Howard Hughes Holdings Inc.: Form 10-K for the period ended Dec 31, 2025
Filed with the SEC on Feb 19, 2026 and accepted by EDGAR at Feb 19, 2026, 16:06 ET.
Business
As filed, 27,605 characters, with its headings, lists and tables. Extracted from the main document; charts and exhibits are in the original on sec.gov.
OVERVIEW
Business Overview Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. (HHH or the Company) is a holding company that owns a real estate development subsidiary, The Howard Hughes Corporation (HHC). Through HHC, the Company operates a large‑scale, mixed‑use real estate platform focused on the development of master planned communities (MPCs), the investment in strategic real estate development opportunities, and the ownership and operation of income‑producing properties. Our award-winning assets include one of the nation's largest portfolios of MPCs, spanning approximately 101,000 gross acres across five states. We create some of the most sought-after communities in the country by curating an environment tailored to meet the needs of our residents and tenants. This unique business model allows us to seek attractive risk-adjusted returns while maintaining a sharp focus on sustainability to ensure our communities are equipped with the resources to last several decades.
In 2025, the Company began executing a long-term strategy to transition from a pure-play real estate company to a diversified holding company. On May 5, 2025, the Company sold 9,000,000 newly issued shares of the Company’s common stock to Pershing Square for an aggregate purchase price of $900 million, with the expectation that the proceeds from the transaction would be used to acquire or make investments in other operating companies (Pershing Square Issuance).
On December 18, 2025, we announced that we have entered into a definitive agreement to acquire 100% of Vantage Group Holdings Ltd. (Vantage), a privately held specialty insurance and reinsurance company, for cash consideration of approximately $2.1 billion. The transaction remains subject to regulatory approvals and other customary closing conditions, and is expected to close in the second quarter of 2026. If completed, the combination of HHH’s corporate holding structure and Vantage’s insurance expertise creates the opportunity to advance the insurance company’s growth using reinvested real estate cash flows while continuing to invest in HHH’s core real estate development business.
Refer to Note 1 - Presentation of Financial Statements and Significant Accounting Policies and Note 2 - Pershing Square in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 of this Annual Report for additional information.
Available Information HHH was incorporated in Delaware on August 11, 2023, and its predecessor, The Howard Hughes Corporation (HHC), was incorporated in Delaware on July 1, 2010.
Our website address is www.howardhughes.com (http://www.howardhughes.com). Our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and other publicly filed documents, including all exhibits filed therewith, are available and may be accessed free of charge through the Investors section of our website under the Financial Reporting subsection, as soon as reasonably practicable after those documents are filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) at www.sec.gov (http://www.sec.gov). Also available through the Investors section of our website are reports filed by our directors and executive officers on Forms 3, 4, and 5, and amendments to those reports. Our website and included or linked information on the website are not incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K. From time to time, we use our website as a means of disclosing material information and for complying with our disclosure obligations under SEC Regulation FD (Fair Disclosure). Accordingly, investors should monitor the Investors section of our website in addition to following the Company’s press releases, SEC filings, public conference calls, presentations and webcasts.
BUSINESS SEGMENTS
HHH operates through three business segments: Operating Assets, MPCs, and Strategic Developments. We create a continuous value-creation cycle through operational and financial synergies associated with these three business segments. In our MPC segment, we plan, develop, and manage small cities and large-scale, mixed-use communities, in markets with strong long-term growth fundamentals. This business focuses on the horizontal development of residential land. The improved acreage is then sold to homebuilders who build and sell homes to new residents. New homeowners create demand for commercial developments, such as retail, office, multifamily, and hospitality offerings. We build these commercial properties through our Strategic Developments business at the appropriate times, which helps mitigate development risk, using the cash flow harvested from the sale of land to homebuilders. Once the commercial developments are completed, the assets transition to our Operating Assets segment, which increases recurring Net Operating Income (NOI), further funding our Strategic Developments. New office, retail, and other commercial amenities make our MPC residential land more appealing to buyers and increase the velocity of land sales at premiums that typically exceed the broader market. This increased demand for residential land generates more cash flow from MPCs, thus continuing the value-creation cycle.
The following further describes our three business segments and provides a general description of the assets comprising these segments. Refer to Item 2. Properties for additional detail on individual properties, including assets by reportable segment, geographic location, and predominant use at December 31, 2025. This section should be referred to when reading Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, which contains information about our financial results and operating performance for our business segments. Financial information about each of our segments is presented in Note 19 - Segments in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 of this Annual Report.
Operating Assets
We have developed many of the assets in our Operating Assets segment since the Company’s inception in 2010. As of December 31, 2025, we had 77 Operating Assets, including our investments in unconsolidated ventures, consisting of 13 retail properties, 37 office properties, 18 multifamily properties, and 9 other operating properties or investments. Excluding our projects under construction, we own approximately 9.3 million square feet of retail and office space and 5,855 multifamily units.
The long-term value of our Operating Assets is driven by their concentration in our MPCs, where we have a competitive advantage. We believe that these assets have the potential for future growth by increasing rental rates, absorbing remaining vacancy, and changing the tenant mix in retail centers to improve gross sales revenue of our tenants, thereby increasing rents. Revenue is primarily generated through rental services and is directly impacted by trends in rental rates and operating costs.
For certain assets, we believe there are opportunities to improve operating performance through redevelopment or repositioning. Redevelopment plans for these assets may include office, retail, or residential space, shopping centers, movie theaters, parking complexes, or open space. These opportunities will require new capital investment and vary in complexity and scale. The redevelopment opportunities range from those that would have minimal disruption to the property to those requiring partial or full demolition of existing structures for new construction. Factors we evaluate in determining whether to redevelop or reposition an asset include the following: (1) existing and forecasted demographics surrounding the property; (2) competition related to existing and/or alternative uses; (3) existing entitlements of the property and our ability to change them; (4) compatibility of the physical site with proposed uses; and (5) environmental considerations, traffic patterns, and access to the properties.
We generally transfer an operating asset that is being repositioned or redeveloped into our Strategic Developments segment when we close operations at a property and/or begin construction on the redevelopment project. Upon completion of construction or renovation of a development or redevelopment, the asset is fully or partially placed in service and transferred back into our Operating Assets segment.
Master Planned Communities
As of December 31, 2025, our portfolio of MPCs was comprised of Summerlin in Las Vegas; The Woodlands, The Woodlands Hills and Bridgeland in the Houston region; and Teravalis in the Phoenix region. Our MPC segment includes the development and sale of residential and commercial land, primarily in large-scale, long-term projects. These developments often require decades of investment and continued focus on the changing market dynamics surrounding these communities. We believe that the long-term value of our MPCs remains strong because of their competitive positioning in their respective markets, our in-depth experience in diverse land-use planning, and the fact that we have substantially completed the entitlement processes within the majority of our communities.
Our MPCs have won numerous awards for design excellence and for community contribution. Summerlin and Bridgeland were again ranked by RCLCO, capturing tenth and eleventh top-selling master planned communities in the nation, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2025.
We expect the competitive position, desirable locations, and land development expertise to drive the long-term growth of our MPCs. As of December 31, 2025, our MPCs, including Floreo, our unconsolidated joint venture in the Phoenix region, include approximately 34,000 acres of land available for sale or development. Residential sales, which are generated primarily from the sale of finished lots and undeveloped superpads to residential homebuilders and developers, include standard and custom parcels designated for detached and attached single-family homes and range from entry-level to luxury homes. Superpad sites are generally 10- to 25-acre parcels of unimproved land where we develop and construct the major utilities (water, sewer, and storm drainage) and roads to the borders of the parcel, and the homebuilder completes the on-site utilities, roads, and finished lots. Revenue is also generated through builder price participation with homebuilders.
We also occasionally sell or lease land for commercial development when we deem its use will not compete with our existing properties or our development strategy. Commercial sales include land parcels designated for retail, office, hospitality, high-density residential projects (condominiums and apartments), services, and other for-profit activities, as well as those parcels designated for use by government, schools, and other not-for-profit entities.
Strategic Developments
Our Strategic Developments segment consists of various development or redevelopment projects, including developments within our MPCs that will transition to Operating Assets upon completion and condominium towers at Ward Village in Hawai‘i and The Woodlands. Many of these developments require extensive planning and expertise in large-scale and long-range development to maximize their highest and best uses. The strategic process is complex and unique to each asset and requires ongoing assessment of the changing market dynamics prior to the commencement of construction. We must study each local market, determine the highest and best use of the land and necessary improvements to the area, obtain entitlements and permits, complete architectural design and construction drawings, secure tenant commitments, and obtain and commit sources of capital.
We are in various stages of predevelopment or execution of our strategic plans for many of these assets based on market conditions. As of December 31, 2025, five properties were under construction and not yet placed into service. We generally obtain construction financing to fund a significant amount of the costs associated with developing these assets.
COMPETITIVE STRENGTHS AND COMPETITION
Our assets are located across the United States, with the vast majority of the assets in Operating Assets segment located within our MPCs. This helps us achieve scale and, in most cases, critical mass, which leads to pricing power in lease and vendor negotiations; increased ability to attract, hire, and retain the best local leadership and leasing teams; flexibility to meet changing customer demands; and enhanced ability to identify and capitalize on emerging opportunities. Our MPCs, including Floreo, our unconsolidated joint venture, contain approximately 21,000 residential acres of land remaining to be developed and sold in high-demand geographic areas. In addition to the residential land, our MPCs contain approximately 13,000 acres designated for commercial development or sale to non-competing users such as hospitals.
Competitive Strengths We distinguish ourselves from other real estate companies through the following competitive strengths:
- Self-Funded Business Plan. One of our key differentiators is our ability to self-fund significant portions of our new development without having to dispose of our recently completed developments. Our residential land sales, recurring NOI, and profits on the sales of condominium units generate substantial amounts of free cash flow, which is used to fund the equity required to execute our many development opportunities. From time to time, we may also allocate a portion of this cash flow to support the growth and capitalization of any newly acquired businesses, such as the proposed Vantage acquisition, while maintaining the capacity to fund our existing development opportunities. Furthermore, we are not required to pay dividends, nor are we restricted from investing in any asset type, amenity, or service, unlike many other real estate companies, which are limited in their activities because they have elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (REIT). We believe our structure currently provides us with significant financial and operating flexibility to maximize the value of our portfolio.
- Track Record of Value Creation. We have completed development of various office, retail, and multifamily properties since 2011. These developments are projected to generate a 8.8% yield on cost, a significant spread over market cap rates which, in turn, has generated meaningful value for our stockholders. These returns exclude condominium developments as they do not result in recurring NOI. We have either opened or started construction on 11 condominium towers, with approximately 99% of the units sold or pre-sold as of December 31, 2025.
- Unique, Diverse Portfolio. We own a portfolio with many diverse market-leading assets with a combination of steady cash flow and longer-term value creation opportunities.
- Significant Value Creation Opportunity. We believe we have found the optimal mix of price point and product in the Honolulu market for condominium development as evidenced by the demand for our condominium projects. As of December 31, 2025, we have two condominium towers under construction that are 96% pre-sold representing $1.5 billion of contracted future revenue and three condominium towers in predevelopment that are 66% pre-sold representing $2.0 billion of contracted future revenue. Additionally, the State of Hawai’i has approved amendments to the local development rules to include updated guidelines for smart growth in areas including Ward Village. The Company estimates this amendment increases its potential residential entitlements in Ward Village between 2.5 to 3.5 million gross square feet, which could be used for the development of additional condominium towers in future years.
- Flexible Balance Sheet. We ended the year with $1.5 billion of cash on hand. As of December 31, 2025, our total debt equaled approximately 48% of the book value of our total assets, which we believe is significantly less than our market value. Our net debt, which includes our share of debt of unconsolidated ventures less cash and Special Improvement District and Municipal Utility District receivables, equaled approximately 39% of our total enterprise value. Unconsolidated ventures refer to partnerships or joint ventures primarily for the development and operation of real estate assets.
- Sustainability Strategy. Our communities provide an exceptional lifestyle that has made them among the most sought-after places to live and work in the country. Sustained migration into The Woodlands, Bridgeland, and Summerlin reinforces that thoughtful planning is highly attractive as residents, CEOs, and commercial tenants are seeking and expecting a committed approach to sustainability and community health and wellness. We integrate sustainability initiatives into the planning, development, and operation of our MPCs by promoting access to green spaces, reducing energy use and carbon emissions, conserving water, protecting biodiversity, and supporting healthy living. We pursue sustainability certifications, including Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED), where appropriate by asset type and market conditions, and voluntarily report on our sustainability efforts through the annual Global Real Estate Sustainability Benchmark (GRESB) and S&P Global Corporate Sustainability Assessment. Additional details are available in our most recent annual Sustainability Report, which can be found in the Investors section of the Company’s website (https://investor.howardhughes.com/news-events/presentations).
Competition The nature and extent of our competition depends on the type of property involved. With respect to our Operating Assets segment, we primarily compete for retail, office, and multifamily tenants. We believe the principal factors that retailers consider in making their leasing decisions include: (1) consumer demographics; (2) age, quality, design, and location of properties; (3) neighboring real estate projects that have been developed or that we, or others, may develop in the future; (4) diversity of retailers and anchor tenants at shopping center locations; (5) management and operational expertise; and (6) rental rates. The principal factors influencing tenant leasing decisions for our office space include: (1) rental rates; (2) attractive views; (3) amenities; (4) walkable retail; (5) commute time; (6) efficiency of space; and (7) demographics of the available workforce. For residential tenants of our multifamily properties in our Operating Assets segment, we believe the principal factors that impact their decision of where to live are: (1) walkability/proximity to work; (2) amenities; and (3) the best value for their money.
With respect to our MPC segment, we compete with other landholders and residential and commercial property developers primarily in the development of properties within Las Vegas, Nevada; the greater Houston, Texas area; and Phoenix, Arizona markets. Significant factors that we believe allow us to compete effectively in this business include:
- the size and scope of our MPCs
- our strong reputation within the industry and years of experience serving our communities
- the recreational and cultural amenities available within our communities
- the commercial centers in our communities, including the properties that we own and/or operate or may develop
- our relationships with homebuilders
- the proximity of our developments to major metropolitan areas
With respect to our Strategic Developments segment, our direct competitors include other commercial property developers and other owners of commercial real estate that engage in similar businesses. We also compete with residential condominium developers. With significant existing entitlements, we hold an advantage over many of our competitors in our markets in that we already own or have significant influence over, substantial acreage for development. We also own the majority of square feet of each product type in many of our markets.
HUMAN CAPITAL
As of December 31, 2025, the Company employed approximately 500 individuals, with the majority serving in full-time roles across various U.S. locations. Our employees are fundamental to our core operations and represent a vital asset to the organization. The ongoing effectiveness of our strategy and the generation of sustainable value for the company are contingent upon our capacity to attract, develop, and retain exceptional talent.
Our commitment to community building is reflected in the creation of spaces that empower employees to prosper both professionally and personally. To further promote growth, employees have access to a variety of valuable resources. These include tuition reimbursement programs, support for managing student debt, and financial wellness workshops, all aimed at enhancing financial literacy and stability. Customized training initiatives focus on professional development as well as compliance and ethics education, reinforcing our dedication to integrity and career advancement throughout the organization. In 2025, the Company invested in various training initiatives, including the introduction of our leadership development program. This initiative underscores our ongoing investment in developing future leaders and supporting the professional aspirations of our workforce.
Our talent management processes are structured to ensure that the appropriate skills are aligned with the correct roles at the optimal time. We monitor voluntary and involuntary turnover, as well as time to fill for critical positions, to assess the effectiveness of our recruiting, onboarding, and retention initiatives. This allows us to adjust our talent strategies as needed.
The company's comprehensive benefits program includes robust healthcare coverages including voluntary benefits for unexpected life events, wellness incentives for all life stages, up to 12 weeks of fully paid parental leave, adoption and surrogacy support, a 401(k)-match program for retirement planning, and other plans like commuter benefits and pet insurance to meet the needs of our diverse workforce. The Company remains deeply committed to community impact through our HHCares program, which supported 178 local charities in 2025 through monetary donations and employee volunteerism. Our employees collectively volunteered approximately 3,150 hours, showcasing their dedication to strengthening communities where we live and work.
At HHH, we recognize that our people are at the heart of our organization and the communities we serve. By investing in their development, well-being, and community impact, we continue to build a foundation for success that drives meaningful change.
REGULATORY MATTERS
A portion of our business is dedicated to the development and sale of condominiums. Condominiums are generally regulated by an agency of the state in which they are located or where the condominiums are marketed to be sold. In connection with our development and offering of condominium units for sale, we must submit regulatory filings to various state agencies and engage in an entitlement process by which real property owned under one title is converted into individual units. Responses or comments on our condominium filings may delay our ability to sell condominiums in certain states and other jurisdictions in a timely manner, or at all. In addition, approval to develop real property sometimes requires political support and generally entails an extensive entitlement process involving multiple and overlapping regulatory jurisdictions and often requires discretionary action by local governments. Real estate projects must generally comply with local land development regulations and may need to comply with state and federal regulations. We incur substantial costs to comply with legal and regulatory requirements.
Various local, state, and federal statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations concerning building, health and safety, site and building design, environment, zoning, sales and similar matters apply to and/or affect the real estate development industry. Our ability to obtain or renew permits or approvals and the continued effectiveness of permits already granted or approvals already obtained depends on factors beyond our control, such as changes in federal, state, and local policies, rules and regulations, and their interpretations and application.
There is a variety of legislation being enacted, or considered for enactment, at the federal, state, and local levels relating to energy and climate change. This legislation relates to items such as carbon dioxide emissions control and building codes that impose energy efficiency standards. New building code requirements that impose stricter energy efficiency standards could significantly increase our cost to construct buildings. As climate change concerns continue to grow, legislation and regulations of this nature are expected to continue and become more costly to comply with. We may be required to apply for additional approvals or modify our existing approvals because of changes in local circumstances or applicable law. Energy-related initiatives affect a wide variety of companies throughout the United States and the world and, because our operations are heavily dependent on significant amounts of raw materials, such as lumber, steel, and concrete, they could have an indirect adverse impact on our operations and profitability to the extent the manufacturers and suppliers of our materials are burdened with expensive cap and trade and similar energy-related taxes and regulations. Governmental regulation also affects sales activities, mortgage lending activities, and other dealings with consumers. Further, government agencies routinely initiate audits, reviews, or investigations of our business practices to ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations, which can cause us to incur costs or create other disruptions in our business that can be significant. We may experience delays and increased expenses as a result of legal challenges to our proposed communities, whether brought by governmental authorities or private parties.
Under various federal, state, and local laws and regulations, an owner of real estate is liable for the costs of remediation of certain hazardous substances, including petroleum and certain toxic substances (collectively hazardous substances) on such real estate. These laws often impose such liability without regard to whether the owner knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of such hazardous substances. The costs of remediation of such substances may be substantial, and the presence of such substances, or the failure to remediate such substances, may adversely affect the owner’s ability to sell such real estate or to obtain financing using such real estate as collateral. Other federal, state, and local laws, ordinances and regulations require abatement or removal of asbestos-containing materials in the event of demolition or certain renovations or remodeling, the cost of which may be substantial for certain redevelopments, and also govern emissions of and exposure to asbestos fibers in the air. Federal and state laws also regulate the operation and removal of underground storage tanks. In connection with our ownership, operation, and management of certain properties, we could be held liable for the costs of remedial action with respect to these regulated substances or tanks or related claims.
Risk factors
As filed, 75,068 characters, with its headings, lists and tables. Extracted from the main document; charts and exhibits are in the original on sec.gov.
The risks and uncertainties described below are those that we deem currently to be material, and do not represent all of the risks that we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently do not consider material may in the future become material and impair our business operations. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business could be materially harmed, and our financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. Our business, prospects, financial condition, or results of operations could be materially and adversely affected by the following:
RISKS RELATED TO OUR INDUSTRY, MARKET, AND CUSTOMERS
Our performance and the market value of our securities are subject to risks associated with our investments in real estate assets and with trends in the real estate industry.
