RadNet, Inc.: Form 10-K for the period ended Dec 31, 2025
Filed with the SEC on Mar 2, 2026 and accepted by EDGAR at Mar 2, 2026, 17:17 ET.
Business
As filed, 76,889 characters, with its headings, lists and tables. Extracted from the main document; charts and exhibits are in the original on sec.gov.
Business Overview
We are a leading national provider of diagnostic imaging services in the United States based on number of locations and annual imaging revenue. We have been in business since 1985. Our principal business segment is the provision of diagnostic imaging services. As of December 31, 2025, we operated, directly or indirectly through hospital and health system joint ventures, 418 imaging centers located in Arizona, California, Delaware, Florida, Maryland, Virginia, New Jersey, Texas and New York.
Our Imaging Centers segment provides physicians with capabilities to facilitate the diagnosis and treatment of diseases and disorders and may reduce unnecessary invasive procedures, often reducing the cost and amount of care for patients. Our services include magnetic resonance imaging ("MRI"), computed tomography ("CT"), positron emission tomography ("PET"), nuclear medicine, mammography, ultrasound, diagnostic radiology ("X-ray"), fluoroscopy and other related procedures. The vast majority of our centers offer multi-modality imaging services, a key point of differentiation from our competitors. Our multi-modality strategy diversifies revenue streams, reduces exposure to reimbursement changes and provides patients and referring physicians one location to serve the needs of multiple procedures. Integral to the imaging center business is our Digital Health operating segment, which sells computerized systems that distribute, display, store and retrieve digital images.
We seek to develop leading positions in regional markets in order to leverage operational efficiencies. We develop our imaging business through a combination of organic growth and acquisitions. Our scale and density within selected geographies provides close, long-term relationships with key payors, radiology groups and referring physicians. Each of our center-level and regional operations teams is responsible for managing relationships with local physicians and payors, meeting our standards of patient service, and maintaining profitability. We provide training programs, standardized policies and procedures, and sharing of best practices among the physicians in our regional networks.
Internationally, our majority-owned subsidiary, The HLH Imaging Group Limited fka Heart & Lung Imaging Limited, provides teleradiology services for remote interpretation of images on behalf of providers within the framework of the United Kingdom's National Health Service.
We have also established a Digital Health segment division, that develops and deploys Artificial Intelligence ("AI") suites to enhance radiologist interpretations of, among others, breast, lung and prostate images. The segment is led by our DeepHealth, Inc. subsidiary and includes our acquisitions of Aidence Holding B.V. and Quantib B.V., both based in the Netherlands. The portfolio of software solutions is anchored by eRad, Inc.'s RIS/PACS, informatics designed specifically for outpatient radiology and DeepHealth OS, a cloud-native operating system that helps operate all aspects of the radiology service line from scheduling and patient preparation to technologist workflow to interpretation and referral management.
Available Information
All reports we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) are available free of charge via EDGAR through the SEC website at www.sec.gov (http://www.sec.gov). We also maintain a website at www.radnet.com (http://www.radnet.com) where we make available, free of charge, our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after the material is electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. References to our website in this report are provided as a convenience and the information contained on, or otherwise accessible through, the website is not incorporated by reference into, nor does it form a part of this annual report on Form 10-K or any other document that we file with the SEC.
Industry Overview
Diagnostic imaging involves the use of non-invasive procedures to generate representations of internal anatomy and function that can be recorded on film or digitized for display on a video monitor. Diagnostic imaging procedures facilitate the early diagnosis and treatment of diseases and disorders and may reduce unnecessary invasive procedures, often minimizing the cost and amount of care for patients. Diagnostic imaging procedures include MRI, CT, PET, nuclear medicine, ultrasound, mammography, X-ray and fluoroscopy.
While X-ray remains the most commonly performed diagnostic imaging procedure, the fastest growing and higher margin procedures are MRI, CT and PET. The rapid growth in PET scans is attributable to the increasing recognition of the efficacy of PET scans in the diagnosis and monitoring of cancer. The number of MRI and CT scans performed annually in the United States continues to grow due to their wider acceptance by physicians and payors, an increasing number of applications for their use and a general increase in demand due to the aging population.
In recent years, there has been rapid development of AI tools for the radiology field. By August 2024, the United States Food & Drug Administration (“FDA”) reported that it had granted marketing clearance to over 700 artificial intelligence and machine learning (“AI/ML”)-enabled radiology software products. Modern AI is built by training on large databases to recognize patterns with much higher performance than previously. AI methods are now being employed throughout the imaging industry in a wide variety of ways, such as speeding image acquisition, providing diagnostic assistance, or prioritizing workflows. In addition, AI methods can speed up administrative tasks, such as tracking of individuals who need procedures on a regular basis (i.e., mammograms, follow-up exams, etc.) and alerting our staff to contact the patient and schedule appointments.
Diagnostic Imaging Settings
Diagnostic imaging services are typically provided in one of the following settings:
Fixed-site, freestanding outpatient diagnostic centers. These centers range from single-modality to multi-modality centers and are generally not owned by hospitals or clinics. These centers depend upon physician referrals for their patients and generally do not maintain dedicated, contractual relationships with hospitals or clinics. In fact, these centers may compete with hospitals or clinics that have their own imaging systems to provide services to these patients. These centers bill third-party payors, such as managed care organizations, insurance companies, Medicare or Medicaid. All of our wholly owned centers are in this category.
Hospitals. Many hospitals provide both inpatient and outpatient diagnostic imaging services, typically on site or at a dedicated center located on or nearby the hospital campus. These centers can be owned and operated by the hospital and provide imaging services to inpatients as ordered or outpatients through physician referrals. The hospital normally bills third-party payors such as managed care organizations, insurance companies, Medicare or Medicaid. We have entered into joint ventures with certain hospitals to both provide and manage their diagnostic imaging services, allowing them to leverage our industry expertise.
Mobile Imaging. While many hospitals own or lease their own equipment, certain hospitals provide diagnostic imaging services by contracting with providers of mobile imaging services. Using specially designed trailers, mobile imaging service providers transport imaging equipment and provide services to hospitals and clinics on a part-time or full-time basis, thus allowing small to mid-size hospitals and clinics that do not have the patient demand to justify fixed on-site equipment access to advanced diagnostic imaging technology. Diagnostic imaging providers contract directly with the hospital or clinic and are typically reimbursed directly by them. We do not provide mobile imaging services.
Diagnostic Imaging Modalities
The principal diagnostic imaging modalities we use at our centers are:
MRI. MRI has become widely accepted as the standard diagnostic tool for a wide and fast-growing variety of clinical applications for soft tissue anatomy, such as those found in the brain, spinal cord, abdomen, heart and interior ligaments of body joints such as the knee. MRI uses a strong magnetic field in conjunction with low energy electromagnetic waves that are processed by a computer to produce high-resolution, three-dimensional, cross-sectional images of body tissue. A typical MRI examination takes from 20 to 45 minutes. MRI systems are designed as either open or closed and have magnetic field strength of 0.2 Tesla to 3.0 Tesla.
CT. CT provides higher resolution images than conventional X-rays, but generally not as well defined as those produced by MRI. CT uses a computer to direct the movement of an X-ray tube to produce multiple cross-sectional images of a particular organ or area of the body. CT is used to detect tumors and other conditions affecting bones and internal organs. It is also used to detect the occurrence of strokes, hemorrhages and infections. A typical CT examination takes from 15 to 45 minutes.
PET. PET scanning involves the administration of a radiopharmaceutical agent with a positron-emitting isotope and the measurement of the distribution of that isotope to create images for diagnostic purposes. PET scans provide the capability to determine how metabolic activity impacts other aspects of physiology in the disease process by correlating the reading for the PET with other tools such as CT or MRI. PET technology has been found highly effective and appropriate in certain clinical circumstances for the detection and assessment of tumors throughout the body, the evaluation of some cardiac conditions and the assessment of epilepsy seizure sites. The information provided by PET technology often obviates the need to perform further highly invasive or diagnostic surgical procedures. In addition, we employ combined PET/CT systems that blend the PET and CT imaging modalities into one scanner.
Nuclear Medicine. Nuclear medicine uses short-lived radioactive isotopes that release small amounts of radiation that can be recorded by a gamma camera and processed by a computer to produce an image of various anatomical structures or to assess the function of various organs such as the heart, kidneys, thyroid and bones. Nuclear medicine is used primarily to study anatomic and metabolic functions.
X-ray. X-rays use roentgen rays to penetrate the body and record images of organs and structures on film. Digital X-ray systems add computer image processing capability to traditional X-ray images, which provides faster transmission of images with a higher resolution and the capability to store images more cost-effectively.
Ultrasound. Ultrasound imaging uses sound waves and their echoes to visualize and locate internal organs. It is particularly useful in viewing soft tissues that do not X-ray well. Ultrasound is used in pregnancy to avoid X-ray exposure as well as in gynecological, urologic, vascular, cardiac and breast applications.
Mammography. Mammography is a specialized form of radiology using low dosage X-rays to visualize breast tissue and is the primary screening tool for breast cancer. Mammography procedures and related services assist in the diagnosis of and treatment planning for breast cancer.
Fluoroscopy. Fluoroscopy uses ionizing radiation combined with a video viewing system for real time monitoring of organs.
Industry Trends
We believe the diagnostic imaging services industry will continue to grow as a result of a number of factors, including the following:
Escalating Demand for Healthcare Services from an Aging Population. The U.S. population is expected to trend older over the coming decades. According to a Pew Research Center report issued January 9, 2024, the number of U.S. residents age over 65 stands at approximately 62 million, representing 18% of the population, and is expected to reach 84 million, or 23% of the total population by 2054. Because diagnostic imaging use tends to increase as a person ages, we believe the aging population will generate more demand for diagnostic imaging procedures.
Greater Consumer Awareness of and Demand for Preventive Diagnostic Screening. Diagnostic imaging, such as elective full-body scans, is increasingly being used as a screening tool for preventive care procedures. Consumer awareness of diagnostic imaging as a less invasive and preventive screening method has added to the growth in diagnostic imaging procedures. We believe that further technological advancements allowing for early diagnosis of diseases and disorders using less invasive procedures will create additional demand for diagnostic imaging.
New Effective Applications for Diagnostic Imaging Technology. New technological developments are expected to extend the clinical uses of diagnostic imaging technology and increase the number of scans performed. Recent technological advancements include:
- MRI spectroscopy, which can differentiate malignant from benign lesions;
- MRI angiography, which can produce three-dimensional images of body parts and assess the status of blood vessels;
- enhancements in teleradiology systems, which permit the digital transmission of radiological images from one location to another for interpretation by radiologists at remote locations;
- the development of combined PET/CT and PET/MRI scanners, which combine technologies to create a powerful diagnostic imaging system; and
- use of augmented reality technologies which make it possible to create three dimensional images that physicians can examine through virtual reality headsets or print using a three dimensional printer.
Additional improvements in imaging technologies, contrast agents, and scan capabilities are leading to new non-invasive diagnostic imaging applications, including methods of diagnosing blockages in the heart’s vital coronary arteries, liver metastases, pelvic diseases and vascular abnormalities without exploratory surgery. We believe that the use of the diagnostic capabilities of MRI and other imaging services will continue to increase because they are cost-effective, time-efficient, and non-invasive as compared to alternative procedures, including surgery, and that newer technologies and future technological advancements will further increase the use of imaging services. At the same time, the industry has increasingly upgraded existing equipment to expand applications, extend the useful life of existing equipment, improve image quality, reduce image acquisition time and increase the volume of scans that can be performed. We believe the use of equipment upgrades rather than equipment replacements will continue, as we do not foresee new imaging technologies on the near-term horizon that will displace MRI, CT or PET as the principal advanced diagnostic imaging modalities.
Impact of Artificial Intelligence. AI has the potential to significantly change the medical imaging industry. Current AI applications are aiding in image creation (for example, reducing the time required to perform an MRI scan, or the dose of a CT or PET scan) as well as aiding physicians performing image interpretation. AI appears to be particularly valuable in aiding radiologists reviewing cancer screening exams, where volumes can be high and lesions can be difficult to find, such as in screening mammography. AI can also improve business processes to better effectively serve customers and improve reimbursement and collections accuracy.
Competition
Our competitors include independent imaging operators and smaller regional operators, as well as hospitals and hospital groups that operate their own imaging services. In addition, some physician practices have established their own diagnostic imaging centers within their group practices. Some of our competitors may now or in the future have access to greater financial resources than we do, which could allow them to establish more centers and provide access to newer, more advanced equipment.
We compete principally on the basis of our reputation, our ability to provide multiple modalities at many of our centers, the location of our centers, the quality of our diagnostic imaging services and technologists and our ability to establish and maintain relationships with healthcare providers and referring physicians. We believe that the following competitive strengths differentiate us from our competition.
Our Scale and Reputation. As of December 31, 2025, we operated, directly or indirectly through hospital and health system joint ventures, 418 centers in Arizona, California, Delaware, Florida, Maryland, Virginia, New Jersey, New York, and Texas. We are the largest operator of freestanding, fixed-site outpatient diagnostic imaging service centers in the United States, based on number of centers and revenue. Our specific knowledge of our geographic markets drives strong relationships with key payors, radiology groups and referring physicians within our markets.
Our Comprehensive "Multi-Modality" Diagnostic Imaging Offering. The vast majority of our centers offer multiple types of imaging procedures, driving strong relationships with referring physicians and payors in our markets and a diversified revenue base. At each of our multi-modality centers, we offer patients and referring physicians one location to serve their needs for multiple procedures. This prevents multiple patient visits or unnecessary travel between locations, thus increasing patient throughput and decreasing costs and time delays. Our revenue is generated by a broad mix of modalities. We believe our multi-modality strategy lessens our exposure to reimbursement changes in any specific modality.
Our Competitive Pricing. Our business focus, scale, resources and access to technology afford us with certain operating efficiencies. Our size and scale allow us to achieve operating, sourcing and administrative efficiencies, including equipment and medical supply sourcing savings and favorable maintenance contracts from equipment manufacturers and other suppliers. As such, we believe our fees are generally lower than hospital fees for the same services we provide.
Our Facility Density in Many Highly Populated Areas of the United States. Our diagnostic imaging centers are strategically organized into regional networks concentrated in major population centers in nine states, providing a density that offers unique benefits to our patients, our referring physicians, our payors and us. We are able to increase the convenience of our services to patients by implementing scheduling systems within geographic regions, where practical. For example, many of our diagnostic imaging centers within a particular region can access the patient appointment calendars of other centers within the same regional network to efficiently allocate time available and to meet a patient's appointment, date, time, or location preferences. The grouping of our centers within regional networks enables us to easily move technologists and other personnel, as well as equipment, from over-utilized to under-utilized centers on an as-needed basis, and drive referrals. Our organization of referral networks results in increased patient throughput, greater operating efficiencies, better equipment utilization rates and improved response time for our patients. We believe our networks of centers and tailored service offerings for geographic areas drive local physician referrals, make us an attractive candidate for selection as a preferred provider by third-party payors and create economies of scale.
Our Strong Relationships with Payors and Diversified Payor Mix. Our revenue is derived from a diverse mix of payors, including commercial insurance payors, managed care capitated payors, and government payors such as Medicare and Medicaid, mitigating our exposure to unfavorable reimbursement trends within any one payor class. In addition, our experience with capitation arrangements has provided us with the expertise to manage utilization and pricing effectively, resulting in a predictable and recurring stream of revenue. We believe that third-party payors representing large groups of patients often prefer to enter into managed care contracts with providers that offer a broad array of diagnostic imaging services at convenient locations throughout a geographic area.
Our Strong Relationships with Experienced and Highly Regarded Radiologists. Our contracted radiologists have outstanding credentials, strong relationships with referring physicians, and a broad mix of sub-specialties. The collective experience and expertise of these radiologists translates into more accurate and efficient service to patients.
Our Experienced and Committed Management Team. Our senior and executive management teams have created our differentiated approach based on their comprehensive understanding of the diagnostic imaging industry and the dynamics of our regional markets. We have a track record of successful acquisitions and integration of acquired businesses into RadNet and have managed the business through a variety of economic and reimbursement cycles.
Our Technologically Advanced Operations. In 2019, we created an AI enabled Health Informatics team that now hosts the combined efforts of our acquisitions of DeepHealth, Inc., Aidence Holding B.V., Quantib B.V, Kheiron Technologies, ICAD Inc, See Mode Technologies and CIMAR. All of these businesses now constitute the “Digital Health segment” as a standalone business segment within RadNet. The segment is currently focused on developing improved medical interpretation of scans within the fields of Clinical AI for mammography, lung, prostate, ultrasound imaging AI, as well as Enterprise Operations and Enterprise Imaging products such as RIS, PACS, Reporting and a Remote Scanning Solution for imaging modalities.
We have assembled an industry leading team to create radiology workflow solutions that improve patient care and drive efficiency. The portfolio of AI enabled Health Informatics solutions are designed for outpatient radiology as well as hospital systems and at the center of these solutions is the DeepHealth OS, a cloud-native operating system that helps operate all aspects of the radiology service line from scheduling and patient preparation to technologist workflow to interpretation and referral management.
In 2025, the Digital Health segment integrated the business of ICAD Inc. which was a leader in providing AI solutions for Breast Cancer detection. This acquisition added roughly 1500 customers to the Digital Health business along with differentiating commercialization and product development capabilities. Additionally, in November 2025 the segment acquired CIMAR in UK which provides Image exchange platform Services for various NHS hospitals as well as private healthcare providers. This acquisition enables us to deliver screening programs with embedded AI solutions at scale in the UK and over time in other countries as well.
Our Digital Health segment has by now 22 FDA clearances and 15 CE marks across its portfolio of AI-enabled Health Informatics solutions. Our digital health segment provides these solutions to us and to over 2000+ customers in the US and outside of the US.
Business Strategy
Maximize Performance at Our Existing Centers. We seek to enhance our operations and increase scan volume and revenue at our existing centers by expanding physician relationships and increasing the procedure offerings.
Focus on Profitable Contracting. We regularly evaluate our contracts with third-party payors, industry vendors and radiology groups, as well as our equipment and real property leases, to determine how we may improve the terms to increase our revenues and reduce our expenses. Because many of our contracts with third party payors are short-term in nature, we can regularly renegotiate these contracts, if necessary. We believe our position as a leading provider of diagnostic imaging services and our long-term relationships with physician groups in our markets enable us to obtain more favorable contract terms than would be available to smaller or less experienced imaging services providers.
Optimize Operating Efficiencies. We seek to maximize our equipment utilization by adding, upgrading, and re-deploying equipment where we experience excess demand. We will continue to trim excess operating and general and administrative costs where it is feasible to do so. We may also continue to use, where appropriate, highly trained radiology physician assistants to perform, under appropriate supervision of radiologists, basic services traditionally performed by radiologists. We will continue to upgrade our advanced information technology system to create cost reductions for our centers in areas such as image storage, support personnel and financial management.
Expand Our Networks. We intend to continue to expand the number of our centers both organically and through targeted acquisitions, using a disciplined approach for evaluating and entering new areas, including consideration of whether we have adequate financial resources to expand. Our current plans are to strengthen our market presence in geographic areas where we currently have existing operations and to expand into neighboring and other areas where we believe we can compete effectively. We perform extensive due diligence before developing a new facility or acquiring an existing facility or entering into a joint venture with a hospital to manage a facility, including surveying local referral sources and radiologists, as well as examining the demographics, reimbursement environment, competitive landscape and intrinsic demand of the geographic market. We generally will only enter new markets where:
- there is sufficient patient demand for outpatient diagnostic imaging services;
- we believe we can gain significant market share;
- we can build key referral relationships or we have already established such relationships; and
- payors are receptive to our entry into the market.
Expand Our Joint Ventures. As part of our growth strategy we have entered into joint ventures with hospitals, health systems or radiology practices that were formed for the purpose of owning and operating diagnostic imaging centers. We have created a number of joint ventures in key markets with well-established hospital systems to manage additional centers. We intend to continue to expand in established markets through additional joint ventures, particularly with hospital systems. We believe that these joint ventures deepen and expand our strength in markets where we are already established.
Advancing a Cloud First, AI Powered Digital Health Platform. Our Digital Health segment, DeepHealth, is a global leader in AI‑powered health informatics, offering a portfolio of 22 FDA‑cleared and 15 CE‑marked solutions. The radiology market is facing increasing clinical, financial, and operational pressures, driven in part by fragmented care delivery and the proliferation of AI tools developed in isolation. This siloed environment places the burden on care teams to manually bridge workflow gaps, contributing to inefficiencies and rising costs.
DeepHealth addresses these challenges through the DeepHealth OS, an enterprise‑wide platform that unifies clinical and operational intelligence. By integrating AI, workflow orchestration, and data management into a single operating system, DeepHealth enables health systems to streamline radiology operations, enhance diagnostic quality, and improve care coordination across the imaging value chain.
