,000 in interest income. The average yield on construction loans increased from 7.01% to 7.45%, which correlated to a $623,000 increase in interest income.
• Interest income on commercial loans increased $14,744,000 from 2023 to 2024. The increase in the average balance of commercial loans of $164,470,000 is primarily attributable to the HVBC acquisition. The increase in the average balance of these loans resulted in an increase in interest income due to volume of $10,314,000. The average yield on commercial loans increased 39 bps to 6.39% in 2024, resulting in an increase in interest income due to rate of $4,430,000. The increase in yield on commercial loans was a result of the higher rate environment in 2023 and 2024.
• Interest income on agricultural loans increased $1,917,000 from 2023 to 2024. The increase in the average balance of agricultural loans of $7,608,000 is primarily attributable to the south-central Pennsylvania market. The increase in the average balance of these loans resulted in an increase in interest income due to volume of $370,000. The average yield on agricultural loans increased from 4.97% in 2023 to 5.41% in 2024 due to the increase in market rates, resulting in an increase in interest income due to rate of $1,547,000.
• The average balance of other loans increased $9,361,000 million as a result of an increase in outstanding student loans. This resulted in an increase of $737,000 on total interest income due to volume. The average tax equivalent yield on other loans increased from 7.59% in 2023 to 8.00% in 2024, increasing interest income by $320,000 in other loans due to the increase in market rates in 2023 and 2024.

Total interest expense increased $21,004,000 in 2024 compared to 2023. The majority of the increase was due to an increase in the average rate paid on interest bearing liabilities of 66 basis points to 3.00%. This increase resulted in an increase in interest expense of $13,356,000. The increase in rates was driven by the Federal Reserve’s response to inflation during 2022 and 2023 by increasing interest rates, which were not offset by the rate cuts made in the second half of 2024. The average rate on money markets increased from 2.39% to 3.14% resulting in an increase in interest expense of $2,915,000. The average rate paid on savings accounts increased 11 bps and resulted in an increase in interest expense of $308,000. The average rate paid on NOW accounts increased from 2.01% to 2.53% resulting in an increase in interest expense of $3,747,000. The average rate paid on certificates of deposits increased from 2.52% to 3.97% resulting in an increase in interest expense of $5,970,000. The average rate paid on other borrowed funds increased from 4.64% to 4.80% resulting in an increase in interest expense of $528,000.

Average interest-bearing liabilities increased $260,614,000 in 2024, with average interest-bearing deposits increasing $263,782,000 and average other borrowings decreasing $3,168,000. As a result of the increase in average deposits, interest expense increased $7,599,000 as a result of the change in volume. Increases in average deposits, which were primarily driven by the HVBC acquisition, included NOW accounts of $90,184,000 and money market accounts of $33,557,000. Certificates of deposits increased $153,309,000 due to the acquisition, an increase in brokered CD’s and conversion of non-maturity deposits to term products. During 2024, a new business interest bearing checking account was created that had an average balance $8,756,000. The average balance of other borrowed funds decreased $3,168,000 due to the maturity of several borrowings, which corresponds to a decrease in interest expense of $151,000.

Our tax equivalent net interest margin for 2024 was 3.13% compared to 3.21% for 2023, with the change attributable to the yield of interest-earning assets increasing less than the cost from interest-bearing liabilities during 2024. Interest rates continued to increase during the first half of 2024 due to the increases in market interest rates and competitive pressure for deposits. With inflation decreasing, the Federal Reserve did start decreasing rates, but rates still remained high in relation to previous years. During 2024, inflation remained above the Federal Reserve’s targets, but had decreased enough that allowed the Federal Reserve to lower rates, but not to the extent the market had forecast at the beginning of 2024. The yield curve remained inverted for the majority of 2024, but some positive slope did return to the curve during the 4th quarter of 2024 due to a decrease in short term rates as well as an increase in long term interest rates.

PROVISION FOR CREDIT LOSSES

For the year ended December 31, 2025, we recorded a provision for credit losses of $2,375,000, which represents a decrease of $212,000 from the $2,587,000 provision recorded in 2024. The provision for 2025 was driven by the current economic forecasts and specific reserves for non-accrual loans at December 31, 2025. The provision for 2024 was driven by other commercial loans that were originated by HVBC that subsequent to the acquisition deteriorated and were charged-off during 2024. The provision in 2024 was also impacted by an increase in past due and non-accrual loans, the vast majority of which were acquired as part of the HVBC acquisition, and an increase in classified loans. (see also “Financial Condition – Allowance for Credit Losses - Loans and Credit Quality Risk”).

For the year ended December 31, 2024, we recorded a provision for credit losses of $2,587,000, which represents a decrease of $2,941,000 from the $5,528,000 provision recorded in 2023. The provision for 2023 includes $4,591,000 associated with the HVBC acquisition and $162,000 as a provision for off-balance sheet items, which is also primarily attributable to the HVBC acquisition. Excluding these items, the provision for 2024 is $1,650,000 more than 2023 and is due to other commercial loans that were originated by HVBC that subsequent to the acquisition have deteriorated and were charged-off during 2024. The provision in 2024 is also higher due to an increase in past due and non-accrual loans, the vast majority of which were acquired as part of the HVBC acquisition, and an increase in classified loans. (see also “Financial Condition – Allowance for Credit Losses - Loans and Credit Quality Risk”).

NON-INTEREST INCOME

The following table reflects non-interest income by major category for the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

29

Index

2025 vs. 2024

Non-interest income decreased $1,057,000 in 2025 from 2024, or (6.9%). There were no sales of available for sale securities during 2025 or 2024. During 2025, net equity security gains amounted to $67,000 as a result of market conditions experienced in 2025 compared to gains of $145,000 in 2024.

Gains on loans sold decreased $26,000 compared to 2024. The decrease in gains on loans sold is attributable to a slight decrease in the amount of loans of $1,417,000, or (1.0%). The decrease in earnings on bank owned life insurance is due to death proceeds from the passing of former employees in 2024. During the first quarter of 2024, the Company completed the sale of certain assets acquired as part of the HVBC acquisition, which included loans and accrued interest, software, as well as transferring certain contracts, processes and employees of a division internally known as Braavo. The proceeds from the sale totaled approximately $7.2 million and generated a pre-tax gain of approximately $1.1 million. The increase in other income is due to derivative income earned by offering customers a product similar to a back to back swap.

2024 vs. 2023

Non-interest income increased $3,796,000 in 2024 from 2023, or 32.7%. There were no sales of available for securities during 2024. During 2023, we experienced a $51,000 net loss on available for sale securities. During 2023, we sold $10.0 million of municipal securities for a pre-tax loss of $51,000. Additionally, $76.5 million of securities obtained as part of the HVBC acquisition were sold for no gain or loss during the second quarter of 2023. During 2024, net equity security gains amounted to $145,000 as a result of market conditions experienced in 2024 compared to losses of $144,000 in 2023.

