Talen Energy Corp: Form 10-Q for the period ended Mar 31, 2016
Filed with the SEC on May 10, 2016 and accepted by EDGAR at May 10, 2016, 08:39 ET.
Management's discussion and analysis
As filed, 52,008 characters, with its headings, lists and tables. Extracted from the main document; charts and exhibits are in the original on sec.gov.
This "Item 2. Combined Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" is separately filed by Talen Energy Corporation and Talen Energy Supply. Any information contained herein relating to an individual registrant is filed by such registrant solely on its own behalf, and neither registrant makes any representation as to information relating to the other registrant except that information relating to Talen Energy Supply and its subsidiaries is also attributed to Talen Energy Corporation and information relating to the subsidiaries of Talen Energy Supply is also attributed to Talen Energy Supply. As Talen Energy Corporation is substantially comprised of Talen Energy Supply and its subsidiaries, most disclosures refer to Talen Energy and are intended to be applicable to both registrants. When identification of a particular entity is considered important to understanding the matter being disclosed, the specific entity's name is used, in particular, for those few disclosures that apply only to Talen Energy Corporation.
Talen Energy Supply is considered the accounting predecessor of Talen Energy Corporation. Therefore, the financial information prior to the June 2015 spinoff presented in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for both registrants includes only legacy Talen Energy Supply information. See Note 1 in Talen Energy's 2015 Form 10-K for a discussion of the June 2015 spinoff from PPL and formation of Talen Energy.
The following should be read in conjunction with Talen Energy's Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying Notes and with Talen Energy's 2015 Form 10-K. Capitalized terms and abbreviations are defined in the glossary. Dollars are in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise noted.
Overview
Introduction
Talen Energy is a North American competitive power generation and marketing company headquartered in Allentown, Pennsylvania. Talen Energy produces and sells electricity, capacity and ancillary services from its fleet of power plants totaling approximately 16,000 MW, principally located in the Northeast, Mid-Atlantic and Southwest regions of the U.S.
Business Strategy
Talen Energy seeks to optimize the value from its competitive power generation assets and marketing portfolios while mitigating near-term volatility in both cash flow and earnings metrics. Talen Energy endeavors to accomplish this by matching projected output from its generation assets with forward power sales in the wholesale and retail markets while effectively managing exposure to fuel price volatility, counterparty credit risk and operational risk. Talen Energy is focused on safe, reliable, and resilient operations, disciplined capital investment, portfolio optimization, cost management and the pursuit of value enhancing growth opportunities.
To manage financing costs and access to credit markets, and to fund capital expenditures and growth opportunities, a key objective of Talen Energy is to maintain adequate liquidity capacity. In addition, Talen Energy has a financial risk management policy and operational procedures that, among other things, are designed to monitor and manage exposure to earnings and cash flow volatility related to, as applicable, changes in energy and fuel prices, interest rates, counterparty credit quality and the operating performance of generating units. To manage these risks, Talen Energy generally uses contracts such as forwards, options, swaps and insurance contracts primarily focused on mitigating cash flow volatility within the next 12 month period.
Key Performance Measures
In addition to operating income (loss), Talen Energy utilizes Adjusted EBITDA and Margins, both non-GAAP financial measures, as indicators of performance for its business, with Adjusted EBITDA as the primary financial performance measure used by management to evaluate its business and monitor results of operations. Results for the periods ended March 31 were as follows.
| Three Months 2016 | 2015 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net Income (Loss) | $151 | $96 | $55 |
| Operating Income (Loss) | 311 | 178 | 133 |
| Adjusted EBITDA | 235 | 237 | (2) |
| Margins | 491 | 428 | 63 |
See "Results of Operations" and for a detailed analysis of Talen Energy's results, the definitions of Margins and Adjusted EBITDA and reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to related GAAP measures.
Executive Summary
The increase in Margins, a primary driver to changes in the other three earnings measures reflected above, was partially due to a $100 million increase related to the RJS and MACH Gen generating facilities acquired in 2015, partially offset by a decrease of $30 million related to other operations within the East segment.
Adjusted EBITDA was essentially flat between periods, as the increase in Margins was almost entirely offset by increases in operation and maintenance expenses as described below.
The increase in operating income (loss) and net income (loss) were partially due to the change in Margins described above and non-cash net gains on the 2016 sales of certain facilities as described below. These positive impacts were partially offset by an increase in operation and maintenance expenses of $60 million and an increase in depreciation of $32 million largely due to the addition of the RJS and MACH Gen generating facilities acquired in 2015. Additionally, interest expense increased $24 million primarily as a result of RJS and MACH Gen related debt and income taxes increased $53 million, primarily from an increase in pre-tax income.
The key financial and operational development that impacted results for 2016 was as follows:
- Divestitures of Ironwood, C.P. Crane, Holtwood and Lake Wallenpaupack Power Plants - In October 2015, Talen Energy announced agreements for the sales of these facilities, with an aggregate generating capacity of approximately 1,400 MW, to satisfy a December 2014 FERC order approving the combination of Talen Energy Supply and RJS Power. The sales of the Ironwood and C.P. Crane plants were completed in February 2016 and the Holtwood and Lake Wallenpaupack sale was completed in April 2016. Talen Energy generated $1.5 billion in pre-tax cash proceeds from the completion of these sales. Talen Energy used $600 million of these proceeds during the first quarter of 2016 to repay short-term debt. Talen Energy's operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2016 includes net pre-tax gains of $140 million ($84 million after-tax) related to the first quarter sales. Talen Energy expects to record a pre-tax gain of approximately $420 million in the second quarter of 2016 related to the Holtwood and Lake Wallenpaupack sale. See Note 7 to the Financial Statements for additional information.
