XTI Aerospace, Inc.: Form 10-Q for the period ended Jun 30, 2017

You should read the following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q and with our audited consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the SEC. In addition to our historical condensed consolidated financial information, the following discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates, and beliefs. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to these differences include those discussed below and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q, particularly in Part II, Item 1A, “Risk Factors.”

Overview of our Business

We provide a number of different technology products and services to private and public sector customers. Effective January 1, 2017 the Company has changed the way it analyzes and assesses divisional performance of the Company. The Company has therefore re-aligned its operating segments along those division business lines and now operates in two segments, namely Indoor Positioning Analytics and Infrastructure. Our premier proprietary product secures, digitizes and optimizes the interior of any premises with indoor positioning and data analytics that provide rich positional information, similar to a global positioning system, and browser-like intelligence for the indoors. Other products and services that we provide include enterprise computing and storage, virtualization, business continuity, data migration, custom application development, networking and information technology, and business consulting services.

Indoor Positioning Analytics Segment

Our Indoor Positioning Analytics segment is expected to grow in 2017; however, sales cycles proved to be longer than we expected in 2016. The long sales cycles result from customer related issues such as budget and procurement processes but also because of the early stages of indoor-positioning technology and the learning curve required for customers to implement such solutions. Customers also engage in a pilot program first which prolongs sales cycles and is typical of most emerging technology adoption curves. We anticipate sales cycles to improve in 2017 and more so in 2018 as our customer base moves from innovators to mainstream customer adoption. The sales cycle is also improving with the increased presence and awareness of beacon and wi-fi locationing technologies in the market. IPA segment sales can be licensed-based with government customers but are primarily Software-as-a-Service (“SaaS”) model with commercial customers. Our other SaaS products include cloud-based applications for media customers, which allow us to generate industry analytics that complement our indoor-positioning solutions.

Infrastructure Segment

Our storage and computing component of our Infrastructure segment revenues are typically driven by purchase orders that are received on a monthly basis. Approximately 38% of Company revenues are from these purchase orders which are recurring contracts that range from one to five years for warranty and maintenance support. For these contracts the customer is invoiced one time and pays Inpixon upfront for the full term of the warranty and maintenance contract. Revenue from these contracts is determinable ratably over the contract period with the unearned revenue recorded as deferred revenue and amortized over the contract period. We have a 30-year history and a high repeat customer rate of approximately 55% annually. Our revenues are diversified over hundreds of customers and typically no one customer exceeds 15% of revenues however from time to time a large order from a customer could put it temporarily above 15%. During the six months ended June 30, 2017, there were no customers that generated sales of 15% or more of total revenues. Management believes this diversification provides stability to our revenue streams.

Our professional services group provides consulting services ranging from enterprise architecture design to custom application development to data modeling. We offer a full scope of information technology development and implementation services with expertise in a broad range of IT practices including project design and management, systems integration, outsourcing, independent validation and verification, cyber security and more.

Inpixon has many key vendor, technology, wholesale distribution and strategic partner relationships. These relationships are critical for us to deliver solutions to our customers. We have a variety of vendors and also products that we provide to our customers, and most of these products are purchased through the distribution partners. We also have joint venture partnerships and teaming agreements with various technology and service providers for this segment as well as our other business segments. These relationships range from joint-selling activities to product integration efforts.

In addition our business is required to meet certain regulatory requirements. Our federal government customers in particular have a range of regulatory requirements including ITAR certifications, DCAA compliancy in our government contracts and other technical or security clearance requirements as may be required from time to time.

We experienced a net loss of approximately $12.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017. We cannot assure that we will ever earn revenues sufficient to support our operations, or that we will ever be profitable. In order to continue our operations, we have supplemented the revenues we earned with proceeds from the sale of our equity and debt securities and proceeds from loans and bank credit lines. Furthermore, except as discussed in this report, we have no committed source of financing and we cannot assure that we will be able to raise money as and when we need it to continue our operations. If we cannot raise funds as and when we need them, we may be required to scale back our business operations by reducing expenditures for employees, consultants, business development and marketing efforts, selling assets or one or more segments of our business, or otherwise severely curtailing our operations.

Recent Events

Hillair Share Issuance

On April 19, 2017, Inpixon entered into an exchange agreement (the “Exchange Agreement”) with Hillair Capital Investments L.P. in connection with an interest payment due on May 9, 2017 pursuant to the Company’s 8% Original Issue Discount Senior Secured Convertible Debenture in the principal amount of $5,700,000. In accordance with the Exchange Agreement, solely in respect of the interest payment in the amount of $343,267 due on May 9, 2017, the parties agreed that $315,700 of such interest payment will be made in in the form of 110,000 shares of the Company’s common stock issued at an interest conversion rate equal to $2.87 per share. The shares were issued on April 20, 2017.

Capital Raise

On June 30, 2017, the Company completed the previously announced registered underwritten public offering (the “Offering”) of an aggregate of (i) 1,849,460 Class A Units (the “Class A Units”), with each Class A Unit consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant to purchase one share of common stock at an exercise price of $1.3125 per share (“Exercise Price”) and (ii) 4,060 Class B Units (the “Class B Units”), with each Class B Unit consisting of one share of Series 2 Preferred Stock and one warrant to purchase the number of shares of common stock equal to the number of shares of common stock underlying the Series 2 Preferred Stock at the Exercise Price. The warrants issued in the offering contained a price protection provision pursuant to which the Exercise Price would be reduced in the event the Company issued additional securities at a price per share that was less than the Exercise Price, provided however, the adjustment would not be less than $0.50. The net proceeds to the Company from the transactions, after deducting the placement agent’s fees and expenses but before paying the Company’s estimated offering expenses, and excluding the proceeds, if any, from the exercise of the warrants was approximately $5,711,850. Immediately after completion of the Offering, the Company redeemed outstanding indebtedness in the amount of approximately $5,512,000.