Gains on loans sold increased $864,000 compared to 2023. The increase in gains on loans sold is attributable to the HVBC acquisition and its residential lending model, which focused on originating and selling residential mortgage loans, which includes the use of interest rate locks and other derivative activities, which is included in other income and accounts for the majority of the change in other income of $441,000. The increase in earnings on bank owned life insurance is due to the HVBC acquisition as well as death proceeds from the passing of former employees in 2024 exceeding those received in 2023. During the first quarter of 2024, the Company completed the sale of certain assets acquired as part of the HVBC acquisition, which included loans and accrued interest, software, as well as transferring certain contracts, processes and employees of a division internally known as Braavo.

Non-interest Expenses

The following tables reflect the breakdown of non-interest expense by major category for the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

2025 vs. 2024

Non-interest expenses for 2025 totaled $64,732,000, which represents a decrease of $654,000 compared to 2024 expenses of $65,386,000. Salary and benefit costs increased $55,000, or 0.1%, due to due to additional healthcare expenses and post-employment benefits. There were 12 fewer full-time equivalent employees FTEs in 2025 compared to 2024.

The decrease in professional fees and software costs is due to the sale of the Braavo division in 2024. The decrease in FDIC insurance expense is due to an increase in the Bank’s leverage ratio experienced during 2025. Pennsylvania shares tax decreased due to an increase in tax credits obtained through charitable contributions that are included in other expenses. Occupancy expenses increased due to an increase in depreciation associated with the Company’s decision to relocate its branch in the City of Williamsport that is expected to occur in the first half of 2026 that shortened the useful life of the current location. The increase in furniture and fixture expense is due to depreciation associated with purchases made in 2025 and 2024.

2024 vs. 2023

Non-interest expenses for 2024 totaled $65,386,000, which represents an increase of 624,000, compared to 2023 expenses of $64,762,000. Salary and benefit costs increased $4,357,000, or 12.5%, due to an additional 34.3 full-time equivalent employees (FTE) as a result of the HVBC acquisition, merit increases for 2024, as well as an increase in health insurance costs due to additional headcount and claims.

The increases in occupancy, furniture and fixtures, software expenses and amortization expenses was due to the HVBC acquisition and additional branches acquired as part of it. FDIC insurance expense increased $521,000 due to the Company’s increased size and the Bank’s lower leverage capital ratio during the first half of 2024 compared to 2023. Professional fees increased due to increased legal expenses, of which $201,000 was related to the sale of certain Braavo assets. Pennsylvania shares tax increased due to the increased size of the Bank. Other expenses increased primarily due to the acquisition, with increases experienced in subscriptions, marketing and advertising, postage, printing, data communication expenses and FHLB letter of credit fees. Independent of the HVBC acquisition, other expenses increased due to insurance reimbursements received in 2023 to cover amounts previously charged-off through expense. Merger and acquisition costs for the HVBC acquisition totaled $9,269,000 in 2023 and included professional and consulting fees, printing, travel, contract termination payments and severance-related expenses.

Provision for Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes was $8,666,000, $6,065,000 and $3,764,000 for 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The effective tax rates for 2025, 2024 and 2023 were 19.2%, 17.9% and 17.5%, respectively.

The increase in income tax expense of $2,601,000 in 2025 compared to 2024 was due to the increase of $11,405,000 in income before the provision for income taxes, which accounts for an increase in tax expense of $2,395,000 at a 21% tax rate.

The increase in income tax expense of $2,301,000 in 2024 compared to 2023 was due to the increase of $12,168,000 in income before the provision for income taxes, which accounts for an increase in tax expense of $2,555,000 at a 21% tax rate.

We are involved in seven limited partnership agreements that operate low-income housing projects in our market areas. During 2025 and 2024 we recognized credits on three of the seven projects, while in 2023 we recognized credits related to two projects. Tax credits associated with four of the partnerships were fully utilized by December 2022. We started recognizing credits on two of the partnerships during 2023 and on one partnership in 2024. We anticipate recognizing an aggregate of $6.9 million of tax credits over the next eleven years.

FINANCIAL CONDITION

The following table presents ending balances (dollars in millions), the dollar amount of change and the percentage change during the past year:

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents totaled $34,291,000 at December 31, 2025 compared to $42,202,000 at December 31, 2024. The decrease is due to a decrease in the cash held at the Federal Reserve. Management actively measures and evaluates the Company’s liquidity through our Asset – Liability Committee and believes its liquidity needs are satisfied by the current balance of cash and cash equivalents, readily available access to traditional funding sources, Federal Home Loan Bank financing, federal funds lines with correspondent banks, brokered certificates of deposit and the portion of the investment and loan portfolios that mature within one year. Management expects that these sources of funds will permit us to meet cash obligations and off-balance sheet commitments as they come due.

Investments

The following table shows the year-end composition of the investment portfolio, at fair value, for the two years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

The Company’s investment portfolio increased during 2025 by $18,897,000. This increase was fueled by $82,406,000 of purchases made during 2025, which offset the maturities and calls that took place in 2025. During 2025, $58,301,000, $23,105,000 and $1,000,000 of mortgage backed securities, obligations of political subdivisions and corporate securities were purchased, respectively. The purchases in 2025 were offset by $25,346,000 of principal repayments and $53,460,000 of calls and maturities. The fair value of our investment portfolio increased approximately $15,847,000 in 2025 due to decreases in market interest rates during 2025. Excluding our short-term investments consisting of monies held primarily at the Federal Reserve, the effective yield on our investment portfolio for 2025 was 3.06% compared to 2.44% for 2024 on a tax equivalent basis.

In related to activity by the Federal Reserve, there were similarities between 2024 and 2025 in that there was elevated volatility and, after a long pause, the Fed cut rates the last few months of each year. A new Presidential administration introduced tariffs as a negotiation strategy which caused big market swings in the first half of the year. As the year progressed the Fed became comfortable with the effect of tariffs and the two mandates of full employment and stable prices were sufficiently in balance to permit them to lower rates to the top end of what the FOMC considered a neutral rate. This also provided a measure of cushion in response to a weakening employment market. At the end of the year, officials became increasingly divided with each move, leading to another call for a pause after the December rate decision. The record-long government shutdown distorted and delayed many key economic reports officials use to assess the economy’s trajectory. After 175 bps of easing over the cycle, policy was back within a range of neutral estimates. Importantly, economic growth remained resilient, inflation remained above target, and a run of data fostered a quippy catch phrase of low-hiring, low-firing labor conditions. These rate cuts allowed the yield curve to steepen with the 2-year to 10-year US Treasury spread increasing from 30bps at the start of the year to 69bps at the end of the year. Even so, the very short end of the yield curve remained inverted. The Bank’s investment strategy used cashflow from the investment portfolio to increase convexity and improve yield as opportunities became available. As the rate cycle continues to progress, the Bank will seek investments to improve portfolio yield while monitoring interest rate risk exposure under various rate environments and providing cash flow to meet liquidity needs as they arise.

At December 31, 2025, the Company did not own any securities, other than government-sponsored and government-guaranteed mortgage-backed securities, that had an aggregate book value in excess of 10% of its consolidated stockholders’ equity at that date.