Regulatory Matters
Maryland and New Jersey Capacity Matters
In April 2012, the Maryland Public Service Commission ordered three electric utilities in Maryland to enter into long-term contracts to support the construction of new electricity generating facilities in Maryland, the intent of which, Talen Energy believed, was to encourage the construction of new generation even when, under the FERC-approved PJM economic model, such new generation would not be economic. In April 2012, Talen Energy subsidiaries and several other companies filed a complaint in federal court in Maryland challenging the order on the grounds that it violates the Supremacy and Commerce clauses of the U.S. Constitution and requested declaratory and injunctive relief barring implementation of the order by the
Maryland PSC Commissioners. Following certain lower court rulings, in April 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision finding that Maryland's program is preempted by the Federal Power Act because it sets an interstate wholesale rate, contravening the Federal Power Act's division of authority between state and federal regulators.
Also in April 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court denied all petitions for certiorari in a similar case in New Jersey. The effect of the denial was to let stand lower court rulings finding that a similar law enacted by New Jersey was unconstitutional under the Supremacy Clause on the grounds that it infringes upon the FERC's exclusive authority to regulate the wholesale sale of electricity in interstate commerce.
See Note 9 to the Financial Statements for background information on these cases.
Ohio
There have been attempts in Ohio by certain companies to have their utilities be permitted to subsidize several uneconomic merchant generation assets owned by non-utility affiliates. Those attempts are being opposed by many generator and consumer interests both in Ohio and at the FERC. In April 2016, the FERC rescinded waivers it granted to certain Ohio companies that allowed them to purchase power from their affiliate generators. The Ohio companies must seek approval from the FERC that the contracts are consistent with the FERC's affiliate regulations before those contracts can be made effective. Additional efforts to oppose on grounds of federal preemption may also be made in Federal Court. If approved and not reversed, out-of-market subsidies could be disruptive to the market signals for competitive generation and threaten the long-term viability of PJM's markets. It is too early to predict the outcome of these efforts to subsidize uneconomic generators in Ohio.
Talen Energy cannot predict the impact that future economic and market conditions and regulatory requirements may have on its financial condition or results of operations.
Results of Operations
As a result of the RJS Power acquisition on June 1, 2015, results for RJS are included in Talen Energy's results for the three months ended March 31, 2016 with no comparable amounts in 2015. As a result of the MACH Gen acquisition on November 2, 2015, results for MACH Gen are included in Talen Energy's results for the three months ended March 31, 2016 with no comparable amounts in 2015. When discussing Talen Energy's results of operations for 2016 compared with 2015, when significant, the results of RJS and MACH Gen are isolated for purposes of comparability.
Talen Energy is organized in two segments: East and West, based on geographic location. The East segment includes the generating, marketing and trading activities in PJM, NYISO and ISO-NE. The West segment includes the generating, marketing and trading activities located in ERCOT and WECC. In addition, Talen Energy has an "Other" category that primarily includes wages, benefits, services, certain insurance, rent, financing costs incurred primarily at Talen Energy, which have not been allocated or assigned to the segments and inter-company eliminations, and is presented to reconcile segment information to consolidated results.
The discussion within "Statement of Income Analysis" addresses significant changes in principal line items on the Statements of Income comparing the three months ended March 31, 2016 with the same period in 2015 on a GAAP basis. The "Margins" discussion, presented by segment, includes a reconciliation of that non-GAAP financial measure to operating income. The "EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA" discussion, also presented by segment, includes a reconciliation of those non-GAAP financial measures to operating income and consolidated net income (loss).
The results for interim periods can be disproportionately influenced by numerous factors and developments and by seasonal variations. As such, the results of operations for interim periods do not necessarily indicate results or trends for the year or future periods.
Earnings in future periods are subject to various risks and uncertainties. See "Forward-Looking Information," the rest of this "Item 2. Combined Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and Note 9 to the Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q and "Item 1. Business" and "Item 1A. Risk Factors" in Talen Energy's 2015 Form 10-K for a discussion of the risks, uncertainties and factors that may impact future earnings.
Statement of Income Analysis, Margins, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA
Statement of Income Analysis --
| Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 | 2015 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wholesale energy (a) (b) (c) | $800 | $676 | $124 |
| Retail energy (a) (b) | 259 | 311 | (52) |
| Energy-related businesses | 114 | 104 | 10 |
| Total operating revenues | 1,173 | 1,091 | 82 |
| Fuel and energy purchases (a) (b) (c) | 491 | 515 | (24) |
| Operation and maintenance (c) | 282 | 222 | 60 |
| (Gain) loss on sale | (140) | — | (140) |
| Depreciation | 109 | 77 | 32 |
| Taxes, other than income (c) | 11 | 3 | 8 |
| Energy-related businesses (c) | 109 | 96 | 13 |
| Total operating expenses | 862 | 913 | (51) |
| Operating Income (Loss) | 311 | 178 | 133 |
| Other Income (Expense) - net | 6 | 7 | (1) |
| Interest Expense | 60 | 36 | 24 |
| Income Taxes | 106 | 53 | 53 |
| Net Income (Loss) | $151 | $96 | $55 |
(a) Includes the impact from energy-related economic activity. See "Commodity Price Risk (Non-trading) - Economic Activity" in Note 13 to the Financial Statements for additional information.
(b) Amounts included in "Margins" and are not discussed separately.
(c) Amounts for prior years have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation. See Note 1 to the Financial Statements for additional information.
See below for a discussion of the components of the changes to Net Income (Loss) for the periods. The changes in Net Income (Loss) and Operating Income (Loss) from period to period were, in part, attributable to the acquisition of RJS Power, MACH Gen and several items that management believes are not indicative of ongoing operations. See "EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA" discussion below for information on the items management does not believe are indicative of ongoing operations.
