CB Financial Services, Inc.: Form 10-K for the period ended Dec 31, 2021

CB Financial Services, Inc.

CB Financial Services, Inc. (the “Company”), a Pennsylvania corporation, is a bank holding company headquartered in Carmichaels, Pennsylvania. The Company’s common stock is traded on the Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol “CBFV.” The Company conducts its operations primarily through its wholly owned subsidiary, Community Bank, a Pennsylvania-chartered commercial bank. At December 31, 2021, the Company, on a consolidated basis, had total assets of $1.43 billion, total liabilities of $1.29 billion and stockholders’ equity of $133.1 million.

Copies of the Company's reports, proxy and information statements, and other information filed electronically with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) are available free of charge through the SEC’s website address at https://www.sec.gov and through the Bank’s website address at https://www.communitybank.tv.

Community Bank

Community Bank is a Pennsylvania-chartered commercial bank headquartered in Carmichaels, Pennsylvania. After the consolidation and sale of eight branches in 2021 and consolidation of two branches in 2020, the Bank reduced the total number of branches to 14 and operates from 11 offices in Greene, Allegheny, Washington, Fayette and Westmoreland Counties in southwestern Pennsylvania and three offices in Marshall and Ohio Counties in West Virginia. The Bank also has one loan production office in Allegheny County, a corporate center in Washington County and an operations center in Greene County in Pennsylvania. The Bank is a community-oriented institution offering residential and commercial real estate loans, commercial and industrial loans, and consumer loans as well as a variety of deposit products for individuals and businesses in its market area.

The Bank is the sole shareholder of Exchange Underwriters, Inc. ("Exchange Underwriters" or “EU”), a wholly-owned subsidiary located in Washington County that is a full-service, independent insurance agency that offers property and casualty, commercial liability, surety and other insurance products. Exchange Underwriters' independent insurance agents shop from over 50 of the nation’s leading insurance providers to find the policy that fits their client's needs.

The Bank was originally chartered in 1901 as The First National Bank of Carmichaels. In 1987, the Bank changed its name to Community Bank, National Association. In December 2006, the Bank completed a charter conversion from a national bank to a Pennsylvania-chartered commercial bank wholly-owned by the Company. The Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) System. Our deposits are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”).

Our principal executive office is located at 100 North Market Street, Carmichaels, Pennsylvania, and our telephone number at that address is (724) 966-5041. Our website address is https://www.communitybank.tv. Information on this website is not and should not be considered to be a part of this Report.

Branch Optimization and Operational Efficiency Initiative

In 2021, the Company announced the implementation of branch optimization and operational efficiency strategic initiatives to improve the Bank’s financial performance and operations in order to position the Bank for continued profitable growth through the optimization of its branch network while expanding technology and infrastructure investments in its remaining locations. The decision was the result of a comprehensive internal study that measured branch performance by comparing financial and non-financial indicators to growth opportunities, while evolving changes in consumer preferences, largely driven by the global pandemic, led to an acceleration of branch optimization efforts. The Bank also completed a comprehensive review of its branch network and operating environment to identify solutions to improve operating performance. This review prioritized profitability, efficiency, infrastructure and client experience improvements, automation in operations, and digital marketing and technology investments and the Bank is in process of implementing operational efficiencies related to individualized processes within its branch network and operating environment.

The Bank has substantially completed these initiatives through the consolidation of six branches that was completed on June 30, 2021. In addition, CB Financial, Community Bank, and Citizens Bank of West Virginia, Inc. (“Citizens Bank”) executed a Purchase and Assumption Agreement (the “Agreement”) pursuant to which Citizens Bank agreed to purchase certain loans and other assets, and assume certain deposits and other liabilities, of the branch offices of Community Bank located in Buckhannon, West Virginia, and New Martinsville, West Virginia. The divestiture of two branches in December 2021 resulted in the sale of $102.8 million of deposits, $6.1 million of loans and $795,000 of premises and equipment and the recognition of a $5.2 million pre-tax gain on sale from a 5.0% premium paid by Citizens Bank on the assumed deposits. The branch optimization initiative reduced the Bank's branch network to 14 branches.

Past Mergers

Effective October 31, 2014, the Company completed a merger with FedFirst Financial Corporation (“FedFirst”), the holding company for First Federal Savings Bank (“FFSB”), a federally chartered stock savings bank. As part of the merger, the

Company also acquired FFSB's subsidiary, Exchange Underwriters. The merger expanded the Company’s reach into Fayette and Westmoreland counties in southwestern Pennsylvania.

Effective April 30, 2018, the Company completed its merger with First West Virginia Bancorp (“FWVB”), the holding company for Progressive Bank, N.A. (“PB”), a national association. The FWVB merger enhanced the Bank’s exposure into the core of the Tri-State region with the addition of branches in West Virginia and Eastern Ohio.

Effective August 1, 2018, Exchange Underwriters merged with Beynon Insurance Agency to become one of the largest insurance agencies in the Pittsburgh region. The merger brought together two long-standing, locally owned and operated Southwestern Pennsylvania independent insurance agencies both built upon the same values and culture of serving their customers.

Business Strategy

We intend to operate as a well-capitalized and profitable community bank dedicated to providing exceptional personal service to our customers. We believe that we have a competitive advantage in the markets we serve because of our knowledge of the local marketplace and our long-standing history of providing superior, relationship-based customer service. We will continue to grow and create value for our shareholders. Our employees will be treated fairly and given opportunities for personal growth. We will be closely involved in improving our communities. Our business strategies emphasize building on core strengths and are discussed below.

• Create a sales and service culture to build full relationships with our customers and utilize technology investments to enhance speed of process to improve our customer experience. We have successfully grown valuable core deposits (demand deposits, NOW accounts, money market accounts and savings accounts) that represent longer-term customer relationships and provide a lower cost of funding compared to certificates of deposit and borrowings. Empowering our experienced, high quality employees to provide superior customer service in all aspects of our business which is further supported by the use of technology and a wide array of modern financial products can lead to stronger customer relationships, enhance fee revenue and allow the Bank to be the bank of choice across our footprint for residents and small and medium sized businesses.
• Evolve toward more electronic/digital products and processes driving greater efficiency and expand our brand awareness in our market. We intend to focus on building our mobile and online capabilities through an improved mobile banking platform and product offering, omnichannel experience that is consistent with quick results and interactive alerts.
• Enhance profitability and efficiency while continuing to invest for future growth. Margin compression continues to be a challenge. To combat this impact on core earnings, we view cost reduction as a key part of a company-wide efficiency effort. Short-term targeted cost reductions combined with long-term strategic initiatives will better position the Company for high performance. In addition, this strategy aligns with our efforts to simplify processes while utilizing technology to improve efficiency and build capabilities that supports future growth and high performance.
• Continue our track record of opportunistic growth in the robust Pittsburgh metropolitan area and across our footprint. We believe we have competed effectively by leveraging our branch network and a full assortment of banking products to facilitate deposit and loan growth in our core locations, including southwestern Pennsylvania, Ohio River Valley, and central West Virginia.
• Leverage our credit culture and strong loan underwriting to uphold our asset quality metrics. We have sought to maintain a high level of asset quality and moderate credit risk by using underwriting standards that we believe are conservative. Although we intend to continue our efforts to originate commercial real estate and commercial and industrial loans, we intend to continue our philosophy of managing loan exposures through our conservative, yet reasonable, approach to lending.
• Increase fee and other non-interest income, primarily through our insurance operations, as well as mortgage banking and small business lending. Fee income earned through our insurance agency, Exchange Underwriters, supplements our income from banking operations. We intend to pursue opportunities to grow this line of business, including hiring insurance producers with established books of business and through acquisitions.

Human Capital

The Bank's culture is defined by our mission of being an exceptional, independent financial institution. We value our employees by investing in a healthy work-life balance, competitive compensation and benefit packages and a vibrant, team-oriented environment centered on professional service and open communication. We strive to build and maintain a high-performing culture and be an “employer of choice” by creating a work environment that attracts and retains outstanding, engaged employees. The success of our business is highly dependent on our employees, who provide value to our clients and communities through their dedication to helping clients achieve the American dream of home ownership and financial security.

Demographics. As of December 31, 2021, we employed 192 full-time and 6 part-time employees in Pennsylvania and West Virginia. None of these employees are represented by a collective bargaining agreement. During 2021, we hired 25 employees and our voluntary turnover rate was 17%.

Diversity and Inclusion. We strive toward having a powerful and diverse team of employees, knowing we are better together with our combined wisdom and intellect. With a commitment to equality, inclusion, and workplace diversity, we focus on understanding, accepting, and valuing the differences between people. We continued our commitment to equal employment opportunity through a robust affirmative action plan which includes annual compensation analyses and ongoing reviews of our selection and hiring practices alongside a continued focus on building and maintaining a diverse workforce.

Compensation and Benefits. We provide a competitive compensation and benefits program to help meet the needs of our employees. In addition to salaries, these programs include opportunity for annual bonuses, a 401(k) Plan with an employer matching contribution in addition to an employer annual contribution, an equity incentive plan, healthcare and insurance benefits, health savings accounts, paid time off, paid leave and an employee assistance program.

Learning and Development. We invest in the growth and development of our employees by providing a multi-dimensional approach to learning that empowers, intellectually grows, and professionally develops our colleagues. Our employees receive continuing education courses that are relevant to the banking industry and their job function within the Company. In addition, we have created learning paths for specific positions that are designed to encourage an employee’s advancement and growth within our organization. We support and encourage managers to hire from within. We also offer a peer mentor program, leadership, and customer service training. These resources provide employees with the skills they need to achieve their career goals, build management skills, and become leaders within our Company.

The safety, health and wellness of our employees is a top priority. The COVID-19 pandemic continued to present a unique challenge with regard to maintaining employee safety while continuing successful operations. While management transitioned the majority of our staff back to our locations in early July 2021, some flexible work arrangements continue. Our staff continues to follow the safety protocol developed by management. We further promote the health and wellness of our employees by strongly encouraging work-life balance, offering flexible work schedules, keeping the employee portion of health care premiums to a minimum and sponsoring various wellness programs.

Market Area

The Company’s southwestern Pennsylvania market area consists of Allegheny, Fayette, Greene, Washington and Westmoreland Counties. Greene County is a significantly more rural county compared to the counties in which we have our other branches. Our offices located in Allegheny, Washington, Fayette, and Westmoreland Counties are in the southern suburban area of metropolitan Pittsburgh. Our branches from the FWVB merger extend the Company’s market area into West Virginia with three offices in Marshall and Ohio Counties.

The following table sets forth certain economic statistics for our market area.

(1) Based on the latest data published by the U.S. Census Bureau (July 2021)

(2) Based on the latest data published by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (December 2021)

(3) Based on the latest data published by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (Second Quarter 2021)

The market area has been impacted by the energy industry through the extraction of untapped natural gas reserves in the Marcellus Shale and Utica Shale Formation. The Utica Shale formation lies beneath most of Ohio, West Virginia, Pennsylvania and New York, as well as Kentucky, Maryland, Tennessee, Virginia and a part of Canada. The Marcellus Shale Formation extends throughout much of the Appalachian Basin and most of Pennsylvania, West Virginia and Eastern Ohio. Both formations are located near high-demand markets along the East Coast. The proximity to these markets makes it an attractive target for energy development and has resulted in significant job creation through the development of gas wells and transportation of gas.

Competition

We encounter significant competition both in attracting deposits and in originating real estate and other loans. Our most direct competition for deposits historically has come from other commercial banks, savings banks, savings associations and credit unions in our market area, and we expect continued strong competition from such financial institutions in the foreseeable future. The Company faces additional competition for deposits from online financial institutions and non-depository competitors, such as the mutual fund industry, securities and brokerage firms, and insurance companies. We compete for deposits by offering depositors a high level of personal service and expertise together with a wide range of financial services. Our deposit sources are primarily concentrated in the communities surrounding our branch offices. As of June 30, 2021, our FDIC-insured deposit market share in the counties we serve was 0.61% out of 56 bank and thrift institutions. Our FDIC-insured deposit market share in the counties we serve, excluding Allegheny County, which is the second most populous county in Pennsylvania, but where the Bank's has limited presence with one branch, was 5.18% out of 41 bank and thrift institutions. Such data does not reflect deposits held by credit unions.

The competition for real estate and other loans comes principally from other commercial banks, mortgage banking companies, government-sponsored entities, savings banks and savings associations. This competition for loans has increased substantially in recent years. We compete for loans primarily through the interest rates, prepayment penalties, and loan fees we charge and the efficiency and quality of services we provide to borrowers. Factors that affect competition include general and local economic conditions, current interest rate levels and the volatility of the mortgage markets.

Lending Activities

General. Our principal lending activity has been the origination in our local market area of residential one- to four-family, commercial real estate, construction, commercial and industrial, and consumer loans. At December 31, 2021, our total loans receivable, which excludes the allowance for loan losses, decreased $24.0 million, or 2.3%, to $1.02 billion compared to $1.04 billion at December 31, 2020.

Residential Real Estate Loans. Residential real estate loans are comprised of loans secured by one- to four-family residential properties. Included in residential real estate loans are traditional one- to four-family mortgage loans, home equity installment loans, and home equity lines of credit. We generate loans through our marketing efforts, existing customers and referrals, real estate brokers, builders and local businesses. At December 31, 2021, $320.8 million, or 31.4%, of our total loan portfolio was invested in residential loans.

One- to Four-Family Mortgage Loans. One of our primary lending activities is the origination of fixed-rate, one- to four-family, owner-occupied, residential mortgage loans with terms up to 30 years secured by property located in our market area. At December 31, 2021, one- to four-family mortgage loans totaled $242.8 million. Our one- to four-family residential mortgage loans are generally conforming loans, underwritten according to secondary market guidelines. We generally originate mortgage loans in amounts up to the maximum conforming loan limits established by the Federal Housing Finance Agency, which, for 2021, is typically $548,250 for single-family homes, except in certain high-cost areas in the United States. Our mortgage loans amortize monthly with principal and interest due each month. These loans often remain outstanding for significantly shorter periods than their contractual terms because borrowers may refinance or prepay loans at their option without a prepayment penalty.

When underwriting one- to four-family mortgage loans, we review and verify each loan applicant’s income and credit history. Management believes that stability of income and past credit history are integral parts in the underwriting process. Written appraisals are generally required on real estate property offered to secure an applicant’s loan. We generally limit the loan-to-value ratios of one- to four-family residential mortgage loans to 80% of the purchase price or appraised value of the property, whichever is less. For one- to four-family real estate loans with loan-to-value ratios of over 80%, we generally require private mortgage insurance. We require fire and casualty insurance on all properties securing real estate loans. We require title insurance, or an attorney’s title opinion, as circumstances warrant.

Our one- to four-family mortgage loans customarily include due-on-sale clauses, which give us the right to declare a loan immediately due and payable in the event, among other things, that the borrower sells or otherwise disposes of the underlying real property serving as collateral for the loan.

Fixed-rate one- to four-family residential mortgage loans with terms of 15 years or more are originated for resale to the secondary market. During the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, we originated $12.6 million and $32.1 million of fixed-rate residential mortgage loans, respectively, which were subsequently sold in the secondary mortgage market.

The origination of fixed-rate mortgage loans versus adjustable-rate mortgage loans is monitored on an ongoing basis and is affected significantly by the level of market interest rates, customer preference, our interest rate risk position and our competitors’ loan products. Adjustable-rate mortgage loans secured by one- to four-family residential real estate totaled $39.3 million at December 31, 2021. Adjustable-rate mortgage loans make our loan portfolio more interest rate sensitive. However, as the interest income earned on adjustable-rate mortgage loans varies with prevailing interest rates, such loans do not offer predictable cash flows in the same manner as long-term, fixed-rate loans. Adjustable-rate mortgage loans carry increased credit risk associated with potentially higher monthly payments by borrowers as general market interest rates increase. It is possible that during periods of rising interest rates that the risk of delinquencies and defaults on adjustable-rate mortgage loans may increase due to the upward adjustment of interest costs to the borrower, resulting in increased loan losses.

We do not offer an “interest only” mortgage loan product on one- to four-family residential properties (where the borrower pays interest for an initial period, after which the loan converts to a fully amortizing loan). We also do not offer loans that provide for negative amortization of principal, such as “Option ARM” loans, where the borrower can pay less than the interest owed on the loan, resulting in an increased principal balance during the life of the loan. We do not offer a “subprime loan” program (loans that generally target borrowers with weakened credit histories typically characterized by payment delinquencies, previous charge-offs, judgments, bankruptcies, or borrowers with questionable repayment capacity as evidenced by low credit scores or high debt-burden ratios) or Alt-A loans (traditionally defined as loans having less than full documentation). We may originate loans to consumers with a credit score below 660. This may be defined as subprime loans, however there are typically mitigating circumstances that according to FDIC guidance and our opinion would not designate such loans as “subprime.”

Home Equity Loans. At December 31, 2021, home equity loans totaled $78.0 million. Our home equity loans and lines of credit are generally secured by the borrower’s principal residence. The maximum amount of a home equity loan or line of credit is generally 85% of the appraised value of a borrower’s real estate collateral less the amount of any prior mortgages or related liabilities. Home equity loans and lines of credit are approved with both fixed and adjustable interest rates, which we determine based upon market conditions. Such loans are fully amortized over the life of the loan. Generally, the maximum term for home equity loans is 20 years.

Our underwriting standards for home equity loans include a determination of the applicant’s credit history and an assessment of the applicant’s ability to meet existing obligations and payments on the proposed loan. The stability of the applicant’s monthly income may be determined by verification of gross monthly income from primary employment, and additionally from any verifiable secondary income. We also consider the length of employment with the borrower’s present employer. Creditworthiness of the applicant is of primary consideration; however, the underwriting process also includes a comparison of the value of the collateral in relation to the proposed loan amount.