Leverage our investment in AI and technology to enhance RadNet service. We continue to invest in proprietary technologies that strengthen RadNet’s core imaging operations and create differentiated service offerings. Our technology portfolio spans patient scheduling, image storage and retrieval, radiology information systems (RIS), picture archiving and communication systems (PACS), and advanced AI applications that support scan interpretation across multiple clinical domains.
We are deploying these capabilities across RadNet to improve quality, consistency, and efficiency from patient intake through billing and collections. Current initiatives include:
- Enhancing contact center operations through intelligent automation
- Expanding remote scanning and technologist support capabilities
- Integrating AI‑assisted image interpretation into clinical workflows
- Optimizing scheduling, throughput, and resource utilization
- Modernizing RIS and PACS infrastructure to support enterprise‑scale operations
These investments are designed to reduce operating costs, improve patient and provider experience, and strengthen RadNet’s competitive position in each market we serve.
Expanding our commercial footprint. We intend to continue scaling our commercial Digital Health business, building on a global customer base of more than 2,000 organizations. Our strategy is to expand adoption of our comprehensive portfolio across Enterprise Operations, Enterprise Imaging, and Clinical AI/Population Health.
We plan to grow commercial revenue by:
- Increasing penetration within existing customer accounts
- Expanding internationally in markets with rising imaging demand
- Broadening our product suite to address additional clinical and operational use cases
- Leveraging the DeepHealth OS platform to deliver integrated, enterprise‑wide solutions
Through these initiatives, we aim to accelerate commercial growth, deepen customer relationships, and position RadNet as a leading provider of AI‑enabled imaging and operational intelligence solutions worldwide.
Our Services
We offer a comprehensive set of imaging services including MRI, CT, PET, nuclear medicine, X-ray, ultrasound, mammography, fluoroscopy and other related procedures. We focus on providing standardized high quality imaging services, regardless of location, to ensure patients, physicians and payors consistency in service and quality. To ensure the high quality of our services, we monitor patient satisfaction, timeliness of services to patients, and delivery of reports to physicians.
The key features of our services include:
- patient-friendly, non-clinical environments;
- a 24-hour turnaround on routine examinations;
- interpretations within one to two hours, if needed;
- flexible patient scheduling, including same-day appointments;
- extended operating hours, including weekends;
- reports delivered by courier, facsimile or email;
- availability of second opinions and consultations;
- availability of sub-specialty interpretations at no additional charge; and
- standardized fee schedules by region.
Radiology Professionals
In the states in which we provide services (except Florida and Arizona), a lay person or any entity other than a professional corporation or similar professional organization is not allowed to practice medicine, including by employing professional persons or by having any ownership interest or profit participation in or control over any medical professional practice. This doctrine is commonly referred to as the prohibition on the “corporate practice” of medicine. In order to comply with this prohibition, we contract with medical groups to provide professional medical services in our centers, including the supervision and interpretation of diagnostic imaging procedures.
We contract with a Consolidated Medical Group (the “Group”) which consists of professional corporations owned or controlled by individuals within our senior management that provide professional medical services in Arizona, California, Delaware, Maryland, New Jersey and New York. At locations where the Group does not provide professional medical services, we have entered into long-term contracts with third-party radiology groups in the area to provide physician services at those centers. These third-party radiology practice groups maintain full control over the provision of professional services, including supervision and interpretation of diagnostic imaging procedures, in our diagnostic imaging centers. Each medical group maintains control over the physicians it employs and is responsible for staffing the facility with qualified professional medical personnel.
Under management agreements with the Group or other third-party radiology practices, we provide the use of our diagnostic imaging equipment, technical and management services, and administration of the non-medical functions of the professional medical practices at our centers, including the provision of non-medical staff, accounting services, billing and collection, medical and office supplies, transcription services, maintenance of medical records, and marketing. As compensation for the services furnished under management contracts with our medical groups, we receive technical fees for the use of our diagnostic imaging equipment and technical services and an agreed percentage of the medical practice billings for, or collections from, services provided at our centers. The medical groups retain the professional reimbursements associated with imaging procedures after deducting management service fees paid to us.
Additionally, we perform certain management services for a portion of the professional groups with whom we contract who provide professional radiology services at local hospitals. For performing these management services, which include billing, collecting, transcription and medical coding, we receive management fees, that depending on the agreement are calculated at a fixed or variable rate.
Payors
The fees charged for diagnostic imaging services performed at our centers are paid by a diverse mix of payors:
Commercial Insurance. Generally, insurance companies reimburse us, directly or indirectly, including through the Group or through the contracted radiology groups, on the basis of agreed upon rates. These rates are negotiated and may differ materially with rates set forth in the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (as described below) for the particular service. The patients may be responsible for certain co-payments or deductibles.
Managed Care Capitation Agreements. Under these agreements that are generally between the medical groups and the payor (which in most cases are large medical groups or Independent Practice Associations), the payor pays a pre-determined amount per-member per-month in exchange for the radiology group providing all necessary covered services to the managed care members included in the agreement. These contracts pass much of the financial risk of providing outpatient diagnostic imaging services, including the risk of over-use, from the payor to the radiology practice group and, as a result of our management agreement with the radiology practice group, to us.
We believe that through our comprehensive utilization management ("UM") program we have become highly skilled at assessing and moderating the risks associated with the capitation agreements, so that these agreements are profitable for us. Our UM program is managed by our UM department, which consists of staff who are actively involved with the referring physicians and payor management in both prospective and retrospective review programs. Our UM program includes features such as physician education combined with peer review procedures which are designed to manage our costs while ensuring that patients receive appropriate care.
Medicare/Medicaid. Medicare is the federal health insurance program for people age 65 or older and people under age 65 with certain disabilities. Medicaid, funded by both the federal and state governments, is a state-administered health insurance program for qualifying low-income and medically needy persons. For services for which we bill Medicare directly or indirectly, including through contracted radiologists, we are paid under the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule. Under the Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014, Congress introduced a new quality incentive program that, effective January 1, 2016, reduced Medicare payments for certain CT services reimbursed through the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule that are furnished using equipment that does not meet certain dose optimization and management standards. Medicare patients usually pay a 20% co-payment unless they have secondary insurance. Medicaid rates are set by the individual states for each state program and Medicaid patients may be responsible for a modest co-payment.
Contracts with Physician Groups and Other Non-Insurance Company Payors. For some of our contracts with physician groups and other providers, we do not bill payors, but instead accept agreed upon rates for our radiology services. These rates are typically at or below the rates set forth in the current Medicare Fee Schedule for the particular service. However, we often agree to a specified rate for MRI and CT procedures that is not tied to the Medicare Fee Schedule.
Imaging Centers
Our centers are primarily located in geographic networks that we refer to as regions. The majority of our centers are multi-modality sites, offering various combinations of MRI, CT, PET, nuclear medicine, ultrasound, X-ray, fluoroscopy services and other related procedures. A portion of our centers are single-modality sites, offering either X-ray or MRI services. Consistent with our regional network strategy, we locate our single-modality centers near multi-modality centers, to help accommodate overflow in targeted demographic areas.
The following table sets forth the number of our centers operated directly or managed through joint ventures for each year during the three-year period ended December 31, 2025:
| Years Ended December 31, 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total centers owned or managed (at year end) | 418 | 398 | 366 |
8
Diagnostic Imaging Equipment
The following table indicates, as of December 31, 2025, the quantity of principal diagnostic equipment available at our imaging centers operated directly or through joint venture investments, including both consolidated and unconsolidated joint ventures:
| Equipment Count | Years Ended December 31, 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| MRI | 420 | 382 | 353 |
| CT | 230 | 220 | 208 |
| PET/CT | 74 | 66 | 63 |
| Mammography | 455 | 427 | 405 |
| Ultrasound | 976 | 907 | 861 |
| X-ray | 386 | 380 | 363 |
| Nuclear Medicine | 52 | 56 | 55 |
| Fluoroscopy | 110 | 120 | 121 |
| Total equipment | 2,703 | 2,558 | 2,429 |
The average age of our MRI and CT units is less than five years, and the average age of our PET units is less than four years. The useful life of our MRI, CT and PET units is ten years on average.
Facility Acquisitions
Information regarding our facility acquisitions can be found within Item 7 - “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”, as well as Note 4 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report on Form 10-K.
Information Technology
Our corporate headquarters and many of our centers are interconnected through a state-of-the-art information technology system. This system, which is compliant with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 ("HIPAA"), is comprised of a number of integrated applications and provides a single operating platform for billing and collections, electronic medical records, practice management and image management.
This technology has created cost reductions for our centers in areas such as image storage, support personnel and financial management and has further allowed us to optimize the productivity of all aspects of our business by enabling us to:
- capture patient demographic, history and billing information at point-of-service;
- automatically generate bills and electronically file claims with third-party payors;
- record and store diagnostic report images in digital format;
- digitally transmit in real-time diagnostic images from one location to another, thus enabling networked radiologists to cover larger geographic markets by using the specialized training of other networked radiologists;
- perform claims, rejection and collection analysis; and
- perform sophisticated financial analysis, such as analyzing cost and profitability, volume, charges, current activity and patient case mix, with respect to each of our managed care contracts.
We have developed our own Radiology Information System through our team of software development engineers, which is used as our front desk patient tracking system. Our eRad, Inc., subsidiary develops and sells computerized imaging data storage and retrieval systems.
Human Capital Management Strategy
The primary goal of our talent management strategy is to attract and retain engaged, talented, and diverse team members to establish RadNet as the employer of choice. We seek to drive performance by enabling effective leadership that results in a positive patient experience delivered by talented and engaged team members. To achieve this, leaders across the enterprise partner to develop and deliver talent and culture programs, create total rewards strategies, and provide efficient and effective people operations.
We believe the strength of our workforce is critical to the success of our mission to provide comprehensive radiology solutions and change the future of healthcare. We invest in our employees to ensure their confidence and competence in their roles, as well as to provide a path for professional career development. We value an ethical culture where diversity is embraced, good health and safety are promoted, and employees are empowered to share their ideas and opinions. We strive to care for our team members and are concerned about their total well-being.
Headcount and Labor Representation. As of December 31, 2025, we had a total of 8,844 full-time, 432 part-time and 1,988 per diem employees, including those employed by the Group. These numbers include 222 full-time and 88 part-time physicians and 2,835 full-time, 282 part-time and 1,244 per-diem technologists.
Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, & Belonging. We are committed to creating an inclusive work environment where team members can be their best and authentic selves. With diversity comes a plethora of different perspectives and these different perspectives breed innovative ideas that enable us to lead radiology forward. Our relationship with Jobs.Vision.Success SoCal, a nonprofit, non-sectarian social service agency, is one example of our support and sponsorship of community outreach and enrichment programs for underserved populations. As a foundational practice, all employees are required to complete cultural competence training annually.
Employee Listening. We believe in ensuring every team member feels valued, seen, and heard; therefore, we have various avenues for all to share ideas and provide feedback. Piloting initiatives such as the Connections Roadshow and new employee listening platforms enable senior leaders to hear from team members at all levels of the organization to gain insights on various topics including quality, engagement, innovation, customer service, patient focus, diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging.
Total Well-being. We subscribe to the belief that if we take care of our people, they will in turn, take care of our patients. Prioritizing and promoting wellness allows our team members to be their best selves at work and at home. Concerning ourselves with the physical, mental, emotional, and social well-being of each team member enables us to attract and retain top talent. Beyond fair and equitable pay, we offer a wide range of benefit plan options that include, but are not limited to, medical insurance, health savings accounts, family support services, nutrition and exercise programs, and financial education. We evaluate our total well-being packages regularly to remain competitive, align with legislative changes, and respond to the needs of our team members. Based on survey feedback, we recently replaced our wellness platform and introduced Navigate Wellness to better address what our team members care about most.
Talent Development. Equipping our people to perform excellently is one of our top priorities. With companies across the country facing unprecedented, post-pandemic labor shortages, attrition, and turnover, we are doubling down on our People and Culture initiatives. We have established a Talent & Culture Center of Expertise to focus on the employee experience from beginning to end. With a heightened focus on upskilling our existing workforce, our investment in new training and development platforms and piloting a coaching capabilities builder program for our leaders, we are promoting timely and effective feedback that fosters trust, respect, teamwork, growth, and excellence. Furthermore, our tuition reimbursement program encourages team members at all levels of the enterprise to seek additional skills.
Sales and Marketing
Our sales and marketing team employs a multi-pronged approach to marketing, including physician, payor and sports marketing programs, each of which are described below:
Physician Marketing. Each customer service representative on our physician marketing team is responsible for marketing activity on behalf of one or more centers. The representatives act as a liaison between the facility and referring physicians, holding meetings periodically and on an as-needed basis with them and their staff to present educational programs on new applications and uses of our systems and to address particular patient service issues that have arisen. In our experience, consistent hands-on contact with a referring physician and his or her staff generates goodwill and increases referrals to our centers. The representatives also continually seek to establish referral relationships with new physicians and physician groups. In addition to a base salary, each representative receives a bonus based upon success.
Payor Marketing. Our marketing team regularly meets with managed care organizations and insurance companies to solicit contracts and meet with existing contracting payors to solidify those relationships. The comprehensiveness of our services, the geographic location of our centers and the reputation of the physicians with whom we contract all serve as tools for obtaining new or repeat business from payors.
Sports Marketing Program. Our west coast operations render in stadium digital X-ray for the following organizations: Los Angeles Dodgers, Kings and Lakers. In exchange, we receive season tickets and parking. Contract lengths vary from yearly to up to five years. We also provide radiology services at select imaging centers for the Anaheim Ducks, Los Angeles Angels, Los Angeles Rams, San Francisco 49ers and student athletes of the University of Southern California. Through our east coast operations, we have entered into sponsorship agreements with the Baltimore Ravens of the National Football League and the Baltimore Orioles of Major League Baseball which permit us to state we are the imaging partner to each organization. Both of those agreements are being renewed through 2026.
Suppliers
We acquire our major diagnostic imaging equipment directly from original equipment manufacturers or through third party financing companies and purchase medical supplies from various national vendors. Our diagnostic imaging equipment represents a cornerstone investment of the company as it provides our customers the latest in imaging technology. We employ direct purchase or finance arrangements with such firms as GE, Hologic, Key Equipment, Philips, Siemens and Spectrum for our diagnostic equipment imaging needs. We seek to establish strong working relationships with our providers, who are of comparable stature and offer similar products, to mitigate the risk that any one supplier becomes unavailable. If we open or acquire additional imaging centers, we may incur material equipment lease obligations. See Note 9, Leases, in the notes accompanying our consolidated financial statements included in this report for further information.
Timely and effective maintenance of our imaging equipment is essential for achieving high utilization rates. In order to ensure operational efficiency, we have maintenance arrangements with the various service arms of the original equipment manufacturers that supply our imaging equipment.
Insurance and Liability Mitigation
We maintain insurance policies with coverage we believe is appropriate in light of the risks attendant to our business and consistent with industry practice. We maintain general liability insurance and professional liability insurance in commercially reasonable amounts. Additionally, we maintain workers’ compensation insurance on all of our employees.
In our agreements with physician groups, including the Group, we require the physician group maintain medical malpractice insurance for each physician in the group, with coverage limits of not less than $1.0 million per incident and $3.0 million in the aggregate per year.
Our insurance coverage is placed on a statutory basis and corresponds to individual state’s requirements. However, adequate liability insurance may not be available to us in the future at acceptable costs or at all. In addition, insurers from which we purchase such insurance may experience financial hardship which would impact their ability to pay covered policyholder claims.
In California our operations benefit from a statutory medical malpractice cap that reduces our liability exposure. California places a $250,000 limit on non-economic damages for medical malpractice cases. The cap applies whether the case is for injury or death, and it allows only one $250,000 recovery in a wrongful death case. Non-economic damages are defined as compensation for pain, suffering, inconvenience, physical impairment, disfigurement and other non-pecuniary injury. No cap applies to economic damages. Other states in which we now operate do not have similar limitations and in those states we believe our insurance coverage to be sufficient.
Regulation
The healthcare industry is highly regulated, and changes in the regulatory environment could significantly affect our operations in the future. Our ability to operate profitably will depend in part upon us, and the contracted radiology practices and their affiliated physicians, obtaining and maintaining all necessary licenses and other approvals, and operating in compliance with applicable healthcare regulations. We believe that healthcare regulations will continue to change. Therefore, we monitor developments in healthcare law and modify our operations from time to time as the business and regulatory environment changes.
Facilities Licensing and Certification Laws. Ownership, construction, operation, expansion and acquisition of diagnostic imaging centers are subject to various federal and state laws, regulations and approvals concerning licensing of centers and personnel. In addition, free-standing diagnostic imaging centers that provide services not performed as part of a physician's office must meet Medicare requirements to be certified as an independent diagnostic testing facility before it can be authorized to bill the Medicare program.
Corporate Practice of Medicine. In the states in which we operate, other than Florida and Arizona, a lay person or any entity other than a professional corporation or other similar professional organization is not allowed to practice medicine, including by employing professional persons or by having any ownership interest or profit participation in or control over any medical professional practice. The laws of such states also prohibit a lay person or a non-professional entity from exercising control over the medical judgments or decisions of physicians and from engaging in certain financial arrangements, such as splitting professional fees with physicians. We structure our relationships with the radiology practices, including the purchase of diagnostic imaging centers, in a manner that we believe keeps us from engaging in the practice of medicine, exercising control over the medical judgments or decisions of the radiology practices or their physicians, or violating the prohibitions against fee-splitting.
Government Healthcare Programs. We derive a substantial portion of our revenue from direct billings to governmental healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, and private health insurance companies and/or health plans, including but not limited to those participating in the Medicare Advantage program. During the year ended December 31, 2025, approximately 23.4% of our net service revenue generated at our diagnostic imaging centers was derived from federal government sponsored healthcare programs (Medicare) and 2.5% from state sponsored programs (Medicaid). As a result, any negative changes in governmental capitation or fee-for-service rates or methods of reimbursement for the services we provide could have a significant adverse impact on our revenue and financial results. Because governmental healthcare programs generally reimburse on a fee schedule basis rather than on a charge-related basis, we generally cannot increase our revenues from these programs by increasing our fees for the specified services. Moreover, if our costs increase, we may not be able to recover our increased costs from these programs.
Government payors have taken and may continue to take steps to control the cost, eligibility for, use, and delivery of healthcare services as a result of budgetary constraints, cost containment pressures and other reasons. We believe that these trends in cost containment will continue. These cost containment measures, and other market changes in non-governmental insurance plans have generally restricted our ability to recover, or shift to non-governmental payors, any increased costs that we experience. Our integrated care business and financial operations may be materially affected by these developments.
Medicare and Medicaid Fraud and Abuse – Federal Anti-kickback Statute. Federal law known as the Anti-kickback Statute prohibits the knowing and willful offer, payment, solicitation or receipt of any form of remuneration in return for, or to induce, (i) the referral of a person, (ii) the furnishing or arranging for the furnishing of items or services or (iii) the purchase, lease or order (or arranging or recommending purchasing, leasing or ordering) of any item or service, which is reimbursable under the Medicare, Medicaid or other governmental programs. Noncompliance with the federal Anti-kickback Statute can result in exclusion from the Medicare, Medicaid or other governmental programs and civil and criminal penalties.
The Anti-kickback Statute is broad, and it prohibits many arrangements and practices that are lawful in businesses outside of the healthcare industry. To create better clarity, the Office of the Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services ("OIG") has issued regulations as "safe harbor" guidelines which if met in form and substance, will assure healthcare providers that they will not be prosecuted for violation of the Anti–kickback Statute. The OIG issued a final rule on November 20, 2020, as part of the Regulatory Sprint to Coordinated Care initiative by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services that, among other things, established new "safe harbors" under the Anti-kickback Statute for certain value-based compensation arrangements. Although full compliance with these provisions ensures against prosecution under the federal Anti-kickback Statute, the failure of a transaction or arrangement to fit within a specific safe harbor does not necessarily mean that the transaction or arrangement is illegal or that prosecution under the federal Anti-kickback Statute will be pursued.
Although some of our arrangements may not fall within a safe harbor, we believe that such business arrangements do not violate the Anti-kickback Statute because we are careful to structure them to reflect fair value and ensure that the reasons underlying our decision to enter into a business arrangement comport with reasonable interpretations of the Anti-kickback Statute. However, even though we continuously strive to comply with the requirements of the Anti-kickback Statute, liability under the Anti-kickback Statute may still arise because of the intentions or actions of the parties with whom we do business. While we are not aware of any such intentions or actions, we have only limited knowledge regarding the intentions or actions underlying those arrangements. Conduct and business arrangements that do not fully satisfy one of these safe harbor provisions may result in increased scrutiny by government enforcement authorities such as the Office of the Inspector General.
Medicare and Medicaid Fraud and Abuse – Stark Law. The Ethics in Patient Referral Act of 1989, commonly known as the Stark Law, prohibits a physician from referring Medicare patients to an entity providing designated health services in which the physician (or immediate family member) has an ownership or investment interest or with which the physician (or immediate family member) has entered into a compensation arrangement. The Stark Law also prohibits the entity from billing for any such prohibited referral. The penalties for violating the Stark Law include a prohibition on payment by these governmental programs and civil monetary penalties of as much as $15,000 for each violation referral and $100,000 for participation in a circumvention scheme.