Operation and Maintenance
The increase (decrease) in operation and maintenance for the period ended March 31, 2016 compared with 2015 was due to:
| East segment: | Three Months |
|---|---|
| RJS - Raven and Sapphire (a) | $33 |
| MACH Gen - Athens and Millennium (a) | 6 |
| Nuclear (b) | 24 |
| Other (c) | (18) |
| West segment: | |
| RJS - Jade (a) | 9 |
| MACH Gen - Harquahala (a) | 5 |
| Other: | |
| TSA costs | 13 |
| Stock-based compensation | (5) |
| Other (c) | (7) |
| Total | $60 |
(a) There are no comparable amounts for the three months ended March 31, 2015 as RJS was acquired in June 2015 and MACH Gen was acquired in November 2015.
(b) The decrease for the three month period was primarily due to the timing of the refueling outage.
(c) The decrease for the three month period was primarily due to lower corporate expenses, which were primarily a result of cost reductions following the spinoff from PPL.
(Gain) loss on sale
(Gain) loss on sale for the three months ended March 31, 2016 primarily represents the $148 million gain on the sale of the Ironwood power plant. See Note 7 to the Financial Statements for additional information.
Depreciation
Depreciation increased by $32 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016, compared with the same period in 2015, primarily due to increases in the East and West segments of $18 million and $13 million. The East segment increased by $28 million due to the RJS Power and MACH Gen acquisitions, partially offset by a $6 million decrease due to the sale of Ironwood. The increase in the West segment was primarily related to the RJS Power and MACH Gen acquisitions as there are no comparable amounts for the three months ended March 31, 2015.
Taxes, Other Than Income
Taxes, other than income increased by $8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016 compared with the same period in 2015. The East and West segments both increased by $4 million due to the acquisition of RJS Power and MACH Gen as there are no comparable amounts for the three months ended March 31, 2015.
Interest Expense
The increase (decrease) in interest expense for the period ended March 31, 2016 compared with 2015 was due to:
| Three Months | |
|---|---|
| Long-term debt interest expense (a) | $21 |
| MACH Gen (b) | 9 |
| Short-term debt interest expense | (4) |
| Other | (2) |
| Total | $24 |
(a) The increase was due to a debt issuance in May 2015 and the assumption of an RJS Power subsidiary's debt in June 2015 in connection with the RJS Power acquisition. The increase in expense from the RJS Power related debt was $14 million.
(b) There are no comparable amounts in the 2015 period as MACH Gen was acquired in November 2015.
Income Taxes
The increase (decrease) in income taxes for the period ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 was due to:
| Three Months | |
|---|---|
| Change in pre-tax income at current tax rates (a) | $56 |
| RJS (b) | (4) |
| MACH Gen (b) | (6) |
| Federal tax credits | 2 |
| Other | 5 |
| Total | $53 |
(a) Excludes income taxes related to RJS and MACH Gen as there are no comparable amounts in the three months ended March 31, 2015.
(b) There are no comparable amounts in the 2015 period as RJS was acquired in June 2015 and MACH Gen as acquired in November 2015.
Margins
Management utilizes "Margins," a non-GAAP financial measure, as an indicator of performance for its business.
"Margins" is defined as, energy revenues offset by the cost of fuel and energy purchases. Management believes this performance measure is relevant due to the volatility in the individual revenue and expense lines on the Statements of Income that comprise "Margins." This volatility stems from a number of factors, including the required netting of certain transactions with ISOs, RTOs and significant fluctuations in unrealized gains and losses. Such factors could result in gains or losses being recorded in either "Wholesale energy," "Retail energy" or "Fuel and energy purchases" on the Statements of Income. "Margins"
excludes unrealized (gains) losses on: energy related economic activity, which includes the changes in fair value of positions used to economically hedge a portion of the economic value of the competitive generation assets, full-requirement sales contracts and retail activities; and trading activities. These derivatives are subject to changes in fair value due to market price volatility of the input and output commodities (e.g., fuel and power) prior to the delivery period that was hedged or when realized. Energy related economic activity includes premium amortization associated with options. Unrealized gains and losses related to derivatives and premium amortization associated with options are deferred and included in "Margins" over the delivery period of the item that was hedged or upon realization.
This measure is not intended to replace "Operating Income (Loss)," which is determined in accordance with GAAP, as an indicator of overall operating performance. Other companies may use different measures to analyze and report their results of operations. Management believes this measure provides additional useful criteria to make investment decisions. This performance measure is used, in conjunction with other information, by senior management to manage Talen Energy's operations and analyze actual results compared with budget.
Reconciliation of Margins
The following tables contain the components from the Statements of Income that are included in Margins and a reconciliation to "Operating Income (Loss)" for the periods ended March 31.
| Three Months 2016 East Segment Margins | West Segment Margins | Reconciling Items (a) | Operating Income (Loss) (b) | 2015 East Segment Margins | West Segment Margins | Reconciling Items (a) | Operating Income (Loss) (b) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wholesale energy | $677 | $64 | $59 (c) | $800 | $632 | $27 | $17 (c) | $676 |
| Retail energy | 242 | 16 | 1 (c) | 259 | 306 | 18 | (13 ) (c) | 311 |
| Fuel and energy purchases | 447 | 61 | (17 ) (c) | 491 | 528 | 27 | (40 ) (c) | 515 |
| Other (d) | — | — | 257 | 257 | — | — | 294 | 294 |
| Total | $472 | $19 | $(180) | $311 | $410 | $18 | $(250) | $178 |
(a) Represents amounts excluded from Margins.
(b) As reported on the Statements of Income.
(c) Includes unrealized gains (losses) on energy-related economic activity, which is subject to fluctuations in value due to market price volatility. See
"Commodity Price Risk (Non-trading) - Economic Activity" within Note 13 to the Financial Statements. Amounts have been adjusted for insignificant option premiums for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015.
(d) Other includes all Income Statement line items that are fully excluded from Margins, such as Operation and maintenance, Gain (loss) on sale, Depreciation, Taxes, other than income and Energy-related businesses, net.
