JBG SMITH Properties: Form 10-K for the period ended Dec 31, 2023
Filed with the SEC on Feb 20, 2024 and accepted by EDGAR at Feb 20, 2024, 16:17 ET.
Business
As filed, 54,703 characters, with its headings, lists and tables. Extracted from the main document; charts and exhibits are in the original on sec.gov.
The Company
JBG SMITH, a Maryland REIT, owns, operates, invests in and develops mixed-use properties in high growth and high barrier-to-entry submarkets in and around Washington, D.C., most notably National Landing. Through an intense focus on placemaking, JBG SMITH cultivates vibrant, amenity-rich, walkable neighborhoods throughout the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area. Approximately 75.0% of our holdings are in the National Landing submarket in Northern Virginia, which is anchored by four key demand drivers: Amazon's new headquarters; Virginia Tech's under-construction $1 billion Innovation Campus; the submarket’s proximity to the Pentagon; and our deployment of 5G digital infrastructure. In addition, our third-party asset management and real estate services business provides fee-based real estate services to the JBG Legacy Funds, other third parties and the WHI Impact Pool.
Substantially all our assets are held by, and our operations are conducted through, JBG SMITH LP. As of December 31, 2023, JBG SMITH, as its sole general partner, controlled JBG SMITH LP and owned 87.8% of its OP Units, after giving effect to the conversion of certain vested LTIP Units that are convertible into OP Units. JBG SMITH is referred to herein as "we," "us," "our" or other similar terms.
As of December 31, 2023, our Operating Portfolio consisted of 44 operating assets comprising 16 multifamily assets totaling 6,318 units (6,318 units at our share), 26 commercial assets totaling 8.3 million square feet (7.7 million square feet at our share) and two wholly owned land assets for which we are the ground lessor. Additionally, we have two under-construction multifamily assets with 1,583 units (1,583 units at our share) and 17 assets in the development pipeline totaling 10.8 million square feet (8.8 million square feet at our share) of estimated potential development density. We present combined portfolio operating data that aggregates assets we consolidate in our consolidated financial statements and assets in which we own an interest, but do not consolidate in our financial results. For additional information regarding our assets, see Item 2 "Properties."
Certain terms used throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K are defined under "Definitions" starting on page 3.
Our Strategy
We own and operate urban mixed-use properties concentrated in what we believe are the highest growth, Metro-served submarkets in and around Washington, D.C., most notably National Landing, that have significant barriers to entry and key urban amenities. We have significant expertise with multifamily, office and retail assets. We believe that we are known for our creative deal-making and capital allocation skills and for our development and value creation expertise. We intend to continue to opportunistically sell or recapitalize assets as well as land sites where a ground lease or joint venture execution may represent the most attractive path to maximizing value. Recycling the proceeds from these sales will not only fund our planned growth through value-added development and potential acquisitions but will also further advance the strategic shift in the composition of our portfolio to majority multifamily, with an office portfolio concentrated in National Landing.
One of our approaches to value creation uses a series of complementary disciplines through a process we call "Placemaking." Placemaking involves strategically mixing high-quality multifamily and commercial buildings with anchor, specialty and neighborhood retail in a high density, thoughtfully planned and designed public space. Through this process, we create synergies, and thus value, across those varied uses leading to unique, amenity-rich, walkable neighborhoods that are desirable and enhance tenant and investor demand. We believe our Placemaking approach will increase occupancy and rental rates in our portfolio, in particular with respect to our concentrated and extensive land and operating asset holdings in National Landing. National Landing, situated in Northern Virginia directly across the Potomac River from Washington, D.C., is the interconnected and walkable neighborhood that encompasses Crystal City, the eastern portion of Pentagon City and the northern portion of Potomac Yard. We believe National Landing is one of the region's best-located urban mixed-use communities due to its central and easily accessible location, its adjacency to Reagan National Airport, and its large base of existing offices, apartments and hotels.
We are repositioning our holdings in National Landing by executing a broad array of Placemaking strategies, including the delivery of new multifamily and office developments, locally sourced amenity retail, and thoughtful improvements to the streetscape, sidewalks, parks and other outdoor gathering spaces. Utilizing our Placemaking expertise, each new project is intended to contribute to authentic and distinct neighborhoods by creating a vibrant street environment with robust retail offerings and other amenities, including improved public spaces.
Amazon's new headquarters is located in National Landing. During the second quarter of 2023, we completed the construction of two new office buildings for Amazon on Metropolitan Park in National Landing, totaling 2.1 million square feet, inclusive of approximately 50,000 square feet of street-level retail with new shops and restaurants, and Amazon took occupancy of its new headquarters in June 2023. We are the developer, property manager and retail leasing agent for Amazon's new headquarters at National Landing. As of December 31, 2023, we have leases with Amazon totaling approximately 927,000 square feet across five office buildings in National Landing.
In connection with Amazon's new headquarters in National Landing, the Commonwealth of Virginia agreed to provide tax incentives to Amazon to create a minimum of 25,000 new full-time jobs and potentially 37,850 full-time jobs in National Landing with average annual wage targets for each calendar year, starting with $150,000 in 2019, and escalating 1.5% per year. As of March 2023, Amazon has created approximately 8,000 new full-time jobs in National Landing. We, alongside Amazon, Virginia Tech, and federal, state, and local governments plan to invest over $12.0 billion, including infrastructure investments, that will directly benefit National Landing. The infrastructure investments include: a new Metro station (Potomac Yard), a new Metro entrance (Crystal Drive) a pedestrian bridge to Reagan National Airport; a new commuter rail station located between two of our Crystal Drive office assets; lowering of elevated sections of U.S. Route 1 that currently divide parts of National Landing to create better multimodal access and walkability; funding for the innovation campus anchored by Virginia Tech; and Long Bridge, the planned two-track rail connection between Washington, D.C. and National Landing. The Potomac Yard Metro station opened in May 2023.
In the fall of 2020, Virginia Tech virtually launched the inaugural academic year of its $1 billion Innovation Campus in National Landing, which is under construction. This expected powerful demand driver sits adjacent to 2.0 million square feet of development density we own in National Landing and the new Potomac Yard Metro station, which opened in May 2023, all approximately one mile south of Amazon's new headquarters. The campus is part of a 20-acre innovation district, of which the fully entitled first phase encompasses approximately 1.6 million square feet of space, including four office towers and two residential buildings, with ground-level retail. On this campus, Virginia Tech intends to create an innovation ecosystem by co-locating academic and private sector uses to accelerate research and development spending, as well as the commercialization of technology. When the Innovation Campus is fully operational, Virginia Tech plans to annually enroll approximately 750 master students and 200 PhD students in STEM fields. Virginia Tech is expected to occupy a 3.5-acre campus in the Innovation Campus.
In December 2023, we, along with Monumental Sports & Entertainment, the Commonwealth of Virginia, and the City of Alexandria announced a plan to build a new sports and entertainment anchor in National Landing, subject to definitive documentation and applicable government approvals. This 1.2 million square foot anchor would include a new arena for the Washington Capitals and Washington Wizards, along with a global corporate headquarters for Monumental Sports & Entertainment, a Monumental Sports Network media studio, the Wizards practice facility, a performing arts venue, and an expanded e-sports facility – all situated adjacent to the Virginia Tech Innovation Campus and the recently delivered Potomac Yard Metro Station.
We are making cutting-edge digital infrastructure investments to establish National Landing as among the first 5G-operable submarkets in the nation. Building upon our Placemaking efforts, we are leveraging our concentrated and extensive land and operating asset holdings in National Landing to deploy a digital infrastructure platform at a neighborhood scale that delivers an amenity that we believe enhances tenant demand, specifically in the technology and defense sectors, and further differentiates National Landing.
The following are key components of our strategy:
Capitalize on Significant Demand Catalysts in National Landing. We believe the strong technology sector tailwinds created by Amazon, the Virginia Tech Innovation Campus, the Pentagon and our National Landing digital infrastructure platform will contribute to substantial growth from our Operating Portfolio and our 6.6 million square foot development pipeline in National Landing. Approximately 75.0% of our portfolio is located in National Landing where Amazon is incentivized to employ a minimum of 25,000 new full-time jobs and potentially 37,850 planned employees, and Virginia Tech's $1 billion Innovation Campus is under construction.
Given National Landing’s proximity to the Pentagon, recent historic increases in the U.S. defense budget and robust foreign defense spending, we believe National Landing is positioned to capture growing defense demand, particularly as tech and defense are increasingly intertwined. In 2023, 47.4% of leases executed by us in National Landing were with the Department of Defense and defense contractors.
We believe our investment in digital infrastructure including dense, redundant, and secure fiber networks, data center access, next-generation 5G connectivity, and privately held CBRS wireless spectrum provide a key advantage in continuing to attract companies to National Landing. The digital infrastructure provides us with valuable tenant inducement tools, such as the ability to offer ubiquitous and redundant fiber connectivity and 5G private cellular networks. Based on our experience, these features, delivered with support from industry-leading service providers including AT&T, Cisco, and Federated Wireless, are increasingly important to technology and defense companies, especially innovators in cybersecurity, internet of things, artificial intelligence and cloud computing. In 2023, we believe that access to the unique digital infrastructure amenity was a decision factor for many of the tenants who executed leases in National Landing.
In addition to our Primary Focus on National Landing, Invest in and Operate Mixed-Use Assets in Other High-Growth, Metro-Served Submarkets in the Washington, D.C. Metropolitan Area. We intend to continue our longstanding strategy of owning and operating urban mixed-use properties concentrated in what we believe are the highest growth, Metro-served submarkets in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area with high barriers to entry and vibrant urban amenities. In addition to National Landing, these submarkets include the Rosslyn-Ballston Corridor in Northern Virginia; the Ballpark, U Street/Shaw, and Union Market/NoMa, in the District of Columbia; and Bethesda in Maryland. These submarkets generally feature strong economic and demographic attributes, as well as superior transportation infrastructure that caters to the preferences of multifamily, office and retail tenants. We believe these positive attributes will enable our assets located in these high-growth submarkets to outperform the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area as a whole.
Drive Incremental Growth Through Lease-up and Stabilization of Our Operating Assets, and Deliver Our Under-Construction Assets. Given our leasing capabilities and tenant demand for high-quality space in our submarkets, we believe that we are well positioned to achieve significant internal growth from the lease-up of vacant space in our in-service Operating Portfolio. As of December 31, 2023, we had 16 multifamily assets totaling 6,318 units (6,318 units at our share), which were 96.0% leased at our share. As of December 31, 2023, we had 26 commercial assets totaling 8.3 million square feet (7.7 million square feet at our share), which were 86.3% leased at our share, resulting in 1.0 million square feet available for lease. In addition to portfolio lease-up, we expect increases in NOI from: (i) the commencement of signed but not yet commenced office and retail leases ($4.7 million total annualized estimated rent as of December 31, 2023, of which $2.7 million is expected in 2024) and (ii) contractual rent escalators in our non-GSA office and retail leases, which are based on increases in the Consumer Price Index or a fixed percentage.
As of December 31, 2023, we had 1,583 multifamily units under construction in National Landing across two projects (4 buildings): 1900 Crystal Drive and 2000/2001 South Bell Street. Based on our current plans and estimates, these assets will require an additional $177.1 million to complete.
Monetize Our Significant Development Pipeline. We expect our pipeline of ground-up development opportunities will produce favorable risk-adjusted returns on invested capital.
As of December 31, 2023, our development pipeline consisted of 17 assets, and we estimate it can support 10.8 million square feet (8.8 million square feet at our share) of estimated potential development density: 82.1% of this potential development density comprises multifamily projects located in the high-growth submarkets of National Landing, the Ballpark, and Union Market/NoMa; and 100.0% of this potential development density is Metro-served. Subject to market conditions, we intend to invest in multifamily development and in new office development subject to preleasing. The estimated potential development densities and uses reflect our current business plans as of December 31, 2023 and are subject to change based on market conditions.
In addition to developing select assets in this pipeline, we expect to unlock value through opportunistic asset sales, ground leases and recapitalizations.
Actively Allocate our Capital, Reposition Our Portfolio to Majority Multifamily and Concentrate our Office Portfolio in National Landing. A fundamental component of our strategy to maximize long-term NAV per share is active capital allocation. We evaluate development, acquisition, disposition, share repurchases and other investment decisions based on how they may impact long-term NAV per share. We intend to continue to opportunistically sell or recapitalize assets as well as land sites where a ground lease or joint venture execution may represent the most attractive path to maximizing value. Successful execution of our capital allocation strategy enables us to source capital at NAV from the disposition of assets generating low cash yields and invest those proceeds in new acquisitions with higher cash yields and growth, development projects with significant yield spreads and profit potential, and share repurchases. Consequently, at any given time, we expect to be in various stages of discussions and negotiations with potential buyers, real estate venture partners, ground lessors, and other counterparties with respect to sales, joint ventures, and/or ground leases for certain of our assets, including portfolios thereof. These discussions and negotiations may or may not lead to definitive documentation or closed transactions. We anticipate redeploying the proceeds from these sales will not only help fund our planned growth but will also further advance the strategic shift of our portfolio to majority multifamily. Current market conditions, however, have significantly slowed down the pace of asset sales, and we expect this reduced activity to continue in 2024. In the meantime, we continue to advance our two under-construction multifamily assets in National Landing, 1900 Crystal Drive and 2000/2001 South Bell Street, totaling 1,583 units.
We expect near-term acquisition activity to be focused on assets in emerging growth neighborhoods, as well as assets adjacent to our existing holdings where the combination of sites can add unique value to any new investment with a focus on multifamily given our long-term objective of growing our portfolio to majority multifamily. Where there are opportunities to trade out of higher risk assets with extensive capital needs or those outside of our geographic footprint, we will consider like-kind exchanges under Section 1031 of the Code.
Third-Party Services Business
Our third-party asset management and real estate services business provides fee-based real estate services to the JBG Legacy Funds, other third parties and the WHI Impact Pool. Although a significant portion of the assets and interests in assets formerly owned by certain of the JBG Legacy Funds were contributed to us in the Combination, the JBG Legacy Funds retained certain assets that were not consistent with our long-term business strategy. With respect to the remaining investments of the JBG Legacy Funds, we provide asset management, property management, development, construction management, leasing and other services. We expect to continue to earn fees for the management of the JBG Legacy Funds until their investments are liquidated. Certain individual members of our management team own direct equity co-investment and promote interests in the JBG Legacy Funds and certain of the funds' investments that were not contributed to us. These economic interests will be eliminated as the JBG Legacy Funds are wound down over time. Additionally, we often retain management of properties we sell as part of our capital allocation strategy. These assets, while no longer owned by us, continue to generate third-party service fees.
We believe that the fees we earn in connection with providing these third-party services enhance our overall returns, provide additional scale and efficiency in our operating, development and acquisition businesses and absorb a portion of the overhead and other administrative costs of our platform. This scale provides competitive advantages, including market knowledge, buying power and operating efficiencies across all product types. We also believe that our existing relationships arising out of our third-party asset management and real estate services business will continue to provide potential access to capital and new investment opportunities.
Competition
The commercial real estate markets in which we operate are highly competitive. We compete with numerous acquirers, developers, owners and operators of commercial real estate including other REITs, private equity investors, domestic and foreign financial institutions, life insurance companies, pension trusts, partnerships, and individual investors, many of which own or may seek to acquire or develop assets similar to ours in the same markets in which our assets are located. These competitors may have greater financial resources or access to capital than we do or be willing to acquire assets in transactions which are more highly leveraged or are less attractive from a financial viewpoint than we are willing to pursue, which may reduce the number of suitable investment opportunities available to us or increase pricing. Leasing is a major component of our business and is highly competitive. The principal means of competition in leasing are lease terms (including rent charged and tenant improvement allowances), location, services provided, and the nature and condition of the asset to be leased. If our competitors offer space at rental rates below current market rates, below the rental rates we currently charge our tenants, in better locations within our markets, in higher quality assets or offer better services, we may lose existing and potential tenants, and we may be pressured to reduce our rental rates below those we currently charge to retain tenants when our tenants' leases expire.
Segment Data
We operate in the following business segments: multifamily, commercial and third-party asset management and real estate services. Financial information related to these business segments for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2023 is set forth in Note 20 to the consolidated financial statements.
Tax Status
We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856-860 of the Code. Under those sections, a REIT which distributes at least 90% of its REIT taxable income as dividends to its shareholders each year and which meets certain other conditions will not be taxed on that portion of its taxable income which is distributed to its shareholders. We currently adhere and intend to continue to adhere to these requirements and to maintain our REIT status in future periods.
Future distributions will be declared and paid at the discretion of our Board of Trustees and will depend upon cash generated by operating activities, our financial condition, capital requirements, annual dividend requirements under the REIT provisions of the Code and such other factors as our Board of Trustees deems relevant.
We also participate in the activities conducted by our subsidiary entities that have elected to be treated as TRSs under the Code. As such, we are subject to federal, state, and local taxes on the income from these activities. For additional information regarding our REIT status, see Item 9B "Other Information."
Significant Tenants
Only the U.S. federal government accounted for 10% or more of our rental revenue, which consists of property rental and other property revenue, as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
| | | Year Ended December 31, 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rental revenue from the U.S. federal government | | $64,439 | $75,516 | $83,256 |
| Percentage of commercial segment rental revenue | | 23.0% | 23.7% | 22.8% |
| Percentage of rental revenue | | 12.9% | 14.8% | 16.2% |
ESG
Our business values integrate environmental sustainability, social responsibility, D&I, and strong governance practices throughout our organization. We believe that by understanding the social and environmental impacts of our business, we are better able to protect asset value, reduce risk, and advance initiatives that result in positive social and environmental outcomes creating shared value. Our business model prioritizes maximizing long-term NAV per share. By investing in urban infill and transit-oriented development and strategically mixing high-quality multifamily and commercial buildings with public areas, retail spaces, and walkable streets, we are working to define neighborhoods that deliver benefits to the environment and our community, as well as long-term value to our shareholders.
We remain committed to transparent reporting of ESG financial and non-financial indicators. We intend to continue publishing an annual ESG report with key performance indicators that are aligned with the Global Reporting Initiative reporting framework, United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, Sustainability Accounting Standards Board Standards, and recommendations set forth by the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures. In 2023, we maintained a carbon neutral operating portfolio for Scope 1 and Scope 2. Carbon neutrality was accomplished first through energy and water efficiency, then the purchase of verified carbon offsets for Scope 1 emissions produced by onsite natural gas consumption and fugitive refrigerant emissions, and the purchase of Green-e RECs for Scope 2 emissions produced by consuming onsite electricity procured by us. (We own three company vehicles with emissions that are less than 0.01% of our carbon footprint and, therefore, are not included in our calculations of carbon neutrality.) Our planned next step toward long-term sustainability includes the development and execution of an offsite renewable energy strategy, which is expected to replace a significant portion of our annual REC purchases, which add renewable energy capacity to the national electrical grid. Our detailed sustainability information, including our strategy, key performance targets and indicators, annual absolute comparisons, achievements and historical ESG reports are available on our website at https://www.JBGSMITH.com/About/Sustainability. All energy, water, waste and greenhouse gas emissions data in our ESG report is third-party, limited assurance verified following ISO 14064-3. Our website and the information contained therein or connected thereto are not intended to be incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
We focus on operating efficiency, responding to evolving environmental and social trends, and delivering on the needs of our tenants and communities. We have demonstrated the results of this focus by:
- Achieving a 5-star designation in the GRESB Global ESG Benchmark for Real Assets for both diversified operating assets and future development, and being recognized as a 2023 Global Sector Leader - Development - Residential Sector.
- Being named 2023 Nareit Diversified Leader in the Light award winner for sustained ESG excellence.
- Being named a 2023 U.S. Green Building Council Leadership award winner for sustainability leadership in the real estate sector.
- Maintaining an ESG Committee and oversight of environmental and social matters by the Board of Trustees' Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee.
- Being named to Bloomberg's Gender Equality Index.
- Maintaining the diversity of our Board of Trustees, which currently comprises 40% women. Reflecting the strength and diversity of our national labor force, our Board of Trustees has made a long-term commitment to evolve its composition to have equal balance between men and women and to reflect the ethnic diversity of our country.
- Surpassing $114 million in investor commitments to the JBG SMITH-managed WHI Impact Pool, which raises funds from third parties and, through 2023, has closed $72.0 million in financing related to the purchase of residential communities containing 2,833 units. We launched the WHI in 2018 in partnership with the Federal City Council to preserve or build between 2,000 and 3,000 units of affordable workforce housing in the Washington, D.C. region.
Our sustainability team works directly with our business units to integrate our ESG principles throughout our operations and investment processes. Our sustainability team is responsible for leading annual ESG reporting efforts, maintaining building certifications, energy, water and waste benchmarking, sustainability strategy development, and implementation and coordination with industry and community partners.
To ensure that our ESG principles are fully integrated into our business practices, our sustainability, human resources, legal, accounting, D&I, and social impact investing teams, as well as members of our management team, provide top-down support for the implementation of ESG initiatives. Our ESG Committee is responsible for ESG improvement initiatives and provides our Board of Trustees' Corporate Governance & Nominating and Audit Committees with periodic updates on ESG strategy. Accomplishments of this group in 2023 include an update to climate-related risks inclusive of physical and transition risks and the potential financial impacts of those risks, and the creation and adoption of human rights and ESG policies.
Energy and Water Efficiency and Management
We believe that the efficient use of natural resources will result in sustainable long-term value and mitigate climate-related risks. By 2030, we have committed to reduce: energy consumption 25%, predicted energy consumption 25%, water consumption 20% and greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1 and 2) 25%. Further, by 2030, we have committed to increase waste diversion to 60% and verify all assets using green building and health and well-being certifications across our Operating Portfolio and development pipeline. In addition to our 2030 targets, we have a legacy commitment to improve the energy efficiency of our commercial Operating Portfolio by at least 20% over the 10-year period ending in 2024 through the Department of Energy Better Buildings Challenge. We achieve this improvement through real time energy use monitoring. We are tracking a 15% reduction in energy consumption, a 12% reduction in water consumption and a 25% reduction in carbon emissions from our 2018 baseline through 2022. We report progress on these commitments annually in our ESG report.
Our long-term strategy to reduce energy and water consumption includes operational and capital improvements that align with our business plan and contribute to attaining our performance targets. Asset teams review historical performance, conduct energy audits and regularly assess opportunities to achieve efficiency targets. Capital investment planning considers the useful life of equipment, energy and water efficiency, occupant health impacts and maintenance requirements. Asset-level business plans that include energy and water efficiency capital investments were completed in 2023.
Our development strategy focuses on reducing predicted energy and water consumption and embodied carbon, contributing to attaining our performance targets. Development teams use energy, water, and embodied carbon modeling to inform design decisions that best fit each individual building program, adapt to identified climate change conditions for our region, and promote healthy buildings. Since the establishment of performance targets for our development projects, we are tracking an aggregate 25% reduction in predicted energy consumption, 35% reduction in predicted water use and 20% reduction in embodied carbon as of December 31, 2023.