We primarily originate home equity loans secured by first lien mortgages. Home equity loans in a junior lien position totaled $11.3 million at December 31, 2021 and entail greater risks than one- to four-family residential mortgage loans or home equity loans secured by first lien mortgages. In such cases, collateral repossessed after a default may not provide an adequate source of repayment of the outstanding loan balance because of damage or depreciation in the value of the property or loss of equity to the first lien position. Further, home equity loan payments are dependent on the borrower’s continuing financial stability, and therefore are more likely to be adversely affected by job loss, divorce, illness or personal bankruptcy. Finally, the application of various federal and state laws, including federal and state bankruptcy and insolvency laws, may limit the amount that can be recovered on such loans in the event of a default.

Commercial Real Estate Loans. We originate commercial real estate loans that are secured primarily by improved properties, such as retail facilities, office buildings and other non-residential buildings as well as multifamily properties. At December 31, 2021, $392.1 million, or 38.5% of our total loan portfolio, consisted of commercial real estate loans.

Our commercial real estate loans generally have adjustable interest rates with terms of up to 15 years and amortization periods up to 25 years. The adjustable rate loans are typically fixed for the first five years and adjust every five years thereafter. The maximum loan-to-value ratio of our commercial real estate loans is generally 75% to 80% of the lower of cost or appraised value of the property securing the loan.

We consider a number of factors in originating commercial real estate loans. We evaluate the qualifications and financial condition of the borrower, including project-level and global cash flows and debt service coverage, credit history and management expertise, as well as the value and condition of the property, securing the loan. When evaluating the qualifications of the borrower, we consider the financial resources of the borrower, the borrower’s experience in owning or managing similar property and the borrower’s payment history with the Bank and other financial institutions. In evaluating the property securing the loan, the factors considered include the net operating income of the mortgaged property before debt service and depreciation, and the ratio of the loan amount to the appraised value of the property. We generally will not lend to high volatility commercial real estate projects. All commercial real estate loans are appraised by outside independent state certified general appraisers. Personal guarantees are generally obtained from the principals of commercial real estate loan borrowers, although this requirement may be waived in limited circumstances depending upon the loan-to-value ratio and the debt-service ratio associated with the loan. The Bank requires property and casualty insurance and flood insurance if the property is in a flood zone area.

We underwrite commercial real estate loan participations to the same standards as loans originated by us. In addition, we consider the financial strength and reputation of the lead lender. We require the lead lender to provide a full closing package as well as annual financial statements for the borrower and related entities so that we can conduct an annual loan review for all loan participations. Loans secured by commercial real estate generally involve a greater degree of credit risk than residential mortgage loans and carry larger loan balances. This increased credit risk is a result of several factors, including the effects of general economic conditions on income producing properties and the successful operation or management of the properties securing the loans. Furthermore, the repayment of loans secured by commercial real estate is typically dependent upon the successful operation of the related business and real estate property. If the cash flow from the project is reduced, the borrower’s ability to repay the loan may be impaired.

Commercial real estate loans generally have higher credit risks compared to one- to four-family residential mortgage loans, as they typically involve larger loan balances concentrated with single borrowers or groups of related borrowers. In addition, payment experience on loans secured by income-producing properties typically depends on the successful operation of the related real estate project, and this may be subject, to a greater extent, to adverse conditions in the real estate market and in the general economy.

Construction Loans. We originate construction loans to individuals to finance the construction of residential dwellings and also originate loans for the construction of commercial properties, including hotels, apartment buildings, housing developments, and owner-occupied properties used for businesses. At December 31, 2021, $85.0 million, or 8.3% of our total loan portfolio, consisted of construction loans. Our construction loans generally provide for the payment of interest only during the construction phase, which is usually 12 to 18 months. At the end of the construction phase, the loan generally converts to a permanent residential or commercial mortgage loan. Loans generally can be made with a maximum loan-to-value ratio of 80% on both residential and commercial construction. Before making a commitment to fund a construction loan, we require a pro forma appraisal of the property, as completed by an independent licensed appraiser. We also will require an inspection of the property before disbursement of funds during the term of the construction loan. We typically do not lend to developers unless they maintain a 15% cash equity position in the project.

Commercial and Industrial Loans. We originate commercial and industrial loans and lines of credit to borrowers located in our market area that are generally secured by collateral other than real estate, such as equipment, accounts receivable, inventory, and other business assets. At December 31, 2021, $89.0 million, or 8.7% of our total loan portfolio, consisted of commercial and industrial loans, of which $24.5 million are SBA guaranteed Payroll Protection Program ("PPP") loans.

Exclusive of PPP loans, commercial and industrial loans generally have terms of maturity from five to seven years with adjustable interest rates tied to the prime rate, LIBOR or the weekly average of the FHLB of Pittsburgh three- to ten-year fixed rates. We generally obtain personal guarantees from the borrower or a third party as a condition to originating the loan. On a limited basis, we will originate unsecured business loans in those instances where the applicant’s financial strength and creditworthiness has been established. Commercial business loans generally bear higher interest rates than residential loans, but they also may involve a higher risk of default because their repayment is generally dependent on the successful operation of the borrower’s business.

Our underwriting standards for commercial business loans include a determination of the applicant’s ability to meet existing obligations and payments on the proposed loan from normal cash flows generated in the applicant’s business. We assess the financial strength of each applicant through the review of financial statements and tax returns provided by the applicant. The creditworthiness of an applicant is derived from a review of credit reports as well as a search of public records. We periodically review business loans following origination. We request financial statements at least annually and review them for substantial deviations or changes that might affect repayment of the loan. Our loan officers may also visit the premises of borrowers to observe the business premises, facilities, and personnel and to inspect the pledged collateral. Lines of credit secured with accounts receivable and inventory typically require that the customer provide a monthly borrowing base certificate that is reviewed prior to each draw request. Underwriting standards for business loans are different for each type of loan depending on the financial strength of the applicant and the value of collateral offered as security. All commercial loans are assigned a risk rating, which is reviewed internally, as well as by independent loan review professionals, annually.

Commercial and industrial business loans involve a greater risk of default than one- to four-residential mortgage loans of like duration because their repayment generally depends on the successful operation of the borrower’s business and the sufficiency of collateral, if any.

The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”) was signed into law on March 27, 2020 and provided over $2.0 trillion in emergency economic relief to individuals and businesses impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, which included authorizing the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) to temporarily guarantee loans under a new 7(a) loan program called the Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”). On April 16, 2020, the original $349 billion funding cap was reached. On April 23, 2020, the Paycheck Protection Program and Health Care Enhancement Act (the “PPP Enhancement Act”) was signed into law and included an additional $484 billion in COVID-19 relief, including allocating an additional $310 billion to replenish the PPP. PPP was designed to help small businesses keep their workforce employed and cover expenses during the COVID-19 crisis. Under the PPP, participating SBA and other qualifying lenders originated loans to eligible businesses that are fully guaranteed by the SBA as to principal and accrued interest, have more favorable terms than traditional SBA loans and may be forgiven if the proceeds are used by the borrower for certain eligible purposes. PPP loans have an interest rate of 1% per annum. Loans issued prior to June 5, 2020 have a term to maturity of two-years and loans issued after June 5, 2020 have a term to maturity of five-years. The PPP Flexibility Act of 2020 extended the deferral period for borrower payments of principal, interest, and fees on all PPP loans to the date that the SBA remits the borrower’s loan forgiveness amount to the lender (or, if the borrower does not apply for loan forgiveness, 10 months after the end of the borrower’s loan forgiveness covered period). Previously the deferral period could end after six months. In 2020, the Bank received a processing fee from the SBA ranging from 1% to 5% depending on the size of the loan, which was offset by a 0.75% third-party servicing agent fee.

The SBA reopened the PPP in January 2021 and began accepting applications for both First Draw and Second Draw PPP Loans. Second Draw PPP Loans were available for certain eligible borrowers that previously received a PPP loan. A Second Draw PPP Loan has the same general terms as the First Draw PPP Loan. A borrower was generally eligible for a Second Draw PPP Loan if the borrower previously received a First Draw PPP Loan and will or had used the full amount only for authorized uses, had no more than 300 employees, and demonstrated at least a 25% reduction in gross receipts between comparable quarters in 2019 and 2020. For most borrowers, the maximum amount of a Second Draw PPP Loan was 2.5x average monthly 2019 or 2020 payroll costs up to $2.0 million. Loan payments are deferred for borrowers who apply for loan forgiveness until the SBA remits the borrower's loan forgiveness amount to the lender. If a borrower does not apply for loan forgiveness, payments are deferred 10 months after the end of the covered period for the borrower’s loan forgiveness (either 8 weeks or 24 weeks). For PPP loans made in 2021, the processing fee from the SBA was the lesser of 50% or $2,500 for loans up to $50,000, 5% for loans greater than $50,000 and up to $350,000, 3% for loans greater than $350,000 and less than $2.0 million and 1% for loans of at least $2.0 million.

The Bank originated $71.1 million of PPP loans in 2020 and $34.6 million in 2021. Net deferred loan origination fees were $2.2 million in 2020 and $1.3 million in 2021, of which $1.1 million was recognized during the year ended December 31, 2020 and $1.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2021. After processing forgiveness, there is $24.5 million of PPP loans remaining at December 31, 2021, net of the unearned $678,000 in deferred loan origination fees.

Consumer Loans. We originate consumer loans that primarily consist of indirect auto loans and, to a lesser extent, secured and unsecured loans and lines of credit. As of December 31, 2021, consumer loans totaled $122.2 million, or 12.0%, of our total loan portfolio, of which $115.4 million were indirect auto loans. Consumer loans are generally offered on a fixed-rate basis. Our underwriting standards for consumer loans include a determination of the applicant’s credit history and an assessment of the applicant’s ability to meet existing obligations and payments on the proposed loan. The stability of the applicant’s monthly income may be determined by verification of gross monthly income from primary employment, and additionally from any verifiable secondary income. We also consider the length of employment with the borrower’s present employer as well as the amount of time the borrower has lived in the local area. Creditworthiness of the applicant is of primary consideration; however, the underwriting process also includes a comparison of the value of the collateral in relation to the proposed loan amount.

Indirect auto loans are loans that are sold by auto dealerships to third parties, such as banks or other types of lenders. We work with various auto dealers throughout our lending area. The dealer collects information from the applicant and transmits it to us electronically for review, where we can either accept or reject the applicant without ever meeting the applicant. If the Bank approves the applicant’s request for financing, the Bank purchases the dealership-originated installment sales contract and is known as the holder in due course that is entitled to receive principal and interest payments from a borrower. As compensation for generating the loan, a portion of the rate is advanced to the dealer and accrued in a prepaid dealer reserve account. As a result, the Bank’s yield is below the contractual interest rate because the Bank must wait for the stream of loan payments to be repaid. The Bank will receive a pro rata refund of the amount prepaid to the dealer only if the loan prepays within the first six months or if the collateral for the loan is repossessed. The Bank is responsible for pursuing repossession if the borrower defaults on payments.

Consumer loans entail greater risks than one- to four-family residential mortgage loans, particularly consumer loans secured by rapidly depreciating assets, such as automobiles, or loans that are unsecured. In such cases, collateral repossessed after a default may not provide an adequate source of repayment of the outstanding loan balance because of damage, loss or depreciation. Further, consumer loan payments are dependent on the borrower’s continuing financial stability, and therefore are more likely to be adversely affected by job loss, divorce, illness or personal bankruptcy. Such events would increase our risk of loss on unsecured loans. Finally, the application of various federal and state laws, including federal and state bankruptcy and insolvency laws, may limit the amount that can be recovered on such loans in the event of a default.

Loan Approval Procedures and Authority

Our lending activities follow written, non-discriminatory underwriting standards and loan origination procedures established by the Board of Directors (the “Board”). In the approval process for residential loans, we assess the borrower’s ability to repay the loan and the value of the property securing the loan. To assess the borrower’s ability to repay, we review the borrower’s income and expenses and employment and credit history. In the case of commercial loans, we also review projected income, expenses and the viability of the project being financed. We generally require appraisals of all real property securing loans. Appraisals are performed by independent licensed appraisers. The Bank’s loan approval policies and limits are also established by its Board. All loans originated by the Bank are subject to its underwriting guidelines. Loan approval authorities vary based on loan size in the aggregate. Individual officer loan approval authority generally applies to loans of up to $1.0 million. Loans above that amount and up to 65% of the Bank’s legal lending limit may be approved by the Loan Committee. Loans in the aggregate over 65% of the Bank’s legal lending limit must be approved by the Board.

Delinquencies and Classified Assets

When a borrower fails to remit a required loan payment, a courtesy notice is sent to the borrower prior to the end of their appropriate grace period stressing the importance of paying the loan current. If a payment is not paid within the appropriate grace period, then a late notice is mailed. In addition, telephone calls are made and additional letters may be sent. Collection efforts continue until it is determined that the debt is uncollectible.

For loans secured by real estate, a Homeownership Counseling Notice is mailed when the loan is 45 days delinquent. In Pennsylvania, an Act 91 Notice is mailed to the borrower stating that they have 33 days to cure the default before foreclosure is initiated. In West Virginia, a Notice of Default is mailed and in Ohio, a demand letter is mailed when a loan is 60 days delinquent. When a loan becomes 90 or more days delinquent, it is forwarded to the Bank’s attorney to pursue other remedies. An official mortgage foreclosure complaint typically occurs at 120 days delinquent. In the event collection efforts have not succeeded, the property will proceed to a Sheriff Sale to be sold.

For commercial loans, the borrower is contacted in an attempt to reestablish the loan to current payment status and ensure timely payments continue. Collection efforts continue until the loan is 60 days past due, at which time demand payment, default, and/or foreclosure procedures are initiated. We may consider loan workout arrangements with certain borrowers under certain circumstances.

Investment Activities

General. The Company’s investment policy is established by its Board. The policy emphasizes safety of the investment, liquidity requirements, potential returns, cash flow targets, and consistency with the Company’s interest rate risk management strategy.

Our current investment policy permits us to invest in U.S. treasuries, U.S government agency securities, mortgage-backed securities, investment grade corporate bonds, obligations of states and political subdivisions, short-term instruments, and other securities. The investment policy also permits investments in certificates of deposit, securities purchased under an agreement to resell, banker’s acceptances, commercial paper and federal funds. Our current investment policy generally does not permit investment in stripped mortgage-backed securities, short sales, derivatives, or other high-risk securities. Federal and Pennsylvania state laws generally limit our investment activities to those permissible for a national bank.

The accounting rules require that, at the time of purchase, we designate a debt security as held to maturity, available-for-sale, or trading, depending on our ability and intent. Securities available for sale are reported at fair value, while securities held to maturity are reported at amortized cost. Our entire debt securities portfolio is designated as available-for-sale.

The debt securities portfolio consists primarily of U.S. government agency securities, obligations of states and political subdivisions, and mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations of government sponsored enterprises. We expect the composition of our debt securities portfolio to continue to change based on liquidity needs associated with loan origination activities. During the year ended December 31, 2021, we had no debt securities that were deemed to be other than temporarily impaired.

We also invest in equity securities, which consist primarily of mutual funds and a portfolio of bank stocks. This portfolio is valued at fair value with changes in market price recognized through noninterest income.

We maintain a minimum amount of liquid assets that may be invested in specified short-term securities and certain other investments. Liquidity levels may be increased or decreased depending upon the yields on investment alternatives and upon management’s judgment as to the attractiveness of the yields then available in relation to other opportunities and its expectation of the level of yield that will be available in the future, as well as management’s projections as to the short-term demand for funds to be used in our loan originations and other activities.

U.S. Government Agency Securities. At December 31, 2021, we held U.S. Government and agency securities with a fair value of $52.6 million compared to $41.4 million at December 31, 2020. At December 31, 2021, these securities had an average expected life of 3.9 years. While these securities generally provide lower yields than other investments, such as mortgage-backed securities, our current investment strategy is to maintain investments in such instruments to the extent appropriate for liquidity and pledging purposes, as collateral for borrowings, and for prepayment protection.

Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions. At December 31, 2021, we held available-for-sale municipal bonds with a fair value of $19.0 million compared to $22.0 million at December 31, 2020. 100% of our municipal bonds are issued by local municipalities or school districts located in Pennsylvania. Municipal bonds may be general obligation of the issuer or secured by specific revenues. The majority of our municipal bonds are general obligation bonds, which are backed by the full faith and credit of the municipality, paid off with funds from taxes and other fees, and have ratings (when available) of A or above. We also invest in a limited amount of special revenue municipal bonds, which are used to fund projects that will eventually create revenue directly, such as a toll road or lease payments for a new building.

Mortgage-Backed Securities. We invest in mortgage-backed (“MBS”) and collateralized mortgage obligation (“CMO”) securities insured or guaranteed by the United States government or government-sponsored enterprises. These securities, which consist of MBS’s issued by Ginnie Mae, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, had an amortized cost of $143.9 million and $75.9 million at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The fair value of our MBS portfolio was $143.1 million and $79.5 million at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. At December 31, 2021, all MBS’s had fixed rates of interest.

MBS’s are created by pooling mortgages and issuing a security with an interest rate that is less than the interest rate on the underlying mortgages. CMO’s generally are a specific class of MBS’s that are divided based on risk assessments and maturity dates. These mortgage classes are pooled into a special purpose entity, where tranches are created and sold to investors. Investors in a CMO are purchasing bonds issued by the entity, and then receive payments based on the income derived from the pooled mortgages. The various pools are divided into tranches are then securitized and sold to the investor. MBS’s typically represent a participation interest in a pool of one- to four-family or multifamily mortgages, although we invest primarily in MBS’s backed by one- to four-family mortgages. The issuers of such securities pool and resell the participation interests in the form of securities to investors. Some security pools are guaranteed as to payment of principal and interest to investors. MBS’s generally yield less than the loans that underlie such securities because of the cost of payment guarantees and credit enhancements. However, MBS’s are more liquid than individual mortgage loans because there is an active trading market for such securities. In addition, MBS’s may be used to collateralize our specific liabilities and obligations. Finally, MBS’s are assigned lower risk-weightings for purposes of calculating our risk-based capital level.

Investments in MBS’s involve a risk that actual payments will be greater or less than the prepayment rate estimated at the time of purchase, which may result in adjustments to the amortization of any premium or acceleration of any discount relating to such interests, thereby affecting the net yield on our securities.