Changes in Margins
The following table shows Margins by segments, for the periods ended March 31 as well as the change between the periods. The factors that gave rise to the changes are described following the table.
| Three Months 2016 | 2015 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| East segment | $472 | $410 | $62 |
| West segment | 19 | 18 | 1 |
| Total | $491 | $428 | $63 |
East Segment
East segment Margins increased $79 million in 2016 from the addition of the Raven and Sapphire portfolios, as well as $13 million from the addition of the Athens and Millennium portfolios. There are no comparable amounts in the first quarter of 2015 as the acquisitions occurred during subsequent periods in 2015.
Excluding the impact of the Raven, Sapphire, Athens and Millennium acquisitions, East segment Margins decreased in 2016 compared with 2015 by $30 million primarily due to lower realized energy prices of $29 million, timing of the nuclear refueling outage of $23 million and lost energy and capacity revenue from the sale of the Ironwood plant of $21 million.
Partially offsetting these amounts is an increase in capacity prices of $25 million, margins on full-requirement sales contracts of $12 million, and retail electric activity of $8 million.
West Segment
West segment Margins increased $8 million in 2016 from the addition of the Jade and Harquahala portfolios. There are no comparable amounts in the first quarter of 2015 as the acquisitions occurred during subsequent periods in 2015. These amounts were offset by a decrease of $7 million in the Montana portfolio due to lower realized energy prices.
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA
In addition to operating income (loss), management utilizes EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA, which are both non-GAAP financial measures, as indicators of performance for Talen Energy's business, with Adjusted EBITDA as the primary financial performance measure used by management to evaluate its business and monitor results of operations.
EBITDA represents net income (loss) before interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and certain amortization. Adjusted EBITDA represents EBITDA further adjusted for certain non-cash and other items that management believes are not indicative of ongoing operations including, but not limited to, unrealized gains and losses on derivative contracts, stock-based compensation expense, asset retirement obligation accretion, impairments, gains and losses on securities in the NDT funds, gains or losses on sales, dispositions or retirements of assets, debt extinguishments and transition, transaction and restructuring costs.
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are not intended to represent cash flows from operations, operating income (loss) or net income (loss) as defined by GAAP as indicators of operating performance and are not necessarily comparable to similarly-titled measures reported by other companies. Management cautions investors that amounts presented in accordance with Talen Energy's definitions of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to similar measures disclosed by other companies because not all companies calculate EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA in the same manner. Talen Energy believes EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are useful to investors and other users of these financial statements in evaluating Talen Energy's operating performance because they provide additional tools to compare business performance across companies and across periods. Talen Energy believes that EBITDA is widely used by investors to measure a company's operating performance without regard to such items as interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, which can vary substantially from company to company depending upon accounting methods and book value of assets, capital structure and the method by which assets were acquired. Additionally, Talen Energy believes that investors commonly adjust EBITDA information to eliminate the effect of restructuring and other expenses, which vary widely from company to company and impair comparability. Talen Energy adjusts for these and other items; as management believes that these items would distort their ability to efficiently view and assess the company's core operating trends. In summary, management primarily uses Adjusted EBITDA as a measure of operating performance to assist in comparing performance from period to period on a consistent basis and to readily view operating trends, as a measure for planning and forecasting overall expectations and for evaluating actual results against such expectations, as a measure of certain corporate financial goals used to determine variable compensation and in communications with the Talen Energy Corporation Board of Directors, senior management, shareholders, creditors, analysts and investors concerning Talen Energy's financial performance.
Reconciliations of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA
The table below provides reconciliations of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA to operating income (loss) on a segment basis and to net income (loss) on a consolidated basis for the periods ended March 31.
| Three Months 2016 East | West | Other | Total | 2015 East | West | Other | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net income (loss) | $151 | $96 | ||||||
| Interest expense | 60 | 36 | ||||||
| Income taxes | 106 | 53 | ||||||
| Other (income) expense - net | (6) | (7) | ||||||
| Operating income (loss) | $392 | $(28) | $(53) | $311 | $231 | $(1) | $(52) | $178 |
| Depreciation | 95 | 13 | 1 | 109 | 77 | — | — | 77 |
| Other income (expense) - net | 5 | 1 | — | 6 | 7 | — | — | 7 |
| EBITDA | $492 | $(14) | $(52) | $426 | $315 | $(1) | $(52) | $262 |
| Margins: | ||||||||
| Unrealized (gain) loss on derivative contracts (a) | (81) | (1) | — | (82) | (48) | 2 | — | (46) |
| Other (b) | 3 | — | — | 3 | 3 | — | — | 3 |
| Operation and maintenance: | ||||||||
| Stock-based compensation expense (c) | — | — | 5 | 5 | — | — | 9 | 9 |
| ARO accretion | 9 | 1 | — | 10 | 8 | — | — | 8 |
| (Gain) loss on sale (Note 7) | (140) | — | — | (140) | — | — | — | — |
| TSA costs | — | — | 13 | 13 | — | — | — | — |
| Corette closure costs (d) | — | — | — | — | — | 4 | — | 4 |
| Transaction and restructuring costs (e) | — | — | 3 | 3 | — | — | 3 | 3 |
| Legal contingency | — | 4 | — | 4 | — | — | — | — |
| Other | (3) | — | — | (3) | — | — | — | — |
| Other income (expense): | ||||||||
| (Gain) loss from NDT funds | (4) | — | — | (4) | (6) | — | — | (6) |
| Adjusted EBITDA | $276 | $(10) | $(31) | $235 | $272 | $5 | $(40) | $237 |
(a) Represents unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives. See "Commodity Price Risk (Non-trading) - Economic Activity" and "Commodity Price Risk (Trading)" in Note 13 to the Financial Statements for additional information on derivatives. Amounts have been adjusted for insignificant option premiums for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015.
(b) Includes OCI amortization on non-active derivative positions.
(c) For the periods prior to June 2015, represents the portion of PPL's stock-based compensation cost allocable to Talen Energy.