The expected principal repayments at amortized cost and average weighted yields for the investment portfolio (excluding equity securities) as of December 31, 2025, are shown below (dollars in thousands). Expected principal repayments, which include prepayment speed assumptions for mortgage-backed securities, are significantly different than the contractual maturities detailed in Note 4 of the consolidated financial statements. Yields on tax-exempt securities are presented on a fully taxable equivalent basis, assuming a 21% tax rate, which was the rate in effect at December 31, 2025.

33

At December 31, 2025, approximately 68.3% of the amortized cost of debt securities is expected to mature, call or pre-pay within five years or less. The Company expects that earnings from operations, the levels of cash held at the Federal Reserve and other correspondent banks, the high liquidity level of the available-for-sale securities, growth of deposits and the availability of borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank and other third-party banks will be sufficient to meet future liquidity needs.

Loans Held for Sale

Loans held for sale decreased $214,000 to $9,393,000 as of December 31, 2025 from December 31, 2024. The rate environment for 2025 continued to place pressure on refinancing activity as well as new home purchases.

Loans

The Bank’s lending efforts have historically focused on the north central Pennsylvania counties of Tioga, Bradford and Potter, south central Pennsylvania counties of Lebanon, Schuylkill, Berks and Lancaster and Allegheny, Steuben and Tioga counties of southern New York. We have a limited branch office in Union County that is staffed by a lending team to primarily support agricultural opportunities, and offices in State College, Mill Hall and Williamsport to support commercial opportunities in central Pennsylvania, especially Centre, Clinton and Lycoming Counties. The Williamsport branch was opened in 2023. The MidCoast acquisition expanded our markets into the State of Delaware with activity centered around the cities of Wilmington and Dover, Delaware, which was further supported by branch openings in Kennett Square, Pennsylvania and Greenville, Delaware. During 2024, the Bank opened a limited production office in Georgetown, Delaware, to primarily support agricultural customers in the Delaware market. In June 2023, we completed the HVBC acquisition, which expanded our markets into south east Pennsylvania, including the counties of Montgomery, Bucks and Philadelphia. It also includes a Mortgage production office in Mount Laurel, New Jersey.

We originate loans primarily to our existing customer base, with new customers generated through the strong relationships that our lending teams have with their customers, as well as by referrals from real estate brokers, building contractors, attorneys, accountants, corporate and advisory board members, existing customers and the Bank’s website. The Bank offers a variety of loans, although historically most of our lending has focused on real estate loans including residential, commercial, agricultural, and construction loans. As of December 31, 2025, approximately 85.1% of our loan portfolio consisted of real estate loans. All lending is governed by a lending policy that is developed and administered by management and approved by the Board of Directors.

The Bank primarily offers fixed rate residential mortgage loans with terms of up to 25 years and adjustable rate mortgage loans (with amortization schedules up to 30 years) with interest rates and payments that adjust based on one, three, five and fifteen year fixed periods. Loan to value ratios are usually 80% or less with exceptions for individuals with excellent credit and low debt to income and/or high net worth. Adjustable rate mortgages are tied to a margin above the comparable Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh borrowing rate. Home equity loans are written with terms of up to 15 years at fixed rates. Home equity lines of credit are variable rate loans tied to the Prime Rate generally with a ten year draw period followed by a ten year repayment period. Home equity loans are typically written with a maximum 80% loan to value.

Commercial real estate loan terms are generally 20 years or less, with one to five year adjustable interest rates. The adjustable rates are typically tied to a margin above the comparable Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh borrowing rate with a typical loan to value ratio of 80% or less. During 2025, 2024 and 2023, the Bank offered certain customers derivative contracts that allowed the customer to obtain a fixed interest rate for a period up to 10 years. Where feasible, the Bank participates in the United States Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) and Small Business Administration (“SBA”) guaranteed loan programs to offset credit risk and to further promote economic growth in our market area.

Agriculture is an important industry throughout our market areas. Therefore, the Bank has not only developed an agriculture lending team with significant experience that has a thorough understanding of this industry, but also continually looks for additional employees with a thorough understanding of agriculture. We have an agricultural loan policy to assist in underwriting agricultural loans. Agricultural loans are made to a diversified customer base that include dairy, swine and poultry farmers and their support businesses. Agricultural loans focus on character, cash flow and collateral, while also considering the particular risks of the industry. Loan terms are generally 20 years or less, with one to five year adjustable interest rates. The adjustable rates are typically tied to a margin above the comparable Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh borrowing rate with a typical loan to value of less than 80%. We evaluate the financial strength of the integrators we have exposure to with our poultry and swine agricultural customers. The Bank is a preferred lender under the USDA’s Farm Service Agency (FSA) and participates in the FSA guaranteed loan program.

The Bank believes that a secondary education can provide individuals with upward mobility. As such, the Bank has partnered with industry leaders to provide individuals with private student loans that can undergraduate, graduate and parent loans that can cover up to the cost of attendance of college or university. In addition, prior student loans can also be refinanced. Our partners assist in ensuring that the application, approval and servicing processes are best in class. Loans are offered with either fixed or variable rates and terms typically range from five to fifteen years, but depending on the program can be up to twenty years. Payments options include deferral until after graduation, interest only while enrolled in school, a flat payment and full principal and interest.

The Bank, as part of its commitment to the communities it serves, is an active lender for projects by our local municipalities and school districts. These loans range from short term bridge financing to 20 year term loans for specific projects. These loans are typically written at rates that adjust at least every five years. Due to the size of certain municipal loans, we have developed participation lending relationships with other community banks that allow us to meet regulatory compliance issues, while meeting the needs of the customer. At December 31, 2025, the aggregate balance of our participation loans, in which a portion was sold to other lenders totaled $334,913,000, of which $149,344,000 was sold.

Activity associated with exploration for natural gas continued in 2024 in the Company’s north central Pennsylvania market. Certain entities drilled new wells and created new pad sites and pipelines, while other companies only maintained their existing wells. While the Bank has loaned to companies that service the exploration activities, the Bank has not originated any loans to companies performing the actual drilling and exploration activities. Loans made by the Company were to service industry customers which included trucking companies, stone quarries and other support businesses. We also originated loans to businesses and individuals for restaurants, hotels and apartment rentals that were developed and expanded to meet the housing and living needs of the gas workers. Due to our understanding of the industry and its cyclical nature, the loans made for natural gas-related activities were originated in a prudent and cautious manner and were subject to specific policies and procedures for lending to these entities, which included lower loan to value thresholds, shortened amortization periods, and expansion of our monitoring of loan concentrations associated with this activity.

The following table shows the year-end composition of the loan portfolio as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 (dollars in thousands):

Total loans grew $37,380,0000 in 2025 and total $2,350,622,000 at the end of 2025. The primary driver of growth during 2025 was increases in real estate lending and other commercial loans.

Residential real estate loans decreased $10,426,000 primarily due to the interest rate environment that lessened demand. During 2025, $153,519,000 of residential real estate loans were originated for sale on the secondary market, which compares to $155,379,000 for 2024. For loans sold on the secondary market, the Company recognizes fee income for servicing these sold loans, which is included in non-interest income. During 2025, the Bank originated and added to its residential real estate portfolio $13,909,000 of loans.

