Consumers Bancorp Inc: Form 10-K for the period ended Jun 30, 2025

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

General

Consumers Bancorp, Inc. (Company) is a bank holding company as defined under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (BHCA), and is a registered bank holding company under that act and was incorporated under the laws of the State of Ohio in 1994. In February 1995, the Company acquired all the issued and outstanding capital stock of Consumers National Bank (Bank), a bank chartered under the laws of the United States of America. The Company’s activities have been limited primarily to holding the common stock of the Bank.

Consumers National Bank is a community-oriented financial institution that offers a wide range of commercial and consumer loan and deposit products, as well as mortgage, financial planning and investment services to individuals, farmers and small and medium sized businesses in our markets. Since 1965, the Bank’s main office has been serving Minerva, Ohio, and surrounding areas from its location at 614 East Lincoln Way, Minerva, Ohio. The Bank seeks to be the provider of choice for financial solutions to customers who value exceptional personalized service, local decision making, and modern banking technology. The Bank’s business involves attracting deposits from businesses and individual customers and using such deposits to originate commercial, mortgage and consumer loans in its market area, consisting primarily of Carroll, Columbiana, Jefferson, Mahoning, Stark, and Summit counties in Ohio. Its market includes these counties as well as the contiguous counties in northeast Ohio, western Pennsylvania, and northern West Virginia. As of June 30, 2025, the Bank had 22 full-service branch locations and one loan production office. The Bank also invests in securities consisting primarily of obligations of U.S. government-sponsored agencies, municipal obligations, and mortgage-backed securities issued by U.S. government sponsored entities. CNB Investment Co. (CNB) is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Bank formed in November 2024 for the primary purpose of investing in municipal securities and is disclosed as part of the Bank.

Supervision and Regulation

The Company and the Bank are subject to regulation by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Federal Reserve Board), the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) and other federal and state regulators. The regulatory framework is intended primarily for the protection of depositors, federal deposit insurance funds and the banking system as a whole and not for the protection of shareholders and creditors. Earnings and dividends of the Company are affected by state and federal laws and regulations and by policies of various regulatory authorities. Changes in applicable law or in the policies of various regulatory authorities could affect materially the business and prospects of the Company and the Bank. The following describes selected federal and state statutory and regulatory provisions that have, or could have, a material impact on the Company. The following discussion of supervision and regulation is qualified in its entirety by reference to the statutory and regulatory provisions discussed.

Regulation of the Company

The Bank Holding Company Act: As a bank holding company, the Company is subject to regulation under the BHCA, and the examination and reporting requirements of the Federal Reserve Board. Under the BHCA, the Company is subject to periodic examination by the Federal Reserve Board and is required to file periodic reports regarding its operations and any additional information that the Federal Reserve Board may require.

The BHCA generally limits the activities of a bank holding company to banking, managing or controlling banks, furnishing services to or performing services for its subsidiaries and engaging in any other activities that the Federal Reserve Board has determined to be so closely related to banking or to managing or controlling banks as to be a proper incident to those activities. In addition, subject to certain exceptions, the BHCA requires every bank holding company to obtain the approval of the Federal Reserve Board prior to acquiring substantially all the assets of any bank, acquiring direct or indirect ownership or control of more than 5% of the voting shares of a bank or merging or consolidating with another bank holding company.

Under Federal Reserve Board policy, a bank holding company is expected to act as a source of financial strength to each subsidiary bank and to commit resources to support those subsidiary banks. Under this policy, the Federal Reserve Board may require a bank holding company to contribute additional capital to an undercapitalized subsidiary bank and may disapprove of the payment of dividends to shareholders if the Federal Reserve Board believes the payment of such dividends would be an unsafe or unsound practice. The Federal Reserve Board has extensive enforcement authority over bank holding companies for violations of laws and regulations and unsafe or unsound practices.

Privacy Provisions of Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act: The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 contains extensive provisions on a customer’s right to privacy of non-public personal information. Under these provisions, a financial institution must provide its customers with the institution’s policies and procedures regarding the handling of customers’ non-public personal information. Except in certain cases, an institution may not provide personal information to unaffiliated third parties unless the institution discloses that such information may be disclosed, and the customer is given the opportunity to opt out of such disclosure. The Company and the Bank are also subject to certain state laws that deal with the use and distribution of non-public personal information.

Sarbanes-Oxley Act: The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 contains important requirements for public companies in the areas of financial disclosure and corporate governance. In accordance with section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, written certifications by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer are required. These certifications attest that the Company’s quarterly and annual reports filed with the SEC do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact.

Regulation of the Bank

As a national bank, the Bank is subject to regulation, supervision, and examination by the OCC and by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). These examinations are designed primarily for the protection of the depositors of the Bank.

Dividend Restrictions: Dividends from the Bank are the primary source of funds for payment of dividends to the Company’s shareholders. There are statutory limits, however, on the amount of dividends the Bank can pay without regulatory approval. Under regulations promulgated by the OCC, the Bank may not declare a dividend in excess of its undivided profits. Additionally, the Bank may not declare a dividend if the total amount of all dividends, including the proposed dividend, declared by the Bank in any calendar year exceeds the total of its retained net income of that year to date, combined with its retained net income of the two preceding years, unless the dividend is approved by the OCC. The Bank may not declare or pay any dividend if, after making the dividend, the Bank would be “undercapitalized,” as defined in the federal regulations.

FDIC: The FDIC is an independent federal agency, which insures the deposits of federally insured banks and savings associations up to certain prescribed limits and safeguards the safety and soundness of financial institutions. The deposits of the Bank are subject to the deposit insurance assessments of the Deposit Insurance Fund of the FDIC. Under the FDIC’s deposit insurance assessment system, the assessment rate for any insured institution varies according to regulatory capital levels of the institution and other factors such as supervisory evaluations.

The FDIC is authorized to prohibit any insured institution from engaging in any activity that poses a serious threat to the insurance fund and may initiate enforcement actions against banks, after first giving the institution’s primary regulatory authority an opportunity to take such action. The FDIC may also terminate the deposit insurance of any institution that has engaged in or is engaging in unsafe or unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations or has violated any applicable law, order or condition imposed by the FDIC.

Current Expected Credit Loss Model: In December 2018, the OCC, the Federal Reserve Board, and the FDIC issued a final rule to address regulatory treatment of credit loss allowances under the current expected credit loss (CECL) model. The rule revised the federal banking agencies’ regulatory capital rules to identify which credit loss allowances under the CECL model are eligible for inclusion in regulatory capital and to provide banking organizations the option to phase in over three years the day one adverse effects on regulatory capital that may result from the adoption of the CECL model. The Bank adopted the CECL model on July 1, 2023 since it’s a smaller reporting company and elected to phase in the day-one effect of adopting CECL for regulatory capital purposes.