(d) Operations were suspended and the Corette plant was retired in March 2015.
(e) Costs related to the spinoff transaction, including expenses associated with the FERC-required mitigation and legal and professional fees.
Changes in Adjusted EBITDA
The following table shows Adjusted EBITDA by segment for the periods ended March 31 as well as the change between periods. The factors that gave rise to the changes are described following the table.
| Three Months 2016 | 2015 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| East | $276 | $272 | $4 |
| West | (10) | 5 | (15) |
| Other | (31) | (40) | 9 |
| Total | $235 | $237 | $(2) |
East Segment
The increase for the three month period for the East segment was driven by higher margins, primarily due to the addition of the Raven, Sapphire, Athens and Millennium operations acquired during 2015, higher capacity prices, higher margins on full- requirements sales contracts, and higher retail electricity sales, which were offset by higher operation and maintenance costs resulting from the Raven, Sapphire, Athens and Millennium operations, lower realized energy prices, timing of the nuclear refueling outage, and lost energy and capacity revenue from the sale of the Ironwood plant.
West Segment
The decrease for the three month period for the West segment was driven by higher operation and maintenance expenses, primarily due to the addition of the Jade and Harquahala operations and lower realized energy prices in Montana, partially offset by higher margins from the addition of the Jade and Harquahala operations during 2015.
Other
The increase for the three month period for Other was primarily due to lower corporate expenses, which were primarily a result of cost reductions following the spinoff from PPL.
See "Margins" and "Statement of Income Analysis" above for a more detailed analysis of the changes.
Financial Condition
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Talen Energy had the following at:
| March 31, 2016 | December 31, 2015 | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash and cash equivalents | $393 | $141 |
| Short-term debt (a) | — | 608 |
(a) December 31, 2015 includes $108 million related to the New MACH Gen RCF which was reclassified to "Long-term debt" on the Balance Sheet at March 31, 2016 based on New MACH Gen's intent to refinance on a long-term basis.
Net cash provided by (used in) operating, investing and financing activities for the three months ended March 31, and the changes between periods were as follows.
| 2016 | 2015 | Change - Cash Provided (Used) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating activities | $196 | $221 | $(25) |
| Investing activities | 583 | (130) | 713 |
| Financing activities | (527) | (222) | (305) |
Operating Activities
The components of the change in cash provided by (used in) operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2016 compared with 2015 were as follows.
| Change - Cash Provided (Used) | |
|---|---|
| Net income (loss) | $55 |
| Non-cash components | (162) |
| Working capital | 3 |
| Defined benefit plan funding | 74 |
| Other operating activities | 5 |
| Total | $(25) |
Net income (loss) increased by $55 million between the periods; however, it was partially offset by $162 million of non-cash components, which is primarily the $164 million net gain on the sale of certain generation facilities. The change in defined benefit plan funding is a result of timing of contributions as there have been no contributions to date in 2016.
Investing Activities
The $713 million increase in cash provided by investing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2016 compared with 2015 primarily reflects $670 million in proceeds received in 2016 from sale of the Ironwood and C.P. Crane power generation facilities.
Financing Activities
The components of the change in cash provided by (used in) financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2016 compared with 2015 were as follows.
| Change - Cash Provided (Used) | |
|---|---|
| Capital contributions from/distributions to predecessor member, net | $191 |
| Debt issuances/redemptions, net | (42) |
| Change in revolving credit facilities borrowings, net (a) | (451) |
| Other | (3) |
| Total | $(305) |
(a) Includes activity under the New MACH Gen RCF which at March 31, 2016 is classified as "Long-term debt" on the Balance Sheet.
The above change for the three months ended March 31, 2016 compared with 2015 primarily resulted from changes in capital distributions to predecessor member and changes in revolving credit facilities' borrowings. In 2015, Talen Energy made a distribution to its predecessor member prior to the June 2015 spinoff, with no such distributions occurring in 2016. In 2016, Talen Energy used a portion of the proceeds from the sale of the Ironwood and C.P. Crane power generation facilities to repay all then outstanding $600 million of short-term borrowings under Talen Energy Supply's RCF.
Talen Energy may from time to time seek to retire or repurchase outstanding debt (including publicly issued debt) through cash purchases and/or exchanges, in open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions, by tender offer or otherwise. Such repurchases or exchanges, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors. The amounts involved may be material.
See Note 6 to the Financial Statements for information on 2016 short and long-term debt activity. See Note 5 in Talen Energy's 2015 Form 10-K for information on 2015 activity.
Revolving Credit Facilities
Talen Energy Supply and a subsidiary maintain credit facilities to enhance liquidity and provide credit support. The total committed borrowing capacity under outstanding credit facilities and the use of this borrowing capacity were:
| March 31, 2016 Committed Capacity | Borrowed | Letters of Credit Issued | Unused Capacity | December 31, 2015 Borrowed | Letters of Credit Issued | Unused Capacity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Credit facilities | $2,010 | $127 | $188 | $1,695 | $608 | $194 | $1,208 |
The amounts "Borrowed" are recorded as either "Short-term debt" or "Long-term debt" on the Balance Sheets depending on the facility utilized and management's ability and intent to repay or refinance borrowings.
The Talen Energy Supply RCF provides capacity for revolving cash borrowings and up to $925 million of letters of credit, which in combination cannot exceed the capacity of the facility at any given time.
The commitments at March 31, 2016 under the Talen Energy Supply RCF are provided by a diverse bank group, with no one bank or its affiliates providing an aggregate commitment of more than 8% of the total committed capacity.
The New MACH Gen RCF provides capacity for revolving cash borrowings and up to $120 million of letters of credit, which in combination cannot exceed the capacity of the facility at any given time.
