Huntsman CORP: Form 10-K for the period ended Dec 31, 2024

Overview

We are a global manufacturer of diversified organic chemical products. We operate in three segments: Polyurethanes, Performance Products and Advanced Materials. Our products comprise many different chemicals and chemical formulations, which we market globally to a wide range of consumers that consist primarily of industrial and building product manufacturers. Our products are used in a broad range of applications, including those in the adhesives, aerospace, automotive, coatings and construction, construction products, durable and non-durable consumer products, electronics, insulation, power generation and refining. Many of our products offer effects such as premium insulation in homes and buildings and the lightweighting of airplanes and automobiles that help conserve energy. We are a leading global producer in many of our key product lines, including MDI, amines, maleic anhydride and epoxy-based polymer formulations. Our revenues for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 were $6,036 million, $6,111 million and $8,023 million, respectively.

Our company, a Delaware corporation, was formed in 2004 to hold the Huntsman businesses, which were founded by Jon M. Huntsman. Mr. Huntsman founded the predecessor to our Company in 1970 as a small packaging materials company. Since then, we have transformed through a series of acquisitions and divestitures and now own a global portfolio of businesses with a primary focus on improving energy efficiency. On February 28, 2023, we completed the sale of our textile chemicals and dyes business (“Textile Effects Business”) to Archroma, a portfolio company of SK Capital Partners (“Archroma”), and during the first quarter of 2024, we finalized the purchase price valued at $597 million, which includes adjustments to the purchase price for working capital, plus the assumption of underfunded pension liabilities. For more information, see “Note 4. Discontinued Operations—Sale of Textile Effects Business” to our consolidated financial statements. We operate all of our businesses through Huntsman International, our wholly-owned subsidiary. Huntsman International is a Delaware limited liability company and was formed in 1999.

For information regarding significant recent developments, see “Note 1. General—Recent Developments” to our consolidated financial statements.

Our principal executive offices are located at 10003 Woodloch Forest Drive, The Woodlands, Texas 77380, and our telephone number at that location is (281) 719-6000.

Our Products

(1) Percentage allocations in this chart do not give effect to Corporate and other unallocated items and eliminations. For a reconciliation of net (loss) income to total adjusted EBITDA and further details of cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations, see “Part II. Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Results of Operations.”

The following table identifies the key product lines, principal end markets and applications, representative customers, raw materials and representative competitors of each of our business segments:

Product lines End markets / applications Representative customers Raw materials Representative competitors

2

Polyurethanes

General

We are a leading global manufacturer and marketer of a broad range of polyurethane chemicals, including MDI products, polyols and TPU (each discussed in more detail below under “Products and Markets”). Polyurethane chemicals are used to produce rigid and flexible foams, as well as coatings, adhesives, sealants and elastomers. We focus on differentiated MDI-based polyurethane systems and polyurethane component molecules. Volume growth in our Polyurethanes segment has been driven primarily by global economic activity and the continued substitution of MDI-based products for other materials across a broad range of applications. We operate three major polyurethane manufacturing facilities in the United States (“U.S.”), Europe and China. We also operate 26 strategically located downstream facilities, of which 17 are polyurethane formulation facilities, commonly referred to in the chemical industry as “systems houses”. Our systems houses are located in close proximity to our customers worldwide, which enables us to focus on customer support, technical service and a differentiated product offering. We also operate two specialty polyester polyol manufacturing facilities focused on the insulation market, three downstream TPU manufacturing facilities in the U.S., Europe and China and two spray polyurethane foam (“SPF”) manufacturing sites located in the U.S. and Canada.

Our customers produce polyurethane-based products through the combination of an isocyanate, such as MDI, with polyols, which are derived largely from PO. We are able to produce over 2,400 distinct MDI-based polyurethane products by modifying the MDI molecule through varying the proportion and type of polyol used and by introducing other chemical additives to our MDI formulations. As a result, polyurethane products, especially those derived from MDI, are continuing to replace traditional products in a wide range of end-use markets, including insulation in construction and cold chain, cushioning for automotive and furniture, coatings, adhesives, wood binders for construction and furniture, footwear and other specialized engineering applications.

We operate a world-scale integrated polyurethane formulations facility and a world-scale research and development campus in China to service our customers in the critical Chinese market, the largest MDI market in the world, and we will support the long-term demand growth that we believe this region will continue to experience. Additionally, we formed a joint venture with Sinopec to build and operate a world-scale PO/MTBE plant in Nanjing, China utilizing proprietary PO/MTBE manufacturing technology. PO is used in the manufacturing of polyurethane systems and MTBE is an oxygenate used in gasoline. We own a 49% interest in the joint venture and account for our interest in the joint venture as an equity method investment.

Huntsman Building Solutions (“HBS”) is a leading North American manufacturer and distributor of SPF insulation systems for residential and commercial applications. Our SPF products offer significant environmental benefits, as our proprietary manufacturing process transforms raw material from low quality PET plastic bottles into highly effective energy-saving polyurethane insulation. HBS offers attractive growth potential as energy efficiency standards and requirements increase globally and continue to shift towards a greener economy.

Products and Markets

MDI is used primarily in rigid foam applications and in a wide variety of customized, higher-value flexible foam as well as coatings, adhesives, sealants and elastomers. Polyols, including polyether and polyester polyols, are used in conjunction with MDI in rigid foam, flexible foam and other non-foam applications. Polyurethane chemicals produce a range of product types and end uses. We produce MDI, polyols and TPU products and do not produce TDI products.

Polyurethane chemicals are sold to customers who combine the chemicals to produce polyurethane-based products. Customers will use either polyurethane component molecules produced for mass sales or polyurethane systems tailored to specific requirements. By varying the blend, additives and specifications of the polyurethane chemicals, manufacturers are able to develop and produce a breadth and variety of polyurethane-based products.

MDI. MDI is an aromatic diisocyanate molecule used in the manufacture of polyurethane-based products. MDI can be used to make polyurethanes with a broad range of properties and can therefore be used in a wide range of applications. We believe that MDI and formulated MDI systems, which combine MDI and polyols, will continue to grow at a multiple of global GDP driven by the megatrends of energy management, food preservation, demographics and urbanization/transportation. MDI offers key products benefits of energy efficiency, comfort and durability aligned with these megatrends. We believe that MDI and formulated MDI systems will continue to substitute for alternative materials, such as fiberglass in insulation, phenol formaldehyde in wood binders and TDI in automotive and furniture. Specialty cushioning and insulation applications, thermoplastic polyurethanes and adhesives and coatings will further contribute to the continued growth of MDI. MDI experiences some seasonality in its sales reflecting its exposure to seasonal construction-related end markets, such as insulation and composite wood products. Sales generally peak during the spring and summer months in the northern hemisphere, resulting in greater sales volumes during the second and third quarters of the year.

Polyols. Polyols are combined with MDI and other isocyanates to create a broad spectrum of formulated polyurethane systems. Demand for specialty polyols has been growing at approximately the same rate at which MDI consumption has grown.

TPU. TPU is a high-quality, fully formulated thermal plastic derived from the reaction of MDI or an aliphatic isocyanate with polyols to produce unique qualities such as durability, flexibility, strength, abrasion-resistance, shock absorbency and chemical resistance. We can tailor the performance characteristics of TPU to help meet the specific requirements of our customers. TPU is used in injection molding and small components for the automotive and footwear industries. It is also extruded into films for apparel, wires and cables for industrial use and in a wide variety of applications in the coatings, adhesives, sealants and elastomers markets.

Other. Other sales consist primarily of aniline, benzene, nitrobenzene and other co-products, which all are used primarily to manufacture MDI. The majority of our aniline is consumed internally with some sold to third parties. We believe that the lack of a significant spot market for aniline means that in order to remain competitive, MDI manufacturers must either be integrated with an aniline manufacturing facility or have long-term, cost-competitive aniline supply contracts.

Our strategy is focused on growing our differentiated product offering (differentiated MDI and polyols, formulated MDI-based systems and TPU), which requires a greater emphasis on formulating capability and technical solutions to help our downstream customers meet the desired effect required in their applications. The diagram below provides an overview of how we leverage our technology and experience with the MDI splitter by transforming crude MDI into differentiated higher value systems and markets.

Sales and Marketing

We market our polyurethane chemicals to over 6,200 customers in more than 90 countries. Our sales, marketing and technical resources are organized to support major regional markets and key end-use markets, some of which require a coordinated global approach, such as key accounts across the automotive and elastomers markets. These regional key end-use markets include our insulation businesses, footwear, furniture and other construction and industrial markets. We sell both directly and indirectly to customers, the latter via a network of distributors and agents who in turn sell our products to customers who cannot be served as cost effectively by our internal sales groups.

We provide a wide variety of polyurethane solutions as components (i.e., the isocyanate or the polyol) or in the form of “systems”, in which we provide the total isocyanate and polyol formulation to our customers. Our ability to deliver a range of polyurethane solutions and technical support, which can be tailored for the needs of our customers, is critical to our long-term success. We have strategically located our downstream polyurethane systems houses close to our customers, enabling us to focus on customer support and technical service. We believe this customer support and technical service system contributes to customer retention and also provides opportunities for identifying further product and service needs of customers.

Our strategy is to grow the capabilities of our downstream facilities both organically and inorganically. As a result, we have made a number of “bolt-on” acquisitions in the last decade to expand our downstream footprint and align with our strategic intent. Along with this, we continuously evaluate our global footprint to better utilize our assets and systems houses while providing strong customer support and technical service.

We believe that the extensive market knowledge and industry experience of our sales teams and technical experts, in combination with our strong emphasis on customer relationships, have facilitated our ability to establish and maintain long-term customer supply positions. Our sales strategy is to continue to increase sales to existing customers and to attract new customers by providing innovative solutions, quality products, reliable supply, competitive prices and superior customer service.

Manufacturing and Operations

Our world-scale MDI production facilities are located in Geismar, Louisiana; Rotterdam, the Netherlands; and Caojing, China. These facilities receive aniline, which is a primary material used in the production of MDI, from our facilities and third-party suppliers. We believe that this relative scale and product integration of our large facilities is necessary to provide cost competitiveness in MDI production. At our Geismar, Rotterdam and Caojing facilities we utilize sophisticated proprietary technology to produce MDI. This technology contributes to our position as a low-cost MDI producer. Our global production capacity of MDI, polyols and TPU is approximately 2.9 billion pounds, 0.7 billion pounds and 0.1 billion pounds, respectively.

Key Joint Ventures

Rubicon Joint Venture. Lanxess AG (“Lanxess”) is our joint venture partner in Rubicon LLC (“Rubicon”), which owns aniline, nitrobenzene and DPA manufacturing facilities in Geismar, Louisiana. We are entitled to approximately 78% of the nitrobenzene and aniline production capacity of Rubicon, and Lanxess is entitled to 100% of the DPA production. In addition to operating the joint venture’s aniline, nitrobenzene and DPA facilities, Rubicon operates our wholly-owned MDI, polyol and maleic anhydride facilities at Geismar and is responsible for providing other auxiliary services to the entire Geismar complex. As a result of this joint venture, we are able to achieve greater scale and lower costs for our products than we would otherwise have been able to obtain. Rubicon is consolidated in our financial statements.

Chinese MDI Joint Venture. On January 31, 2024, we completed the planned separation and acquisition of assets of Shanghai Liengheng Isocyanate Company Ltd. (“SLIC”), our manufacturing joint venture with BASF and three Chinese chemical companies. Following the separation, we now operate an independent manufacturing facility at our site in Caojing, China producing crude MDI. This facility is part of our existing Huntsman Polyurethanes Shanghai Ltd. (“HPS”), site, which is our splitting joint venture with Shanghai Chlor-Alkali Chemical Company, Ltd that also manufactures pure MDI, polymeric MDI, MDI variants and formulated MDI systems. We own 70% of HPS and it is consolidated in our financial statements. For more information, see “Note 3. Business Combinations and Acquisitions—Separation and Acquisition of Assets of SLIC Joint Venture” to our consolidated financial statements.

Chinese PO/MTBE Joint Venture. In November 2012, we entered into an agreement to form a joint venture with Sinopec. The joint venture involved the construction and operation of a PO/MTBE facility in China. Under the joint venture agreement, we hold a 49% interest in the joint venture and Sinopec holds a 51% interest. We account for this investment under the equity method.

Raw Materials

The primary raw materials for MDI-based polyurethane chemicals are benzene, chlorine, caustic, carbon monoxide, nitric acid and formaldehyde. Benzene is a widely available commodity that we purchase from third parties to manufacture nitrobenzene and aniline, almost all of which we then use to produce MDI. Historically, benzene has been the largest component of our raw material costs. In recent years, the costs of natural gas-related raw materials in Europe have been volatile.

The primary raw material used in the production of polyols is PO, which we purchase in North America and Europe. The Chinese PO/MTBE joint venture supplies PO into our downstream China business. The strategic supply of PO gives us access to competitively priced PO and the opportunity to develop polyols that enhance our range of MDI products.

Competition

Our major competitors in the polyurethane chemicals market include BASF, Covestro, Dow, Lubrizol and Wanhua Chemical Group. While these competitors and others produce various types and quantities of polyurethane chemicals, we focus on MDI and MDI-based formulated polyurethane systems. Our downstream business is fragmented with different competitors in various markets and regions. Our competitors in downstream markets include Carlisle Construction Materials, Coim and Lubrizol. Our polyurethane chemicals business competes in two basic ways: (1) where price is the dominant element of competition, our polyurethane chemicals business differentiates itself by its high level of customer support, including cooperation on technical and safety matters; and (2) elsewhere, we compete on the basis of product performance, our ability to react quickly to changing customer needs and providing customers with innovative solutions to their needs.