The following table presents the maturity distribution of our loan portfolio as of December 31, 2025 (in thousands). The table does not include any estimate of prepayments which significantly shorten the average life of all loans and may cause our actual repayment experience to differ from that shown below. Demand loans having no stated schedule of repayments and no stated maturity are reported as due in one year or less.

The following table presents the portion of loans that have fixed interest rates or variable interest rates that fluctuate over the life of loans in accordance with changes in the interest rate index that mature after December 31, 2026 (in thousands).

The federal banking regulators have issued guidance for those institutions which are deemed to have concentrations in commercial real estate lending. Pursuant to the supervisory criteria contained in the guidance for identifying institutions with a potential commercial real estate concentration risk, institutions which have (1) total reported loans for construction, land development and other land acquisitions which represent 100% or more of an institution’s total risk-based capital; or (2) total commercial real estate loans representing 300% or more of the institution’s total risk-based capital and the institution’s commercial real estate loan portfolio has increased 50% or more during the prior 36 months are identified as having potential commercial real estate concentration risk. Institutions which are deemed to have concentrations in commercial real estate lending are expected to employ heightened levels of risk management with respect to their commercial real estate portfolios and may be required to hold higher levels of capital. The Company, like many community banks, has a concentration in commercial real estate loans, and the Company has experienced growth in its commercial real estate portfolio in recent years. As of December 31, 2025, non-owner-occupied commercial real estate loans (including construction, land and land development loans) represented 287.0% of consolidated risk based capital. Construction, land and land development loans represented 30.5% of consolidated risk based capital as of December 31, 2025. Management has extensive experience in commercial real estate lending and has implemented and continues to maintain heightened risk management procedures and strong underwriting criteria with respect to its commercial real estate portfolio. We may be required to maintain higher levels of capital as a result of our commercial real estate concentrations, which could require us to obtain additional capital and may adversely affect shareholder returns. The Company has an extensive Capital Policy and Capital Plan, which includes pro-forma projections including stress testing within which the Board of Directors has established internal minimum targets for regulatory capital ratios that are in excess of well capitalized ratios. Due to the concentration in commercial real estate loans, the Company has implemented enhanced monitoring and risk assessment procedures with respect to this portfolio. As of December 31, 2025, management believes that it has implemented appropriate risk management practices, including risk assessments, board-approved underwriting policies and related procedures, which include monitoring loan portfolio performance and stressing of the commercial real estate portfolio under adverse economic conditions.

Given the significance of commercial real estate (“CRE”) loans to our total loan portfolio, the following table further disaggregates these loans by occupied status and by collateral type as of December 31, 2025 (dollars in thousands):

37

The following table provides a breakdown of our construction portfolio by collateral type as of December 31, 2025 (dollars in thousands):

The Company obtains an appraisal of the real estate collateral securing a CRE loan prior to originating the loan. The appraised value is used to calculate the ratio of the outstanding loan balance to the value of the real estate collateral, or loan-to-value ratio (“LTV”). The original appraisal is used to monitor the LTVs within the CRE portfolio unless an updated appraisal is received, which may happen for a variety of reasons, including but not limited to payment delinquency, additional loan requests using the same collateral, and loan modifications. The following table presents the ranges in the LTVs of our CRE loans at December 31, 2025 and 2024 (dollars in thousands):

Allowance for Credit Losses – Loans and Credit Quality Risk

The allowance for credit losses – loans is maintained at a level which, in management’s judgment, is adequate to absorb probable future credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The provision for credit losses is charged against current income. Loans deemed not collectable are charged-off against the allowance while subsequent recoveries increase the allowance. The allowance for credit losses - loans was $22,806,000 or 0.97% of total loans as of December 31, 2025 as compared to $21,699,000 or 0.94% of loans as of December 31, 2024. The $1,107,000 increase is a result of a $1,888,000 provision for credit losses – loans, less net charge-offs of $781,000. Net charge-offs for 2025 are driven by loans acquired as part of the HVBC acquisition due to collateral issues and the acquired medical student loan portfolio from HVBC.

The adequacy of the allowance for credit losses – loans is subject to a formal, quarterly analysis by management of the Company. In order to better analyze the risks associated with the loan portfolio, the entire portfolio is divided into several categories. As stated above, commercial loans on non-accrual status are specifically reviewed and given a specific reserve, if appropriate. Historical credit loss experience provides the basis for the estimation of expected credit losses. Adjustments to historical loss information are made for differences in current loan-specific risk characteristics such as differences in underwriting standards, changes in environmental conditions, delinquency level, segment growth rates and changes in duration within new markets, or other relevant factors. For further information on the allowance for credit losses on loans, Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” and Note 5, “Loans,” in the consolidated financial statements provides additional disclosure on the allowance for credit losses. The Company adopted ASC 326 effective January 1, 2023. Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” in the consolidated financial statements provides additional disclosure on the adoption of ASC 326.

The following table shows the distribution of the allowance for credit losses - loans and the percentage of loans compared to total loans by loan category (dollars in thousands) as of December 31:

The following tables presents the activity in the allowance for credit losses – loans, by portfolio segment, for 2025, 2024 and 2023 (in thousands).

39

Index

The following table provides information related to credit loss experience and net (charge-offs) recoveries for 2025, 2024 and 2023 (dollars in thousands).

40

Index

The Company believes it utilizes a disciplined and thorough loan review process based upon its internal loan policy approved by the Company’s Board of Directors. The purpose of the review is to assess loan quality, analyze delinquencies, identify problem loans, evaluate potential charge-offs and recoveries, and assess general overall economic conditions in the markets served. An external independent loan review is performed on our commercial portfolio at least semi-annually for the Company. The external consultant is engaged to review 1) a minimum of 50% of the dollar volume of the commercial loan portfolio on an annual basis, 2) a large sample of relationships in aggregate over $1,000,000, 3) selected loan relationships over $750,000 which are over 30 days past due, or classified Special Mention, Substandard, Doubtful, or Loss, and 4) such other loans which management or the consultant deems appropriate. As part of this review, our underwriting process and loan grading system is evaluated.

Management believes it uses the best information available to make such determinations and the allowance for credit losses – loans is adequate as of December 31, 2025. However, future adjustments could be required if circumstances differ substantially from assumptions and estimates used in making the initial determination. A prolonged downturn in the economy, changes in the economies of various segments of our agricultural and commercial portfolios, high unemployment rates, significant changes in the value of collateral and delays in receiving financial information from borrowers could result in increased levels of non-performing assets, charge-offs, credit loss provisions and reduction in income. Additionally, bank regulatory agencies periodically examine the Bank’s allowance for credit losses - loans. The banking agencies could require the recognition of additions to the allowance for credit losses based upon their judgment of information available to them at the time of their examination.

On a monthly basis, problem loans are identified and updated primarily using internally prepared past due reports. Based on data surrounding the collection process of each identified loan, the loan may be added or deleted from the monthly watch list. The watch list includes loans graded special mention, substandard, doubtful, and loss, as well as additional loans that management may choose to include. Watch list loans are continually monitored going forward until satisfactory conditions exist that allow management to upgrade and remove the loan from the watchlist. In certain cases, loans may be placed on non-accrual status or charged-off based upon management’s evaluation of the borrower’s ability to pay. All commercial loans, which include commercial real estate, agricultural real estate, state and political subdivision loans, other commercial loans and other agricultural loans on non-accrual are evaluated quarterly for impairment.

