Elite Pharmaceuticals Inc: Form 10-K for the period ended Mar 31, 2024

General

Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”, “Elite”, “Elite Pharmaceuticals”, the “registrant”, “we”, “us” or “our”) was incorporated on October 1, 1997 under the laws of the State of Delaware, and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Elite Laboratories, Inc. (“Elite Labs”), was incorporated on August 23, 1990 under the laws of the State of Delaware. On January 5, 2012, Elite Pharmaceuticals was reincorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada.

We are a specialty pharmaceutical company principally engaged in the development and manufacture of oral, controlled-release products, and the manufacture of generic pharmaceuticals. Our strategy includes developing generic versions of controlled-release drug products with high barriers to entry.

We occupy manufacturing, warehouse, laboratory and office space at 135, 144 and 165 Ludlow Avenue in Northvale, NJ (the “Northvale Facility”). The Northvale Facility operates under Current Good Manufacturing Practice (“cGMP”) and is a United States Drug Enforcement Agency (“DEA”) registered facility for research, development, and manufacturing. Our website address is www.elitepharma.com (http://www.elitepharma.com).

Strategy

We focus our efforts on the following areas: (i) manufacturing of a line of generic pharmaceutical products with approved Abbreviated New Drug Applications (“ANDAs”); (ii) development of additional generic pharmaceutical products; (iii) development of the other product candidates in our pipeline including products co-developed with partners; (iv) commercial exploitation of our product candidates either by sales under our own label, license and the collection of royalties, or through the manufacture of our formulations; and (v) development of new products for sale under our own label, and the expansion of our licensing agreements with other pharmaceutical companies, including co-development projects, joint ventures and other collaborations.

We continue to evaluate opportunities for the development of various types of drug products, including branded drug products which require New Drug Applications (“NDAs”) under Section 505(b)(1) or 505(b)(2) of the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984 (the “Drug Price Competition Act”) as well as generic drug products which require ANDAs.

We believe that our business strategy enables us to reduce its risk by having a diverse product portfolio.

Commercial Products

We own, license, manufacture, sell, distribute or receive royalties from the following products currently being sold commercially:

Note: Phentermine 37.5mg is also referred to as “Phentermine Tablets”. Phentermine 15mg and Phentermine 30mg are collectively and individually referred to as “Phentermine Capsules”. Phendimetrazine 35mg is also referred to as “Phendimetrazine Tablets”. Naltrexone 50mg is also referred to as “Naltrexone Tablets”. Isradipine 2.5mg and Isradipine 5mg are collectively and individually referred to as “Isradipine Capsules”. Trimipramine 25mg, Trimipramine 50mg, and Trimipramine 100mg are collectively and individually referred to as “Trimipramine Capsules”. Amphetamine IR 5mg, Amphetamine IR 7.5mg, Amphetamine IR 10mg, Amphetamine IR 12.5mg, Amphetamine IR 15mg, Amphetamine IR 20mg and Amphetamine IR 30mg are collectively and individually referred to as “Amphetamine IR Tablets”. Dantrolene 25mg, Dantrolene 50mg and Dantrolene 100mg are collectively and individually referred to as “Dantrolene Capsules”. Amphetamine ER 5mg, Amphetamine ER 10mg, Amphetamine ER 15mg. Amphetamine ER 20mg, Amphetamine ER 25mg and Amphetamine ER 30mg are collectively and individually referred to as “Amphetamine ER Capsules”. Loxapine 5gm, Loxapine 10mg, Loxapine 25mg and Loxapine 50mg are collectively and individually referred to as “Loxapine Capsules”, Vigabatrin 500mg is collectively and individually referred to as “Vigabatrin Powder”.

Phentermine 37.5mg

The Company acquired two ANDA’s for Phentermine 37.5mg, in 2010 and 2013, respectively.

Sales and marketing rights for Phentermine 37.5mg relating to the approved ANDA acquired in 2010 are included in the licensing agreement between the Company and Precision Dose Inc. (“Precision Dose”) dated September 10, 2010 (the “Precision Dose License Agreement”). Please see the section below titled “Precision Dose License Agreement” for further details of this agreement. This product is currently being manufactured by Elite and distributed by TAGI under the Precision Dose License Agreement.

The Phentermine 37.5mg product relating to the approved ANDA acquired in 2013 is currently a commercial product being manufactured at the Northvale Facility and distributed by Elite Labs.

Phendimetrazine Tartrate 35mg

The ANDA for Phendimetrazine was acquired by Elite in 2013.

Phendimetrazine 35mg is currently a commercial product being manufactured at the Northvale Facility and distributed by Elite Labs.

Phentermine 15mg and Phentermine 30mg

Phentermine 15mg capsules and Phentermine 30mg capsules were developed by the Company, with Elite receiving approval from the United States Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) of the related ANDA in September 2012.

Sales and marketing rights for Phentermine 15mg and Phentermine 30mg are included in the Precision Dose License Agreement. Please see the section below titled “Precision Dose License Agreement” for further details of this agreement.

Phentermine 15mg and Phentermine 30mg are currently being manufactured by Elite and distributed by TAGI under the Precision Dose License Agreement.

Naltrexone 50mg

The ANDA for Naltrexone 50mg was acquired by Elite in 2010.

Sales and marketing rights for Naltrexone 50mg are included in the Precision Dose License Agreement. Please see the section below titled “Precision Dose License Agreement” for further details of this agreement. Naltrexone 50mg is currently being manufactured by Elite and distributed by TAGI under the Precision Dose License Agreement.

Isradipine 2.5mg and Isradipine 5mg

The approved ANDAs for Isradipine 2.5mg and Isradipine 5mg were acquired by Elite in 2013

Isradipine 2.5mg and Isradipine 5mg are commercial products being manufactured by Elite at the Northvale Facility and distributed by Elite Labs.

Trimipramine 25mg, Trimipramine 50mg and Trimipramine 100mg

The approved ANDA for Trimipramine was acquired by Elite in 2017.

Trimipramine 25mg, Trimipramine 50mg and Trimipramine 100mg are a commercial product being manufactured by Elite at the Northvale Facility and distributed by Elite Labs.

Amphetamine IR Tablets

On December 10, 2018, the Company received approval from the FDA for Amphetamine IR Tablets, a generic version of Adderall®, an immediate-release mixed salt of a single entity Amphetamine product (Dextroamphetamine Saccharate, Amphetamine Aspartate, Dextroamphetamine Sulfate, Amphetamine Sulfate) with strengths of 5 mg, 7.5 mg, 10 mg, 12.5 mg, 15 mg, 20 mg, and 30 mg tablets. The product is a central nervous system stimulant and is indicated for the treatment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and Narcolepsy.

Amphetamine IR Tablets are currently a commercial product being manufactured by Elite and distributed by Elite Labs.

Amphetamine ER Capsules

On December 12, 2019, the Company received approval from the FDA for Amphetamine ER Capsules, a generic version of Adderall XR®, an extended-release mixed salt of a single entity Amphetamine product (Dextroamphetamine Saccharate, Amphetamine Aspartate, Dextroamphetamine Sulfate, Amphetamine Sulfate) with strengths of 5mg, 10mg, 15mg, 20mg, 25mg, and 30 mg tablets. The product is a central nervous system stimulant and is indicated for the treatment of ADHD and Narcolepsy.

Amphetamine ER Capsules are currently a commercial product being manufactured by Elite at the Northvale Facility and distributed by Elite Labs as well as being manufactured by Elite at the Northvale Facility and distributed by Prasco, LLC (“Prasco”) pursuant to the non-exclusive license agreement between the Company and Prasco dated April 5, 2023 (the “Prasco Non-Exclusive License Agreement”).

Dantrolene Capsules

The approved ANDAs for Dantrolene 25mg, Dantrolene 50mg and Dantrolene 100mg were acquired by Elite in 2013. Dantrolene Capsules are a commercial product being manufactured by Elite at the Northvale Facility and distributed by Elite Labs.

Loxapine Capsules

The approved ANDA for Loxapine was acquired by Elite in 2013.

Loxapine Succinate 5, 10, 25 and 50 mg are commercial products being manufactured by Elite at the Northvale Facility and distributed by Elite Labs

Vigabatrin Powder

On June 29, 2022 the Company received approval from the FDA for Vigabatrin powder. The product is in the anti-epileptic therapeutic category. Pursuant to the asset purchase agreement between the Company and Pyros Pharmaceuticals Inc. (“Pyros”) dated November 21, 2022 (the “Pyros Asset Purchase Agreement”), the Company sold to Pyros its rights in and to the Company’s approved ANDA for Vigabatrin Powder.

On November 21, 2022, the Company entered into a Manufacturing and Supply Agreement with Pyros (the “Pyros Manufacturing and Supply Agreement”), pursuant to which the Company manufactures and supplies to Pyros Vigabatrin Powder at an agreed upon price over a term of three years.

Vigabatrin Powder is currently being manufactured by Elite at the Northvale Facility and commercially launched and marketed by Pyros since January 2024.

Products Under FDA Review

SequestOx™ - Immediate Release Oxycodone with sequestered Naltrexone

SequestOx™ is our abuse-deterrent candidate for the management of moderate to severe pain where the use of an opioid analgesic is appropriate. SequestOx™ is an immediate-release Oxycodone Hydrochloride containing sequestered Naltrexone which incorporates 5mg, 10mg, 15mg, 20mg and 30mg doses of oxycodone into capsules.

In January 2016, the Company submitted a 505(b)(2) New Drug Application for SequestOx™, after receiving a waiver of the $2.3 million filing fee from the FDA. In March 2016, the Company received notification of the FDA’s acceptance of this filing and that such filing has been granted priority review by the FDA with a target action under the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (“PDUFA”) of July 14, 2016.

On July 15, 2016, the FDA issued a Complete Response Letter, or CRL, regarding the NDA. The CRL stated that the review cycle for the SequestOx™ NDA is complete and the application is not ready for approval in its present form.

On July 7, 2017, the Company reported topline results from a pivotal bioequivalence fed study for or SequestOx™. The mean Tmax (the amount of time that a drug is present at the maximum concentration in serum) of SequestOx™ was 4.6 hr. with a range of 0.5 hr. to 12 hr. and the mean Tmax of the comparator, Roxicodone®, was 3.4 hr. with a range of 0.5 hr. to 12 hr. A key objective for the study was to determine if the reformulated SequestOx™ had a similar Tmax to the comparator when taken with a high fat meal. Based on these results, the Company paused clinical trials for this formulation of SequestOx™. On January 30, 2018, the Company reported positive topline results from a pilot study conducted for a modified SequestOx™ wherein, based on the results of this pilot study, the modified SequestOx™ formulation is expected to achieve bioequivalence with a Tmax range equivalent to the reference product when conducted in a pivotal trial under fed conditions. The Company has provided the pilot data to the FDA, requesting clarification as to the requirements for resubmission of the NDA. The FDA has provided guidance for repeated bio-equivalence studies in order to bridge the new formulation to the original SequestOx™ studies and also extended our filing fee waiver until July 2023. Due to the prohibitive cost of such repeated bio-equivalence studies and the uncertain commercial viability given the regulatory and competitive landscape, the Company has paused development of this product candidate.

There can be no assurances of the Company conducting future clinical trials, or if such trials are conducted, there can be no assurances of the success of any future clinical trials, or if such trials are successful, there can be no assurances that an intended future resubmission of the NDA product filing, if made, will be accepted by or receive marketing approval from the FDA. In addition, even if marketing authorization is received, there can be no assurances that there will be future revenues or profits, or that any such future revenues or profits would be in amounts that provide adequate return on the significant investments made to secure this marketing authorization.

Generic Products Filed

Currently the Company has filed the following ANDA’s which have been accepted for review by the FDA:

• Generic dopamine agonist accepted for review in December 2022
• Generic antimetabolite accepted for review in April 2023
• Generic opiate analgesic for pain management accepted for review in September 2023
• Generic central nervous system stimulant accepted for review in December 2023

Approved Products Not Yet Commercialized

Acetaminophen and Codeine Phosphate

The Company received approval on September 10, 2019 from the FDA of an ANDA for a generic version of Tylenol® with Codeine (acetaminophen and codeine phosphate) 300mg/7.5mg, 300mg/15mg, 300mg/30mg and 300mg/60mg tablets. Acetaminophen with codeine is a combination medication indicated for the management of mild to moderate pain, where treatment with an opioid is appropriate and for which alternative treatments are inadequate. The Company is currently assessing commercialization options for this product.

Doxycycline Hyclate Tablets

The Company received approval in April 2022 from the FDA of an ANDA for a generic version of an antibiotic product. The product is jointly owned by Elite and Praxgen Pharmaceuticals LLC, formerly SunGen Pharma LLC, (“Praxgen”).

Methotrexate Sodium Tablets

On May 10, 2024, the Company received approval from the FDA for an ANDA for generic Methotrexate Sodium 2.5 mg tablets. Methotrexate belongs to a class of drugs known as antimetabolites and will be sold under the Elite Laboratories, Inc. label.

Hydrocodone Bitartrate and Acetaminophen Tablets

On June 17, 2024, the Company entered into an asset purchase agreement with Nostrum Laboratories Inc. (the “Nostrum Asset Purchase Agreement”), pursuant to which the Company acquired all rights in and to the approved ANDA to this product and a royalty-free, non-exclusive perpetual license to use the manufacturing technology, proprietary information, processes, techniques, protocols, methods, know-how and improvements necessary or used to manufacture this product.

Oxycodone Hydrochloride and Acetaminophen Tablets

On June 17, 2024, the Company entered into an asset purchase agreement with Nostrum Laboratories Inc. (the “Nostrum Asset Purchase Agreement”), pursuant to which the Company acquired all rights in and to the approved ANDA to this product and a royalty-free, non-exclusive perpetual license to use the manufacturing technology, proprietary information, processes, techniques, protocols, methods, know-how and improvements necessary or used to manufacture this product.

Methadone Hydrochloride Tablets

On June 17, 2024, the Company entered into an asset purchase agreement with Nostrum Laboratories Inc. (the “Nostrum Asset Purchase Agreement”), pursuant to which the Company acquired all rights in and to the approved ANDA to this product and a royalty-free, non-exclusive perpetual license to use the manufacturing technology, proprietary information, processes, techniques, protocols, methods, know-how and improvements necessary or used to manufacture this product.

There can be no assurances in relation to any of the above approved products not yet commercialized, that there will be future revenues of profits, or that any such future revenues or profits would be in amounts that provide adequate return on the significant investments made to secure these marketing authorizations.

Discontinued and Transferred Products

As part of standard operating practices, the Company, from time to time, as relevant, conducts evaluations of all ANDAs owned, consisting, without limitation, of ANDAs acquired or approved prior to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2024 (“Fiscal 2024”) and ANDAs acquired or approved during the Fiscal 2023. Such evaluations include, without limitation, costs and benefits relating to each ANDA owned, with such costs including those fees required under the FDA’s Generic Drug User Fee Amendment which is significantly influenced by the number of ANDAs owned, and other costs and benefits taking into consideration various specific market factors for each ANDA. Those ANDAs with a cost/benefit profile not consistent with management criteria for continuation are identified for disposition and effort is made to determine the optimal course of action to achieve disposition of the ANDA.

The Company did not transfer or discontinue any ANDAs during Fiscal 2023 or Fiscal 2024.

Licensing, Manufacturing and Development Agreements

Precision Dose License Agreement

On September 10, 2010, the Company executed a License Agreement with Precision Dose (the “Precision Dose License Agreement”) to market and distribute Phentermine 37.5mg, Phentermine 15mg, Phentermine 30mg, Hydromorphone 8mg, Naltrexone 50mg, and certain additional products that require approval from the FDA, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, TAGI, in the United States, Puerto Rico and Canada. Phentermine 37.5mg was launched in April 2011. Hydromorphone 8mg was launched in March 2012. Phentermine 15mg and Phentermine 30mg were launched in April 2013. Naltrexone 50mg was launched in September 2013. Precision Dose will have the exclusive right to market these products in the United States and Puerto Rico and a non-exclusive right to market the products in Canada.

Pursuant to the Precision Dose License Agreement, Elite will receive a license fee and milestone payments. The license fee will be computed as a percentage of the gross profit, as defined in the Precision Dose License Agreement, earned by Precision Dose as a result of sales of the products. The license fee is payable monthly for the term of the Precision Dose License Agreement. The milestone payments will be paid in six installments. The first installment was paid upon execution of the Precision Dose License Agreement. The remaining installments are to be paid upon FDA approval and initial shipment of the products to Precision Dose. The term of the Precision Dose License Agreement is 15 years and may be extended for 3 successive terms, each of 5 years.

Marketing License with Epic Pharma LLC

On November 21, 2020 we entered into a license, manufacturing and supply agreement with Epic Pharma LLC to market the two Elite generic products described below in the United States.

Beginning on May 23, 2021 and continuing until the agreement terminates, Epic has exclusive marketing rights to Trimipramine Capsules and Isradipine Capsules. The products are manufactured by Elite for Epic on a cost-plus basis. In addition to the purchase prices for the products, Elite also receives license fees of 50% of gross profits or greater, with such being defined as net sales less the price paid to Elite for the products, distribution fees of less than 10% and shipping costs. This license was terminated as of March 31, 2023.

Prasco-Burel Loxapine License Agreement

On February 14, 2020, and as amended on July 30, 2020, the Company entered into a license, manufacturing and supply agreement with Prasco, LLC and its affiliate Burel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Burel”) to market generic Loxapine Succinate capsules in the United States. Burel sales for the product began in May 2021.

Under the agreement, Burel has exclusive marketing rights to Loxapine. The product is manufactured by Elite, and the Company receives manufacturing fees and license fees of 50% of gross profits or greater, with such being defined as net sales less the price paid to Elite for the products, distribution fees of less than 10% and shipping costs. This agreement was terminated as of March 31, 2023.

Prasco Non-Exclusive License Agreement

On April 5, 2023, the Company entered into a non-exclusive license agreement to manufacture, supply and distribute with Prasco, LLC and its affiliate Burel to distribute generic mixed amphetamine extended-release capsules in the United States. The term of the agreement is two years from January 1, 2024. First commercial sale by Prasco of this product was April 5, 2024.

Strategic Marketing Alliances with Lannett Company Inc.

The Company has entered into two separate license, supply and distribution agreements with Lannett Company Inc. (“Lannett”). The first agreement, dated March 6, 2019, relates to products that were co-developed with Praxgen (the “Lannett-Praxgen Product Alliance”). The second agreement, dated April 9, 2019, relates to products that were solely developed by Elite (the “Lannett-Elite Product Alliance”). Both agreements are collectively and individually referred to as the “Lannett Alliance”).

Pursuant to Lannett-Praxgen Product Alliance with Lannett, Lannett will be the exclusive U.S. distributor for Amphetamine IR Tablets and Amphetamine ER Capsules. Elite manufactures these products, which are purchased, marketed and distributed by Lannett under the Lannett label. In addition to the purchase prices for the products, Elite will receive license fees well in excess of 50% of net profits, which will be shared equally with Praxgen, pursuant to the Praxgen Agreement. Net profits are defined as net sales less the price paid to Elite for the products, distribution fees (less than 10%) and shipping costs. The Lannett-Praxgen Product Alliance has an initial term of three years and automatically renews for one year periods absent prior written notice of non-renewal. In addition to customary termination provisions, the Agreement permits Lannett to terminate with regard to a product on at least three months’ prior written notice if it determines to stop marketing and selling such product, and it permits Elite to terminate with regard to a product if at any time after the first twelve months from the first commercial sale, the average license fee paid by Lannett for such product is less than $100,000 for a six month sales period. In addition to manufacturing fees and license fees, Lannett also paid a $750,000 milestone, upon the March 2020 commercial launch of Amphetamine ER Capsules. This milestone payment was earned during March 2020 and was shared equally by Elite and Praxgen, pursuant to the Praxgen Agreement.

Pursuant to the Lannett-Elite Product Alliance, Elite manufactures for Lannett’s purchase, marketing, and distribution of Dantrolene Capsules under the Lannett label. In addition to the purchase prices for the products, Elite will receive license fees well in excess of 50% of gross profits. Gross profits are defined as net sales less the price paid to Elite for the products, distribution fees (less than 10%) and shipping costs. Lannett will have exclusive marketing rights to Dantrolene Capsules. The Lannett-Elite Product Alliance has an initial term of three years and automatically renews for one year periods absent prior written notice of non-renewal. In addition to customary termination provisions, the Agreement permits Lannett to terminate with regard to a product on at least three months’ prior written notice if it determines to stop marketing and selling such product, and it permits Elite to terminate with regard to a product if at any time after the first twelve months from the first commercial sale, the average license fee paid by Lannett for such product is less than $100,000 for a six month sales period. In addition to manufacturing fees and license fees.

Please also note that in May 2020, Praxgen, under an asset purchase agreement, assigned its rights and obligations under the Praxgen Agreement for Amphetamine IR and Amphetamine ER to Mikah. The ANDAs for Amphetamine IR and Amphetamine ER are now registered under Elite’s name. Mikah will now be Elite’s partner with respect to Amphetamine IR and ER and will assume all the rights and obligations for these products from Praxgen.

All agreements with Lannett were terminated as of March 31, 2023.

Pyros Asset Purchase Agreement

On November 21, 2022, the Company entered into an agreement with Pyros Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Pyros”) pursuant to which the Company sold to Pyros its rights in and to the Company’s approved ANDA for its generic Sabril drug. The Company sold its rights to Pyros for $1,000,000, which was recorded as gain on sale of ANDA during the year ended March 31, 2023. There is no further action required by the Company regarding the rights which would affect future periods.

Pyros Manufacturing and Supply Agreement

In conjunction with the sale of its Product to Pyros, the Company executed a Manufacturing and Supply Agreement (the “Pyros Agreement”) with Pyros. Under the terms of the Pyros Agreement, the Company will receive an agreed-upon price per drug for the manufacturing and packaging of Sabril over a term of three years. Revenue per the Pyros Agreement will be recognized as control of the manufactured and supplied drugs is transferred to Pyros (at the time of delivery).

Products Under Development

Elite’s research and development activities include developing its proprietary abuse deterrent technology and the development of a range of abuse deterrent opioid products that utilize this technology or other approaches to abuse deterrence.

Elite’s proprietary abuse-deterrent technology utilizes the pharmacological approach to abuse deterrence and consists of a multi-particulate capsule which contains an opioid agonist in addition to naltrexone, an opioid antagonist used primarily in the management of alcohol dependence and opioid dependence. When this product is taken as intended, the naltrexone is designed to pass through the body unreleased while the opioid agonist releases over time providing therapeutic pain relief for which it is prescribed. If the multi-particulate beads are crushed or dissolved, the opioid antagonist, naltrexone, is designed to release. The absorption of the naltrexone is intended to block the euphoria by preferentially binding to the same receptors in the brain as the opioid agonist and thereby reducing the incentive for abuse or misuse by recreational drug abusers.

The Company filed an NDA for the first product to utilize our abuse deterrent technology, Immediate Release Oxycodone 5mg, 10mg, 15mg, 20mg and 30mg with sequestered Naltrexone (collectively and individually referred to as “SequestOx™”), on January 14, 2016. Please see “Filed products under FDA review; SequestOx™ - Immediate Release Oxycodone with sequestered Naltrexone” above and please note that continued development of this product is currently paused.

The Company is currently not selling and is evaluating the market place when deciding to proceed with the above listed filed application.

Please note that, while the FDA is required to review applications within certain timeframes, during the review process, the FDA frequently requests that additional information be submitted. The effect of such requests and subsequent submissions can significantly extend the time for the FDA review process. Until a product is actually approved, there can be no assurances that the information requested and submitted will be considered adequate by the FDA to justify approval. The packaging and labeling of our approved products are also subject to FDA regulation. Based on the foregoing, it is impossible to anticipate the amount of time that will be needed to obtain FDA approval and to commercialize a product, if approved. In addition, there can be no assurances of the Company filing the required application(s) with the FDA or of the FDA approving such application(s) if filed. The Company’s ability to successfully develop and commercialize products incorporating its abuse deterrent technology is subject to a high level of risk as detailed in “Item 1A-Risk Factors-Risks Related to our Business” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Abuse-Deterrent and Sustained Release Opioids

The abuse-deterrent opioid products utilize our patented abuse-deterrent technology that is based on a pharmacological approach. These products are combinations of a narcotic agonist formulation intended for use in patients with pain, and an antagonist, formulated to deter abuse of the drug. Both, agonist, and antagonist, have been on the market for a number of years and sold separately in various dose strengths.