Performance Products

General

Our Performance Products segment has leading global positions in the manufacture and sale of amines and maleic anhydride and serves a wide variety of consumer and industrial end markets. Our Performance Products segment is organized by region and product family: amines (both performance amines and ethyleneamines) as well as maleic anhydride.

We produce a wide range of amines in seven manufacturing facilities in North America, Europe, the Middle East and Asia. We believe we are the largest global producer of polyetheramines, the largest producer of 2-(2-amino ethoxy) ethanol (sold under our DGA® brand), the largest global producer of the full range of ethyleneamines and a leading global producer of low emission polyurethane catalysts. We are the only producer and largest supplier of propylene carbonate and ethylene carbonate in North America. We believe we are the largest producer of maleic anhydride outside of China and the second largest globally with three production facilities in North America and Europe.

Products and Markets

Amines. Amines are a family of intermediate chemicals that are produced by reacting ammonia, or an alkylamine, with various ethylene and propylene derivatives. Generally, amines are valued for their properties as a reactive agent, emulsifier, dispersant, solvent or corrosion inhibitor. Growth in demand for amines is highly correlated with GDP growth. However, certain segments of the amines market, such as polyetheramines, have historically grown at rates in excess of GDP growth due to new product development, technical innovation and end-use substitution. As amines are generally sold based upon the performance characteristics that they provide to customer-specific end-use applications, pricing does not generally fluctuate directly with movements in underlying raw materials. Our amines business is organized around the following product groups:

Polyetheramines are produced by reacting polyol with ammonia. They provide sophisticated performance characteristics as an additive in the manufacture of highly customized epoxy formulations, enabling customers to penetrate new markets and substitute for traditional curing materials.

Our ethyleneamines are manufactured by reacting EDC and caustic soda with ammonia to produce a range of various ethyleneamines homologues having different molecular weights. Most other producers utilize a reductive amination process, which yields a light slate of ethyleneamines. We believe our heavier slate of homologues allows access to a greater range of markets.

Our amines are used in a wide variety of mainly industrial applications, including composites, paints and coatings, fuel and lubricant additives, agrochemicals, gas treating, oilfield chemicals, polyurethane insulation and flexible foams, semiconductor manufacturing and solvents. Our amines customers include Afton, Bayer, Chevron, DuPont, Evonik, Hipower, Infineum, Lubrizol, Quadra Chemicals and Univar.

Maleic Anhydride. Maleic anhydride is a highly versatile chemical intermediate used for products sold into construction, infrastructure, industrial and marine applications. Notably, maleic anhydride is used to produce unsaturated polyester resins (UPRs), which are mainly used in the production of fiberglass reinforced resins. Maleic anhydride is also used in the production of lubricant additives as well as food additives and artificial sweeteners.

Maleic anhydride is produced by oxidizing either benzene or normal butane using a catalyst. Our maleic anhydride technology is a proprietary fixed bed butane-based process with a solvent recovery and refining system. We believe that our process is superior in the areas of feedstock and energy efficiency and solvent recovery. The maleic anhydride-based route to BDO manufacture is currently the preferred process technology and is favored over the other routes, which utilize PO, butadiene or acetylene as feedstocks. As a result, the growth in demand for BDO supports growing demand for our maleic anhydride technology. Generally, changes in price have resulted from a combination of changes in industry capacity utilization and underlying raw material costs. Our maleic anhydride customers include Afton, AOC, BASF, Chevron, Ineos, Infineum, Polynt-Reichhold, Primient, Reacciones Quimicas and Solenis.

Sales and Marketing

We sell approximately 200 products to over 800 customers globally through our regional sales and marketing organizations, which have extensive market knowledge, considerable chemical industry experience and well-established customer relationships.

In more specialty products for certain markets (e.g., coatings, fuel additives, epoxy-based composites, construction, automotive, polymer modification, energy and semiconductor manufacturing), our marketing efforts are focused on how our product offerings perform in customer applications. We believe that this approach enhances the value of our product offerings and creates opportunities for ongoing differentiation in our development activities with our customers.

We provide extensive pre- and post-sales technical service support to our customers. Our research and development function creates solutions to meet our customers unique and changing requirements. These technical professionals interact closely with our marketing managers and business leadership teams to help guide future offerings and market approach strategies. In addition to our focused direct sales efforts, we maintain an extensive global network of distributors and agents that also sell our products. These distributors and agents typically promote our products to smaller end-use customers who cannot be served as cost effectively by our direct sales forces.

Manufacturing and Operations

Our Performance Products segment has the capacity to produce a variety of products at 10 manufacturing locations in North America, EAME and APAC. Our global production capacity of amines is approximately 0.9 billion pounds and our North America and EAME production capacity of maleic anhydride is approximately 0.6 billion pounds.

Our amines facilities are located globally. These facilities have a competitive cost base and use modern manufacturing units that allow for flexibility in production capabilities and technical innovation.

Several of our facilities are located within large integrated petrochemical manufacturing complexes. We believe this results in greater scale and lower costs for our products than we would be able to obtain if these facilities were standalone operations. These include our maleic anhydride facilities in Pensacola, Florida, Geismar, Louisiana and Moers, Germany; our amines facilities in Freeport, Texas and Port Neches, Texas; and the amines facility of Arabian Amines Company (“AAC”), our consolidated manufacturing joint venture with the Zamil Group in Jubail, Saudi Arabia.

Joint Venture

We consolidate the results of AAC, our 50%-owned manufacturing joint venture with the Zamil Group. AAC operates an ethyleneamines manufacturing plant in Jubail, Saudi Arabia. The plant has an approximate annual capacity of 70 million pounds. We purchase and then market all the production from this joint venture.

Raw Materials

The main raw materials used in the production of our amines are EO, PO, glycols, EDC, caustic soda, ammonia, hydrogen, methylamines, and acrylonitrile. Most of these raw materials are available from multiple sources in the merchant market at competitive prices.

Maleic anhydride is produced by the reaction of normal butane with oxygen. The principal raw material is normal butane, which is purchased pursuant to long-term contracts and delivered to our Pensacola, Florida site by barge, to our facility in Geismar, Louisiana via pipeline and to our Moers, Germany site by railcar.

Competition

There are a small number of competitors for many of our amines due to the considerable customization of product formulations, the proprietary nature of many of our product applications and manufacturing processes and the relatively high research and development and technical costs involved. Our global competitors include BASF, Delamine, Dow, Evonik, Nouryon and Tosoh. We compete primarily based on product performance, new product innovation and price.

In our maleic anhydride market, we compete primarily based on price, customer service, technical support, reliability of supply and logistics management. Our competitors include AOC, Bartek, Ineos, Lanxess and Polynt-Reichhold. We compete primarily based on technological performance and service.

Advanced Materials

General

Our Advanced Materials segment is a leading global manufacturer and marketer of technologically-advanced epoxy, phenoxy, acrylic, polyurethane, mercaptan and acrylonitrile butadiene-based polymer products as well as carbon nanomaterials. We focus on chemical compounds and formulations that are used to address customer-specific needs in a wide variety of industrial and consumer applications. Our products are used either as replacements for traditional materials or in applications where traditional materials do not meet demanding engineering specifications. For example, structural adhesives are used to replace metal rivets and advanced composites are used to replace traditional aluminum panels and other steel materials to lighten structures in aerospace, automotive and other transportation. Our Advanced Materials segment is characterized by the breadth of our product offering, our expertise in complex chemistry, our long-standing relationships with our customers, our ability to develop and adapt our technology and our applications expertise for new markets and new applications.

We operate synthesis, formulating and production facilities in North America, Europe, Asia and South America. We sell to over 1,700 customers in the following end markets: aerospace, automotive, oil and gas, liquid natural gas transport, coatings and construction, printed circuit boards, consumer, industrial and automotive electronics, consumer and industrial appliances, electrical power transmission and distribution, recreational sports equipment, medical appliances and food and beverage packaging.

Products and Markets

Aerospace. Our Advanced Materials segment is a leading global supplier of advanced, high-performance materials for the fabrication and repair of aircraft components. We supply leading aerospace companies with innovations in composites, adhesives, laminating and repair systems, alongside innovative carbon nanotube technologies.

We offer a wide range of materials to the aerospace market under the ARALDITE®, EPIBOND®, EPOCAST®, URALANE® and MIRALON® brands. Many of these products are qualified under the specification of major aerospace original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”), complying with appropriate regulations governing large civil aircraft.

Automotive. We offer to the automotive market, including leading automotive OEMs and Tier 1 suppliers, high-end composite and adhesive formulations, specialty resins and toughening agents. Lightweight, strength, flexibility, shorter cycle time and fatigue resistance are key requirements of our industrial partners.

Our Advanced Materials segment has a long history of delivering a wide range of solutions meeting stringent requirements for automotive electronics applications, such as high temperature and chemical resistance, flame-retardancy and excellent mechanical and dielectric properties. The strong global push for electric vehicles opens new opportunities in electric motor thermal management, hydrogen storage systems and battery performance enhancement with our innovative encapsulants, composite systems, toughening agents and carbon nanomaterials.

Electrical Infrastructure. We are a leading global supplier of insulating materials for motors, generators, switchgears, distribution and instrument transformers, and insulators and bushings for electrical power applications. The products formulated by our Advanced Materials segment are designed to provide the electrical equipment with an extended service life and meet specific industry requirements for electrical insulation in indoor and outdoor environments.

Coatings Infrastructure. We offer expertise in curing and toughening technologies and a portfolio of specialized resins and additives to the manufacturers of paints and construction materials. Our product technologies, including epoxy hardeners, phenoxy and acrylonitrile-butadiene reactive liquid polymers and high solid or water-based components, enable customers to address challenging industry requirements, such as resistance to aggressive chemicals and high temperature, adhesion to difficult substrates, excellent mechanical properties, high drying speed and easy re-coatability, low temperature and sub-zero cure and low VOC and environmental impact.

General Industry. We offer high-performance adhesives and composite formulations, specialty resins, toughening agents and rubber polymers to a large variety of industrial applications, such as sport equipment, leisure and shipping boats, engineering machineries, consumer electronics, rubber consumables and the do-it-yourself market.

ARALDITE® is an important brand in high-performance adhesive technologies. We offer formulation expertise in various chemistries, including epoxies, polyurethanes, methacrylates, phenolics, mercaptan and acrylonitrile-butadiene-based polymer products. Our materials address requirements such as long open times for large area applications, fast-curing adhesives for early removal and rapid through-put, resistance to high temperature, water and chemicals, thixotropy for gap-filling or vertical applications, and toughness, impact-resistance and elasticity to cope with different thermal expansions when bonding larger structures. Our adhesives are used in a large variety of industrial applications.

Sales and Marketing

We maintain multiple routes to market to service our diverse and fragmented customer base throughout the world. These routes to market range from using our own direct sales force, distribution to mass distribution. Our direct sales force focuses on engineering solutions for our major customers who purchase significant amount of product. We use specialist distributors to augment our sales effort in niche markets and applications where we do not believe it is appropriate to develop direct sales resources. We use mass general distribution channels to sell our products into a wide range of general applications where technical expertise is less important, which reduces our overall selling expenses. We believe our use of multiple routes to market enables us to reach a broader customer base at an efficient cost.

We conduct sales activities through dedicated regional sales teams in Europe and India, Asia and the Americas. Our global customers are covered by key account managers who are familiar with the specific requirements of these customers. The management of long-standing customer relationships is critical to the sales and marketing process.

Manufacturing and Operations

We are a global business serving customers in three principal geographic regions: Europe and India, Asia and the Americas. In order to service our customers efficiently, we maintain both synthesis and formulations manufacturing plants around the world with a strategy of global, regional and local manufacturing employed to optimize the level of service and minimize the cost to our customers.

We have commissioned a pilot plant in San Antonio, Texas, specifically designed to convert methane into high-value MIRALON® carbon nanomaterials, as well as clean hydrogen for sale into the energy, materials and chemicals markets. The pilot plant operations are being optimized to demonstrate improved production capability for MIRALON® carbon nanomaterials at significantly higher volumes than have historically been produced at our Merrimack, New Hampshire research and development site. This reactor design will form the basis of a larger kiloton scale commercial reactor, which will address the needs of markets such as thermoplastics and battery additives as well as providing a commercial scale source of hydrogen for applications in markets such as chemicals, steel, energy and transportation.

Raw Materials

The principal raw materials we purchase for the manufacture of basic and advanced epoxy resins are epichlorohydrin, bisphenol A, MDA, phenol and aminophenols. We also purchase amines, polyols, isocyanates, acrylic materials, hardeners and fillers for the production of our formulated polymer systems and complex chemicals and additives. In our specialty nitrile latexes and carboxyl terminated acrylonitrile-butadiene copolymer product lines, acrylonitrile and butadiene are the main raw materials purchased. For production of mercaptan curatives, we purchase polyols, epichlorohydrin and hydrogen sulfide. Raw material costs constitute a sizeable percentage of the costs for certain applications. We have supply contracts with a number of suppliers. The terms of our supply contracts vary, but in general, these contracts contain provisions that set forth the quantities of product to be supplied and purchased. Formula pricing is sometimes used if advantageous for the business.

Additionally, in our European operations, we produce some of our most important raw materials, such as BLR and its basic derivatives, which are the basic building blocks of many of our products. In the Americas and Asia, we procure BLR on the open market from a number of suppliers.

We consume certain amines produced by our Performance Products segment and isocyanates produced by our Polyurethanes segment, which we use to formulate our Advanced Materials products.