Other Facilities
Talen Energy Supply is party to a $1.3 billion Amended STF Agreement whereby Talen Energy Supply will receive credit to be applied to satisfy collateral posting obligations related to Talen Energy's energy marketing and trading activities with counterparties participating in the facility.
See Note 6 to the Financial Statements for further discussion of Talen Energy Supply's credit and other agreements.
Long-term Debt
See Note 6 to the Financial Statements for information on Talen Energy Supply's long-term debt activity.
Rating Agencies and Credit Considerations
A credit rating reflects an assessment by the rating agency of the creditworthiness associated with an issuer and particular securities that it issues. The ratings issued by rating agencies are not recommendations to buy, sell or hold any debt securities of Talen Energy, and they are often based in part on information provided by Talen Energy and other sources. Such ratings may be subject to revisions or withdrawal by the agencies at any time and should be evaluated independently of each other and any other rating that may be assigned to the securities. Talen Energy's credit ratings may affect its liquidity, access to capital markets and cost of borrowing.
The following table sets forth the credit ratings issued by Moody's and Standard & Poor's for outstanding debt securities or credit facilities of Talen Energy Supply as of;
| March 31, 2016 | December 31, 2015 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moody's | S&P | Moody's | S&P | |
| Senior Unsecured | B1 | B+ | Ba3 | B+ |
| Senior Secured | Baa3 | BB | Baa2 | BB |
| Corporate Issuer Rating | Ba3 | B+ | Ba2 | B+ |
| Outlook | Stable | Stable | Negative | Stable |
Various derivative and non-derivative contracts, including contracts for the sale and purchase of electricity and fuel, commodity transportation and storage and interest rate instruments contain provisions that require the posting of additional collateral, or permit the counterparty to terminate the contract, upon a downgrade in Talen Energy Supply's credit rating. See Note 13 to the Financial Statements for a discussion of "Credit Risk-Related Contingent Features," including a discussion of the potential additional collateral requirements for Talen Energy for derivative contracts in a net liability position at March 31, 2016.
Talen Energy has no credit rating triggers that, by themselves, would result in the reduction of access to capital markets or the acceleration of maturity dates of outstanding debt.
Risk Management
Market Risk
See Notes 12 and 13 to the Financial Statements for information about Talen Energy's risk management objectives, valuation techniques and accounting designations.
The forward-looking information presented below provides estimates of what may occur in the future, assuming certain adverse market conditions and model assumptions. Actual future results may differ materially from those presented. These disclosures are not precise indicators of expected future losses, but only indicators of possible losses under normal market conditions at a given confidence level.
Commodity Price Risk (Non-trading)
Talen Energy's non-trading activity includes economic hedge transactions that address a specific risk. This activity includes the changes in fair value of positions used to hedge a portion of the economic value of Talen Energy's competitive generation assets and full-requirement sales and retail contracts. This economic activity is subject to changes in fair value due to market price volatility of the input and output commodities (e.g., fuel and power). See Note 13 to the Financial Statements for additional information.
To hedge the impact of market price volatility on Talen Energy's energy-related assets, liabilities and other contractual arrangements, Talen Energy subsidiaries both sell and purchase physical energy at the wholesale level under FERC market-based tariffs throughout the U.S. and enter into financial exchange-traded and over-the-counter contracts. Talen Energy's non-trading commodity derivative contracts range in maturity through 2020.
The following tables sets forth the changes in the net fair value of non-trading commodity derivative contracts for the periods ended March 31. See Notes 12 and 13 to the Financial Statements for additional information.
| Gains (Losses) Three Months 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|
| Fair value of contracts outstanding at the beginning of the period | $144 | $53 |
| Contracts realized or otherwise settled during the period | (123) | 133 |
| Fair value of new contracts entered into during the period (a) | 1 | (5) |
| Other changes in fair value | 190 | (92) |
| Fair value of contracts outstanding at the end of the period | $212 | $89 |
(a) Represents the fair value of contracts at the end of the quarter of their inception.
The following table segregates the net fair value of non-trading commodity derivative contracts at March 31, 2016, based on the observability of the information used to determine the fair value.
| Source of Fair Value | Net Asset (Liability) Maturity Less Than 1 Year | Maturity 1-3 Years | Maturity 4-5 Years | Maturity in Excess of 5 Years | Total Fair Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prices based on significant observable inputs (Level 2) | $140 | $6 | $6 | $— | $152 |
| Prices based on significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) | 37 | 22 | 1 | — | 60 |
| Fair value of contracts outstanding at the end of the period | $177 | $28 | $7 | $— | $212 |
Talen Energy subsidiaries sell electricity, capacity and related services and buy fuel on a forward basis to hedge the value of energy from Talen Energy's generation assets. If these Talen Energy subsidiaries were unable to deliver firm capacity and energy or to accept the delivery of fuel under their agreements, under certain circumstances they could be required to pay liquidated damages. These damages would be based on the difference between the market price and the contract price of the commodity. Depending on price changes in the wholesale energy markets, such damages could be significant. Extreme weather conditions, unplanned power plant outages, transmission disruptions, nonperformance by counterparties (or their counterparties) with which it has energy contracts and other factors could affect Talen Energy's ability to meet its obligations, or cause significant increases in the market price of replacement energy. Although Talen Energy attempts to mitigate these risks, it cannot be assured that it will be able to fully meet its firm obligations, that it will not be required to pay damages for failure to perform, or that it will not experience counterparty nonperformance in the future.
Commodity Price Risk (Trading)
Talen Energy's trading commodity derivative contracts range in maturity through 2019. The following table sets forth changes in the net fair value of trading commodity derivative contracts for the periods ended March 31. See Notes 12 and 13 to the Financial Statements for additional information.
| Gains (Losses) Three Months 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|
| Fair value of contracts outstanding at the beginning of the period | $9 | $48 |
| Contracts realized or otherwise settled during the period | (6) | (30) |
| Fair value of new contracts entered into during the period (a) | 1 | (7) |
| Other changes in fair value | 5 | 35 |
| Fair value of contracts outstanding at the end of the period | $9 | $46 |
(a) Represents the fair value of contracts at the end of the quarter of their inception.