The Company is currently not selling opioids and is evaluating the market place when deciding to proceed with the above listed filed applications.

Patents

The Company owns the following patents (as of March 31, 2024):

We intend to apply for patents for other products in the future; however, there can be no assurance that any of the pending applications or other applications which we may file will be granted. We have also filed corresponding foreign applications for key patents.

Prior to the enactment in the United States of new laws adopting certain changes mandated by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (“GATT”), the exclusive rights afforded by a U.S. Patent were for a period of 17 years measured from the date of grant. Under GATT, the term of any U.S. Patent granted on an application filed subsequent to June 8, 1995 terminates 20 years from the date on which the patent application was filed in the United States or the first priority date, whichever occurs first. Future patents granted on an application filed before June 8, 1995, will have a term that terminates 20 years from such date, or 17 years from the date of grant, whichever date is later.

Under the Drug Price Competition Act, a U.S. product patent or use patent may be extended for up to five years under certain circumstances to compensate the patent holder for the time required for FDA regulatory review of the product. Such benefits under the Drug Price Competition Act are available only to the first approved use of the active ingredient in the drug product and may be applied only to one patent per drug product. There can be no assurance that we will be able to take advantage of this law.

Also, different countries have different procedures for obtaining patents, and patents issued by different countries provide different degrees of protection against the use of a patented invention by others. There can be no assurance, therefore, that the issuance to us in one country of a patent covering an invention will be followed by the issuance in other countries of patents covering the same invention, or that any judicial interpretation of the validity, enforceability, or scope of the claims in a patent issued in one country will be similar to the judicial interpretation given to a corresponding patent issued in another country. Furthermore, even if our patents are determined to be valid, enforceable, and broad in scope, there can be no assurance that competitors will not be able to design around such patents and compete with us using the resulting alternative technology.

Trademarks

SequestOx™ is a trademark owned by Elite.

We currently plan to license at least some of our products to other entities in the marketing of pharmaceuticals but may also sell products under our own brand name in which case we may register trademarks for those products.

Elite sells its own products under an “Elite Labs” label.

Other Business Factors and Details

Government Regulation and Approval

The design, development, manufacturing, and marketing of pharmaceutical compounds, on which our success depends, are intensely regulated by governmental regulatory agencies, in particular the FDA and DEA. Non-compliance with applicable requirements can result in fines and other judicially imposed sanctions, including product seizures, injunction actions and criminal prosecution based on products or manufacturing practices that violate statutory requirements. In addition, administrative remedies can involve voluntary withdrawal of products, as well as the refusal of the FDA to approve ANDAs and NDAs. The FDA also has the authority to withdraw approval of drugs in accordance with statutory due process procedures.

Before a drug may be marketed, it must be approved by the FDA either through an NDA or an ANDA, each of which is discussed below.

NDAs and NDAs under Section 505(b)(2) of the Drug Price Competition Act

The FDA approval procedure for an NDA is generally a two-step process. During the initial product development stage, an investigational new drug application (“IND”) for each product is filed with the FDA. The IND contains results of animal and in vitro studies assessing the toxicology, pharmacokinetic, pharmacological, and pharmacodynamics characteristics of the product candidate; chemistry, manufacturing, and controls information; and any available human data or literature to support the use of the product candidate. A 30-day waiting period after the filing of each IND is required by the FDA prior to the commencement of initial clinical testing. If the FDA does not comment on or question the IND within such 30-day period, initial clinical studies may begin. If, however, the FDA has comments or questions, they must be answered to the satisfaction of the FDA before initial clinical testing may begin. In some instances, this process could result in substantial delay and expense. Clinical trials are typically conducted in three sequential phases that may overlap or be combined:

Phase One: The product candidate is initially introduced into healthy human subjects or patients with the target disease or condition. These studies are designed to test the safety, dosage tolerance, absorption, metabolism, and distribution of the investigational product in humans, the side effects associated with increasing doses, and, if possible, to gain early evidence on effectiveness. In the case of some products for severe or life-threatening diseases, especially when the product may be too inherently toxic to ethically administer to healthy volunteers, the initial human testing;

Phase Two: The product candidate is administered to a limited patient population with a specified disease or condition to evaluate the preliminary efficacy, optimal dosages, and dosing schedule and to identify possible adverse side effects and safety risks. Multiple Phase 2 clinical trials may be conducted to obtain information prior to beginning;

Phase Three: The product candidate is administered to an expanded patient population to further evaluate dosage, to provide statistically significant evidence of clinical efficacy and to further test for safety, generally at multiple geographically dispersed clinical trial sites. These clinical trials are intended to establish the overall risk.

Concurrent with clinical trials, companies usually complete additional animal studies and must also develop additional information about the chemistry and physical characteristics of the drug and finalize a process for manufacturing the product in commercial quantities in accordance with cGMP requirements. The manufacturing process must be capable of consistently producing quality batches of the product candidate and, among other things, the manufacturer must develop methods for testing the identity, strength, quality, and purity of the final drug. In addition, appropriate packaging must be selected and tested, and stability studies must be conducted to demonstrate that the product candidate does not undergo unacceptable deterioration over its shelf life.

Assuming successful completion of all required testing in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements, the results of product development nonclinical and clinical trials, along with descriptions of the manufacturing process, analytical tests conducted on the chemistry of the drug, proposed labeling and other relevant information are submitted to the FDA as part of an NDA requesting approval to market the product. The submission of an NDA is subject to the payment of substantial user fees; a waiver of such fees may be obtained under certain limited circumstances.

The FDA reviews an NDA to determine, among other things, whether a product is safe and effective for its intended use and whether its manufacturing is cGMP-compliant to assure and preserve the product’s identity, strength, quality, and purity. Under the Prescription Drug User Fee Act, or PDUFA, guidelines that are currently in effect, the FDA has a goal of ten months from the date of “filing” of a standard NDA for a new molecular entity to review and act on the submission. This review typically takes 12 months from the date the NDA is submitted to FDA because the FDA has approximately two months to make a “filing” decision after the application is submitted. The FDA conducts a preliminary review of all NDAs within the first 60 days after submission, before accepting them for filing, to determine whether they are sufficiently complete to permit substantive review The FDA may request additional information rather than accept an NDA for filing. In this event, the NDA must be resubmitted with the additional information. The resubmitted application is also subject to review before the FDA accepts it for filing.

The FDA may refer an application for a novel drug to an advisory committee. An advisory committee is a panel of independent experts, including clinicians and other scientific experts, that reviews, evaluates and provides a recommendation as to whether the application should be approved and under what conditions. The FDA is not bound by the recommendations of an advisory committee, but it considers such recommendations carefully when making decisions.

Before approving an NDA, the FDA will typically inspect the facility or facilities where the product is manufactured. The FDA will not approve an application unless it determines that the manufacturing processes and facilities are in compliance with cGMP and adequate to assure consistent production of the product within required specifications. Additionally, before approving an NDA, the FDA will typically inspect one or more clinical sites to assure compliance with good clinical practices, or GCPs. If the FDA determines that the application, manufacturing process, or manufacturing facilities are not acceptable, it will outline the deficiencies in the submission and often will request additional testing or information. Notwithstanding the submission of any requested additional information, the FDA ultimately may decide that the application does not satisfy the regulatory criteria for approval.

After the FDA evaluates an NDA, it will issue an approval letter or a Complete Response Letter. An approval letter authorizes commercial marketing of the drug with prescribing information for specific indications. A Complete Response Letter indicates that the review cycle of the application is complete, and the application will not be approved in its present form. A Complete Response Letter usually describes the specific deficiencies in the NDA identified by the FDA and may require additional clinical data, such as an additional pivotal Phase 3 clinical trial or other significant and time-consuming requirements related to clinical trials, nonclinical studies, or manufacturing. If a Complete Response Letter is issued, the sponsor must resubmit the NDA, addressing all of the deficiencies identified in the letter, or withdraw the application. Even if such data and information are submitted, the FDA may decide that the NDA does not satisfy the criteria for approval.

If regulatory approval of a product is granted, such approval will be granted for particular indications and may entail limitations on the indicated uses for which such product may be marketed. For example, the FDA may approve the NDA with a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy, or REMS to ensure the benefits of the product outweigh its risks. A REMS is a safety strategy to manage a known or potential serious risk associated with a medicine and to enable patients to have continued access to such medicines by managing their safe use. It could include medication guides, physician communication plans, or elements to assure safe use, such as restricted distribution methods, patient registries, and other risk minimization tools. The FDA also may offer conditional approval subject to, among other things, changes to proposed labeling or the development of adequate controls and specifications. Once approved, the FDA may withdraw the product approval if compliance with pre- and post-marketing requirements is not maintained or if problems occur after the product reaches the marketplace. The FDA may also require one or more Phase 4 post-market studies and surveillance to further assess and monitor the product’s safety and effectiveness after commercialization, and may limit further marketing of the product based on the results of these post-marketing studies. In addition, new government requirements, including those resulting from new legislation, may be established, or the FDA’s policies may change, which could impact the timeline for regulatory approval or otherwise impact ongoing development programs.

The FDA closely regulates the marketing, labeling, advertising, and promotion of drug products. A company can make only those claims relating to safety and efficacy that are approved by the FDA and in accordance with the provisions of the approved label. The FDA and other agencies actively enforce the laws and regulations prohibiting the promotion of off-label uses. Failure to comply with these requirements can result in, among other things, adverse publicity, warning letters, corrective advertising, and potential civil and criminal penalties. Physicians may prescribe, in their independent professional medical judgment, legally available products for uses that are not described in the product’s labeling and that differ from those tested by us and approved by the FDA. Physicians may believe that such off-label uses are the best treatment for many patients in varied circumstances. The FDA does not regulate the behavior of physicians in their choice of treatments. The FDA does, however, restrict manufacturer’s communications on the subject of off-label use of their products. The federal government has levied large civil and criminal fines against companies for alleged improper promotion of off-label use and has enjoined companies from engaging in off-label promotion. The FDA and other regulatory agencies have also required that companies enter into consent decrees or permanent injunctions under which specified promotional conduct is changed or curtailed. However, companies may share truthful and not misleading information that is otherwise consistent with a product’s FDA-approved labeling.

Whether or not FDA approval has been obtained, approval of the product by comparable regulatory authorities in any foreign country must be obtained prior to the commencement of marketing of the product in that country. We intend to conduct all marketing in territories other than the United States through other pharmaceutical companies based in those countries. The approval procedure varies from country to country, can involve additional testing, and the time required may differ from that required for FDA approval. Although there are some procedures for unified filings for certain European countries, in general each country has its own procedures and requirements, many of which are time consuming and expensive. Thus, there can be substantial delays in obtaining required approvals from both the FDA and foreign regulatory authorities after the relevant applications are filed. After such approvals are obtained, further delays may be encountered before the products become commercially available.

NDAs under Section 505(b)(2)

Section 505(b)(2) NDAs may provide an alternate path to FDA approval for new or improved formulations or new uses of previously approved products. Section 505(b)(2) permits the filing of an NDA where at least some of the information required for approval comes from clinical trials not conducted by, or for, the applicant and for which the applicant has not obtained a right of reference. The FDA may then approve the new product candidate for all, or some, of the label indications for which the referenced product has been approved, as well as for any new indication sought by the Section 505(b)(2) applicant.

To the extent that the Section 505(b)(2) applicant is relying on the FDA’s findings of safety and effectiveness for an already approved product, the applicant is required to certify to the FDA concerning any patents listed for the approved product in the Orange Book to the same extent that an ANDA applicant would. Thus approval of a Section 505(b)(2) NDA can be stalled until all the listed patents claiming the referenced product have expired; until any non-patent exclusivity, such as exclusivity for obtaining approval of a NCE, listed in its publication “Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations,” also referred to as the “Orange Book,” for the referenced product has expired; and, in the case of a Paragraph IV certification and subsequent patent infringement suit, until the earlier of 30 months, settlement of the lawsuit or a decision in the infringement case that is favorable to the Section 505(b)(2) applicant. In the interim period, the FDA may grant tentative approval. Tentative approval indicates that the FDA has determined that the applicant meets the standards for approval as of the date that the tentative approval is granted. Final regulatory approval can only be granted if the FDA is assured that there is no new information that would affect final regulatory/ approval.

ANDAs

To obtain approval of a generic drug, an applicant must submit an abbreviated new drug application, or ANDA, to the agency. An ANDA is a comprehensive submission that contains, among other things, data and information pertaining to the active pharmaceutical ingredient, bioequivalence, drug product formulation, specifications and stability of the generic drug, as well as analytical methods, manufacturing process validation data and quality control procedures. ANDAs are “abbreviated” because they cannot include preclinical and clinical data to demonstrate safety and effectiveness. Instead, in support of such applications, a generic manufacturer must rely on the preclinical and clinical testing previously conducted for a drug product previously approved under an NDA, known as the reference listed drug, or RLD.

In order for an ANDA to be approved, the FDA must find that the generic version is identical to the RLD with respect to the active ingredients, the route of administration, the dosage form, the strength of the drug and the conditions of use of the drug. At the same time, the FDA must also determine that the generic drug is “bioequivalent” to the innovator drug. Under the statute, a generic drug is bioequivalent to a RLD if “the rate and extent of absorption of the drug do not show a significant difference from the rate and extent of absorption of the listed drug.” Upon approval of an ANDA, the FDA indicates whether the generic product is “therapeutically equivalent” to the RLD in the Orange Book. Physicians and pharmacists consider a therapeutic equivalent generic drug to be fully substitutable for the RLD. In addition, by operation of certain state laws and numerous health insurance programs, the FDA’s designation of therapeutic equivalence often results in substitution of the generic drug without the knowledge or consent of either the prescribing physician or patient.

When an ANDA applicant submits its application to the FDA, it is required to certify to the FDA concerning any patents listed for the reference product in the FDA’s Orange Book. Specifically, the ANDA applicant must certify that: (i) the required patent information has not been filed; (ii) the listed patent has expired; (iii) the listed patent has not expired, but will expire on a particular date and approval is sought after patent expiration; or (iv) the listed patent is invalid or will not be infringed by the new product.

If the follow-on applicant does not challenge the innovator’s listed patents, FDA will not approve the ANDA application until all the listed patents claiming the referenced product have expired. A certification that the new product will not infringe the already approved product’s listed patents, or that such patents are invalid, is called a Paragraph IV certification. If the follow-on applicant has provided a Paragraph IV certification to the FDA, the applicant must also send notice of the Paragraph IV certification to the NDA and patent holders once the ANDA has been accepted for filing by the FDA. The NDA and patent holders may then initiate a patent infringement lawsuit in response to the notice of the Paragraph IV certification. The filing of a patent infringement lawsuit within 45 days of the receipt of a Paragraph IV certification automatically prevents the FDA from approving the ANDA until the earlier of 30 months, expiration of the patent, settlement of the lawsuit, or a decision in the infringement case that is favorable to the ANDA applicant.

In May 1992, Congress enacted the Generic Drug Enforcement Act of 1992, which allows the FDA to impose debarment and other penalties on individuals and companies that commit certain illegal acts relating to the generic drug approval process. In some situations, the Generic Drug Enforcement Act requires the FDA to not accept or review ANDAs for a period of time from a company or an individual that has committed certain violations. It also provides for temporary denial of approval of applications during the investigation of certain violations that could lead to debarment and also, in more limited circumstances, provides for the suspension of the marketing of approved drugs by the affected company. Lastly, the Generic Drug Enforcement Act allows for civil penalties and withdrawal of previously approved applications. Neither we nor any of our employees have ever been subject to debarment. We do not believe that we receive any services from any debarred person.

Controlled Substances

The federal Controlled Substances Act of 1970, or CSA, and its implementing regulations establish a “closed system” of regulations for controlled substances. The CSA imposes registration, security, recordkeeping and reporting, storage, manufacturing, distribution, importation, exportation, disposal and other requirements under the oversight of the Drug Enforcement Agency, or DEA. The DEA is the federal agency responsible for regulating controlled substances, and requires those individuals or entities that manufacture, import, export, distribute, research, or dispense controlled substances to comply with the regulatory requirements in order to prevent the diversion of controlled substances to illicit channels of commerce.

The DEA categorizes controlled substances into one of five schedules — Schedule I, II, III, IV or V — with varying qualifications for listing in each schedule. Schedule I substances by definition have a high potential for abuse, have no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States and lack accepted safety for use under medical supervision. Pharmaceutical products having a currently accepted medical use that are otherwise approved for marketing may be listed as Schedule II, III, IV or V substances, with Schedule II substances presenting the highest potential for abuse and physical or psychological dependence, and Schedule V substances presenting the lowest relative potential for abuse and dependence. The regulatory requirements are more restrictive for Schedule II substances than Schedule III-V substances.

Facilities that manufacture, distribute, import or export any controlled substance must register annually with the DEA. The DEA registration is specific to the particular location, activity(ies) and controlled substance schedule(s). For example, separate registrations are required for importation and manufacturing activities, and each registration authorizes which schedules of controlled substances the registrant may handle. Certain coincident activities are permitted without obtaining a separate DEA registration, however, such as distribution of controlled substances by the manufacturer that produces them.

The DEA inspects all manufacturing facilities to review security, recordkeeping, reporting and handling prior to issuing a controlled substance registration. The specific security requirements vary by the type of business activity and the schedule and quantity of controlled substances handled. The most stringent requirements apply to manufacturers of Schedule I and Schedule II substances. Required security measures commonly include background checks on employees and physical control of controlled substances through storage in approved vaults, safes and cages, and through use of alarm systems and surveillance cameras. Once registered, manufacturing facilities must maintain records documenting the manufacture, receipt and distribution of all controlled substances. Manufacturers must submit periodic reports to the DEA of the distribution of Schedule I and II controlled substances, Schedule III narcotic substances, and other designated substances. Registrants must also report any controlled substance thefts or significant losses, and must obtain authorization to destroy or dispose of controlled substances.

For drugs manufactured in the United States, the DEA establishes annually an aggregate quota for the amount of substances within Schedules I and II that may be manufactured or produced in the United States based on the DEA’s estimate of the quantity needed to meet legitimate medical, scientific, research and industrial needs. The quotas apply equally to the manufacturing of the active pharmaceutical ingredient and production of dosage forms. The DEA may adjust aggregate production quotas, and individual manufacturing or procurement quotas from time to time, although the DEA has substantial discretion in whether or not to make such adjustments for individual companies. The DEA quota system was amended in 2018 to require sponsors to strengthen controls over diversion of controlled substances, controls and limits the availability and production of controlled substances in Schedule I or II.

Federal laws have been enacted to address the national epidemics of prescription opioid abuse and illicit opioid use. In 2016, the Comprehensive Addiction and Recovery Act (“CARA”), was enacted to address the national epidemics of prescription opioid abuse and heroin use. CARA expands the availability of naloxone for law enforcement and other first responders, forms an interagency task force to develop best practices for pain management with opioid medications and provides resources to improve state monitoring of opioids. The Substance Use-Disorder Prevention that Promotes Opioid Recovery and Treatment for Patients and Communities Act (“SUPPORT Act”), which was signed into law in November 2018, includes a number of measures directed towards regulation and improvement of treatment for substance use-disorder and increased coverage by CMS of medically-assisted treatment options. In addition, the SUPPORT Act requires HHS to report to Congress on existing barriers to access to abuse-deterrent opioid formulations by Medicare Part C and D beneficiaries

The states also maintain separate controlled substance laws and regulations, including licensing, recordkeeping, security, distribution, and dispensing requirements. State authorities, including Boards of Pharmacy, regulate use of controlled substances in each state. Failure to maintain compliance with applicable requirements, particularly as manifested in the loss or diversion of controlled substances, can result in enforcement action that could have a material adverse effect on business, operations and financial conditions. The DEA may seek civil penalties, refuse to renew necessary registrations, or initiate proceedings to revoke those registrations. In certain circumstances, violations could lead to criminal prosecution.

Other Healthcare Laws and Compliance Requirements

Our activities are subject to various federal and state fraud and abuse laws, including, without limitation, the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, the federal civil False Claims Act, and laws and regulations pertaining to limitations on and reporting of healthcare provider payments (physician sunshine laws). These laws and regulations are interpreted and enforced by various federal, state and local authorities including CMS, the Office of Inspector General for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the U.S. Department of Justice, individual U.S. Attorney offices within the Department of Justice, and state and local governments. These laws include:

• the U.S. federal Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibits, among other things, persons or entities from knowingly and willfully soliciting, offering, receiving or paying any remuneration, directly or indirectly, overtly or covertly, in cash or in kind, to induce or reward either the referral of an individual for, or the purchase, lease, order, or arranging for or recommending the purchase, lease or order of, any good or service, for which payment may be made, in whole or in part, under federal healthcare programs such as Medicare and Medicaid. A person or entity does not need to have actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it in order to have committed a violation;
• the U.S. civil False Claims Act (which can be enforced through “qui tam,” or whistleblower actions, by private citizens on behalf of the federal government and impose civil and criminal penalties), prohibits any person from, among other things, knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented false or fraudulent claims for payment of government funds or knowingly making, using or causing to be made or used, a false record or statement material to an obligation to pay money to the government or knowingly and improperly avoiding, decreasing or concealing an obligation to pay money to the U.S. federal government;
• U.S. federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, or HIPAA, which imposes criminal liability and amends provisions on the reporting, investigation, enforcement, and penalizing of civil liability for, among other things, knowingly and willfully executing, or attempting to execute, a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program, or knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing or covering up a material fact or making any materially false statement, in connection with the delivery of, or payment for healthcare benefits, items or services by a healthcare benefit program, which includes both government and privately funded benefits programs; similar to the U.S. federal Anti-Kickback Statute, a person or entity does not need to have actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it in order to have committed a violation;
• HIPAA, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act of 2009, or HITECH, and its implementing regulations, which also imposes obligations, including mandatory contractual terms, with respect to safeguarding the privacy, security and transmission of individually identifiable health information without appropriate authorization by covered entities subject to the rule, such as health plans, healthcare clearinghouses and healthcare providers as well as their business associates and their subcontractors that perform certain services for or on their behalf involving the use or disclosure of individually identifiable health information;
• state laws and regulations, including state anti-kickback and false claims laws, that may apply to our business practices, including but not limited to, research, distribution, sales and marketing arrangements and claims involving healthcare items or services reimbursed by any third-party payer, including private insurers; state laws that require pharmaceutical companies to comply with the pharmaceutical industry’s voluntary compliance guidelines and the relevant compliance guidance promulgated by the U.S. federal government, or otherwise restrict payments that may be made to healthcare providers and other potential referral sources; and state laws and regulations that require drug manufacturers to file reports relating to pricing and marketing information, which requires tracking gifts and other remuneration and items of value provided to healthcare professionals and entities; and
• the Physician Payments Sunshine Act, implemented as the Open Payments program, and its implementing regulations, requires certain manufacturers of drugs, devices, biologics and medical supplies that are reimbursable under Medicare, Medicaid, or the Children’s Health Insurance Program to report annually to CMS information related to certain payments made in the preceding calendar year and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals, as well as ownership and investment interests held by physicians and their immediate family members; beginning in 2022, applicable manufacturers are required to report such information regarding payments and transfers of value provided, as well as ownership and investment interests held, during the previous year to physician assistants, nurse practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, certified nurse anesthetists, and certified nurse-midwives.

13

Violations of any of these laws or any other governmental regulations that may apply to us, may subject us to significant civil, criminal and administrative sanctions including penalties, damages, fines, imprisonment, and exclusion from government funded healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, and/or adverse publicity.