Corporate Debt. At December 31, 2021, we held corporate debt securities with a fair value of $7.5 million. We invest in corporate debt issued by financial institutions which have fixed to floating-rate terms. Corporate debt are unsecured, medium or long term, interest-bearing bonds issued by financial institutions that are backed only by the general credit of the issuer. As such, investments in corporate debt involve default risk that the company may fail to make timely payments of interest or principal. We perform a credit analysis to verify the creditworthiness of the financial institution prior to purchase.

Sources of Funds

General. Deposits have traditionally been the Company’s primary source of funds for use in lending and investment activities. The Company also uses borrowings, primarily FHLB of Pittsburgh advances, to supplement cash flow needs, lengthen the maturities of liabilities for interest rate risk purposes and manage the cost of funds. In addition, funds are derived from scheduled loan payments, investment maturities, loan prepayments, loan sales, retained earnings and income on earning assets. While scheduled loan payments and income on earning assets are relatively stable sources of funds, deposit inflows and outflows can vary widely and are influenced by prevailing interest rates, market conditions and levels of competition.

Deposits. Deposits are generated primarily from residents within the Company’s market area. The Company offers a variety of deposit accounts. Deposit account terms vary, with the principal differences being the minimum balance required, the amount of time the funds must remain on deposit and the interest rate.

Interest rates paid, maturity terms, service fees and withdrawal penalties are established on a periodic basis. Deposit rates and terms are based primarily on current operating strategies and market rates, liquidity requirements, rates paid by competitors and growth goals.

The flow of deposits is influenced significantly by general economic conditions, changes in money market and other prevailing interest rates and competition. The variety of deposit accounts offered allows the Company to be competitive in obtaining funds and responding to changes in consumer demand. Based on experience, the Company believes that its deposits are relatively stable. However, the ability to attract and maintain deposits and the rates paid on these deposits has been and will continue to be significantly affected by market conditions.

Borrowings. Deposits are our primary source of funds for lending and investment activities. If the need arises, we may rely upon borrowings to supplement our supply of available funds and to fund deposit withdrawals. Our borrowings may consist of advances from the FHLB, subordinated debt, funds borrowed under repurchase agreements and federal funds purchased.

The FHLB functions as a central reserve bank providing credit for us and other member savings associations and financial institutions. As a member, we are required to own capital stock in the FHLB and are authorized to apply for advances on the security of such stock and certain of our home mortgages, provided certain standards related to creditworthiness have been met. We typically secure advances from the FHLB with one- to four-family residential mortgage and commercial real estate loans. Advances are made pursuant to several different programs. Each credit program has its own interest rate and range of maturities. Depending on the program, limitations on the amount of advances are based either on a fixed percentage of a member institution’s stockholders’ equity or on the FHLB’s assessment of the institution’s creditworthiness. At December 31, 2021, we had a maximum borrowing capacity with the FHLB of up to $427.2 million and available borrowing capacity of $347.1 million. At December 31, 2021, we had $3.0 million in FHLB advances outstanding, of which all were long-term borrowings. As an alternative to pledging securities, the facility is also used for standby letters of credit to collateralize public deposits in excess of the level insured by the FDIC. Commitments for standby letters of credit to secure public deposits were $62.0 million and $90.3 million as of December 31, 2021 and 2020.

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase represent business deposit customers whose funds, above designated target balances, are transferred into an overnight interest-earning investment account by purchasing securities from the Bank’s investment portfolio under an agreement to repurchase. We may be required to provide additional collateral based on the fair value of the underlying securities. Short-term borrowings may also consist of federal funds purchased.

At December 31, 2021, the Bank maintained a Borrower-In-Custody of Collateral line of credit agreement with the FRB for $86.3 million that requires monthly certification of collateral, is subject to annual renewal, incurs no service charge and is secured by commercial and consumer indirect auto loans. The Bank also maintains multiple line of credit arrangements with various unaffiliated banks totaling $50.0 million. At December 31, 2021, we did not have any outstanding balances under any of these borrowing relationships.

In December 2021, the Company entered into a term loan in the principal amount of $15.0 million, evidenced by a term note which matures on December 15, 2031 ("2031 Note"). The 2031 Note is an unsecured subordinated obligation of the Company and may be repaid in whole or in part, without penalty, on any interest payment date on or after December 15, 2026 and at any time upon the occurrence of certain events. The 2031 Note initially bears a fixed interest rate of 3.875% per year to, but excluding, December 15, 2026 and thereafter at a floating rate equal to the then-current three-month term SOFR plus 280 basis points. The 2031 Note qualifies as Tier 2 capital under regulatory guidelines. At December 31, 2021, the principal balance and unamortized debt issuance costs for the 2031 Note were $15.0 million and $399,000, respectively.

Subsidiary Activities

Community Bank is the only subsidiary of the Company. The Bank wholly-owns Exchange Underwriters, Inc., a full-service, independent insurance agency.

REGULATION AND SUPERVISION

General

CB Financial Services, Inc., is a bank holding company within the meaning of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended. As such, it is registered with, subject to examination and supervision by, and otherwise required to comply with the rules and regulations of the Federal Reserve Board.

Community Bank is a Pennsylvania-chartered commercial bank subject to extensive regulation by the Pennsylvania Department of Banking and Securities and the FDIC. The Bank’s deposit accounts are insured up to applicable limits by the FDIC. The Bank must file reports with the Pennsylvania Department of Banking and Securities and the FDIC concerning its activities and financial condition, in addition to obtaining regulatory approvals prior to entering into certain transactions, such as mergers or acquisitions with other depository institutions. There are periodic examinations of the Bank by the Pennsylvania Department of Banking and Securities and the FDIC to review the Bank’s compliance with various regulatory requirements. The Bank is also subject to certain reserve requirements established by the Federal Reserve Board. This regulation and supervision establishes a comprehensive framework of activities in which a commercial bank can engage and is intended primarily for the protection of the FDIC and depositors. The regulatory structure also gives the regulatory authorities extensive discretion in connection with their supervisory and enforcement activities and examination policies, including policies with respect to the classification of assets and the establishment of adequate loan loss reserves for regulatory purposes. Any change in such regulation, whether by the Pennsylvania Department of Banking and Securities, the FDIC, the Federal Reserve Board or Congress could have a material impact on the operations of the Bank.

Set forth below is a brief description of material regulatory requirements that are or will be applicable to CB Financial Services, Inc., and Community Bank. The description is limited to certain material aspects of the statutes and regulations addressed, is not intended to be a complete description of such statutes and regulations and their effects on CB Financial Services, Inc. and Community Bank, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the actual statutes and regulations involved.

Federal Legislation

The Dodd-Frank Act made significant changes to the regulatory structure for depository institutions and their holding companies. However, the Dodd-Frank Act’s changes go well beyond that and affect the lending, investments and other operations of all depository institutions. The Dodd-Frank Act requires the Federal Reserve to set minimum capital levels for bank holding companies that are as stringent as those required for the insured depository subsidiaries, and the components of Tier 1 capital for holding companies are restricted to capital instruments that are currently considered to be Tier 1 capital for insured depository institutions. The legislation also establishes a floor for capital of insured depository institutions that cannot be lower than the standards in effect upon passage, and directs the federal banking regulators to implement new leverage and capital requirements that take into account off-balance sheet activities and other risks, including risks relating to securitized products and derivatives.

The Dodd-Frank Act created a new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau with broad powers to supervise and enforce consumer protection laws. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has broad rule-making authority for a wide range of consumer protection laws that apply to all banks, such as the Bank, including the authority to prohibit “unfair, deceptive or abusive” acts and practices. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has examination and enforcement authority over all banks with more than $10 billion in assets. Banks with $10 billion or less in assets are still examined for compliance by their applicable bank regulators. The new legislation also gave state attorney generals the ability to enforce applicable federal consumer protection laws.

The Dodd-Frank Act broadened the base for FDIC insurance assessments. Assessments are now based on the average consolidated total assets less tangible equity capital of a financial institution. The legislation also increased the maximum amount of deposit insurance for banks to $250,000 per depositor. The Dodd-Frank Act increased shareholder influence over boards of directors by requiring companies to give shareholders a non-binding vote on executive compensation and so called “golden parachute” payments. The legislation also directs the Federal Reserve to promulgate rules prohibiting excessive compensation paid to bank holding company executives, regardless of whether the company is publicly traded or not. Further, the legislation requires that originators of securitized loans retain a percentage of the risk for transferred loans, directs the Federal Reserve to regulate pricing of certain debit card interchange fees and contains a number of reforms related to mortgage origination.

The Dodd Frank Act has resulted in an increased regulatory burden and compliance, operating and interest expense for the Company and the Bank.

Bank Regulation

Business Activities. The Bank derives its lending and investment powers from the applicable Pennsylvania law, federal law and applicable state and federal regulations. Under these laws and regulations, The Bank may invest in mortgage loans secured by residential and commercial real estate, commercial business and consumer loans, certain types of debt securities and certain other assets, subject to applicable limits.

Capital Requirements. Federal regulations require state banks to meet three minimum capital standards: a 1.5% tangible capital ratio, a 4% core capital to assets leverage ratio (3% for savings associations receiving the highest rating on the composite, or “CAMELS,” rating system for capital adequacy, asset quality, management, earnings, liquidity and sensitivity to market risk), and an 8% risk-based capital ratio.

The risk-based capital standard for state banks requires the maintenance of Tier 1 (core) and total capital (which is defined as core capital and supplementary capital) to risk-weighted assets of at least 4% and 8%, respectively. In determining the amount of risk weighted assets, all assets, including certain off-balance sheet assets, are multiplied by a risk-weight factor of 0% to 1250%, assigned by the regulations, based on the risks believed inherent in the type of asset. Core capital is defined as common shareholders’ equity (including retained earnings), certain noncumulative perpetual preferred stock and related surplus and minority interests in equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries, less intangibles other than certain mortgage servicing rights and credit card relationships. The components of supplementary capital include cumulative preferred stock, long-term perpetual preferred stock, mandatory convertible securities, subordinated debt and intermediate preferred stock, the allowance for loan losses limited to a maximum of 1.25% of risk-weighted assets and up to 45% of net unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities with readily determinable fair market values. Overall, the amount of supplementary capital included as part of total capital cannot exceed 100% of core capital. Additionally, an institution that retains credit risk in connection with an asset sale is required to maintain additional regulatory capital because of the purchaser’s recourse against the institution. In assessing an institution’s capital adequacy, the FDIC takes into consideration not only these numeric factors, but qualitative factors as well and has the authority to establish higher capital requirements for individual associations where necessary.

At December 31, 2021, the Bank’s capital exceeded all applicable requirements.

The risk-based capital rule and the method for calculating risk-weighted assets by the FDIC and the other federal bank regulators are consistent with agreements that were reached by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act. The rule applies to all depository institutions (such as the Bank) and top-tier bank holding companies with total consolidated assets of $3.0 billion or more. Among other things, the rule established a common equity Tier 1 minimum capital requirement (4.5% of risk-weighted assets), increases the minimum Tier 1 capital to risk-based assets requirement (from 4.0% to 6.0% of risk-weighted assets) and assigns a higher risk weight (150%) to exposures that are more than 90 days past due or are on nonaccrual status and to certain commercial real estate facilities that finance the acquisition, development or construction of real property. The rule also requires unrealized gains and losses on certain available-for-sale securities to be included for purposes of calculating regulatory capital requirements unless a one-time opt-in or opt-out is exercised. The Bank elected the one-time opt-out election for accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) to be excluded from the regulatory capital calculation. The rule limits a banking organization’s capital distributions and certain discretionary bonus payments if the banking organization does not hold a capital conservation buffer consisting of 2.5% of common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets in addition to the amount necessary to meet its minimum risk-based capital requirements. The capital conservation buffer requirement was phased in at 0.625% per year beginning January 1, 2016 and ended January 1, 2019, when the full 2.5% capital conservation buffer requirement became effective.

Loans-to-One Borrower. Generally, a Pennsylvania-chartered commercial bank may not make a loan or extend credit to a single or related group of borrowers in excess of 15% of capital. An additional amount may be loaned, equal to 10% of unimpaired capital and surplus, if the loan is secured by readily marketable collateral, which generally does not include real estate. As of December 31, 2021, the Bank was in compliance with the loans-to-one borrower limitations.

Capital Distributions. The Pennsylvania Banking Code states, in part, that dividends may be declared and paid only out of accumulated net earnings and may not be declared or paid unless surplus is at least equal to capital. Dividends may not reduce surplus without the prior consent of the Pennsylvania Department of Banking and Securities. In addition, the Federal Deposit Insurance Act provides that an insured depository institution may not make any capital distribution if, after making such distribution, the institution would fail to meet any applicable regulatory capital requirement.

Community Reinvestment Act and Fair Lending Laws. All insured institutions have a responsibility under the Community Reinvestment Act and related regulations to help meet the credit needs of their communities, including low- and moderate-income borrowers. The FDIC is required to assess the Bank’s record of compliance with the Community Reinvestment Act. Failure to comply with the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act could, at a minimum, result in denial of certain corporate applications, such as branches or mergers, or in restrictions on its activities. In addition, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and the Fair Housing Act prohibit lenders from discriminating in their lending practices on the basis of characteristics specified in those statutes. The failure to comply with the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and the Fair Housing Act could result in enforcement actions by the FDIC, as well as other federal regulatory agencies and the Department of Justice.

The Community Reinvestment Act requires all institutions insured by the FDIC to publicly disclose their rating. The Bank received a “satisfactory” rating in its most recent federal examination.

Transactions with Related Parties. A state-chartered bank’s authority to engage in transactions with its affiliates is limited by Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act and federal regulation. An affiliate is generally a company that controls or is under common control with an insured depository institution, such as the Bank. The Company is an affiliate of the Bank because of its control of the Bank. In general, transactions between an insured depository institution and its affiliates are subject to certain quantitative limits and collateral requirements. In addition, federal regulations prohibit a state-chartered bank from lending to any of its affiliates that are engaged in activities that are not permissible for bank holding companies and from purchasing the securities of any affiliate, other than a subsidiary. Finally, transactions with affiliates must be consistent with safe and sound banking practices, not involve the purchase of low-quality assets and be on terms that are as favorable to the institution as comparable transactions with non-affiliates.

The Bank’s authority to extend credit to its directors, executive officers and 10% shareholders, as well as to entities controlled by such persons, is currently governed by the requirements of Sections 22(g) and 22(h) of the Federal Reserve Act and Regulation O of the Federal Reserve. Among other things, these provisions generally require that extensions of credit to insiders be made on terms that are substantially the same as, and follow credit underwriting procedures that are not less stringent than, those prevailing for comparable transactions with unaffiliated persons and that do not involve more than the normal risk of repayment or present other unfavorable features; and not exceed certain limitations on the amount of credit extended to such persons, individually and in the aggregate, which limits are based, in part, on the amount of the Bank’s capital. In addition, extensions of credit in excess of certain limits must be approved by the Bank’s Board. Extensions of credit to executive officers are subject to additional limits based on the type of extension involved.

Standards for Safety and Soundness. Federal law requires each federal banking agency to prescribe certain standards for all insured depository institutions. These standards relate to, among other things, internal controls, information systems and audit systems, loan documentation, credit underwriting, interest rate risk exposure, asset growth, compensation, and other operational and managerial standards as the agency deems appropriate. Interagency guidelines set forth the safety and soundness standards that the federal banking agencies use to identify and address problems at insured depository institutions before capital becomes impaired. If the appropriate federal banking agency determines that an institution fails to meet any standard prescribed by the guidelines, the agency may require the institution to submit to the agency an acceptable plan to achieve compliance with the standard. If an institution fails to meet these standards, the appropriate federal banking agency may require the institution to implement an acceptable compliance plan. Failure to implement such a plan can result in further enforcement action, including the issuance of a cease and desist order or the imposition of civil money penalties.

Prompt Corrective Action Regulations. Under the Federal Prompt Corrective Action statute, the FDIC is required to take supervisory actions against undercapitalized state-chartered banks under its jurisdiction, the severity of which depends upon the institution’s level of capital. An institution that has total risk-based capital of less than 8% or a leverage ratio or a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio that generally is less than 4% is considered to be “undercapitalized”. An institution that has total risk-based capital less than 6%, a Tier 1 core risk-based capital ratio of less than 3% or a leverage ratio that is less than 3% is considered to be “significantly undercapitalized.” An institution that has a tangible capital to assets ratio equal to or less than 2% is deemed to be “critically undercapitalized.”

Generally, the Pennsylvania Department of Banking and Securities (the “Pennsylvania Department of Banking” or “PDBS”) is required to appoint a receiver or conservator for a state-chartered bank that is “critically undercapitalized” within specific time frames. The regulations also provide that a capital restoration plan must be filed with the FDIC within 45 days of the date that an institution is deemed to have received notice that it is “undercapitalized,” “significantly undercapitalized” or “critically undercapitalized.” Any bank holding company of an institution that is required to submit a capital restoration plan must guarantee performance under the plan in an amount of up to the lesser of 5% of the institution’s assets at the time it was deemed to be undercapitalized by the FDIC or the amount necessary to restore the institution to adequately capitalized status. This guarantee remains in place until the FDIC notifies the institution that it has maintained adequately capitalized status for each of four consecutive calendar quarters. Institutions that are undercapitalized become subject to certain mandatory measures, such as restrictions on capital distributions and asset growth. The PDBS may also take any one of a number of discretionary supervisory actions against undercapitalized institutions, including the issuance of a capital directive and the replacement of senior executive officers and directors.

At December 31, 2021, the Bank met the criteria for being considered “well capitalized.”

In addition, the final capital rule adopted in July 2013 revises the prompt corrective action categories to incorporate the revised minimum capital requirements of that rule.