Our economic performance and the value of our real estate assets, and consequently the market value of the Company’s securities, are subject to the risk that our properties may not generate revenues sufficient to meet our operating expenses or other obligations. A deficiency of this nature would adversely impact our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, the quoted trading price of our securities, and our ability to satisfy our debt service obligations.
A downturn in the housing market or decline in general economic conditions could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and operations.
We believe that new home sales are an important indicator of future demand for our superpad sites, lots, and condominium units. Demand for new homes is sensitive to changes in economic conditions such as the level of employment, consumer confidence, consumer income, the availability of financing, and interest rate levels. The prior economic downturn severely affected both the number of homes that could be sold in our MPCs and the prices for which homebuilders could sell them. We cannot predict when another economic downturn in the housing market will occur. If there were another economic downturn in the housing market or in general economic conditions, the resulting decline in demand for new homes and condominium units would likely have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Our condominium sales are sensitive to interest rates and the ability of consumers to obtain mortgage financing.
The ability of the ultimate buyers of condominiums to finance their purchases is generally dependent on their personal savings and availability of third-party financing. Consequently, the demand for condominiums could be adversely affected by increases in interest rates, unavailability of mortgage financing, increasing housing costs, and unemployment levels. Levels of income and savings, including retirement savings, available to condominium purchasers can be affected by declines in the capital markets. Any significant increase in the mortgage interest rates or decrease in available credit could reduce consumer demand for housing, and result in fewer condominium sales, which may have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Purchasers may default on their obligations to purchase condominiums.
We enter into contracts for the sale of condominium units that generally provide for the payment of a substantial portion of the sales price at closing when a condominium unit is ready to be delivered and occupied. A significant amount of time may pass between the execution of a contract for the purchase of a condominium unit and the closing thereof. The rate of defaults may increase from historical levels due to the personal finances of purchasers being negatively impacted as a result of changing macroeconomic and other conditions, including slow growth or recession, interest rate volatility, trade policies, high unemployment, inflation, and/or tighter credit. Defaults by purchasers to pay any remaining portions of the sales prices for condominium units under contract may have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Downturn in tenants’ businesses may reduce our revenues and cash flows.
A tenant may experience a downturn in its business, due to a variety of factors including rising inflation or supply chain issues, which may weaken its financial condition and result in its failure to make timely rental payments or result in defaults under our leases. The rate of defaults may increase from historical levels due to tenants’ businesses being negatively impacted by interest rate volatility or trade policies. In the event of default by a tenant, we may experience delays in enforcing our rights as the landlord and may incur substantial costs in protecting our investment.
We may be negatively impacted by the consolidation or closing of anchor stores.
Many of our mixed-use properties are anchored by “big box” tenants. We could be adversely affected if these or other anchor stores were to consolidate, close, or enter into bankruptcy. Given the current economic environment for certain retailers, there is a heightened risk that an anchor store could close or enter into bankruptcy. Any losses resulting from the bankruptcy of any of our existing tenants could adversely impact our financial condition. Even if we own the anchor space, we may be unable to re-lease this area or to re-lease it on comparable terms. The loss of these revenues could adversely affect our results of operations and cash flows. Further, the temporary or permanent loss of any anchor would likely reduce customer traffic in the retail center, which could lead to decreased sales at other retail stores. Rents obtained from other tenants may be adversely impacted as a result of co-tenancy clauses in their leases. One or more of these factors could cause the retail center to fail to meet its debt service requirements. The consolidation of anchor stores may also negatively affect lease negotiations and current and future development projects.
We may be unable to renew leases or re-lease available space.
We cannot provide any assurance that existing leases will be renewed, available space will be re-leased, or that our rental rates will be equal to or above the current rental rates. If the average rental rates for our properties decrease, existing tenants do not renew their leases, or available space is not re-leased, our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, and our ability to satisfy our debt service obligations at the affected properties could be adversely affected.
Significant competition could have an adverse effect on our business.
The nature and extent of the competition we face depend on the type of property. With respect to our MPCs, we compete with other landholders and residential and commercial property developers in the development of properties in the respective MPC regions. Numerous residential and commercial developers, some with greater financial and other resources, compete with us in seeking resources for development and prospective purchasers and tenants. Competition from other real estate developers may adversely affect our ability to attract purchasers and sell residential and commercial real estate, sell undeveloped rural land, attract and retain experienced real estate development personnel, or obtain construction materials and labor. These competitive conditions can make it difficult to sell land at desirable prices and can adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
There are numerous shopping facilities that compete with our operating retail properties in attracting retailers to lease space. In addition, retailers at these properties face continued competition from other retailers, including internet retailers, retailers at other regional shopping centers, outlet malls and other discount shopping centers, discount shopping clubs, and catalog companies. Competition of this type could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. In addition, we compete with other major real estate investors with significant capital for attractive investment and development opportunities. These competitors include REITs and private institutional investors.
The concentration of our properties in certain states may make our revenues and the value of our assets vulnerable to adverse changes in local economic conditions.
Many of the properties we own are located in the same or in a limited number of geographic regions, including Arizona, Texas, Hawai‘i, Nevada, and Maryland. Our operations at the properties in these states are generally subject to significant fluctuations by various factors that are beyond our control such as the regional and local economy, which may be negatively impacted by material relocation by residents, industry slowdowns, plant closings, increased unemployment, lack of availability of consumer credit, levels of consumer debt, housing market conditions, adverse weather conditions, natural disasters, climate change and other factors, as well as the local real estate conditions, such as an oversupply of, or a reduction in demand for, retail space or retail goods and the availability and creditworthiness of current and prospective tenants.
In addition, some of our properties are subject to various other factors specific to those geographic areas. For example, tourism is a major component of both the local economies in Hawai‘i and Nevada. Ward Village, which is located in Honolulu, Hawai‘i, and Summerlin, which is located in Las Vegas, Nevada, may be impacted by the local and global tourism industry. These properties are susceptible to many factors that affect travel and tourism related to Hawai‘i and Las Vegas, including cost and availability of air services and the impact of any events that disrupt air travel to and from these regions. Moreover, these properties may be affected by risks such as acts of terrorism and natural disasters, including major fires, floods, and earthquakes, as well as severe or inclement weather, which could also decrease tourism activity in Las Vegas or Hawai‘i.
Further, Summerlin is to some degree dependent on the gaming industry, which could be adversely affected by changes in consumer trends and preferences and other factors over which we have no control. The gaming industry is characterized by an increasingly high degree of competition among a large number of participants, including riverboat casinos, dockside casinos, land-based casinos, video lottery, sweepstakes, and poker machines, many of which are located outside of Las Vegas. Furthermore, competition from internet lotteries, sweepstakes, and other internet-wagering gaming services, which allow their customers to wager on a wide variety of sporting events and play Las Vegas-style casino games from home or in non-casino settings, could negatively impact the population in the Las Vegas area.
Markets and the local economies surrounding our properties in Columbia, Maryland are heavily influenced by government spending and activity. A reduction of government spending in this market generally could decrease the demand for housing and retail space in this geographic region.
The Woodlands, The Woodlands Hills, and Bridgeland in the Houston, Texas region depend significantly on the energy sector. Our success depends to a large extent upon the business activity, population, income levels, employment trends, and real estate activity in and around Houston, Texas. In the event that oil prices fall and remain depressed for a sustained period, demand may decrease for housing and commercial space in The Woodlands, Bridgeland, and The Woodlands Hills.
Additionally, Summerlin and Teravalis may be negatively impacted by changes in temperature due to climate change, increased stress on water supplies caused by climate change and population growth and other factors over which we have no control.
If any or all of the factors discussed above were to occur and result in our inability to sell or lease our residential and commercial property in any of these geographic regions, it would likely have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Our business model includes entering into joint venture arrangements with strategic partners, and our strategic partners may have different interests than us.
We currently have, and intend to enter into, additional joint venture partnerships. These joint venture partners may bring local market knowledge and relationships, development experience, industry expertise, financial resources, financing capabilities, brand recognition, and credibility or other competitive advantages. In the future, we may not have sufficient resources, experience and/or skills to locate desirable partners. We also may not be able to attract partners who want to conduct business in the locations where our properties are located, and who have the assets, reputation, or other characteristics that would optimize our development opportunities.
While we generally participate in making decisions for our jointly owned properties and assets, we might not always have the same objectives as the partner in relation to a particular asset, and we might not be able to formally resolve any issues that arise. In addition, actions by a partner may subject property owned by the joint venture to liabilities greater than those contemplated by the joint venture agreements, be contrary to our instructions or requests or result in adverse consequences. We cannot control the ultimate outcome of any decision made by our partners, which may be detrimental to our interests.
The bankruptcy or, to a lesser extent, financial distress of any of our joint venture partners could materially and adversely affect the relevant property or properties. If this occurred, we would be precluded from taking some actions affecting the estate of the other investor without prior court approval which would, in most cases, entail prior notice to other parties and a hearing. At a minimum, the requirement to obtain court approval may delay the actions we would or might want to take. If the relevant joint venture through which we have invested in a property has incurred recourse obligations, the discharge in bankruptcy of one of the other partners might result in our ultimate liability for a greater portion of those obligations than would otherwise be required.
Because real estate is illiquid, we may not be able to sell properties when in our best interest.
Real estate investments generally, and in particular large office and mixed-use properties like those that we develop and construct, often cannot be sold quickly. The capitalization rates at which properties may be sold could be higher than historic rates, thereby reducing our potential proceeds from the sale. Consequently, we may not be able to alter our portfolio promptly in response to changes in economic or other conditions. All of these factors reduce our ability to respond to changes in the performance of our investments and could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Some of our properties are subject to potential natural or other disasters.
A number of our properties are located in areas that are subject to natural or other disasters, including hurricanes, floods, earthquakes, and oil spills. We cannot predict the extent of damage that may result from such adverse weather events, which depend on a variety of factors beyond our control. Some of our properties, including Houston-area MPCs and Ward
Village, are located in regions that could be affected by increases in sea levels, the frequency or severity of hurricanes and tropical storms, or environmental disasters, whether such events are caused by global climate changes or other factors. Additionally, adverse weather events can cause widespread property damage and significantly depress the local economies in which the Company operates and have an adverse impact on the Company’s business, financial condition, and operations.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS OPERATIONS, INFRASTRUCTURE, AND STRATEGIC MATTERS
Our MPC segment is highly dependent on homebuilders.
We are highly dependent on our relationships with homebuilders to purchase superpad sites and lots at our MPCs. Our business will be adversely affected if homebuilders do not view our MPCs as desirable locations for homebuilding operations or due to a change in demand, our inability to achieve certain pricing arrangements, or upon an overall decline in general market conditions. Also, some homebuilders may be unwilling or unable to close on previously committed lot purchases due to our failure to meet certain conditions in our agreements or otherwise. As a result, we may sell fewer lots and in certain instances suspend any of our MPC developments. This would result in lower land sales revenues, which could have an adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.
We are exposed to risks associated with the development, redevelopment, or construction of our properties.
Our development, redevelopment, and construction activities expose us to risks such as:
- inability to obtain construction financing for the development or redevelopment of properties
- increased construction costs for a project that exceed our original estimates due to increases in materials, labor, or other costs, which could make completion of the project less profitable because market rents or condominium prices may not increase sufficiently to compensate for the increased construction costs
- supply chain issues and increased difficulty in workforce recruitment which may lead to construction delays and increased project development costs
- claims for construction defects after a property has been developed
- poor performance or nonperformance by any of our joint venture partners or other third parties on whom we rely
- health and safety incidents and site accidents
- easement restrictions which may impact our development costs and timing
- compliance with building codes and other local regulations
- the inability to secure tenants necessary to support commercial projects
If any of the aforementioned risks were to occur during the development, redevelopment, or construction of our properties, it could have a substantial negative impact on the project’s success and result in a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
Our development projects may subject us to certain liabilities.
We may hire and supervise third-party contractors to provide construction, engineering, and various other services for wholly owned development projects or development projects undertaken by real estate ventures in which we hold an equity interest. Certain of these contracts are structured such that we are the principal rather than the agent. As a result, we may assume liabilities in the course of the project and be subjected to, or become liable for, claims for construction defects, negligent performance of work or other similar actions by third parties we have engaged.
Adverse outcomes of disputes or litigation could negatively impact our business, results of operations, and financial condition, particularly if we have not limited the extent of the damages to which we may be liable, or if our liabilities exceed the amounts of the insurance that we carry. Moreover, our tenants and condominium owners may seek to hold us accountable for the actions of contractors because of our role even if we have technically disclaimed liability as a legal matter, in which case we may determine it necessary to participate in a financial settlement for purposes of preserving the tenant or customer relationship or to protect our corporate brand. Acting as a principal may also mean that we pay a contractor before we have been reimbursed by our tenants or have received the entire purchase price of a condominium unit from the purchaser. This exposes us to additional risks of collection in the event of a bankruptcy, insolvency, or a purchaser default. The reverse can occur as well, where a contractor we have paid files for bankruptcy protection or commits fraud with the funds before completing a project which we have funded in part or in full.
Cybersecurity risks and incidents, such as a breach of the Company’s privacy or information security systems, or those of our vendors or other third parties, could compromise our information and expose us to liability, which would cause our business and reputation to suffer.
In the ordinary course of our business, we collect and store sensitive data, including intellectual property, our proprietary business information and that of our tenants and business partners and personally identifiable information of our employees on our networks. The collection and use of personally identifiable information are governed by federal and state laws and regulations. Privacy and information security laws continue to evolve and may be inconsistent from one jurisdiction to another. Compliance with all such laws and regulations may increase our operating costs and adversely impact our ability to market our properties and services.
Additionally, we rely on our information technology systems to be able to monitor and control our operations, adjust to changing market conditions and implement strategic initiatives. We own and manage some of these systems but also rely on third parties for a range of products and services. Any disruptions in or the failure of our own systems, or those managed by third parties, to operate as expected could adversely affect our ability to access and use certain applications and could, depending on the nature and magnitude of the problem, adversely affect our operating results by limiting our ability to effectively monitor and control our operations, adjust to changing market conditions, and implement strategic initiatives.
The security measures that we and our vendors put in place cannot provide absolute security, and the information technology infrastructure we and our vendors use may be vulnerable to criminal cyber-attacks or data security incidents.
Any such incident could compromise our networks or our vendors’ networks (or the networks or systems of third parties that facilitate our business activities or our vendors’ business activities), and the information we or our vendors store could be accessed, misused, publicly disclosed, corrupted, lost, or stolen, resulting in fraud, including wire fraud related to our assets, or other harm. Moreover, if a data security incident or breach affects our systems or our vendors’ systems, whether through a breach of our systems or a breach of the systems of third parties, or results in the unauthorized release of personally identifiable information, our reputation and brand could be materially damaged, and we may be exposed to a risk of loss or litigation and possible liability, including, without limitation, loss related to the fact that agreements with our vendors, or our vendors’ financial condition, may not allow us to recover all costs related to a cyber-breach for which they alone are responsible or for which we are jointly responsible, which could result in a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
Like many companies, we and our third party vendors have been impacted by security incidents in the past and will likely experience security incidents of varying degrees. While we do not believe these incidents have had a material impact to date, privacy and information security risks have generally increased in recent years because of the proliferation of new technologies, such as ransomware, and the increased sophistication and activities of perpetrators of cyber-attacks. The rapid evolution and increased adoption of artificial intelligence technologies may also intensify our privacy and information security risks. Further, there has been a surge in widespread cyber-attacks during and since the COVID-19 pandemic, and the use of remote work environments and virtual platforms may increase our risk of cyber-attack or data security breaches. In light of the increased risks, we have dedicated substantial additional resources of expense, labor, and time to strengthening the security of our computer systems. In the future, we may expend additional resources to continue to enhance our information security measures and/or to investigate and remediate any information security vulnerabilities. Despite these steps, there can be no assurance that we will not suffer a significant data security incident in the future, that unauthorized parties will not gain access to sensitive data stored on our systems, or that any such incident will be discovered in a timely manner. Any failure in or breach of our information security systems, those of third-party service providers, or a breach of other third-party systems that ultimately impacts our operational or information security systems as a result of cyber-attacks or information security breaches could result in potentially serious harm to our business and results of operations.
Global economic and political instability, geopolitical conflicts, and changes in U.S. trade policies, including tariffs, could adversely affect our business, financial condition, or results of operations.
Our business could be adversely affected by unstable economic and political conditions within the U.S. and foreign jurisdictions, geopolitical conflicts, and changes in trade policies. For example, the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine, conflicts in the Middle East, and uncertainty regarding future trade relations between the U.S. and key trading partners could disrupt global supply chains, increase material costs, and contribute to inflationary pressures. While we do not have direct customer or supplier relationships in these regions, sanctions, export controls, cyberattacks, and disruptions to energy markets could indirectly impact our supply chain and the cost of goods necessary for construction.
In particular, recent executive actions and trade policies implemented or proposed by the current U.S. administration, including the imposition or threat of significant tariffs on imported goods, including construction materials and other critical supplies, could increase our costs and reduce availability of necessary materials. These tariffs, as well as potential retaliatory measures by other countries, may further impact global trade flows, exacerbate inflation, and contribute to interest rate volatility or general economic uncertainty. Such factors could negatively impact our business partners, employees, and customers or otherwise adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Some of our directors are involved in other businesses including real estate activities and public and/or private investments and, therefore, may have competing or conflicting interests with us.
Certain of our directors have and may in the future have interests in other real estate business activities and may have control or influence over these activities or may serve as investment advisors, directors, or officers. These interests and activities, and any duties to third parties arising from such interests and activities, could divert the attention of such directors from our operations. Additionally, certain of our directors are engaged in investment and other activities in which they may learn of real estate and other related opportunities in their non-director capacities. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applicable to our directors expressly provides, as permitted by Section 122(17) of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the DGCL), that our non-employee directors are not obligated to limit their interests or activities in their non-director capacities or to notify us of any opportunities that may arise in connection therewith, even if the opportunities are complementary to, or in competition with, our businesses. Accordingly, we have no expectation that we will be able to learn of or participate in such opportunities. If any potential business opportunity is expressly presented to a director exclusively in his or her director capacity, the director will not be permitted to pursue the opportunity, directly or indirectly through a controlled affiliate in which the director has an ownership interest, without the approval of the independent members of our board of directors.
In 2024, we completed the spinoff of Seaport Entertainment Group Inc. into an independent publicly traded company, and we may not achieve some or all of the Spinoff’s expected benefits.
On July 31, 2024, we completed the spinoff of Seaport Entertainment Group Inc. (the Spinoff), as an independent, publicly traded company. In structuring and completing the Spinoff, we anticipated certain benefits that may not be achieved, may be delayed, or may be less advantageous than we anticipate for a variety of reasons. Following the Spinoff, we may be more susceptible to market fluctuations and other adverse events than prior to the Spinoff, and our business is less diversified than the combined businesses prior to the Spinoff.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR NEW HOLDING COMPANY STRATEGY AND OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH PERSHING SQUARE
Pershing Square has the ability to influence our policies and operations and its interests may not in all cases be aligned with other stockholders.
Pershing Square beneficially owns approximately 46.7% of our outstanding common stock as of February 12, 2026. Mr. William Ackman, the Chief Executive Officer of Pershing Square, is the Executive Chairman of our board of directors. Additionally, Mr. Ryan Israel, the Chief Investment Officer of Pershing Square, is our Chief Investment Officer and a member of our board of directors, and Mr. Ben Hakim, the President of Pershing Square, is a member of our board of directors.
On May 5, 2025, HHH entered into a Share Purchase Agreement (Purchase Agreement), by and between HHH and Pershing Square Holdco, L.P. (PS Holdco), pursuant to which HHH sold to PS Holdco 9,000,000 newly issued shares of the Company’s common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $900 million. In connection with the Purchase Agreement, we also entered into several other agreements with Pershing Square, including a Services Agreement and a Shareholder Agreement.