We use green building and health and well-being certifications as a verification tool across our portfolio. These certifications demonstrate our commitment to green, smart, and healthy buildings and verify predicted operational performance. We seek to benchmark 100% of our assets to help inform capital improvement projects. As of December 31, 2023:
- 95% of all operating assets, based on square footage, have earned at least one green building or health and well-being certification:
- 3.2 million square feet of LEED Certified Multifamily Space (61%)
- 3.3 million square feet of LEED Certified Commercial Space (43%)
- 2.7 million square feet of ENERGY STAR Certified Multifamily Space (52%)
- 3.9 million square feet of ENERGY STAR Certified Commercial Space (51%)
- 7.5 million square feet of BOMA 360 Certified Commercial Space (99%)
- 3.8 million square feet of Fitwel Full Building Certified Commercial and Multifamily Space (29%)
- 7.3 million square feet of Fitwel Viral Response Module Certified Commercial Space (96%)
- 99.4% of our operating assets' energy and water use are benchmarked
Tenant Sustainability Impacts
Customer service is an integral component of real estate management. Our mission includes creating a unique experience at all our properties where our tenants' needs are our highest priority. We believe in sustainability as a service — by integrating efficiency and conservation into standard operating practices, we engage on topics that are most impactful to our tenants and residents. We are committed to providing a healthy living and working environment for building occupants. We accomplish this goal through monitoring and improving indoor air quality, eliminating toxic chemicals, providing access to nature and daylight, fresh foods, fitness, composting and waste reduction programs.
We are a Green Lease Leader established by the Institute for Market Transformation and the U.S. Department of Energy's Better Buildings Alliance. Green Lease Leaders recognizes companies who use the leasing process to achieve better collaboration between landlords and tenants with the goal of reducing building energy consumption and operating costs. Our standard lease contains a cost recovery clause for resource efficiency-related capital improvements and requires tenants to provide data for measuring, managing, and reporting sustainability performance. This language is included in 100% of our new office and retail leases and renewals.
Nearly all our commercial tenants are metered at the whole building level for their grid electricity and water usage. Many of our retail tenants in multifamily buildings are billed directly for electricity and water. As such, the percentage of our directly sub-metered tenants is very low. In most cases, we receive a bill at the whole building level for grid electricity and water usage, and bill tenants based on the percentage of the building's square footage that they occupy. These tenants are not considered to be separately metered or sub-metered.
Climate Change Resilience
We take climate change and the associated risks seriously, and we are committed to managing and avoiding the impacts of climate change using science to inform action. We stand with our communities, tenants and shareholders in supporting meaningful solutions that address this global challenge. To develop a more informed view of future climate conditions and further our understanding of the direct climate-related risks to our properties, we have conducted a new climate-related risk assessment (both acute and chronic risks across our operating assets and development pipeline) which addresses both physical and transition climate risk factors, and estimates the financial implications of those modeled risks at the asset level.
Climate Change Risk Management Strategy
We have aligned our climate-related disclosures with the recommendations of the TCFD. As defined by the TCFD framework, physical risks associated with climate change include acute risks (extreme weather-related events) and chronic risks (such as extreme heat and coastal flooding), and transition risks associated with climate change include policy and legal risks, market and reputation-related risks and decarbonization technology risks.
Our 2023 assessment of climate change risk relied on S&P Global Inc.'s Climanomics modeling tool. The Climanomics methodology projects portfolio level risk exposure as well as individual asset risk exposure over four reference scenarios, or representative concentration pathways, established by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and across a range of time horizons through 2100. Climanomics’ primary output is a risk exposure metric called MAAL. This value is presented as both absolute MAAL ($ in millions) and relative MAAL (% of total asset or portfolio value). We intend to conduct periodic climate-related risk assessments as the composition of our portfolio changes.
The assessment included all in-service assets, and our development pipeline and landholdings, and included climate events such as hurricane, wildfire, temperature extremes, water stress, drought, fluvial and coastal flooding. The assessment of our portfolio identified fluvial and coastal flooding and temperature extremes (heat stress) as top hazards. We currently have no properties in a Federal Emergency Management Agency hazard designated area.
Asset-Level Risk Management
We are managing transition risks by benchmarking energy, carbon, water and waste performance at the asset level and review this information with asset management and operations teams quarterly. As a leader in green building, we will continue to make capital investments that enhance building performance and tenant comfort, energy and water efficiency, on-site renewable energy and other decarbonization strategies. We work with our insurance team to benchmark resilience features and develop adaptations for short-term horizons. We aim to develop risk mitigation and physical resilience plans for all assets taking into account the outputs from the Climanomics tool.
Carbon-Neutral Operations Strategy
Our strategy to maintain carbon-neutral operations includes the following steps:
- First and foremost, plan for and deploy energy and water efficiency at all assets.
- Plan for and deploy energy, water, and embodied carbon reductions in the design of our buildings.
- Deploy on-site renewable energy where most impactful.
- Develop and deploy off-site renewable procurement strategies.
- To the extent necessary, offset any remaining emissions by purchasing verified renewable energy credits and carbon offsets.
Social Responsibility
We believe the economic strength of our region is central to sustaining the long-term value of our portfolio. We are committed to the economic development of the Washington D.C. metropolitan area through continued investment in our projects and local communities. We recognize, however, that new development can foster challenging growth dynamics, with matters of social equity at the forefront. We strive to work alongside community members, leaders, and local and federal governments to appropriately respond to these challenges. One of our efforts is the WHI, which we launched in 2018 in partnership with the Federal City Council.
The WHI is a transformational market-driven approach to producing affordable workforce housing and creating sustainable, mixed-income communities. The WHI is a scalable, market-driven model funded by a unique relationship between philanthropy and private investment. As of December 31, 2023, we have invested $7.7 million of our $11.2 million commitment in the WHI Impact Pool. The WHI Impact Pool completed fundraising in 2020 with capital commitments totaling $114.4 million, and has closed $72.0 million in financing related to the purchase of residential communities containing 2,833 units through December 31, 2023.
To learn more about our ESG initiatives and performance, please visit https://www.JBGSMITH.com/About/Sustainability and download our ESG Report. The expected publication date of our 2024 ESG report is April 30, 2024. Our website and the information contained therein or connected thereto are not intended to be incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
D&I
We have a comprehensive, multi-year D&I strategy. See "Human Capital" below for further discussion.
Governance
We are engaged in addressing ESG matters, including climate-related matters, at all levels of our organization. Management’s role in overseeing, assessing, and managing climate-related risks, opportunities and initiatives is integrated throughout our business units. We have a dedicated team of sustainability professionals focused on ESG matters that coordinate and collaborate across business units and with our Board of Trustees and management, and which advises on environmental sustainability matters and develops and implements related initiatives. In 2022, management established a new ESG Committee to help inform ESG strategy and more robustly advise the Board of Trustees on climate-related risks and opportunities. The ESG Committee is responsible for ensuring compliance with guidelines from the SEC and other regulatory bodies, and assists in establishing our general strategy as it relates to ESG matters that may affect our business, operation, performance or reputation. The ESG Committee reports to the Chief Legal Officer, with oversight provided by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. Co-chairs include our Deputy General Counsel and Senior Vice President of Sustainability, with representation by business leaders from various groups across the organization.
Regulatory Matters
Environmental Matters
Under various federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, a current or former owner or operator of real estate may be liable for conducting or paying for the costs of the investigation, removal or remediation of certain hazardous or toxic substances on that real estate. These laws often impose such liability without regard to whether the owner knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of hazardous or toxic substances, and the liability may be joint and several. The costs of remediation or removal of these substances may be substantial and could exceed the value of the property, and the presence of these substances, or the failure to promptly remediate these substances, may adversely affect the owner's ability to sell or develop the real estate or to borrow using the real estate as collateral. In connection with the ownership and operation of our current and former assets, we may be potentially liable for these costs. The operations of current and former tenants at our assets have involved, or may have involved, the use of hazardous substances or generated hazardous wastes, and indemnities in our lease agreements may not fully protect us from liability, if, for example, a tenant responsible for environmental noncompliance or contamination becomes insolvent. The release of these hazardous substances and wastes could result in us incurring liabilities to remediate any resulting contamination. The presence of contamination or the failure to remediate contamination at our properties may (i) expose us to third-party liability (e.g., for cleanup costs, natural resource damages, bodily injury or property damage), (ii) subject our properties to liens in favor of the government for damages and costs the government incurs in connection with the contamination, (iii) impose restrictions on the manner in which a property may be used or businesses may be operated, or (iv) materially adversely affect our ability to sell, lease or develop the real estate or to borrow using the real estate as collateral. In addition, our assets are exposed to the risk of contamination originating from other sources. While a property owner may not be responsible for remediating contamination that has migrated onsite from an identifiable and viable offsite source, the contaminant's presence can have adverse effects on operations and the redevelopment of our assets. To the extent we arrange for contaminated materials to be sent to other locations for treatment or disposal, we may be liable for the cleanup of those sites if they become contaminated, without regard to whether we complied with environmental laws in doing so.
Most of our assets have been subject, at some point, to environmental assessments that are intended to evaluate the environmental condition of the subject and surrounding assets. These environmental assessments generally have included a historical review, a public records review, a visual inspection of the site and surrounding assets, visual or historical evidence of underground storage tanks and other features, and the preparation and issuance of a written report. Soil, soil vapor and/or groundwater subsurface testing is conducted at our assets, when necessary, to further investigate any issues raised by the initial assessment that could reasonably be expected to pose a material concern to the property or result in us incurring material environmental liabilities as a result of redevelopment. The tests may not, however, have included extensive sampling or subsurface investigations. In each case where the environmental assessments have identified conditions requiring remedial actions required by law, we have initiated appropriate actions. The environmental assessments have not revealed any material environmental contamination that we believe would have a material adverse effect on our overall business, financial condition or results of operations, or that have not been anticipated and remediated during site redevelopment as required by law. Nevertheless, there can be no assurance that the identification of new areas of contamination, changes in the extent or known scope of contamination, the discovery of additional sites or changes in cleanup requirements would not result in significant cost to us.
Affordable Housing and Tenant Protection Regulations
Certain states and municipalities have adopted laws and regulations imposing restrictions on the timing or amount of rent increases and other tenant protections. As of December 31, 2023, approximately 7% of the multifamily units in our Operating Portfolio were designated as affordable housing. In addition, Washington, D.C. and Montgomery County, Maryland have laws that require, in certain circumstances, an owner of a multifamily rental property to allow tenant organizations the option to purchase the building at a market price if the owner attempts to sell the property. We expect to continue operating and acquiring assets in areas that either are subject to these types of laws or regulations or where such laws or regulations may be enacted in the future. Such laws and regulations limit our ability to charge market rents, increase rents, evict tenants or recover increases in our operating expenses and could make it more difficult for us to dispose of assets in certain circumstances.
The Americans with Disabilities Act and other Federal, State and Local Regulations
The ADA generally requires that public buildings, including our assets, meet certain federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. Noncompliance could result in the imposition of fines by the federal government or the award of damages to private litigants and/or legal fees to their counsel. If, under the ADA, we are required to make substantial alterations and capital expenditures in one or more of our assets, including the removal of access barriers, it could have a material adverse effect on us.
Additionally, our assets are subject to various federal, state and local regulatory requirements, such as state and local fire and life safety requirements. If we fail to comply with these requirements, we could incur fines or private damage awards. We do not know whether existing requirements will change or whether compliance with future requirements will require significant unanticipated expenditures that will affect our cash flow and results of operations.
Regulation Related to Government Tenants
As discussed above, the U.S. federal government is a significant tenant. Lease agreements with federal government agencies contain provisions required by federal law, which require, among other things, that the lessor of the property agree to comply with certain rules and regulations, including rules and regulations related to anti-kickback procedures, examination of records, audits and records, equal opportunity provisions, prohibition against segregated facilities, certain executive orders, subcontractor cost or pricing data, and certain provisions intending to assist small businesses. We directly manage assets with federal government agency tenants, which subjects us to additional risks associated with compliance with applicable federal rules and regulations. In addition, there are additional requirements relating to the potential application of equal opportunity provisions and related requirements to prepare written affirmative action plans applicable to government contractors and subcontractors. Some of the factors used to determine whether these requirements apply to a company that is affiliated with the actual government contractor (the legal entity that is the lessor under a lease with a federal government agency) include whether that company and the government contractor are under common ownership, have common management, and are under common control. We own the entity that is the government contractor and the property manager, increasing the risk that requirements of the Employment Standards Administration's Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs and requirements to prepare affirmative action plans pursuant to the applicable executive order may be determined to be applicable to us. Compliance with these regulations is costly and any increase in regulation could increase our costs, which could have a material adverse effect on us.
Human Capital
Our headquarters is located at 4747 Bethesda Avenue, Suite 200, Bethesda, MD 20814. As of December 31, 2023, we had 844 employees.
We believe that our talent is our competitive advantage. To that end, we focus on talent development and succession planning, pay-for-performance, and D&I. We utilize talent management practices in the broadest sense to create an engaging workplace experience for our employees, where they feel valued, respected and supported. Based on our most recent engagement survey, our employees are highly satisfied with their jobs (90% favorable) and feel positive about our D&I efforts and progress (88% favorable).
We are keenly focused on the employee experience and want every person to feel respected for what makes them unique. At the same time, our core values provide a sound structure for finding common ground and working together as a team to deliver the best possible outcomes. In addition to our inclusive culture, our pay equity study results show no systemic disparity in compensation related to race or gender, affirming our strong belief in treating people equitably.
With our hybrid corporate office schedule, flexibility, and emphasis on health and welfare, we offer our employees an environment that enables them to be confident in their in-office experience and demonstrate the energy and excitement that comes from being together and collaborating with coworkers to achieve desirable outcomes. In addition, we are proud to have been recognized by the Washington Post as a "Top Workplace" several times in past years, and are focused on providing a positive employee experience to ensure that we remain an employer of choice.
We continually invest in our employee population, ensuring our employee experience more broadly continues to help us attract and retain the best talent in the industry. The list below is a sampling of offerings that help create a compelling employee experience:
- Streamlined annual performance reviews
- Executive coaching available
- Employee share purchase plan
- Hybrid / flexible work schedules
- Flexible paid time off
- Regular town halls where senior management updates the entire team on recent progress and other important matters
- Employee surveys
- Mentorship and coaching programs to develop and retain talent
- Monthly D&I communications
- Employee roundtable discussions on pertinent current events, workplace issues and teambuilding
- Utilization of JBGS Inclusion Community and Women's Initiative to guide D&I programming and events
- Partnerships with schools and organizations to facilitate recruitment of diverse talent
- Employee referral program
- Generous company subsidy on health-related benefits
- Lunches with Leaders
- Volunteer opportunities
In addition to the above, we have a strong pay-for-performance culture where compensation is tied to both company and individual performance, ensuring that employees are focused on our success, as well as their individual goals. We want our employees to feel aligned with our company vision and enabled to grow in their careers. To that end, we have a strong track record of promoting from within; in 2023, 50% of promotions went to people of color. Consequently, the opportunities for growth and development also help to keep our population engaged and motivated.
2023 continued the evolution of our comprehensive, multi-year D&I strategy. With an ongoing focus on our three strategic pillars – (i) employee development, (ii) engagement and (iii) recruiting – we have made additional progress and have continued to drive cultural and behavioral change. We offered a broad range of events and activities to recognize and celebrate our employees’ rich cultural diversity.
We recognize that diversity in our workforce brings valuable perspectives, views and ideas to our organization. We pride ourselves on our strong, collaborative culture, and we strive to create an inclusive and healthy work environment for our employees, which helps us continue to attract innovators to our organization. Our workforce comprises 38% women and 61% people of color, and our senior leadership has 39% women representation. In addition, we were proud to be named to the 2023 Bloomberg Gender Equality Index.
Implementing more inclusive, equitable systems and practices had a significant impact on our ability to identify diverse talent, particularly related to our entry-level recruitment efforts. 100% of 2023 intern hires were from underrepresented groups, and 81% of our new hires at all levels were people of color. In addition, we have continued to expand our strategic partnerships with diverse educational, professional and community organizations to ensure that we are building a strong, diverse pipeline of talent.
Available Information
Copies of our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports are available free of charge through our website (https://www.JBGSMITH.com) as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. Also available on our website are copies of our Audit Committee Charter, Compensation Committee Charter, Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee Charter, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and Corporate Governance Guidelines. In the event of any changes to these charters or the code or guidelines, changed copies will also be made available on our website. Copies of these documents are also available directly from us free of charge. Our website also includes other financial information, including certain financial measures not in compliance with GAAP, none of which is a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Copies of our filings under the Exchange Act are also available free of charge from us, upon request.
Risk factors
As filed, 82,108 characters, with its headings, lists and tables. Extracted from the main document; charts and exhibits are in the original on sec.gov.
You should carefully consider the following risks in evaluating our company and our common shares. If any of the following risks were to occur, our business, prospects, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, and the ability to make distributions to our shareholders could be materially and adversely affected, which we refer to herein collectively as a "material adverse effect on us," the per share trading price of our common shares could decline significantly, and you could lose all or part of your investment. Some statements in this Form 10-K, including statements in the following risk factors, constitute forward-looking statements. Refer to the section entitled "Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements" for additional information regarding these forward-looking statements.
Risks Related to Our Business and Operations
A material portion of our portfolio comprises office assets, which have generally experienced a decrease in demand and may experience a further decrease in demand that could have a material adverse effect on us. Furthermore, the decline in the attractiveness of office assets, particularly combined with a lack of transactional activity and the current challenging capital markets could delay our capital recycling plans and our planned transition to majority multifamily.
A material portion of our portfolio comprises office assets, which, due to the increase in work-from-home policies and practices, have generally experienced a decrease in demand and may experience a further decrease in demand as some tenants do not renew leases as they expire or renew space with a smaller footprint, which could have a material adverse effect on us. Demand for office space in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area and nationwide, including in our portfolio, has declined and may continue to decline due to increased usage of teleworking arrangements and more flexible work-from-anywhere policies leading to reconsiderations regarding amount of square footage needed (e.g. certain tenants have reduced their leased square footage or advised us of their intention to do so), and cost cutting resulting from the pandemic, which could lead to continued lower office occupancy (as of December 31, 2023, 25.7% of our commercial and retail leases at our share, based on square footage, were scheduled to expire in 2024 or had month-to-month terms, and 6.8% were scheduled to expire in 2025), and new leasing has been slow to recover and will likely continue to lag due to delayed return-to-office plans and decision-making related to future office utilization. Furthermore, the decline in the attractiveness of office assets, particularly combined with a lack of transactional activity and the current challenging capital markets could delay our capital recycling plans and our plan to transition to a portfolio comprising a majority of multifamily assets. Finally, a key demand driver in National Landing is the presence of Amazon’s headquarters, Phase I of which was completed in 2023. Phase II has not yet commenced construction due to a pause announced by Amazon; if Amazon determines to further delay construction, reduce the size of Phase II, or otherwise shrink its footprint in National Landing, that could have a material adverse impact on our plans for National Landing.
Our portfolio of assets is geographically concentrated in Washington, D.C. metropolitan area submarkets, and particularly concentrated in National Landing, which makes us susceptible to adverse economic and other conditions such that an economic downturn affecting this area could have a material adverse effect on us.
We are particularly susceptible to adverse economic or other conditions in the Washington D.C. metropolitan market (such as periods of economic slowdown or recession, business layoffs or downsizing, industry slowdowns, actual or anticipated federal government shutdowns, uncertainties related to federal elections, relocations of businesses, increases in real estate and other taxes, actual or perceived increases in retail theft and other crime, imposed curfews or states of security, and the cost of complying with governmental regulations or increased regulation), as well as to natural disasters (including earthquakes, floods, storms and hurricanes), utility outages (including electricity and drinking water), potentially adverse effects of climate change and other disruptions that occur in this market (such as terrorist activity or threats of terrorist activity and other events), any of which may have a greater impact on the value of our assets or on our operating results than if we owned a more geographically diverse portfolio.
Additionally, acts of violence, including terrorist attacks in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area could directly or indirectly damage our assets, both physically and financially, or cause losses that materially exceed our insurance coverage. Properties that are occupied by federal government tenants may be more likely to be the target of a future attack. Moreover, the same risks that apply to the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area as a whole also apply to the individual submarkets where our assets are located. National Landing makes up more than half of our portfolio based on square footage at our share. Portions of our markets, including National Landing, have underperformed other markets in the region with respect to rent growth and occupancy. Any adverse economic or other conditions in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area and our submarkets, especially National Landing, or any decrease in demand for multifamily, office or retail assets could have a material adverse effect on us.
Our assets and the property development market in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area are dependent on an economy that is heavily reliant on federal government spending and use of office assets, and any actual or anticipated curtailment of such spending could have a material adverse effect on us.
Any curtailment of federal government spending, whether due to a change of presidential administration or control of Congress, federal government sequestrations, furloughs or shutdowns, a slowdown of the U.S. and/or global economy, any change in federal government agencies work-from-home policies or uses of office space or other factors, could have an adverse impact on real estate values and property development in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area, on demand and willingness to enter into long-term contracts for office space by the federal government and companies dependent upon the federal government, as well as on occupancy rates and annualized rents of multifamily and retail assets by occupants or patrons whose employment is by or related to the federal government. For instance, certain of our GSA tenants reduced their leased square footage. Any such curtailments in federal spending or changes in federal leasing policy could occur in the future, which could have a material adverse effect on us.
We have significant exposure to Amazon and the National Landing submarket.
The impact of Amazon's headquarters in National Landing is difficult to forecast and quantify and may differ from what we, financial or industry analysts or investors anticipate and have anticipated since Amazon’s November 2018 announcement that it had selected sites in National Landing as the location of its new headquarters. We have significant exposure to Amazon, both as a result of their status as a tenant and as a result of fees we expect to continue to receive from them as developer, property manager, and retail leasing agent for the company’s new headquarters at National Landing. As of December 31, 2023, we have leases with Amazon across five office buildings in National Landing totaling approximately 927,000 square feet with annualized rent totaling $41.6 million, of which 191,000 square feet are month-to-month and 378,000 square feet expire in 2024. Of the month-to-month leases and leases expiring in 2024, 444,000 square feet represent the entirety of 1800 South Bell Street and 2100 Crystal Drive. 1800 South Bell Street was taken out of service in the first quarter of 2024, and we plan to take 2100 Crystal Drive out of service when Amazon vacates in the second quarter of 2024. If Amazon invests less than the announced amounts in National Landing or makes such investment over a longer period than anticipated, if its business prospects decline, if it reduces the size of its workforce in National Landing below initially anticipated levels or further delays hiring or if it leases, releases or develops less square footage than anticipated, our ability to achieve the benefits associated with Amazon's headquarters location in National Landing could be adversely affected. If we, Virginia Tech, Amazon, federal, state and local governments do not make the anticipated investments, including infrastructure investments, that would directly benefit National Landing, we could be adversely affected. Furthermore, Amazon's headquarters may not have the anticipated collateral financial effect on the National Landing submarket. If we do not achieve the perceived benefits of such location as rapidly or to the extent anticipated by us, financial or industry analysts or investors, we and potentially the market price of our common shares could be adversely affected. If we are unable to re-lease that space at attractive rents, it could have a material adverse effect on us and the market price of our common shares. Additionally, if the Virginia Tech Innovation Campus reduces its contemplated size, further delays its opening, or does not have the anticipated collateral financial effect, or if any of our other key demand drivers in National Landing fail to materialize, it could have a material adverse effect on us.
We derive a significant portion of our revenue from U.S. federal government tenants, and we may face additional risks and costs associated with directly managing assets occupied by government tenants.