Enforcement. The Pennsylvania Department of Banking maintains enforcement authority over the Bank, including the power to issue cease and desist orders and civil money penalties and to remove directors, officers or employees. It also has the power to appoint a conservator or receiver for a bank upon insolvency, imminent insolvency, unsafe or unsound condition or certain other situations. The FDIC has primary federal enforcement responsibility over non-Federal Reserve Bank (“FRB”)-member state banks and has authority to bring actions against the institution and all institution-affiliated parties, including shareholders, and any attorneys, appraisers and accountants who knowingly or recklessly participate in wrongful actions likely to have an adverse effect on the bank. Formal enforcement action may range from the issuance of a capital directive or cease and desist order to removal of officers and/or directors. Civil penalties cover a wide range of violations and can amount to $25,000 per day, or even $1 million per day in especially egregious cases. In general, regulatory enforcement actions occur with respect to situations involving unsafe or unsound practices or conditions, violations of law or regulation or breaches of fiduciary duty. Federal and Pennsylvania laws also establish criminal penalties for certain violations.

Insurance of Deposit Accounts. The Deposit Insurance Fund (“DIF”) of the FDIC insures deposits at FDIC-insured financial institutions, such as the Bank. Deposit accounts in the Bank are insured by the FDIC generally up to a maximum of $250,000 per separately insured depositor and up to a maximum of $250,000 for self-directed retirement accounts. The FDIC charges insured depository institutions premiums to maintain the DIF.

The Dodd-Frank Act increased the minimum target DIF ratio from 1.15% to 1.35% of estimated insured deposits. The Dodd-Frank Act eliminated the 1.5% maximum fund ratio, instead leaving it to the discretion of the FDIC to establish a maximum fund ratio. The FDIC has exercised that discretion by establishing a long-range fund ratio of 2%. The FDIC announced that the ratio had declined to 1.30% at September 30, 2020 due largely to consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic. The FDIC adopted a plan to restore the fund to the 1.35% ratio within eight years but did not change its assessment schedule.

The FDIC has authority to increase insurance assessments. Any significant increases would have an adverse effect on the operating expenses and results of operations of the Bank. Management cannot predict what assessment rates will be in the future.

Insurance of deposits may be terminated by the FDIC upon a finding that an institution has engaged in unsafe or unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations or has violated any applicable law, regulation, rule, order or condition imposed by the FDIC. The Bank does not currently know of any practice, condition or violation that may lead to termination of its deposit insurance.

Prohibitions Against Tying Arrangements. State-chartered banks are prohibited, subject to some exceptions, from extending credit to or offering any other service, or fixing or varying the consideration for such extension of credit or service, on the condition that the customer obtain some additional service from the institution or its affiliates or not obtain services of a competitor of the institution.

FHLB System. The Bank is a member of the FHLB System, which consists of 11 regional FHLBs. The FHLB System provides a central credit facility primarily for member institutions as well as other entities involved in home mortgage lending. As a member of the FHLB of Pittsburgh, The Bank is required to acquire and hold shares of capital stock in the FHLB. As of December 31, 2021, the Bank was in compliance with this requirement. The Bank also is able to borrow from the FHLB of Pittsburgh, which provides an additional source of liquidity for the Bank.

Federal Reserve System. The FRB regulations require banks to maintain reserves against their transaction accounts (primarily Negotiable Order of Withdrawal, or NOW and regular checking accounts). The regulations generally provide that reserves be maintained against aggregate transaction accounts as follows for 2021: a 3% reserve ratio is assessed on net transaction accounts up to and including $182.9 million; a 10% reserve ratio is applied above $182.9 million. The first $21.1 million of otherwise reservable balances (subject to adjustments by the Federal Reserve Board) are exempted from the reserve requirements. The Bank complies with the foregoing requirements. The amounts are adjusted annually and, for 2022, establish a 3% reserve ratio for aggregate transaction accounts up to $640.6 million, a 10% ratio above $640.6 million, and an exemption of $32.4 million. However, effective March 26, 2020, the FRB reduced reserve requirement ratios on all net transaction accounts to 0%, eliminating reserve requirements for all depository institutions, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Other Regulations

Interest and other charges collected or contracted by the Bank are subject to state usury laws and federal laws concerning interest rates. The Bank’s operations are also subject to federal and state laws applicable to credit transactions, such as the:

• Truth-In-Lending Act, governing disclosures of credit terms to consumer borrowers;
• Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, requiring financial institutions to provide information to enable the public and public officials to determine whether a financial institution is fulfilling its obligation to help meet the housing needs of the community it serves;
• Equal Credit Opportunity Act, prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race, creed or other prohibited factors in extending credit;
• Fair Credit Reporting Act, governing the use and provision of information to credit reporting agencies;
• Fair Debt Collection Act, governing the manner in which consumer debts may be collected by collection agencies;
• Truth in Savings Act; and
• Rules and regulations of the various federal and state agencies charged with the responsibility of implementing such laws.

The operations of the Bank also are subject to the:

• Right to Financial Privacy Act, which imposes a duty to maintain confidentiality of consumer financial records and prescribes procedures for complying with administrative subpoenas of financial records;
• Electronic Funds Transfer Act and Regulation E promulgated thereunder, which govern automatic deposits to and withdrawals from deposit accounts and customers’ rights and liabilities arising from the use of automated teller machines and other electronic banking services;
• Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act (also known as “Check 21”), which gives “substitute checks,” such as digital check images and copies made from that image, the same legal standing as the original paper check;
• The USA PATRIOT Act, which requires banks operating to, among other things, establish broadened anti-money laundering compliance programs, due diligence policies and controls to ensure the detection and reporting of money laundering. Such required compliance programs are intended to supplement existing compliance requirements, also

applicable to financial institutions, under the Bank Secrecy Act and the Office of Foreign Assets Control regulations; and

• The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which places limitations on the sharing of consumer financial information by financial institutions with unaffiliated third parties. Specifically, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act requires all financial institutions offering financial products or services to retail customers to provide such customers with the financial institution’s privacy policy and provide such customers the opportunity to “opt out” of the sharing of certain personal financial information with unaffiliated third parties.

Holding Company Regulation

General. The Company is a bank holding company within the meaning of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended. As such, the Company is registered with the Federal Reserve and is subject to regulations, examinations, supervision and reporting requirements applicable to bank holding companies. In addition, the Federal Reserve has enforcement authority over the Company and its non-bank subsidiaries. Among other things, this authority permits the Federal Reserve to restrict or prohibit activities that are determined to be a serious risk to the subsidiary banking institution.

Capital. The Dodd-Frank Act requires the Federal Reserve to establish for all depository institution holding companies minimum consolidated capital requirements that are as stringent as those required for the insured depository subsidiaries.

Source of Strength. The Dodd-Frank Act requires that all bank holding companies serve as a source of strength to their subsidiary depository institutions by providing capital, liquidity and other support in times of financial stress.

Dividends. The Federal Reserve has issued a policy statement regarding the payment of dividends and the repurchase of shares of common stock by bank holding companies. In general, the policy provides that dividends should be paid only out of current earnings and only if the prospective rate of earnings retention by the holding company appears consistent with the organization’s capital needs, asset quality and overall financial condition. Regulatory guidance provides for prior regulatory consultation with respect to capital distributions in certain circumstances, such as where the company’s net income for the past four quarters, net of dividends previously paid over that period, is insufficient to fully fund the dividend or the company’s overall rate or earnings retention is inconsistent with the company’s capital needs and overall financial condition. The ability of a holding company to pay dividends may be restricted if a subsidiary depository institution becomes undercapitalized. The policy statement also states that a holding company should inform the Federal Reserve supervisory staff before redeeming or repurchasing common stock or perpetual preferred stock if the holding company is experiencing financial weaknesses or if the repurchase or redemption would result in a net reduction, as of the end of a quarter, in the amount of such equity instruments outstanding compared with the beginning of the quarter in which the redemption or repurchase occurred. These regulatory policies may affect the Company’s ability to pay dividends, repurchase shares of common stock or otherwise engage in capital distributions.

Acquisition. Under the Change in Bank Control Act, a federal statute, a notice must be submitted to the Federal Reserve if any person (including a company), or group acting in concert, seeks to acquire direct or indirect “control” of a bank holding company. Under certain circumstances, a change of control may occur, and prior notice is required, upon the acquisition of 10% or more of the company’s outstanding voting stock, unless the Federal Reserve has found that the acquisition will not result in control of the company. A change in control definitively occurs upon the acquisition of 25% or more of the company’s outstanding voting stock.

Under the Change in Bank Control Act, the Federal Reserve generally has 60 days from the filing of a complete notice to act, taking into consideration certain factors, including the financial and managerial resources of the acquirer and the competitive effects of the acquisition.

Federal Securities Laws. The Company’s common stock is registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. As a result, the Company is subject to the information, proxy solicitation, insider trading restrictions and other requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 is intended to improve corporate responsibility, to provide for enhanced penalties for accounting and auditing improprieties at publicly traded companies and to protect investors by improving the accuracy and reliability of corporate disclosures pursuant to the federal securities laws. The Company has policies, procedures and systems designed to comply with these regulations, and the Company reviews and documents these policies, procedures and systems to ensure continued compliance with these regulations.

TAXATION

General. The Company and the Bank are subject to federal income taxation in the same general manner as other corporations, with some exceptions discussed below. The following discussion of federal taxation is intended only to summarize certain pertinent federal income tax matters and is not a comprehensive description of the tax rules applicable to the Company and the Bank.

Method of Accounting. For federal income tax purposes, the Company currently reports its income and expenses on the accrual method of accounting and uses a tax year ending December 31 for filing its federal and state income tax returns.

Federal Taxation. The federal income tax laws apply to the Company in the same manner as to other corporations with some exceptions. The Company may exclude from income 100% of dividends received from the Bank as members of the same affiliated group of corporations. For federal income tax purposes, corporations may carryforward net operating losses indefinitely, but the deduction is limited to 80% of taxable income. For its 2021 and 2020 fiscal year, the Company’s maximum federal income tax rate was 21%.

State Taxation. The Bank is subject to the Pennsylvania Bank and Trust Company Shares Tax (“Shares Tax”) rate of 0.95%. The tax is imposed on the Bank’s adjusted equity. The Company and Exchange Underwriters are subject to the Pennsylvania Corporate Net Income Tax, otherwise known as “CNI tax.” The CNI tax rate in 2021 and 2020 was 9.99%. The tax is imposed on income or loss from the federal income tax return on a separate-company basis for the Company and Exchange Underwriters. The federal return income or loss is adjusted for various items treated differently by the Pennsylvania Department of Revenue.

The FWVB merger has exposed the Company to additional state tax filing requirements in West Virginia and Ohio. The West Virginia Corporation Net Income Tax imposes a state income tax at the rate 6.5% based on the Company's consolidated taxable federal net income or loss on the Company's federal tax return, adjusted for various items treated differently by the West Virginia State Tax Department. The State of Ohio imposes an equity-based tax similar to the PA Shares Tax called Financial Institutions Tax (“FIT”) at a minimum tax of $1,000 or a rate of 0.8% for the first $200 million of Ohio based-equity, and then a declining rate thereafter. All state taxation is apportioned to states where nexus exists based on different metrics of the Company's Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition and Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss).

In addition to risks disclosed elsewhere in this Report, the following discussion sets forth the material risk factors that could affect the Company’s consolidated financial condition and results of operations. Readers should not consider any descriptions of these factors to be a complete set of all potential risks that could affect the Company. Any risk factor discussed below could by itself, or combined with other factors, materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, results of operations, financial condition, capital position, liquidity, competitive position or reputation, including by materially increasing expenses or decreasing revenues, which could result in material losses or a decrease in earnings.

Risks Related to COVID-19 Pandemic

The economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant economic dislocation in the United States. Although the domestic and global economies have begun to recover from the COVID-19 pandemic as many health and safety restrictions have been lifted and vaccine distribution has increased, certain adverse consequences of the pandemic continue to impact the macroeconomic environment and may persist for some time, including labor shortages and disruptions of global supply chains. The growth in economic activity and in the demand for goods and services, coupled with labor shortages and supply chain disruptions, has also contributed to rising inflationary pressures. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and the related adverse economic consequences, we could be subject to the following risks, among others, any of which individually or in combination with others could have a material, adverse effect on our business, financial condition, liquidity, and results of operations:

• demand for our products and services may decline, making it difficult to grow assets and income;
• if high levels of unemployment continue for an extended period of time, loan delinquencies, problem assets, and foreclosures may increase, resulting in increased charges and reduced income;
• collateral for loans, especially real estate, may decline in value, which could cause loan losses to increase;
• limitations may be placed on our ability to foreclose on properties we hold as collateral;
• our allowance for loan losses may have to be increased if borrowers experience financial difficulties, which will adversely affect our net income;
• the net worth and liquidity of loan guarantors may decline, impairing their ability to honor commitments to us;
• our cybersecurity risks are increased as the result of an increase in the number of employees working remotely;
• we rely on third-party vendors for certain services and the unavailability of a critical service due to the COVID-19 pandemic could have an adverse effect on us; and
• Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation premiums may increase if the agency experiences additional resolution costs.

Risks Related to Our Lending Activities

A large percentage of the Company’s loans are collateralized by real estate, and further disruptions in the real estate market may result in losses and reduce the Company’s earnings.

A substantial portion of the Company’s loan portfolio consists of loans collateralized by real estate. Improving economic conditions have shifted to an increase in demand for real estate, which has resulted in stabilization of some real estate values in the Company’s markets. Further disruptions in the real estate market could significantly impair the value of the Company’s collateral and its ability to sell the collateral upon foreclosure. The real estate collateral in each case provides an alternate source of repayment in the event of default by the borrower and may deteriorate in value during the time the credit is extended. If real estate values decline further, it is likely that the Company would be required to increase its allowance for loan losses. If, during a period of lower real estate values, the Company is required to liquidate the collateral securing a loan to satisfy debts or to increase its allowance for loan losses, it could materially reduce its profitability and adversely affect its financial condition.

Because the Company emphasizes commercial real estate and commercial loan originations, its credit risk may increase, and continued downturns in the local real estate market or economy could adversely affect its earnings.

Commercial real estate and commercial loans generally have more inherent risk than the residential real estate loans. Because the repayment of commercial real estate and commercial loans depends on the successful management and operation of the borrower’s properties or related businesses, repayment of such loans can be affected by adverse conditions in the local real estate market or economy. Commercial real estate and commercial loans also may involve relatively large loan balances to individual borrowers or groups of related borrowers. A downturn in the real estate market or the local economy could adversely affect the value of properties securing the loan or the revenues from the borrower’s business, thereby increasing the risk of nonperforming loans. As the Company’s commercial real estate and commercial loan portfolios increase, the corresponding risks and potential for losses from these loans may also increase. Furthermore, it may be difficult to assess the future performance of newly originated commercial loans, as such loans may have delinquency or charge-off levels above the Company’s historical experience, which could adversely affect the Company’s future performance.

If our nonperforming assets increase, our earnings will suffer.

Our nonperforming assets adversely affect our net income in various ways. We do not record interest income on non-accrual loans or real estate owned. We must reserve for probable losses, which results in additional provisions for loan losses. As circumstances warrant, we must write down the value of properties in our other real estate owned portfolio to reflect changing market values. Additionally, we have legal fees associated with the resolution of problem assets as well as additional costs, such as taxes, insurance and maintenance related to our other real estate owned. The resolution of nonperforming assets also requires the active involvement of management, which can adversely affect the amount of time we devote to the income-producing activities of the Bank. If our estimate of the allowance for loan losses is inadequate, we will have to increase the allowance accordingly.

If the Company’s allowance for loan losses is not sufficient to cover actual loan losses, the Company’s results of operations would be negatively affected.

In determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, the Company analyzes its loss and delinquency experience by loan categories and considers the effect of existing economic conditions. In addition, the Company makes various assumptions and judgments about the collectability of the loan portfolio, including the creditworthiness of its borrowers and the value of the real estate and other assets serving as collateral for the repayment of many of the loans. If the results of these analyses are incorrect, the allowance for loan losses may not be sufficient to cover losses inherent in the portfolio, which would require additions to the allowance and would reduce net income.

In addition, bank regulators periodically review the Company’s allowance for loan losses and may require it to increase the allowance for loan losses or recognize further loan charge-offs. Any increase in the allowance for loan losses or loan charge-offs as required by these regulatory authorities may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

The Financial Accounting Standard Board ("FASB") has issued an accounting standard update that will result in a significant change in how we recognize credit losses and may have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.

In 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. For assets held at amortized cost basis, ASU 2016-13 eliminates the probable initial recognition threshold in current accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") and instead requires an entity to reflect its estimate of all current expected credit losses ("CECL"). Under the CECL model, we will be required to present certain financial assets carried at amortized cost, such as loans held for investment and debt securities, at the net amount expected to be collected. The measurement of expected credit losses is to be based on information about past events, including historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the reported amount. This measurement will take place at the time the financial asset is first added to the Statements of Financial Condition and periodically thereafter. This differs significantly from the incurred loss model required under current GAAP, which delays recognition until it is probable a loss has been incurred. Accordingly, we expect that the adoption of the CECL model will materially affect how we determine our allowance for loan losses and could require us to significantly increase our allowance. Moreover, the CECL model may create more volatility in the level of our allowance for loan losses. If we are required to materially increase our level of allowance for loan losses for any reason, such increase could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In November 2019, the FASB approved a delay of the required implementation date of ASU 2016-13 for smaller reporting companies resulting in a required implementation date for the Company of January 1, 2023. The Company is evaluating the impact of this ASU and expects to recognize a one-time cumulative-effect adjustment to the allowance for loan losses upon adoption, but we cannot yet determine the magnitude of the one-time adjustment or the overall impact of the new guidance on the Company’s consolidated financial condition or results of operation.

Risk Related to Changes in Market Interest Rates

Changes in interest rates may reduce the Company’s profits and impair asset values.