Risk-Based Capital Requirements: The Federal Reserve Board and the OCC employ similar risk-based capital guidelines in their examination and regulation of bank holding companies and national banks, respectively. The Company meets the definition of a Small Bank Holding Company and, therefore, was exempt from maintaining consolidated regulatory capital ratios. Instead, regulatory capital ratios only apply at the subsidiary bank level. The guidelines involve a process of assigning various risk weights to different classes of assets, then evaluating the sum of the risk-weighted balance sheet structure against the capital base. If capital falls below the minimum levels established by the guidelines, the bank holding company or bank may be denied approval to acquire or establish additional banks or non-bank businesses or to open new facilities. In addition, failure to satisfy capital guidelines could subject a banking institution to a variety of enforcement actions by federal bank regulatory authorities, including the termination of deposit insurance by the FDIC and a prohibition on the acceptance of “brokered deposits.”

Effective January 1, 2020, qualifying community banking organizations may elect to comply with a greater than 9% community bank leverage ratio (CBLR) requirement in lieu of the currently applicable requirements for calculating and reporting risk-based capital ratios. The CBLR is equal to Tier 1 capital divided by average total consolidated assets. In order to qualify for the CBLR election, a community bank must (i) have a leverage capital ratio greater than 9 percent, (ii) have less than $10 billion in average total consolidated assets, (iii) not exceed certain levels of off-balance sheet exposure and trading assets plus trading liabilities and (iv) not be an advanced approaches banking organization. A community bank that meets the above qualifications and elects to utilize the CBLR is considered to have satisfied the risk-based and leverage capital requirements in the generally applicable capital rules and is also considered to be "well capitalized" under the prompt corrective action rules. The Bank has not elected to be subject to the CBLR.

Unless a community bank qualifies for, and elects to comply with the CBLR beginning on January 1, 2020, national banks are required to maintain the Basel III minimum levels of regulatory capital. The Basel III capital requirements for U.S. banking organizations became effective on January 1, 2015 and were fully phased in by January 1, 2019. Under Basel III, the Bank is required to maintain a minimum common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 4.5%, a Tier 1 capital ratio of 6%, a total capital ratio of 8%, and a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 4%. Basel III also established a “capital conservation buffer” of 2.5% above the new regulatory minimum capital requirements, which effectively resulted in a minimum common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 7%, a Tier 1 capital ratio of 8.5%, a total capital ratio of 10.5% and a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 6.5%. The capital conservation buffer is designed to absorb losses during periods of economic stress. Banking institutions with a common equity Tier 1 ratio to risk-weighted assets above the minimum but below the conservation buffer will face constraints on dividends, equity repurchases, and compensation based on the amount of the shortfall.

The OCC and the FDIC may take various corrective actions against any undercapitalized bank and any bank that fails to submit an acceptable capital restoration plan or fails to implement a plan accepted by the OCC or the FDIC. These powers include, but are not limited to, requiring the institution to be recapitalized, prohibiting asset growth, restricting interest rates paid, requiring prior approval of capital distributions by any bank holding company that controls the institution, requiring divestiture by the institution of its subsidiaries or by the holding company of the institution itself, requiring new election of directors, and requiring the dismissal of directors and officers. The OCC’s final supervisory judgment concerning an institution’s capital adequacy could differ significantly from the conclusions that might be derived from the absolute level of an institution’s risk-based capital ratios. Therefore, institutions generally are expected to maintain risk-based capital ratios that exceed the minimum ratios. As of June 30, 2025, the Bank exceeded minimum regulatory capital requirements to be considered well-capitalized.

Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act: The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act) established the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), which regulates consumer financial products and services and certain financial services providers. The CFPB is authorized to prevent unfair, deceptive and abusive acts or practices and seeks to ensure consistent enforcement of laws so that consumers have access to fair, transparent and competitive markets for consumer financial products and services. Since it was established the CFPB has exercised extensive rulemaking and interpretive authority.

Interstate Banking and Branching: The Interstate Banking and Branch Efficiency Act of 1995 has eased restrictions on interstate expansion and consolidation of banking operations by, among other things: (i) permitting interstate bank acquisitions regardless of host state laws, (ii) permitting interstate merger of banks unless specific states have opted out of this provision, and (iii) permitting banks to establish new branches outside the state provided the law of the host state specifically allows interstate bank branching.

Community Reinvestment Act: The Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) requires depository institutions to assist in meeting the credit needs of their market areas, including low- and moderate-income areas, consistent with safe and sound banking practices. Under this Act, each institution is required to adopt a statement for each of its market areas describing the depository institution’s efforts to assist in its community’s credit needs. Depository institutions are periodically examined for compliance and assigned ratings. Banking regulators consider these ratings when considering approval of a proposed transaction by an institution. The Bank’s most recent CRA rating is satisfactory.

USA PATRIOT Act: In 2001, Congress enacted the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (Patriot Act). The Patriot Act is designed to deny terrorists and criminals the ability to obtain access to the United States’ financial system and has significant implications for depository institutions, brokers, dealers, and other businesses involved in the transfer of money. The Patriot Act mandates that financial services companies implement additional policies and procedures with respect to additional measures designed to address any or all the following matters: money laundering, terrorist financing, identifying and reporting suspicious activities and currency transactions, and currency crimes.

The Anit-Money Laundering Act: In 2021, Congress enacted the Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020 (AMLA), which amended the Bank Secrecy Act of 1970 (BSA). The AMLA is intended to be a comprehensive reform and modernization to U.S. bank secrecy and anti-money laundering laws. Among other things, the AMLA codifies a risk-based approach to anti-money laundering compliance for financial institutions; requires the development of standards for evaluating technology and internal processes for BSA compliance; expands enforcement-related and investigation-related authority, including increasing available sanctions for certain BSA violations and instituting BSA whistleblower initiatives and protections.

Office of Foreign Assets Control Regulation: The U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) administers and enforces economic and trade sanctions against targeted foreign countries and regimes, under authority of various laws, including designated foreign countries, nationals and others. OFAC publishes lists of specially designated targets and countries. We are responsible for, among other things, blocking accounts of, and transactions with, such targets and countries, prohibiting unlicensed trade and financial transactions with them and reporting blocked transactions after their occurrence. Failure to comply with these sanctions could have serious financial, legal and reputational consequences, including applicable bank regulatory authorities not approving merger or acquisition transactions when regulatory approval is required or prohibiting such transactions even if approval is not required. Regulatory authorities have imposed cease and desist orders and civil money penalties against institutions found to be violating these obligations.

Cybersecurity: In March 2015, federal regulators issued two related statements regarding cybersecurity. One statement indicates that financial institutions should design multiple layers of security controls to establish lines of defense and to ensure that their risk management processes also address the risk posed by compromised customer credentials, including security measures to reliably authenticate customers accessing internet-based services of the financial institution. The other statement indicates that a financial institution’s management is expected to maintain sufficient business continuity planning processes to ensure the rapid recovery, resumption and maintenance of the institution’s operations after a cyberattack involving destructive malware. A financial institution is also expected to develop appropriate processes to enable recovery of data and business operations and address rebuilding network capabilities and restoring data if the institution or its critical service providers fall victim to this type of cyberattack.