Under the Stark Law, radiology and certain other imaging services and radiation therapy services and supplies are services included in the designated health services subject to the self-referral prohibition. Such services include the professional and technical components of any diagnostic test or procedure using X-rays, ultrasound or other imaging services, CT, MRI, radiation therapy and diagnostic mammography services (but not screening mammography services). PET and nuclear medicine procedures are also included as designated health services under the Stark Law. The Stark Law, however, excludes from designated health services: (i) X-ray, fluoroscopy or ultrasound procedures that require the insertion of a needle, catheter, tube or probe through the skin or into a body orifice; (ii) radiology procedures that are integral to the performance of, and performed during, non-radiological medical procedures; and (iii) invasive or interventional radiology, because the radiology services in these procedures are merely incidental or secondary to another procedure that the physician has ordered.
The Stark Law provides that a request by a radiologist for diagnostic radiology services or a request by a radiation oncologist for radiation therapy, if such services are furnished by or under the supervision of such radiologist or radiation oncologist pursuant to a consultation requested by another physician, does not constitute a referral by a referring physician. If such requirements are met, the Stark Law self-referral prohibition would not apply to such services. The effect of the Stark Law on the radiology practices, therefore, will depend on the precise scope of services furnished by each such practice’s radiologists and whether such services derive from consultations or are self-generated.
Although we receive fees under our service agreements for management and administrative services, we are not in a position to make or influence referrals of patients. We believe that, other than self-referred patients, all of the services covered by the Stark Law provided by the contracted radiology practices derive from requests for consultation by non-affiliated physicians. Therefore, we believe that the Stark Law is not implicated by the financial relationships between our operations and the contracted radiology practices. In addition, we believe that we have structured our acquisitions of the assets of existing practices, and we intend to structure any future acquisitions, so as not to violate the Anti-kickback Statute, Stark Law and the regulations related to these laws. Specifically, we believe the consideration paid by us to physicians to acquire the tangible and intangible assets associated with their practices is consistent with fair value in arms’ length transactions and is not intended to induce the referral of patients or other business generated by such physicians. Should any such practice be deemed to constitute an arrangement designed to induce the referral of Medicare or Medicaid patients, then our acquisitions could be viewed as possibly violating anti-kickback and anti-referral laws and regulations. A determination of liability under any such laws could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Medicare and Medicaid Fraud and Abuse – General. The federal government embarked on an initiative to audit all Medicare carriers, which are the companies that adjudicate and pay Medicare claims. These audits are expected to intensify governmental scrutiny of individual providers. An unsatisfactory audit of any of our diagnostic imaging centers or contracted radiology practices could result in any or all of the following: significant repayment obligations, exclusion from Medicare, Medicaid or other governmental programs, and civil and criminal penalties.
Federal regulatory and law enforcement authorities have increased enforcement activities with respect to Medicare and Medicaid fraud and abuse regulations and other reimbursement laws and rules, including laws and regulations that govern our activities and the activities of the radiology practices. The federal government also has increased funding to fight healthcare fraud and is coordinating its enforcement efforts among various agencies, such as the U.S. Department of Justice, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General, and state Medicaid fraud control units. The government may investigate our or the radiology practices’ activities, claims may be made against us or the radiology practices and these increased enforcement activities may directly or indirectly have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
State Anti-kickback and Physician Self-referral Laws. Many states have adopted laws similar to the federal Anti-kickback Statute and the Stark Law. Some of these state prohibitions apply to services and the referral of patients for healthcare services reimbursed by any source, not only the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Although we believe that we comply with both federal and state anti-kickback laws and self-referral laws, any finding of a violation of these laws could subject us to criminal and civil penalties or possible exclusion from federal or state healthcare programs. Such penalties would adversely affect our financial performance and our ability to operate our business.
Federal False Claims Act. The federal False Claims Act provides, in part, that the federal government may bring a lawsuit against any person who it believes has knowingly presented, or caused to be presented, a false or fraudulent request for payment from the federal government, or who has made a false statement or used a false record to get a claim approved. The federal False Claims Act further provides that a lawsuit thereunder may be initiated in the name of the United States by an individual, a “whistleblower,” who is an original source of the allegations. The government has taken the position that claims presented in violation of the federal Anti-kickback Statute or Stark Law may be considered a violation of the federal False Claims Act. Penalties include civil penalties of not less than $5,500 and not more than $11,000 for each false claim, plus three times the amount of damages that the federal government sustained because of the act of that person.
Further, states are being encouraged to adopt false claims acts similar to the federal False Claims Act, which establish liability for submission of fraudulent claims to the State Medicaid program and contain whistleblower provisions. Even in instances when a whistleblower action is dismissed with no judgment or settlement, we may incur substantial legal fees and other costs relating to an investigation. Future actions under the False Claims Act may result in significant fines and legal fees, which would adversely affect our financial performance and our ability to operate our business. We believe that we are in compliance with the rules and regulations that apply to the federal False Claims Act as well as its state counterparts.
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Healthcare reform legislation enacted in the first quarter of 2010 by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act or PPACA, specifically requires the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, in computing physician practice expense relative value units, to increase the equipment utilization factor for advanced diagnostic imaging services (such as MRI, CT and PET) from a presumed utilization rate of 50% to 75% over a three year period. The Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (H.R. 4872), or Reconciliation Act, fully implemented the higher utilization rate in the beginning of 2011, eliminating the phase-in approach provided in the PPACA. This utilization rate was further increased to 90% by the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, effective as of January 1, 2014.
The aim of increased utilization of diagnostic imaging services is to spread the cost of the equipment and services over a greater number of scans, resulting in a lower cost per scan. These changes precipitated reductions in federal reimbursement for medical imaging, resulting in decreased revenues per scan for the scans we perform for Medicare beneficiaries. Other changes in reimbursement for services rendered by Medicare Advantage plans may also reduce the revenues we receive for services rendered to Medicare Advantage enrollees.
The PPACA also required individuals to pay additional taxes if he or she was uninsured during the year (the "Individual Mandate"). On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was enacted which, among numerous changes to the tax code, repealed the Individual Mandate tax penalty. Repeal of the Individual Mandate may lead to more people being uninsured, and could raise premium rates for insured persons. Such a development could affect reimbursement, coverage, and utilization of diagnostic imaging services in ways that are currently unpredictable. Other changes to the PPACA (whether through legislation or judicial action), including further rollbacks of the PPACA being sought by congressional and state members of the Republican Party, or expansion of the PPACA (including, but not limited to, the development of a "public option" that would compete with private insurers to offer coverage to both individuals and those with employer sponsored insurance) being sought by the Biden Administration, could have similarly unpredictable effects.
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996. Congress enacted the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, or HIPAA, in part, to combat healthcare fraud and to protect the privacy and security of patients’ individually identifiable healthcare information. HIPAA, among other things, amends existing crimes and criminal penalties for Medicare fraud and enacts new federal healthcare fraud crimes, including actions affecting non-government healthcare benefit programs. Under HIPAA, a healthcare benefit program includes any private plan or contract affecting interstate commerce under which any medical benefit, item or service is provided. A person or entity that knowingly and willfully obtains the money or property of any healthcare benefit program by means of false or fraudulent representations in connection with the delivery of healthcare services is subject to a fine or imprisonment, or potentially both. In addition, HIPAA authorizes the imposition of civil money penalties against entities that employ or enter into contracts with excluded Medicare or Medicaid program participants if such entities provide services to federal health program beneficiaries. A finding of liability under HIPAA could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Further, HIPAA requires healthcare providers and their business associates to maintain the privacy and security of individually identifiable protected health information (“PHI”). HIPAA imposes federal standards for electronic transactions, for the security of electronic health information and for protecting the privacy of PHI. The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act of 2009 (“HITECH”), signed into law on February 17, 2009, dramatically expanded, among other things, (1) the scope of HIPAA to now apply directly to “business associates,” or independent contractors who receive or obtain PHI in connection with providing a service to a covered entity, (2) substantive security and privacy obligations, including new federal security breach notification requirements to affected individuals, DHHS and prominent media outlets, of certain breaches of unsecured PHI, (3) restrictions on marketing communications and a prohibition on covered entities or business associates from receiving remuneration in exchange for PHI, and (4) the civil and criminal penalties that may be imposed for HIPAA violations, increasing the annual cap in penalties from $25,000 to $1.5 million per year.
In addition, many states have enacted comparable privacy and security statutes or regulations that, in some cases, are more stringent than HIPAA requirements. In those cases it may be necessary to modify our operations and procedures to comply with the more stringent state laws, which may entail significant and costly changes for us. We believe that we are in compliance with such state laws and regulations. However, if we fail to comply with applicable state laws and regulations, we could be subject to additional sanctions.
We believe that we are in compliance with the current HIPAA requirements, as amended by HITECH, and comparable state laws, but we anticipate that we may encounter certain costs associated with future compliance. Moreover, we cannot guarantee that enforcement agencies or courts will not make interpretations of the HIPAA standards that are inconsistent with ours, or the interpretations of our contracted radiology practices or their affiliated physicians. A finding of liability under the HIPAA standards may result in significant criminal and civil penalties. Noncompliance also may result in exclusion from participation in government programs, including Medicare and Medicaid. These actions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration or FDA. The FDA has issued the requisite pre-market authorization for all of the MRI and CT systems we use.
Our mammography systems are regulated by the FDA pursuant to the Mammography Quality Standards Act of 1992, as amended by the Mammography Quality Standards Reauthorization Acts of 1998 and 2004 (collectively, the “MQSA”), and implementing regulations promulgated by the FDA, including the regulations that the FDA finalized in 2023. All mammography centers are required to meet the applicable MQSA requirements under such laws and regulations, including quality standards, being accredited by an approved accreditation body or state agency and certified by the FDA or an FDA-approved certifying state agency. Pursuant to the accreditation process, each facility providing mammography services must comply with certain standards that include, among other things, annual inspection of the facility's equipment, personnel (interpreting physicians, technologists and medical physicists), equipment, radiation dose, quality assurance programs, and practices, among others.
Compliance with these MQSA requirements and standards is required to obtain Medicare payment for services provided to beneficiaries and to avoid various sanctions, including monetary penalties, or suspension of certification. Although the Mammography Accreditation Program of the American College of Radiology is an approved accreditation body and currently accredits all of our centers which provide mammography services, and although we anticipate continuing to meet the requirements for accreditation, if we lose such accreditation, the FDA could revoke our certification. Congress has extended Medicare benefits to include coverage of screening mammography but coverage is subject to the facility performing the mammography meeting prescribed quality standards described above. The Medicare requirements to meet the standards apply to diagnostic mammography and image quality examination as well as screening mammography.
Radiologist Licensing. The radiologists providing professional medical services at our centers are subject to licensing and related regulations by the states in which they provide services. As a result, we require the radiology groups with which we contract to require those radiologists to have and maintain appropriate licensure. We do not believe that such laws and regulations will either prohibit or require licensure approval of our business operations, although no assurances can be made that such laws and regulations will not be interpreted to extend such prohibitions or requirements to our operations.
Insurance Laws and Regulation. States in which we operate have adopted certain laws and regulations affecting risk assumption in the healthcare industry, including those that subject any physician or physician network engaged in risk-based managed care to comply with applicable insurance laws and regulations. These laws and regulations may require physicians and physician networks to meet minimum capital requirements and other safety and soundness requirements. Implementing additional regulations or compliance requirements could result in substantial costs to the contracted radiology practices, limiting their ability to enter into capitated or other risk-sharing managed care arrangements and indirectly affecting our revenue from the contracted practices.
Environmental Matters. The facilities we operate or manage generate hazardous and medical waste subject to federal and state requirements regarding handling and disposal. We believe that the facilities that we operate and manage are currently in compliance in all material respects with applicable federal, state and local statutes and ordinances regulating the handling and disposal of such materials. We do not believe that we will be required to expend any material additional amounts in order to remain in compliance with these laws and regulations or that compliance will materially affect our capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position.
Compliance Program. We maintain a program to monitor compliance with federal and state laws and regulations applicable to healthcare entities. We have a compliance officer who is charged with implementing and supervising our compliance program, which includes the adoption of (i) Standards of Conduct for our employees and affiliates and (ii) a process that specifies how employees, affiliates and others may report regulatory or ethical concerns to our compliance officer. We believe that our compliance program meets the relevant standards provided by the Office of Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services.
An important part of our compliance program consists of conducting periodic audits of various aspects of our operations and that of the contracted radiology practices. We also conduct mandatory educational programs designed to familiarize our employees with the regulatory requirements and specific elements of our compliance program.
Risk factors
As filed, 81,743 characters, with its headings, lists and tables. Extracted from the main document; charts and exhibits are in the original on sec.gov.
You should consider and read carefully all of the risks and uncertainties described below, as well as the other information included in this Annual Report, including our consolidated financial statements and related notes. The risks described below have been organized under headings that are provided for convenience and intended to organize the risks and uncertainties into related categories to improve readability for investors; no inference should be drawn, however, that the placement of a risk factor under a particular category means that it is not applicable to another category of risks or that it may be more or less material than another risk factor. Regardless, they are also not the only risks and uncertainties facing us. The occurrence of any of the following risks or additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently believe to be immaterial could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. This Annual Report also contains forward-looking statements and estimates that involve risks and uncertainties, as discussed above under the caption “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.” Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in any forward‑looking statements as a result of many factors, including the risk factors and uncertainties described below.
General Economic and Industry Risks
Adverse changes in general domestic and worldwide economic conditions could adversely affect our operating results, financial condition, and liquidity.
Our business has in the past been, and may continue to be, affected by a number of factors that are beyond our control, such as general macroeconomic conditions, conditions in the financial services markets, geopolitical conditions and other general political and economic developments, and can continue to be affected by such factors in the future. Concerns about the systemic impact of potential long-term and wide-spread recession, inflation, energy costs, geopolitical issues, the availability and cost of credit have contributed to increased market volatility and diminished expectations for near-term growth in the United States and many global economies. Additionally, general political uncertainty, including any actions from a new administration in the United States could impact the healthcare industries in the United States.
Continued turbulence in domestic and international markets and economies may adversely affect our liquidity and financial condition. Patients may transition work, leave insurance programs, or defer non-emergency procedures, which could reduce overall demand for our services. A decline in global economic conditions could also have a significant impact on the financial condition and operations of our third-party payors, contracting radiology groups, equipment manufacturers and other suppliers.
A downturn in the economic environment can also lead to increased risk of collection on our accounts receivable, impairment of goodwill, and increased risk of failure of financial institutions including insurance companies and derivatives counterparties. These and other economic events could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and stock price.
A worsening of the economic and employment conditions in the geographies in which we operate could materially affect our business and future results of operations.
During periods of high unemployment, governmental entities often experience budget deficits as a result of increased costs and lower than expected tax collections. These budget deficits at the federal, state and local levels have decreased, and may continue to decrease, spending on health and human service programs, including Medicare and Medicaid, which are significant payor sources for our facilities. In periods of high unemployment, we have faced and could continue to face, the risk of potential declines in the population covered under private insurance, patient decisions to postpone or decide against receiving services, potential increases in the uninsured and underinsured populations we serve, and further difficulties in collecting patient co-payment and deductible receivables.
Increases in inflation and rising interest rates or disruption of credit markets could adversely affect our financial condition and liquidity.
Inflation in the U.S. has recently accelerated and is currently expected to continue at an elevated level in the near-term. Current and future inflationary effects may be driven by, among other things, supply chain disruptions and governmental stimulus or fiscal policies, and geopolitical instability.
In response to recent macroeconomic concerns, the United States and other western countries have implemented monetary policies focused on suppressing inflation, including increasing interest rates. We operate in an industry that requires significant amounts of capital to fund operations, particularly in the development or acquisition of diagnostic imaging centers and the acquisition of diagnostic imaging equipment. To meet these capital requirements, we have incurred various indebtedness including senior secured credit facilities and equipment leases.
Most of our indebtedness is borrowed under terms with variable interest rates. We have purchased, and may in the future purchase, forward swaps or other derivative instruments designed to mitigate the risk of changes in interest rates. The use of such hedging activities may not be effective to offset any, or more than a portion, of the adverse financial effects of unfavorable movements in interest rates over the limited time the hedges are in place. If these market conditions continue, we may experience increased expenses associated with borrowing and resulting decreases in profitability. Moreover, continued disruption in credit markets could render it more difficult for us to timely replace maturing liabilities or to expand credit facilities, which would adversely affect our liquidity and financial condition.
Our labor costs have been, and we expect will continue to be, adversely affected by competition for staffing, the shortage of experienced healthcare professionals, and regulatory activity including changes in minimum wage laws.
Our operations are dependent on the availability, efforts, abilities and experience of management and medical support personnel. We compete with other healthcare providers in recruiting and retaining qualified employees; however, over the past several years, the healthcare industry has faced considerable workforce challenges, including shortages of skilled personnel and increased wage competition. In some of the regions in which we operate, state or municipalities increased the applicable minimum wage, which has created more competition and, in some cases, higher labor costs. If prevailing wages continue to be driven higher, we could suffer increased employee turnover and increased costs, adversely affecting our business.
We have a substantial number of employees who are paid on a part-time or per diem basis. In 2024, California mandated minimum wage increases for certain industries, including ours. As a result, we experienced increased compensation costs for certain of our employees and vendors beginning in 2025. As minimum wage rates increase, related laws and regulations change, and/or inflationary or other pressures increase wage rates, we and our partners may need to increase not only the wage rates of minimum wage employees, but also the wages paid to other hourly or salaried employees. If other states adopt similar minimum wage increases, the effect on our cost of operations would be compounded. In addition, we expect that inflationary pressures will continue to impact our salaries, wages, benefits and other costs.
Because the majority of our services are performed under multi-year contracted rates with commercial insurance companies or through government programs such as Medicare and Medicaid, we may be unable to offset these increased labor costs. Any such increase in costs, without an attendant increase in revenues or offsetting increase in operating efficiency, would reduce profitability and cash flows.
We face various risks related to health epidemics and other outbreaks, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
We face various risks related to health epidemics and other outbreaks that have emerged, and could emerge in the future, including:
- restrictions intended to slow the spread of outbreaks, including quarantines, government-mandated actions, stay-at-home orders and other restrictions, have led, and may in the future lead, to periods where our imaging procedure volumes drop significantly;
- disruptions in supply chains can affect the cost and availability of reagents and other materials needed for certain procedures;
- significant portions of our workforce may be unable to work due to illness, quarantines, facility closures, ineffective remote work arrangements or technology failures or limitations;
- general economic downturns as a result of outbreaks may affect demand or pricing for our services; and
- volatility in the global capital markets may result in a decrease in the price of our common stock, or an increase in our cost of capital.
Business interruptions due to natural disasters to include but not limited to earthquakes, floods, fires, hurricanes and severe winter storms or other external events beyond our control can adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Our operations can be impacted by external events beyond our control, such as the effects of earthquakes, fires, floods, severe weather, public health issues, power failures, telecommunication loss, and other natural and man-made events, some of which may be intensified by the effects of climate change and changing weather patterns. Our corporate headquarters and over 100 of our radiology centers are located in California, which is subject to wildfires, blackouts, and potentially damaging earthquakes. In addition, several of our imaging centers located in parts of the east coast have suffered from weather events that caused us to temporarily close centers. These or other similar events could cause disruption or interruption to our operations and significantly impact our employees. Additionally, long-term adverse weather conditions, whether caused by global climate change or otherwise, could cause an outmigration of people from the communities where our facilities are located. If any of the circumstances described above, or other similar events, occur, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be adversely affected.
Any disruption to our services may result in decreases in revenues or increased operating and capital expenses. Historically, when we have experienced a reduction in business due to inclement weather or external events for a period of time, our operations have returned to a normalized level, but we have not experienced a significant increase of procedures that would fully compensate for the revenues lost during the slower periods.
Changes in the method or rates of third-party reimbursement could have a negative impact on our results.
A significant portion of our business is derived from federal and state reimbursement programs such as Medicare or Medicaid. From time to time those programs implement changes designed to contain healthcare costs, some of which have resulted in decreased reimbursement rates for diagnostic imaging services that impact our business. On October 30, 2025, CMS released the calendar year 2026 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule final rule, which governs Medicare payment for Radnet's services in CY 2026. Medicare payment and coverage policies in the final rule could result in reimbursement reductions or reduced volume of diagnostic imaging services at our imaging centers.
One of the principal objectives of health maintenance organizations and preferred provider organizations is to control the cost of healthcare services. Managed care contracting has become very competitive, and reimbursement schedules are at or below Medicare reimbursement levels. The expansion of health maintenance organizations, preferred provider organizations and other managed care organizations within the geographic areas covered by our network could have a negative impact on the utilization and pricing of our services because these organizations will exert greater control over patients’ access to diagnostic imaging services, the selections of the provider of such services and reimbursement rates for those services. Relatedly, reimbursement rate cuts may be pursued as a cost-saving measure by third-party payors resulting from the implementation of the federal No Surprises Act (H.R. 133) and similar insurer-provider payment dispute laws, which also may negatively impact our revenue.