Moreover, government entities and private litigants have asserted claims under state consumer protection statutes against pharmaceutical companies for alleged false or misleading statements in connection with the marketing, promotion and/or sale of pharmaceutical products, including state investigations and litigation by certain government entities regarding the marketing of opioid products.

Foreign Corrupt Practices Act

The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, or the FCPA, generally prohibits offering, promising, giving, or authorizing others to give anything of value, either directly or indirectly, to a non-U.S. government official in order to influence official action, or otherwise obtain or retain business. The FCPA also requires public companies to make and keep books and records that accurately and fairly reflect the transactions of the corporation and to devise and maintain an adequate system of internal accounting controls. Our industry is heavily regulated and therefore involves significant interaction with public officials, including officials of non-U.S. governments. Additionally, in many other countries, the health care providers who prescribe pharmaceuticals are employed by their government, and the purchasers of pharmaceuticals are government entities; therefore, our dealings with these prescribers and purchasers are subject to regulation under the FCPA. Recently, the SEC and Department of Justice have increased their FCPA enforcement activities with respect to pharmaceutical companies. Violations could result in fines, criminal sanctions against us, our officers, or our employees, the closing down of our facilities, requirements to obtain export licenses, cessation of business activities in sanctioned countries, implementation of compliance programs, and prohibitions on the conduct of our business. Enforcement actions may be brought by the Department of Justice or the Securities and Exchanges Commission (“SEC”), and recent enacted legislation has expanded the SEC’s power to seek disgorgement in all FCPA cases filed in federal court and extended the statute of limitations in SEC enforcement actions in intent-based claims such as those under the FCPA from five years to ten years.

Coverage and Reimbursement

Sales of any pharmaceutical product depend, in part, on the extent to which such product will be covered by third-party payors, such as federal, state, and foreign government healthcare programs, commercial insurance, and managed healthcare organizations, and the level of reimbursement for such product by third-party payors. Significant uncertainty exists as to the coverage and reimbursement status of any newly approved product. Decisions regarding the extent of coverage and amount of reimbursement to be provided for any product are made on a plan-by-plan basis. One third-party payor’s decision to cover a particular product does not ensure that other payors will also provide coverage for the product. As a result, the coverage determination process can require manufacturers to provide scientific details, information on cost-effectiveness, and clinical support for the use of a product to each payor separately. This can be a time-consuming process, with no assurance that coverage and adequate reimbursement will be applied consistently or obtained in the first instance.

In addition, third-party payors are increasingly reducing reimbursements for pharmaceutical products and related services. The U.S. government and state legislatures have continued implementing cost-containment programs, including price controls and restrictions on coverage and reimbursement. Third-party payors are increasingly challenging the prices charged, examining the medical necessity and reviewing the cost effectiveness of pharmaceutical products, in addition to questioning their safety and efficacy. Adoption of price controls and cost-containment measures, and adoption of more restrictive policies in jurisdictions with existing controls and measures, could further limit sales of any product. Decreases in third-party reimbursement for any product or a decision by a third-party payor not to cover a product could reduce physician usage and patient demand for the product.

The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (“IRA”) contains substantial drug pricing reforms, including the establishment of a drug price negotiation program within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services that would require manufacturers to charge a negotiated “maximum fair price” for certain selected drugs or pay an excise tax for noncompliance, the establishment of rebate payment requirements on manufacturers of certain drugs payable under Medicare Parts B and D to penalize price increases that outpace inflation, and requires manufacturers to provide discounts on Part D drugs. Substantial penalties can be assessed for noncompliance with the drug pricing provisions.

Drugs with an available generic or biosimilar, certain drugs that represent a limited portion of Medicare program spending, drugs with an orphan designation as their only FDA approved indication, and all plasma-derived products are exempt from direct negotiation. The number of negotiated products will be phased in between 2026 and 2029, and the law sets a maximum fair price the manufacturer can charge based on the number of years the product has been on the market. The law allows HHS to levy an excise and civil monetary penalties against non-compliant manufacturers or those who refuse to negotiate.

The IRA also imposes rebate requirements on manufacturers of single-source generics and other drugs covered under Medicare Part B and Part D where the price of the drug increases faster than inflation. Multisource generics and all products with an average manufacturer’s price less than $100 per year, per individual, are exempt from rebate requirements. Beginning on October 1, 2022 for Part D products and on January 1, 2023 for Part B products, CMS will monitor for products with price increases higher than the rate of inflation on a quarterly basis. Rebates will be calculated as the total number of units sold by the amount the product exceeds the inflation-adjusted price, with 2021 as the base year to measure cumulative changes relative to inflation. Noncompliant manufacturers will be subject to a civil monetary penalty of at least 125% of the calculated rebate amount.

The effect of the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 on our business, generic manufacturers, and the pharmaceutical industry in general is not yet known.

We expect that additional federal, state and foreign healthcare reform measures will be adopted in the future, any of which could limit the amounts that third-party payors, including government payors, will pay for healthcare products and services, which could result in limited coverage and reimbursement and reduced demand for our products or additional pricing pressures.

Compliance with Environmental Laws

We are subject to comprehensive federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations that govern, among other things, air polluting emissions, waste water discharges, solid and hazardous waste disposal, and the remediation of contamination associated with current or past generation handling and disposal activities, including the past practices of corporations as to which we are the legal successor or in possession. We do not expect that compliance with such environmental laws will have a material effect on our capital expenditures, earnings, or competitive position in the foreseeable future. There can be no assurance, however, that future changes in environmental laws or regulations, administrative actions or enforcement actions, or remediation obligations arising under environmental laws will not have a material adverse effect on our capital expenditures, earnings, or competitive position.

Competition

We have competition with respect to our principal areas of operation. We develop and manufacture generic products, products using controlled-release drug technology, products utilizing abuse deterrent technologies, and we develop and market (either on our own or by license to other companies) generic and proprietary controlled-release and abuse deterrent pharmaceutical products. In both areas, our competition consists of those companies which develop controlled release, abuse deterrent drugs and alternative drug delivery systems. We do not represent a significant presence in the pharmaceutical industry.

An increasing number of pharmaceutical companies have become interested in the development and commercialization of products incorporating advanced or novel drug delivery systems. Some of the major pharmaceutical companies have invested and are continuing to invest significant resources in the development of their own drug delivery systems and technologies and some have invested funds in such specialized drug delivery companies. Many of these companies have greater financial and other resources as well as more experience than we do in commercializing pharmaceutical products. Certain companies have a track record of success in developing controlled-release drugs. Significant among these are, without limitation, Pfizer, Sandoz (a Novartis company), Mylan Laboratories, Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd., Amneal Laboratories, Inc., Mallinckrodt, and Aurobindo. Each of these companies has developed expertise in certain types of drug delivery systems, although such expertise does not carry over to developing a controlled-release version of all drugs. Such companies may develop new drug formulations and products or may improve existing drug formulations and products more efficiently than we can. In addition, almost all of our competitors have vastly greater resources than we do. While our product development capabilities and, if obtained, patent protection may help us to maintain our market position in the field of advanced drug delivery, there can be no assurance that others will not be able to develop such capabilities or alternative technologies outside the scope of our patents, if any, or that even if patent protection is obtained, such patents will not be successfully challenged in the future.

In addition to competitors that are developing products based on drug delivery technologies, there are also companies that have announced that they are developing opioid abuse-deterrent products that might compete directly or indirectly with Elite’s products. These include, but are not limited to Pfizer Inc., Collegium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Purdue Pharma LP.

We also face competition in the generic pharmaceutical market. The principal competitive factors in the generic pharmaceutical market include: (i) introduction of other generic drug manufacturers’ products in direct competition with our products under development, (ii) introduction of authorized generic products in direct competition with any of our products under development, particularly if such products are approved and sold during exclusivity periods, (iii) consolidation among distribution outlets through mergers and acquisitions and the formation of buying groups, (iv) ability of generic competitors to quickly enter the market after the expiration of patents or exclusivity periods, diminishing the amount and duration of significant profits, (v) the willingness of generic drug customers, including wholesale and retail customers, to switch among pharmaceutical manufacturers, (vi) pricing pressures and product deletions by competitors, (vii) a company’s reputation as a manufacturer and distributor of quality products, (viii) a company’s level of service (including maintaining sufficient inventory levels for timely deliveries), (ix) product appearance and labelling and (x) a company’s breadth of product offerings.

Sources and Availability of Raw Materials; Manufacturing

A significant portion of our raw materials may be available only from foreign sources. Foreign sources can be subject to the special risks of doing business abroad, including:

• Greater possibility for disruption due to transportation or communication problems;
• The relative instability of some foreign governments and economies;
• Interim price volatility based on labor unrest, materials or equipment shortages, export duties, restrictions on the transfer of funds, or fluctuations in currency exchange rates; and,
• Uncertainty regarding recourse to a dependable legal system for the enforcement of contracts and other rights.

While we currently obtain the raw materials that we need from over 20 suppliers, some materials used in our products are currently available from only one supplier or a limited number of suppliers. The FDA requires identification of raw material suppliers in applications for approval of drug products. If raw materials were unavailable from a specified supplier, FDA approval of a new supplier could delay the manufacture of the drug involved.

We have acquired pharmaceutical manufacturing equipment for manufacturing our products. We have registered our facilities with the FDA and the DEA.

Our Reporting Segments

We currently operate in two segments, which are products whose marketing approvals were secured via an ANDA and products whose marketing approvals were secured via an NDA. ANDA products are referred to as generic pharmaceuticals and NDA products are referred to as branded pharmaceuticals. During fiscal year ended March 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company has paused further development of NDAs and has not engaged in business activities. Accordingly during March 31, 2024 and 2023, results the Company has only engaged in business activities in a single operating segment. For the years ended March 31, 2024 and 2023 revenue from our ANDA segment were $56.6 million and $34.2 million, respectively.

Segment information is consistent with the financial information regularly reviewed by our chief operating decision maker, who we have determined to be the chief executive office, for the purposes of making decisions about allocating resources and assessing performance of the Company. There are currently no intersegment revenues. Asset information by operating segment is not presented below since the chief operating decision maker does not review this information by segment.

Employees

As of June 1, 2024, we had 64 full-time employees. Full-time employees are engaged in operations, administration, research, and development. None of our employees is represented by a labor union and we have never experienced a work stoppage. We believe our relationship with our employees to be good. However, our ability to achieve our financial and operational objectives depends in large part upon our continuing ability to attract, integrate, retain, and motivate highly qualified personnel, and upon the continued service of our senior management and key personnel.

An investment in the Company’s securities involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks described below as well as other information provided to you in this report, including information in the section of this document entitled “Forward Looking Statements.” The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently believe are immaterial may also impair our business operations. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially adversely affected, the value of our Common Stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.

In addition to the other information contained in this report, the following risk factors should be considered carefully in evaluating an investment in us and in analyzing our forward-looking statements.

Risk Factor Summary

The following is a summary of the risk factors contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K that could adversely affect our business, ability to operate, financial condition, results of operation, equity and cash flows. This summary does not address all of the risks that we face and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the more detailed descriptions included below. In addition to this summary, we strongly encourage you to carefully review the full risk factors in their entirety.

Business Related Risks

• The pharmaceutical industry is highly competitive.
• Natural disasters and associated supply chain effects.
• Interruptions in operations at our sole facility could have a material adverse effect on our business.
• We may sell, withdraw or discontinue manufacture of certain products.
• We may fail to successfully identify, develop, and commercialize new products.
• Introduction of generic equivalents of our products by competitors.
• Our operations could be disrupted by failure of our information systems or cyber-attacks and artificial.
• Artificial intelligence based platforms my present new risks and challenges to our business.
• Delays in product development may result in failure to achieve adequate return on investment.
• Our business is dependent on market acceptance of our products, social and political pressures, including public concern over the abuse of certain products, including opioids..
• Unstable economic conditions may adversely affect our business.
• We depend on qualified scientific and technical personnel and our ability to attract and retained such.
• Unsuccessful collaboration or licensing arrangements could limit revenues and product development.
• Substantial portion of revenues is derived from a limited number of products.
• We depend to a large extent on third-party suppliers and distributors for the raw materials for our products.
• Risks related to incorrect or inadequate provision for price adjustments and sales allowances

Financial and Liquidity Related Risks

• We have identified material weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting
• We have a relatively limited operating history and our operating results could fluctuate significantly.
• Our ability to fund operations is uncertain and we may require additional financing to meet objectives.
• We most likely will require additional financing to meet our business objectives.
• We have substantial indebtedness which may adversely affect our financial condition.
• There is a risk of impairment of significant intangible assets on our balance sheet.
• GAAP requires estimates, judgements and assumptions which inherently contain uncertainties.

Legal and Regulatory Risks

• The pharmaceutical industry is heavily regulated which creates uncertainty and substantial compliance costs.
• Our business may be adversely affected by legislation or healthcare regulatory reform and initiatives.
• Use of generics may be limited through legislative, regulatory or efforts of pharmaceutical companies.
• Our revenues and profits from generic products may decline as a result of changes in regulatory policy.
• New tariffs and evolving trade policy between the US and other countries may adversely affect our business.
• The DEA could limit the availability of active ingredients used in many of our products.
• We received a Complete Response Letter (“CRL”) from the FDA indicating that the SequestOx™ NDA is not ready for approval.
• Regulatory factors may cause us to be unable to manufacture products or face interruptions in our manufacturing process.
• Agreements between branded pharmaceutical companies and generic pharmaceutical companies are facing increased government scrutiny in the United States and Internationally.
• Complex reporting and payment obligations under the Medicaid rebate program.
• Investigations and litigation concerning the calculation of average wholesale prices may adversely affect our business

17

Litigation and Liability Related Risks

• We may not be able to obtain or maintain adequate insurance coverages.
• Litigation, product liability claims, product recalls, government investigations and other significant legal proceedings are common in the pharmaceutical industry.
• We are subject to various fraud and abuse laws which could expose us to criminal sanctions, civil penalties, contractual damages, reputational harm, and diminished profits and future earnings.
• Our products contain controlled substances which may subject us to increased litigation risk and regulation.
• Mandatory REMS programs could increase the cost, burden, and liability associated with the commercialization of certain products.
• Illegal distribution and third party sale of counterfeit versions of our products could have a detrimental effect on our reputation and business.
• Competitors or other third parties may allege that we are infringing upon their IP.

Intellectual Property Related Risks

• Our ability to protect intellectual property rights and successfully defend third party allegations of intellectual property infringement is vital to our business and uncertain.

Risks Related to our Common Shares

• Dilution from issuance of shares to Lincoln Park, Directors, Employees, Consultants or upon exercise of warrants and options or the perception that dilution may occur could cause the price per share of common stock to fall.
• Our common stock is a penny stock, quoted on the OTC bulletin board, with rules in place that could limit trading and liquidity of our shares, increased transaction costs that could adversely affect our price per share.
• Shareholder activism could negatively affect us.
• Our stock price has been volatile.
• Capital raises through sales of securities may cause substantial dilution to existing shareholders.
• Issuance of shares of common or preferred stock could make achieving a change of control more difficult.
• We have no plans to pay regular dividends or conduct ordinary share purchases.

Business Related Risks

The pharmaceutical industry is highly competitive.

The pharmaceutical industry is highly competitive and subject to rapid and significant technological change, and we may be unable to compete effectively, which could impair our ability to implement our business model. Competitive factors faced include, without limitation:

• Introduction of other generic drug manufacturers’ products in direct competition with our generic drug products;
• Introduction of authorized generic drug products in direct competition with our products, particularly during any period of exclusivity;
• The ability of generic drug product competitors to quickly enter the market after the expiration of patents or exclusivity periods, diminishing the amount and duration of significant profits;
• Consolidation among distribution outlets through mergers and acquisitions and the formation of buying groups;
• The willingness of generic drug customer, including, without limitation, wholesale and retail customers, to switch among products of different generic pharmaceutical manufacturers;
• Pricing pressures by competitors and customers, even if similar price savings are not passed on to consumers;
• A company’s reputation as a manufacturer and distributor of quality generic pharmaceutical products;
• A company’s level of service, including, without limitation, maintaining sufficient inventory levels for deliveries consistent with customer expectations;
• A company’s ability to use and integrate technology, including the use and integration of artificial intelligence;
• Product appearance and labeling;

18

• A company’s breadth of product offerings;
• Rapid and significant technological change;
• Development and commercialization of advanced or novel drug delivery systems;
• Availability of greater financial resources to fund research and development, marketing, human resources and other operational and overhead resources and capabilities;
• Development of new formulations and products, or improvement of existing ones, at higher levels of efficiency; and
• We depend on third party suppliers and distributors for the raw materials for our products.

Our success, if any, will depend in part on our ability to successfully keep pace with these factors.

As we expand our presence in the generic pharmaceuticals market our products may face intense competition from brand-name companies that have taken aggressive steps to thwart competition from generic companies. In particular, brand-name companies continue to sell or license their products directly or through licensing arrangements or strategic alliances with generic pharmaceutical companies (so-called “authorized generics”). No significant regulatory approvals are required for a brand-name company to sell directly or through a third party to the generic market, and brand-name companies do not face any other significant barriers to entry into such market. In addition, such companies continually seek to delay generic introductions and to decrease the impact of generic competition, using tactics which include, without limitation:

• Obtaining new patents on drugs whose original patent protection is about to expire;
• Filing patent applications that are more complex and costly to challenge;
• Filing suits for patent infringement that automatically delay approval from the FDA;
• Filing citizens’ petitions with the FDA contesting approval of the generic versions of products due to alleged health and safety issues;
• Developing controlled-release or other “next-generation” products, which often reduce demand for the generic version of the existing product for which we may be seeking approval;
• Changing product claims and product labeling;
• Developing and marketing as over-the-counter products those branded products which are about to face generic competition; and,
• Making arrangements with managed care companies and insurers to reduce the economic incentives to purchase generic pharmaceuticals.

These strategies may increase the costs and risks associated with our efforts to introduce our generic products under development and may delay or prevent such introduction altogether.

In addition, sales of our products may be adversely affected by the continuing consolidation within the retail and wholesale pharmaceutical markets. Our products, whether sold directly by the Company or through third parties that are licensed to market and distribute our products are sold in large part to a market that is comprised of a relatively few retail drug chains, wholesalers, and managed care organizations, with such entities continuing to undergo consolidation. Such consolidation may provide these customers or our products with additional purchasing leverage, and consequently, may increase the pricing pressures faced by us. Additionally, the emergence of large buying groups representing independent retail pharmacies, and the prevalence and influence of managed care organizations and similar institutions, enable those groups to extract price discounts on our products and our revenues and quarterly results comparisons may also be affected by fluctuations in the buying patterns of retail chains, major distributors, and other trade buyers.

Furthermore, policies regarding returns, rebates, allowances and chargebacks, and marketing programs adopted by wholesalers may reduce our revenues in future fiscal periods. Based on industry practice, generic drug manufacturers have liberal return policies and have been willing to give customers post-sale inventory allowances. Such industry practices apply to the current sales of our products by our marketing partners, which in turn effect profit splits and license fees received, and they will also affect prospective future sales made directly by Company.

Under these arrangements, from time to time, customers are given credits on our generic products that are held by them in inventory after there is a decrease in the market prices of the same generic products due to competitive pricing. Therefore, if new competitors enter the marketplace and significantly lower the prices of any of their competing products, the price of our products would also likely be reduced. As a result, we, or are marketing partners, would be obligated to provide credits to our customers who are then holding inventories of such products, which could reduce sales revenue, profit splits, license fees and gross margin for the period the credit is provided. Like most competitors in this market, our marketing partners, or us in the case of prospective direct sales made by the Company, also give credits for chargebacks to wholesalers that have contracts with our marketing partners, or us, prospectively, for their sales to hospitals, group purchasing organizations, pharmacies, or other customers. A chargeback is the difference between the price the wholesaler pays and the price that the wholesaler’s end-customer pays for a product. Although, our marketing partners establish, and prospectively we would also establish reserves based on prior experience and best estimates of the impact that these policies may have in subsequent periods, we cannot ensure that such reserves established are adequate or that actual product returns, rebates, allowances, and chargebacks will not exceed estimates. Differences between established reserves and actual amounts of such credits and charges, could result in a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and stock price.

The existence and occurrence of any of the above could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, ability to operate and stock price.

Natural disasters could cause closures of our facilities and disrupt our operations.

Furthermore, the occurrence of one or more unexpected events, including fires, tornadoes, tsunamis, hurricanes, earthquakes, floods, and other forms of severe hazards in the United States or in other countries in which we or our suppliers operate or are located could adversely affect our operations and financial performance. We have lost power or had to shut down operations as a result of extreme weather and natural disasters. These types of unexpected events could result in physical damage to and complete or partial closure of one or more of distribution centers or manufacturing facilities, or the temporary or long-term disruption in the supply of products, and/or disruption of our ability to deliver products to customers. Further, the long-term effects of climate change on general economic conditions and the pharmaceutical manufacturing and distribution industry in particular are unclear, and changes in the supply, demand or available sources of energy and the regulatory and other costs associated with energy production and delivery may affect the availability or cost of goods and services, including natural resources, necessary to run our businesses. Existing insurance arrangements may not provide protection for the costs that may arise from such events, particularly if such events are catastrophic in nature or occur in combination. Any long-term disruption in our ability to service our customers from one or more distribution centers or outsourcing facilities could have a material adverse effect on our operations, our business, results of operations and stock price.

Interruptions in operations at our sole facility could have a material adverse effect on our business.

If our manufacturing facility or the facilities of any of our suppliers fail to comply with regulatory requirements or encounter other manufacturing difficulties, it could adversely affect our ability to manufacture and supply products. All facilities and manufacturing processes used for the manufacture of pharmaceutical products are subject to inspection by regulatory agencies at any time and must be operated in conformity with current good manufacturing practice (“cGMP”) and, in the case of controlled substances, DEA regulations. Compliance with the FDA’s cGMP and DEA requirements applies to both drug products seeking regulatory approval and to approved drug products. In complying with cGMP requirements, pharmaceutical manufacturing facilities must continually expend significant time, money and effort in production, recordkeeping, quality assurance and quality control so that their products meet applicable specifications and other requirements for product safety, efficacy and quality. Failure to comply with applicable legal requirements subjects us, our manufacturing facilities and the facilities of our third-party suppliers to possible legal or regulatory action, including, without limitation, shutdown, which may adversely affect our ability to supply the product. Additionally, our manufacturing facilities, and those of our third party suppliers may face other significant disruptions due to labor strikes, failure to reach acceptable agreement with labor unions, infringement of intellectual property rights, vandalism, natural disaster, pandemics, storm or other environmental damage, civil or political unrest, export or import restrictions or other events. Were we not able to manufacture products at our manufacturing facilities or were our third party suppliers unable to manufacture products at their facilities because of regulatory, business or any other reasons, the manufacture and marketing of these products would be interrupted. This could have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operation, financial condition, cash flows, competitive position and ability to operate.

Furthermore, all of our manufacturing operations are conducted at the Northvale Facility and any delays or unanticipated expenses in connection with the operation at the Northvale Facility, resulting in a significant disruption at this facility, even on a short-term basis, whether due to, without limitation, an adverse quality or compliance observation, including a total or partial suspension of production and/or distribution by regulatory authorities, an act of God, civil or political unrest, force majeure situation or other events could impair our ability to produce and ship products on a timely basis, and could, among other consequences, subject us to exposure to claims from customers. Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows.

We may sell, withdraw or discontinue manufacture of certain products.