In connection with the Offering, the Company entered into that certain waiver and consent agreement, dated June 28, 2017, (the “Waiver and Consent Agreement”) with those purchasers (the “December 2016 Purchasers”) signatory to that certain securities purchase agreement, dated as of December 12, 2016 (the “December 2016 SPA”). Pursuant to the terms of the Waiver and Consent Agreement, the December 2016 Purchasers agreed to waive (the “Waiver”) the variable rate transaction prohibition contained in the December 2016 SPA, which, if not waived, prohibits the adjustment to the exercise price set forth in the Warrants. In consideration of the Waiver, the warrants held by the December 2016 Purchasers issued in accordance with the December 2016 SPA (the “December 2016 Warrants”) were amended to equal the Exercise Price of the warrants issued in the Offering and to provide for an adjustment to the Exercise Price to the extent shares of Common Stock are issued or sold for a consideration per share that is less than the exercise price then in effect; provided, that the exercise price will not be less than $0.50 per share.

Agreement with Warrant Holders

On August 9, 2017, the Company entered into a warrant exercise agreement (the “Warrant Exercise Agreement”) with certain participants in the Offering (collectively, the “Warrant Holders” and each, a “Warrant Holder”) pursuant to which the Warrant Holders agreed to exercise, for up to an aggregate of 1,095,719 shares of common stock, the warrants (the “Warrants”) issued pursuant to that certain warrant agency agreement, dated as of June 30, 2017 (the “Warrant Agency Agreement”), by and between the Company and Corporate Stock Transfer, as warrant agent (the “Warrant Agent”), provided that the Company will agree to:

(a) amend the Warrant Agency Agreement to reduce the exercise price of the Warrants from $1.325 per share to $0.30 per share in accordance with the terms and conditions of Amendment No. 1 to the Warrant Agency Agreement, dated August 9, 2017 between the Company and the Warrant Agent (“Warrant Agreement Amendment”), with the consent of Aegis Capital Corp. and the registered holders of a majority of the outstanding Warrants; and

(b) issue additional warrants to the Warrant Holders, for the number of shares of common stock that will be equal to the number of exercised shares purchased by such Warrant Holder (the “Additional Warrant Shares”), at an exercise price of $0.55 per share (the “Additional Warrant”) for warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 1,095,719 shares of common stock.

The Warrant Holders agreed to exercise up to 1,095,719 shares of common stock underlying the Warrants (the “Exercised Shares”) for aggregate gross proceeds of $328,715.70 from the exercise of the Warrants which will be used for general working capital purposes, including the payment of outstanding debt and trade payables in the ordinary course of the Company’s business and prior practices. The Warrants and Exercised Shares were registered on the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed by the Company (333-218173) and declared effective on June 28, 2017.

In connection with the exercise of the Warrants, the Company issued a 5-year warrant to each Warrant Holder for the number of shares of common stock equal to the number of exercised shares purchased by such Warrant Holder (the “Warrant Shares”), at an exercise price of $0.55 per share. We incorporate by reference the information included at Item 1.01 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 9, 2017 Waiver and Consent from Hillair Capital Investments L.P.

As a result of the transactions consummated by the Warrant Exercise Agreement, the Exercise P rice of the December 2016 Warrants was adjusted to $0.50.

On August 9, 2017, the Company and Hillair Capital Investments L.P. entered into a waiver and consent agreement (the “Hillair Waiver”) pursuant to which Hillair waived the prohibition on issuing any securities at an effective per share price that is less than $7.05 contained in the securities purchase agreement pursuant to which that certain 8% Original Issue Discount Senior Convertible Debenture was issued to Hillair and consented to the transactions contemplated by the Warrant Exercise Agreement and the Warrant Agreement Amendment. We incorporate by reference the information included at Item 3.02 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 9, 2017.

Payplant Accounts Receivable Bank Line

Pursuant to the terms of a Commercial Loan Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 14, 2017, Gemcap Lending I, LLC (“Gemcap”) sold and assigned to Payplant LLC, as agent for Payplant Alternatives Fund LLC, all of its right, title and interest to that certain revolving Secured Promissory Note in an aggregate principal amount of up to $10,000,000 issued in accordance with that certain Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of November 14, 2016 by and among Gemcap and the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Inpixon USA and Inpixon Federal, Inc. for an aggregate purchase price of $1,402,770.16. In connection with the purchase and assignment, the GemCap loan was amended and restated in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Payplant Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of August 14, 2017, between the Company and Payplant (the “Loan Agreement”) The Loan Agreement allows the Company to request loans from Payplant with a term of no greater than 360 days in amounts that are equivalent to 80% of the face value of purchase orders received. In connection with the assignment, the Company entered into the Payplant Client Agreement (the “Client Agreement”), pursuant to which the Company will offer to Payplant for purchase those receivables payable to the Company in connection with the purchase orders under which advances have been made pursuant to the Loan Agreement for the purposes of paying off any notes issued pursuant to the Loan Agreement. Under the Client Agreement, the Company cannot raise additional financings, without Payplant’s approval, which will not be unreasonably withheld by Payplant unless it is an equity financing or a convertible equity financing, where the Company can force conversion, while Payplant’s advances are outstanding. In accordance with the terms of the Loan Agreement, Inpixon Federal, Inc. issued a promissory note to Payplant with a term of 30 days in an aggregate principal amount of $995,472.61 in connection with a purchase order received. The promissory note is subject to the interest rates described in the Loan Agreement and is secured by the assets of the Company pursuant to the Loan Agreement and will be satisfied in accordance with the terms of the Client Agreement.

Exchange Right Agreement with Hillair Capital Investments L.P.

On August 14, 2017, the Company entered into an exchange right agreement (the “ Exchange Agreement” ) with Hillair Capital Investments L.P. (“ Hillair” ), pursuant to which the Company granted Hillair the right to exchange 1,850 of the Company’ s Series 2 Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Preferred Shares”) for up to an aggregate of 5,606,061 shares (the “Exchange Shares” ) of the Company’ s common stock. Pursuant to the Exchange Agreement, for so long as the Preferred Shares remain outstanding, each outstanding Preferred Share may be exchanged for the number of Exchange Shares equal to the quotient obtained by dividing $1,000 by $0.33. The exchange of the Preferred Shares will not be effected if, after giving effect to the exchange Hillair, together with its affiliates, would beneficially own in excess of 4.99% of the number of shares of the Company’s common stock outstanding immediately after giving effect to the issuance of the Exchange Shares. Upon not less than 61 days’ prior notice to the Company, Hillair may increase or decrease the ownership limitation, provided that the ownership limitation in no event exceeds 9.99% of the number of shares of the Company’s common stock outstanding immediately after giving effect to the issuance of the Exchange Shares.