Certain of our services may require patients to pay out-of-pocket fees. Our ability to collect these out-of-pocket fees is subject to various coverage and reimbursement policies of third-party payors that may change over time and may be open to a variety of interpretations and applications. Changes in coverage policies or errors in our billing and collections procedures could adversely affect our revenue and business.
Any reduction in the rate that we can charge for our imaging services under these programs will reduce our net revenues and our operating margins per procedure under those reimbursement programs. Unless we can secure additional procedure volumes, increase utilization of our equipment, or change the overall mix of service procedures that we provide, a decline in reimbursement rates will reduce our net revenues and results of operations.
If we fail to manage the complex and lengthy reimbursement process, our revenue, financial condition and results of operations could suffer.
Because our business depends upon reimbursement from Medicare, Medicaid and third-party payors for a significant majority of its revenues, our revenue, financial condition and results of operations may be affected by the reimbursement process, which in the healthcare industry is complex and can involve lengthy delays between the time that services are rendered and the time that the reimbursement amounts are settled. Depending on the payor, we may be required to obtain certain payor-specific documentation from physicians and other healthcare providers before submitting claims for reimbursement. Certain payors have filing deadlines and will not pay claims submitted after such deadlines. We cannot ensure that we will be able to effectively manage the reimbursement process and collect payments for its equipment and services promptly.
We experience competition from other diagnostic imaging companies and hospitals, and this competition could adversely affect our revenue and business.
The market for diagnostic imaging services is highly competitive. We compete for patients principally on the basis of our reputation, our ability to provide multiple modalities at many of our centers, the location of our centers and the quality of our diagnostic imaging services. Our competitors include independent imaging operators, private equity-backed chains, and smaller regional operators, as well as hospitals, clinics and radiology groups that operate their own imaging equipment. Some of our competitors may have, now or in the future, access to greater financial resources than we do and may have access to newer, more advanced equipment. If we are unable to successfully compete, our business and financial condition could be adversely affected.
Technological change in our industry could reduce the demand for our services and require us to incur significant costs to upgrade our equipment.
The development of new technologies or refinements of existing modalities may require us to upgrade and enhance our existing equipment before we may otherwise intend. Many companies currently manufacture diagnostic imaging equipment. Competition among manufacturers for a greater share of the diagnostic imaging equipment market may result in technological advances in the speed and imaging capacity of new equipment. In addition, advances in technology may enable physicians and others to perform diagnostic imaging procedures without us.
Our scale in both the number of our locations and the number and types of imaging equipment we offer is one of our competitive advantages. If the development of new technologies accelerates the obsolescence of our current equipment, we may lose some of our competitive advantage. We may also be required to accelerate the depreciation on existing equipment and incur significant capital expenditures to acquire the new technologies. We may not have the financial ability to acquire the new or improved equipment and may not be able to maintain a competitive equipment base.
Business Risks
Our results of operations may fluctuate significantly from period to period and can be difficult to predict.
Our results of operations have experienced fluctuations from period to period, which we expect may continue in the future. These fluctuations can occur because of a variety of factors, including, among others, the prices we charge for our services, customer or payor mix, the rate and timing of our billings and collections, our ability to obtain reimbursement for our services from third-party payors, the timing and amount of our commitments and other payments, as well as the other risk factors discussed in this report. The fluctuations in our operating results may render period-to-period comparisons less meaningful, and investors should not rely on the results of any one period as an indicator of future performance. These fluctuations in our operating results could cause our performance in any particular period to fall below the expectations of securities analysts or investors or guidance we have provided to the public, which could negatively affect the price of our common stock.
If our contracted radiology practices terminate their agreements with us, our business could substantially diminish.
Our business is substantially dependent on the radiology groups that we contract with to provide medical services at our imaging centers. The radiology groups are party to substantially all of the managed care contracts from which we derive revenue. Under the terms of our management agreements, the radiology groups are required to use their best efforts to provide medical services at our centers as well as any new centers that we open or acquire in their areas of operation. Although our management agreements are for multiple years, the radiology groups have the right to terminate the agreements if we default on our obligations and fail to cure the default. Also, the various radiology groups’ ability to continue performing under the management agreements may be curtailed or eliminated due to the radiology groups’ own financial difficulties, loss of physicians or other circumstances.
If any of our contracted radiology groups cannot perform their obligations to us, we would need to contract with one or more other radiology groups to provide the professional medical services. We may not be able to locate radiology groups willing to provide those services on terms acceptable to us, if at all. In addition, the radiology group’s relationships with referring physicians are largely responsible for the revenue generated at the centers they service. Any replacement radiology group’s relationships with referring physicians may not be as extensive as those of the terminated group. The termination of a management agreement with a radiology group could result in both short and long-term loss of revenue and adversely affect our performance and competitive position in the markets served by the departing radiology group.
Each of the Group and our third-party contracted radiology practices has entered into agreements with its physician shareholders and full-time employed radiologists that generally prohibit those shareholders and radiologists from competing for a period of two to five years within defined geographic regions after they cease to be owners or employees, as applicable. In certain states, like California, a covenant not to compete is enforced in limited circumstances involving the sale of a business. In other states, a covenant not to compete will be enforced only:
- to the extent it is necessary to protect a legitimate business interest of the party seeking enforcement;
- if it does not unreasonably restrain the party against whom enforcement is sought; and
- if it is not contrary to public interest.
Enforceability of a non-compete covenant is determined by a court based on all of the facts and circumstances of the specific case at the time enforcement is sought. For this reason, it is not possible to predict whether or to what extent a court will enforce the contracted radiology practices’ covenants. The inability of the contracted radiology practices or us to enforce a radiologist’s non-compete covenants could result in increased competition from individuals who are knowledgeable about our business strategies and operations.
We are dependent on the ability of our contracted radiology practices, including the Group, to hire and retain qualified radiologists.
At times, there has been a shortage of qualified radiologists in some of the regional markets we serve. Competition in recruiting radiologists may make it difficult for our contracted radiology practices to maintain adequate levels of radiologists. If a significant number of radiologists terminate their relationships with our contracted radiology practices and those radiology practices cannot recruit sufficient qualified radiologists to fulfill their obligations under our agreements with them, our ability to maximize the use of our diagnostic imaging centers and our financial results could be adversely affected.
We are experiencing tighter labor conditions in some of the markets we serve. As a result, our contracting radiological practices have experienced increased salary and professional services expenses. Increased expenses for the contracting radiological practices, including the Group, impact our financial results because the management fee we receive from them, which is based on a percentage of their collections, is adjusted annually to take into account their expenses. Neither we, nor our contracted radiology practices, maintain insurance on the lives of any affiliated physicians.
Our ability to generate revenue depends in large part on referrals from physicians.
A significant portion of the services that we perform are derived from patient referrals from unaffiliated physicians and other third parties. Those physicians and other third parties do not have any contractual obligation to refer patients to us. If a sufficiently large number of these physicians and other third parties were to discontinue referring patients to us, our imaging procedure volume would decrease, which would reduce our net revenue and operating margins.
Further, commercial third-party payors have implemented managed care programs that could limit the ability of physicians to refer patients to us. For example, health maintenance organizations sometimes contract directly with providers and require their enrollees to obtain these services exclusively from those contracted providers. Some insurance companies and self-insured employers also limit these services to contracted providers. These “closed panel” systems are now common in the managed care environment. Other systems such as preferred physician organizations create an economic disincentive for referrals to providers outside the system’s designated panel of providers. We seek to be the designated provider under these systems. If we are unable to compete successfully for these managed care contracts, our net revenues and our prospects for growth could be adversely affected.
We may become subject to professional malpractice liability, which could be costly and negatively impact our reputation and business.
The physicians employed by our contracted radiology groups are from time to time subject to malpractice claims. Under the terms of our management agreements with those radiology groups, we structure the relationship in a manner that we believe does not constitute our practice of medicine, or subject us to professional malpractice claims for acts or omissions of physicians employed by the contracted radiology practices. Nevertheless, claims relating to services provided by the contracted radiology practices have been asserted against us in the past and may be asserted against us in the future. In addition, we may be subject to other professional liability claims, including for improper use or malfunction of our diagnostic imaging equipment, or for accidental contamination, or injury from exposure to radiation.
We seek to mitigate this risk through the purchase of professional liability insurance. Any claim made against us that is not fully covered by insurance could be costly to defend, result in a substantial damage award against us and divert the attention of our management from our operations, all of which could have an adverse effect on our financial performance. In addition, successful claims against us may adversely affect our business or reputation. Although California places a $250,000 limit on non-economic damages for medical malpractice cases, no limit applies to economic damages and no such limits exist in the other states in which we provide services.
We may not receive payment from some of our healthcare provider customers because of their financial circumstances.
We contract with commercial insurance and managed care providers to provide diagnostic imaging services to their members. Some of our healthcare provider customers do not have significant financial resources, liquidity, or access to capital. If these customers experience financial difficulties they may be unable to pay us for the services that we provide. A significant deterioration in general or local economic conditions could have a material adverse effect on the financial health of certain of our healthcare provider customers. If our health care provider customers suffer financial hardship they could delay or default on their payment obligations to us, reducing our accounts receivable and negatively impacting our results of operations.
Capitation fee arrangements could reduce our operating margins.
For the year ended December 31, 2025, we derived approximately 6% of our total net revenue from capitation arrangements, and we expect to continue to derive a significant portion of our revenue from capitation arrangements in the future. Under capitation arrangements, the payor pays us a pre-determined amount per-patient per-month, and in exchange we are required to provide all necessary covered services to the patients covered under the arrangement. These contracts pass much of the financial risk of providing diagnostic imaging services, including the risk of over-use, from the payor to us as the provider. Our ability to generate profit from these arrangements is dependent on our ability to correctly forecast demand for services for the patient base, negotiate appropriate pre-determined amounts with the payor and efficiently manage the utilization of those services. If we are not successful in forecasting demand patients or enrollees covered by these contracts require more frequent or extensive care than anticipated, or if we are not efficient in managing the utilization of services under these capitation arrangements, we would incur unanticipated costs not offset by additional revenue, which would reduce operating margins.
Cybersecurity threats and other disruption or malfunction in our information technology systems could adversely affect our business.
We rely on information technology systems to process, transmit and store electronic information including legally-protected personal information, such as diagnostic image results and other patient health information, credit card and other financial information, insurance information, and personally identifiable information. A significant portion of the communication between our personnel, patients, business partners, and suppliers depends on information technology. We rely on our information systems to perform functions critical to our ability to operate, including patient scheduling, billing, collections, image storage and image transmission. We also use information technology systems and networks in our operations and supporting departments such as research and development, marketing, accounting, finance, and human resources. The future success and growth of our business depends on streamlined processes made available through information systems, global communications, internet activity and other network processes.
Our information technology system is vulnerable to damage or interruption from:
- Cybersecurity attacks and breaches, ransomware and computer viruses, coordinated attacks by hackers, activist entities, organized criminal threat actors, and nation-state sponsored actors, seeking to disrupt operations or misappropriate information;
- technology service provider outages and technology supply chain cyber-security weaknesses;
- power losses, computer systems failures, internet and telecommunications or data network failures, operator negligence, improper operation by or supervision of employees, physical and electronic losses of data and similar events;
- earthquakes, fires, floods and other natural disasters; and
- acts of vandalism or theft, misplaced or lost data, programming or human errors and similar events.
Cybersecurity threats are constantly changing, increasing the difficulty of successfully defending against them or implementing adequate preventive measures. While we maintain multiple layers of security measures and are continuously enhancing our security technologies to address new threats, emerging and advanced cybersecurity threats, including coordinated attacks, require additional layers of security which may disrupt or impact efficiency of operations. We have in the past experienced unauthorized access to our network and could again face attempts by others to gain unauthorized access to information or to introduce malicious software to disrupt the operation of our information technology systems. While management is not aware of a cybersecurity incident that has had a material effect on our operations, there can be no assurances that a cybersecurity incident that could have a material impact on us will not occur in the future.
In particular, severe ransomware attacks are becoming increasingly prevalent and can lead to significant interruptions in our operations, loss of sensitive data and income, reputational harm, and diversion of funds. A successful ransomware or similar attack could disrupt or limit our ability to operate and generate revenue for an extended period of time including our ability to retrieve patient records, schedule imaging procedures, store and transmit diagnostic images, bill payors or patients, provide customer assistance services, conduct research and development activities, collect, process and prepare company financial information, and manage the administrative aspects of our business, any of which could materially adversely affect our business. Extortion payments may alleviate the negative impact of a ransomware attack, but there is the risk that the threat actor may not destroy the stolen information and we may be unwilling or unable to make such payments due to, for example, applicable laws or regulations prohibiting such payments.
Recent cyberattacks in the healthcare sector, such as the February 2024 incident affecting Change Healthcare, have underscored critical cybersecurity risks which extend beyond internal systems to encompass third-party service providers and interconnected supply chains. Attacks targeting these areas can lead to significant disruptions in critical healthcare functions, exposure of sensitive patient data, and substantial financial losses. The impact of such breaches can be severe and are similar to those we face with ransomware. Our organization prioritizes comprehensive risk management strategies that include robust vetting and monitoring of third-party vendors, regular security assessments of supply chain partners, and implementation of strong authentication and access control measures throughout the entire ecosystem. However, while management is not aware of a cybersecurity incident through third-party service providers that has had a material effect on our operations, there can be no assurances that a cybersecurity incident through third-party service providers that could have a material impact on us will not occur in the future.
Any such interruption in access, improper access, disclosure, modification, or other loss of information could result in legal claims or proceedings, liability or penalties under laws and regulations that protect the privacy of personal information, such as HIPAA, European data privacy regulations, such as the General Data Protection Regulation, or GDPR, U.S. state privacy regulations, such as the California Consumer Privacy Act, or newly emerging U.S. state health information privacy laws, such as those in Washington, Oregon, and Texas. We may be required to comply with state breach notification laws or become subject to mandatory corrective action.
Responding to such incidents could require us to incur significant costs related to rebuilding internal systems, defending against litigation, responding to regulatory inquiries or actions, paying damages, complying with consumer protection laws or taking other remedial steps with respect to third parties. If our data storage system was compromised, it could also give rise to unwanted media attention, materially damage our payor and physician relationships, and harm our business reputation. While we maintain cyber liability insurance, our insurance may not be sufficient to protect against all losses we may incur if we suffer significant or multiple attacks.
Additionally, if and as our business grows, we will need to continually improve and expand the scope of our technology systems in order to maintain their adequacy for the scale of our operations. Any failure to make such improvements or any significant delay in the planned implementation of new or enhanced systems could render our systems obsolete or inadequate, in which case our service to our customers and our other business activities could suffer, and we could be more vulnerable to electronic breaches from outside sources.
Our success depends in part on our key personnel and loss of key executives could adversely affect our operations.
Our success depends in part on our ability to attract and retain qualified senior and executive management, and managerial and technical personnel. The loss of the services of Dr. Howard G. Berger, our President and Chief Executive Officer, and Norman R. Hames or Stephen M. Forthuber, our Presidents and Chief Operating Officers, West Coast and East Coast, respectively, could hinder our ability to execute our business strategy and have a significant negative impact on our operations. We believe that they could not easily be replaced with executives of equal experience and capabilities, which would adversely affect our business.
The future growth of our imaging business is partially dependent on our ability to continue to successfully integrate acquired businesses.
Historically, we have experienced substantial growth through acquisitions that have increased our size, scope and geographic distribution of our imaging center business. During the past three fiscal years, we have completed acquisitions that have added 35 centers to our fixed-site outpatient diagnostic imaging services.
We may never realize expected synergies or capitalize on expected business opportunities in connection with an acquisition. Moreover, assumptions underlying estimates of expected cost savings may be inaccurate, or general industry and business conditions may deteriorate. Integrating operations requires significant efforts and expense on our part. Our management may have its attention diverted while trying to integrate an acquisition. Personnel may leave or be terminated because of an acquisition. If these factors limit our ability to integrate the operations of an acquisition successfully or on a timely basis, our expectations of future results of operations, including certain cost savings and synergies as a result of the acquisition, may not be met.
Acquisitions are also accompanied by the risk that obligations and liabilities of an acquired business may not be adequately reflected in the historical financial statements of that business and the risk that historical financial statements may be based on assumptions, which are incorrect or inconsistent with our assumptions or approach to accounting policies. Further, integration of an acquired business or technology could involve significant difficulties and could require management and capital resources that otherwise would be available for ongoing development of our existing business or pursuit of other opportunities. We may also acquire contingent liabilities in connection with the acquisitions of a business, which may be material, and any estimates we might make regarding any acquired contingent liabilities and the likelihood that these liabilities will materialize could differ materially from the liabilities actually incurred. These circumstances could materially harm our business, results of operations, and prospects.
We may not generate the expected benefits from our investment in AI technologies or other new lines of business and the use of AI and machine learning tools in our operations and the services of our third-parties may introduce risks that could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and reputation.
We believe that technological advancements including AI will significantly impact diagnostic imaging services in the future. As part of our growth strategy we have acquired or invested in a number of AI companies and technologies, including DeepHealth, Inc., NuLogix Health, Inc., WhiteRabbit.ai, Aidence Holding B.V. and Quantib B.V. with the expectation that these AI technologies can be developed into solutions that enhance the quality of outcomes for patients via improved diagnostic imaging, reduce operating costs, and correspondingly improve our competitive position. However, the success of our AI investments will depend upon a number of factors, some of which are out of our control, such as:
- our ability to effectively integrate the operations of the acquired companies, including retaining key personnel;
- the timeline and related expenses associated with applying for regulatory authorizations necessary for commercialization;
- whether any of our existing or future AI products will receive European CE or U.S. FDA 510(k) clearance or other clearances and or regulatory authorizations necessary for commercialization;
- whether our AI solutions will prove effective for improving health care quality, patient services or business procedures;
- our ability to successfully commercialize and secure market acceptance of our AI solutions from patients and health care providers; and
- the development of competing technologies by other companies, and the relative efficacy, cost and ease of use of those technologies.
There is no guarantee that we will receive the anticipated benefits from the investments we have made and may continue to make in the area of AI. Any failure would result in reduced operating profits and the potential impairment of goodwill related to those investments, which would further impact our profitability.
In the future, we may acquire companies that create a new line of business. The process of integrating the acquired business, technology, service and research and development component into our business and operations and entry into a new line of business in which we are inexperienced may result in unforeseen operating difficulties and expenditures. In developing a new line of business, we may invest significant time and resources that take away the attention of management that would otherwise be available for ongoing development of our business. In addition, there can be no assurance that our new lines of business will ultimately be successful. The failure to successfully manage these risks in the development and implementation of new lines of business could have a material, adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Additionally, we leverage AI and machine learning tools to increase productivity and innovation. We also face potential risks from the use of AI and machine learning tools. Our, or our customers’ sensitive, proprietary, or confidential information could be leaked, disclosed, or revealed as a result of or in connection with employees’ or vendors’ use of generative AI technologies. In addition, we may use AI outputs to inform certain decisions, and AI models may create incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise flawed outputs, some of which may appear correct. Due to the potential flaws in the use of AI, we could make incorrect decisions, including decisions that could bias certain individuals or classes of individuals and adversely impact their rights. The rapid development of AI tools could render obsolete certain technologies or tools we currently use, or otherwise provide competitors with a technological edge. New or evolving legislation or regulations might impose restrictions on how AI and machine learning tools can be used, requiring us to adapt our tools or face various penalties for non-compliance, including potential disgorgement of data and associated capabilities. As a result, we could face adverse consequences, including exposure to reputational and competitive harm, customer loss, and legal liabilities. The AI tools may also be subject to additional, and as yet unidentified, security threats.
Healthcare and Regulatory Risks
The regulatory framework in which we operate is continually evolving.
Although we believe that we are operating in compliance with applicable federal and state laws, neither our current or anticipated business operations nor the operations of our contracted radiology practices have been the subject of judicial or regulatory interpretation. We cannot assure you that a review of our business by courts or regulatory authorities will not result in a determination that could adversely affect our operations. In addition, healthcare laws and regulations may change significantly in the future in a way that restricts our operations. We continuously monitor these developments and modify our operations from time to time as the regulatory environment changes. We cannot assure you, however, that we will be able to adapt our operations to address new regulations or that new regulations will not adversely affect our business. In particular, the new administration in 2025 is expected to make significant changes to the operations of the Department of Health and Human Services, and other regulatory agencies such as FDA and CMS, each of which regulates certain aspects of our business. It is not clear what changes will be implemented by such agencies in terms of legal or regulatory requirements, or policies, or whether we will be able to comply with such changes in terms of legal or regulatory requirements, or policies.
Certain states have enacted statutes or adopted regulations affecting risk assumption in the healthcare industry, including statutes and regulations that subject any physician or physician network engaged in risk-based managed care contracting to comply with applicable insurance laws. These laws, if adopted in the states in which we operate, may require physicians and physician networks to meet minimum capital requirements and other safety and soundness requirements. Implementing additional regulations or compliance requirements could result in substantial costs to us and the contracted radiology practices and limit our ability to enter into capitation or other risk-sharing managed care arrangements.