Pursuant to the terms of the Services Agreement, Pershing Square will support the Company’s new diversified holding company strategy by providing services to the Company, such as (i) investment advisory services, (ii) making recommendations with respect to hedging, balance sheet optimization, and capital allocation, (iii) executing transactions, (iv) assisting the Company with business and corporate development functions, (v) making voting recommendations for the Company’s investments, (vi) assisting with and advising on fundraising, (vii) monitoring operations of the Company and its investments, subject to the day-to-day authority and responsibility of management of the Company, (viii) providing recommendations for persons to serve as designees or deputies of the Chief Investment Officer, (ix) engaging and supervising third-party service providers, (x) making dividend payment recommendations, and (xi) providing other services as may be agreed upon. The Services Agreement has an initial ten-year term and will have successive renewal terms of ten years. The Company pays Pershing Square a quarterly base advisory fee of $3.75 million and a quarterly variable advisory fee equal to 0.375% of the excess value of the quarter-end stock price of the Company’s common stock minus the reference price of $66.15, multiplied by existing share count as of the transaction date, which will not increase with the issuance of new shares of common stock.
Among other things, the Shareholder Agreement provides that, at any meeting of stockholders where directors are to be elected, (a) so long as PS Holdco, Pershing Square and their respective affiliates, including investment funds managed by one or more affiliates (collectively, the Purchaser Group), beneficially own at least 17.5% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock on a fully diluted basis, PS Holdco may nominate for election a number of directors equal to 25% of the total number of members of the Board as constituted after giving effect to such election, rounded up (e.g., three directors in the case of an 11-member Board) (such director, a PS Board Designee), and (b) so long as the Purchaser Group beneficially owns less than 17.5% but at least 10% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock on a fully diluted basis, PS Holdco may nominate for election a number of PS Board Designees equal to 10% of the total number of members of the Board as constituted after giving effect to such election, rounded up (e.g., two directors in the case of an 11-member Board). If the Purchaser Group owns less than 10% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock on a fully diluted basis, PS Holdco no longer has the right to nominate any PS Board Designees. William A. Ackman, Ben Hakim, and Ryan Israel currently serve as the PS Board Designees.
Accordingly, Pershing Square has the ability to influence our policies and operations, including the appointment of management, business development and investment strategies, future issuances of our common stock or other securities, the payment of dividends, if any, on our common stock, the incurrence or modification of debt by us, amendments to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws and the entering into of extraordinary transactions, and its interests may not in all cases be aligned with other stockholders’ interests.
Our recent shift in business strategy, including the planned acquisition of Vantage, will create additional and different risks than those we face in our existing real estate business.
Since the announcement of our transaction with Pershing Square in May 2025, we have been executing on our strategy to become a diversified holding company, including by entering into the Purchase and Sale Agreement with Vantage on December 17, 2025, pursuant to which the Company will acquire Vantage for a purchase price of $2.1 billion (subject to certain adjustments). As part of this strategy, we expect to acquire controlling stakes in high-quality, durable growth public and private operating companies while continuing to invest in and grow our core real estate development and Master Planned Communities business. In embarking on this changed strategy, we are subject to risks such as being unable to identify and consummate transactions (including the Vantage Transaction) as part of the new strategy, as well as risks inherent in acquiring or making investments in operating companies, especially companies in industries unrelated to our existing real estate business. Sources of risk arising from these types of transactions include financial, accounting, tax, and regulatory challenges; difficulties with integration, business retention, execution of strategy, unforeseen liabilities or market conditions; and other managerial or operating risks and challenges. Any future transactions could also subject us to risks such as failure to obtain appropriate value, post-closing claims being levied against us, and disruption to our other businesses during the negotiation or execution process or thereafter. Risk-mitigating provisions that we put in place in the course of negotiating and executing these transactions, such as due diligence efforts and indemnification provisions, may not be sufficient to fully address these risks and contingencies.
We may be unable to realize the anticipated benefits of the transactions with Pershing Square, the Vantage Transaction, and/or our new strategy, which could adversely impact our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, the quoted trading price of our securities, and our ability to satisfy our debt service obligations.
FINANCIAL RISKS
Our indebtedness and changing interest rates could adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition, or results of operations and prevent us from fulfilling our obligations under our senior unsecured notes and loan agreements.
As of December 31, 2025, our total consolidated debt was approximately $5.1 billion of which $2.1 billion was recourse to the Company or one of its subsidiaries. In addition, as of December 31, 2025, we had $6.6 million of recourse guarantees associated with undrawn financing commitments. As of December 31, 2025, our proportionate share of the debt of our unconsolidated ventures was $215.5 million based upon our economic interest. All of this indebtedness is without recourse to the Company, with the exception of the collateral maintenance obligation for Floreo.
Subject to the limits contained in the indentures governing the $600 million Bridgeland Notes due 2029, the $750 million 5.375% senior unsecured notes due 2028, the $650 million 4.125% senior unsecured notes due 2029, and the $650 million 4.375% senior unsecured notes due 2031 (collectively, the senior unsecured notes), and any limits under our other debt agreements, we may need to incur substantial additional indebtedness from time to time, including project indebtedness for developments by our subsidiaries. If we incur additional indebtedness or experience an adverse change in interest rates, the risks related to our level of indebtedness could intensify. Specifically, an increased level of indebtedness could have important consequences, including:
- making it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with respect to our indebtedness, including the senior unsecured notes and loan agreements
- limiting our ability to obtain additional financing to fund future working capital, capital expenditures, debt service requirements, execution of our business strategy, or finance other general corporate requirements
- requiring us to make non-strategic divestitures, particularly when the availability of financing in the capital markets is limited, which may adversely impact sales prices
- requiring a substantial portion of our cash flow to be allocated to debt service payments instead of other business purposes, thereby reducing the amount of cash flow available for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, dividends, and other general corporate purposes
- increasing our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions, including increases in interest rates, particularly given that certain indebtedness bears interest at variable rates
- limiting our ability to capitalize on business opportunities, reinvest in and develop properties, and to react to competitive pressures and adverse changes in government regulations
- placing us at a disadvantage compared to other less leveraged competitors, if any
- limiting our ability, or increasing the costs, to refinance indebtedness
- resulting in an event of default if we fail to satisfy our obligations under our indebtedness, which default could result in all or part of our indebtedness becoming immediately due and payable and, in the case of our secured debt, could permit the lenders to foreclose on our assets securing such debt
The indentures governing our senior unsecured notes, the loan agreements, and our other debt agreements contain restrictions that may limit our ability to operate our business.
The indentures governing our senior unsecured notes contain certain restrictions that may limit our ability to operate. In addition, the loan agreements contain representations and covenants customary for loan agreements of this type, including financial covenants related to maintenance of interest coverage ratios and loan-to-value ratios with respect to the certain mortgaged properties, taken as a whole. The loan agreements also contain customary events of default, certain of which are subject to cure periods. These restrictions limit our ability or the ability of certain of our subsidiaries to, among other things:
- incur indebtedness or issue equity
- create certain liens
- pay dividends on, redeem, or repurchase capital stock or make other restricted payments
- make investments
- incur obligations that restrict the ability of our subsidiaries to make dividend or other payments to us
- consolidate, merge, or transfer all, or substantially all, of our assets
- enter into or amend lease or other agreements or transactions without consent
- substitute collateral, if applicable, due to product and geographic concentrations
- enter into transactions with our affiliates
- create or designate unrestricted subsidiaries
Additionally, certain of our debt agreements also contain various restrictive covenants, including minimum net worth requirements, maximum payout ratios on distributions, minimum debt yield ratios, minimum fixed charge coverage ratios, minimum interest coverage ratios and maximum leverage ratios. The restrictions under the indentures and/or other debt agreements could limit our ability to finance our future operations or capital needs, make acquisitions, or pursue available business opportunities.
We may be required to take action to reduce our debt or act in a manner inconsistent with our business objectives and strategies to meet such ratios and satisfy the covenants in our debt agreements. Events beyond our control, such as changes in economic and business conditions, may affect our ability to do so. We may not be able to meet the ratios or satisfy the covenants in our debt agreements, and we cannot provide any assurance that our lenders will waive any failure to do so. A breach of any of the covenants in, or our inability to maintain the required financial ratios, under our debt agreements would likely result in a default under such debt agreements, which may accelerate the principal and interest payments of the debt and, if such debt is secured, result in the foreclosure on certain of our assets that secure such debt. A breach of any of the covenants in, or our inability to maintain the required financial ratios, under our debt agreements also would prevent us from borrowing additional money under such agreements that include revolving credit facilities. A default under any of our debt agreements could, in turn, result in defaults under other obligations and result in other creditors accelerating the payment of other obligations and foreclosing on assets securing such obligations, if any. Any such defaults could materially impair our financial condition and liquidity. In addition, if the lenders under any of our debt agreements or other obligations accelerate the maturity of those obligations, we cannot assure that we will have sufficient assets to satisfy our obligations under the notes or our other debt.
We may be unable to develop and expand our properties without sufficient capital or financing.
Our business objective includes the development and redevelopment of our properties, particularly those in our Strategic Developments segment, which we may be unable to do if we do not have, cannot obtain, or cannot generate sufficient capital from MPC land sales or operations, debt capital from lenders or the capital markets, or government incentives, such as tax increment financing, to proceed with planned development, redevelopment, or expansion activities. We may be unable to access or acquire financing due to the market volatility and uncertainty. We may be unable to obtain an anchor store, mortgage lender and property partner approvals that are required for any such development, redevelopment, or expansion. We may abandon redevelopment or expansion activities already underway that we are unable to complete due to the inability to secure additional capital to finance such activities. This may result in charge-offs of costs previously capitalized. In addition, if redevelopment, expansion, or reinvestment projects are unsuccessful, the investment in such projects may not be recoverable, in full or in part, from future operations or sale resulting in impairment charges.
Adverse changes in our credit ratings could increase our financing costs and limit market access.
We and certain of our subsidiaries may be evaluated by one or more nationally recognized credit rating agencies. Ratings reflect each agency’s assessment of factors such as liquidity, leverage, capital structure, cash flow stability, asset quality, business profile, corporate governance, and market conditions, and they can be downgraded, placed on negative watch, revised in outlook, or withdrawn at any time. A downgrade or other adverse action, or the announcement of a review, could increase interest rates and fees on new or existing debt; narrow the pool of investors willing or permitted to invest in our securities; require additional collateral, tighter covenants, shorter maturities, or other unfavorable terms; and reduce the trading price and liquidity of our securities. These outcomes could raise our overall cost of capital, constrain access to bank and capital markets, reduce financial flexibility, and impair execution of our strategy and our ability to meet obligations, any of which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.
We may be unable to refinance our indebtedness on favorable terms, or at all.
We have a substantial amount of indebtedness, a significant portion of which will mature in the coming years. Our strategy assumes continued access to the debt capital markets and other financing sources to refinance existing indebtedness, including property‑level mortgage loans, construction and development facilities, and unsecured or recourse borrowings, often before maturity. Our ability to refinance our indebtedness on favorable terms, or at all, depends on factors beyond our control, including conditions in the credit and capital markets (such as interest rates, spreads, and lender appetite for real estate and construction lending); our leverage, liquidity, interest coverage and credit ratings; the performance and values of properties securing our debt and our broader portfolio; changes in banking and other financial regulations; and broader macroeconomic, geopolitical, and industry developments.
If we cannot refinance maturing indebtedness on acceptable terms, we may be forced to seek alternative financing on less favorable terms, use more of our available liquidity, sell assets, on disadvantageous terms or at unfavorable times in the market, delay or cancel development, redevelopment, or other capital projects, or issue equity or equity‑linked securities that could be dilutive to existing stockholders. Even if refinancing is available, it may be at higher interest rates or subject to more restrictive covenants, which could increase our interest expense, reduce our financial flexibility, and constrain our ability to invest in our existing properties and development pipeline or pursue new investment opportunities. Failure to refinance, repay, or otherwise address maturing indebtedness could lead to defaults, acceleration, foreclosure on collateral, and potential cross defaults or cross accelerations, any of which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, and ability to service our debt.
The Company is dependent on the operations and funds of its subsidiaries, including The Howard Hughes Corporation.
The Company has no business operations of its own, and the Company’s only significant assets are the outstanding equity interests of its subsidiaries, including The Howard Hughes Corporation. As a result, the Company relies on cash flows from its subsidiaries, including HHC, to meet its financial obligations, including to service any debt obligations that the Company may incur from time to time in the future. Legal and contractual restrictions in agreements governing future indebtedness of any of the Company’s subsidiaries, as well as the financial condition and future operating requirements of any such subsidiaries, in each case, including HHC, may limit such subsidiaries’ ability to distribute cash to the Company. If HHC or any of the Company’s other subsidiaries is limited in its ability to distribute cash to the Company, or if the earnings or other available assets of the Company’s subsidiaries are not sufficient to pay distributions or make loans to the Company in the amounts or at the times necessary for the Company to meet its financial obligations, then the Company’s business, financial condition, cash flows, results of operations, and reputation may be materially adversely affected.
We are subject to risks associated with hedging arrangements.
We enter into interest rate swap agreements and other interest rate hedging contracts, including caps and cash settled forward starting swaps, to mitigate or reduce our exposure to interest rate volatility, or to satisfy lender requirements. These agreements expose us to additional risks, including a risk that counterparties of these hedging and swap agreements will not perform. There also could be significant costs and cash requirements involved to fulfill our obligations under a hedging agreement. In addition, our hedging activities may not have the desired beneficial impact on interest rate exposure and have a negative impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
We may not realize the value of our tax assets.
Certain provisions of the Internal Revenue Code could limit our ability to fully utilize certain tax assets if we were to experience a change in control. As of December 31, 2025, we had approximately $708.6 million of federal net operating loss carryforwards. If certain change in control events were to occur, the cash flow benefits we might otherwise have received could be decreased.
Inflation has adversely affected us in recent years, and could continue to adversely affect us in future periods, by increasing costs beyond what we can recover through price increases.
In recent years, the U.S. economy has experienced relatively high levels of inflation. Inflation can adversely affect us by increasing costs of land, materials, and labor, which we have experienced in recent years due to higher inflation rates. Although we believe that sources of supply for raw materials and components are generally adequate, it is difficult to predict what effects price increases may have in the future. In addition, significant inflation is often accompanied by higher interest rates, which have a negative impact on demand for homes in our MPCs and demand for our condominium projects, and our ability to refinance existing indebtedness on favorable terms, or at all, due to higher borrowing costs. In an inflationary environment, depending on the homebuilding industry and other economic conditions, we may be precluded from raising land prices enough to keep up with the rate of inflation, which could significantly reduce our profit margins. In recent years we have been experiencing increases in the prices of labor and materials above the general inflation rate. Our inability to offset increasing costs due to inflation through price increases to customers could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial conditions, and cash flows.
Some potential losses are not insured.
We carry comprehensive liability, fire, flood, earthquake, terrorism, extended coverage, and rental loss insurance on all of our properties. We believe the policy specifications and insured limits of these policies are adequate and appropriate. There are some types of losses, including lease and other contract claims, which generally are not insured. If an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of insured limits occurs, we could lose all or a portion of the capital invested in a property, as well as the anticipated future revenue from the property. If this happens, we might remain obligated for any mortgage debt or other financial obligations related to the property.
REGULATORY, LEGAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS
Our development, construction, and sale of condominiums are subject to state regulations and may be subject to claims from the condominium owner’s association at each project.
A portion of our business is dedicated to the development and sale of condominiums. Condominiums are generally regulated by an agency of the state in which they are located or where the condominiums are marketed to be sold. In connection with our development and offering of condominium units for sale, we must submit regulatory filings to various state agencies and engage in an entitlement process by which real property owned under one title is converted into individual units. Responses or comments on our condominium filings may delay our ability to sell condominiums in certain states and other jurisdictions in a timely manner, or at all. Further, we will be required to transfer control of a condominium association’s board of directors once we trigger one of several statutory thresholds, with the most likely triggers being tied to the sale of not less than a majority of units to third-party owners. Transfer of control can result in claims with respect to deficiencies in operating funds and reserves, construction defects, and other condominium-related matters by the condominium association and/or third-party condominium unit owners. Any material claims in these areas could negatively affect our reputation in condominium development and ultimately have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Development of properties entails a lengthy, uncertain and costly entitlement process.
Approval to develop real property sometimes requires political support and generally entails an extensive entitlement process involving multiple and overlapping regulatory jurisdictions and often requires discretionary action by local governments. Real estate projects must generally comply with local land development regulations and may need to comply with state and federal regulations. We incur substantial costs to comply with legal and regulatory requirements. An increase in legal and regulatory requirements may cause us to incur substantial additional costs, or in some cases cause us to determine that the property is not feasible for development. In addition, our competitors and local residents may challenge our efforts to obtain entitlements and permits for the development of properties. The process to comply with these regulations is usually lengthy and costly, may not result in the approvals we seek and can be expected to materially affect our development activities.
Government regulations and legal challenges may delay the start or completion of the development of our communities, increase our expenses, or limit our homebuilding or other activities.
Various local, state, and federal statutes, ordinances, rules, and regulations concerning building, health and safety, site and building design, environment, zoning, sales, and similar matters apply to and/or affect the real estate development industry. In addition, our ability to obtain or renew permits or approvals and the continued effectiveness of permits already granted or approvals already obtained depends on factors beyond our control, such as changes in federal, state, and local policies, rules, and regulations, and their interpretations and application.
Municipalities may restrict or place moratoria on the availability of utilities, such as water and sewer taps. If municipalities in which we operate take such actions, they could have an adverse effect on our business by causing delays, increasing our costs, or limiting our ability to operate in those municipalities. These measures may reduce our ability to open new MPCs and to build and sell other real estate development projects in the affected markets, including with respect to land we may already own, and create additional costs and administrative requirements, which in turn may harm our future sales, margins, and earnings.
Governmental regulation affects not only construction activities but also sales activities, mortgage lending activities, and other dealings with consumers. Further, government agencies routinely initiate audits, reviews, or investigations of our business practices to ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations, which can cause us to incur costs or create other disruptions in our business that can be significant. Further, we may experience delays and increased expenses as a result of legal challenges to our proposed communities, whether brought by governmental authorities or private parties.
We may be subject to increased compliance costs to comply with new and contemplated government regulations relating to energy standards and climate change.
A variety of legislation is being enacted, or considered for enactment, at the federal, state, and local levels relating to energy and climate change. This legislation relates to items such as carbon dioxide emissions control and building codes that impose energy efficiency standards. New building code requirements that impose stricter energy efficiency standards could significantly increase our cost to construct buildings. Such environmental laws may affect, for example, how we manage storm water runoff, wastewater discharges, and dust; how we develop or operate on properties on or affecting resources such as wetlands, endangered species, cultural resources, or areas subject to preservation laws; and how we address contamination. As climate change concerns continue to grow, legislation and regulations of this nature are expected to continue and to make compliance more costly. In addition, it is possible that some form of expanded energy efficiency legislation may be passed by the U.S. Congress or federal agencies and certain state legislatures, which may, despite being phased in over time, significantly increase our costs of building MPCs and the sale price to our buyers and adversely affect our sales volumes. We may be required to apply for additional approvals or modify our existing approvals because of changes in local circumstances or applicable law.
Energy-related initiatives affect a wide variety of companies throughout the U.S. and the world. Because our operations are heavily dependent on significant amounts of raw materials, such as lumber, steel, and concrete, energy-related initiatives could have an indirect adverse impact on our operations and profitability to the extent the manufacturers and suppliers of our materials are burdened with expensive cap and trade and similar energy-related taxes and regulations. Noncompliance with environmental laws could result in fines and penalties, obligations to remediate, permit revocations, and other sanctions.
We may be subject to potential costs to comply with environmental laws.