For the year ended December 31, 2023, 23.0% of the rental revenue from our commercial segment was generated by rentals to federal government tenants, and federal government tenants historically have been a significant source of new leasing for us. For the year ended December 31, 2023, GSA was our largest single tenant, with 37 leases comprising 22.7% of total annualized rent at our share. The occurrence of events that have a negative impact on the demand for federal government office space, such as a decrease in federal government payrolls or a change in policy that prevents governmental tenants from renting our office space, would have a much larger adverse effect on our revenue than a corresponding occurrence affecting other categories of tenants. Additionally, a federal government shutdown could delay or prevent us from collecting rent payments from our federal government tenants. If demand for federal government office space were to decline, it would be more difficult for us to lease our buildings and could reduce overall market demand and corresponding rental rates, all of which could have a material adverse effect on us. For example, we have been notified by various GSA tenants that they are vacating their space totaling approximately 293,000 square feet in 2024. Lease agreements with these federal government agencies contain provisions required by federal law, which require, among other things, that the lessor of the property agree to comply with certain rules and regulations, including rules and regulations related to audits and records and subcontractor cost or pricing data. In addition, there are additional requirements relating to the potential application of equal opportunity provisions and related requirements to prepare written affirmative action plans applicable to government contractors and subcontractors. Some of the factors used to determine whether these requirements apply to a company that is affiliated with the actual government contractor (the legal entity that is the lessor under a lease with a federal government agency) include whether such company and the government contractor are under common ownership, have common management, and are under common control. We own the entity that is the government contractor and the property manager, increasing the risk that requirements of the Employment Standards Administration's Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs and requirements to prepare affirmative action plans pursuant to the applicable executive order may be determined to be applicable to us. Compliance with these regulations is costly and any increase in regulation could increase our costs, which could have a material adverse effect on us.
We are exposed to risks associated with real estate development and redevelopment, such as unanticipated expenses, delays and other contingencies, any of which could have a material adverse effect on us.
Real estate development and redevelopment activities are a critical element of our business strategy, and we expect to engage in such activities with respect to several of our properties and with properties that we may acquire in the future. To the extent that we do so, we will continue to be subject to risks, including, without limitation:
- construction or redevelopment costs of a project may exceed original estimates, possibly making the project less profitable than originally estimated, or unprofitable;
- inflation could increase the costs of construction and development projects, which could decrease the yield on such projects, delaying their commencement or resulting in fewer such pursuits. In 2023, these conditions made new development starts infeasible;
- time required to complete the construction or redevelopment of a project or to lease-up the completed project may be greater than originally anticipated, thereby adversely affecting our cash flow and liquidity;
- contractor, subcontractor and supplier disputes, strikes, labor disputes or shortages, weather conditions or supply disruptions (including those related to the supply chain);
- failure to achieve expected occupancy and/or rent levels within the projected time frame, if at all;
- delays with respect to obtaining, or the inability to obtain, necessary zoning, occupancy, land use and other governmental permits, and changes in zoning and land use laws;
- occupancy rates and rents of a completed project may not be sufficient to make the project profitable;
- incurrence of design, permitting and other development costs for opportunities that we ultimately abandon;
- the ability of prospective real estate venture partners or buyers of our properties to obtain financing; and
- the availability and pricing of financing to fund our development activities on favorable terms or at all.
These risks could result in substantial unanticipated delays or expenses and, under certain circumstances, could prevent the initiation or the completion of development or redevelopment activities, any of which could have a material adverse effect on us.
Partnership or real estate venture investments could be adversely affected by our lack of sole decision-making authority, our reliance on partners' or co-venturers' financial condition and disputes between us and our partners or co-venturers, which could have a material adverse effect on us.
As of December 31, 2023, 7.2% of our assets measured by total square feet at our share was held through real estate ventures, and we expect to co-invest in the future with other third parties through partnerships, real estate ventures or other entities, acquiring noncontrolling interests in or sharing responsibility for managing the affairs of a property, partnership, real estate venture or other entity. In particular, we may use real estate ventures as a significant source of equity capital to fund our development strategy. Consequently, with respect to any such third-party arrangement, we would not be in a position to exercise sole decision-making authority regarding the property, partnership, real estate venture or other entity, or structure of ownership and may, under certain circumstances, be exposed to risks not present were a third party not involved, including the possibility that partners or co-venturers might become bankrupt or fail to fund their share of required capital contributions, and we may be forced to make contributions to maintain the value of the property. Partners or co-venturers may have economic or other business interests or goals that are inconsistent or in direct conflict with our business interests or goals and may be in a position to take action or withhold consent contrary to our policies or objectives. These investments may also have the potential risk of impasses on decisions, such as a sale, because neither we nor the partner or co-venturer would have full control over the partnership or real estate venture. We and our respective partners or co-venturers may each have the right to trigger a buy-sell right or forced sale arrangement, which could cause us to sell our interest, or acquire our partners' or co-venturers' interest, or to sell the underlying asset, either on unfavorable terms or at a time when we otherwise would not have initiated such a transaction. In addition, a sale or transfer by us to a third party of our interests in the partnership or real estate venture may be subject to consent rights or rights of first refusal in favor of our partners or co-venturers, which would in each case restrict our ability to dispose of our interest in the partnership or real estate venture. Where we are a limited partner or non-managing member in any partnership or limited liability company, if the entity takes or expects to take actions that could jeopardize our status as a REIT or require us to pay tax, we may be forced to dispose of our interest in that entity, including by contributing our interest to a subsidiary of ours that is subject to corporate level income tax. Disputes between us and partners or co-venturers may result in litigation or arbitration that would increase our expenses and prevent our officers and/or trustees from focusing their time and effort on our business. In addition, we may in certain circumstances be liable for the actions of our third-party partners or co-venturers. Our real estate ventures may be subject to debt, and the refinancing of such debt may require equity capital calls. Furthermore, any cash distributions from real estate ventures will be subject to the operating agreements of the real estate ventures, which may limit distributions, the timing of distributions or specify certain preferential distributions among the respective parties. The occurrence of any of the risks described above could have a material adverse effect on us.
We depend on major tenants in our commercial portfolio, and the bankruptcy, insolvency or inability to pay rent of any of these tenants could have a material adverse effect on us.
As of December 31, 2023, the 20 largest office and retail tenants in our Operating Portfolio represented 61.7% of our share of total annualized office and retail rent. In many cases, through tenant improvement allowances and other concessions, we have made substantial upfront investments in leases with our major tenants that we may not recover if they fail to pay rent through the end of the lease term. The inability or failure of a major tenant to pay rent, or the bankruptcy or insolvency of a major tenant, may adversely affect the income produced by our Operating Portfolio. Additionally, we may experience delays in enforcing our rights as landlord due to federal, state and local laws and regulations and may incur substantial costs in protecting our investment. Any such event could have a material adverse effect on us.
We derive a significant portion of our revenue from five of our assets.
As of December 31, 2023, five of our assets in the aggregate generated 26.1% of our share of annualized rent. The occurrence of events that have a negative impact on one or more of these assets, such as a natural disaster that damages one or more of these assets, would have a much larger adverse effect on our revenue than a corresponding occurrence affecting a less significant property. A substantial decline in the revenue generated by one or more of these assets could have a material adverse effect on us.
Our Placemaking depends in significant part on a retail component, which frequently involves retail assets embedded in or adjacent to our multifamily assets and/or commercial assets, making us subject to risks that affect the retail environment generally, such as competition from discount and online retailers, weakness in the economy, fluctuations in foot traffic, pandemics, a decline in consumer spending and the financial condition of major retail tenants, any of which could adversely affect market rents for retail space and the willingness or ability of retailers to lease space in our retail assets.
If our retail assets lose tenants, whether to the proliferation of online businesses and discount retailers, a decline in general economic conditions and consumer spending or otherwise, it could have a material adverse effect on us. If we fail to reinvest in and redevelop our assets to maintain their attractiveness to retailers and shoppers, then retailers or shoppers may perceive that shopping at other venues or online is more convenient, cost-effective or otherwise more attractive, which could negatively affect our ability to rent retail space at our assets. In addition, some of our assets depend on anchor or major retail tenants and/or occupancy in surrounding offices to attract shoppers and could be adversely affected by the loss of, or a store closure by, one or more of these tenants or changes to in-office policies of surrounding businesses. Any of the foregoing factors could adversely affect the financial condition of our retail tenants, the willingness of retailers to lease space from us, and the success of our Placemaking, which could have a material adverse effect on us.
The loss of one or more members of our senior management team could adversely affect our ability to manage our business and to implement our growth strategies or could create a negative perception in the capital markets.
Our success and our ability to implement and manage anticipated future growth depend, in large part, upon the efforts of our senior management team. Members of our senior management team have national or regional industry reputations that attract business and investment opportunities and assist us in negotiations with lenders, existing and potential tenants and other industry participants. The loss of services of one or more members of our senior management team, or our inability to attract and retain similarly qualified personnel, could adversely affect our business, diminish our investment opportunities and weaken our relationships with lenders, business partners, existing and prospective tenants and industry participants, which could have a material adverse effect on us.
The actual density of our development pipeline and/or any development parcel may not be consistent with our estimated potential development density.
As of December 31, 2023, we estimate that our 17 assets in the development pipeline will total 10.8 million square feet (8.8 million square feet at our share) of estimated potential development density. The potential development density estimates for our development pipeline and/or any particular development parcel are based solely on our estimates, using data available to us, and our business plans as of December 31, 2023. The actual density of our development pipeline and/or any development parcel may differ substantially from our estimates based on numerous factors, including our inability to obtain necessary zoning, land use and other required entitlements, legal challenges to our plans by activists and others, as well as building, occupancy and other required governmental permits and authorizations, and changes in the entitlement, permitting and authorization processes that restrict or delay our ability to develop, redevelop or use our development pipeline at anticipated density levels. We can provide no assurance that the actual density of our development pipeline and/or any development parcel will be consistent with our estimated potential development density.
The occurrence of cyber incidents, or a deficiency in our cybersecurity, or the cybersecurity of our service providers, could negatively impact our business by causing a disruption to our operations, a compromise or corruption of our confidential information, regulatory enforcement and other legal proceedings, and/or damage to our business relationships, all of which could negatively impact our financial results.
A cyber incident is any intentional or unintentional adverse event that threatens the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of our information resources and can include unauthorized persons gaining access to systems to disrupt operations, corrupting data or stealing confidential information. The risk of a cyber incident or disruption, including by computer hackers, foreign governments and cyber terrorists, has generally increased as the number, intensity and sophistication of attempted attacks have increased globally. As our reliance on technology increases, so do the risks posed to our systems – both internal and external. Our primary risks that could directly result from the occurrence of a cyber incident are theft of assets; operational interruption; reputational damage; stolen funds; regulatory enforcement, lawsuits and other legal proceedings; damage to our relationships with our tenants; and private data exposure. A significant and extended disruption could damage our business or reputation, cause a loss of revenue, have an adverse effect on tenant relations, cause an unintended or unauthorized public disclosure, or lead to the misappropriation of proprietary, personally identifying, and confidential information, any of which could result in us incurring significant expenses to resolve these kinds of issues. Although we have implemented processes, procedures and controls to help mitigate the risks associated with a cyber incident, there can be no assurance that these measures will be sufficient for all possible situations. Even security measures that are appropriate, reasonable and/or in accordance with applicable legal requirements may not be sufficient to protect the information we maintain. Unauthorized parties, whether within or outside our company, may disrupt or gain access to our systems, or those of third parties with whom we do business, through human error, misfeasance, fraud, trickery, or other forms of deceit, including break-ins, use of stolen credentials, social engineering, phishing, computer viruses or other malicious codes, and similar means of unauthorized and destructive tampering. A successful attack on one of our service providers could result in a compromise of our own network, theft of our data, legal obligations or liabilities, deployment of ransomware or a disruption in our supply chain or of services upon which we rely. Even the most well protected information, networks, systems and facilities remain potentially vulnerable because the techniques used in such attempted cyber incidents evolve and generally are not recognized until they have been launched against a number of targets. Accordingly, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate security barriers or other preventative measures, making it impossible for us to entirely mitigate this risk. If any of the foregoing risks materialize, it could have a material adverse effect on us.
Pandemics and other health concerns, including COVID-19, could have a negative effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.
Pandemics, including COVID-19, as well as both future widespread and localized outbreaks of infectious diseases and other health concerns, and the measures taken to prevent the spread or lessen the impact, could cause a material disruption to multifamily and office industry or the economy as a whole. The impacts of such events could be severe and far-reaching, and may impact our operations in several ways. Additionally, pandemic outbreaks could lead governments and other authorities around the world, including federal, state and local authorities in the United States, to impose new or heightened measures intended to mitigate its spread, including restrictions on freedom of movement and business operations such as issuing guidelines, travel bans, border closings, business closures, quarantine orders, and orders not allowing the collection of rents, rent increases, or eviction of non-paying tenants. In the event of a decline in business activity and demand for real estate transactions, our ability or desire to grow or diversify our portfolio could be affected. Additionally, local and national authorities could extend or re-implement certain measures imposing restrictions on our ability to enforce contractual rental obligations upon our residents and tenants. Unanticipated costs and operating expenses coupled with decreased anticipated and actual revenue as a result of compliance with regulations, could negatively impact our business, results of operations, cash flow, and overall financial condition and/or our ability to satisfy certain REIT-related requirements.
The full extent of the impact of a pandemic on our business is largely uncertain and dependent on a number of factors beyond our control, and we are not able to estimate with any degree of certainty the effect a pandemic, or measures intended to curb its spread, could have on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. Moreover, many of the other risk factors described herein could be more likely to impact us as a result of a pandemic or measures intended to curb its spread.
Increased focus on our ESG business values may constrain our business operations, impose additional costs and expose us to new risks that could have a material adverse effect on us.
Our business values integrate environmental sustainability, social responsibility, D&I and strong governance practices throughout our organization—these types of ESG matters have become increasingly important to investors and other stakeholders. Some investors may use these factors to determine their investment strategies, while current and potential employees and business partners may consider these factors when considering relationships with us. Certain organizations that provide corporate risk and corporate governance advisory services to investors have developed scores and ratings to evaluate companies based upon ESG metrics, and investors may consider a company's score as a factor in making an investment decision. There can be no assurance that our focus on our ESG business values will be well regarded by investors, particularly since the criteria by which companies are rated for their ESG efforts may change. Additionally, focus and activism related to ESG matters may constrain our business operations or increase expenses, and we may face reputational damage if our corporate responsibility initiatives do not meet the standards set by various constituencies, including those of third-party providers of corporate responsibility ratings and reports. A low ESG score could result in a negative perception of us, exclusion of our securities from consideration by certain investors and/or cause investors to reallocate their capital away from us, each of which could have an adverse impact on the price of our securities.
As we continue to integrate environmental sustainability, social responsibility, D&I and strong governance practices throughout our organization, we could also be criticized by ESG detractors for the scope or nature of our ESG initiatives or goals. We could also encounter negative reactions from governmental actors (such as anti-ESG legislation or retaliatory legislative treatment), tenants and residents, that that could have a material adverse effect on us.
We face risks related to the real estate industry.
As a REIT we are subject to significant risks related to the real estate industry, any of which could have a material adverse effect on us. These include, among other things:
- The value of real estate fluctuates depending on conditions in the general economy and the real estate business. Additionally, adverse changes in these conditions may result in a decline in rental revenue, sales proceeds and occupancy levels at our assets and adversely impact our revenue and cash flows. If rental revenue, sales proceeds and/or occupancy levels decline, we generally would expect to have less cash available to pay indebtedness and for distribution to shareholders. In addition, some of our major expenses, including mortgage loan payments, real estate taxes and maintenance costs generally do not decline when the related rents decline.
- The cost and availability of credit may be adversely affected by illiquid credit markets and wider credit spreads, and our inability or the inability of our tenants to timely refinance maturing liabilities to meet liquidity needs may materially affect our financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, mortgage loan obligations expose us to risk of foreclosure and the loss of properties subject to such obligations.
- It may be difficult to buy and sell real estate quickly, or we or potential buyers of our assets may experience difficulty in obtaining financing, which may limit our ability to vary our portfolio promptly in response to changes in economic or other conditions. Additionally, we may be unable to identify, negotiate, finance or consummate acquisitions of properties, or acquire properties on favorable terms, or at all.
- The composition of our portfolio by asset type is likely to continue to change over time, which could expose us to different asset class risks than if our portfolio composition remained static, and we may be adversely affected by trends in the asset classes we currently own.
- We may not be able to control the operating expenses associated with our properties, which include real estate taxes, insurance, loan payments, maintenance, and costs of compliance with governmental regulation, or our operating expenses may remain constant or increase, even if our revenue does not increase, which could have a material adverse effect on us.
- Macroeconomic trends, including increases in inflation and interest rates, could have a material adverse effect on us, as well as our tenants, which may adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
- We may be unable to renew leases, lease vacant space or re-let space as leases expire, or do so on favorable terms, which could have a material adverse effect on us. As of December 31, 2023, leases representing 25.7% of our share of the office and retail square footage in our Operating Portfolio were scheduled to expire in 2024 or have month-to-month terms, 6.8% were scheduled to expire in 2025, and 14.4% of our share of the square footage of the assets in our commercial portfolio was unoccupied and not generating rent. We may find it necessary to make rent or other concessions and/or significant capital expenditures to improve our assets to retain and attract tenants.
- We may be unable to maintain or increase our occupancy and revenue at certain multifamily, commercial and other assets due to an increase in supply, more favorable terms offered by competitors, and/or deterioration in our markets.
- Increased affordability of residential homes and other competition for tenants of our multifamily properties could affect our ability to retain current residents of our multifamily properties, attract new ones or increase or maintain rents, which could adversely affect our results of operations and our financial condition.
- We may from time to time be subject to litigation, which may significantly divert the attention of our officers and/or trustees and result in defense costs, settlements, fines or judgments against us, some of which are not, or cannot be, covered by insurance, any of which could have a material adverse effect on us. For example, we are currently a defendant in an antitrust lawsuit, brought by the Washington, D.C. Attorney General, involving RealPage, which is one of our vendors, alleging that RealPage and lessors of multifamily residential real estate conspired, principally in connection with the alleged use of RealPage revenue management systems, to artificially inflate the rental rates for multifamily residential real estate above competitive levels.
- We own leasehold interests in certain land on which some of our assets are located. If we default under the terms
of any of these ground leases, we may be liable for damages and could lose our leasehold interest in the property or our option to purchase the underlying fee interest in such asset. In addition, unless we purchase the underlying fee interests in the land on which a particular property is located, we will lose our right to operate the property or we will continue to operate it at much lower profitability, which would significantly adversely affect our results of operations. In addition, if we are perceived to have breached the terms of a ground lease, the fee owner may initiate proceedings to terminate the lease.
- Our assets may be subject to impairment losses, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
- Climate change, including rising sea levels, flooding, prolonged periods of extreme temperature or other extreme weather, and changes in precipitation and temperature, may result in physical damage to, or a total loss of, our assets located in areas affected by these conditions, including those in low-lying areas close to sea level, such as National Landing, and/or decreases in demand, rent from, or the value of those assets. In addition, we may incur material costs to protect these assets, including increases in our insurance premiums as a result of the threat of climate change, or the effects of climate change may not be covered by our insurance policies. Furthermore, changes in federal and state legislation and regulations on climate change could result in increased utility expenses and/or increased capital expenditures to improve the energy efficiency and reduce carbon emissions of our properties in order to comply with such regulations or result in fines for non-compliance. Any of the foregoing could have a material and adverse effect on us.
We may incur significant costs to comply with environmental laws, and environmental contamination may impair our ability to lease and/or sell real estate.
Our operations and assets are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations concerning the protection of the environment including air and water quality, hazardous or toxic substances and health and safety. Under some environmental laws, a current or previous owner or operator of real estate may be required to investigate and clean up hazardous or toxic substances released at a property. The owner or operator may also be held liable to a governmental entity or to third parties for property damage or personal injuries and for investigation and clean-up costs incurred by those parties because of the contamination. These laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of the release of the substances or caused such release. The presence of contamination or the failure to remediate contamination may (i) expose us to third-party liability (e.g., for cleanup costs, natural resource damages, bodily injury or property damage), (ii) subject our properties to liens in favor of the government for damages and costs the government incurs in connection with the contamination, (iii) result in restrictions on the manner in which a property may be used or businesses may be operated, or (iv) impair our ability to sell or lease real estate or to borrow using the real estate as collateral. To the extent we send contaminated materials to other locations for treatment or disposal, we may be liable for cleanup of those sites if they become contaminated. Other laws and regulations govern indoor and outdoor air quality including those that can require the abatement or removal of asbestos-containing materials in the event of damage, demolition, renovation or remodeling, and also govern emissions of and exposure to asbestos fibers in the air. The maintenance and removal of lead paint and certain electrical equipment containing polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) are also regulated by federal and state laws. We are also subject to risks associated with human exposure to chemical or biological contaminants such as molds, pollens, viruses and bacteria which, above certain levels, can be alleged to be connected to allergic or other health effects and symptoms in susceptible individuals. Our predecessor companies may be subject to similar liabilities for activities of those companies in the past. We could incur fines for environmental noncompliance and be held liable for the costs of remedial action with respect to the foregoing regulated substances or related claims arising out of environmental contamination or human exposure at or from our assets. Most of our assets have been subjected to varying degrees of environmental assessment at various times. To date, these environmental assessments have not revealed any environmental condition material to our business. However, identification of new compliance concerns or undiscovered areas of contamination, changes in the extent or known scope of contamination, human exposure to contamination or changes in cleanup or compliance requirements could result in significant costs to us. In addition, we may become subject to costs or taxes, or increases therein, associated with natural resource or energy usage (such as a "carbon tax"). These costs or taxes could increase our operating costs and decrease the cash available to pay our obligations or distribute to equity holders.
Increasingly competitive labor markets and our need to provide additional incentives to remain competitive in our hiring and retention efforts may hurt our ability to effectively operate our business and have a negative effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition.
Our success depends on our ability to continue to attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel, but we may not be able to do so on acceptable terms or at all. Recently, the U.S. job market has experienced labor shortages, resulting in intense competition for retaining and hiring skilled employees. Additionally, the competitive labor conditions have significantly increased compensation expectations for our existing and prospective personnel. If we are unable to hire and retain qualified personnel as required for our operations, our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition could be adversely affected.
Risks Related to the Capital Markets and Related Activities
We face risks related to our common shares.
These risks include, among other things, the risk that an economic downturn or a deterioration in the capital markets may materially affect the value of our equity securities; the absence of any guarantee or certainty regarding the timing, amount, or payment of future dividends on our common shares; the risk of dilution of ownership in our company due to certain actions taken by us; the risk that future offerings of debt or preferred equity securities, which would be senior to our common shares upon liquidation, and in the case of preferred equity securities may be senior to our common shares for purposes of dividend distributions or upon liquidation, may adversely affect the per share trading price of our common shares; and the risk that the announcement of a material acquisition may result in a rapid and significant decline in the price of our common shares. If any of the foregoing risks materialize, it could have a material adverse effect on us.
We have a substantial amount of indebtedness, and our debt agreements include restrictive covenants and other requirements, which may limit our financial and operating activities, our future acquisition and development activities, or otherwise affect our financial condition.