If we are unable to effectively adapt to changes in the healthcare industry, including changes to laws and regulations regarding or affecting U.S. healthcare reform, our business could be harmed.
Due to the importance of the healthcare industry in the lives of all Americans, federal, state, and local legislative bodies frequently pass legislation, and administrative agencies promulgate regulations relating to healthcare reform or that affect the healthcare industry. As has been the trend in recent years, it is reasonable to assume that there will continue to be increased government oversight and regulation of the healthcare industry in the future. We cannot assure our stockholders as to the ultimate content, timing or effect of any new healthcare legislation or regulations, nor is it possible at this time to estimate the impact of potential new legislation or regulations on our business.
Since a portion of our revenue is derived from government payors, we are subject to regulatory changes. Federal and state legislators routinely introduce and consider proposed legislation that would impact Medicare, Medicaid, and PACE funding and operations, and state and federal agencies also consider and implement regulations and guidance that impact our business. Similarly, changes in private payor reimbursement policies could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and result of operations. We cannot predict with certainty the impact that any particular federal and state healthcare legislation or regulation will have on us, but such changes could impose new and/or more stringent regulatory requirements on our activities or result in reduced payment rates, any of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
While we believe that we have structured our agreements and operations in material compliance with applicable healthcare laws and regulations, there can be no assurance that regulators will agree with our approach or that we will be able to successfully address changes in the current legislative and regulatory environment. Moreover, some of the healthcare laws and regulations applicable to us are subject to limited or evolving interpretations, and a review of our business or operations by a court, law enforcement or a regulatory authority might result in a determination that could have a material adverse effect on us. Furthermore, the healthcare laws and regulations applicable to us may be amended or interpreted in a manner that could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, results of operations and financial condition.
We may be impacted by eligibility changes to government and private insurance programs.
Due to potential decreased availability of healthcare through private employers, the number of patients who are uninsured or participate in governmental programs may increase. Healthcare reform legislation will increase the participation of individuals in the Medicaid program in states that elect to participate in the expanded Medicaid coverage. A shift in payor mix from managed care and other private payors to government payors as well as an increase in the number of uninsured patients may result in a reduction in the rates of reimbursement or an increase in uncollectible receivables or uncompensated care, with a corresponding decrease in net revenue. Changes in the eligibility requirements for governmental programs and state decisions on whether to participate in the expansion of such programs also could increase the number of patients who participate in such programs and the number of uninsured patients. Even for those patients who remain in private insurance plans, changes to those plans could increase patient financial responsibility, resulting in a greater risk of uncollectible receivables. Furthermore, additional changes to, or rollback of, the PPACA, whether through legislation or judicial action, may also affect reimbursement and coverage in ways that are currently unpredictable. These factors and events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Complying with federal and state regulations is an expensive and time-consuming process, and any failure to comply could result in substantial penalties.
We are directly or indirectly, through the radiology practices with which we contract, subject to extensive regulation by both the federal government and the state governments in which we provide services, including:
- the federal False Claims Act;
- the federal Medicare and Medicaid Anti-Kickback Statute, and state anti-kickback prohibitions;
- federal and state billing and claims submission laws and regulations;
- HIPAA, as amended by HITECH, and comparable state laws;
- the federal physician self-referral prohibition commonly known as the Stark Law and state equivalents;
- state laws that prohibit the corporate practice of medicine and prohibit similar fee-splitting arrangements;
- state laws governing the approval of healthcare transactions and complying with cost targets, including the California Health Care Quality and Affordability Act and its implementing regulations.
- federal and state laws governing the diagnostic imaging and therapeutic equipment we use in our business concerning patient safety, equipment operating specifications and radiation exposure levels;
- state laws governing reimbursement for diagnostic services related to services compensable under workers' compensation rules; and
- federal and state environmental and health and safety laws.
If our operations are found to be in violation of any of the laws and regulations to which we or the radiology practices with which we contract are subject, we may be subject to penalties, including civil and criminal penalties, damages, fines and curtailment of our operations. Any penalties, damages, fines or curtailment of our operations, individually or in the aggregate, could adversely affect our ability to operate our business and our financial results. The risks of our being found in violation of these laws and regulations are increased by the fact that many of them have not been fully interpreted by the regulatory authorities or the courts, and their provisions are open to a variety of interpretations. Any action brought against us for violation of these laws or regulations, even if we successfully defend against it, could cause us to incur significant legal expenses and divert our management’s attention from the operation of our business.
There may be changes in FDA’s regulatory requirements and policies, and we may not be able to comply with them.
FDA’s policies regarding regulation of AI-ML-enabled software products are constantly evolving and developing. FDA typically communicates with the industry and the public through occasions such as presentations to the industry, or through FDA’s guidance documents. At times, such policies may involve significant changes, and we may not be able to comply with all of such policies, and in particular, policies relating to the regulation of AI-ML-enabled software products. Non-compliance may result in significant enforcement actions, including but not limited to recalls, Form 483s, warning letters, untitled letters, it-has-come-to-our-attention letters, detention or seizure of adulterated or misbranded products, or other forms of enforcement. We may be forced to remove our products from the market entirely. Any adverse regulatory action, depending on its magnitude, may restrict us from effectively marketing and selling our products and limit our ability to obtain future pre-market authorization, and could result in a substantial modification to our business practices and operations.
State and federal anti-kickback and anti-self-referral laws may adversely affect income.
Various federal and state laws govern financial arrangements among healthcare providers. The federal Anti-Kickback Statute prohibits the knowing and willful offer, payment, solicitation or receipt of any form of remuneration in return for, or to induce, the referral of Medicare, Medicaid, or other federal healthcare program patients, or in return for, or to induce, the purchase, lease or order of items or services that are covered by Medicare, Medicaid, or other federal healthcare programs. Similarly, many state laws prohibit the solicitation, payment or receipt of remuneration in return for, or to induce the referral of patients in private as well as government programs. Violation of these anti-kickback laws may result in substantial civil or criminal penalties for individuals or entities and/or exclusion from federal or state healthcare programs. We believe we are operating in compliance with applicable law and believe that our arrangements with providers would not be found to violate the anti-kickback laws. However, these laws could be interpreted in a manner inconsistent with our operations.
Federal law prohibiting certain physician self-referrals, known as the Stark Law, prohibits a physician from referring Medicare or Medicaid patients to an entity for certain “designated health services” if the physician has a prohibited financial relationship with that entity, unless an exception applies. Certain radiology services are considered “designated health services” under the Stark Law. Although we believe our operations do not violate the Stark Law, our activities may be challenged. If a challenge is successful, it could have an adverse effect on our operations. In addition, legislation may be enacted in the future that further addresses Medicare and Medicaid fraud and abuse or imposes additional regulatory burdens on us.
In addition, under the Deficit Recovery Act, states enacting false claims statutes similar to the federal False Claims Act, which establish liability for submission of fraudulent claims to the State Medicaid program and contain qui tam or whistleblower provisions, receive an increased percentage of any recovery from a State Medicaid judgment or settlement. Adoption of new false claims statutes in states where we operate may impose additional burdens on us.
If we fail to comply with various licensure, certification and accreditation standards, we may be subject to loss of licensure, certification or accreditation, which would adversely affect our operations.
Ownership, construction, operation, expansion and acquisition of our diagnostic imaging centers are subject to various federal and state laws, regulations and approvals concerning licensing of personnel, other required certificates for certain types of healthcare facilities and certain medical equipment. In addition, freestanding diagnostic imaging centers that provide services independent of a physician’s office must be enrolled by Medicare as an independent diagnostic treatment facility, or IDTF, to bill the Medicare program. Medicare carriers have discretion in applying the IDTF requirements and therefore the application of these requirements may vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.
In addition, federal legislation requires all suppliers that provide the technical component of diagnostic MRI, PET/CT, CT, and nuclear medicine to be accredited by an accreditation organization designated by CMS (which currently include the American College of Radiology, the Intersocietal Accreditation Commission and the Joint Commission). Our MRI, CT, nuclear medicine, ultrasound and mammography centers are currently accredited by the American College of Radiology. We may not be able to receive the required regulatory authorizations or accreditation for any future acquisitions, expansions or replacements, and the failure to obtain these authorizations could limit the opportunity to expand our services.
Our payors required that the physicians providing imaging services are credentialed, before the payor will commence payment. We have experienced a slowdown in the credentialing of our physicians over the last several years which has lengthened our billing and collection cycle, and could negatively impact our ability to collect revenue from patients covered by Medicare.
Our centers are subject to periodic inspection by governmental and other authorities to assure continued compliance with the various standards necessary for licensure and certification. If any facility loses its certification under the Medicare program, then the facility will be ineligible to receive reimbursement from the Medicare and Medicaid programs. For the year ended December 31, 2025, approximately 25% and 3% of our net service fee revenue came from Medicare and various state Medicaid programs, respectively. A change in the applicable certification status of one of our centers could adversely affect our other centers and, in turn, us as a whole.
Our agreements with the contracted radiology practices must be structured to avoid the corporate practice of medicine and fee-splitting.
The laws of certain states prohibit us from exercising control over the medical judgments or decisions of physicians and from engaging in certain financial arrangements, such as splitting professional fees with physicians. These laws are enforced by state courts and regulatory authorities, each with broad discretion. A component of our business has been to enter into management agreements with radiology practices. We provide management, administrative, technical and other non-medical services to the radiology practices in exchange for a service fee typically based on a percentage of the practice’s revenue. We structure our relationships with the radiology practices, including the purchase of diagnostic imaging centers, in a manner that we believe keeps us from engaging in the practice of medicine or exercising control over the medical judgments or decisions of the radiology practices or their physicians, or violating the prohibitions against fee-splitting. State laws and enforcement efforts regarding corporate practice of medicine and fee-splitting are often subject to change. As a consequence, there can be no assurance that our present arrangements with the Group or the physicians providing medical services and medical supervision at our imaging centers will not be challenged, and, if challenged, that they will not be found to violate the corporate practice of medicine or fee splitting prohibitions. Any violation would subject us to potential damages, injunction and/or civil and criminal penalties or require us to restructure our arrangements in a way that would affect the control or quality of our services and/or change the amounts we receive under our management agreements.
Our software products could be regulated as medical devices by regulatory agencies, and we may be subject to such agencies’ regulatory or enforcement activities.
Certain of the products that we develop are or are likely to be regulated by FDA or other regulatory agencies as medical devices. Regulatory bodies in the United States and abroad, such as the FDA, impose significant legal and regulatory requirements on our operations. Such agencies regulate and oversee our design and manufacturing processes, labeling, record-keeping, and mandatory reporting of adverse events and other information to identify potential issues with marketed products. Our facilities are or may become subject to periodic inspections to ensure adherence to applicable quality system regulations, which dictate the methods, facilities, and controls used in the design, manufacture, and servicing of finished medical devices for human use. Furthermore, FDA and other regulatory agencies, both domestic and international, oversee the promotion and advertising of our products. If FDA or other regulatory agencies were to conclude that we are not in compliance with applicable laws or regulations, or that any of our medical products are ineffective or pose an unreasonable health risk, such agencies could order a recall, repair, replacement, or refund of such products, refuse to grant pending pre-market authorization applications, and/or require us to notify health professionals and others that the devices present unreasonable risks of substantial harm to the public health, and in certain rare circumstances, ban such products. Such non-compliance could also result in inspectional observations on the U.S. FDA’s Form 483, warning letters, untitled letters, it-has-come-to-our-attention letters, detention or seizure of adulterated or misbranded products, or other forms of enforcement, such as a consent decree. FDA and other non-U.S. government agencies may also assess civil or criminal penalties against us, our officers or employees. Any unfavorable legal or regulatory enforcement action, depending on its severity, could restrict our ability to effectively market and sell our products, hinder future pre-market authorizations, or necessitate substantial changes to our business practices and operations.
If we fail to comply with federal and state privacy and information security laws mandating protection of certain confidential data against disclosure, including cybersecurity attacks, we may be subject to government or private actions.
We must comply with numerous federal and state laws and regulations governing the collection, dissemination, access, use, security and privacy of PHI, including HIPAA and its implementing privacy and security regulations, as amended by the federal HITECH Act. Information security risks have significantly increased in recent years in part because of the proliferation of new technologies, and the increased sophistication and activities of organized crime, hackers, terrorists and other external parties, including foreign state agents.
Failure to adequately protect and maintain the integrity of our information systems (including our networks) and data, or to defend against cybersecurity attacks, could subject us to monetary fines, civil suits, civil penalties or criminal sanctions. We could also be required to disclose the breach publicly, which may damage our business reputation with our patients and vendors and cause a further material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position, and cash flows.
Some of our imaging modalities use radioactive materials, which generate regulated waste and could subject us to liabilities for injuries or violations of environmental and health and safety laws.
Some of our imaging procedures use radioactive materials, which generate medical and other regulated wastes. For example, patients are injected with a radioactive substance before undergoing a PET scan. Storage, use and disposal of these materials and waste products present the risk of accidental environmental contamination and physical injury. Although we typically use licensed or otherwise qualified outside vendors to dispose of this waste, applicable laws and regulations could hold us liable for damages and fines if our or others’ business operations or other actions result in contamination to the environment or personal injury due to exposure to hazardous materials. We cannot eliminate the risk of contamination or injury, and any liability imposed on us for any resulting damages or injury could exceed our resources or any applicable insurance coverage. We are subject to federal, state and local regulations governing storage, handling and disposal of these materials. We could incur significant costs and the diversion of our management’s attention in order to comply with current or future environmental and health and safety laws and regulations. Also, we cannot completely eliminate the risk of accidental contamination or injury from these hazardous materials. Although we maintain professional liability insurance coverage in amounts we believe is consistent with industry practice in the event of an accident, we could be held liable for any resulting damages, and any liability could exceed the limits of or fall outside the coverage of our professional liability insurance.
If CMS ends its current policy permitting professionals to provide direct supervision of diagnostic imaging to be immediately available through virtual presence using two-way, real-time audio/video technology, instead of requiring their physical presence, we may be subject to additional costs and a shortage of professionals to provide such supervision.
On November 1, 2024, CMS released the calendar year 2025 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule final rule, which extended through December 31, 2025 the Medicare policy permitting supervising professionals to be immediately available through virtual presence using two-way, real-time audio/video technology, instead of requiring their physical presence. In comments to the final rule, CMS indicated that it may address the most appropriate way to balance patient safety concerns with the interest of supporting access in future rulemaking. If CMS changes the current policy to require in-person supervision of diagnostic imaging that requires direct supervision, we may be required to add professional staff to our diagnostic imaging centers and/or decrease the volume of imaging services that require direct supervision of a professional.
Financial Risks
Because we have high fixed costs, lower scan volumes or other decreases revenues could adversely affect the profitability of our business.
The principal components of our expenses are debt service, depreciation, compensation paid to technologists, salaries, real estate lease expenses and equipment maintenance costs. Because a majority of these expenses are fixed, a relatively small change in our revenue could have a disproportionate effect on our operating and financial results depending on the source of our revenue. Thus, decreased revenue as a result of lower scan volumes, product mix, or reductions in reimbursement rates could result in lower margins, which would materially adversely affect the profitability of our business.
Our debt could adversely affect our financial condition and prevent us from fulfilling our obligations under our outstanding indebtedness.
Our current indebtedness and any future indebtedness we incur could adversely affect our financial condition. As of December 31, 2025 term loan indebtedness, excluding related discount, was $1,084.9 million, which $961.1 million was borrowed pursuant to the Barclays Revolving Credit Facility and the Barclays Term Loan and which includes $123.7 million borrowed pursuant to the Truist Revolving Credit Facility and the Truist Term Loan (as such capitalized terms are defined in the notes to our consolidated financial statements, and collectively, the "Barclays and Truist Credit Facilities") at our New Jersey Imaging joint venture. The Company is neither a borrower or guarantor under the Truist Credit Facilities. Our indebtedness could also:
- make it difficult for us to satisfy our payment obligations with respect to our outstanding indebtedness;
- require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to payments on our debt, reducing the availability of our cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other general corporate purposes;
- expose us to the risk of interest rate increases on our variable rate borrowings, including borrowings under our Barclays and Truist Credit facilities;
- increase our vulnerability to adverse general economic and industry conditions;
- limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry in which we operate;
- place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors that have less debt; and
- limit our ability to borrow additional funds on terms that are satisfactory to us, or at all.
A restriction in our ability to make capital expenditures would restrict our growth and could adversely affect our business.
We operate in a capital intensive, high fixed-cost industry that requires significant amounts of capital to fund operations, particularly the initial start-up and development expenses of new diagnostic imaging centers and the acquisition of additional centers and new diagnostic imaging equipment. We incur capital expenditures to, among other things, upgrade and replace equipment for existing centers and expand within our existing markets and enter new markets. If we open or acquire additional imaging centers, we may have to incur material capital lease obligations. To the extent we are unable to generate sufficient cash from our operations, funds are not available under our credit facilities or we are unable to structure or obtain financing through operating leases or long-term installment notes, we may be unable to meet the capital expenditure requirements necessary to support the maintenance and continued growth of our operations.
We may be required to recognize an impairment of our goodwill, other intangible assets, or other long-lived assets, which could have an adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.
When we acquire businesses we are generally required to allocate the purchase price to various assets including goodwill and other intangible assets. We are required to perform impairment tests for goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets annually and whenever events or circumstances indicate that it is more likely than not that impairment exists. We are also required to perform an impairment test of definite lived intangible or other long-lived assets when indicators of impairment are present.
We have been required to recognize impairment charges in the past, and may again. In September 2023, we determined that an In-process Research and Development ("IPR&D") indefinite-lived intangible asset related to Aidence Holding B.V.'s Ai Veye Lung Nodule and Veye Clinic would not receive FDA authorization for sale in the U.S. without a new submission and additional expenditures for rework in the original projected timeline. The additional expenditures, delay and reduction of U.S. sales affected the estimated fair value of the related IPR&D intangible asset and resulted in impairment charges of $3.9 million. A future decline in our operating results, future estimated cash flows and other assumptions could impact our estimated fair values, potentially leading to a material impairment of goodwill, other intangible assets, or other long-lived assets, which could adversely affect our financial position and results of operations.
Our credit facilities and instruments governing our other indebtedness restrict certain operations of our business.
Our credit facilities contain affirmative and negative covenants which restrict, among other things, our ability to:
- pay dividends or make certain other restricted payments or investments;
- incur additional indebtedness and certain disqualified equity interests;
- create liens (other than permitted liens) securing indebtedness or trade payables;
- sell certain assets or merge with or into other companies or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of our assets;
- enter into certain transactions with affiliates;
- create restrictions on dividends or other payments by our restricted subsidiaries; and
- create guarantees of indebtedness by restricted subsidiaries.
All of these restrictions could affect our ability to operate our business and may limit our ability to take advantage of potential business opportunities as they arise. A failure to comply with these covenants and restrictions would permit the relevant creditors to declare all amounts borrowed under the applicable agreement governing such indebtedness, together with accrued interest and fees, to be immediately due and payable. If the indebtedness under our credit facilities is accelerated, we may not have sufficient assets to repay amounts due under the credit facilities or on other indebtedness then outstanding.
If we are unable to obtain insurance, or if insurance becomes more costly for us to obtain, our business may be adversely affected.
It may become more difficult and costly for us to obtain coverage liabilities and other risks, including property, automobile and casualty insurance. For example, the following circumstances may adversely affect our ability to obtain insurance at favorable rates:
- we experience higher-than-expected professional liability, property and casualty, or other types of claims or losses;
- we receive survey deficiencies or citations of higher-than-normal scope or severity;
- we acquire especially troubled operations or facilities that present unattractive risks to current or prospective insurers;
- insurers choose to stop operating or offering policies in certain states due to changes in economic conditions or laws;
- insurers tighten underwriting standards applicable to us or our industry; or
- insurers or reinsurers are unable or unwilling to insure us or the industry at historical premiums and coverage levels.
If any of these potential circumstances were to occur, our insurance carriers may cancel or not renew our policies, or require us to significantly increase our self-insured retention levels or pay substantially higher premiums for the same or reduced coverage for insurance, including workers compensation, property and casualty, automobile, employment practices liability, directors and officers liability, employee healthcare and general and professional liability coverages.
In some states, the law prohibits or limits insurance coverage for the risk of punitive damages arising from professional liability and general liability claims or litigation. Coverage for punitive damages is also excluded under some insurance policies. As a result, we may be liable for punitive damage awards in these states that either are not covered or are in excess of our insurance policy limits. Claims against us, regardless of their merit or eventual outcome, could also inhibit our ability to attract patients or expand our business and could require our management to devote time to matters unrelated to the day-to-day operation of our business.
With few exceptions, workers compensation and employee health insurance costs have also increased markedly in recent years and are expected to increase in the future. If we are unable to obtain insurance, or if insurance becomes more costly for us to obtain, or if the coverage levels we can economically obtain decline, our business may be adversely affected.