The Company’s earnings and cash flows depend primarily on its net interest income. Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors that are beyond the Company’s control, including general economic conditions and the policies of various governmental and regulatory agencies, particularly the Federal Reserve. Changes in market interest rates could have an adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. If rates increase rapidly, the Company may have to increase the rates paid on deposits, particularly higher cost time deposits and borrowed funds, more quickly than any changes in interest rates earned on loans and investments, resulting in a negative effect on interest rate spreads and net interest income. Increases in interest rates may also make it more difficult for borrowers to repay adjustable rate loans. Conversely, should market interest rates fall below current levels, the Company’s net interest margin also could be negatively affected if competitive pressures keep it from further reducing rates on deposits, while the yields on the Company’s interest-earning assets decrease more rapidly through loan prepayments and interest rate adjustments. Decreases in interest rates often result in increased prepayments of loans and mortgage-related securities, as borrowers refinance their loans to reduce borrowings costs. Under these circumstances, the Company is subject to reinvestment risk to the extent it is unable to reinvest the cash received from such prepayments in loans or other investments that have interest rates that are comparable to the interest rates on existing loans and securities. Changes in interest rates also affect the value of the Company’s interest-earning assets, and in particular its securities portfolio. Generally, the value of fixed-rate securities fluctuates inversely with changes in interest rates. Unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale determined to be temporary in nature are reported as a separate component of equity. Decreases in the fair value of securities available for sale resulting from increases in interest rates therefore could have an adverse effect on the Company’s stockholders’ equity.

Risks Related to Our Acquisition Activity

Impairment in the carrying value of goodwill could negatively affect our results of operations.

We have recorded goodwill in connection with our recently completed mergers. At December 31, 2021, we had $9.7 million of goodwill on our Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition after incurring goodwill impairment of $18.7 million in 2020. Any further impairment to goodwill could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s consolidated financial conditions and results of operations. 100% of the goodwill is assigned to the Community Banking reporting unit. Under GAAP, goodwill must be evaluated for impairment annually or on an interim basis when a triggering event occurs. If the carrying value of our reporting unit exceeds its current fair value as determined based on the value of the business, the goodwill is considered impaired and is reduced to fair value by a non-cash, non-tax-deductible charge to earnings. The impairment testing required by GAAP involves estimates and significant judgments by management. Although we believe our assumptions and estimates are reasonable and appropriate, any changes in key assumptions or other unanticipated events and circumstances may affect the accuracy or validity of such estimates. Events and conditions that could result in impairment in the value of our goodwill include worsening business conditions and economic factors, particularly those that may result from the impact of a downturn in the economy as a result of COVID-19, changes in the industries in which we operate, adverse changes in the regulatory environment, or other factors leading to reduction in expected long-term profitability and cash flows.

Risk Related to Our Liquidity Position

If we are unable to borrow funds, we may not be able to meet the cash flow requirements of our depositors, creditors, and borrowers, or the operating cash needed to fund corporate expansion and other corporate activities.

Liquidity is the ability to meet cash flow needs on a timely basis at a reasonable cost. Our liquidity is used to make loans and to repay deposit liabilities as they become due or are demanded by customers. Liquidity policies and procedures are established by the board, with operating limits set based upon the ratio of loans to deposits and percentage of assets funded with non-core or wholesale funding. We regularly monitor our overall liquidity position to ensure various alternative strategies exist to cover unanticipated events that could affect liquidity. We also establish policies and monitor guidelines to diversify our wholesale funding sources to avoid concentrations in any one market source. Wholesale funding sources include federal funds purchased, securities sold under repurchase agreements, non-core deposits, and debt. The Bank is a member of the FHLB of Pittsburgh, which provides funding through advances to members that are collateralized with mortgage-related assets.

We maintain a portfolio of available-for-sale securities that can be used as a secondary source of liquidity. There are other sources of liquidity available to us should they be needed. These sources include the sale of loans, the ability to acquire national market, non-core deposits, issuance of additional collateralized borrowings such as FHLB advances and federal funds purchased, and the issuance of preferred or common securities.

Risks Related to Our Ability to Pay Dividends

The Company’s ability to pay dividends is subject to the ability of Community Bank to make capital distributions to the Company, and also may be limited by Federal Reserve policy.

The Company’s long-term ability to pay dividends to its shareholders depends primarily on the ability of the Bank to make capital distributions to the Company and on the availability of cash at the holding company level if the Bank’s earnings are not sufficient to pay dividends. In addition, the Federal Reserve has issued a policy statement regarding the payment of dividends by bank holding companies. In general, the policy provides that dividends should be paid only out of current earnings and only if the prospective rate of earnings retention by the holding company appears consistent with the organization’s capital needs, asset quality and overall financial condition. Regulatory guidance provides for prior regulatory consultation with respect to capital distributions in certain circumstances, such as where the holding company’s net income for the past four quarters, net of dividends paid over that period, is insufficient to fully fund the dividend or the holding company’s overall rate or earnings retention is inconsistent with its capital needs and overall financial condition. These regulatory policies may adversely affect the Company’s ability to pay dividends or otherwise engage in capital distributions.

Risks Related to Our Operations

Because the nature of the financial services business involves a high volume of transactions, the Company faces significant operational risks.

The Company operates in diverse markets and relies on the ability of its employees and systems to process a significant number of transactions. Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from operations, including the risk of fraud by employees or persons outside a company, the execution of unauthorized transactions by employees, errors relating to transaction processing and technology, breaches of the internal control system and compliance requirements, and business continuation and disaster recovery. Insurance coverage may not be available for such losses, or where available, such losses may exceed insurance limits. This risk of loss also includes the potential legal actions that could arise as a result of an operational deficiency or as a result of noncompliance with applicable regulatory standards, adverse business decisions or their implementation, and customer attrition due to potential negative publicity. If a breakdown occurs in the internal controls system, improper operation of systems or improper employee actions, the Company could incur financial loss, face regulatory action and suffer damage to its reputation.

Risks associated with system failures, interruptions, breaches of security or cyber security could negatively affect the Company’s earnings.

Information technology systems are critical to the Company’s business. The Company uses various technology systems to manage customer relationships, general ledger, securities, deposits and loans. The Company has established policies and procedures to prevent or limit the effect of system failures, interruptions and security breaches, but such events may still occur or may not be adequately addressed if they do occur. In addition, any compromise of the Company’s systems could deter customers from using its products and services. Security systems may not protect systems from security breaches.

In addition, the Company outsources some of its data processing to certain third-party providers. If these third-party providers encounter difficulties, or if the Company has difficulty communicating with them, the Company’s ability to adequately process and account for transactions could be affected, and business operations could be adversely affected. Threats to information security also exist in the processing of customer information through various other vendors and their personnel.

The occurrence of any system failures, interruption or breach of security could damage the Company’s reputation and result in a loss of customers and business thereby, subjecting it to additional regulatory scrutiny, or could expose it to litigation and possible financial liability. Although the Company has not experienced any system failures, interruption or breach of security to date, any of these events could have a material adverse effect on its financial condition and results of operations.

The Company is constantly relying upon the availability of technology, the Internet and telecommunication systems to enable financial transactions by clients, to record and monitor transactions and transmit and receive data to and from clients and third parties. Information security risks have increased significantly due to the use of online, telephone and mobile banking channels by clients and the increased sophistication and activities of organized crime, hackers, terrorists and other external parties. Our technologies, systems, networks and our clients’ devices have been subject to, and are likely to continue to be the target of, cyberattacks, computer viruses, malware, phishing attacks or information security breaches that could result in the unauthorized release, gathering, monitoring, misuse, loss or destruction of our or our clients’ confidential, proprietary and other information, the theft of client assets through fraudulent transactions or disruption of our or our clients’ or other third parties’ business operations. Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

The Company’s risk management framework may not be effective in mitigating risk and reducing the potential for significant losses.

The Company’s risk management framework is designed to minimize risk and loss to the company. The Company seeks to identify, measure, monitor, report and control exposure to risk, including strategic, market, liquidity, compliance and operational risks. While the Company uses a broad and diversified set of risk monitoring and mitigation techniques, these techniques are inherently limited because they cannot anticipate the existence or future development of currently unanticipated or unknown risks. Economic conditions and heightened legislative and regulatory scrutiny of the financial services industry, among other developments, have increased the Company’s level of risk. Accordingly, the Company could suffer losses if it fails to properly anticipate and manage these risks.

Reforms to and uncertainty regarding LIBOR may adversely affect our business.

In 2017, the Chief Executive of the United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority ("FCA"), which regulates the London Inter-bank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), announced in July 2017 that the sustainability of LIBOR cannot be guaranteed. The administrator for LIBOR announced on March 5, 2021 that it will permanently cease to publish most LIBOR settings beginning on January 1, 2022 and cease to publish the overnight, one-month, three-month, six-month and 12-month USD LIBOR settings on July 1, 2023. Accordingly, the FCA has stated that is does not intend to persuade or compel banks to submit to LIBOR after such respective dates. Until such time, however, FCA panel banks have agreed to continue to support LIBOR. It is impossible to predict whether and to what extent banks will continue to provide LIBOR submissions to the administrator of LIBOR or whether any additional reforms to LIBOR may be enacted in the United Kingdom or elsewhere. A committee of private-market derivative participants and their regulators convened by the Federal Reserve, the Alternative Reference Rates Committee (“ARRC”), was created to identify an alternative reference interest rate to replace LIBOR. The ARRC announced Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”), a broad measure of the cost of borrowing cash overnight collateralized by Treasury securities, as its preferred alternative to LIBOR. Subsequently, the Federal Reserve announced final plans for the production of SOFR, which resulted in the commencement of its published rates by the FRB of New York on April 2, 2018. Whether or not SOFR attains market traction as a LIBOR replacement tool remains in question and the future of LIBOR at this time is uncertain. The uncertainty as to the nature and effect of such reforms and actions and the political discontinuance of LIBOR may adversely affect the value of and return on our financial assets and liabilities that are based on or are linked to LIBOR, our results of operations or financial condition. In addition, these reforms may also require extensive changes to the contracts that govern these LIBOR based products, as well as our systems and processes. The implementation of a substitute index or indices for the calculation of interest rates under our loan agreements with our borrowers may result in our incurring significant expenses in effecting the transition, may result in reduced loan balances if borrowers do not accept the substitute index or indices, and may result in disputes or litigation with customers over the appropriateness or comparability to LIBOR of the substitute index or indices, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations. Currently, the manner and impact of this transition and related developments, as well as the effect of these developments on our funding costs, securities portfolio and business, is uncertain.

Risks Related to Accounting Matters

Changes in the Company’s accounting policies or in accounting standards could materially affect how the Company reports its financial condition and results of operations.

The Company’s accounting policies are essential to understanding its financial condition and results of operations. Some of these policies require the use of estimates and assumptions that may affect the value of the Company’s assets, liabilities, and financial results. Some of the Company’s accounting policies are critical because they require management to make difficult, subjective and complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain, and because it is likely that materially different amounts would be reported under different conditions or using different assumptions. If such estimates or assumptions underlying the Company’s financial statements are incorrect, it may experience material losses.

From time to time, the FASB and the Securities and Exchange Commission change the financial accounting and reporting standards or the interpretation of those standards that govern the preparation of the Company’s financial statements. These changes are beyond the Company’s control, can be difficult to predict, and could materially affect how the Company reports its financial condition and results of operations. The Company could also be required to apply a new or revised standard retroactively, resulting in restating prior period financial statements in material amounts.

The need to account for certain assets at estimated fair value, such as securities, may adversely affect the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

The Company reports certain assets, such as securities, at estimated fair value. Generally, for assets that are reported at fair value, the Company uses quoted market prices or valuation models that utilize observable market inputs to estimate fair value. Because the Company carries these assets on its books at their estimated fair value, it may incur losses even if the asset in question presents minimal credit risk.

Risks Related to Competitive Matters

Strong competition within the Company’s market area could adversely affect the Company’s earnings and slow growth.

The Company faces intense competition both in making loans and attracting deposits. Price competition for loans and deposits might result in the Company earning less on its loans and paying more on its deposits, which reduces net interest income. Some of the Company’s competitors have substantially greater resources than the Company has and may offer services that it does not provide. The Company expects competition to increase in the future as a result of legislative, regulatory and technological changes and the continuing consolidation in the financial services industry. The Company’s profitability will depend upon its continued ability to compete successfully in its market areas.

General Risk Factors

A worsening of economic conditions could adversely affect the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

A worsening of economic conditions could significantly affect the markets in which the Company operates, the value of loans and investments, ongoing operations, costs and profitability. Further declines in real estate values and sales volumes and continued elevated unemployment levels may result in higher than expected loan delinquencies, increases in nonperforming and criticized classified assets, and a decline in demand for the Company’s products and services. In addition, the volatility in natural gas prices, or if prices decline, may depress natural gas exploration and drilling activities in the Marcellus Shale Formation. Furthermore, exploration and drilling of natural gas reserves in our market area may be affected by federal, state and local laws and regulations affecting production, permitting, environmental protection and other matters. Any of these events may negatively affect our customers, and may cause the Company to incur losses, and may adversely affect its financial condition and results of operations.

Inflation can have an adverse impact on our business and on our customers.

Inflation risk is the risk that the value of assets or income from investments will be worth less in the future as inflation decreases the value of money. Recently, there have been market indicators of a pronounced rise in inflation and the FRB has indicated its intention to raise certain benchmark interest rates in an effort to combat inflation. As inflation increases, the value of our investment securities, particularly those with longer maturities, would decrease, although this effect can be less pronounced for floating rate instruments. In addition, inflation increases the cost of goods and services we use in our business operations, such as electricity and other utilities, which increases our noninterest expenses. Furthermore, our customers are also affected by inflation and the rising costs of goods and services used in their households and businesses, which could have a negative impact on their ability to repay their loans with us.

Climate change and related legislative and regulatory initiatives may materially affect the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

The effects of climate change continue to create a rising level of concern for the state of the global environment. As a result, businesses have increased their political and social awareness surrounding the issue, and the U.S. has entered into international agreements in an attempt to reduce global temperatures. In addition, the U.S. government, state legislatures and federal and state regulatory agencies continue to propose numerous initiatives to combat climate change. Other expansive initiatives are expected, including potentially increasing supervisory expectations with respect to banks’ risk management practices, accounting for the effects of climate change in stress testing scenarios and systemic risk assessments, revising expectations for credit portfolio concentrations based on climate-related factors and encouraging investment by banks in climate-related initiatives and lending to communities disproportionately impacted by the effects of climate change. The lack of empirical data surrounding the credit and other financial risks posed by climate change render it difficult to predict how climate change may impact our financial condition and results of operations; however, the physical effects of climate change may also directly impact us. Specifically, unpredictable and more frequent weather disasters may adversely impact the value of real property securing the loans in our portfolios. Additionally, if insurance obtained by our borrowers is insufficient to cover any losses sustained to the collateral, or if insurance coverage is otherwise unavailable to our borrowers, the collateral securing our loans may be negatively impacted by climate change, which could impact our financial condition and results of operations. Further, the effects of climate change may negatively impact regional and local economic activity, which could lead to an adverse effect on our customers and impact the communities in which we operate. Overall, the effects and resulting, unknown impact of climate change could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

We could be adversely affected by failure in our internal controls.

A failure in our internal controls could have a significant negative impact not only on our earnings, but also on the perception that customers, regulators and investors may have of us. We devote a significant amount of effort, time and resources to continually strengthening our controls and ensuring compliance with complex accounting standards and banking regulations. Compliance with increased or new standards and regulations applicable to our Company may entail management spending increased time addressing such standards and regulations. Further, the Company may be required to expend additional capital resources on professional advisors, which could increase operational expenses and therefore negatively impact our net income.

At December 31, 2021, our premises and equipment had an aggregate net book value of approximately $18.4 million. We conduct our business through our main office and 13 branch offices. The branch offices are utilized by the community banking segment. In addition, the community banking segment has a corporate office, operations center and loan production office. The insurance brokerage services segment, Exchange Underwriters, operates from one office. We believe that our office facilities are adequate to meet our present and immediately foreseeable needs.

The following table sets forth certain information concerning the main and each branch office at December 31, 2021.

24

At December 31, 2021, we were not involved in any pending legal proceedings other than routine legal proceedings occurring in the ordinary course of business which, in the aggregate, involve amounts that management believes are immaterial to our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

This discussion and analysis reflects our consolidated financial statements and other relevant statistical data, and is intended to enhance your understanding of our financial condition and results of operations. The information in this section has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements, which appear in this Report. You should read the information in this section in conjunction with the business and financial information the Company provided in this Report.

Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements

See the first page of this Report for information regarding forward-looking statements.

Selected Financial Data

The following tables set forth selected historical financial and other data of the Company at and for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019. The information at December 31, 2021 and 2020, and for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 is derived in part from, and should be read together with, the Company's audited consolidated financial statements and notes included in this Report and should be read together therewith. The information at December 31, 2019 and for the year ended December 31, 2019 is derived in part from audited financial statements that are not included in this Report.

(Dollars in Thousands)

26

(Dollars in Thousands)

27

(1) Represents dividends per share divided by net income per share.

(2) Represents the difference between the weighted average yield on average interest-earning assets and the weighted average cost of average interest-bearing liabilities.

(3) Represents net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.

(4) Fully taxable-equivalent (FTE) yield adjustments have been made for tax exempt loan and securities income utilizing a marginal federal income tax rate of 21% for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019. Refer to Explanation of Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures in Item 7 of this Report for the calculation of the measure and reconciliation to the most comparable GAAP measure..

(5) Represents noninterest expense divided by the sum of net interest income and noninterest income.

(6) Capital ratios are for Community Bank only.

Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Critical Accounting Estimates

Critical accounting policies are those that involve significant judgments, estimates and assumptions by management and that have, or could have, a material impact on the Company’s income or the carrying value of its assets.

Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses (“allowance”) is maintained at a level considered adequate to provide for losses that can be reasonably anticipated. Management performs a quarterly evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance based on potential losses in the current loan portfolio, which includes an assessment of economic conditions, changes in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, loan loss experience, volume and severity of past due, classified and nonaccrual loans as well as other loan modifications, quality of the Company’s loan review system, the degree of oversight by the Company’s Board, existence and effect of any concentrations of credit and changes in the level of such concentrations, effect of external factors, such as competition and legal and regulatory requirements, and other relevant factors. While management uses the best information available to make such evaluations, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary if economic conditions differ substantially from the assumptions used in making evaluations. Additions are made to the allowance through periodic provisions charged to income and recovery of principal and interest on loans previously charged-off. Losses of principal are charged directly to the allowance when a loss occurs or when a determination is made that the specific loss is probable. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revisions as more information becomes available.