See also “Note 5 – Loans and Related Allowance for Credit Losses - Loans” to the consolidated financial statements.

As a result of previous loss experiences and other risk factors utilized in determining the allowance, the Bank’s allocation of the allowance does not directly correspond to the actual balances of the loan portfolio. While commercial and agricultural real estate loans total 66.6% of the loan portfolio at December 31 2025, 64.7% of the allowance is assigned to these portions of the loan portfolio. Residential real estate loans comprise 14.5% of the loan portfolio as of December 31, 2025 and 13.7% of the allowance is assigned to this segment. Other commercial loans comprise 7.6% of the loan portfolio as of December 31, 2025 and 11.6% of the allowance is assigned to this segment.

The following table is a summary of our non-performing assets for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 (in thousands).

The following table identifies amounts of loans contractually past due 30 to 90 days and non-performing loans by loan category, as well as the change from December 31, 2024 to December 31, 2025 in non-performing loans (in thousands). Non-performing loans include those accruing loans that are contractually past due 90 days or more and non-accrual loans. Interest does not accrue on non-accrual loans. Subsequent cash payments received are applied to the outstanding principal balance or recorded as interest income, depending upon management’s assessment of its ultimate ability to collect principal and interest.

Nonperforming loans increased $854,000 during 2025. During 2025, several large relationships were placed on non-accrual status, including one construction loan relationship, a commercial relationship that includes a commercial real estate loan and an other commercial loan and finally a commercial real estate relationship. Two commercial relationships and two agricultural relationships were returned to accrual status during 2025 and three loans that were on non-accrual status as of December 31, 2024 paid off during 2025. All non-performing commercial, agricultural and construction loans are reviewed on an individual basis to determine the need for a specific reserve at quarter ends. In addition, non-performing residential loans with a balance in excess of $150,000 are individually evaluated. The specific reserves for these non-performing loans as of December 31, 2025 was $1,039,000 compared to specific reserves for non-performing loans as of December 31, 2024 of $888,529. In addition, the Bank’s policy is to reserve 100% of all non-performing student loans. The reserve for these loans was $770,000 and $1,002,000 as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

Management believes that the allowance for credit losses - loans December 31, 2025 was adequate at that date, which was based on the following factors:

• Specific reserves for non-performing loans total $1,808,000.
• The Company has a history of low charge-offs, which were 0.03% of average loans on an annualized basis for 2025 and 0.11% for 2024, which included the charge-offs related to the Braavo loans.

Bank Owned Life Insurance

The Company holds bank owned life insurance policies to offset current and future employee benefit costs. These policies provide the Bank with an asset that generates earnings to partially offset the current costs of benefits, and eventually (at the death of the insureds) provide partial recovery of cash outflows associated with the benefits. As of December 31, 2025, and 2024, the cash surrender value of the life insurance was $51,501,000 and $50,341,000, respectively. The change in cash surrender value, net of purchases and amounts acquired through acquisitions, is recognized in the results of operations. The amounts recorded as non-interest income totaled $1,433,000, $1,684,000 and $1,254,000 in 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The decrease in 2025 compared to 2024 is due to death proceeds received in 2024 upon the passing of a former employee. The increase in 2024 compared to 2023 is due to the HVBC acquisition being outstanding for the entire year versus a partial year in 2023. The Company evaluates annually the risks associated with the life insurance policies, including limits on the amount of coverage and an evaluation of the various carriers’ credit ratings.

Effective January 1, 2015, the Company restructured its agreements so that any death benefits received from a policy while the insured person is an active employee of the Bank will be split with the beneficiary of the policy. Under the restructured agreements, the employee’s beneficiary will be entitled to receive 50% of the net amount at risk from the proceeds. The policies acquired as part of the acquisition of MidCoast are only for the benefit of the Bank. The net amount at risk is the total death benefit payable less the cash surrender value of the policy as of the date of death. The policies acquired as part of an acquisition in 2015, provide a fixed dollar benefit for the beneficiary’s’ estate, which is dependent on several factors including whether the covered individual was a Director of the acquired company or an employee of the acquired company and their salary level. As of December 31, 2025, and 2024, included in other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance sheet is a liability of $529,000 and $514,000, respectively, for the obligation under the split-dollar benefit agreements.

Fair Value of Derivative Instruments - asset

The Company holds derivative instruments to hedge interest rate risk, to offer customers longer term fixed rate loans through a program similar to a back to back swap, which results in both a derivative asset and liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, and through the residential lending platform through interest rate locks. (See Note 18 for additional information). As of December 31, 2025, and 2024, the fair value for the derivative instrument assets was $6,927,000 and $10,370,000, respectively. The change in the fair value of financial instruments was due to the changes in market interest rates during 2025, the time to maturity of the various instruments and the maturity or early termination of certain instruments. The effective portion of changes in the fair value of the cash flow interest rate hedge derivative is initially reported in other comprehensive income (outside of earnings), net of tax, and subsequently reclassified to earnings when the hedged transaction affects earnings, and the ineffective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative is recognized directly in earnings.

Deferred Tax Asset

Deferred tax assets are computed based on the difference between the financial statement basis and income tax basis of assets and liabilities using the enacted marginal tax rates. Deferred income tax expenses or benefits are based on the changes in the net deferred tax asset or liability from period to period. (See Note 12 for additional information) As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the balance for deferred tax assets was $11,440,000 and $15,199,000, respectively. The change was due to the change in the market value of the Bank’s available-for-sale investment portfolio, the amortization of various credit and interest rate marks associated with acquisitions and the usage of net operating losses acquired from acquisitions.

Other Assets

Other assets decreased $1,486,000 in 2025 to $53,145,000 from $54,631,000 in 2024. The decrease was driven by a decrease in other receivables of $2,871,000 due to timing of payments associated with a participation loan and a participating bank and a decrease in tax receivable of $2,098,000. Regulatory stock increased $2,221,000 and there was a $634,000 increase in the right to use asset.

Deposits

The following table shows the breakdown of deposits by deposit type (dollars in thousands) at December 31:

2025

Total deposits decreased $5,049,000 in 2025, or 0.2%. While less in 2025 than 2024, competitive pressure for deposits continues to be at the forefront. Additionally, we have numerous state and political organization depositors with seasonal funding timelines. During 2025, brokered certificates of deposit decreased $33,055,000 to $60,000,000. Additionally, a school district in our southeastern Pennsylvania market saw a decrease in their balance of $58,946,000 due to the lack of state budget for parts of 2025. We continue to work on enhancing our cash management services to improve our customer services. As a percentage of total deposits, non-interest-bearing deposits totaled 21.7% as of the end of 2025, which compares to 22.4% at the end of 2024. The rates paid on certificates of deposit by the Company remain competitive with rates paid by our competition.