Competition

The markets in which our Advanced Materials segment competes are diverse and require an appropriate human capital and asset footprint to compete effectively. The competitive intensity, capital investment and development of proprietary technology and maintenance of product research and development are all market specific. We operate dedicated technology centers in Basel, Switzerland; The Woodlands, Texas; Merrimack, New Hampshire, and Shanghai, China in support of our product and technology development. Among our competitors are some of the world’s largest chemical companies with integrated raw material value chains to formulation companies that leverage intellectual and highly proprietary technology for problem solving.

Aerospace. Our leading market position is driven by our specialty resins, curing and toughening agents and formulations offerings backed by customer-specific certifications, quality and consistency. These products are value-added, and differentiated, backed by many years of reliable global supply and service. Our major competitors include 3M, Henkel and Sumitomo.

Automotive. Our automotive market is driven by light weight, cost effective production and assembling and durability of electrical devices and high-speed electronics, and is serviced by our leading positions in systems formulations, curing and toughening technologies, backed by application and process manufacturing knowledge. Our product offering allows for reliable and competitive solutions, with a strong ARALDITE® and PROBIMER® brand reputation, a robust supply chain and a specialized distribution channel to fulfill customers’ expectant demand for service and quality. Our major competitors include Kaneka, Taiyo and Westlake.

Electrical Infrastructure. Our leading position in these markets is primarily based on formulations expertise, product reliability and performance, process expertise and technical support. Our competitive strengths result from our focus on defined market segment needs, our long-standing customer relationships, product reliability and technical performance, and reputation and recognition as a quality supplier. Our major competitors include Aditya Birla, Nagase, Westlake and Xiongrun.

Coatings Infrastructure. Our long-standing position in these markets is served by our specialty resins and additives. Our additives and specialty resins offerings, including epoxy hardeners, phenoxy and acrylonitrile-butadiene reactive liquid polymers and high solid or water-based components, are value-added products that allow our customers to differentiate their own products. Our major competitors include Aditya Birla, Allnex, Evonik, Kukdo and Westlake.

General Industry. Our adhesive markets are being driven by cost effective production and assembling and are serviced by our leading positions in systems formulations, curing and toughening technologies backed by application and process manufacturing knowledge. Our adhesive offering allows for reliable and competitive solutions with a strong ARALDITE® brand reputation, a robust supply chain and a specialized distribution channel to fulfill customers’ expectant demand for service and quality. Our major competitors include 3M, Henkel, ITW and Parker Hannifin.

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

We support our businesses with a major commitment to research and development, technical services and process engineering improvement. Our research and development centers are located in The Woodlands, Texas; Tienen, Belgium; Basel, Switzerland; Merrimack, New Hampshire; and Shanghai, China. Other process development/technical service centers are located in Deggendorf, Germany, Auburn Hills, Michigan and Derry, New Hampshire (Polyurethanes); and Monthey, Switzerland, MacIntosh, Alabama, Akron, Ohio and Panyu, China (Advanced Materials).

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS

Proprietary protection of our processes, apparatuses and other technology and inventions is important to our businesses. We own approximately 2,225 unexpired patents and have approximately 965 patent applications (including provisionals) currently pending. While a presumption of validity exists with respect to issued U.S. patents, we cannot assure that any of our patents will not be challenged, invalidated, circumvented or rendered unenforceable. Furthermore, we cannot assure the issuance of any pending patent application, or that if patents do issue, that these patents will provide meaningful protection against competitors or against competitive technologies. Additionally, our competitors or other third parties may obtain patents that restrict or preclude our ability to lawfully produce or sell our products in a competitive manner.

We also rely upon unpatented proprietary know-how and continuing technological innovation and other trade secrets to develop and maintain our competitive position. There can be no assurance, however, that confidentiality and other agreements into which we enter and have entered will not be breached, that they will provide meaningful protection for our trade secrets or proprietary know-how, or that adequate remedies will be available in the event of an unauthorized use or disclosure of such trade secrets and know-how. In addition, there can be no assurance that others will not obtain knowledge of these trade secrets through independent development or other access by legal means.

In addition to our own patents and patent applications and proprietary trade secrets and know-how, we are a party to certain licensing arrangements and other agreements authorizing us to use trade secrets, know-how and related technology and/or operate within the scope of certain patents owned by other entities. We also have licensed or sub-licensed intellectual property rights to third parties.

We have associated brand names with a number of our products, and we have approximately 2,925 trademark registrations and 135 pending trademark applications globally. These registrations and applications include extensions of protection under the Madrid system for the international registration of marks. However, there can be no assurance that the trademark registrations will provide meaningful protection against the use of similar trademarks by competitors or that the value of our trademarks will not be diluted.

Because of the breadth and nature of our intellectual property rights and our business, we do not believe that any single intellectual property right (other than certain trademarks, for which we intend to maintain the applicable registrations) is material to our business. Moreover, we do not believe that the termination of intellectual property rights expected to occur over the next several years, either individually or in the aggregate, will materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

HUMAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT

As of December 31, 2024, we employed approximately 6,300 associates in our operations around the world. Approximately 2,000 of these employees are located in the U.S., while approximately 4,300 are located in other countries.

We believe our employees are the foundation of our success. Our overall talent acquisition and retention strategy is designed to attract and retain diverse and qualified candidates to meet our performance goals on an ongoing basis and enable the success of our Company. Our key areas of focus include:

Health and Safety: Our global health and safety programs are designed around dedicated environmental, health and safety (“EHS”) Standards and Procedures specifically tailored at the facility level to address the different jurisdictions and regulations, specific operating hazards and unique working environments. The Company’s objectives focus on regulatory compliance and protection of people and the environment. Compliance with the EHS Standards and Procedures are evaluated through site self-audits as well as regularly scheduled Corporate EHS audits. In addition, other management systems applicable to many of our sites include third party verification of Responsible Care® and ISO 14001. A key metric used to assess the safety performance of our operations is the ASTM 2920 Level 1 injury rate, which follows a uniform international method for recording occupational injuries and illnesses. For both years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, we had injury rates of 0.13.

Ethics and Compliance: At Huntsman, our commitment to our values of honesty, integrity, respect and responsibility unite us globally and fosters high ethical standards in our relationships with each other, with our customers and with all those we do business. Our Business Conduct Guidelines, along with the policies and procedures referenced within the guidelines, provide guidance for all employees on topics such as anti-corruption and bribery, anti-trust and competition law, discrimination including our policy on harassment and retaliation, privacy, appropriate use of company assets, protecting confidential information and reporting concerns and violations. The guidelines are used to reinforce our commitment to operating in a fair, honest, responsible and ethical manner and to emphasize the importance of having an open and welcoming environment in which all employees feel empowered to do what is right. Should potential violations of the guidelines, policies, procedures or the law occur, employees are encouraged to voice concerns promptly and are reminded that we do not tolerate retaliation against anyone who reports a potential violation in good faith. All employees are required to complete the training on the Business Conduct Guidelines annually, and our Chief Compliance Officer reports matters related to the Business Conduct Guidelines to the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors on a quarterly basis.

Compensation and Benefits: Our policy is to competitively compensate our associates and to appropriately motivate associates to provide value to our shareholders. Our compensation philosophy is to align both short-term and long-term incentives with our strategic objectives and to take into account market forces, best practices, and the performance of our Company and the employee. We offer employees benefits that vary by country and are designed to meet or exceed local laws and to be competitive in the marketplace. Examples of benefits offered in the U.S. include a 401(k) plan with employer contributions, health benefits, business travel and life/disability insurance, supplemental voluntary insurance and paid time off.

Training and Talent Development: We are committed to the continued development of our workforce. We provide technical and leadership training to our associates, customers and suppliers who work for or with our products and services. Training is provided in a number of formats to accommodate the learner’s style, pace, location, technological knowledge and access.

ENVIRONMENTAL, HEALTH AND SAFETY MATTERS

General

We are subject to extensive federal, state, local and international laws, regulations, rules and ordinances relating to occupational health and safety, process safety, pollution, protection of the environment and natural resources, product management and distribution, and the generation, storage, handling, transportation, treatment, disposal and remediation of hazardous substances and waste materials. In the ordinary course of business, we are subject to frequent environmental inspections and monitoring and occasional investigations by governmental enforcement authorities. In addition, our production facilities require operating permits that are subject to renewal, modification and, in certain circumstances, revocation. Actual or alleged violations of safety laws, environmental laws or permit requirements could result in restrictions or prohibitions on plant operations or product distribution, substantial civil or criminal sanctions, or injunctions limiting or prohibiting our operations altogether. In addition, some environmental laws may impose liability on a strict or joint and several basis. Moreover, changes in environmental regulations could inhibit or interrupt our operations, or require us to modify our facilities or operations and make significant environmental compliance expenditures. Accordingly, environmental or regulatory matters may cause us to incur significant unanticipated losses, costs or liabilities. Information related to EHS matters may also be found in other areas of this report including “—Item 1A. Risk Factors” and “Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies—Environmental Expenditures” and “Note 21. Environmental Health and Safety Matters” to our consolidated financial statements.

Environmental, Health and Safety Systems

We are committed to achieving and maintaining compliance with all applicable EHS legal requirements, and we have developed policies and management systems that are designed to identify the myriad EHS legal requirements applicable to our operations, enhance compliance with applicable legal requirements, improve the safety of our employees, contractors, community neighbors and customers and minimize the production and emission of wastes and other pollutants. We cannot guarantee, however, that these policies and systems will always be effective or that we will be able to manage EHS legal requirements without incurring substantial costs. Although EHS legal requirements are constantly changing and, for that reason, are frequently difficult to comply with, these EHS management systems are designed to assist us in our compliance goals while also fostering efficiency and improvement and reducing overall risk to us. For the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, our capital expenditures for EHS matters totaled $27 million, $30 million and $44 million, respectively, and our estimated capital expenditures for EHS matters for 2025 is expected to be approximately $56 million.

Environmental Remediation

We have incurred, and we may in the future incur, liabilities to investigate and clean up waste or contamination at our current or former facilities or facilities operated by third parties at which we may have disposed of waste or other materials. Similarly, we may incur costs for the cleanup of waste that was disposed of prior to the purchase of our businesses. Under some circumstances, the scope of our liabilities may extend to damages to natural resources.

In cases where our potential liabilities arise from historical contamination based on operations and other events occurring prior to our ownership of a business or specific facility, we frequently obtain an indemnity agreement from the prior owner addressing remediation liabilities arising from pre-closing conditions. We have successfully exercised our rights under these contractual covenants for a number of sites and, where applicable, mitigated our ultimate remediation liabilities. We cannot assure, however, that the liabilities for all such matters subject to indemnity will be honored by prior owners or that our existing indemnities will be sufficient to cover our liabilities for such matters.

Based on available information and the indemnification rights we believe are likely to be available, we believe that the costs to investigate and remediate known contamination will not have a material effect on our financial statements. However, if such indemnities are not honored or do not fully cover the costs of investigation and remediation or we are required to contribute to such costs, then such expenditures may have a material effect on our financial statements. At the current time, we are unable to estimate the total cost, exclusive of indemnification benefits, to remediate contaminated sites.

Regulatory Matters

Greenhouse Gas Regulation and Climate Change

Globally, our operations are increasingly subject to regulations that seek to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases (“GHGs”), such as carbon dioxide (“CO2”) and methane. At the Durban negotiations of the Conference of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol in 2012, a limited group of nations, including the European Union (the “EU”), agreed to a second commitment period for the Kyoto Protocol, an international treaty that provides for reductions in GHG emissions. More significantly, the EU GHG Emissions Trading System (“ETS”), established pursuant to the Kyoto Protocol to reduce GHG emissions in the EU, continues in its fourth phase. The European Commission (the “EC”) established a market stability reserve that started operating in 2019 and addresses a surplus of allowances and improves the system’s resilience to major shocks by adjusting the supply of allowances to be auctioned. In addition, the EU has set a binding target to reduce domestic GHG emissions by at least 40% below 1990 levels by 2030 and a binding target to increase the share of renewable energy to at least 32% of the EU’s energy consumption by 2030. In July 2021, the EC proposed legislation to increase its GHG emission reduction target to at least 55% and the renewable energy target to 40%. In January 2024, the EC communicated support for a 90% reduction in GHG emissions by 2040.

Moreover, beginning in 2026, the EU’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive will mandate reporting of wide-ranging environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) data, which is estimated to affect a significant number of companies in the EU and foreign companies with EU operations—including some companies based in the U.S. Affected companies or their EU-based subsidiaries will be required to report on matters ranging from pollution to biodiversity, business conduct, and climate change. Failure to do so could result in financial liabilities, civil or criminal penalties, and reputational risks.

In addition, at the 2015 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in Paris, the U.S. and nearly 200 other nations entered into an international climate agreement, which went into effect in November 2016 (the “Paris Agreement”). Although the Paris Agreement does not create any binding obligations for nations to limit their GHG emissions, it does include pledges to voluntarily limit or reduce future emissions. The U.S. rejoined the Paris Agreement on February 19, 2021. In addition, in September 2021, former U.S. President Biden publicly announced the Global Methane Pledge, a pact that aims to reduce global methane emissions at least 30% below 2020 levels by 2030. Since its formal launch at the United Nations Climate Change Conference (“COP26”), over 100 countries have joined the Global Methane Pledge. On January 20, 2025, the new U.S. presidential administration under U.S. President Trump (the “Trump Administration”) directed the U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations to immediately submit formal written notification of the U.S.’s withdrawal from the Paris Agreement. Until new policy directives are fully implemented, however, the full scope and effect of such changes remain uncertain.