Capital Markets Risks
Possible volatility in our stock price could negatively affect us and our stockholders.
The trading price of our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Market has fluctuated significantly in the past. During the period from January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2025, the trading price of our common stock fluctuated from a high of $93.65 per share to a low of $12.03 per share. In the past, we have experienced a drop in stock price following an announcement of disappointing earnings or earnings guidance. Any such announcement in the future could lead to a similar drop in stock price. The price of our common stock could also be subject to wide fluctuations in the future as a result of a number of other factors, including the following:
- changes in expectations as to future financial performance or buy/sell recommendations of securities analysts;
- our, or a competitor’s, announcement of new services, or significant acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments; and
- the operating and stock price performance of other comparable companies.
In addition, the U.S. securities markets periodically experience significant price and volume fluctuations. These fluctuations often have been unrelated to the operating performance of companies in these markets. Broad market and industry factors may lead to volatility in the price of our common stock, regardless of our operating performance.
In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of an individual company’s securities, securities class action litigation often has been instituted against that company. The institution of similar litigation against us could result in substantial costs and a diversion of management’s attention and resources, which could negatively affect our business, results of operations or financial condition.
Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market, or the perception that such sales could occur, could cause the price of our common stock to fall.
Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market could occur at any time. Any such sales, or the perception in the market that sales are pending or could occur, could reduce the market price of our common stock. The vast majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock are freely tradable without restriction in the public market, subject to certain volume and manner of sale limitations applicable to shares held by our affiliates, as that term is defined in the Securities Act. In addition, subject to similar limitations and any other applicable legal and contractual limitations, all of the shares of our common stock subject to outstanding equity-based awards or reserved for issuance pursuant to such awards we may grant in the future are registered under the Securities Act or are otherwise eligible under applicable securities laws for free trading in the public market upon their issuance.
Future issuances of our common stock or rights to purchase our common stock could result in additional dilution to the percentage ownership of our stockholders and could cause the price of our common stock to fall.
To raise capital or for other strategic purposes, we may sell common stock, convertible securities or other equity securities in one or more transactions at prices and in a manner we determine from time to time. If we issue common stock, convertible securities or other equity securities, our then-existing stockholders could be materially diluted by such issuances and, if we otherwise issue preferred stock, new investors could gain rights, preferences and privileges senior to the holders of our common stock, any of which could cause the price of our common stock to decline.
We do not intend to pay dividends on our common stock, so any returns will be limited to the value of our common stock.
We currently anticipate that we will retain any future earnings to finance the continued development, operation and expansion of our business. As a result, we do not anticipate declaring or paying any cash dividends or other distributions in the foreseeable future. Further, if we were to enter into a credit facility or issue debt securities or preferred stock in the future, we may become contractually restricted from paying dividends. If we do not pay dividends, our common stock may be less valuable because stockholders must rely on sales of their common stock after price appreciation, which may never occur, to realize any gains on their investment.
Provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law and our organizational documents may discourage an acquisition of us.
In the future, we could become the subject of an unsolicited attempted takeover of our company. Although an unsolicited takeover could be in the best interests of our stockholders, our organizational documents and the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware both contain provisions that will impede the removal of directors and may discourage a third-party from making a proposal to acquire us. For example, provisions in our organizational documents:
- permit the board of directors to increase its own size, within the maximum limitations set forth in the bylaws, and fill the resulting vacancies;
- authorize the issuance of shares of preferred stock in one or more series without a stockholder vote;
- establish an advance notice procedure for stockholder proposals to be brought before an annual meeting of our stockholders, including proposed nominations of persons for election to the board of directors; and
- prohibit transfers and/or acquisitions of stock (without consent of the Board of Directors ) that would result in any stockholder owning greater than 5% of the currently outstanding stock resulting in a limitation on net operating loss carryovers, capital loss carryovers, general business credit carryovers, alternative minimum tax credit carryovers and foreign tax credit carryovers, as well as any loss or deduction attributable to a “net unrealized built-in loss” within the meaning of Section 382 of the internal revenue code of 1986, as amended.
We are subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control.
Cybersecurity
As filed, 5,861 characters, with its headings, lists and tables. Extracted from the main document; charts and exhibits are in the original on sec.gov.
Risk Management and Strategy
As a healthcare provider, cybersecurity, data protection, safeguarding patient information and the integrity of our information systems is of the utmost priority. We have developed and maintain a Cybersecurity and Data Protection Program which aligns with industry-standard frameworks and applicable regulatory requirements, integrates with our overall risk management process, and aims to ensure cybersecurity concerns are a requisite element for decision-making at all levels of our business.
RadNet’s Cybersecurity and Data Protection Program assesses, identifies and manages threats to our information systems and evaluates cybersecurity risks associated with our vendors and third-party partners. We are focused on detecting, preventing and responding to cyber threats, maintaining the privacy and protection of sensitive information, and maintaining the durability and resiliency of our information and data processing systems.
Our approach to designing, operating and measuring the effectiveness of our program leverages experienced internal resources, industry-recognized cybersecurity consultants, assessors, healthcare and industry-specific cybersecurity working groups and threat-intelligence platforms, federal law enforcement and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (“CISA”) partnerships. We use these resources and partnerships, along with our internal expertise, to develop specialized insights pertinent to our business’s cyber-risk, and tailor our cybersecurity strategy to best safeguard our systems and data.
We staff an internal cybersecurity team and maintain a third-party managed security operations center which in-concert provide 24x7x365 real-time detection and response. These teams are always connected and routinely respond to perceived threats within minutes. Time to detect and respond metrics are continuously evaluated for opportunities to enhance our program.
Cyber-awareness training and testing is a key component of RadNet’s Cybersecurity and Data Protection Program. Every employee is required to complete cyber-related training (including third-parties who access our systems) and successfully complete testing throughout the year in addition to monthly phishing tests. Furthermore, we require all system users to complete annual Patient Privacy and Patient Data Breach training and testing to meet RadNet compliance standards.
We benchmark and evaluate our Cybersecurity and Data Protection Program and data protection maturity against the National Institute of Standards & Technology ("NIST") Cybersecurity Framework and the HIPAA Security Rule. Consistent with these frameworks, our program includes recurring third-party assessments and a vendor risk management program. Our vendor risk management program conducts security assessments to determine a risk profile of potential vendors and third-party partners and integrates ongoing monitoring and periodic re-assessments to ensure compliance with RadNet’s security standards. RadNet’s Vendor Risk Management Team works closely with RadNet Legal, Compliance and Operations teams to address data safety, compliance and legal requirements for each of our vendor/partner engagements.
We continuously evaluate the practical effectiveness of our cyber-defenses both internally and externally using a combination of technology-based assessments and recurring third-party audits. Our Critical Incident Response Team periodically conducts cyber-focused tabletop exercises using scenarios drawn from observations of risk indicators and from threat intelligence reports of real-world incidents affecting our industry. Outcomes and insights from tabletop exercises are used to enhance RadNet’s Incident Response Plan which is architected following NIST guidelines and reviewed annually and updated periodically as needed.
Our program's overall maturity and operational readiness are regularly evaluated internally by RadNet IT Governance and Compliance teams and by independent expert auditors using the NIST's Cybersecurity Framework. Our program, and the results of the evaluation and testing efforts, are regularly reviewed by our senior management and members of our Board of Directors.
Cybersecurity threats, including previous cybersecurity incidents, have not materially affected our business strategy, results of operations, or financial condition. However, cybersecurity threats have the potential to interrupt our operations or cause significant financial hardship. Our risks associated with cybersecurity threats are set forth under “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A in this report.
Governance
RadNet is committed to appropriate cybersecurity governance and oversight. Our Cybersecurity and Data Protection Program is the principal responsibility of our Chief Information Officer ("CIO") and Chief Information Security Officer ("CISO"), each of whom have over 20 years of experience in information systems, including cybersecurity training and experience. Additionally, RadNet’s CIO and CISO work closely with our executive management, legal and compliance leaders, and meet regularly to discuss cybersecurity matters and risks.
Our Board of Directors oversees management's processes for identifying and mitigating risks, including cybersecurity and information security risks. Our Audit Committee of our Board of Directors regularly reviews our technology and cybersecurity program and effectiveness, and internal audits of our program. Our Audit Committee also receives regular cybersecurity updates and education on a broad range of topics, including:
- current cybersecurity landscape and emerging threats;
- status of ongoing cybersecurity initiatives and strategies;
- incident report and learnings from any cybersecurity events; and
- compliance with regulatory requirements and industry standards.
Properties
As filed, 1,690 characters, with its headings, lists and tables. Extracted from the main document; charts and exhibits are in the original on sec.gov.
Our corporate headquarters is located in adjoining premises at 1508, 1510 and 1516 Cotner Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90025, and approximately 21,500 square feet is occupied under these leases, which including options, expire June 30, 2037. We also have a regional office of approximately 35,400 square feet in Baltimore, Maryland under a lease, which including options, expires September 30, 2028. In addition, we lease approximately 35,000 square feet of warehouse space nationwide, which expire at various dates, including options, through December 31, 2028.
At December 31, 2025, we operated directly or indirectly through hospital and health system joint ventures, 418 centers located in Arizona, California, Delaware, Florida, Maryland, Virginia, New Jersey, New York, and Texas. We lease the premises at which these facilities are located and do not have options to purchase the facilities we rent. Our most common initial lease term varies in length from 5 to 15 years. Factoring in renewal options, we can have a total span of 10 to 35 years at the facilities we lease. We also lease smaller satellite X-Ray locations, usually for one year terms, that are renewable on mutual consent with the landlord. Rental increases can range from 1% to 10% on an annual basis, depending on the location and market conditions where we do business.
As of December 31, 2025, total square footage operated directly or indirectly under lease, including medical office, administrative and warehouse locations, was approximately 3.2 million square feet. All leasing activity described relates solely to our Imaging Center segment, as our Digital Health leasing activity is currently immaterial.
Legal proceedings
As filed, 539 characters, with its headings, lists and tables. Extracted from the main document; charts and exhibits are in the original on sec.gov.
From time to time we are engaged in the defense of lawsuits arising out of the ordinary course of our business. We do not believe that the outcome of our current litigation will have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. However, the outcome of litigation is inherently uncertain. If one or more legal matters were resolved against us in a reporting period for amounts above management’s expectations, our financial condition and operating results could be materially adversely affected.
Management's discussion and analysis
As filed, 59,038 characters, with its headings, lists and tables. Extracted from the main document; charts and exhibits are in the original on sec.gov.
The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) is intended to help the reader understand the results of operations and financial condition of RadNet, Inc. The MD&A is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with, our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes included in this annual report on Form 10-K.
Overview
We are a national provider of freestanding, fixed-site outpatient diagnostic imaging services in the United States. As of December 31, 2025, we operated directly or indirectly through hospital and health system joint ventures, 418 centers located in Arizona, California, Delaware, Florida, Maryland, Virginia, New Jersey, New York, and Texas. Internationally, our subsidiary, The HLH Imaging Group Limited fka Heart & Lung Imaging Limited, provides teleradiology services for remote interpretation of images on behalf of providers within the framework of the United Kingdom's National Health Service. Our operations comprise two segments for financial reporting purposes for this reporting period, Imaging Centers and Digital Health. For further financial information about these segments, see Note 5, Segment Reporting, in the notes accompanying our consolidated financial statements included in this report.
Our imaging centers provide physicians with imaging capabilities to facilitate the diagnosis and treatment of diseases and disorders and may reduce unnecessary invasive procedures, often reducing the cost and amount of care for patients.
In addition to our imaging business, we established a Digital Health business segment during our 2024 fiscal year, which combines our former AI businesses with our eRad, Inc. business. Our Digital Health segment develops and delivers AI-powered health informatics solutions to improve quality, efficiency, and diagnostic outcomes in diagnostic imaging and radiology. We are using AI to develop solutions to assist radiologists and other clinicians in interpreting images and improving radiologist efficiency and patient care. The portfolio of AI and software solutions is anchored by Enterprise Operations solutions (traditionally knowns as RIS), Enterprise Imaging solutions (traditionally known as PACS), and Clinical AI solutions, enabled by the DeepHealth OS, a cloud-native operating system that connects critical aspects of the radiology service line from scheduling and patient preparation to technologist workflow to interpretation and referral management. Our Clinical AI solutions currently cover the fields of diagnosis and screening in the domain of breast, prostate, lung, thyroid, and brain. Across our portfolio of AI solutions, we have 22 FDA clearances and 15 CE marks. Our Digital Health segment provides these solutions to RadNet and to over 2000 customers in the U.S. and outside of the U.S.
As part of our continued strategic expansion in Digital Health, we recently completed three acquisitions: iCAD, Inc., an AI-powered breast health solutions company; See-Mode Technologies, which enhances ultrasound-based diagnostics through artificial intelligence; and CIMAR (UK) Limited, which provides cloud-based medical image storage, PACS, and AI-enabled imaging workflow solutions. We are currently integrating these businesses into our Digital Health segment
The following table presents the total number of imaging centers in operation at year end, including both consolidated and non-consolidated centers, and our consolidated revenues for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023. Revenue from non-consolidated centers is not included in consolidated revenues.
| Years Ended December 31, 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centers in operation | 418 | 398 | 366 |
| Total consolidated revenue | $2,040 | $1,830 | $1,617 |
Our revenue is derived from a diverse mix of payors, including private payors and commercial insurance companies, managed care capitated payors, and government payors such as Medicare and Medicaid. We believe our payor diversity mitigates our exposure to possible unfavorable reimbursement trends within any one payor class. Our total revenue for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023 is summarized in the following table (in thousands):
In Thousands
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Commercial insurance | $1,130,114 | $1,018,327 | $879,792 |
| Medicare | 476,987 | 410,072 | 356,506 |
| Medicaid | 51,736 | 44,736 | 42,302 |
| Workers' compensation/personal injury | 44,700 | 43,666 | 46,406 |
| Other payors | 118,599 | 104,888 | 87,675 |
| Management fee revenue | 27,516 | 24,676 | 17,936 |
| Other revenue | 65,021 | 46,724 | 32,580 |
| Revenue under capitation arrangements | 125,537 | 136,575 | 153,433 |
| Total revenue | $2,040,210 | $1,829,664 | $1,616,630 |
Our revenue is not always consistent across each quarter. We generally experience the lowest volumes of procedures and the lowest level of revenue during the first quarter of each year. This is primarily the result of two factors. First, our volumes and revenue are typically impacted by winter weather conditions in our northeastern operations. It is common for snowstorms and other inclement weather to result in patient appointment cancellations and, in some cases, imaging center closures. Second, in recent years, we have observed greater participation in high deductible health plans by patients. As these high deductibles reset in January for most of these patients, we have observed that patients utilize medical services less during the first quarter, when securing medical care will result in significant out-of-pocket expenditures.
Acquisitions, Equity Investments and Joint Venture Activity
The following discussion summarizes certain details concerning our acquisition or disposition of centers, our equity investments, and our joint venture transactions. See Note 4, Business Combinations and Related Activity and Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, in the notes accompanying our consolidated financial statements included in this report for further information.
Acquisitions
Imaging Center Segment
Radiology Imaging Center Asset Acquisitions:
During the years ended 2025 and 2024, we completed the acquisition of certain assets of the following entities, which engage directly in the practice of radiology or associated businesses. The primary reason for these acquisitions was to strengthen our presence in many of our geographic markets. These acquisitions are reported as part of our Imaging Center segment. We made a fair value determination of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities and the following were recorded (in thousands):
2025:
| Entity | Date Acquired | Total Consideration | Property & Equipment | Right of Use Assets | Goodwill | Intangible Assets | Other Assets | Right of Use Liabilities | Finance lease |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HALO Centers LLC | 1/2/2025 | $4,200 | 587 | 3,238 | 3,563 | 50 | — | (3,238) | — |
| Hillcroft Medical Clinic | 3/7/2025 | $734 | 278 | — | 406 | 50 | — | — | — |
| North County Radiology Oceanside LLC | 4/1/2025 | $1,702 | 238 | 599 | 1,307 | 150 | 7 | (599) | — |
| Faculty Physicians and Surgeons of LLUSM (Palm Imaging) | 5/1/2025 | $1,400 | 648 | — | 702 | 50 | — | — | — |
| California MSK MSO, LLC (OSS Burbank) | 5/1/2025 | $500 | 330 | — | 70 | 100 | — | — | — |
| HALO Centers LLC (Indian Wells) | 5/1/2025 | $7,850 | 1,714 | 2,439 | 6,072 | 50 | 15 | (2,439) | — |
| Kolb Radiology P.C. | 7/1/2025 | $26,659 | 6,887 | 5,355 | 22,396 | 79 | 155 | (6,125) | (2,088) |
| Schonholz and Drossman, LLP | 9/1/2025 | $30,101 | 2,921 | 5,566 | 26,790 | 295 | 95 | (5,566) | — |
| Laser Assets, Inc.* | 11/1/2025 | $29,058 | 7,145 | 4,529 | 22,170 | 134 | (32) | (4,889) | — |
| Woodburn Nuclear Medicine, Ltd.* | 11/1/2025 | $29,705 | 1,658 | 4,292 | 27,902 | 1,105 | — | (5,252) | — |
| River Radiology, PLLC* | 11/3/2025 | $1,200 | 798 | 1,908 | 244 | 150 | 8 | (1,908) | — |
| Total | 133,109 | 23,204 | 27,925 | 111,622 | 2,213 | 248 | (30,015) | (2,088) |
*Fair Value Determination is preliminary and subject to change
2024:
| Entity | Date Acquired | Total Purchase Consideration | Property & Equipment | Right of Use Assets | Goodwill | Intangible Assets | Other | Right of Use Liabilities | Notes payable and other liabilities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antelope Valley Outpatient Imaging | 2/1/2024 | 3,530 | 2,793 | 563 | 687 | 50 | — | (563) | — |
| Grossman Imaging Center of CMH, LLC | 3/31/2024 | 10,343 | 1,717 | 6,304 | 8,500 | 280 | 56 | (6,514) | — |
| Providence Health System - Southern California | 3/31/2024 | 7,369 | 1,378 | 3,441 | 5,991 | — | — | (3,441) | — |
| Houston Medical Imaging, LLC | 4/1/2024 | 22,703 | 15,826 | 7,929 | 11,584 | 1,660 | 90 | (8,089) | (6,297) |
| U.S. Imaging, Inc. | 6/1/2024 | 4,200 | 4,025 | 5,597 | — | 175 | — | (5,597) | — |
| Global Imaging LLP | 9/1/2024 | 2,900 | 1,266 | — | 1,584 | 50 | — | — | — |
| Stanislaus Surgical Hospital, LLC | 9/16/2024 | 3,000 | 503 | 1,468 | 2,382 | 100 | 15 | (1,468) | — |
| Pink Perception, LLC | 10/7/2024 | 4,000 | 494 | 407 | 3,306 | 200 | — | (407) | — |
| AV Imaging PLLC | 11/1/2024 | 1,000 | 287 | — | 663 | 50 | — | — | — |
| Total | $59,045 | $28,289 | $25,709 | $34,697 | $2,565 | $161 | $(26,079) | $(6,297) |
Digital Health Segment
See-Mode Technologies
On June 2, 2025, through our wholly owned subsidiary DH AI International Holdings, B.V, we acquired all of the equity interest in See-Mode Technologies (“See-Mode”), a medical technology company focused on using artificial intelligence to enhance ultrasound-based diagnostics.
See-Mode’s operations are included in our Digital Health segment for reporting purposes. The transaction was accounted for as the acquisition of a business with a total purchase consideration of approximately of $28.9 million, including: (i) cash of $17.9 million, (ii) a holdback of $2.0 million cash to be released 18 months after acquisition, and (iii) contingent consideration with a fair value of $9.0 million related to three performance milestones payable 50% in cash and 50% in shares of our common stock. We recorded $0.2 million in other net assets, $5.5 million in developed technology, $5.4 million in IPR&D, $20.0 million in goodwill, and $2.2 million in deferred tax liabilities in connection with this transaction.
In performing the purchase price allocation, we considered, among other factors, the intended future use of the acquired assets, the historical financial performance, and estimates of the future performance of the See-Mode business.
iCAD, Inc.
On July 17, 2025, we completed the acquisition of all of the outstanding equity interests of iCAD, Inc. (“iCAD”), a global leader in AI-powered breast health solutions. The acquisition integrates iCAD’s commercial, technology, and regulatory capabilities with those of DeepHealth, our wholly owned subsidiary within the Digital Health segment. The transaction strengthens DeepHealth’s position as an industry leader in AI-enabled breast cancer image interpretation and workflow optimization and expands its global market reach.
The transaction was accounted for as the acquisition of a business and was completed through an all-stock exchange, with total purchase consideration of approximately $110.7 million based on the fair value of our common stock issued to iCAD shareholders and the fair value of our options issued in exchange for outstanding iCAD options.