Future development opportunities may require additional capital and other expenditures to comply with laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment. Under various federal, state, or local laws, ordinances, and regulations, a current or previous owner or operator of real estate may be required to investigate and clean up hazardous or toxic substances released at a property and may be held liable to a governmental entity or to third parties for property damage or personal injuries and for investigation and clean-up costs incurred by the parties in connection with the contamination. These laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the release of the hazardous or toxic substances. The presence of contamination or the failure to remediate contamination may adversely affect the owner’s ability to sell or lease real estate or to borrow using the real estate as collateral. Other federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, and regulations require abatement or removal of asbestos-containing materials in the event of demolition or certain renovations or remodeling, the cost of which may be substantial for certain redevelopments, and also govern emissions of and exposure to asbestos fibers in the air. Federal and state laws also regulate the operation and removal of underground storage tanks. In connection with our ownership, operation, and management of certain properties, we could be held liable for the costs of remedial action with respect to these regulated substances or tanks or related claims.
We cannot predict with any certainty the magnitude of any expenditures relating to environmental compliance or the long-range effect, if any, on our operations. Compliance with such laws has not had a material adverse effect on our operating results or competitive position in the past but could have such an effect on our operating results and competitive position in the future.
Compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act may be a significant cost for us.
The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as amended (ADA), requires that all public accommodations and commercial facilities, including office buildings, meet certain federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. Other federal, state, and local laws may require modifications to or restrict further renovations of our properties with respect to such accesses. Noncompliance with the ADA or similar or related laws or regulations could result in the U.S. government imposing fines or private litigants being awarded damages against us. Such costs may adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Catastrophic events, including climate change, may adversely affect our business.
As a result of climate change, we may experience extreme weather and changes in precipitation and temperature, all of which may result in physical damage or a decrease in demand for our properties located in the areas affected by these conditions. Should the impact of climate change be material in nature or occur for lengthy periods of time, our financial condition or results of operations would be adversely affected. In addition, many state and local governments are adopting or considering adopting regulations requiring that property owners and developers include in their development or redevelopment plans resiliency measures to address climate-change related risks. We may be required to incur substantial costs if such regulations apply to any of our properties. Additionally, COVID-19 disrupted our business and a resurgence of it, or another pandemic, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial performance and condition, operating results, and cash flows.
Water and electricity shortages could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Drought conditions and increased temperatures in the Phoenix, Arizona and Las Vegas, Nevada, regions could cause our master planned communities in these regions to experience water and electricity shortages. The lack or reduced availability of electricity or water in these regions may make it more difficult or expensive for us to obtain approvals for new developments and could limit, impair or delay our ability to develop or sell, or increase the cost of developing, our land in these master planned communities.
Tax increases and changes in tax rules may adversely affect our financial results.
As a company conducting business with physical operations throughout North America, we are exposed, both directly and indirectly, to the effects of changes in U.S., state, and local tax rules. Taxes for financial reporting purposes and cash tax liabilities in the future may be adversely affected by changes in such tax rules.
GENERAL RISKS
Loss of key personnel could adversely affect our business and operations.
We depend on the efforts of key executive personnel. The loss of the services of any key executive personnel could adversely affect our business and operations. While we believe we have proper succession planning and are confident we could attract and train new personnel if necessary, this could impose additional costs and hinder our business strategy.
Possible terrorist activity or other acts of violence could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Future terrorist attacks in the U.S. or other acts of violence may result in declining economic activity, which could harm the demand for goods and services offered by tenants and the value of our properties and might adversely affect the value of an investment in our securities. Such a resulting decrease in retail demand could make it difficult to renew or re-lease properties at lease rates equal to or above historical rates. Terrorist activities or violence also could directly affect the value of our properties through damage, destruction or loss, and the availability of insurance for such acts, or of insurance generally, might be lower or cost more, which could increase our operating expenses and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. To the extent that tenants are affected by future attacks, their businesses similarly could be adversely affected, including their ability to continue to meet obligations under their existing leases. Any one of these events might decrease demand for real estate, decrease or delay the occupancy of new or redeveloped properties, and limit access to capital or increase the cost of capital.
Our stock price may be volatile.
The trading price of our common stock may be volatile due to the stock market’s routine periods of large or extreme volatility. This volatility often has been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of particular companies, including ours. Factors that could affect our trading price include the following:
- results of operations that vary from the expectations of securities analysts and investors, including our ability to consummate and achieve the anticipated benefits of the Vantage Transaction
- changes in expectations as to our future financial performance, including financial estimates and investment recommendations by securities analysts and investors
- announcements by us or our competitors of new significant real-estate developments, acquisitions, joint ventures, other strategic relationships or actions, capital commitments, or responses to these events
- changes in general economic or market conditions, including increases in interest rates, or trends in our industry or markets
- future sales of our common stock or other securities
- guidance, if any, that we provide to the public, any changes in this guidance, or our failure to meet this guidance
- the sustainability of an active trading market for our stock
- changes in accounting principles
- events or factors resulting from natural disasters, war, acts of terrorism, or responses to these events
These broad market and industry fluctuations may adversely affect the market price of our common stock, regardless of our actual operating performance. In addition, price volatility may be greater if the public float and trading volume of our common stock is low. In the past, following periods of market volatility, stockholders have instituted securities class action litigation. If we were involved in securities litigation, it could have a substantial cost and divert resources and the attention of executive management from our business regardless of the outcome of such litigation.
We are exposed to risks related to the adoption and use of artificial intelligence (AI).
We are subject to various risks associated with the adoption and utilization of AI technologies by both our company and our competitors. The inherent complexity and rapid evolution of AI technology may hinder our ability to effectively implement these capabilities, potentially leading to significant costs without corresponding benefits to our business or customer value. Our AI implementations may result in errors or unintended outcomes due to algorithmic flaws, inadequate training data, or inherent biases, which could expose us to liability and reputational damage. Additionally, we face competitive risks if our adoption of AI or other machine learning technologies is not done timely or as effectively as that of our competitors. AI technology also presents unique challenges related to data privacy, cybersecurity, and ethical considerations, which could impact our business operations. The regulatory landscape is continuously evolving, with new laws and regulations being proposed or enacted by various jurisdictions. Compliance with these diverse requirements could increase our operational costs, and any actual or perceived regulatory violations could subject us to enforcement actions, penalties, and reputational harm. The combined effect of these interrelated risks could materially and adversely affect our business operations, financial condition, and competitive position.
The technologies or models we rely upon may undergo major updates or shifts while our AI features are already live in the market. Such updates could force us to retrain or redeploy our own AI systems at inopportune times, increasing our costs and delaying upgrades or product releases. Furthermore, the vendor might unexpectedly discontinue certain features or stop supporting the version on which our platform depends. Any such mid-deployment disruption could result in downtime, diminished accuracy or usability, and ultimately damage our brand reputation and customer experience.
The Company may not obtain the anticipated benefits of the holding company structure.
If circumstances prevent the Company from taking advantage of the strategic and business opportunities that it expects to realize from the holding company structure, the Company would nevertheless bear the costs incurred in connection with the holding company structure, which could adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition, cash flows, and results of operations.
Anti-takeover provisions in our certificate of incorporation, our by-laws, Delaware law, Shareholder Agreement, Standstill Agreement, and certain other agreements may prevent or delay an acquisition of us, which could decrease the trading price of our common stock.
Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws contain the following limitations:
- the inability of our stockholders to act by written consent
- restrictions on the ability of stockholders to call a special meeting without 15% or more of the voting power of the issued and outstanding shares entitled to vote generally in the election of our directors
- rules regarding stockholder proposals and director nominations
- the right of our board of directors to issue preferred stock without stockholder approval
- a requirement that, to the fullest extent permitted by law, certain proceedings against or involving us or our directors or officers be brought exclusively in the Court of Chancery in the State of Delaware
- that certain provisions may be amended only by the affirmative vote of at least 66 2/3% of the shares of common stock entitled to vote generally in the election of directors
In addition, we are a Delaware corporation, and Section 203 of the DGCL applies to us. In general, Section 203 prevents an interested stockholder from engaging in certain business combinations with us for three years following the date that person becomes an interested stockholder subject to certain exceptions. The statute generally defines an interested stockholder as any person that is the owner of 15% or more of the outstanding voting stock or is our affiliate or associate and was the owner of 15% or more of outstanding voting stock at any time within the three-year period immediately before the date of determination.
In connection with the Pershing Square Issuance, we granted a waiver of the applicability of the provisions of Section 203 of the DGCL to Pershing Square Capital Management, L.P., PS Management GP, LLC and William A. Ackman (together, Pershing Square) with respect to Pershing Square’s purchase of our common stock in connection therewith. Also, in connection with the Pershing Square Issuance, we also entered into the Standstill Agreement.
Pursuant to the Standstill Agreement, (i) Pershing Square agreed not to acquire beneficial ownership of more than 47.0% of our common stock and (ii) for all matters being voted on at a stockholder meeting or in a consent solicitation that the Board recommends that stockholders approve, the voting power of the shares held by PS Holdco, Pershing Square and their respective affiliates will be limited to 40% of the total voting power of our outstanding common stock (the voting cap), with the excess of any shares held by them over the voting cap (the excess shares) to be voted in proportion to the votes cast by unaffiliated stockholders. The voting cap applies across all matters, except with respect to voting to elect PS Board Designees, for which no voting cap applies. For all matters being voted on at a stockholder meeting or in a consent solicitation that the Board has recommended that stockholders not approve, PS Holdco, Pershing Square and their respective affiliates may vote all of their shares “against” such matter, or it may vote their shares up to the voting cap “for” such matter, with the excess shares to be voted them in proportion to the votes cast by unaffiliated stockholders.
As such, Pershing Square, a large holder that is able to affect matters requiring approval by Company stockholders, including the election of directors and approval of mergers or other business combination transactions. The Board’s Corporate Governance Guidelines also reflect that it will grant to any stockholder a waiver of the applicability of Section 203 of the DGCL to the acquisition of up to 40% of the Company’s outstanding voting stock upon the request of such stockholder, subject to the Board’s fiduciary duties and applicable law.
These anti-takeover provisions could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us, even if the third-party’s offer may be considered beneficial by many of our stockholders. As a result, our stockholders may be limited in their ability to obtain a premium for their shares. These provisions could limit the price that investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock.
Cybersecurity
As filed, 4,643 characters, with its headings, lists and tables. Extracted from the main document; charts and exhibits are in the original on sec.gov.
Risk Management and Strategy The HHH cybersecurity program is an enterprise-wide, risk-based program that is designed to support the security, confidentiality, integrity, and availability of our systems and information. We conduct periodic assessments of the cybersecurity program to identify and manage material cybersecurity threats and risks using internal teams and independent third parties. The assessment results are used to develop appropriate cybersecurity controls best practices and risk mitigation strategies, which are then implemented throughout the Company.
We rely on our systems and networks to support our business activities. As some networks and systems are managed by third parties, the HHH cybersecurity program also includes evaluation and monitoring of cybersecurity risks associated with its use of third-party service providers. We also leverage third-party experts and vendors to help manage our cybersecurity program, audit the effectiveness of our existing cybersecurity controls, and make recommendations for improvements and best practices. We utilize a Managed Detection and Response service that provides threat intelligence, technology, and specialist expertise to protect our systems and networks from cyber threats. We require all third parties with access to our information systems or data to maintain industry standard cybersecurity programs and to report actual or suspected security incidents to us.
We employ a range of tools and strategies to mitigate cybersecurity risks and regularly test them for effectiveness. Additionally, we continuously assess and improve our cybersecurity stance by conducting vulnerability scans, internal and external network penetration tests, and by integrating threat intelligence updates. We also have specific tools to provide real time, continuous monitoring and protection of our endpoints. To the extent that our proactive monitoring and testing identifies weakness in our cybersecurity readiness, these weaknesses are tracked and remediated as part of our cybersecurity program. Our employees receive security awareness training at a minimum on an annual basis and are subjected to phishing training and phishing tests throughout the year. Annually, we perform tabletop exercises to test our cybersecurity incident response plan. Our cybersecurity program is aligned with industry standards and best practices such as the National Institute of Standards and Technology Cybersecurity Framework.
As of the date of this report, we are not aware of any material risks from cybersecurity threats that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Company, including our business strategy, results of operations, or financial condition. However, along with all companies of comparable size, we face common cybersecurity threats. These threats include ransomware and denial-of-service, including sophisticated attacks from criminal ransomware groups and nation state actors. Our customers, supply-chain providers, and subcontractors face similar cybersecurity threats, and an incident impacting us or any of these entities could materially adversely affect our business operations.
Governance Management is responsible for measuring and managing cybersecurity risk, specifically the prevention, mitigation, detection, and remediation of cybersecurity incidents as well as the Company’s overall information security strategy, policy, and operations. The cybersecurity program is executed by the Company’s Senior Vice President of IT Governance, Risk, and Compliance, who has over 15 years of cybersecurity experience in overseeing and managing cybersecurity risk. He is also responsible for maintaining and, in the event of an actual or suspected security incident, executing the Company’s incident response plan.
The Board of Directors’ Audit Committee governs and oversees HHH’s cybersecurity program. This includes reviewing the cybersecurity program’s strategy and effectiveness, the cybersecurity landscape and emerging threats, and reports from any cybersecurity events. The Audit Committee also oversees cybersecurity and digital strategy and other innovation-related matters that relate to or affect the Company’s internal control systems. Management provides updates to the Audit Committee on a quarterly basis. When appropriate, the Audit Committee will inform the Board of Directors on important matters. Furthermore, the Board of Directors would be notified in accordance with the Company’s incident response plan, of any suspected cyber incidents that may have at least a moderate business impact on the Company.
Properties
As filed, 19,404 characters, with its headings, lists and tables. Extracted from the main document; charts and exhibits are in the original on sec.gov.
Our corporate headquarters is located in The Woodlands, Texas. We also maintain offices at certain of our properties nationwide, including Honolulu, Hawai‘i; Columbia, Maryland; Las Vegas, Nevada; and Scottsdale, Arizona. We believe our present facilities are sufficient to support our operations.
OPERATING ASSETS
In our Operating Assets segment, we own a variety of asset types including approximately 9.3 million square feet of retail and office properties, 5,855 wholly and partially owned multifamily units, and wholly and partially owned other properties and investments. Our assets in this segment are primarily located in and around Houston, Texas (The Woodlands and Bridgeland); Columbia, Maryland (Columbia); Las Vegas, Nevada (Summerlin); and Honolulu, Hawai‘i (Ward Village).
The following table summarizes certain metrics of our office assets within our Operating Assets segment as of December 31, 2025:
| Office Assets The Woodlands | Rentable Square Feet | % Leased | Annualized Base Rent (thousands) (a) | Annualized Base Rent Per Square Foot (a) | Effective Annual Rent (thousands) (b) | Effective Annual Rent per Square Foot (b) | Year Built / Acquired / Redeveloped | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| One Hughes Landing | 201,268 | 78% | $2,524 | $16.99 | $3,681 | $24.78 | 2013 | |
| Two Hughes Landing | 200,255 | 61% | 2,799 | 23.36 | 4,324 | 36.09 | 2014 | |
| Three Hughes Landing | 325,810 | 98% | 9,049 | 28.48 | 13,626 | 42.88 | 2016 | |
| 1725 Hughes Landing Boulevard | 340,611 | 69% | 3,430 | 16.40 | 4,885 | 23.35 | 2015 | |
| 1735 Hughes Landing Boulevard | 319,456 | 95% | 8,071 | 26.71 | 11,996 | 39.70 | 2015 | |
| 2201 Lake Woodlands Drive | (c) | 22,259 | —% | — | — | — | — | 2011 |
| Lakefront North | 258,058 | 100% | 7,425 | 28.77 | 11,881 | 46.04 | 2018 | |
| 8770 New Trails | (c) | 180,000 | 100% | — | — | — | — | 2020 |
| 9303 New Trails | 98,283 | 51% | 1,102 | 21.98 | 1,767 | 35.25 | 2011 | |
| 3831 Technology Forest Drive | 106,104 | 93% | 1,960 | 19.94 | 3,092 | 31.46 | 2014 | |
| The Woodlands Towers at The Waterway | 1,395,599 | 100% | 45,024 | 32.43 | 69,213 | 49.85 | 2019 | |
| 3 Waterway Square | 227,617 | 91% | 3,200 | 15.51 | 4,872 | 23.62 | 2013 | |
| 4 Waterway Square | 217,952 | 90% | 804 | 4.73 | 1,242 | 7.32 | 2011 | |
| 6 Waterway | (d) | 141,763 | 82% | 1,887 | 23.29 | 2,757 | 34.01 | 2024 |
| 1400 Woodloch Forest | 94,931 | 85% | 2,636 | 32.85 | 2,846 | 35.48 | 2011 | |
| 4,129,966 | ||||||||
| Bridgeland | ||||||||
| One Bridgeland Green | 49,502 | 80% | 568,544 | 43.27 | 824,774 | 62.77 | 2025 | |
| 49,502 | ||||||||
| Columbia | ||||||||
| Columbia Office Properties | 67,066 | 72% | 1,302 | 27.05 | 1,517 | 31.51 | 2004 / 2007 | |
| 10285 Lakefront Medical Office | 85,380 | 50% | 1,063 | 24.77 | 1,469 | 34.21 | 2024 | |
| One Mall North | 99,806 | 37% | 1,190 | 31.81 | 1,329 | 35.52 | 2016 | |
| One Merriweather | 209,950 | 94% | 8,151 | 41.18 | 8,656 | 43.73 | 2017 | |
| Two Merriweather | 124,639 | 96% | 4,496 | 42.54 | 4,649 | 43.98 | 2017 | |
| 6100 Merriweather | 326,237 | 98% | 11,809 | 40.56 | 12,176 | 41.82 | 2019 | |
| Merriweather Row | 925,584 | 74% | 18,890 | 28.81 | 19,670 | 30.00 | 2012 / 2014 | |
| 1,838,662 | ||||||||
| Summerlin | ||||||||
| Aristocrat | (c) | 181,534 | 100% | — | — | — | — | 2018 |
| Meridian | 147,602 | 46% | 877 | 34.20 | 877 | 34.20 | 2024 | |
| 1700 Pavilion | 265,898 | 94% | 11,654 | 47.57 | 12,137 | 49.54 | 2022 | |
| One Summerlin | 207,292 | 85% | 7,794 | 44.74 | 8,187 | 47.00 | 2015 | |
| Two Summerlin | 147,139 | 100% | 5,984 | 40.67 | 6,472 | 43.98 | 2018 | |
| 949,465 | ||||||||
| Total | 6,967,595 |
(a) Annualized Base Rent is calculated as the monthly Base Minimum Rent for the property at December 31, 2025, multiplied by 12. Annualized Base Rent Per Square Foot is the Annualized Base Rent for the property at December 31, 2025, divided by the average occupied square feet.
(b) Effective Annual Rent includes base minimum rent and common area maintenance recovery revenue. Effective Annual Rent Per Square Foot is the Effective Annual Rent divided by the average occupied square feet.
(c) These properties are entirely leased by a single tenant. Therefore, the Annualized Base Rent and Effective Annual Rent details have been excluded for competitive reasons. The lease for the single tenant at 2201 Lake Woodlands Drive expired in December 2025.
(d) In 2025, this property was rebranded to 6 Waterway (formerly Waterway Plaza II).