In February 2018, the SEC published interpretive guidance to assist public companies in preparing disclosures about cybersecurity risks and incidents. These SEC guidelines are in addition to notification and disclosure requirements under state and federal banking law and regulations. In addition, in July 2023, the SEC issued a final rule that requires disclosure of material cybersecurity incidents, as well as cybersecurity risk management, strategy and governance. Under this rule, banking organizations that are SEC registrants must disclose information about any material cybersecurity incident within four business days of determining such incident is material and provide periodic updates as to the status of the incident in subsequent filings as necessary.

In November 2021, the OCC, the FRB and the FDIC issued a final rule, which became effective in May 2022, requiring banking organizations that experience a computer-security incident to notify certain entities. A computer-security incident occurs when actual or potential harm to the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of an information system or the information occurs, or there is a violation or imminent threat of a violation to banking security policies and procedures. The affected bank must notify its respective federal regulator of the computer-security incident as soon as possible and no later than 36 hours after the bank determines a computer-security incident that rises to the level of a notification event has occurred. These notifications are intended to promote early awareness of threats to banking organizations and will help banks react to those threats before they manifest into larger incidents. This rule also requires bank service providers to notify their bank organization customers of a computer-security incident that has caused, or is reasonably likely to cause, a material service disruption or degradation.

Furthermore, once administrative rules are adopted by the Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), the Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act enacted in March 2022, will require certain covered entities, including those in the financial services industry, to report a covered cyber incident to CISA within 72 hours once the covered entity reasonably believes an incident has occurred. Separate reporting to CISA will also be required within 24 hours if a ransom payment is made as a result of a ransomware attack.

State regulators have also been increasingly active in implementing privacy and cybersecurity standards and regulations. Recently, several states have adopted regulations requiring certain financial institutions to implement cybersecurity programs and many states have also recently implemented or modified their data breach notification, information security and data privacy requirements. We expect this trend of state-level activity in those areas to continue and we are monitoring developments in the states in which our customers are located.

Environmental Regulation: Compliance with federal, state and local provisions regulating the discharge of materials into the environment, or otherwise relating to the protection of the environment, has not had a material effect upon the capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position of the Company. In the opinion of management, the Company does not have exposure to material costs associated with compliance with environmental laws and regulations or material expenditures related to environmental hazardous waste mitigation or cleanup.

The Company believes its primary exposure to environmental risk is through the lending activities of the Bank. In cases where management believes environmental risk potentially exists, we mitigate our environmental risk exposure by requiring environmental site assessments at the time of loan origination to confirm collateral quality as to commercial real estate parcels posing higher than normal potential for environmental impact, as determined by reference to present and past uses of the subject property and adjacent sites. In addition, environmental assessments are typically required prior to any foreclosure activity involving non-residential real estate collateral.

Government Monetary Policy: The earnings of the Company are affected by general and local economic conditions and by the policies of various governmental regulatory authorities. In particular, the Federal Reserve Board regulates money and credit conditions and interest rates to influence general economic conditions, primarily through open market acquisitions or dispositions of United States Government securities, varying the discount rate on member bank borrowings and setting reserve requirements against member and nonmember bank deposits. Federal Reserve Board monetary policies have had a significant effect on the interest income and interest expense of commercial banks, including the Bank, and are expected to continue to do so in the future.

Executive and Incentive Compensation: Under the Dodd-Frank Act and rules adopted by the SEC in October 2022, public companies listed on the New York Stock Exchange or Nasdaq Stock Market are now required to adopt and implement “clawback” policies for incentive compensation payments and to disclose the details of the procedures for recovery of incentive compensation that was paid on the basis of erroneous financial information necessitating an accounting restatement due to material noncompliance with financial reporting requirements. Such clawback policies are intended to apply to compensation paid within the three completed fiscal years immediately preceding the date the issuer is required to prepare a restatement and would cover all executives (including former executives) who received incentive awards. The Company is not listed on the New York Stock Exchange or Nasdaq Stock Market and, therefore, not required to adopt a clawback policy. However, the Company implemented a clawback policy on December 13, 2018, which was further revised and adopted by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors effective March 12, 2024.

Employees

As of June 30, 2025, the Bank employed 178 full-time and 17 part-time employees. None of the employees are represented by a collective bargaining group. Management considers its relations with employees to be good.

Available Information

The Company files annual, quarterly, and current reports, proxy statements, and other information with the SEC. The SEC maintains a website at www.sec.gov (http://www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. We file electronically with the SEC.

The Company’s reports on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K, and amendments to those reports, are available, free of charge, on our website (www.consumers.bank (http://www.consumers.bank)) as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are filed with or furnished to the SEC. The Company’s Code of Ethics Policy, which is applicable to all directors, officers and employees of the Company, and its Code of Ethics for Principal Financial Officers, which is applicable to the principal executive officer and the principal financial officer, are each available on the Investor Relations section under Corporate Governance of the Company’s website. The Company intends to post amendments to or waivers from either of its Code of Ethics Policies on its website. A printed copy of any of these documents will be provided to any requesting shareholder.

Risk Management and Strategy

Our cybersecurity risk management program is designed to identify, assess, and mitigate risks across various aspects of our company, including financial, operational, regulatory, reputational, and legal. Cybersecurity is a critical component of this program, given the increasing reliance on technology and the potential cyber threats. Our Chief Information Officer and Information Technology Security Officer are primarily responsible for the cybersecurity component and are key members of the risk management organization.

Our objective for managing cybersecurity risk is to avoid or minimize the impacts of external threat events or other efforts to penetrate, disrupt or misuse our systems or information. The structure of our information security program is designed around the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Cybersecurity Framework, regulatory guidance, and other industry standards. In addition, we leverage certain industry and government associations, third-party benchmarking, audits, and threat intelligence feeds to facilitate and promote program effectiveness. The information security program is periodically reviewed by personnel with the goal of addressing changing threats and conditions.

We employ an in-depth, layered, defensive strategy when deploying new products, services, and technology. We leverage people, processes, and technology as part of our efforts to manage and maintain cybersecurity controls. We also employ a variety of preventative and detective tools designed to monitor, block, and provide alerts regarding suspicious activity, as well as to report on suspected advanced persistent threats. We have established processes and systems designed to mitigate cyber risk, including regular and on-going education and training for employees, preparedness simulations and tabletop exercises, and recovery and resilience tests. We engage in regular assessments of our infrastructure, software systems, and network architecture. We also maintain a third-party risk management program designed to identify, assess, and manage risks, including cybersecurity risks, associated with external service providers. We also actively monitor our email gateways for malicious phishing email campaigns and monitor remote connections as a portion of our workforce has the option to work remotely. We leverage internal and external auditors and independent external partners to periodically review our processes, systems, and controls, including with respect to our information security program, to assess their design and operating effectiveness and make recommendations to strengthen our risk management program.