Loan and Security Agreement

Pursuant to the terms of a Commercial Loan Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 14, 2017 (the “Purchase Agreement”), Gemcap Lending I, LLC (“GemCap”) sold and assigned to Payplant LLC, as agent for Payplant Alternatives Fund LLC (“Payplant” or “Lender”), all of its right, title and interest to that certain revolving Secured Promissory Note in an aggregate principal amount of up to $10,000,000 (the “GemCap Note”) issued in accordance with that certain Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of November 14, 2016 (the “GemCap Loan”), by and among Gemcap and Inpixon (“INPX”) and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Inpixon USA (“INPXUSA”) and Inpixon Federal, Inc. (“INPXF,” and together with INPX and INPXUSA, the “Company”) for an aggregate purchase price of $1,402,770.16.

In connection with the purchase and assignment of the Gemcap Loan in accordance with the Purchase Agreement, the GemCap Loan was amended and restated in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Amended and Restated GemCap Loan and Security Agreement: Payplant Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of August 14, 2017, between the Company and Payplant (the “Loan Agreement”). The Loan Agreement allows the Company to request loans (each a “Loan” and collectively the “Loans”) from the Lender (in the manner provided therein) with a term of no greater than 360 days in amounts that are equivalent to 80% of the face value of purchase orders received (“Aggregate Loan Amount”). The Lender is not obligated to make the requested loan, however, if the Lender agrees to make the requested loan, before the loan is made, the Company must provide Lender with (i) one or more promissory notes (“Notes”) for the amount being loaned in favor of Lender, (ii) one or more guaranties executed in favor of Lender and (iii) other documents and evidence of the completion of such other matters as Lender may request. The principal amount of each Loan shall accrue interest at a 30 day rate of 2% (the “Interest Rate”), calculated per day on the basis of a year of 360 days and, when combined with all fees that may be characterized as interest will not exceed the maximum rate allowed by law Upon the occurrence and during the continuance of any event of default, interest shall accrue at a rate equal to the Interest Rate plus 0.42% per 30 days. All computations of interest shall be made on the basis of a year of 360 days.

JOBS Act

Pursuant to Section 107 of the JOBS Act, emerging growth companies may delay adopting new or revised accounting standards until such time as those standards apply to private companies. We have irrevocably elected to opt out of this exemption from new or revised accounting standards and, therefore, are subject to the same new or revised accounting standards as other public companies that are not emerging growth companies.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, or GAAP. In connection with the preparation of our consolidated financial statements, we are required to make assumptions and estimates about future events, and apply judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, expenses and the related disclosures. We base our assumptions, estimates and judgments on historical experience, current trends and other factors that management believes to be relevant at the time our consolidated financial statements are prepared. On a regular basis, we review the accounting policies, assumptions, estimates and judgments to ensure that our consolidated financial statements are presented fairly and in accordance with GAAP. However, because future events and their effects cannot be determined with certainty, actual results could differ from our assumptions and estimates, and such differences could be material.

Our significant accounting policies are discussed in Note 3 of the condensed consolidated financial statements. We believe that the following accounting estimates are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating our reported financial results, and they require our most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, resulting from the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. There have been no changes to estimates during the periods presented in the filing. Historically, changes in management estimates have not been material.

Revenue Recognition

We provide IT solutions and services to customers with revenues currently derived primarily from the sale of third-party hardware and software products, software, assurance, licenses and other consulting services, including maintenance services. The products and services we sell, and the manner in which they are bundled, are technologically complex and the characterization of these products and services requires judgment in order to apply revenue recognition policies. For all of these revenue sources, we determine whether we are the principal or the agent in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification Topic, 605-45 Principal Agent Considerations.

We allocate the total arrangement consideration to the deliverables based on an estimated selling price of our products and services and report revenues containing multiple deliverable arrangements under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 605-25 “Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables” (“ASC-605-25”). These multiple deliverable arrangements primarily consist of the following deliverables: third-party computer hardware, third-party software, hardware and software maintenance (a.k.a. support), and third-party services. We determine the estimated selling price using cost plus a reasonable margin for each deliverable, which was based on our established policies and procedures for providing customers with quotes, as well as historical gross margins for our products and services. From time to time our personnel are contracted to perform installation and services for the customer. In situations where we bundle all or a portion of the separate elements, Vendor Specific Objective Evidence (“VSOE”) is determined based on prices when sold separately. Our revenue recognition policies vary based upon these revenue sources and the mischaracterization of these products and services could result in misapplication of revenue recognition polices.

We recognize revenue when the following criteria are met: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) shipment (software or hardware) or fulfillment (maintenance) has occurred and applicable services have been rendered; (3) the sales price is fixed or determinable; and (4) collectability is reasonably assured. Generally, these criteria are met upon shipment to customers with respect to the sales of hardware and software products. With respect to our maintenance and other service agreements, this criteria is met once the service has been provided. Revenue from the sales of our services on time and material contracts is recognized based on a fixed hourly rate as direct labor hours are expended. We recognize revenue for sales of all services on a fixed fee ratably over the term of the arrangement as such services are provided. The Company evaluates whether the revenues it receives from the sale of hardware and software products, licenses, and services, including maintenance and professional consulting services, should be recognized on a gross or net basis on a transaction by transaction basis. We maintain primary responsibility for the materials and procedures utilized to service our customers, even in connection with the sale of third party-products and maintenance services as we are responsible for the fulfillment and acceptability of the products and services purchased by our customers. In addition, the nature of the products sold to our customers are such that they need configuration in order to be utilized properly for the purposes intended by the customer and therefore we assume certain responsibility for product staging, configuration, installation, modification, and integration with other client systems, or retain general inventory risk upon customer return or rejection. Our customers rely on us to develop the appropriate solutions and specifications applicable to their specific systems and then integrate any such required products or services into their systems. As described above, we are responsible for the day to day maintenance and warranty services provided in connection with all of our existing customer relationships, whether such services are ultimately provided directly by the Company and its employees or by the applicable third party service provider. As of the date of this filing, after an evaluation of all of our existing customer relationships, we have concluded that we are the primary obligor to all of our existing customers and therefore recognize all revenues on a gross basis.