We allocated the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values, which resulted in the recognition of goodwill of approximately $36.6 million, primarily reflecting expected synergies from integrating iCAD’s technology portfolio, established customer relationships, and assembled workforce. In addition, we recorded identifiable intangible assets related to backlog, developed technology, customer relationships, and trade name totaling approximately $38.3 million, consisting of $1.8 million, $0.7 million, $6.8 million, and $29.0 million, respectively, deferred tax asset, net of $20.6 million, Cash, deposits and others of $14.2 million, and property and equipment of $1.1 million.
In connection with the iCAD acquisition, the Company identified and measured the fair values of acquired intangible assets, including backlog, trade names, developed technology, in-process research and development (“IPR&D”), and customer relationships. The valuations were performed using the income approach, consistent with market participant assumptions. The income approach incorporated assumptions such as projected revenues, estimated customer attrition, royalty rates, and discount rates reflecting market participant expectations. IPR&D projects were determined to have no material fair value as of the acquisition date. The identified intangible assets were assigned estimated useful lives as follows: backlog — approximately 4 years; trade names — approximately 1 year; developed technology — approximately 7 years; and customer relationships — approximately 15 years.
In performing the purchase price allocation, we considered, among other factors, the intended future use of the acquired assets, the historical financial performance, and the expected future contributions of the iCAD business. As of December 31, 2025, the valuation of assets acquired and liabilities assumed is preliminary and subject to change, primarily with respect to the valuation of deferred taxes. The fair value determination will be updated as additional information becomes available during the measurement period.
CIMAR UK Limited
On November 10, 2025, the Company completed the acquisition of all outstanding shares of CIMAR (UK) Limited (“CIMAR”), a United Kingdom–based provider of medical image storage and cloud-based PACS solutions. The acquisition was accounted for as a business combination.
The total purchase consideration was approximately $37.0 million, consisting of $13.2 million in cash, $14.8 million in RadNet common stock issued after year end, a holdback of $3.2 million, and contingent consideration with a fair value of approximately $5.8 million as of the acquisition date, payable upon the achievement of specified recurring revenue targets.
The purchase consideration was preliminarily allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values, resulting in the recognition of goodwill of approximately $20.1 million, which is primarily attributable to expected synergies from integrating CIMAR’s technology and operations with the Company’s Digital Health platform.
Identifiable intangible assets recognized totaled approximately $22.3 million, consisting primarily of customer relationships of approximately $19.7 million, National Health Service ("NHS") and International Organization for Standardization ("ISO") certifications of approximately $2.2 million, and trade names of approximately $0.5 million. In addition, the Company recorded current net liabilities of approximately $0.3 million. The Company also recognized deferred tax liabilities of approximately $5.7 million in connection with the acquisition..
The identifiable intangible assets were valued using income- and cost-based valuation methodologies in accordance with ASC 805. Customer relationships were valued using the multi-period excess earnings method, which considers projected revenues, customer attrition, contributory asset charges, and a market-based discount rate. Trade names were valued using the relief-from-royalty method, based on projected revenues, an estimated royalty rate, and a market-based discount rate. NHS and ISO certifications were valued using a cost approach based on estimated replacement cost. The estimated useful lives are approximately 21 years for customer relationships, 4 years for trade names, and 1 years for certifications.
As of December 31, 2025, the purchase price allocation is preliminary and subject to change during the measurement period, primarily related to refinements in the valuation of intangible assets, contingent consideration, deferred taxes, and other customary purchase accounting adjustments.
Kheiron Medical Technologies LTD
On October 14, 2024, we acquired all of the equity interest in Kheiron Medical Technologies LTD (“Kheiron”), which uses deep learning AI to help radiologists detect breast cancer.
Kheiron’s operations are included in our Digital Health segment for reporting purposes. The transaction was accounted for as the acquisition of a business with a total purchase consideration of approximately $2.3 million, including: i) cash of $0.4 million, ii) cash holdback of $0.5 million to be issued 18 months after acquisition, (iii) acquisition costs incurred by the seller of $0.4 million, and (iv) a settlement of a loan from RadNet of $1.0 million. We recorded $1.2 million in current assets, $2.6 million of IPR&D in intangible assets, and $1.5 million in current liabilities in connection with this transaction.
In performing the purchase price allocation, we considered, among other factors, the intended future use of acquired assets, analysis of historical financial performance and estimates of future performance of the Kheiron business.
Formation of majority owned subsidiaries
Tri Valley Imaging Group, LLC. On February 23, 2024, we formed Tri Valley Imaging Group, LLC ("TVIG"), a partnership with Providence Health System - Southern California ("PHS"). The operation offers multi-modality services out of seven locations in Southern California. On March 29, 2024, we contributed the operations of four centers to the enterprise and PHS contributed a business comprising of three centers, including $1.4 million of fixed assets and $6.0 million in goodwill. Simultaneously, PHS purchased from us an additional economic interest in TVIG for cash payment of $9.6 million. As a result of the transaction, we recognized a gain of $7.9 million to additional paid in capital and retained a 52% controlling economic interest in TVIG and PHS retained a $7.8 million or 48% noncontrolling economic interest in TVIG.
Ventura County Imaging Group. On March 31, 2024, Community Memorial Health System purchased an economic interest of Ventura County Imaging Group ("VGIC") for a consideration of $5.1 million. As a result of the transaction, we retained 47.5% controlling economic interest in VGIC.
Pacific Diagnostic Imaging Group, LLC. On March 21, 2025, we formed Pacific Diagnostic Imaging Group, LLC (“PDRG”), a Delaware limited liability company. On April 1, 2025, we entered into a partnership with Tri-City Healthcare District (“Tri-City”) by selling a 20% membership interest in PDRG for cash consideration of $337,500. We retained an 80% controlling interest in PDRG. The joint venture operates outpatient imaging centers in Southern California. The transaction did not result in a change of control, and no gain or loss was recognized.
Joint venture investment contributions
Santa Monica Imaging Group, LLC
On April 1, 2017, we formed in conjunction with Cedars-Sinai Medical Center the Santa Monica Imaging Group, LLC ("SMIG"), consisting of two multi-modality imaging centers located in Santa Monica, California with RadNet holding a 40% economic interest and Cedars-Sinai Medical Center holding a 60% economic interest. We account for our share of the venture under the equity method. On January 1, 2019, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center purchased an additional 5% economic interest in SMIG from us and, as a result, our economic interest in SMIG was reduced to 35%.
On September 1, 2023, we contributed an additional multi-modality imaging center and a newly constructed imaging center located in Beverly Hills, California valued at $27.2 million and purchased an additional economic interest in SMIG for cash payment of $11.3 million. Simultaneously, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center contributed five additional multi-modality imaging centers located in Santa Monica, California. As a result of the transaction, our economic interest in SMIG increased to 49%. We recorded a gain of $16.8 million, within gain on contribution of imaging centers into joint venture in our consolidated statement of operations representing the difference between the fair value and carrying value of the business contributed.
Arizona Diagnostic Radiology Group
During the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, we made additional equity contributions of $20.5 million and $1.4 million, respectively, to Arizona Diagnostic Radiology Group ("ADRG", our joint venture with Dignity Health).
On June 12, 2025, we executed a $17.0 million promissory note with Dignity Health, a related party and joint venture member of ADRG. Monthly principal payments of $0.9 million began July 1, 2025, with interest accruing at the Wall Street Journal Prime Rate plus 2%. Future distributions from ADRG to Dignity will be applied to the note balance until fully repaid. The note is expected to mature on December 1, 2026. As of December 31, 2025, we recorded the note balance of $11.4 million in Due from Affiliates on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.
On November 1, 2022 we contributed eight of our imaging centers to ADRG for $12.7 million and recorded a loss of $0.5 million which was calculated as the difference between the transaction price and carrying value of such imaging centers which included equipment and other assets and an allocation of goodwill to such imaging centers. We recorded $4.5 million of the transaction price as an offset due to affiliates while the remaining $8.3 million was recorded as investment in joint venture on our balance sheet. We accounted for the transaction as an adjustment to our equity investment for the value of the assets contributed. To maintain our 49% economic interest in ADRG, we received a distribution from the partnership of $4.5 million to reduce our overall investment to $8.3 million.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the percentage that certain line items within the consolidated statements of operations bear to net revenue for the years 2025, 2024, and 2023.
| REVENUE | Years Ended December 31, 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Service fee revenue | 93.8% | 92.5% | 90.5% |
| Revenue under capitation arrangements | 6.2% | 7.5% | 9.5% |
| Total service revenue | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| OPERATING EXPENSES | |||
| Cost of operations, excluding depreciation and amortization | 88.5% | 86.4% | 86.3% |
| Lease abandonment charges | 0.4% | 0.1% | 0.3% |
| Depreciation and amortization | 7.5% | 7.5% | 7.9% |
| Gain on contribution of imaging centers into joint venture | —% | —% | (1.0)% |
| Loss on sale and disposal of equipment | 0.5% | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Severance costs | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.2% |
| Total operating expenses | 97.0% | 94.3% | 93.9% |
| INCOME FROM OPERATIONS | 3.0% | 5.7% | 6.1% |
| OTHER INCOME AND EXPENSES | |||
| Interest expense | 3.4% | 4.4% | 4.0% |
| Equity in earnings of joint ventures | (0.7)% | (0.8)% | (0.4)% |
| Non-cash change in fair value of interest rate swaps | 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.5% |
| Debt restructuring and extinguishment expenses | —% | 0.6% | —% |
| Other income | (1.6)% | (1.4)% | (0.4)% |
| Total other expenses | 1.5% | 3.3% | 3.8% |
| INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES | 1.6% | 2.5% | 2.4% |
| Provision for income taxes | (0.7)% | (0.3)% | (0.5)% |
| NET INCOME | 0.8% | 2.0% | 1.8% |
| Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest | 1.7% | 2.0% | 1.7% |
| NET (LOSS) INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO RADNET, INC. COMMON STOCKHOLDERS | (0.9)% | 0.2% | 0.1% |
Result Summary
The following table summarizes our consolidated revenue by segments:
In Thousands
| 2025 Operating Revenue | Years Ended December 31, 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Imaging Center | $1,988,193 | $1,792,319 | $1,415,513 |
| Digital Health | 92,691 | 65,706 | 38,058 |
| Intersegment eliminations | (40,674) | (28,361) | (23,510) |
| Total service revenue | $2,040,210 | $1,829,664 | $1,430,061 |
Imaging Center Segment
Year Ended December 31, 2025 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2024
Total Revenue
In Thousands
| Years Ended December 31, 2025 | 2024 | $ Increase/(Decrease) | % Change | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $1,988,193 | $1,792,319 | $195,874 | 10.9% |
Our 10.9% increase in Imaging Center revenue compared to the same period last year was driven by higher fees per imaging procedure and increased procedure volumes. This is a function of procedural volume growth at our consolidated centers. This growth reflects both organic increases at existing centers and incremental volumes from centers acquired since the prior-year period.
The increase in revenue was largely attributable to the procedural volume growth, increased reimbursement from commercial and capitated payors and favorable changes in product mix, as advanced imaging represented a greater proportion of total procedures. A significant contributor to this shift was the increase in PET CT procedures related to prostate cancer and Alzheimer’s-related studies, which are included within advanced modality imaging procedures.
Operating Expenses
Total Imaging Center operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2025 increased approximately $221.1 million, or 13.2%, from $1.67 billion for the year ended December 31, 2024 to $1.89 billion for the year ended December 31, 2025, primarily due to increase in procedures volumes. The following table sets forth our cost of operations and total operating expenses for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 (in thousands):
| Years Ended December 31, 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|
| Salaries and professional reading fees, excluding stock-based compensation | $1,083,550 | $984,280 |
| Stock-based compensation | 44,674 | 26,863 |
| Building and equipment rental | 127,798 | 121,514 |
| Medical supplies | 126,126 | 103,189 |
| Other operating expenses* | 355,225 | 303,952 |
| Cost of operations | 1,737,373 | 1,539,798 |
| Depreciation and amortization | 136,297 | 127,142 |
| Lease abandonment charges | 8,563 | 2,478 |
| Loss on sale and disposal of equipment | 9,821 | 2,257 |
| Severance costs | 1,797 | 1,095 |
| Total operating expenses | $1,893,851 | $1,672,770 |
* Includes billing fees, office supplies, repairs and maintenance, insurance, business tax and license, outside services, telecommunications, utilities, marketing, travel and other expenses.
Salaries and professional reading fees, excluding stock-based compensation and severance
In Thousands
| Years Ended December 31, 2025 | 2024 | $ Increase/(Decrease) | % Change | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Salaries | $775,640 | $711,054 | $64,586 | 9.1% |
| Professional Fees | 307,910 | 273,226 | 34,684 | 12.7% |
| Salaries and Professional Fees | $1,083,550 | $984,280 | 99,270 | 10.1% |
In response to higher procedure volumes, we increased staffing levels across clinical, administrative, and technical functions to support the influx of patients. This included permanent headcount growth as well as a significant number of temporary hires to keep our centers operating smoothly during the first quarter of 2025. Compensation-related expenses were further impacted by increased 401K match contributions and more vacation and paid time off taken during the period. We also continued to experience wage inflation across the board, driven by a competitive labor market and the October 2024 increase in California’s minimum wage for healthcare workers. Additionally, higher workers’ compensation insurance premiums contributed to the overall rise in staffing costs.
Stock-based compensation
Stock-based compensation increased $17.8 million, or 66.3%, to approximately $44.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to $26.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. The increase is primarily due to a greater number of shares granted and higher grant-date fair values compared to prior-year period.
Building and equipment rental
In Thousands
| Years Ended December 31, 2025 | 2024 | $ Increase/(Decrease) | % Change | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Building rent and common area maintenance | $125,459 | $118,467 | $6,992 | 5.9% |
| Equipment Rental | 2,340 | 3,047 | (707) | (23.2)% |
| Building & Equipment Rental | $127,798 | $121,514 | 6,284 | 5.2% |
Building and equipment rental expense increased primarily as a result of additional centers from openings and acquisitions. Equipment lease expense represents an immaterial portion of total rental expense.
Medical supplies
In Thousands
| Years Ended December 31, 2025 | 2024 | $ Increase/(Decrease) | % Change | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medical Supplies Expense | $126,126 | $103,189 | $22,937 | 22.2% |
Consistent with the shift in our procedural mix toward more advanced imaging, medical supplies expense increased at a higher rate than revenue growth. The growth in PET/CT procedures, particularly for prostate cancer and suspected Alzheimer’s studies, drove higher utilization of high-cost isotope tracers, contributing to the increase. In addition, price increases for these tracers further elevated medical supplies expense compared to the prior year.
Other operating expenses
In Thousands
| Years Ended December 31, 2025 | 2024 | $ Increase/(Decrease) | % Change | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other Operating Expenses | $355,225 | $303,952 | $51,273 | 16.9% |
Other operating expenses, which include outside services, software licensing fees, repair and maintenance, and utilities, have increased $51.3 million, or 16.9%, to approximately $314.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to $275.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. The increase was primarily attributable to higher professional fees associated with acquisition activity, increased contractor services, and higher equipment and maintenance costs. In addition, certain increases relate to intersegment software licensing fees from the Digital Health segment, which are eliminated in consolidation and therefore impact segment operating results but not consolidated operating income.
Additional segment operating and non-operating expenses:
In Thousands
| Years Ended December 31, 2025 | 2024 | $ Increase/(Decrease) | % Change | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Depreciation and Amortization | $136,297 | $127,142 | $9,155 | 7.2% |
| Loss on disposal of equipment and other | $9,821 | $2,257 | $7,564 | 335.1% |
| Other income | ($32,066) | ($30,336) | ($1,730) | 5.7% |
| Debt restructuring and extinguishment expenses | $— | $11,292 | ($11,292) | (100.0)% |
| Severance | $1,797 | $1,095 | $702 | 64.1% |
The increase in depreciation expense was due to higher depreciable asset base, mainly driven by our expanded locations.
The increase in loss on disposal of equipment was primarily driven by a higher volume of fixed asset disposals during the period. These disposals reflect a strategic initiative to replace legacy imaging units with newer AI-enabled and other advanced technologies intended to enhance operational efficiency, clinical capabilities, and long-term productivity.
Other income primarily consists of interest income earned on our cash and cash equivalents.
Lease abandonment charges
In Thousands
| Years Ended December 31, 2025 | 2024 | $ Increase/(Decrease) | % Change | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lease abandonment charges | $8,563 | 2,478 | $6,085 | 246% |
We closely monitor patient levels at our imaging centers and occasionally divest or shut down centers to maximize utilization rates. We may abandon low utilization leases and divert the patients to nearby centers.
During year ended 2025, we experienced lower utilization at seven imaging centers. As a result, we abandoned the leases related to these locations at the end of 2025 and diverted the patients to our other sites in the area. We recorded a charge of approximately $8.6 million in December 2025 related to lease facilities abandonment. The lease abandonment charges include the impairment of associated right-of-use assets of $6.7 million and write off of related leasehold improvements of approximately $1.9 million.
Digital Health Segment
Our Digital Health segment develops and deploys clinical applications to enhance interpretation of medical images and improve patient outcomes with a current emphasis on breast, prostate, and lung cancer diagnostics. The breakdown of revenue and expenses of the segment for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 are as follows:
In Thousands
| Years Ended December 31, 2025 | 2024 | $ change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $92,691 | $65,706 | $26,985 |
| Salaries and Wages | 45,207 | 26,569 | 18,638 |
| Stock Compensation | 9,927 | 2,971 | 6,956 |
| Other operating | 32,683 | 24,578 | 8,105 |
| Non-Capitalized R&D - DeepHealth Cloud OS & Generative AI | 20,155 | 14,995 | 5,160 |
| Depreciation & Amort. | 15,831 | 10,696 | 5,135 |
| Other operating (gain) loss | (163) | 19 | (182) |
| Severance | 1,348 | 807 | 541 |
| Total operating expenses | 124,988 | 80,635 | 44,353 |
| Loss from operations | (32,297) | (14,929) | (17,368) |
Year Ended December 31, 2025 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2024
For the year ended December 31, 2025, Digital Health segment revenues increased $27.0 million or 41.1%, to $92.7 million, compared to $65.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. The growth was primarily driven by a 64.9% increase in AI-related revenue and a 29.0% increase in Enterprise Imaging revenue.
External revenue represented 55.3% of total segment revenue for 2025. During the year, the segment’s customer base expanded from 486 to 2,075, and procedure volumes increased from 19.1 million to 24.1 million, primarily reflecting the addition of iCAD.
Annual Recurring Revenue or ARR, at the end of 2025 was $75 million. The Company defines Annual Recurring Revenue ("ARR") as a key subscription economy metric representing the predictable, normalized annualized value of contracted recurring revenue generated from customers from active customer contracts. ARR includes subscription fees, recurring support fees, and contracted usage charges and excludes one-time, non-recurring fees such as, implementation, hardware sales, professional services, consulting and one-off training. ARR is a non-GAAP measure and does not represent GAAP revenue recognized over time.
For the year ended December 31, 2025, results reflect steady organic growth prior to the acquisition and a sharp acceleration in the third quarter following the inclusion of iCAD, highlighting that recent performance was driven primarily by external expansion rather than internal volume increases.
Segment operating expenses increased year over year due to the addition of new costs resulting from acquisitions (iCAD, SeeMode, and CIMAR); investments in the personnel, increased stock-based compensation commensurate with the growing organization, and higher non-capitalized R&D costs, reflecting continued investment in scaling our platforms for broader deployment. We expect the segment to continue operating at a net loss in the near term as integration of iCAD, Inc., See-Mode Technologies, and CIMAR UK progresses.
Consolidated
Interest expense
In Thousands
| Interest Expense | Years Ended December 31, 2025 | 2024 | $ Increase/(Decrease) | % Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Interest Expense | $69,913 | $79,849 | ($9,936) | (12.4)% |
| Interest related to derivatives* | 5,004 | 762 | ||
| Interest related to amortization** | (3,014) | (2,276) | ||
| Adjusted Interest Expense*** | $71,903 | $78,335 | $(6,433) | (8.2)% |
*Includes payments from 2019 swaps, inclusive of amortization of other comprehensive income
**Includes noncash amortization of deferred loan costs and discount on issuance of debt
***Includes interest related to our term loans, revolving credit line, notes, and other
The decrease in interest expense was primarily due to the repricing transaction of our Barclays Revolving Credit Facility (as defined in the notes to our consolidated financial statements) in the fourth quarter of 2024, which resulted in lower interest rates compared to the same period in the prior year. This benefit was partially offset by the $100.0 million of incremental term loan borrowings under our existing Barclays Revolving Credit Facility in the second quarter of 2025. See Note 8, Credit Facilities and Notes Payable, included in the notes to our consolidated financial statements.
During the year ended December 31, 2025, interest rates were above the arranged rates in our 2019 Swaps for most of the year and we received $7.9 million in cash payments from our 2019 swap counterparties, which were reported as a component of interest expense. Also, the 2019 Swaps for $100 million of notional value matured in October 2023, and were not in effect in 2024. See the Derivative Instruments section of Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, in the notes accompanying the consolidated financial statements included in this report and Item 7A — "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk" below for more details on our derivative transactions.