As of December 31, 2023, we had $2.6 billion aggregate principal amount of consolidated debt outstanding, and our unconsolidated real estate ventures had $235.0 million aggregate principal amount of debt outstanding ($68.0 million at our share), resulting in a total of $2.6 billion aggregate principal amount of debt outstanding at our share. A portion of our outstanding debt is guaranteed by JBG SMITH LP. Our cash flow from operations may be insufficient to meet our required debt service and payments of principal and interest on borrowings may leave us with insufficient cash resources to operate our assets or to pay the dividends currently contemplated. Additionally, our debt agreements include customary restrictive covenants, that, among other things, restrict our ability to incur additional indebtedness, to engage in material asset sales, mergers, consolidations and acquisitions, and to make capital expenditures, and some of our debt agreements also include requirements to maintain financial ratios. Our ability to borrow is subject to compliance with these and other covenants, and failure to comply with our covenants could cause a default under the applicable debt instrument, and we may then be required to repay such debt with capital from other sources or give possession of a property to the lender. Any of the foregoing could affect our ability to obtain additional funds as needed, or on favorable terms, which could, among other things, adversely affect our ability to meet operational needs or to finance our future acquisition and development activities.
We may not be able to obtain capital to make investments.
We are primarily dependent on external capital to fund the expected growth of our business. Our access to debt or equity capital depends on the willingness of third parties to lend or make equity investments and on conditions in the capital markets generally. There can be no assurance that new capital will be available or available on acceptable terms.
Our future development plans are capital intensive. To complete these plans, we anticipate funding construction and development through asset sales, real estate ventures with third parties, recapitalizations of assets, and public or private securities offerings, or a combination thereof. Similarly, these plans require a significant amount of debt financing which subjects us to additional risks, such as rising interest rates. For information about our available sources of funds, see "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Liquidity and Capital Resources" and the notes to the consolidated financial statements included herein.
We are subject to interest rate risk, which could increase our interest expense, increase the cost to refinance and increase the cost of issuing new debt.
As of December 31, 2023, $670.6 million of our outstanding consolidated debt was subject to instruments that bear interest at variable rates, and we may continue to incur indebtedness that bears interest at variable interest rates. While some of this debt is protected against interest rate increases above specified rates via interest rate cap agreements, the remainder does not benefit from such arrangements. Further, we may borrow money at variable interest rates in the future without the benefit of associated hedges and caps. With respect to these unhedged amounts, increases in interest rates would increase our interest expense under these instruments, increase the cost of refinancing these instruments or issuing new debt, and adversely affect our cash flow and our ability to service our indebtedness and make distributions to our shareholders, which could, in turn, adversely affect the market price of our common shares. We may enter into hedging transactions to protect ourselves from the effects of interest rate fluctuations on floating rate debt. As of December 31, 2023, our hedging transactions included interest rate cap agreements, which covered $466.1 million of our outstanding consolidated debt, a significant portion of which is with one counterparty, which also exposes us to counterparty risk. Interest rate hedging can be expensive, particularly during periods of rising and volatile interest rates, which could reduce the overall returns on our investments. Moreover, there can be no assurance that our hedging arrangements will qualify as highly effective hedges under applicable accounting standards. Furthermore, should we desire to terminate a hedging agreement, there could be significant costs and cash requirements. Additionally, we are required to maintain interest rate cap agreements under certain of our variable rate debt agreements. Renewing, extending or entering into new interest rate cap agreements in a rising and volatile interest rate environment may cause us to incur significant upfront costs. Finally, the REIT provisions of the Code impose certain restrictions on our ability to use hedges, swaps and other types of derivatives to hedge our liabilities. Any of the foregoing could increase our interest expense, increase the cost to refinance and increase the cost of issuing new debt.
Risks and Conflicts of Interest Related to Our Organization and Structure
Tax consequences to holders of OP Units upon a sale of certain of our assets may cause the interests of our senior management to differ from your own.
Some holders of OP Units, including some members of our senior management, may suffer different and more adverse tax consequences than holders of our common shares upon the sale of certain of the assets owned by JBG SMITH LP, and therefore these holders may have different objectives regarding the material terms of any sale or refinancing of certain assets, or whether to sell such assets at all.
Certain of our trustees and executive officers may have actual or potential conflicts of interest, including because of their previous or continuing equity interest in, or positions at JBG, including trustees and members of our senior management, who have an ownership interest in the JBG Legacy Funds and own carried interests in certain JBG Legacy Funds and in certain of our real estate ventures that entitle them to receive additional compensation if certain funds or real estate ventures achieve certain return thresholds.
Some of our trustees and executive officers are persons who were employees of JBG, and they own equity interests in certain JBG Legacy Funds and related entities. Ownership of interests in the JBG Legacy Funds and current or past service as a managing member, at JBG, could create, or appear to create, potential conflicts of interest. Certain of the JBG Legacy Funds own the JBG Excluded Assets, which JBG Legacy Funds are owned in part by members of our senior management and certain trustees. In addition, although the asset management and property management fees associated with the JBG Excluded Assets were assigned to us upon completion of the Formation Transaction, the general partner and managing member interests in the JBG Legacy Funds held by former JBG executives (who became members of our management team) and certain trustees were not transferred to us and remain under the control of these individuals. Our management's time and efforts may be diverted from the management of our assets to management of the JBG Legacy Funds, which could adversely affect the execution of our business plan and our results of operations and cash flow.
Members of our senior management and certain trustees have an ownership interest in the JBG Legacy Funds and own carried interests in each fund and in certain of our real estate ventures that entitle them to receive additional compensation if the fund or real estate venture achieves certain return thresholds. Additionally, in the future, we may elect to assign to certain employees a percentage of third-party fees, carried interests or other equity interests in certain assets, joint ventures or other real estate ventures. As a result, such employees could be incentivized to spend time and effort maximizing the cash flow from the assets being retained by the JBG Legacy Funds or other relevant real estate ventures in which they have an ownership or other interest, including through sales of assets, which may, for example, accelerate payments of the carried interest but would reduce the asset management and other fees that would otherwise be payable to us with respect to the JBG Excluded Assets. These actions could adversely impact our results of operations and cash flow. Other potential conflicts of interest may arise with the JBG Legacy Funds or other relevant real estate ventures if we engage in direct transactions or compete for tenants. For example, we have entered, and in the future may enter into transactions with the JBG Legacy Funds, such as purchasing assets from them. Any such transaction creates a conflict of interest as a result of our management team's interests on both sides of the transaction, because we manage the JBG Legacy Funds and because members of our management and Board of Trustees own interests in the general partner or other managing entities of the funds. Any of the above-described conflicts of interest could have a material adverse effect on us.
We may acquire properties or portfolios of properties through tax deferred contribution transactions, which could result in shareholder dilution and limit our ability to sell or refinance such assets.
In the future, we may acquire properties or portfolios of properties through tax deferred contribution transactions in exchange for partnership interests in JBG SMITH LP, which may result in shareholder dilution through the issuance of OP Units that may be exchanged for common shares. This acquisition structure may have the effect of, among other things, reducing the amount of tax depreciation we could deduct (as compared to a transaction where we do not inherit the contributor's tax basis but acquire tax basis equal to the value of the consideration exchanged for the property) until the OP Units issued in such transactions are redeemed for cash or converted into common shares. While no such protection arrangements existed as of December 31, 2023, in the future we may agree to protect the contributors' ability to defer recognition of taxable gain through restrictions on our ability to dispose of, or refinance the debt on, the acquired properties for specified periods of time. Similarly, we may be required to incur or maintain debt we would otherwise not incur or maintain so that we can allocate the debt to the contributors to maintain their tax bases. These restrictions could limit our ability to sell an asset at a time, or on terms that would be favorable absent such restrictions.
Our declaration of trust and bylaws, the partnership agreement of JBG SMITH LP and MGCL, and the Code contain provisions that may delay, defer or prevent a change of control transaction that might involve a premium price for our common shares or that our shareholders otherwise believe to be in their best interest.
Our declaration of trust contains ownership limits with respect to our shares. Generally, to maintain our qualification as a REIT under the Code, not more than 50% in value of our outstanding shares of beneficial interest may be owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer "individuals" (including some types of entities) at any time during the last half of our taxable year. To address this requirement and other tax considerations, our declaration of trust prohibits, among other things, the actual, beneficial or constructive ownership by any person of more than 7.5% in value or number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of the outstanding shares of any class or series, including our common shares. For these purposes, our declaration of trust includes a "group" as that term is used for purposes of Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act in the definition of "person." Our Board of Trustees may exempt a person, prospectively or retroactively, from these ownership limits if certain conditions are satisfied, but is not required to grant any exemption. Our Board of Trustees may determine not to grant an exemption even if no adverse tax or REIT qualification consequences would be caused by ownership in excess of the 7.5% ownership limit.
This ownership limit and the other restrictions on ownership and transfer of our shares contained in our declaration of trust may: (i) discourage a tender offer or other transactions or a change in management or of control that might involve a premium price for our common shares or that our shareholders might otherwise believe to be in their best interest; or (ii) result in the transfer of shares acquired in excess of the restrictions to a trust for the benefit of a charitable beneficiary and, as a result, the forfeiture by the acquirer of the benefits of owning the additional shares.
Additionally, our declaration of trust authorizes the Board of Trustees, without shareholder approval, to establish a class or series of common or preferred shares whose terms could delay, deter or prevent a change in control or other transaction that might involve a premium price or otherwise be in the best interest of our shareholders. Our declaration of trust and bylaws contain other provisions that may delay, deter or prevent a change of control or other transaction that might involve a premium price or otherwise be in the best interest of our shareholders.
Provisions of MGCL could inhibit changes in control, which may discourage third parties from conducting a tender offer or seeking other change of control transactions that might involve a premium price for our common shares or that our shareholders might otherwise believe to be in their best interest. Provisions of the MGCL, may have the effect of inhibiting a third party from making a proposal to acquire us or of impeding a change of control under circumstances that otherwise could provide the holders of common shares with the opportunity to realize a premium over the then-prevailing market price of such shares, including:
- provisions that prohibit business combinations between us and an "interested shareholder," defined generally as any holder or affiliate of any holder who beneficially owns 10% or more of the voting power of our shares, for five years after the most recent date on which the shareholder becomes an interested shareholder, and thereafter impose fair price and/or supermajority shareholder voting requirements on these combinations; and
- provisions that provide that a shareholder's "control shares" acquired in a "control share acquisition," as defined in the MGCL, have no voting rights, except to the extent approved by our shareholders by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of all the votes entitled to be cast on the matter, excluding all interested shares.
As permitted by the MGCL, we have elected in our bylaws to opt out of the business combination and control share provisions of the MGCL. However, we cannot assure you that our Board of Trustees will not opt to be subject to such provisions of the MGCL in the future, including opting to be subject to such provisions retroactively.
The limited partnership agreement of JBG SMITH LP requires the approval of the limited partners with respect to certain extraordinary transactions involving JBG SMITH, which may reduce the likelihood of such transactions being consummated, even if they are in the best interests of, and have been approved by, our shareholders.
The limited partnership agreement of JBG SMITH LP provides that we may not engage in a merger, consolidation or other combination with or into another person, a sale of all or substantially all of our assets, or a reclassification, recapitalization or a change in outstanding shares (except for changes in par value, or from par value to no par value, or as a result of a subdivision or combination of our common shares), which we refer to collectively as an extraordinary transaction, unless specified criteria are met. In particular, with respect to any extraordinary transaction, if partners will receive consideration for their limited partnership units and if we seek the approval of our shareholders for the transaction (or if we would have been required to obtain shareholder approval of any such extraordinary transaction but for the fact that a tender offer shall have been accepted with respect to a sufficient number of our common shares to permit consummation of such extraordinary transaction without shareholder approval), then the limited partnership agreement prohibits us from engaging in the extraordinary transaction unless we also obtain "partnership approval." To obtain "partnership approval," we must obtain the consent of our limited partners (including us and any limited partners majority owned, directly or indirectly, by us) representing a percentage interest in JBG SMITH LP that is equal to or greater than the percentage of our outstanding common shares required (or that would have been required in the absence of a tender offer) to approve the extraordinary transaction, provided that we and any limited partners majority owned, directly or indirectly, by us will be deemed to have provided consent for our partnership units solely in proportion to the percentage of our common shares approving the extraordinary transaction (or, if there is no shareholder vote with respect to such extraordinary transaction because a tender offer shall have been accepted with respect to a sufficient number of our common shares to permit consummation of the extraordinary transaction without shareholder approval, the percentage of our common shares with respect to which such tender offer shall have been accepted). The limited partners of JBG SMITH LP may have interests in an extraordinary transaction that differ from those of common shareholders, and there can be no assurance that, if we are required to seek "partnership approval" for such a transaction, we will be able to obtain it. As a result, if a sufficient number of limited partners oppose such an extraordinary transaction, the limited partnership agreement may prohibit us from consummating it, even if it is in the best interests of, and has been approved by, our shareholders.
Substantially all our assets are owned by subsidiaries. We depend on dividends and distributions from these subsidiaries. The creditors of these subsidiaries are entitled to amounts payable to them by the subsidiaries before the subsidiaries may pay any dividends or other distributions to us.
Substantially all of our assets are held through JBG SMITH LP, which holds substantially all of its assets through wholly owned subsidiaries. JBG SMITH LP's cash flow is dependent on cash distributions to it by its subsidiaries, and in turn, substantially all of our cash flow is dependent on cash distributions to us by JBG SMITH LP. The creditors of each of our subsidiaries are entitled to payment of that subsidiary's obligations to them when due and payable before distributions may be made by that subsidiary to its equity holders. In addition, the operating agreements governing some of our subsidiaries which are parties to real estate joint ventures may have restrictions on distributions which could limit the ability of those subsidiaries to make distributions to JBG SMITH LP. Thus, JBG SMITH LP's ability to make distributions to holders of its units, including us, depends on its subsidiaries' ability first to satisfy their obligations to their creditors, and then to make distributions to holders of its units. Likewise, our ability to pay dividends depends on JBG SMITH LP's ability first to satisfy its obligations, if any, to its creditors and make distributions payable to holders of preferred units (if any), and then to make distributions to us. In addition, our participation in any distribution of the assets of any of our subsidiaries upon the liquidation, reorganization or insolvency of the subsidiary, occurs only after the claims of the creditors, including trade creditors, and preferred security holders, if any, of the applicable direct or indirect subsidiaries are satisfied.
Our rights and the rights of our shareholders to take action against our trustees and officers are limited.
As permitted by MGCL, under our declaration of trust, trustees and officers shall not be liable to us and our shareholders for money damages, except for liability resulting from actual receipt of an improper benefit or profit in money, property or services; or a final judgment based upon a finding of active and deliberate dishonesty by the trustee or officer that was material to the cause of action adjudicated. In addition, our declaration of trust and indemnification agreements require us to indemnify our trustees and officers (in some cases, without requiring a preliminary determination of the trustee's or officer's ultimate entitlement to indemnification) for actions taken by them in those and certain other capacities to the maximum extent permitted by MGCL. The Maryland REIT law permits a REIT to indemnify and advance expenses to its trustees, officers, employees and agents to the same extent as permitted by the MGCL for directors and officers of a Maryland corporation. Generally, MGCL permits a Maryland corporation to indemnify its present and former directors and officers except in instances where the person seeking indemnification acted in bad faith or with active and deliberate dishonesty, actually received an improper personal benefit in money, property or services or, in the case of a criminal proceeding, had reasonable cause to believe that his or her actions were unlawful. Under MGCL, a Maryland corporation also may not indemnify a director or officer in a suit by or in the right of the corporation in which the director or officer was adjudged liable to the corporation or for a judgment of liability on the basis that a personal benefit was improperly received. A court may order indemnification if it determines that the director or officer is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnification, even though the director or officer did not meet the prescribed standard of conduct; however, indemnification for an adverse judgment in a suit by us or in our right, or for a judgment of liability on the basis that personal benefit was improperly received, is limited to expenses. As a result, we and our shareholders may have more limited rights against our trustees and officers than might otherwise exist. Accordingly, if actions taken in good faith by any of our trustees or officers impede the performance of our company, our shareholder’s ability to recover damages from such trustee or officer will be limited.
Risks Related to Our Status as a REIT
We may fail to qualify or remain qualified as a REIT and may be required to pay income taxes at corporate rates.
Although we believe that we are organized and intend to operate to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we may fail to remain so qualified. Qualification and taxation as a REIT are governed by highly technical and complex provisions of the Code for which there are only limited judicial or administrative interpretations and depend on various facts and circumstances that are not entirely within our control. If, with respect to any taxable year, we fail to maintain our qualification as a REIT and do not qualify under the relevant statutory relief provisions, we would have to pay federal income tax on our taxable income at regular corporate rates, could not deduct our distributions in determining our taxable income subject to tax, and would possibly also be subject to certain taxes enacted by the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 that are applicable to non-REIT corporations, including the nondeductible 1% excise tax on certain stock repurchases. If we had to pay federal income tax, the amount of money available to distribute to shareholders and pay our indebtedness would be reduced for the year or years involved, and we would not be required to make distributions to shareholders in that taxable year and in future years until we again were able to qualify as a REIT. In addition, we would also be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which qualification was lost, unless we were entitled to relief under the relevant statutory provisions.
REIT distribution requirements could adversely affect our liquidity and our ability to execute our business plan or require us to make distributions of our shares or other securities.
For us to qualify to be taxed as a REIT, we generally must distribute to our shareholders each year at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding any net capital gains. We intend to distribute 100% of our REIT taxable income to our shareholders out of assets legally available therefor. From time to time, we may generate taxable income greater than our cash flow. If we do not have other funds available, we could be required to borrow funds on unfavorable terms, sell assets at disadvantageous prices, distribute amounts that would otherwise be invested in future acquisitions, capital expenditures or repayment of debt, or make taxable distributions of our shares to make distributions sufficient to enable us to pay out enough of our taxable income to satisfy the REIT distribution requirement and avoid corporate income tax and a 4% excise tax in a particular year. These alternatives could increase our costs or reduce our equity. Because amounts distributed will not be available to fund investment activities, compliance with the REIT requirements may hinder our ability to grow, which could adversely affect the value of our shares. Restrictions on our ability to incur additional indebtedness or make certain distributions could preclude us from meeting the 90% distribution requirement. Consequently, there can be no assurance that we will be able to make distributions at the anticipated distribution rate or any other rate.
The tax imposed on REITs engaging in "prohibited transactions" may limit our ability to engage in transactions that would be treated as sales for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
A REIT's net income from prohibited transactions is subject to a 100% penalty tax. In general, prohibited transactions are sales or other dispositions of property, other than foreclosure property, held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business. Although we and our subsidiary REITs believe that we have held, and intend to continue to hold, our properties for investment and do not intend to hold directly (rather than through taxable corporate subsidiaries) any properties that could be characterized as held for sale to customers in the ordinary course of our business, such characterization is a factual determination and no guarantee can be given that the IRS would agree with our characterization of our properties or that we will always be able to make use of the available statutory safe harbor. In the case of some of our properties held through partnerships with third parties, our ability to control the disposition of such properties in a manner that avoids the imposition of the prohibited transactions tax depends in part on the action of third parties over which we have no control or only limited influence.
To comply with the restrictions imposed on REITs, we may have to conduct certain activities and own certain assets through a TRS, which will be subject to normal corporate income tax, and we could be subject to a 100% penalty tax if our transactions with our TRSs are not conducted on arm's length terms.
A TRS is an entity taxed as a corporation in which a REIT directly or indirectly holds stock and which has elected with the REIT to be treated as a TRS of the REIT and which is taxable as a regular corporation, at regular corporate income tax rates. As a REIT, we cannot own certain assets or conduct certain activities directly, without risking failing the income or asset tests that apply to REITs. We can, however, hold these assets or undertake these activities through a TRS. For example, we generally cannot provide certain non-customary services to our tenants, and we cannot derive income from a third party that provides such services. If we forego providing such services to our tenants, we may be at a disadvantage to competitors who are not subject to the same restrictions. Accordingly, we provide such non-customary services to our tenants and share in the revenue from such services through our TRSs. As noted, the income earned through our TRSs will be subject to corporate income taxes. In addition, a 100% excise tax will be imposed on certain transactions between us and our TRSs that are not conducted on an arm's length basis.
Risks Related to the Formation Transaction
We could be required to indemnify Vornado for certain material tax obligations that could arise as addressed in the Tax Matters Agreement and certain obligations under the Separation and Distribution Agreement. Furthermore, Vornado agreed to indemnify us for certain pre-distribution liabilities and liabilities related to Vornado assets and there can be no assurance that these obligations will be sufficient to protect us. Additionally, there may be undisclosed liabilities of the Vornado and JBG assets contributed to us in the Formation Transaction that might expose us to potentially large, unanticipated costs.
Under the Tax Matters Agreement that we entered into with Vornado, we may be required to indemnify Vornado against any taxes and related amounts and costs if the distribution of JBG SMITH shares by Vornado, together with certain related transactions, is not tax-free and that treatment results from (i) actions or failures to act by us, or (ii) our breach of certain representations or undertakings. The Separation Agreement provides for indemnification obligations designed to make us financially responsible for substantially all liabilities that may exist relating to our business activities, whether incurred prior to or after the Formation Transaction, as well as those obligations of Vornado that we assumed pursuant to the Separation Agreement. If we are required to indemnify Vornado under the circumstances set forth in the Tax Matters Agreement or the Separation Agreement, we may be subject to substantial liabilities. Pursuant to the Separation Agreement, Vornado agreed to indemnify us for certain liabilities. However, third parties could seek to hold us responsible for any of the liabilities that Vornado agreed to retain, and there can be no assurance that Vornado will be able to fully satisfy its indemnification obligations. Moreover, even if we ultimately succeed in recovering from Vornado any amounts for which we are held liable, such indemnification may be insufficient to fully offset the financial impact of such liabilities and/or we may be temporarily required to bear these losses while seeking recovery from Vornado. Additionally, prior to entering into the MTA, the diligence reviews performed by each of Vornado and JBG with respect to the business and assets of the other were necessarily limited in nature and scope and may not have adequately uncovered all of the contingent or undisclosed liabilities that we assumed in connection with the Formation Transaction, many of which may not be covered by insurance. The MTA does not provide for indemnification for these types of liabilities by either party post-closing, and, therefore, we may not have any recourse with respect to such unexpected liabilities. Any such liabilities could cause us to experience losses, which may be significant, which could have a material adverse effect on us.
Unless Vornado and JBG SMITH were both REITs following the Separation, JBG SMITH could be required to recognize certain corporate-level gains for tax purposes as a result of the Separation.
We believe that each of Vornado and JBG SMITH operated in a manner so that each qualified as a REIT immediately after the Separation and at all times during the two years after the Separation. However, if either Vornado or JBG SMITH failed to qualify as a REIT following the Separation, then, for our taxable year that includes the Separation, the IRS may assert that JBG SMITH would have to recognize corporate-level gain on assets acquired in the Separation.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain statements contained herein constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. They represent our intentions, plans, expectations and beliefs and are subject to numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties. Our future results, financial condition and business may differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements. You can find many of these statements by looking for words such as "approximates," "believes," "expects," "anticipates," "estimates," "intends," "plans," "would," "may" or other similar expressions in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Investors are cautioned to interpret many of the risks identified under the section titled "Risk Factors" in this Annual Report on Form 10-K as being heightened as a result of the numerous adverse impacts of COVID-19.