Long-lived Assets

We account for our long-lived assets in accordance with ASC 360, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (“ASC 360”), which requires that long-lived assets be evaluated whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable or the useful life has changed. Some of the events or changes in circumstances that would trigger an impairment test include, but are not limited to:

• significant under-performance relative to expected and/or historical results (negative comparable sales growth or operating cash flows for two consecutive years);
• significant negative industry or economic trends;

31

• knowledge of transactions involving the sale of similar property at amounts below our carrying value; or
• our expectation to dispose of long-lived assets before the end of their estimated useful lives, even though the assets do not meet the criteria to be classified as “held for sale.”

Long-lived assets are grouped for recognition and measurement of impairment at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other assets. The impairment test for long-lived assets requires us to assess the recoverability of our long-lived assets by comparing their net carrying value to the sum of undiscounted estimated future cash flows directly associated with and arising from our use and eventual disposition of the assets. If the net carrying value of a group of long-lived assets exceeds the sum of related undiscounted estimated future cash flows, we would be required to record an impairment charge equal to the excess, if any, of net carrying value over fair value.

When assessing the recoverability of our long-lived assets, which include property and equipment and finite-lived intangible assets, we make assumptions regarding estimated future cash flows and other factors. Some of these assumptions involve a high degree of judgment and also bear a significant impact on the assessment conclusions. Included among these assumptions are estimating undiscounted future cash flows, including the projection of comparable sales, operating expenses, capital requirements for maintaining property and equipment and the residual value of asset groups. We formulate estimates from historical experience and assumptions of future performance based on business plans and forecasts, recent economic and business trends, and competitive conditions. In the event that our estimates or related assumptions change in the future, we may be required to record an impairment charge. Based on our evaluation, we did not record a charge for impairment for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016.

The benefits to be derived from our acquired intangibles, will take additional financial resources to continue the development of our technology. Management believes our technology has significant long-term profit potential, and to date, management continues to allocate existing resources to the develop products and services to seek returns on its investment. We continue to seek additional resources, through both capital raising efforts and meeting with industry experts, as part of our continued efforts. Although there can be no assurance that these efforts will be successful, we intend to allocate financial and personnel resources when deemed possible and/or necessary. If we choose to abandon these efforts, or if we determine that such funding is not available, the related development of our technology (resulting in our lack of ability to expand our business), may be subject to significant impairment.

As described previously, we continue to experience weakness in market conditions, a depressed stock price, and challenges in executing our business plans. The Company will continue to monitor these uncertainties in future periods, to determine the impact.

We evaluate the remaining useful lives of long-lived assets and identifiable intangible assets whenever events or circumstances indicate that a revision to the remaining period of amortization is warranted. Such events or circumstances may include (but are not limited to): the effects of obsolescence, demand, competition, and/or other economic factors including the stability of the industry in which we operate, known technological advances, legislative actions, or changes in the regulatory environment. If the estimated remaining useful lives change, the remaining carrying amount of the long-lived assets and identifiable intangible assets would be amortized prospectively over that revised remaining useful life. We have determined that there were no events or circumstances during the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 which would indicate a revision to the remaining amortization period related to any of our long lived assets. Accordingly, we believe that the current estimated useful lives of long-lived assets reflect the period over which they are expected to contribute to future cash flows and are therefore deemed appropriate.

Goodwill and Indefinite-lived Assets

We have recorded goodwill and other indefinite-lived assets in connection with our acquisitions of Lilien, Shoom, AirPatrol, LightMiner and Integrio. Goodwill, which represents the excess of acquisition cost over the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets of the acquired company, is not amortized. Indefinite-lived intangible assets are stated at fair value as of the date acquired in a business combination. Our goodwill balance and other assets with indefinite lives are evaluated for potential impairment during the fourth quarter of each year and in certain other circumstances. The evaluation of impairment involves comparing the current fair value of the business to the recorded value, including goodwill. To determine the fair value of the business, we utilize both the income approach, which is based on estimates of future net cash flows, and the market approach, which observes transactional evidence involving similar businesses. There was no goodwill impairment for the six months ended June 30, 2017 or 2016.

We review our goodwill for impairment annually, but may need to review goodwill more frequently, if facts and circumstances warrant a review.

We analyze goodwill first to assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform a detailed goodwill impairment test as required. The more-likely-than-not threshold is defined as having a likelihood of more than 50 percent.

Events and circumstances for an entity to consider in conducting the qualitative assessment are:

• Macroeconomic conditions such as a deterioration in general economic conditions, limitations on accessing capital, fluctuations in foreign exchange rates, or other developments in equity and credit markets.
• Industry and market considerations such as a deterioration in the environment in which an entity operates, an increased competitive environment, a decline in market-dependent multiples or metrics (considered in both absolute terms and relative to peers), a change in the market for an entity’s products or services, or a regulatory or political development.
• Cost factors such as increases in raw materials, labor, or other costs that have a negative effect on earnings and cash flows.
• Overall financial performance such as negative or declining cash flows or a decline in actual or planned revenue or earnings compared with actual and projected results of relevant prior periods.
• Other relevant entity-specific events such as changes in management, key personnel, strategy, or customers, contemplation of bankruptcy, or litigation.
• Events affecting a reporting unit such as a change in the composition or carrying amount of its net assets, a more-likely-than-not expectation of selling or disposing of all, or a portion, of a reporting unit, the testing for recoverability of a significant asset group within a reporting unit, or recognition of a goodwill impairment loss in the financial statements of a subsidiary that is a component of a reporting unit.
• If applicable, a sustained decrease in share price (considered in both absolute terms and relative to peers).

As described previously, we continue to experience weakness in market conditions, a depressed stock price, and challenges in executing our business plans. We also require significant funds to operate and continue to experience losses. If these conditions continue, it may necessitate a requirement to record a goodwill impairment charges. The Company will continue to monitor these uncertainties in future periods.

Acquired In-Process Research and Development (“IPR&D”)

In accordance with authoritative guidance, we recognize IPR&D at fair value as of the acquisition date, and subsequently account for it as an indefinite-lived intangible asset until completion or abandonment of the associated research and development efforts. Once an IPR&D project has been completed, the useful life of the IPR&D asset is determined and amortized accordingly. If the IPR&D asset is abandoned, the remaining carrying value is written off. During fiscal year 2014, we acquired IPR&D through the acquisition of AirPatrol and in 2015 through the acquisition of the assets of LightMiner. Our IPR&D is comprised of AirPatrol and LightMiner technology, which was valued on the date of the acquisition. It will take additional financial resources to continue development of these technologies.