Domestic efforts to curb GHG emissions are being driven by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“EPA”) GHG regulations and similar programs of certain states. To the extent that our domestic operations are subject to EPA’s GHG regulations, we may face increased capital and operating costs associated with new or expanded facilities. Significant expansions of our existing facilities or construction of new facilities may be subject to the federal Clean Air Act’s (the “CAA”) requirements for pollutants regulated under the Prevention of Significant Deterioration and Title V programs. Some of our facilities are also subject to EPA’s Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases Rule, and any further regulation may increase our operational costs.

On March 6, 2024, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) adopted final rules requiring, among other things, disclosure of material climate-related risks and related governance practices, Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions reports and financial impacts of severe weather events and other natural conditions (the “Climate Rule”). Several lawsuits have been filed challenging the Climate Rule. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit was selected to consolidate the lawsuits, and on April 4, 2024, the SEC voluntarily stayed the rules pending the outcome of the litigation.

Furthermore, in October 2023, the state of California enacted significant corporate climate disclosure legislation (S.B. 253) that will require annual reporting of GHG emissions (Scope 1, 2 and 3 in accordance with the Greenhouse Gas Protocol) for public and private companies with over $1 billion in gross annual revenue that are doing business in California. Phased-in disclosure requirements (and assurance) begin in 2026, covering emissions during 2025.

In addition, separate California legislation (S.B. 261) requires biennial climate risk reporting, in accordance with the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures recommendations, by public and private companies with over $500 million in annual revenues that are doing business in California. First reports will need to be published on or before January 1, 2026.

The climate-related laws in California are currently under legal challenge in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. On November 5, 2024, the court denied the plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment, allowing the laws to remain in effect for the time being. However, the litigation is ongoing, and the ultimate outcome remains uncertain. If the laws are upheld, they could result in additional costs associated with regulatory reporting requirements and potential liability.

Further, on April 9, 2024, EPA updated the Hazardous Organic National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants under the CAA, also known as the HON rule, imposing more stringent emissions regulations and additional air monitoring requirements for approximately 200 chemical plants across the U.S. If implemented, we anticipate that these regulations may result in material changes to Huntsman.

We are already managing and reporting GHG emissions, to varying degrees, as required by law for our sites in locations subject to U.S. federal and state requirements, Kyoto Protocol obligations and/or ETS requirements. Although these sites are subject to existing GHG legislation, few have experienced or anticipate significant cost increases because of these programs, although it is possible that GHG emission restrictions may increase over time. Potential consequences of such restrictions include capital requirements to modify assets to meet GHG emission restrictions and/or increases in energy costs above the level of general inflation, as well as direct compliance costs. Currently, however, it is not possible to estimate the likely financial impact of potential future regulation on any of our sites.

Finally, most scientists have concluded that increasing concentrations of GHGs in the earth’s atmosphere may produce climate changes that have significant physical effects, such as increased frequency and severity of storms, droughts, floods and other climatic events. If any of those effects were to occur, they could have an adverse effect on our assets and operations.

AVAILABLE INFORMATION

We maintain an internet website at http://www.huntsman.com. Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to these reports are available free of charge through our website as soon as reasonably practicable after we file these materials with the SEC. We also provide electronic or paper copies of our SEC filings free of charge upon request.

GLOSSARY OF CHEMICAL TERMS

BDO—butane diol

BLR—base liquid resin

DGA® Agent—DIGLYCOLAMINE® agent

DPA—diphenylamine

EDC—ethylene dichloride

EO—ethylene oxide

MDA—methylene dioxy amphetamine

MDI—methyl diphenyl diisocyanate

MTBE—methyl tertiary-butyl ether

PO—propylene oxide

Polyols—a substance containing several hydroxyl groups. A diol, triol and tetrol contain two, three and four hydroxyl groups, respectively.

TDI—toluene diisocyanate

TPU—thermoplastic polyurethane

UPR—unsaturated polyester resin

Any of the following risks could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS AND OPERATIONS

Our industry is affected by global economic factors, including risks associated with volatile economic conditions, and the economic environment, inflation, elevated interest rates and recessions. Prolonged periods of slow economic growth and global instability have had, and may continue to have, significant effects on our customers and suppliers and have had, and may in the future continue to have, a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, financial condition and/or stock price.

Our financial results are substantially dependent on overall economic conditions in the U.S., Europe and Asia. Declining economic conditions, including adverse factors such as inflation, rising and elevated interest rates, supply chain disruptions and geopolitical conflicts, or negative perceptions about future economic conditions, have resulted in, and in the future could result in, a substantial decrease in demand for our products and could adversely affect our business. The timing and extent of any changes to currently prevailing market conditions is uncertain, and supply and demand may be unbalanced at any time. The effects of global economic conditions in certain markets include, among other things, significant reductions in available capital and liquidity from credit markets, supply or demand driven inflationary pressures, and substantial fluctuations in currency values worldwide. Uncertain economic conditions and market instability make it particularly difficult for us to forecast demand trends. As a consequence, we may not be able to accurately predict future economic conditions or the effect of such conditions on our financial condition or results of operations. In addition, a prolonged or substantial economic downturn could have material unforeseen consequences, and may result in increased indebtedness or substantially lower adjusted EBITDA, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business and our ability to comply with the financial covenants in our debt agreements. We can give no assurances as to the timing, extent or duration of the current or future economic cycles impacting the industries in which we operate.

The industries in which we compete are highly competitive, and we may not be able to compete effectively with our competitors, including those that have greater financial resources and sovereign and other state-owned or affiliated entities, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

The industries in which we operate are highly competitive. Among our competitors are some of the world’s largest chemical companies. Changes in the competitive landscape could make it difficult for us to retain our competitive position in various products and markets throughout the world. Some of the companies with whom we compete may be able to produce products more economically than we can. Furthermore, some of our competitors have greater financial resources, which may enable them to invest significant capital into their businesses, including expenditures for research and development.

While we are engaged in a range of research and development programs to develop new products and processes, to improve and refine existing products and processes, and to develop new applications or alternative uses for existing products, the failure to develop new products, processes or applications or the failure to keep pace with evolving technological innovations in our end-use markets, could make us less competitive and have an adverse impact on our financial results. Moreover, if any of our current or future competitors develops proprietary technology that enables them to produce products at a significantly lower cost, our technology could be rendered uneconomical or obsolete. We cannot predict whether technological innovations will, in the future, result in a lower demand for our products or affect the competitiveness of our business.

Further, it is possible that we could abandon certain products, processes, or applications due to potential infringement of third party intellectual property rights or that we could be named in future litigation for the infringement or misappropriation of a competitor’s or other third party’s intellectual property rights, which could include a claim for injunctive relief and damages, and, if so, such adverse results could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial position.

In addition, certain of our competitors in various countries in which we do business, including China, may be sovereign and other state-owned or affiliated entities. These competitors may get special treatment with respect to regulatory compliance and product registration, while certain of our products, including those based on new technologies, may be delayed or even prevented from entering into the local market.

Certain of our businesses use technology that is widely available. Accordingly, barriers to entry, apart from capital availability, may be low in certain product segments of our business. The entrance of new competitors into any of our businesses may reduce our ability to maintain margins or capture improving margins in circumstances where capacity utilization in the industry is increasing. Finally, we may face increased competition due to the rapid development of digital, artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies. Failure to early adopt and incorporate such technologies to improve productivity and manufacturing technology may put us at a long-term competitive disadvantage. Increased competition in any of our businesses could compel us to reduce the prices of our products, which could result in reduced margins and loss of market share and have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.

Disruptions in production at our manufacturing facilities may have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations and/or financial condition.

Manufacturing facilities in our industry are subject to planned and unplanned production shutdowns, turnarounds, outages and other disruptions. Any serious disruption at any of our facilities could impair our ability to use our facilities and have a material adverse impact on our revenues and increase our costs and expenses. Alternative facilities with sufficient capacity may not be available, may cost substantially more or may take a significant time to increase production or qualify with our customers, any of which could negatively impact our business, results of operations and/or financial condition. Long-term production disruptions may cause our customers to seek alternative supply which could further adversely affect our profitability.

Unplanned production disruptions may occur for external reasons including natural disasters, weather, disease, strikes, transportation interruption, government regulation, political unrest or terrorism, or internal reasons, such as fire, unplanned maintenance or other manufacturing problems. Any significant production disruption could have a material impact on our operations, operating results and financial condition.

In addition, we rely on a number of vendors, suppliers, and in some cases sole-source suppliers, service providers, toll manufacturers and collaborations with other industry participants to provide us with chemicals, feedstocks and other raw materials, along with energy sources and, in certain cases, facilities that we need to operate our business. If the business of these third parties is disrupted, some of these companies could be forced to reduce their output, shut down their operations or file for bankruptcy protection. If this were to occur, it could adversely affect their ability to provide us with the raw materials, energy sources or facilities that we need, which could materially disrupt our operations, including the production of certain of our products. Moreover, it could be difficult to find replacements for certain of our business partners without incurring significant delays or cost increases. If we are required to obtain alternate sources for raw materials because a supplier is unwilling or unable to perform under raw material supply agreements, if a supplier terminates its agreements with us, if we are unable to renew our existing contracts, or if we are unable to obtain new long-term supply agreements, we may not be able to obtain these raw materials in sufficient quantities, on economic terms, or in a timely manner, and we may not be able to enter into supply agreements on terms as favorable to us as our existing supply agreements, if at all. All of these risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.

While we maintain business recovery plans that are intended to allow us to recover from natural disasters or other events that could disrupt our business, we cannot provide assurances that our plans would fully protect us from the effects of all such disasters or from events that might increase in frequency or intensity due to climate change. In addition, insurance may not adequately compensate us for any losses incurred as a result of natural or other disasters. In areas prone to frequent natural or other disasters, insurance may become increasingly expensive or not available at all. Furthermore, some potential climate-driven losses, particularly inundation due to sea-level rise, may pose long-term risks to our physical facilities such that operations cannot be restored in their current locations.

The markets for many of our products are cyclical and volatile, and we may experience depressed market conditions for such products.

The cyclicality in the markets for many of our products occurs as a result of alternating periods of tight supply, causing prices and margins to increase, followed by periods of lower capacity utilization, resulting in oversupply and declining prices and margins. The volatility these markets experience occurs as a result of changes in the demand for products as a consequence of global economic activity, changes in energy prices and changes in customers’ requirements. For example, demand for our products depends in part on aerospace, housing and construction industries, which are cyclical in nature and have historically been impacted by downturns in the economy. The supply-demand balance is also impacted by capacity additions or reductions that result in changes in utilization rates. The cyclicality and volatility of our industry results in significant fluctuations in profits and cash flow from period to period and over the business cycle.

Our results of operations may be adversely affected by international business risks, including fluctuations in currency exchange rates, legal restrictions and/or taxes.

We conduct a majority of our business operations outside the U.S., and these operations are subject to risks normally associated with international operations. These risks include the need to convert currencies that may be received for our products into currencies in which we purchase raw materials or pay for services, which could result in a gain or loss depending on fluctuations in exchange rates. We transact business in many foreign currencies, including euros, Swiss francs, Chinese renminbi, Indian rupees, Saudi riyals and Turkish liras. We translate our local currency financial results into U.S. dollars based on average exchange rates prevailing during the reporting period or the exchange rate at the end of that period. During times of a strengthening U.S. dollar, our reported international sales and earnings may be reduced because the local currency may translate into fewer U.S. dollars. Because we currently have significant operations located outside the U.S., we are exposed to fluctuations in global currency rates which may result in gains or losses on our financial statements.

Other risks of international operations include trade barriers, tariffs, exchange controls, cash repatriation restrictions, national and regional labor strikes, social and political risks, general economic risks and required compliance with a variety of U.S. and foreign laws, including monetary policies, tax laws, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (and foreign equivalents), export controls and regulations administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control. Any changes in tariffs or trade barriers could make our products less competitive compared to other producers not subject to the same tariffs or trade barriers. Any decision to repatriate cash as dividends could subject us to foreign and U.S. federal and state income taxes without any offsetting foreign tax credit relief. Although we maintain an anti-corruption compliance program throughout our company, violations of our compliance program may result in criminal or civil sanctions, including material monetary fines, penalties and other costs against us or our employees, and may have a material adverse effect on our business. Furthermore, in foreign jurisdictions where legal processes may vary from country to country, we may experience difficulty in enforcing agreements. In jurisdictions where bankruptcy laws and practices vary, we may experience difficulty collecting foreign receivables through foreign legal systems. The occurrence of these risks, among others, could disrupt the businesses of our international subsidiaries, which could significantly affect their ability to make distributions to us.

We operate in a significant number of jurisdictions, which contributes to the volatility of our effective tax rate. Changes in tax laws or the interpretation of tax laws in the jurisdictions in which we operate may affect our effective tax rate. For example, a number of countries, as well as organizations such as the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, support a global minimum tax initiative. Such countries and organizations are also actively considering changes to existing tax laws or have proposed new tax laws that could increase our tax obligations. For such laws that have been enacted, we anticipate the impact will be immaterial to our financial statements. In addition, generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP” or “U.S. GAAP”) have required us to place valuation allowances against some of our net operating losses and other deferred tax assets in certain tax jurisdictions. These valuation allowances result from analysis of positive and negative evidence supporting the realization of tax benefits. Negative evidence includes a cumulative history of pre-tax operating losses in specific tax jurisdictions. Changes in valuation allowances have resulted in material fluctuations in our effective tax rate. Economic conditions or changes in tax laws may dictate the continued imposition of current valuation allowances and, potentially, the establishment of new valuation allowances. While significant valuation allowances remain, our effective tax rate will likely continue to experience significant fluctuations. Furthermore, certain foreign jurisdictions may take actions to delay our ability to collect value-added tax refunds.

Significant price volatility or interruptions in supply of our raw materials and energy may result in increased costs that we may be unable to pass on to our customers, which could reduce our profitability.