In particular, information included under "Business," "Risk Factors," and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" contains forward-looking statements. Many of the factors that will determine the outcome of these and our other forward-looking statements are beyond our ability to control or predict. Such factors include:
- the economic health and public safety climate of the greater Washington Metro region and our geographic concentration therein, particularly our concentration in National Landing;
- decreases in demand for office space in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area, particularly with respect to our two largest tenants, Amazon and the federal government;
- the amount and timing of Amazon’s investments in National Landing and revenue we receive from them currently and may receive in the future;
- whether any or all of the other three demand drivers discussed above will fail to materialize;
- whether the plan to build a sports and entertainment anchor in National Landing will materialize at the planned scale, or at all;
- reductions in or actual or threatened changes to the timing of federal government spending;
- changes in general political, economic, public safety and competitive conditions and specific market conditions;
- the risks associated with real estate development and redevelopment, including unanticipated expenses, delays and other contingencies;
- the risks associated with the acquisition, disposition and ownership of real estate in general and our real estate assets in particular;
- the ability to control our operating expenses;
- the risks related to co-investments in real estate ventures and partnerships;
- the ability to renew leases, lease vacant space or re-let space as leases expire, and to do so on favorable terms;
- the economic health of our tenants;
- fluctuations in interest rates;
- the supply of competing properties and competition in the real estate industry generally;
- the availability and terms of financing and capital and the general volatility of securities markets;
- the risks associated with mortgage loans and other indebtedness;
- compliance with applicable laws, including those concerning the environment and access by persons with disabilities;
- increased investor focus and activism related to ESG matters;
- terrorist attacks, acts of violence and the occurrence of cyber incidents or system failures;
- the ability to maintain key personnel;
- failure to qualify and maintain our qualification as a REIT and the risks of changes in laws affecting REITs; and
- other factors discussed under the caption "Risk Factors."
For a further discussion of factors that could materially affect the outcome of our forward-looking statements, see "Risk Factors" in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
For these forward-looking statements, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K or the date of any document incorporated by reference. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or any person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section. We do not undertake any obligation to release publicly any revisions to our forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Cybersecurity
As filed, 5,827 characters, with its headings, lists and tables. Extracted from the main document; charts and exhibits are in the original on sec.gov.
Strategy and Risk Management
To mitigate cybersecurity risks we have adopted a process of continuous improvement and adaptation to the ever-changing threat landscape. As part of this process, we engage with industry-leading managed security service provider(s) to supplement our efforts in preventing, identifying and responding to cybersecurity threats. Our information technology operations, information security processes and CIRP are generally aligned with the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s framework.
We have adopted a cloud-first strategy which is a foundational element to our overall cybersecurity posture. For essential systems, we utilize SaaS-based software partners who annually conduct Statement on Standards for Attestation Engagements SOC 1 or SOC 2 assessments, as appropriate, based on functional use within our company. Based on the nature of services provided by our technology partners, our third-party risk management process may include:
- Reviewing cybersecurity practices of such provider.
- Contractually obligating the provider to share detailed results of cybersecurity assessments on an annual basis.
- Contractually obligating the provider to make us aware of significant cybersecurity related incidents.
- Coordinating independent security assessments with the provider utilizing our own resources.
Cybersecurity Risk Management
We have adopted a cybersecurity risk management process that is designed to identify and mitigate potential cybersecurity risks. On an annual basis, we work with credible, third-party cybersecurity experts to assess our ability to prevent, identify, and respond to cybersecurity threats through internal and external penetration tests and monthly vulnerability scans. We also test our organizational cybersecurity capabilities through facilitated tabletop exercises which simulate real life scenarios. Together with the findings of the SOC 1 and 2 assessments, and our threat intelligence and monitoring activities, these exercises, tests and scans help us identify potential cybersecurity risks.
We seek to mitigate cybersecurity risks we identify through a variety of methods, including:
- When practical and necessary, we patch vulnerabilities that are identified.
- We deploy endpoint detection and monitoring technologies to identify potential cybersecurity incidents.
- We back up our systems and data to mitigate the impact of a cybersecurity event that would impact our ability to operate or result in the loss of data.
- We partner with strategic managed cybersecurity service providers to supplement the capabilities of our internal team.
- We update and refine our CIRP in response to identified risks.
- To manage the third-party cybersecurity risk introduced by our cloud-first strategy, we have implemented a due diligence process for new software partners as well as an annual review process for essential SaaS system partners.
- We conduct cybersecurity awareness training annually and simulated phishing campaigns no less than quarterly to test and educate our employees.
Notwithstanding the steps we take to address cybersecurity, we may not be successful in preventing or mitigating all cybersecurity incidents or threats. See Item 1A. Risk Factors - Risks Related to Our Business and Operations – The occurrence of cyber incidents, or a deficiency in our cybersecurity, or the cybersecurity of our service providers, could negatively impact our business by causing a disruption to our operations, a compromise or corruption of our confidential information, regulatory enforcement and other legal proceedings, and/or damage to our business relationships, all of which could negatively impact our financial results – for a discussion of cybersecurity risks. To date, we have not experienced any material cybersecurity incidents.
Governance
Our Chief Information & Technology Officer along with our Vice President of Cybersecurity & Cloud Infrastructure provide principal oversight and guidance of our cybersecurity risk management strategy, programs and processes. The Chief Information & Technology Officer has over 20 years of experience in information technology in the real estate sector, leading organizations through strategic technology and process improvement initiatives. The Vice President of Cybersecurity & Cloud Infrastructure has over 15 years of extensive experience in cybersecurity and information technology. They are supported in their efforts by a team of technical experts who have had formal training and possess relevant industry related experience in addition to managed cybersecurity service providers who specialize in preventing, identifying, and responding to cybersecurity threats.
The Audit Committee of our Board of Trustees provides board-level governance and oversight regarding cybersecurity matters. Management meets with the Audit Committee periodically to discuss cybersecurity strategy, risk, trends, and internal personnel and qualifications. As part of our annual enterprise risk assessment, technology and cyber risks are standing risk factors which are ranked and reviewed by management.
In the event of a cyberattack, we engage our CIRP, which provides a framework of processes and procedures related to identifying, categorizing, responding, containing, analyzing, and eradicating cybersecurity threats to mitigate downtime and promptly restore systems and services. Management has responsibility for reporting cybersecurity incidents to the Audit Committee as they occur, if consistent with our CIRP. The CIRP also addresses management's responsibility, with Audit Committee oversight, with respect to any reporting or disclosure determinations related to a given cybersecurity incident and provides for Audit Committee and Board of Trustee briefings as appropriate.
Properties
As filed, 18,285 characters, with its headings, lists and tables. Extracted from the main document; charts and exhibits are in the original on sec.gov.
Note on presentation of "at share" information. We present certain financial information and metrics "at JBG SMITH Share," which is calculated on an entity-by-entity basis, but exclude our: (i) 10.0% subordinated interest in one commercial building, (ii) 33.5% subordinated interest in four commercial buildings, (iii) 49.0% interest in three commercial buildings and (iv) 9.9% interest in one commercial building, as well as the associated non-recourse mortgage loans, held through unconsolidated real estate ventures; these interests and debt are excluded because our investment in each real estate venture is zero, we do not anticipate receiving any near-term cash flow distributions from the real estate ventures and we have not guaranteed their obligations or otherwise committed to providing financial support. "At JBG SMITH Share" information, which we also refer to as being "at share," "our pro rata share" or "our share," is not, and is not intended to be, a presentation in accordance with GAAP. Because as of December 31, 2023, 7.2% of our assets, as measured by total square feet, was held through real estate ventures in which we own less than 100% of the ownership interest, we believe this form of presentation, which includes our economic interests in the unconsolidated real estate ventures, provides investors important information regarding a significant component of our portfolio, its composition, performance and capitalization. We classify our portfolio as "operating," "under-construction," or "development pipeline."
The following tables provide information about our multifamily, commercial and development pipeline portfolios as of December 31, 2023. Many of our assets in the development pipeline are adjacent to or an integrated component of operating multifamily or commercial assets in our portfolio. A number of our assets included in the following tables are held through real estate ventures with third parties or are subject to ground leases. In addition to other information, the following tables indicate our percentage ownership, whether the asset is consolidated or unconsolidated, and whether the asset is subject to a ground lease.
Multifamily Assets
| Multifamily Assets National Landing | % | Ownership | C/U (1) | | Same Store (2): YTD 2022-2023 | | Number of Units | | Total Square Feet | % | Leased | % | Multifamily Occupied | | Retail % Occupied | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RiverHouse Apartments | 100.0% | C | Y | 1,676 | 1,327,551 | 96.6% | | 96.0% | | 100.0% | | |||||
| The Bartlett | 100.0% | C | Y | 699 | 619,372 | 97.2% | | 96.7% | | 100.0% | | |||||
| 220 20th Street | 100.0% | C | Y | 265 | 271,476 | 95.1% | | 94.0% | | 100.0% | | |||||
| 2221 S. Clark Street - Residential (3) | 100.0% | C | Y | 216 | 96,948 | 88.6% | | 85.9% | | - | | |||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| D.C. | | | | |||||||||||||
| West Half | | 100.0% | C | Y | 465 | 385,368 | 94.4% | | 93.1% | | 83.1% | | ||||
| Fort Totten Square | 100.0% | C | Y | 345 | 384,956 | 97.3% | | 91.6% | | 100.0% | | |||||
| The Wren | | 100.0% | C | | Y | | 433 | | 332,682 | | 96.8% | | 94.2% | | 100.0% | |
| The Batley | | 100.0% | C | | Y | | 432 | | 300,388 | | 96.1% | | 94.4% | | - | |
| WestEnd25 | 100.0% | C | Y | 283 | 273,264 | 94.3% | | 93.6% | | - | | |||||
| F1RST Residences | | 100.0% | C | | Y | | 325 | | 270,928 | | 95.1% | | 94.2% | | 100.0% | |
| Atlantic Plumbing | 100.0% | C | Y | 310 | 245,143 | 94.0% | | 93.9% | | 89.2% | | |||||
| 1221 Van Street | 100.0% | C | Y | 291 | 225,592 | 96.0% | | 93.1% | | 100.0% | | |||||
| 901 W Street | | 100.0% | C | | Y | | 161 | | 154,379 | | 94.5% | | 95.7% | | 63.9% | |
| 900 W Street (3) | | 100.0% | C | | Y | | 95 | | 71,050 | | 61.1% | | 47.4% | | - | |
| North End Retail (4) | 100.0% | C | Y | — | 27,355 | 96.0% | | - | | 96.0% | | |||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| MD | | | | |||||||||||||
| 8001 Woodmont | 100.0% | C | N | 322 | 363,979 | 96.2% | | 94.1% | | 95.1% | | |||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Operating - Total / Weighted Average (3) | | | | | | 6,318 | 5,350,431 | 96.0% | | 94.7% | | 95.3% | | |||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Under-Construction | | | | |||||||||||||
| National Landing | | | | | | |||||||||||
| 1900 Crystal Drive (5) | — | C | | | 808 | 633,985 | | | | | | | | |||
| 2000/2001 South Bell Street (5) | | — | C | | | | 775 | | 580,966 | | | | | | | |
| Under-Construction - Total | | | | | | 1,583 | 1,214,951 | | | | | | | | ||
| Total | | | | | 7,901 | 6,565,382 | | | | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Totals at JBG SMITH Share (3) | | | | |||||||||||||
| National Landing | | | | | | 2,856 | 2,315,347 | 96.6% | | 96.0% | | 100.0% | | |||
| D.C. | | | | | | | 3,140 | | 2,671,105 | | 95.5% | | 93.7% | | 94.7% | |
| MD | | | | | | 322 | 363,979 | 96.2% | | 94.1% | | 95.1% | | |||
| Operating - Total / Weighted Average | | | | | | | 6,318 | | 5,350,431 | | 96.0% | | 94.7% | | 95.3% | |
| Under-construction assets | | | | | | | 1,583 | | 1,214,951 | | | | | | |
Note: At 100% share, unless otherwise noted.
(1) "C" denotes a consolidated interest and "U" denotes an unconsolidated interest.
(2) "Y" denotes an asset as same store and "N" denotes an asset as non-same store.
(3) 2221 S. Clark Street - Residential and 900 W Street are excluded from percent leased and percent occupied metrics as they are operated as short-term rental properties.
(4) In January 2024, we sold North End Retail for a gross sales price of $14.3 million.
(5) In 2021, we leased the land underlying 1900 Crystal Drive and 2000/2001 South Bell Street to a lessee. The assets are consolidated in our financial statements as they are owned through variable interest entities for which we are the primary beneficiary. See Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.
Commercial Assets
| Commercial Assets National Landing | % | Ownership | C/U (1) | | Same Store (2): YTD 2022-2023 | | Total Square Feet | % | Leased | | Office % Occupied | | Retail % Occupied | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1550 Crystal Drive (3) | 100.0% | C | Y | 555,302 | 95.3% | | 91.4% | | 100.0% | | ||||
| 2121 Crystal Drive | 100.0% | C | Y | 509,922 | 89.7% | | 87.0% | | 100.0% | | ||||
| 2345 Crystal Drive | 100.0% | C | Y | 499,688 | 55.4% | | 55.0% | | 74.3% | | ||||
| 2231 Crystal Drive | 100.0% | C | Y | 468,907 | 72.7% | | 69.6% | | 97.4% | | ||||
| 2011 Crystal Drive | 100.0% | C | Y | 440,510 | 57.6% | | 57.7% | | 50.3% | | ||||
| 2451 Crystal Drive | 100.0% | C | Y | 402,375 | 86.3% | | 86.1% | | 92.6% | | ||||
| 1235 S. Clark Street | 100.0% | C | Y | 384,656 | 97.5% | | 95.4% | | 95.0% | | ||||
| 241 18th Street S. (3) | 100.0% | C | Y | 355,728 | 96.3% | | 93.8% | | 100.0% | | ||||
| 1215 S. Clark Street | 100.0% | C | Y | 336,159 | 99.6% | | 100.0% | | 44.5% | | ||||
| 201 12th Street S. | 100.0% | C | Y | 329,687 | 99.8% | | 98.4% | | 100.0% | | ||||
| 251 18th Street S. (3) | 100.0% | C | Y | 309,450 | 82.7% | | 81.7% | | 100.0% | | ||||
| 1225 S. Clark Street | 100.0% | C | Y | 276,203 | 94.2% | | 91.1% | | 80.9% | | ||||
| 1901 South Bell Street | 100.0% | C | Y | 274,912 | 67.6% | | 67.6% | | - | | ||||
| 1770 Crystal Drive | | 100.0% | C | | Y | | 273,787 | | 100.0% | | 100.0% | | 100.0% | |
| 2100 Crystal Drive | 100.0% | C | Y | 253,437 | 100.0% | | 100.0% | | - | | ||||
| 1800 South Bell Street (3) | 100.0% | C | Y | 203,273 | 100.0% | | 100.0% | | 100.0% | | ||||
| 200 12th Street S. | 100.0% | C | Y | 202,761 | 77.5% | | 77.5% | | - | | ||||
| 2200 Crystal Drive (3) | 100.0% | C | Y | 161,668 | 100.0% | | 100.0% | | - | | ||||
| Crystal Drive Retail (3) | 100.0% | C | Y | 42,938 | 100.0% | | - | | 100.0% | | ||||
| Crystal City Shops at 2100 (3) | 100.0% | C | Y | 34,452 | 100.0% | | - | | 100.0% | | ||||
| Central Place Tower (4) | | 50.0% | U | Y | 551,594 | 96.4% | | 96.2% | | 100.0% | | |||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Other | | |||||||||||||
| 2101 L Street | 100.0% | C | Y | 375,493 | 76.1% | | 74.6% | | 92.6% | | ||||
| 800 North Glebe Road | 100.0% | C | Y | 303,759 | 99.3% | | 100.0% | | 92.4% | | ||||
| One Democracy Plaza (4) (5) | 100.0% | C | Y | 213,139 | 85.5% | | 85.6% | | 70.5% | | ||||
| 4747 Bethesda Avenue (6) | | 20.0% | U | | Y | | 300,535 | 98.0% | | 97.9% | | 100.0% | | |
| 1101 17th Street | 55.0% | U | Y | 209,401 | 88.6% | | 88.9% | | 82.8% | | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Operating - Total / Weighted Average | | | | | | 8,269,736 | 87.0% | | 85.7% | | 95.9% | | ||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Totals at JBG SMITH Share | | |||||||||||||
| National Landing | | | | | | 6,591,612 | 86.2% | | 84.6% | | 96.5% | | ||
| Other | | | | | | 1,067,669 | 87.2% | | 86.9% | | 91.4% | | ||
| Operating - Total / Weighted Average | | | | | | | 7,659,281 | | 86.3% | | 84.9% | | 95.8% | |
Note: At 100% share, unless otherwise noted.
(1) "C" denotes a consolidated interest and "U" denotes an unconsolidated interest.
(2) "Y" denotes an asset as same store and "N" denotes an asset as non-same store.
(3) The following assets contain space that is held for development or not otherwise available for lease. This out-of-service square footage is excluded from square feet, leased and occupancy metrics in the above table.
| Commercial Asset | | In-Service | | Not Available for Lease |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1550 Crystal Drive | 555,302 | | 3,270 | |
| 241 18th Street S. | | 355,728 | | 6,612 |
| 251 18th Street S. | | 309,450 | | 29,996 |
| 1800 South Bell Street | | 203,273 | | 2,913 |
| 2200 Crystal Drive | | 161,668 | | 121,940 |
| Crystal Drive Retail | | 42,938 | | 14,027 |
| Crystal City Shops at 2100 | | 34,452 | | 37,763 |
| 2221 S. Clark Street - Office | | — | | 35,182 |
(4) Asset is subject to a ground lease where we are the lessee. In February 2024, one of our unconsolidated real estate ventures sold Central Place Tower for a gross sales price of $325.0 million.
(5) Not Metro-served.
(6) Includes our corporate office lease for approximately 84,400 square feet.
Development Pipeline
| Asset National Landing | % | Ownership | | Estimated Potential Development Density (SF) Total | | Multifamily | | Office | | Retail | | Estimated Number of Units |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Potomac Yard Landbay F/G/H | | 50.0% / 100.0% | | 2,614,000 | | 1,147,000 | | 1,369,000 | | 98,000 | | 1,240 |
| 1415 S. Eads Street | | 100.0% | | 531,400 | | 527,400 | | — | | 4,000 | | 635 |
| 3330 Exchange Avenue | | 50.0% | | 239,800 | | 216,400 | | — | | 23,400 | | 240 |
| 3331 Exchange Avenue | | 50.0% | | 180,600 | | 164,300 | | — | | 16,300 | | 170 |
| RiverHouse Land | | 100.0% | | 1,988,400 | | 1,960,600 | | — | | 27,800 | | 1,665 |
| 2250 Crystal Drive | | 100.0% | | 696,200 | | 681,300 | | — | | 14,900 | | 825 |
| 223 23rd Street | | 100.0% | | 492,100 | | 484,100 | | — | | 8,000 | | 610 |
| 2525 Crystal Drive | | 100.0% | | 373,000 | | 370,000 | | — | | 3,000 | | 370 |
| 101 12th Street S. | | 100.0% | | 239,600 | | — | | 234,400 | | 5,200 | | — |
| 1800 South Bell Street Land (1) | | 100.0% | | 311,000 | | — | | 307,000 | | 4,000 | | — |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| D.C. | | | | |||||||||
| Gallaudet Parcel 2-3 (2) | 100.0% | | 819,100 | | 758,200 | | — | | 60,900 | | 820 | |
| Capitol Point - North | | 100.0% | | 451,400 | | 434,100 | | — | | 17,300 | | 470 |
| Gallaudet Parcel 4 (2) | | 100.0% | | 644,200 | | 605,200 | | — | | 39,000 | | 645 |
| | | | | | | | | | | — | | |
| Other Development Parcels (3) | | | | 1,248,100 | | 142,200 | | 1,105,900 | | — | | — |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | | | 10,828,900 | 7,490,800 | 3,016,300 | 321,800 | 7,690 | |||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Totals at JBG SMITH Share | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| National Landing | | | | 6,649,000 | | 5,137,300 | | 1,375,900 | | 135,800 | | 5,280 |
| D.C. | | | | 2,107,000 | | 1,840,200 | | 149,600 | | 117,200 | | 1,935 |
| | | | | 8,756,000 | | 6,977,500 | | 1,525,500 | | 253,000 | | 7,215 |
Note: At 100% share, unless otherwise noted.
(1) Currently encumbered by an operating commercial asset.
(2) Controlled through an option to acquire a leasehold interest. As of December 31, 2023, the weighted average remaining term for the option is 1.4 years.
(3) Comprises four assets in which we have a minority interest.
Major Tenants
The following table sets forth information for our 10 largest tenants by annualized rent for the year ended December 31, 2023:
(In thousands)
| Tenant | Number of Leases | At JBG SMITH Share Square Feet | % of Total Square Feet | Annualized Rent | % of Total Annualized Rent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSA | 37 | 1,810,310 | 26.1% | $72,167 | 22.7% |
| Amazon | 6 | 926,703 | 13.4% | 41,640 | 13.1% |
| Gartner, Inc | 1 | 174,424 | 2.5% | 12,878 | 4.1% |
| Lockheed Martin Corporation | 2 | 207,095 | 3.0% | 10,001 | 3.2% |
| Accenture LLP | 2 | 116,736 | 1.7% | 5,722 | 1.8% |
| Public Broadcasting Service | 1 | 120,328 | 1.7% | 5,004 | 1.6% |
| Booz Allen Hamilton Inc | 3 | 107,415 | 1.5% | 4,859 | 1.5% |
| Greenberg Traurig LLP | 1 | 64,090 | 0.9% | 4,698 | 1.5% |
| The International Justice Mission | 1 | 74,833 | 1.1% | 4,508 | 1.4% |
| Family Health International | 1 | 59,514 | 0.9% | 4,047 | 1.3% |
| Total | 55 | 3,661,448 | 52.8% | $165,524 | 52.2% |
Note: Includes all leases as of December 31, 2023 for which a tenant has taken occupancy for office and retail space within our Operating Portfolio.
Lease Expirations
The following table sets forth as of December 31, 2023 the scheduled expirations of tenant leases in our Operating Portfolio for each year from 2024 through 2032 and thereafter:
(In thousands)
| Year of Lease Expiration | Number of Leases | At JBG SMITH Share Square Feet | % of Total Square Feet | Annualized Rent (1) | % of Total Annualized Rent | Annualized Rent Per Square Foot (1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Month-to-Month | 34 | 350,538 | 5.1% | $12,823 | 4.0% | $36.58 |
| 2024 | 84 | 1,425,853 | 20.6% | 67,318 | 21.2% | 47.21 |
| 2025 | 59 | 470,183 | 6.8% | 21,600 | 6.8% | 45.94 |
| 2026 | 52 | 246,936 | 3.6% | 12,414 | 3.9% | 50.27 |
| 2027 | 34 | 508,033 | 7.3% | 24,879 | 7.8% | 48.97 |
| 2028 | 39 | 429,762 | 6.2% | 20,916 | 6.6% | 48.67 |
| 2029 | 27 | 199,507 | 2.9% | 9,730 | 3.1% | 48.77 |
| 2030 | 22 | 608,111 | 8.8% | 29,839 | 9.4% | 49.07 |
| 2031 | 27 | 552,510 | 8.0% | 21,122 | 6.7% | 38.23 |
| 2032 | 20 | 793,813 | 11.5% | 36,919 | 11.6% | 46.51 |
| Thereafter | 62 | 1,345,827 | 19.2% | 59,766 | 18.9% | 45.74 |
| Total / Weighted Average | 460 | 6,931,073 | 100.0% | $317,326 | 100.0% | $46.04 |
Note: Includes all leases as of December 31, 2023 for which a tenant has taken occupancy for office and retail space within our Operating Portfolio and assuming no exercise of renewal options or early termination rights. The weighted average remaining lease term for the entire portfolio is 5.1 years.