2024

Total deposits increased $60,547,000 in 2024, or 2.6%. With the rise in market interest rates, competitive pressure for deposits increased during 2024. During 2024, brokered certificates of deposit decreased $16.2 million to $93.1 million. As a percentage of total deposits, non-interest-bearing deposits totaled 22.4% as of the end of 2024, which compares to 22.6% at the end of 2023.

Remaining maturities of certificates of deposit in excess of FDIC insurance limits are as follows for December 31, 2025 (dollars in thousands):

Uninsured deposits as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 are estimated based on regulatory reporting requirements to be $1,124,675,000 and $1,160,581,000, respectively. Included in this balance as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 are balances held through Intrafi, which provides customers with FDIC insurance coverage by placing customer funds with insured banks within the Intrafi network, as well as deposits collateralized by securities (almost exclusively municipal deposits), which together total $646,677,000, or 27.2%, and $638,624,000, or 26.8% of the Bank’s total deposits, respectively. As a result, deposits in excess of $250,000 that are unsecured total $477,998,000, or 20.1% and $521,957,00, or 21.9% of deposits as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

Deposits by type of depositor are as follows (dollars in thousands) at December 31:

Borrowed Funds

Borrowed funds increased $11,727,000 during 2025. Short term borrowings from the FHLB increased $65,339,000 and totaled $263,483,000 as of December 31, 2025 compared to $198,144,000 as of December 31, 2024. Long term borrowings from the FHLB decreased $41,350,000 and were all paid-off as of December 31, 2025. The Company has a line of credit with an unaffiliated bank for $15.0 million, which is unused as of December, 31, 2025. Management continually monitors interest rates in order to minimize interest rate risk in future years and as part of this may extend some of the short-term borrowings via term notes. The Bank has four interest rate swap agreements outstanding to convert floating-rate debt to fixed rate debt on notional amounts of $10.0 million and three agreements with individual notional amounts of $6.0 million. The $10.0 million agreements were originated on April 1, 2020 and expire on April 1, 2025 and April 1, 2027, respectively. The three $6.0 million agreements originated on May 14, 2020 had a two year forward start date and expire on May 14, 2027, 2029 and 2032. During 2025, one swap agreement for $15.0 million matured. The Company has an interest rate swap agreement outstanding that was entered into on April 13, 2020 to convert floating-rate debt to fixed rate debt on a notional amount of $7.5 million. The interest rate swap agreement expires on June 17, 2027. The interest rate swap instruments involve an agreement to receive a floating rate and pay a fixed rate, at specified intervals, calculated on the agreed-upon notional amounts. The differentials paid or received on interest rate swap agreements are recognized as adjustments to interest expense in the period in which they arise. The fair value of the interest rate swaps at December 31, 2025 was $2,487,000 and is included within fair value of derivative instruments – asset on the consolidated balance sheets.

Fair Value of Derivative Instruments – liability

The Company holds derivative instruments to hedge interest rate risk and to offer customers longer term fixed rate loans through a program similar to a back to back swap, which results in both a derivative asset and liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheet and through the residential lending platform through interest rate locks. (See Note 18 for additional information). As of December 31, 2025, and 2024, the fair value for the derivatives instrument liabilities was $4,100,000 and $5,817,000, respectively. The change in the fair value of financial instruments was due to changes in market interest rates during 2025, the time to maturity of the various instruments and the maturity or early termination of certain instruments. The effective portion of changes in the fair value of the cash flow interest hate hedge derivative is initially reported in other comprehensive income (outside of earnings), net of tax, and subsequently reclassified to earnings when the hedged transaction affects earnings, and the ineffective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative is recognized directly in earnings.

Other Liabilities

Other liabilities decreased $2,875,000 to $32,856,000 during 2025. The primary driver was a decrease of $4,459,000 due to payments made in 2025 to the low-income housing projects in which the Bank is a partner. Other liabilities increased $682,000 due to an increase in the liability associated with right of use assets due to leases entered into during 2025.

Stockholders’ Equity

We evaluate stockholders’ equity in relation to total assets and the risk associated with those assets. The greater our capital resources, the greater the likelihood of meeting our cash obligations and absorbing unforeseen losses. For these reasons, capital adequacy has been, and will continue to be, of paramount importance. Due to its importance, we develop a capital plan and stress test capital levels using various techniques and assumptions annually to ensure that in the event of unforeseen circumstances, we would remain in compliance with our capital plan approved by the Board of Directors and regulatory requirement levels.

Our Board of Directors determines our cash dividend rate after considering our capital requirements, current and projected net income, and other factors. In 2025 and 2024, the Company paid out 26.11% and 33.44% of net income in cash dividends, respectively. The decrease in the payout percentage was due to the increase in net income in 2025 due to the expansion of the net interest margin.

As of December 31, 2025, the total number of common shares outstanding was 4,807,080. For comparative purposes, outstanding shares for prior periods were adjusted for the June 2025 stock dividend in computing earnings and cash dividends per share as detailed in Note 1 of the consolidated financial statements. As part of the Company’s employee stock purchase plan, the Company issued 1,157 shares at a cost of $68,000. During 2025, we purchased 6,151 shares of treasury stock at a weighted average cost of $58.09 per share. The Company awarded 4,431 shares of restricted stock to employees at a weighted average cost per share of $57.28 under an equity incentive plan. The Board of Directors was awarded 3,674 shares at a cost of $58.71 per share.

Stockholders’ equity increased 12.8% in 2025 to $338,051,000. Excluding accumulated other comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity increased $27,173,000, or 8.4%. Net income for 2025 was $36,572,000, offset by net cash dividends of $9,548,000 and net treasury stock activity of ($36,000). All of the Company’s debt investment securities are classified as available-for-sale, making this portion of the Company’s balance sheet more sensitive to the changing market value of investments. Accumulated other comprehensive loss decreased $11,144,000 from December 31, 2024, primarily as a result of the increase in the fair market value of the investment portfolio. Total stockholders’ equity was approximately 11.0% of total assets as of December 31, 2025, compared to 9.9% of total assets as of December 31, 2024.

LIQUIDITY

Liquidity is a measure of the Company’s ability to efficiently meet normal cash flow requirements of both borrowers and depositors. Liquidity is needed to meet depositors’ withdrawal demands, extend credit to meet borrowers’ needs, provide funds for normal operating expenses and cash dividends, and fund future capital expenditures.

To maintain proper liquidity, we use funds management policies along with our investment and asset liability policies to assure we can meet our financial obligations to depositors, credit customers and stockholders. Management monitors liquidity by reviewing loan demand, investment opportunities, deposit pricing and the cost and availability of borrowing funds. Additionally, the bank has established various limits and ratios to monitor liquidity. On a quarterly basis, we stress test our liquidity position to ensure that the Bank has the capability of meeting its cash flow requirements in the event of unforeseen circumstances. The Company’s historical activity in this area can be seen in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows from investing and financing activities.

Cash generated by operating activities, investing activities and financing activities influences liquidity management. The most important source of funds is the deposits that are primarily core deposits (deposits from customers with other relationships). Short-term debt from the Federal Home Loan Bank supplements the Company’s availability of funds as well as a line of credit arrangement with a corresponding bank. Other sources of short-term funds include brokered CDs and the sale of loans, if needed.