We purchase a substantial portion of our raw materials and energy from third-party suppliers and their costs represent a substantial portion of our operating expenses. The prices for raw materials and energy generally follow price trends of, and vary with market conditions for, crude oil and natural gas feedstocks, which are highly volatile and cyclical. While we attempt to match cost increases with corresponding product price increases or surcharges, we are not always able to raise product prices immediately or at all. Timing differences between raw material and energy prices, which may change daily, and contract product prices, which in many cases are negotiated only monthly or less often, have had and may continue to have a negative effect on our cash flow. Any cost increase that we are not able to pass on to our customers could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and/or liquidity.

In general, the feedstocks and other raw materials we consume are organic chemical commodity products that are readily available at market prices. There are, however, several raw materials for which there are only a limited number of suppliers or a single supplier. To mitigate potential supply constraints, we frequently enter into supply agreements with particular suppliers, evaluate alternative sources of supply and evaluate alternative technologies to avoid reliance on limited or sole-source suppliers. In addition, where supply relationships are concentrated, particular attention is paid by the parties to ensure strategic intentions are aligned to facilitate long-term planning. If certain of our suppliers are unable to meet their obligations under present supply agreements, we may be forced to pay higher prices to obtain the necessary raw materials from other sources and we may not be able to increase prices for our finished products to recoup the higher raw materials costs. Any interruption in the supply of raw materials could increase our costs or decrease our revenues, which could reduce our cash flow. The inability of a supplier to meet our raw material needs could have a material adverse effect on our financial statements and results of operations.

The number of sources for and availability of certain raw materials is also specific to the particular geographical region in which a facility is located. Political and economic instability in the countries from which we purchase our raw material supplies could adversely affect their availability. In addition, if raw materials become unavailable within a geographic area from which they are now sourced, then we may not be able to obtain suitable or cost-effective substitutes. We may also experience higher operating costs such as energy costs, which could affect our profitability. We may not always be able to increase our selling prices to offset the impact of any higher production costs or reduced production levels, which could reduce our earnings and decrease our liquidity.

Our efforts to grow and transform our businesses may require significant investments; if our strategies are unsuccessful, our business, results of operations and/or financial condition may be materially adversely affected.

We continuously evaluate opportunities for growth and change. These initiatives may involve making acquisitions, entering into partnerships and joint ventures, divesting assets, restructuring our existing operations and assets, creating new financial structures and building new facilities—any of which could require a significant investment and subject us to new kinds of risks. We may incur additional indebtedness to finance these opportunities. If our strategies for growth and change are not successful, we could face increased financial pressure, such as increased cash flow demands, reduced liquidity and diminished access to financial markets, and the equity value of our businesses could be diluted.

The implementation of strategies for growth and change may create additional risks, including:

• diversion of management time and attention away from existing operations;
• requiring capital investment that could otherwise be used for the operation and growth of our existing businesses;
• disruptions to important business relationships;
• increased operating costs;
• limitations imposed by various governmental entities; and
• difficulties due to lack of or limited prior experience in any new markets we may enter.

Our inability to mitigate these risks or other problems encountered in connection with our strategies for growth and change could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and/or financial condition. In addition, we may fail to fully achieve the savings or growth projected for current or future initiatives notwithstanding the expenditure of substantial resources in pursuit thereof.

We are subject to risks relating to our information technology systems, and any technology disruption or cyberattack could negatively affect our operations.

We rely on information technology systems across our operations, including for management, supply chain and financial information and various other processes and transactions. Our ability to effectively manage our business depends on the security, reliability and capacity of these systems. Our technology systems or the technology systems of third parties on which we rely, are vulnerable to disruption from circumstances beyond our control including fire, natural disasters, power outages, system failures, security breaches, espionage, viruses, theft and inadvertent release of information. To date, we have not had a cyberattack that has had a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. Any disruption to our information technology systems could disrupt our operations or result in the disclosure of proprietary information about our business or confidential information concerning our customers or employees which could result in negative publicity/brand damage, violation of privacy laws, potential liability, including litigation/investigation/remediation or other legal actions against us or the imposition of penalties, fines, fees or liabilities, which may not be covered adequately by our insurance policies. Any or all the above would potentially cause delays or cancellations of customer orders or impede the manufacture or shipment of products, processing of transactions or reporting of financial results.

While we have invested and will continue to invest in technology security initiatives and disaster recovery plans, we may not be able to implement measures sufficient to prevent cyberattacks or that will protect against other significant risks to our information technology systems. We have put in place security measures designed to protect against the misappropriation or corruption of our systems, intentional or unintentional disclosure of confidential information, or disruption of our operations. In addition, current employees have, and former employees may have, access to a significant amount of information regarding our operations which could be disclosed to our competitors or otherwise used to harm us. Moreover, our operations in certain locations, such as China, may be particularly vulnerable to security attacks or other problems. Any breach of our security measures could result in unauthorized access to and misappropriation of our information, corruption of data or disruption of operations or transactions, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, we could be required to expend significant additional efforts to respond to information technology issues or to protect against threatened or actual cyberattacks.

Finally, data privacy is subject to frequently changing rules and regulations in countries where we do business. For example, the General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) requires companies to meet regulations regarding the handling of personal data. Our failure to successfully comply with GDPR requirements could result in substantial fines or penalties and legal liability, which could tarnish our reputation.

Our operations involve risks that may increase our operating costs, which could reduce our profitability.

Although we take precautions to enhance the safety of our operations and minimize the risk of disruptions, our operations are subject to hazards inherent in the manufacturing and marketing of chemical and other products. These hazards include chemical spills, pipeline leaks and ruptures, storage tank leaks, discharges or releases of toxic or hazardous substances or gases and other hazards incident to the manufacturing, processing, handling, transportation and storage of dangerous chemicals. We are also potentially subject to other hazards, including natural disasters and severe weather; explosions and fires; transportation problems, including interruptions, spills and leaks; mechanical failures; unscheduled downtimes; labor difficulties; remediation complications; and other risks. In addition, some equipment and operations at our facilities are owned or controlled by third parties who may not be fully integrated into our safety programs and over whom we are able to exercise limited control. Many potential hazards can cause bodily injury and loss of life, severe damage to or destruction of property and equipment and environmental damage and may result in suspension of operations and the imposition of civil or criminal penalties and liabilities. Furthermore, we are subject to present and future claims with respect to workplace exposure, exposure of contractors on our premises as well as other persons located nearby, workers’ compensation and other matters.

We maintain property, business interruption, products liability and casualty insurance policies which we believe are in accordance with customary industry practices, as well as insurance policies covering other types of risks, including pollution legal liability insurance, but we are not fully insured against all potential hazards and risks incident to our business. Each of these insurance policies is subject to customary exclusions, deductibles and coverage limits, in accordance with industry standards and practices. As a result of market conditions, premiums and deductibles for certain insurance policies can increase substantially and, in some instances, certain insurance may become unavailable or available only for reduced amounts of coverage. If we were to incur a significant liability for which we were not fully insured, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and/or liquidity.

In addition, we are subject to various claims and litigation in the ordinary course of business. We are a party to various pending lawsuits and proceedings. For more information, see “—Item 3. Legal Proceedings” below.

Our operations, financial condition and liquidity could be adversely affected by legal claims against us, including antitrust claims.

We face risks arising from various legal actions, including matters relating to antitrust, product liability, intellectual property and environmental claims. It is possible that judgments could be rendered against us in these cases or others for which we could be uninsured or not covered by indemnity, or which may be beyond the amounts that we currently have reserved or anticipate incurring for such matters. Over the past few years, antitrust claims have been made against chemical companies. In this type of litigation, the plaintiffs generally seek injunctive relief, treble damages or the maximum damages allowed by state law, costs of suit and attorneys’ fees, which may result in significant liabilities. An adverse outcome in any antitrust claim could be material and significantly impact our operations, financial condition, liquidity and/or business reputation.

We may have difficulties integrating acquired businesses and as a result, our business, results of operations and/or financial condition may be materially adversely affected.

We have completed a number of acquisitions, and we expect to continue to acquire additional businesses and enter into joint ventures as part of our business strategy. Growth through acquisitions and joint ventures involves risks, including:

• inability to efficiently operate new businesses or to integrate acquired businesses and products;
• inability to accurately predict delays in realizing the costs and benefits of acquisitions, partnerships, or joint ventures;
• unexpected losses of customers or suppliers of an acquired or existing business;
• difficulties in retaining key employees of acquired businesses;
• difficulties in realizing projected synergies; and
• exposure to unanticipated liabilities, including unexpected environmental exposures, product liability or illegal activities conducted by an acquired company or a joint venture partner.

Our inability to address these risks could cause us to fail to realize the anticipated benefits of such acquisitions or joint ventures and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and/or financial condition.

Our business is exposed to risks associated with the creditworthiness of our suppliers, customers and business partners and the industries in which our suppliers, customers and business partners participate are cyclical in nature, both of which may adversely affect our business and results of operations.

Our business is exposed to risks associated with the creditworthiness of our key suppliers, customers and business partners and reductions in demand for our customers’ products. During periods of economic disruption, more of our customers than normal may experience financial difficulties, including bankruptcies, restructurings and liquidations, which could affect our business by reducing sales, increasing our risk in extending trade credit to customers and reducing our profitability. A significant adverse change in a customer relationship or in a customer’s financial position could cause us to limit or discontinue business with that customer, require us to assume more credit risk relating to that customer’s receivables or limit our ability to collect accounts receivable from that customer.

Our business is dependent on our intellectual property; if our intellectual property rights cannot be enforced or our trade secrets become known to our competitors, our ability to compete may be adversely affected.

Proprietary protection of our processes, apparatuses and other technology is important to our business. While a presumption of validity exists with respect to patents issued to us in the U.S., there can be no assurance that any of our patents will not be challenged, invalidated, circumvented or rendered unenforceable. Furthermore, if any pending patent application filed by us does not result in an issued patent, or if patents are issued to us, but such patents do not provide meaningful protection of our intellectual property, then our ability to compete may be adversely affected. Additionally, our competitors or other third parties may obtain patents that restrict or preclude our ability to lawfully produce or sell our products in a competitive manner, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and/or liquidity.

We also rely upon unpatented proprietary know-how and continuing technological innovation and other trade secrets to develop and maintain our competitive position. While it is our policy to enter into agreements imposing confidentiality obligations upon our employees and third parties to protect our intellectual property, these confidentiality obligations may be breached, may not provide meaningful protection for our trade secrets or proprietary know-how, or adequate remedies may not be available in the event of an unauthorized access, use or disclosure of our trade secrets and know-how. In addition, others could obtain knowledge of our trade secrets through independent development or other access by legal means.

We may have to rely on judicial enforcement of our patents and other proprietary rights. We may not be able to effectively protect our intellectual property rights from misappropriation or infringement in countries where effective patent, trademark, trade secret and other intellectual property laws and judicial systems may be unavailable or may not protect our proprietary rights to the same extent as U.S. law.

The failure of our patents or confidentiality agreements to protect our processes, apparatuses, technology, trade secrets or proprietary know-how or the failure of adequate legal remedies for related actions could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.

Conflicts, military actions, terrorist attacks, political events, public health crises, changes in regulatory regimes and general instability, along with increased security regulations related to our industry, could adversely affect our business.

Conflicts, military actions, terrorist attacks, political events and public health crises have precipitated economic instability and turmoil in international commerce and the global economy. The uncertainty and economic disruption resulting from hostilities, military action or acts of terrorism may impact any or all of our facilities and operations or those of our suppliers or customers. Accordingly, any conflict, military action or terrorist attack that impacts us or any of our suppliers or customers, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and/or liquidity. Furthermore, instability and turmoil, particularly in energy-producing nations, may result in raw material cost increases.

Changes in social, political, regulatory and economic conditions or in laws and policies governing foreign trade, manufacturing, development and investment in the territories and countries where we currently develop and sell products, could adversely affect our business. For example, a number of governments have proposed or instituted regulations attempting to increase the security of chemical plants and the transportation of hazardous chemicals, and in certain regions, putting pressure on manufacturing industries, which could result in higher operating costs and could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and liquidity.

Our pension and postretirement benefit plan obligations have historically been underfunded, and, under certain circumstances, we may have to increase the level of cash funding to some or all of these plans, which would reduce the cash available for our business.

While our pension and postretirement benefit plan obligations are currently adequately funded, we have historically experienced unfunded and underfunded obligations under some of our domestic and foreign pension and postretirement benefit plans. The funded status of our pension plans is dependent upon many factors, including returns on invested assets, the level of certain market interest rates and the discount rates used to determine pension obligations. Unfavorable returns on the plan assets or unfavorable changes in applicable laws or regulations could materially change the timing and amount of required plan funding, which would reduce the cash available for our business. In addition, a decrease in the discount rate used to determine pension obligations could result in an increase in the valuation of pension obligations, which could affect the reported funding status of our pension plans and future contributions, as well as the periodic pension cost in subsequent fiscal years.

With respect to our domestic pension and postretirement benefit plans, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (“PBGC”) has the authority to terminate an underfunded tax-qualified pension plan under limited circumstances in accordance with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended. In the event our tax-qualified pension plans are terminated by the PBGC, we could be liable to the PBGC for the entire amount of the underfunding. With respect to our foreign pension and postretirement benefit plans, the effects of underfunding depend on the country in which the pension and postretirement benefit plan is established. For example, in the United Kingdom (“U.K.”) and Germany semi-public pension protection programs have the authority in certain circumstances to assume responsibility for underfunded pension schemes, including the right to recover the amount of the underfunding from us.

RISKS RELATED TO REGULATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION

We are subject to many EHS regulations that may result in unanticipated costs or liabilities, which could reduce our profitability.