We maintain an Incident Response Plan that provides a documented framework for responding to actual or potential cybersecurity incidents, including timely notification of and escalation to the Risk & Technology Committee of our board of directors. The Incident Response Plan is coordinated through the Information Technology Security Officer and is evaluated at least annually.

Notwithstanding our defensive measures and processes, the threat posed by cyber-attacks is severe, attacks are sophisticated and increasing in volume, and attackers respond rapidly to changes in defensive measures. Our internal systems, processes, and controls are designed to mitigate loss from cyber-attacks and, while to date, we have not detected a significant compromise, significant data loss or any material financial losses related to cybersecurity attacks, our systems and those of its customers and third-party service providers are under constant threat and it is possible that we could experience a significant event in the future. Risks and exposures related to cybersecurity attacks are expected to remain high for the foreseeable future due to the rapidly evolving nature and sophistication of these threats, as well as the expanding use of internet banking, mobile banking and other technology-based products and services by the Company and its customers.

Governance

Our Information Security Program consists of policies, procedures, risk assessments, monitoring, reporting and training to ensure the security, availability, and confidentiality of systems and customer information. The Information Security Program is led by our Information Technology Security Officer and is subject to oversight by the Risk & Technology Committee.

The Risk & Technology Committee of our board of directors is responsible for overseeing our information security and technology programs, including management’s actions to identify, assess, mitigate, and remediate or prevent material cybersecurity issues and risks. Our Information Technology Security Officer and our Chief Information Officer provide quarterly reports to the Risk & Technology Committee of our board of directors regarding the information security and technology programs, key enterprise cybersecurity initiatives, and other matters relating to cybersecurity processes. The Risk & Technology Committee of our board of directors reviews and approves our Information Security Program and strategies annually. Additionally, the Information Technology Security Officer provides a cybersecurity report to the full board of directors at each board meeting.

The Bank operates 22 full-service banking facilities and one loan production office (LPO) as noted below:

The Bank considers its physical properties to be in good operating condition and suitable for the purposes for which they are being used. In management’s opinion, all properties owned and operated by the Bank are adequately insured.

The Company is not a party to any pending material legal or administrative proceedings, other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to the business of the Company. Further, there are no material legal proceedings in which any director, executive officer, principal shareholder or affiliate of the Company is a party or has a material interest therein that is adverse to the Company. No routine litigation in which the Company is involved is expected to have a material adverse impact on the financial position or results of operations of the Company.

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

General

The following is management’s analysis of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations as of and for the years ended June 30, 2025 and 2024. This discussion is designed to provide a more comprehensive review of the operating results and financial position than could be obtained from an examination of the financial statements alone. This analysis should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related footnotes and the selected financial data included elsewhere in this report.

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which are not statements of historical fact, constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The words “may,” “continue,” “estimate,” “intend,” “plan,” “seek,” “will,” “believe,” “project,” “expect,” “anticipate” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements may involve risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict, may be beyond our control, and could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in such statements. Any such forward-looking statements are made only as of the date of this report or the respective dates of the relevant incorporated documents, as the case may be, and, except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances. Risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results for future periods to differ materially from those anticipated or projected include, but are not limited to:

• changes in local, regional and national economic conditions becoming less favorable than we expect, resulting in a deterioration in asset credit quality or debtors being unable to meet their obligations because of high unemployment rates and inflationary pressures;
• rapid fluctuations in market interest rates could result in changes in fair market valuations and a decline in net interest income;
• the effects of, and changes in, trade, monetary and fiscal policies and laws, including interest rate policies of the Federal Reserve Board;
• changes in the level of non-performing assets and charge-offs;
• unanticipated changes in our liquidity position, including, but not limited to, changes in the cost of liquidity, our ability to find alternative funding sources, and potential market reactions to the default or risk of default by other financial institutions;
• the effect of changes in laws and regulations (including laws and regulations concerning taxes, banking, securities, and insurance) with which we must comply;
• competitive pressures on product pricing and services;
• breaches of security or failures of our technology systems due to technological or other factors and cybersecurity threats;
• changes in consumer spending, borrowing and savings habits;
• declining asset values impacting the underlying value of collateral;
• changes in accounting policies, rules and interpretations;
• our ability to attract and retain qualified employees; and
• changes in the reliability of our vendors, internal control systems or information systems.

The risks and uncertainties identified above are not the only risks we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently believe to be immaterial also may adversely affect us. Should any known or unknown risks and uncertainties develop into actual events, those developments could have material adverse effects on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Overview

Consumers Bancorp, Inc., a bank holding company incorporated under the laws of the State of Ohio, owns all the issued and outstanding capital stock of Consumers National Bank, a bank chartered under the laws of the United States of America. The Company’s activities have been limited primarily to holding the common stock of the Bank. The Bank’s business involves attracting deposits from businesses and individual customers and using such deposits to originate commercial, mortgage and consumer loans in its market area, consisting primarily of Carroll, Columbiana, Jefferson, Mahoning, Stark, and Summit counties in Ohio. Its market includes these counties as well as the contiguous counties in northeast Ohio, western Pennsylvania, and northern West Virginia. The Bank also invests in securities consisting primarily of U.S. government-sponsored agencies, municipal obligations, agency issued mortgage-backed and collateralized mortgage obligations.

Net Income. Net income was $8,667 for fiscal year 2025 compared with $8,580 for fiscal year 2024. The following key factors summarize our results of operations for the year ended June 30, 2025 compared with the same prior year period:

• net interest income increased by $2,115, or 6.6%, in fiscal year 2025, primarily as a result of an increase in the yield on average interest earning assets as loans and securities repriced up to higher current market rates and due to a $40.0 million, or 3.9%, increase in average interest-earning assets;
• a $1,137 provision for credit losses on loans and a $10 provision for credit losses on unfunded commitments were recorded during fiscal year 2025 compared with a $556 provision for credit losses on loans and a $63 provision for credit losses on unfunded commitments that were recorded during fiscal year 2024. The provision for credit losses on loans increased in fiscal year 2025 primarily due to the organic loan growth during the fiscal year;
• noninterest income increased by $554, or 11.3%, in fiscal year 2025 from the same prior year period primarily as a result of an increase in debit card interchange income of $163, or 7.1%, and an increase in bank owned life insurance income of $113, or 40.6%; and
• total noninterest expenses increased by $2,242, or 8.7%, in fiscal year 2025 due to increases in salaries, incentives, occupancy and equipment, and debit card processing expenses.

Return on average equity and return on average assets were 12.05% and 0.78%, respectively, for fiscal year 2025 compared with 14.95% and 0.80%, respectively, for the same period last year.

Net Interest Income. Net interest income, the difference between interest income earned on interest-earning assets and interest expense incurred on interest-bearing liabilities, is the largest component of the Company’s earnings. Net interest income is affected by changes in the volumes, rates and composition of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. In addition, prevailing economic conditions, fiscal and monetary policies, and the policies of various regulatory agencies all affect market rates of interest and the availability and cost of credit, which, in turn, can significantly affect net interest income.