The allowance consists of specific and general components. The specific component relates to loans that are classified as impaired. A loan is considered impaired when, based upon current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due for principal and interest according to the original contractual terms of the loan agreement. Generally, management considers all substandard-, doubtful-, and loss-rated loans, nonaccrual loans, and TDRs for impairment. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. The maximum period without payment that typically can occur before a loan is considered for impairment is 90 days. Impairment is measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at a loan’s effective interest rate, or as a practical expedient, the observable market price, or, if the loan is collateral dependent, the fair value of the underlying collateral. When the measurement of an impaired loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan, the impairment is recorded in a specific valuation allowance. This specific valuation allowance is periodically adjusted for significant changes in the amount or timing of expected future cash flows, observable market price or fair value of the collateral. The specific valuation allowance, or allowance for impaired loans, is part of the total allowance for loan losses. Cash payments received on impaired loans that are considered non-accrual are recorded as a direct reduction of the recorded investment in the loan. When the recorded investment has been fully collected, receipts are recorded as recoveries to the allowance for loan losses until the previously charged-off principal is fully recovered. Subsequent amounts collected are recognized as interest income. If no charge-off exists, then once the recorded investment has been fully collected, any future amounts collected would be recognized as interest income. Impaired loans are not returned to accrual status until all amounts due, both principal and interest, are current and a sustained payment history has been demonstrated.

The general allowance component covers pools of homogeneous loans by loan class. Management determines historical loss experience for each segment of loans using the five-year rolling average of the net charge-off data within each segment. Qualitative and environmental factors are also considered that are likely to cause estimated credit losses associated with the Bank’s existing portfolio to differ from historical loss experience, and include levels and trends in delinquency and impaired loans; levels and trends in net charge-offs, trends in volume and terms of loans; change in underwriting, policies, procedures, practices and key personnel; national and local economic trends; industry conditions, and effects of changes in high-risk credit circumstances. The qualitative and environmental factors are reviewed on a quarterly basis to ensure they are reflective of current conditions in the portfolio and economy. An unallocated component, which is a part of the general allowance component, is maintained to cover uncertainties that could affect the Company’s estimate of probable losses.

Our allowance is sensitive to a number of inputs, most notably the qualitative factors and historical loss experience by loan segment. Given the dynamic relationship between the inputs, it is difficult to estimate the impact of a change in any one individual variable on the allowance. Although management believes that it uses the best information available to establish the allowance, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary and results of operations could be adversely affected if circumstances differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the determinations. Because future events affecting borrowers and collateral value cannot be predicted with certainty, there can be no assurance that the existing allowance is adequate or that increases will not be necessary should the quality of assets deteriorate as a result of the factors discussed previously. Any increase in the allowance may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. Changes in factors underlying the assessment could have a material impact on the amount of the allowance that is necessary and the amount of provision to be charged against earnings.

Fair Value Measurements. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability at the transaction date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. A three-level of fair value hierarchy prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value:

Level 1 – Fair value is based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible to the Company for identical assets. These generally provide the most reliable evidence and are used to measure fair value whenever available.

Level 2 – Fair value is based on significant inputs, other than Level 1 inputs, that are observable either directly or indirectly for substantially the full term of the asset through corroboration with observable market data. Level 2 inputs include quoted market prices in active markets for similar assets, quoted market prices in markets that are not active for identical or similar assets, and other observable inputs.

Level 3 – Fair value is based on significant unobservable inputs. Examples of valuation methodologies that would result in Level 3 classification include option pricing models, discounted cash flows, and other similar techniques.

This hierarchy requires the use of observable market data when available. The level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement falls is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company attempts to maximize observable inputs and limit the use of unobservable inputs when developing fair value measurements, Fair value measurements for assets where there exists limited or no observable market data and that are based primarily upon the Company’s or other third-party’s estimates, are often calculated based on the characteristics of the asset, the economic and competitive environment and other such factors. Therefore, the results cannot be determined with precision and may not be realized in an actual sale or immediate settlement of the asset. Additionally, there may be inherent weaknesses in any calculation technique where changes in the underlying assumptions used, including discount rates and estimates of future cash flows, could significantly affect the results of current or future valuations.

Goodwill. Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquisition over the fair value of the net assets acquired. Deemed to have an indefinite life and not subject to amortization, goodwill is instead tested for impairment at the reporting unit level at least annually on October 31 or more frequently if triggering events occur or impairment indicators exist. The Company operates two reporting units – Community Banking segment and Insurance Brokerage Services segment. The Company has assigned 100% of the goodwill to the Community Banking reporting unit.

Determining the fair value of a reporting unit under the goodwill impairment test is judgmental and often involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions. In 2019, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2017-04 whereby the Company applies a one-step quantitative test and records the amount of goodwill impairment as the excess of a reporting unit's carrying amount over its fair value, not to exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit. The Company has the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If, after assessing the totality of events or circumstances, an entity determines it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then performing a step one impairment test is unnecessary. An entity also has the option to bypass the qualitative assessment for any reporting unit and proceed directly to the first step of impairment testing.

Two basic approaches to determine the fair value of an entity are the income approach and market approach or a combination of the two. The income approach uses valuation techniques to convert future earnings or cash flows to present value to arrive at a value that is indicated by market expectations about future amounts. The market approach uses observable prices and other relevant information that is generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities. The fair value measure is based on the value that those transactions indicate. These approaches involve significant estimates and assumptions

In the application of the income approach, fair value of a reporting unit is determined using a discounted cash flow (“DCF”) analysis. The income approach relies on Level 3 inputs along with a market-derived cost of capital when measuring fair value. Fair value is determined by converting anticipated benefits into a present single value. Once the benefit or benefits are selected, an appropriate discount or capitalization rate is applied to each benefit. These rates are calculated using the appropriate measure for the size and type of company, using financial models and market data as required. A discount rate may be derived based on a modified capital asset pricing model. which is comprised of a risk-free rate of return, an equity risk premium, a size premium and a factor covering the systemic market risk and a company specific risk premium. The values for the factors applied are determined primarily using external sources of information. The DCF model also uses prospective financial information. Estimating future earnings and capital requirements involves judgment and the consideration of past and current performance and overall macroeconomic and regulatory environments.

Under the market approach, Level 1 and 2 inputs are used when measuring fair value. In the application of the market approach, the Guideline Public Company ("GPC") method of appraisal is based on the premise that pricing multiples of publicly traded companies can be used as a tool to be applied in valuing a closely held entity. A value multiple or ratio relates a stock’s market price to the reported accounting data such as revenue, earnings, and book value. These ratios provide an objective basis for measuring the market’s perception of a stock’s fair value. Value ratios generally reflect the trends in growth, performance and stability of the financial results of operations. In this way, the business and financial risks exhibited by an industry or group of companies can be viewed in relation to market values. Value ratios also reflect the market’s outlook for the economy as a whole. Guideline companies provide a reasonable basis for comparison to the relative investment characteristics of the company being valued. The Company analyzes the relationships between the guideline companies' asset size, profitability, asset quality and capital ratios and applies a control premium to the selected guideline company multiples. The control premium is management's estimate of how much a market participant would be willing to pay over the fair market value in consideration of synergies and other benefits that flow from control of the entity. The GPC method using trading activity of publicly traded companies that are most similar to the Company may also be considered when the banking industry has a sufficient level of mergers and acquisitions activity

The results of the income and market approaches may be weighted to determine the concluded fair value of the reporting unit. The weighting is judgmental and is based on the perceived level of appropriateness of the valuation methodology. Estimating the fair value involves the use of estimates and significant judgments that are based on a number of factors including actual operating results. If current conditions change from those expected, it is reasonably possible that the judgments and estimates described above could change in future periods and require management to further evaluate goodwill for impairment.

As a result of a quantitative goodwill impairment test and in connection with the preparation of the consolidated financial statements, the Company concluded that goodwill was impaired in 2020. Accordingly, the Company recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $18.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 as the Company's estimated fair value was less than its book value. If the Company determines a triggering event occurs in the future, changes in the judgments, assumptions and inputs noted above could result in additional goodwill impairment.

Other-Than-Temporary Impairment. In estimating other-than-temporary impairment of securities, securities are evaluated on at least a quarterly basis to determine whether a decline in their value is other-than-temporary. In estimating other-than temporary impairment losses, management considers (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (3) whether or not the Company intends to sell or expect that it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the security before an anticipated recovery in fair value. Once a decline in value for a debt security is determined to be other than temporary, the other-than-temporary impairment is separated in (a) the amount of total other-than-temporary impairment related to a decrease in cash flows expected to be collected from the debt security (the credit loss) and (b) the amount of other-than-temporary impairment related to all other factors. The amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to credit loss is recognized in earnings. The amount of other-than-temporary impairment related to other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income (loss).

Deferred Tax Assets. Deferred income tax expense results from changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities between periods. Deferred tax assets are recognized if it is more likely than not, based on the technical merits, that the tax position will be realized or sustained upon examination, the term more likely than not means a likelihood of more than 50%; the terms examined and upon examination also include resolution of the related appeals or litigation processes, if any. A tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold is initially and subsequently measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon settlement with a taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information. The determination of whether a tax position has met the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold considers the facts, circumstances and information available at the reporting date, and is subject to management’s judgment. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance if, based on the weight of evidence available, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. The Company did not have a deferred tax asset valuation allowance as of December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements and Developments

New accounting pronouncements that were adopted in the current period or will be adopted in a future period are discussed in Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, which is included in Part IV, Item 15 of this Report.

Branch Optimization and Operational Efficiency Initiative

In 2021, the Company announced the implementation of branch optimization and operational efficiency strategic initiatives to improve the Bank’s financial performance and operations in order to position the Bank for continued profitable growth through the optimization of its branch network while expanding technology and infrastructure investments in its remaining locations. The decision was the result of a comprehensive internal study that measured branch performance by comparing financial and non-financial indicators to growth opportunities, while evolving changes in consumer preferences, largely driven by the global pandemic, led to an acceleration of branch optimization efforts. The Bank also completed a comprehensive review of its branch network and operating environment to identify solutions to improve operating performance. This review prioritized profitability, efficiency, infrastructure and client experience improvements, automation in operations, and digital marketing and technology investments and the Bank is in process of implementing operational efficiencies related to individualized processes within its branch network and operating environment.

The Bank has substantially completed these initiatives through the consolidation of six branches that was completed on June 30, 2021. In addition, CB Financial, Community Bank, and Citizens Bank of West Virginia, Inc. (“Citizens Bank”) executed a Purchase and Assumption Agreement (the “Agreement”) pursuant to which Citizens Bank agreed to purchase certain loans and other assets, and assume certain deposits and other liabilities, of the branch offices of Community Bank located in Buckhannon, West Virginia, and New Martinsville, West Virginia. The divestiture of two branches in December 2021 resulted in the sale of $102.8 million of deposits, $6.1 million of loans and $795,000 of premises and equipment and the recognition of a $5.2 million pre-tax gain on sale from a 5.0% premium paid by Citizens Bank on the assumed deposits. The branch optimization initiative reduced the Bank's branch network to 14 branches. The Company anticipates $3.0 million of ongoing pre-tax cost savings as a result of the branch optimization initiatives. The majority of the process improvements have been implemented with the remaining items to be implemented in 2022. The Company anticipates cost savings from the operational efficiency initiative ranging from approximately $2.5 million to $3.5 million in 2022, as well as expected enhanced revenue and fee generating capacity in future years.

COVID-19 Pandemic

Although many health and safety restrictions have been lifted and vaccine distribution has increased, the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has negatively impacted local, national and global economies and financial markets since March 2020. Economic activity and demand for goods and services, alongside labor shortages and supply chain complications, has also contributed to rising inflationary pressures. The extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic continues to impact our business, financial condition, liquidity, and results of operations will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and are difficult to predict

In response to the anticipated economic effects of COVID-19, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve took a number of actions that significantly affected the financial markets, including actions intended to result in substantial decreases in market interest rates. On March 15, 2020, the FRB reduced the target federal funds range by 100 basis points to 0% to 0.25% and have held the target federal funds rate in that range for the remainder of 2020 and throughout 2021. These reductions in interest rates, among other actions of the FRB and the Federal government generally, adversely affected our net interest income, compressed our margins and impacted our overall profitability. We expect that the reduction of interest rates to near zero in response to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic will gradually be reversed over the course of the next year with the FRB now signaling its concerns with respect to inflation and announcing that it will begin to taper its purchase of mortgage and other bonds. The timing and impact of the expected reversal in interest rate trends is unknown.

Explanation of Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures

In addition to traditional measures presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), we use, and this Report contains or references, certain non-GAAP financial measures. We believe these non-GAAP financial measures provide useful information in understanding our underlying results of operations or financial position and our business and performance trends as they facilitate comparisons with the performance of other companies in the financial services industry. Although we believe that these non-GAAP financial measures enhance the understanding of our business and performance, these non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered an alternative to GAAP or considered to be more important than financial results determined in accordance with GAAP, nor are they necessarily comparable with non-GAAP measures which may be presented by other companies. Where non-GAAP financial measures are used, the comparable GAAP financial measure, as well as the reconciliation to the comparable GAAP financial measure, can be found herein. Refer to the "Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures to GAAP" within this Item 7 for further information.

Comparison of Financial Condition at December 31, 2021 and 2020

Assets. Total assets increased $8.8 million, or 0.6%, to $1.43 billion at December 31, 2021, compared to $1.42 billion at December 31, 2020.

Cash and Due From Banks. Cash and due from banks decreased $41.2 million, or 25.6%, to $119.7 million at December 31, 2021, compared to $160.9 million at December 31, 2020. The change is primarily related to securities purchases and sale of branches, partially offset by net repayments on loans.

Securities. Securities increased $79.6 million, or 54.7%, to $225.0 million at December 31, 2021, compared to $145.4 million at December 31, 2020. Current period activity included $135.0 million of purchases, $38.4 million of paydowns, and $12.0 million of sales, primarily of mortgage-backed securities, which resulted in the recognition of a $231,000 gain. The sales recognized gains on higher-interest securities with faster prepayment speeds. The purchases were made to earn a higher yield on excess cash. In addition, there was a $5.5 million decrease in the market value of the debt securities portfolio and a $295,000 gain in market value in the equity securities portfolio, which is primarily comprised of bank stocks.

Securities Portfolio. The following table sets forth the composition of our securities portfolio at the dates indicated.

(Dollars in Thousands)

32

Securities Portfolio Maturities and Yields. The composition and maturities of the debt securities portfolio at December 31, 2021, are summarized in the following table. Maturities are based on the final contractual payment dates, and do not reflect the impact of prepayments or early redemptions that may occur. The weighted average yield for each security category is determined by the security's book yield and calculating the interest earned divided by the carrying value. For tax free obligations of states and political subdivision, the book yield is the tax free yield.

(Dollars in Thousands)

Loans. Total loans decreased $24.0 million, or 2.3%, to $1.02 billion at December 31, 2021 compared to $1.04 billion at December 31, 2020. Excluding the net decline of $30.6 million in PPP loans in the current period, loans increased $6.6 million. 2021 loan growth was experienced through net funding of $18.6 million in commercial real estate loans, $12.4 million in construction loans and $8.3 million in consumer loans. Average loans for the year ended December 31, 2021 increased $6.0 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2020.

Loan Portfolio Composition. The following table sets forth the composition of the Company’s loan portfolio by type of loan at the dates indicated. The Company did not have loans held for sale at the dates indicated below.

(Dollars in Thousands)

33

Loan Portfolio Maturities and Yields. The following table summarizes the scheduled repayments of our loan portfolio at December 31, 2021. Demand loans, loans having no stated repayment schedule or maturity, and overdraft loans are reported as being due in one year or less. For construction-to-permanent loans in the construction category, the maturity date is the date the loan matures once it is in permanent repayment status. Consumer loans consist primarily of indirect automobile loans whereby a portion of the rate is prepaid to the dealer and accrued in a prepaid dealer reserve account. Therefore, the true yield for the consumer loan portfolio is significantly less than the note rate disclosed below.

(Dollars in Thousands)

(Dollars in Thousands)

The following table sets forth at December 31, 2021, the dollar amount of all fixed-rate and adjustable-rate loans due after December 31, 2022.

(Dollars in Thousands)

34

PPP Loans. The following table presents PPP loan activity segregated by loans originated in 2020 and 2021.

(Dollars in Thousands)

Net deferred origination fees on PPP loans totaled $3.5 million, of which $1.7 million and $1.1 million was recognized during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020. No allowance for loan loss was allocated to the PPP loan portfolio due to the Bank complying with the lender obligations that ensure SBA guarantee.

Liabilities. Total liabilities increased $10.2 million, or 0.8%, to $1.29 billion at December 31, 2021 compared to $1.28 billion at December 31, 2020.

Deposits. Despite the impact of the sale of $102.8 million of deposits from the sale of two branches completed in December 2021, total deposits increased $2.0 million to $1.23 billion as of December 31, 2021 compared to $1.22 billion at December 31, 2020. Noninterest bearing demand deposits, NOW accounts and savings accounts increased $45.2 million, $12.6 million and $4.4 million, respectively, partially offset by a decrease of $53.3 million in time deposits.

The following table sets forth the distribution of our average deposit accounts, by account type, for the years indicated.

(Dollars in Thousands)

35

The following table sets forth time deposits classified by interest rate as of the dates indicated.

(Dollars in Thousands)

The following table sets forth, by interest rate ranges and scheduled maturity, information concerning our time deposits at the date indicated.

(Dollars in Thousands)

As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the aggregate estimated amount of outstanding deposits in amounts uninsured by the FDIC, or that were not secured by the Bank through the pledging of securities, FHLB letters of credit or other means, was approximately $337.9 million and $290.2 million respectively. The estimates are based on the same methodologies and assumptions used for the Bank's regulatory reporting requirements. Of the amount at December 31, 2021, an estimated $8.6 million are uninsured time deposits and the following table sets forth their maturity.