We may discontinue the manufacture and distribution of certain existing products, which may adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows. As part of regular evaluations of product performance, we may determine that it is in our best interest to discontinue the manufacture and distribution of certain of our products. We cannot guarantee that we have correctly forecasted, or will correctly forecast in the future, the appropriate products to discontinue or that a decision to discontinue various products is prudent if market conditions change. In addition, there can be no assurances that the discontinuance of products will reduce operating expense or not cause the incurrence of material charges associated with such a decision. Furthermore, the discontinuance of existing products, entails various risks, including, without limitation, the ability to find a purchaser for such products, if there is a decision to sell the product, as well as the risk that the purchase price obtained will not be equal to at least the book value of the net assets relating to such products. Other risks associated with a product discontinuance, include, without limitation, managing the expectations of and maintaining good relations with our customers who previously purchased a discontinued product from us, and the effects such would have on future sales to these customers. We may also incur significant liabilities and costs associated with our product discontinuance.

In addition, we may, from time to time, sell and/or withdraw approved ANDAs if we determine that the costs of maintaining such ANDAs is excessive when compared to their actual current value and their perceived value and place in our strategic plans.

Although our expectations are to engage only in the sale or withdrawal of ANDAs if they advance or otherwise support our overall strategy, any such ANDA sale by definition reduces the size and scope of our business, with a direct correlation to opportunities with respect to certain markets, products or therapeutic categories.

All of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows and ability to operate.

We may fail to successfully identify, develop and commercialize new products.

Elite’s product pipeline, including the paused development of its abuse deterrent opioid products, are in various stages of development. Prior to commercialization, product development must be completed that could include scale-up, clinical studies, bioequivalence studies, regulatory filing, regulatory review, approval by the FDA, and/or other development steps. Development is subject to risks. We cannot assure you that development will be successful, or that during development unexpected delays might occur or additional costs might be incurred.

In order to obtain FDA approval to market a new drug product, we must demonstrate proof of safety and effectiveness in humans or bioequivalence to the reference listed drug. To meet these requirements, we must conduct extensive preclinical testing and “adequate and well-controlled” clinical trials and/or bioequivalence studies. Conducting clinical trials and bioequivalence studies is a lengthy, time-consuming, and expensive process. Completion of necessary clinical trials may take several years or more. Delays associated with product candidates for which we are directly conducting preclinical or clinical trials may cause us to incur additional operating expenses. The commencement and rate of completion of clinical trials may be delayed by many factors, including, without limitation, for example:

• Ineffectiveness of our product candidate or perceptions by physicians that the product candidate is not safe or effective for a particular indication;
• Inability to manufacture sufficient quantities of the product candidate for use in clinical trials or bioequivalence studies;
• Delay or failure in obtaining approval of our clinical trial protocols from the FDA or institutional review boards;
• Slower than expected rate of patient recruitment and enrollment;
• Inability to adequately follow and monitor patients after treatment;
• Difficulty in managing multiple clinical sites;
• Unforeseen safety issues;
• Government or regulatory delays; and,
• Clinical trial or bioequivalence costs that are greater than we currently anticipate.

Even if we achieve positive interim results in clinical trials and bioequivalence studies, these results do not necessarily predict final results, and positive results in early trials and studies may not be indicative of success in later trials and studies. A number of companies in the pharmaceutical industry have suffered significant setbacks in advanced clinical trials, even after achieving promising results in earlier trials. Negative or inconclusive results or adverse medical events during a clinical trial could cause us to repeat or terminate a clinical trial or require us to conduct additional trials. We do not know whether our existing or any future clinical trials or bioequivalence studies will demonstrate safety and efficacy, or bioequivalence to the reference listed drug, sufficiently to result in marketable products. Our clinical trials may be suspended at any time for a variety of reasons, including if the FDA or we believe the patients participating in our trials are exposed to unacceptable health risks or if the FDA finds deficiencies in the conduct of these trials.

Failures or perceived failures in our clinical trials or bioequivalence studies will directly delay our product development and regulatory approval process, damage our business prospects, make it difficult for us to establish collaboration and partnership relationships, and negatively affect our reputation and competitive position in the pharmaceutical community.

Our ability to sustain current operations, engender business growth, achieve current and future revenues and profitability, significantly depends on our ability to successfully identify, develop, obtain regulatory approval, commercialize and market new pharmaceutical products, including, without limitation, our own products as well as those that may be developed in partnership with other entities, such as those that were previously developed with Praxgen pursuant to a now terminated product development agreement. As a result, we must continually develop, test and manufacture new products, which must meet regulatory standards to receive requisite marketing authorizations.

The process of developing and obtaining regulatory approvals for new products is time-consuming, costly and inherently unpredictable. There are direct, indirect, known and unknown risks inherent in the development of pharmaceuticals, including, without limitation, product candidates which initially show promise in preliminary pharmacological or marketing studies, but fail to yield the positive results consistent with initial indications. Product candidates we may develop may not receive the marketing authorizations necessary for us to market them and, if approved, we may be unable to successfully commercialize them on a timely basis or at all, or if commercialized, revenues and profits achieved from the sale of such products might not reach levels that provide sufficient return on those costs incurred during the commercialization process.

The successful commercialization of a product is subject to a number of factors, including:

• The timely filing of any NDA, ANDA or other regulatory submission applicable to our product candidates;
• Any adverse development or perceived adverse development with respect to the applicable regulatory agency’s review of such regulatory submission and approval for the indication sought;
• The effectiveness, ease of use and safety of our products as compared to existing products;
• Customer demand and the willingness of physicians and customers to adopt our products over products with which they may have more loyalty or familiarity and overcoming any biases towards our products;
• The cost of our product compared to alternative products and the pricing and commercialization strategies of our competitors;
• The success of our launch and marketing efforts;
• Adverse publicity about us, our products, our competitors and their products or the industry as a whole or favorable publicity about competitors;
• The advent of new and innovative alternative products; and
• Any unforeseen issues or adverse developments in connection with a product and any resulting litigation or regulatory scrutiny and harm to our reputation or the reputation or acceptance of the product in the market.

In addition, there are many risks associated with developing, commercializing and marketing new products that are beyond our control. For example, without limitation, our collaboration partner(s) may decide to make substantial changes to a product’s formulation or design, may experience financial difficulties or may have limited financial resources. Any of the foregoing may delay the development, commercialization and/or marketing of new products. In addition, if a codeveloper on a new product terminates our collaboration agreement or does not perform under the agreement, we may experience delays and additional costs in developing and marketing that product, with no assurances of us having the resources that may be required to overcome such delays or additional costs that were beyond our control.

We conduct research and development to enable us to manufacture and market pharmaceutical products in accordance with specific government regulations. Our drug development efforts relating to SequestOx™, which are currently paused, and certain generics are focused on technically difficult-to-formulate products and/or products that require advanced manufacturing technology. Typically, expenses related to research, development, and regulatory approval of compounds for SequestOx™, which is a branded pharmaceutical product, the development of which is currently paused, are significantly greater than those expenses associated with generic products. Expanded research and development efforts are required, resulting in increased research expenses. Because of the inherent risk associated with research and development efforts in the healthcare industry, particularly with respect to new drugs, our research and development expenditures may not result in the successful regulatory approval and introduction of new pharmaceutical products and failure in the development of any new product can occur at any point in the process, including late in the process after substantial investment. Also, after we submit a regulatory application, the relevant governmental health authority may require that we conduct additional studies, including, for example, studies to assess the product’s interaction with alcohol. As a result, we may be unable to reasonably predict the total research and development costs to develop a particular product and there is a significant risk that the funds we invest in research and development will not generate financial returns. In addition, our operating results and financial condition may fluctuate as the amount we spend to research and develop, commercialize, acquire or license new products, technologies and businesses changes. Much of the preceding occurred with the development of SequestOx™, which has not received marketing approval from the FDA, for which continued development has been paused and with material adverse effects on our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows and ability to operate resulting in the past, as well as the risk remaining for the future.

Because of these risks, our research and development efforts may not result in any commercially viable products. Any delay in, or termination of, preclinical or clinical trials will delay the filing of our drug applications with the FDA and, ultimately, our ability to commercialize product candidates and generate product revenues. If a significant portion of these development efforts are not successfully completed, required regulatory approvals are not obtained, or any approved products are not commercially successful, our business, financial condition, and results of operations may be materially harmed.

As our competitors introduce their own generic equivalents of our generic drug products, our revenues and gross margin from such products generally decline, often rapidly.

Revenues and gross margin derived from generic pharmaceutical products often follow a pattern based on regulatory and competitive factors that we believe are unique to the generic pharmaceutical industry. As the patent(s) for a brand name product or any statutory period of marketing exclusivity expires, the first generic manufacturer to receive regulatory approval for a generic equivalent of the product is often able to capture a substantial share of the market. However, as other generic manufacturers receive regulatory approvals for their own generic versions, that market share, and the price of the that product, will typically decline depending on several factors, including, without limitation, the number of competitors, the price of the branded product and the pricing strategy of the new competitors. Significant competition in the generic pharmaceutical marketplace is not uncommon with one result of such being significant decline in revenue and gross margins. There can be no assurances of our ability to continue to develop new products or that the number of competitors for any given product will not increase to such an extent that we may stop marketing a generic drug product for which we previously obtained approval, resulting in a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, ability to operate and stock price.

Our operations could be disrupted by failure of our information systems or cyber-attacks.

Significant disruptions to our IT systems or breaches of information security could adversely affect our business. In the ordinary course of business, we collect, store and transmit what we consider to be large amounts of confidential information, and it is critical that we do so in a secure manner to maintain the confidentiality and integrity of such information. Additionally, our IT systems are critical to our ability to store electronic and financial information and to manage a variety of business processes and activities, including, without limitation, manufacturing, financial, logistics, sales, marketing and administrative functions. We depend on our IT infrastructure to communicate internally and externally with employees, customers, suppliers and others. We also use IT networks and systems to comply with regulatory, legal and tax requirements. We have outsourced significant elements of our IT infrastructure. As a result, we manage independent vendor relationships with third-parties who are responsible for maintaining significant elements of our IT systems and infrastructure and who may or could have access to our confidential information. The size and complexity of our IT systems, and those of our third-party vendors, make such systems potentially vulnerable to service interruptions and security breaches from inadvertent or intentional actions by our employees, partners or vendors. These systems are also vulnerable to attacks by malicious third parties, such as phishing or ransomware attacks, and may be susceptible to intentional or accidental physical damage to the infrastructure maintained by us or by third parties, including, without limitation, as a result of extreme weather events, such as fires, floods, hurricanes or tornadoes or as the result of the use of AI or other new technologies.

Maintaining the secrecy of confidential, proprietary, and/or trade secret information is important to our competitive business position. We continually assess these threats and make investments to increase internal protection, detection, and response capabilities, as well as ensure our third-party providers have required capabilities and controls, to address these risks. Like other public companies, our computer systems and those of our third-party vendors and service providers are regularly subject to, and will continue to be the target of, computer viruses, malware or other malicious code (including ransomware), unauthorized access, cyber-attacks or other computer-related penetrations, which have caused, and may continue to cause, disruptions to our operations. Over time, the sophistication of these threats continues to increase. Our reliance on unsupported and vulnerable operating systems and other software in certain cases may increase both the likelihood and potential severity of cyber incidents. The preventative actions we take to reduce the risk of cyber incidents and protect our information may be insufficient. Our efforts may not prevent service interruptions or security breaches in our systems or the unauthorized or inadvertent wrongful use or disclosure of confidential information that could adversely affect our business operations or result in the loss, dissemination, or misuse of critical or sensitive information. A breach of our security measures or the accidental loss, inadvertent disclosure, unapproved dissemination, misappropriation or misuse of trade secrets, proprietary information, or other confidential information, whether as a result of theft, hacking, fraud, trickery or other forms of deception, or for any other cause, could enable others to produce competing products, use our proprietary technology or information, and/or adversely affect our business position. Further, any such interruption, security breach, loss or disclosure of confidential information could result in financial, legal, business, and reputational harm to us and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, ability to operate and stock price.

Artificial intelligence based platforms may present new risks and challenges to our business.

AI technologies may exacerbate existing risks, including risks associated with data privacy, cybersecurity, IP, healthcare fraud and abuse, drug development and manufacturing, and risks to patients or human subjects in clinical trials. AI also introduces new risks, due to the autonomous nature of the technology, which, in some cases, may be deployed to perform tasks, inform decisions, automate decisions, and make predictions. AI may amplify biased and discriminatory decision making, perform unreliably and malfunction, generate insights which are difficult to interpret and explain, and cause direct harm to individuals or groups.

Regulators are proposing, adopting, and implementing new AI laws and regulations. We may be required to change our business practices and policies as a result of such laws and regulations and may incur substantial compliance-related costs.

Regulators are also using existing laws and regulations to take enforcement actions related to the deployment of AI in ways that result in non-compliance with current laws and regulations. If we fail to comply with AI laws and regulations, we may be subject to sanctions, fines, and reputational damage, orders to stop certain processing of personal data, orders to delete certain data or destroy AI algorithms derived from data collects, legal action on behalf of impacted individuals or other enforcement or other actions. If we fail to take steps to protect our confidential data, trade secrets, IP and personal data, we may be subject to legal, regulatory, financial, and reputational risks. AI technologies present significant opportunities and risks to our business. Harnessing AI’s transformative potential may enable us to speed up the discovery and development of new drugs, optimize our manufacturing processes, and drive efficiencies. Our failure to use AI technologies in a way that maintains trust, quality and control in our business activities and to capitalize on opportunities presented by AI may also place us at a competitive disadvantage. Failure to address AI risks will reduce our ability to deliver strategic objectives. Also, investments in AI may not realize the benefits that were anticipated.

Delays in generic product development may result in failure to achieve adequate return on investment.

The time necessary to develop generic drugs may adversely affect whether, and the extent to which, we receive a return on our capital. The development process for generic products, including, without limitation, drug formulation, testing, and FDA review and approval, often takes three or more years. We must also successfully address any challenges brought by the owner of the listed patent. This process requires that we expend considerable capital to pursue activities that do not yield an immediate or near-term return. Also, because of the significant time necessary to develop a product, the actual market for a product at the time it is available for sale may be significantly less than the originally projected market for the product. If this were to occur, our potential return on our investment in developing the product, if approved for marketing by the FDA, would be adversely affected and we may never receive a return on our investment in the product. It is also possible for the manufacturer of the brand-name product for which we are developing a generic drug to obtain approvals from the FDA to switch the brand-name drug from the prescription market to the OTC market. If this were to occur, we would be prohibited from marketing our product other than as an OTC drug, in which case revenues could be substantially less than we anticipated.

Our business is dependent on market acceptance of our products, social and political pressures, including public concern over the abuse of opiods.

Market acceptance of our products among physicians, patients, health care payors and the medical community, is a key component of commercial success and if such is not achieved, our business will be adversely affected. The degree of market acceptance of any of our approved products among physicians, patients, health care payors and the medical community will depend on a number of factors, including, without limitation:

• Acceptable evidence of safety and efficacy;
• Relative convenience and ease of administration;
• The prevalence and severity of any adverse side effects;
• Availability of alternative treatments;
• Pricing and cost effectiveness;
• Effectiveness of sales and marketing strategies; and,
• Ability to obtain sufficient third-party coverage or reimbursement.

If we are unable to achieve market acceptance for our products, then such products will not be commercially successful, and our business will be adversely affected.

Some of these factors are not within our control, and our products may not achieve expected levels of market acceptance. Additionally, continuing and increasingly sophisticated studies of the proper utilization, safety and efficacy of pharmaceutical products are being conducted by the industry, government agencies and others which can call into question the utilization, safety, and efficacy of previously marketed products. In some cases, studies have resulted, and may in the future result, in the discontinuance of product marketing or other risk management programs such as the need for a patient registry.

We may also experience downward pressure on the price of our products due to social or political pressure to lower the cost of drugs, which would reduce our revenue and future profitability.

Public concern over the abuse of opioid medications, including increased legal and regulatory action, could also negatively affect our business. Certain governmental and regulatory agencies, as well as state and local jurisdictions, are focused on the abuse of opioid medications in the United States. State and local governmental agencies may investigate us as a manufacturer and/or distributor of medicines containing opioids or in conjunction with their investigation of other pharmaceutical wholesale distributors, and others in the supply chain that have a direct or indirect connection to our operations in relation to the distribution of opioid medications. In addition, multiple lawsuits have been filed against other pharmaceutical manufacturers and distributors alleging, among other claims, that they failed to provide effective controls and procedures to guard against the diversion of controlled substances, acted negligently by distributing controlled substances to pharmacies that serve individuals who abuse controlled substances, and failed to report suspicious orders of controlled substances in accordance with regulations. Additional governmental entities have indicated an intent to sue these other manufacturers and distributors. While no such actions have been taken against us, the immediate effect on the Company has been an inability to commercialize and market three opioid products approved during fiscal years prior to the twelve months ended March 31, 2021 and a cessation of orders for another two other opioid products that had been marketed by our marketing partners. During the year ended March 31, 2020, we disposed of four approved ANDAs for opioid products. As of March 31, 2024, we continue to hold one approved ANDA for an opioid product that, while approved by the FDA, has not been launched commercially. Subsequent to March 31, 2024, the Company acquired three approved ANDAs for opioid products, and plans on commercially launching these three products, in addition to the one approved ANDA for an opioid product previously held within a timeframe that is beneficial to the Company’s interests. Further, defense against any such opioid related lawsuits could be cost-prohibitive resulting in an adverse material effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and stock price. Similar allegations made against us, even without litigation, could also negatively affect our business in various ways, including through increased costs and harm to our reputation. In addition, an adverse resolution of any lawsuit or investigation could also have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows and stock price.

Market perceptions of our business are important to us, especially market perceptions of the safety and quality of our products. If any of our products or similar products that other companies distribute are subject to market withdrawal, recall, or are proven to be, or are claimed to be, harmful to consumers, then this could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows. Furthermore, due to the importance of market perceptions, negative publicity associated with product quality, illness or other adverse effects resulting from, or perceived to be resulting from, our products, or similar products made by other companies, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows.

Any or all of the above could result in a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, ability to operate and stock price.

Unstable economic conditions may adversely affect our business.

The global economy has undergone a period of significant volatility, which has led to diminished credit availability, declines in consumer confidence, and increases in unemployment rates. There remains caution about the stability of the U.S. economy, and we cannot assure that further deterioration in the financial markets will not occur. These economic conditions have resulted in, and could lead to further, reduced consumer spending related to healthcare in general and pharmaceutical products in particular.

In addition, we have exposure to many different industries and counterparties, including our partners under our alliance and collaboration agreements, suppliers of raw chemical materials, drug wholesalers and other customers that may be affected by an unstable economic environment. Any economic instability may affect these parties’ ability to fulfil their respective contractual obligations to us, cause them to limit or place burdensome conditions upon future transactions with us or drive us and our competitors to decrease prices, each of which could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition, cash flows and stock price.

We depend on qualified scientific and technical personnel and our ability to attract and retain such personnel.

Because of the specialized scientific nature of our business, we are highly dependent upon our ability to continue to attract and retain qualified scientific and technical personnel. We are not aware of any pending, significant losses of scientific or technical personnel. Loss of the services of, or failure to recruit, key scientific and technical personnel, however, would be significantly detrimental to our product-development programs. As a result of our small size and limited financial and other resources, it may be difficult for us to attract and retain qualified officers and qualified scientific and technical personnel.

In addition, marketing of our branded product, SequestOx™, if approved, will require much greater use of a direct sales force compared to marketing of our generic products, should we reinstate development and successfully commercialize this product. Our ability to realize significant revenues from marketing and sales activities depends on our ability or the ability of our partners to attract and retain qualified sales personnel. Competition for qualified sales personnel is intense. Any failure to attract or retain qualified sales personnel could negatively impact our sales revenue and have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows and stock price.

We have entered into employment agreements with our executive officers and certain other key employees. We do not maintain “Key Man” life insurance on any executives.

Unsuccessful collaboration or licensing arrangements could limit revenues and product development.

We have entered into several collaborations and licensing arrangements for the development of products. However, there can be no assurance that any of these agreements will result in FDA approvals, or that we will be able to market any such products, if approved, at a profit. Collaboration and licensing arrangements pose the following risks:

• Collaborations and licensing arrangements may be terminated, in which case we will experience increased operating expenses and capital requirements if we elect to pursue further development of the related product candidate;
• Collaborators and licensees may delay clinical trials and prolong clinical development, under-fund a clinical trial program, stop a clinical trial, or abandon a product candidate;
• Expected revenue might not be generated because milestones may not be achieved, and product candidates may not be developed;
• Collaborators and licensees could independently develop, or develop with third parties, products that could compete with our future products;
• The terms of our contracts with current or future collaborators and licensees may not be favorable to us in the future;
• A collaborator or licensee with marketing and distribution rights to one or more of our products may not commit enough resources to the marketing and distribution of our products, limiting our potential revenues from the commercialization of a product;
• Disputes may arise delaying or terminating the research, development, or commercialization of our product candidates, or result in significant and costly litigation or arbitration; and,
• One or more third-party developers could obtain approval for a similar product prior to the collaborator or licensee resulting in unforeseen price competition in connection with the development product.

Any or all of the above could result in a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, ability to operate and stock price.

A substantial portion of our total revenues is expected to be derived from sales of a limited number of products to a limited number of customers.

We expect that we will continue to derive a substantial portion of our revenue from sales of a limited number of products. For the twelve months ended March 31, 2024, our significant product families (defined as the top four products based on active pharmaceutical ingredient) accounted for in excess of 90% of allocated revenues (defined as gross revenues less chargebacks and government rebates processed). The sale of our products may be significantly influenced by market conditions, as well as regulatory actions. We may experience decreases in the sale of our products in the future as a result of actions taken by our competitors, such as price reductions, or as a result of regulatory actions, such as changes in quota, related to our products or to competing products, which could result in a material adverse on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, ability to operate and stock price.

We also expect that we will continue to derive a substantial portion of our revenue from sales to a limited number of customers. For the twelve months ended March 31, 2024, our six largest customers accounted for in excess of 80% of revenues. The loss of any one or more of these customers, without replacement by a customer of similar significance, or the substantial reduction in orders from any one or more of these customers, without replacement of orders of a similar magnitude from other customers, could result in a material adverse on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, ability to operate and stock price.

We depend to a large extent on third-party suppliers and distributors for the raw materials for our products, particularly the chemical compounds comprising the active pharmaceutical ingredients (“API’s”) that we use to manufacture our products, as well as for certain finished goods.

We purchase the bulk of the raw materials essential to our manufacturing business from third parties. If we experience supply interruptions or delays, or if a supplier discontinues the sale of certain products, we may have to obtain substitute materials or products, which in turn would require us to obtain amended or additional regulatory approvals, subjecting us to additional expenditures of significant time and resources. In addition, changes in our raw material suppliers could result in significant delays in production, higher raw material costs and loss of sales and customers, because regulatory authorities must generally approve raw material sources for pharmaceutical products, which may be time consuming. For example, it may take as long as 18 months to find and qualify a new sole-source supplier. If we receive less than one year’s termination notice from a sole-source supplier that intends to cease supplying raw materials, it could result in disruption of our ability to produce the drug involved. Any significant interruption could result in a material adverse on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, ability to operate and stock price.

We issue price adjustments and other sales allowances to our customers. Although we may establish reserves based on our estimates of these amounts, if estimates are incorrect and the reserves are inadequate, it may result in adjustments to these liabilities that may have a material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.

Based on estimates, we establish liabilities for sales allowances, including, without limitation, sales discounts, returns, chargebacks, sales volume rebates, shelf stocks, cash discounts and Medicaid rebate obligations at each reporting period. Although we believe our liabilities are adequate as of the date of this report, there can be no assurances given by us that our reserves will ultimately prove to be adequate. Increases in such sales allowances may exceed our estimates for a variety of reasons, including, without limitation, unanticipated competition, an unexpected change in one or more contractual relationships or changes in ratios in contractual sales volumes as compared to historical ratios. We will continue to evaluate the relevant factors upon which our estimates and reserves are calculated and record appropriate adjustments if and when deemed necessary. Any failure to establish adequate liabilities with respect to these sales allowances could result in a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations, cash flows, ability to operate and cash flows.