The following table summarizes certain metrics of our retail properties within the Operating Assets segment as of December 31, 2025, and does not include any retail square footage in our multifamily assets:
| Retail Properties The Woodlands | Rentable Square Feet | % Leased | Annualized Base Rent (thousands) (a) | Annualized Base Rent Per Square Foot (a) | Year Built / Acquired / Redeveloped | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Creekside Park West | 72,976 | 100% | $2,104 | $31.76 | 2019 | |
| Grogan’s Mill Retail | 31,363 | 68% | 445 | 30.19 | 2025 | |
| Hughes Landing Retail | 125,721 | 96% | 4,419 | 39.00 | 2015 | |
| 1701 Lake Robbins | 12,376 | 100% | 551 | 44.49 | 2014 | |
| 20/25 Waterway Avenue | 51,688 | 100% | 1,705 | 37.85 | 2011 | |
| Waterway Square Retail | 21,513 | 100% | 876 | 40.83 | 2011 | |
| 315,637 | ||||||
| Bridgeland | ||||||
| Village Green at Bridgeland Central | 27,944 | 90% | 661 | 32.33 | 2024 | |
| Columbia | ||||||
| Color Burst Park Retail | 12,410 | 100% | 588 | 47.42 | 2020 | |
| Rouse Building | 89,199 | 100% | 2,285 | 25.62 | 2014 | |
| 101,609 | ||||||
| Summerlin | ||||||
| Downtown Summerlin | (b) | 801,010 | 100% | 25,585 | 38.95 | 2014 / 2015 |
| Summerlin Grocery Anchored Center | 67,147 | 85% | 1,652 | 28.86 | 2024 | |
| 868,157 | ||||||
| Ward Village | ||||||
| Ward Village Retail - Pending Redevelopment | 336,616 | 79% | 6,225 | 23.46 | 2002 | |
| Ward Village Retail - New or Renovated | 500,015 | 84% | 19,268 | 45.64 | 2012 - 2023 | |
| 836,631 | ||||||
| Total | 2,149,978 |
(a) Annualized Base Rent is calculated as the monthly Base Minimum Rent for the property at December 31, 2025, multiplied by 12. Annualized Base Rent Per Square Foot is the Annualized Base Rent for the property at December 31, 2025, divided by the average occupied square feet.
(b) Excludes 381,767 square feet of anchors and 39,700 square feet of additional office space above our retail space.
The following tables summarize certain metrics of our multifamily Operating Assets as of December 31, 2025:
| Multifamily Assets The Woodlands | Ownership % | Units | Retail Square Feet | % Units Leased | Average Monthly Rate Per Unit | Average Monthly Rate Per Square Foot | Year Built / Acquired / Redeveloped |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Creekside Park | 100% | 292 | — | 92% | $1,845 | $1.88 | 2018 |
| Creekside Park The Grove | 100% | 360 | — | 94% | 1,789 | 1.82 | 2021 |
| One Lakes Edge | 100% | 390 | 22,971 | 94% | 2,478 | 2.51 | 2015 |
| Two Lakes Edge | 100% | 386 | 11,415 | 94% | 2,843 | 2.85 | 2020 |
| Millennium Six Pines | 100% | 314 | — | 90% | 2,015 | 2.10 | 2016 |
| Millennium Waterway | 100% | 393 | — | 92% | 1,838 | 2.04 | 2012 |
| The Lane at Waterway | 100% | 163 | — | 90% | 2,620 | 2.38 | 2020 |
| 1 Riva Row | 100% | 268 | — | 28% | 4,298 | 3.75 | 2025 |
| Bridgeland | |||||||
| Lakeside Row | 100% | 312 | — | 92% | 1,909 | 1.94 | 2019 |
| Starling at Bridgeland | 100% | 358 | — | 91% | 1,980 | 2.03 | 2022 |
| Wingspan | 100% | 263 | — | 89% | 2,542 | 2.03 | 2023 |
| Columbia | |||||||
| Juniper | 100% | 382 | 55,677 | 96% | 2,526 | 2.83 | 2020 |
| Marlow | 100% | 472 | 32,607 | 87% | 2,414 | 3.09 | 2022 |
| The Metropolitan | 50% | 380 | 13,591 | 96% | 2,382 | 2.52 | 2015 |
| TEN.m.flats | 50% | 437 | 28,026 | 97% | 2,439 | 2.75 | 2018 |
| Summerlin | |||||||
| Constellation | 100% | 124 | — | 95% | 2,562 | 2.29 | 2017 |
| Tanager | 100% | 267 | — | 100% | 2,468 | 2.54 | 2019 |
| Tanager Echo | 100% | 294 | — | 96% | 2,662 | 3.04 | 2023 |
| Total | 5,855 | 164,287 |
The following tables summarize certain metrics of our other Operating Assets as of December 31, 2025:
| Other Assets The Woodlands | Ownership % | Asset Type | Size | % Leased | Year Built / Acquired / Redeveloped |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hughes Landing Daycare | 100% | Other | N/A | N/A | 2019 |
| Houston Ground Leases | 100% | Ground lease | N/A | N/A | Various |
| Stewart Title of Montgomery County, TX | 50% | Title Company | N/A | N/A | — |
| The Woodlands Warehouse | 100% | Warehouse | 125,801 sq ft | 100% | 2019 |
| Woodlands Sarofim | 20% | Industrial | N/A | N/A | late 1980s |
| Summerlin | |||||
| Hockey Ground Lease | 100% | Ground lease | N/A | N/A | 2017 |
| Summerlin Hospital Medical Center | 5% | Hospital | N/A | N/A | 1997 |
| Ward Village | |||||
| Kewalo Basin Harbor | 100% | Marina | 55 acres | N/A | 2019 |
| Other | |||||
| Columbia Ground Leases | 100% | Ground lease | N/A | N/A | 2024 |
| Parking Garages (a) | 100% | Garage | 9,696 spaces | N/A | Various |
(a) Includes parking garages in The Woodlands, Columbia, and Ward Village.
The following table summarizes our Operating Assets segment lease expirations:
$ in thousands
| Year | Number of Expiring Leases (a) | Total Square Feet Expiring | Total Annualized Base Rent Expiring | % of Total Annual Gross Rent Expiring |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 106 | 426,562 | $17,332 | 4.2% |
| 2027 | 124 | 1,017,147 | 43,550 | 10.7% |
| 2028 | 93 | 578,094 | 28,422 | 6.9% |
| 2029 | 92 | 834,163 | 42,334 | 10.4% |
| 2030 | 87 | 918,064 | 47,772 | 11.7% |
| 2031 | 58 | 543,220 | 27,574 | 6.7% |
| 2032 | 44 | 1,292,975 | 68,058 | 16.7% |
| 2033 | 43 | 709,240 | 36,225 | 8.9% |
| 2034 | 31 | 411,409 | 21,250 | 5.2% |
| 2035 | 51 | 559,942 | 23,664 | 5.8% |
| 2036+ | 60 | 887,940 | 52,289 | 12.8% |
| Total | 789 | 8,178,756 | $408,470 | 100.0% |
(a) Excludes leases with an initial term of 12 months or less.
MASTER PLANNED COMMUNITIES
Our MPCs are located in and around Houston, Texas; Las Vegas, Nevada; and Phoenix, Arizona and are summarized in the following table as of December 31, 2025:
| Community | Location | Total Gross Acres (a) | Approx. No. Residents | Remaining Saleable Acres Residential | Commercial | Estimated Price Per Acre (thousands) (b) Residential | Commercial | Projected Community Sell-Out Date Residential | Commercial | Projected Cash Margin (c) Residential |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bridgeland | Cypress, TX | 11,506 | 29,000 | 1,234 | 1,093 | $662 | $767 | 2032 | 2046 | 89% |
| Summerlin | Las Vegas, NV | 22,500 | 132,000 | 1,978 | 494 | 1,719 | 1,378 | 2043 | 2039 | 81% |
| Teravalis | Phoenix, AZ | 33,810 | — | 15,908 | 10,531 | 832 | 206 | 2086 | 2086 | 81% |
| The Woodlands (d) | The Woodlands, TX | 28,545 | 124,800 | 64 | 685 | N/A | 1,020 | 2031 | 2034 | 96% |
| The Woodlands Hills | Conroe, TX | 2,055 | 3,793 | 624 | 181 | 391 | 511 | 2035 | 2032 | 87% |
| Total | 98,416 | 289,593 | 19,808 | 12,984 | ||||||
| Floreo (e) | Phoenix, AZ | 3,029 | 35 | 1,061 | 116 | 836 | 335 | 2038 | 2032 | 52% |
(a) Encompasses the land located within the borders of the master planned community, including parcels already sold, saleable parcels, and non-saleable areas such as roads, parks and recreation areas, conservation areas, and parcels acquired during the year (if any).
(b) Residential and commercial pricing represents the Company's estimate of price per acre that will be achieved in 2026 per its land models.
(c) Projected cash gross margin represents the net cash margin expected to be received in the future and includes all future projected revenues less all remaining future projected cash development costs. The projected cash gross margin does not include remaining historical development costs incurred to date. Gross margin for each MPC may vary from period to period based on the locations of the land sold and the related costs associated with developing the land sold.
(d) The Woodlands residential land development is nearing completion.
(e) The Company owns a 50% interest in this unconsolidated venture, however the data above is presented at 100%. See below for additional detail.
The Summit
Within our Summerlin MPC, an exclusive luxury community named The Summit is being developed and managed through a joint venture with Discovery Land Company, a leading developer of luxury communities and private clubs. The original 555-acre community, which is expected to consist of approximately 245 homes and 32 condominiums, is nearing completion. In 2022, the Company contributed an additional 54 acres to The Summit adjacent to the existing Summit community to develop approximately 28 custom home sites. See Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Note 4 - Investments in Unconsolidated Ventures in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 of this Annual Report for further details.
Floreo
Floreo, the first village to be developed in our Teravalis MPC, is being developed and managed through a 50% joint venture. The 3,029-acre village is located in the greater Phoenix, Arizona area and is expected to consist of approximately 5,000 residential lots, commercial sites, as well as a planned business park. In late 2025, the Company welcomed the first residents and celebrated the grand opening of the community. See Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Note 4 - Investments in Unconsolidated Ventures in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 of this Annual Report for further details.
STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENTS
We continue to plan, develop, and hold or seek development rights for unique properties primarily in Ward Village, The Woodlands, Bridgeland, Summerlin, Columbia, and Teravalis. We continue to execute our strategic plans for developing several of these assets with construction either actively underway or pending. Strategic Developments are transferred into our Operating Assets segment when the asset is placed in service.
The following table summarizes our Strategic Developments projects under construction as of December 31, 2025:
$ in thousands
Strategic Developments Under Construction
| Bridgeland | Asset Type | Location | Size (a) | Total Estimated Cost (b) | Estimated Completion | Estimated Stabilization Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Memorial Hermann Medical Office | Office | Cypress, TX | 50,895 sq ft | $23,661 | Q2 2026 | 2029 |
| The Woodlands | ||||||
| 7 Waterway (c) | Office | The Woodlands, TX | 186,369 sq ft | 39,181 | Q2 2026 | 2029 |
| Condominiums | ||||||
| Under Construction | ||||||
| Kalae | Condominium | Honolulu, HI | 329 units / 2,000 sq ft | 623,745 | 2028 | N/A |
| The Park Ward Village | Condominium | Honolulu, HI | 545 units / 26,800 sq ft | 613,807 | Q2 2026 | N/A |
| The Ritz-Carlton Residences | Condominium | The Woodlands, TX | 111 units / 5,800 sq ft | 369,465 | 2027 | N/A |
| Completed and Sold Out | ||||||
| ‘A‘ali‘i | Condominium | Honolulu, HI | 750 units / 11,175 sq ft | 390,138 | Completed | N/A |
| Ae`o | Condominium | Honolulu, HI | 465 units / 70,800 sq ft | 430,086 | Completed | N/A |
| Anaha | Condominium | Honolulu, HI | 317 units / 16,048 sq ft | 403,796 | Completed | N/A |
| Ke Kilohana | Condominium | Honolulu, HI | 423 units / 28,386 sq ft | 217,318 | Completed | N/A |
| Kō'ula | Condominium | Honolulu, HI | 565 units / 36,995 sq ft | 481,302 | Completed | N/A |
| Ulana Ward Village (d) | Condominium | Honolulu, HI | 696 units / 32,100 sq ft | 402,914 | Completed | N/A |
| Victoria Place | Condominium | Honolulu, HI | 349 units | 539,017 | Completed | N/A |
| Waiea | Condominium | Honolulu, HI | 177 units / 7,716 sq ft | 542,631 | Completed | N/A |
(a) For condominium units and multifamily assets, square feet represents ground floor retail space whereas units represents residential units for sale or rent.
(b) As of December 31, 2025, total estimated cost remaining to be spent on these properties was $857.9 million, of which $180.9 million is expected to be funded by HHH with the remaining cost to be funded with existing construction loans and condominium buyer deposits.
(c) The Company acquired this office property in the second quarter of 2025 for $16.3 million, and commenced a redevelopment project in the third quarter of 2025. Total estimated cost for 7 Waterway is inclusive of acquisition, closing, redevelopment, and tenant lease-up costs.
(d) The Company completed construction at Ulana in November 2025. However, landlord work is still ongoing for the retail section of the property as of December 31, 2025. The retail space is expected to be placed in service as leases are executed.
The following table summarizes future Strategic Developments projects as of December 31, 2025:
| Location | Size | |
|---|---|---|
| Future Strategic Developments Rights or Pending Construction | ||
| The Woodlands | ||
| 2000 Woodlands Parkway (a) | The Woodlands, TX | 7,900 sq ft |
| Ward Village | ||
| ‘Ilima (b) | Honolulu, HI | 148 units / 5,000 sq ft |
| The Launiu (c) | Honolulu, HI | 485 units / 10,000 sq ft |
| Melia (b) | Honolulu, HI | 220 units / 6,000 sq ft |
| Other | ||
| West End Alexandria (d) | Alexandria, VA | 41 acres |
| Commercial Land | ||
| Columbia | ||
| Columbia Commercial Land (e) | Columbia, MD | 99 acres |
| Merriweather District (e)(f) | Columbia, MD | 26 acres |
| Ward Village | ||
| Ward Commercial Land (e) | Honolulu, HI | 6 acres |
(a) 2000 Woodlands Parkway was transferred to Strategic Developments in 2023. The Company expects to execute a new lease in 2026, and transfer the property back to Operating Assets.
(b) We launched pre-sales for these condominiums in June 2025, and as of December 31, 2025 we have entered into contracts for 51% of the total units at ‘Ilima and 65% of the total units at Melia.
(c) As of December 31, 2025, we have entered into contracts for 346 units at The Launiu, representing 71% of total units. Construction is expected to begin in early 2026.
(d) Represents acreage owned through a joint venture.
(e) Represents land acquired or transferred to the Strategic Developments segment for future development, excluding acreage related to assets that are now in service in our Operating Assets segment or related to completed or under construction condominium towers.
(f) Includes acreage from the Lakefront District development that is now considered a part of Merriweather District following rebranding efforts for the area.
OTHER INFORMATION Table of Contents Index to Financial Statements
Legal proceedings
As filed, 836 characters, with its headings, lists and tables. Extracted from the main document; charts and exhibits are in the original on sec.gov.
We, as part of our normal business activities, are a party to a number of legal proceedings. Management periodically assesses our liabilities and contingencies in connection with these matters based upon the latest information available. We disclose material pending legal proceedings pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission rules and other pending matters as we may determine to be appropriate. As of December 31, 2025, management believes that any monetary liability or financial impact of claims or potential claims to which we might be subject after final adjudication of any legal procedures would not be material to our financial position or our results of operations. See Note 12 - Commitments and Contingencies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 of this Annual Report for further discussion.
Management's discussion and analysis
As filed, 75,024 characters, with its headings, lists and tables. Extracted from the main document; charts and exhibits are in the original on sec.gov.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes filed as a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K (Annual Report). This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties, assumptions, and other factors, including those described in Part I, Item 1A*. Risk Factors* and elsewhere in this Annual Report. These factors and others not currently known to us could cause our financial results in 2025 and subsequent fiscal years to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, those forward-looking statements. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on this information which speaks only as of the date of this report. We are not obligated to update this information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as may be required by law.
This section of our Annual Report discusses 2025 and 2024 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2025 and 2024. Discussion of 2023 and year-to-year comparisons between 2024 and 2023 that are not included in this Annual Report can be found in Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024.
All references to numbered Notes are to specific Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report and which descriptions are incorporated into the applicable response by reference.
| Index | Page |
|---|---|
| Overview | 36 |
| Results of Operations | 39 |
| Operating Assets | 39 |
| Master Planned Communities | 41 |
| Strategic Developments | 46 |
| Corporate Income, Expenses, and Other Items | 49 |
| Liquidity and Capital Resources | 51 |
| Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates | 55 |
| Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements and Developments | 55 |
HHH 2025 FORM 10-K | 35
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OVERVIEW Table of Contents Index to Financial Statements
OVERVIEW
General Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. (HHH or the Company) is a holding company that owns a real estate development subsidiary, The Howard Hughes Corporation (HHC). Through HHC, the Company operates a large‑scale, mixed‑use real estate platform focused on the development of master planned communities (MPCs), the investment in strategic real estate development opportunities, and the ownership and operation of income‑producing properties. References to HHH, the Company, we, us, and our refer to Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, which includes The Howard Hughes Corporation, unless otherwise specifically stated. References to HHC or Howard Hughes Communities refer to The Howard Hughes Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries unless otherwise specifically stated.
In 2025, the Company began executing a long-term strategy to transition from a pure-play real estate company to a diversified holding company. On May 5, 2025, the Company issued 9,000,000 shares of newly issued common stock to Pershing Square for an aggregate purchase price of $900 million (Pershing Square Issuance). In connection with the investment, the Company and Pershing Square entered into related agreements, including a Services Agreement, Shareholder Agreement, Standstill Agreement, and Registration Rights Agreement. The Company intends to use the proceeds from the transaction to acquire or invest in operating businesses.
As previously disclosed in our Current Report on Form 8‑K filed on December 18, 2025, the Company entered into a definitive agreement to acquire 100% of Vantage Group Holdings Ltd. (Vantage), a privately held specialty insurance and reinsurance company, for cash consideration of approximately $2.1 billion. The transaction remains subject to regulatory approvals and other customary closing conditions, and is expected to close in the second quarter of 2026. To support the funding of the acquisition, the Company also entered into an equity commitment letter with Pershing Square Holdings, Ltd. under which Pershing Square committed to purchase up to $1.0 billion of the Company’s preferred stock, prior to and contingent upon the closing of the Vantage acquisition. Over time, the Company will have the right, but not the obligation, to repurchase the preferred stock during specified periods and upon certain triggering events. The acquisition is expected to be funded through the Company’s cash on hand, and proceeds from the issuance of the preferred stock.
Refer to Item 1. Business for a general description of the assets contained in our three business segments and Item 2. Properties for details regarding the asset type, size, location, and key metrics about our various properties.
We are primarily focused on creating stockholder value by increasing our per-share net asset value. Often, the nature of our business results in short-term volatility in our net income due to the timing of Master Planned Communities (MPC) land sales, recognition of condominium revenue, and operating business pre-opening expenses.
Changes for monetary amounts between periods presented are calculated based on the amounts in thousands of dollars stated in our consolidated financial statements and then rounded to the nearest million. Therefore, certain changes may not recalculate based on the amounts rounded to the nearest million.
2025 Results During 2025, we delivered exceptional results across our core business lines. Operating Assets net operating income (NOI) and MPC earnings before taxes (EBT) both reached record highs, while our condo and strategic development activities extended the runway for future growth.
In our MPCs, we continued to experience heightened demand and home builder interest for new land parcels. As a result, MPC EBT increased 36% year-over-year, driven by a new full-year record number of residential acres sold.
In Operating Assets, we delivered another full-year NOI record, outpacing 2024 results by 7%, excluding dispositions. This growth was led by our office portfolio, which continued to benefit from strong lease-up activity and abatement expirations at various properties in The Woodlands, Merriweather District, and Summerlin. In 2025, the Company executed 484,000 square feet of new or expanded office leases including 334,000 square feet in The Woodlands, 88,000 square feet in Merriweather District, and 62,000 square feet in Summerlin. Our multifamily portfolio also contributed meaningfully to the outperformance due to continued lease-up at our newer properties in Summerlin, Bridgeland, and Merriweather District.