We are subject to extensive federal, state, local and foreign laws, regulations, rules and ordinances relating to pollution, protection of the environment and human health and safety, and the generation, storage, handling, transportation, treatment, disposal and remediation of hazardous substances and waste materials. Actual or alleged violations of EHS laws or permit requirements could result in restrictions or prohibitions on plant operations and substantial civil or criminal sanctions and under certain EHS laws, the assessment of strict liability and/or joint and several liability.

Many of our products and operations are subject to the chemical control laws of the countries in which they are located. These laws include the regulation of chemical substances and inventories under the Toxic Substances Control Act (“TSCA”) in the U.S. and the Registration, Evaluation and Authorization of Chemicals (“REACH”) and the Classification, Labeling and Packaging of substances and mixtures (“CLP”) regulations in Europe. Analogous regulatory regimes exist in other parts of the world, including China, South Korea and Taiwan. In addition, a number of countries where we operate, including the U.K., have adopted rules to conform chemical labeling in accordance with a globally harmonized system. Many of these foreign regulatory regimes are in the process of a multi-year implementation period for these rules.

Additional new laws and regulations may be enacted or adopted by various regulatory agencies globally. For example, TSCA reform legislation was enacted in June 2016, and EPA has begun the process of issuing new chemical control regulations. EPA issued several final rules in 2017 and 2018 under the revised TSCA related to existing chemicals, including the following: (i) a rule to establish EPA’s process and criteria for identifying chemicals for risk evaluation; (ii) a rule to establish EPA’s process for evaluating high priority chemicals and their uses to determine whether or not they present an unreasonable risk to health or the environment; and (iii) a rule to require industry reporting of chemicals manufactured or processed in the U.S. over the past 10 years. In April 2020, EPA finalized revisions to its Chemical Data Reporting rule under TSCA, which changes reporting requirements. EPA has also released its framework for approving new chemicals and new uses of existing chemicals. Under the framework, a new chemical or use presents an unreasonable risk if it exceeds established standards. Such a finding could result in either the issuance of rules restricting the use of the chemical being evaluated or in the need for additional testing. The costs of compliance with any new laws or regulations cannot be estimated until the way they will be implemented has been more precisely defined.

Furthermore, governmental, regulatory and societal demands for increasing levels of product safety and environmental protection could result in increased pressure for more stringent regulatory control with respect to the chemical industry. In addition, these concerns could influence public perceptions regarding our products and operations, the viability of certain products, our reputation, the cost to comply with regulations, and the ability to attract and retain employees. Moreover, changes in EHS regulations could inhibit or interrupt our operations, or require us to modify our facilities or operations. Accordingly, environmental or regulatory matters may cause us to incur significant unanticipated losses, costs or liabilities, which could reduce our profitability. For example, several of our products are being evaluated under REACH and CLP regulations and actions thereunder could negatively impact sales.

We could incur significant expenditures in order to comply with existing or future EHS laws. Capital expenditures and costs relating to EHS matters will be subject to evolving regulatory requirements and will depend on the timing of the promulgation and enforcement of specific standards which impose requirements on our operations. Capital expenditures and costs beyond those currently anticipated may therefore be required under existing or future EHS laws.

Furthermore, we may be liable for the costs of investigating and cleaning up environmental contamination on or from our properties or at off-site locations where we disposed of or arranged for the disposal or treatment of hazardous materials, or from disposal activities that pre-dated our purchase of our businesses. We may therefore incur additional costs and expenditures beyond those currently anticipated to address all such known and unknown situations under existing and future EHS laws.

Regulatory requirements to reduce GHG or other emissions could have an adverse effect on our results of operations.

Our operations are increasingly subject to regulations aimed at reducing GHG emissions, including CO2, methane, and ethylene oxide. Efforts to address these emissions are underway at the international, national, and regional levels.

In the U.S., on April 25, 2024, the Biden Administration and EPA issued a final rule under Section 111 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”) to regulate CO2 and other GHG emissions from fossil-fueled electric generating units. The final rule (i) establishes emission guidelines for states to set CO2 performance standards for existing coal-fired generating and other fossil-fueled steam generating units; and (ii) revise the new source performance standards for CO2 emissions for new and reconstructed stationary combustion turbines. Several industry groups, electric generators, and states have challenged the final rule. In addition, on April 9, 2024, EPA updated the Hazardous Organic National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants under the CAA, also known as the HON rule, imposing more stringent emissions regulations and additional air monitoring requirements for approximately 200 chemical plants across the U.S. Huntsman, along with several industry groups and states, has challenged the final rule. If implemented, we anticipate that these regulations may result in material changes to Huntsman.

Regardless of the outcome of ongoing regulatory actions or legal challenges, regulations, international agreements and initiatives aimed at reducing GHG emissions could affect the long-term price and supply of electricity and natural gas, and also drive greater demand for energy efficient products and renewable energy. Additionally, they could result in higher energy costs, additional capital expenditures for equipment installation or modification, and costs directly associated with emissions, such as cap and trade systems or carbon taxes. Efforts to address other environmental risks, including emissions of different substances, could have similar effects. Compliance with these regulations, or with potentially more stringent restrictions in the future, may increase our operational costs.

Additionally, the capital improvements required to meet environmental standards often involve developing and installing new technologies within existing plant operations. There is a risk that these technologies may not perform as expected, leading to potential delays in project timelines and affecting our ability to comply with regulatory requirements on schedule.

Finally, most scientists have concluded that increasing concentrations of GHGs in the Earth’s atmosphere may produce climate changes, such as increased frequency and severity of storms, droughts, floods and other climatic events. If any such effects were to occur in areas where we or our clients operate, they could have an adverse effect on our assets and operations.

RISKS RELATED TO INDEBTEDNESS

Changes in our credit ratings could increase our borrowing costs or negatively impact our ability to access debt capital markets.

We rely on access to the debt capital markets and other short-term borrowings to finance our operations. The major rating agencies routinely evaluate our credit profile and assign debt ratings. This evaluation is based on a number of factors, which include weighing our financial strength versus business, industry and financial risk. A decrease in the ratings assigned to us by ratings agencies may negatively impact our access to the debt capital markets and increase our borrowing costs. The addition of more debt to our capital structure could also impact our credit ratings. Failure to maintain an investment grade rating would adversely affect our borrowing costs and could adversely affect our access to the debt capital markets. Any limitation on our ability to continue to raise money in the debt capital markets could have a substantial negative effect on our liquidity. Further, if we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow or maintain access to adequate external financing, including from significant disruptions in the global credit markets, our operations and opportunities for growth would be negatively impacted, which could adversely impact our results of operations.

GENERAL RISK FACTORS

Certain provisions contained in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws could discourage a takeover attempt, which may reduce or eliminate the likelihood of a change of control transaction and, therefore, limit your ability to sell our common stock at a price higher than the current market value.

Certain provisions contained in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, as well as certain provisions of Delaware law, could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire control of our Company, even if some of our stockholders were to consider such a change of control to be beneficial. Our certificate of incorporation also authorizes our Board of Directors to issue preferred stock without stockholder approval. Therefore, our Board of Directors could elect to issue preferred stock that has special voting or other rights that could make it even more difficult for a third party to acquire us, which may reduce or eliminate your ability to sell our common stock at a price higher than the current market value.

We have purchased, and may continue to purchase, a portion of our equity and debt securities, which could impact the market for our equity and debt securities and likely would negatively affect our liquidity.

We may from time to time seek to repurchase or redeem our equity and debt securities in open market purchases, accelerated repurchase programs, privately negotiated transactions, tender offers, partial or full calls for redemption or otherwise. Any such repurchases or redemptions and the timing and amount thereof would depend on prevailing market conditions, liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors. Such transactions could negatively affect our liquidity.

We may fail to meet our publicly announced guidance or other expectations about our business, which could cause our stock price to have unanticipated movements.

From time to time, we provide guidance regarding our expected financial performance. Correctly identifying key factors affecting business conditions and predicting future events is inherently an uncertain process, and our guidance may not ultimately be accurate. Our guidance is based on certain assumptions, such as those relating to anticipated sales volumes, average selling prices, raw material costs and anticipated cost reductions. If our guidance varies from actual results, the market value of our common stock could have unanticipated movements.

Cybersecurity Risk Management and Strategy

We recognize the importance of developing, implementing and maintaining cybersecurity measures to safeguard our information systems, shield our operational technologies in our manufacturing plants and protect the confidentiality, integrity and availability of our data.

We have a qualitative cybersecurity risk management program within our Enterprise Information Security function to promote a company-wide culture of cybersecurity risk management for our information technology and operational technology. This program supports cybersecurity considerations as part of our decision-making processes. Our Enterprise Information Security team works closely with our global information technology organization (“Global IT”), operational technology teams and business units to continuously evaluate and address cybersecurity risks in alignment with our business objectives and operational needs. We are aligned with the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology Cybersecurity Framework, against which we periodically assess our readiness.

Recognizing the complexity and evolving nature of cybersecurity threats, we engage with a range of external experts, including cybersecurity assessors, consultants and auditors, in evaluating and testing our cybersecurity posture. These partnerships enable us to leverage specialized knowledge and insights in the development of our cybersecurity program consistent with industry best practices. Our collaboration with these third parties includes regular audits, threat assessments and consultation on security enhancements.

Because we are aware of the risks associated with third parties, we have implemented a third-party security risk management program to oversee and manage these risks. We conduct security assessments of third-party providers contracted by Global IT before engagement and maintain ongoing monitoring to ensure compliance with our cybersecurity standards. The program includes tools and services, which continuously monitor third parties for potential security concerns, data leaks and cyber posture, as well as periodic renewals of due diligence commensurate with their risk. This approach is designed to mitigate risks related to data breaches or other security incidents originating from these third parties.

As of the date hereof, we have not identified any cybersecurity threats or previous cybersecurity incidents that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our business strategy, results of operations or financial condition. However, despite our efforts, we cannot eliminate all risks from cybersecurity threats or provide assurances that we have not experienced undetected cybersecurity incidents. For additional information about these risks, see “Part I. Item 1A. Risk Factors.”

Cybersecurity Governance

The Board of Directors is aware of the importance of managing risks associated with cybersecurity threats. The Board of Directors has established oversight mechanisms for effective governance in managing risks associated with cybersecurity threats, because they recognize the significance of these threats to our operational integrity and stakeholder confidence.

The Audit Committee is responsible for the Board of Directors’ oversight of cybersecurity risks. The Audit Committee is composed of board members with diverse expertise including, cyber operations, risk management, technology and finance, equipping them to oversee cybersecurity risks effectively. The Audit Committee reviews our cybersecurity programs and the effectiveness of its risk management strategies. This review helps management identify areas for improvement and align our cybersecurity program with the overall risk management framework.

The Chief Information Officer (“CIO”) plays a pivotal role in informing the Audit Committee on cybersecurity risks. The CIO provides briefings to the Audit Committee on a quarterly basis. These briefings encompass a broad range of topics, including:

• current cybersecurity landscape and emerging threats;
• status of ongoing cybersecurity initiatives and strategies;
• incident reports and learnings from any cybersecurity events; and
• compliance with regulatory requirements and industry standards.

In addition to our scheduled meetings, select members of the Audit Committee and CIO maintain an ongoing dialogue regarding potential cybersecurity threats and mitigation strategies and updates to our cybersecurity posture. The Audit Committee oversees strategic decisions related to our cybersecurity program, offering guidance and approving investments in major initiatives. This ongoing oversight enables cybersecurity considerations to be integrated into our broader strategic planning objectives.

Reporting to our CIO, our cybersecurity function is led by our Chief Information Security Officer (“CISO”). The CISO manages a team of cybersecurity professionals and third-party support functions with broad experience and expertise, including in cybersecurity threat assessments and detection, mitigation technologies, cybersecurity training, incident response, cyber forensics, insider threats and regulatory compliance.

Our CISO and CIO are regularly informed about the latest developments in cybersecurity, including potential threats and innovative risk management techniques, for the effective prevention, detection, mitigation and remediation of cybersecurity incidents. The CISO implements and oversees processes for the regular monitoring of our information systems. This includes the deployment of security measures and regular system audits to identify potential vulnerabilities. In the event of a cybersecurity incident, we have an incident response plan that includes immediate actions to contain and eradicate the threat, mitigate the impact, and long-term strategies for remediation and prevention of future incidents.

The CIO regularly informs the Chief Executive Officer and management regarding cybersecurity risks and incidents, so they are kept abreast of the cybersecurity posture and potential risks. Significant cybersecurity matters and strategic risk management decisions are reported to the Audit Committee.

We own or lease chemical manufacturing and research facilities in the locations indicated in the list below, which we believe are adequate for our short-term and anticipated long-term needs. We own or lease office space and storage facilities throughout the U.S. and in many foreign countries. Our principal executive offices are located at 10003 Woodloch Forest Drive, The Woodlands, Texas 77380. The following is a list of our principal physical properties where manufacturing, research and main office facilities are located. These facilities are in good operating condition, are suitable and adequate for their use and have sufficient capacity for our current needs.

21

(1) Leased land and/or building.

(2) 51%-owned consolidated manufacturing joint venture with Basic Chemical Industries Ltd.

(3) 49% interest in Nanjing Jinling Huntsman New Material Co., Ltd., our unconsolidated manufacturing joint venture with Sinopec.

(4) The ownership of the Geismar facility is as follows: we own 100% of the MDI, polyol and maleic anhydride facilities, and Rubicon, a consolidated manufacturing joint venture with Lanxess in which we own a 50% interest, owns the aniline and nitrobenzene facilities. Rubicon is a separate legal entity that operates both the assets that we own jointly with Lanxess and our wholly-owned assets at Geismar.