Financial and Liquidity Risks

We have identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting which could, if not remediated, adversely affect our ability to report our financial condition, cash flows and results of operations in a timely and fairly stated manner and/or increase the risk of future misstatements, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations and could cause the market value of our common shares and/or debt securities to decline.

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over our financial reporting, as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Based on reviews conducted by management and specific guidance from third party subject matter experts engaged by the Company, we have concluded that material weaknesses in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting existed. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal controls over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

The Company has identified certain remediation actions and is in the process of implementing them, but such efforts are not complete, most likely require the retention of additional personnel or consultants, both of which are further subject to the Company’s financial condition and financial ability to retain such resources. Although no material misstatement of historical financial statements was identified, if we are unable to complete our remediation in a timely manner or if our remedial measures are insufficient to address the material weaknesses, or if additional material weaknesses in our internal controls are discovered or occur in the future, it may adversely affect our ability to report our financial condition and results of operations in a timely and accurate manner and there will continue to be an increased risk of future misstatements. In our periodic review and evaluation of internal control systems to allow management to assess the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting, we may discover additional weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting or disclosure controls and procedures. The next time we evaluate our internal controls over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures, if we identify one or more new material weaknesses or have been unable to timely remediate our existing material weaknesses, we would be unable to conclude that our internal controls over financial reporting or disclosure controls and procedures are effective. If we are unable to conclude that our internal controls over financial reporting or our disclosure controls and procedures are effective or, if required to issue such an opinion, our independent registered public accounting firm expresses an opinion that our internal controls over financial reporting is ineffective, we may not be able to report our financial condition and results of operations in a timely and accurate manner, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations and could cause the market value of our common shares to decline. In addition, any potential future restatements could subject us to additional adverse consequences, including sanctions by the SEC, shareholder litigation and other adverse actions. Moreover, we may be the subject of further negative publicity focusing on such financial statement adjustments and resulting restatement and negative reactions from our shareholders, creditors or others with whom we do business. The occurrence of any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations and could cause the market value of our common shares to decline. Please see Item 9A “Controls and Procedures” in Part II.

We have a relatively limited operating history and our operating results could fluctuate significantly.

Our revenues and operating results may vary significantly from year-to-year and quarter-to-quarter as well as in comparison to the corresponding quarter of the preceding year. Variations may result from one or more factors, including, without limitation:

• Timing of approval of applications filed with the FDA;
• Timing of process validation, product launches and market acceptance of products launched;
• Changes in the amounts spent to research, develop, acquire, license or promote new and existing products;
• Results of clinical trial programs;
• Serious or unexpected health or safety concerns with our products, brand products which we have genericized, products currently under development or any other product candidates;
• Introduction of new products by others that render our products obsolete or non-competitive;
• The ability to maintain selling prices and gross margin on our products;
• Mix of product manufactured and sold due to each product having different gross margins;
• The cost and outcome of litigation, in the event that such occurs in relation to, without limitation, intellectual property issues, regulatory or other matters;
• The ability to comply with complex and numerous governmental regulations and regulatory authorities which oversee and regulate many aspects of our business and operations;
• Changes in coverage and reimbursement policies of health plans and other health insurers, including changes to Medicare, Medicaid, and similar state programs, especially in relation to those products that are currently manufactured, under development or identified for future development by the Company;
• Increases in the cost of raw materials contained within our products;
• Manufacturing and supply interruptions, including product rejections or recalls due to failure to comply with manufacturing specifications;
• Timing of revenue recognition relating to our licensing and other agreements;
• The ability to avoid infringing the intellectual property of others;
• The ability to protect our intellectual property from being acquired by other entities;
• Our ability to manage growth and integrate acquired products and assets successfully; and
• The addition or loss of customers.

A negative variation in one, many or all of the above factors could, may or will have a material adverse effect on Elite’s business, results of operations, financial condition, and cash flow and ability to operate in the future, depending on the nature and magnitude of the variation(s).

In addition, although we have been in operation since 1990, we have a relatively short operating history, have only achieved profitability for the first time during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021 and limited financial data upon which you may evaluate our business and prospects. There can be no assurances of our ability to sustain current profitability. Additionally, in certain years prior to the year ended March 31, 2021, the auditor’s opinion on our financials was qualified with respect to there being substantial doubt as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern due to continued losses not being sufficiently offset by operating revenues. A failure to generate sufficient revenues to offset related costs of operations will have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flow and ability to operate.

Furthermore, our business model is likely to continue to evolve as we attempt to expand our product offerings and our presence in the generic pharmaceutical market. As a result, our potential for future profitability must be considered in view of the risks, uncertainties, expenses, and difficulties frequently encountered by companies that are attempting to move into new markets and continuing to innovate with new and unproven technologies. Some of these risks relate to our potential inability to:

• Develop new products;
• Obtain regulatory approval of our products;

28

• Manage our growth, control expenditures and align costs with revenues;
• Attract, retain, and motivate qualified personnel; and respond to competitive developments.

If we do not effectively address the risks we face, our business model may become unworkable and we may not achieve or sustain profitability or successfully develop any products, resulting in a material adverse effect on Elite’s business, results of operations, financial condition, and cash flow and ability to operate in the future.

Our ability to fund operations is uncertain and we may require additional financing to meet objectives.

Our ability to fund our operations, maintain liquidity and meet our financing obligations is reliant on our operations, which are subject to significant risks and uncertainties. We rely on cash generated by operations as well as access to financial markets and equipment financings, to fund our commercial, product development and other operations, maintain liquidity and meet our financial obligations. There can be no assurances of our ability to secure equipment financing, resulting in an increased risk of our inability to achieve critical or necessary facility upgrades.

Our operations are also subject to many significant risks and uncertainties, as described, without limitation, in this “Risk Factors” section, including, without limitation, competition in the markets in which we operate, litigation risks, government investigations, including those related to our sale, marketing and/or distribution of prescription opioid medications in prior periods, and others. Any negative development or outcome in connection with any or all of these risks and uncertainties could result in significant consequences, including, without limitation, one or more of the following:

• The dedication of a substantial portion of our cash flows from operations to the payment of legal or related expenses, resulting in these same funds being unavailable for other purposes, including, without limitation, debt service, operations, capital expenditures, product development and future business opportunities;
• A limitation in our ability to adjust to changing market conditions, causing us to be more vulnerable to periods of negative or impaired growth in the general economy or in our business, resulting the company being put at a competitive disadvantage as a result of a decreased or unavailable ability to engage in capital spending and take all other actions that would otherwise be required to ensure growth and competitiveness;
• A limitation in our ability to attract and retain key personnel;
• A decrement in our debt service and compliance obligations related to certain of our outstanding debt obligations, exposing us to events of default and reduced credit ratings, which in turn lead to increased capital costs and potential unavailability of capital; and,
• An overall inability to fund our operations and liquidity needs.

The occurrence or possibility of one or more of these or similar events may cause us to pursue one or more significant corporate transactions as well as other remedial measures, including refinancing all or part of our then-existing indebtedness, selling assets, reducing, delaying or eliminating capital expenditures, seeking to raise additional capital or pursuing internal reorganizations, restructuring activities, strategic alliances, or cost-saving initiatives. Any refinancing of our substantial indebtedness could be at significantly higher interest rates, which will depend on both the conditions of the market as well as the Company’s finances at such time, and may also require our compliance with covenants that could be more onerous than current, which in turn could result in the further restriction of our business operations. Any refinancing may also increase the amount of our secured indebtedness. In addition, the terms of existing or future debt agreements may restrict us from adopting any of the alternatives. Internal reorganizations, restructuring activities, asset sales and cost saving initiatives may also be complex and could entail significant costs and charges or could otherwise negatively impact shareholder value. There can also be no assurance that we will be able to accomplish any of these alternatives on terms acceptable to us, or at all, or that even if accomplished, that the intended results and benefits would be realized.

We most likely will require additional financing to meet our business objectives.

We most likely will need additional funding to accomplish our plans to conduct the clinical development and commercialization of a range of multiple abuse deterrent opioids or initiate, continue or complete the development of additional generic products already identified for development or currently in development.

As of March 31, 2024, we had cash on hand of approximately $7.1 million and a working capital surplus of $27.0 million, as of March 31, 2024, we generated income from operations totaling $10.8 million, net other expenses totaling $10.3 million and a net tax benefit of $19.6 million, resulting in net income of $20.1 million.

While growth in our current generic product line, consisting of Phentermine Tablets, Phentermine Capsules, Phendimetrazine Tablets, Naltrexone Tablets, Isradipine Capsules, Trimipramine Capsules, Loxapine capsules, Amphetamine IR Tablets, Amphetamine ER Capsules and Dantrolene Capsules, and successful commercialization of other products in our product development pipeline, may lead to increased profitability, there can be no assurances of Elite increasing profits or achieving profitable operations in the future. Furthermore, there can be no assurances of the continuation of revenues being earned from the current generic product line, no assurances of Elite’s successful commercialization of other products in our development pipeline. In addition, there can be no assurances of Elite being able to raise additional funds in a timely manner, on acceptable terms, if needed to support commercial operations resulting in a material detrimental effect on Elite’s operations and profits as well as having a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, and cash flow and ability to operate in the future.

To sustain operations and meet our business objectives we must be able to commercialize our products and other products or pipeline opportunities. If we are unable to timely obtain additional financing, if necessary, and/or we are unable to timely generate greater revenues from our operations, we will be required to reduce and, possibly, cease operations and liquidate our assets. No assurance can be given that we will be able to commercialize the new opportunities or consummate such other financing or strategic alternative in the time necessary to avoid the cessation of our operations and liquidation of our assets.

Furthermore, the capital and credit markets have experienced extreme volatility. Disruptions in the credit markets make it harder and more expensive to obtain funding. In the event current resources do not satisfy our needs, we may have to seek additional financing. The availability of additional financing will depend on a variety of factors such as market conditions and the general availability of credit. Future debt financing may not be available to us when required or may not be available on acceptable terms, and as a result we may be unable to grow our business, take advantage of business opportunities, or respond to competitive pressures..

We have substantial indebtedness which may adversely affect our financial condition.

We currently have substantial indebtedness. Total liabilities as of March 31, 2024, were $26.1 million, with such amount including, without limitation, $11.7 million in various loans, leases, bonds payable and deferred revenues, $6.3 million in derivative liabilities and $8.0 million in current payables and accruals. The consequences of this substantial indebtedness could include:

• Exposure to the risk of increased interest rates;
• The Company being required to dedicate a substantial portion of cash flow from operations for debt service and the attendant result of a diminished ability to fund working capital, capital expenditures and other expenses;
• A limitation in our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry in which we operate;
• Our being at a competitive disadvantage as compared to competitors with less indebtedness; and
• A limitation in our ability to borrow additional funds that may be needed to operate and expand our business.

In addition, a notice of default was issued by the New Jersey Economic Development Authority in relation to prior obligations of our tax-exempt bonds. Although we are current in our payments under these bonds, if the principal balances due under these bonds are accelerated pursuant to the notice of default, our ability to operate in the future will be materially and adversely affected.

For more information on the NJEDA Bonds, see Part II, Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations; Liquidity and Capital Resources; NJEDA Bonds”.

There is a risk of impairment of significant intangible assets on our balance sheet.

We have significant intangible assets on our balance sheet. Consequently, potential impairment of intangible assets may have an adverse material effect on our profitability.

Intangible assets represent a significant portion of our assets. As of March 31, 2024, intangible assets were approximately $6.3 million, or approximately 8% of our assets.

Generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”) requires that intangible assets be subject to regular impairment analysis to determine if changes in circumstances indicate that the value of the asset as recorded may not be recoverable. Such events or changes in circumstances are an inherent risk in the pharmaceutical industry and often cannot be predicted. However, should a change in circumstance occur, requiring the impairment of an intangible asset, the result of such an impairment may have an adverse material effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and stock price. During the year ended March 31, 2023, we determined that circumstances indicated that the value of our intangible assets may not be recoverable. During the years ended March 31, 2024 and 2023, we recorded impairment of approximately $0.0 million, and $0.3 million respectively, of our ANDA and patent intangible assets.

GAAP requires estimates, judgements and assumptions which inherently contain uncertainties.

There are inherent uncertainties involved in estimates, judgments and assumptions used in the preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP. Any future changes in estimates, judgments and assumptions used or necessary revisions to prior estimates, judgments or assumptions could lead to a restatement of our results.

The consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are prepared in accordance with GAAP. This involves making estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets (including intangible assets), liabilities, mezzanine equity, stockholders’ equity, operating revenues, costs of sales, operating expenses, other income, and other expenses. Estimates, judgments, and assumptions are inherently subject to change in the future and any necessary revisions to prior estimates, judgments or assumptions could lead to a restatement. Any such changes could result in corresponding changes to the amounts of assets (including goodwill and other intangible assets), liabilities, mezzanine equity, stockholders’ equity, operating revenues, costs of sales, operating expenses, other income and other expenses.

Legal and Regulatory Risks

The pharmaceutical industry is heavily regulated which creates uncertainty and substantial compliance costs.

The pharmaceutical industry is heavily regulated, which creates uncertainty about our ability to bring new products to market and imposes substantial compliance costs on our business in relation to product development as well as commercial operations.

Governmental authorities such as the FDA impose substantial requirements on the development, manufacture, holding, labelling, marketing, advertising, promotion, distribution and sale of therapeutic pharmaceutical products through lengthy and detailed laboratory and clinical testing and other costly and time-consuming procedures. In addition, before obtaining regulatory approvals for certain generic products, we must conduct limited bioequivalence studies and other research to show comparability to the branded products. A failure to obtain satisfactory results in required pre-marketing trials may prevent us from obtaining required regulatory approvals. The FDA may also require companies to conduct post-approval studies and companies are subject to post-approval surveillance regarding their drug products and to report adverse events. The FDA also can require companies to formulate approved Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS) to help ensure that a drug’s benefits outweigh its risks.

We may seek FDA approval for certain product candidates through the 505(b)(2) regulatory pathway. Even if we receive approval for an NDA under Section 505(b)(2), the FDA may not take timely enforcement action against companies marketing unapproved versions of the drug; therefore, we cannot be sure that that we will receive the benefit of any de facto exclusive marketing period or that we will fully recoup the expenses incurred to obtain an approval. In addition, certain competitors and others have objected to the FDA’s interpretation of Section 505(b)(2). If the FDA’s interpretation of Section 505(b)(2) is successfully challenged, this could delay or even prevent the FDA from approving any NDA that we submit under Section 505(b)(2).

Moreover, even if our product candidates are approved under Section 505(b)(2), the approval may be subject to limitations on the indicated uses for which the products may be marketed or to other conditions of approval or may contain requirements for costly post-marketing testing and surveillance to monitor the safety or efficacy of the products.

The ANDA approval process for a new product varies in time, is difficult to estimate and can vary significantly, from as little as 10 months from the date of application, to several years or more. Furthermore, ANDA approvals, if granted, may not include all indications for which the Company may seek to market each product.

Further, once a product is approved or cleared for marketing, failure to comply with applicable regulatory requirements can result in, among other things, suspensions or withdrawals of approvals or clearances, seizures or recalls of products, injunctions against the manufacture, holding, distribution, marketing and sale of a product, and civil and criminal sanctions. Furthermore, changes in existing regulations or the adoption of new regulations could prevent us from obtaining, or affect the timing of, future regulatory approvals or clearances. Meeting regulatory requirements and evolving government standards may delay marketing of our new products for a considerable period of time, impose costly procedures upon our activities and result in a competitive advantage to larger companies that compete against us.

Even if regulatory approval is obtained for a particular product candidate, the FDA and foreign regulatory authorities may, nevertheless, impose significant restrictions on the indicated uses or marketing of such products, or impose ongoing requirements for post-approval studies. Following any regulatory approval of our product candidates, we will be subject to continuing regulatory obligations, such as safety reporting requirements, and additional post-marketing obligations, including regulatory oversight of the promotion and marketing of our products. If we become aware of previously unknown problems with any of our product candidates here or overseas or at our contract manufacturers’ facilities, a regulatory agency may impose restrictions on our products, our contract manufacturers or on us, including requiring us to reformulate our products, conduct additional clinical trials, make changes in the labelling of our products, implement changes to or obtain re-approvals of our contract manufacturers’ facilities or withdraw the product from the market. In addition, we may experience a significant drop in the sales of the affected products, our reputation in the marketplace may suffer and we may become the target of lawsuits, including class action suits. Moreover, if we fail to comply with applicable regulatory requirements, we may be subject to fines, suspension or withdrawal of regulatory approvals, product recalls, seizure of products, operating restrictions, and criminal prosecution. Any of these events could harm or prevent sales of the affected products or could substantially increase the costs and expenses of commercializing and marketing these products.

Compliance with federal and state and local law regulations, including compliance with any newly enacted regulations, requires substantial expenditures of time, money, and effort to ensure full compliance. Failure to comply with the FDA, DEA, EPA and other governmental regulations can result in fines, disgorgement, unanticipated compliance expenditures, recall or seizure of products, exposure to product liability claims, total or partial suspension of production or distribution, suspension of the FDA’s review of NDAs or ANDAs, enforcement actions, injunctions and civil or criminal prosecution, any of which could have a material and adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our business may be adversely affected by legislation or healthcare regulatory reform and initiatives.

Our business and financial condition may be adversely affected by legislation or regulatory reform of the healthcare system in the United States. We cannot predict with any certainty how existing laws may be applied or how laws or legal standards may change in the future. Current or future legislation, whether state or federal, or in any of the non-U.S. jurisdictions with authority over our suppliers, customers or operations, may have a material effect on our business, ability to operate, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Employers may seek to reduce costs by reducing or eliminating employer group healthcare plans or by transferring a greater portion of their healthcare costs to their employees. Job losses, or other economic hardships may also result in reduced levels of coverage for some individuals, potentially resulting in lower healthcare coverage for themselves or their families. Furthermore, increased instability in the insurance marketplace or an increase in uninsured Americans or others living and working in the USA may result from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, elimination of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, elimination of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA)’s requirement that individuals maintain health insurance or incur a financial penalty and other steps taken by various governmental and other organizations to limit or end subsidies to such individuals at comparatively lower income levels. These economic conditions may affect an individual’s ability to afford healthcare as a result of increased premiums, co-pay or deductible obligations, greater cost sensitivity to existing co-pay or deductible obligations, lost healthcare coverage or for other reasons. It is possible that such conditions could lead to changes in patient behavior and spending patterns that could negatively affect prescription and usage of certain or all of our products, including, without limitation, delaying of treatment, rationing of prescription medications, non-filling of prescriptions, reduction in the frequency of visits to healthcare facilities, utilizing alternative therapies or foregoing healthcare insurance coverage altogether. Such changes may result in the reduced demand for any or all of our products, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows and ability to operate as a going concern.

Furthermore, our ability to commercialize and generate revenues and profit splits relating to the sale of our products depends, in part, on the extent to which reimbursement for the costs of these products is available from third-party payors, including government healthcare programs, such as Medicaid and Medicare, private health insurers and other payors. We cannot be certain that, over time, third party reimbursements for our products will be adequate for us to maintain price levels sufficient for realization of an appropriate return on our investment. Government payers, private insurers and other third party payers are increasingly attempting to contain healthcare costs by: (i) limiting both coverage and the level of reimbursement (including adjusting co-pays) for drugs, (ii) refusing, in some cases, to provide any coverage for certain uses for drugs, (iii) requiring rebates, in the case of government healthcare programs, for net sales amounts above statutorily defined ceilings, with such ceilings being potentially below production costs and (iv) requiring or encouraging, through more favorable reimbursement levels or otherwise, the substitution of generic alternatives to branded drugs. For example, government agencies or third-party payers could attempt to reduce reimbursement for physician administered products through their interpretation of complex government price reporting obligations and payment and reimbursement coding rules, and could attempt to reduce reimbursement for separate physician administered products that share an active ingredient by requiring the blending of sales and pricing information in the same payment and reimbursement code.

The unavailability of, or reduction in, the reimbursement of our products could have a material adverse effect on our business, ability to operate as a going concern, financial condition, results of operations and cash flow.

Use of generics may be limited through legislative, regulatory or efforts of pharmaceutical companies.

Many pharmaceutical companies increasingly have used state and federal legislative and regulatory means to delay generic competition, which, if successful, could limit the use of generic pharmaceuticals. These efforts have included:

• Pursuing new patents for existing products which may be granted just before the expiration of earlier patents, which could extend patent protection for additional years;
• Using the Citizen Petition process (for example, under 21 C.F.R. s. 10.30) to request amendments to FDA standards;

32

• Attempting to use the legislative and regulatory process to have drugs reclassified or rescheduled or to set definitions of abuse-deterrent formulations to protect patents and profits; and
• Engaging in state-by-state initiatives to enact legislation that restricts the substitution of some generic drugs.
• Seeking changes to U.S. Pharmacopeia, an organization that publishes industry recognized compendia of drug standards;
• Attaching patent extension amendments to non-related federal legislation;
• Persuading regulatory bodies to withdraw the approval of brand-name drugs for which the patents are about to expire and converting the market to another product of the brand company on which longer patent protection exists;
• Entering into agreements whereby other generic companies will begin to market an authorized generic at the same time or after generic competition initially enters the market;
• Filing suits for patent infringement and other claims that may delay or prevent regulatory approval, manufacture and/or scale of generic products; and,
• Introducing “next generation” products prior to the expiration of market exclusivity for the reference product, which often materially reduces demand for the generic or the reference product for which we seek regulatory approval for a generic equivalent.

If pharmaceutical companies or other third parties are successful in limiting the use of generic products through these or other means, our sales of generic products and our growth prospects may decline. A material decline in generic product sales will have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, cash flows and our ability to operate.

Our revenues and profits from generic products may decline as a result of changes in regulatory policy.

The IRA contains substantial drug pricing reforms, including the establishment of a drug price negotiation program within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services that would require manufacturers to charge a negotiated “maximum fair price” for certain selected drugs or pay an excise tax for noncompliance, the establishment of rebate payment requirements on manufacturers of certain drugs payable under Medicare Parts B and D to penalize price increases that outpace inflation, and requires manufacturers to provide discounts on Part D drugs. Substantial penalties can be assessed for noncompliance with the drug pricing provisions.

Drugs with an available generic or biosimilar, certain drugs that represent a limited portion of Medicare program spending, drugs with an orphan designation as their only FDA approved indication, and all plasma-derived products are exempt from direct negotiation. The number of negotiated products will be phased in between 2026 and 2029, and the law sets a maximum fair price the manufacturer can charge based on the number of years the product has been on the market. The law allows HHS to levy an excise and civil monetary penalties against non-compliant manufacturers or those who refuse to negotiate.

The IRA also imposes rebate requirements on manufacturers of single-source generics and other drugs covered under Medicare Part B and Part D where the price of the drug increases faster than inflation. Multisource generics and all products with an average manufacturer’s price less than $100 per year, per individual, are exempt from rebate requirements. Beginning on October 1, 2022 for Part D products and on January 1, 2023 for Part B products, CMS will monitor for products with price increases higher than the rate of inflation on a quarterly basis. Rebates will be calculated as the total number of units sold by the amount the product exceeds the inflation-adjusted price, with 2021 as the base year to measure cumulative changes relative to inflation. Noncompliant manufacturers will be subject to a civil monetary penalty of at least 125% of the calculated rebate amount.

The effect of the IRA on our business, generic manufacturers, and the pharmaceutical industry in general is not yet known.

New tariffs and evolving trade policy between the US and other countries may adversely affect our business.

New tariffs and evolving trade policy between the United States and other countries, including China and Mexico, may have an adverse effect on our sourcing of critical raw materials from suppliers located outside of the United States and corresponding adverse effects on our business and results of operations.

Some of our suppliers, including those of critical active pharmaceutical ingredients are located outside of the United States. There is uncertainty about the future relationship between the U.S. and various other countries, including China, with respect to trade policies, treaties, government regulations and tariffs.