(1) Annualized rent and annualized rent per square foot exclude percentage rent and the square footage of tenants that only pay percentage rent.
Legal proceedings
As filed, 254 characters, with its headings, lists and tables. Extracted from the main document; charts and exhibits are in the original on sec.gov.
We are, from time to time, involved in legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In our opinion, the outcome of such matters is not expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Management's discussion and analysis
As filed, 81,490 characters, with its headings, lists and tables. Extracted from the main document; charts and exhibits are in the original on sec.gov.
The following discussion is intended to provide material information relevant to our financial condition and results of operations, including cash flows, and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing in Item 8 - Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Organization and Basis of Presentation
JBG SMITH, a Maryland REIT, owns, operates, invests in and develops mixed-use properties in high growth and high barrier-to-entry submarkets in and around Washington, D.C., most notably National Landing. Through an intense focus on placemaking, JBG SMITH cultivates vibrant, amenity-rich, walkable neighborhoods throughout the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area. Approximately 75.0% of our holdings are in the National Landing submarket in Northern Virginia, which is anchored by four key demand drivers: Amazon's new headquarters; Virginia Tech's under-construction $1 billion Innovation Campus; the submarket’s proximity to the Pentagon; and our deployment of 5G digital infrastructure. In addition, our third-party asset management and real estate services business provides fee-based real estate services to the
JBG Legacy Funds, other third parties and the WHI Impact Pool. Substantially all our assets are held by, and our operations are conducted through, JBG SMITH LP.
We were organized for the purpose of receiving, via the spin-off on July 17, 2017, substantially all the assets and liabilities of Vornado's Washington, D.C. segment. On July 18, 2017, we acquired the management business and certain assets and liabilities of JBG.
We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under sections 856-860 of the Code. Under those sections, a REIT which distributes at least 90% of its REIT taxable income as dividends to its shareholders each year and which meets certain other conditions will not be taxed on that portion of its taxable income which is distributed to its shareholders. We currently adhere and intend to continue to adhere to these requirements and to maintain our REIT status in future periods.
As a REIT, we can reduce our taxable income by distributing all or a portion of such taxable income to shareholders. Future distributions will be declared and paid at the discretion of the Board of Trustees and will depend upon cash generated by operating activities, our financial condition, capital requirements, annual dividend requirements under the REIT provisions of the Code, and such other factors as our Board of Trustees deems relevant.
We also participate in the activities conducted by our subsidiary entities that have elected to be treated as TRSs under the Code. As such, we are subject to federal, state, and local taxes on the income from these activities. Income taxes attributable to our TRSs are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Under the asset and liability method, deferred income taxes arise from temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the consolidated financial statements, which will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future.
We aggregate our operating segments into three reportable segments (multifamily, commercial and third-party asset management and real estate services) based on the economic characteristics and nature of our assets and services.
We compete with many property owners and developers. Our success depends upon, among other factors, trends affecting national and local economies, the financial condition and operating results of current and prospective tenants, the availability and cost of capital, interest rates, construction and renovation costs, taxes, governmental regulations and legislation, population trends, zoning laws, and our ability to lease, sublease or sell our assets at profitable levels. Our success is also subject to our ability to refinance existing debt on acceptable terms as it comes due.
Overview
As of December 31, 2023, our Operating Portfolio consisted of 44 operating assets comprising 16 multifamily assets totaling 6,318 units (6,318 units at our share), 26 commercial assets totaling 8.3 million square feet (7.7 million square feet at our share) and two wholly owned land assets for which we are the ground lessor. Additionally, we have two under-construction multifamily assets with 1,583 units (1,583 units at our share) and 17 assets in the development pipeline totaling 10.8 million square feet (8.8 million square feet at our share) of estimated potential development density.
We continue to implement our comprehensive plan to reposition our holdings in the National Landing submarket in Northern Virginia by executing a broad array of Placemaking strategies. Our Placemaking includes the delivery of new multifamily and office developments, locally sourced amenity retail, and thoughtful improvements to the streetscape, sidewalks, parks and other outdoor gathering spaces. In keeping with our dedication to Placemaking, each new project is intended to contribute to authentic and distinct neighborhoods by creating a vibrant street environment with robust retail offerings and other amenities, including improved public spaces. To that end, we saw the delivery of two Placemaking projects, Water Park and Surreal, this year. Additionally, the digital infrastructure investments we are making, including our ownership of CBRS wireless spectrum in National Landing and our agreements with AT&T, Cisco and Federated Wireless, are advancing our efforts to make National Landing among the first 5G-operable submarkets in the nation.
During the second quarter of 2023, we completed the construction of two new office buildings for Amazon on Metropolitan Park in National Landing, totaling 2.1 million square feet, inclusive of approximately 50,000 square feet of street-level retail with new shops and restaurants, and Amazon took occupancy of its new headquarters in June 2023. We are the developer, property manager and retail leasing agent for Amazon's new headquarters at National Landing. As of December
31, 2023, we also have leases with Amazon totaling approximately 927,000 square feet across five office buildings in National Landing.
Outlook
A fundamental component of our strategy to maximize long-term NAV per share is active capital allocation. We evaluate development, acquisition, disposition, share repurchases and other investment decisions based on how they may impact long-term NAV per share. We intend to continue to opportunistically sell or recapitalize assets as well as land sites where a ground lease or joint venture execution may represent the most attractive path to maximizing value. Successful execution of our capital allocation strategy enables us to source capital at NAV from the disposition of assets generating low cash yields and invest those proceeds in new acquisitions with higher cash yields and growth, development projects with significant yield spreads and profit potential, and share repurchases. Consequently, at any given time, we expect to be in various stages of discussions and negotiations with potential buyers, real estate venture partners, ground lessors and other counterparties with respect to sales, joint ventures and/or ground leases for certain of our assets, including portfolios thereof. These discussions and negotiations may or may not lead to definitive documentation or closed transactions. We anticipate redeploying the proceeds from these sales will not only help fund our planned growth, but will also further advance the strategic shift of our portfolio to majority multifamily. Current market conditions have significantly slowed down the pace of asset sales, and we expect this reduced activity to continue in 2024.
Our multifamily portfolio occupancy as of December 31, 2023 increased by 110 basis points compared to December 31, 2022. For fourth quarter lease expirations, we increased effective rents, which represent the average change in rental rates versus expiring rental rates net of concessions, by 7.0% upon renewal while achieving a 56.0% renewal rate across our portfolio. We continue to advance our two under-construction multifamily assets in National Landing, 1900 Crystal Drive and 2000/2001 South Bell Street, totaling 1,583 units. Upon delivery of 1900 Crystal Drive, expected in the second quarter of 2024, we will no longer be able to capitalize interest, which will increase annual interest expense by approximately $17.3 million once the mortgage loan is fully drawn. Upon delivery of 2000/2001 South Bell Street, expected in the third quarter of 2025, we will no longer be able to capitalize interest, which will increase annual interest expense by approximately $14.1 million once the mortgage loan is fully drawn. The current weighted average interest rate on these mortgage loans is 7.2%, and while we anticipate refinancing with agency debt upon stabilization, the ultimate terms of those future refinancings are not yet known.
Our office portfolio occupancy as of December 31, 2023 decreased by 20 basis points compared to December 31, 2022. During 2023, we executed 927,000 square feet of office leases during the year at our share, approximately 89% of which comprised leases in National Landing and 90.3% of leases (on a square footage basis) were with defense and technology tenants. We have 1.5 million square feet of office leases in National Landing expiring in 2024 or on a month-to-month status and expect only approximately 20.0% of this space to be renewed. As of December 31, 2023, we have leases with Amazon across five office buildings in National Landing totaling approximately 927,000 square feet with annualized rent totaling $41.6 million, of which 191,000 square feet are month-to-month and 378,000 square feet expire in 2024. Of the month-to-month leases and leases expiring in 2024, 444,000 square feet represent the entirety of 1800 South Bell Street and 2100 Crystal Drive (which together generated $14.7 million of NOI in 2023). In addition, we anticipate approximately 750,000 square feet (approximately $36.9 million of annualized rent) will be vacated in 2024. In 2025, we have approximately 375,000 square feet expiring, and while it is too early to determine a precise retention rate, we expect at least 110,000 square feet or 29% (at least $4.4 million of annualized rent) will vacate, but that number could increase as those expirations grow nearer.
As the office market continues to experience headwinds due to hybrid work trends and the broader macroeconomic environment, we anticipate continued weakness in the commercial office sector. In this environment, we expect many tenants will look for space that is newer or repurposed for their current flexible workspace needs. We have also seen tenants lease space but contract their total footprint. Accordingly, our efforts to re-lease certain spaces will be targeted toward buildings with long-term viability where we can concentrate occupancy, and we intend to take some of our other buildings out of service. In addition to 1800 South Bell Street, which we took out of service in the first quarter of 2024, we plan to take 2100 Crystal Drive out of service when Amazon vacates in the second quarter of 2024. We also plan to begin phasing 2200 Crystal Drive out of service as leases expire. With the objective of ultimately reducing our competitive inventory in National Landing, we expect to repurpose these older, obsolete and vacant buildings for redevelopment, conversion to multifamily or another specialty use.
Operating Results
Highlights of operating results for the year ended December 31, 2023 included:
- net loss attributable to common shareholders of $80.0 million, or $0.78 per diluted common share, compared to net income attributable to common shareholders of $85.4 million, or $0.70 per diluted common share, for 2022;
- third-party real estate services revenue, including reimbursements, of $92.1 million compared to $89.0 million for 2022;
- operating multifamily portfolio leased and occupied percentages (1) at our share of 96.0% and 94.7% compared to 94.5% and 93.6% as of December 31, 2022;
- operating commercial portfolio leased and occupied percentages at our share of 86.3% and 84.9% compared to 88.5% and 85.1% as of December 31, 2022;
- the leasing of 927,000 square feet at our share, at an initial rent (2) of $47.14 per square foot and a GAAP-basis weighted average rent per square foot (3) of $45.52; and
- an increase in same store (4) NOI of 1.6% to $299.9 million compared to $295.0 million for 2022.
(1) 2221 S. Clark Street - Residential and 900 W Street are excluded from leased and occupied percentages as they are operated as short-term rental properties.
(2) Represents the cash basis weighted average starting rent per square foot, which excludes free rent and fixed escalations.
(3) Represents the weighted average rent per square foot recognized over the term of the respective leases, including the effect of free rent and fixed escalations.
(4) Includes the results of the properties that are owned, operated and in-service for the entirety of both periods being compared except for properties for which significant redevelopment, renovation or repositioning occurred during either of the periods being compared.
Additionally, investing and financing activity during the year ended December 31, 2023 included:
- the sale of Falkland Chase, 5 M Street Southwest, Crystal City Marriott and Capitol Point-North-75 New York Avenue. See Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information;
- the sale of an 80.0% interest in 4747 Bethesda Avenue, and the sale of Stonebridge at Potomac Town Center and Rosslyn Gateway by our unconsolidated real estate ventures. See Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information;
- a $187.6 million loan facility, collateralized by The Wren and F1RST Residences. See Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information;
- the repayment of $142.4 million in mortgage loans collateralized by Falkland Chase-South & West and 800 North Glebe Road;
- net borrowings of $62.0 million under our revolving credit facility;
- the amendment of our revolving credit facility. See Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information;
- the drawing of the $50.0 million remaining advance under our Tranche A-2 Term Loan;
- a $120.0 million term loan. See Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information;
- the payment of dividends totaling $94.0 million and distributions to our noncontrolling interests of $15.3 million;
- the repurchase and retirement of 22.6 million of our common shares for $335.3 million, a weighted average purchase price per share of $14.83; and
- the investment of $333.7 million in development costs, construction in progress and real estate additions.
Activity subsequent to December 31, 2023 included:
- the repurchase and retirement of 2.7 million common shares for $45.4 million, a weighted average purchase price per share of $16.52, pursuant to a repurchase plan under Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
- the repayment of our outstanding revolving credit facility;
- the sale of North End Retail, a multifamily asset, for a gross sales price of $14.3 million;
- the sale of Central Place Tower by one of our unconsolidated real estate ventures for a gross sales price of $325.0 million; and
- the declaration of a quarterly dividend of $0.175 per common share, payable on March 15, 2024 to shareholders of record as of March 1, 2024.
Critical Accounting Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that in certain circumstances may significantly impact our financial results. These estimates are prepared using management's best judgment, after considering past and current events and economic conditions. In addition, certain information relied upon by management in preparing such estimates includes internally generated financial and operating information, external market information, when available, and when necessary, information obtained from consultations with third-party experts. Actual results could differ from these estimates. We consider an accounting estimate to be critical if changes in the estimate could have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations or financial condition.
Our significant accounting policies are fully described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements; however, the most critical accounting estimates, which involve the use of judgments as to future uncertainties and, therefore, may result in actual amounts that differ from estimates, are as follows:
Asset Acquisitions
Description: We account for asset acquisitions, which includes the consolidation of previously unconsolidated real estate ventures, at cost, including transaction costs, plus the fair value of any assumed debt. We estimate the fair values of acquired assets and liabilities assumed based on our evaluation of information and estimates available at the date of acquisition. Based on these estimates, we allocate the purchase price, including all transaction costs related to the acquisition and any contingent consideration, to the identified assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their relative fair value.
Judgments and Uncertainties: Asset acquisitions primarily consist of buildings and land. The fair values of buildings are determined using the "as-if vacant" approach whereby we use discounted cash flow models with inputs and assumptions that we believe are consistent with current market conditions for similar assets. The most significant assumptions in determining the allocation of the purchase price to buildings are the exit capitalization rate, discount rate, estimated market rents and hypothetical expected lease-up periods, when applicable. We assess the fair value of land based on market comparisons and development projects using an income approach of cost plus a margin.
Sensitivity of Estimate to Change: While our methodology did not change in 2023, to the extent the estimates and assumptions in our discounted cash flow models used to value our buildings or our projections of land value change due to market conditions or other factors, our estimated fair values may be different and such differences could be material to our consolidated financial statements.
Real Estate
Description: Real estate is carried at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization. As real estate is undergoing redevelopment activities, all property operating expenses directly associated with and attributable to the redevelopment, including interest expense, are capitalized to the extent that we believe such costs are recoverable through the value of the property.
Judgments and Uncertainties: Our real estate and related intangible assets are reviewed for impairment whenever there are changes in circumstances or indicators that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. These indicators may include declining operating performance, below average occupancy, shortened anticipated holding periods, costs in excess of budgets for under-construction assets and other adverse changes. An impairment exists when the carrying amount of an asset exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. Estimates of future cash flows are based on our current plans, anticipated holding periods and available market information at the time the analyses are prepared. An impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount of the asset is not recoverable and is measured based on the excess of the property's carrying amount over its estimated fair value. Estimated fair values are calculated based on the following information in order of preference, dependent upon availability: (i) pending or executed agreements, (ii) market prices for comparable properties or (iii) the sum of discounted cash flows.
Sensitivity of Estimate to Change: While our methodology did not change in 2023, if our estimates of future cash flows, anticipated holding periods, asset strategy or fair values change, based on market conditions, anticipated selling prices or other factors, our evaluation of impairment losses may be different and such differences could be material to our consolidated financial statements. Estimates of future cash flows are subjective and are based, in part, on assumptions regarding future occupancy, rental rates, capitalization and discount rates, and capital requirements that could differ materially from actual results. Longer anticipated holding periods for real estate assets directly reduce the likelihood of recording an impairment loss. If there is a change in the strategy for an asset or if market conditions dictate a shorter holding period, an impairment loss may be recognized, and such loss could be material.
Investments in Real Estate Ventures
Description: We use the equity method of accounting for investments in unconsolidated real estate ventures when we have significant influence, but do not have a controlling financial interest.
Judgments and Uncertainties: On a periodic basis, we evaluate our investments in unconsolidated real estate ventures for impairment. An investment in a real estate venture is considered impaired if we determine that its fair value is less than the net carrying value of the investment in that real estate venture on an other-than-temporary basis. Cash flow projections for the investments consider property level factors such as expected future operating income, trends and prospects, anticipated holding periods, as well as the effects of demand, competition and other factors. We consider various qualitative factors to determine if a decrease in the value of our investment is other-than-temporary. These factors include the age of the venture, our intent and ability to retain our investment in the real estate venture, financial condition and long-term prospects of the real estate venture and relationships with our partners and banks. If we believe that the decline in the fair value of the investment is temporary, no impairment loss is recorded. If our analysis indicates that there is an other-than temporary impairment related to the investment in a particular real estate venture, the carrying value of the venture will be adjusted to an amount that reflects the estimated fair value of the investment. In the event our investment in a real estate venture is reduced to zero, and we are not obligated to provide for additional losses, have not guaranteed its obligations or otherwise committed to providing financial support, we will discontinue the equity method of accounting until such point that our share of net income equals the share of net losses not recognized during the period the equity method was suspended.
Sensitivity of Estimate to Change: While our methodology did not change in 2023, if our cash flow projections or our evaluation of qualitative factors change, based on market conditions or other factors, our evaluation of impairment losses may be different and such differences could be material to our consolidated financial statements. Cash flow projections are subjective and are based, in part, on assumptions regarding expected future operating income, trends and prospects, anticipated holding periods, as well as the effects of demand, competition and other factors that could differ materially from actual results. If our assessment that an impairment is other-than-temporary changes, it could result in an impairment loss that could be material to our consolidated financial statements.
Revenue Recognition
Description: We have leases with various tenants across our portfolio of properties, which generate rental income and operating cash flows for our benefit. Property rental revenue includes base rent each tenant pays in accordance with the terms of its respective lease and is reported on a straight-line basis over the non-cancellable term of the lease, which includes the effects of periodic step-ups in rent and rent abatements under the lease.
Judgments and Uncertainties: We periodically evaluate the collectability of amounts due from tenants and recognize an adjustment to property rental revenue for accounts receivable and deferred rent receivable if we conclude it is not probable we will collect the remaining lease payments under the lease agreements. We exercise judgment in assessing the probability of collection and consider payment history, current credit status and economic outlook in making this determination.
Sensitivity of Estimate to Change: If the probability of collection changes, due to tenant creditworthiness, changes to tenant payment patterns or economic trends, our evaluation of collectability may be different and such differences could be material to our consolidated financial statements.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for a description of recent accounting pronouncements.
Results of Operations
The following section discusses certain line items from our consolidated statements of operations and the year-to-year comparisons between 2023 and 2022. Discussions of the year-to-year comparisons between 2022 and 2021 can be found in "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in Part II, Item 7 of Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022, filed with the SEC on February 21, 2023.
In 2023, we sold an 80.0% interest in 4747 Bethesda Avenue to an unconsolidated real estate venture, and we sold Falkland Chase, 5 M Street Southwest, Crystal City Marriott and Capital Point-North-75 New York Avenue. In 2022, we sold the Universal Buildings and Pen Place, and sold 7200 Wisconsin Avenue, 1730 M Street, RTC-West/RTC-West Trophy Office/RTC-West Land and Courthouse Plaza 1 and 2 to an unconsolidated real estate venture. We collectively refer to these assets as the "Disposed Properties" in the discussion below. In 2022, we acquired the remaining 36.0% ownership interest in Atlantic Plumbing and the remaining 50.0% ownership interest in 8001 Woodmont, which were previously owned by unconsolidated real estate ventures and consolidated upon acquisition.
Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2023 to 2022
The following summarizes certain line items from our consolidated statements of operations that we believe are important in understanding our operations and/or those items which significantly changed in the year ended December 31, 2023 compared to the same period in 2022:
(Dollars in thousands)
| | | Year Ended December 31, 2023 | | 2022 | | % Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Property rental revenue | | $483,159 | | $491,738 | (1.7)% | |
| Third-party real estate services revenue, including reimbursements | | 92,051 | | 89,022 | 3.4% | |
| Depreciation and amortization expense | | 210,195 | | 213,771 | (1.7)% | |
| Property operating expense | | 144,049 | | 150,004 | (4.0)% | |
| Real estate taxes expense | | 57,668 | | 62,167 | (7.2)% | |
| General and administrative expense: | | | | | | |
| Corporate and other | | 54,838 | | 58,280 | (5.9)% | |
| Third-party real estate services | | 88,948 | | 94,529 | (5.9)% | |
| Share-based compensation related to Formation Transaction and special equity awards | | 549 | | 5,391 | (89.8)% | |
| Loss from unconsolidated real estate ventures, net | | 26,999 | | 17,429 | 54.9% | |
| Interest and other income, net | | 15,781 | | 18,617 | (15.2)% | |
| Interest expense | | 108,660 | | 75,930 | 43.1% | |
| Gain on the sale of real estate, net | | 79,335 | | 161,894 | (51.0)% | |
| Impairment loss | | 90,226 | | — | | * |
* Not meaningful.
Property rental revenue decreased by $8.6 million, or 1.7%, to $483.2 million in 2023 from $491.7 million in 2022. The decrease was primarily due to a $39.1 million decrease in revenue from our commercial assets, partially offset by a $26.6 million increase in revenue from our multifamily assets and a $3.9 million increase in other revenue. The decrease in revenue from our commercial assets was primarily due to a $31.2 million decrease related to the Disposed Properties, and lower occupancy and rents across the portfolio. The increase in revenue from our multifamily assets was primarily due to a $16.9 million increase related to the consolidation of Atlantic Plumbing and 8001 Woodmont, and higher occupancy and rents across the portfolio, partially offset by a $2.0 million decrease related to the sale of Falkland Chase.
Third-party real estate services revenue, including reimbursements, increased by $3.0 million, or 3.4%, to $92.1 million in 2023 from $89.0 million in 2022. The increase was primarily due to a $1.9 million increase in development fees related to the timing of development projects, a $1.9 million increase in reimbursement revenue and an $861,000 increase in construction management fees due to an increase in active projects, partially offset by a $1.2 million decrease in asset management fees due to the sale of assets within the JBG Legacy Funds.
Depreciation and amortization expense decreased by $3.6 million, or 1.7%, to $210.2 million in 2023 from $213.8 million in 2022. The decrease was primarily due to a $14.9 million decrease related to the Disposed Properties, a $4.3 million decrease due to the amortization of the acquired in-place lease intangible at The Batley in 2022 and a $3.9 million decrease related to 2221 S. Clark Street-Residential due to the amortization and disposal of certain tenant improvements in 2022. The decrease in depreciation and amortization expense was partially offset by an $8.9 million increase related to the consolidation of Atlantic Plumbing and 8001 Woodmont, a $6.5 million increase related to 2100 Crystal Drive due to the acceleration of depreciation of certain assets as the building will be taken out of service in the second quarter of 2024, and a $4.2 million increase related to 2451 Crystal Drive and 1550 Crystal Drive due to the amortization and disposal of certain tenant improvements in 2023.
Property operating expense decreased by $6.0 million, or 4.0%, to $144.0 million in 2023 from $150.0 million in 2022. The decrease was primarily due to a $11.0 million decrease in property operating expense from our commercial assets and a $5.2 million decrease in other property operating expense, partially offset by a $10.2 million increase in property operating expense from our multifamily assets. The decrease in property operating expense from our commercial assets was primarily due to a $9.5 million decrease related to the Disposed Properties and a $1.4 million decrease in construction management services provided to tenants. The decrease in other property operating expense was primarily due to a $1.9 million decrease in insurance claims covered by our captive insurance subsidiary, a $1.1 million decrease in costs incurred related to digital infrastructure initiatives in National Landing and a $1.1 million decrease related to operating expenses for properties under development. The increase in property operating expense from our multifamily assets was primarily due to a $6.9 million increase related to the consolidation of Atlantic Plumbing and 8001 Woodmont, and a $3.6 million increase in operating expenses across our multifamily portfolio, primarily related to higher compensation, temporary staffing, cleaning, marketing, legal and security expenses.