We continue to seek additional resources, through both capital raising efforts and meeting with industry experts, for further development of the AirPatrol and LightMiner technologies. Through June 30, 2017, we have made some progress with raising capital since these acquisitions, building our pipeline and getting industry acknowledgment. We are being recognized by leading industry analysts in their report on leading indoor positioning companies and also was awarded the IoT Security Excellence award by TMC . However, management is focused on growing revenue from these products and continues to actively and aggressively pursue efforts to recognize the value of the AirPatrol and LightMiner technologies. Although there can be no assurance that these efforts will be successful, we intend to allocate financial and personnel resources when deemed possible and/or necessary. If we choose to abandon these efforts, or if we determine that such funding is not available, the related IPR&D will be subject to significant impairment.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets Subject to Amortization

We amortize intangible assets with finite lives over their estimated useful lives and review them for impairment whenever an impairment indicator exists. We continually monitor events and changes in circumstances that could indicate carrying amounts of our long-lived assets, including our intangible assets, may not be recoverable. When such events or changes in circumstances occur, we assess recoverability by determining whether the carrying value of such assets will be recovered through the undiscounted expected future cash flows. If the future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount of these assets, we recognize an impairment loss based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the assets. We did not recognize any intangible asset impairment charges for the six month period ended June 30, 2017. See "Acquired In-Process Research and Development ("IPR&D")" for further information.

Deferred Income Taxes

In accordance with ASC 740 “Income Taxes” (“ASC 740”), management routinely evaluates the likelihood of the realization of its income tax benefits and the recognition of its deferred tax assets. In evaluating the need for any valuation allowance, management will assess whether it is more likely than not that some portion, or all, of the deferred tax asset may not be realized. Ultimately, the realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during those periods in which temporary differences become deductible and/or tax credits and tax loss carry-forwards can be utilized. In performing its analyses, management considers both positive and negative evidence including historical financial performance, previous earnings patterns, future earnings forecasts, tax planning strategies, economic and business trends and the potential realization of net operating loss carry-forwards within a reasonable timeframe. To this end, management considered (i) that we have had historical losses in the prior years and cannot anticipate generating a sufficient level of future profits in order to realize the benefits of our deferred tax asset; (ii) tax planning strategies; and (iii) the adequacy of future income as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2017, based upon certain economic conditions and historical losses through June 30, 2017. After consideration of these factors management deemed it appropriate to establish a full valuation allowance.

A liability for “unrecognized tax benefits” is recorded for any tax benefits claimed in the Company’s tax filings that do not meet these recognition and measurement standards. For the six months ended June 30, 2017 or 2016 no liability for unrecognized tax benefits was required to be reported. The guidance also discusses the classification of related interest and penalties on income taxes. The Company’s policy is to record interest and penalties on uncertain tax positions as a component of income tax expense. No interest or penalties were recorded during the six months ended June 30, 2017 or 2016.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

We maintain our reserves for credit losses at a level believed by management to be adequate to absorb potential losses inherent in the respective balances. We assign an internal credit quality rating to all new customers and update these ratings regularly, but no less than annually. Management’s determination of the adequacy of the reserve for credit losses for our accounts and notes receivable is based on the age of the receivable balance, the customer’s credit quality rating, an evaluation of historical credit losses, current economic conditions, and other relevant factors.

As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, allowance for credit losses included an allowance for doubtful accounts of approximately $373,000 and $378,000, respectively, due to the aging of the items greater than 120 days outstanding and other potential non-collections.

Business Combinations

We account for business combinations using the acquisition method of accounting, and accordingly, the assets and liabilities of the acquired business are recorded at their fair values at the date of acquisition. The excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair value is recorded as goodwill. Any changes in the estimated fair values of the net assets recorded for acquisitions prior to the finalization of more detailed analysis, but not to exceed one year from the date of acquisition, will change the amount of the purchase price allocable to goodwill. Any subsequent changes to any purchase price allocations that are material to our consolidated financial results will be adjusted. All acquisition costs are expensed as incurred and in-process research and development costs are recorded at fair value as an indefinite-lived intangible asset and assessed for impairment thereafter until completion, at which point the asset is amortized over its expected useful life. Separately recognized transactions associated with business combinations are generally expensed subsequent to the acquisition date. The application of business combination and impairment accounting requires the use of significant estimates and assumptions.

Upon acquisition, the accounts and results of operations are consolidated as of and subsequent to the acquisition date and are included in our Consolidated Financial Statements from the acquisition date.

Stock-Based Compensation

We account for equity instruments issued to non-employees in accordance with accounting guidance which requires that such equity instruments are recorded at their fair value on the measurement date, which is typically the date the services are performed.

We account for equity instruments issued to employees in accordance with accounting guidance that requires that awards are recorded at their fair value on the date of grant and are amortized over the vesting period of the award. We recognize compensation costs over the requisite service period of the award, which is generally the vesting term of the equity instrument issued.

The Black-Scholes option valuation model is used to estimate the fair value of the options or the equivalent security granted. The model includes subjective input assumptions that can materially affect the fair value estimates. The model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options or warrants. The expected volatility is estimated based on the average of historical volatilities for industry peers.

The principal assumptions used in applying the Black-Scholes model along with the results from the model were as follows:

For the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company incurred stock-based compensation charges of $993,000 and $711,000, respectively.

Operating Segments

Effective January 1, 2017, the Company has changed the way it analyzes and assesses divisional performance of the Company. The Company has therefore re-aligned its operating segments along those division business lines and has created the following operating segments. The Company has retroactively applied these new segment categories to the prior periods presented below for comparative purposes.

• Indoor Positioning Analytics: This segment includes Inpixon’s proprietary products and services delivered on premise or in the Cloud as well as our hosted SaaS based solutions. Our Indoor Positioning Analytics product is based on a unique and patented sensor technology that detects and locates accessible cellular, Wi-Fi and Bluetooth devices and then uses a lightning fast data-analytics engine to deliver actionable insights and intelligent reports for security, marketing, asset management, etc.
• Infrastructure: This segment includes third party hardware, software and related maintenance/warranty products and services that Inpixon resells to commercial and government customers. It includes but is not limited to products for enterprise computing; storage; virtualization; networking; etc. as well as services including custom application/software design; architecture and development; staff augmentation and project management.