Changes could potentially disrupt our existing supply chains and impose additional costs on our business, including costs with respect to raw materials upon which our business depends. Furthermore, if tariffs, trade restrictions or trade barriers are placed on products such as ours by foreign governments, it could cause us to raise prices for our products, which may result in the loss of customers. If we are unable to pass along increased costs to our customers, our margins could be adversely affected. Additionally, it is possible that further tariffs may be imposed that could affect imports of APIs and other materials used in our products, or our business may be adversely impacted by retaliatory trade measures taken by other countries, including restricted access to APIs or other materials used in our products, causing us to raise prices or make changes to our products. Further, the continued threats of tariffs, trade restrictions and trade barriers could have a generally disruptive impact on the global economy and, therefore, negatively impact our sales. Given the volatility and uncertainty regarding the scope and duration of these tariffs and other aspects of U.S. international trade policy, the impact on our operations and results is uncertain and could be significant. Further governmental action related to tariffs, additional taxes, regulatory changes or other retaliatory trade measures could occur in the future. Any of these factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

The DEA could limit the availability of active ingredients used in many of our products.

The DEA limits the availability of the active ingredients used in many of our current products and products in development, as well as the production and distribution of these products, and, as a result, our procurement, production, and distribution quotas may not be sufficient to meet commercial demand or complete clinical trials.

The DEA regulates chemical compounds as Schedule I, II, III, IV or V substances, with Schedule I substances considered to present the highest risk of substance abuse and Schedule V substances the lowest risk. The active ingredients in some of our current products and products in development, including, without limitation, hydromorphone, methadone, phentermine, phendimetrazine and oxycodone, are listed by the DEA as Scheduled substances under the Controlled Substances Act of 1970. Consequently, their manufacture, shipment, storage, sale, and use are subject to a high degree of regulation. Furthermore, the DEA limits the availability of the active ingredients used in many of our current products and products in development and we and/or our contract customers and suppliers, must annually apply to the DEA for procurement quotas in order to obtain and distribute these substances. As a result, our procurement and production quotas may not be sufficient to meet commercial demand or to complete any clinical trials we may conduct. Moreover, the DEA may adjust these quotas from time to time during the year, although the DEA has substantial discretion in whether or not to make such adjustments. Any delay or refusal by the DEA in establishing our quotas, or modification of our quotas, for controlled substances could delay or result in the stoppage of our clinical trials or product launches or could cause trade inventory disruptions for those products that already been launched, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, cash flows and stock price.

We received a CRL from the FDA indicating that the SequestOx™ NDA is not ready for approval.

We received a Complete Response Letter from the FDA that indicated that our SequestOx™ NDA is not ready for approval in its present form. We have paused further development of this product and we cannot assure that development will restart. If we are unable to obtain approval for SequestOx™ or if we incur significant costs or delays in obtaining such approval, our return on investment in SequestOx™ will be materially adversely affected.

In July 2016, the FDA issued a Complete Response Letter, or CRL, regarding the NDA. The CRL stated that the review cycle for the SequestOx™ NDA is complete and the application is not ready for approval in its present form. On December 21, 2016, we met with the FDA for an end-of-review meeting to discuss steps that we could take to obtain approval of SequestOx™. Based on the FDA response, we believe there is a path forward to address the issues cited in the CRL, with such path forward including modification of the SequestOx™ formulation, and the successful completion of in vitro and in vivo studies. If we are unable to modify the formulation or if we are unable to successfully complete the required studies, we will not meet the requirements specified by the FDA for resubmission of the NDA. Furthermore, there can be no assurances given that the FDA will eventually approve our NDA. If we are unable to obtain approval for SequestOx™, we will be unable to commercialize the product. Furthermore, in the event that the Company does receive marketing approval for SequestOx™, there can be no assurances of the Company realizing future revenues or profits related to this product, or that any such future revenues and profits would be in amounts that provide adequate return on the significant investments made to secure this marketing authorization. The Company has currently paused further development of SequestOx™ due to the prohibitive cost of such and attendant risks related thereto.

Regulatory factors may cause us to be unable to manufacture products or face interruptions in our manufacturing process.

Our manufacturing operations as well as our suppliers’ manufacturing operations are subject to establishment registration by the FDA and periodic inspections by the FDA to assure compliance regarding the manufacturing of our products. If we or our suppliers do not maintain the current registrations or if we or our partners receive notices of manufacturing and quality-related observations following inspections by the FDA, our operating results would be materially negatively impacted.

Our facilities, as well as those of applicable suppliers, rely on maintaining current FDA, and DEA if applicable, registration and other license to produce and develop generic drugs and raw materials used in such operations. If we, or one of our suppliers does not successfully renew and maintain current FDA, DEA and other required licenses, our operations and financial results would be negatively impacted. We and our suppliers are subject to periodic inspection by the FDA, DEA and other regulatory agencies, as applicable, to assure regulatory compliance regarding the manufacture and distribution of pharmaceutical products and raw materials. These regulatory bodies impose stringent mandatory requirements on the manufacture and distribution of pharmaceutical products to ensure their safety and efficacy. If we or any of our third party suppliers receive notices of manufacturing and quality-related observations and are unable to satisfactorily resolve the issues and observations identified in a timely fashion, there could be a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and stock price.

Agreements between branded pharmaceutical companies and generic pharmaceutical companies are facing increased government scrutiny in the United States and Internationally.

There are numerous and continuing litigation in which generic companies challenge the validity or enforceability of an innovator products patents and/or the applicability of such patents to a generic applicant’s products. Settlement of such litigation is a common outcome, with review of such agreements by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (the “FTC”) and the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice (the “DOJ”) being required by law. The FTC has stated publicly its view that some of these settlement agreements violate antitrust laws and has commenced actions against the branded and generic companies that are parties to these agreements. Accordingly, in the event of the Company being party to a settlement agreement, either as the branded, innovator product owner, or as the generic applicant, we may receive formal or informal requests from the FTC for information about a settlement agreement and there is a risk of the FTC or DOJ alleging a violation of antitrust laws and commencing an action against us.

Any such action could have an adverse effect on the Company’s business, operations and financial condition.

Our reporting and payment obligations under the Medicaid rebate program and other governmental purchasing and rebate programs are complex and may involve subjective decisions. Any determination that we have failed to comply with those obligations could subject us to penalties and sanctions which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

The regulations applicable to us regarding reporting and payment obligations with respect to Medicaid reimbursement and rebates and other governmental programs are complex. Our calculations and methodologies are subject to review and challenge by the applicable governmental agencies, and it is possible that such reviews could adversely affect us and our business. In addition, because our processes for these calculations and the judgments involved in making these calculations involve, and will continue to involve, subjective decisions and complex methodologies, these calculations are subject to the risk of error and misjudgment. Any governmental agencies that have commenced (or that may commence) an investigation of us could impose, based on a claim of violation of anti-fraud and false claims laws or otherwise, civil and/or criminal sanctions, including fines, penalties and possible exclusion from federal health care programs (including Medicaid and Medicare). Some of the applicable laws may impose liability even in the absence of specific intent to defraud. Furthermore, should there be ambiguity with respect to how to properly calculate and report payments, and even in the absence of any such ambiguity, a governmental authority may take a position contrary to a position that we have taken and may impose civil and/or criminal sanctions on us. Any such penalties, sanctions, or exclusion from federal health care programs could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operation, ability to operate and stock price.

Investigations and litigation concerning the calculation of average wholesale prices may adversely affect our business

Many government and third-party payers, including Medicare, Medicaid, HMOs and others, reimburse doctors and others for the purchase of certain prescription drugs based on a drug’s average wholesale price (“AWP”). In the past several years, state and federal government agencies have conducted ongoing investigations of manufacturers’ reporting practices with respect to AWP, as a result of which certain agencies have suggested that reporting of inflated AWPs by manufacturers has led to excessive payments for prescription drugs. Numerous pharmaceutical companies have been named as defendants in actions brought by various State Attorneys General and have faced state law qui tam actions brought on behalf of various states, alleging generally that the defendants defrauded state Medicaid systems by purportedly reporting or causing the reporting of AWP and/or “Wholesale Acquisition Costs” that exceeded the actual selling price of the defendants’ prescription drugs. These cases generally seek some combination of actual damages, and/or double damages, treble damages, compensatory damages, statutory damages, civil penalties, disgorgement of excessive profits, restitution, disbursements, counsel fees and costs, litigation expenses, investigative costs, injunctive relief, punitive damages, imposition of a constructive trust, accounting of profits or gains derived through the alleged conduct, expert fees, interest and other relief that the court may have deemed proper.

We can give no assurance that we will be able to settle current or future actions on terms that we deem reasonable, or that such settlements or adverse judgments, if entered, will not exceed the amount of any liability we have recorded. Accordingly, such actions could adversely affect us and may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows ability to operate and stock price.

Litigation and Liability Related Risks

We may not be able to obtain or maintain adequate insurance coverages.

The cost of insurance, including directors and officer insurance, workers compensation, product liability for products containing opioids and products not containing opioids, truck and general liability insurance have increase significantly in recent years and may continue to increase in the future. We have increased deductibles and/or decreased coverages to mitigate some of these costs. These insurance premium increases, as well as our increased risk due to reduced coverage and increased deductibles could have an adverse material effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and stock price.

We may not have and may be unable to obtain or maintain in the future insurance, on acceptable terms, that provide adequate coverage against potential liabilities or other losses, such as the cost of a recall or defense against claims, if any claim is brought against us, for any reason, regardless of the merits, success or failure of such claim. In past years, as a result of product liability and securities litigation in the general marketplace, and a threatened claim of action against us in relation to the shareholder vote conducted in December 2019, our insurance premiums have increased significantly, while also providing no greater, and in most cases, lower levels of coverage.

The amount of our insurance coverage is accordingly limited by our financial resources and greatly impacted by the significant premium increases of the past year and reasonably expected further increases in the near to mid-term due to the global pandemic. Furthermore, even where claims are submitted to insurance carriers for defenses and indemnity that are within coverage limits, there can be no assurance that such claims will be fully covered by insurance or that the indemnitors or insurers will remain financially viable to provide reimbursement consistent with coverage maintained.

Any failure by us, to obtain sufficient insurance coverage, with reimbursement of claims being provided and generate sufficient cash flow, if needed, above insurance coverage, to pay amounts due in relation to potential claims, will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and ability to operate as a going concern.

Litigation, product liability claims, product recalls, government investigations and other significant legal proceedings are common in the pharmaceutical industry.

Litigation, product liability claims, other significant legal proceedings, government investigations and product recalls are common in the pharmaceutical industry and can be protracted and expensive and could delay and/or prevent entry of our products into the market, which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our business.

As a business that operates in the pharmaceutical industry, we are inherently exposed to significant potential risks from lawsuits, product liability claims, patent and proprietary rights claims, other significant proceedings, government investigations or product recalls, including, without limitation, such matters associated with the testing, manufacturing, marketing and sale of our products. While no such judgements have been made against us to date, some plaintiffs have received substantial damage awards or settlements against other healthcare companies based upon various legal theories, including, without limitation, claims for injuries allegedly caused by use of their products. Our business continues to be inherently exposed to the risk of being subject to product liability cases, as well as other significant legal proceedings and government investigations.

For example, we have been a manufacturer of prescription opioid medications in the past, and while we have not been subject to lawsuits, other manufacturers of such products, as well as distributors and other sellers of such medications, have been subjects of subject of lawsuits and have received subpoenas and other requests for information from various federal, state and local government agencies regarding the sale, marketing and/or distribution of prescription opioid medications. Numerous claims against opioid manufacturers, have been and may continue to be filed by or on behalf of states, counties, cities, Native American tribes, other government-related persons or entities, hospitals, health systems, unions, health and welfare funds, other third-party payers and/or individuals. In these cases, plaintiffs seek various remedies, including without limitation declaratory and/or injunctive relief; compensatory, punitive and/or treble damages; restitution, disgorgement, civil penalties, abatement, attorneys’ fees, costs and/or other relief. Settlement demands may seek significant monetary and other remedies, or otherwise be on terms that would result in material adverse effects on our business and ability to operate as a going concern. The precedent of awards against and settlements by our competitors could also incentivize parties to bring additional claims against us. In addition to the risks of direct expenditures for defense costs, settlements and/or judgments in connection with these claims, proceedings and investigations, there is a possibility of loss of revenues, injunctions and disruption of business. Furthermore, we and other manufacturers of prescription opioid medications have been, and will likely continue to be, subject to negative publicity and press, which could harm our brand and the demand for our products. In addition, current or future regulatory and legislative proposals could impact us and other manufacturers of prescription opioid medications. See the risk factor “Our business and financial condition may be adversely affected by legislation” for more information.

In addition, our current and former products may cause or appear to cause serious adverse side effects or potentially dangerous drug interactions if misused or improperly prescribed or as a result of faulty surgical technique. Any failure to effectively identify, analyze, report and protect adverse event data and/or to fully comply with relevant laws, rules and regulations around adverse event reporting could expose the Company to legal proceedings, penalties, fines and/or reputational damage.

Also, through the use of social media, plaintiff’s attorneys have a wide variety of tools to advertise their services and solicit new clients for litigation, including using judgments and settlements obtained in litigation against us or other pharmaceutical companies as an advertising tool. For these or other reasons, any significant product liability or mass tort litigation in which we are a defendant could have a larger number of plaintiffs than such actions have seen historically and we could also see an increase in the number of cases filed against us because of the increasing use of widespread and media-varied advertising. Furthermore, a ruling against other pharmaceutical companies in product liability or mass tort litigation in which we are not a defendant could have a negative impact on pending litigation where we are a defendant.

In addition, in certain circumstances, such as in the case of products that do not meet approved specifications or for which subsequent data demonstrate such products may be unsafe, ineffective or misused, it may be necessary for us to initiate voluntary or mandatory recalls or withdraw such products from the market. Any such recall or withdrawal could result in adverse publicity, costs connected to the recall and loss of revenue. Adverse publicity could also result in an increased number of additional product liability claims, whether or not these claims have a basis in scientific fact. See the risk factor “Our business is dependent on market perceptions, social and political pressures, including public concern over the abuse of opioids” for more information.

We are also inherently exposed to litigation concerning patents and proprietary rights which can be protracted and expensive. Companies routinely bring litigation against applicants and allege patent infringement or other violations of intellectual property rights as the basis for filing suit against an applicant. Elite develops, owns, and/or manufactures generic and branded pharmaceutical products and such drug products may be subject to such litigation. Litigation often involves significant expense and can delay or prevent introduction or sale of our products.

There may also be situations where we use our business judgment and decide to market and sell products, notwithstanding the fact that allegations of patent infringement(s) have not been finally resolved by the courts. The risk involved in doing so can be substantial because the remedies available to the owner of a patent for infringement include, among other things, damages measured by the profits lost by the patent owner and not by the profits earned by the infringer. In the case of a willful infringement, the definition of which is subjective, such damages may be trebled. Moreover, because of the discount pricing typically involved with bioequivalent products, patented brand products generally realize a substantially higher profit margin than bioequivalent products. An adverse decision in a case such as this or in other similar litigation could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position and results of operations and could cause the market value of our Common Stock to decline.

If we are found liable in any lawsuits, including patent infringement, violation of proprietary rights, product liability claims or actions related to our manufacture, sales, marketing or pricing practices or the sale, marketing and/or distribution of prescription opioid medications, or if we are subject to government investigations or product recalls, it could result in the imposition of damages, including punitive damages, fines, reputational harm, civil lawsuits, criminal penalties, interruptions of business, modification of business practices, equitable remedies and other sanctions against us or our personnel as well as significant legal and other costs. We may also voluntarily settle cases even if we believe that we have meritorious defenses because of the significant legal and other costs that may be required to defend such actions. Any judgments, claims, settlements and related costs could be well in excess of any applicable insurance. As a result, we may experience significant negative impacts on our operations. To satisfy judgments or settlements, we also may need to seek financing, which may not be available on terms acceptable to us, or at all, when required. Judgments also could cause defaults under our debt agreements and/or restrictions on our product use and we could incur losses as a result. Any of the risks above could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows and ability to operate as a going concern.

The occurrence or possibility of any such result may cause us to pursue one or more significant corporate transactions as well as other remedial measures, including internal reorganizations, restructuring activities, strategic corporate alignments, cost saving initiatives or asset sales. See the risk factor “Our ability to fund our operations, maintain liquidity and meet our financing obligations is reliant on our operations, which are subject to significant risks and uncertainties” for more information. Likewise, any internal reorganizations, restructuring activities, strategic corporate alignments, cost-saving initiatives or asset sales may be complex, could entail significant costs and charges or could otherwise negatively impact shareholder value and there can be no assurance that we will be able to accomplish any of these alternatives on terms acceptable to us, or at all, or that they will result in their intended benefits.

We also may incur significant liability if it is determined that we are promoting or have in the past promoted the “off-label” use of drugs. In jurisdictions including, without limitation, the United States, a company is not permitted to promote drugs for uses that are not described in the product’s labelling and that differ from those that were approved or cleared by the FDA. Such users are commonly referred to as “off-label uses”. Under what is known as the “practice of medicine”, physicians and other healthcare practitioners may prescribe drug products for off-label or unapproved uses. While the FDA does not regulate a physician’s choice of medications, treatments, or product uses, the FFDCA and FDA regulations significantly restrict permissible communications on the subject of off-label uses of drug products by pharmaceutical companies. The FDA, FTC, the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”), the DOJ and various state Attorneys General actively enforce laws and regulations that prohibit the promotion of off-label uses. A company that is found to have improperly promoted off-label uses may be subject to significant liability, including civil fines, criminal fines and penalties, civil damages, exclusion from federal funded healthcare programs and potential liability under the federal False Claims Act and any applicable state false claims act. Conduct giving rise to such liability could also form the basis for private civil litigation by third-party payers or other persons claiming to be harmed by such conduct.

Notwithstanding the regulatory restrictions on off-label promotion, the FDA’s regulations and judicial case law allows companies to engage in some forms of truthful, non-misleading and non-promotional speech concerning the off-label use of products. Elite believes it and its marketing partners comply with these restrictions.

Nonetheless, the FDA, HHS, DOJ, and/or state Attorneys General, and qui tam relators may take the position that the Company is not in compliance with such requirements, and if such non-compliance is proven, the consequences of such may have an adverse material effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and stock price.

We are subject to various fraud and abuse laws which could expose us to criminal sanctions, civil penalties, contractual damages, reputational harm and diminished profits and future earnings.

Our activities are subject to various federal and state fraud and abuse laws, including, without limitation, the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, the federal civil False Claims Act, and laws and regulations pertaining to limitations on and reporting of healthcare provider payments (physician sunshine laws). These laws and regulations are interpreted and enforced by various federal, state and local authorities including CMS, the Office of Inspector General for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the U.S. Department of Justice, individual U.S. Attorney offices within the Department of Justice, and state and local governments. These laws include:

• the U.S. federal Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibits, among other things, persons or entities from knowingly and willfully soliciting, offering, receiving or paying any remuneration, directly or indirectly, overtly or covertly, in cash or in kind, to induce or reward either the referral of an individual for, or the purchase, lease, order, or arranging for or recommending the purchase, lease or order of, any good or service, for which payment may be made, in whole or in part, under federal healthcare programs such as Medicare and Medicaid. A person or entity does not need to have actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it in order to have committed a violation
• the U.S. civil False Claims Act (which can be enforced through “qui tam,” or whistleblower actions, by private citizens on behalf of the federal government and impose civil and criminal penalties), prohibits any person from, among other things, knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented false or fraudulent claims for payment of government funds or knowingly making, using or causing to be made or used, a false record or statement material to an obligation to pay money to the government or knowingly and improperly avoiding, decreasing or concealing an obligation to pay money to the U.S. federal government;
• U.S. federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, or HIPAA, which imposes criminal liability and amends provisions on the reporting, investigation, enforcement, and penalizing of civil liability for, among other things, knowingly and willfully executing, or attempting to execute, a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program, or knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing or covering up a material fact or making any materially false statement, in connection with the delivery of, or payment for healthcare benefits, items or services by a healthcare benefit program, which includes both government and privately funded benefits programs; similar to the U.S. federal Anti-Kickback Statute, a person or entity does not need to have actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it in order to have committed a violation;
• HIPAA, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act of 2009, or HITECH, and its implementing regulations, which also imposes obligations, including mandatory contractual terms, with respect to safeguarding the privacy, security and transmission of individually identifiable health information without appropriate authorization by covered entities subject to the rule, such as health plans, healthcare clearinghouses and healthcare providers as well as their business associates and their subcontractors that perform certain services for or on their behalf involving the use or disclosure of individually identifiable health information;
• state laws and regulations, including state anti-kickback and false claims laws, that may apply to our business practices, including but not limited to, research, distribution, sales and marketing arrangements and claims involving healthcare items or services reimbursed by any third-party payer, including private insurers; state laws that require pharmaceutical companies to comply with the pharmaceutical industry’s voluntary compliance guidelines and the relevant compliance guidance promulgated by the U.S. federal government, or otherwise restrict payments that may be made to healthcare providers and other potential referral sources; and state laws and regulations that require drug manufacturers to file reports relating to pricing and marketing information, which requires tracking gifts and other remuneration and items of value provided to healthcare professionals and entities;

38

• the Physician Payments Sunshine Act, implemented as the Open Payments program, and its implementing regulations, requires certain manufacturers of drugs, devices, biologics and medical supplies that are reimbursable under Medicare, Medicaid, or the Children’s Health Insurance Program to report annually to CMS information related to certain payments made in the preceding calendar year and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals, as well as ownership and investment interests held by physicians and their immediate family members; beginning in 2022, applicable manufacturers are required to report such information regarding payments and transfers of value provided, as well as ownership and investment interests held, during the previous year to physician assistants, nurse practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, certified nurse anesthetists, and certified nurse-midwives; and
• the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, or the FCPA, which generally prohibits offering, promising, giving, or authorizing others to give anything of value, either directly or indirectly, to a non-U.S. government official in order to influence official action, or otherwise obtain or retain business. The FCPA also requires public companies to make and keep books and records that accurately and fairly reflect the transactions of the corporation and to devise and maintain an adequate system of internal accounting controls. Our industry is heavily regulated and therefore involves significant interaction with public officials, including officials of non-U.S. governments. Additionally, in many other countries, the health care providers who prescribe pharmaceuticals are employed by their government, and the purchasers of pharmaceuticals are government entities; therefore, our dealings with these prescribers and purchasers are subject to regulation under the FCPA. Recently, the SEC and Department of Justice have increased their FCPA enforcement activities with respect to pharmaceutical companies.

Violations of any of these laws or any other governmental regulations that may apply to us, may subject us to significant civil, criminal and administrative sanctions including penalties, damages, fines, imprisonment, and exclusion from government funded healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, and/or adverse publicity. Moreover, government entities and private litigants have asserted claims under state consumer protection statutes against pharmaceutical companies for alleged false or misleading statements in connection with the marketing, promotion and/or sale of pharmaceutical products, including state investigations and litigation by certain government entities regarding the marketing of opioid products.

Our products contain controlled substances which may subject us to increased litigation risk and regulation.

Some of our current products and products under development contain controlled substances. Misuse or abuse of such drugs can lead to physical or other hard. The FDA and/or the DEA may impose new regulations concerning the manufacture, storage, transportation, distribution, and sale of prescription narcotics. Such regulations may include new labelling requirements, the development and implementation of a formal REMS, restrictions on prescription and sale of such products and mandatory reformulation in order to make abuse of such products more difficult. In 2007, Congress passed legislation authorizing the FDA to require companies to undertake post-approval studies in order to assess known or signaled potential serious safety risks and to make any labelling changes necessary to address safety risks. Congress also empowered the FDA to require companies to formulate REMS to confirm a drug’s benefits exceed its risks. In 2011, the FDA issued letters to manufacturers of long-acting and extended-release opioids requiring them to develop and submit to the FDA a post-market REMS plan to require that training be provided to prescribers of these products and that information is provided to prescribers that they can use in counselling patients on the risks and benefits of opioid drug use. Elite does not currently own a product that requires a REMS plan, but some of the products in our pipeline may require a REMS plan. The federal government has also released a comprehensive action plan to reduce prescription drug abuse, which may include proposed legislation to amended existing controlled substances laws to require healthcare practitioners who request DEA registration to prescribe controlled substances to receive training on opioid prescribing practices as a condition of registration. In addition, state health departments and boards of pharmacy have authority to regulate distribution and may modify their regulations with respect to prescription narcotics in an attempt to curb abuse.