(5) 50% interest in AAC, our consolidated manufacturing joint venture with the Zamil Group.

(6) 95%-owned consolidated manufacturing joint venture with Guangzhou Sheng’an Package Company Limited.

Texas Emissions Enforcement

On July 26, 2021, the Attorney General of the State of Texas filed a civil suit in the District Court of Travis County, Texas seeking civil penalties and attorney’s fees for alleged violations of the Texas Clean Air Act, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality regulations and facility permit terms. The complaint alleged multiple unauthorized emissions events and reporting discrepancies that occurred between December 2016 and June 2019 at our former manufacturing facility in Port Neches, Texas. While the state initially sought monetary relief between $250,000 and $1 million, additional allegations were added, which may result in a penalty in the upper range or higher. We completed the sale of our former Port Neches, Texas facility to Indorama Ventures Holdings L.P. on January 3, 2020. We believe that we are contractually indemnified for any defense costs and potential liability that may result from this action.

ReSULTS OF OPERATIONS

As discussed in “Note 4. Discontinued Operations—Sale of Textile Effects Business” to our consolidated financial statements, the results from continuing operations primarily exclude the results of our Textile Effects Business for all periods presented. For each of our Company and Huntsman International, the following tables set forth our consolidated results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 (in millions, except per share amounts).

Huntsman Corporation

26

Huntsman International

27

Huntsman Corporation

NM—Not meaningful

(1) See “—Non-GAAP Financial Measures.”

(2) Includes the net (loss) gain on the sale of our Textile Effects Business. In addition to income tax impacts, this adjusting item is also impacted by depreciation and amortization expense and interest expense.

(3) Certain legal and other settlements and related expenses for the year ended December 31, 2024 includes approximately $10 million related to the settlement of a claim in connection with a commercial dispute.

(4) Loss on dissolution of subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2024 relates to the elimination and non-cash recognition of cumulative translation adjustments from accumulated other comprehensive loss due to the liquidation of certain subsidiaries.

(5) Includes costs associated with transition activities relating primarily to our Corporate program to optimize our global approach to managed services in various information technology functions and our program to realign our cost structure in Europe.

(6) The income tax impacts, if any, are computed on the pre-tax adjustments using a with and without approach.

(7) During the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, we established significant deferred tax asset valuation allowances of $23 million, $14 million and $49 million, respectively, in Germany, Luxembourg, the U.K. and the Netherlands. We eliminated the effect of these significant deferred tax asset valuation allowances from our presentation of adjusted net income to allow investors to better compare our ongoing financial performance from period to period.

(8) For details regarding the tax impacts of our non-GAAP adjustments, please see the reconciliation of our net (loss) income to adjusted net (loss) income noted above.

28

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, which we supplement with certain non-GAAP financial information. These non-GAAP measures should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the related U.S. GAAP measures, and other companies may define such measures differently. We encourage investors to review our financial statements and the reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP financial measures in their entirety and not to rely on any single financial measure. These non-GAAP measures exclude the impact of certain income and expenses that we do not believe are indicative of our core operating results.

Adjusted EBITDA

Our management uses adjusted EBITDA to assess financial performance. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as net income of Huntsman Corporation or Huntsman International, as appropriate, before interest, income tax, depreciation and amortization, net income attributable to noncontrolling interests and certain Corporate and other items, as well as eliminating the following adjustments: (a) business acquisition and integration expenses and purchase accounting inventory adjustments, net; (b) EBITDA from discontinued operations; (c) fair value adjustments to Venator investment, net and other tax matter adjustments; (d) certain legal and other settlements and related expenses; (e) costs associated with the Albemarle settlement, net; (f) loss on sale of business/assets; (g) loss on dissolution of subsidiaries; (h) income from transition services arrangements; (i) certain nonrecurring information technology project implementation costs; (j) amortization of pension and postretirement actuarial losses; (k) plant incident remediation credits; and (l) restructuring, impairment and plant closing and transition costs. We believe that net income of Huntsman Corporation or Huntsman International, as appropriate, is the performance measure calculated and presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP that is most directly comparable to adjusted EBITDA.

We believe adjusted EBITDA is useful to investors in assessing the businesses’ ongoing financial performance and provides improved comparability between periods through the exclusion of certain items that management believes are not indicative of the businesses’ operational profitability and that may obscure underlying business results and trends. However, this measure should not be considered in isolation or viewed as a substitute for net income of Huntsman Corporation or Huntsman International, as appropriate, or other measures of performance determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Moreover, adjusted EBITDA as used herein is not necessarily comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies due to potential inconsistencies in the methods of calculation. Our management believes this measure is useful to compare general operating performance from period to period and to make certain related management decisions. Adjusted EBITDA is also used by securities analysts, lenders and others in their evaluation of different companies because it excludes certain items that can vary widely across different industries or among companies within the same industry. For example, interest expense can be highly dependent on a company’s capital structure, debt levels and credit ratings. Therefore, the impact of interest expense on earnings can vary significantly among companies. In addition, the tax positions of companies can vary because of their differing abilities to take advantage of tax benefits and because of the tax policies of the various jurisdictions in which they operate. As a result, effective tax rates and tax expense can vary considerably among companies. Finally, companies employ productive assets of different ages and utilize different methods of acquiring and depreciating such assets. This can result in considerable variability in the relative costs of productive assets and the depreciation and amortization expense among companies.

Nevertheless, our management recognizes that there are material limitations associated with the use of adjusted EBITDA in the evaluation of our Company as compared to net income of Huntsman Corporation or Huntsman International, as appropriate, which reflects overall financial performance. For example, we have borrowed money in order to finance our operations and interest expense is a necessary element of our costs and ability to generate revenue. Our management compensates for the limitations of using adjusted EBITDA by using this measure to supplement U.S. GAAP results to provide a more complete understanding of the factors and trends affecting the business rather than U.S. GAAP results alone.

Adjusted Net Income

Adjusted net income is computed by eliminating the after tax amounts related to the following from net income attributable to Huntsman Corporation: (a) business acquisition and integration expenses and purchase accounting inventory adjustments, net; (b) (loss) income from discontinued operations; (c) fair value adjustments to Venator investment, net and other tax matter adjustments; (d) certain legal and other settlements and related expenses; (e) costs associated with the Albemarle settlement, net; (f) loss on sale of business/assets; (g) loss on dissolution of subsidiaries; (h) income from transition services arrangements; (i) certain nonrecurring information technology project implementation costs; (j) amortization of pension and postretirement actuarial losses; (k) plant incident remediation credits; (l) establishment of significant deferred tax asset valuation allowances; (m) income tax settlement related to U.S. Tax Reform Act; and (n) restructuring, impairment and plant closing and transition costs. Basic adjusted net income per share excludes dilution and is computed by dividing adjusted net income by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Adjusted diluted net income per share reflects all potential dilutive common shares outstanding during the period and is computed by dividing adjusted net income by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period increased by the number of additional shares that would have been outstanding as dilutive securities. Adjusted net income and adjusted net income per share amounts are presented solely as supplemental information.

We believe adjusted net income is useful to investors in assessing the businesses’ ongoing financial performance and provides improved comparability between periods through the exclusion of certain items that management believes are not indicative of the businesses’ operational profitability and that may obscure underlying business results and trends.

Free Cash Flow

We believe free cash flow from continuing operations is an important indicator of our liquidity as it measures the amount of cash we generate. Management internally uses a free cash flow measure: (a) to evaluate our liquidity, (b) evaluate strategic investments, (c) plan dividend and stock buyback levels and (d) evaluate our ability to incur and service debt.

Adjusted Effective Tax Rate

We believe that the effective tax rate of Huntsman Corporation or Huntsman International, as appropriate, is the performance measure calculated and presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP that is most directly comparable to adjusted effective tax rate. We believe our adjusted effective tax rate provides improved comparability between periods through the exclusion of certain items, such as, business acquisition and integration expenses and purchase accounting inventory adjustments, certain legal and other settlements and related expenses, gains on sale of businesses/assets and certain tax only items, such as certain changes in valuation allowances that we believe are not indicative of the businesses’ operational profitability and that may obscure underlying business results and trends.

Our forward-looking adjusted effective tax rate is calculated based on our forecast effective tax rate, and the range of our forward-looking adjusted effective tax rate equals the range of our forecast effective tax rate. We disclose forward-looking adjusted effective tax rate because we cannot adequately forecast certain items and events that may or may not impact us in the near future, such as business acquisition and integration expenses and purchase accounting inventory adjustments, certain legal and other settlements and related expenses, gain on sale of businesses/assets and certain tax only items, including tax law changes not yet enacted. Each of such adjustment has not yet occurred, is out of our control and/or cannot be reasonably predicted. In our view, our forward-looking adjusted effective tax rate represents the forecast effective tax rate on our underlying business operations but does not reflect any adjustments related to the items noted above that may occur and can cause our effective tax rate to differ.

Year Ended December 31, 2024 Compared with Year Ended December 31, 2023

For the year ended December 31, 2024, loss from continuing operations attributable to Huntsman Corporation was $162 million as compared with $17 million in the 2023 period. For the year ended December 31, 2024, loss from continuing operations attributable to Huntsman International was $160 million as compared with $15 million in the 2023 period. The decreases noted above were the result of the following items:

• Revenues for the year ended December 31, 2024 decreased by $75 million, or 1%, as compared with the 2023 period. The decrease was primarily due to lower average selling prices in all our segments, partially offset by higher sales volumes in all our segments. See “—Segment Analysis” below.
• Gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2024 decreased by $40 million, or 4%, as compared with the 2023 period. The decrease resulted primarily from lower gross profits in our Performance Products segment. See “—Segment Analysis” below.
• Restructuring, impairment and plant closing costs for the year ended December 31, 2024 increased by $21 million, or 117%, as compared with the 2023 period. For more information on restructuring activities, see “Note 12. Restructuring, Impairment and Plant Closing Costs” to our consolidated financial statements.
• Gain on acquisition of assets, net was approximately $51 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 representing a net bargain purchase gain related to the separation and acquisition of assets of SLIC. For further information, see “Note 3. Business Combinations and Acquisitions—Separation and Acquisition of Assets of SLIC Joint Venture” to our consolidated financial statements.
• Prepaid asset write-off was approximately $71 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. Concurrent with the acquisition of assets of SLIC, we wrote off certain prepaid assets related to operating agreements with SLIC and other joint venture partners. For further information, see “Note 3. Business Combinations and Acquisitions—Separation and Acquisition of Assets of SLIC Joint Venture” to our consolidated financial statements.
• Loss on dissolution of subsidiaries was approximately $39 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 related to the elimination and non-cash recognition of cumulative translation adjustments from accumulated other comprehensive loss due to the liquidation of certain subsidiaries in the fourth quarter of 2024.
• Interest expense, net for the year ended December 31, 2024 increased by $14 million, or 22%, as compared with the 2023 period. The increase resulted primarily from higher borrowings under our 2022 $1.2 billion senior unsecured revolving credit facility (“2022 Revolving Credit Facility”).
• Equity in income of investment in unconsolidated affiliates for the year ended December 31, 2024 decreased to $44 million from $83 million in the 2023 period, primarily related to a decrease in income at our PO/MTBE joint venture with China, in which we hold a 49% interest.
• Other income (expense), net for the year ended December 31, 2024 was income of $21 million as compared with expense of $3 million in the 2023 period, primarily due to a decrease in losses related to the fair value adjustments to our investment in Venator, as well as income recognized during the year ended December 31, 2024 for the resolution of certain matters related to the 2017 separation of our titanium dioxide and performance additives business.
• Our income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2024 was $61 million as compared with $64 million in the 2023 period. The income tax expense of Huntsman International for the year ended December 31, 2024 was $62 million as compared with $65 million in the 2023 period. Our income tax expense is significantly affected by the mix of income and losses in the tax jurisdictions in which we operate along with the impact of valuation allowances in certain tax jurisdictions. In particular, we recognize tax expense in jurisdictions with pre-tax income, but do not recognize a tax benefit of pre-tax losses in jurisdictions with valuation allowances. In addition, in 2024 we recognized discrete tax expenses for settlement of U.S. tax reform items of approximately $5 million and discrete establishments of valuation allowances of approximately $29 million, which were greater than the valuation allowance net establishments of approximately $16 million in 2023. For more information concerning income taxes, see “Note 19. Income Taxes” to our consolidated financial statements.

Segment Analysis

(Dollars in millions)

(1) Excludes revenues from tolling arrangements, byproducts and raw materials.

(2) Excludes sales volumes of byproducts and raw materials.

Polyurethanes

The increase in revenues in our Polyurethanes segment for 2024 compared to 2023 was primarily due to higher sales volumes, partially offset by lower MDI average selling prices. Sales volumes increased primarily due to improved demand and share gains in certain markets, including insulation and composite wood panels. MDI average selling prices decreased primarily due to competitive pressures. The minimal decrease in segment adjusted EBITDA was primarily due to lower MDI average selling prices and lower equity earnings from our minority-owned joint venture in China, partially offset by lower raw materials costs, lower fixed costs and higher sales volumes.

Performance Products

The decrease in revenues in our Performance Products segment for 2024 compared to 2023 was primarily due to lower average selling prices, partially offset by higher sales volumes. Average selling prices decreased primarily due to competitive pressure. Sales volumes increased primarily due to improved demand and volume improvement initiatives across certain markets, including fuel and lubricant additives and coatings and adhesives. The decrease in segment adjusted EBITDA was primarily due to lower average selling prices, partially offset by higher sales volumes and lower raw materials costs.