Rounding

All dollar amounts in this section have been rounded to the nearest thousand.

Results of Operations

Three Months Ended June 30, 2017 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2016

The following table sets forth selected unaudited condensed consolidated financial data as a percentage of our revenue and the percentage of period-over-period change:

(in thousands, except percentages)

35

Net Revenues

Net revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2017 were $15.1 million compared to $13.3 million for the comparable period in the prior year. This $1.8 million increase in revenues was primarily attributable to the acquisition of Integrio Technologies in November 2016. For the three months ended June 30, 2017, Indoor Positioning Analytics revenue was $1.2 million compared to $1.3 million for the prior year period. Infrastructure revenue was $13.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, and $12.1 million for the prior year period.

Cost of Net Revenues

Cost of net revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2017 was $11.7 million compared to $9.9 million for the prior year period. The increase in cost of revenues of $1.8 million is primarily attributable to the increase in revenues due to the Integrio acquisition in November 2016. Indoor Positioning Analytics cost of net revenues was $380,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2017 as compared to $291,000 for the prior period. Infrastructure cost of net revenues was $11.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and $9.6 million for the prior period.

The gross profit margin for the three months ended June 30, 2017 was 22% compared to 26% during the three months ended June 30, 2017. The decrease in gross margin was primarily attributable to lower gross margins on the Integrio revenue, which is included in the Infrastructure segment, during the quarter ended June 30, 2017. Indoor Positioning Analytics gross margins for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 were 67% and 77%, respectively. Gross margins for the Infrastructure segment for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 were 19% and 20%, respectively.

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2017 were $8.6 million compared to $7.4 million for the prior year period. This increase of approximately $1.2 million includes an increase in operating expenses related to the Integrio acquisition offset by a decrease in salaries, commissions and bonuses, travel expenses and other operating expenses related to Inpixon USA and an increase in amortization of intangibles and depreciation related to the Integrio acquisition.

Loss from Operations

Loss from operations for the three months ended June 30, 2017 was $5.2 million compared to $3.9 million for the prior year period. This increase in loss of $1.3 million was primarily attributable to the lower gross profit, increase in amortization of intangibles and depreciation costs, additional costs incurred for the Integrio operations offset by a reduction in operating expenses related to Inpixon USA.

Other Income/Expense

Total other income/expense for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 was ($1.2 million) and ($227,000), respectively. This increase of $973,000 is primarily attributable to interest attributable to a convertible debenture and higher interest on the Company’s Credit Facility, and amortization of debt discount and deferred financing fees.

Provision for Income Taxes

There was no provision for income taxes for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016. Deferred tax assets resulting from such losses are fully reserved as of June 30, 2017 and 2016 since, at present, we have no history of taxable income and it is more likely than not that such assets will not be realized.

Net Loss Attributable to Non-Controlling Interest

Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 was $4,000.

Net Loss Attributable To Common Stockholders

Net loss attributable to common stockholders for the three months ended June 30, 2017 was $6.4 million compared to $4.2 million for the prior year period. This increase in net loss of $2.2 million was attributable to the changes discussed above.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2016

The following table sets forth selected unaudited consolidated financial data as a percentage of our revenue and the percentage of period-over-period change:

(in thousands, except percentages)

Net Revenues

Net revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2017 were $28.6 million compared to $27.4 million for the comparable period in the prior year. The increase in revenues of $1.2 million are primarily attributable to the Integrio Technologies acquisition in November 2016. For the six months ended June 30, 2017, Indoor Positioning Analytics revenue was $2.1 million compared to $2.3 million for the prior year period. Infrastructure revenue was $26.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and $25.1 million for the prior year period.

Cost of Net Revenues

Cost of net revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2017 was $21.9 million compared to $20 million for the prior year period. The increase in cost of revenues of $1.9 million is primarily attributable to the increase in revenues due to the Integrio acquisition in November 2016. Indoor Positioning Analytics cost of net revenues was $723,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2017 as compared to $577,000 for the prior period. Infrastructure cost of net revenues was $21.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and $19.5 million for the prior period.

The gross profit margin for the six months ended June 30, 2017 was 23% compared to 27% during the six months ended June 30, 2016. The decrease in gross margin was primarily attributable to lower gross margins on the Integrio revenue which is included in the Infrastructure segment during the quarter ended June 30, 2017. Indoor Positioning Analytics gross margins for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 were 66% and 75%, respectively. Gross margins for the Infrastructure segment for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 were 20% and 23%, respectively.

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2017 were $17.3 million compared to $15.5 million for the prior year period. This increase of $1.8 million includes an increase in operating expense related to the Integrio acquisition and amortization related to the Integrio acquisition offset by lower operating expenses in the remaining Inpixon business.

Loss from Operations

Loss from operations for the six months ended June 30, 2017 was $10.6 million compared to $8.1 million for the prior year period. This increase in loss of $2.5 million was primarily attributable to an increase in amortization of intangibles, depreciation, additional operating expenses for the Integrio acquisition, increase in professional services fees and lower gross margins from the Integrio acquisition.

Other Income/Expense

Net other income/expense for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 were ($1.8 million) and ($351,000), respectively. This increase of $1.4 million was primarily attributable to interest attributable to a convertible debenture and higher interest on the Company’s Credit Facility, and amortization of debt discount and deferred financing fees.

Provision for Income Taxes

There was no provision for income taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016. Deferred tax assets resulting from such losses are fully reserved as of June 30, 2017 and 2016 since, at present, we have no history of taxable income and it is more likely than not that such assets will not be realized.

Net Loss Attributable to Non-Controlling Interest

Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest for the six months ended June 30, 2017 was $9,000 compared to a net loss of $8,000 for the prior year period. This increase of $1,000 was attributable to an increase in losses for Sysorex Arabia and was not material.

Net Loss Attributable To Common Stockholders

Net loss attributable to common stockholders for the six months ended June 30, 2017 was $12.5 million compared to $8.5 million for the prior year period. This increase in net loss of $4 million was attributable to the changes discussed above.