Net interest margin is calculated by dividing net interest income on a fully tax equivalent basis (FTE) by total interest-earning assets. FTE income includes tax-exempt income, restated to a pre-tax equivalent, based on the statutory federal income tax rate of 21.0%. All average balances are daily average balances. Non-accruing loans are included in average loan balances and average securities include unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale, while yields are based on average amortized cost. In fiscal year 2024, the taxable equivalent adjustment to net interest income was negative since the interest expense attributable to carrying tax exempt securities is not deductible. The taxable equivalent adjustment improved in fiscal year 2025 since the municipal securities were transferred to CNB which does not have any interest expense.

FTE net interest income for fiscal year 2025 was $34,197, an increase of $2,498 or 7.9%, from $31,699 in fiscal year 2024. The Company’s tax equivalent net interest margin was 3.15% for fiscal year 2025 and 3.00% for fiscal year 2024. FTE interest income for fiscal year 2025 was $53,139, an increase of $4,214, or 8.6%, from fiscal year 2024, primarily because of a 26-basis point increase in the yield on interest earning assets and a $39,977, or 3.9%, increase in average interest-earning assets from fiscal year 2024. The Company’s yield on average interest-earning assets was 4.90% for fiscal year 2025 compared with 4.64% for the same period last year. The yield on average interest-earning assets increased as loans and securities repriced up to higher current market rates and the tax-equivalent yield on nontaxable securities was positively impacted in fiscal year 2025 by the transfer of municipal bonds to CNB.

Interest expense for fiscal year 2025 was $18,942, an increase of $1,716 from fiscal year 2024. Interest expense increased primarily because of an increase in the cost of savings deposits, which includes money market accounts that have seen the largest increase in rates. Also, interest expense was impacted by a $31,220, or 4.1%, increase in average interest-bearing liabilities. The Company’s average cost of funds was 2.37% for fiscal year 2025 compared with 2.25% for the same prior year period.

Average Balance Sheet and Net Interest Margin

(1) Calculated on a fully taxable equivalent basis utilizing a statutory federal income tax rate of 21.0%.

The following table presents the changes in the Company’s interest income and interest expense resulting from changes in interest rates and changes in the volume of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Changes attributable to both rate and volume that cannot be segregated have been allocated in proportion to the changes due to rate and volume.

INTEREST RATES AND INTEREST DIFFERENTIAL

(In thousands)

(1) Nontaxable income is adjusted to a fully tax equivalent basis utilizing a statutory federal income tax rate of 21.0%.

(2) Non-accrual loan balances are included for purposes of computing the rate and volume effects although interest on these balances has been excluded.

Provision for Credit Losses. The provision for credit losses on loans represents the charge to income necessary to adjust the allowance for credit losses on loans to a level considered appropriate by management to absorb estimated losses over the expected life of loans. The provision for credit losses on unfunded commitments represents the charge to income necessary to adjust the allowance for credit losses on off-balance sheet credit exposures for the expected credit losses over the contractual period for which the Company is exposed to credit risk resulting from a contractual obligation to extend credit.

A provision for credit losses on loans of $1,137 was recorded in fiscal year 2025 compared with $556 in fiscal year 2024. The increase in the provision for expected credit losses on loans recorded in fiscal year 2025 was primarily due to the organic growth and a change in loan mix within the loan portfolio. The Commercial & Industrial loan segment includes a third-party residential mortgage warehouse line-of-credit that had an outstanding balance of zero as of June 30, 2025 compared with $26,159 as of June 30, 2024. The warehouse line-of-credit did not have any allowance for credit losses allocated to it in 2025 because of the unique structure and historical performance of this relationship and because this line-of-credit was replaced with other loans that received an allowance allocation at the time of origination. In the Commercial Real Estate loan segment, the provision declined primarily because of a reduction to the calculated loss rate. For each portfolio segment, the forecasted loss rate is determined by using peer and economic data from prior economic cycles to develop regression models.

For fiscal year 2025, net charge-offs of $597, or 0.07% of total loans, were recorded compared with $402, or 0.05% of total loans, for the same period last year. The allowance for credit losses as a percentage of loans was 1.04% at June 30, 2025 and 2024. The allowance for credit losses as a percentage of total loans was stable between the two periods since the forecasted unemployment rate projections remained within a relatively narrow range. The economy has remained resilient through the rapid rise in short-term interest rates and the recent changes in trade policies.

Non-performing loans were $1,031, or 0.11% of total loans, as of June 30, 2025. This compared with $858, or 0.10% of total loans, as of June 30, 2024. Non-performing loans have been considered in management’s analysis of the appropriateness of the allowance for credit losses. Management and the Board of Directors closely monitor these loans and believe the prospect for recovery of principal, less identified specific reserves, are favorable. As of June 30, 2025, loans classified as special mention were $15,750, compared with $4,455 as of June 30, 2024. The increase was primarily related to one commercial customer because of a combination of a delay in a construction project and reduced revenue in the industry. The construction project for this commercial customer is now complete and operations have commenced in the new building, a portion of the property is being leased out, and the customer has implemented cost saving measures which are all expected to improve its financial performance. Also, the real estate secured position on this credit is further improved by existing and approved/pending Small Business Administration 504 debentures. Uncertainty remains regarding future levels of criticized and classified loans, non-performing loans and charge-offs. Management will continue to closely monitor changes in the loan portfolio and will work with borrowers as needed to mitigate losses to the Company.

Noninterest Income. Total noninterest income increased by $554, or 11.3%, to $5,450 for fiscal year 2025. Debit card interchange income increased by $163, or 7.1% in fiscal year 2025 because of an increase in customer usage. Bank owned life insurance income increased by $113, or 40.6%, because of the purchase of a new life insurance policy during fiscal year 2025. Service charges on deposit accounts increased by $61, or 3.6%, in fiscal year 2025 primarily because of an increase in new commercial deposit customers and an increase in the usage of our cash management products by our existing business customers. Mortgage banking revenue increased by $53, or 15.3%.

Noninterest Expenses. Total noninterest expenses were $28,086 for the year ended June 30, 2025; an increase of $2,242, or 8.7%, from $25,844 for the year ended June 30, 2024.

Salaries and employee benefit expenses increased by $1,175, or 8.2%, during fiscal year 2025 primarily due to merit and cost of living increases and higher sales and incentive expenses.

Occupancy and equipment expenses increased by $279, or 8.1%, in fiscal year 2025 because of investments in new software, increases in software licensing fees, and increases in building maintenance and repair expenses. Professional and director fees increased by $257, or 24.9%, primarily because of an increase in director fees due to the accrual for a restricted stock award and due to higher legal fees. Debit card processing expenses increased by $175, or 14.2%, in fiscal year 2025 compared to the same prior year period primarily because of an increase in customer card usage and an increase in fees. Financial institution tax expenses increased by $74, or 17.1%, in fiscal year 2025 since this is a capital-based tax and total capital was higher as of the measurement date in fiscal year 2025.

Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense totaled $1,657 and $1,845 and the effective tax rates were 16.0% and 17.7% for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively. Income tax expense was calculated utilizing a statutory federal income tax rate of 21.0% in fiscal years 2025 and 2024. The effective tax rate differs from the federal statutory rate as a result of tax-exempt income from obligations of states and political subdivisions, loans, bank owned life insurance earnings, and the low-income housing tax credits.

Financial Condition

Total assets as of June 30, 2025 were $1.17 billion compared with $1.10 billion at June 30, 2024, an increase of $67,919, or 6.2%. The growth in total assets is mainly attributable to an increase of $54,344, or 7.2%, in total loans that was funded by a $63,838, or 6.6%, increase in total deposits.

Securities. Total securities were $279,042 at June 30, 2025, of which $273,875 were classified as available-for-sale and $5,167 were classified as held-to-maturity. The securities portfolio is mainly comprised of mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations issued by U.S. government sponsored entities and obligations of state and political subdivisions. The following tables summarize the amortized cost and fair value of available-for-sale securities at June 30, 2025 and 2024 and the corresponding amounts of gross unrealized gains and losses recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss:

16

The following tables summarize the amortized cost and fair value of held-to-maturity securities at June 30, 2025 and 2024 and the corresponding gross unrecognized gains and losses:

The following tables summarize the amounts and distribution of the Company’s securities held and the weighted average yields as of June 30, 2025:

17

The weighted average interest rates are based on coupon rates for securities purchased at par value and on effective yields considering amortization or accretion if the securities were purchased at a premium or discount. The weighted average yield on tax-exempt obligations has been calculated on a tax equivalent basis. Average yields are based on amortized cost balances.

Loans. Loan receivables increased by $54,344, or 7.2%, to $813,458 at June 30, 2025 compared to $759,114 at June 30, 2024. Commercial & industrial loans decreased by $14,298 primarily because of a third-party residential mortgage warehouse line-of-credit that had a balance of $26,159 as of June 30, 2024 that was paid down to zero as of June 30, 2025. The paydown was a result of lower mortgage volume due to higher mortgage rates and the funding needs of the lead bank. The outstanding balance of this line-of-credit is expected to increase in future periods if mortgage volume increases and as the funding needs of the lead bank changes. Consumer loans increased by $39,642, or 54.5%, because of the expansion of indirect auto lending within our market areas. Major classifications of loans, net of deferred loan fees and costs, were as follows as of June 30:

18

The following table shows the major classifications of loans, net of deferred fees and costs, which are based on the contractual terms for repayment of principal, that are due in the periods indicated as of June 30, 2025:

The following is a schedule of fixed and variable rate loans due after one year (variable rate loans are those loans with floating or adjustable interest rates) as of June 30, 2025:

Allowance for Credit Losses on Loans. The determination of the balance of the allowance for credit losses is based on the CECL methodology and utilizes a lifetime “expected credit loss” measurement objective for the recognition of credit losses for loans, held-to-maturity securities and other receivables at the time the financial asset is originated or acquired. The expected credit losses are adjusted each period for changes in expected lifetime credit losses. The allowance for credit losses (ACL) is maintained at a level considered by management to be adequate to cover credit losses currently expected over the weighted average life of each loan segment.

The ACL consists of general and specific components. The general component covers loans collectively evaluated for credit loss and is based on peer historical loss experience adjusted for current and forecasted factors. Management's adjustments to the quantitative evaluation may be for trends in delinquencies, trends in the volume of loans, changes in underwriting standards, changes in the value of underlying collateral, the existence and effect of portfolio concentration, regulatory environment, economic conditions, Company management and the status of portfolio administration including the Company’s loan review function.

The specific component includes loans that do not share similar risk characteristics that are evaluated on an individual basis and are excluded from the pooling approach. As of June 30, 2025, individually evaluated loans totaled $930 and there was a specific reserve of $52 allocated to these individually evaluated loans. As of June 30, 2024, individually evaluated loans totaled $26,933 and included the $26,159 third-party residential mortgage warehouse line-of-credit and $774 of nonaccrual loans. The warehouse line-of-credit is included in individually evaluated loans because of the unique structure of the loan given the short-term nature of the advances, curtailment features provided by the financial institution that the line-of-credit is issued to, as well as being secured by individual residential properties. As of June 30, 2024, there was a specific reserve of $67 allocated to the individually evaluated loans.

Failure to receive principal and interest payments when due on any loan results in efforts to restore such loan to a current status. Loans are classified as non-accrual when, in the opinion of management, full collection of principal and accrued interest is not expected. The loans must be brought and kept current for six sustained payments before being considered for removal from non-accrual status. Occasionally, loans to borrowers in financial distress are modified by providing principal forgiveness, interest rate reduction, term extension, or an other-than-insignificant payment delay. If principal forgiveness is provided, the amount of forgiveness is charged-off against the allowance for credit losses. One concession or multiple types of concessions may be provided on one loan. There were no modifications of loans to borrowers in financial distress completed during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2025 and 2024. Continued unsuccessful collection efforts generally lead to initiation of foreclosure or other legal proceedings.

The following table summarizes non-accrual loans, non-performing assets, and associated ratios for the years ended June 30:

The non-performing loans are either in the process of foreclosure or efforts are being made to work with the borrower to bring the loan current. Properties and vehicles acquired by the Company as a result of foreclosure or repossession, or by deed in lieu of foreclosure, are classified as “other real estate and repossessed assets owned” until they are sold or otherwise disposed of.

The following table summarizes the Company’s net (charge-offs) recoveries by loan category and the ratio of net (charge-offs) recoveries to average loans for the years ended June 30:

The following schedule is a breakdown of the allowance for credit losses allocated by type of loan and related ratios:

While management’s periodic analysis of the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses may allocate portions of the allowance for specific problem loan situations, the entire allowance is available for any loan charge-off that may occur. While the Company has historically experienced strong trends in asset quality, an increase in the provision could occur if economic conditions and factors which affect credit quality, real estate values and general business conditions worsen. Management closely monitors changes in the existing loan portfolio and analyzes potential loan opportunities carefully in order to manage credit risk.

Deposits. Total deposits increased by $63,838 or 6.6%, from $972,980 at June 30, 2024 to $1.04 billion at June 30, 2025. As of June 30, 2025, the Company maintained a favorable funding mix with 23.1% of total deposits in noninterest-bearing demand deposits, 14.8% in interest-bearing demand deposits, 36.6% in savings and money market deposits, and 25.5% in certificates and other time deposits.