Real estate taxes expense decreased by $4.5 million, or 7.2%, to $57.7 million in 2023 from $62.2 million in 2022. The decrease was primarily due to a $5.8 million decrease related to the Disposed Properties and lower assessments across the portfolio, partially offset by a $2.1 million increase related to the consolidation of Atlantic Plumbing and 8001 Woodmont.
General and administrative expense: corporate and other decreased by $3.4 million, or 5.9%, to $54.8 million in 2023 from $58.3 million in 2022. The decrease was primarily due to lower compensation expense resulting from lower headcount, partially offset by a decrease in capitalized payroll.
General and administrative expense: third-party real estate services decreased by $5.6 million, or 5.9%, to $88.9 million in 2023 from $94.5 million in 2022. The decrease was primarily due to lower compensation expense resulting from lower headcount, partially offset by an increase in third-party reimbursable expenses.
General and administrative expense: share-based compensation related to Formation Transaction and special equity awards decreased by $4.8 million, or 89.8%, to $549,000 in 2023 from $5.4 million in 2022. The decrease was primarily due to the graded vesting of certain awards issued in prior years, which resulted in lower expense as portions of the awards vested.
Loss from unconsolidated real estate ventures increased by $9.6 million, or 54.9%, to $27.0 million for 2023 from $17.4 million in 2022. The increase was primarily due to a $9.3 million increase in impairment losses, a $6.4 million reduction in gains at our share from the sale of various assets in 2022 and a decrease in income at our share. The increase in loss from unconsolidated real estate ventures was partially offset by a $5.6 million decrease in loss related to the consolidation of Atlantic Plumbing and 8001 Woodmont as these assets were not yet stabilized and incurring losses and a $1.6 million decrease related to our suspension of the equity method of accounting for the L’Enfant Plaza Assets.
Interest and other income decreased by approximately $2.8 million, or 15.2%, to $15.8 million in 2023 from $18.6 million in 2022. The decrease was primarily due to a $12.6 million decrease in realized gains primarily from the sale of investments in equity securities in 2022 and an $883,000 decrease in unrealized gains from investments. The decrease in interest and other income was partially offset by a $6.2 million increase in interest income from our outstanding cash balances and a $6.0 million gain from the settlement of litigation in 2023.
Interest expense increased by $32.7 million, or 43.1%, to $108.7 million in 2023 from $75.9 million in 2022. The increase in interest expense was primarily due to (i) a $32.3 million increase due to higher outstanding debt, (ii) a $15.2 million decrease related to the mark-to-market associated with our non-designated derivatives, (iii) a $14.0 million increase related to rising interest rates on variable rate mortgage loans and (iv) a $3.8 million increase related to the consolidation of 8001 Woodmont. The increase in interest expense was partially offset by (v) a $15.9 million increase in capitalized interest, (vi) a $7.7 million decrease related to mortgage loans collateralized by 2121 Crystal Drive and Falkland Chase-South & West, which were repaid during 2023, and (vii) a $7.1 million decrease related to the Disposed Properties, excluding Falkland Chase-South & West.
Gain on the sale of real estate of $79.3 million in 2023 and $161.9 million in 2022 was due to the sale of the Disposed Properties.
Impairment loss of $90.2 million in 2023 related to various commercial assets (2101 L Street, 2100 Crystal Drive and 2200 Crystal Drive) and a development parcel, which were written down to their estimated fair value.
FFO
FFO is a non-GAAP financial measure computed in accordance with the definition established by Nareit in the Nareit FFO White Paper - 2018 Restatement. Nareit defines FFO as net income (loss) (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding depreciation and amortization expense related to real estate, gains (losses) from the sale of certain real estate assets, gains (losses) from change in control and impairment write-downs of certain real estate assets and investments in entities when the impairment is directly attributable to decreases in the value of depreciable real estate held by the entity, including our share of such adjustments for unconsolidated real estate ventures.
We believe FFO is a meaningful non-GAAP financial measure useful in comparing our levered operating performance from period-to-period and compared to similar real estate companies because FFO excludes real estate depreciation and amortization expense, which implicitly assumes that the value of real estate diminishes predictably over time rather than fluctuating based on market conditions, and other non-comparable income and expenses. FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities and is not necessarily indicative of cash available to fund cash requirements and should not be considered as an alternative to net income (loss) (computed in accordance with GAAP), as a performance measure or cash flow as a liquidity measure. FFO may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies.
The following is the reconciliation of net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders, the most directly comparable GAAP measure, to FFO:
(In thousands)
| | | Year Ended December 31, 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders | | $(79,978) | | $85,371 | | $(79,257) |
| Net income (loss) attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests | | (10,596) | | 13,244 | | (8,728) |
| Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests | | (1,135) | | 371 | | (1,740) |
| Net income (loss) | | (91,709) | | 98,986 | | (89,725) |
| Gain on the sale of real estate, net of tax | | (79,335) | | (158,769) | | (11,290) |
| Gain on the sale of unconsolidated real estate assets | | (411) | | (6,797) | | (28,326) |
| Real estate depreciation and amortization | | 203,269 | | 204,752 | | 227,424 |
| Real estate impairment loss, net of tax | | 90,226 | | — | | 24,301 |
| Impairment related to unconsolidated real estate ventures (1) | | 28,598 | | 19,286 | | 25,263 |
| Pro rata share of real estate depreciation and amortization from unconsolidated real estate ventures | | 11,545 | | 21,169 | | 28,216 |
| FFO attributable to noncontrolling interests | | 1,024 | | (735) | | 1,522 |
| FFO attributable to OP Units | | 163,207 | | 177,892 | | 177,385 |
| FFO attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests | | (22,820) | | (21,846) | | (18,034) |
| FFO attributable to common shareholders | | $140,387 | | $156,046 | | $159,351 |
(1) Related to decreases in the value of the underlying real estate assets.
NOI and Same Store NOI
NOI is a non-GAAP financial measure management uses to assess an asset's performance. The most directly comparable GAAP measure is net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders. We use NOI internally as a performance measure and believe NOI provides useful information to investors regarding our financial condition and results of operations because it reflects only property related revenue (which includes base rent, tenant reimbursements and other operating revenue, net of free rent and payments associated with assumed lease liabilities) less operating expenses and ground rent for operating leases, if applicable. NOI also excludes deferred rent, related party management fees, interest expense, and certain other non-cash adjustments, including the accretion of acquired below-market leases and the amortization of acquired above-market leases and below-market ground lease intangibles. Management uses NOI as a supplemental performance measure of our assets and believes it provides useful information to investors because it reflects only those revenue and expense items that are incurred at the asset level, excluding non-cash items. In addition, NOI is considered by many in the real estate industry to be a useful starting point for determining the value of a real estate asset or group of assets. However, because NOI excludes depreciation and amortization expense and captures neither the changes in the value of our assets that result from use or market conditions, nor the level of capital expenditures and capitalized leasing commissions necessary to maintain the operating performance of our assets, all of which have real economic effect and could materially impact the financial performance of our assets, the utility of NOI as a measure of the operating performance of our assets is limited. NOI presented by us may not be comparable to NOI reported by other REITs that define these measures differently. We believe to facilitate a clear understanding of our operating results, NOI should be examined in conjunction with net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders as presented in our consolidated financial statements. NOI should not be considered as an alternative to net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders as an indication of our performance or to cash flows as a measure of liquidity or our ability to make distributions.
Information provided on a same store basis includes the results of properties that are owned, operated and in-service for the entirety of both periods being compared, which excludes disposed properties or properties for which significant redevelopment, renovation or repositioning occurred during either of the periods being compared. During the year ended December 31, 2023, our same store pool decreased to 42 properties from 47 properties due to (i) the sale of Falkland Chase, Crystal City Marriott, Stonebridge at Potomac Town Center and Rosslyn Gateway, (ii) the exclusion of The Foundry as we discontinued the equity method of accounting for this unconsolidated real estate venture and our investment in the venture was reduced to zero and (iii) the inclusion of The Wren and The Batley as they were in service for the entirety of the comparable periods. While there is judgment surrounding changes in designations, a property is removed from the same store pool when the property is considered to be under-construction because it is undergoing significant redevelopment or renovation pursuant to a formal plan or is being repositioned in the market and such renovation or repositioning is expected to have a significant impact on property NOI. A development property or under-construction property is moved to the same store pool once a substantial portion of the growth expected from the development or redevelopment is reflected in both the current and comparable prior year period. Acquisitions are moved into the same store pool once we have owned the property for the entirety of the comparable periods and the property is not under significant development or redevelopment.
Same store NOI increased by $4.8 million, or 1.6%, to $299.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2023 from $295.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. The increase was substantially attributable to (i) higher rents and occupancy, partially offset by higher concessions and higher operating expenses in our multifamily portfolio and (ii) lower occupancy, partially offset by the burn off of rent abatements, higher parking revenue and lower operating expenses in our commercial portfolio.
The following is the reconciliation of net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders to NOI and same store NOI:
(Dollars in thousands)
| | | Year Ended December 31, 2023 | | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders | | $(79,978) | | $85,371 |
| Add: | | | | |
| Depreciation and amortization expense | | 210,195 | | 213,771 |
| General and administrative expense: | | | | |
| Corporate and other | | 54,838 | | 58,280 |
| Third-party real estate services | | 88,948 | | 94,529 |
| Share-based compensation related to Formation Transaction and special equity awards | | 549 | | 5,391 |
| Transaction and other costs | | 8,737 | | 5,511 |
| Interest expense | | 108,660 | | 75,930 |
| Loss on the extinguishment of debt | | 450 | | 3,073 |
| Impairment loss | | 90,226 | | — |
| Income tax expense (benefit) | | (296) | | 1,264 |
| Net income (loss) attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests | | (10,596) | | 13,244 |
| Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests | | (1,135) | | 371 |
| Less: | | | | |
| Third-party real estate services, including reimbursements revenue | | 92,051 | | 89,022 |
| Other revenue | | 10,902 | | 7,421 |
| Loss from unconsolidated real estate ventures, net | | (26,999) | | (17,429) |
| Interest and other income, net | | 15,781 | | 18,617 |
| Gain on the sale of real estate, net | | 79,335 | | 161,894 |
| Consolidated NOI | | 299,528 | | 297,210 |
| NOI attributable to unconsolidated real estate ventures at our share | | 19,452 | | 26,861 |
| Non-cash rent adjustments (1) | | (23,482) | | (17,442) |
| Other adjustments (2) | | 22,994 | | 27,739 |
| Total adjustments | | 18,964 | | 37,158 |
| NOI | | 318,492 | | 334,368 |
| Less: out-of-service NOI loss (3) | | (3,512) | | (4,849) |
| Operating Portfolio NOI | | 322,004 | | 339,217 |
| Non-same store NOI (4) | | 22,125 | | 44,174 |
| Same store NOI (5) | | $299,879 | | $295,043 |
| | | | | |
| Change in same store NOI | | 1.6% | | |
| Number of properties in same store pool | | 42 | | |
(1) Adjustment to exclude straight-line rent, above/below market lease amortization and lease incentive amortization.
(2) Adjustment to include other revenue and payments associated with assumed lease liabilities related to operating properties and to exclude commercial lease termination revenue and related party management fees.
(3) Includes the results of our under-construction assets and assets in the development pipeline.
(4) Includes the results of properties that were not in-service for the entirety of both periods being compared, including disposed properties, and properties for which significant redevelopment, renovation or repositioning occurred during either of the periods being compared.
(5) Includes the results of the properties that are owned, operated and in-service for the entirety of both periods being compared.
Reportable Segments
We review operating and financial data for each property on an individual basis; therefore, each of our individual properties is a separate operating segment. We define our reportable segments to be aligned with our method of internal reporting and the way our Chief Executive Officer, who is also our CODM, makes key operating decisions, evaluates financial results, allocates resources and manages our business. Accordingly, we aggregate our operating segments into three reportable segments (multifamily, commercial and third-party asset management and real estate services) based on the economic characteristics and nature of our assets and services.
The CODM measures and evaluates the performance of our operating segments, with the exception of the third-party asset management and real estate services business, based on the NOI of properties within each segment.
With respect to the third-party asset management and real estate services business, the CODM reviews revenue streams generated by this segment ("Third-party real estate services, including reimbursements"), as well as the expenses attributable to the segment ("General and administrative: third-party real estate services"), which are both disclosed separately in our consolidated statements of operations. The following represents the components of revenue from our third-party asset management and real estate services business:
(In thousands)
| | | Year Ended December 31, 2023 | | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Property management fees | | $19,930 | | $19,589 |
| Asset management fees | | 5,030 | | 6,191 |
| Development fees | | 10,253 | | 8,325 |
| Leasing fees | | 5,592 | | 6,017 |
| Construction management fees | | 1,383 | | 522 |
| Other service revenue | | 5,316 | | 5,706 |
| Third-party real estate services revenue, excluding reimbursements | | 47,504 | | 46,350 |
| Reimbursement revenue (1) | | 44,547 | | 42,672 |
| Third-party real estate services revenue, including reimbursements | | 92,051 | | 89,022 |
| Third-party real estate services expenses | | 88,948 | | 94,529 |
| Third-party real estate services revenue less expenses | | $3,103 | | $(5,507) |
(1) Represents reimbursements of expenses incurred by us on behalf of third parties, including allocated payroll costs and amounts paid to third-party contractors for construction management projects.
See discussion of third-party real estate services revenue, including reimbursements, and third-party real estate services expenses for the year ended December 31, 2023 in the preceding pages under "Results of Operations."
Consistent with internal reporting presented to our CODM and our definition of NOI, the third-party asset management and real estate services operating results are excluded from the NOI data below. Property revenue is calculated as property rental revenue plus parking revenue. Property expense is calculated as property operating expenses plus real estate taxes. Consolidated NOI is calculated as property revenue less property expense. See Note 20 to the consolidated financial statements for the reconciliation of net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders to consolidated NOI for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022.
The following is a summary of NOI by segment:
(In thousands)
| Property revenue: (1) | | Year Ended December 31, 2023 | | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Multifamily | | $207,752 | | $180,925 |
| Commercial | | 279,670 | | 318,485 |
| Other (2) | | 13,823 | | 9,971 |
| Total property revenue | | 501,245 | | 509,381 |
| | | | | |
| Property expense: (3) | | | ||
| Multifamily | | 94,225 | | 82,597 |
| Commercial | | 108,800 | | 124,173 |
| Other (2) | | (1,308) | | 5,401 |
| Total property expense | | 201,717 | | 212,171 |
| | | | | |
| Consolidated NOI: | | | ||
| Multifamily | | 113,527 | | 98,328 |
| Commercial | | 170,870 | | 194,312 |
| Other (2) | | 15,131 | | 4,570 |
| Consolidated NOI | | $299,528 | | $297,210 |
(1) Includes property rental revenue and parking revenue.
(2) Includes activity related to development assets, corporate entities, land assets for which we are the ground lessor and the elimination of inter-segment activity.
(3) Includes property operating expenses and real estate taxes.
Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2023 to 2022
Multifamily: Property revenue increased by $26.8 million, or 14.8%, to $207.8 million in 2023 from $180.9 million in 2022. Consolidated NOI increased by $15.2 million, or 15.5%, to $113.5 million in 2023 from $98.3 million in 2022. The increases in property revenue and consolidated NOI were primarily due to the consolidation of Atlantic Plumbing and 8001 Woodmont, and higher occupancy and rents across the portfolio. The increase in consolidated NOI was partially offset by an increase in property operating costs.
Commercial: Property revenue decreased by $38.8 million, or 12.2%, to $279.7 million in 2023 from $318.5 million in 2022. Consolidated NOI decreased by $23.4 million, or 12.1%, to $170.9 million in 2023 from $194.3 million in 2022. The decreases in property revenue and consolidated NOI were primarily due to the Disposed Properties and lower occupancy and rents across the portfolio.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Property rental revenue is our primary source of operating cash flow and depends on many factors including occupancy levels and rental rates, as well as our tenants' ability to pay rent. In addition, our third-party asset management and real estate services business provides fee-based real estate services to the JBG Legacy Funds, other third parties and the WHI Impact Pool. Our assets provide a relatively consistent level of cash flow that enables us to pay operating expenses, debt service, recurring capital expenditures, dividends to shareholders and distributions to holders of OP Units and LTIP Units. Other sources of liquidity to fund cash requirements include proceeds from financings, recapitalizations, asset sales, and the issuance and sale of securities. We anticipate that cash flows from continuing operations and proceeds from financings, asset sales and recapitalizations, together with existing cash balances, will be adequate to fund our business operations, debt amortization, capital expenditures, any dividends to shareholders, and distributions to holders of OP Units and LTIP Units.
Mortgage Loans
The following is a summary of mortgage loans:
(In thousands)
| | | Weighted Average Effective Interest Rate (1) | | December 31, 2023 | | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable rate (2) | 6.25% | | $608,582 | | $892,268 | |
| Fixed rate (3) | 4.78% | | 1,189,643 | | 1,009,607 | |
| Mortgage loans | | | 1,798,225 | | 1,901,875 | |
| Unamortized deferred financing costs and premium/discount, net (4) | | | (15,211) | | (11,701) | |
| Mortgage loans, net | | | | $1,783,014 | | $1,890,174 |
(1) Weighted average effective interest rate as of December 31, 2023.
(2) Includes variable rate mortgage loans with interest rate cap agreements. For mortgage loans with interest rate caps, the weighted average interest rate cap strike was 3.33%, and the weighted average maturity date of the interest rate caps is March 2025. The interest rate cap strike is exclusive of the credit spreads associated with the mortgage loans. As of December 31, 2023, one-month term SOFR was 5.35%.
(3) Includes variable rate mortgage loans with interest rates fixed by interest rate swap agreements.
(4) As of December 31, 2022, excludes $2.2 million of net deferred financing costs related to unfunded mortgage loans that were included in "Other assets, net" in our consolidated balance sheet.
As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, the net carrying value of real estate collateralizing our mortgage loans totaled $2.2 billion. Our mortgage loans contain covenants that limit our ability to incur additional indebtedness on these properties and, in certain circumstances, require lender approval of tenant leases and/or yield maintenance upon repayment prior to maturity. Certain mortgage loans are recourse to us. See Note 21 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.
In January 2023, we entered into a $187.6 million loan facility, collateralized by The Wren and F1RST Residences. The loan has a seven-year term and a fixed interest rate of 5.13%. This loan is the initial advance under a Fannie Mae multifamily credit facility which provides flexibility for collateral substitutions, future advances tied to performance, ability to mix fixed and floating rates, and staggered maturities. Proceeds from the loan were used, in part, to repay the $131.5 million mortgage loan collateralized by 2121 Crystal Drive, which had a fixed interest rate of 5.51%.
In June 2023, we repaid $142.4 million in mortgage loans collateralized by Falkland Chase-South & West and 800 North Glebe Road.
In August 2022, we entered into a mortgage loan with a principal balance of $97.5 million collateralized by WestEnd25. The mortgage loan has a seven-year term and an interest rate of SOFR plus 1.45%. We also entered into an interest rate swap with a total notional value of $97.5 million, which effectively fixes SOFR at an average interest rate of 2.71% through the maturity date. During the year ended December 31, 2021, we entered into two separate mortgage loans with an aggregate principal balance of $190.0 million, collateralized by 1225 S. Clark Street and 1215 S. Clark Street.
As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, we had various interest rate swap and cap agreements on certain of our mortgage loans with an aggregate notional value of $1.7 billion and $1.3 billion. See Note 19 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.
Revolving Credit Facility and Term Loans
As of December 31, 2023, our unsecured revolving credit facility and term loans totaling $1.5 billion consisted of a $750.0 million revolving credit facility maturing in June 2027, a $200.0 million Tranche A-1 Term Loan maturing in January 2025, a $400.0 million Tranche A-2 Term Loan maturing in January 2028 and a $120.0 million 2023 Term Loan maturing in June 2028.
In January 2022, the Tranche A-1 Term Loan was amended to extend the maturity date to January 2025 with two one-year extension options, and to amend the interest rate to SOFR plus 1.15% to SOFR plus 1.75%, varying based on a ratio of our total outstanding indebtedness to a valuation of certain real property and assets.
In July 2022, the Tranche A-2 Term Loan was amended to increase its borrowing capacity by $200.0 million. The incremental $200.0 million included a delayed draw feature, of which $150.0 million was drawn in September 2022 and the remaining $50.0 million was drawn in May 2023. The amendment extended the maturity date of the term loan to January 2028 and amended the interest rate to SOFR plus 1.25% to SOFR plus 1.80%, varying based on a ratio of our total outstanding indebtedness to a valuation of certain real property and assets.
Effective as of June 29, 2023, the revolving credit facility was amended to: (i) reduce the borrowing capacity from $1.0 billion to $750.0 million, (ii) extend the maturity date from January 2025 to June 2027 and (iii) amend the interest rate to daily SOFR plus 1.40% to daily SOFR plus 1.85%, varying based on a ratio of our total outstanding indebtedness to a valuation of certain real property and assets. We have the option to increase the $750.0 million revolving credit facility or add term loans up to $500.0 million, and we also have the right to extend the maturity date beyond June 2027 via two six-month extension options.
In addition, on June 29, 2023, we entered into a $120.0 million term loan maturing in June 2028 with an interest rate of one-month term SOFR plus 1.25% to one-month term SOFR plus 1.80%, varying based on a ratio of our total outstanding indebtedness to a valuation of certain real property and assets.
In July 2023, we amended the covenants related to the Tranche A-1 Term Loan and the Tranche A-2 Term Loan to be consistent with the revolving credit facility and 2023 Term Loan covenants.
The following is a summary of amounts outstanding under the revolving credit facility and term loans:
(In thousands)
| | | Effective Interest Rate (1) | | December 31, 2023 | | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revolving credit facility (2) (3) | 6.83% | | $62,000 | | $— | |
| | | | | | | |
| Tranche A-1 Term Loan (4) | 2.70% | | $200,000 | | $200,000 | |
| Tranche A-2 Term Loan (5) | 3.58% | | 400,000 | | 350,000 | |
| 2023 Term Loan (6) | | 5.31% | | 120,000 | | — |
| Term loans | | | 720,000 | | 550,000 | |
| Unamortized deferred financing costs, net | | | (2,828) | | (2,928) | |
| Term loans, net | | | | $717,172 | | $547,072 |
(1) Effective interest rate as of December 31, 2023. The interest rate for the revolving credit facility excludes a 0.15% facility fee.
(2) As of December 31, 2023, daily SOFR was 5.38%. As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, letters of credit with an aggregate face amount of $467,000 were outstanding under our revolving credit facility. In February 2024, we repaid all amounts outstanding under our revolving credit facility.
(3) As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, excludes net deferred financing costs related to our revolving credit facility of $10.2 million and $3.3 million that were included in "Other assets, net" in our consolidated balance sheets.
(4) As of December 31, 2023, the interest rate swaps fix SOFR at a weighted average interest rate of 1.46%. Interest rate swaps with a total notional value of $200.0 million mature in July 2024. We have two forward-starting interest rate swaps that will be effective July 2024 with a total notional value of $200.0 million, which will effectively fix SOFR at a weighted average interest rate of 4.00% through January 2027.