(Dollars in Thousands)

Borrowed Funds

• Short-term borrowings. Short-term borrowings decreased $1.8 million, or 4.4%, to $39.3 million at December 31, 2021, compared to $41.1 million at December 31, 2020. At December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, short-term borrowings were comprised entirely of securities sold under agreements to repurchase, which are related to business deposit customers whose funds, above designated target balances, are transferred into an overnight interest-earning investment account by purchasing securities from the Bank’s investment portfolio under an agreement to repurchase.
• Other borrowed funds. Other borrowed funds increased $9.6 million to $17.6 million at December 31, 2021 due to the issuance of subordinated debt in December 2021 with net proceeds of $14.6 million partially offset by $5.0 million of Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings that matured in the current period. The Company intends to utilize the subordinated debt proceeds to continue to proactively repurchase shares or for other general corporate matters.

Stockholders’ Equity. Stockholders’ equity decreased $1.4 million, or 1.0%, to $133.1 million at December 31, 2021, compared to $134.5 million at December 31, 2020.

• Net income was $11.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2021.
• Accumulated other comprehensive income decreased $4.3 million primarily due to market interest rate conditions in the current period on the Bank’s available-for-sale debt securities.
• The Company paid $5.2 million in dividends to common stockholders in the current year.
• Primarily as part of the Company’s $7.5 million stock repurchase program previously announced in June 2021, the Company repurchased 178,252 shares of common stock totaling $4.1 million in the current year. The Company completed this stock repurchase program in February 2022. In connection with the program, the Company purchased a total of 308,996 shares of the Company’s common stock at an average price of $24.27 per share.
• Book value per share was $25.31 at December 31, 2021 compared to $24.76 at December 31, 2020, an increase of $0.55. Tangible book value per share (Non-GAAP) increased $1.03, or 4.8%, to $22.45 compared to $21.42 at December 31, 2020. Refer to “Explanation of Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures” at the end of this section.

Comparison of Operating Results for the Years Ended December 31, 2021 and 2020

Overview. 2021 Annual Results were impacted by the following significant items:

• The branch optimization and operational efficiency initiatives resulted in $7.5 million of restructuring-related and other expenses for the year ended December 31, 2021. The non-recurring expenses include a $2.3 million writedown on premises and equipment and $1.2 million impairment of intangible assets associated with the branch sales. The Company also incurred $4.1 million of expenses related to contracted services, employee severance costs, branch lease impairment, professional fees, data processing fees, charitable donations, legal and other expenses for the year ended December 31, 2021 related to these initiatives.
• The Company recognized a $5.2 million pre-tax gain on sale of branches related to the 5.0% premium paid by Citizens Bank on the assumed deposits.

2020 Annual Results were impacted by the following significant non-recurring items:

• The Company conducted a goodwill impairment analysis at September 30, 2020 and determined that $18.7 million of goodwill was deemed impaired and written off for the year ended December 31, 2020, reducing goodwill to $9.7 million at December 31, 2020. This non-cash charge was deemed non-core and had no impact on the Company’s tangible equity, cash flows, liquidity or regulatory capital.
• The Company incurred a pre-tax non-cash impairment of fixed assets of $1.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 as a result of the previously announced Monessen branch closure. The property was written down by $884,000 to its fair value of $240,000 in the third quarter of 2020 and was subsequently donated in the fourth quarter of 2020 with the remaining $240,000 written off.

Net Interest Income. Net interest income decreased $1.8 million, or 4.2%, to $40.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to $41.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. Net interest margin (Non-GAAP FTE) decreased 38 bps to 2.94% for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to 3.32% the year ended December 31, 2020. Net interest margin (GAAP) decreased to 2.92% for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to 3.30% for the year ended December 31, 2020. While the Company has further controlled its deposit cost structure and benefited from nonrenewal or repricing of higher cost time deposits, the net interest margin decreased primarily due to the low interest rate environment decreasing yields on loans and securities.

Interest and dividend income decreased $3.9 million, or 8.2%, to $43.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to $47.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2020.

• Interest income on loans decreased $3.2 million, or 7.4%, to $39.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to $42.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. Although average loans increased $6.0 million, the loan yield for the year ended December 31, 2021 decreased 35 bps to 3.92% for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to 4.27% for the year ended December 31, 2020 due to the full year impact of the COVID-19 pandemic-related declines in market interest rates beginning in March 2020. Interest and fee income on PPP loans was $2.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 and contributed 4 bps to loan yield, compared to $1.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, which decreased loan yield 4 bps in the prior period. The impact of the accretion of

the credit mark on acquired loan portfolios was $468,000 for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to $434,000 for the year ended December 31, 2020, or 4 bps in the current period compared to 5 bps in the prior period.

• Interest income on taxable investment securities decreased $629,000, or 17.4%, to $3.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to $3.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. While average investment securities increased $25.0 million, there was a 79 bps decrease in average yield. The Federal Reserve pandemic-driven decision to drop the benchmark interest rate in March 2020 resulted in significant calls of U.S. government agency securities and paydowns on mortgage-backed securities in the declining rate environment, which, in combination with excess liquidity, were replaced by lower-yielding securities. In addition, the sales of securities in 2021 recognized gains on higher-interest securities with faster prepayment speeds. Prior period yield benefited from approximately $231,000 in discount accretion from U.S. government agency calls.
• Interest income on tax-exempt investment securities decreased $80,000, or 21.7%, to $289,000 for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to $369,000 for the year ended December 31, 2020 primarily driven by a decrease of $2.4 million in average balance from municipal securities calls.
• Interest from other interest-earning assets, which primarily consists of interest-earning cash, decreased $27,000, or 5.2% for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to the year ended December 31, 2020. Interest and dividend income earned on other interest-earning assets, which is primarily composed of restricted stock, decreased $60,000. Average interest bearing deposits at other banks increased $76.0 million, primarily related to funds received from deposit and loan activity, resulting in a $33,000 increase in interest income even though declines in interest rates resulted in a 6 bp decrease in average yield.

Interest expense decreased $2.2 million, or 38.8%, to $3.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to $5.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2020.

• Interest expense on deposits decreased $2.0 million, or 39.6%, to $3.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to $5.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. While average interest-bearing deposits increased $35.3 million, interest rate declines for all products driven by pandemic-related interest rate cuts, nonrenewal or repricing of higher cost time deposits, and overall efforts to control pricing resulted in a 25 bp decrease in average cost compared to the year ended December 31, 2020.
• Interest expense on short-term borrowings decreased $39,000, or 28.5%, to $98,000 for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to $137,000 for the year ended December 31, 2020 primarily due to a 14 bp decrease in average cost on securities sold under agreements to repurchase.
• Interest expense on other borrowed funds decreased $72,000, or 28.3%, to $182,000 for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to $254,000 for the year ended December 31, 2020 primarily due to maturity of FHLB long-term advances in the current year that were not replaced, which resulted in a $4.2 million decrease in average balance.

Provision for Loan Losses. The provision for loan losses had a $1.1 million recovery for the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to a $4.0 million provision for the year ended December 31, 2020. The pandemic resulted in a dramatic increase in unemployment and recessionary economic conditions in the prior year. Based on evaluation of the macroeconomic conditions, the qualitative factors used in the allowance for loan loss analysis were increased at the onset of the pandemic, primarily related to economic trends and industry conditions, because of vulnerable industries such as hospitality, oil and gas, retail and restaurants and resulted in the prior year provision. The prior year also included the impacts from an increase in specific reserves primarily due to two commercial real estate loans secured by hotels that were impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Those qualitative factors were decreased as the economic impacts of the pandemic eased. In addition, a decrease in specific reserves on impaired loans and improving economic and industry condition contributed to the recovery of provision in the current period.

Noninterest Income. The breakdown of noninterest income for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to year ended December 31, 2020 is as follows:

(Dollars in Thousands)

Noninterest income increased $6.8 million, or 71.9%, to $16.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to $9.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2020.

• Service fees increased $125,000 to $2.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to $2.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 due to an increase in customer account usage compared to the prior year period when shelter-in-place orders occurred at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.
• Insurance commissions increased $738,000, or 15.1%, to $5.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to $4.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 due to an increase in contingency fees as well as commercial-related insurance policy revenue. Contingency fees are profit sharing commissions that are contingent upon several factors including, but not limited to, eligible written premiums, incurred losses, policy cancellations and stop loss charges.
• Net gain on sales of loans was $1.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to $1.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 primarily due to decreased mortgage loan production from refinances in 2020 that were driven by reduced market interest rates. Gains from sales of mortgage loans decreased to $323,000 for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to $1.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. In the current year, the Bank sold a substandard-rated commercial real estate loan secured by a hotel, which was partially charged-off $931,000 in 2020, that resulted in the recognition of an $897,000 gain on sale, and also sold a substandard-rated commercial and industrial loan, which resulted in the recognition of a $77,000 loss on sale.
• Net gain on securities was $526,000 for the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to $233,000 for the year ended December 31, 2020. Net gain on sales of securities was $231,000 in the current period primarily to recognize gains on higher-interest securities with faster prepayment speeds compared to $500,000 in the prior period. The Company’s equity securities, which are primarily comprised of bank stocks, reflected an increase in value of $295,000 for the current period compared to a $267,000 net loss in value in the prior period primarily from the impact of COVID-19 on the banking industry.
• The Company recorded a $61,000 net loss on disposal of fixed assets in the prior year, of which $48,000 related to the sale of the former EU headquarters.
• The Company recognized a $5.2 million pre-tax gain on sale of branches in the current period related to the 5.0% premium paid by Citizens Bank on the assumed deposits.
• There was a $594,000 increase in other income (loss) primarily due to a $274,000 valuation allowance adjustment on mortgage servicing rights in the current period as a result of a decrease in prepayment speeds resulting in an increase in the fair value of the serviced mortgage portfolio, compared to a $302,000 temporary impairment in the prior period due to a decline in the interest rate environment that caused increased prepayment speeds in 2020.

Noninterest Expense. The breakdown of noninterest expense for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to year ended December 31, 2020 is as follows:

(Dollars in Thousands)

Noninterest expense decreased $13.9 million, or 24.5%, to $42.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to $56.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. This was primarily impacted by $7.5 million of expenses associated with the branch optimization and operational efficiency initiatives in the current year, which included writedown on premises and equipment of $2.3 million and intangible asset impairment of $1.2 million. The prior period included goodwill impairment of $18.7 million goodwill impairment and writedown on fixed assets of $1.1 million.

• Salaries and employee benefits increased $129,000 to $19.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to $19.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. Activity in the current period included an increase in employee benefit expenses primarily attributed to the prior period impact from a $407,000 one-time payment that offset employee benefits related to the transition from a self-funded to a fully insured health insurance plan, the recognition of $335,000 in severance related to the branch optimization initiative, and an increase in employee incentive expense. The Company also recognized a greater benefit in the prior period from deferred employee-related loan origination costs primarily associated with PPP loans. The prior period was also impacted by the recognition of approximately $560,000 of one-time payments and related taxes and benefits from the transition and retention of a permanent CEO and approximately $388,000 of expenses associated with the Community Bank Cares 10% premium pay during the pandemic.
• Occupancy expense increased $171,000 to $3.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to $2.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. The increase was due to the recognition of a $227,000 lease impairment related to the consolidation of a branch as part of the branch optimization initiative in the current period compared to an $84,000 early lease termination payment from a branch closure in the prior period.
• Equipment expense increased $99,000 to $1.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to $935,000 for the year ended December 31, 2020 as the result of an increase in repairs and maintenance.
• Data processing increased $311,000 to $2.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to $1.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 primarily due to $110,000 in deconversion costs associated with the branch sales as well as other technology investments associated with the branch optimization and efficiency initiative.
• FDIC assessment expense increased $177,000 to $1.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to $837,000 for the year ended December 31, 2020. The increase in assessment was due to net losses recognized during

the assessment period and an increase in nonperforming loans negatively impacting the quarterly assessment rates in the current period.

• Contracted services increased $2.0 million to $4.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to $2.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, primarily due to to $2.8 million of expenses associated with the engagement of a third-party expert to improve workflow as well as implement more effective sales management techniques designed to improve operational efficiencies in the near and long-term and engagement of other third party specialists to assist in core platform improvements and efficiencies. The prior period included expense related to the hiring of temporary employees to assist with PPP loan processing, consultants used to assist in infrastructure improvements, and $177,000 of consulting fees associated with the search for a permanent CEO.
• Legal fees and professional fees increased $242,000 to $994,000 for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to $752,000 for the year ended December 31, 2020 due to a $209,000 investment banker success-based fee and legal fees related to the branch sales. The prior period included fees associated with the retention of a permanent CEO.
• Advertising increased $85,000 to $749,000 for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to $664,000 for the year ended December 31, 2020 due to a decrease in marketing initiatives in the prior year during the pandemic.
• Other real estate owned income increased $114,000 to $183,000 for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to $69,000 for the year ended December 31, 2020 primarily due to an $80,000 gain on sale of a property sold in the current period.
• Amortization of intangible assets decreased $202,000 to $1.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to $2.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 primarily due to current period impairment in core deposit intangible asset from the branch sales, which reduced the remaining amount of intangible assets to amortize.
• Within other noninterest expense, charitable contributions increased $195,000 due to greater outreach in the communities served by the Bank. Loan expenses decreased $172,000 primarily due to an increase in mortgage refinance costs in the prior year from the decline in market interest rates.

Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense increased $1.9 million to $3.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to $1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 and is primarily attributed to an increase in pre-tax income.

Average Balances and Yields. The following table sets forth average balance sheets, average yields and costs, and certain other information for the years indicated. Tax-equivalent yield adjustments have been made for tax exempt loan and securities income utilizing a marginal federal income tax rate of 21% for 2021 and 2020. All average balances are daily average balances. Non-accrual loans are included in the computation of average balances only. The yields set forth below include the effect of deferred fees, discounts, and premiums that are amortized or accreted to interest income or interest expense.

(Dollars in Thousands)

(1) Net of the allowance for loan losses and includes nonaccrual loans with a zero yield

(2) Refer to Explanation of Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures in this Report for the calculation of the measure and reconciliation to the most comparable GAAP measure.

(3) Net interest rate spread represents the difference between the weighted average yield on interest-earning assets and the weighted average cost of interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest rate spread (GAAP) was 2.81% and 3.13% for the year ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively

(4) Net interest-earning assets represent total interest-earning assets less total interest-bearing liabilities.

(5) Net interest margin represents net interest income divided by average total interest-earning assets. Net interest margin (GAAP) was 2.92% and 3.30% for the year ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively

Rate/Volume Analysis

The following table presents the effects of changing rates and volumes on our net interest income for the years indicated. The rate column shows the effects attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume). The volume column shows the effects attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate). The total column represents the sum of the prior columns. For purposes of this table, changes attributable to both rate and volume, which cannot be segregated, have been allocated proportionately based on the changes due to rate and the changes due to volume. There were no out of period items that occurred this past year.

(Dollars in Thousands)

Asset Quality

Nonperforming Assets and Delinquent Loans. The Company reviews its loans on a regular basis and generally places loans on nonaccrual status when either principal or interest is 90 days or more past due. In addition, the Company places loans on nonaccrual status when we do not expect to receive full payment of interest, principal or both. Interest accrued and unpaid at the time a loan is placed on nonaccrual status is reversed from interest income. Loans that are 90 days or more past due may still accrue interest if they are well secured and in the process of collection. Payments received on nonaccrual loans are applied against principal. Loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current, and current and future payments are reasonably assured.

Management monitors all past due loans and nonperforming assets. Such loans are placed under close supervision, with consideration given to the need for additions to the allowance for loan losses and (if appropriate) partial or full charge-off.

Management believes the volume of nonperforming assets can be partially attributed to unique borrower circumstances as well as the economy in general. We have an experienced chief credit officer, collections and credit departments that monitor the loan portfolio and seek to prevent any deterioration of asset quality.

Real estate acquired through foreclosure or by deed-in-lieu of foreclosure is classified as real estate owned until such time as it is sold. When real estate owned is acquired, it is recorded at the lower of the unpaid principal balance of the related loan, or its fair market value, less estimated selling expenses. Any further write-down of real estate owned is charged against earnings.

Nonaccrual Loans and Nonperforming Assets. The following table sets forth the amounts and categories of our nonperforming assets at the dates indicated. Included in nonperforming loans and assets are troubled debt restructurings, which are loans whose contractual terms have been restructured in a manner that grants a concession to a borrower experiencing financial difficulties.

(Dollars in Thousands)

At December 31, 2021, we had no loans 90 days or more past due that were still accruing interest. At December 31, 2021, we had no loans that were not classified as nonaccrual, 90 days past due or troubled debt restructurings where known information about possible credit problems of borrowers caused management to have serious concerns as to the ability of the borrowers to comply with present loan repayment terms and that may result in disclosure as nonaccrual, 90 days past due or troubled debt restructurings.

Nonperforming assets decreased $7.4 million to $7.3 million at December 31, 2021, compared to $14.7 million at December 31, 2020. Nonperforming loans decreased $7.2 million to $7.3 million at December 31, 2021 compared to $14.5 million at December 31, 2020. The respective decreases are primarily attributable to the sale and full payoff in the current year of two of the Bank’s larger nonperforming commercial real estate loans that were secured by hotels totaling $6.7 million.

The following table presents the components of the ratio of nonaccrual loans to total loans at the dates indicated.

(Dollars in Thousands)

Nonaccrual loans decreased $5.9 million to $5.0 million at December 31, 2021 compared to $10.9 million at December 31, 2020. Nonaccrual commercial real estate loans decreased $5.0 million to $2.1 million at December 31, 2021 compared to $7.1 million at December 31, 2020 primarily related to the sale and full payoff in the current year of two of the Bank’s nonperforming commercial real estate loans that were secured by hotels totaling $6.7 million.