Non-cash change in fair value of interest rate hedge
In 2020, we determined that the cash flows from the 2019 swaps did not match the cash flows of our Barclays Term Loan and were therefore ineffective as cash flow hedges. Since that time, in accordance with accounting guidelines, all changes in fair value are being recognized in other income and expense.
The fair value of the 2019 swaps as of December 31, 2025 was a net asset of $0.0 million compared to a net asset of $7.1 million as of December 31, 2024, resulting in a loss $7.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2025. The decrease in fair value was primarily attributable to the expiration of the 2019 swaps during 2025, which reduced the remaining contractual term to zero.
Equity in earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures
For the year ended December 31, 2025 we recognized equity in earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures of $14.9 million versus $14.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, an increase of $0.4 million or 2.8%.
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
As of December 31, 2025, our consolidated subsidiaries operated 368 imaging centers of which 101 were not wholly-owned and thus a portion of their operating results were attributable to noncontrolling interests. At December 31, 2024, our consolidated subsidiaries included 345 centers of which 100 were not wholly-owned. As noncontrolling interests only represent a portion of our imaging center business, and excludes our Digital Health segment which generated losses of $30.3 million in 2025, we do not expect changes in net income attributable to noncontrolling interests to correlate with changes in consolidated operating income or pretax income.
For the year ended December 31, 2025, we recognized net income attributable to noncontrolling interests of $35.7 million versus $36.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, a decrease of $0.3 million.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
We use both GAAP and non-GAAP metrics to measure our financial results. We believe that, in addition to GAAP metrics, non-GAAP metrics such as Adjusted EBITDA assist us in measuring our core operations from period to period.
Adjusted EBITDA
Our Adjusted EBITDA metric removes non-cash and non-recurring charges that occur in the affected period and provides a basis for measuring the Company’s core financial performance against other periods.
We define Adjusted EBITDA as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, as adjusted to exclude losses or gains on the disposal of equipment, other income or loss, loss on debt extinguishment, bargain purchase gains, loss on de-consolidation of joint ventures, gain on contribution of imaging centers into joint ventures, and non-cash equity compensation. Adjusted EBITDA includes equity earnings in unconsolidated operations and subtracts allocations of earnings to non-controlling interests in subsidiaries, and is adjusted for non-cash or one-time events that take place during the period.
Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure used as an analytical indicator by us and the healthcare industry to assess business performance. Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered a measure of financial performance under GAAP, and Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered in isolation or as alternatives to net income, or other financial statement data presented in the consolidated financial statements as an indicator of financial performance. Adjusted EBITDA is not a measurement determined in accordance with GAAP and is therefore susceptible to varying methods of calculation and this metric, as presented, may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies.
The following is a reconciliation of the nearest comparable GAAP financial measure, net income, to Adjusted EBITDA for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023, respectively (in thousands):
| Years Ended December 31, 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net (Loss) Income Attributable To Radnet, Inc. Common Stockholders | $(18,652) | $2,793 | $3,044 |
| Income taxes | 14,862 | 6,026 | 8,473 |
| Interest expense | 69,913 | 79,849 | 64,483 |
| Severance costs | 3,145 | 1,902 | 3,778 |
| Depreciation and amortization | 152,127 | 137,838 | 128,391 |
| Non-cash employee stock-based compensation | 54,601 | 29,833 | 26,785 |
| Loss on sale and disposal of equipment and other | 9,658 | 2,276 | 2,187 |
| Non-cash change in fair value of interest rate hedge | 7,112 | 8,006 | 8,185 |
| Other (income) expenses | (32,066) | (24,916) | (6,354) |
| Non-Capitalized R&D - DeepHealth Cloud OS & Generative AI | 20,155 | 14,995 | 1,308 |
| Lease abandonment charges | 8,563 | 2,478 | 5,146 |
| Gain on contribution of imaging centers into joint venture | — | — | (16,808) |
| Loss on extinguishment of debt and related expenses | — | 11,292 | — |
| Non-cash change to contingent consideration | 110 | 1,974 | (4,075) |
| Acquisition related non-cash intangible adjustment | — | — | 3,950 |
| Non-operational rent expenses | 3,247 | 4,233 | 3,629 |
| Acquisition transaction costs | 7,446 | 880 | 222 |
| Adjusted EBITDA - Radnet, Inc. | $300,221 | $279,459 | $232,344 |
| NOTE | |||
| Adjusted EBITDA - Imaging Center Segment | 284,710 | 264,901 | 225,846 |
| Adjusted EBITDA - Digital Health Segment | $15,511 | $14,558 | $6,498 |
The following table is a reconciliation of GAAP net income for our Digital Health Segment to Adjusted EBITDA for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023 respectively.
| Year Ended December 31, 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Segment net loss | $(30,299) | $(19,925) | $(5,154) |
| Stock Compensation | 9,927 | 2,971 | 2,211 |
| Depreciation & Amortization | 15,831 | 10,696 | 8,250 |
| Other operating loss | (163) | 19 | (4) |
| Other income | — | 5,419 | 4,537 |
| Severance | 1,348 | 807 | 1,805 |
| Income taxes | (2,011) | (424) | (1,906) |
| Non-Capitalized R&D - DeepHealth Cloud OS & Generative AI | 20,155 | 14,995 | — |
| Non-cash change to contingent consideration | 710 | — | (7,191) |
| Acquisition related to non-cash intangible adjustment | — | — | 3,950 |
| Adjusted EBITDA - Digital Health Segment | $15,511 | $14,558 | $6,498 |
49
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The cash we generate from our core operations enables us to fund ongoing operations, our research and development for new products and technologies including our investment in AI, and acquisition or expansion of imaging centers. We expect to continue to generate positive cash flows from operations for the foreseeable future. In March 2024, we closed on a public offering of our common stock raising net proceeds, after deducting underwriting discounts, commissions, and expenses, of $230.2 million. Accordingly, we believe that our current sources of funds will provide us with adequate liquidity during the 12-month period following December 31, 2025, as well as in the long-term.
The following table summarizes key balance sheet data as of December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024 and income statement data for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023 (in thousands):
| Balance Sheet Data as of December 31, | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Cash and cash equivalents | $767,215 | $740,020 |
| Accounts receivable | 200,317 | 185,821 |
| Working capital (exclusive of current operating lease liability) | 507,298 | 596,158 |
| Stockholders' equity | 1,355,886 | 1,133,410 |
| Income Statement data for the years ended December 31, | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total revenue | $2,040,210 | $1,829,664 | $1,616,630 |
| Net (loss) income attributable to RadNet, Inc. common stockholders | (18,652) | 2,793 | 3,044 |
We operate in a capital intensive, high fixed-cost industry that requires significant amounts of capital to fund operations. In addition to ongoing operations, we invest in the purchase of imaging facilities, the acquisition of equipment, and the acquisition of technology to fund our growth. If economic or global business conditions slowed, we expect that we will be able to adjust the pace of our investment activities.
We continually evaluate our cash needs and may decide it is best to raise additional capital or seek alternative financing sources to fund the rapid growth of our business, including through draw-downs on existing or new debt facilities or financing funds. We expect to fund any future capital requirements primarily with cash flow from operations and borrowings, including borrowing from amounts available under our senior secured credit facilities or through new equity or debt issuances. We and our subsidiaries or affiliates may from time to time, in our sole discretion, purchase, repay, redeem, or retire any of our outstanding debt or equity securities in privately negotiated or open market transactions, by tender offer or otherwise.
Sources and Uses of Cash
The following table summarizes key components of our sources and uses of cash for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively, in thousands:
| Cash Flow Data | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cash provided by operating activities | $298,820 | $233,023 | $220,863 |
| Cash used in investing activities | (343,865) | (233,070) | (201,470) |
| Cash provided by financing activities | 72,207 | 397,950 | 195,635 |
Cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2025 included $308.6 million of net income, adjusted for non-cash items such as depreciation and amortization, non-cash lease expense, stock-based compensation and deferred taxes, offset by a $9.8 million change in assets and liabilities. The $65.8 million increase in cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to December 31, 2024 was primarily driven by favorable changes in working capital.
Cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2025 increased from the year ended December 31, 2024 by $110.8 million. Purchases of imaging centers and other acquisitions during the period was $133.4 million, a $89.8 million increase from the prior period. Cash payments for capital expenditures on property and equipment during the period was $213.3 million, a $25.2 million increase from the prior period.
Cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2025 decreased by $325.7 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2024. Financing activity in 2024 included a public equity offering that generated $218.4 million in net proceeds and a refinancing of the Barclays Revolving Credit Facility that resulted in an additional $167.9 million of cash. In 2025, financing activity primarily consisted of a $100.0 million incremental term loan under the Barclays Credit Agreement, partially offset by repayment of term loans, notes, and lease payables of $27.8 million.
Based on current operating performance, cash on hand and available borrowing capacity, management believes the Company has sufficient liquidity to meet its short-term working capital needs and contractual obligations.
Over the long term, the Company expects to fund operations, capital expenditures and acquisitions through a combination of cash generated from operations, available credit facilities and access to capital markets, as appropriate.
Senior Credit Facilities:
We maintain secured credit facilities with Barclays Bank PLC and Truist Bank.
On April 18, 2024, we refinanced our Barclays Credit Facility, replacing the prior facility with an $875.0 million term loan and a $282.0 million revolving credit facility. The refinance transaction reduced our interest rates on the Barclays Term Loan and Revolving Credit Facility and extended the maturity date for the term loan to April 18, 2031, and for the revolving credit facility to April 18, 2029. The new term loan calls for quarterly principal payments of $2.2 million, compared to $1.8 million under the prior credit facility.
Included in our consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2025 are $1,072.6 million of total term loan debt (net of unamortized discounts of $12.2 million) displayed below in thousands:
| Face Value | Discount | Total Carrying Value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Barclays Term Loans | $961,119 | $(11,759) | $949,360 |
| Truist Term Loan | 123,750 | (462) | 123,288 |
| Total Term Loans | $1,084,869 | $(12,221) | $1,072,648 |
We had no outstanding balance under our $282.0 million Barclays Revolving Credit Facility as of December 31, 2025 and had reserved $9.0 million for certain letters of credit. The remaining $273.0 million of our Barclays Revolving Credit Facility was available to draw upon as of December 31, 2025. We also had no balance under our $50.0 million Truist Revolving Credit Facility as of December 31, 2025, and with no letters of credit reserved against the facility, the full amount was available to draw upon. For more information on our secured credit facilities see Note 8, Credit Facilities and Notes Payable, in the notes accompanying our consolidated financial statements in this report.
Contractual Commitments
Our future obligations for notes payable, lines of credit, and equipment and building operating leases for the next five years and thereafter include (dollars in thousands):
| 2025 | 2026 | 2027 | 2028 | 2029 | Thereafter | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Notes payable | $27,928 | $129,447 | $12,673 | $10,003 | $9,758 | $912,331 | $1,102,140 |
| Interest and fees on notes payable | 67,908 | 65,272 | 70,382 | 58,743 | 58,142 | 18,980 | 339,427 |
| Operating leases (1) | 113,443 | 112,258 | 110,435 | 100,428 | 97,619 | 582,128 | 1,116,310 |
| Total | $209,279 | $306,977 | $193,490 | $169,174 | $165,519 | $1,513,439 | $2,557,877 |
(1) Includes interest component of operating lease obligations.
We have service agreements with various vendors under which they have agreed to be responsible for the maintenance and repair of a majority of our equipment for a fee that is based on the type and age of the equipment. Under these agreements, we are committed to minimum payments of approximately $34.0 million in 2026.
Critical Accounting Policies
The SEC defines critical accounting estimates as those that are both most important to the portrayal of a company’s financial condition and results of operations and require management’s most difficult, subjective, or complex judgment, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain and may change in subsequent periods. In Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements in this annual report on Form 10-K, we discuss our significant accounting policies, including those that do not require management to make difficult, subjective, or complex judgments or estimates. The critical areas involving management’s judgments and estimates are described below.
USE OF ESTIMATES - The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), which requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. These estimates and assumptions affect various matters, including our reported amounts of assets and liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets at the dates of the financial statements, our disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements, and our reported amounts of revenues and expenses in our consolidated statements of operations during the reporting periods. These estimates involve judgments with respect to numerous factors that are difficult to predict and are beyond management’s control. As a result, actual amounts could materially differ from these estimates.
REVENUES – Our revenues generally relate to net patient fees that we receive from various payors and patients themselves under contracts in which our performance obligations are to provide diagnostic services to the patients. Revenues are recorded during the period when our obligations to provide diagnostic services are satisfied. Our performance obligations for diagnostic services are generally satisfied over a period of less than one day. The contractual relationships with patients, in most cases, also involve a third-party payor (Medicare, Medicaid, managed care health plans and commercial insurance companies, including plans offered through the health insurance exchanges) and the transaction prices for the services provided are dependent upon the terms provided by Medicare and Medicaid, or negotiated with managed care health plans and commercial insurance companies. The payment arrangements with third-party payors for the services we provide to the related patients typically specify payments at amounts less than our standard charges and generally provide for payments based upon predetermined rates per diagnostic services or discounted fee-for-service rates. Management continually reviews the contractual estimation process to consider and incorporate updates to laws and regulations and the frequent changes in managed care contractual terms resulting from contract renegotiations and renewals.
As it relates to the Group (as defined in Item 1 of this Form 10-K), this service fee revenue includes payments for both the professional medical interpretation revenue recognized by them as well as the payment for all other aspects related to our providing the imaging services, for which we earn management fees. As it relates to other centers, this service fee revenue is earned through providing the use of our diagnostic imaging equipment and the provision of technical services as well as providing administration services such as clerical and administrative personnel, bookkeeping and accounting services, billing and collection, provision of medical and office supplies, secretarial, reception and transcription services, maintenance of medical records, digital health support services, and advertising, marketing, and promotional activities.
Our revenues are based upon the estimated amounts we expect to be entitled to receive from patients and third-party payors. Estimates of contractual allowances under managed care and commercial insurance plans are based upon the payment terms specified in the related contractual agreements. Revenues related to uninsured patients and copayment and deductible amounts for patients who have health care coverage may have discounts applied (uninsured discounts and contractual discounts). We also record estimated implicit price concessions (based primarily on historical collection experience) related to uninsured accounts to record self-pay revenues at the estimated amounts we expect to collect.
Under capitation arrangements with various health plans, we earn a per-enrollee amount each month for making available diagnostic imaging services to all plan enrollees under the capitation arrangement. Revenue under capitation arrangements is recognized in the period in which we are obligated to provide services to plan enrollees under contracts with various health plans.
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE – Substantially all of our accounts receivable are due under fee-for-service contracts from third-party payors, such as insurance companies and government-sponsored healthcare programs, or directly from patients. Services are generally provided pursuant to one-year contracts with healthcare providers. We continuously monitor collections from our payors and maintain an allowance for credit losses based upon specific payor collection issues that we have identified and our historical experience.
BUSINESS COMBINATIONS – When the qualifications for business combination accounting treatment are met, it requires us to recognize separately from goodwill the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed at their acquisition date fair values. Goodwill as of the acquisition date is measured as the excess of consideration transferred over the net of the acquisition date fair values of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. While we use our best estimates and assumptions to accurately value assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date, our estimates are inherently uncertain and subject to refinement. As a result, during the measurement period, which may be up to one year from the acquisition date, we record adjustments to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed with the corresponding offset to goodwill. Upon the conclusion of the measurement period or final determination of the values of assets acquired or liabilities assumed, whichever comes first, any subsequent adjustments are recorded to our consolidated statements of operations.
Recent Accounting Standards
See Note 3, Recent Accounting Standards, in the notes accompanying the consolidated financial statements included in this report for further information.
Additional Information
Additional information concerning RadNet, Inc., including our consolidated subsidiaries, for each of the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023 is included in the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto in this report.
Market risk
As filed, 2,695 characters, with its headings, lists and tables. Extracted from the main document; charts and exhibits are in the original on sec.gov.
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk. We generate substantially all of our revenues and incur substantially all of our expenses in United States dollars. As a result, our financial results are unlikely to be materially affected by changes in foreign currency exchange rates or weak economic conditions in foreign markets.
We are exposed to foreign exchange risk with respect to revenues and expenses denominated in the Euro, Canadian Dollar, Hungarian Forint and Pound Sterling. We have AI operations in the Netherlands, radiology services in the United Kingdom, and maintain research and development centers in Canada and Hungary. At the present time, we do not have any foreign currency exchange contracts to mitigate this risk. On December 31, 2025, a hypothetical 1% decline in the currency exchange rates between the U.S. dollar against the above-mentioned currencies, would have resulted in an annual increase of approximately $0.4 million in operating expenses.
Interest Rate Sensitivity. We pay interest on various types of debt instruments to our suppliers and lending institutions. The agreements entail either fixed or variable interest rates. Instruments which have fixed rates are mainly leases on radiology equipment. Variable rate interest obligations relate primarily to amounts borrowed under our outstanding credit facilities. Accordingly, our interest expense, and consequently our earnings, are affected by changes in short term interest rates. We purchased the 2019 swaps to mitigate interest rate risk on a portion of our outstanding term loan debt, as described below.
We can elect SOFR or Alternative Base Rate interest rate options on amounts outstanding under the Barclays Term Loan. On December 31, 2025, after giving effect to the $400 million notional amount of our 2019 swaps, we had $561.1 million outstanding subject to a SOFR election on our Barclays Term Loan, at an effective rate plus applicable margin of 6.07%. A hypothetical 1% increase in the SOFR rates under the Barclays Credit Facility would result in an increase of $5.6 million in annual interest expense and a corresponding decrease in income before taxes.
We can elect SOFR or Base Rate interest rate options on amounts outstanding under the Truist Credit Facility. On December 31, 2025, we had $123.7 million outstanding subject to an adjusted SOFR election on our Truist Term Loan. On December 31, 2025, our effective SOFR rate plus applicable margin was 5.27%. A hypothetical 1% increase in the adjusted SOFR rates under the Truist Credit Facility would result in an increase of approximately $1.2 million in annual interest expense and a corresponding decrease in income before taxes.
Controls and procedures
As filed, 8,575 characters, with its headings, lists and tables. Extracted from the main document; charts and exhibits are in the original on sec.gov.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision of our management, including our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures under Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as of December 31, 2025. Based on this evaluation, our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2025 to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). Internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are transacted in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Our management, under the supervision of our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024 based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Based on this assessment, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2025.
Ernst & Young LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, has audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025, as stated in their report, which is included below in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls and Procedures
Our management does not expect that internal controls over financial reporting will prevent or detect all misstatements or incidences of fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. The design and implementation of a control system is limited by resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of internal controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. Also, any evaluation of the effectiveness of controls in future periods is subject to the risk that those internal controls may become inadequate because of changes in business conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended December 31, 2025, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of RadNet, Inc.
Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We have audited RadNet, Inc. and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, RadNet, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive (loss) income, equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2025, and the related notes and our report dated March 2, 2026 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Los Angeles, California
March 2, 2026
Figures reported in this filing
Standardized line items from the XBRL in this filing, for the period ended 2025-12-31. Comparative periods it repeats are left out.
| Line item | Period | Value | XBRL concept |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 12 months2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 | $2.04bn | us-gaap:RevenueFromContractWithCustomerExcludingAssessedTax |
| Operating income | 12 months2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 | $62.0m | us-gaap:OperatingIncomeLoss |
| Income tax | 12 months2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 | $14.9m | us-gaap:IncomeTaxExpenseBenefit |
| Net income | 12 months2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 | −$18.7m | us-gaap:NetIncomeLoss |
| Diluted EPS | 12 months2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 | −$0.25 | us-gaap:EarningsPerShareDiluted |
| Basic EPS | 12 months2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 | −$0.25 | us-gaap:EarningsPerShareBasic |
| Diluted shares (weighted) | 12 months2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 | 75,189,872 shares | us-gaap:WeightedAverageNumberOfDilutedSharesOutstanding |
| Operating cash flow | 12 months2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 | $298.8m | us-gaap:NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities |
| Cash and equivalents | At period end2025-12-31 | $767.2m | us-gaap:CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue |
| Current assets | At period end2025-12-31 | $1.03bn | us-gaap:AssetsCurrent |
| Total assets | At period end2025-12-31 | $3.76bn | us-gaap:Assets |
| Current liabilities | At period end2025-12-31 | $586.8m | us-gaap:LiabilitiesCurrent |
| Total liabilities | At period end2025-12-31 | $2.40bn | us-gaap:Liabilities |
| Long-term debt | At period end2025-12-31 | $1.06bn | us-gaap:LongTermDebtNoncurrent |
| Current portion of debt | At period end2025-12-31 | $25.4m | us-gaap:LongTermDebtCurrent |
| Shareholders' equity | At period end2025-12-31 | $1.09bn | us-gaap:StockholdersEquity |
Source: SEC EDGAR, the filing index for accession 0001628280-26-013337. Last ingested by Listed: Oct 26, 2026, 16:12 ET. Listed shows no prices and gives no investment advice.