Non-GAAP Financial information

EBITDA

EBITDA is defined as net income (loss) before interest, provision for (benefit from) income taxes, and depreciation and amortization. Adjusted EBITDA is used by our management as the matrix in which it manages the business. It is defined as EBITDA plus adjustments for other income or expense items, non-recurring items and non-cash stock-based compensation.

Adjusted EBITDA for the three months ended June 30, 2017 was a loss of $2.7 million compared to a loss of $2.2 million for the prior year period. Adjusted EBITDA for the six months ended June 30, 2017 was a loss of $6 million compared to a loss of $4.7 million for the prior year period.

The following table presents a reconciliation of net income/loss attributable to stockholders of Inpixon, which is our GAAP operating performance measure, to Adjusted EBITDA for the fiscal quarters ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 (in thousands):

We rely on Adjusted EBITDA, which is a non-GAAP financial measure for the following:

• to review and assess the operating performance of our Company as permitted by Accounting Standards Codification Topic 280, Segment Reporting;
• to compare our current operating results with corresponding periods and with the operating results of other companies in our industry;
• as a basis for allocating resources to various projects;
• as a measure to evaluate potential economic outcomes of acquisitions, operational alternatives and strategic decisions; and
• to evaluate internally the performance of our personnel.

We have presented Adjusted EBITDA above because we believe it conveys useful information to investors regarding our operating results. We believe it provides an additional way for investors to view our operations, when considered with both our GAAP results and the reconciliation to net income (loss). By including this information we can provide investors with a more complete understanding of our business. Specifically, we present Adjusted EBITDA as supplemental disclosure because of the following:

• We believe Adjusted EBITDA is a useful tool for investors to assess the operating performance of our business without the effect of interest, income taxes, and other non-operating expenses as well as depreciation and amortization which are non-cash expenses;
• We believe that it is useful to provide investors with a standard operating metric used by management to evaluate our operating performance; and
• We believe that the use of Adjusted EBITDA is helpful to compare our results to other companies.

Even though we believe Adjusted EBITDA is useful for investors, it does have limitations as an analytical tool. Thus, we strongly urge investors not to consider this metric in isolation or as a substitute for net income (loss) and the other consolidated statement of operations data prepared in accordance with GAAP. Some of these limitations include the fact that:

• Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect our cash expenditures or future requirements for capital expenditures or contractual commitments;
• Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs;
• Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect the significant interest expense, or the cash requirements necessary to service interest or principal payments, on our debt;
• although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized will often have to be replaced in the future, and Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect any cash requirements for such replacements;
• Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect income or other taxes or the cash requirements to make any tax payments; and
• other companies in our industry may calculate Adjusted EBITDA differently than we do, thereby potentially limiting its usefulness as a comparative measure.

Because of these limitations, Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered a measure of discretionary cash available to us to invest in the growth of our business or as a measure of performance in compliance with GAAP. We compensate for these limitations by relying primarily on our GAAP results and providing Adjusted EBITDA only as supplemental information.

Proforma Non-GAAP Net Loss per Share

Proforma non-GAAP net income (loss) per share is used by our Company’s management as an evaluation tool as it manages the business and is defined as net income (loss) per basic and diluted share adjusted for non-cash items including stock based compensation, amortization of intangibles and one time charges including acquisition costs, the costs associated with the public offering, severance costs and changes in the fair value of shares to be issued.

Proforma non-GAAP net loss per basic and diluted common share for the three months ended June 30, 2017 was ($1.89) compared to ($1.65) for the prior year period. Proforma non-GAAP net loss per basic and diluted common share for the six months ended June 30, 2017 was ($3.91) compared to ($3.36) for the prior year period. These decreases were attributable to the changes discussed in our results of operations.

The following table presents a reconciliation of net loss per basic and diluted share, which is our GAAP operating performance measure, to proforma non-GAAP net loss per share for the periods reflected:

(thousands, except per share data)

We rely on proforma non-GAAP net loss per share, which is a non-GAAP financial measure and not a substitution for GAAP:

• to review and assess the operating performance of our Company as permitted by Accounting Standards Codification Topic 280, Segment Reporting;
• to compare our current operating results with corresponding periods and with the operating results of other companies in our industry;
• as a measure to evaluate potential economic outcomes of acquisitions, operational alternatives and strategic decisions; and
• to evaluate internally the performance of our personnel.

We have presented proforma non-GAAP net loss per share above because we believe it conveys useful information to investors regarding our operating results. We believe it provides an additional way for investors to view our operations, when considered with both our GAAP results and the reconciliation to net income (loss), and that by including this information we can provide investors with a more complete understanding of our business. Specifically, we present proforma non-GAAP net loss per share as supplemental disclosure because:

• we believe proforma non-GAAP net loss per share is a useful tool for investors to assess the operating performance of our business without the effect of non-cash items including stock based compensation, amortization of intangibles and one time charges including acquisition costs, costs associated with the public offering, severance costs and changes in the fair value of shares to be issued;
• we believe that it is useful to provide investors with a standard operating metric used by management to evaluate our operating performance; and
• we believe that the use of proforma non-GAAP net loss per share is helpful to compare our results to other companies.

Liquidity and Capital Resources as of June 30, 2017 Compared With June 30, 2016

The Company’s net cash flows used in operating, investing and financing activities for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 and certain balances as of the end of those periods are as follows (in thousands):

(thousands, except per share data)

Operating Activities:

Net cash provided by operating activities during the six months ended June 30, 2017 was $1.5 million. Net cash used in operating activities during the six months ended June 30, 2016 was $118,000. Net cash used in operating activities during the six months ended June 30, 2017 consisted of the following (in thousands):

The non-cash income and expenses of $5.8 million consisted primarily of (in thousands):

42

The net use of cash due to changes in operating assets and liabilities totaled $8.2 million and consisted primarily of the following (in thousands):

Investing Activities:

Net cash used in investing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2017 was $804,000 compared to net cash used in investing activities of $963,000 for the prior year period. The net cash used in investing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2017 was comprised of $86,000 for the purchase of property and equipment and a $718,000 investment in capitalized software.

Financing Activities:

Net cash used in financing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2017 was approximately $2.5 million. Net cash used in financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2016 was $2.6 million. The net cash used in financing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2017 was primarily comprised of $4.3 million of repayments to the Credit Facility, $5.6 million of proceeds from issuance of common stock, preferred stock and warrants, $3 million repayment of the debenture and a net repayment of a convertible promissory note of $662,000.