The following is a schedule of average deposit amounts and average rates paid on each category for the periods included:

Uninsured deposits as of June 30, 2025 were $310,119, or 29.9% of total deposits, and include $110,412 of uninsured public fund deposits that are fully collateralized. Uninsured deposits as of June 30, 2024 were $263,345, or 27.1% of total deposits, and include $87,357 of uninsured public fund deposits that are fully collateralized. Uninsured deposits as of June 30, 2025 and 2024 are based on estimates and include portions of FDIC-insured deposit accounts that exceed the insurance limit of $250 thousand per separately insured depositor.

The following table summarizes time deposits issued in amounts of more than $250 thousand as of June 30, 2025 by time remaining until maturity:

Short-term Borrowings: Borrowings with original maturities of one year or less are classified as short-term and were comprised of the following:

Repurchase agreements are financing arrangements with local customers that mature daily. The Bank pledges securities as collateral for the repurchase agreements. The Federal Reserve’s Bank Term Funding Program was a facility established in 2023 in response to liquidity concerns within the banking industry, the program ceased making new loans in March 2024, and the outstanding balance of this loan was repaid in November 2024. A line of credit from another financial institution was established since the Company does not conduct operations and its primary sources of liquidity are dividend upstreams from the Bank and borrowings from outside sources. As of June 20, 2025, the available credit on the Company’s line of credit was $5,000. See Note 7—Short-Term Borrowings to the Consolidated Financial Statements, for additional information concerning short-term borrowings.

Capital Resources

Total shareholders’ equity increased by $12,586 from $63,685 as of June 30, 2024 to $76,271 at June 30, 2025. The primary reason for the increase in shareholders’ equity was because of net income of $8,667 for fiscal year 2025 and a decrease of $5,778 in the accumulated other comprehensive loss from the mark-to-market of available-for-sale securities which were partially offset by $2,383 in cash dividends paid. The total accumulated other comprehensive loss was $22,554 as of June 30, 2025 and $28,332 as of June 30, 2024. Available-for-sale securities and shareholders’ equity were impacted by rapidly rising interest rates during 2022 and 2023 causing the accumulated other comprehensive loss to increase as available-for-sale securities are marked to fair market value. As market interest rates rise, the fair value of fixed-rate securities decline with a corresponding net of tax decline recorded in the accumulated other comprehensive loss portion of equity. This unrealized loss in securities is temporary and is adjusted monthly for additional market interest rate fluctuations, principal paydowns, calls, and maturities. The fair value is expected to recover as the securities approach their maturity date or repricing date or if market yields for such securities decline. The Company has significant sources of liquidity and therefore does not expect to have to sell securities to fund growth.

For fiscal year 2025, the average equity to average total assets ratio was 6.44% and the dividend payout ratio was 27.5%. For fiscal year 2024, the average equity to average total assets ratio was 5.35% and the dividend payout ratio was 26.2%.

At June 30, 2025, management believes the Bank complied with all regulatory capital requirements. Based on the Bank’s computed regulatory capital ratios, the OCC has determined the Bank to be well capitalized under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act as of its latest exam date. The Bank’s actual and required capital amounts are disclosed in Note 12-Regulatory Matters to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Management is not aware of any matters occurring subsequent to that exam that would cause the Bank’s capital category to change.

At June 30, 2025, the Company had no unconsolidated, related special purpose entities, nor did the Company engage in hedging contracts, such as interest rate swaps, which may expose the Company to liabilities greater than the amounts recorded on the consolidated balance sheet. The Company’s investment policy prohibits engaging in derivative contracts for speculative trading purposes; however, in the future, the Company may pursue certain contracts, such as interest rate swaps, to execute a sound and defensive interest rate risk management policy.

Liquidity

Management considers the asset position of the Bank to be sufficiently liquid to meet normal operating needs and conditions. The Bank’s earning assets are divided primarily between loans and available-for-sale securities, with any excess funds placed in federal funds sold or interest-bearing deposit accounts with other financial institutions.

For fiscal year 2025, net cash inflows from operating activities were $7,934, net cash inflows from financing activities were $55,948 and net cash outflows from investing activities were $61,697. Major sources of cash were a $63,838 net increase in deposits and $38,548 in cash received from maturities, calls, and principal pay downs of available-for-sale securities. Major uses of cash were a $55,017 net increase in loans and $40,292 purchases of available-for-sale securities. Total cash and cash equivalents were $19,908 as of June 30, 2025 compared to $17,723 at June 30, 2024.

The Bank groups its loan portfolio into six major categories: commercial & industrial loans; commercial real estate loans; farmland loans; land development loans; 1-4 family residential real estate loans; and consumer loans. The Bank’s 1-4 family residential real estate loan portfolio primarily consists of fixed and variable rate mortgage loans with amortization periods up to thirty years, residential construction loans with a fixed rate interest only period of up to 18-months that converts to a fixed or variable rate loan with amortization periods of up to thirty years, and variable rate home equity lines of credit. Commercial & industrial, commercial real estate loans, and farmland loans are comprised of both variable rate notes subject to interest rate changes based on the prime rate or Treasury index, and fixed rate notes having maturities of generally not greater than twenty years. Land development loans are adjustable-rate loans with interest only periods generally up to three years. Consumer loans offered by the Bank are generally written for periods of up to seven years, based on the nature of the collateral. These may be either installment loans having regular monthly payments or demand type loans for short periods of time.

Funds not allocated to the Bank’s loan portfolio are invested in various securities having diverse maturity schedules. Most of the Bank’s securities are held in obligations of U.S. Government-sponsored entities, mortgage-backed securities, and investments in tax-exempt municipal bonds.

The Bank offers several forms of deposit products to its customers. We believe the rates offered by the Bank and the fees charged for them are competitive with others currently available in the market area. While the Bank continues to be under competitive pressures in the Bank’s market area as financial institutions attempt to attract and keep new deposits, we believe many commercial and retail customers are turning to community banks. Compared to our peers, the Company’s core deposits consist of a larger percentage of noninterest-bearing demand deposits resulting in a lower cost of funds of 2.37% for fiscal year 2025.

Jumbo time deposits (those with balances of $250 and over) were $74,683 and $59,233 at June 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively. These deposits are monitored closely by the Bank and typically priced on an individual basis. When these deposits are from a municipality, certain bank-owned securities are pledged to guarantee the safety of these public fund deposits as required by Ohio law.

The Company has the option to use a third-party broker to obtain deposits from outside its normal service area as an additional source of funding, however, these deposits are not relied upon as a primary source of funding. As of June 30, 2025, there were $1,420 of brokered deposits within savings deposits that were used to fund the seasonal decline of public fund deposits. There were $6,004 of brokered deposits as of June 30, 2024.

To provide additional sources of liquidity, the Company has lines of credit with other financial institutions and has entered into agreements with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati (FHLB) and the Federal Reserve Discount Window. As of June 30, 2025, advances from the FHLB of Cincinnati totaled $22,551 compared with $13,709 as of June 30, 2024. As of June 30, 2025, the Bank had the ability to borrow an additional $86,330 from the FHLB of Cincinnati based on a blanket pledge of qualifying first mortgage and multi-family loans. The Company considers the FHLB of Cincinnati to be a reliable source of liquidity funding, secondary to its deposit base. In addition, at June 30, 2025, the Company had approximately $91,626 in securities unencumbered by a pledge that could be used to support additional borrowings, as needed, through the Federal Reserve discount window.