In Strategic Developments, Ward Village had another strong year, closing 690 units at Ulana Ward Village, a workforce tower that generated $369.5 million of condominium revenues at a break even gross margin, which is consistent with our typical target for workforce towers. Pre-sales activity for our under construction condominiums progressed, and these projects were 93% pre-sold at year end and represent more than $1.9 billion of future contracted revenue. Leasing activity at The Launiu remained strong and we launched pre-sales for two new Ward Village condominiums, Melia and ‘Ilima in June 2025, with 66% of the units at these predevelopment towers pre-sold at year end representing $2.0 billion of future contracted revenue. Future contracted revenues will be recognized as projects are completed.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OVERVIEW Table of Contents Index to Financial Statements
2026 Outlook Proceeding into 2026, we maintain a positive long-term outlook for our businesses and believe we are well positioned to create value across cycles. We remain focused on maintaining liquidity, managing near‑term maturities, and allocating capital to the highest‑return opportunities across our business segments. Development spending will continue on a disciplined basis, and we will evaluate opportunities to recycle capital and enhance balance‑sheet flexibility as market conditions evolve.
Across our master planned communities, we expect demand for new homes, retail, and office space to remain resilient, supported by constrained inventories of existing homes, continued migration to our communities, and the quality and scale of our offerings. MPC EBT is expected to normalize in 2026 following a record year of land sales in 2025 and Operating Assets performance is expected to be stable to modestly positive. We expect condominium activity during the year to be driven primarily by The Park Ward Village, which is substantially pre-sold and positioned to contribute meaningful revenue and gross profit as it is delivered.
Additionally, the Pershing Square investment and the pending agreement to acquire Vantage mark important steps in broadening our strategic reach. We expect to make meaningful progress in 2026 toward building a durable foundation to compound long-term shareholder value across multiple platforms, while maintaining our focus on liquidity, disciplined capital allocation, and balance sheet flexibility. The Company’s expectations will be updated as applicable throughout 2026, and as additional information becomes available regarding the pending Vantage acquisition and its expected contribution to the consolidated business.
Our outlook is subject to risks and uncertainties, including those related to interest rates, capital markets conditions, general economic and housing trends in our key regions, and other factors described in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors and elsewhere in this Annual Report.
2025 Highlights
Overall
- Net income from continuing operations decreased to $123.8 million in 2025, compared to net income of $285.2 million in the prior year. The year-over-year decrease was primarily attributed to a change in the product mix of condominium closings as we closed units at a workforce tower in the current year, compared to closing units at a luxury tower in the prior year, and the receipt of insurance proceeds in the prior year following the execution of a settlement agreement related to the construction defect claims at Waiea. These decreases were partially offset by an increase in residential acres sold in Summerlin.
- We continue to maintain a strong liquidity position with $1.5 billion of cash and cash equivalents, $515.0 million of undrawn capacity on our Secured Bridgeland Notes, and $686.6 million of undrawn lender commitment available to be drawn for property development, and limited near-term debt maturities.
Operating Assets
- Operating Assets EBT increased $1.0 million, with a loss of $27.4 million in 2025, compared to a loss of $28.5 million in the prior year.
- Operating Assets NOI was $262.0 million in 2025, a $16.5 million increase compared to $245.5 million in the prior year.
- Office NOI increased $13.6 million, primarily due to strong leasing activity and abatement expirations at various properties in The Woodlands, Merriweather District, and Summerlin, most notably at 9950 Woodloch Forest, 6100 Merriweather, and 1700 Pavilion, partially offset by decreases related to lower occupancy at certain properties in The Woodlands, most notably at 3831 Technology Forest and Two Hughes Landing.
- Multifamily NOI increased $3.9 million primarily due to continued lease-up at Tanager Echo in Summerlin, Wingspan in Bridgeland, and Marlow in Merriweather District.
- In 2025, the Company completed the sale of four land parcels and retail spaces in Ward Village for total proceeds of $18.2 million, and a combined gain on sale of $14.4 million.
MPC
- MPC EBT totaled income of $476.1 million in 2025, a $127.0 million increase compared to income of $349.1 million in the prior year.
- The increase in EBT was primarily due to higher residential land sales at Summerlin and Bridgeland, higher commercial land sales in The Woodlands, and lower equity losses at The Summit.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OVERVIEW Table of Contents Index to Financial Statements
Strategic Developments
- Strategic Developments EBT totaled a loss of $13.9 million in 2025, a $296.7 million decrease compared to income of $282.8 million in the prior year.
- The decrease in EBT was primarily due to a decrease in condominium sales net cost of sales due to the change in the product mix of condominium closings as we closed units at a workforce tower in the current year, compared to closing units at a luxury tower in the prior year, and a decrease in other income related to accruing a charge for a legal judgment in Columbia in the current year, compared to the receipt of insurance proceeds for the Waiea remediation in the prior year. These decreases were partially offset by an increase in gain on sale of real estate assets due to a land swap in The Woodlands and the sale of a land parcel near Merriweather District in the current year.
- Leasing activity at The Launiu remained strong and we launched pre-sales for two new Ward Village condominiums, Melia and ‘Ilima in June 2025. During 2025, we contracted 283 pre-development units and as of December 31, 2025, 66% of the units at our three pre-development towers are under contract.
- In 2025, we placed three properties in service, including Grogan’s Mill Retail, a retail property in The Woodlands; One Bridgeland Green, an office property in Bridgeland; and 1 Riva Row, a multifamily property in The Woodlands. These properties represent 268 multifamily units and approximately 81,000 square feet of retail and office space.
- In 2025, we began construction on Memorial Hermann Medical Office, an office building in Bridgeland, and the redevelopment of 7 Waterway, an office building in The Woodlands. These properties represent approximately 237,000 square feet of office space.
Corporate
- Net expenses related to Corporate income, expenses, and other items decreased $7.3 million compared to the prior year primarily due to a decrease in income tax expense, partially offset by an increase in general and administrative expenses, primarily related to the Pershing Square advisory fee and a strategic reduction in force in the current year.
Capital and Financing Activities
- In 2025, our financing activity included draws on existing mortgages of $573.5 million, refinancings of $184.2 million, and repayments of $365.7 million. In addition, we repaid $198.0 million on the Secured Bridgeland Notes using the proceeds from the sale of Municipal Utility District (MUD) receivables. For additional information, refer to Note 9 - Mortgages, Notes, and Loans Payable, Net in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 of this Annual Report.
- Subsequent to year end, on February 17, 2026, HHC, the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, issued $500.0 million of 5.875% senior unsecured notes due 2032 and $500.0 million of 6.125% senior unsecured notes due 2034. HHC used the net proceeds to redeem its outstanding $750.0 million 5.375% senior unsecured notes due 2028, including premiums, accrued and unpaid interest and related expenses, and will use the remaining proceeds for general corporate purposes. Refer to Note 9 - Mortgages, Notes, and Loans Payable, Net in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 of this Annual Report for additional detail.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Table of Contents Index to Financial Statements
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Operating Assets
Segment EBT The following table presents segment EBT for Operating Assets for the years ended December 31:
thousands except percentages
| Operating Assets Segment EBT | 2025 | 2024 | $ Change | % Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rental revenue | $441,413 | $421,641 | $19,772 | 5% |
| Other land, rental, and property revenues | 24,155 | 22,659 | 1,496 | 7% |
| Total revenues | 465,568 | 444,300 | 21,268 | 5% |
| Operating costs | (145,464) | (138,172) | (7,292) | (5)% |
| Rental property real estate taxes | (58,577) | (55,915) | (2,662) | (5)% |
| (Provision for) recovery of doubtful accounts | (232) | (504) | 272 | 54% |
| Total operating expenses | (204,273) | (194,591) | (9,682) | (5)% |
| Segment operating income (loss) | 261,295 | 249,709 | 11,586 | 5% |
| Depreciation and amortization | (172,835) | (169,040) | (3,795) | (2)% |
| Interest income (expense), net | (136,637) | (138,207) | 1,570 | 1% |
| Other income (loss), net | 2,266 | 822 | 1,444 | 176% |
| Equity in earnings (losses) from unconsolidated ventures | 4,829 | 5,819 | (990) | (17)% |
| Gain (loss) on sale or disposal of real estate and other assets, net | 14,354 | 22,907 | (8,553) | (37)% |
| Gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt | (698) | (465) | (233) | (50)% |
| Segment EBT | $(27,426) | $(28,455) | $1,029 | 4% |
Operating Assets segment EBT increased $1.0 million compared to the prior year primarily due to the following:
- Rental revenues, net of Operating costs increased $12.5 million primarily due to increased leasing activity across our portfolio.
This increase to EBT was partially offset by the following:
- Gain on sale of real estate decreased $8.6 million primarily due to the sale of four land parcels and retail spaces in Ward Village in 2025, compared to the sale of Lakeland Village Center at Bridgeland, Creekside Park Medical Plaza, and four non-core ground leases in The Woodlands in 2024.
Net Operating Income In addition to the required presentations using accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP), we use certain non-GAAP performance measures, as we believe these measures improve the understanding of our operational results and make comparisons of operating results among peer companies more meaningful. Management continually evaluates the usefulness, relevance, limitations and calculation of our reported non-GAAP performance measures to determine how best to provide relevant information to the public, and thus such reported measures could change.
We define NOI as operating revenues (rental income, tenant recoveries, and other revenue) less operating expenses (real estate taxes, repairs and maintenance, marketing, and other property expenses). NOI excludes straight-line rents and amortization of tenant incentives, net; interest expense, net; ground rent amortization; demolition costs; other income (loss); depreciation and amortization; development-related marketing costs; gain on sale or disposal of real estate and other assets, net; loss on extinguishment of debt; provision for impairment; and equity in earnings from unconsolidated ventures.
We believe that NOI is a useful supplemental measure of the performance of our Operating Assets segment because it provides a performance measure that reflects the revenues and expenses directly associated with owning and operating real estate properties. We use NOI to evaluate our operating performance on a property-by-property basis because NOI allows us to evaluate the impact that property-specific factors such as rental and occupancy rates, tenant mix, and operating costs have on our operating results, gross margins, and investment returns.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Table of Contents Index to Financial Statements
A reconciliation of Operating Assets segment EBT to Operating Assets NOI is presented in the table below.
thousands except percentages
| Operating Assets NOI | 2025 | 2024 | $ Change | % Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Assets segment EBT | $(27,426) | $(28,455) | $1,029 | 4% |
| Add back: | ||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 172,835 | 169,040 | 3,795 | 2% |
| Interest (income) expense, net | 136,637 | 138,207 | (1,570) | (1)% |
| Equity in (earnings) losses from unconsolidated ventures | (4,829) | (5,819) | 990 | 17% |
| (Gain) loss on sale or disposal of real estate and other assets, net | (14,354) | (22,907) | 8,553 | 37% |
| (Gain) loss on extinguishment of debt | 698 | 465 | 233 | 50% |
| Impact of straight-line rent | (1,964) | (4,770) | 2,806 | 59% |
| Other | 388 | (306) | 694 | NM |
| Operating Assets NOI | $261,985 | $245,455 | $16,530 | 7% |
NM Not meaningful.
The below table presents Operating Assets NOI by property type:
thousands except percentages
| Operating Assets NOI by Property Type | 2025 | 2024 | $ Change | % Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Office | $138,173 | $124,594 | $13,579 | 11% |
| Retail | 55,132 | 54,163 | 969 | 2% |
| Multifamily | 62,694 | 58,827 | 3,867 | 7% |
| Other | 5,986 | 6,153 | (167) | (3)% |
| Dispositions (a) | — | 1,718 | (1,718) | (100)% |
| Operating Assets NOI | $261,985 | $245,455 | $16,530 | 7% |
(a) Properties that were transferred to our Strategic Developments segment for redevelopment and properties that were sold are shown separately for all periods presented.
Operating Assets NOI increased $16.5 million compared to the prior year primarily due to the following:
- Office NOI increased $13.6 million primarily due to strong leasing activity and abatement expirations at various properties in The Woodlands, Merriweather District, and Summerlin, most notably at 9950 Woodloch Forest, 6100 Merriweather, and 1700 Pavilion, partially offset by decreases related to lower occupancy at certain properties in The Woodlands, most notably at 3831 Technology Forest and Two Hughes Landing.
- Multifamily NOI increased $3.9 million primarily due to continued lease-up at Tanager Echo in Summerlin, Wingspan in Bridgeland, and Marlow in Merriweather District.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Table of Contents Index to Financial Statements
Master Planned Communities
Segment EBT The following table presents segment EBT for MPC for the years ended December 31:
thousands except percentages
| MPC Segment EBT | 2025 | 2024 | $ Change | % Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Master Planned Communities land sales (a) | $562,586 | $453,195 | $109,391 | 24% |
| Other land, rental, and property revenues | 19,929 | 17,707 | 2,222 | 13% |
| Builder price participation (b) | 52,341 | 52,023 | 318 | 1% |
| Total revenues | 634,856 | 522,925 | 111,931 | 21% |
| Master Planned Communities cost of sales | (188,704) | (169,191) | (19,513) | (12)% |
| Operating costs | (45,298) | (52,736) | 7,438 | 14% |
| Total operating expenses | (234,002) | (221,927) | (12,075) | (5)% |
| Segment operating income (loss) | 400,854 | 300,998 | 99,856 | 33% |
| Depreciation and amortization | (408) | (438) | 30 | 7% |
| Interest income (expense), net | 75,160 | 60,473 | 14,687 | 24% |
| Other income (loss), net | 120 | — | 120 | NM |
| Equity in earnings (losses) from unconsolidated ventures | (3,374) | (11,899) | 8,525 | 72% |
| Gain (loss) on sale or disposal of real estate and other assets, net | 3,750 | — | 3,750 | NM |
| Segment EBT | $476,102 | $349,134 | $126,968 | 36% |
(a) MPC land sales include deferred revenue from land sales closed in a previous period that met criteria for recognition in the current period and excludes amounts deferred from current period land sales that do not yet meet the recognition criteria.
(b) Builder price participation revenue is earned when a developer that acquired land from us develops and sells a home to an end user at a price higher than a predetermined breakpoint. The excess over the breakpoint is shared between us and the developer at the time of closing on the sale of the home based on a previously agreed-upon percentage. This revenue fluctuates based upon the number and the prices of homes closed that qualify for builder price participation payments.
NM Not meaningful.
The following table presents MPC segment EBT by MPC for the years ended December 31:
thousands except percentages
| MPC Segment EBT by MPC | 2025 | 2024 | $ Change | % Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bridgeland | $100,396 | $77,611 | $22,785 | 29% |
| Summerlin | 361,205 | 260,924 | 100,281 | 38% |
| Teravalis (a) | (3,163) | 3,596 | (6,759) | (188)% |
| The Woodlands | 7,380 | (8,863) | 16,243 | 183% |
| The Woodlands Hills | 10,284 | 15,866 | (5,582) | (35)% |
| Segment EBT | $476,102 | $349,134 | $126,968 | 36% |
| Floreo (b) | $(3,602) | $9,816 | $(13,418) | (137)% |
(a) As of December 31, 2025, the Company owned an 88.0% interest in and consolidates Teravalis. For additional detail, refer to Note 1 - Presentation of Financial Statements and Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 of this Annual Report.
(b) These amounts represent 100% of Floreo EBT. As of December 31, 2025, the Company owned a 50% interest in Floreo. Refer to Note 4 - Investments in Unconsolidated Ventures in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 of this Annual Report for a description of the joint venture and further discussion.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Table of Contents Index to Financial Statements
MPC segment EBT increased $127.0 million compared to the prior year, primarily due to higher residential land sales at Summerlin and Bridgeland, higher commercial land sales in The Woodlands, and lower equity losses at The Summit.
Summerlin EBT increased $100.3 million compared to the prior year.
- MPC sales, net of MPC cost of sales increased $72.5 million primarily due to the following activity:
- increase in superpad acres sold, with 412.3 acres sold at an average price of $970,000 per acre in 2025, compared to 216.5 acres sold at an average price of $1.3 million per acre in 2024
- decrease due to $6.0 million less revenue recognized out of deferred revenue, net of associated deferred costs in 2025, compared to 2024
- decrease in custom lot acres sold partially offset by an increase in price per acre, with 2.7 acres sold at an average price of $7.5 million per acre in 2025, compared to 3.8 acres sold at an average price of $6.0 million per acre in 2024
- Equity earnings at The Summit increased $15.2 million. This was primarily due to higher losses in 2024 related to changes to the development model.
- Builder price participation increased $4.9 million as homes earned higher participation revenue per home, partially offset by fewer homes closing with sales prices above the predetermined breakpoint necessary for participation revenue in 2025, compared to 2024.
- Increase of $4.0 million primarily due to higher capitalized interest inclusive of derivatives.
- Other land, rental, and property revenues increased $3.5 million primarily due to higher advertising revenue related to superpad acres sold in 2025, compared to 2024.
Bridgeland EBT increased $22.8 million compared to the prior year.
- Increase of $9.4 million primarily due to higher capitalized interest.
- MPC sales, net of MPC cost of sales increased $8.9 million primarily due to the following activity:
- increase in price per acre offset by a slight decrease in residential acres sold, with 177.1 acres sold at an average price of $669,000 per acre in 2025, compared to 178.1 acres sold at an average price of $591,000 per acre in 2024
- decrease due to $3.0 million less revenue recognized out of deferred revenue, net of associated deferred costs in 2025, compared to 2024
- decrease in commercial acres sold, with no acres sold in 2025, compared to 13.5 acres sold at an average price of $369,000 per acre in 2024
- Operating costs decreased $7.6 million due to lower real estate taxes, primarily from the finalization of prior-year accrual estimates.
- Builder price participation decreased $3.1 million as fewer homes were closed with sales prices over the predetermined breakpoint necessary for participation revenue in 2025, compared to 2024.
The Woodlands EBT increased $16.2 million compared to the prior year.
- MPC sales, net of MPC cost of sales increased $13.2 million primarily due to the following activity:
- increase in commercial acres sold, with 30.1 acres sold at an average price of $670,000 per acre in 2025, compared to no acres sold in 2024
- decrease due to $2.1 million less revenue recognized out of deferred revenue, net of associated deferred costs in 2025, compared to 2024
- Gain on sale or disposal of real estate and other assets, net increased $3.7 million due to an eminent domain settlement related to the condemnation of a 9.9-acre parcel of non-saleable land in 2025, with no similar activity in 2024.
Teravalis EBT decreased $6.8 million compared to the prior year.
- Equity earnings at Floreo decreased $6.7 million primarily related to lower land sales in 2025 compared to 2024. Our Floreo joint venture sold a total of 10.6 residential acres at an average price of $793,000 per acre in 2025, compared to 115.4 acres sold at an average price of $777,000 per acre in 2024.
The Woodlands Hills EBT decreased $5.6 million compared to the prior year.
- MPC sales, net of MPC cost of sales decreased $4.7 million primarily due to the following activity:
- decrease in residential acres sold partially offset by an increase in price per acre, with 28.4 acres sold at an average price of $479,000 per acre in 2025, compared to 47.0 acres sold at an average price of $458,000 per acre in 2024
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Table of Contents Index to Financial Statements
MPC Equity Investments
The Summit
The Summit, our joint venture with Discovery Land Company, offers a mix of custom lots, single-family homes, and clubhouse suites in our Summerlin MPC. The original 555-acre community (Phase I) is nearing completion and expected to consist of approximately 245 homes and 32 condominiums. In 2022, the Company contributed an additional 54 acres (Phase II) to The Summit adjacent to the existing Summit community to develop approximately 28 custom home sites. We recognized equity losses of $1.6 million and received no cash distributions in 2025, compared to equity losses of $16.8 million and cash distributions of $4.9 million in 2024.
Floreo
Land development is currently underway at Floreo, our joint venture with Trillium Development Holding Company, LLC. In late 2025, the Company welcomed the first residents and celebrated the grand opening of the community.