The following table segregates the net fair value of trading commodity derivative contracts at March 31, 2016, based on the observability of the information used to determine the fair value.
| Source of Fair Value | Net Asset (Liability) Maturity Less Than 1 Year | Maturity 1-3 Years | Maturity 4-5 Years | Maturity in Excess of 5 Years | Total Fair Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prices based on significant observable inputs (Level 2) | $4 | $(3) | $— | $— | $1 |
| Prices based on significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) | 7 | 3 | (2) | — | 8 |
| Fair value of contracts outstanding at the end of the period | $11 | $— | $(2) | $— | $9 |
VaR Models
A VaR model is utilized to measure commodity price risk in margins for the non-trading and trading portfolios. VaR is a statistical model that attempts to estimate the value of potential loss over a given holding period under normal market conditions at a given confidence level. VaR is calculated using a Monte Carlo simulation technique based on a five-day holding period at a 95% confidence level. Given Talen Energy's disciplined hedging program, the non-trading VaR exposure is expected to be limited in the short-term. The VaR for portfolios using end-of-month results for the three months ended March 31, 2016 was as follows.
| 95% Confidence Level, Five-Day Holding Period | Trading VaR | Non-Trading VaR |
|---|---|---|
| Period End | $— | $19 |
| Average for the Period | — | 23 |
| High | — | 31 |
| Low | — | 18 |
The trading portfolio includes all proprietary trading positions, regardless of the delivery period. All positions not considered proprietary trading are considered non-trading. The non-trading portfolio includes the entire portfolio, including generation, with delivery periods through the next 12 months. Both the trading and non-trading VaR computations exclude FTRs due to the absence of reliable spot and forward markets. The fair value of the non-trading and trading FTR positions was insignificant at March 31, 2016.
Interest Rate Risk
Talen Energy, directly or through its subsidiaries, issues debt to finance its operations, which exposes it to interest rate risk. Talen Energy may utilize various financial derivative instruments to adjust the mix of fixed and floating interest rates in its debt portfolio, adjust the duration of its debt portfolio and lock in components of current market interest rates in anticipation of future financing, when appropriate. Risk limits under the risk management policy are designed to mitigate interest rate exposure and volatility in interest expense.
Talen Energy had no interest rate hedges outstanding at March 31, 2016.
Talen Energy is exposed to a potential increase in interest expense and to changes in the fair value of its debt portfolio. The estimated impact of a 10% adverse movement in interest rates at March 31, 2016 would cause an insignificant increase in interest expense and a $110 million increase in the fair value of debt.
NDT Funds - Securities Price Risk
In connection with certain NRC requirements, Susquehanna Nuclear maintains trust funds to fund certain costs of decommissioning the Susquehanna Nuclear plant. At March 31, 2016, these funds were invested primarily in domestic equity securities and fixed-rate, fixed-income securities and are reflected at fair value on the balance sheet. The mix of securities is designed to provide returns sufficient to fund Susquehanna Nuclear's decommissioning and to compensate for inflationary increases in decommissioning costs. However, the equity securities included in the trusts are exposed to price fluctuation in equity markets, and the values of fixed-rate, fixed-income securities are primarily exposed to changes in interest rates. Talen Energy actively monitors the investment performance and periodically reviews asset allocation in accordance with its nuclear decommissioning trust policy statement. At March 31, 2016, a hypothetical 10% increase in interest rates and a 10% decrease in equity prices would have resulted in an estimated $74 million reduction in the fair value of the trust assets. See Notes 12 and 15 to the Financial Statements for additional information regarding the NDT funds.
Credit Risk
See Notes 12 and 13 to the Financial Statements and "Risk Management - Credit Risk" in Talen Energy's 2015 Form 10-K for additional information.
Acquisitions, Development and Divestitures
Talen Energy from time to time evaluates opportunities for potential acquisitions, divestitures and development projects. Development projects are reexamined periodically based on market conditions and other factors to determine whether to proceed with the projects, sell, cancel or expand them, execute tolling agreements or pursue other options. See Note 7 to the Financial Statements for information on the acquisition of MACH Gen and the divestitures of the Ironwood, Holtwood, Lake Wallenpaupack and C.P. Crane power plants and information on an April 2016 NRC action related to Bell Bend, LLC's COLA and the costs capitalized associated with the licensing process. Talen Energy will continue to consider alternatives that may be available to support its objectives with respect to the future of the Bell Bend project, which could impact the project's ability to provide future economic benefit to Talen Energy. At March 31, 2016, $204 million of costs, which includes capitalized interest, associated with the licensing application were capitalized and are included on the Balance Sheet in noncurrent "Other intangibles."
Environmental Matters
The following is a discussion of the more significant environmental matters impacting Talen Energy's business this fiscal year. See "Item 1. Business" in Talen Energy's 2015 Form 10-K for additional information on environmental matters.
NAAQS
Regulations to address more stringent NAAQS for ozone advanced in Pennsylvania in the first quarter of 2016. These regulations became effective in April 2016 and establish reasonably available control technologies (RACT) for nitrogen oxide and volatile organic compound emissions from fossil-fuel fired power plants. Affected sources must comply by January 1, 2017, unless a compliance extension is granted under the conditions of the Regulation.
Pertaining to the EPA's 2010 NAAQS for sulfur dioxide, the EPA and Sierra Club entered into an approved consent decree on March 2, 2015 that establishes deadlines for remaining area designations. Several of Talen's affected plants are in undesignated areas and various actions occurred in the first quarter of 2016 to advance these characterizations.
Compliance with Pennsylvania RACT regulations, or other regulations that could be developed to address the NAAQS established by the EPA, including their 2010 sulfur dioxide standard, could lead to increased capital and/or operating and maintenance expenses for Talen Energy's fossil-fuel fired power plants.