Dividends from the Bank are the primary source of funds for payment of dividends to our shareholders. However, there are statutory limits on the amount of dividends the Bank can pay without regulatory approval. Under these regulations, the amount of dividends that may be paid in any calendar year is limited to the current year’s net profits, combined with the retained net profits of the preceding two years, subject to the capital requirements described above. Additionally, the Bank may not declare or pay any dividend if, after making the dividend, the Bank would be “undercapitalized,” as defined in the federal regulations. As of June 30, 2025, the Bank could, without prior approval, declare a dividend of approximately $17,085.

Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices

The financial statements and related data presented herein have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, which require the measurement of financial position and results of operations primarily in terms of historical dollars without considering changes in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation. Unlike most industrial companies, virtually all the assets and liabilities of the Company are monetary in nature. Therefore, as a financial institution, interest rates have a more significant impact on the Company’s performance than the effects of general levels of inflation. Interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or in the same magnitude as the prices of goods and services. The liquidity, maturity structure and quality of the Company’s assets and liabilities are critical to the maintenance of acceptable performance levels.

Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Significant Estimates

The financial condition and results of operations for the Company presented in the Consolidated Financial Statements, accompanying notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements and management’s discussion and analysis are, to a large degree, dependent upon the Company’s accounting policies. The selection and application of these accounting policies involve judgments, estimates and uncertainties that are susceptible to change. The most significant accounting policies followed by the Company are presented in Note 1-Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to the Consolidated Financial Statements. These policies, along with the disclosures presented in the other financial statement notes, provide information on how significant assets and liabilities are valued in the financial statements and how those values are determined.

Management views critical accounting policies to be those which are highly dependent on subjective or complex judgments, estimates and assumptions, and where changes in those estimates and assumptions could have a significant impact on the financial statements. In the event different assumptions or conditions were to prevail, and depending upon the severity of such changes, the possibility of materially different financial condition or results of operations is a reasonable likelihood. Management has identified the following as critical accounting policies:

Allowance for Credit Losses on Loans (ACL). The determination of the ACL on loans involves considerable subjective judgment and estimation by management. The ACL is a reserve established through a provision for credit losses charged to expense, which represents management’s best estimate of all expected credit losses based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. The ACL calculation is performed and evaluated quarterly, and losses are estimated over the expected life of the loan. The level of the ACL is believed to be adequate to absorb all expected future losses inherent in the loan portfolio at the measurement date.

In calculating the ACL, the loan portfolio was pooled into loan segments with similar risk characteristics. The general component covers loans collectively evaluated for credit loss and is based on peer historical loss experience adjusted for current and forecasted factors.

The Company qualitatively adjusts model results for risk factors that are not inherently captured in the general component but are nonetheless relevant in assessing the expected credit losses within the loan portfolio. These adjustments may increase or decrease the estimate of expected credit losses based upon the assessed level of risk for each qualitative factor. Management's adjustments to the quantitative evaluation may be for trends in delinquencies, trends in the volume of loans, changes in underwriting standards, changes in the value of underlying collateral, the existence and effect of portfolio concentration, regulatory environment, economic conditions, Company management and the status of portfolio administration including the Company’s loan review function.

In some cases, management may determine that an individual loan exhibits unique risk characteristics which differentiate the loan from other loans within the loan segments. In such cases, the loans are evaluated for expected credit losses on an individual basis and excluded from the general component. Specific reserves in the ACL are determined by analyzing the borrower's ability to repay amounts owed, collateral deficiencies, the relative risk grade of the loan and economic conditions affecting the borrower's industry, among other things. A loan is considered collateral dependent when, based upon management's assessment, the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and repayment is expected to be provided substantially through the operation or sale of the collateral. In such cases, expected credit losses are based on the fair value of the collateral at the measurement date, adjusted for estimated selling costs if satisfaction of the loan depends on the sale of the collateral. The fair value of collateral supporting collateral dependent loans is evaluated on a quarterly basis. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available. Although management believes its process for determining the allowance adequately considers all the potential factors that could potentially result in credit losses, the process includes subjective elements and may be susceptible to significant change. To the extent actual outcomes differ from management’s estimates, additional provisions for credit losses may be required that would adversely impact the Company’s financial condition or earnings in future periods.

Goodwill. The Company accounts for business combinations using the acquisition method of accounting. Accordingly, the identifiable assets acquired and the liabilities assumed are recorded at their estimated fair values as of the date of acquisition with any excess of the cost of the acquisition over the fair value recorded as goodwill. The carrying value of goodwill is tested annually for impairment, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. The evaluation for impairment involves comparing the current estimated fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying value. If the current estimated fair value of a reporting unit exceeds the carrying value, no additional testing is required, and an impairment loss is not recorded. If the estimated fair value is less than the carrying value, further valuation procedures are performed that could result in impairment of goodwill being recorded. Further valuation procedures would include allocating the estimated fair value to all assets and liabilities of the reporting unit to determine an implied goodwill value. If the implied value of goodwill of a reporting unit is less than the carrying amount of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.

Management evaluated goodwill as of April 30, 2025, the measurement date, utilizing an income approach that incorporated a discounted cash flow model that involved management assumptions based upon future growth and earnings projections. The estimated fair value of the reporting unit was then compared to the current carrying value to determine if impairment had occurred. It is our opinion that, as of the measurement date, the aggregate fair value of the reporting unit exceeded the carrying value of the reporting unit. Therefore, management concluded that goodwill was not impaired. Although we believe our assumptions are reasonable, actual results may vary significantly and it is impossible to know the future impact of evolving economic conditions. If for any future period it is determined that there has been impairment in the carrying value of our goodwill balances, the Company will record a charge to earnings, which could have a material adverse effect on net income, but not risk-based capital ratios.

Contractual Obligations, Commitments and Contingent Liabilities

The following table presents, as of June 30, 2025, the Company’s significant fixed and determinable contractual obligations by payment date. The payment amounts represent those amounts contractually due to the recipient and do not include any unamortized premiums or discounts. Further discussion of the nature of each obligation is included in the referenced note to the consolidated financial statements.

Note 13 - Commitments with Off-Balance Sheet Risk to the Consolidated Financial Statements discusses in greater detail other commitments and contingencies and the various obligations that exist under those agreements. These commitments and contingencies consist primarily of commitments to extend credit to borrowers under lines of credit.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

With the participation of the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined under Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) was performed, as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The management of Consumers Bancorp, Inc. is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by the board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2025 based on the criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting established in “Internal Control-Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO) of the Treadway Commission in 2013. Based on that assessment, we have concluded that, as of June 30, 2025, our internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.

Changes In Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2025 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.