The Company’s use of funds is shown in the investing activity section of the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows, where the net loan activity is detailed. Other significant uses of funds are capital expenditures, purchase of loans and acquisition premiums. Surplus funds are then invested in investment securities.

Capital expenditures, including software purchases in 2025 totaled $1,296,000, which included:

• ATM upgrades totaling $463,000
• Computers, servers and copier purchases of $162,000
• Dover branch remodel totaling $321,000

Capital expenditures, including software purchases in 2024 totaled $1,314,000, which included:

• ATM upgrades totaling $935,000
• Computers, servers and copier purchases of $245,000

We expect these expenditures will support our initiatives and will create operating efficiencies, while providing quality customer service.

In addition to the Bank’s cash balances, the Bank achieves additional liquidity primarily from its investment in the FHLB of Pittsburgh and the resulting borrowing capacity obtained through this investment, investments that mature in less than one year and expected principal repayments from mortgage backed securities. The Bank has a maximum borrowing capacity at the Federal Home Loan Bank of approximately $1,115,189,000, inclusive of any outstanding amounts, as a source of liquidity. The Bank also has two unsecured federal funds lines with third party providers in the total amount of $34.0 million as of December 31, 2025, which are unsecured and a borrower in custody agreement was established with the FRB in the amount of $11,798,000, which is collateralized by $21,827,000 of municipal loans, which is unused at December 31, 2025. The Company has a $15.0 million line of credit with a New York community bank, which is unused as of December 31, 2025.

The Company is a separate legal entity from the Bank and must provide for its own liquidity. In addition to its operating expenses, the Company is responsible for paying any dividends declared to its shareholders. The Company also has repurchased shares of its common stock. The Company’s primary source of income is dividends received from the Bank. The Bank may not declare a dividend without approval from the FRB, unless the dividend to be declared by the Bank’s Board of Directors does not exceed the total of: (i) the Bank’s net profits for the current year to date, plus (ii) its retained net profits for the preceding two current years, less any required transfers to surplus. In addition, the Bank can only pay dividends to the extent that its retained net profits (including the portion transferred to surplus) exceed its bad debts. The FRB, the OCC, the PDB and the FDIC have formal and informal policies which provide that insured banks and bank holding companies should generally pay dividends only out of current operating earnings, with some exceptions. The Prompt Corrective Action Rules, described above, further limit the ability of banks to pay dividends, because banks which are not classified as well capitalized or adequately capitalized may not pay dividends and no dividend may be paid which would make the Bank undercapitalized after the dividend. At December 31, 2025, the Company (unconsolidated basis) had liquid assets of $4,586,000.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

The Company has various financial obligations, including contractual obligations which may require cash payments. The following table (in thousands) presents as of December 31, 2025, significant fixed and determinable contractual obligations to third parties by payment date. Further discussion of the obligations can be found in Notes 9, 10, 13 and 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

In the normal course of operations, we engage in a variety of financial transactions that, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, are not recorded in our financial statements. These transactions involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit, interest rate and liquidity risk. Such transactions are used primarily to manage customers’ requests for funding and take the form of loan commitments, unused lines of credit and letters of credit. For information about our loan commitments, unused lines of credit and letters of credit, see Note 17 of the notes to consolidated financial statements.

For the year ended December 31, 2025, we did not engage in any off-balance sheet transactions reasonably likely to have a material effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

INTEREST RATE AND MARKET RISK MANAGEMENT

The objective of interest rate sensitivity management is to maintain an appropriate balance between the stable growth of income and the risks associated with maximizing income through interest sensitivity imbalances and the market value risk of assets and liabilities.

Because of the nature of our operations, we are not subject to foreign currency exchange or commodity price risk and, since the Company has no trading portfolio, it is not subject to trading risk.

At December 31, 2025, the Company had equity securities that represent only 0.06% of our total assets, and therefore market risk related to equity securities is not significant.

The primary factors that make assets interest-sensitive include adjustable-rate features on loans and investments, loan repayments, investment maturities and money market investments. The primary components of interest-sensitive liabilities include maturing certificates of deposit, IRA certificates of deposit, repurchase agreements and short-term borrowings. Savings deposits, NOW accounts and money market investor accounts, with the exception of top interest tier money market and NOW accounts, are considered core deposits and are not short-term interest sensitive and therefore are included in the table below in the over five year column. Top interest tier money market and NOW accounts are included in the table below in the within three month column. Borrowings subject to swap arrangements are included in the table below based on the swap arrangement maturity.

The following table shows the cumulative static gap (at amortized cost) for various time intervals (dollars in thousands):

Maturity or Re-pricing of Company Assets and Liabilities as of December 31, 2025

(1) Cumulative interest-earning assets divided by interest-bearing liabilities.

The previous table and the simulation models discussed below are presented assuming money market investment accounts and NOW accounts in the top interest rate tier are re-priced within the first three months. The loan amounts reflect the principal balances expected to be re-priced as a result of contractual amortization and anticipated early payoffs.

Gap analysis, one of the methods used by us to analyze interest rate risk, does not necessarily show the precise impact of specific interest rate movements on the Bank’s net interest income because the re-pricing of certain assets and liabilities is discretionary and is subject to competition and other pressures. In addition, assets and liabilities within the same period may, in fact, be repaid at different times and at different rate levels. We have not experienced the kind of earnings volatility that might be indicated from gap analysis.

The Bank currently uses a computer simulation model to better measure the impact of interest rate changes on net interest income. We use the model as part of our risk management and asset liability management processes that we believe will effectively identify, measure, and monitor the Bank’s risk exposure. In this analysis, the Bank examines the results of movements in interest rates with additional assumptions made concerning the timing of interest rate changes, prepayment speeds on mortgage loans and mortgage securities and deposit pricing movements. Shock scenarios, which assume a parallel shift in interest rates and is instantaneous, typically have the greatest impact on net interest income. The following is a rate shock analysis and the impact on net interest income as of December 31, 2025 (dollars in thousands):

The model makes estimates, at each level of interest rate change, regarding cash flows from principal repayments on loans and mortgage backed securities, call activity of other investment securities, and deposit selection, re-pricing and maturity structure. Because of these assumptions, actual results could differ significantly from these estimates which would result in significant differences in the calculated projected change on net interest income. Additionally, the changes above do not necessarily represent the level of change under which management would undertake specific measures to realign its portfolio in order to reduce the projected level of change. The projections above utilize a static balance sheet and do not include any changes that may result from the growth of the Bank. Management has developed policy limits for acceptable changes in net interest income for multiple scenarios, including shock scenarios. As of December 31, 2025, changes in net interest income projected for all scenarios, including the shock scenarios noted above, are in line with Bank policy limits for interest rate risk.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES; CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

The Company’s accounting policies are integral to understanding the results reported. The accounting policies are described in detail in Note 1 of the consolidated financial statements. Our most complex accounting policies require management’s judgment to ascertain the valuation of assets, liabilities, commitments and contingencies. We have established detailed policies and control procedures that are intended to ensure valuation methods are well controlled and applied consistently from period to period. In addition, the policies and procedures are intended to ensure that the process for changing methodologies occurs in an appropriate manner. The following is a brief description of our current accounting policies involving significant management valuation judgments and critical accounting estimates.