(5) As of December 31, 2023, the interest rate swaps fix SOFR at a weighted average interest rate of 2.29%. Interest rate swaps with a total notional value of $200.0 million mature in July 2024 and with a total notional value of $200.0 million mature in January 2028. We have two forward-starting interest rate swaps that will be effective July 2024 with a total notional value of $200.0 million, which will effectively fix SOFR at a weighted average interest rate of 2.81% through the maturity date.
(6) As of December 31, 2023, the outstanding balance was fixed by an interest rate swap agreement, which fixes SOFR at an interest rate of 4.01% through the maturity date.
Common Shares Repurchased
Our Board of Trustees previously authorized the repurchase of up to $1.0 billion of our outstanding common shares, and in May 2023, increased the common share repurchase authorization to $1.5 billion. During the year ended December 31, 2023, we repurchased and retired 22.6 million common shares for $335.3 million, a weighted average purchase price per share of $14.83. During the year ended December 31, 2022, we repurchased and retired 14.2 million common shares for $361.0 million, a weighted average purchase price per share of $25.49. During the year ended December 31, 2021, we repurchased and retired 5.4 million common shares for $157.7 million, a weighted average purchase price per share of $29.34. Since we began the share repurchase program through December 31, 2023, we have repurchased and retired 45.9 million common shares for $958.8 million, a weighted average purchase price per share of $20.88.
During the first quarter of 2024, through the date of this filing, we repurchased and retired 2.7 million common shares for $45.4 million, a weighted average purchase price per share of $16.52, pursuant to a repurchase plan under Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Purchases under the program are made either in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions from time to time as permitted by federal securities laws and other legal requirements. The timing, manner, price and amount of any repurchases will be determined by us at our discretion and will be subject to economic and market conditions, share price, applicable legal requirements and other factors. The program may be suspended or discontinued at our discretion without prior notice.
Material Cash Requirements
Our material cash requirements for the next 12 months and beyond are to fund:
- normal recurring expenses;
- debt service and principal repayment obligations, including balloon payments on maturing mortgage debt — As of December 31, 2023, we had $120.3 million on a consolidated basis and at our share related to a mortgage loan scheduled to mature in 2024;
- capital expenditures, including major renovations, tenant improvements and leasing costs — As of December 31, 2023, we had committed tenant-related obligations totaling $46.8 million ($46.0 million related to our consolidated entities and $828,000 related to our unconsolidated real estate ventures at our share);
- development expenditures — As of December 31, 2023, we had assets under construction that, based on our current plans and estimates, require an additional $177.1 million to complete, which we anticipate will be primarily expended over the next two years;
- dividends to shareholders and distributions to holders of OP Units and LTIP Units — on February 14, 2024, our Board of Trustees declared a quarterly dividend of $0.175 per common share;
- possible common share repurchases — during the first quarter of 2024, through the date of this filing, we repurchased and retired 2.7 million common shares for $45.4 million; and
- possible acquisitions of properties, either directly or indirectly through the acquisition of equity interests.
We expect to satisfy these requirements using one or more of the following:
- cash and cash equivalents — As of December 31, 2023, we had cash and cash equivalents of $164.8 million;
- cash flows from operations;
- distributions from real estate ventures;
- borrowing capacity under our current revolving credit facility — As of December 31, 2023, we had $687.5 million of availability under our revolving credit facility;
- proceeds from financings, asset sales and recapitalizations; and
- proceeds from the issuance of securities.
The following is a summary of our material cash requirements as of December 31, 2023:
(In thousands)
| Material cash requirements (principal and interest): | | Total | | 2024 | | 2025 | | 2026 | | 2027 | | 2028 | | Thereafter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt obligations (1) (2) | | $3,120,752 | | $254,845 | | $712,085 | | $213,919 | | $560,265 | | $660,333 | | $719,305 |
| Operating leases (3) | | 93,848 | | 6,539 | | 6,737 | | 6,942 | | 7,154 | | 5,934 | | 60,542 |
| Other | | 662 | | 365 | | 108 | | 105 | | 84 | | — | | — |
| Total material cash requirements (4) | | $3,215,262 | | $261,749 | | $718,930 | | $220,966 | | $567,503 | | $666,267 | | $779,847 |
(1) Interest was computed giving effect to interest rate hedges. One-month term SOFR of 5.35% and daily SOFR of 5.38% was applied to loans, as applicable, which are variable (no hedge) or variable with an interest rate cap. Additionally, we assumed no additional borrowings on construction loans.
(2) Excludes our proportionate share of unconsolidated real estate venture indebtedness. See additional information in Unconsolidated Real Estate Ventures section below.
(3) We have operating lease right-of-use assets and lease liabilities associated with various ground leases for which we are the lessee in our consolidated balance sheet. See Note 21 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.
(4) Excludes obligations related to construction or development contracts totaling $177.1 million since payments are only due upon satisfactory performance under the contracts. Also excludes committed tenant-related obligations totaling $46.8 million ($46.0 million related to our consolidated entities and $828,000 related to our unconsolidated real estate ventures at our share) as timing and amounts of payments are uncertain and may only be due upon satisfactory performance of certain conditions. See Commitments and Contingencies section below for additional information.
Summary of Cash Flows
The following summary discussion of our cash flows is based on our consolidated statements of cash flows and is not meant to be an all-inclusive discussion of the changes in our cash flows:
(In thousands)
| | | Year Ended December 31, 2023 | | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net cash provided by operating activities | | $183,372 | | $178,037 |
| Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities | | (98,179) | | 524,021 |
| Net cash used in financing activities | | (158,825) | | (730,080) |
Cash Flows for the Year Ended December 31, 2023
Cash and cash equivalents, and restricted cash decreased $73.6 million to $200.4 million as of December 31, 2023, compared to $274.1 million as of December 31, 2022. This decrease resulted from $158.8 million of net cash used in financing activities and $98.2 million of net cash used in investing activities, partially offset by $183.4 million of net cash provided by operating activities. Our outstanding debt was $2.6 billion and $2.5 billion as of December 31, 2023 and 2022.
Net cash provided by operating activities of $183.4 million primarily comprised: (i) $185.2 million of net income (before $356.2 million of non-cash items and $79.3 million of gain on the sale of real estate), (ii) $20.7 million of return on capital from unconsolidated real estate ventures and (iii) $22.5 million of net change in operating assets and liabilities. Non-cash income adjustments of $356.2 million primarily include depreciation and amortization expense, impairment loss, share-based compensation expense, loss from unconsolidated real estate ventures, deferred rent and other non-cash items.
Net cash used in investing activities of $98.2 million primarily comprised: (i) $333.7 million of development costs, construction in progress and real estate additions, (ii) $29.0 million of investments in unconsolidated real estate ventures and other investments and (iii) a $19.6 million payment of a deferred purchase price related to the 2020 acquisition of a development parcel, partially offset by (iv) $281.5 million of proceeds from the sale of real estate and (v) $10.5 million of distributions of capital from unconsolidated real estate ventures and other investments.
Net cash used in financing activities of $158.8 million primarily comprised: (i) $335.3 million of common shares repurchased, (ii) $309.8 million of repayments of the revolving credit facility, (iii) $281.9 million of repayments of mortgage loans, (iv) $94.0 million of dividends paid to common shareholders, (v) $17.6 million of debt issuance and modification costs and (vi) $15.3 million of distributions to redeemable noncontrolling interests, partially offset by (vii) $371.8 million of proceeds from borrowings under the revolving credit facility, (viii) $345.1 million of borrowings under mortgage loans and (ix) $170.0 million of borrowings under the term loans.
Unconsolidated Real Estate Ventures
We consolidate entities in which we have a controlling interest or are the primary beneficiary in a variable interest entity. From time to time, we may have off-balance-sheet unconsolidated real estate ventures and other unconsolidated arrangements with varying structures.
As of December 31, 2023, we have investments in unconsolidated real estate ventures totaling $264.3 million. For these investments, we exercise significant influence over but do not control these entities and, therefore, account for these investments using the equity method of accounting. For a more complete description of our real estate ventures, see Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements.
From time to time, we (or ventures in which we have an ownership interest) have agreed, and may in the future agree with respect to unconsolidated real estate ventures, to (i) guarantee portions of the principal, interest and other amounts in connection with borrowings, (ii) provide customary environmental indemnifications and nonrecourse carve-outs (e.g., guarantees against fraud, misrepresentation and bankruptcy) in connection with borrowings or (iii) provide guarantees to lenders and other third parties for the completion of development projects. We customarily have agreements with our outside venture partners whereby the partners agree to reimburse the real estate venture or us for their share of any payments made under certain of these guarantees. At times, we also have agreements with certain of our outside venture partners whereby we agree to either indemnify the partners and/or the associated ventures with respect to certain contingent liabilities associated with operating assets or to reimburse our partner for its share of any payments made by them under certain guarantees. Guarantees (excluding environmental) customarily terminate either upon the satisfaction of specified circumstances or repayment of the underlying debt. Amounts that we may be required to pay in future periods in relation to guarantees associated with budget overruns or operating losses are not estimable.
As of December 31, 2023, we had additional capital commitments and certain recorded guarantees to our unconsolidated real estate ventures and other investments totaling $61.3 million. As of December 31, 2023, we had no principal payment guarantees related to our unconsolidated real estate ventures.
Commitments and Contingencies
Insurance
We maintain general liability insurance with limits of $150.0 million per occurrence and in the aggregate, and property and rental value insurance coverage with limits of $1.0 billion per occurrence, with sub-limits for certain perils such as floods and earthquakes on each of our properties. We also maintain coverage, through our wholly owned captive insurance subsidiary, for a portion of the first loss on the above limits and for both conventional terrorist acts and for nuclear, biological, chemical or radiological terrorism events with limits of $2.0 billion per occurrence. These policies are partially reinsured by third-party insurance providers.
We will continue to monitor the state of the insurance market, and the scope and costs of coverage for acts of terrorism. We cannot anticipate what coverage will be available on commercially reasonable terms in the future. We are responsible for deductibles and losses in excess of the insurance coverage, which could be material.
Our debt, consisting of mortgage loans secured by our properties, a revolving credit facility and term loans, contains customary covenants requiring adequate insurance coverage. Although we believe that we currently have adequate insurance coverage, we may not be able to obtain an equivalent amount of coverage at a reasonable cost in the future. If lenders insist on greater coverage than we are able to obtain, it could adversely affect our ability to finance or refinance our properties.
Construction Commitments
As of December 31, 2023, we had assets under construction that will, based on our current plans and estimates, require an additional $177.1 million to complete, which we anticipate will be primarily expended over the next two years. These capital expenditures are generally due as the work is performed, and we expect to finance them with debt proceeds, proceeds from asset recapitalizations and sales, and available cash.
Other
As of December 31, 2023, we had committed tenant-related obligations totaling $46.8 million ($46.0 million related to our consolidated entities and $828,000 related to our unconsolidated real estate ventures at our share). The timing and amounts of payments for tenant-related obligations are uncertain and may only be due upon satisfactory performance of certain conditions.
There are various legal actions against us in the ordinary course of business. In our opinion, the outcome of such matters will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. During the year ended December 31, 2023, we recognized a $6.0 million gain from the settlement of litigation, which was included in "Interest and other income, net" in our consolidated statement of operations.
With respect to borrowings of our consolidated entities, we have agreed, and may in the future agree, to (i) guarantee portions of the principal, interest and other amounts, (ii) provide customary environmental indemnifications and nonrecourse carve-outs (e.g., guarantees against fraud, misrepresentation and bankruptcy) or (iii) provide guarantees to lenders, tenants and other third parties for the completion of development projects. As of December 31, 2023, the aggregate amount of principal payment guarantees was $8.3 million for our consolidated entities.
In connection with the Formation Transaction, we have a Tax Matters Agreement that provides special rules that allocate tax liabilities if the distribution of JBG SMITH shares by Vornado, together with certain related transactions, is determined not to be tax-free. Under the Tax Matters Agreement, we may be required to indemnify Vornado against any taxes and related amounts and costs resulting from a violation by us of the Tax Matters Agreement.
Environmental Matters
Under various federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, a current or former owner or operator of real estate may be liable for conducting or paying for the costs of the investigation, removal or remediation of certain hazardous or toxic substances on that real estate. These laws often impose such liability without regard to whether the owner knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of hazardous or toxic substances, and the liability may be joint and several. The costs of remediation or removal of these substances may be substantial and could exceed the value of the property, and the presence of these substances, or the failure to promptly remediate these substances, may adversely affect the owner's ability to sell or develop the real estate or to borrow using the real estate as collateral. In connection with the ownership and operation of our current and former assets, we may be potentially liable for these costs. The operations of current and former tenants at our assets have involved, or may have involved, the use of hazardous substances or generated hazardous wastes, and indemnities in our lease agreements may not fully protect us from liability, if, for example, a tenant responsible for environmental noncompliance or contamination becomes insolvent. The release of these hazardous substances and wastes could result in us incurring liabilities to remediate any resulting contamination. The presence of contamination or the failure to remediate contamination at our properties may (i) expose us to third-party liability (e.g., for cleanup costs, natural resource damages, bodily injury or property damage), (ii) subject our properties to liens in favor of the government for damages and costs the government incurs in connection with the contamination, (iii) impose restrictions on the manner in which a property may be used or businesses may be operated, or (iv) materially adversely affect our ability to sell, lease or develop the real estate or to borrow using the real estate as collateral. In addition, our assets are exposed to the risk of contamination originating from other sources. While a property owner may not be responsible for remediating contamination that has migrated onsite from an identifiable and viable offsite source, the contaminant's presence can have adverse effects on operations and the redevelopment of our assets. To the extent we arrange for contaminated materials to be sent to other locations for treatment or disposal, we may be liable for the cleanup of those sites if they become contaminated, without regard to whether we complied with environmental laws in doing so.
Most of our assets have been subject, at some point, to environmental assessments that are intended to evaluate the environmental condition of the subject and surrounding assets. These environmental assessments generally have included a historical review, a public records review, a visual inspection of the site and surrounding assets, visual or historical evidence of underground storage tanks and other features, and the preparation and issuance of a written report. Soil, soil vapor and/or groundwater subsurface testing is conducted at our assets, when necessary, to further investigate any issues raised by the initial assessment that could reasonably be expected to pose a material concern to the property or result in us incurring material environmental liabilities as a result of redevelopment. The tests may not, however, have included extensive sampling or subsurface investigations. In each case where the environmental assessments have identified conditions requiring remedial actions required by law, we have initiated appropriate actions. The environmental assessments have not revealed any material environmental contamination that we believe would have a material adverse effect on our overall business, financial condition or results of operations, or that have not been anticipated and remediated during site redevelopment as required by law. Nevertheless, there can be no assurance that the identification of new areas of contamination, changes in the extent or known scope of contamination, the discovery of additional sites or changes in cleanup requirements would not result in significant cost to us. As disclosed in Note 21 to the consolidated financial statements, environmental liabilities totaled $17.6 million and $18.0 million as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, and are included in "Other liabilities, net" in our consolidated balance sheets.
Market risk
As filed, 7,156 characters, with its headings, lists and tables. Extracted from the main document; charts and exhibits are in the original on sec.gov.
Interest Rate Risk
We have exposure to fluctuations in interest rates, which are sensitive to many factors that are beyond our control. The following is a summary of our exposure to a change in interest rates:
(Dollars in thousands)
| Debt (contractual balances): Mortgage loans: | | December 31, 2023 Balance | | Weighted Average Effective Interest Rate | | | | Annual Effect of 1% Change in Base Rates | | December 31, 2022 Balance | | Weighted Average Effective Interest Rate | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable rate (1) | | $608,582 | | 6.25% | | | $1,445 | | $892,268 | 5.21% | | ||
| Fixed rate (2) | | 1,189,643 | | 4.78% | | | — | | 1,009,607 | 4.44% | | ||
| | | $1,798,225 | | | | | | $1,445 | | $1,901,875 | | | |
| Revolving credit facility and term loans: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Revolving credit facility (3) | | $62,000 | | 6.83% | | | $629 | | $— | 5.51% | | ||
| Tranche A-1 Term Loan (4) | | 200,000 | | 2.70% | | | — | | 200,000 | 2.61% | | ||
| Tranche A-2 Term Loan (4) | | 400,000 | | 3.58% | | | — | | 350,000 | 3.40% | | ||
| 2023 Term Loan (5) | | 120,000 | | | 5.31% | | | — | | — | | — | |
| | | $782,000 | | | | | | $629 | | $550,000 | | | |
| Pro rata share of debt of unconsolidated real estate ventures (contractual balances): | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Variable rate (1) | | $35,000 | | 5.00% | | | $— | | $22,065 | 6.45% | | ||
| Fixed rate (2) | | 33,000 | | 4.13% | | | — | | 33,000 | 4.13% | | ||
| | | $68,000 | | | | | | $— | | $55,065 | | | |
(1) Includes variable rate mortgage loans with interest rate cap agreements. For mortgage loans with interest rate caps, the weighted average interest rate cap strike was 3.33%, and the weighted average maturity date of the interest rate caps is March 2025. The interest rate cap strike is exclusive of the credit spreads associated with the mortgage loans. As of December 31, 2023, one-month term SOFR was 5.35%. The impact of these interest rate caps is reflected in our calculation of the annual effect of a 1% change in base rates.
(2) Includes variable rate mortgage loans with interest rates fixed by interest rate swap agreements.
(3) As of December 31, 2023, daily SOFR was 5.38%. The interest rate for the revolving credit facility excludes a 0.15% facility fee. In February 2024, we repaid all amounts outstanding under our revolving credit facility.
(4) As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, the outstanding balance was fixed by interest rate swap agreements. As of December 31, 2023, the interest rate swaps fix SOFR at a weighted average interest rate of 1.46% for the Tranche A-1 Term Loan and 2.29% for the Tranche A-2 Term Loan. See Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.
(5) As of December 31, 2023, the outstanding balance was fixed by an interest rate swap agreement, which fixes SOFR at an interest rate of 4.01% through the maturity date.
The fair value of our mortgage loans is estimated by discounting the future contractual cash flows of these instruments using current risk-adjusted rates available to borrowers with similar credit profiles based on market sources. The fair value of our revolving credit facility and term loans is calculated based on the net present value of payments over the term of the facilities using estimated market rates for similar notes and remaining terms. As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, the estimated fair value of our consolidated debt was $2.5 billion and $2.4 billion. These estimates of fair value, which are made at the end of the reporting period, may be different from the amounts that may ultimately be realized upon the disposition of our financial instruments.
Hedging Activities
To manage, or hedge, our exposure to interest rate risk, we follow established risk management policies and procedures, including the use of a variety of derivative financial instruments.
Derivative Financial Instruments Designated as Effective Hedges
Certain derivative financial instruments, consisting of interest rate swap and cap agreements, are cash flow hedges that are designated as effective hedges, and are carried at their estimated fair value on a recurring basis. We assess the effectiveness of our hedges both at inception and on an ongoing basis. If the hedges are deemed to be effective, the fair value is recorded in "Accumulated other comprehensive income" in our consolidated balance sheets and is subsequently reclassified into "Interest expense" in our consolidated statements of operations in the period that the hedged forecasted transactions affect earnings. Our hedges become less than perfectly effective if the critical terms of the hedging instrument and the forecasted transactions do not perfectly match such as notional amounts, settlement dates, reset dates, calculation period and interest rates. In addition, we evaluate the default risk of the counterparty by monitoring the creditworthiness of the counterparty. While management believes its judgments are reasonable, a change in a derivative's effectiveness as a hedge could materially affect expenses, net income (loss) and equity.
As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, we had interest rate swap and cap agreements with an aggregate notional value of $2.2 billion and $1.4 billion, which were designated as effective hedges. The fair value of our interest rate swaps and caps designated as effective hedges consisted of assets totaling $35.6 million and $53.5 million as of December 31, 2023 and 2022 included in "Other assets, net" in our consolidated balance sheets, and liabilities totaling $7.9 million as of December 31, 2023 included in "Other liabilities, net" in our consolidated balance sheet.
Non-Designated Derivatives
Certain derivative financial instruments, consisting of interest rate cap agreements, do not meet the accounting requirements to be classified as hedging instruments. These derivatives are carried at their estimated fair value on a recurring basis with realized and unrealized gains recorded in "Interest expense" in our consolidated statements of operations. As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, we had various interest rate cap agreements with an aggregate notional value of $642.7 million and $711.8 million, which were non-designated derivatives. The fair value of our interest rate cap agreements which were non-designated derivatives consisted of assets totaling $6.7 million and $8.1 million as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, included in "Other assets, net" in our consolidated balance sheets, and liabilities totaling $6.5 million as of December 31, 2023, included in "Other liabilities, net" in our consolidated balance sheet.
Controls and procedures
As filed, 7,029 characters, with its headings, lists and tables. Extracted from the main document; charts and exhibits are in the original on sec.gov.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As required by Rule 13a-15(b) under the Exchange Act, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that as of December 31, 2023, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over our financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act). Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of our consolidated financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Our internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect transactions and dispositions of our assets, (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors, and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisitions, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
As of December 31, 2023, management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on this assessment, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2023.
Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has audited our consolidated financial statements and has issued a report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, which is included herein.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2023 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Shareholders and the Board of Trustees of JBG SMITH Properties
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of JBG SMITH Properties and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2023, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2023, of the Company and our report dated February 20, 2024, expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
Basis for Opinion
The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
McLean, Virginia
February 20, 2024
Figures reported in this filing
Standardized line items from the XBRL in this filing, for the period ended 2023-12-31. Comparative periods it repeats are left out.
| Line item | Period | Value | XBRL concept |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 12 months2023-01-01 to 2023-12-31 | $604.2m | us-gaap:Revenues |
| Interest expense | 12 months2023-01-01 to 2023-12-31 | $108.7m | us-gaap:InterestExpense |
| Income tax | 12 months2023-01-01 to 2023-12-31 | −$296.0k | us-gaap:IncomeTaxExpenseBenefit |
| Net income | 12 months2023-01-01 to 2023-12-31 | −$80.0m | us-gaap:NetIncomeLoss |
| Diluted EPS | 12 months2023-01-01 to 2023-12-31 | −$0.78 | us-gaap:EarningsPerShareDiluted |
| Basic EPS | 12 months2023-01-01 to 2023-12-31 | −$0.78 | us-gaap:EarningsPerShareBasic |
| Diluted shares (weighted) | 12 months2023-01-01 to 2023-12-31 | 105,095,000 shares | us-gaap:WeightedAverageNumberOfDilutedSharesOutstanding |
| Operating cash flow | 12 months2023-01-01 to 2023-12-31 | $183.4m | us-gaap:NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities |
| Dividends paid | 12 months2023-01-01 to 2023-12-31 | $94.0m | us-gaap:PaymentsOfDividendsCommonStock |
| Share repurchases | 12 months2023-01-01 to 2023-12-31 | $335.3m | us-gaap:PaymentsForRepurchaseOfCommonStock |
| Cash and equivalents | At period end2023-12-31 | $164.8m | us-gaap:CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue |
| Total assets | At period end2023-12-31 | $5.52bn | us-gaap:Assets |
| Total liabilities | At period end2023-12-31 | $2.83bn | us-gaap:Liabilities |
| Shareholders' equity | At period end2023-12-31 | $2.22bn | us-gaap:StockholdersEquity |
Source: SEC EDGAR, the filing index for accession 0001558370-24-001366. Last ingested by Listed: Nov 6, 2026, 11:16 ET. Listed shows no prices and gives no investment advice.