Advanced Materials

The decrease in revenues in our Advanced Materials segment for 2024 compared to 2023 was primarily due to lower average selling prices, partially offset by higher sales volumes. Average selling prices decreased primarily due to unfavorable sales mix. Sales volumes increased in our infrastructure, general industry and aerospace markets driven by market recovery. The decrease in segment adjusted EBITDA was primarily due to lower average selling prices.

Corporate and other

Corporate and other includes unallocated corporate overhead, unallocated foreign currency exchange gains and losses, last-in first-out (“LIFO”) inventory valuation reserve adjustments, loss on early extinguishment of debt, unallocated restructuring, impairment and plant closing costs, nonoperating income and expense and gains and losses on the disposition of corporate assets. Adjusted EBITDA from Corporate and other for Huntsman Corporation remained the same, a loss of $163 million, for 2024 as compared to 2023. Adjusted EBITDA from Corporate and other for Huntsman International remained the same, a loss of $160 million, for 2024 as compared to 2023. The impact on adjusted EBITDA from Corporate and other resulted primarily from decreases in corporate overhead costs and unallocated foreign currency exchange losses, offset by an increase in LIFO valuation losses.

Year Ended December 31, 2023 Compared with Year Ended December 31, 2022

For a comparison of both our results of operations and segment analysis for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, see “Part II. Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 filed with the SEC on February 22, 2024.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The following is a discussion of our liquidity and capital resources and generally does not include separate information with respect to Huntsman International in accordance with General Instruction I of Form 10-K.

Cash Flows For Year Ended December 31, 2024 Compared with Year Ended December 31, 2023

Net cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations for 2024 and 2023 was $285 million and $251 million, respectively. The increase in net cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations during 2024 compared with 2023 was primarily attributable to an increase of $42 million in dividends received from unconsolidated subsidiaries and a net cash inflow of $29 million related to changes in operating assets and liabilities for 2024 as compared with 2023, partially offset by a decrease of $37 million in operating (loss) income from continuing operations adjusted for noncash activities as noted in our consolidated statements of cash flows.

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities from continuing operations for 2024 and 2023 was $(126) million and $309 million, respectively. During 2024 and 2023, we paid $184 million and $230 million, respectively, for capital expenditures. During 2024, we received approximately $30 million as an interim liquidating distribution from SLIC, we received $16 million for the sale of businesses, net, primarily related to the resolution of net working capital of $12 million from the sale of our Textile Effects Business, and we received $11 million related to the sale of assets. During 2023, we received $544 million for the sale of businesses, net, primarily related to net proceeds of $530 million from the sale of our Textile Effects Business. See “Note 4. Discontinued Operations—Sale of Textile Effects Business” to our consolidated financial statements.

Net cash used in financing activities for 2024 and 2023 was $326 million and $620 million, respectively. During 2024, we received proceeds of approximately $350 million related to the issuance of our 5.70% senior notes due 2034 (“2034 Senior Notes”). See “Note 8. Debt—Direct and Subsidiary Debt—Senior Notes” to our consolidated financial statements. During 2024, HPS paid approximately $218 million against the note payable with SLIC for the acquisition of assets. “See “Note 3. Business Combinations and Acquisitions—Separation and Acquisition of Assets of SLIC Joint Venture” to our consolidated financial statements. During 2024 and 2023, we repaid $169 million and $51 million, respectively, against the outstanding balances under our 2022 Revolving Credit Facility and our U.S. accounts receivable securitization program (“U.S. A/R Program”) and European accounts receivable securitization program (“EU A/R Program” and collectively with the U.S. A/R Program, “A/R Programs”). During 2023, we paid $349 million for repurchases of our common stock.

Free cash flow from continuing operations for 2024 and 2023 were proceeds of cash of $101 million and $21 million, respectively. The increase in free cash flow from continuing operations was attributable to an increase in cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations and a decrease in cash used for capital expenditures during 2024 as compared with 2023.

Cash Flows For Year Ended December 31, 2023 Compared with Year Ended December 31, 2022

For a comparison of our cash flows for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, see “Part II. Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 filed with the SEC on February 22, 2024.

Changes in Financial Condition

The following information summarizes our working capital (dollars in millions):

Our working capital decreased by $582 million as a result of the net impact of the following significant changes:

• The decrease in cash and cash equivalents of $200 million resulted from the matters identified on our consolidated statements of cash flows. See also “—Cash Flows Year Ended December 31, 2024 Compared with Year Ended December 31, 2023.”
• Inventories increased by $50 million primarily due to higher sales volumes.
• Prepaid expenses increased by $22 million primarily due to higher prepaid information technology costs.
• Other current assets decreased by $33 million primarily due to lower bank accepted drafts and lower current income tax receivable.
• Accounts payable increased by $51 million primarily due to higher inventory purchases and improved terms.
• Accrued liabilities increased by $21 million primarily due to increases in accrued income taxes, accrued interest, accrued rebates and accrued environmental liabilities, partially offset by a decrease in accrued payroll and taxes other than income.
• Current portion of debt increased by $313 million primarily due to the outstanding balance on our 4.25% senior notes due April 2025 (“2025 Senior Notes”) that are now classified as current debt.

Liquidity

Short-Term Liquidity

We depend upon our cash, our 2022 Revolving Credit Facility, our A/R Programs and other debt instruments to provide liquidity for our operations and working capital needs. As of December 31, 2024, we had $1,719 million of combined cash and unused borrowing capacity, consisting of $340 million in cash, $1,197 million in availability under our 2022 Revolving Credit Facility and $182 million in availability under our A/R Programs. Our liquidity can be significantly impacted by various factors. The following matters are expected to have a significant impact on our liquidity:

• During 2025, we expect to spend between approximately $180 million to $190 million on capital expenditures. Our future expenditures include certain environmental, health and safety upgrades; expansions and upgrades of our existing manufacturing and other facilities; construction of new facilities; certain cost reduction projects, including those described below; and certain information technology expenditures. We expect to fund capital expenditures with cash provided by operations.
• During 2025, we expect to make contributions to our pension and postretirement benefit plans of approximately $35 million.
• Our €300 million 2025 Senior Notes are scheduled to mature on April 1, 2025. Accordingly, an approximate €306 million (approximately $320 million as of December 31, 2024) payment for the principal and the unpaid, accrued interest will be made from our available liquidity.
• On January 31, 2024, we completed the planned separation and acquisition of assets of SLIC, our manufacturing joint venture with BASF and three Chinese chemical companies. The final purchase price of the acquired assets has been determined based on an asset valuation, which was completed in the second quarter of 2024. The acquisition of the assets was funded in part with HPS issuing a U.S. dollar equivalent note payable at closing of approximately $218 million, which was repaid in full in the second quarter of 2024 using available funds at HPS. During the third quarter of 2024, we received approximately $64 million of cash from SLIC, of which $34 million was a dividend and $30 million was an interim liquidating distribution. Upon the full liquidation of the joint venture, all remaining cash of SLIC, primarily resulting from the proceeds received by SLIC, will be distributed back to the joint venture partners. We currently anticipate that approximately RMB 300 million (approximately $40 million as of December 31, 2024) will be distributed as a liquidating distribution and return of investment upon full liquidation, which we anticipate will be completed in 2025.
• On February 28, 2023, we completed the sale of our Textile Effects Business to Archroma, and during the first quarter of 2024, we finalized the purchase price valued at $597 million, which includes adjustments to the purchase price for working capital, plus the assumption of underfunded pension liabilities. During the year ended December 31, 2024, we paid cash taxes of approximately $11 million, and we expect to pay additional cash taxes of approximately $2 million and expect to pay cash for contingencies and post-closing indemnifications in future periods related to the sale of our Textile Effects Business. See “Note 4. Discontinued Operations—Sale of Textile Effects Business” to our consolidated financial statements.
• During 2020 and 2021, management implemented cost realignment and synergy plans and, in November 2022, committed to further plans to realign our cost structure with additional restructuring in Europe, including exiting and consolidating certain facilities, workforce relocation to lower cost locations and further personnel rationalization. In connection with these plans, we have achieved combined annualized cost savings and synergy benefits in excess of $280 million. Associated with these plans, we expect total cash costs of approximately $300 million (including approximately $60 million of capital expenditures) through 2026, of which we have spent approximately $275 million through the end of 2024 (including approximately $44 million of capital expenditures). Of the remaining cash costs, the majority will be payments related to our restructuring in Europe, primarily for personnel who have exited as of the end of 2023 as well as capital expenditures related to our research and development footprint, which is included in our overall future capital expenditures projections.
• As of December 31, 2024, we have approximately $547 million remaining under the authorization of our existing share repurchase program. Repurchases may be commenced or suspended from time to time without prior notice.

Long-Term Liquidity

As of December 31, 2024, we had $325 million classified as current portion of debt, including $313 million outstanding under our 2025 Senior Notes, debt at our variable interest entities of $9 million and certain other short-term facilities and scheduled amortization payments totaling $3 million. We intend to renew, repay or extend these short-term facilities in the next twelve months.

As of December 31, 2024, we had approximately $280 million of cash and cash equivalents, including restricted cash, held by our foreign subsidiaries, including our variable interest entities. With the exception of certain amounts that we expect to repatriate in the foreseeable future, we intend to use cash held in our foreign subsidiaries to fund our local operations. Nevertheless, we could repatriate additional cash as dividends and the repatriation of cash as a dividend would generally not be subject to U.S. taxation. However, such repatriation may potentially be subject to limited foreign withholding taxes.

For more information regarding our debt, see “Note 14. Debt” to our consolidated financial statements.

Critical Accounting Estimates

This discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of financial statements requires us to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that involve a significant level of estimation and uncertainty and are reasonably likely to have a material impact on our financial condition and/or results of operations. Summarized below are our critical accounting estimates.

Income Taxes

Deferred income taxes reflect the net effects of temporary differences between assets and liabilities for financial and tax reporting purposes. We evaluate deferred tax assets to determine whether it is more likely than not that they will be realized; valuation allowances are recorded to offset deferred tax assets unlikely to be realized. Valuation allowances are reviewed each period on a tax jurisdiction basis and analyzed to determine whether there is sufficient positive or negative evidence to support a change in judgment about the realizability of the related deferred tax assets. These conclusions require significant judgment. In evaluating the objective evidence that historical results provide, we consider cumulative income or losses during the applicable three-year period. Cumulative losses incurred over the three-year period limits our ability to consider other evidence, such as our projections for the future. Changes in expected future taxable income and tax planning strategies in applicable jurisdictions affect our assessment of the realization of deferred tax assets. Our judgments regarding valuation allowances are also influenced by factors outside of business results, including the costs and risks associated with any tax planning strategy associated with utilizing a deferred tax asset. As of December 31, 2024, we had total valuation allowances of $255 million, which represents an increase of $34 million from the prior year, and we have recognized a net deferred tax liability of $135 million. See “Note 19. Income Taxes” to our consolidated financial statements for more information regarding our deferred tax assets and valuation allowances.

Employee Benefit Programs

We sponsor several contributory and non-contributory defined benefit plans, covering employees primarily in the U.S., the U.K., the Netherlands, Belgium and Switzerland, but also covering employees in a number of other countries. We fund the material plans through trust arrangements (or local equivalents) where the assets are held separately from us. We also sponsor unfunded postretirement plans which provide medical and, in some cases, life insurance benefits covering certain employees in the U.S. Amounts recorded in our consolidated financial statements are recorded based upon actuarial valuations performed by various independent actuaries. Inherent in these valuations are numerous assumptions regarding expected long-term rates of return on plan assets, discount rates, compensation increases, mortality rates and health care cost trends. Each of these critical estimates are subject to uncertainty and are assessed by us using historical data, as well as projections of future conditions. These assumptions and changes during the period are described in “Note 18. Employee Benefit Plans” to our consolidated financial statements.

We retain third party actuaries to assist us with judgments necessary to make assumptions on which our employee pension and postretirement benefit plan obligations and expenses are based. The effects of a 1% change in three key assumptions are summarized as follows (dollars in millions):

(1) Estimated (decrease) increase on 2024 net periodic benefit cost

(2) Estimated (decrease) increase on December 31, 2024 pension and postretirement liabilities and accumulated other comprehensive loss

We are exposed to market risks, such as changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates and commodity prices. From time to time, we enter into transactions, including transactions involving derivative instruments, to manage certain of these exposures. We also hedge our net investment in certain European operations. Changes in the fair value of the hedge in the net investment of certain European operations are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss. For more information on interest rate risk, foreign exchange rate risk and commodity prices risk, see “Note 15. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” to our consolidated financial statements.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of December 31, 2024. Based on this evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that, as of December 31, 2024, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective, in that they ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is (1) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and (2) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

No changes to our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2024 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our internal control framework and processes for our Company and Huntsman International are designed to provide reasonable assurance to management, Huntsman International’s Board of Managers and our Board of Directors regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of our consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Our internal control over financial reporting for our Company and Huntsman International includes those policies and procedures that:

• pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of our Company and Huntsman International;
• provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded properly to allow for the preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of our Company and Huntsman International are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and Directors of our Company and Huntsman International;
• provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements; and
• provide reasonable assurance as to the detection of fraud.

Because of its inherent limitations, a system of internal control over financial reporting can provide only reasonable assurance and may not prevent or detect misstatements. Further, because of changing conditions, effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting may vary over time.

Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting for our Company and Huntsman International and concluded that, as of December 31, 2024, such internal control is effective. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013).

Our independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP, with direct access to our Board of Directors through our Audit Committee, have audited our consolidated financial statements prepared by our Company and have issued an attestation report on internal control over financial reporting for our Company.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of Huntsman Corporation

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Huntsman Corporation and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2024, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2024, of the Company and our report dated February 18, 2025, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Houston, Texas

February 18, 2025