GHG Regulations
The EPA's final rules for new and existing power plants were published in the Federal Register in October 2015, along with a proposed federal implementation plan for those states that fail to submit an acceptable state implementation plan for the existing plant rule. The EPA's existing plant rule was stayed by the U.S. Supreme Court in the first quarter of 2016 pending the outcome of other legal challenges to the rule. The new plant rule remains in effect and challenges are also outstanding in federal court. Talen Energy is unable to determine if the rules will have a material adverse effect on Talen Energy's financial condition or results of operations, but increased capital and operating and maintenance costs could be imposed.
ELGs and Standards
The EPA's final ELG regulations that revise discharge limitations for steam electric generation wastewater permits became effective in January 2016. The Regulation contains requirements that could significantly impact Talen Energy's coal-fired power plants. At this point, Talen Energy is unable to estimate a range of reasonably possible compliance costs. The Regulation is being challenged in federal court.
New Accounting Guidance
See Notes 2 and 17 to the Financial Statements for a discussion of new accounting guidance adopted and pending adoption.
Application of Critical Accounting Policies
Financial condition and results of operations are impacted by the methods, assumptions and estimates used in the application of critical accounting policies. Certain accounting policies are particularly important to an understanding of the reported financial condition or results of operations, and require management to make estimates or other judgments of matters that are inherently uncertain, including policies for defined benefits, income taxes, asset impairments (excluding investments), AROs, business combinations and price risk management.
See "Item 7. Combined Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," in Talen Energy's 2015 Form 10-K for a discussion of each critical accounting policy.
TALEN ENERGY CORPORATION
TALEN ENERGY SUPPLY, LLC
Market risk
As filed, 147 characters, with its headings, lists and tables. Extracted from the main document; charts and exhibits are in the original on sec.gov.
Reference is made to "Risk Management" in "Item 2. Combined Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."
Controls and procedures
As filed, 2,239 characters, with its headings, lists and tables. Extracted from the main document; charts and exhibits are in the original on sec.gov.
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
Disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their desired control objectives. The registrants' principal executive officers and principal financial officers, based on their evaluation of the registrants' disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act")) have concluded for their respective companies that, as of March 31, 2016, the registrants' disclosure controls and procedures were effective, at the reasonable assurance level, to ensure that information required to be disclosed by each registrant in the reports filed by it under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC's rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the principal executive and principal financial officers, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
(b) Change in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting.
Reference is made to "Item 9A. Controls and Procedures" of Talen Energy's 2015 Form 10-K for a discussion regarding on-going assessments of internal control over financial reporting relating to the RJS Power and MACH Gen acquisitions that occurred during 2015. During the first fiscal quarter of 2016, the registrants continued to transition the processes, information technology systems and other components of internal control over financial reporting of RJS Power and MACH Gen to the internal control structure of the registrants. The registrants have expanded their consolidation and disclosure controls and procedures related to the acquired companies, and the registrants continue to assess the current internal control over financial reporting at RJS and MACH Gen. Except for those items, there were no changes in the registrants' internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the first fiscal quarter of 2016 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants' internal control over financial reporting.
Risk factors
As filed, 124 characters, with its headings, lists and tables. Extracted from the main document; charts and exhibits are in the original on sec.gov.
There have been no material changes in risk factors from those disclosed in "Risk Factors" in Talen Energy's 2015 Form 10-K.
Figures reported in this filing
Standardized line items from the XBRL in this filing, for the period ended 2016-03-31. Comparative periods it repeats are left out.
| Line item | Period | Value | XBRL concept |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating income | 3 months2016-01-01 to 2016-03-31 | $311.0m | us-gaap:OperatingIncomeLoss |
| Interest expense | 3 months2016-01-01 to 2016-03-31 | $60.0m | us-gaap:InterestExpense |
| Income tax | 3 months2016-01-01 to 2016-03-31 | $106.0m | us-gaap:IncomeTaxExpenseBenefit |
| Net income | 3 months2016-01-01 to 2016-03-31 | $151.0m | us-gaap:NetIncomeLoss |
| Diluted EPS | 3 months2016-01-01 to 2016-03-31 | $1.17 | us-gaap:EarningsPerShareDiluted |
| Basic EPS | 3 months2016-01-01 to 2016-03-31 | $1.18 | us-gaap:EarningsPerShareBasic |
| Diluted shares (weighted) | 3 months2016-01-01 to 2016-03-31 | 129,018,000 shares | us-gaap:WeightedAverageNumberOfDilutedSharesOutstanding |
| Operating cash flow | 3 months2016-01-01 to 2016-03-31 | $196.0m | us-gaap:NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities |
| Capital expenditure | 3 months2016-01-01 to 2016-03-31 | $99.0m | us-gaap:PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment |
| Cash and equivalents | At period end2016-03-31 | $393.0m | us-gaap:CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue |
| Current assets | At period end2016-03-31 | $2.53bn | us-gaap:AssetsCurrent |
| Total assets | At period end2016-03-31 | $12.60bn | us-gaap:Assets |
| Current liabilities | At period end2016-03-31 | $1.54bn | us-gaap:LiabilitiesCurrent |
| Long-term debt | At period end2016-03-31 | $3.91bn | us-gaap:LongTermDebtNoncurrent |
| Current portion of debt | At period end2016-03-31 | $354.0m | us-gaap:LongTermDebtCurrent |
| Short-term borrowings | At period end2016-03-31 | $0 | us-gaap:ShortTermBorrowings |
| Shareholders' equity | At period end2016-03-31 | $4.46bn | us-gaap:StockholdersEquity |
Source: SEC EDGAR, the filing index for accession 0001622536-16-000122. Last ingested by Listed: Nov 12, 2026, 18:21 ET. Listed shows no prices and gives no investment advice.