Allowance for Credit Losses

The Company’s allowance for credit losses is a critical accounting policy that requires the most significant judgments and estimates used in preparation of its consolidated financial statements. In determining the appropriate estimate for the allowance for credit losses, management considers a number of factors relative to both individually evaluated credits in the loan portfolio and macroeconomic factors relative to the economy of the U.S. as a whole and the economies of the areas in which the Company does business.

Management performs a quarterly evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses. Management considers a variety of factors in establishing this estimate. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates by management that may be susceptible to significant change based on changes in economic and real estate market conditions.

The evaluation is comprised of specific and pooled components. The specific component is the Company’s evaluation of credit loss on individually evaluated loans based on the fair value of the collateral less estimated selling costs if collateral dependent or based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s initial effective interest rate if not collateral dependent. The majority of the Company’s loans subject to individual evaluation are considered collateral dependent. All other loans are evaluated collectively for credit loss by pooling loans based on similar risk characteristics.

As a significant percentage of the Company’s loan portfolio is collateralized by real estate, appraisals of the underlying value of property securing loans are critical in determining the charge-offs for specific loans. Assumptions are instrumental in determining the value of properties. Overly optimistic assumptions or negative changes to assumptions could significantly affect the valuation of a property securing a loan and the related allowance determined. Management carefully reviews the assumptions supporting such appraisals to determine that the resulting values reasonably reflect amounts realizable on the related loans.

The pooled component of the evaluation is determined by applying reasonable and supportable economic forecasts and historical averages to the remaining loans segmented by similar risk characteristics. The key assumptions used in projecting future loss rates include the economic forecast, the forecast and reversion to mean time periods, and prepayment and curtailment assumptions. The assumptions are used to calculate and aggregate estimated cash flows for the time period that remains in each loan’s contractual life. The cash flows are discounted back to the balance sheet date using each loan’s effective yield, to arrive at a present value of future cash flows, which is compared to the amortized cost basis of the loan pool to determine the amount of allowance for credit loss required by the calculation.

One of the most significant judgments used in projecting loss rates when estimating the allowance for credit losses is the macro-economic forecasts provided by a third party. The economic indices sourced from the macro-economic forecast and used in projecting loss rates are national unemployment rate, national gross domestic product and changes in home values. The economic index used in the calculation to which the calculation is most sensitive is the national unemployment rate and gross domestic product. Changes in the macro-economic forecast, especially for the national unemployment rate and gross domestic product, could significantly impact the calculated estimated credit losses between reporting periods.

Other key assumptions in the calculation of the allowance for credit losses include the forecast and reversion to mean time periods and prepayment and curtailment assumptions. The macro-economic forecast is applied for a reasonable and supportable time period before reverting to long-term historical averages for each economic index. The forecast and reversion to mean time period used for each economic index at December 31, 2025 were four quarters and eight quarters, respectively. Prepayment and curtailment assumptions are based on the Company’s historical experience over the trailing 12 months and are adjusted by management as deemed necessary. The prepayment and curtailment assumptions vary based on segment.

The quantitative estimated losses are supplemented by more qualitative factors that impact potential losses. Qualitative factors include changes in underwriting standards, changes in environmental conditions, delinquency level, segment growth rates and changes in duration within new markets, or other relevant factors. The allowance for credit loss may be materially affected by these qualitative factors, especially during periods of economic uncertainty, for items not reflected in the lifetime credit loss calculation, but which are deemed appropriate by management’s current assessment of the risks related to the loan portfolio and/or external factors. The qualitative factors applied at December 31, 2025, and the importance and levels of the qualitative factors applied, may change in future periods depending on the level of changes to items such as the uncertainty of economic conditions and management’s assessment of the level of credit risk within the loan portfolio as a result of such changes, compared to the amount of allowance for credit loss calculated by the model. The evaluation of qualitative factors is inherently imprecise and requires significant management judgment.

While management utilizes its best judgment and information available, the adequacy of the allowance for credit loss is determined by certain factors outside of the Company’s control, such as the performance of the Company’s portfolios, changes in the economic environment including economic uncertainty, changes in interest rates, and the view of the regulatory authorities toward classification of assets and the level of allowance for credit losses. Additionally, the level of allowance for credit losses may fluctuate based on the balance and mix of the loan portfolio. If actual results differ significantly from management’s assumptions, the Company’s allowance for credit loss may not be sufficient to cover inherent losses in the Company’s loan portfolio, resulting in additions to the Company’s allowance for credit losses and an increase in the provision for credit losses.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

As discussed in Note 1 of the consolidated financial statements, the Company performs an evaluation of goodwill for impairment on an annual basis, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. The Company performed a quantitative assessment in 2025 to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value. Based on the fair value of the reporting unit, no impairment of goodwill was recognized in 2025, 2024 or 2023.

Business Combinations

Business combinations are accounted for by applying the acquisition method. As of the acquisition date, the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed are measured at fair value and recognized separately from goodwill. Results of operations of the acquired entities are included in the consolidated statement of income from the date of acquisition. The calculation of intangible assets including core deposits and the fair value of loans are based on significant judgements. Core deposits intangibles are calculated using a discounted cash flow model based on various factors including discount rate, attrition rate, interest rate, cost of alternative funds and net maintenance costs.

Loans acquired in connection with acquisitions are recorded at their acquisition-date fair value. Determining the fair value of the acquired loans involves estimating the principal and interest cash flows expected to be collected on the loans and discounting those cash flows at a market rate of interest. Management considers a number of factors in evaluating the acquisition-date fair value including the remaining life of the acquired loans, delinquency status, estimated prepayments, payment options and other loan features, internal risk grade, estimated value of the underlying collateral and interest rate environment.

This information is included under Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Interest Rate and Market Risk Management”, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

As of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, an evaluation was carried out by our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report. No changes were made to our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) during the last fiscal quarter that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

MANAGEMENT’S ANNUAL REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

A material weakness is a significant deficiency (as defined in Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Auditing Standard No. 5), or a combination of significant deficiencies, that results in there being more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by management or employees in the normal course by management or employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions.

Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025. Management’s assessment did not identify any material weaknesses in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in the 2013 Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Because there were no material weaknesses discovered, management believes that, as of December 31, 2025, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective.

The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm that audited the consolidated financial statements has issued an audit report on the effective operation of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025, and this report is included in this Item under the heading “Attestation Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.”

/s/ Randall E. Black

By: Randall E. Black

Chief Executive Officer and President

(Principal Executive Officer)

Date: March 12, 2026

/s/ Stephen J. Guillaume

By: Stephen J. Guillaume

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial & Accounting Officer)

Date: March 12, 2026

Attestation Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of Citizens Financial Services, Inc.

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited Citizens Financial Services, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”)’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013. In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2025 and 2024; and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2025, of the Company; and our report dated March 12, 2026, expressed an unqualified opinion.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent, with respect to the Company, in accordance with U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/S.R. Snodgrass, P.C.

Cranberry Township, Pennsylvania

March 12, 2026