Liquidity and Capital Resources - General:

Our current capital resources and operating results as of June 30, 2017, as described in the preceding paragraphs, consist of:

1) an overall working capital deficit of $30.7 million;

2) cash of $42,000;

3) the Credit Facility for up to $10 million which we borrow against based on eligible assets with a maturity date of November 14, 2018 of which $2.4 million is utilized; and

4) net cash provided by operating activities year-to-date of $1.5 million.

The breakdown of our overall working capital deficit is as follows (in thousands):

Deferred revenue exceeds the related prepaid contracts by $1.6 million and other liabilities exceed other assets by $3.4 million. These deficits are expected to be funded by our anticipated cash flow from operations and financing activities, as described below, over the next twelve months. We do not believe that the Credit Facility, with a balance of $2.4 million at June 30, 2017, will have a material adverse effect on our liquidity in the next twelve months as the Credit Facility principal balance is not due until November 2018.

Net cash provided by operating activities during the six months ended June 30, 2017 of $1.5 million consists of net loss of $12.5 million less non-cash expenses of $5.8 million and net cash provided by changes in operating assets and liabilities of $8.2 million. We expect net cash from operations to increase during 2017 as a result of the following:

1) We expect our revenues to increase as a result of the Integrio acquisition. These revenues will generate additional gross margins to our cash flow in the future.

2) We are working with our key distributors and financing partners to address our credit limitation issues. Revenues during the six months ended June 30, 2017 could have been higher but were negatively impacted by our inability to timely process orders due to past due amounts and credit limitations with various vendors. We expect to relieve some of these issues during the year ending December 31, 2017 if are able to secure additional financing, continue to grow our services revenue and as sales of our Inpixon product line increase.

The Company’s capital resources as of June 30, 2017, availability on the unlimited Payplant Facility to finance purchase orders and invoices, higher margin business line expansion and credit limitation improvements, may not be sufficient to fund planned operations during 2017. The Company will need to raise $4-6 million outside capital under structures available to it including debt and/or equity offerings this year. The Company also has an effective registration statement on Form S-3 which may allow it to raise additional capital from the sale of its securities, subject to certain limitations for registrants with a market capitalization of less than $75 million. The information in this Form 10-Q concerning the Company’s Form S-3 registration statement does not constitute an offer of any securities for sale. If these sources do not provide the capital necessary to fund the Company’s operations during the next twelve months, the Company may need to curtail certain aspects of its expansion activities or consider other means of obtaining additional financing, such as through the sale of assets or of a business segment, although there is no guarantee that the Company could obtain the financing necessary to continue its operations.

Our condensed consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2017 have been prepared under the assumption that we will continue as a going concern for the next twelve months from the date the financial statements are issued. Our financial statements as of June 30, 2017 include an explanatory paragraph referring to our recurring and continuing losses from operations and expressing substantial doubt in our ability to continue as a going concern without additional capital becoming available. Management’s plans and assessment of the probability that such plans will mitigate and alleviate any substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, is dependent upon the ability to obtain additional equity or debt financing, attain further operating efficiency, reduce expenditures, and, ultimately, to generate sufficient levels of revenue, which together represent the principal conditions that raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our condensed consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2017 do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

As a result of our recurring and continuing losses from operations there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern without additional capital becoming available. Management’s plans and assessment of the probability that such plans will mitigate and alleviate any substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, is dependent upon the ability to obtain additional equity or debt financing, attain further operating efficiency, reduce expenditures, and, ultimately, to generate sufficient levels of revenue, which together represent the principal conditions that raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. At this time, management cannot provide any assurance they will be successful in their efforts to alleviate substantial doubt for the next 12 months. Our condensed consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2017 do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet guarantees, interest rate swap transactions or foreign currency contracts. We do not engage in trading activities involving non-exchange traded contracts.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

For a discussion of recently issued accounting pronouncements, please see the Recent Accounting Standards section of Note 3 to our condensed consolidated financial statements, which is included in this Form 10-Q in Item 1.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Disclosure controls are procedures that are designed with the objective of ensuring that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act, such as this Form 10-Q, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls are also designed with the objective of ensuring that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Internal controls are procedures which are designed with the objective of providing reasonable assurance that (1) our transactions are properly authorized, recorded and reported; and (2) our assets are safeguarded against unauthorized or improper use, to permit the preparation of our condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles.

In connection with the preparation of this Form 10-Q, management, with the participation of our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)). Based upon that evaluation, our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Changes in Internal Controls

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Rule 13a-15 or 15d-15 under the Exchange Act that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2017 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Limitations of the Effectiveness of Control

A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Because of the inherent limitations of any control system, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues, if any, within a company have been detected.

We face a number of significant risks and uncertainties in connection with our operations. Our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected by these risks. Except as set forth below, there have been no material changes to the Risk Factors disclosed in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Risks Related to Our Securities

Our common stock may be delisted from the NASDAQ Capital Market, which could affect its market price and liquidity.

We are required to meet certain qualitative and quantitative tests (including a minimum stockholders’ equity requirement of $2.5 million) to maintain the listing of our common stock on the NASDAQ Capital Market, and our common stock is in jeopardy of being delisted. As reported in this Form 10-Q, as of June 30, 2017, we had a stockholders’ deficit of approximately $6.4 million, which was below the minimum stockholders’ equity of $2.5 million required by NASDAQ to maintain compliance and our common stock could be subject to delisting. Nasdaq has given the Company an extension of time until September 30, 2017 to provide documentation on how the Company has regained compliance with the rule.

On August 14, 2017, we received a second deficiency letter from NASDAQ indicating that, based on our closing bid price for the last 30 consecutive business days, we do not comply with the minimum bid price requirement of $1.00 per share, as set forth in NASDAQ Listing Rule 5550(a)(2). In accordance with NASDAQ Listing Rule 5810(c)(3)(A), we have a grace period of 180 calendar days, or until February 12, 2018, to regain compliance with the minimum closing bid price requirement for continued listing.

If we are unable to regain compliance with either of these listing requirements, our common stock will be subject to delisting by NASDAQ. A delisting of our common stock from NASDAQ would negatively affect the value of our common stock. A delisting of our common stock could also adversely affect our ability to obtain financing for our operations and could result in the loss of confidence in our company.