Loans in Forbearance. Section 4013 of the CARES Act and regulatory guidance promulgated by federal banking regulators provides temporary relief from accounting and financial reporting requirements for TDRs regarding certain loan modifications related to COVID-19. Specifically, the CARES Act provides that the Bank may elect to suspend the requirements under GAAP for certain loan modifications that would otherwise be categorized as a TDR and suspend any determination that such loan modifications would be considered a TDR, including the related impairment for accounting purposes. As such, the applicable loans are reported as current with regard to payment status and continue to accrue interest during the payment deferral period. The Company worked with its borrowers impacted by COVID-19 to defer payments. The Bank provided borrower support and relief through short-term loan forbearance options by primarily allowing: (a) deferral of three- to six-months of payments; or (b) for consumer loans not secured by a real estate mortgage, three months of interest-only payments that also extends the maturity date of the loan by three months. In certain circumstances, additional deferral periods were granted.

At December 31, 2020, there were 31 loans in forbearance totaling $24.1 million, or 2.3% of total loans, for borrowers impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, including $19.8 million of commercial real estate loans. All loans exited forbearance in 2021 except a $1.9 million commercial real estate loan secured by a hotel, which was considered a troubled debt restructuring upon providing an additional forbearance period and modified payment terms. The loan was substandard rated at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively, and designated as a nonaccrual loan in 2021.

Classified Assets. Federal regulations provide that loans and other assets of lesser quality should be classified as “substandard,” “doubtful” or “loss” assets. An asset is considered “substandard” if it is inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Substandard assets include those characterized by the “distinct possibility” that the Company will sustain “some loss” if the deficiencies are not corrected. Assets classified as “doubtful” have all of the weaknesses inherent in those classified “substandard,” with the added characteristic that the weaknesses present make “collection or liquidation in full,” on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, “highly questionable and improbable.” Assets classified as “loss” are those considered “uncollectible” and of such little value that their continuance as assets is not warranted. The Company designates an asset as “special mention” if the asset has a potential weakness that warrants management’s close attention.

The Company uses an eight-point internal risk rating system to monitor the credit quality of the overall loan portfolio. The first four categories are not considered criticized and are aggregated as “pass” rated. The criticized rating categories used by management generally follow bank regulatory definitions. The special mention category includes assets that are currently protected but are below average quality, resulting in an undue credit risk, but not to the point of justifying a substandard classification. Loans in the substandard category have well-defined weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt and have a distinct possibility that some loss will be sustained if the weaknesses are not corrected. Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in loans classified as substandard with the added characteristic that collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of current conditions and facts, is highly improbable. Loans classified as loss are considered uncollectible and of such little value that continuance as an asset is not warranted.

As part of the periodic exams of the Bank by the FDIC and the Pennsylvania Department of Banking and Securities, the staff of such agencies reviews our classifications and determines whether such classifications are adequate. Such agencies have, in the past, and may in the future require us to classify certain assets which management has not otherwise classified or require a classification more severe than established by management. The following table shows the principal amount of special mention and classified loans at December 31, 2021 and 2020.

(Dollars in Thousands)

The total amount of special mention and classified loans decreased $3.0 million, or 4.1%, to $71.2 million at December 31, 2021, compared to $74.2 million at December 31, 2020. The decrease of $12.0 million in the substandard category as of December 31, 2021 compared to December 31, 2020 was mainly from the sale or full payoff in the current year of two of the Bank’s nonperforming commercial real estate loans that were secured by hotels totaling $6.7 million and a $1.9 million commercial and industrial loan. The increase of $9.1 million in the special mention loan category is primarily due to pandemic-related cash flow issues on construction loan projects and downgrade of commercial and industrial loans in the senior housing industry partially offset by a decrease of commercial real estate loans secured by hotels that were upgraded to a pass rating due to improved occupancy rates from an increase in travel in 2021 as the COVID-19 vaccine rollout occurred.

Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level considered adequate to provide for losses that can be reasonably anticipated. Management performs a quarterly evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance based on losses in the current loan portfolio, which includes an assessment of economic conditions, changes in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, loan loss experience, volume and severity of past due, classified and nonaccrual loans as well as other loan modifications, quality of the Company’s loan review system, the degree of oversight by the Company’s Board, existence and effect of any concentrations of credit and changes in the level of such concentrations, effect of external factors, such as competition and legal and regulatory requirements and other relevant factors. While management uses the best information available to make such evaluations, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary if economic conditions differ substantially from the assumptions used in making evaluations. Additions are made to the allowance through periodic provisions charged to income and recovery of principal and interest on loans previously charged-off. Losses of principal are charged directly to the allowance when a loss occurs or when a determination is made that the specific loss is probable. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revisions as more information becomes available.

Although we maintain our allowance for loan losses at a level that we consider to be adequate to provide for potential losses, there can be no assurance that such losses will not exceed the estimated amounts or that we will not be required to make additions to the allowance for loan losses in the future. Future additions to our allowance for loan losses and changes in the related ratio of the allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans are dependent upon the economy, changes in real estate values and interest rates, the view of the regulatory authorities toward adequate loan loss reserve levels, and inflation. Management will continue to periodically review the entire loan portfolio to determine the extent, if any, to which further additional loan loss provisions may be deemed necessary.

Analysis of the Allowance for Loan Losses. The following table summarizes changes in the allowance for loan losses by loan categories for each year indicated and additions to the allowance for loan losses, which have been charged to operations. Loans acquired in connection with mergers were recorded at their estimated fair value at the acquisition date and did not include a carryover of the pre-merger allowance for loan losses.

(Dollars in Thousands)

The allowance for loan losses decreased $1.2 million, or 9.3%, to $11.6 million at December 31, 2021, compared to $12.8 million at December 31, 2020. Allowance for loan losses to total loans decreased 9 basis points to 1.13% at December 31, 2021 compared to 1.22% at December 31, 2020. The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in an increase in unemployment and recessionary economic conditions in 2020. Based on evaluation of the macroeconomic conditions, the qualitative factors used in the allowance for loan loss analysis were increased in 2020 primarily related to economic trends and industry conditions as a result of the pandemic and vulnerable industries such as hospitality and retail. In addition, an increase in commercial real estate loans combined with an increase in the historical loss factor primarily related to a $931,000 commercial real estate loan charge-off resulted in an increase in commercial real estate loan loss reserves in 2020. The combination of these factors primarily resulted in a $4.0 million provision for loan losses for the year ended December 31, 2020. There was a net recovery of $1.1 million of provision for loan losses for the year ended December 31, 2021. Improving economic and industry conditions resulting in a decrease in qualitative factors, as well as a decrease in specifically impaired loans, contributed to the net recovery in the current period.

The ratio of allowance for loan losses to nonaccrual loans ratio increased to 233.37% at December 31, 2021, compared to 117.28% at December 31, 2020. Nonaccrual loans decreased $5.9 million to $5.0 million at December 31, 2021 compared to $10.9 million at December 31, 2020. Nonaccrual commercial real estate loans decreased $5.0 million to $2.1 million at December 31, 2021 compared to $7.1 million at December 31, 2020 primarily related to the sale and full payoff in the current year of two of the Bank’s nonperforming commercial real estate loans that were secured by hotels totaling $6.7 million.

Net charge-offs were $64,000 or 0.01% to average loans, during 2021 compared to $1.1 million, or 0.11% to average loans, during 2020. The decrease was primarily related to the $931,000 commercial real estate loan charge-off of a hotel loan in the prior year. This loan was sold in 2021 and resulted in the recognition of an $897,000 gain on sale. The following table presents the ratio of net charge-offs (recoveries) as a percent of average loans for the periods indicated.

Allocation of Allowance for Loan Losses. The following table sets forth the allocation of allowance for loan losses by loan category at the dates indicated. The table reflects the allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans receivable. Management believes that the allowance can be allocated by category only on an approximate basis. The allocation of the allowance by category is not necessarily indicative of future losses and does not restrict the use of the allowance to absorb losses in any category.

(Dollars in Thousands)

(1) Represents percentage of loans in each category to total loans

Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures to GAAP

Reconciliations of non-GAAP financial measures discussed in this Report to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures are included in the following tables.

Interest income on interest-earning assets, net interest rate spread and net interest margin are presented on a FTE basis. The FTE basis adjusts for the tax benefit of income on certain tax-exempt loans and securities using the federal statutory income tax rate of 21 percent. We believe the presentation of net interest income on a FTE basis ensures comparability of net interest income arising from both taxable and tax-exempt sources and is consistent with industry practice.

Interest income on interest-earning assets, net interest rate spread and net interest margin are presented on a fully tax-equivalent (“FTE”) basis. The FTE basis adjusts for the tax benefit of income on certain tax-exempt loans and securities using the federal statutory income tax rate of 21 percent. We believe the presentation of net interest income on a FTE basis ensures comparability of net interest income arising from both taxable and tax-exempt sources and is consistent with industry practice. The following table reconciles net interest income, net interest spread and net interest margin on a FTE basis for the periods indicated:

(Dollars in Thousands)

Tangible book value per common share is a non-GAAP measure and is calculated based on tangible common equity divided by period-end common shares outstanding. Tangible common equity to tangible assets is a non-GAAP measure and is calculated based on tangible common equity divided by tangible assets. We believe these non-GAAP measures serve as useful tools to help evaluate the strength and discipline of the Company's capital management strategies and as an additional, conservative measure of the Company’s total value.

(Dollars in Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

Liquidity

Liquidity is the ability to meet current and future financial obligations of a short-term nature. The Bank’s primary sources of funds consist of deposit inflows, loan repayments, and maturities and sales of securities. While maturities and scheduled amortization of loans and securities are predictable sources of funds, deposit flows and mortgage prepayments are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions and competition.

The Bank regularly adjusts its investments in liquid assets based upon its assessment of expected loan demand, expected deposit flows, yields available on interest-earning deposits and securities, and the objectives of its asset/liability management program. Excess liquid assets are invested generally in interest-earning deposits with other banks and short- and intermediate-term securities. The Bank believes that it had sufficient liquidity at December 31, 2021, to satisfy its short- and long-term liquidity needs at that date.

The Bank’s most liquid assets are cash and due from banks, which totaled $119.7 million at December 31, 2021. Unpledged securities, which provide an additional source of liquidity, totaled $54.3 million. In addition, the Bank maintains a credit arrangement with the FHLB with a maximum borrowing limit of approximately $427.2 million and available borrowing capacity of $347.1 million as of December 31, 2021. $62.0 million was utilized toward standby letters of credit to collateralize public deposits in excess of the level insured by the FDIC and $3.0 million was utilized for advances. This arrangement is subject to annual renewal, incurs no service charge, and is secured by a blanket security agreement on $573.5 million of residential and commercial mortgage loans and the Bank’s investment in FHLB stock. The Bank also maintains a Borrower-In-Custody of Collateral line of credit agreement with the FRB for $86.3 million that requires monthly certification of collateral, is subject to annual renewal, incurs no service charge and is secured by $134.6 million of commercial and consumer indirect auto loans. The Bank also maintains multiple line of credit arrangements with various unaffiliated banks totaling $50.0 million as of December 31, 2021.

At December 31, 2021, the Bank had funding commitments totaling $175.8 million, consisting primarily of commitments to originate loans, unused lines of credit and letters of credit.

At December 31, 2021, certificates of deposit due within one year of that date totaled $59.5 million, or 43.5% of total certificates of deposit. While liquidity levels at December 31, 2021 are currently sufficient, if these certificates of deposit do not remain with the Bank, the Bank may be required to seek other sources of funds. Depending on market conditions, the Bank may be required to pay higher rates on such deposits or other borrowings than it currently pays on these certificates of deposit. The Bank believes, however, based on past experience that a significant portion of its certificates of deposit will remain with it, either as certificates of deposit or as other deposit products. The Bank can attract and retain deposits by adjusting the interest rates offered.

The Bank’s primary investing activities are the origination of loans and the purchase of securities. For the year ended December 31, 2021, the Bank originated $336.0 million in loans, including $34.6 million of PPP loans, compared to $465.7 million, including $71.0 million of PPP loans, for the year ended December 31, 2020.

The Company is a separate legal entity from the Bank and must provide for its own liquidity to pay dividends to stockholders, to pay principal and interest on its subordinated debt and for other corporate purposes. At December 31, 2021, the Company (on an unconsolidated basis) had liquid assets of $20.4 million.

We are committed to maintaining a strong liquidity position. We monitor our liquidity position daily and anticipate that we will have sufficient funds to meet our current funding commitments. Based on our deposit retention experience and current pricing strategy, we anticipate that a significant portion of maturing time deposits will be retained.

Commitments. As a financial services provider, the Company routinely is a party to various financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risks, such as commitments to extend credit, commitments under unused lines of credit, and commitments under letters of credit. While these contractual obligations represent potential future cash requirements, a significant portion of commitments to extend credit may expire without being drawn upon. Such commitments are subject to the same credit policies and approval process accorded to loans the Company makes. In addition, the Company enters into commitments to sell mortgage loans.

Contractual Obligations. In the ordinary course of its operations, the Company enters into certain contractual obligations. Such obligations include operating leases for premises and equipment, agreements with respect to borrowed funds and deposit liabilities and agreements with respect to investments.

The following tables present certain of our contractual obligations at December 31, 2021.

(Dollars in Thousands)

Capital Resources

At December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively, the Bank was considered "well capitalized" under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. At December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Bank's capital ratios were not affected by loans modified in accordance with Section 4013 of the CARES Act. In addition, PPP loans received a zero-percent risk weight under the regulatory capital rules regardless of whether they were pledged as collateral to the Federal Reserve Bank's PPP lending facility, but were included in the Bank's leverage ratio requirement due to the Bank not pledging the loans as collateral to the PPP lending facility.

The following table presents the Bank’s regulatory capital amounts and ratios, as well as the minimum amounts and ratios required to be well capitalized at the dates indicated.

(Dollars in Thousands)

Impact of Inflation and Changing Price

The consolidated financial statements and related notes of the Company have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. GAAP generally requires the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars without consideration of changes in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation. The impact of inflation is reflected in the increased cost of the Company’s operations. Unlike industrial companies, the Company’s assets and liabilities are primarily monetary in nature. As a result, changes in market interest rates have a greater impact on performance than the effects of inflation.

Management of Interest Rate Risk. The majority of the Company’s assets and liabilities are monetary in nature. Consequently, the Company’s most significant form of market risk is interest rate risk and a principal part of its business strategy is to manage interest rate risk by reducing the exposure of net interest income to changes in market interest rates. Accordingly, the Company’s Board has established an Asset/Liability Management Committee, which is responsible for evaluating the interest rate risk inherent in the Company’s assets and liabilities, for determining the level of risk that is appropriate given the Company’s business strategy, operating environment, capital, liquidity and performance objectives; and for managing this risk consistent with the guidelines approved by the Board. Senior management monitors the level of interest rate risk and the Asset/Liability Management Committee meets on a quarterly basis to review its asset/liability policies and position and interest rate risk position, and to discuss and implement interest rate risk strategies.

The Company monitors interest rate risk through the use of a simulation model. The quarterly reports developed in the simulation model assist the Company in identifying, measuring, monitoring and controlling interest rate risk to ensure compliance within the Company’s policy guidelines. This quantitative analysis measures interest rate risk from both a capital and earnings perspective. With regard to earnings, movements in interest rates and the shape of the yield curve significantly influence the amount of net interest income that is recognized. Movements in market interest rates significantly influence the spread between the interest earned on our interest-earning assets and the interest paid on our interest-bearing liabilities. Our internal interest rate risk analysis calculates the sensitivity of our projected net interest income over a one year period utilizing a static balance sheet assumption through which incoming and outgoing asset and liability cash flows are reinvested into similar instruments. Product pricing and earning asset prepayment speeds are adjusted for each rate scenario.

With regard to capital, our internal interest rate risk analysis calculates the sensitivity of our economic value of equity (“EVE”) ratio to movements in interest rates. EVE represents the present value of the expected cash flows from our assets less the present value of the expected cash flows arising from our liabilities. EVE attempts to quantify our economic value using a discounted cash flow methodology while the EVE ratio reflects that value as a form of capital ratio. The degree to which the EVE ratio changes for any hypothetical interest rate scenario from its base case measurement is a reflection of an institution’s sensitivity to interest rate risk.

For both net interset income and capital at risk, our interest rate risk analysis calculates a base case scenario that assumes no change in interest rates. The model then measures changes throughout a series of interest rate scenarios representing immediate and permanent, parallel shifts in the yield curve up and down 100, 200 and 300 basis points with additional scenarios modeled where appropriate. The model requires that interest rates remain positive for all points along the yield curve for each rate scenario which may preclude the modeling of certain falling rate scenarios during periods of lower market interest rates such as that experienced in the current rate environment at December 31, 2021.

The table below sets forth, as of December 31, 2021, the estimated changes in EVE and net interest income at risk that would result from the designated instantaneous changes in market interest rates. Computations of prospective effects of hypothetical interest rate changes are based on numerous assumptions, including relative levels of market interest rates, loan prepayments and deposit decay, and should not be relied upon as indicative of actual results.

(Dollars in Thousands)

Certain shortcomings are inherent in the methodology used in the above interest rate risk measurement. Modeling changes in EVE and net interest income require making certain assumptions that may or may not reflect the manner in which actual yields and costs respond to changes in market interest rates. In this regard, the table presented assumes that the composition of the Company’s interest-sensitive assets and liabilities existing at the beginning of a period remains constant over the period being measured, and assumes that a particular change in interest rates is reflected uniformly across the yield curve regardless of the duration or repricing of specific assets and liabilities. Accordingly, although the table provides an indication of the Company’s interest rate risk exposure at a particular point in time, such measurements are not intended to and do not provide a precise forecast of the effect of changes in market interest rates on EVE and net interest income and will differ from actual results. EVE calculations also may not reflect the fair values of financial instruments. For example, changes in market interest rates can increase the fair values of the Company’s loans, deposits and borrowings.

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2021. The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

Based upon their evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective for the purpose of ensuring that the information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act with the SEC

(1) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and (2) is accumulated and communicated to our management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

(b) Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The internal control process has been designed under our supervision to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, utilizing the framework established in the 2013 Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on management’s assessment, the Company concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2021, based on that framework.

(c) Changes to Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) that occurred during the three months ended December 31, 2021 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.