Mandatory REMS programs could increase the cost, burden and liability associated with the commercialization of certain products.

The FDA has imposed a class-wide REMS on all IR, ER and long acting opioid drug products (known as the Opioid Analgesic REMS). The FDA continually evaluates whether the REMS program is meeting its goal of ensuring that the benefit of these drugs continue to outweigh their risks, and whether the goals or elements of the program should be modified. If the FDA determines that additional measures are necessary, the modification of the Opioid Analgesic REMS to impose additional or more burdensome requirements could increase the costs associated with marketing opioid products and/or reduce the willingness of healthcare providers to prescribe those products, both which would have a material adverse effect on the ability to successfully commercializing, or to generate sufficient revenue from, such products.

Illegal distribution and third party sale of counterfeit versions of our products could have a detrimental effect on our reputation and business.

Third parties could illegally distribute and sell counterfeit versions of our products, which do not meet the rigorous manufacturing and testing standards that our products undergo. Counterfeit products are frequently unsafe or ineffective and can be life-threatening. Counterfeit medicines may contain harmful substances, the wrong dose of the active pharmaceutical ingredient or no active pharmaceutical ingredients at all. However, to distributors and users, counterfeit products may be visually indistinguishable from the authentic version.

Reports of adverse reactions to counterfeit drugs or increased levels of counterfeiting could materially affect patient confidence in the authentic product. It is possible that adverse events caused by unsafe counterfeit products will mistakenly be attributed to the authentic product. In addition, thefts of inventory at warehouses, plants or while in-transit, which are not properly stored, and which are sold through unauthorized channels could adversely impact patient safety, our reputation, and our business.

Public loss of confidence in the integrity of pharmaceutical products as a result of counterfeiting or theft could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our competitors or other third parties may allege that we are infringing upon their intellectual property (“IP”), forcing us to expend substantial resources in litigation, the outcome of which is uncertain. Any unfavorable outcome of such litigation, including, without limitation, losses related to “at-risk” product launches, could have a material effect our business, financial position and results of operations.

Companies that produce branded pharmaceutical products routinely bring litigation against ANDA filers or similar applicants that seek regulatory approval to manufacture and market generic forms of their branded products alleging patent infringement or other violations of IP rights. Patent holders may also bring patent infringement suits against companies that are currently marketing and selling approved generic products. Litigation often involves significant expense and can delay or prevent introduction or sale of our generic and/or biosimilar products. If valid and enforceable patents are infringed by our products, we would need to delay selling the infringing generic product unless we could obtain a license from the patent holder, and, if we were already selling the infringing product, cease selling and potentially destroy existing product stock.

There may be situations in which we may make business and legal judgments to market and sell products that are subject to claims of alleged patent infringement prior to final resolution of those claims by the courts, based upon our belief that such patents are invalid, unenforceable, or are not infringed by our marketing and sale of such products. This is referred to in the pharmaceutical industry as an “at-risk” launch. The risk involved in an at-risk launch can be substantial because, if a patent holder ultimately prevails against us, the remedies available to such holder may include, among other things, damages measured by the profits lost by the patent holder or treble damages, which can be significantly higher than the profits we make from selling the generic version of the product. We may also be harmed by the loss of any value of such inventory that we are unable to market or sell. Any or all of the above could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, ability to operate as a going concern and stock price.

Intellectual Property Related Risks

Our ability to protect intellectual property rights and successfully defend third party allegations of intellectual property infringement is vital to our business and uncertain.

Our success depends on our ability to protect our current and future products and to defend our intellectual property rights. If we fail to protect our intellectual property adequately, competitors may manufacture and market products similar to ours.

We currently hold three patents and we may intend to file further patent applications in the future. We cannot be certain that any further patent applications will result in the issuance of patents. If patents are issued, third parties may sue us to challenge our patent protection, and although we know of no reason why they should prevail, it is possible that they could. In addition to modification or revocation of patents in legal proceedings, issued patents may later be modified or revoked by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office or by analogous foreign offices. It is likewise possible that our patent rights may not prevent or limit our present and future competitors from developing, using or commercializing products that are similar or functionally equivalent to our products.

In addition, we may be required to obtain licenses to patents, or other proprietary rights of third parties, in connection with the development and use of our products and technologies as they relate to other persons’ technologies. At such time as we discover a need to obtain any such license, we will need to establish whether we will be able to obtain such a license on favorable terms, if at all. The failure to obtain the necessary licenses or other rights could preclude the sale, manufacture or distribution of our products.

We rely particularly on trade secrets, unpatented proprietary expertise and continuing innovation that we seek to protect, in part, by entering into confidentiality agreements with licensees, suppliers, employees, and consultants. We cannot provide assurance that these agreements will not be breached or circumvented. We also cannot be certain that there will be adequate remedies in the event of a breach. Disputes may arise concerning the ownership of intellectual property or the applicability of confidentiality agreements. We cannot be sure that our trade secrets and proprietary technology will not otherwise be obtained by other entities, such as government or regulatory authorities, or become known, obtained, or independently developed by our competitors or by other entities through means beyond our control. We also cannot be sure that, if patents are not issued with respect to products arising from research, we will be able to maintain the confidentiality of information relating to these products. In addition, efforts to ensure our intellectual property rights can be costly, time-consuming, and/or ultimately unsuccessful.

Furthermore, companies that produce branded pharmaceutical products routinely bring litigation against ANDA or similar applicants that seek regulatory approval to manufacture and market generic forms of branded products, alleging patent infringement or other violations of intellectual property rights. Patent holders may also bring patent infringement suits against companies that are currently marketing and selling approved generic products. Litigation often involves significant expense. Additionally, if the patents of others are held valid, enforceable and infringed by our current products or future product candidates, we would, unless we could obtain a license from the patent holder, need to delay selling our corresponding generic product and, if we are already selling our product, cease selling and potentially destroy existing product stock. Additionally, we could be required to pay monetary damages or royalties to license proprietary rights from third parties and we may not be able to obtain such licenses on commercially reasonable terms or at all.

There may be situations in which we may make business and legal judgments to market and sell products that are subject to claims of alleged patent infringement prior to final resolution of those claims by the courts based upon our belief that such patents are invalid, unenforceable or are not infringed by our marketing and sale of such products. This is commonly referred to in the pharmaceutical industry as an “at-risk” launch. The risk involved in an at-risk launch can be substantial because, if a patent holder ultimately prevails against us, the remedies available to such holder may include, among other things, damages calculated based on the profits lost by the patent holder, which can be significantly higher than the profits we make from selling the generic version of the product. Moreover, if a court determines that such infringement is willful, the damages could be subject to trebling. We could face substantial damages from adverse court decisions in such matters. We could also be at risk for the value of such inventory that we are unable to market or sell.

The occurrence of any of the above could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and stock price.

Risks Related to our Common Shares

Dilution from issuance of shares to Directors, Employees, Consultants or upon exercise of warrants and options or the perception that dilution may occur could cause the price per share of common stock to fall.

As of March 31, 2024, there were outstanding warrants to purchase an aggregate of approximately 79.0 million shares of Common Stock at a cash exercise price of $0.1521 per share, vested options to purchase an aggregate of approximately 15.7 million shares at a weighted average cash exercise price of $0.05. Additional shares of Common Stock may be issuable as a result of anti-dilution provisions in the outstanding warrants. We may also issue shares from time to time to our directors, officers, employees, and consultants.

As a result of the above discussed potential issuance of securities, such issuances by us could result in substantial dilution to the interests of other holders of our common stock, and the subsequent sale of these shares, or the perception that the sale of these shares may occur, could cause the price of our common stock to fall. Additionally, the conversion or exercise of outstanding shares of warrants, or the anticipation of such issuances, could make it more difficult for us to sell equity or equity-related securities in the future at a time and at a price that we might otherwise wish to effect sales.

Our common stock is a penny stock, quoted on the OTC bulletin board, with rules in place that could limit trading and liquidity of our shares, increased transaction costs that could adversely affect our price per share.

Our common stock is a “low-priced” security or “penny stock” under rules promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). In accordance with these rules, broker-dealers participating in transactions in low-priced securities must first deliver a risk disclosure document which describes the risks associated with such stocks, the broker-dealer’s duties in selling the stock, the customer’s rights and remedies and certain market and other information. Furthermore, the broker-dealer must make a suitability determination approving the customer for low-priced stock transactions based on the customer’s financial situation, investment experience and objectives. Broker-dealers must also disclose these restrictions in writing to the customer, obtain specific written consent from the customer, and provide monthly account statements to the customer. The effect of these restrictions will likely decrease the willingness of broker-dealers to make a market in our Common Stock, will decrease liquidity of our Common Stock and will increase transaction costs for sales and purchases of our Common Stock as compared to other securities.

In addition, our Common stock is quoted on the Venture Market (the “OTCQB”) which is a regulated quotation service that displays real-time quotes, last sale prices and volume limitations in over-the-counter securities. Because trades and quotations on the OTCQB involve a manual process, the market information for such securities cannot be guaranteed. In addition, quote information, or even firm quotes, may not be available. The manual execution process may delay order processing and intervening price fluctuations may result in the failure of a limit order to execute or the execution of a market order at a significantly different price. Execution of trades, execution reporting and the delivery of legal trade confirmations may be delayed significantly. Consequently, one may not be able to sell shares of our Common Stock at the optimum trading prices.

When fewer shares of a security are being traded on the OTCQB, volatility of prices may increase, and price movement may outpace the ability to deliver accurate quote information. Lower trading volumes in a security may result in a lower likelihood of an individual’s orders being executed, and current prices may differ significantly from the price one was quoted by the OTCQB at the time of the order entry. Orders for OTCQB securities may be cancelled or edited like orders for other securities. All requests to change or cancel an order must be submitted to, received, and processed by the OTCQB. Due to the manual order processing involved in handling OTCQB trades, order processing and reporting may be delayed, and an individual may not be able to cancel or edit his order. Consequently, one may not be able to sell shares of Common Stock at the optimum trading prices.

The dealer’s spread (the difference between the bid and ask prices) may be large and may result in substantial losses to the seller of securities on the OTCQB if the Common Stock or other security must be sold immediately. Further, purchasers of securities may incur an immediate “paper” loss due to the price spread. Moreover, dealers trading on the OTCQB may not have a bid price for securities bought and sold through the OTCQB. Due to the foregoing, demand for securities that are traded through the OTCQB may be decreased or eliminated.

Shareholder activism could negatively affect us.

In recent years, shareholder activism involving corporate governance, fiduciary duties of Directors and Officers, strategic direction and operations has become increasingly prevalent. If we become the subject of such shareholder activism, their demands may disrupt our business and divert the attention of our management, Board and employees. Also, we may incur substantial costs, including legal fees and other expenses, related to such activist shareholder matters. Perceived uncertainties resulting from such activist shareholder matters may result in loss of potential business opportunities with our current and potential customers and business partners, be exploited by our competitors and make attracting and retaining qualified personnel more difficult. In addition, such shareholder activism may cause significant fluctuations in our share price based on temporary or speculative market perceptions, uncertainties or other factors that do not necessarily reflect the underlying fundamentals and prospects of our business.

The effects of shareholder activism pursued against the Company could have an adverse material effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and stock price.

Our stock price has been volatile.

The market price for the publicly traded stock of pharmaceutical companies is generally characterized by high volatility. There has been significant volatility in the market prices for our Common Stock. For the twelve months ended March 31, 2024, the closing sale price on the Venture Market (“OTCQB”) of our Common Stock fluctuated from a high of $0.21 per share to a low of $0.03 per share. The price per share of our Common Stock may not exceed or even remain at current levels in the future. The market price of our Common Stock may be affected by a number of factors, including, without limitation:

• Results of our clinical trials;
• Approval or disapproval of our ANDAs or NDAs;
• Announcements of innovations, new products, or new patents by us or by our competitors;
• Announcements of other material events;
• Governmental regulation;
• Patent or proprietary rights developments;
• Proxy contests or litigation;
• News regarding the efficacy of, safety of or demand for drugs or drug technologies;

42

• Economic and market conditions, generally and related to the pharmaceutical industry;
• Healthcare legislation;
• Changes in third-party reimbursement policies for drugs; and
• Fluctuations in our operating results.

Capital raises through sales of securities may cause substantial dilution to existing shareholders.

Any additional financing that involves the further sale of our securities could cause existing holders of our Common Stock to experience substantial dilution. On the other hand, if we incurred debt, we would be subject to risks associated with indebtedness, including the risk that interest rates might fluctuate, and cash flow would be insufficient to pay principal and interest on such indebtedness.

Issuance of shares of common or preferred stock could make achieving a change of control more difficult.

The issuance of additional shares of our Common Stock, including those shares issued pursuant to conversion of convertible preferred shares, or the issuance of shares of an additional series of preferred stock could be used to make a change of control of us more difficult and expensive. Under certain circumstances, such shares could be used to create impediments to, or frustrate persons seeking to cause, a takeover or to gain control of us. Such shares could be sold to purchasers who might side with our Board of Directors in opposing a takeover bid that the Board of Directors determines not to be in the best interests of our shareholders. It might also have the effect of discouraging an attempt by another person or entity through the acquisition of a substantial number of shares of our Common Stock to acquire control of us with a view to consummating a merger, sale of all or part of our assets, or a similar transaction, since the issuance of new shares could be used to dilute the stock ownership of such person or entity.

We have no plans to pay regular dividends or conduct share purchases.

We do not intend to pay any cash dividends either currently or in the foreseeable future on our common shares. Additionally, we do not intend to conduct share repurchases either currently or in the foreseeable future.

As part of the Company’s overall enterprise risk management processes, the Company maintains a cyber risk management program designed to identify, assess, manage, mitigate, and respond to cybersecurity threats.

The underlying processes and controls of the Company’s cyber risk management program incorporate recognized best practices and standards for cybersecurity and information technology, including the National Institute of Standards and Technology (“NIST”) Cybersecurity Framework (“CSF”). Elite has an annual assessment performed by a third-party specialist of the Company’s cyber risk management program against the NIST CSF. The annual risk assessment identifies, quantifies, and categorizes material cyber risks. In addition, the Company, in conjunction with the third-party cyber risk management specialists develop a risk mitigation plan to address such risks, and where necessary, remediate potential vulnerabilities identified through the annual assessment process.

In addition, Elite maintains processes to help govern the processes put in place by management designed to protect the Company’s IT assets, data, and services from threats and vulnerabilities. Elite employs additional key practices within the cybersecurity risk management program including, but not limited to maintenance of an IT assets inventory, identity access management controls including restricted access of privileged accounts, physical security measures at Company facilities, information protection (IPS)/detection systems (IDS) including maintenance of firewalls, network and data traffic monitoring and automated alerting, and critical data backups to reduce cybersecurity risk.

Cybersecurity partners to the Company, including, consultants, and other third-party service providers are a key part of Elite Pharmaceutical’s cybersecurity risk management strategy and infrastructure. Elite partners with industry recognized cybersecurity providers leveraging third-party technology and expertise and engages with these partners to monitor and maintain the performance and effectiveness of IT assets, data, and services that are deployed in the Company’s environment. The cybersecurity partners provide services including, but not limited to systems inventory monitoring, user management, network protection and monitoring, IPS/IDS management, remote access monitoring and management, user activity monitoring, data backups management, cybersecurity strategy, and cyber risk advisory, including assessment and remediation.

Elite’s management team, in conjunction with cybersecurity service providers is responsible for oversight and administration of Elite’s cyber risk management program, and for informing senior management and other relevant stakeholders regarding the prevention, detection, mitigation, and remediation of cybersecurity incidents. The Company’s management team has prior experience selecting, deploying, and overseeing cybersecurity technologies, initiatives, and processes directly or via selection of strategic third-party partners, and also relies on threat intelligence as well as other information obtained from governmental, public or private sources, including external consultants engaged by Elite for strategic cyber risk management, advisory and decision making.

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors oversees Elite’s cybersecurity risk exposures and the steps taken by management to monitor and mitigate cybersecurity risks. The cybersecurity stakeholders, including members of management assigned with cybersecurity oversight responsibility and/or third-party consultants providing cyber risk services brief the Audit Committee on cyber vulnerabilities identified through the risk management process, the effectiveness of Elite’s cyber risk management program, and the emerging threat landscape and new cyber risks on at least an annual basis. This includes updates on processes to prevent, detect, and mitigate cybersecurity incidents. The Company also relies on threat intelligence and other information obtained from governmental, public, or private sources, including external consultants engaged by the Company for strategic cyber risk management, advisory and decision making.

Elite has implemented third-party risk management processes to manage the risks associated with reliance on vendors, critical service providers, and other third-parties that may lead to a service disruption or an adverse cybersecurity incident. This includes service level agreement monitoring and contract negotiations.

Elite faces risks from cybersecurity threats that could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows or reputation. Elite acknowledges that the risk of cyber incident is prevalent in the current threat landscape and that a future cyber incident may occur in the normal course of its business. However, as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Company is not aware of any risks from cybersecurity threats that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect Elite’s business strategy, financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows. The Company proactively seeks to detect and investigate unauthorized attempts and attacks against Company IT assets, data, and services, and to prevent their occurrence and recurrence where practicable through changes or updates to internal processes and tools and changes or updates to Company service delivery; however, potential vulnerabilities to known or unknown threats will still remain. Further, there is increasing regulation regarding responses to cybersecurity incidents, including reporting to regulators, investors, and additional stakeholders, which could subject the Company to additional liability and reputational harm. In response to such risks, the Company has implemented initiatives such as implementation of the cybersecurity risk assessment process and development of an incident response plan. See Item 1A. “Risk Factors” for more information on cybersecurity risks.

We own a facility located at 165 Ludlow Avenue, Northvale, New Jersey (“165 Ludlow”) which contains approximately 15,000 square feet of floor space. This real property and the improvements thereon are encumbered by a mortgage in favor of the New Jersey Economic Development Authority (“NJEDA”) as security for a loan through tax-exempt bonds from the NJEDA to Elite. The mortgage contains certain customary provisions including, without limitation, the right of NJEDA to foreclose upon a default by Elite. The NJEDA has declared the payment of this bond to be in default (for more information on the NJEDA Bonds, see Part II, Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations; Liquidity and Capital Resources; NJEDA Bonds”). We are currently using the facility as a laboratory, manufacturing, storage, distribution, and office space.

We own a facility located at 135-137 Ludlow Avenue, Northvale, New Jersey (“135 Ludlow”) which contains approximately 35,000 square feet of floor space. This real property and the improvements thereon are encumbered by a mortgage in favor of East West Bank.

In October 2020, the Company entered into an operating lease for office space in Pompano Beach, Florida (the “Pompano Office Lease”). The Pompano Office Lease is for approximately 1,275 square feet of office space, with Elite taking occupancy on November 1, 2020. The Pompano Office includes a 3 month abatement from November 2020 through February 2021 and had an original term of three years, ending on October 31, 2023. The Pompano Office Lease has been extended for one additional year to October 31, 2024.

The Company has entered into a lease agreement for approximately 35,000 square feet of floor space in a building located at 144 Ludlow Avenue, Northvale, New Jersey (the “144 Ludlow Ave. lease”). The 144 Ludlow Ave. lease began on January 22, 2024, and has a term of five years. The 144 Ludlow Ave. lease will expire on December 31, 2028. The lease terms also include a Company option to extend the term by two years.

Properties used in our operation are considered suitable for the purposes for which they are used, at the time they are placed into service, and are believed adequate to meet our needs for the reasonably foreseeable future.

On August 17, 2023, Elite filed a paragraph IV certification with its ANDA to generic Oxycontin and after Elite got acceptance of the ANDA by the FDA on September 19, 2023, Elite sent the patentee and NDA holder a Notice Letter as required under the Hatch-Waxman Act. On November 14, 2023, a patent infringement suit was filed in the District Court of New Jersey by Purdue Pharma. Elite obtained agreement with Purdue to stay the litigation for six months. Elite’s launch of a generic Oxycontin will depend on approval by the FDA and the outcome of various litigations involving Purdue or the expiry of the patents listed on the Orange Book.

In the ordinary course of business, we may be subject to litigation from time to time. There is no current, pending or, to our knowledge, threatened litigation or administrative action to which we are a party or of which our property is the subject (including litigation or actions involving our officers, directors, affiliates, or other key personnel, or holders of record or beneficially of more than 5% of any class of our voting securities, or any associate of any such party) which in our opinion has, or is expected to have, a material adverse effect upon our business, prospects financial condition or operations. A significant increase in the number of claims or an increase in amounts owing under successful claims could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, or MD&A, is intended to provide a reader of our consolidated financial statements with a narrative from the perspective of our management on our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and certain other factors that may affect our future results. You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations together with our financial statements and the related notes and other financial data included elsewhere in this Annual Report. Some of the information contained in this discussion and analysis or set forth elsewhere in this Annual Report, including information with respect to our plans and strategy for our business, includes forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. You should review Item 1A of this Annual Report for a discussion of important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results described in or implied by the forward-looking statements contained in the following discussion and analysis.

Results of Operations:

For the Years Ended March 31, 2024 and 2023

Revenue, Cost of revenue and Gross profit:

Total revenues for the year ended March 31, 2024 increased by $22.5 million or 66%, to $56.6 million, as compared to $34.2 million, for the of the prior fiscal year, primarily due to the launch of the Elite label during the current fiscal year which achieved increased sales for the year ended March 31, 2024, as compared to the prior year, which did not include any sales of Elite label products.

Manufacturing fees revenue increased by $24.9 million, or 85%, primarily due to the launch of the Elite label during the current fiscal year which achieved increased sales for the year ended March 31, 2024, as compared to the prior year, which did not include any sales of Elite label products.

Licensing fees revenue decreased by $2.5 million, or 50%. This decrease is primarily due to the expiration of the marketing alliance agreements between the Company and Lannett Company, Inc. (the “Lannett Agreements”) on March 31, 2023. The revenue streams that were generated during periods ending on or prior to March 31, 2023 and attributed to the Lannett Agreements, included profit splits on the sale by Lannett of Amphetamine IR and Amphetamine ER. Since April 1, 2023, these products are now sold by the Company under its own label, with revenues being recorded as manufacturing revenues instead of licensing fees going forward.

Cost of revenue consists of manufacturing and assembly costs. Our cost of revenue increased by $12.7 million or 72%, to $30.3 million as compared to $17.6 million for the prior fiscal year. This increase was due to an increased volume of products sold during the year ended March 31, 2024, as compared to the prior fiscal year, as noted above.

Our gross profit margin was 47% during the year ended March 31, 2024 as compared to 49% during the prior fiscal year. The decrease is due to increased manufacturing volumes resulting in decreased unit costs due to efficiencies of scale being achieved on the increased manufacturing volume. In addition, the commercial launch of the Elite label and expiration of the Lannett Agreements resulted in higher net revenues per unit being achieved. Both of these factors had the effect of increased gross profit margin.

Operating expenses:

Operating expenses consist of research and development costs, general and administrative costs, non-cash compensation and depreciation and amortization expenses. Operating expenses for the year ended March 31, 2024 increased by $2.7 million, or 21%, to $15.6 million as compared to $12.9 million for the prior fiscal year, largely due to an increase in research and development of $0.7 million and general and administrative expenses of $2.0 million.

Research and development costs during the year ended March 31, 2024 were $6.9 million, an increase of $0.7 million, or 11%, from approximately $6.2 million of such costs for the prior year. The increase was a result of the timing and nature of product development activities during the year ended March 31, 2024 as compared to the prior fiscal year.