For additional detail, refer to Note 4 - Investments in Unconsolidated Ventures in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 of this Annual Report.
Master Planned Communities Land Sales The following table presents the detail of MPC land sales recognized for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024. Total net recognized (deferred) revenue includes revenues recognized in the current period which are related to sales closed in prior periods, offset by revenues deferred on sales closed in the current period.
| thousands | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Total residential land sales closed | $552,360 | $441,044 |
| Total commercial land sales closed | 20,168 | 4,984 |
| Net recognized (deferred) revenue: | ||
| Bridgeland | 2,542 | 6,491 |
| The Woodlands | (2,137) | 517 |
| The Woodlands Hills | 61 | 30 |
| Summerlin | (28,346) | (18,140) |
| Total net recognized (deferred) revenue | (27,880) | (11,102) |
| Special Improvement District revenue | 17,938 | 18,269 |
| Master Planned Communities land sales | $562,586 | $453,195 |
HHH 2025 FORM 10-K | 43
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Table of Contents Index to Financial Statements
Residential and Commercial Land Sales Closed The following tables detail our residential and commercial land sales closed for the years ended December 31:
| thousands, except acres sold Residential Land Sales Closed Bridgeland | Summary of MPC Land Sales Closed Land Sales 2025 | 2024 | Acres Sold 2025 | 2024 | Average Price Per Acre 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single family | $118,538 | $105,296 | 177.1 | 178.1 | $669 | $591 |
| Summerlin | ||||||
| Superpad sites | 400,046 | 291,230 | 412.3 | 216.5 | 970 | 1,345 |
| Custom lots | 20,175 | 22,982 | 2.7 | 3.8 | 7,472 | 6,048 |
| The Woodlands Hills | ||||||
| Single family | 13,601 | 21,536 | 28.4 | 47.0 | 479 | 458 |
| Total residential land sales closed (a) | $552,360 | $441,044 | 620.5 | 445.4 | $890 | $990 |
| Commercial Land Sales Closed | ||||||
| Bridgeland | $— | $4,984 | — | 13.5 | $— | $369 |
| The Woodlands | 20,168 | — | 30.1 | — | 670 | — |
| Total commercial land sales closed (a) | $20,168 | $4,984 | 30.1 | 13.5 | $670 | $369 |
(a) Excludes revenues recognized in the current period which are related to sales closed in prior periods and includes revenues deferred on sales closed in the current period. Please see the summary of MPC land sales table above which reconciles total residential and commercial land sales closed to MPC land sales revenue recognized for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024.
Although our business does not involve the sale or resale of homes, we believe that net new home sales are an important indicator of future demand for our superpad sites and finished lots. Therefore, we use this statistic where relevant in our discussion of MPC operating results herein. Net new home sales reflect home sales made by homebuilders, less cancellations. Cancellations generally occur when a homebuyer signs a contract to purchase a home but later fails to qualify for a home mortgage or is unable to provide an adequate down payment to complete the home sale.
thousands except percentages
| Net New Home Sales 2025 | 2024 | % Change | Median Home Sales Price 2025 | 2024 | % Change | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bridgeland | 812 | 938 | (13.4)% | $470 | $465 | 1.1% |
| Summerlin | 949 | 1,038 | (8.6)% | 779 | 692 | 12.6% |
| The Woodlands (a) | 4 | 9 | (55.6)% | 2,875 | 2,249 | 27.8% |
| The Woodlands Hills | 171 | 249 | (31.3)% | 400 | 419 | (4.5)% |
| Total | 1,936 | 2,234 | (13.3)% |
(a) New home sales in The Woodlands are not expected to be significant as residential land development is nearing completion.
MPC Net Contribution MPC Net Contribution is a non-GAAP financial measure derived from EBT, adjusted for certain items as discussed below. Management uses this measure because it captures current period performance through the velocity of sales, as well as current period development expenditures based upon demand at our MPCs, which varies depending upon the stage of the MPC’s development lifecycle, and the overall economic environment. MPC Net Contribution is defined as MPC segment EBT, plus MPC cost of sales, Depreciation and amortization, and net collections from MUD and Special Improvement District (SID) bonds receivables, reduced by MPC development expenditures, land acquisitions, and Equity in earnings from unconsolidated ventures, net of distributions. MPC Net Contribution is not a GAAP-based operational metric and should not be used to measure operating performance of the MPC assets as a substitute for GAAP measures of such performance nor should it be used as a comparison metric with other comparable businesses.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Table of Contents Index to Financial Statements
Below is a reconciliation of segment EBT to MPC Net Contribution for the years ended December 31:
thousands except percentages
| 2025 | 2024 | $ Change | % Change | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MPC segment EBT | $476,102 | $349,134 | $126,968 | 36% |
| Plus: | ||||
| Master Planned Communities cost of sales | 188,704 | 169,191 | 19,513 | 12% |
| Depreciation and amortization | 408 | 438 | (30) | (7)% |
| MUD and SID bonds collections, net (a) | 37,293 | 107,031 | (69,738) | (65)% |
| Proceeds from sale of MUD receivables | 180,043 | 176,680 | 3,363 | 2% |
| Distributions from unconsolidated ventures | — | 4,896 | (4,896) | (100)% |
| Less: | ||||
| MPC development expenditures | (477,870) | (427,979) | (49,891) | (12)% |
| Equity in (earnings) losses from unconsolidated ventures | 3,374 | 11,899 | (8,525) | (72)% |
| MPC Net Contribution | $408,054 | $391,290 | $16,764 | 4% |
(a) SID collections are shown net of SID transfers to buyers in the respective periods.
MPC Net Contribution increased $16.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, primarily due to higher MPC land sales, partially offset by lower MUD and SID bonds collections, net, higher MPC development expenditures, and no distributions from unconsolidated ventures in 2025 compared to 2024.
MPC Land Inventory The following table summarizes MPC land inventory activity:
| thousands | Bridgeland | Summerlin | Teravalis | The Woodlands | The Woodlands Hills | Total MPC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balance December 31, 2023 | $533,031 | $1,079,927 | $544,824 | $172,652 | $115,239 | $2,445,673 |
| Development expenditures (a) | 204,542 | 186,163 | 573 | 5,853 | 30,848 | 427,979 |
| MPC Cost of sales | (47,056) | (113,844) | — | (117) | (8,174) | (169,191) |
| MUD reimbursable costs (b) | (178,701) | — | — | (877) | (20,087) | (199,665) |
| Transfer to Strategic Development and Operating Assets Segments | (1,218) | — | — | 11,399 | — | 10,181 |
| Other | (1,367) | 1,491 | (16) | 583 | (4,006) | (3,315) |
| Balance December 31, 2024 | 509,231 | 1,153,737 | 545,381 | 189,493 | 113,820 | 2,511,662 |
| Development expenditures (a) | 215,001 | 233,631 | 1,867 | 4,053 | 23,318 | 477,870 |
| MPC Cost of sales | (42,459) | (136,797) | — | (4,431) | (5,017) | (188,704) |
| MUD reimbursable costs (b) | (189,603) | — | — | (1,062) | (18,327) | (208,992) |
| Transfer to Strategic Development and Operating Assets Segments | (1,459) | — | — | 121 | — | (1,338) |
| Other | 31,520 | 6,482 | (37) | (859) | 7,473 | 44,579 |
| Balance December 31, 2025 | $522,231 | $1,257,053 | $547,211 | $187,315 | $121,267 | $2,635,077 |
(a) Development expenditures are inclusive of capitalized interest and property taxes.
(b) MUD reimbursable costs represent land development expenditures transferred to MUD Receivables.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Table of Contents Index to Financial Statements
Strategic Developments
Our Strategic Developments assets generally require substantial future development to maximize their value. Other than our condominium properties, most of the properties and projects in this segment do not generate revenues. Our expenses relating to these assets are primarily related to costs associated with constructing the assets, selling condominiums, carrying costs including, but not limited to, property taxes and insurance and other ongoing costs relating to maintaining the assets in their current condition. If we decide to redevelop or develop a Strategic Developments asset, we expect that with the exception of the residential portion of our condominium projects, upon completion of development, the asset would likely be reclassified to Operating Assets when the asset is placed in service and NOI would become a meaningful measure of its operating performance. All development costs discussed herein are exclusive of land costs.
Segment EBT The following table presents segment EBT for Strategic Developments for the years ended December 31:
thousands except percentages
| Strategic Developments Segment EBT | 2025 | 2024 | $ Change | % Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Condominium rights and unit sales | $370,156 | $778,616 | $(408,460) | (52)% |
| Rental revenue | 33 | 459 | (426) | (93)% |
| Other land, rental, and property revenues | 4,174 | 4,321 | (147) | (3)% |
| Total revenues | 374,363 | 783,396 | (409,033) | (52)% |
| Condominium rights and unit cost of sales | (369,408) | (582,574) | 213,166 | 37% |
| Operating costs | (22,490) | (17,670) | (4,820) | (27)% |
| Real estate taxes | (2,191) | (2,480) | 289 | 12% |
| Total operating expenses | (394,089) | (602,724) | 208,635 | 35% |
| Segment operating income (loss) | (19,726) | 180,672 | (200,398) | (111)% |
| Depreciation and amortization | (6,579) | (7,255) | 676 | 9% |
| Interest income (expense), net | 18,851 | 18,603 | 248 | 1% |
| Other income (loss), net | (18,487) | 90,534 | (109,021) | (120)% |
| Equity in earnings (losses) from unconsolidated ventures | 317 | 251 | 66 | 26% |
| Gain (loss) on sale or disposal of real estate and other assets, net | 11,721 | — | 11,721 | NM |
| Segment EBT | $(13,903) | $282,805 | $(296,708) | (105)% |
NM Not meaningful.
Strategic Developments segment EBT decreased $296.7 million compared to the prior year primarily due to the following:
- Condominium sales, net of cost of sales decreased $195.3 million, primarily due to a change in the product mix of condominium closings executed in the current year. Although unit closings were higher with 690 units closed at Ulana Ward Village in the current year, compared to 349 units closed at Victoria Place in the prior year, condominium sales, net of cost of sales decreased as Ulana is a workforce tower and closed at a breakeven gross margin as expected. Ulana is our second workforce tower and fulfills our current reserved housing guaranty in the community. See Note 12 - Commitments and Contingencies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 of this Annual Report for additional information on the reserved housing requirements in Ward Village.
- Other income (loss), net decreased $109.0 million primarily due to the accrual of a $19.8 million charge in the current year for a legal judgment in Columbia, compared to the receipt of $90.0 million of insurance proceeds in the prior year following the execution of a settlement agreement related to the construction defect claims at Waiea. See Note 12 - Commitments and Contingencies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 of this Annual Report for additional information on the legal judgment in Columbia.
These decreases to EBT were partially offset by the following:
- Gain on sale of real estate increased $11.7 million due to the land swap in The Woodlands and the sale of a land parcel near Merriweather District in the current year. See Note 5 - Acquisitions and Dispositions in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 of this Annual Report for additional information on these transactions.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Table of Contents Index to Financial Statements
Strategic Developments Projects The following describes the status of our major construction projects as of December 31, 2025. These properties will be transferred to the Operating Assets segment upon completion of construction, unless otherwise noted below.
Bridgeland
Memorial Hermann Medical Office This will be a 50,895-square-foot medical office property. Total development costs are expected to be approximately $23.7 million. We began construction in the third quarter of 2025, and anticipate project completion in the second quarter of 2026. We expect this property to reach projected annual stabilized NOI of $1.9 million by 2029.
The Woodlands
7 Waterway We acquired this 186,369 square-foot office property in the second quarter of 2025 for $16.3 million, and commenced a redevelopment project in the third quarter of 2025. Total redevelopment and tenant lease-up costs are expected to be approximately $22.9 million, bringing total expected cost for this property to $39.2 million. We anticipate project completion in the second quarter of 2026, and expect this property to reach projected annual stabilized NOI of $4.8 million by 2029.
Condominiums Condominium revenue is recognized when construction of the condominium tower is complete and unit sales close, leading to potentially significant variability in revenue recognized between periods.
For all Ward Village condominium units, sales contracts are subject to a 30-day rescission period. The buyers are required to make an initial deposit at signing and an additional deposit 30 days later at which point their total deposit becomes non-refundable. Buyers are then required to make a final deposit within approximately 90 days of our receipt of their second deposit. Buyers are required to deposit the remainder of the sales price on a predetermined pre-closing date. Contracted units disclosed below represent sales that are past the 30-day rescission period.
For The Woodlands condominium units, sales contracts are subject to a 6-day rescission period. The buyers are required to make an initial deposit at signing and a final deposit 60 days later at which point their total deposit becomes non-refundable. Buyers are required to deposit the remainder of the sales price on a predetermined pre-closing date. Contracted units disclosed below represent sales that are past the 6-day rescission period.
Completed Condominiums
Ward Village As of December 31, 2025, our eight completed condominiums, Ae`o, Ke Kilohana, Anaha, Waiea, ‘A‘ali‘i, Kō‘ula, Victoria Place, and Ulana are completely sold. Ulana was completed in the fourth quarter of 2025, and 690 of the 696 units were closed prior to year end. The remaining 6 units are expected to close in early 2026.
Condominiums Under Construction
Ward Village As of December 31, 2025, 96% of the units at our two towers under construction, The Park Ward Village and Kalae, are under contract.
We broke ground on The Park Ward Village in October 2022, and expect to complete construction in the second quarter of 2026. The Park Ward Village will consist of 545 studio, one-, two-, and three-bedroom residences. As of December 31, 2025, we have entered into contracts for 529 units, representing 97% of total units.
We broke ground on Kalae in June 2024, and expect to complete construction in 2028. Kalae will consist of 329 one-, two-, and three-bedroom residences. As of December 31, 2025, we have entered into contracts for 307 units, representing 93% of total units.
The Woodlands We broke ground on The Ritz-Carlton Residences in October 2024, and expect to complete construction in 2027. The Ritz-Carlton Residences will consist of 111 one-, two-, three-, and four-bedroom residences. The development sits on the last available large-scale residential site on Lake Woodlands, spanning roughly eight acres across approximately 1,200 feet of premier lakefront shoreline. As of December 31, 2025, we have entered into contracts for 84 units, representing 76% of total units.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Table of Contents Index to Financial Statements
Predevelopment Condominiums
Ward Village We launched public pre-sales for The Launiu in February 2024. The Launiu will consist of 485 studio, one-, two-, and three-bedroom residences. As of December 31, 2025, we have entered into contracts for 346 units, representing 71% of total units. Construction is expected to commence on The Launiu in early 2026.
We launched public pre-sales for Melia in June 2025. Melia will consist of 220 one-, two-, three-, and four-bedroom residences. As of December 31, 2025, we have entered into contracts for 144 units, representing 65% of total units.
We launched public pre-sales for ‘Ilima in June 2025. ‘Ilima will consist of 148 one-, two-, three-, and four-bedroom residences. As of December 31, 2025, we have entered into contracts for 76 units, representing 51% of total units.
The following provides further detail for all condominium projects as of December 31, 2025:
| Completed | Location | Units Closed | Units Under Contract | Total Units | Total % of Units Closed or Under Contract | Completion Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Waiea | Honolulu, HI | 177 | — | 177 | 100% | Q4 2016 |
| Anaha | Honolulu, HI | 317 | — | 317 | 100% | Q4 2017 |
| Ae`o | Honolulu, HI | 465 | — | 465 | 100% | Q4 2018 |
| Ke Kilohana | Honolulu, HI | 423 | — | 423 | 100% | Q2 2019 |
| ‘A‘ali‘i | Honolulu, HI | 750 | — | 750 | 100% | Q4 2021 |
| Kō'ula | Honolulu, HI | 565 | — | 565 | 100% | Q3 2022 |
| Victoria Place | Honolulu, HI | 349 | — | 349 | 100% | Q4 2024 |
| Ulana Ward Village | Honolulu, HI | 690 | 6 | 696 | 100% | Q4 2025 |
| Under construction | ||||||
| The Park Ward Village | Honolulu, HI | — | 529 | 545 | 97% | Q2 2026 |
| Kalae | Honolulu, HI | — | 307 | 329 | 93% | 2028 |
| The Ritz-Carlton Residences | The Woodlands, TX | — | 84 | 111 | 76% | 2027 |
| Predevelopment | ||||||
| The Launiu | Honolulu, HI | — | 346 | 485 | 71% | 2028 |
| Melia | Honolulu, HI | — | 144 | 220 | 65% | 2030 |
| ‘Ilima | Honolulu, HI | — | 76 | 148 | 51% | 2030 |
HHH 2025 FORM 10-K | 48
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Table of Contents Index to Financial Statements
Corporate Income, Expenses, and Other Items
The following table contains certain corporate-related and other items not related to segment activities and that are not otherwise included within the segment analyses. Variances related to income and expenses included in NOI or EBT are explained within the previous segment discussions. Significant variances for consolidated items not included in NOI or EBT are described below for the years ended December 31:
thousands except percentages
| 2025 | 2024 | $ Change | % Change | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| General and administrative expenses | $(122,240) | $(91,752) | $(30,488) | (33)% |
| Gain (loss) on sale of MUD receivables | (48,197) | (48,651) | 454 | 1% |
| Corporate interest expense, net | (80,307) | (80,446) | 139 | —% |
| Corporate depreciation and amortization | (3,410) | (3,066) | (344) | (11)% |
| Income tax (expense) benefit | (37,616) | (80,184) | 42,568 | 53% |
| Other | (19,160) | (14,170) | (4,990) | (35)% |
| Total Corporate income, expenses, and other items | $(310,930) | $(318,269) | $7,339 | 2% |
Corporate income, expenses, and other items were favorably impacted compared to the prior year by the following:
- Income tax expense decreased $42.6 million primarily due to a decrease in Income before income taxes in 2025 as compared to 2024 as well as the net impact of the 2024 spinoff of Seaport Entertainment Group Inc. which included a net increase in tax expense in 2024 related to the revaluation of deferred tax assets and liabilities, partially offset by a partial release of valuation allowances on the Company’s deferred tax assets. Refer to Note 14 - Income Taxes in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 of this Annual Report for additional information.
Corporate income, expenses, and other items were unfavorably impacted compared to the prior year by the following:
- General and administrative expenses increased $30.5 million primarily due to a $17.1 million increase in Pershing Square advisory fees, $14.2 million of expenses related to a strategic reduction in force, and $10.5 million of legal and consulting fees related to the planned acquisition of Vantage. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in compensation and benefits, including those from the strategic reduction in force, as well as other cost reduction initiatives.
- Other expenses increased $5.0 million primarily due to increased marketing costs across our condominium projects.
Pershing Square Advisory Fees Pershing Square will support the Company’s new diversified holding company strategy by providing certain investment and advisory services. The Company will pay Pershing Square a quarterly advisory fee that includes base and variable components. Refer to Note 2 - Pershing Square in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 of this Annual Report for additional information on the advisory fee.
The base and variable components of the quarterly advisory fee are detailed below:
| thousands | Year Ended December 31, 2025 |
|---|---|
| Base fee | $9,849 |
| Variable fee | 7,284 |
| Total Pershing Square advisory fee | $17,133 |
HHH 2025 FORM 10-K | 49
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Table of Contents Index to Financial Statements
Income Taxes
thousands except percentages
| 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|
| Income tax expense (benefit) | $37,616 | $80,184 |
| Income (loss) before income taxes | $161,459 | $365,399 |
| Effective tax rate | 23.3% | 21.9% |
The Company’s effective tax rate is typically impacted by non-deductible executive compensation and other permanent differences as well as state income taxes, which cause the Company’s effective tax rate to deviate from the federal statutory rate.
The Company’s effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2025, was 23.3% compared to 21.9% for the year ended December 31, 2024. The increase was primarily due to a partial release of valuation allowances on the Company’s deferred tax assets in 2024.