General and administrative expenses for the year ended March 31, 2024 were $7.1 million as compared to $5.1 million for the prior fiscal year, an increase of $2.0 million or approximately 39%, largely due to an increased human resource headcount and costs as compared to the prior fiscal year as well as infrastructure costs related to Elite label commercial activities resulting from the commercial launch of the Elite label product line during the year ended March 31, 2024.

Non-cash compensation expense for the year ended March 31, 2024 was $0.2 million as compared to $0.04 million for the prior fiscal year, an increase of $0.1 million or approximately 307%, with such increase being attributed to the issuance to employees of options to purchase Common Stock during the current fiscal year.

Depreciation and amortization expenses from the year ended March 31, 2024 were $1.4 million as compared to $1.3 million for the prior fiscal year, an increase of $0.1 million or approximately 9%. This increase is due to depreciation expense being recorded on an increased fixed asset base which resulted from additional investments in capital manufacturing facilities.

As a result of the foregoing, our income from operations during the year ended March 31, 2024 was $10.8 million, compared to income from operations of $3.7 million for the prior fiscal year.

Other income (expense):

49

Other income (expense) for the year ended March 31, 2024 was an other expense of $10.3 million, a decrease of $10.6 million from other income of $0.3 million for the prior fiscal year. The decrease was primarily due to a net increases in other expenses totaling $12.9 million and consisting of increased other expenses of $6.2 million relating to the change in fair value of warrant derivative instruments, $5.7 million relating to the change in fair value of stock-based liabilities and $1.0 million relating to gain on sale of ANDA, offset by increases in other income totaling $2.3 million and consisting of $1.8 million gain from settlement agreements, $0.5 million relating to decreased interest expense and amortization of debt issuance, and $0.01 million increase in interest income. The change in the fair value of derivative instruments and stock-based liabilities is determined in large part by the change in the closing price of the Company’s Common Stock as of the end of the period, as compared to the closing price at the beginning of the period, with a strong inverse relationship between the fair value of the Company’s derivative instruments and stock-based liabilities and decreases in the closing price of the Company’s Common Stock. The decrease in interest expense associated with the loans payable is due in large part to the Company paying off the principal balance of the EWB loan during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2023, resulting in no interest on the EWB loan incurred for the year ended March 31, 2024. The increased other income from gain from settlement agreements is the result of there being a settlement agreement during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2024 as compared to there being no settlement agreement during the comparable period of the prior fiscal year. The decrease in other income relating to gain of sale of ANDA is the result of there being a sale of an ANDA during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2023 as compared to no sales of ANDA occurring during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2024.

As a result of the foregoing, our net income before income taxes for the year ended March 31, 2024 was $0.5 million, compared to net income before income taxes of $4.0 million for the prior fiscal year.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Capital Resources

The Company considers cash and working capital balances as several of the factors the Company uses in evaluating its performance. As of March 31, 2024, the Company had cash on hand of $7.1 million and accounts receivable to be collected within expected operating cycles of $19.5 million. The Company believes that such resources, combined with the working capital surplus of $27.0 million and the continuation of ongoing operations, are sufficient to fund operations through the next twelve months. For the year ended March 31, 2024, the Company had income from operations totaling $10.8 million, net other expense totaling $10.3 million and a net income attributable to common shareholders of $20.1 million. The Company’s other income (expense) and net income attributable to common shareholders are significantly influenced by the fluctuations in the fair value of warrant derivatives with such fair value bearing a strong inverse correlation to the market share price of the Company’s Common Stock as well as the recording of a discrete tax benefit of $17.3 million related to the Company’s release of the valuation allowance against deferred tax assets related to U.S. federal net operating loss carryforwards and research and development tax credits, which are expected to be realized based on demonstrated current profitability and the Company’s expectations of forecasted income.

Our working capital (total current assets less total current liabilities) increased by $13.3 million from $13.7 million as of March 31, 2023 to $27.0 million as of March 31, 2024, with such increase being primarily related to the increase in finished goods inventory and accounts receivable, associated with increased customer orders during the year ended March 31, 2024 exceeding the increase in total current liabilities over the same period.

Summary of Cash Flows:

Net cash used in operating activities for the year ended March 31, 2024 was $3.3 million, which included net income of $20.1 million, increased by depreciation and other non-cash expenses totaling $11.5 million and reduced by the change in operating assets and liabilities totaling $11.9 million and tax benefit of $20.0 million.

Net cash provided by operating activities for the year ended March 31, 2023 was $3.3 million, which included net income of $3.6 million, offset by non-cash (income) expenses totaling $1.8 million and net increases in assets and decreases in liabilities totaling $2.0 million.

Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended March 31, 2024 was comprised of purchases of property and equipment of approximately $0.8 million.

Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended March 31, 2023 was comprised of purchases of property and equipment of $5.7 million.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $3.4 million for the year ended March 31, 2024 which consisted primarily of proceeds from related party loans payable totaling $4.0 million offset by payments of bond and loan principal totaling $0.3 million.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $1.7 million for the year ended March 31, 2023 which contained proceeds and loan payments related to the EWB mortgage loan and equipment loans.

Hakim Promissory Note

The Company has entered into a collateralized promissory note with individual lenders with rates comparable to the EWB Term Loan but with fewer restrictive covenants. These covenants include filing timely tax returns and financial statements, and an agreement not to sell, lease, or transfer a substantial portion of the Company’s assets during the term of the note. On June 2, 2023, the Company entered into a Promissory Note with Nasrat Hakim, CEO and Chairman of the Board of Directors, pursuant to which the Company borrowed funds in the aggregate principal amount of $3,000,000 (the “Hakim Promissory Note”). The Hakim Promissory Note has an interest rate of 9% for the first year and 10% for an optional second year and the proceeds were used for working capital and other business purposes. The original maturity date of the Hakim Promissory Note is June 2, 2024, with an optional second year extension. The second year extension of the Hakim Promissory Note was agreed to by both parties, with the maturity date being extended to June 2, 2025.

Caskey Promissory Note

On June 30, 2023, the Company entered into a collateralized promissory note with Davis Caskey (the “Caskey Promissory Note”). The Caskey Promissory Note has a principal balance of $1,000,000 and an interest rate of 9% for the first year and 10% for an optional second year. The Caskey Promissory Note is subject to the same covenants as are contained in the Hakim Promissory Note. The proceeds were used for working capital and other business purposes. The original maturity date of the Caskey Promissory Note is June 30, 2024, with both parties agreeing to the optional second year extension, as provided in the Caskey Promissory Note. The Caskey Promissory Note has a current maturity date of June 30, 2025.

East West Bank

On April 2, 2022, the Company and Elite Labs entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (the “EWB Loan Agreement”) with East West Bank (“EWB”). Pursuant to the EWB Loan Agreement, the Company and Elite Labs received one term loan for a principal amount of $12,000,000 (the “EWB Term Loan”) and a revolving line of credit up to $2,000,000 (the “EWB Revolver,” together with the “EWB Term Loan,” the EWB Loans”), each of which shall be used for working capital. As of March 31, 2023, the principal and interest on the EWB Term Loan has been paid in full by the Company and the EWB Loan Agreement is terminated.

On July 1, 2022, EWB provided a mortgage loan (“EWB Mortgage Loan”) in the amount of $2.55 million for the purchase of the property at 135-137 Ludlow Avenue, which was formerly a lease held by the Company. The EWB Mortgage Loan matures in 10 years and bears interest at a rate of 4.75% fixed for 5 years then adjustable at WSJP plus 0.5% with floor rate of 4.5%. The total transaction costs associated with the EWB Mortgage Loan incurred as of March 31, 2024, were $13,251, which are being amortized on a monthly basis over ten years, beginning in July 2022. The EWB Mortgage Loan contains customary representations, warranties and covenants. These covenants include maintaining a minimum debt coverage ratio of 1.50 to 1.00 tested annually and a minimum trailing 12-month debt coverage ratio of 1.50 to 1.00. As of March 31, 2024, and through the date of filing of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, the Company was not aware of the existence of any violations of financial covenants included in the EWB Mortgage Loan.

Lincoln Park Capital – July 8, 2020 Purchase Agreement

On July 8, 2020, the Company entered into a purchase agreement (the “2020 LPC Purchase Agreement”), and a registration rights agreement, with Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC (“Lincoln Park”), pursuant to which Lincoln Park has committed to purchase up to $25.0 million of the Company’s Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share, from time to time over the term of the 2020 LPC Purchase Agreement, at the Company’s direction. The 2020 LPC Purchase Agreement expired on August 1, 2023.

During the years ended March 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company did not issue any shares of Common Stock to Lincoln Park.

NJEDA Bonds

On August 31, 2005, the Company successfully completed a refinancing of a prior 1999 bond issue through the issuance of new tax-exempt bonds (the “Bonds”). The refinancing involved borrowing $4,155,000, evidenced by a 6.5% Series A Note in the principal amount of $3,660,000 maturing on September 1, 2030 and a 9% Series B Note in the principal amount of $495,000 maturing on September 1, 2012. The net proceeds, after payment of issuance costs, were used (i) to redeem the outstanding tax-exempt Bonds originally issued by the Authority on September 2, 1999, (ii) refinance other equipment financing and (iii) for the purchase of certain equipment to be used in the manufacture of pharmaceutical products. As of March 31, 2016, all of the proceeds were utilized by the Company for such stated purposes.

Interest is payable semi-annually on March 1 and September 1 of each year. The Bonds are collateralized by a first lien on the Company’s facility and equipment acquired with the proceeds of the original and refinanced Bonds. The related Indenture requires the maintenance of a Debt Service Reserve Fund of $366,000 in relation to the Series A Notes.

Bond issue costs of $354,454 were paid from the bond proceeds and are being amortized over the life of the bonds. Amortization of bond issuance costs amounted to $14,185 for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2024.

The NJEDA Bonds require the Company to make an annual principal payment on September 1st of varying amounts as specified in the loan documents and semi-annual interest payments on March 1st and September 1st, equal to interest due on the outstanding principal at the applicable rate for the semi-annual period just ended.

In addition, the Company had previously received Notices of Default from the Trustee of the NJEDA Bonds as a result of the utilization of the debt service reserve being used to pay interest payments as well as the company’s failure to make scheduled principal payments. All monetary defaults were cured during Fiscal 2015 and the Company is current on all NJEDA Bond interest and principal payments. See the Risk Factor in Part I, Item 1A entitled “We have substantial indebtedness which may adversely affect our financial condition NJEDA Bonds”.

As of the date of filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, there are no interest or principal amounts in arrears. The Series B Notes were retired, at par in July 2014.

Recent Developments

On May 20, 2024, the Company reported that it received approval for the FDA for a generic version of Methotrexate Sodium 2.5mg tablets. Methotrexate Sodium belongs to a class of drugs known as antimetabolites and will be sold under the Elite Laboratories Inc. label. As of the date of filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, this product had not yet been commercially launched.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have not entered into any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues, or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources that would be considered material to investors.

Effects of Inflation

We are subject to price risks arising from price fluctuations in the market prices of the products that we sell. Management does not believe that inflation risk is material to our business or our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our significant accounting policies are disclosed in Note 1 of our Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The following discussion addresses our most critical accounting policies, which are those that are both important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and that require significant judgment or use of complex estimates.

Use of estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Revenue Recognition

The Company generates revenue from the development of pain management products, manufacturing of a line of generic pharmaceutical products with approved ANDA, commercialization of products either by license and the collection of royalties, or through the manufacture of formulations and the development of new products and the expansion of licensing agreements with other pharmaceutical companies, including co-development projects, joint ventures and other collaborations. The Company also generates revenue through its focus on the development of various types of drug products, including branded drug products which require NDAs.

Under ASC 606, Revenue from Contacts with Customers (“ASC 606”), the Company recognizes revenue when the customer obtains control of promised goods or services, in an amount that reflects the consideration which is expected to be received in exchange for those goods or services. The Company recognizes revenues following the five-step model prescribed under ASC 606: (i) identify contract(s) with a customer; (ii) identify the performance obligation(s) in the contract; (iii) determine the transaction price; (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligation(s) in the contract; and (v) recognize revenues when (or as) the Company satisfies a performance obligation. The Company only applies the five-step model to contracts when it is probable that the entity will collect the consideration it is entitled to in exchange for the goods or services it transfers to the customer. At contract inception, once the contract is determined to be within the scope of ASC 606, the Company assesses the goods or services promised within each contract and determines those that are performance obligations and assesses whether each promised good or service is distinct. The Company then recognizes as revenue the amount of the transaction price that is allocated to the respective performance obligation when (or as) the performance obligation is satisfied. Sales, value add, and other taxes collected on behalf of third parties are excluded from revenue.

Nature of goods and services

The following is a description of the Company’s goods and services from which the Company generates revenue, as well as the nature, timing of satisfaction of performance obligations, and significant payment terms for each, as applicable:

a) Manufacturing Fees

The Company is equipped to manufacture immediate release and controlled release products that are sold under the Elite Laboratories Inc. label (the “Elite Label”). The Company recognizes revenue when its customers obtain control of the Elite Labeled products. These revenues are offset by variable consideration, which may include, without limitation, chargebacks, distribution fees, rebates, group purchasing organization fees, prompt payment cash discounts, consideration payable to the customer, billbacks, Medicaid and other government pricing programs, price protection and shelf stock adjustments, sales returns and profit shares. The Company’s estimates for variable consideration are adjusted as required at each reporting period for specific known developments that may result in a change in the amount of total consideration it expects to receive as well as updating estimate assumptions to reflect current and/or historical trends.

Like most competitors in this market, our marketing partners, or us in the case of prospective direct sales made by the Company, also give credits for chargebacks to wholesalers that have contracts with our marketing partners, or us, prospectively, for their sales to hospitals, group purchasing organizations, pharmacies, or other customers. A chargeback is the difference between the price the wholesaler pays and the price that the wholesaler’s end-customer pays for a product. Although, our marketing partners establish, and prospectively we would also establish reserves based on prior experience and best estimates of the impact that these policies may have in subsequent periods, we cannot ensure that such reserves established are adequate or that actual product returns, rebates, allowances, and chargebacks will not exceed estimates. Differences between established reserves and actual amounts of such credits and charges, could result in a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and stock price.

The Company is also equipped to manufacture immediate release and controlled-release products on a contract basis for third parties, if and when the products are approved. These products include products using immediate release technology, controlled-release drug technology and products utilizing abuse deterrent technologies. The Company also develops and markets (either on its own or by license to other companies) generic and proprietary controlled-release and abuse deterrent pharmaceutical products.

The Company recognizes revenue when the customer obtains control of the Company’s product based on the contractual shipping terms of the contract. Revenue on product are presented gross because the Company is primarily responsible for fulfilling the promise to provide the product, is responsible to ensure that the product is produced in accordance with the related supply agreement and bears risk of loss while the inventory is in-transit to the commercial partner. Revenue is measured as the amount of consideration the Company expects to receive in exchange for transferring products to a customer.

b) License Fees

The Company enters into licensing and development agreements, which may include multiple revenue generating activities, including milestones payments, licensing fees, product sales and services. The Company analyzes each element of its licensing and development agreements in accordance with ASC 606 to determine appropriate revenue recognition. The terms of the license agreement may include payment to the Company of licensing fees, non-refundable upfront license fees, milestone payments if specified objectives are achieved, and/or royalties on product sales.

If the contract contains a single performance obligation, the entire transaction price is allocated to the single performance obligation. Contracts that contain multiple performance obligations require an allocation of the transaction price based on the estimated relative standalone selling prices of the promised products or services underlying each performance obligation. The Company determines standalone selling prices based on the price at which the performance obligation is sold separately. If the standalone selling price is not observable through past transactions, the Company estimates the standalone selling price taking into account available information such as market conditions and internally approved pricing guidelines related to the performance obligations.

The Company recognizes revenue from non-refundable upfront payments at a point in time, typically upon fulfilling the delivery of the associated intellectual property to the customer. For those milestone payments which are contingent on the occurrence of particular future events (for example, payments due upon a product receiving FDA approval), the Company determined that these need to be considered for inclusion in the calculation of total consideration from the contract as a component of variable consideration using the most-likely amount method. As such, the Company assesses each milestone to determine the probability and substance behind achieving each milestone. Given the inherent uncertainty of the occurrence of future events, the Company will not recognize revenue from the milestone until there is not a high probability of a reversal of revenue, which typically occurs near or upon achievement of the event.

Significant management judgment is required to determine the level of effort required under an arrangement and the period over which the Company expects to complete its performance obligations under the arrangement. If the Company cannot reasonably estimate when its performance obligations either are completed or become inconsequential, then revenue recognition is deferred until the Company can reasonably make such estimates. Revenue is then recognized over the remaining estimated period of performance using the cumulative catch-up method.

When determining the transaction price of a contract, an adjustment is made if payment from a customer occurs either significantly before or significantly after performance, resulting in a significant financing component. Applying the practical expedient in ASC 606-10-32-18, the Company does not assess whether a significant financing component exists if the period between when the Company performs its obligations under the contract and when the customer pays is one year or less. None of the Company’s contracts contained a significant financing component as of March 31, 2024.

In accordance with ASC 606-10-55-65, royalties are recognized when the subsequent sale of the customer’s products occurs.

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Expected Credit Losses

Accounts receivable are comprised of balances due from customers, net of estimated allowances for expected credit losses, and other contractual deductions, including, without limitation, chargebacks, discounts and program rebates. In determining collectability, historical trends are evaluated, and specific customer issues are reviewed on a periodic basis to arrive at appropriate allowances.

The allowance for expected credit losses is based on the probability of future collection under the current expected credited loss (“CECL”) impairment model under Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326), Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Assets, which was adopted by the Company on April 1, 2023, as discussed below within Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements. Under the CECL impairment model, the Company determines its allowance by applying a loss-rate method based on an aging schedule using the Company’s historical loss rate. The Company also considers reasonable and supportable current information in determining its estimated loss rates, such as external forecasts, macroeconomic trends or other factors including customers’ credit risk and historical loss experience. The adequacy of the allowance is evaluated on a regular basis. Account balances are written off after all means of collection are exhausted and the balance is deemed uncollectible. Subsequent recoveries are credited to the allowance. Changes in the allowance are recorded as adjustments to credit losses in the period incurred.

Prior to April 1, 2023, trade receivables were presented net of allowance for expected credit losses based on the credit risk of specific clients, past collection history, and management’s evaluation of other risks. Expected credit losses stemming from unbilled receivables expected to be billed between March 31, 2024 and March 31, 2028 include additional risk premiums estimated based on factors such as projected inflation, projected decreases in GDP, and projected unemployment.

Income Taxes

Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Where applicable, the Company records a valuation allowance to reduce any deferred tax assets that it determines will not be realizable in the future.

The Company recognizes the benefit of an uncertain tax position that it has taken or expects to take on income tax returns it files if such tax position is more likely than not to be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. These tax benefits are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate resolution.

The Company operates in multiple tax jurisdictions within the United States of America. The Company remains subject to examination in all tax jurisdiction until the applicable statutes of limitation expire. As of March 31, 2024, a summary of the tax years that remain subject to examination in our major tax jurisdictions are: United States – Federal, 2014 and forward, and State, 2010 and forward. The Company did not have any unrecognized tax positions for the years ended March 31, 2024 and 2023.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. This update requires immediate recognition of management’s estimates of current expected credit losses (“CECL”). Under the prior model, losses were recognized only as they were incurred. The new model is applicable to all financial instruments that are not accounted for at fair value through net income. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022 for public entities qualifying as smaller reporting companies. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact of this update on the consolidated financial statements and does not expect a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09 (Topic 740), Improvements to income tax disclosures, which enhances the disclosure requirements for the income tax rate reconciliation, domestic and foreign income taxes paid, requiring disclosure of disaggregated income taxes paid by jurisdiction, unrecognized tax benefits, and modifies other income tax-related disclosures. The amendments are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2024. Early adoption is permitted and should be applied prospectively. The Company is currently evaluating the effect of adopting this guidance on its consolidated financial statements.

In November 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-07, “Segment Reporting (Topic 280): Improvements to Reportable Segments,” which aims to improve financial reporting by requiring disclosure of incremental segment information on an annual and interim basis for all public entities to enable investors to develop more decision-useful financial analyses. Currently, Topic 280 requires that a public entity disclose certain information about its reportable segments. Topic 280 also requires other specified segment items and amounts to be disclosed under certain circumstances. The amendments in this ASU do not change or remove those disclosure requirements and do not change how a public entity identifies its operating segments, aggregates those operating segments, or applies the quantitative thresholds to determine its reportable segments. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024. Early adoption is permitted. We do not expect that the requirements of ASU 2023 – 07 will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Management has evaluated recently issued accounting pronouncements and does not believe that any of these pronouncements will have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act, refers to controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the company’s management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. As required by Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b) of the Exchange Act, our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures based on the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission on Internal Control (“COSO”), as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of March 31, 2024 to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms and such information is accumulated and communicated to management as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. As of March 31, 2024, we identified the following control deficiencies that we believe constituted individually, and in the aggregate, material weaknesses in the design and operation components of our internal controls within the COSO framework:

• We were unable to formalize and implement revised controls, policies and procedure documentation to evidence a system of internal controls, including testing of such revised controls, that was consistent with available personnel and resources;
• We failed to maintain effective control activities over our control environment, risk assessment, information technology and monitoring components;
• We had insufficient segregation of duties, oversight of work performed and lack of compensating controls in our finance and accounting functions due to limited personnel and resources.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Internal control over financial reporting refers to the process designed by, or under the supervision of, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, and effected by our board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and includes those policies and procedures that:(1) pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are achieved. Further, the design of a control system must be balanced against resource constraints, and therefore the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Given the inherent limitations in all systems of controls, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of a simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is also based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may deteriorate. Accordingly, given the inherent limitations in a system of internal control, financial statement misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and may not be detected. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable, not absolute, assurance of achieving their objectives. We conduct periodic evaluations of our systems of controls to enhance, where necessary, our control policies and procedures.

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over our financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Management has used the framework set forth in the report entitled “Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013)” published by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission to evaluate the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Based on its evaluation, utilizing those criteria, management has determined that, as of March 31, 2024, because of the material weaknesses described above, our internal control over financial reporting was not effective.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. As of March 31, 2024, we identified the following control deficiencies that we believe constituted individually, and in the aggregate, material weaknesses in the design and operation components of our internal controls within the COSO framework:

• We were unable to formalize and implement revised controls, policies and procedure documentation to evidence a system of internal controls, including testing of such revised controls, that was consistent with available personnel and resources;
• We failed to maintain effective control activities over our control environment, risk assessment, information technology and monitoring components;
• We had insufficient segregation of duties, oversight of work performed and lack of compensating controls in our finance and accounting functions due to limited personnel and resources.

The deficiencies in our internal controls over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures are described above and our efforts to remediate these deficiencies are described below. Please also see Item 1A-Risk Factors: “We have identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting which could, if not remediated, adversely affect our ability to report our financial condition, cash flows and results of operations in a timely and fairly stated manner and/or increase the risk of future misstatements, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations and could cause the market value of our common shares and/or debt securities to decline.”

Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2024, as a result of reviews and assessments of internal controls over financial reporting conducted by the Company’s CFO appointed on September 5, 2023 over the last seven month period ended March 31, 2024, the Company identified material weaknesses in internal controls over financial reporting as further detailed above and began remediation efforts which are detailed below, with such activities expected to result in further changes in internal control over financial reporting as necessary to remediate the identified material weaknesses.

Remediation efforts to address material weaknesses in internal controls over financial reporting

We intend to revise the existing control environment documentation, designing and implementing controls, policies and procedure documentation that is consistent with our current personnel, resources and capabilities, with significant focus on controls relating to financial oversight, management, analysis and reporting of operations emanating from the Company’s manufacturing, marketing and distribution of its Elite Laboratory label product line. Please note that these material weaknesses cannot be considered remediated until the applicable remedial controls operate for a sufficient period of time, allowing management, through testing, to reach a conclusion on such controls design and operational effectiveness.