For additional information on income taxes, see Note 14 - Income Taxes in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 of this Annual Report.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES Table of Contents Index to Financial Statements
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
We continue to maintain a strong balance sheet and endeavor to ensure we maintain the financial flexibility and liquidity necessary to fund future growth. As of December 31, 2025, we had $1.5 billion of cash and cash equivalents, $515.0 million of undrawn capacity on our Secured Bridgeland Notes, and $686.6 million of undrawn lender commitments available to be drawn for property development, subject to certain restrictions.
Cash Flows
| thousands | Year Ended December 31, 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Cash provided by (used in) operating activities of continuing operations | $462,370 | $447,751 |
| Cash provided by (used in) investing activities of continuing operations | (219,066) | (430,705) |
| Cash provided by (used in) financing activities of continuing operations | 855,351 | (27,754) |
| Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations | — | (43,846) |
Operating Activities Each segment’s relative contribution to our cash flows from operating activities will likely vary significantly from year to year given the changing nature of our development focus. Other than our condominium properties, most of the properties and projects in our Strategic Developments segment do not generate revenues, and the cash flows and earnings may vary. Condominium deposits received from contracted units offset by other various cash uses related to condominium development and sales activities are a substantial portion of our operating activities. Operating cash is utilized to fund ongoing development expenditures in our Strategic Developments and MPC segments.
The cash flows and earnings from the MPC business may fluctuate more than from our operating assets because the MPC business generates revenues from land sales rather than recurring contractual revenues from operating leases. MPC land sales are a substantial portion of our cash flows from operating activities and are partially offset by development costs associated with the land sales business and acquisitions of land that is intended to ultimately be developed and sold.
Net cash provided by operating activities of continuing operations was $462.4 million in 2025, and $447.8 million in 2024. The increase in cash provided by operating activities of $14.6 million was primarily due to an increase in MPC land sales, a decrease in condominium development expenditures, and a net decrease in interest payments, partially offset by a decrease in condominium deposits and cash from closings, the receipt of an insurance reimbursement for the Waiea remediation in the prior year, a decrease in MUD receivable collections, and a decrease in MPC development expenditures.
Investing Activities Net cash used in investing activities of continuing operations was $219.1 million in 2025, and $430.7 million in 2024. The $211.6 million decrease in cash used in investing activities was primarily due to a decrease in cash used related to the net parent investment in discontinued operations and a decrease in cash used for property development, partially offset by a decrease in proceeds from the sale of properties.
Financing Activities Net cash provided by financing activities of continuing operations was $855.4 million in 2025, and net cash used in financing activities was $27.8 million in 2024. The change in financing activities of $883.1 million was primarily due to $862.8 million of net proceeds received in the current year related to the Pershing Square Issuance and a $25.1 million decrease in principal payments on mortgages, notes, and loans payable.
Short- and Long-Term Liquidity
Short-Term Liquidity In the next 12 months, we expect to continue executing our strategy to transition from a pure-play real estate company to a diversified holding company.
From our real estate operations, we expect our primary sources of cash to include cash flow from MPC land sales and condominium closings, cash generated from our operating assets, first mortgage financings secured by our assets, and deposits from condominium sales (which are restricted to funding construction of the related developments). We expect our primary uses of cash to include condominium pre-development and development costs, debt principal payments and debt service costs, MPC land development costs, other strategic developments costs, and general operating costs. We believe that our sources of cash, including existing cash on hand will provide sufficient liquidity to meet our existing obligations and anticipated ordinary course operating expenses for at least the next 12 months.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES Table of Contents Index to Financial Statements
As previously disclosed, in December 2025, we entered into a purchase agreement to acquire Vantage for $2.1 billion in cash consideration. The transaction remains subject to regulatory approvals and other customary closing conditions, and is expected to close in the second quarter of 2026. To support the funding of the acquisition and to allow for an additional equity contribution to Vantage post acquisition to be used for working capital and general corporate purposes, the Company entered into an equity commitment letter with Pershing Square Holdings, Ltd. under which Pershing Square committed to purchase up to $1.0 billion of the Company’s preferred stock, prior to and contingent upon the closing of the Vantage acquisition. The acquisition is expected to be funded through the Company’s cash on hand, and proceeds from the issuance of the preferred stock. We also expect to incur additional transaction-related expenses prior to the closing and will reimburse all reasonable and documented expenses incurred by Pershing Square in connection with the preferred stock issuance. We believe we have adequate liquidity to meet these acquisition-related obligations; however, the timing of regulatory approvals and closing conditions may affect the timing of cash outflows associated with the transaction.
Long-Term Liquidity The development and redevelopment opportunities in Strategic Developments and Operating Assets are capital intensive and will require significant additional funding, if and when pursued. Any additional funding beyond those sources listed above would be raised with a mix of construction, bridge, and long-term financings, by entering into joint venture arrangements, as well as future equity raises. We cannot provide assurance that financing arrangements for our properties will be on favorable terms or occur at all, which could have a negative impact on our liquidity and capital resources. In addition, we typically must provide completion guarantees to lenders in connection with their financing for our projects.
The preferred stock issued by HHH to Pershing Square will become convertible into the common stock of Vantage if not redeemed by the end of the seventh fiscal year post-transaction. HHH will receive a series of call options giving it the right but not the obligation to redeem the preferred stock over the next seven years. The acquisition is expected to have other long‑term implications for the Company’s liquidity profile, although the magnitude and timing of these impacts cannot yet be determined.
Summary of Remaining Development Costs The following table summarizes remaining development costs and related debt for projects held in the Operating Assets and Strategic Developments segments as of December 31, 2025. Total cost remaining to be paid net of debt and buyer deposits consists of $56.0 million related to substantially completed projects, $35.5 million related to projects with estimated completion dates within the next 12 months, and $118.7 million related to projects with estimated completion dates in 2027 and 2028.
Projects that are substantially complete and have been placed into service in the Operating Assets segment and completed condominium projects in the Strategic Developments segment are included in the following table if the project has more than $1.0 million of estimated costs remaining to be incurred. The remaining cost related to substantially completed projects typically represent costs associated with the completion of common areas at our completed condominium towers and budgeted tenant allowances necessary to bring our completed operating assets to stabilized occupancy. The $56.0 million of remaining cost related to substantially complete projects is primarily comprised of $24.6 million for Ulana Ward Village for lease up and tenant buildout of the ground floor retail space and $23.7 million for 1 Riva Row which is being placed in service in phases with only 61% of the property in service as of December 31, 2025.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES Table of Contents Index to Financial Statements
We expect to be able to meet our cash funding requirements with a combination of existing and anticipated construction loans, condominium buyer deposits, cash flow from our Operating Assets and MPC segments, net proceeds from condominium sales, and our existing cash balances.
| thousands Operating Assets | Estimated Remaining to be Spent | Remaining Buyer Deposits/Holdback to be Drawn | Debt to be Drawn (a) | Costs Remaining to be Paid, Net of Debt and Buyer Deposits/Holdbacks to be Drawn (b) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Columbia | $14,337 | $— | $14,460 | $(123) |
| The Woodlands | 30,565 | — | 4,147 | 26,418 |
| Bridgeland | 4,921 | — | 1,900 | 3,021 |
| Summerlin | 14,179 | — | 14,204 | (25) |
| Total Operating Assets | 64,002 | — | 34,711 | 29,291 |
| Strategic Developments | ||||
| The Woodlands | 253,327 | — | 149,873 | 103,454 |
| Bridgeland | 15,798 | — | 15,725 | 73 |
| Ward Village | 588,755 | 43,752 | 467,601 | 77,402 |
| Total Strategic Developments | 857,880 | 43,752 | 633,199 | 180,929 |
| Total | $921,882 | $43,752 | $667,910 | $210,220 |
(a) Refer to Note 9 - Mortgages, Notes, and Loans Payable, Net in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 of this Annual Report for additional information on debt.
(b) Negative balance relates to costs paid by HHH, but not yet reimbursed by our lenders. We expect to receive funds from our lenders for these costs in the future.
Contractual Cash Obligations and Commitments The following table aggregates our contractual cash obligations and commitments as of December 31, 2025:
| thousands | 2026 | 2027 | 2028 | 2029 | 2030 | Thereafter | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mortgages, notes, and loans payable | $663,243 | $507,661 | $923,362 | $1,075,975 | $277,225 | $1,696,748 | $5,144,214 |
| Interest payments (a) | 260,531 | 214,724 | 173,511 | 108,835 | 85,862 | 149,256 | 992,719 |
| Ground lease commitments | 300 | 300 | 300 | 300 | 300 | 5,300 | 6,800 |
| Total | $924,074 | $722,685 | $1,097,173 | $1,185,110 | $363,387 | $1,851,304 | $6,143,733 |
(a) Interest is based on the borrowings that are presently outstanding and current floating interest rates.
Debt As of December 31, 2025, the Company had $5.1 billion of outstanding debt and $686.6 million of undrawn lender commitment available to be drawn for property development, subject to certain restrictions. Our proportionate share of the debt of our unconsolidated ventures totaled $215.5 million as of December 31, 2025. All of this indebtedness is without recourse to the Company, with the exception of the collateral maintenance obligation for Floreo. See Note 12 - Commitments and Contingencies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 of this Annual Report for additional information related to the Company’s collateral maintenance obligation.
On February 17, 2026, HHC, the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, issued $500.0 million of 5.875% senior unsecured notes due 2032 and $500.0 million of 6.125% senior unsecured notes due 2034 (collectively the New Notes). The New Notes will pay interest semi-annually, in each case payable on March 1 and September 1 of each year, beginning on September 1, 2026. HHC used the net proceeds to redeem its outstanding $750.0 million 5.375% senior unsecured notes due 2028, including the payment of premiums, accrued and unpaid interest and expenses related to such redemption, and will use the remaining proceeds for general corporate purposes.
Refer to Note 9 - Mortgages, Notes, and Loans Payable, Net in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 of this Annual Report for additional detail.
Debt Compliance As of December 31, 2025, the Company was not in compliance with certain property-level debt covenants due to not meeting certain debt service coverage ratios caused by lease expirations, vacancies, rent abatements, and other factors. As a result, the excess net cash flow after debt service from the underlying properties became restricted. While the restricted cash could not be used for general corporate purposes, it could be used to fund operations of the underlying assets, and therefore there was no material impact on the Company’s liquidity or its ability to operate these assets.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES Table of Contents Index to Financial Statements
Net Debt The following table summarizes our net debt on a segment basis as of December 31, 2025. Net debt is defined as Mortgages, notes, and loans payable, net, including our ownership share of debt of our unconsolidated ventures, reduced by liquidity sources to satisfy such obligations such as our ownership share of Cash and cash equivalents and SID, MUD, and Tax Increment Financing (TIF) receivables. Although net debt is a non-GAAP financial measure, we believe that such information is useful to our investors and other users of our financial statements as net debt and its components are important indicators of our overall liquidity, capital structure, and financial position. However, it should not be used as an alternative to our debt calculated in accordance with GAAP.
| thousands | Operating Assets | Master Planned Communities | Strategic Developments | Segment Totals | Non- Segment Amounts | December 31, 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mortgages, notes, and loans payable, net | $2,431,685 | $159,280 | $481,520 | $3,072,485 | $2,037,343 | $5,109,828 |
| Mortgages, notes, and loans payable of unconsolidated ventures | 90,533 | 124,938 | — | 215,471 | — | 215,471 |
| Less: | ||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | (25,941) | (126,774) | (32,060) | (184,775) | (1,283,732) | (1,468,507) |
| Cash and cash equivalents of unconsolidated ventures | (4,288) | (12,670) | (3,793) | (20,751) | — | (20,751) |
| Special Improvement District receivables | — | (90,417) | — | (90,417) | — | (90,417) |
| Municipal Utility District receivables, net | — | (459,729) | — | (459,729) | — | (459,729) |
| TIF receivable | — | — | (4,012) | (4,012) | — | (4,012) |
| Net Debt | $2,491,989 | $(405,372) | $441,655 | $2,528,272 | $753,611 | $3,281,883 |
Unconsolidated Ventures We have interests in certain unconsolidated ventures which, as of December 31, 2025, had mortgage financing totaling $434.0 million, with our proportionate share of this debt totaling $215.5 million. All of this indebtedness is without recourse to the Company, with the exception of the collateral maintenance obligation for Floreo. See Note 12 - Commitments and Contingencies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 of this Annual Report for additional information related to the Company’s collateral maintenance obligation. The following table summarizes our share of affiliate debt and cash as of December 31, 2025:
| thousands Operating Assets | Company’s Share of Unconsolidated Ventures’ Debt | Company’s Share of Unconsolidated Ventures’ Cash |
|---|---|---|
| Operating equity investments | $90,533 | $4,288 |
| Master Planned Communities | ||
| The Summit | 7,690 | 10,862 |
| Floreo | 117,248 | 1,808 |
| Strategic Developments | ||
| West End Alexandria | — | 3,752 |
| Other | — | 41 |
| Total | $215,471 | $20,751 |
HHH 2025 FORM 10-K | 54
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES Table of Contents Index to Financial Statements
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make informed judgments, assumptions, and estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Changes in facts and circumstances or additional information may result in revised estimates, and actual results may differ from these estimates.
Below is a discussion of the accounting policies and estimates that we consider critical to an understanding of our financial condition and operating results that may require complex or significant judgment in their application or require estimates about matters which are inherently uncertain. A discussion of our significant accounting policies, including further discussion of the accounting policies described below, can be found in Note 1 - Presentation of Financial Statements and Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 of this Annual Report.
Impairments
Methodology We review our long-lived assets for potential impairment indicators whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. Although the carrying amount may exceed the estimated fair value of certain properties, a real estate asset is only considered to be impaired when its carrying amount is not expected to be recovered through estimated future undiscounted cash flows. To the extent an impairment provision is necessary, the excess of the carrying amount of the asset over its estimated fair value is expensed to operations and the carrying amount of the asset is reduced. The adjusted carrying amount, which represents the new cost basis of the asset, is depreciated over the remaining useful life of the asset or, for MPCs, is expensed as a cost of sales when land is sold.
Judgments and uncertainties An impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount of an asset is not recoverable and exceeds its fair value. The cash flow estimates used both for determining recoverability and estimating fair value are inherently judgmental and reflect current and projected trends in rental, occupancy, pricing, development costs, sales pace, capitalization rates, selling costs, and estimated holding periods for the applicable assets. As such, the evaluation of anticipated cash flows is highly subjective and is based in part on assumptions that could differ materially from actual results in future periods. Unfavorable changes in any of the primary assumptions could result in a reduction of anticipated future cash flows and could indicate property impairment. Uncertainties related to the primary assumptions could affect the timing of an impairment. While we believe our assumptions are reasonable, changes in these assumptions may have a material impact on our financial results.
Master Planned Communities Cost of Sales
Methodology When residential or commercial land is sold, the cost of sales includes actual costs incurred and estimates of future development costs benefiting the property sold. When land is sold, costs are allocated to each sold superpad or lot based upon the relative sales value. For purposes of allocating development costs, estimates of future revenues and development costs are re-evaluated throughout the year, with adjustments being allocated prospectively to the remaining parcels available for sale. For certain parcels of land, including acquired parcels that the Company does not intend to develop or for which development was complete at the date of acquisition, the specific identification method is used to determine the cost of sales.
Judgments and uncertainties MPC cost of sales estimates are highly judgmental as they are sensitive to cost escalation, sales price escalation, and pace of absorption, which are subject to judgment and affected by expectations about future market or economic conditions. Changes in the assumptions used to estimate future development costs could result in a significant impact on the amounts recorded as cost of sales.
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS AND DEVELOPMENTS
Please refer to Note 1 - Presentation of Financial Statements and Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 of this Annual Report for additional information about new accounting pronouncements.
MARKET RISK QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES Table of Contents Index to Financial Statements
Market risk
As filed, 2,556 characters, with its headings, lists and tables. Extracted from the main document; charts and exhibits are in the original on sec.gov.
We are subject to interest rate risk with respect to our variable-rate financings as increases in interest rates would cause our payments under such financings to increase. With respect to fixed-rate financings, increases in interest rates could make it more difficult to refinance such debt when it becomes due. As properties are placed into service and become stabilized, we typically refinance the variable-rate debt with long-term fixed-rate debt.
The Company uses derivative instruments to manage its interest rate risk, primarily through the use of interest rate swaps, caps, and collars. The Company had $1.2 billion of variable-rate debt outstanding at December 31, 2025, of which $361.5 million was swapped to a fixed rate through the use of interest rate swaps and $648.1 million had interest rate cap contracts in place. Additionally, the interest rate caps and collars are on construction loans and mortgages with undrawn loan commitment of $29.0 million as of December 31, 2025, which will be covered by the interest rate cap and collar contracts upon drawing. Refer to Note 11 - Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 of this Annual Report for additional detail.
As of December 31, 2025, annual interest costs would increase approximately $2.1 million for every 1.00% increase in floating interest rates. Generally, a significant portion of our interest expense is capitalized due to the level of assets we currently have under development; therefore, the current impact of a change in our interest rate on our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income would be less than the total change, but we would incur higher cash payments and the development costs of our assets would be higher, resulting in greater depreciation or cost of sales in later years.
The following table summarizes principal cash flows on our debt obligations and related weighted-average interest rates by expected maturity dates as of December 31, 2025:
thousands except percentages
| Contractual Maturity Date 2026 | 2027 | 2028 | 2029 | 2030 | Thereafter | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mortgages, notes, and loans payable | $663,243 | $507,661 | $923,362 | $1,075,975 | $277,225 | $1,696,748 | $5,144,214 |
| Weighted-average interest rate | 5.29% | 5.06% | 4.85% | 4.65% | 4.64% | 4.27% |
HHH 2025 FORM 10-K | 56
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INDEX Table of Contents Index to Financial Statements
Controls and procedures
As filed, 2,089 characters, with its headings, lists and tables. Extracted from the main document; charts and exhibits are in the original on sec.gov.
DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act of 1934) that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and principal accounting officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
As required by SEC rules, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and principal accounting officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2025, the end of the period covered by this report. Based on the foregoing, our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and principal accounting officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2025.
INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
There were no changes to our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Management’s annual report on internal control over financial reporting is provided in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The attestation report of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, regarding the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is also provided in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Figures reported in this filing
Standardized line items from the XBRL in this filing, for the period ended 2025-12-31. Comparative periods it repeats are left out.
| Line item | Period | Value | XBRL concept |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 12 months2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 | $1.47bn | us-gaap:Revenues |
| Operating income | 12 months2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 | $331.5m | us-gaap:OperatingIncomeLoss |
| Interest expense | 12 months2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 | $169.9m | us-gaap:InterestExpenseNonoperating |
| Income tax | 12 months2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 | $37.6m | us-gaap:IncomeTaxExpenseBenefit |
| Net income | 12 months2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 | $123.9m | us-gaap:NetIncomeLoss |
| Diluted EPS | 12 months2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 | $2.21 | us-gaap:EarningsPerShareDiluted |
| Basic EPS | 12 months2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 | $2.22 | us-gaap:EarningsPerShareBasic |
| Diluted shares (weighted) | 12 months2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 | 56,046,000 shares | us-gaap:WeightedAverageNumberOfDilutedSharesOutstanding |
| Operating cash flow | 12 months2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 | $462.4m | us-gaap:NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities |
| Cash and equivalents | At period end2025-12-31 | $1.47bn | us-gaap:CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue |
| Total assets | At period end2025-12-31 | $10.64bn | us-gaap:Assets |
| Total liabilities | At period end2025-12-31 | $6.80bn | us-gaap:Liabilities |
| Long-term debt | At period end2025-12-31 | $5.11bn | us-gaap:LongTermDebt |
| Shareholders' equity | At period end2025-12-31 | $3.78bn | us-gaap:StockholdersEquity |
Source: SEC EDGAR, the filing index for accession 0001628280-26-009710. Last ingested by Listed: Nov 5, 2026, 18:15 ET. Listed shows no prices and gives no investment advice.